/cuteboys/ - Boypussy

>>412981

If anything it makes the boys / men look utterly pathetic. If your whole self professed sexuality is sourced from the fact that a girl said no to you in your teens then you really are a cucked-out joke of a person

>>413011

Not really. If things won't work the way i want them to, why keep playing the game? It is always better to move away from it and play another game. One where i can get things to work properly, given the circumstances.

Nobody likes rejection.

Nobody likes difficulty either.

Life is meant to be easy and joyful. Not hard and painful.

>>413010

Pathetic, should be spread further.

>>412715

>women are so fucking boring now jesus christ lay on their back like a dead fish. I want to have sex, not pump and dump and go back in the woodshop what the fuck is wrong with straight people?

>I want movement I want passion, excitement, exhibitionism, you get nothing with women, they expect you to dole it out to them 100% of the time.

This so much of this. even as a top/switch kinda man myself. I find women boring.

I've had sex with prostitutes, I have asked them to stop the fake moaning, one of then was like hey anon are you ok if I check my phone while you pump it? I was like sure I don't care. she was typing and reading her whats app the whole time.

When I'm with another man. even in glory holes or a grindr hook up, that I know that I'm never going to see again the sex is so much more passionate.

Seeing the bottom get hard and dripping precum turns me on like crazy and if I'm feeling really gay at the moment. I even switch sides and let them pump my ass.

>>412777

>Women are tedious to deal with.

They are so dumb that they can't handle a real conversation about anything interesting or engaging. You can't talk about technological advances with women. You can't talk politics and it's repercussions in society with women. You can't even talk about truly funny activities (such as playing video games or any other hobbies) with women. Even talking about health and fitness with women falls off, as they only care about the subject when it enables them to show off to other women.

>Every conversation with women boils down to either gossip about themselves, gossip about irrelevant people (celebrities and such), or showing off to each other, trying to compare friends, boyfriends, resources and so on.

>And then, like you said,m they are like dead fish during sex. No action. No creativity. No reaction. Nothing at all.

>Women became a waste of time and money.

I couldn't agree more with what you wrote.

I've had only one girlfriend and one boyfriend in all of my life, because I'm a psychotic failure.

I had so much fun with my boyfriend, even tho he was extremely effeminate. we could talk for hours non stop about any topic. play, be really gay, cuddle and everything.

My girlfriend was really cute, I even fell in love with her. but she was always gossiping about her sister, cousins and friends. spending time with her sometimes was fun and all of that. but when she began gossiping I felt a sleep and we even had problems with her, because I told her that I hated gossip and pity talk. then we had a scare pregnancy and I ghosted her.

>>413027

1/2

> I even switch sides and let them pump my ass.

I know that feeling. When the other guy is manly, i often switch sides. Even with the more effeminate ones i switch sides, depending on how exciting their behavior is.

I found out that switching to passive towards a cuteboys that were passive in the beginning boosts their self esteem a lot, and they become even more passionate after a while. It made me switch roles more frequently after i noticed that. The more shy ones really feel great when i suddenly stop pumping their asses and start to letting them pump my ass. Their excitement goes through the roof.

>I've had only one girlfriend and one boyfriend in all of my life

I only had one single girlfriend in all of my life. Not even boyfriends. I just moved on from occasional non-compromised short affairs with both men and women. But regarding a relationship, i only had one girlfriend.

>I'm a psychotic failure

You aren't a failure, anon. Women are failures. They expect everything without delivering anything. They are the ones that need men, but men can live pretty well (and mostly, better) without women. And they hate that fact.

Don't ever put yourself down like this. You are fine. They are the problem.

You had passionate sex with complete stranger men, and it was great for both of you. That is proof that you can be passionate and lively. Therefore, you are not a failure. The women are the ones who are dead inside. They are the ones that fail at everything, even at noticing their own failures.

