[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / erp / fast / hydrus / kind / lewd / mai / pdfs / tech ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Voice recorder Show voice recorder

(the Stop button will be clickable 5 seconds after you press Record)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

| Rules | Log | Tor | Wiki | Bunker |

File: e3fa5a9c0ff5f68⋯.jpg (157.54 KB, 1280x549, 1280:549, e3fa5a9c0ff5f6865a1e7928b7….jpg)

be5f2f  No.827003

>>>/newslus/252338

Archbishops in the Church of England have apologized for a statement issued last week that said only married heterosexual couples should have sex.

“We as Archbishops, alongside the bishops of the Church of England, apologize and take responsibility for releasing a statement last week which we acknowledge has jeopardized trust,” the Thursday statement said. “We are very sorry and recognize the division and hurt this has caused.”

On January 22, the Church’s House of Bishops published pastoral guidance regarding civil partnerships between same-sex and opposite-sex couples. “In its approach to civil partnerships the Church seeks to uphold that standard, to affirm the value of committed, sexually abstinent friendships and to minister sensitively and pastorally to those Christians who conscientiously decide to order their lives differently,” the statement read.

The Church said that their teachings on sexual ethics do not change for unmarried same-sex and opposite-sex couples in civil partnerships. “For Christians, marriage – that is the lifelong union between a man and a woman, contracted with the making of vows – remains the proper context for sexual activity.”

The original statement came in response to a change to England’s law regarding civil partnerships, which same-sex couples have been able to form since 2005. New regulations, which went into effect in December 2019, extended the ability to form civil partnerships to same-sex couples.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/02/01/church-of-england-apologizes-sex-married-heterosexual-couples/

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

be5f2f  No.827004

>>>/newsplus/252338

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

973904  No.827023

>>827003

>Church of England

top kek

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

aae254  No.827041

Color me surprised that a Church founded on immoral principles regarding marriage and divorce are having trouble maintaining conservative views of marriage on their slippery slope.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6307d6  No.827050

THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF ANGLICANISM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

dd7d04  No.827055

File: f2b249a2ea511ea⋯.jpg (2.75 MB, 2400x3129, 800:1043, Thomas Cranmer by Gerlach ….jpg)

>>827041

>t. doesn't know anything about the English reformation but what he was told in high school euro history

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ad4377  No.827061

>>827055

The Reformation policies, and other staples like the Book of Common Prayer and 39 articles only came afterwards. First with Edward and Elizabeth. Henry's own era was nothing but a clownshow. He never thoroughly renounced Catholicism anyways, at least in any sophisticated Protestant sense. You can credit Elizabeth for somewhat salvaging the debacle, but not him.

Even then, it barely retained a Protestant character for long either. James I and the Puritans were the only era that ever truly did. By the time of the Enlightenment - especially by the 1800s, it was full of Higher Critical scholars and other skeptical thinkers ( much like those in Germany, who sprung from the Evangelical churches). Their works are largely responsible for the apostasy and skepticism that typifies the modern age of bible scholarship. Nowadays, you can count on one hand the few Church of England thinkers with respectable/orthodox principles (NT Wright, CS Lewis, etc).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8c5cf6  No.827106

>>827003

>those Christians who conscientiously decide to order their lives differently

<those "Christians" who consciously decide to disorder their lives.

I think they made a typo.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

220c17  No.827117

>>827055

Hey look, it’s Thomas Cranmer, the dude who blasphemed the Eucharist because he read a forged secret Vatican document. Oh yeah, and before dying he renounced the entire Anglican reformation movement and confessed that salvation does not exist outside the Catholic church. Good dude.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2d6673  No.827121

>>827117

do you think that literally facing a burning at the stake is an impartial setting for a theological recant?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ad4377  No.827122

The sad thing is that Cranmer is his judges would probably embrace right now, if they saw how pozzed both of their churches have become.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / erp / fast / hydrus / kind / lewd / mai / pdfs / tech ]