No.1 [View All]
so let's get started shall we.
friendly invitational TBA
board reps drop your dox in this thread if you'd like to
participate
update 3: strawpoll chose PES 2015
https://kickass.to/pro-evolution-soccer-pes-2015-reloaded-
t10420436.html
PES15 1.03 torrent: magnet:?
xt=urn:btih:3BA1CDCF1FB223310D5D4549B316B4153ABB7C05
PES15 1.03 official DLC: https://mega.co.nz/#!yRkwjLbY!
key: 4ZqVRd8iq86NVexbyxwSVlMN_NezruqDHG_ZNGirEk0
update 2: 16 teams have been chosen
cup rules/guidelines 2.1:
http://pastebin.com/GHQy8YKj
update 1: strawpoll choose soccer
http://strawpoll.me/3557527
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
No.2201
>>2193
Were trying to fix this mess not create a bigger one.
If >>2186 is correct, then /co/ gained no advantage. Besides they lost anyway.
By hosting a rematch were essentially punishing /v/. And thats not the point of all this.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2202
>>2200
/lefty/ has to play matches they already won with demoted stats. Making /co/ play again is redundant, as it puts them at a disadvantage. If anything, it sets /v/ up to lose if PES decides to go haywire, which it is prone to do, sadly.
I am sorry, I really like /co/, but the matter is settled. Don't worry, the team will get to play more matches in the near future, I assure you that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2203
>>2201
>By hosting a rematch were essentially punishing /v/. And thats not the point of all this.
And I could make the argument that if we host a rematch, we're pushing /leftypol/. Is that the point of this? Are some boards sacred now?
>If >>2186 is correct, then /co/ gained no advantage
So? /leftypol/ did not gain a considerable advantage from their GK against /pone/, they fucking smashed them, yet /pone/ gets to play against /leftypol/ again and /co/ does not gget an extra chance?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2204
>>2203
The /co/ game was COMPLETELY UNAFFECTED by the single BENCHED GK at 77s, THERE WAS NO RIGGING ON THE FIELD therefore they don't get freebies because MUH 1 NON-PLAYED GK WAS RIGGED AND /lefty/ GET IT SO I WANT ONE TOO!
/leftypol/s GKs were boosted and it affected the outcome which is unfair to all teams and replaying the matches is the best equilibrium solution that can be done. /co/ didn't have their match rigged and it was never in favour of any team so no rematch simple as that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2205
>>2204
>essentially punishing /v/
Oh, you get to be the dictator now?
>/leftypol/s GKs were boosted and it affected the outcome which is unfair to all teams
Perhaps over /k/ where they won on overtime, but against /pone/? THEY FUCKING STEAM ROLLED /PONE/! THE GOALKEEPER HAD NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH THAT!
I can understand /k/, but /pone/? If /pone/ is getting one, then so should /co/ because the GK had nothing to do with that.
Either the mach is disqualified as a whole or it fucking isn't.
There is no fair standard under which you give /pone/ another shot and don't let /co/ get another swing at it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2207
>>2205
>THE GOALKEEPER HAD NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH THAT!
Except it did with some very good saves up close and the number of trollpost shots that occurred compared to other games
Like holy shit I spelt out for you why /co/ doesn't deserve a rematch.
>If /pone/ is getting one, then so should /co/ because the GK had nothing to do with that.
GK stats affected /pone/ because a 77 gk was in the opposite goal. /co/ had no advantage or disadvantage so they don't deserve a rematch and it's bloody justified and I'm not repeating myself again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2208
I was sent here by /co/ to complain about some bullshit, but then I came and found legitimate arguments an why /co/ doesn't deserve squat.
Carry on, /icup/,
peace
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2209
>>2203
>So? /leftypol/ did not gain a considerable advantage from their GK against /pone/
See, that's where you're wrong. Three missed chances due to saves made by a boosted keeper is a HUGE deal, especially given the shots taken/on target ratio /pone/ had.
