/comms/ - COMMS

this is my tripcode

a few of my bakes

https://pastebin.com/m543P2B6

https://pastebin.com/pTCCBV5R

https://pastebin.com/0g7DrTft

https://pastebin.com/WY29pix7

https://pastebin.com/V9WxepH6

https://pastebin.com/5MV13zPG

https://pastebin.com/PBcS2Evq

https://pastebin.com/v8cEmR1c

test

Splitting up the board I think is bad. I like the crowd bake but I do feel it is slowing up the availability of the info. It makes baking easier but a jumbled mess of information with notes scattered by many anons . I like how noteables takers have been being confirmed and I also like the dough being kept up to date . Il help anyway I can.

https://pastebin.com/h2692GjV

baker stoopid

kungfu baker

fat chris christy

anime baker

take your pick

hello to fam old and new

first every try at trip so not sure if it will be right

oldest bake I got saved . https://pastebin.com/NMAjnFcC

>>5126

>>5132

>>5134

>>5137

>>5138

ThanQ Bakers for gathering here and giving evidence you've baked.

I'm waiting a day or so to begin

It will take time for all concerned to hear of this place and gather. (if they choose)

>>5140

>>5135

Not your fam, fam.

>>>/qrb/7759

>>5139

o7

will be good vetting system for /qrb/

>>5126

>>5142

>>5135

oh ok

i thought you were A4

>>5138

trying to tripfag

>>5144

>>5142

"qrb" wont be participating there sorry

>>5144

if you look at tripcodes you notice ! or !! or !!! at the start of the character sequence. this is the security level

using one # to start the password is level 1 and results in !

using two ## results in !!

using Three ### results in !!!

guess which one is the most secure?

3

the single trip is easy to crack (Q had one as bait in the beginning)

the double is possible

the triple is nearly uncrackable

please take notice of the type 8bit uses

Muh tripcode test muh baker proofs !

Site seems to be posting very slowly as well as sometimes not posting a post here . hits 100% then hangs. Was trying to upload a png but it did not work .Il try now no png

>>5145

docstange #password

that will be your name field

also

tripfag here because Rusty chose no IDs

>>5152

>Rusty chose no IDs

IDs change each bread and from board to board...

We're here for the long haul aren't we?

We all have our own ideas of the ethics of baking and the Q movement. I'd like to put down in writing a few things. I'd like us as a group to be able to track bakers breads and help train new ones properly. We've all seen the differences between a tasty bread and a moldy one. I intent to help train bakers that will take pride in their work and produce tasty loaves. We cannot stop the BO from changing the kitchen around but we can help each other to produce the best bread possible.

I set /comms/ up as a practice area and archive. Now I'd like to create a neutral place for discussion between principals. I intend to give all qualified bakers (and some others by invite 8bit, FJ & BVs) BV status here. It will allow anonymous or non anonymous conversations and debates among known peers as not just anyone can post in >>5103

I still need to codify some simple rules essentially about keeping what I've created so far intact so /comms/ isn't burnt to the ground by a rogue subversive member and what exactly it will take to expel a member.

I know famefagging is reason for the boot, board subversion or illegal acts are a few others, I'd like to group to vote on other things I'm sure I haven't thought of yet such as for inclusion in the group and expulsion from it.

My intention is a round table with equal status for all who've been serious contributors to the Q movement

>>5153

You can count on me to help . Myself I would like to see real accountability for BOs and BV's too many rouge BV's running wild for months.Million excuses given (I was here I meber ) Phony bs coming from the back end deleting threads and posts on and on we can go everyday all day. Just trying to express what I exp and saw with my constant presence there . I want to see things get better and Im ready to talk about this with all in a central forum as I have currently stepped back from my 20 plus hrs a week in the kitchen baking and posting in Qresearch the way it is. I see a designed operation to split the anons between 2 boards and I want to help remedy this chaotic situation. I already see rouge subversion in this very thread by "someone " trying to direct to /qrb known to be controlled by someone to me is very suspect as an anti Q poster. No offence to anyone just my opinion and my time here either way on Qr was very worth the effort but cannot continue on with the team of operators manning the ovens sometimes and all the rest. I will be glad to help you Rusty as I never saw 1 post that was bad from you. Everyone else besides Q is 100% suspect. Just how the Qr board has shown me with both the admins past. I am a pattern Anon they jump out at me. Allowing BVs to ban anons for months on end plus a million other red flags and also FJ's moves and words its too crazy. Def need a way to expel and bring in new people. It's too chaotic as is good you did this. Thanks for listening not tryin to piss anyone off just what I seen happen LIVE.

>>5154

Part of this exercise is accountability, we will remain anon but at least we'll be able to attribute specific actions to specific anons.

I don't really like the idea of a baker's union or baker's guild but lets face it random anon bakers is anarchy and doesn't produce a consistent bread. We cannot lead by fiat, we MUST lead by example.

I doubt we'll have much real influence on FJ & current staff of /qresearch/

But we may have influence on the future of the movement by helping to provide continuity and quality

Bear with me for a moment... it seems you don't have a pastebin account so I have no way to verify that you are the anon who baked, that aside I have no private way to give you a password for the Board Volunteer position which will be needed to post in >>5103

Do you have any suggestions about how I can privately exchange a password with you?

>>5155I created a pastebin account. I can also send more photo files from bakes I did showing the (you) at the front of the breads if you need more prrofs . If you can send the password to that pastebin account somehow would that work? Not sure of another way .Def agree with you on all points and am ready to help build a real solution to the chaos ongoing .

https://pastebin.com/u/NoLimitAnon does this work? thanks for the thread and the concern for Q anons work

I was suppose to break the link sorry bout that i forgot

>>5140

instead of masha

I'm good, pastebin up to date

ty

o7

>>5156

>>5157

yest the pastebin account will work

don't worry about breaking links here

>>5152

>>5153

correct

making the point of the tripfag here essential

since no IDs im new every post

>I tried posting /qrb/ bread #12 into the /qresearch/ notables thread… it got deleted

The problem for the movement is you don't know which one of the 2 board owners deleted it. FJ could want everyone to go to qrb as well and I am thinking he does. I notice also the finkelstein copypasta operation and other spam has disapeared now they have to pay so close attention to the drive to qrb and defending that . Also the spam "bot" has no time to spam as well too busy watching the anons and deleteing in the back end. Conversations with 1 and 2 post anons acting like pro anons pushing the extreme effort to drive to /qrb. I think FJ wants anons to go to qrb as well. No one can be trusted from the current set up without a check and balance system that all can see. Qresearch and /qrb pic related . How do we go forwrd from here without wasting time and changes of tactics by the admins to further split. What will be the evolution at /qrb if they get there way and we split? I think it will not be good the circle of the tyrants.

Everything I was commenting on is also to be noted as just my opinion as I believe I have seen things happen. I have no ability to see any better than anyone else but I am seeing many red flags to indicate what I have commented on. Im not going to comment anymore about it in this ID thread and for sure do not want to falsely call out a person or a event . As I have learned here since 2017 and the introduction of the mighty Q.Conformation bias can run wild in this 5D war. I do know that and I am the first to admit I can be fooled by my own mind. I see a Q board the way originaly it was but with news the right way posted working perfectly in the mind that is why I am here to help bring that vision into reality in my own little piece of a fagot way. No ego as u mentioned anon is good with me only doing the trip because asked.

>>5169

>don't know which one of the 2 board owners deleted it.

it was FJ or one of the BVs of /qresearch/

OR

all of the BVs, FJ & 8bit are telling the exact same lie, that 8bit 'retired' from QR.

it is possible that FJ & 8bit are sharing the username & password for the Board Owner's position, but I seriously doubt it

I think it's as they've presented it, 8bit gave FJ the password and then FJ has most likely changed it afterward, thus locking 8bit out.

What do you guys think about self-nominating?

>>5153

I wish to God this discussion had been initiated many months prior. This baker is past the point where there is any possibility of reconciliation with BO/BV team, Rubicon was crossed LONG ago.

>>5169

>>5171

Big money on fapjack.

Not an oldfag but never in my near-year on QR did I ever seen 8bit pull what I saw FJ pull in three months–the insults, lies, ridicule, name-calling, sneaky late night attacks, mockery, calling bakers "complacent" for wanting baker checks, whole buffalo crap, 80% of bakers shills, "who is paying you?" to baker, picking out a single notable to rake targeted bakers over the coals, bo shilling bakers during baking, bv's harassing bakers espec at night, and BO condemning bakers for ghosting even during graveyard. Lots of screenshots, everything documented. If that faggot BO even knows how to bake, I'll eat my hat.

>>5170

Confirmation bias generally a problem with research here, espec. anon analyses. Just called out yet another crappy piece of research yesterday; latest hit piece, this one with lotsa circles, arrows, irrelevant links and spurious conclusions.

Most anons do not have training in research design much less statistics, even descriptive. There are nonetheless some brilliant pieces of work here–but also much junk.

Many disputes over notables involve unlabeled screenshots with multiple linked graphics but very little explanation. Bakers are supposed to judge the merits of the work and provide a suitable description in the 30 secs or so that they have to look at it before racing to look at the next post. Impossible task which gives ample opportunity fir shills to call out bakers who hesitate to include work that cannot vet as "comp'd." Lots of times shills generate that stuff themselves–clever tactic.

