/hgg/ - Hentai Games General

>>332871

>On 3/29: Furfags and Cuckshit have been given a soft ban

Wait, doesn't that include CoC?

On a side note, i have no problems with games that have NTR in them, however i do have a problem with games mostly about NTR

Albeit, I personally prefer games which have NTR in them to allow you to dodge the NTR or content, or just disable it through toggle. Games that force you through NTR are terrible unless you can get revenge

I will however hold on to the belief that NTR as a fail state in games shouldn't be considered an NTR game so long as the win condition isnt NTR.

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but….

what is that game where you have girl in your basement and you have X days to train her to be obedient and you shitpost about her training on 2ch?

the core game loop is you lewd her until her endurance runs out and then you wait until the next day

>>332904

>Wait, doesn't that include CoC?

See >>331000.

>>332906

>I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but….

Technically, >>16620 would have been a lot more ideal but what done, is already done.

>what is that game where you have girl in your basement and you have X days to train her to be obedient and you shitpost about her training on 2ch?

I am 99.999% certain that is the 'Sealed Room Breed' series.

5th for cuck-tan is CUTE and needs autistic/artistic representation.

>>332904

What about games like Seeds of Chaos which are obviously intended to be rampant cuckshit but they make it "opt out" so they can argue it's optional when someone criticizes them?

I think it's a "I know it when I see it" situation with a bit of leeway for personal/vol interpretation.

>>332982

6th

>>330901

>The thing a lot of people have raged and shitstormed over have been avoidable NTR/cucking

To be fair, the EraGames thread had a cuck infestation a ways back. The cucks got really pissed that a broken event that cucks the player was put on a toggle with the default being off. For context, this was one of the only events that wasn't on a toggle to begin with. You just had to accept that this rando fat ass would regularly ask to fuck your woman and would just take her anyway if you did anything but politely ask him to go away.

the thread had fairly regular complaints coming in about that exact event from people who had only recently picked up the game and didn't know about the event ahead of time, as well as complaints from people (me included) that didn't like that there was no way to permanently get rid of this guy who kept taking up event slots. Cucks started crying 'censorship' about their fetish having to play by the same rules as everyone else's and not being forced on everyone.

>>331066

I'll be honest, I'd fuck both those dragons. I get why furry isn't okay here, and I agree with it, but I still think there is a tasteful side to the furry stuff. Like the difference between amazonian women and giantess porn. Similar concepts, but one taken to weird extremes that I just can't understand.

Still though, the furry 'community' is a pack of degenerates that ruin games with their shitty donut steel OCs.

>>333073

The retarded sparkedog OCs have always been around in the furry fandom, but it seems to have gotten really insufferable in recent times. Between that and a bunch of prominent figures getting outed as pedos, the whole scene is just a giant dumpster fire.

Furries have historically been an invasive species, and that is true today more than ever. Cuckoldry should probably be treated the same way considering the fetish is oddly politicized now. God knows PC bullshit is the last thing we need here.

>>333118

I'm not sure that you understand how internet communities work. You have to be proactive about cultivating the kind of content you want in your board, or else foreign bodies will take over.

>>333002

>I think it's a "I know it when I see it" situation with a bit of leeway for personal/vol

That is the absolute worst way to do moderation.

>>333138

Why? This isn't the fucking Hague, nobody here is Emmanuel Kant, nobody cares about intangible ideals of justice or whatever, we just want the right content.

>>333123

More or less this. The current foreign bodies on this board long took over almost six months ago in my opinion though.

>>333142

>Why?

Because in the end the enforcement is arbitrary and inconsistent. On top of that you get constant arguments over interpretation and bitching about vols which leads to retards forming factions that fight with one another and turn everything to shit. It's none of the freedom that you want in a chan combined with all of the pointless shit-flinging that you find on social media.

>>332982

So is the lore behind cuck-tan that she's so fucking thirsty for cock that her brain stopped working and she wants every man to solely focus on hording as many virgins as possible in order to maximize her chances of getting her holes filled?

>>333147

You underestimate her. Cuck-tan’s autism is so severe she wouldn’t be able to get her hymen broken even if she was the last girl on earth.

>>333145

eastern european stilted english pornography is cuckoldry definitely-not-from-/pol/ has been posting longer than that.

>>333181

I don’t mind cucking being banned, except for how it raises questions on “what else are they going to ban” but fuck it, let’s cross that bridge when we come to it.

The problem comes when total fucking retards, and by that I mean one particular total fucking retard, comes and says that any woman being fucked by any man that isn’t explicitly a self-insert is cucking. Because that would preclude quite literally 95% of games on this board.

>>333197

No one seriously listens to that fag.

>>333192

>it's still cuckshit and allowing it will only attract more cucks. You are basically asking for cuck games to be allowed

This might be hard for you to understand, but there are games that aim to provide an audience for cuckolds, and there are games that have NTR content in them as a plot device or narrative tool.

I actually have no problem with a game with cuck content in it so long as most of the content is not cucked and you can skip/dodge/stop the cuck content that is there (and so long as it isn't alluded to further in the story). I mean gods knows how many games I've played that had, scat, dark skin and guro that I didn't mind so long as i wasn't forced to go through that literal and figurative shit.

Yes i know that NTR is sort of more indication of the type of person who wants this content and how subhuman they are whereas the others are just disgusting fetishes, but i still don't see why we can't just put them in their places when they come here Which they will even if cucked is absolutely banned, you're lying to yourself if you think cuckfags only exclusively play cuck games.

Its almost like you're afraid of dealing with them personally.

>Are you stupid or false flagging/virtue signalling?

I have no idea what you mean here.

what the fuck am I Falseflagging? Virtue signalling on /hgg/?

are you fucking retarded, do you not even understand what these words mean?

It sounds like you're just shitting the thread up with buzzwords you've heard.

tldr:

Cucks can and will be bullied, cuck games that are overwhelmingly cuck content or force you to be cucked will not be allowed here, NTR can actually be a plot point or narrative device in a game which is why I don't want it banned otherwise we will never get a shield hero parody game and anon has no idea what certain 'buzzwords' mean.

>>333200

Oh Boy, will there be furry cuckholdry?

I would play the fuck out of that just to see how far i could make it until i vomit

>>333199

>NTR can actually be a plot point or narrative device in a game which is why I don't want it banned otherwise we will never get a shield hero parody game and anon has no idea what certain 'buzzwords' mean.

I think that little tidbit about a "10% exception" more or less covers this aspect.

>>333200

>Not touched since 3/29

How about you give anons a reason to go there?

>>333203

>I think that little tidbit about a "10% exception" more or less covers this aspect.

to be honest fam, I could play a game so long as its 70%+ not cucked

as soon as you get near a third it goes to shit

90% seems a bit rigid for games that are just starting out, will there be a leniency for incomplete games that havn't got at least 9 sex scenes that aren't of the NTR variety?

Wouldn't this mean i wont hear about the shield hero parody until its got at least 10 sex scenes?

>>333200

>>333210

>>333208

This board seems lame as fuck and lacks content that exists here. What use would there be to split the userbase of /hgg/? It would make sense if the BO and vols were acting as retarded as (((Mark))), such as how successful the /k/-led /vg/ split has been mayorly due to (((Mark)))'s team complete incompetence at moderating /v/ to make it actually be about discussing videogames instead of webcomics, reddit and fucking blogposting. However, banning furries while being completely lax on nearly everything else, barring obvious crossniggers from Fag95 and v0.001 patreonshits advertising their garbage, is already complete opposite of what (((Mark))) does.

What is the point of this? Do you just want "/b/ but with hgames" or something? Isn't that already what /htg/ is, barring the focus on trainer games?

>>333146

>Because in the end the enforcement is arbitrary and inconsistent.

That's the best part about community policing. Can you name a single instance of the moderation going awry here? No, because there is community trust, which is far more effective than hard and fast restrictive rules.

> On top of that you get constant arguments over interpretation and bitching about vols which leads to retards forming factions that fight with one another and turn everything to shit.

One autist REEEEEEing doesn't mean there is "constant arguments" nor will her autism actually be alleviated by concrete rules.

Case by case is best for small boards like this. Rules will just allow for autistic lawyering of said rules.

>>333166

>So? You'd only be affected if you are a cuck yourself.

Everyone is affected when the board is swamped by retards like you calling each other cucks in every thread.

>>333227

>That's the best part about community policing.

Moderation is not "community policing."

>Can you name a single instance of the moderation going awry here?

I don't really keep track.

>One autist REEEEEEing doesn't mean there is "constant arguments" nor will her autism actually be alleviated by concrete rules.

I doubt that one faggot is responsible for all the thread derailments let alone their perpetuation.

>Rules will just allow for autistic lawyering of said rules

I don't want more rules. I want fewer, simpler rules. A few simple rules allow for very little lawyering. Mods should not get involved in how the users interact. That is when you get actual community policing.

>>333242

>Where was the censorship? What censorship even?

not allowing content you personally don't like is somehow not censorship?

>>333339

I..don't remember the cuck stuff in FC, mind elaborating? Unless you mean that fucking awful hacker.

>>333206

>shield hero parody

Fuck you. You made me think it's a thing.

>>333342

>It's not uncommon so it should be accepted

Die in a hole faggot, I just said that cuck content will always exist (because it makes easy patreonbux), and NTR fags deserve bully

I just think if anons were more hostile to them they wouldn't come here, giving the mods extra powers to attack one type of fetish is just giving them more unnecessary power.

>Just close your eyes and pretend it doesn't happen

Depends on how they block off the cuck content as i said before, in some games you can actually kill the guy who cucks you before he does it

Other games just remove dialogue, some games do shit all and even have references to it, but those games are actual cuck games.

>all text-based threads are containment threads

>everything i dislike is a containment thread

except they're not faggot, And if you think containment threads actually work make an NTR thread you potato nigger

>The Avatar game doesn't have it,

I don't think it was Four element trainer, but there used to be 3 or 4 other ones, one which had a scene where you could watch katara (I think it was katara) suck someone off in a tent

>any amount of cuck content makes a game cucked unless its >1%

that's just retarded. go suck on cock, you're almost as bad as that guy who says all porn is a form of cuckoldry, or playing as a female mc makes you a cuck

>>333341

>I..don't remember the cuck stuff in FC, mind elaborating? Unless you mean that fucking awful hacker.

You can literally marry one of your slaves and then let them fuck other slaves. theres a few other things involving other arcologies but thats about it. Although yes, there is the awful hacker, not sure if you can count that though.

