>>839603
We shouldn't, since it is obvious.
Yet here it is.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200612110450/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/has-media-ignored-sex-abuse-in-school/
>Hofstra University researcher Charol Shakeshaft looked into the problem, and the first thing that came to her mind when Education Week reported on the study were the daily headlines about the Catholic Church.
>"[T]hink the Catholic Church has a problem?" she said. "The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."
>So, in order to better protect children, did media outlets start hounding the worse menace of the school systems, with headlines about a "Nationwide Teacher Molestation Cover-up" and by asking "Are Ed Schools Producing Pedophiles?"
>No, they didn't. That treatment was reserved for the Catholic Church, while the greater problem in the schools was ignored altogether.
>As the National Catholic Register's reporter Wayne Laugesen points out, the federal report said 422,000 California public-school students would be victims before graduation — a number that dwarfs the state's entire Catholic-school enrollment of 143,000.
>Yet, during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government's discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools.
Yet you go on and on like a good parrot.
>>839606
We know reality doesn't matter to you, it is merely ammo against people you dislike.