What I'm saying is, while /lefty/ certainly had the power over /pone/'s defense, /pone/ had just as many opportunities when it came to firing on /lefty/'s keeper.
You'll notice that /pone/'s only goals came from late in the match, and in quick succession. This is because of keeper/defender fatigue, and /pone/ being able to finally get those shots passed a boosted GK.
What's more, we're not even talking about /k/. I'm all for the success of /lefty/, but with a properly-statted GK going into /k/, who they only beat on penalties, /k/ can easily find enough opportunities to beat /lefty/.
I'm looking for what's fair, and what's not redundant. /co/ lost with a regular keeper while having a boosted keeper on the bench. /lefty/ won twice with boosted keepers. The only matches that need to be replayed are /lefty/'s.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2210
>>2208
Make Garnet your new gold captain nigga. I wanna see some Squaremom goals with Stronger Than You as her alternate horn.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2212
I find it funny that /leftypol/ shitposted on /k/ when they won, now we know they cheated they immediately left.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2217
>>2209
this looks like a pretty clear argument to my eyes
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2223
>>2203
Look, we can go back and forth with this but the main contention here is with the /k/ vs /leftypol/ match. Besides the fact that the first half of the penalties was carried out incorrectly, there is serious doubt that the outcome was affected by the different stats. This isnt about punishing /leftypol/.
Talking about /leftypol/ vs /pone/ in the same key as /co/ vs /v/ is silly. The result of that match is null and void because of the previous /k/ vs /leftypol/ match. The reason pone would need a rematch is because the new proposed k vs lefty match might have a different outcome than previously. If /k/ wins, that would automatically mean a new match for /pone/.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2224
>>2223
/leftypol/ /k/ needs to replayed, yeah, but imo, if /leftypol/ wins, there isn't a real reason to replay /leftypol/ /pone/, if /k/ wins, they obviously will have to face /pone/ to determine the semifinalist
also:
groupstages for next cup pls.
having teams go out after 1 match just sucks
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2225
>>2224
This.
If we reach 24 teams in the next 3 months, we should do a group stage where the top 3 go to the elimination stage
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2226
>>2156
I have to ask something. I'm not too sure about how the game works, so I might just be saying something ignorant here, but during /monster/'s match against /a/, why didn't Ammit-chan have a red arrow like Gamergazer? They were both supposed to have been gold players, after all. And Ammit-chan was captain.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2229
>>2226
I think you are referring to the form/condition arrows. They are not directly related to the overall rating.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2230
>>2229
O-okay but why did only Gamergazer start off as red?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2232
>>2230
Because conditions are randomized and mainly based on randomization by the PES15 scripting code.
So in another match the conditions may be different, but in that one Gamergrazer was red condition.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2233
>>2126
>>2126
>>2128
>>2129
>>2131
>first infinity cup and there' already some rigging
and I wouldn't have it any other way
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2234
>>2233
>the communists literally rig it
>first they go into the PKs with player controlled
>then they get a better GK
>not R I G G E D
#SackReluctantSavior
#McCarthyWhereArtThou
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2236
To be honest this whole thing has been one fuck up after another from the very beginning.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2237
>>2236
that's in the grand tradition of anything a chan has ever done
chill out, we work things out in the end
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2245
>>2144
Incompetent hosts are incompetent.
You had over ducking 8 weeks to check.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2250
>>2224
>there isn't a real reason to replay /leftypol/ /pone/
Weren't the GK stats also at 77 when they fought /pone/? They need to replay both matches if /leftypol/ wins against /k/ again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2251
>>2212
I don't think they cheated, I think they just misinterpreted the rules otherwise they would have done something more drastic
in any case, I'm blaming /pone/'s defense
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2253
>>2251
>they just misinterpreted the rules
just like greece :^)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2254
>>2251
>Leftypol
>did the roster after the rules release
>their first team GK had 77 stats
>Cartoons and Comics
>Did the rosters based on cuckchan cup rules originally
>their 2nd backup GK had 77 stats
Misinterpreted my ass!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2256
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2258
>>2254
>>did the roster after the rules release
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2261
>>2256
what is this from, this is the portuguese equivalent of shitposting
>>2253
ouuuuuuuuu
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2268
/leftypol/ was warned about GKs being 77 — on the 19th of April!