All the girls that i had contact with in my life were always playing the "chase game", where if i showed interest in them, they would move away, but as soon as i ignored them, they started coming to me. They would keep repeating this cycle until for some arbitrary reason they either accepted a date or moved away completely. Both outcomes are so boring and tiring. For those who started a date with me after this whole chase game bullshit, the time and effort that i put into playing that game just made me feel tired of them. By the time when i started dating with one of them, i was already fed up and just wanted to leave them behind. The fact that they always revealed themselves to be tedious and boring empty shells of a person only contributed to my disgust. I end up just ignoring them altogether, even when they tried to advance upon me. It was never worth before, and i doubt that it will ever be worth it.

The only girlfriend that i had was the insecure, paranoid type. Because of my former affairs, she always feared that i would leave her. And that constant fear made her take decisions that contributed to me stopping caring about her later. She was always complaining and crying for anything that triggered her fear of abandonment, to the point that she became unbearable. And, of course, she was tedious and boring as all other women. always gossiping about her female friends, or gossiping about her former boyfriends. Tiring and boring to the end. Add to that the fact that sex with her was the dead fish kind, and i simply moved away from her, ending the relationship without ever addressing the fact that i was ending it. I simply cut ties with her a left her. Through her friends, i learned that she hates me for that to this day. Completely oblivious to how boring as hell she is as a person. Always blaming others for her mistakes.

>even tho he was extremely effeminate. we could talk for hours non stop about any topic. play, be really gay, cuddle and everything.

That is always nice. Being able to talk, to play, to be really gay from time to time, without any complaints or demands from the partner about it makes the relationship even more enjoyable.

>>413027

>>413047

2/2

>spending time with her sometimes was fun and all of that. but when she began gossiping I felt a sleep and we even had problems with her

That problem happens with all women. They just carve attention, status and money (for materialistic purposes, not necessities). Women don't really care about the men they are having a relationship with. They only care about being envied by other women for being with that man. They only interest is in how people will view her and talk about her for being with a particular man.That makes living with them borefest, since they only talk about other women (they all compare each other's lives, even when talking to men) or about other people in a way to compare their lives with them and trying to feel better about their own lives. Almost all the time, this culminates in talking about the misfortunes of others, to the point where the gossip turns into a constant remark about every single problem that other people are having in their lives, so the woman gossiping can feel a little better about their own. They are that empty.

Their only excitement comes from being abused. That makes the whole relationship a tiresome endeavor. When they are not constantly being abused, they will do anything to provoke an abusive and angry reaction from the man. That reaction is what turns them on, and it is pure tedium to live by having to constantly act and react in that manner to please them. All of that, to "earn" sex with a dead meat, because their brains "work" in a way that they think that they pleased us, men, when they teased or provoked us. They think that doing that is enough. Job well done. Now they don't need to do anything. Let the man do everything during sex. It is tiresome, tedious, empty and it is so repetitive (and unavoidable, because of their nature), that in the end, you will notice that being with a woman, no matter how hot she is, and having sex constantly with her is not even pleasant. It is just boring. It is always the same, every single time, with every woman.

And if you, as a man, ever points any of that out to them, they instantly hate you for that. Exposure of their true intentions is what women hates most. It all falls back to their chase game. They always want men to pretend that they don't notice their (women's) intentions, even when those intentions are throw in your face. They only feel excited by playing chasing games. As soon as you act outside the teasing, they lose interest. And if you show any sing of noticing their true intentions, they literally start to hate you, even if temporarily. They truly have the brain of a children. Everything to them must be make-believe, or they feel insecure or lose interest. They tease sex, but when you show that yes, you want sex, they genuinely think that you "ruined it". Ruined the game. Ruined the roleplay. That extends to everything else regarding how they view a relationship. They bully expecting you to bully them even harde. They get angry when you, as all rational beings, show that that is a stupid game. They move away, expecting you to chase them, and get angry when you show them that chasing someone who already has interest in you, just to play a chase game, is a boring, tiresome and stupid endeavor. They want you to think that they are the most valuable thing in the world, but to never demonstrate that directly, while at the same time, delivering noting of value to qualify them as such a valuable thing. And this whole demented behavior gets tiring quickly. No wonder that many men are turning gay, trans, or simply stopping having relationships altogether. It is all tiresome and a waste of time.

But enough rant for now ;)

Hopefully, you find more cuties to pump you. I'm sure that you are a nice cutie boy yourself. And you are doing great. The women are the ones failing you.

