I gave a speech in high school (during the cold war) about the benefits of living in the Soviet Union. No I am not a Communist, it was to demonstrate the use of propaganda and during the whole speech, I never lied. I just used propaganda techniques. These include half-truths, bandwagon, glittering generalities, etc. Take a half-truth like: You can say anything you like in Moscow, even if it is critical of the government. The fact is you can, you just might end up in a gulag for it, but you CAN say it. Bandwagon techniques are like commercials, that show people drinking a particular beer and showing people having a great time, beautiful women all around them, with the mental impression that if you drink this beer, you can have fun like this, you know.. Everyone is doing it. Glittering generalities are used in politics and the legal profession all the time, saying something like to reduce crime you need to ban guns and citing a study that shows a city that increased restrictions on the number of gun stores and a lower crime rate. They didn’t ban guns, they made more restrictions, but they want to “prove” the position by using data from a study that shows results they can make you think applies to the narrative that works for them. Of course if you see a trend in lower crime, you could quickly pass a law to try to reinforce your narrative, in other words you use the event as a way of validating your narrative.
If COVID-19 is a novel virus, then how can we infer that it will act the same as other viruses? It is in the coronavirus family, but it still is unique, right? How can we make models that are first reliant on data from China when we know the totalitarian government there had the first person to raise the alarm to the world arrested? They claim that they keep changing the model based on data, that is good, but when the data may be completely skewed to begin with, the predictions you make with the model are skewed as well. What does all this mean? Ok, hypothetically let us pretend that the lethality of the virus is greater depending on the amount of a certain protein that is produced in the lungs, and Asians produce a greater amount of this protein than other races. The death rate would be higher in China, right? So a model produced on the assumption that the death rate is constant regardless of the race of the person infected would be hugely inaccurate. But, what could happen? The media could pick up the story and broadcast it 24/7 and cause mass hysteria based on this assumption. Matter of fact, they could hide the fact that in certain other countries the regions the outbreak occurred had higher proportions of Chinese immigrants too, right? Did this happen? I don’t know, but the whole point of this is to show you that no one knows. So anyone claiming to know what is going on and have it figured out is lying or trying to convince you of something that may not be true.
Look at what President Trump is saying, he tells us that we don’t know things, that this drug seems to be helpful, but we do not know for sure. He is telling you truth. Not HIS truth, but THE truth. (what the hell does that even mean, if YOUR truth isn’t THE truth, you are delusional) He states that he “hopes” this and that, not trying to persuade us of something that he is unsure of. The best thing we can do is stay inside as much as we can, wash our hands before touching our face or eating, or even anytime we touch a surface that is touched by others, think doorknobs, light switches, cell phones, remote controls, toilet handles, keyboards, etc. The president is not using propaganda, in my humble opinion, (so there it is at last) because he isn’t telling us something that cannot be proven. He isn’t blurring the line between fact and opinion and he certainly is not pushing/promoting/praying that we are in an apocalypse. The media is doing all that and more.
Think for yourself, do not let others think for you, or you will forever be controlled by them.
WWG1WGA