>>333344

>NTR is ok because the games I play have NTR in them

I've played hundreds of shitty RPG maker games cunt, And a good portion of them have cuck shit in them

I'm not saying you should play them at all, most of them are pure garbage, but I'm trying to say that not every game that has cuck shit in it is automatically garbage. (but definitely when its forced or the game is geared towards it)

>>332871

>On 3/29: Furfags and Cuckshit have been given a soft ban

wait, I thought the whole NTR hate thing was a joke. why would anyone care about fetishes are in a game they don't play? I mean I think incest stuff is gross but I'm not going to petition for it's removal.

>>333424

>there are no practical reasons for a woman to have more than one partner

[Citation needed.] If that were true, there wouldn't be any female infidelity nor the need for mate guarding for their partners. Off the top of my head, it prevents them from putting all eggs in a single basket from the genetic standpoint. Less genetically uniform offspring means for cheating slut's bloodline more chances of surviving an epidemic, for example.

>>333398

>I think games can have a ratio of NTR avoidable content to non-NTR content (so long as the NTR content is avoidable) and still be classified as good

And that's basically how the rules have been fleshed out regarding what would get the "cuck" ban or "furfag" ban. Continue shitting on NTR, but blatant games designed around NTR will get the hammer.

>>333433

You're correct on a technical level, but you're missing the point of the statement. There are no practical reasons (from a male perspective) for a woman to have more than one partner. She still is either fucking for the sake of fucking or popping out kids of unknown heritage. The underlying implication isn't about her popping out kids of unknown heritage and taking care of them herself, it's about doing so and making the guy unrelated to the kid raise said kid. If she wants the money she has to give the honey and she better not be sharing that fucking honey.

>>333437

wouldn't the solution here be to ban the people causing a fuss or isolate those topics to their own thread? removing the topic entirely is giving trolls power just for being annoying.

"don't shit on other people's fetishes" should be common sense for a board of already niche sexual interests.

>>333236

>Moderation is not "community policing."

Potato tomato

>I don't really keep track.

Long winded way of saying "no". I asked for a single example, it can't really be that hard, can it? Because if there's no instances in which the current system is bad, why are you trying so hard to change it?

>I doubt that one faggot is responsible for all the thread derailments let alone their perpetuation.

Doubt all you want, look for yourself. Cuck-tan is supremely dedicated.

>I don't want more rules. I want fewer, simpler rules.

I didn't say "more rules", I said "rules". What we have now is guidelines, not rules, so mods have discretion and can be reasonable and some faggot screeching because "technically in this scenario the player character isn't the one fucking a girl" doesn't lead to shit happening and she's just screeching in the darkness like she usually does. Hard and fast rules will only lead to lawyering.

>cucks vs anti-cucks

Hello /htg/!

>>333441

It's funny, because the logic is "we have to stop these people because they cause constant shitstorms and ruin everything!" and right now the only people who are ruining everything and causing shitstorms are the one poster who thinks owning sex slaves is cuckoldry

>>333449

>/hgg/ is a big tent board of fetishes. "Don't shit on other people's fetishes" is the kind of garbage that belongs on Fag95 and similar websites. This is an anonymous imageboard, shitting on someone's fetish should be the standard, not a cause for alarm.

Nah, being a niggerfaggot and whining should rightly be bannable behavior.

>>333446

>Potato tomato

No, you idiot, moderation is not the community making a decision about a given issue. It is definatively one individual or a group of individuals who are distinct from the community making decisions at least ostensibly on their behalf. Community policing is users telling a troublemaker to fuck off.

>I asked for a single example, it can't really be that hard, can it?

I am not interested in telling the mods that they should not have banned such and such OP whose thread none the less is full of on-topic discussion. I just don't want them to start doing our job for us, which is acting as a community.

>Because if there's no instances in which the current system is bad, why are you trying so hard to change it?

The system is changing right now. That's the whole point.

>Hard and fast rules will only lead to lawyering.

Bullshit. Your "guidelines" lead to lawyering, just as they have been.

>>333452

>I am not interested in telling the mods that they should not have banned such and such OP whose thread none the less is full of on-topic discussion. I just don't want them to start doing our job for us, which is acting as a community.

What you just said is a total nonsequitur to what I asked.

>The system is changing right now. That's the whole point.

And your point is that you have no real reason for implementing what you are asking.

>Bullshit. Your "guidelines" lead to lawyering, just as they have been.

Really. Because the only lawyering I have seen is cuck-tan whining that there are no hard and fast rules and that something that almost barely could be counted as cuckoldry, if you asked an autistic alien who has never seen porn before, isn't getting banned because there's no hard and fast rule on the subject. Again, feel free to give me an example, of which you have provided none.

>>333453

hi cuck-tan

>>333449

Thing is, the only problems being created are on the side of the purists. I don't see furries constantly starting shit here, but cuck-tan is happy to pick up the slack.

That and the shitposting has DEFINITELY seen a big uptick in recent months, if the moderation keeps up the bans even someone who prides himself in "weaponized autism" will get bored eventually.

>>333460

>if the moderation keeps up the bans even someone who prides himself in "weaponized autism" will get bored eventually.

The existence of Johnny Nigger on /n/ disproves this point.

>>333449

>Both were tried, both result in the people from those isolated topics becoming bigger and bigger faggots who spread to other boards.

isn't this just conceding that the board's management has no real power and should just do whatever the loudest voice wants? I get that running anonymous boards is hard but explicitly taking that stance could be asking for trouble.

>shitting on someone's fetish should be the standard

I'm not opposed to banter, but fetishes are inherently subjective, there's no real constructive discussion to be had. the only direction I can see those smaller fights going in is escalation until it becomes an actual problem for everybody. again, I get that there's a balancing act. but it feels like volunteers are condoning the very same posts that are forcing them to the more authoritative decisions.

I'd put money down that even if those two fetishes were taken out of the picture, people would find another one to get up in arms about. and it's not like it's rare for these communities to attract the type of people who just want to see shit burn.

>>333463

This. I have no desire to see muh porn board overrun by loud retards who scream until they get what they want.

honestly I'd be more concerned about all the shitty shovelwares and people spamming patreon links over people contained on specific threads that catter to their interest, they aren't clogging the board and I doubt they are the one shitposting on other people's threads.

People that spam threads with shitty OPs shilling their patreons and the people that are just being contrarian for the sake of trolling are the one that should be dealt with.

It's fine to critic a game but users harassing people on the threads because they don't have the same taste or the game isn't what they want it to be should be promptly dealt with. Whining about a game that's about tentacle porn because there's tentacle porn is silly and a waste of space on the thread.

>>333448

and here's a poster proving my point:

>>333493

>>333498

Doushio! Cuck-tan noticed me!

>>333463

>isn't this just conceding that the board's management has no real power and should just do whatever the loudest voice wants?

I don't see how lacking power immediately means giving anyone what they want. Vols just said they won't get involved, as it should be, except for explicit NTR and furshit.

>but fetishes are inherently subjective

And this is where you fall for your own Fag95 stupidity. No, fetishes are not subjective, some of them are objectively worst than others, there's literally a shit fetish, there's guro, then there's inflation and that kind of shit furries like. If you are meaning to tell me those are not OBJECTIVELY shit, one being literally shit, then you must have problems.

This is the "everything is ok mentality" that prevents people from forming their own opinion because they fear they may offend someone, in an anonymous imageboard of all places. People who likes those fetishes should be shamed, and they can decide to ignore it or to get upset like faggots.

>>333501

N-no, I love you, cuck-tan!

It's just that it's so easy to recognize someone who has such a hilariously broad definition of what constitutes "cuck".

>>333502

Aah, she's even samefagging for me! Cute~!

>>333509

>>333511

>>333508

It's an all-out assault! Her favorite tactics too! Post your whole reaction folder, cuck-tan! Ganbatte!

>>333520

Making cuck-tan edit screenshots

>>333504

that isn't even the issue you complete retard, the issue is that mods just remove it regardless, is the fact that users of a site who left cuckchan due to shitty moderation being concerned about shitty garbage mods beyond your comprehension?

>>333504

What the fuck is fag95 and why do everything-is-cuck autists keep insinuating people are secretly from it

>>333531

Namefag h-game forum.

It's shit and moderation there suck so much cock, that it could be measured in marathons.

>>333530

I might be with you if you couldn't simply create your own board, but you can. I might be with you if you couldn't simply fork projects, but you can. Since there are remedies to the situation AND it involves staying on 8ch, you can fuck right off with your cuck and fur shit.

>>333424

> There are no practical reasons for a woman to have more than one partner except being a disgusting slut. So no, it's not a construct, it's a fact.

Social Construct isn't just a buzzword anon, it literally refers to constructs created by humans social interaction. In this case, marriage was created by humans wanting 1:1 exclusive partnering and is therefor a social construct. Just because its also practical doesn't mean its not a construct. You know, just like civilization?

Societal Norms in this case just refers to most societies believing that partners should be exclusively for each other. Reverse harems have existed before in society, but they are rare due to how biologically unnecessary they are as well as unpractical Shit happens all the time in France weirdly enough.

Also you could say the same of literally any animal, but take horses for instance. Mares literally fuck every stallion they can reach just so none of the stallions can figure out whose it is. Horses are like any animal, biological geared towards breeding, but due to their herd mentality having multiple partners is seen as a good thing. that and they're also fucking Animals, so sort of mute point

There is also the fact that previous sexual partner genetics have ended up in the offspring of a child, its just that its an extremely tiny amount, like less than 1%. Just putting it out there that used women don't give birth to just your child.

>>333440

>There are no practical reasons (from a male perspective) for a woman to have more than one partner.

In human society, yes, but as i mentioned before horses and other animals have a practical reason to be sluts. Its based on their social interactions, with being a herd species and all that. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some backwards barbarian society in the past that shared women, but coupled pairs were not allowed to fuck until marriage.

But yeah, in normal human society, what you say makes sense.

You just need to remember that not all humans think the same, take bug people for example.

>>333576

You have the same IQ as a nigger, jump off a building and help the gene pool.

Social Construct is a term older than Tumblr and the SJWs. Jesus Christ you come off so fucking retarded, just because they use that word incorrectly all that time, is the word ruined forever? This is the same logic that ended up putting 'literally' meaning its exact opposite in the oxford dictionary.

Something being a social construct and something being practical are not mutually exclusive.

And what part of what i said implies i like sluts?

Fucking end yourself you cocksucking cunt.

>>333586

So you can't give me a reason, slit your wrists faggot

>>333582

You're using their language and speaking like they do - trying to suggest that e.g. human mating patterns are a "construct" which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place, while using the exact same arguments they use now to do so, without any actual factual basis that isn't entirely lifted whole cloth from (((anthropologists))) who were the first academic field to be pozzed.