Also, some less experienced anons just don't realize that–while everything in life may be related–not everything is related in a way that's very meaningful (or relevant to QResearch). Other times, anons often they know an idea is half-baked but are posting it to get a better handle on a pattern that is emerging. When done on late shifts, baker can ask them to continue discussing on next shift; think Magaveli did this once, worthwhile approach. One of the reasons it's of value to staff graveyard, not to write it off. Hotbed of creative ideas but MUCH more productive with an interested baker present.

>>5175

>There are nonetheless some brilliant pieces of work here–but also much junk.

that seems to have been the long term plan for the last year… drown out the valuable information with crap & wild goose chases

drove 8bit away and allowed the FJ crew to achieve total control of /qresearch/

the one good thing I see is JF definitely bit off more than that big mouth can chew and the work load that has been created will eventually overwhelm them.

a twitter famefag as /qresearch/ BO is suspect from the get-go

>>5177

Perfect synopsis.

JG have been doing a gradual take-down for months.

===

'To any legit bakers (if there are any) still baking for them who are not part of FJ crew':

Can tell ya what to do, but plz consider this suggestion from a friend: Cease and desist baking for them, let them drop dead from lack of support and need to shut down snipers 24/7. Mebbe start sniping yourselves–try it, you'll like it.

>>5165

i was your comms relay then

i was the other guy

i guess i should preface the whole double clarification on why tripfag here

since i came here, per your request, interested in your post, i put my name in the name field. when i when back to qresearch my browser left the name in the namefield and now im this yuge shill namefag

no worries. slings and arrows. water under the bridge.

anyways, i was your stalemate.

>>5144

>>5180

>>5180

>>5180

I can delete those if you wish

I'm sorry, I didn't consider them to be legit #justdoit isn't an e-mail server I thought it was a joke

Anons want blood for the changes that have happened. They went after magaveil and then went looking for doc, probably the two bakers who went along with the changes, not fair to call them out but they did, I am sorry for that, eye for an eye, misery likes company, BO and BV know who the bakers are and who will help them, they can draw them in when ready, so it's best to decide to stand with them or against them and let them know, in the meantime it's anon, screencap as usual and wait for Q, board goes on

>>5182

>>5183

I'm aware those two were baking for FJ

I have no quarrel with them

thus the offer to delete posts

which is something I don't usually do

transparency is paramount in this endeavor

I'm trying to create a neutral meeting place

I do not wish anybody to be doxed

I will do anything in my power to prevent that

just re-read your post and

>Anons want blood for the change

those are clowns & shills & immature teens

anyone who truly understands the anon thing lives by what is at the top of the breads

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

>>5184

Anons want blood is a figure of speech but anons calling out anons by name or pic is wrong, it's not going after an idea, it's going after a person, each person represents their own ideas, attack my ideas but don't step in my way and keep me from doing what I like, that was a personal attack on both mage and doc and no one called them on it, no one called out the bakers for shitting the bread with notables when they always screamed at others, I got a bit peeved when they called out maga and doc today, it was a personal attack, that's all I'm sayin and it's wrong

>>5185

>it's wrong

I agree

cool, just making sure, I don't mind the new system, I know social media censorship/publishing is about to get real and system needed to change

thankq Rusty

>>5186

>>5165

"proper"

a word i thought i'd never hear on 8chan

kek

>>5182

no worries

i know rookie attempts at tripfag, so nothing was unique

regarding stalemate

was that us that had comms again yesterday morning again

>>5183

thank you for your kind words

i called this change back in august fo 2018 and advocated for it ever since even while i was baking, i was the originator of baker assist as well

it went down poorly so its not as i have wished

but i feel it was and is my duty and obligation to see it through, the split between baking and note taking

im not going to tripfag too often

my browser is keeping my name in the name field too often and im missing these and its a cause for future potential misrepresentations on the other board

im gonna stick with memefag

this was one of my originals

>>5193

Thats not accountability muh dude thats hiding . Can you not remeber to clear the name over there? But yet you bake? Seems elementary to clear the name my browser also keeps it in there. Anyone can say this is my meme this is my whatever. Lies cant be proven nor can truth. Comms anon asked for trips and you won't do it. How will the others know what your opinion is then or keep track? Seems like a game within a game to me. We are not tripfaggin to see who can pee the farthest . Just my observation as a fellow baker who puts in alot of hours a week. I would like to keep working for Q so Im here and this matters to me .

Whatever big dawg says goes with me Im just a speck in of sand . Im just saying it would be nice to know who is who and what is there opinion instead of random chaos . Again not trying to offend anyone. Just pointing out things that jump out at me .

>>5194

>>5191

>The problem comes down to lies and who is lying and who is not.

the crux of the biscuit

I saw and experienced the same 'oh it was a mistake' BS a year ago. there have been subversive activities by some bakers(?) and BVs for more than a year

thus tripcodes here on /comms/

I've always intended for this place to help train bakers and to do that properly accountability is important, being able to distinguish one anon from another, to highlight the 'oh gee that wasn't me who did that' bullshit

I need a way to securely and privately give out some passwords to you folks

if you don't have an anonymous e-mail get one

I've had a proton account for a while now.

I thought I was going to be able to use the messaging feature in pastebin to hand out these passwords but that is not available to me without a PRO account and I don't have one of those.

>>5101

>>5197

I agree with you 100 percent . I got a proton setup: NoLimitAnon @ proton ready to join the cause to fix the lords bread. 0 ego onboard . No one above another.

>>5199

RustyBShackelfordJr@protonmail.ch

PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION!

OPSEC

learn what it means

we are anonymous here

known anonymous but still anonymous

you don't know who I am IRL and I do not want to know who you are we're all safer that way

there are bad actors

never forget that

there are bad actors

if we truly are a threat then it is prudent to remain as anonymous as possible

>>5195

i understand

im just new

and now im a bit gunshy since it happened

i had fucked up bakes when i was new baker

now i have fucked up name field unfamiliarity as im new tripfag

im not ashamed of being new and stsying in the shallow end

>>5197

understood

its late and i will tripfag asap

and i will protomail asap

it didn’t feel great at all when i posted to the qresearch with my name in the name field

but yes

>>5195

i will adapt and overcome

I'm just going to toss in one and only one comment then leave.

You have to take the good with the bad, that's life. Everyone is going to have to grow a thicker skin, no way around it. Otherwise you're going to live a pissed off life and life is too short for that shit.

You can not control how others think, feel or act in a free setting, you just can't. And why would you want to? Aren't we all here fighting for Freedom?

You can't control it unless you're going to change it from a free open board to a controlled one and that will only drive people away.

My father taught me as a child,

You can't control what others do, you can only control yourself. Just do what you know in your heart is right and don't worry about someone else. Any wrongs they do is on them, not you and they'll have to face any consequences for their actions but it's not up to you to correct them. Best you can hope for is just do the right things and hope you're an example for them.

God Bless. Everyone owes so much to all of you who donate so much time and effort to the board, don't think it's not greatly appreciated! Just think long and hard before deciding what to do, don't let anger or frustration drive your decisions.

>>5208

>when i posted to the qresearch with my name in the name field

lol

I remember when I did that well over a year ago

the next bread was full of anons with Rusty in the name field.

There is a group of anons who dislike namefagging their only point is that it is a halfway step to famefagging.

My point it that without a handle you cannot keep track of authorship... that is... who baked which bread.

Since I was collecting notables and posting them here at /comms/ >>225 I could see quite clearly that there was fuckery going on.

Some of those 'mistakes', possibly most were honest mistakes, however many, many were NOT.

I tried to convince 8bit to allow some form of BAKER ID

8bit set up a strawpoll with the prejudicial title of 'Baker Prestige'

Even with the naming the response was overwhelmingly in favor of some form of ID for bakers.

8bit never did allow baker ID, he couldn't stop bakers from using the pastebin ID, (using a pastebin account to sign the dough) but not many bakers adopted it.

The process of 'vetting' the bakers by BO & BVs did keep the most egregious offenders away from the kitchen but it wasn't effective against the more subtle of the subversives and it created an extra workload for himself and staff.

And now here we are...

>>5215

we don't want to directly control anyone

we just want some accountability in baking

anarchy isn't a reliable system

>>5219

are you comfortable with the tripcode you've picked?

I'm about to lock it in

it will be your handle as a BV here on /comms/

you will be able to post in the council thread >>5103

you can post as anon

you can post as BV

you can post as NoLimitAnon !!!YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx

the choice will be yours

but...

all other council members here will know that it's you whenever you post here

>>5223

your credentials are in the mail

by logging in here on /comms/ as a BV you promise to help anons when you can, be kind whenever possible and not to delete anything.

transparency is paramount going forward

>>5221

mine keeps changing

but im also new at this

i expect this one though to be the same

>>5224

but im also in the same browser session though

>>5181

they should be the same as this one, i would think

>>5224

KEK

see

>>5200

>>5229

once you've logged on as BV you will be able to post in the locked threads >>5103 etc...

there are a few quirks once you've logged in, you'll see options to do many things, ask and I'll explain.

I locked threads like >>220 & >>283 for obvious reasons

the council thread is locked for slightly different reasons, I want everyone to know who posts on >>5103

I can see its already started up again over there. So when I post in the Baker's council thread I just put in the username and ###password you gave me for login? I hope more patriot bakers step up now and help. I think the hardest part of baking is not knowing when you can handoff. I think if we had a open schedule just like a real kitchen we can fill in our times available then it may help easing the stress knowing such and such will be here in 20 min etc. Just an idea thanks again for the opportunity . Moar Bakers equals more power for Q . We need a 10 to 1 pats/clowns baker squad.

