>>239209

Using duckduckgo?

Does that make sure the search isn't personalized and uniform for all?

>>239365

RRVe we pretty specific about using Google. It seems logical that if there is code in the Q posts pointing to specific webpages, then Q would have had to know, for sure, that the same search, using the same method would always bring up the same page. Because of that, it would seem logical that using the search engine that Q intended would be essential to getting the correct webpage.

>>238914

>[J-Go_dX)-2-8

At an offset of 3, J-G, so that would make sense as confirmation of the letter transposition method. I'm thinking that "dX-2-8" might indicate changing to a different offset for the rest of this post. Perhaps 10?

>Everything has meaning.

Twenty characters. 10 10 marker?

>Who is AMB Matlock?

Why is AMB all caps? Marker?

>YES.

Same Question. Or maybe this is a confirmation or result.

>/[RR-out][P_pers]

At an offset of 3 "RR" becomes "PP." Interesting to see what an offset of 8 or 10 does with "out" "ers."

>EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]

HF showed us a technique for making sense of the blank spaces. Does anyone have a way to check the exact characters in the blank area of this line?

>SIG_con_MAR39sv3665BECD

Lots of 3,6,9 in here.

"BECD" -> abcd?

>Q

We've been asking for longer strings to test HF's methods on. This post appears to have the kind of elements elements and patterns many of those techniques would apply to.

The "RR out" is interesting too. The main thread reads that Rod Rosenstien, but there could be a double meaning. The AI "RR" has been quite distracting to our efforts here, and he's heavily disparaged HF's methods. Could Q be telling us to quit wasting our time on RR?

>>241835

>Could Q be telling us to quit wasting our time on RR?

This makes me think of >>236449, the cautionary message from our Physics Anon.

There is an interesting relationship between Physics Anon (ID:096bef) and JerkOff Anon (ID:f5462b). They play off of each other, at times good bot bad bot. Similar to HF and RR… One helps while the other distracts,

>>217682

>>238410

What do you think of this from Physics Anon?

>>238134

>>241835

>EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]

>HF showed us a technique for making sense of the blank spaces. Does anyone have a way to check the exact characters in the blank area of this line?

I got one character of extra space when I tested.

>>242132

>What do you think of this from Physics Anon?

>>238134

My gut reaction is that it's a hint about whatever we are doing wrong on the letter transpositions / mirroring method.

"put the 3 in the middle" could refer to my paired columns off-set chart. I did two columns with the numbers corresponding the to the letters on the outside. Maybe the numbers should run down the center so there are 3 columns?

Also, it could be a refininement what we think we know of HF's word mirroring across markers. "Three six nine." Assuming "six" is the mirror mark, then "nine" would mirror to the other side giving us "nine three six." That puts the three in the middle.

>>242284

You mean the space is a single tab character instead of a bunch of space characters?

>>242240

For me, in Libre Office it shows as a space and a hypen. I'm running on a custom built office machine. It has a very small character set built in, so I don't have a good way to check characters. Thanks for your help.

>>242302

Yes there is a hyphen in there as well. Belay my last for not including 1 space and 1 -

…would that make it 2 extra spaces?

>>242290

It is a single space, not Tab.

>>242132

>What do you think of this from Physics Anon?

The physics anon post you refer to also appears to be closely related to this one with respect to the "infinity" hint.

>>238615

>NN NN NN NN

>with an infinity symbol around each set of 4

>why do i picture this lol

>>242347

That's really odd. In my firefox it displays as what appears to be 3 or 4 spaces. What does it look like visually in your web browser?

>>242284

I agree with you on this post from Physics Anon >>242350 . It gave me the impression it is a mirroring/marker hint. Physics Anon kicks my ass in math knowledge. I am not sure what a moebius strip is…

Quick Firefox search -→

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MoebiusStrip.html

>>242365

I am using Firefox. In the browser, it looks like 3 spaces. When I pasted into notepad, it shortened to 1 space. Not sure if this had something to do with it

>>242411

That web link is a way mathier approach to mobieus than we probably need.

Mobieus strip is commonly a children's curiosity toy. Take a strip of paper and tape the ends together into a circle except give the paper a twist so the back tapes to the front.

Kids play with them for hours discovering that you can just keep running your finger along the paper forever going from one side of the paper to the other without ever taking your finger off the paper.

Basically, it's a physical representation of infinity.

>>242468

Thank you for reeling us back in and clarification.

>take a strip of paper and tape the ends together into a circle except give the paper a twist so the back tapes to the front.