>>333596

>human mating patterns are a "construct" which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place,

They are a construct, its just that they can also be practical. its why humans can have both monogamous pairings and harems. If it wasn't a social construct then it wouldn't be as various.

>which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place,

I can't deny this, thats quite correct. However I'm of the opinion that the social constructs of old were and are of practical use, which Tumblr and SJWs are counter to.

> while using the exact same arguments they use now to do so,

Yes and no, I am arguing that monogamous sexual pairings (marriage) is a social construct, which Tumblrs argues all the time, however i am not saying its useless and has an actual practical use which tuimblr willingly refuses to understand.

>without any actual factual basis that isn't entirely lifted whole cloth from (((anthropologists))) who were the first academic field to be pozzed.

I disagree mostly with this, albeit i will admit some of my opinions do come from Anthropology, which is indeed at the moment mostly pozzed. That doesn't necessarily make all the age old arguments useless. Also I'm pretty sure there were quite a few other fields that were pozzed first, such as Journalism, the arts and some social sciences.

>>333608

>The problem with your logic, autist, is that then everything is a construct,

I don't think everything is a construct, just that social interactions from intelligent beings can give rise different sexual behaviors and pairings, and as these can vary both in functionality and practicality, these can be called constructs. As in they were created by people/animals unintentionally to fill a social niche. This is more distinctive in the more intelligent animals which behave more on a learned basis where as the more instinctive lesser animals are more uniform

>Even animal behaviour is a construct designed by animals themselves instead of patterns, which is what they are, patterns, that's why they are practical, because they have been proved to work before, so they keep happening.

Some animal behaviors are instinctive, and some are more learned. Learned behaviors that are created via social interactions for the use in social situations can be considered on some level part of a social construct. I.e, shaking hands vs saluting a superior (not so much the action itself, but rather the reason for the action). They exist because they're different stations of power created by humans interacting with each other, which while i admit covers a huge amount of subjects, still does have a limit. SJWs will literally use it for anything.

Learned behaviors do not always have to have been proven to work to become an occurrence, especially when you have social media coming into existence, which has given rise to an entirely different type of social hierarchy.

Now excluding social media, I will admit that they are patterns, but patterns is an even broader subject, you can literally use patterns for almost anything. Not to mention patterns don't actually give you a reason for why they exist in the first place and more used as evidence or something, rather than an explanation for why something is happening in the first place. A social construct is an attempt at explaining the patterns between social interactions.

>Humans didn't construct shit like marriage, it was the most logical thing to do at the moment, to the point that most societies worked under a similar idea of what marriage is.

I think we're getting a out of sync here, Social construct doesn't mean that it was intentionally constructed, albeit you could argue that some of them actually were. Rather social construct means something created by social interactions. Its a construct not because it was created intentionally, but rather just that it was created by humans. Now you could argue that other animals which have monogamous parings are also social constructing them. However with animals i believe it is more instinctive in a lot of cases, being more of a result of genetics than actual learned behaviors. This is counter to what humans do, via learning their behaviors, which is why humans can have, harems, reverse harems, cuckolds, menage de trois (or however you spell that fucking french word) and asexual pandas. These can still be functional relationships providing most of whats needed by a social group,

However there is a great deal less practicality in these relationships vs monogamous relationships, which is why I consider them all social constructs. Animals are held back by genetically learned social behaviours, while humans can make their own.

>tldr

Patterns aren't mutually exclusive with social constructs, and actually encompass more things than social constructs. Also social constructs don't have to be intentionally made, they just need to be formed from human social interactions.

>I'm shocked. And no, anthropology fell before journalism or even arts.

I want some kind of citation for this, not because i don't believe you, but because it would be nice information to have

>>333438

>>Do you have previous vol experience?

oh, is this one of those situations where everyone only ever wants someone who has been a vol for years previously, meaning that it's impossible for anyone new to join?

I realize I'm late, but one of the board's resident medfags reporting in just to dab on cuck-tan having no idea how the fuck female sexual behavior works and still being wrong even in their cherry-picked example

>>333450

>otherwise women would be able to get impregnated by multiple men at once. Seeing how the contrary is true, then no, a woman having multiple partners is not practical, while the contrary is.

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1488855

OH NONONONO

>>333646

>anyone who uses memes I don't like should be banned

Fuck off.

>>333633

>oh, is this one of those situations where everyone only ever wants someone who has been a vol for years previously, meaning that it's impossible for anyone new to join?

That is very likely not the case, as if it was the vol would be kind enough to clearly specified a minimum amount up front.Unlike a certain board's application process, which shall not be named, yes I am still slightly salty about it. My reading is that it is similar to several sections on most job postings, ie. having some experience would be useful/beneficial but is not a hard requirement as the application's 'fit' with the organisation is in general not something that be so easily adjusted on a large scale. Hopefully >>333438 can clarify further.

>>333683

>women would be able to get impregnated by multiple men at once

>women can get impregnated by multiple men at once

>W-well it's rare under modern circumstances so it doesn't count

Nice goalpost moving faggot.

>>333738

2.4% of the time in paternity suits involving multiple ovulation. To put this into perspective, the general rate for a non-paternity event is around 10% in general paternity suits. One fourth of the time a woman has multiple ova and has committed infidelity children can be born from different fathers despite simultaneous gestation. You are clearly wrong in assuming this is insignificant, especially considering that people who are poorer and younger have higher rates of non-paternity events, up to about 30% in unmarried blacks today. The vast majority of people throughout human evolution lived more like the former than modern people in developed nations; therefore we can extrapolate that it has had a more significant role in human evolution than we would expect based off of modern data. Moreover, you're falsely assuming female and male reproductive strategies are identical when they clearly aren't. Male mammals produce millions of sperm at a time and are in theory capable of fathering many children simultaneously without much investment afterwards, female mammals produce a small number of ova at a time and must invest significant amounts of energy into raising young to adulthood. While they don't directly benefit from infidelity beyond potentially having better genes for their offspring, the do benefit significantly from maximizing the amount of resources, either physical or social, they acquire from courtship in order to better raise their offspring, which often involves extra-pair copulation and manipulation of the uncertainty of paternity (this is probably why humans don't go into noticeable heat, for example). While this is more apparent in mammals and birds, literally only the jackdaw is known to not engage in this or similar behavior.

>>333743

Ah right, before I forget, I'm gonna close the application pool next Saturday night at midnight. We'll say Midnight Alaska time to keep it simple.

>>333750

>no multiple children involved but a single one with 2 different fathers

Oh, so you don't even understand what heteropaternal superfecundation means. "Superfecundation" occurs when there are multiple, separate ova inside the female reproductive tract which are fertilized on separate occasions, typically resulting in multiple births; mosaicism is relatively rare in comparison. Might help your case if you bothered to look up terms you didn't understand as opposed to pretending that you did.

>speculations with no evidence or proof

>https://jech.bmj.com/content/59/9/749.long

>https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth

>you not being man enough to not only being able to provide for a single woman but for multiple ones, thus making your slut of a woman having to rely on multiple partners

I don't even have one. I'm not a nigger, and I'm still in education, so I really don't have any desire to start a family I can't support; but that's besides the point. Women, regardless of position, can gain from having multiple sex partners, and therefore have a motivation to perform acts of infidelity. Likewise, men can gain from raping every women they see. Just because they can doesn't mean they do.

>>333759

>Even though I'm wrong you still have to wait 9 months

>still only have the possibility to do it 20+ times

I'm not seeing the argument.

>risk factors for a certain result on a genetic test have nothing to do with biology because they aren't based on a genetic test but rather factors that increase the probability of a woman fucking more people

Nice reading comprehension, dipshit.

>I still don't understand conditionals

You might want to consider medication or a gas chamber.

Mods are retarded.

If you have sanity, >>>/sgg/ welcomes you.

That's all.

>>333768

No one is ever going to go to your board to do anything but laugh at you. Christ, you actually put those banners up.

>>333769

>What about the fact that men can do it no problem with more women and more often

Since you seem to ignore reason when it doesn't agree with you, let me put it this way: how many men do you know that have had over 20 children with multiple women? As you don't seem to understand that a potential for something to happen isn't the same thing as that thing actually happening, the practical number of children men and women have is functionally identical in humans, with higher class men and lower class men being the extremes in both directions. Humans sexuality is not and has never been primarily polygamous; this is indicated by other indices such as the relative testicular mass between species which is demonstrated by other studies which you aren't intellectually capable of understanding, so I won't even bother.

>That IS exactly my point, I'm an utter fucking moron who can barely read, let alone understand basic scientific concepts

Well at least we can agree on something.

>>333783

>just like your shit argument

I honestly don't think you've understood even a single statement in this entire exchange if you think that's a rebuttal for any portion of my argument.

>more logical and practical in literally any way for men to do it and not women

Which I've demonstrated is based on false assumptions, to which your response has been "cuck" and a fundamental misunderstanding of basic conditional statements.

>So you agree you have reading comprehension

Yes, I can read scientific papers, unlike you. I also don't assume anyone who calls me out for being a fucking retard has some fetish I dislike, consistently repeat criticisms levied at me against the people making them, and am actually capable of abstract reasoning. I imagine to someone who is as retarded as you are this probably seems like some type of fucking magic show, but this is well within the capacity of most of the human population.

>>333797

I love cuck-tan, and all her adherents. You're all so cute.

>>333794

>I'm pretty sure you are just playing the devil's advocate

I'm pretty sure you're retarded and your entire world view is based off of misunderstanding your secondary-public-school-level education.

>This one specific example is the only thing that matters to this argument and every other factor that's been presented doesn't matter at all

Fuck, you're dumb. Can you even tie your shoelaces by yourself?

>An study is barely a fact when even then say the impact of it is inconclusive and merely speculations

You really have no scientific literacy whatsoever. It's not even a study, it's a review.

>So you're a fence sitter.

I'm not a fence sitter, I just want you to fuck off and stop shitting up threads with your chromosomally-enriched misinterpretation of what cuckoldry is. I realize you desperately want to fit in, but different boards have different cultures, either make your own board or fucking lurk more and stop being such an autistic retard.

>>333799

He? Who's the one making assumptions now? For instance, I'm not the one earlier up in the thread doing that. I must admit some fault here, this person clearly doesn't use the actual word "cuck" quite enough to be cuck-tan.

It's funny that a new thread is made and cuck-tan started the exact same cycle over again. Once again he will eventually lose the argument to anyone who cares to respond to him and he'll fuck off until the next thread.

>>333802

Cuck-tan has demonstrated an ability to repress his constant urge to scream the word for a couple hours at a time.

>>333803

Pot, meet kettle.