>>5233

you'll go to

https://8ch.net/mod.php

then you'll login using the username and password

then you'll be able to post in the council thread

remember

things posted on the web are forever

>>5234

You can all expect military grade professionalism while working this volunteer position. I take Q's work and name very seriously . Il see what I can do to help from here. TQ

>>5235

not a lot you can do here at /comms/ except to help new bakers if you can

use YOUR best judgement

when the time comes you'll know it and you will be able to post in >>5103

YOU have a voice there.

I have no further instructions for you while I'm wearing my BO of /comms/ hat.

you are a member of the council and we are all equals there.

I was thinking about possible ways to help ease the moment when bakers say " === New Baker Needed ===

This seems to be a stopping point and one of the hardest parts of the road is knowing that if you take up the bake you need to wait to get a handoff and that could take hours sometimes. I know from exp. IRL people yelling at me sitting at my computer. It's no fun. Maybe a pastebin schedule of availability from all the bakers then a group effort to schedule by hour the week . That way I know . Yes Monday 6 am to 11 am I will be at the kitchen working for Q. Could also make a bakers assistant availability as well if it gets too slim. Just some ideas I wanted to post here in this thread . I can see the tactics are changing back to the death threats and threats of violence now the attempt at board split is over. There is some evil shit going on that is all I know and I think having a big patriot baking staff can't be bad. Just some ideas. With pastebin availability it does give chance for names and all that maybe a way to change ids each week to avoid ego tripping? A randome bakers number or something that rotates. This week im baker 1 next week im baker 10 . Just ideas to help give anons confidence to step up. Stress is difficult witht he increased speed. Ok thats all for now . kind of just a shitpost random so not going to go all balls to the wall and post in council with trips

Bakers caught in the middle is true, when breads run fast there is little interaction, shills make fast breads harder and while it's not necessary to read all posts there are always exceptions

Nature of the beast, practice

>>5253

>>5253

>Will remain anonymous for now.

I understand

anonymity is important

but what is anonymity?

is it to be totally indistinguishable from the herd?

is 8bit anonymous?

am I (Rusty, /comms/ anon) anonymous?

does having a tripcode or an anonymous e-mail account or an anonymous pastebin account make you less anonymous? not anonymous at all? or just a 'known anon'?

are all anons equal in truthfulness, talents or skills?

I understand the spirit of anon, but the reality is that more than a few anons use that anonymity to talk out of both sides of their faces, they lie.

Ordinarily that is not of any real consequence, but the job of baking is important enough that bad bakes, corrupted bakes, subtly subversive bakes hamper the efforts of the rest of us.

the question all along has been how to work around this

I'm open to any and all suggestions

I've tried to create a neutral place where this can all be discussed and debated and possibly a solution found

>>5217

stung pretty bad

>>5256

It is the truth you speak. Accounting in the back office is needed for bakers, too much BS . Where is the names here ? Doc, GYB, WNB? Why do we not have the 5 or so chiming in to help solve the slowdowns why only 3 ? We should all be getting checked in and assemble to find the solution tothe problem that will return. I can see the confusion on what direction to take the shill operation next. i think getting the new bakers now is paramount to Q's moves being easier to make whatever they are. I think today we have a new baker signed up so think of this drive as possibly producing the replication of Q's power against the evil. I was called 2000s baker so I can give that out as I know I did a solid job . Normally I anon bake but did fall into the namefag trap. Here it matters. Sign in Anons what is the issue ? I can take getting yelled at when I mess up, can you? Learning is this process. Ok thats all I got . Thanks to the ones who are here.

>>5261

ya it did

helped me grow a thicker skin

taught me that I am the only one I must please, I have to live with myself. What others think is their problem. Yes it does feel good to receive approval and it hurts when rejected or ridiculed, but ultimately I have to live with myself.

>>5262

yes, keep baking as anon

no need or use for ID there… yet

here it's good to know who said what

ya, I remember a baker who used Jack Burton from Big Trouble in Little China

Real Genius

Grave Yard Baker

Wake N Bake

many bakers have used some form of ID when they baked

you may not understand this, but I will even welcome AFLB here.

All viewpoints are needed in the council

bakers cannot lead by fiat

we must lead by example

>>5256

Morning, Rusty.

Your post is making me laugh.

I have made the same arguments.

Basking in anonymity only bc my baker handle is easily the most well-known on this board.

Now can you guess?

I bake at QRB–new board is exciting, fun, opportunities to learn. Also help new bakers, although I'm still pretty new myself. A number of anons are interested in learning to bake, as you can see from previous post.

Have no quarrel with bakers at QR, it's all good. Many are old time frens–we covered for each other during hard times. Figure anybody whose gutsy enough to stick around til now is worthy knowing.

>>5261

Left you a message above, but ya didn't seem to get the joke.

>>5189

Bake at the other board. Comfy. Makes gy breads look fast, kek, but pretty good research & discussions. Left behind my infamous handle, good riddance. Lucky enough to be baking when Q posted late about board changes. Raced to get in all the anon comments I could before end of bred. Love that FJ asked about captchas–and the answer. Endless keks…..

>>5265

>and the answer. Endless keks…..

a well deserved smack down

>>>/qresearch/7076810

>Please revert bread back to original form.

>New structure eliminates / reduces 'hive mind' cataloging & expansion.

>Why change a good thing?

Why change a good thing?

Why indeed?

and then as if FJ couldn't understand a clear message he had to ask about captcha

>>>/qresearch/7076859

>Anons will ask, does this include removing the captcha?

Anons will ask??? LMFAO FJ is such a disingenuous flake

>>>/qresearch/7076919

>Captcha can be easily bypassed by those who would seek to cause disruption.

>Having active serves no purpose.

Having active serves no purpose.

gee... I wonder why it took FJ so long to figure that out

I'd love it if he'd join us here and explain this

>>5267

it's obvious they do not want to talk to us in the format you asked for comms anon. I also see again diverting over to the second board as if that would be something Q would approve of without noting. Also why if 8bit retired and is suppose to be getting caught up and all that how did he post withing 10 min of BO's announcemnt to chop the bread to 1 post? How is it possible he be right there at the right time with the script already figured out. Now look I know 8bit helps with things here and so does FJ . What is the true motivation behind these efforts tho? Is it to help Q anons or is it control of information? Beyond the nicey nicey smiles and hi fives 07 handoffs who really are some of the creatures that pretend to be our friends? I think the simplest answer is the answer . They are all in on it together . Same as it always was . Now all the shill tactics and takedown efforts have failed . Evry single clown file and the strings probably are getting tighter and tighter arounf the badddies here. Messing with Q anon and Q+. Unreal folly in my view. No I think this problem is going to take care of itself soon with the power of the bakers on Qs team REALLY on his team. Q can change BO's almost instantly . Anons are training now the lull in the action. Il be here helping recruit new patriot bakers. I recruited another friend shills would run away as fast as they could from . Red white and blue lasers shoot out of this guy and he's got time to help. I know what the solution is for my end to help . Multiply myself and multiply and multiply (you ,me, we ,us) making Calls for Bakers copypasta and memes I never realized was SO IMPORTANT. Naming bread titles asking for bakers is helping. Getting people to stop digging in sand to find gold they can find it in there heart at Q bakery. Im ready to go all the way for this. Soon more will gather here > MOAR AND MOAR AND MOAR ! Then the bad guys will dissolve . Ber ready for there next attack you know it's being worked on. Ok back to work overtime if needed for Q ! Doit Team Bakers !

>>5269

it seems the /QRB/ bakers are incompetent or clowns

they can't get the Q posts corrected

I've been after them since last night

>>>/qrb/19289

>>>/qrb/20200

>>>/qrb/20214

>>>/qrb/20220

>>>/qrb/20697

I hate to admit it but FJ may have been close to accurate when he said 80% of the bakers were comp'd (He'd know)

I do find it interesting that so few have come here to discuss this

You YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx

are the only one that's e-mailed to get a BV passcode

magaveli !!!NTZjYWQyNmMyNmIx >>5261

still hasn't

not a fair playing field here until you can see with BV tools just who you're talking with

>>5200

Comms Anon . I have got 100 hrs a week to serve Q . Count on it .You got 1 on your team .

This may be key also

bringing back oldfagbakers campaign

individual schedules

>>5274

something similar to this?

>>>/qrb/20697

>>>/qrb/20731

>>>/qrb/20812

>>>/qrb/20913

they don't need to be oldfag

they just need to be competent

>>5262

I am here, Baker2000, now that I know who you are. Yes, solid baker.

I also used id, nothing to hide. No longer GYB, try FreeBaker (FRB).

Many bakers–and anons–from QRB are not happy with those who voluntariliy baked for BO. I have no position on that.

I treat others well who treat me well. And most bakers on both boards are decent and honorable.

I've made suggestions to try to help

>>5253

take em or leave em.

Interested in communication but only with

mutual respect, see see

>>5283

Anything that smacks of division-fagging among bakers will get no support from me. Stupid trap, don't fall into it.

>>5283

>Plz don't division fag. Serves no purpose.

consider me properly chastised

was this you?

>>5179

>Cease and desist baking for them, let them drop dead from lack of support

talk about division fagging…

>(Besides, your own revisions had to be revised for formatting–plz don't see yourself as above other bakers.)

the length of the black line in the Q posts is the formatting you refer to?