I might be jumping at straws. Look at the kids example with creating a moebius strip out of paper and how the ABCDs line up compared to the paper loop.

https://www.physics.wisc.edu/ingersollmuseum/exhibits/mechanics/mobiusstrip

>>242563

As you follow the strip around, A goes to D and then returns to A never hitting B or C.

I dont know what the hell

>>238410

that post meant.

There's seriously no code in anything I post.

But our posts to each other can still reveal things that we didn't intend.

Like an accidental muse.

So anyways here's the deal.

I don't really have a great grasp on some of the concepts that I talk about.

So let's just be perfectly clear about that right off the bat.

That being said, I'm good enough to sense when things are missing.

The whole train of thought that I was on earlier….

how can I put this…

ok lets talk about CAUSE and EFFECT.

because there's something hinky going on here.

we think it goes CAUSE>EFFECT right?

Are things really that simple?

Let me tell you how I think it goes.

Scientist Bob is on the cutting edge of his field.

He has just prepared an experiment to measure X, a measurement that no one has taken before.

He is about to venture into new territory.

Bob prepares his lab, and measures X.

He gets a value of 8.13.

So X=8.13.

In the days following, other scientists around the globe catch up to Bob's work and measure X.

They measure X as 8.13 as well.

Bob is excited at first…..

Until he realizes that he calibrated his equipment wrong.

He fucked up.

X should = 6.72

Fuckkkkk.

But wait, why did the other scientists measure X=8.13?

They check each other's work and it all appears sound.

How the fuck did they get 8.13?

It's the power of the observer.

Effect > Cause?

On another note

Conservation of Momentum/Energy/etc

Eventually, there were things that seemingly broke these rules.

Rather than re-write the scope of these rules and rethink about it, they keep patching up the new findings so that they don't violate conservation!

It's completely ass-backwards.

LIES to cover up LIES.

When does it end?

That's just my opinion guys.

It's all just my opinion.

>>243049

My bad, I linked the wrong ID/post!!

And so as not to get you guys off track with philosophy and physics

(which would be fun for me I admit)

Let's get back on track

Because I think what anons are doing here might be good.

I hope so.

So here's my opinion on the code stuff.

I really think you guys are onto something with the infinity symbol thing.

I really think quaternions are the answer.

There's a way that you're supposed to chunk things up into "qubits" or "quaternions".

Then you're supposed to apply certain transformations.

Chess is an allegory I think, because of the knight.

It acts like it moves in an extra dimension.

The chess stuff COULD be more literal, I don't really know.

But yeah guys, I know reading about quaternions and qubits hurts.

It hurts my head too.

I know they use quaternions to determine graphical calculations.

Like in counter-strike.

It might help to read about it from that perspective to start with instead of …..

well you know.

The wikipedia pages are painful to me, I don't know about you.

and RR……

I really don't know about him.

I like him

a lot actually.

But I keep getting the feeling that he's playing a different game.

And I can't get this nagging thought out of my head that he's clown-affiliated.

And HF….is that f5462b? or is that a different guy?

I like those 2

Good feelings about them.

Just my intuition.

I still like RR, and I'm not saying we can't learn from him.

We definitely can.

>>243097

>Quibbits and Quaternions

I think we already pretty much have this general concept applied to the letter transformations. Any letter to be transposed could have either of two values depending on whether we are on the up (or positive) side of the iteration cycle or the down (or negative).

For instance, with an off-set of 3, the letter "E" could transpose into either "B" or "H."

Is that the sort of thing you are referring to?

and I can't help but wonder

where all the honest to god

true geniuses went.

We could really use someone who actually knows about this shit

A real PhysicsAnon

and a CryptoAnon

I feel like they're already across the finish line and they're not allowed to help or something.

Or maybe the brainwashing of academia prevents them from entertaining these thoughts.

But it would be great if we could manifest/will these anons into appearing lol

>>243204

I think so, but the helpers keep saying PAIRS, pairs pairs pairs.

the pos/neg as you call it definitely resonates with me and reminds me of right/left hand and also of POLErization

>>243097

Thanks Physics Anon. You have great insight and pose interesting thought experiments. I hope one day in the future (or past) we can discuss philosophy. I will need a primer on physics.

I also believe we are doing something good here. Heck, IRL we are constantly being played and fucked with, what is the difference in being punk'd or larp'd on the Chan?

Until last night, I never heard of qubits or quaternions. Your knowledge on qbits > my knowledge. I will need to familiarize myself with this concept. Do you have a recommending for a starting paper (not Wiki)? If possible, not too technical.