>>413047

Wanna know why "women are children"?

Western society sees boys as expendable servant-warriors while girls are frail dames to be protected.

Because of this, many paternalists believe giving a woman personal freedom is bad for them.

A woman's "worth" is her youth. Bc you know "youth=innonce=purity=beauty". Once a woman hits her 30s, she's expected to held accountable for her actions for the first time.

That's why women like to chase older men, bc they want an age gap that makes them feel like an eternal daughter. Also the fallacy of "age=maturity=worldiness"

>>413056

*innocence

Also, have you noticed that older women are held in greater contempt for personal failures than their male counterparts?

Anytime they have a bad husband, bad child, bad sibling, and have to cover for them, society views said older woman as the reason for bad family. Yet, older men can care for degenerate family and not be condemned as badly. Why? Because a woman's worth is her "youth". Once a woman loses her docility/cheeriness/idealism, men see her as a washed-up old hag.

>>413057

>>413056

Mostly true.

>society sees

It is not a social thing. It is our very nature. Our biological programing. But only men are capable of going against their programming. The feminine brain is incapable of such thing.

>Once a woman hits her 30s

I would argue that it is even earlier. By her 20s, a woman already starts to lose her fertility, although not as fast as in her 30s. But since it is the start of her decline, her 20s are the age when she starts to be (rightfully) held accountable for her actions.

>That's why women like to chase older men, bc they want an age gap that makes them feel like an eternal daughter

Yes. and even though that is their nature, and also their brains being completely incapable of moving away from such behavior, it still is something that deteriorates the mind over time. There is not a single woman who doesn't grow ut to become a paranoid schizo after some point in her age, because reality will always overcome her desire to be an eternal daughter. The man close to her becoming older and wiser and demanding proper adult behavior, as well as society itself (other men and other women) having to deal with their own problems and lives, with nobody having time to pamper an adult with a child-like mind. At that point in time, you can see the woman turning into a crazy bitch.

>women are held in greater contempt for personal failures than their male counterparts?

That happens because women are mostly useless outside of producing children. Therefore, the minimal tasks that people allocate to women are expected to be completed. But even those simple tasks are too much for a typical woman's brain. Regardless, they are very simple tasks (cleaning, cooking, partly raising children), therefore, nobody will ever stop to held women in greater contempt, for failing such simple tasks is an abhorrent sight for anyone to see. And of course, the older (= less infertile and less pretty) she becomes, the more repulsive her failures will be seen.

>men see her as a washed-up old hag

That is literally what they are. Once a woman loses her good looks and/or her fertility, she is automatically a washed-up old hag. It is not just perception from men. It is the very biological reality of being a woman.

>>413062

>It is not a social thing. It is our very nature. Our biological programing. But only men are capable of going against their programming. The feminine brain is incapable of such thing.

Wait. I thought "going against nature" is "leftism" therefore defective.

>I would argue that it is even earlier. By her 20s, a woman already starts to lose her fertility, although not as fast as in her 30s. But since it is the start of her decline, her 20s are the age when she starts to be (rightfully) held accountable for her actions.

Not exactly. 20s is still considered "young", so women in that decade are still excused. Alot of our social crises are often blamed on young men. Young women are rarely harnessed to that despite doing same things.

You'd be surprised. Young men are viewed as "defective" for failing and finding themselves, blacklisted from romantic candidacy, yet young women can be as fucked up in the head and not have their maturity questioned.

>>413065

Adapting is natural. Men are adapting to leave behind their biological programing that turn them into braindead slaves to women.

But women are incapable of adapting. Women today behave exactly as they did 2.000 years ago. The difference is that now we know more about it to notice, thanks to instant communication around the world.

>20s is still considered "young"

Considered. Socially. But biologically, it is already the initial stage of decline.

>Young men are viewed as "defective"

Yes. No wonder millions of young men are embracing MGTOW. Men, from any age, can adapt. If society isn't valuing the young men, the young men will simply abandon society and live on their own, or form a new society. The more they are mocked, the more they will move away, and so will others who aren't even seen as "defective", because all the mockery done to the first group wakes up the natural instincts of surviving in non-hostile packs/groups in those that weren't still abandoning everything, making them do so now.

