>>327614
"If Trump Wins", I can see this happening. A lot of people have nothing to lose (people who have been corrupt have a chance of getting caught, and SJW think they'll be rounded up) so they are ripe for exploitation to set the pieces for civil war.
Any website not SJW will get shut down, forced to rebrand, DDOS'd or owners will mysteriously "vanish".
Even if they fail, it makes Trump's presidency look bad (he was in charge when chaos happened, ergo it's his fault).
However, if they were going to play their hand big, I'd see it being done to get Shillary in. Either election fraud (which could spark civil war as everyone calls bullshit) or even a false-flag attack during the election. Don't dress it up as people attacking Trump voters, just make it look like an Alt.Right terrorist or ISIS-but-somehow-not-Muslim terrorist.
While everyone focuses on that, the extra security forces have agents slipped in who fuck with the election ballots or machines. Or maybe they even go as far as to stop-and-search people in the queue- those who are likely to be Trump supporters or even an actor who freaks out so he can be publicly beaten- to discourage others from voting.
If what OP says is true, then that method is too clumsy to be an anti-Trump tactic before the election- as the fallout would be epic. The "alt-right" (everyone who isn't SJW) would galvanize under "fuck those guys" and would get organized fast in small sects.
I could see this more as a post-Clinton win tactic. They nearly lost it all once, so now they double down and make the internet a "safe space". It also ties into what Obama is trying to do with ICANN (selling off the domain name control to the UN or foreign nations, so websites are no longer protected under Freedom of Speech).
It ties into other "online doomsday" theories I've read (pic related), but I'm not ready to listen and believe.
I've read about terrorist attack that'd justify emergency powers into a totalitarian state nearly every year since Obama took office. Maybe it's bullshit. Maybe every year that fact slipping out to a message board was enough to shut it down.
We just don't know.
We need evidence on OP's claim. But it does raise other issues.
- We need ways to keep in contact if the net becomes heavily regulated.
- We need to nurture a truly free social media platform to protect free speech.
- We need to protect the internet, and keep free speech laws.