>>333801

>Pretty sure I fit in more here than you do, faggot

Textbook egocentrism. You get in an argument in every single thread you go to, at all times of the day. Literally not a single person has ever agreed with you, which you conceded last thread. How is that "fitting in" by anyone's definition?

>>333806

Oh, really? Which one of us has the selective memory of the last thread?

Because I remember you getting into a dozen different arguments, continuing them until you lost so hard not even your stupid ass could come up with a response, then refusing to ever respond to that argument again. You'd then start an argument with a different person. Or possibly the same person who just wants to kick the retard again.

>>333809

Gradually I began to hate them

>>333801

>the fact that a woman doesn't have any logical nor practical reason to want more than one partner, either biologically or societal

Except they do, which has been previously stated, you're response to the explanation was accusing me of stating it because of

>you not being man enough to not only being able to provide for a single woman but for multiple ones

like some 16 year old valley girl.

>still using study to refer to a review, but it it's not a fact except for the references to studies that have conclusions I like

The purpose of a review, you mongoloid, is to compile conclusions of studies on a particular topic in an easily accessible manner. And you still managed to get the wrong conclusions from that review, call its validity into question, and then selectively use sections to support your argument. Literally the reason I brought it up in the first place is because it demonstrates the correlation between PD and low socioeconomic status combined with the fact that for most of human history more people had lower socioeconomic status than they do now in order to support my claim that NPEs were probably more common in the past than they are now, which you said had no evidence. In short, you are completely retarded.

>Pretty sure I fit in more here than you do

Even if you did I still wouldn't give a fuck.

>>333816

>t-t-there's tons of people like me here

>i-i can't show even one case of anyone but me personally doing this, but trust me!

>e-everyone who doesn't post agrees with me

This is why some people don't believe you're being genuine. No one is actually this retarded, right?

>>333821

No, the only ""evidence"" I have is cuck-tan repeatedly admitting that it's all him.

But that could be fake, right? Because there's no proof about the identity of the people I'm replying to I should assume by default that each and every post in every single thread is a completely separate person, even when people explicitly state otherwise.

>>333817

>Why are some people on 8ch so obsessed with cuckchan?

This place was literally founded on butthurt re: cuckchan's moderation

>>333828

When he says things like it repeatedly over hundreds of posts of arguments it's reasonable to assume he's the same person, but as mentioned, it's actually unreasonable to begin with for me to assume that anyone has ever posted on this board more than once.

>>333826

He's literally not wrong, though.

It's EXTREMELY unlikely that a large number of shitposters with the exact same posting style, mannerisms and bizarre behavior and beliefs cropped up out of nowhere a few months ago

>>333828

It's an honor, Mr. Bush.

>>333823

>cheating is still badly seen in society

Fuck, I forgot about all of those times when having mistresses who were married to someone else was considered shameful and inappropriate or how the Greeks and Romans detested Hercules, Castor, Pollux, and Aeneas because they were the products of female adultery.

>So your argument in short is that since niggers do it.

Niggers also breathe. It would make the world a better place if you stopped doing that, too.

>>333830

What are the inherent differences between someone who posts here and someone who posts on cuckchan?

>>333834

>i've been in this argument with someone for six hours now and they've continued posting in the exact same style and continue espousing the exact same beliefs

>should i assume it's the same person

>no that wouldn't make sense, clearly it's six dozen different people!!

>everyone who disagreed with me was one person

Stop saying that you inbred goblin. No one claims that everyone is the same person. We are saying that you in particular are the same person. Because you are literally the only person who has ever in the entire history of the board used your single-digit IQ definition of cuckoldry. With repeated prompting you couldn't even manage to point to a single post, even one that you made, and claim that it's an instance of someone else using your retarded definition.

>>333838

While the person you've been (pointlessly) arguing with is clearly one person, there are a few people across the board who've adopted that viewpoint. You can tell because, for instance, it crops up in threads that cuck-tan doesn't go to and in a few different posting styles.

>>333839

>and they usually have leftist/SJW mentality like "accept what is different even if it's literally shit", which is why you get retards with "STOP KINKSHAMING ME" that never was a problem here before except for a few instances really long ago, that were dealt with.

You actually had me going that you weren't cuck-tan up until this part

>>333840

Does it? There are other anti-NTR hardliners on the board and that's fine, the problem I have is with his utterly retarded definition of what cuckoldry is.

But fair enough, I accept that it's possible I just don't pay as much attention as you.

>>333839

I guess I'm different, because I don't do any of that.

>>333837

>it was generally seen as a fucking dick because of shit like that

You've got any evidence to back that up? Neither Venus nor Jupiter ever had negative consequences for repeatedly getting knocked up by other men despite being married or knocking up married women as far as I can recall, but I only studied the classics for four and a half years so maybe you could enlighten me.

>it seems perfectly practical for a woman to do so when cucks are willing to comply

Good to see that you still have no fucking understanding whatsoever of any statement in that entire exchange.

>>333844

I wouldn't really consider "shitposting so hard and being so universally hated board-wide that people gave you a name to mock you with" winning an argument

>>333844

>and losing

Oh come now, cuck-tan. Point at one argument you've one. Seriously, feel free to claim credit for any argument in your style that has actually won the argument.

Every single time it's just you screeching incoherently for a few hours while everyone else laughs at you, then you refuse to reply to them.

>>333849

Nah

>>333851

To be fair, does anyone ever win any of these?

>>333854

Not really.

Cuck-tan tries and fails to push her beliefs on the board or "popularize" them and gets her IP banned, everyone else ridicules her but she's past the autism threshold for caring about that so it all starts again in a few hours.

>>333855

>In greece being a cuck was already bad. Just read ancient shitpost around pompeii

Pompeii is in Italy and basically had a reputation as the Roman equivalent of Vegas. In contrast, a shit ton of prominent Romans, including Julius Caesar, Augustus (though he had her divorce her husband and marry him), Catullus, and Ovid were publicly known to have had sex with women who were married to other men. Having your wife be unfaithful was considered dishonorable for the husband, not necessarily for the wife; hence mater semper certa est, pater numquam.

>Gee, why would the goddesses of fertility will not be shitted on for "doing their jobs"

Well Gilgamesh did it, for one.

>>333863

>NTR is generally despised

See >>333843

Everyone agrees that NTR is shit, you absolute mongoloid. We disagree with your absurdly expansive definition of what "cuck" means.

I'm very confused as to why you all are arguing over semantics about a topic you already fundamentally hate.

>>333863

I think my favorite thing about you is you're at least cognizant of dialectical tactics. You're leveraging anonymity to try to put reasonable doubt in lurkers' minds that you're just one samefag (unfortunately your beliefs are so jarring and bizarre that it's mostly unbelievable), something that can't be disproven and requires having interacted with you for a while to recognize. You're pretty good at deflecting (drawing out a point that's pretty clear-cut against you with fucktons of minor points that confuses the issue) and arguing from incredulity, so good that I'd wager you were one of those "meme war" twitter propagandists who got bored because there was nothing to fight for any more and you were still a NEET with time on your hands. It would be impressive, if you weren't too autistic to realize the content of the message you were trying to push doesn't appeal to anyone here.

>>333868

That's literally a joke, anon.

>>333871

Because cuck-tan has spent months at this point aggressively shitposting almost non-stop. When he first started only people who like NTR argued with him, but he has been at it for so long with his stupid fucking definition of what a "cuck" is that he has earned the antipathy of the entire board regardless of their opinions on NTR.

That's why he's had repeated accusations against him of being a false flag attack.

>>333867

>the peasants that did hate cuckolding

Augustus was so popular he was still worshiped by some peasants after Christianization, yet he would be a cuck by your definition. Julius Caesar was popular enough to end the fucking Republic. Historical reality does not match your interpretation.

>Exactly.

What the fuck do you even mean?

>>333871

Because anon, literally every single game on this board except Honey Select is cuckshit according to cuck-tan.

Every. Single. One.

I fucking hate NTR but I can't get behind the idea that we need to purge every single game from this board based off of one retard's misunderstanding of terms.

>>333875

Here I am pouring my heart out and you can't even break kayfabe for one minute to give me a "thank you"?

That's it, all my cuck-tan merch is going in the garbage can.

>>333876

>I don't know what is more pathetic, that person if that was true, or anyone who believes that is even possible.

You literally admitted it, cuck-tan. Several times. I don't know why you bother with this whole song and dance when you just abandon it in the heat of an argument.

>I hate this guy so everyone must hate him too

Oh, we're going to do this again? Alright, cuck-tan, point to anyone on this board agreeing with you. Not just being anti-NTR, because 90% of this board is anti-NTR, you need to find someone who agrees with your specific definition of cuckoldry.

Don't worry, I'll wait.

>>333875

>I've never done any of this

No, he's literally describing precisely what you were doing in the post he replied to. You can't just say you didn't do something that is clearly evident to everyone in that exact post. You can deny the conjecture afterwards, but it's asinine to claim you didn't do any of it.

>>333884

>he was worshiped

>therefore he wasn't worshiped

Not even him, but how the fuck do you get this backwards in logic? X, therefore notX?

>>333814

>How the fuck do you get to unironically say you "dab on" people, do the whole cancer that is currently infesting cuckchan with his "OH NONONONO" and STILL not catch a ban?

Because it's the meta thread, anon. If this were any other thread they would be shat on/banned under rule 0, but that's allowed here.

>>333884

>he wasn't worshiped exactly because he was a cuck

>the peasants hated cukolding

>but they worshiped a cuck for three centuries

Wew.

>Authority figure shits on another authority figure

>this is somehow significant

>>333888

>>Everyone I don't like is the same person

>a specific instance is the rule

That's not how it works, you utter retard.

>You do realize you are on an anonymous imageboard

You frequently cast doubt over whether or not it's you arguing in every thread (despite at other times admitting it is you), but you're not even willing to point at one of your own posts and say "see? that one's definitely someone else!"

Come on now, cuck-tan. How is anyone going to take you seriously if you aren't even willing to put in the effort?

>>333888

>If anyone other than the MC fucks a woman then it's cuckshit

This is the definition that only you have ever used, anon.

It just gets so damn tiring to deal with you.

Why do you bother? According to your own definition, everything on this board is cuckshit. In your mind, this place is no better than Fag95zone. Why bother coming to what you believe is a hive of literally nothing but cuckshit?

Go create another board that is "cuck-free" by your definition.

>>333893

>So people aren't allowed to worship a single aspect of an authoritative figure but his whole life as if it was a cult? Are you retarded?

That's literally how deification works though. You might want to read apocolocyntosis, or just look at Islam. The pope isn't worshiped as a deity, Augustus was.

