I have plenty of these types of questions but I'll just pick one and go with it…
In ur drop #90 (interesting, a number that represents Q equivalent in Greek) but in this drop you make a rather bold statement that the murder of Seth green was confirmed through a email of John podesta's that was leaked on Wikileaks. In fact you were so certain of this confirmation that a confirmation meme is supplied under this post on qmap… and as much as you tried denying you have nothing to do with that set up, the fact that every post as an added title that was not originally part of your drop that typically includes some very strong opinions and statements…. statements that wouldn't have change the dynamic of your drop, per se, you would have certainly rebuked such a action and informed ur following to not use the site…. which has a never happened. Not to mention all the organization and signatures that are embedded and not visible… I'm getting off topic LOL my bad.
Anyway one of my questions is why would you make such a firm statement about the confirmation of Seth Green being murdered based purely on the included screenshot of a email in the podesta leaks which happens to be cropped in a manner that excludes pertinent information that would have made it pretty clear to most to read it, that they wasn't suggesting killing anybody… but instead making a political statement through firing or outing. Also this email says Jack schitt about Seth Green?!
…. I provided more of the email for those who wish to read it.
Secondly, seems quite odd to me that you seem so familiar with these emails that were dumped. I mean you're talkin 40 50 thousand emails which would take a Dick yr to read em all individually.
In fact most of the Snippets of emails you've posted in drops from the Wikileaks, all basically have the same type of MO, which is providing hardly no info/concrete evidence to back the claims you use them for backing. In fact most of the emails I read are written in a similar fashion as the US government uses to release classified documents to the public, which renders practically any usable Discerning information unattainable without an outline for declassifying… why is this? Are you trying to sow distrust or are you trying to divert attention… mislead?
And one of my favorite parts of this drop is the second to last portion of your drop ((HCR)) … adding the second set of parentheses when translating doesn't change anything with the translation so I'm almost positive you were just kind of throwing us out here to poke fun or laugh in everybody's face, huh?
You talk a big game about what being patriotic means and what it should look like and how your followers should act, when you're not inciting Rage or anger so how about you step up and do the Patriotic thing, by being honest?
Time is almost nigh anyway….
I still 💛 u btw;) for reals… Just curious if you will respond