If Q himself put out the patriotic call for help in the kitchen I am sure we would have at least 5 new patriot bakers by the end of the week. Just a thought. The rewards for being a baker are very internal. You have to be willing to have the payment that does not come from this world to do the job it's intense as we all know. Some pushing from Q may be needed to fill the ranks as I saw on the board the only option the bad guys have now is total destruction of the info and board. All the other attempts to breach the walls have failed. MOAB from the bad guys I think or they let Q have his way and the board stays perfect as it is now. Just my 2 pennys worth.

>>5292

>at least 5 new patriot bakers by the end of the week.

and 50 that were from various intel orginizations as well as private citizens who just like to cause chaos

the problem is to sort the sheep from the wolves in sheep's clothing

>>5293

That is where accountability comes in and I believe the reason we are even here in the first place anon. So we cant hide behind lies and fake smiles with a demon behind the mask.

>>5294

we've always needed more bakers

problem was burnout

lack of help from QR staff

outright interference and harassment from QR staff

complete lack of transparency allowed this to happen

8bit was overwhelmed by the task

nobody can do 24 / 7 / 365

but…

8bit wouldn't allow any type of easy bakerID

hence this place

we cannot edit a bake

we cannot control who bakes

but we can lead by example

build a cooperative of bakers

all equals

in communication with each other here, where it's slow and we can do things like schedules etc…

several new bakers on QRB

I'd like to get them here to join the council

I made an invite

>>>/qrb/21459

>>5296

>outright interference and harassment from QR staff

2 of the prep cooks put rocks in the salads while were plating them. Accountability for ones work is the way or an overwhelming force of good guy bakers where the shills are like a drop of water in an ocean

>>5297

oh ya… LOL

I remember some real fun rocks that'd been left in the dough

one of the reasons I made /comms/

needed someplace to test post

helped with body too long error when doing notables etc…

while AFLB was a BV it banned me mid bake on feb 12 last year.

once the ban expired (3 day) I found a few 'rocks'

>>5298

> it

KEK

>>5253

Thanks for kind words, I am the Far Eastern baker aka Black Rifle Bakerand so far enjoying my time on QRB,

I want to thank you for your help when on my first bake and for keeping an eye on things.

I didn't enjoy Rustys comments, but I think we'll just leave that be, water under the bridge and all that,

This seems like a good idea Rusty, thanks for putting this together. I hope I am able to contribute but also learn a lot from fellow bakers. I genuinely hope we can sort out the BO/BV issues, but I'm not optimistic.

In the meantime, I shall bake and thank my fellow anons for the work they do, and encourage all as best I can.

Also, I definitely agree with some sort of Baker id to indicate our posts. I have a roaming vpn due to my location (as all our internet in Cambo is routed through neighbouring countries as they buy the bandwith) and my ID number changes 3 or 4 times a (slow) bread

>>5300

you have my most sincere appology

you need to realize that I consider myself incompetent to bake

I make too many mistakes

get flustered too easily

cannot keep up once the posting exceeds 15 posts per minute in a bread…

please get a pastebin account

once you've baked and posted a dough from that account e-mail me and I'll give you the keys to the kingdom here

>>5303

Roger. Wilco.

How do i get your email addy?

>>5304

see

>>5200

>>5306

Gotcha, will try tonight , subject to IRL and board duties kek

>>5306 Just sent reqst. "I want to help"

>>5306

Ok. I've signed up for pastebin. What details would you like me to send in my email Rusty?

>>5309

I had to use a protonmail account to email him as pastebin wants paid to use the mail.

>>5303

>>5309

>>5307

>>5307

>subject to IRL and board duties kek

yup, here too

>>5308

>>5303

>please get a pastebin account

>once you've baked and posted a dough from that account e-mail me and I'll give you the keys to the kingdom here

I'd advise to get the anonymous proton e-mail account 1st

use it to get the pastebin account

bake and post dough from the account

then send me the bread & dough links

PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION!

OPSEC

learn what it means

we are anonymous here

known anonymous but still anonymous

you don't know who I am IRL and I do not want to know who you are we're all safer that way

there are bad actors

never forget that

there are bad actors

if we truly are a threat then it is prudent to remain as anonymous as possible

>>5309

if you've used personal information

like an e-mail address

start over and make a new pastebin account

you can get the proton e-mail anonymously

there are other anonymous e-mail services

once you have the anonymous e-mail you can get the pastebin account

use a handle you like so it's easily to ID

>>5309

one more thing…

>>5101

>>5102

>>5221

>>5311 Should have been more clear - Sent a request to your email address w/"I want to help" in the subject line. Kekekekek.

>>5315

I think of baker ID more as a matter of who can you trust

Authorship and accountability can be used to famefag… and thus it is dangerous as a temptation

not sure how comfortable I'd be having Angel G. here as I do not agree with famefagging

>>5316

yea I dont like using a name only doing it here for the purpose of this discussion. I anon bake and use no memes unless im being goofy that day Il past a bango kid meme or something. The only name allowed is Q or Rusty BO or BV . once you find a system that does not famefag but keeps track of intentional destruction then quickly the baddies will show themselves and get booted out of the park. Just random thoughts

Quick question, to get a trip code do I just write BlackRifle ##password

in the name field?

>>5317

not fond of the system either

but tell me

if you see a dough signed by Rusty or another baker you know does it help ease concerns over 'rocks' ?

>>5318

yep

you may wish to use ### as the triple hash tripcode (displays beginning with !!!)

is the most secure

>>5319

YES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5319

Definitely. You get to know a bakers style and sometimes their weaknesses. Makes it quicker to check the dough

>>5321

if you ever come up with a better system or improvements on the system we're building here, don't hide it, bring it here

I'm always open to new ideas

>>5140

test

>>5326

>I think many people would feel better knowing Cg4563heq1 the solid baker is baking today and FgY7786j32x

or

YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx

YmUwNDJjOTI3MmIx

is baking

ya, my feelings are not to namefag at all

just sign the dough by using your pastebin account

can use it for handoffs too

https://pastebin.com/ueMJmj0S

I think the penalty for betraying Q and abusing a baker id would be something 98 percent of anyone involved here would not do. Anons shame the famewhores more than any punishment Q could do. Photos of Anjel with a dick sticking out of his forehead come to mind. The other few percent will glow and be seen quickly and weeded out I think. Ok random thoughts and welcome new Bakers .Welcome to the Qvolution

I like the fact an ID would help me find my posts. As i stated earlier, I sometimes go through 3 or 4 IDs a bake

>>5329

some oldfag anons and /pol/ anons will object and give you a bit of grief over it, it's a kneejerk reaction to namefag abuses in the past (nassim, etc…)

If you stand your ground and don't abuse it the crap will mostly stop. Shills and others will continue to harass you about it though…

just my thoughts

btw

welcome to baking

>>5330

"welcome to baking" - Thanks. Its an honour

As for oldfags and /pol insults -

Water off a ducks back. Do what I do for the love of the cause.

>>5329 Which confused the heck outta me in bread #23! (I'm the anon who told you about the spreadsheet sort of notables.)

Aah, thanks for all your help. Yeah, it confuses all the anons as they don't know I;m the baker as my ID has switched. Nothing I can do about it.

>>5330

I think everyone knows there are serious problems at Qreseach and something needs to happen because of liars and fake friends handing off to other shills getting paid to destroy the dough etc. I think the abuse will be minimal and other anons here will smack there pee pees for yelling about it. The way it has been is the proper way to do this board but evil people insist you keep us held to the books. When you all decide what you are going to do and when I will learn what needs done and I promise to never abuse any type of solution that makes this process easier and less fighting or suspicion. When I hand off and say THANK YOU ANON. I want to mean it as a co worker not being lied to. I hate liars! Ok thats all

>>5333 Understood. Your bake was outstanding BTW.

>>5334

>The way it has been is the proper way to do this board

it has been an evolution

best practices have evolved

good bakers copy the best practices they see

it's time for a true baker's union / guild whatever you wish to call it. As long as it is open and transparent it will flourish

some good bakers may not join, do not discriminate against them

but soon the bad bakers will be obvious to all and we need do nothing but lead by example

All three boards hit 581 @ the exact same time.

Kek

>>5337

Sorry

>>5336

I really like this idea for many reasons. Since beginning at around 700s of the board and baking anon so long I understand how important that is. Unfortunately as mentioned FAKE Liars insist you put in place a tag id trace system. It will bring more good than bad I believe it and yes we will outshine the evil as it evolves even further. I think also the level of professionalism will rise as this changes when the time comes.

>>5140

Newfag Baker.

This is my tripcode and bakes to date:

https://pastebin.com/TsWxCjpR

https://pastebin.com/Amm5gv6d

https://pastebin.com/NcrAftdi

>>5345

see

>>5200

use an anonymous e-mail

>>5327

Ok I think I am understanding what you are saying here. When we save the pastebin for the bread we leave our YmUwNDJjOTI3MmIx tag at the very bottom? I am trying to visualize what the dough will look like or what you mean , leave a new pastebin with a signoff and accept ?

how would the signing in and signing out process go ? Baker 1 asks for a handoff ,baker 2 signs on with anew pastebin post swapping shift? Or are we signing the dough with the tag assigned?

>>5348

not exactly

you don't need to do anything special

when I post

>>5327

https://pastebin.com/ueMJmj0S

and you go look at it…

you'll see

it's from my pastebin account

so, you know it's me

thus baker ID

like this?

https://pastebin.com/3WHqWyyd

>>5350

ok il go look again

>>5350

ok i see the rusty shackleford icon up top says you did the paste .got it.