>>333876

>I don't know what is more pathetic, that person if that was true, or anyone who believes that is even possible.

I can confirm Cuck-tan's existence. In the previous meta thread she even stated that she swaps IPs around after getting the [B&D+] treatment for constant shitposting over several weeks.

Unfortunately, the anon that anon has been fighting with actually isn't cuck-tan for once. It's a different anon (who is admittedly also a cross-boarder going through their history).

>>333900

>If you actually hate NTR, why do you get so upset when anyone shits on NTR

I'm not the person who's responding to you, but if you permit someone to be a retard just because they agree with you it reflects poorly on your side of the argument.

>>333901

>"Divine right monarchy" is the same thing as deification

>good leadership is the only qualification for deification

You really have no idea what you're talking about.

>>333900

>there's evidently more people that hates NTR as much as I do

Yes, that's precisely what I'm saying. Everyone universally dislikes NTR on this board, yet people still disagree with you in particular. Use your pattern recognition to analyze why the board at large can shit on NTR while simultaneously hating you.

>if you actually hate NTR, why do you get so upset when anyone shits on NTR?

I don't. I get annoyed when someone uses your particularly retarded arguments.

>If you don't think that's the definition of NTR you can just ignore it,

The problem is that you have kept this up for months. It's so goddamn tiring. I didn't argue the first time you started a shitstorm in a random thread. I didn't even argue with you the tenth time you started a shitstorm. It just gets so tiring dealing with it so often.

>>333902

>It's a different anon (who is admittedly also a cross-boarder going through their history).

The problem is that VPNs exist, which muddy the water with those kinds of things. For example, I use PrivateInternetAccess as my VPN and it auto-connects me to Silicon Valley. That's the same VPN and node that Viperfag uses, so occasionally I get caught by bans he was hit with. I also often just don't have to enter a captcha when I try to post the first time in a day, meaning that someone else is currently active with that same IP.

Though I suppose general posting style is an indicator as well, but that further muddies the water because not everyone posts the same at all times.

>>333902

Can confirm. I have been busy so I have not been able to post anymore. But I'm glad faggots made a boogeyman out of me.

>>333775

>But, if the BO allows me, I want to shill my own, that it's dead even though I've been wanting to post a doujin I read recently.

Sure go ahead and I way say post it any way.

What do you think about merging the two boards or >>>/hgg/ outright absorbing your board? If that is the case then you are more than welcome to be a vol/co-BO if you want. Either way I have added your board to the announcement bar.

>I also put a lot of effort in my banners and I can easily make more. Vols are free to use them here if they want.

Thanks, the five you have posted have been added (only because of how minimal the upload tool is).

>>333963

I'm not sure what you're thinking, but you need to seriously rethink this post

>letting /sgg/ shill

fine, I guess. if someone wants their furry/cuck games that badly, /sgg/ can act as containment.

>absorbing /sgg/

have you fucking looked at /sgg/?

there's nothing there to absorb

>giving /sgg/ BO vol position on /hgg/ when /sgg/ was created less than a month ago and purely as a way to bitch about /hgg/ moderation

what the fuck are you smoking?

>>334126

He means /hentaiclub/, you fucking illiterate troglodyte.

>>334128

my bad, but it's still an empty board.

how the hell would "absorbing" it benefit us?

why should the owner of a board that tiny get any kind of special treatment like automatic vol status?

>>334143

If we make the merger, I suggest making it "allow hentai general and scanlations initially to have threads, and allow specific mangakas to have threads if this works out in a few months." Also a strict ban on western comics unless it's in the hentai general.

>>334143

Why would we want a "bigger tent"? What does any of that have to do with h-games?

>>334143

>hentai games general

>>334148

exactly

>>334145

If BO wants more vols that's okay, but I don't want some other no-name BO being given vol status just because.

If he goes through the same application process any other vol does and gets approved, then I'm fine with that.

What really bugged me was offering co-BO status to somebody we don't know from adam.

What the fuck, BO?

>>334155

You do know someone saying "hey, I do X/Y/Z and have a vested interest in this board" is how NotCIA and Veil were brought on, right? Dunno about Oilrig's circumstances. In fact NotCIA is the only one pushing for this application process I think.

>>334143

>>334144

>>334148

>>334155

I assume it's a "Reeee! The West is cucked! We must rely on Japan for everything!" weeb sentiment.

>>334179

That was my thought process, yeah. I think the last thing anyone wants is to have a dozen separate hentai threads dumped on what's generally a porn game board.

On the topic of furry.

>Humans with superficial animal characteristics are okay

I've some thoughts about this.

Monster Girls tend to have animalistic traits that enhance or hinder them in some way. Like a Wolf Girl looking like a regular girl but with wolf ears and tail, but still having the improved sense of smell attributed to wolves and the like.

On the flip side, CoC is fairly rare in the realm of furry. I've delved into that abyss before. It was research I swear. Don't judge me too harshly.

Furries tend to be very sensitive. By that I mean they are thin skinned freaks that very quickly feel emasculated. They suffer an inferiority complex. So, to cater to these freaks, most furry content tends to have as little emphasis on the animalistic parts as possible, as paradoxical as that sounds.

That is why a sizable chunk of furshit has outrageous proportions or weird biology that never gets addressed or even noticed, with grossly oversized genitals or tits not even disturbing the way they walk, or no one even mentioning why someone's pussy is literally glowing for seemingly no reason. Basically, most furries are that one kid that insists that a parakeet could totally beat a lion in a fight, and generally won't shut up about parakeets. To keep their shilling dispensers from getting upset with them, most who make furry content just never bring up how one animal is obviously better or the best at something.

It still happens, but I've found Monster Girls actually utilize their animal sides more often than furries, so I think that definition could use some work as it would actually allow more furry stuff than Monster Girls.

>>334278

What are you smoking? I haven't read extensive amounts of furry porn like you evidently have so I'll have to accept that your interpretation of it is correct, but even with that you're being dumb.

>b-but the author doesn't actively point out how dumb a zebra with ZZ cup tits are!

Doesn't fucking matter in terms of the rules, it's a zebra. Doesn't matter if the fact that the girl is a zebra is only mentioned once, she's still a goddamn zebra.

If it's not a zebra and instead just a girl with horse ears, it's not furry, it's kemonomimi. Pretty fucking easy to figure out.

>>334155

>What the fuck, BO?

It made sense for me to ask him up front now rather than once the merging process was complete. I personally find it only fair to offer him equal say in how the hypothetical combined board would have been moderated.

>>334158

>In fact NotCIA is the only one pushing for this application process I think.

Last week I sent a unloaded PM to the rest of the team, asking for their thought's on 'if it was time to bring in more vol's'.

>>334287

>How exactly would the merging works? I've read some of the posts about it and I like the idea of the hentai general with the redirection to >>>/hentaiclub/.

My initial idea was simply that I updated the title and subtitle (tags,etc) then your topic has a dedicated thread, finally >>>/hentaiclub/ would be deleted after any desired importing. However in hind sight it is not very fair and board's can not be deleted by anyone but Ron on an individual case. So now I agree the redirection idea is a good one.

>So sorry, I have to decline.

Fair enough.

>>334350

>only fair

Why? How is that fair?

If the two boards were equal size, that might be fair, but that board has like six threads or something grand total probably for its entire lifetime.

It's like the king of some decent sized country offering to marry the ruler of a tiny pacific island kingdom with like 300 population total and giving them equal rulership.

It simply doesn't make any sense.

>>334329

You're missing the point. The point is that furry material doesn't take like rabbit x zebra-taur and spend the entire time talking about the uniquely interesting ways they have to mate due to their differing physiognomy, instead furry material mentions in passing that it's a rabbit and a zebra, then it gives them both two foot horse cocks, Q cup tits, and balls the size of watermelons, and then writes a bunch of thinly veiled gay sex focusing entirely on those oversized sexual characteristics.

>>334178

>hentai, not doujins or manga

You want to split hairs, let's split hairs.

The board's name is "[perverse/perverted] games general" and strictly has nothing to do with any non-game medium in the slightest.

>>334329

>it's not furry, it's kemonomimi.

No no no. That isn't my point at all. I'm pointing out how, in a lengthy discussion, it was said that animal traits were fine as long as they were superficial cosmetic shit. Here is the exact quote.

> "Superficial" would mean that it is either purely aesthetic (eg. cat ears and a tail) or induces the character to affect silly mannerisms (eg. interspersing speech with "meow"). Once the animalistic feature significantly either impares or enhances the character's abilities it ceases to be "superficial."

For all intents and purposes, this more commonly includes furry. This is because monster girls are more likely to be enhanced by their animalistic traits in some way, while the furries could easily be argued as just humans that are completely covered by purely aesthetic animalistic features.

I agree with the notion, but I think we need a better definition to work with.

>>334680

> In the Japanese language, however, "hentai" is not a genre of media but any type of perverse or bizarre sexual desire or act.

Better than you, apparently.

>>333228

Cucks are like muslims. If they'd fuck off we wouldn't keep having to tell them to fuck off.

>>334734

What cucks? All I see is idiots calling eachother cucks.

>>334722

Exactly.

It's insulting.

I'm disappointed in you, BO-senpai.

>>334831

wew lad

>>334866

Yeah, but you don't suddenly make that hick a baron or something.

>>334871

vol, sure. co-BO is a different story.

>>334876

He mentioned both. And vols aren't god so I don't mind that, you seem like an okay guy. I just like to think that if he was going to offer co-BO to anyone it would be an existing mod or something. I'm just not sure what he was thinking with that part.

>>334864

Nah, fuck you. BO did nothing wrong. This is a fucking imageboard, learn to take it easy. It's not like Jim giving /fit/ to a redditor or something extreme like that.

>>335462

CoC started out as a demon/monster-girl game with furry on the side, and degraded into full on furry when the furrybucks started to flow in. On the contrary you have TiTS, which has been a game catering solely to furries right from the start. As such, CoC can be cleaned up to a degree to make it what it was always intended to be, while TiTS is furry through and through.

As such, I have no intention to unlike CoC ever work on TiTS, not to mention that the gameplay and movement is shallow as fuck.

>>335462

>>335526

The thread wasn't banned, just the anon. That's what was being clarified.

>>334831

Actually, if furries and cucks made their own country and all moved there, it would be so much easier to genocide them because we'd know where they are.

>>335613

In a straight-up war between furries and cucks on one side and /pol/ on the other, I would lay money on the first group kicking the shit out of the second group. Cucks are supposedly already genociding the 56%, and furries have shitloads of disposable income. All /pol/ has going for it is mass shooters, which don't amount to much when the other side is also armed. Whatever the outcome, the viewing public would be the winners. They could put that shit on pay-per-view.