When JerkOff Anon mentioned palindromes, this did perk my ears. I don't have the physics or math background of JerkOff, but I do remember palindromes from elementary school >>133636

Timestamps could be palindromes also (this might be off topic so I do not want to derail if this is the case).

>>243136

I am in a similar canoe with you on RR. I appreciate their foul mouth and shit talking. Sometime they are helpful, other times they can be a prick.....lol sometimes I fall into this pattern as well so I cannot fault RR.

I am not sure if HF has "made" an appearance in this thread. At times I get the feeling f5462b could be HF or RR. Not conclusive yet...

So, I keep thinking

future determines the past

future determines the past

hmmmm

like the code to decipher Q's first post.

Would that be in Q's LAST post.

I mean that probably hasn't occured yet

just thinking.

Like if you took the timeline of Q postings and folded it in the middle?

Or you made a moebius strip?

or am I just entertaining myself here

hmm

and I have this outrageous thought

that Q might be literally posting from the future.

and that the whole code thing.

might be protection against mucking up the desired changes to the timeline.

but that's probably just LOL territory right?

>>243284

Hey RR

This only relates tangentally but

What do you know about chaotic circuitry

>>243245

>the helpers keep saying PAIRS, pairs pairs pairs.

Yes, I felt pretty confident that pointed us to pairs of same letter length words which could be used in Q posts to either bracket words, or to act as a mirror marker for the words surrounding them. The method seems to work just fine too. I tried it in quite a few posts and got comprehensible an meaningful results. HF urged us to spread the word about the technique.

The problem is that other than Q's "think mirror" post, there is nothing that we can take to the main thread to prove that Q actually intended us to use the method.

With Q worship what it is in the main thread, we can't walk in and start messing with Q's words unless we can prove that Q intended us to do so.

You know what.

I read one of this guys books once.

He can often take complex mathematical subjects and explain them in simpler terms.

https://www amazon.com/Martin-Gardner/e/B000AP8X8G

I may pirate a book or two of his.

It may help set the scene and get me into the right mindset.

Or maybe I'll go to the library…

>>243283

>like the code to decipher Q's first post.

>Would that be in Q's LAST post.

The structure of the Q stringers makes something like this seem highly likely to me.

For instance, today's Q post had "BECD." If there were a previous Q post with "BECD," the decode instructions in today's post might apply to the other. Similarly, since I can't find a previous BECD (doesn't mean it's not there) a subsequent post with BECD might be the key to today's post.

BTW, BECD was just an example. There were multiple other unique elements in today's post that might be markers.

>>243349

Yeah I know.

THIS yields THIS confirmation.

except the signatures often have the phrase CONF in them.

hmm

Gonna go, when I come back later, I may put a different CAP on so to speak.

Was thinking it might be helpful to collect HF/RR concepts in one spot.

Then to try to translate anything I can.

and make it all more readable.

FilterAnon I guess

>>243417

>THIS yields THIS confirmation.

>except the signatures often have the phrase CONF in them.

I looked into that a while ago and couldn't find a consistent pattern of "THIS yields THIS" associated with any of the earlier Q posts with "Conf" in them.

Maybe someobdy else can see something that I don't?

Post 148148004

>jD79-x10ABy-89zBT

>08:00

>12:00

>11_6_TP_Pub

>PHIL_B_O_Extract_Conf

>02:00 Z

Post 148149435

>14.5995° N, 120.9842° E

>_Conf_UDT_green_

>^_Sj69ETC-

Post 149157229

_DGB79FTWA-0ZjBT_19-T_yes

>_Conf_13_pre-lau_yes

>_HTzD09BA_conf_yes

>_^yRTPCCA-7^DFWTAb_yes

>_green1_green2_green3_green4_conf-ZDjTwT9Ry

Post 149490950

>_Conf_D-TT_^_v891_0600_yes

>_green1_0600

>Bunker Apple Yellow Sky [… + 1]

>>243543

Here's a summary of the bulk of what we think we have so far.

>>234972

RR posted this in another thread.

>>193258

Seems like a rabbit hole, but VQC (an early contributor before we started this thread), talked a lot about fibionacci sequence.

This is the complete version of RR's "layers" method.

>>163929

>>244087

Forgot to mention, HF also talked a lot about Hebrew language characters and gematria, but I didn't understand that at all. Matrix Anon might be able to provide a condensed version. Also Matrix Anon gathered from HF that there might be some sort of connection to the Bible quotation methods. "Gen 1-1" etc.