>yet young women can be as fucked up in the head and not have their maturity questioned.

Not always and not anymore. This was true up until a few years ago. But it was a recent (20th Century) thing. In the past, men knew very well that young women are even more retarded than adult women, and treated them accordingly (a common saying was "don't talk, little girl. Be silent and be pretty"). Jewish indoctrination changed that up until recently. But in our current situation, men started to notice this flaw, and started to blame the young women for their mistakes, as they should have never stop doing.

The large amount of depressive/suicidal young women is a consequence of that. Those retarded young women were raised in a pedestal, but now men realized how stupid this was, and are all saying "fuck this. Your problems, your fault." And women, incapable of understanding and adapting as always, are lost in this, not knowing what to do, how to react, and without any guidance from real men, since (as cited above), the majority of men are simply moving away from society as a whole.

>>413067

>Not always and not anymore. This was true up until a few years ago. But it was a recent (20th Century) thing. In the past, men knew very well that young women are even more retarded than adult women, and treated them accordingly (a common saying was "don't talk, little girl. Be silent and be pretty"). Jewish indoctrination changed that up until recently.

Fun fact: the saying "children are to be seen not heard" was actually aimed at young maidens.

>But in our current situation, men started to notice this flaw, and started to blame the young women for their mistakes, as they should have never stop doing.

>The large amount of depressive/suicidal young women is a consequence of that. Those retarded young women were raised in a pedestal, but now men realized how stupid this was, and are all saying "fuck this. Your problems, your fault."

Well, older men run society, so young women are always given diplomatic immunity. Older women are shunned and "left for the dogs".

If anything, this whole "feminism" is just men not benefiting from sucking up to women. Before then, men courted and assisted women in simple tasks and benefiited from it. This was called "chivalry."

This mentality was especially strong in Anglo society. Russia had women fight in wars. Sparta had their girls train alongside the boys.

>And women, incapable of understanding and adapting as always, are lost in this, not knowing what to do, how to react, and without any guidance from real men, since (as cited above), the majority of men are simply moving away from society as a whole.

Is it just me or does every "freethinking" guy have an inherent misogynist streak? Even the hippie death cult leader Charles Manson believed that women were defective alongside his "free love"/"all is one".

Alot of our horror-thriller stories often involve pretentious serial killers with a penchant for killing young women.

>>413073

>Fun fact: the saying "children are to be seen not heard" was actually aimed at young maidens.

Yes. And you can partially thank Lewis Carrol (Alice in Wonderland's author) for being a cuck who promoted that young girls should be listened to in his society's time. Just so he could profit by selling more books to them when they begged their parents for it.

>If anything, this whole "feminism" is just men not benefiting from sucking up to women.

It is more likely female nature being exploited. especially by jews. Women are all like that, but they were kept in check. Since some groups started to exploit women's nature for their own benefit, women were let loose, and it lead to feminism and other demented ideologies. It doesn't change the fact that their very nature is feminist (want everything for them, don't want to contribute to anything). If let free, they will always be like that.

>Russia had women fight in wars. Sparta had their girls train alongside the boys.

And that was/is disastrous for demographics, since women spent less time being pregnant, and those maimed at wars were not chosen to bear children.

A nation can never prosper by treating women equally as men.

>men courted and assisted women in simple tasks and benefiitted from it

The thing is: women are completely incompetent at everything. Aside from bearing children, everything else that they try to do will be subpar. The whole reason for men helping women was out of necessity, or else the women would make a mess out of every task.

>"freethinking" guy have an inherent misogynist streak

Misogyny is a natural trait of any thinking man. By analising patterns over the time, comparing them to other times and finding the same behavior over and over again, with very little variation, regardless of the time, one always find that women have a common trait of being completely incompetent, given their emotionally-driven brains. Estrogen destroys the mind completely, causing schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of self-awareness, dyslexia and many more behavioral traits.

It is not that thinking men simply "hate" women for no reason. The fact is that once you learn about women's nature, you become aware that they fail at everything other than bearing children, so you preemptively expect them to fail once they take a task.