>>335708

>/pol/

>mass shooters

wew

>>335755

Oh, right. I forgot that they were secretly jewish cultural marxist falseflags who wanted to smear /pol/'s good name by spouting /pol/ memes before doing exactly the kind of shit that /pol/ always says it wants to do. Damn those impossibly brilliant and supremely capable untermenschen and their 4D chess! I gotta say, though, that newsman reading Navy SEAL copypasta gave me a giggle.

>>332871

>>Can I make a thread about X?

>You can make a thread about anything really so long as it follows the OP quality rule

Yeah, you probably should point out right there, that you can't post stuff that BO doesn't like (like cuckfaggatory, furries [unless it's the particular kind of furry content that BO enjoys like CoC]) instead of on the bottom of OP.

Just for the sake of clarity.

And speaking of it: when are you going to update https://8ch.net/hgg/rules.html ?

>>335774

Well, as it is now, I wouldn't be surprised if more people would accidentally make some threads about furry games: rules aren't updated yet and OP literally says that anything goes.

The only mention of this change is a small footnote on the bottom of meta thread.

Are you really too dense to see the problem here?

>>335774

>nah, there's no reason to clarify rules at all!

>and anyone who don't like it can just fuck off!

I'm really not sure are you retarded or just shitposting.

>>336006

Except that it's been plainly stated that existing generals won't be banned, you colossal faggot.

>>336006

Will you be moving the game to a new board?

>>336019

Probably /fur/ or something. We'll see when the thread itself gets closer to bump limit.

>>336028

>two very vocal very minor communities that cause 90% of the drama

Oh, please. It is plain as day that /pol/ causes 90% of the drama. The furries are annoying, but there has been nothing unexpected out of them. The cucks don't even seem to be real, just a paranoid fantasy. Whatever. It's you guys' board. You do what you want to it.

>>336028

>Kobold Adventures was in the clear

I do not understand the reasoning for this. My game is 100%, undeniably, irrefutably furry. I have never claimed it *not* to be furry. There's a fox lady, a wolf guy, a sheep, a bunch of anthropomorphic dragons, a rat, an owl guy, and a scaly protagonist, a bunch of which already have art drawn by furry artists. The character sheets page alone, should tell you all you need to know about the nature of the beast.

http://koboldadventure.com/charsheet/index.html

I'm not going to tell you how to do your job, and if you want to allow the game to continue to be discussed here, then that's fine by me. Just seems a bit hypocritical to me, that's all. Why am I arguing against my game being here? Because I don't want to be dishonest, and claim it's something that it's not.

Having rules in the first place is fucking retarded, and you're genuinely a moron if you think otherwise. That is all, you may ban me now.

>>336032

I'm no vol, but I think I got the gist of what is going on. The issue with furry stuff seems to be less about the fetish itself and more about the type of people it attracts. I didn't see whatever shitstorm sparked this action, but, from what I gather, some of the more obnoxious members of the furry community found their way here and the board is collectively lashing out to show they aren't welcome here.

As is often used as an example here, most don't want a repeat of what happened to CoC or Libre Cities. These new rules will likely be forgotten once everyone calms down and only ever brought up when someone who clearly has never been on the board before tries to shill their furry cuck game, like CoC2 or something.

>>336063 (cont.)

For clarity's sake, if I were to try my hand at making a furry game and make a thread about it here in a couple weeks, I doubt I'd have to deal with anything more than the usual offenders that shit up every thread when first made.

That is, of course, as long as I uphold the necessary standard of quality and am not an obnoxious twat about it.

>>336028

>Never played it, but it was already discussed and Kobold Adventures was in the clear, so you're always welcome to come back, dude.

if you're going to pick and choose how to apply the rules to that degree you may as well not have the rule at all. this kind selective enforcement implies that there is some other unwritten rule or that you need to be in the good graces of the authorities for the privilege of breaking them.

it sounds more like the moderation team is unsure of what the rule is supposed to accomplish and what it's supposed to communicate to the user base. it doesn't help that BO didn't explain his reasoning or intentions as far as I can find.

>>335958

>rules are common sense

>the same rules we were discussing for the last few hundreds posts

>are common sense

If they're causing so much drama and discussion for so long, then they obviously aren't common sense.

>>336009

>Except that it's been plainly stated that existing generals won't be banned, you colossal faggot.

Can I make a new Flexible Survival thread then, when the old one will die?

If not, then you're a fucking moron for making this invalid argument.

>>336028

>Kobold Adventures was in the clear

It's as furry as it gets. There's transformation, rape, turning into a breeding slave with drugs, characters that have snouts and fur on their whole body etc. Your new "rules" are shit.

Is it wrong that i don't hate furry game threads, so long as they're not /htg/-tier threads?

Hentai games are going into a drought, Patreon-shit games are on the rise and /hgg/ has decided to fight amongst itself to determine which game belongs up here.

That, and text-based furry games are leagues better than furry games with pictures.

How do i put this? I can play a text based furry game due to having the ability to ignore words i dislike. However a picture is a picture and U can't tune that out.

Also 3D furry games are amongst the worst, they should be banned without a second thought except for skyrim

>>336103

Fuck off, Todd.

>>336031

Not sure what sort of newfag you are, but /pol/ has been a significant presence on this board since basically forever and isn't the cause of the problems. If anything /pol/'s presence is a great way to spot outsiders because newfags of all stripes whine about them, from cuckchanners to fagzoners to redditors. The only group that's legitimately managed to kill a project here was /leftypol/.

Anyway, just chiming in to throw my support of BO in trying to clean up the worst of the cuckshit and furfags. More moderation is bad, but for them I'll make an exception.

Why are furry games being banned? I thought the thing that differentiated infinitychan /hgg/ from cuckchan generals was that each game/topic having it's own topic automatically segregates it and creates containment?

I hope the 'general' thread on this board picks up steam though because the fluid discussion of h-games from one to the next is what I really like about the two generals on cuckchan.

>>336118

>Why are furry games being banned?

Because BO and mods threw a hissy fit when they saw this thread: >>>328342 . It doesn't break any rules whatsoever, but apparently BO decided that only games with content that he likes are allowed; since he dislikes furries and cuckolding, they've decided to start banning those.

> I thought the thing that differentiated infinitychan /hgg/ from cuckchan generals was that each game/topic having it's own topic automatically segregates it and creates containment?

Unfortunately BO doesn't think so: he probably think that hiding threads is for pussies or something. And since it's his board, he can do whatever he wants to do with it.

>>336121

>Because faggotry leaks.

Shouldn't it be left to each threads own culture as to what constitutes faggotry?

>Containment doesn't work when the faggots of furry threads start leaking to other threads and you end up with furries winning when it comes to including his content in games like CoC.

This is strange. As I take it CoC is essentially a game where anybody can add content as they like, right? And if the person in charge of updates likes it, they include it in the next modded release? The thread culture over there seems to decide what they want to do with their game.

>>336123

>t. Furry

>>336120

If you don't like me being butthurt, then you can fuck off as well.

>>336147

>As for CoC, it was really against furries until recently becausebecause furries grew in majority so drama ensued.

What are you talking about? It's the same as ever, there was no drama, and there's no open furfaggotry.

>>336149

He has no idea while attempting to be divisive and get furry game threads kicked off the board. Surprised such faggotry is tolerated to be honest, but I guess that's maybe the culture of /hgg/?

>>336151

Yeah, but if you could figure out your spacing, I'd look a lot less stupid standing next to you.

As you can see, he only makes low quality shitposts in an effort to merely create pointless argument rather than anything constructive.

I wonder how many threads he does this in..

>>336121

>>336147

>>336157

>>336158

>As for CoC, it was really against furries until recently becausebecause furries grew in majority so drama ensued.

The last actual drama was when cucks tried to get their written content in, which was close to a year ago and every single instance of cuck shit has been removed from the game. The only thing your posts say is that you hate CoC and are trying to stir shit up here by spouting the most inane things you can think of.

Here's a little reminder for you: the CoC thread and mod are anti-cuck and anti-furry shit. Not a single contributor from the past year has written or tried to get either of those into the game, and everyone that regulars the thread actively shits on both those kinds of people if they do crop up. Not even to talk about the fact that it has a NoFur toggle that changes every single furry character in the game to be monster-girls or just girls with animal ears and tails.

CoC may have originally been a furry game, but it certainly no longer is here with the mod. It's even funnier when you complain that furry faggotry leaks from the CoC thread to others when it doesn't even exist there in the first place.

What a world we live in that the furries are keeping to themselves and the faggot drama queens are on the other side.

>>336967

I forgot the part where that's happening here at all. All I see is kobold dev keeping to himself in his threads and the autism inquisition (ie, you) screaming that the furries are taking over.

Of course nobody actually does that so to even make an argument they have to say there's a secret conspiracy from whatever "fag95" is to convert us into furries.

>>337023

there's already like 50 threads with NTR games in them, that argument is bad.

>>335771

Sometime you should check out the stats of mass shootings, using the proper legal definition, globally. NatSoc guys are wildly, flagrantly statistically under-represented.

Of course, you wouldn't know that because you aren't actually paying any attention.

>>335764

The consensus on /pol/ last I checked was that mass shootings were a horrible idea because they wouldn't have the desired effect and the backlash would be catastrophic. That would also be why anyone advocating "direct action" tends to be told "fbi plz go".

Maybe you also need to be paying more attention.

Then again, I haven't been on /pol/ in a long while. Maybe things have changed.

>>337023

I do not give a fuck because it does not affect me. What does affect me is autists shitting up my board and trying to drive away games like kobold dev because they'd rather argue against shit even they admit they barely have a problem with because "give em an inch and they'll take a mile"

>>337093

>I do not give a fuck because it does not affect me

The peak of conformism. Kill yourself.

>>337098

No, that is literallythe opposite of conformism.

what is this dev null shit?

CONDUCTOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM

>>337477

>>337505

Working on deleting it. It's a tor node and the delete functions aren't working properly so it's taking time.

>>337527

BO has tweaked the filter, >/dev/null was the initial pass.

good job on deleting every single tor post on the board.

especially when a vol deleted every single tor post while another was already removing only the spam ones like it should've been done.

how do you fuck up this badly?

>>337956

Jim answering DMCA's tier work anon.

>Meta Thread 5: The League of Vols

I'm going to need an official rundown on which vol is which superhero/villain.

>>338805

we're all both

>>338805

that negan guy deletes alot of low quality threads and killed off another 3 threads earlier

he would probably be thanos because he snaps all the faggots from the board

also who is this rickles guy in the board log i havent seen him before

>>338999 (checked)

>also who is this rickles guy in the board log i havent seen him before

He was brought on as a direct result of >>333438.