>>244359

Why? Please enlighten us if you so deign.

>>243284

>Lord of the Larps…..is HF

You reminded me of O'Brien from 1984. He played both sides and in the end screwed over Winston and Julie. He presented them with the Book only to take it away. Interesting that both HF and RR/crony made a reference to Chi Rho.

>>201179

>>138027

Does that make all those searching the Q book Winston and Julie? Maybe OP was right to go on strike.

If the future determines the past, 1984 was written in the past about a horrifying future. That past feels like my current reality. Those behind the curtain created this technology.

>Why is Hussein traveling the globe?

>$$$,$$$,$$$

3,3,3 or 3,6,9 pattern

>Acct # xx-XXXxx-x-39670

These two lines look to me to be HF's mirroring or marking patterns, but I don't quite know what to do with it.

>Acct # XXXxx-XXXx-2391

>Where did the MONEY come from?

The pattern of capitalized words sort of reflects the XXXxx pattern MON? Monday?

>How do you destroy the most POWERFUL country in the world?

Word lengthh "powerful" matches XXXXXXXX. POW FUL? Makes no sense to me.

Alternatively, "most powe rful" could HF's 12 markers for the beginning of an area of text containing mirrored words.

>Direct attack?

6-6 12 marker would appear to end the section, os "in the world" appears to be bracketed. Not sure why.

>Covert OP by [CLAS-59#241-Q] to infiltrate at highest level to destroy from within?

>Think GAME.

>Who are the PLAYERS?

>What are the REWARDS?

>AMERICA FOR SALE.

>PATRIOTS in FULL CONTROL.

>We will make more public.

>SA was strategic.

>“We know” “Do as we say or face consequences”

>These people are stupid!

>Q

>>248595

>>243284

HF ←-> RR…..Cheshire cat got your tongue? Did I stumble upon the game that is being played?

Roth mentioned a book about tesla in that weird interview

>>207205

123

246

369

what happens if you treat the above as a 3x3 mathematical matrix? does this relate to the qmap and its decryption? does 369 relate to the number of letters in successive words in q posts to be used as a reference marker? ps. to the rest of you fags, quit shitting up the board with irrelevant nonsense. try and work on the map dammit, quit wasting time and posts.

>>249820

>>251499

wait, what is the map supposed to lead us to, does

anyone know?

meanwhile we are figuring out a map to a map, well i think we should be figuring out a map to the map to the map.

>>187623

>3,6,9

Been doing a ton of research on this, not q related.. I started my research a long time before his posts. But I think there is some real good over lap.

Note: Since I started down this path I have not fucking been able to explain what I am talking about in a way that makes sense… words just fail. It is something that requires a certain level of faith mixed with the ability to consider alternate perspectives.

1-9 is key. The numbers stream from 'source points'. Where those source points intersect establishes the building blocks of all of existence. All random outcomes have an ordered, and predictable if you can figure out the trickiest parts of the equation result…. And by this I mean, if you take a handful of sand and toss it somewhere, stare at it long enough and you will notice that there is a definite abstract as all get out pattern to the way each grain landed. In this regard the comparison of reality to an orchestra starts to seem like less of a metaphor and more of a fact. This is the source of all knowledge, how letters and words came to be, all of that.

>are you talking about like the matrix code

I don't like using that analogy but its probably the closest reference that makes a damned bit of sense

>>236477

>Is the 4D chess thing….in a way….not a meme?

meme's are very real.

>>259140

Higher levels of perception unlock higher levels of awareness. What exactly the goal is, I can't say. But, I think I found something that no one else has seemed to have mentioned yet. My previous post leads to it, having found it… I believe it's something that we each must find on our own. I have never encountered anything that was so absolutely impossible to put into words. It's almost as if you are prevented from doing so.

>>248595

>If the future determines the past, 1984 was written in the past about a horrifying future. That past feels like my current reality. Those behind the curtain created this technology.

future confirms the past. The past determines the future. The sentiments which are given energy, the belief of the population, taken as a whole, impacts how the future plays out. THE MEMES ARE REAL

Most importantly.. do not give into fear in any way at all. These piles of shit depend and count on your fear. Pray for a light to shine on your path, something has changed.. he answers again.

>>259287

Ineffable is the word u seek.

>>259288

Fear is for pussies. Worst one can do is shed thee of things like flesh Or matter. Your soul is what matters most. Holy Ghost is upon thee.