>>5355

>So anyone who goes by the rules and accepts a ID with comms gets a pass into the baker's council bread where the future will be shaped

yup

it's the anyone part that scares me

bound to get a malicious subversive one eventually

In order to create a fair and neutral playing field…

Semper Vigilans

Vincit Omnia Veritas

>>5300

This is baker from #22 (or now #26), aka as FReeBaker, as you know from the pastebins. Saw your post to Eurobaker. Gosh, it's great to have bakers from Europe, Asia, and America!

Tried to address some of the stuff that went down with Rusty's remarks in

>>5359

but like you, to me, everything is water under the bridge. No grudges, must always keep moving forward, eyes on the goal. QRM is a great board with a comfy feel and amazing researchers. So glad to be a part of it. All the mistakes we make will make us better bakers in the long run. Gonna get back there, think the bred is currently ghosted and could use some note-taking. Guests here still asleep…..

In my opinion both Board owners have proven they hate anons and Q. BO 1 allowed insanity throughout his reign . Many anons left from it. Even if he is innocent and I doubt that how could he allow the insanity from his BV's go on and on and you know FJ was before solidmaga all the same memes. Nothing has changed but what those two told us. I think history will show they are on the same team. QRB is a divison move because Q did not give any order to move anywhere. It takes bakers and anons away from Qs true focus board. I think Rusty is the most solid leader we have right now and I will follow where he goes. Yall go have fun at QRB. Cant give 8ball a chance again he blew it royal with me. No offence to anyone just what I saw happen live. Massive fuckery.

Already seeing the benefits that could be from this . Example the current baker has no baker ID but uses other bakers memes so not sure who it is . How nice it would be to know what to expect from this one, but its a guest. It will be so beneficial if and when this system goes into effect. Who knows whats going to happen currently.

>>5361

Things were ok under 8bit at QR in my direct and personal experience. Not at all ok under FJ. So I'll go with 8bit until I see any problems. So far, it's been good. Board peaceful and productive.

>>5360

mea cupla

I'm a rude sumbiotch sometimes

usually accurate tho

vincit omnia veritas

>>5361

>how could he allow the insanity from his BV's go on and on

one possible explanation is that the job grew quicker than 8bit did

obvious his staff was infiltrated from the get-go

not sure about 8bit's part in all the drama of the last few days

time will tell

I find myself oddly pleased with Q's smackdown of FascistJack

FJ did cause /qrb/ to come to life, so there is at least a small silver lining to that cloud

>>5365

I will trust your judgement and follow what you say to do. Im done yapping at 8ball the 1st. FJ is a total failure as of now for sure no question about it but they are close buddy's on discord…. Where Rusty says to go or do we do. Loyal Soldier here I trust the plan

>>5366

>Where Rusty says to go or do we do.

please don't

I don't need or want blind obedience

it is fine and proper that you have your own opinion

it is based upon your experiences

all I ask is temper your animosity towards the BOs and let's all try not to do any more harm or contribute to the harm that's been done

"Lafayette, we in here!"

EuroBaker from /qrb checking in.

I only started baking because a bread dropped on /qrb, Bread # 3 there. I was so disappointed by the loss of notables @/qresearch, and because I didn't want to live in a world without them, I stepped into the kitchen. Turns out, I like it. Should've done it waaaaaay long ago over at /qresearch, but was too intimidated/lazy to try.

>>5368

>all I ask is temper your animosity towards the BOs and let's all try not to do any more harm or contribute to the harm that's been done

I agree 100% with this sentiment. Shit happened, milk was spilt, we have to move forward. For the moment, I am so wet behind the ears, I don't have much to add, but glad to be here. I'm loving reading the posts here and diving into the deeper mysteries of baking. Looking forward to learning.

o7

>>5369

see

>>5355

this is the kind of post I am noticing alot of

▶Anonymous 07/20/19 (Sat) 15:41:42 034034 (2) No.7112765

File (hide): 624e7965c288766⋯.jpg (77.11 KB, 267x387, 89:129, NotMyBO-NeedsToStepDown.jpg) (h) (u)

I had a great idea!

So I shared it in /qrb/.

Fuck FapJack and his band of comped BVs"

Why do I keep seeing this advertised . "fj comped, comfy at qrb" just seems so orchestrated to divide.

this is the post

▶Anonymous 07/20/19 (Sat) 15:41:42 034034 (2) No.7112765

File (hide): 624e7965c288766⋯.jpg (77.11 KB, 267x387, 89:129, NotMyBO-NeedsToStepDown.jpg) (h) (u)

I had a great idea!

So I shared it in /qrb/.

Fuck FapJack and his band of comped BVs"

>>5375

be warned

a few meaningless shitposts will be tolerated

if you have nothing to contribute please do not post in this thread, make yer own thread and fill it with whatever you like, multiple shitposts (posts with no contribution to the conversation) will get you banned for a day

>>5376

>>5377

collect the post number(s)

it does seem orchestrated

>>5364

No problem with agreeing to disagree on some things. I prayed, I ended up on QRB. Have no problem with those on QR. Never did. Tremendous respect for all bakers, because it's a tough job. Focus is on how all anons–including bakers–can work together to further the cause of liberty in the content of Q's work.

>>5380

*context

>>5376

We've had similar posts in QRB , but they've said - I've found this great dig and I'm going to post it on QR too.

We need all hands on deck really

an ye cant ban me.

sorry kid.

its builtin

chukl

>>5382

It's fine Im just noticing that I see a pattern . Not just I hate BO posts but always with a referal. Just making a note .Back to work for me .

>>5386

>As far as I'm concerned /qresearch is the flagship

agreed

I had a short conversation with a wise anon earlier about cross pollination between boards…

I now feel it best to keep this to a minimum

adverstising /qrb/ on /qresearch/ will inevitably lead to an influx of bad actors

let's keep /qrb/ clean

/qresearch/ is like starbucks

/qrb/ is like black rifle

two different clientele

good reason to have separate boards, when great finds occur, or seriously notable posts I'd advise to check /qresearch/ notables etc to make sure it hasn't been covered there and then instead of linking to /qrb/ I'd copy a nicely formatted notable post with graphic, tag line and links and post it in the current /qresearch/ bread never telling where it came from

>>5365

>>5365

Thanks for getting back, Rusty. We got a lotta new bakers so thinks are gonna be a little crazy for a while. And yours truly is really not that experienced with Q posts–especially with extra-long link names–bc i baked graveyard when q was posting up a storm in late march. Only really started doing q posts in primetime 2 weeks ago. Me and doc both used the word "humbling" to describe that experience.

>the job grew quicker than 8bit did

Makes sense. 8bit is an old chans-guy, from what i can tell, as his comments on baker assist reflect. Reflects "old style" baking, rather than new "crowdbake" idea. Have a feeling like the whole FJ situation allowed him to expand his thinking a little. Same for all, really.

Crowdbake idea interesting–came about for 2 reasons: long graveyard shifts and captcha, which make em impossibly long for one baker (6-7+ hrs). And QRB breds are even longer. Since Q's not there, we often ghost the breds but watch them, just in case. A note-taker or baker will do some notes and then ghost again or hand off. I did notes from this am's ghost and then either Eurobaker or BlackRifle took it away. Slow pace encourages people who want an ez-bake scenario–oh, and the dough doesn't hang ("it's bonus time, baby!")

Have an idea for supporting new bakers which I'll attach.

>>5388

KEK

you're correct,

when I say

all voices are welcome

I really mean all voices within reason

spam isn't welcome

constant shitposting isn't welcome

in general making noise to drown out the conversation isn't welcome

noisy kids will be disciplined

intelligent conversation is welcome

all I ask is that you try to add rather than detract

I say we check in and move over to the council board where the buffalo can't range . ID in here and discuss the job and managing of it there. Il go when you say go the trolls are already gathering trying to disrupt this . Let's cut them off

>>5391

for the 1st problem 'body too long'

for the 1st page this only happens after adding a bunch of fresh Q posts.

If you do not have a character counter in your text program you can quickly post it in a practice bake in /comms/ (don't make a new thread, just pick any practice bake and post in it) this will immediately tell you if it'll fit or not.

(just don't try this while logged in as a BV on /comms/ or the BV authority will override the body too long error)

and yes, I'd like to see that kind of information posted in the baking school thread >>154 or make another with best practices and hints for new bakers

>>5386

>>5390

>Me and doc both used the word "humbling" to describe that experience.

I was baking more than a year ago, when Q did the 'stress test'

Q posted during a Trump rally

posting exceeded 35 posts per minute

bread lasted 28 minutes

burnt me out!

humbling indeed

luckily we had a cadre of good bakers who were helping and I could hand off immediately after baking

I care about the quality of the bread

I value accuracy over the aesthetics of 'it looks good' but I do value both.

posted up in the council bread lets go Bakers !

>>5397

Good to see you here we need all the bakers we can get. The more the easier it becomes to hand off when IRL calls . We all can hold the roof up together

>>5396

sorry, I know of no 'Logan' and the only 'cassandra' I know of is the ancient oracle of Delphi

>>5402

it's fun reading

I spent time working in a print shop, when you get to the point you can tell lower case type for b & d and p & q apart you've learned to read upside down and backwards without using a mirror

sometimes has very different viewpoint with remarkable insights

another voice that deserves to be heard here

>>5396

hmmm....

>>>/qrb/21973

not me... I wonder who?