>>339186

nice vol tag you fucking loser

>>339188

>>339186

Whoops

>>339186

>>339188

dUrPS, heh.

>>342160

You deserve every insult you get for playing fem protag trash.

>>342172

>My sneaking suspicion is that he's one of them.

Mine is that nobody bothered to even report that seething faggot.

What's bizarre to me is that cuck-tan is still at it despite the overwhelming hate he gets in literally every single thread he posts in. In his mind surely that means this place is a degenerate den of cucks, doesn't it?

If the entire community is already cucks, it makes more sense to make a new non-cuck community than to waste all your time fighting for an impossible task.

>>342242

Thing is though, cuck-tan is really obvious. He has a certain style to the way he writes that makes him easy to spot among the faceless, and he always spouts the same rhetoric with the exact same wording wherever he goes.

Couple this with him previously admitting that he is on what he sees as a one man crusade throughout the board, and it becomes fairly easy to see why it is totally believable that it might just be him every time.

Then there is his messed up definition of cuck. The dude legitimately thinks that if you are in a threesome and the two woman so much as look at each other, that is cucking you. Personally, I agree with the idea that he is a false-flagging cuck. Would make a lot more sense, especially with how many actual cucks still have grudges against this board in particular.

>>342278

It still isn't completely wrong.

Cuck-tan was doing his deranged moralfag crusade for almost year now.

>>342284

The problem isn't shitting on NTR, this board almost universally agrees with that. Look at any time NTR is posted in any capacity on this board and you'll have your proof that this isn't a place that welcomes it.

With cuck-tan though, he's on a crusade because he feels that the normal definition of cuckoldry isn't expansive enough.

This is the problem with criticizing him. Idiots like you see us making fun of a baboon pretending to be a human and think "W-wait a minute, that baboon dislikes cuckoldry, how dare they defend cuckshit!!!" because you are seemingly incapable of reading the posts and understanding that it's cuck-tan behaving like a turbonigger that we find objectionable, not his dislike of NTR.

>>342308

> From what I've read, gangbangs and even female protagonists falls under what he considers NTR, and even though that's more along the lines of cuckolding

And cuckchan spotted, go back to your shithole

>>>/htg/

Oh wait, not even /htg/ wants you anymore since the word cuck is now filtered to cluck, you fucking faggot.

>>342308

You just proved that the guy accusing you of being unable to read is right. I gave an example of one of the more outrageous things cucktan has actually labeled as cuckshit.

It wasn't a joke. The guy actually said that MFF threesomes, where you are the guy fucking two women, is cuckshit. His deranged reasoning for this is that if the women even acknowledge the other's existence, you are being cucked because their full attention is not on you.

He also thinks a game is cuckoldry if it has any form of story, because, by his own logic, any game that isn't a pure sandbox is cuckshit because you can't perfectly self-insert into a character that makes any decisions whatsoever.

The whole "well anyone could be cucktan" argument doesn't work, because he has been consistent in his rhetoric. We have a clear idea of who cucktan is by what he has constantly repeated across the board.

>>342324

>We have a clear idea of who cucktan is by what he has constantly repeated across the board

Hardly, I've seen faggots accusing each other of being cucktan, so there's clearly not an exact idea of who he is. Also, stop advocating for others, faggot, as I see it, you're the only one pushing the "cuck-tan" meme.

>>342337

Nah, Viper was a faggot who never gave a logical reason to dislike shota other than "I don't like it".

>She can watch though, as long as her eyes are on me

Cuckqueaning is a nice fetish.

>>342387

If someone goes out of their way to shit up multiple threads, all while spouting the exact same rhetoric, and going so far as to admit to shitting up multiple threads in each of those threads, it would have to take someone incredibly retarded to think, "Nah, it couldn't be the same person. You guys are just labeling people for the shits and giggles."

>>342308

You've been replying to several different people, anon. You seem to use the "every post which agrees with X stance is a different person" when it suits your interest, but then immediately assume that everyone you reply to is always the same person.

>>342394

> What is learning?

< Keeps ignoring the admits to shitting up multiple threads in each thread part.

Something beyond you, apparently.

>>342394

So, the guy outright saying, on multiple occasions, that he is intentionally shitting up multiple threads, isn't enough for you to believe that there is a guy that would constantly shit up multiple threads?

There is being a skeptic, then there is straight retardation. You have reached the later. A guy could approach you wearing a mask, with a knife, covered in blood, holding a sign saying he is a murderer here for (insert your name here), all while charging directly at you, and you still wouldn't believe he has any ill intention.

>>342457

>Only the handful of faggots shitting up the board belong here!

Why do you think people agree with your tiny minority? Do you know how to count?

>>342461

Nigger, I haven't posted in this thread at all today. You keep assuming that there's only 1-2 people who don't like you shitting up the board, for some bizarre reason. It's transparently pathetic. I don't like cucks because they force their absolute garbage fetish where it doesn't belong, but guess what, you retards force your garbage posts into every thread, ten times as much.

I haven't been here in some months and I come back to find cuck and furry shit banned. Cuck ban is obvious, but did the furries do something extra autistic or something? I don't recall furry sperging being as much of a problem as cuck derails.

>>342468

Yeah, I read the previous meta threads, and he is allowing Lilith's Thrones and Coc to stay as well, mentioning "precedents" or some shit. Makes me wonder why he bothered including furries at all, I assumed the furfags did something particularly heinous to piss everyone off.

>>342457

Read >>342451

>>342457

Really, anon? Define cuckoldry right now. Give your own personal definition, don't be shy. Cuck-tan has a very specific definition of cuckoldry, that's one of the most identifying characteristics of him. Even when idiots like you misunderstand what his argument is and mistakenly defend him, you don't adopt his retarded belief because you haven't read any of his posts.

>>342466

>did the furries do something extra autistic or something?

Just few standard 0.03 alpha "games" in usual money laundering scheme called patreon.

Ah, so cuckanon is a mod:

>quill hidden 3 hours /hgg/ Created a new 1-day ban on /hgg/ (#151719) with reason: cuckshit

>quill hidden3 hours /hgg/ Deleted post #342402

Figures

>>342517

Nvm, one of those posts was actual cuckshit

Still, I'm pretty sure it was a false flag, maybe by cuck-tan himself, for example:

"people are actually catching on to me, better post something from my prepped bull folder and post an anti-cuck-tan message", or something like that.

Its just I can't understand why someone would post actual cuckshit on a board that hates it to the core, in response to someone who thinks everything that isn't his personal taste is cuckshit.

>>342510

>>342517

>actual cuck porn gets posted

>vol cleans it up

>cucks come rushing to its defense

What happened to "we're anti-cuck too!" ?

>>342526

see >>342524

you mong

>post bannable content with anti-cuck-tan message

>get post removed by mods

>Ignore ban and post about the horrors of anti-cuck-tan messages getting deleted

>wait for someone to respond without checking the actual post itself which had been deleted at the time

>"see guys, theres plenty of actual cucks here who disagree with me"

You are a transparent degenerate, neck yourself

>>342530

>We're totally not cucks, it's just a conspiracy to make us look bad!

>>342457

The admins have literally on more than one occasion corroborated the existence of cuck-tan.

Admins: There is a small dedicated group of shitposters (in many cases, only one shitposter) who stir the pot and shit up threads over fetishes they don't like. On a porn board.

What are you going to do about it?

>>342537

>Where’s your proof?

Idk, try looking in the archives you braindead fuck. Specifically the old pregmod thread, the female protag thread, and the actual cuckshit thread where he decided to post guro. Although considering your reddit spacing you might be too retarded to do that.

>>342540

Wrong, you fucking idiot. The fact that people unironically believe this makes me weep for the education system of wherever you’re from. Words have meanings, go look up the definition of cuckolding.

>>342534

The fact that it was always in the middle of cucktan's rants. It was never a separate thing, and at least one anon would have spoken up about someone randomly appearing in the middle of an argument pretending to be them for the sake of discrediting them, yet no one ever did.

This is one of the reasons some are starting to think cucktan himself is a false flagging cuck. Probably one of the many who still hold a grudge against this board going out of his way to make people think 'anti cucks' are just as annoying as cucks are.

Considering how often it happens, and not just by cucktan either, why the hell would anyone have a hard time believing that one guy is going out of his way to shit up multiple threads? It isn't like it would be hard to do, nor is cucktan the first one to do it. Did you newfags not see the cunts that made bots to spam every single thread at the same time demanding an apology for the way we treated them? It happens. There are people who think way too highly of themselves and get absurdly angry when not everyone immediately agrees with them. These people hold grudges for a really long time and will go to ridiculous lengths for what most people would see as petty goals.

>>342617

>Whatever you say, cuck-tan

Kys faggot. I’m not here to spoonfeed retarded kids. If you’re too new to have been there when it happened, don’t be a subhuman and refuse look it up.

>Cuckold have changed meanings since it was coined as a term blah blah blah

None of that makes the idea of labeling 95% of all porn as cuckshit any less fetarded.

>>342624

>The irony.

I don't think you know what that word means.

>Didn't know this board had IDs now.

You really are new. If you had spent any amount of time here, you've have figured out how to follow an argument by now. It is usually pretty easy to follow when two anons are having a spat.

God you are stupid. Hows this newfag, admins, as in the people who can very much so see who is who and knows if you've posted in multiple threads, have confirmed that it is one guy on multiple occasions. You would know this if you weren't a newfag.

>>342623

>I support whoever claims to be cuck-tan.

It’s great that you’re so proud of your mental deficiency. But you’re still a worthless human being, and I’m going to have great fun telling you that fact over and over again.

>It does, because it falls under the definition.

I know you hate looking things up because words hurt your brain, but at least open a dictionary.

>How's you call someone that masturbates to someone he likes fucking someone else?

I know you might be desperate enough to fall in love with any slut that walks your way and seethe every day that women sleep with people other than you, but not everyone is as heartbreakingly pathetic as you.

>>342626

>I don't think you know what that word means.

And yet here you are being angry because you lack any proof of me not being cucktan. I'm cucktan. What are you gonna do about it, faggot?

>have confirmed that it is one guy on multiple occasions

Not quite. They said cuck-tan is real. They didn't said it was one person. Hell, they can come up and point if this whole time you've been talking with a single person or not.

>>342628

< Explaining common occurrences is now a ridiculous length for a petty goal.

Your lack of reading comprehension is a pretty convincing argument for you actually being cucktan.

