>>835497
>Anything coming from a seed is safe
>Nothing natural can destroy the body or mind
You ever hear of Datura, bro? How about the Suicide Tree?
This fetishization of naturalism and condemnation of the artificial is only present in those who have no understanding of why science was turned into a process of discovery in the first place. You want to differentiate "natural" from "artificial" as the old ones desired to find "pure" from "corrupt" materials and processes. Through alchemy leading into chemistry and natural observation leading into recorded biology, we have the ability to see that natural things are no different than artificial, with the caveat of when they are inert. Among the very first things to prove this was the synthesis of urea, an organic compound, proving that something organic could indeed be made by inorganic means.
Think about that for a second, many many things can be made to match exactly the chemical structure and behavior of natural things, what does that make those chemicals then, natural or synthetic?
The answer is organic because of the composition and we have not (and I doubt will ever) capture what life is, life is more than these inert chemicals and that is what maybe should be fixated on, that we are unable to use anything but hijacked natural means to create life (all attempts at cloning and the like using the natural means to achieve what they have accomplished). Then consider what is it that enters the body? Nothing living, with exceptions for odd eating habits, however have you considered why there is so much detail on the slaughtering of animals in the law? Nothing that enters our body is alive or specifically animate if we follow the laws of cleanliness, so then I think it no surprise that among all the things mankind can synthesize, not one inert chemical is denied him, even flesh as we have seen in modern times, but the living flesh and anything like it is outside of his reach, being propped up by processes already in place or through microscopic machines.
Don't lose sight of what science is because academia has become a whorehouse for governments and corporations to make their money, instead remember the initial outlook of those who were attempting to make sense of the world God created so that we may worship Him in His fullness through His works not only in us (the important part) but also in His creation. However let us not forget that the ground curses our name and hates us, anyone who's had to live with it outside of the modern artificiality of cities can tell you that. To say something is good because it is natural is the same argumentation that got us into this artificial world to begin with, no things are only good if they work towards God's purposes, and things only evil if they act in rebellion to God's will.
Don't be an anti-rational mystic just because the world has perverted what it means to be a scientist.
And to be clear I don't disagree on the part of anti-psychotics and SSRIs because those were designed specifically to do their evil tasks of lobotomizing threats to society through their unloving institutions.