>>5403

Yes sir ! It is good stuff I always do enjoy AI anons work . hes a oldie and yes all need to be heard

>>5395

might be good to have a specific thread for bakers to post their experiences

alternatively to collect best "baking horror stories" in a bun (but call it something else, ha-ha) and add a line in "How to bake" on page 4 of board)

>>5404

archived

>>5153

Rusty, I'm sitting here looking at your idea of a baker's council with tripcodes for participants. On one hand, I'm interesting in a neutral place to discuss baking issues. At the same time, I am not sure about joining any closed group that looks like it could potentially be construed as a "baker's union." Every time I turned around for months, I've had shills or BO team calling me comp'd–or worse. Haven't gotten over that. And it has continued even now. I wish you would consider having discussions here in this ope forum. Seems very productive and not very shilly. Pastebins or tripcodes are ok, but I would want to move to "closed session" only in case of emergencies not for regular interactions.

>>5407

>archived

please elucidate

>>5408

I understand,

but ask yourself

how better to stop bakers from organizing?

than to harrass anon bakers with the dreaded evil 'baker's union' boogeyman. In truth there was a baker's union and it became 8bits BVs.

the tripcodes and the rest are

so that this is a level playing field

when you're logged in as a BV here you'll be able to see everyone's history of posts here, it helps to see the ones talking out of both sides of their faces.

or if you're like >>5333 and cannot help that IPs change and need to be able to prove ID for continuity of conversation or baking

>I would want to move to "closed session" only in case of emergencies not for regular interactions.

I cannot foresee any circumstance that would cause me to hold a 'closed session'. the council thread is limited and closed in a fashion but posts are visible to all and will always remain so.

just as the board logs and ban list is public and available for view by all.

for view by all with IDs openly displayed. here in this thread anyone can post and there is no requirement for ID so completely anonymous comments (to public appearance) can still be made

I have not forgot the feeling of sickness in the stomach last week when the clowns were laughing there asses off at us and the board was a disaster of chaos. I would say this IS an emergency with the appearance of quiet and order because the enemy does not know what to do yet. I like the pastebin tracking idea Rusty has it's good enough. i know what to expect from each baker who is logged in and no need to even mention there name in the bread it's off site but still you get credit logged for Q. it freekin perfect.

>>5409

/qrb seems like a good place to observe and archive shill patterns because it is a nascent environment and easier spotted than when they hide so easily in a flood of posts. Just doing it as a personal "hobby", to perhaps create a tool that could better serve in understanding and combatting shill/AI patterns in the future.

>>5411

you worry me a bit

you remind me of an old joke

two bulls, a young one and an old one are walking thru the pasture

when they crest a rise and see in the valley below them a herd of cows

the young one not being able to contain his enthusiam begins running but quickly notices his older companion isn't. The young bull turns and asks the old one, don't you see those cows?. The old bull replies yes he does, what about it? The young one says I want to run down the hill and fuck one. And the old bull replies I'm going to walk down the hill and fuck them all

I'm much more the walk down the hill type of anon, I make too many mistakes when I rush in quickly

>>5412

best of luck to you

I've found that these 'shills' are not as easily spotted and categorized as you might think

some of the truly malevolent and subversive ones are exceedingly subtle

>>5409

Yes, they were the bakers union–except it wasn't a bakers union but board mgmt. Suppose the norm becomes that baker has a handle and pastebin, and can participate in discussions here with that. Optionally, bakers could also have a tripcode that they would use if some situation arose in which it might be advisable to meet privately. Maintaining as much transparency as possible has many advantages, imo. Also, there are still some very good bakers that do not participate here at this point. An open forum allows them to check out what's going on and decide whether this is the kind of group they would like to join.

>>5413

Il take all that into consideration thanks. I do like to keep tuning the strings. I fight hard friend. Bake 1 for me was 700 era. I been getting mybreads shit in for a long time by these clowns I am mad. It is an emergency IMO.

>>5415

the tripcode is for the long haul

things change

boards change

equipment fails

IPs change

etc…

how do you know 8bit is really 8bit?

>>5412

Quite true. Muh joos tried to blend it the other night, watched them for hours. They mix valid info with little bits of anti-semitic stuff, usually bured in some paragraphs. Extremely irritated when finally called out hours later.

Another coupla posters started get nasty back and forth. Anon called them out on that PDQ, saying it was a research board.

Today, there was a lively discussion about tourists getting killed by 12 Israelis. Was in notables and then possibly removed in the dough (don't know the details). Resubmitted nb. Don't know how it all came out, but anons are very sensitive on QRB to possible shill influences and want to discourage it. Strongly preference for "comfy" (place to post and discuss not fight).

>>5418

ok, i get ya. lemme think about it. still adjusting to all these changes in just a week. will stay in touch meanwhile.

>>5416

yup it is my opinion

>>5417

We may have handed off to each other at one time as I too baked during that era

I only quit baking in QR due to the posting speed. my old equipment and slow internet connection speeds limit me

with 600 posts it can take almost 60 just to refresh the page and the update function is waaaaay slower that can take 2 ~ 3 minutes

so I cannot keep up and do a good job so I don't bake except on rare occasions when it's been slow and no one else was available.

I don't mean to dis you, your intensity bothers me because I know I'll make mistakes and I'd hate to see bad things happen because I said something stupid and someone acted upon it before the stupidity became evident.

time to study some Sun Tzu

>>5420

>will stay in touch meanwhile.

no hurries

no worries

we're in it for the long haul

>>5421

I understand. Il let off the gas. I always charge into the fight.. I just noticed in the beggining you asked for people to use names and do things a certain way and many are not listening to you. I also see now they were talking back to you and also daring for banning and trolling etc. Just more of the same . Il close the thread and check in another time. I said what my exp was and that's all that I need to do I know you can fight for yourself against the bad guys tactics. Il take all the advice and deal with it like a man would. Thanks

>>5419

I think I can explain, I think I helped cause this

I had grabbed the dough last night to correct the Q post omissions, when I got up this morning I added the notables and revised the dough…

it was not an intentional omission, if you look the last notables bun was posted >>>/qrb/21435 vs when bread #28 >>>/qrb/21439 was posted you'll see it was close.

here's the some of the links in the timeline

>>>/qrb/20681

>>>/qrb/20690

>>>/qrb/20913

>>>/qrb/21425

then addded notables from

>>>/qrb/21410

resulting in

>>>/qrb/21421

that did not include the notables from

>>>/qrb/21435

and the baker used my dough if you compare the notables in bread #27 with

>>>/qrb/21410

>>5423

> I also see now they were talking back to you and also daring for banning and trolling etc.

ya that was AI anon

I don't mind

but I won't put up with spam or multiple meaningless posts here without letting the offender know of the offense and penalties

no problems anon

wwg1wga

>>5424

Yeah that was me copy pasted the wrong tab, had an updated list and your dough open on different tabs next to each other. They all look alike. At least I tagged the the correct final notables post in the NB, kek.

>>5395

I had this issue a few bakes ago and solved it by consolidating the previous q posts on the fly and into current bread. Thus cutting down the wordage. If that still didn't cut it down enough I imagine I would have made it a 2 page input.

>>5432

Its going to be interesting seeing how you are going to deal with this long list of notables on current bread EuroBaker.

On a side note, it looks like I might not get to create a bread again at this rate, just taking the helm in between kek

>>5437

a true conundrum

but it's done

>>>/qrb/22213

>>5438

Yeah, I saw. Good effort. Its all a learning process after all.

Probably a good job I don't get to bake a new bread - the 2 I've done have both been preceded by PC issues

FWIW, One of these Bakers seems very, over eager/zealous,slightly/ slowly divisive but capitulative (word?) all at the same time. You can't see it immediately but big picture…

It would seem moar apparent read slowly in groups.

Been lurkin here w/ya'll for days, just don't say much.ceppin muh oops.[sorry again].

Seeing a name with posts makes it easier/moar interesting to follow story lines on all boards, with or without the moniker.

fantastic setting to discuss board/baker issues. I've been on theses boards since just after the beginning, seen it all. Ban apocalypse, booby apocalypse, porn/gore apocalypse, 8bit mess and fapjack too. I can empathize with most everything said here, was a bake too about a year ago.Stopped because of aforementioned by all reasons, shills, Bo, BV's. Stopped posting several months ago because of the same. Gets old when you drop important shit but it gets buried by over bearing shills. I believe that Anon was correct that Q see's what we call see and has seen the amount of Anons really digging at QR has dropped. He see's them leave and not come back.Fortunately I also believe that it's quite possible that Q is using a "Harvester" AI program of sorts and it's not important that it makes NOtables per se but that the info he wants us to find is just in the bread. With that being said the NOtables ARE important as these are our Red Pills for the masses as they come here slowly, but surely. Point being that ALL of our popup sites, Qanon.pub, QRB et al are VERY important for this work. Like the coffee adage above implies, there are different sites for different types of people. I love Starbucks Coffee but would not be caught dead in one, nor pay their over priced corporate…You get the point. Black Rifle on the other hand, since I am in a mostly Military environment would love to try but Ironically I haven't had the opportunity.Everybody likes their coffee different, I use a local one that is very cheap but VERY good. That's why we need moar boards et al, not the Paytriot types though I think they all serve a purpose, Useful Idiots. [I'm sure we all ended up here in one form or another because of a Useful Idiot] We all just naturally followed the stream backwards to get to the freshest source.