>>342630

< Sluts existing = cuckholding

< Falls in love with any woman he sees

You know, but your own logic, that makes all porn cuckholding. No matter how much you'd like to think otherwise, it isn't your dick getting wet. Even the "self insert" stuff has you watching a dude on the screen fucking all the women you love, all the while you jack off and pathetically wish you were like him.

>>342632

< "Everyone you don't like is cucktan"

> "Everyone I don't like is the same guy"

Irony.

>>342633

>Your lack of reading comprehension is a pretty convincing argument for you actually being cucktan.

Well, there you have it, I'm cucktan. Are you happy now? What are you gonna do now? If everyone is cucktan, nobody is.

>>342636

Fuck off cuck! There can only be one.

>>342637

>Which is me.

Yet you're still a virgin, fancy that. It is almost like you are just watching a boring twat fuck women while you wish it was you, but it still isn't you cuck.

>>342650

>contexture

What is it?

>>342650

Cause it still isn't your dick in her pussy, and the range of games where you have total control is incredibly limited. Any game with any semblance of a decent story to it, like the entire RPG genre, if going to have the character make decisions on their own.

Even with total control, you still aren't getting any, cuck.

>>342666

You don't need total control to self-insert, cucktan.

I almost forgot how useless meta threads are.

Thanks for reminder, fags.

>>342838

>aesthetic

>little boy

You gay.

It's hilarious to me that both sides right now are repeatedly screaming that everyone on the board agrees with their opinion and that the other side is just one person, despite obvious evidence to the contrary.

Maybe, just maybe, multiple people have dissenting opinion. I know, it's baffling to imagine more than two people using an imageboard, but it's the model I'm working with and it seems pretty accurate so far.

>>343061

It still doesn't make this shit any less retarded though.

>>343061

I have no idea why I even posted this. Please disregard.

>>342962

>implying I watch porn

>implying i dont have a wholesome relationship with my wife

>implying the only reason i come to /hgg/ isn't to shitpost in the meta thread

you're making a lot of assumptions cuck-tan

>>343207

yeh rite

Reminder that the jew plays both sides, both to discredit and to push his agenda.

Whoever has forged himself the identity of cuck-tan is also the one posting actual threads about NTR games, while shitting on them, to shit up the board, create drama and kill threads.

It's no longer in doubt, it's a concerted effort into lowering the quality of the board to subhuman standards.

If you can't see it, you're wearing a blindfold willingly.

Now the real question is where he came from. I'm placing bets on either hongfire or fag95.

>Bunch of new vols

>They're all shit and do nothing about the rampant pro-vs-anti-NTR shitposters making /hgg/ terminal

Too many cucks spoils the broth I guess

>>344157

>Too many retards spoils the broth I guess

FTFY

>>344331

They are more like moral crusaders than proper retards.

until BO instructs me otherwise, I am treating shitposting the same thing across multiple threads for days on end as spam.

this is not a fucking blog site.

>>344399

>Vol is a cuck

Imagine.

>>344395

While all moralfag crusaders are retards, not all retards are moralfag crusaders.

All of them can fuck off forever.

>>344399

Hey there veil. Patreon thread shitposter here. I had a great time at the festivities yesterday. Just wanted to pop in to say how astonished I am that you went through the entire fiesta yesterday and individually removed posts while keeping up others. I don't know whether to be impressed or laugh. At least you're dedicated to your job, so keep up the good work I guess.

That's all, you can hammer this IP for ban evasion now. I'm sure one of the 7 bans are mine.

>>344428

Woops turns out it was kickstarter. Whatever.

Kobold Adventure threads were not flooded with constant shitposting until the mods ruled it a specific exception to the rule.

There is a clear concerted effort by the autism brigade to drown out things they don't like PLEASE bo increase moderation.

>>344157

>pro-vs-anti-NTR shitposters

You mean cuck-tan and everyone he baits?

>>346481

>thedonald tourist trying to blend in

fucking yikes

>>346481

>Spend literally months shitting all over /hgg/ and crying rivers over any content in any thread that even vaguely resembles furfaggotry or NTR

>Get surprised when board activity slows to a crawl and that the new vols are as autistic and volatile as the anons who helped make /hgg/ empty in the first place

Life comes at you fast, anon.

>>346481

Basically >>346497. Cucktan and his ilk have a very specific idea of what was considered acceptable hentai. If it wasn’t a game where a male self-insert MC is the only male character in the game to have sex, and all women only had sex with him, then to him it was unacceptableand “cuckshit.” Unfortunately that includes about 90% of all games on this board. So he shit up a bunch of threads because the games contained “cuckshit”

The vols woke up around the time that kickstarter thread fiasco happened and started banning most of cucktan’s spam. The damage is already done though.

>>346519

Possibly? Cucktan IP hops, and IP hoppers need multiple bans. I got two of my IPs banned a while back for something or other.

Aside from that, there’s also the fact that at some point, cucktan got tired of getting shit on all the time so he called backup from reddit. This would explain why there were suddenly 4 or 5 reddit-spacing fags helping him shit up threads.

On that topic: fix your spacing.

>>346514

Normally yes, but that ignores squatting outsiders, bored anons and terminal shitposters.

>>346514

Well then, what are you asking, exactly?

Less cucktan shitposting is basically a 100% quality improvement. I'm not shedding any tears for obnoxious shitposters if they just so happened to start shitposting recently in an ongoing, multi month tidal wave of shitposting. Good riddance.

>>346527

fuck now even I'm using r*ddit spacing

>>346527

Agree to disagree on that one. Stamping on cucktan whenever she showed her face was some of the best entertainment I’ve gotten from this board. That kickstarter thread was almost as fun as gassing a furry convention. It’s a shame the vols began actually doing their job, but I can’t blame them.

>>346518

Don't forget he also shat up freecities threads with "bestaility is furry because furry means two different species having sex"

>>346529

Sure, but if you want to shitpost, take it to /b/ or something, not muh porn board, please.

>>346530

Was that what she was doing there? I didn’t participate in that particular beating. I walked in, saw about 8 other anons dogpiling her, and decided to sit that one out.

I would’ve guessed that cucksgan was throwing a bitch-fit about how you can whore your slaves to other men, thereby “cucking” yourself.

>>346531

Eh. Fair point.

>>346534

Those bans are long overdue and the BO has said before he's caught cucktan IP hopping previously. I could give a fuck if someone got caught in the crossfire so long as it stops this incessant fucking shitposting.

24 sounds about right given our little mascot's notorious dedication to her craft.

>>346534

>Also, how do you know cucktan called backup from reddit?

I don’t know, I’m making a guess based on circumstances. Cucktan was alone for the first few months or so of her shitposting, and regularly got chased out of threads by anons. Then all of a sudden 4 or 5 people who agreed with her magically showed up agreeing with her incredibly broad definition of cucking. 4 or 5 people who regularly lapsed into reddit spacing and repeating each others’ arguemets like a retarded hive mind. What would you think in that situation?

>>346521

>Aside from that, there’s also the fact that at some point, cucktan got tired of getting shit on all the time so he called backup from reddit

Claiming this without evidence is as childish as his claims that cucks from all corners of the web are flocking to this place because of his amazing crusade against NTR. That said, recent posts like >>346481 reek of post-2016 moralfaggotry by maladjusted pseudonormies who think that fapping to hentai games is completely normal and morally unquestionable whereas NTR and furfags are some unique breed of cancer that needs to be larp-crusaded against

Wow, if bans cause cucktan to act this civilized they should happen more often

>>346544

>It's not?

Jacking it to a woman being raped and impregnated by a group of mutant dogs/minotaurs/mutant freaks is not normal or morally unquestionable.

>>346542

Still worth it.

>>346544

>both are trash

Fair enough.

>are against the rules

Only because there was enough of autistic seething to actually force BOs to ban that shit.

Hopefully, it won't lead to slippery slope by giving moralfags ammo to ban whatever they dislike.

>>346549

No. They aren't real anon. None of this is fucking real.

>>346555

>They aren't real anon. None of this is fucking real.

I’m aware. That doesn’t make it any more normal.

>>346556

>You talking about the helia content?

I don’t even remember if helia had mintsur gangbang content. It’s been years since I’ve played CoC. But helia isn’t the only minodick recipient in that game, and CoC is not the only game to have minotaurs fucking and impregnating women.

>>346556

>Why don't you ask CoC what they think about that after I ran the original writer of that NTR scene off the site and shitposted incessantly until the thread OP had to promise he wouldn't include any more NTR?

cmon lad, don't have the nerve to kill the board over several months and fill it with poleddit shitposters and then claim it's been board culture all along

this shit is still going on? has the BO not made his intentions clear to any of the vols yet?

I mean from what I can see BO made a new rule, but in private made enough exceptions that the board wasn't supposed to change significantly and confused everybody.

as well as never stating what the spirit of the new rules were so nobody can tell if they're working. and allegedly some are taking it as proof that ruining threads with bitching and moaning are effective ways to get the changes they want.

>>346563

The rules are clear to me, anon. The only person taling issue is cucktan et al.

>>346566

One shits up the board at a time

The other is your personal strawman, cucktan.

>>346563

>and allegedly some are taking it as proof that ruining threads with bitching and moaning are effective ways to get the changes they want

I mean, it is, the BO made that quite clear when he banned furry and cuckshit in response to their bitching. The new insane vol who actively encouraged anons to spam threads they don't like is just the cherry on the cake. I personally believe it's incompetence on the part of the BO instead of actual malice, but the damage is pretty much the same.

He should have taken a leaf from the Corruption of Champions threads. The shitposting started there after someone wrote an NTR route for one of the characters, so after about a week straight of not being able to have a conversation the thread owner banned any more cuck content from the game. Surprise surprise, the shitposting didn't stop one bit and they just moved on to other aspects of the game that they considered cucky like polyamory or threesomes and started asking for toggles to be implemented on them as well. It did absolutely nothing as fanatics will never be satisfied.

>>346559

>So you, uh, like to watch women take mino dick, huh?

When it’s a female character I give a shit about then I want for comfy vanilla sex with a self-insert, but that requires her to be a well-written character, which is about as easy to find in hentai as a virgin in a whorehouse.

When it’s a female character who’s sole purpose is to take dick, I like getting her to take a variety of dick in a variety of ways. That way at least the sheer novelty can keep me interested.

Also, why am I explaining my fetishes to a random anon.

>>346570

>Also, why am I explaining my fetishes to a random anon

Because you're either retarded or a false-flagger

Your post will now be screenshotted and shared to a group of about 5 other people who will snicker and hoot over their BASED DEUS VULT BRIGADE's latest wrung confession of cuckoldry from a random anon who was pretending to be impartial