>>831447
the 5th ecumenical council accepted miaphysitism as orthodox if understood as how Cyril of Alexandria used the terminology, copts claim to follow Cyril in their christology, so if we can take their word for it we shouldn't have a problem:
>If anyone confesses a belief that a union has been made out of the two natures divinity and humanity, or speaks about the one nature of God the Word made flesh, but does not understand these things according to what the fathers have taught, namely that from the divine and human natures a union was made according to subsistence, and that one Christ was formed, and from these expressions tries to introduce one nature or substance made of the deity and human flesh of Christ: let him be anathema.
one nature of God the Word made flesh = Miaphysitism
St, John of Damascus said that monophysites are orthodox in everything except their non-acceptance of chalcedon.
also Leontius of Jerusalem:
>Leontius of Jerusalem is considered the most accomplished of the neo-Chalcedonian theologians of the sixth century. He shows himself, in his Testimonies of the Saints, to be an ecumenical theologian attempting to convince Syrian anti-Chalcedonians ('Monophysites') that their objections to Chalcedon are baseless, since all agree, beneath their antithetical formulae, on a christology of hypostatic union. They are urged to abandon their self-important yet discredited mentor, Severus, and to see that Chalcedon had no secret agenda.
Abstract between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Joint Commission:
>A number of statements have been issued by the Joint Commission, as well as agreements relating to Pastoral matters. The main agreement is that ‘We have inherited from our fathers in Christ the one apostolic faith and tradition.’
https://orthodoxjointcommission.wordpress.com/