>>413074

No. No. No. No.

Women aren't inherently useless. We made them that way. Assiging women to be sole bousekeepers makes more vulnerable. We need them to be martially competent. You don't wanna waste a bunch of hunks to prptect frail scraggly little dame. You need an amazon that has their backs.

Also, we need to stop telling boys to bend over backwards for their female contemporaries without criticizing the female half.

We also need to stop criminalizing tomboys or other non-feminine women.

Yes women may be emotional but so are men.

>>413080

>Women aren't inherently useless.

Yes, they are, anon. You just didn't realize it yet.

>We made them that way.

No, we didn't. Their very nature is that of a living reproductive "baby factory". Their brains can't process rational though. They can just imitate it, without understanding it.

>We need them to be martially competent.

That is impossible. Their very nature prevents that.

>You need an amazon that has their backs.

No woman is capable of fighting or being self-sufficient, anon. History (real, unaltered history) shows that. Life is not fiction. Women can't be strong or capable. Ever.

>we need to stop telling boys to bend over backwards for their female contemporaries

Yes. completely.

>without criticizing the female half.

Apply this in the correct (and only functional) way: always criticize women who try to have a public life, for women are incapable of doing anything well, aside from making babies.

>We also need to stop criminalizing tomboys or other non-feminine women.

Impossible, since feminine traits are desirable traits for men, while masculine traits are repulsive to a man, other than his own traits.

>Yes women may be emotional but so are men.

A matter of no concern to men, since men have the mental capability of suppressing his emotional side and concentrating only on his rational side. The whole "women are emotional, and thus, a problem" thing derives from the fact that women are incapable of controlling their emotions or to have any true rational thought whatsoever.

Men can be emotional, but never let their emotions cloud their rational judgement of a situation. Those who can't do that are defective, and you can observe their constant failures everywhere. Women are the same as those.

Rationality = Greatness. Success. Prosperity.

Emotions = smallness. Failure. Decadence.

Life will teach you that, sooner or later, anon. You just need to go out of your bubble and see reality for what it is.

freud was fuckin right, traumas are the sources of sexual fetishes. You all need therapy.

>>412969

the anal phase, the lack of security me thinks. check freud's wiki

>>413095

Freud was a jew, so everything that he said was a lie.

yeah, my step dad used to make me wear panties and rub my cock in them while i sucked him

i had that kinda stuff happen after i accepted i was gay, after my first gf i realized i was gay

then another girl ended up locking me in a basement for about a year of sexual abuse because she wanted a "cute emo boyfriend"

i think that time in the basement wasn't good for me, but I'm in a good relationship with a guy who really looks after me now

>>413130

>>413138

Women are devils. Literally.

As for you, anon raped at 6 years old, don't ever let society dictate what you must do. Society is composed entirely of liars pretending to be righteous just to feel good about themselves and to deceive people into believing that they are moral. Nothing but facades to hide the fact that they are all still animals pretending to be people. Civilization is a lie. Everyone in a "civilized" area is a criminal pretending to be either innocent or a victim.

They also lie about sex and pleasure. They make you believe that it is something forbidden and wrong when you are young. But suddenly, want you to be ready for sex and "man up" as if by magic as soon as you reach adulthood, without even having any experience with it or any incentive to engage in it.

In the beginning:

"No sex for you, young man. That is wrong."

Later:

"Why aren't you having sex, man? Are you crazy?"

Society can fuck off. Civilization was a mistake. And the "normal" people are nothing more than mentally ill hypocrites who create a problem for everyone else and still blame everyone else for the problem that they created themselves.

>>413143

Agreed, but still felt embarrassed 'bout my post and deleted.

>>413144

That is your choice. But you don't have to feel embarrassed. You let it out anonymously. That is the first step into improving whatever is bothering you in your life.

Don't ever feel down because of what happened to you. The whole world is made of hypocrites. Them being the majority doesn't make their actions right. It just dumbs down life in general. You are good. The other people (those with their facades and lies) are the bad things in this planet of ours.

>>413143

The biggest irony is older people take performance drugs and do recreation stuff to "feel like theyre 18".

