>>827375
>I read bible in my thai language and still find it's contradict in itself
For all I know the Thai translation you've used could be a paraphrase version based off of an English paraphrase, but I doubt it. I have never in my life run into a thematic or narrative contradiction in the bible. That is my standard for what would qualify as a contradiction. If you find one of those, where an author of one book actually contradicts another author in what they're trying to communicate, you're welcome to present it and we can deal with it.
>http://bibviz.com
>well look by yourself then.
Okay. I'll bite the bait. Categories listed are as follows:
>Scientific Absurdities & Historical Inaccuracies
>Cruelty & Violence
>Misogyny, Violence & Discrimination Against Women
Hippity hoppity, women are property.
>Discrimination Against Homosexuals
Those poor, unfortunate, sexual-deviants… How dare God bully them with fire and sulfur?
Yeah, none of those categories have anything to do with contradictions. BUT LET'S LOOK AT A FEW ANYWAY! Just for fun. I'll go down to the contradictions list and blindly pick three at random. For every reasonable, sincere "contradiction" I find, I'll read another from the list.
>http://bibviz.com/is-it-ok-to-curse-people-sab.html
Romans 12:14 vs 1 Corinthians 16:22 vs Galatians 1:8-9
>Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.
>If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.
>But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Strike one. Not even remotely a contradiction. These mean two different things in two different contexts and even if I thought they were referring to the same group, which they aren't, it still wouldn't be a contradiction. If someone is excommunicated from my church, you'd better believe that we're going to pray for them.
http://bibviz.com/who-put-the-robe-on-Jesus-sab.html
Luke 23:11 vs Matthew 27:27-28 vs Mark 15:15-17 vs John 19:1-2
>And Herod with his men of war set him at nought, and mocked [him], and arrayed him in a gorgeous robe, and sent him again to Pilate.
>Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered unto him the whole band [of soldiers]. And they stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe.
>And [so] Pilate, willing to content the people, released Barabbas unto them, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged [him], to be crucified. . .And they clothed him with purple, and platted a crown of thorns, and put it about his [head],
>Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged [him]. And the soldiers platted a crown of thorns, and put [it] on his head, and they put on him a purple robe,
Strike two. Herod's soldiers also answered to Pilate because Herod answered to Pilate. Not a meaningful objection. Let's try just one more and see if we can randomly find at least a somewhat understandable "contradiction."
http://bibviz.com/who-makes-people-deaf-or-blind-sab.html
Exodus 4:11 vs John 9:1-3 vs Mark 9:17
>And the LORD said unto him, Who hath made man's mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?
>And as [Jesus] passed by, he saw a man which was blind from [his] birth. And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.
>And one of the multitude answered and said, Master, I have brought unto thee my son, which hath a dumb spirit;
Three strikes, I'm done with the list. These are all infantile, surface level arguments that don't even make the attempt to understand the intent and message of the authors. That's how these atheistic lists always are.
>>827379
This. Including the part about making another thread. You can link it here.