Also it should be noted that although Q has publicly chastised fapjack for his behavior, after a private deal he couldn't refuse I'm sure, He NEVER said to shut down ANYTHING, including our very Q research oriented QRB. I agree that when he says expand your thinking he was also referring to the boards. Think about it this way. Do you want to be the Baker the day there are 750 people on the board at the same time and they all have one thing to say and they say it at the same time. despite the lag, that ma or may not be avoided by 8Bits upgrades, the bread will go so fast you won't be able to read, let alone make a NOtable bun.IJS. I do not appreciate the "Cross Polinization" as well and hope it stops but the work we get done is incredible, the breads are slow and smooth, the Anons are dare I say polite. I've only been attacked as a shill once since the board was unlocked and he was just a one and run since I didn't engage, and I think he may have seen afterwards my retraction I posted before his attack.

We are ALL doing God's work here in whatever capacity we are here.

In closing, again this board is refreshing and a great place for Bakers, past present and future and others to get to know each others traits and personalities without doxxing as well as the obvious problem solving and Baker issues.

If your still reading, thanks for taking the time to get this far. and God be with you ALL.

Oh and:

> just don't say much

Ironic isn't it

WWG1WGA WRWY

o7 o7 o7 o7 o7 o7 o7

>>5440

>I do not appreciate the "Cross Polinization" as well and hope it stops

I see two sides to the 'cross pollinization'

a. it will bring the shills, clowns and shitposters and ruin a tranquil place

b. without some form of it there will be much redundancy and it would be a shame if unique findings didn't transfer at all

unique findings 'should' transfer with a speed commensurate with their true importance, that being said important unique findings are likely to be opposed and squashed by opposition forces and it'll be easier if contained on one board only>>5440

>>>5440

>>I do not appreciate the "Cross Polinization" as well and hope it stops

>I see two sides to the 'cross pollinization'

>a. it will bring the shills, clowns and shitposters and ruin a tranquil place

>b. without some form of it there will be much redundancy and it would be a shame if unique findings didn't transfer at all

>unique findings 'should' transfer with a speed commensurate with their true importance, that being said important unique findings are likely to be opposed and squashed by opposition forces and it'll be easier if contained on one board only

>>5440

>You can't see it immediately but big picture…

loose cannon

>>5452

Would have done if not for the fact we were at 741 posts kek

>>5452

In QRB, to check for body too long, bakers can also use a new thread i created for formatting/tryouts. That's what I used to id problem of how to fix body too long for #28 notables. Close by, which is good for end-of-bred checks.

Cool. I'll have a go next time

>>5440

>You can't see it immediately but big picture

Simple game theory and basic mathematics dictate at least 1 of us isn't here for the right reasons. Glad to be here but as an anon above mentioned: "Everyone else besides Q is 100% suspect. "

Even though that is my mindset, I will still interact with respect to open dialogues and opinions here. But you know… I'm paranoid.

>>5455

>Even though that is my mindset, I will still interact with respect to open dialogues and opinions here. But you know… I'm paranoid.

I don't believe anything I hear

I only believe half of what I see

heck, sometimes I don't even trust myself

KEK

slight difference between paranoid and prudent

>>5376

Many have posted "BO needs to step down" posts, no question. But that has nothing to do with QRB at this point. Legit anons on both boards. Typical shill tactic.

>>5441

Hello, Rusty–

Just checkin in from QRB.

Just met another brand new baker, that makes 3 in 10 days (TXBaker). He joins BasedBaker–who goes by Eurobaker–and Black Rifle. NB also bakes there at times but haven't figured out when or how often yet. These new bakers are around a LOT though–they are really taking responsibility and learning fast.

TXBaker is doing great, considering all the Q posts today, as well as new changes to

"Graphics all in GMT" submitted from GraphicsAnon today. I showed them where they could practice posting notables to check for length and also how to do formatting for QRB.

We also needed to split the notable page into two. QRB has 8-12 hour breds, deep diggers, and fresh new bakers. Trying to help them with some of the stuff they don't tell you in "how to bake a bread" tutorials–like how to make dough additions and repairs. But could use input from moar experienced bakers, for I am not an oldfag baker, as I think you know.

Just explained to new bakers how to correct a bad or missing bun link from past bred by reposting in current bred (they thought only BO could fix, kek). Problem made more interesting by the fact that we had to split the notables page in two–page too long, even with at least one bun inserted.

Not unexpected, we've come close many times. When you consider that we're talking about intrepid diggers going over many hours, you're bound to have extra-long notables.

Anons can discuss, but the ones who have commented seem ok with the idea. I don't see any reason why notables can't go for two pages–at least for QRB–but would like to know if there might be unforeseen technical problem with it. Any idea?

(More generally, would appreciate support from you and any other experienced bakers–just realize that these guys are really new. The stuff they're trying to do would usually be handled by oldfag bakers coming into to help. I am hardly that! Can certainly offer assistance but realize I have blind spots bc of only 4 mos of baking experience.)

Kudos to all the great new bakers on QRB. You guise rock!!

>>5511

I've been there lending a hand, watching dough editing early this morning

I think the #33a & #33b labeling should work, if all bakers will adopt it.

din't stick around long enough to see how that conversation works out, will check it in the am

other than baking a bit early, things are going very well on QRB

keep up the good work

>>5513

Things are going well, it's a little crazy. Now that there are no captchas, many moar anons want to bake. Also on QR but not as familiar–just happened along right b4 bake during graveyard where I e-baked on the fly to help out a very new practice baker who was having some kind of problem. Thanks for looking in, Rusty, I monitor a lot but not being oldfag 8chan guy means I miss the mark at times. Often I'm passing along something I just learned a week prior, kek. Great to actually be able to talk to moar experienced bakers.

>>5511

>>5513

Thanks for the help over at QRB, a like how you've sorted the long notables. Hope thats going into How to bake thread

>>5513

Thanks rusty for all your help. Also, I believe there is another baker who wishes to remain nameless who has been a superstar behind the scenes for us at /qrb/

Much appreciated.

As for Notables, I think for the moment two page solution is the best, we shall see how things develop.

>>5511

I referenced an unnamed baker to Rusty who helps at /qrb/, perhaps it is you, thought it might have been someone else. Perhaps all the helper bakers helping me out are legion. Either way I noticed a lot of help coming my way (EuroBaker here). Its been so wonderful. Thank you so much Free. I remember gyb. You were always doing it right. Many thanks fren!

>>5517

I like being Free! Names do change perceptions, mine too. So much tension associated with gyb, did not even realize until it ended. To be here, doing what we do, is a privilege. Much to do, one day at a time, o7.

>>5518

knowing that you are dealing with a 'known anon' does make it better somehow

human nature I guess

do what you can, with what you have, where you are

wwg1wga

>>5513

Rusty, don't know where you stand on some things, but I just went on QR and got a shock. The links below tell the tale–of being told that, from now on, dough updates should go thru META, not thru bakers. That means META controls the dough. The idea was that it's so much easier because the post lasts "forever." When I posted an objection and begged bakers to talk to me, got no replies.

(If any of you are reading this, please let's talk.)

There's been some other funny stuff happening (the weird bred titles, for example) but I've just been watching and waiting. Other odd little disruptions happen for bakers (wnb's icon being "stolen"–nothing big, just kind of jarring). We need to be alert, watching for little changes like these–the same kind of changes that started happening last March. It's no joke.

– frb

>>7173602 Plz replace dead link for quick pic baking instructions

>>7173678 Next time, submit dough change to META

>>7173827 This dough is ours, not META's

>>7174171 Plz wake up, don't go back to sleep

>>5521

Sorry, here you go:

>>>/qresearch/7173602 Plz replace dead link for quick pic baking instructions

>>>/qresearch/7173678 Next time, submit dough change to META

>>>/qresearch/7173827 This dough is ours, not META's

>>>/qresearch/7174171 Plz wake up, don't go back to sleep

>>5522

sorry, second link should be

>>>/qresearch/7173679 Next time, submit dough change to META

>>5520

never sought to be known, someone gave me a baker nickname when that was common, used it as a handle. later became "bad" to have a handle (fame-fag, name-fag). I am nobody special, sure don't have any kind of oldfag know-how, always making dumb little mistakes. So much respect for the many talents anons possess. feeling kind of sad right now bc of stuff I just wrote Rusty about re QR ( >>5521). Good at least that we have another board, kek.

>>5524

>I just wrote Rusty about re QR

>>5521

>Rusty, don't know where you stand on some things,

check the tripcode

same same, I've just dropped the 'Rusty'

CTRL-F is your friend

ask me if you want to know my thoughts on any particular subject.

AFAIK none of the bakers or BVs from QR have joined us here.

I do not know what to think about the changes in QR

What I do know is that as long as Q posts there that Q thinks it is still a workable site.

>>5529

>AFAIK none of the bakers or BVs from QR have joined us here.

There is no doubt in my mind that none of them will come in here. It would be redonkulous if they did. Just one moar place for fungaltranny BS., Anyways, it is very clear that there is a great group of bakers stepping up in the Bunker and it is good to see. Sometimes the breads seem too slow but it gives everyone involved an accurate view of all Bakers and their styles/ along with best case scenarios. KEK! [Ps, if you didn't notice, I hopped]

>>5531

DOH, forgot you won't notice hoppin in here.

>>5529

Sorry re ids, sometimes when I'm here I am dead tired, not 100%.

To be really blunt, the line about "not knowing your thoughts" is moar about being me being gun-shy about expressing ideas that may draw fire. Still shaky from recent happenings.

Pretty sure QR is not in good shape–wnb just noted that dough needed cleaning after shill baker was there previous shift. AFLB is baking, anons think–some say (s)he's also BV now.

As long as Q is on QR, I will remain. Still help out there by e-baking and sharing info (eg, Q post missing, duplicates), old baker frens there too. Just saying what I see so others can evaluate, "eyes on."