Meanwhile, actual 18-year-olds are now banned from smoking and are still being patronized for wanting sex.

Now they're trying to infantilize people in their 20s like this, its no wonder why I notice people in their 40s and 50s becoming more like college jocks in dress and behavior.

>women are the devil

Only becuase Western men spoiled them with chivalry for centuries.

>>413143

> Society is composed entirely of liars pretending to be righteous just to feel good about themselves and to deceive people into believing that they are moral. Nothing but facades to hide the fact that they are all still animals pretending to be people. Civilization is a lie. Everyone in a "civilized" area is a criminal pretending to be either innocent or a victim.

much as i know exactly the sort of person youre talking about, come on. thats pushing too edgy for me territory.

i was fondled when i was in 8th grade. two years later and i still haven't forgotten it.

>>413173

It all boils down the the hypocrisy of the people. They want to pretend to be virtuous, condemning sex for young people. But in reality, they want to prevent the younger to replace the older, since youth = beauty and it is more desirable.

To some extent, those hypocrites hide their natural sexual lust, which in turn makes them not enjoy the full pleasures of having a lot of sex. That makes them grow frustrated, and then you see those old folks all wanting to behave like 18 yo youngsters again.

All the while they create another batch of frustrated people: the young ones who believed in their lies, and grew without having sex. All of them now frustrated for having wasted their prime beauty while young, and having to resort to left-overs or abandoning sex completely.

Modern society is nothing more than a den of hypocrites, frustrated by their own idiotic behavior, who keep doing that just to promote a false image of virtuousness.

>Only becuase Western men spoiled them with chivalry for centuries.

Nah. Women are naturally born devils. Nothing is making them that way other than their very nature.

>>413175

"Edginess" is just a meme propagated by those who hate to hear (or to think about) the truth.

Would you say that modern society isn't exactly as i described? Everyone is a liar, pretending to be virtuous. Everyone is a criminal pretending to be a victim.

Those very few who move away from that are the ones like us: frustrated for noticing everything too late.

>>413180

Oh its far more than lust for youth.

Its nostalgia-lust.

People nowadays are hitting nostalgia like its puberty, except they never grow out of it.

Everybody exaggerates the value of each arbitrary age number, thinking youth is a rosy tropical wonderland where everybody wants to be your friend and go on wacky misadventures.

Hence, we have the smothering 90s nostalgia for the past decade.

People in their late 20s/early 30s are acting like grumpy old men, bitching about any post-2009 product, getting mad at grade schoolers for not knowing "muh classic Nick/Cartoon Network".

They're already buying shit with old cartoons, making fanfictions, and art, yet they're still not satisfied.

>>413182

>nostalgia

I don't see it as nostalgia, given the fact that almost all of them didn't experience the things that they carve for.

The way i see it, it is more of a carving for things that others did. A kind of mix between lusting for youth + jealousy of others who experienced those things.

>90s nostalgia

This is more likely just (((corporations))) trying to push it as a fad in order to deceive the gullible and steal their money. Those (((corporations))) tried the same with 70s and 80s fake nostalgia. All in the name of cancer/profit.

>post-2009 product

As for that, it is objectively true that entertainment as a whole turned to shit after the cancerous year of 2007, which was the rise of Twitter and social media becoming a tumor in the world.

The "grumpiness" is only the result of people noticing how things have turned to shit ever since. As we have more information now than ever, even young people are noticing the pattern and correlation between "more social media influence = decline of quality for all products".

>>413186

>I don't see it as nostalgia, given the fact that almost all of them didn't experience the things that they carve for.

>The way i see it, it is more of a carving for things that others did. A kind of mix between lusting for youth + jealousy of others who experienced those things.

This. Adults, despite their worldly wisdom are beyond retarded when it comes to childhood.

In reality, childhood is more like a jail sentence, though its posh. You dont have as much fun as you think. But people dont wanna realize this, hence the retarded nostalgia epidemic.

And its not the anti-sex attitude either. Its also this inspirational idealism that schools and churches smother on the youth, telling them its their duty to change the world.