>>1170
>>1170
>>1170
>>1170
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2269
>>2268
Then why didn't the mods fix the export if they noticed?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2276
>>2269
Exactly. Was it, perchance, intended?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2280
>>2276
Wait, are you implying the mods are biased towards /leftypol/?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2281
>>2269
that estonian guy is not a cup mod though
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2282
>>2281
Ah, okay then. That explains it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2283
>>2280
It wasn't the mods that warned him, It was the fucking /sp/ manager.
Cotton should know better, Save Fixes have always been necessary and he neglected them and didn't bother with ATF shit.
We got good views but it has been a disaster management wise, this cup that is.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2284
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2285
>>2280
I think they are trying to imply that the mods deliberately ignored the problem so they can disqualify /leftypol/ if it gets too successful.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2286
>>2285
Now, this is the fault of the organizers but, /leftypol/ has been cancer for this cup
You fuckers did nothing but look for drama, and if it's "bantz" then that guy was right "Worst disaster communism did was attempts at humour".
And then you got drama but It wasn't le /pol/ circlejerk shutting down /icup/ because you won two matches by GK stamina, It was because your Frankfruity manager ignored the warning of a different manager ( IT WAS COTTON'S JOB TO DO THIS SHIT BUT STILL IGNORED IT) and went with the same roster
Not only that you entered as the USSC to the == INFINITY CHAN CUP ==, now /v/ is entering as an "alliance as well" as far as anyone is concerned because they are related to so many small boards but YOU ENTERED WITH DIFFERENT CHANS, especially one with the cirnopedos where they pretend to be communist because only fake communists have a sense of humour, I'm sure It would have been United Soviet Socialist Websites if /r/socialism didn't have the SJW "Social Democuck" mods.
Your kind has been nothing but trouble to the cup, I hope /k/ gets the victory it deserved in the first place but couldn't due to your 10% buffed GK and you fuckers get so damn salty that you couldn't get this wonderful chance to bring 8chan together down because we let some "reactionary" boards like /pol/ and /k/.
Well, at least you can do the USSC Cup where you can play 99 GKs and fuck each others asses you want after this one!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2288
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2289
>>2285
You'd be wrong because I actually like /leftypol/, in fact I like all the boards participating Except maybe /pone/ but I'm impartial about them.
I actually forgot about that post since it was a while ago and I assumed /leftypol/ submited another export with the fixed stats and time went on and I forgot that they didn't send a new one.
It was in general a fuckup by all of us and again we apologize. However remember that it's an event for fun and not a stupid esport and it's not gonna be the end of the world if something dumb happens on anyones behalf. We hope everyone keeps enjoying the games as I right the wrongs tomorrow for the 2 rematches.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2290
>>2289
To be fair, even I had forgotten about it.
It was over two months ago.
We just need to carry on, fix the issue and learn our lessons.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2293
>>2286
>you couldn't get this wonderful chance to bring 8chan together down
Fucking lel
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2294
>>2286
Posts like these make me really thankful that /leftypol/ exists.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2296
>>2286
>waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2356
How many positions are allowed for a player?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2357
>>2356
Infinite, the rules allow it
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2358
>>2357
You serious?
This is awesome.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2359
>>2358
The rules were less lenient due to the admins want to do less work (yet failed to check anyway)
I found playing Total Football in PES is a disaster so you at most want them stay in the same area so a fullback should be able to play as a wide midfielder and a winger but not all positions
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.