>>5531

There are a lot of different bakers still at QR. I'm thinking some just want to bake–period. Stay out of politics as much as possible. What does it mean to "join us here"? (not being sarcastic but sincere).To me, it's just a chance to share observations, ask questions, and get to know other bakers. No big deal, like a conversation.

>>5532

IP hoping shows up

>>5534

>What does it mean to "join us here"?

here you can have a tripcode or not

use a label, handle, namefag… whatever you wish to call it to ID yourself… or not

or be as anonymous as possible because there are no UIDs

BO & BVs see the IP hash

I've been granting BV passwords to several bakers who've submitted the data to prove they're bakers.

there are several reasons, for one thing it allows these bakers to get a chance to see what a BV can do, it's only good here on /comms/ and it puts us on equal footing here.

This is a free speech zone

sometimes something less that total anonymity is necessary for continuity of conversation

QR breads happen fast 20 ~ 30 per day

QRB breads happen slow 2 ~ 3 per day

here conversations can take weeks if needed

IRL calls and keeps us from the keyboard from time to time

It takes time to gather all concerned sometimes

and here you can be sure you're talking with the same anon and not an impostor.

The /qrb/ dough is way behind in previous /qresearch/ previous notables collection. /qrb/ dough has /qresearch/ breads collected up till #9129 and /qresearch/ is currently on bread #9193.

Question, do we continue to update /qresearch/ notables in /qrb/ or do we cut that cord?

>>5534

>What does it mean to "join us here"?

I don't know exactly. But as stated by Rusty, this is a long haul thing. It is clear there needs to be transparency to the behind the scenes of this movement as it exists on 8chan. How that will come about? Got me. But this is a good start, me thinks.

>>5539

Just wanted to add before any final decisions are made on /qresearch/ previous notables, it needs to be discussed with ALL anons in the bunker, not just bakers.

I posed the question here first because well, alot of /qrb/ dough kneaders are here. But yeah, all anons need to be in the loop.

>>5539

>>5541

I'd cut the cord, there are enough archives

what does need to happen in my opinion, is helper anons monitor QR. When they see a truly notable post instead of making a post in QRB and cross linking the notable, I'd suggest gathering its components, the graphic, the sauce and any text. Possibly upgrading it a bit with digging to improve the sauce, or graphic or text and the posting it whole in QRB.

This will keep QRB abreast of the latest research.

FRB here. Today a new baker wanted to know what baking involved--not so much the steps but moar of an overview, so I created one. Posted it in the baking school, here it is if anyone's interested.

>>>/comms/5547

>>5538

Well-said, R.

Thanks, truly appreciate what you are doing here.

>>5542

Re cord cutting and cross-fertilization between QR/QRB:

I did moar or less what you are suggesting re ungrading QR info at QRB with the discussion of Disney excursions to Little St James–got rudimentary info from QR that Disney had excursions at some point. Initiated a digg where we pinned down the date of a brochure advertising an excursion (2018–so recent), found that the island has good dive sites (which is why Disney might have a scuba tour).

Generally speaking, QRB can digg deeper and coordinate its diggs better bc of longer breds. Deep diggers can work together, talk about results, and coordinate the work flow–especially helpful when digging on Q posts. QRB a digger's paradise. As a baker, I'm still trying to figure out ways to organize dig results–special buns help, only disadvantage is that you can't hover.

>>5539

Re QRB listing QR notables:

Maybe time to cut that cord? I don't actually use those consolidations, I just go to QR if I want to access something–or to QResear.ch. It takes a lot to stay current on Q posts, graphics, and other dough updates, many of which seem more important, imo. Other bakers and anons can weigh in, I'm just not particularly wanting to do the QR updates. There's plenty of other things to do, kek.

"joining us here"

So far, am benefiting from the conversations on this thread. For a long time, there was no way to talk to other bakers–baker's lounge wasn't used and with the baker's union idea being pushed, talking with other bakers seemed like a subversive act (or would be seen that way). It's helpful that the 3 or 4 of us who are particularly active in QRB like to post here, since the board is new and there are many questions that come up (like the one you asked above or the question of 2-page notables).

>>5549

from FRB

Just wanted to echo Euro Bakers thanks to FRB and Rusty, and the other anon bakers who have been helping guide us on QRB. Its a great place for training and its great to know others are looking out for us.

I also like knowing who I'm dealing with/handing over to. With such long bakes it can be 3 or 4 bakers each bread

one thing I've noticed

one egregious example is 'eggstein'

when searching the archives for 'epstein' will 'eggstein' show up?

I'm not sure if it's a baker being cutesy or a subtly subversive tactic

easily dismissed as

oh, it's harmless fun

>>5556

So yeah, /qresearch/ is definitely weird.

If I may even say, it seems to occupy a grey hat zone.

Not completely black nor white.

I see pretty good notables coming out of there.

Not combing religiously through every bread, but from time to time I follow a bread and see what looks to be fine bakermenship.

On this point I can't complain.

But the bread titles give an off feeling, as if they are automated.

>>5556

it's not a subversive move MTA it is simply being funny but now I can see it messes up the search feature I did not know that. I can see how you might think that it was a move but it really is just that I did not know. Mixture of boredom and my natural sense of humor. I will correct the mistake .

I will be changing the name of my pastebin account as well when I upgrade to the pro level to do that to do the digit code like you are doing. I am all about the anon regardless of what anyone here thinks about me. I simple DO as I am told and sometimes I get in trouble for that. Almost as if I am being set up to be scolded. See that the conspiracy can go both ways and often roots in the mind. making up story's about situations on the board is a common mistake I make .

As far as what I have been witnessing on the board. I see now that the baking is being taken over in shifts one bad guy baker seems to be able to bake 5 to 7 breads at a time all missing notes called. Also yelling at anons etc. Must be the new tactic. I know I am not the smartest anon of the bunch but I do my little part and I have good intentions. Q's standards of operation and thinking are very demanding and not for the weak of mind or heart. I am enjoying helping but it for sure is taking a toll on me. Trying to do everything perfect and know everything already, wow it gets to the point of wanting to take my computer apart and put it in the attic. Il deal with the corrections and critisisms from everyone and keep fighting. Its not about what anyone thinks but Jesus and the HS. All I am trying to impress is them. I will keep trying my best for Q and team. Enjoy your day

>>5556

Don't take wat I said the wrong way either I was not complaining to you or at you I was more seeing the error of my mistakes and it is embarassing that I cannot do this job perfectly and the mistakes I want to correct go from one to the next. It has been a "all in my own head" exp for the last 4 yrs with this war with DJT now Pres T. I have been 100 percent in the fight since day 1 of his campaign and it's evolution to here. I do my best to work and help sometimes that can get me a little misguided and off in the wrong direction. My intentions are to be headed to the right location Q needs us to be at but being that this war is in the dark sometimes that gets difficult. I hope you understand what I am saying because I love being here and fighting for Q and its nothing about me the person. It's the big picture and the future I am happy to fight for. That is all .

>>5578

are you sure all other bakers were doing similar stuff because it was funny?

either way it's minor stuff.

I think the bread titles being used on QR is a more serious subject and dangerous tactic.

BTW you don't need to change your pastebin account to do anything here

you should have recieved an e-mail from Rusty B Shacleford Jr. with

username NGIzYzQx

password #########

that will allow you to logon here at /comms/ as a BV

glad to have you aboard

keep up the good work

wwg1wga

>>5553

qrb easy, good place, good people, good diggs–anons and bakers together. can help with some things but no way an oldfag baker–beginner in so many ways but learning all the time…didn't even want to bake, so funny….

Most oldfag bakers went back to qr, seems like, prolly bc it's slow on qrb and no Q (for the present). E-baked once on qr recently then ghosted, they can collect their own notes, kek.

>>5556

"Harmless fun."

Fun is a good meme, funny joke or singing round the campfire. Weird bred titles, odd misspellings, dead links–not so much.

>>5559

Agree that QR feels like a grey hat zone. Some very good work there but much wonkiness in bred titles, suggestions re dough updates to "let META do itm " roller coastery baking.

Not paranoid but realistic. Based bakers need to be based–grounded. So do anons. Stay sane & sensible. Share good feelings, have a laugh, support each other. Grumpy shills can't do much with that!

>>5599

Hey Free, saw the work you did on /qrb/ #40/#41.

Damn fine work, anon. Damn fine.

Love the addition of Topical and General buns.

Due to the duration of breads over there, the length of Notables can be both impressive and overwhelming to the eyes. Separating into easy digestible buns was a great idea. I will try to continue in this vein, next time I take a bake.

>>5601

It was an interesting exercise. Went better than expected, found it pretty easy to come up with topical categories. Gives bakers another potential tool to use, although it's mainly for those extra long breds that can make your eyes glaze over in QRB.

well whaddya know

made my way back here

don't seem to be many bakers about

have not run into a single baker

for 3 mos

(at least, not that i actually know)

well no use hanging out for now

back to qr to watch the finkelstein show

unfold in all its glory…..

oh what we do for love of country & freedom of speech…..

kek-kek-kek

o7

o7

Testing

>>5101

tripcode test

>>5708

tripcode test 2

!!uoLnJpgdTQ

>>5709

tripcode confirmation test

tripcodes did not change!

Test

Salt change verification

Testing salt

Salty

>>5727

>>5725

>>5726

Ooops, didn't see I posted on my end..

>>5708

tripcode test

after CM's announcement

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1199511082223583232