Last time I checked, people dont like change. Also, adults follow the law of self-preservation. Or they sit on their asses, talking about the "good ol days".

>post 2007 is terrible

Nah. Maybe PC culture bit other than that nah. If anything alot of the late 80s/ealry 90s entertainment was cheesy as fuck. Fashion sense, movies, grunge, etc. The only thing good was the science documentaries and some kids shows. Superhero movies back then were meh. I like the dark realism we have in superhero movies now.

The 70s, early 80s, late 90s, 2000s, and 2010s was better.

We now have indiviadulas making original content and fanfics.

>>413190

>Superhero movies back then were meh. I like the dark realism we have in superhero movies now.

I don't like either. As for entertainment as a whole, it can't be measured by one single aspect. Almost everything is falling apart and losing quality. Movies, music, games, literature, and so on.

Less is better. Less tools and less resources made better entertainment. From 2007 onward, everything became available for everyone, which in turn, made it possible for any nobody to try and "create" something, resulting in shit 99% of the time.

Add to that the cancerous notion of some wanting more attention from social media than to finish a job, and we have the wasteland of shit that plagues today's entertainment.

Elistism is good for that reason. It keeps out the talentless wannabes. In the current world, even colored hair soyfreaks and women are given space, ruining everything.

>Adults, despite their worldly wisdom are beyond retarded when it comes to childhood.

In reality, childhood is more like a jail sentence, though its posh. You dont have as much fun as you think. But people dont wanna realize this

>Its also this inspirational idealism that schools and churches smother on the youth, telling them its their duty to change the world.

Last time I checked, people dont like change.

All true. The idealism comes from the older ones flawed perception of others. They THINK that they know what a child or a teenager wants. Then, those older people hate when they discover that children and teenagers don't care about what they care.

To an old person, a teenager that wants to have sex almost all the time is "wasting time", when in reality, he is doing the very exact thing which we are all obliged to do: seek sex to procreate.

To an old person, a child who is extroverted and acts on it's own is seen as a hindrance, when in reality, children are biologically programmed to explore and to question in order to learn.

No wonder that when older people repress children's extroverted behavior and curiosity, and teenagers' lust for sex, they end up creating introverted and frustrated adults, who grow to rightfully resentful of this whole facade which covers our world.

And those older people still have the audacity to demand those frustrated adults to be more social, more extroverted, more active, to take more risks, and so on. As if those frustrated adults could do all of that by magic, after reaching an arbitrary age, without ever experiencing the very things that we are all programmed to carve, for the older ones denied those things to them when they were young.

>By 17 yo: No privacy, no personal space, not allowed to do things your own way, no sex, nothing but study and obedience

<By 18 yo, suddenly: "Why are you an introvert? Why don't you have sex? Why won't you socialize? Why didn't you get a job? Why didn't you get a degree? What is wrong with YOU?"

No wonder some youngsters are killing their own parents over frustration and the total lack of self awareness from the old people in seeing that they, the old ones and their stupidity, is what is causing all of those problems for the younger ones.

>>413197

>No wonder that when older people repress children's extroverted behavior and curiosity, and teenagers' lust for sex, they end up creating introverted and frustrated adults, who grow to rightfully resentful of this whole facade which covers our world.

>And those older people still have the audacity to demand those frustrated adults to be more social, more extroverted, more active, to take more risks, and so on. As if those frustrated adults could do all of that by magic, after reaching an arbitrary age, without ever experiencing the very things that we are all programmed to carve, for the older ones denied those things to them when they were young.

The worst part is, each new generation of maturing adults are becoming more petulant because of this.

People whine about Baby Boomers, but now it's the Millennials.

Adulthood is now just an eternal big kids club where people just waste money on toys to satisfy their dopamine-rushed brains while whining about little kids having their own toys.

Grown men in their 30s and 40s are loud and rowdy when playing video games live, yet when middle schoolers are having their fun, same manchildren throw a fit.

Same goes with fandoms. It's ok for 30-somethings to act retarded or have unpopular opinions on whatever franchise. But kids are not allowed to do the same.

>>413201

>But kids are not allowed to do the same.

That is the main factor in manchildren: they want everything just for them, because they never had what they wanted when they were young. So they grow up only in body,, but their minds stagnate in a perpetual "spoiled child" state. They feel genuine rage when others are having fun without their influence. They want everyone to never have anything, but to always look at them having their (empty) "fun" without ever trying to participate or even be allowed to.

This can be easily solved by a good old beating, and also by always pushing them over the edge, pointing out their emptyness and their petulancy. Take away from them, but never let them take away from others.

But yes, it is all caused by the same problems as the others: when those manchildren were young, their retarded parents denied them the very basic acts that we are all pushed to do by our basic instincts.

When that happens, we either turn into petulant manchildren (the majority) or frustrated but indifferent people (the minority), such as myself. We see the world for what it is, and we refuse to be a part of any of it.

>>413197

>Elistism is good for that reason. It keeps out the talentless wannabes. In the current world, even colored hair soyfreaks and women are given space, ruining everything.

Elitism is whats ruining entertainment. Yes Sturgeons law applies to the common man given liberties to express his ideas, but taking away that right wont fix the bullshit.

Also, less equipment means better quality?

Nah.

Youre confusing the breakthrough historical products for the norm.

Alot of the 8-track recordings of 50s/60s music was meh.

Same thing with early punk. Most of that shit was terrible. Only a few bands that were good enough to improvise with less made it.

>>413216

>Elitism is whats ruining entertainment.

No. It keeps the untalented hacks out.

>less equipment means better quality?

Yes. It forces people to be creative. As soon as people have access to better equipment, they instantly become lazy and it gets worse over time.

As for punk, it was always medicore. Nothing more than a literal marketing brand created out of thin air and presented as something "new and organic", when in fact, it was carefully crafted to pander to a segment of the populace to take their money away.

Older sister… The confusion made sex mentally disengaging. She'd take me to her room and ride my dick in the dark. I wasn't allowed to look at her.

Football trainer was an old funny jack-the-lad type. He'd shuttle me and another to games, training and swimming every week. Alone we watched porn, he'd fish questions about my body, sex, and non-stop compliment my ass. Quiet day swimming, only us, comparing dicks and groping my ass in the showers. The rest is history.

Still DL, no relationships, still physically attracted to girls, consequence of circumstances typecast me into being sub for Daddies after all the post-swim rimming/fingering and big dick worship. If my sister at least encouraged and taught me what to do like my groomer did, positively reinforcing pussy eating and fucking instead of showing off my ass and deep throat I'd be a normal-ish guy.

>>413035

You horny little slut. You're just begging to get that hole filled aren't you?

>>412979

pretty much; gotta go where you can get it i guess

>>414318

What gave it away

>>413222

>As for punk, it was always medicore.

Nope.

Hey OP post more pics

>>412613

I was molested pretty extensively by an older kid when I was really little, didn't really bother me but it did contribute to fucking me up; also by a creepy man who's been in prison twice for molesting every boy he could get his hands on, which REALLY fucked me up. I blocked out all the memories of the creepy man, I can only really remember being in his shed and in his bedroom, and have forgotten most of the older kid.

>>413216

people confuse gatekeeping for elitism, that ALL gatekeeping is elitist. sometimes you just want to enjoy what you enjoy without somebody shitting it up.

>>414346

>>414420

doubt.jpg

>>413048

Female youth is a goddess complex. Society uses younger women as the default portrait of womanhood.

Older women are seen as paradoxes.

This is the fault of male hebephilia.

>>412613

No? I'm not gay

Join

>>413202

>But yes, it is all caused by the same problems as the others: when those manchildren were young, their retarded parents denied them the very basic acts that we are all pushed to do by our basic instincts.

When that happens, we either turn into petulant manchildren (the majority) or frustrated but indifferent people (the minority), such as myself. We see the world for what it is, and we refuse to be a part of any of it.

That explains why Millennails are becoming even grouchier ta boomers. They exaggerate any slight flaw of the newer generations while going full ludicrous speed on kiddie entertainment and whine about being horny and lonely, obsessing over underage girls at the age of thirty.

And when you call them out on this, they say "It's not my fault, it's the dawn boomers!" all the while doing boomer things.