[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / animus / desu / femdom / fit / komica / mu / pdfs / tech ]

/cbts/ - Calm Before The Storm

Legacy Q Research
Learn more about the EARN IT Act, the latest attempt to gut Section 230
/fringe/ has been migrated.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Voice recorder Show voice recorder

(the Stop button will be clickable 5 seconds after you press Record)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


This board is now under /QResearch/ control as of 10/08/2018


Looking for Q? Come to QResearch


File: 28e06559880103c⋯.png (750.62 KB, 1024x729, 1024:729, clincabalswamp.png)

d1de62  No.1411[View All]

>Post research, news, links, etc. related to the Clintons, the Foundation, Dem & RINO swamp creatures, related persons & companies.

>If your research involves multiple topics, be sure to cross-link in appropriate threads.

>Try to stay on topic and only post relevant things. Keep /cbts/ clutter-free!

>Godspeed

90 posts and 97 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.113713

File: 5e6e1a66cc49e7f⋯.png (51.59 KB, 829x432, 829:432, dreadnought project.png)

>>113709

Who controls Wikipedia?

This is an important question because most of us use Wikipedia in our research. It provides a baseline for much of the information found on the Internet, which is our primary research tool these days. It is also a place many people go for answers to answered. In short, it is a primary purveyor of information in the 21nd century.

The Dreadnought Project launched their own wiki because Wikipedia did not allow them to update content from primary source material and original research. This tells us that Wikipedia, at least some parts of it, are presenting pre-defined content.

-Who is the definer of that content?

- Who decides what content is included and excluded?

-Where do they go for their source material?

-How reliable is that source material?

-Is Wikipedia compromised?

http://www.dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Main_Page

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8947bb  No.114749

>>113713

Who is not allowed on Wikipedia?

http://drjudywood.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.120511

File: 5decc2cc913df03⋯.png (23.39 KB, 723x211, 723:211, Roy C Smith.png)

File: 28061e2c7061ee5⋯.png (105.96 KB, 974x507, 974:507, Roy Campbell Smith.png)

File: 37ce96c741091ea⋯.png (298.67 KB, 985x643, 985:643, Roy Campbell Smith2.png)

File: 12c945972287295⋯.png (214.68 KB, 975x898, 975:898, Roy campbell wiki.png)

>>106634

Captain Roy Campbell Smith

Let’s assume for a moment that Smith was the Captain of the USS Arkansas just like most of the stories indicate, and that the ship was commissioned on Sept 17, 1912 in accordance with Wikipedia, the Office of the Historian website, and Naval History and Heritage Command website.

What can we find about Smith that could corroborate this claim? Not much. As it turns out, he shows up in the records on Sept 17, 1912 but then disappears until 1917 as Governor of Guam.

This is very odd indeed because the USS Arkansas is said to have played a pivotal role in the siege of Vera Cruz, yet there’s not even a peep of the Captain’s heroic deeds. It’s almost like he didn’t exist during those years.

https://history.state.gov/

https://www.history.navy.mil/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.120531

File: f42354df52ca0c9⋯.png (117.14 KB, 809x657, 809:657, Tampico affair.png)

File: 95429ce8a3dbbdc⋯.png (85.36 KB, 311x397, 311:397, Ten Tragic Days.png)

>>106634

The Siege of Vera Cruz

The Siege of Vera Cruz actually covers two different events that are related because the first event caused the second event. But they go by a variety of names, so it’s hard to really figure out what’s going on. Here’s a brief overview.

Event #1 – The Tampico Incident also known as the Ten Tragic Days

The US Ambassador to Mexico, Wilson (no relation to Woodrow Wilson) assisted the Mexican rebel Huerta in overthrowing the President of Mexico in a bloody coup that left the rightful Mexican President, Madero, and Vice President murdered and their families imprisoned.

The pretext for Ambassador’s involvement in the first place had to do with a group of sailors from the warship Dolphin who had gone ashore in Tampico and gotten into some trouble. This event is also known as the Dolphin incident. Note I called the Dolphin a warship. That will be important as the story unfolds in later posts.

*** As the web weaves itself, one of the tricks they use to hide in plain sight is convoluted naming conventions. Everyone has the same name or a version of the name or a similar name so it’s difficult to ferret out who is doing what.

Event #2 – The Occupation of Vera Cruz

As a result of incident #1, US President Woodrow Wilson sent warships to the Vera Cruz harbor. As he waited on Congress to authorize violence, he found and excuse to siege the town without Congress. The excuse was a shipment of guns coming into the port. Now, you may ask yourself why we would care about an artillery shipment to Mexico when we don’t own Mexico and don’t have the right to tell them what to do. That would be a very good question to ask yourself because it will play a part as the story unfolds.

***Someone trying to make sense of all this would find themselves frustrated to the nth degree and maybe give up the search. That is by design. That’s what they are trying to do. Once you are aware that this is all a trick designed to frustrate, then it’s all a matter of breaking it down into little pieces and noticing how the pieces play against each other to create a web of deception.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampico_Affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_occupation_of_Veracruz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Tragic_Days

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.120545

File: d4b1aaa382433cc⋯.png (390.03 KB, 983x2795, 983:2795, Guam governors.png)

>>120511

Here we have a record of Smith as the Governor of Guam.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.120731

>>106634

Now let’s assume for a moment that Moffett’s bio is the truth. Right off the bat we have a problem because it’s not really a testimony at all. The reference document was written by the Navy in 1962 after Moffett’s death. (see the pdf attached to the previous post).

The document is type written, which means it can’t readily be digitally altered. But if Moffett was already dead, then he couldn’t object to the contents. The Navy could have written anything they pleased, fabricated the whole thing from start to finish and there would be nobody to call them out as fake news.

Notice how the “A” on the typewriter doesn’t print clearly. This is by design. It obscures the word so you don’t know exactly what you are seeing or reading. Just think how many typewriters they had to try before they found one that would print this poorly. Must have taken all day, lol.

Now the dates are a bit of a problem as well. According to these dates, Moffett would have been on the USS Arkansas during the Siege of Vera Cruz, but there seems to be a lack of evidence to support that claim. We’ll take a closer look at this fact in another post.

Incidentally, 1962 was after the JFK assassination, so perhaps this little anomaly is just one more piece of a much bigger deceptive puzzle.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.120855

File: 7c5bf252b3bc14b⋯.png (1.56 MB, 978x2884, 489:1442, USS Arkansas christening.png)

>>106634

There are two big questions regarding the USS Arkansas:

When was she commissioned?

Who was the captain?

There’s a difference between launching a ship and commissioning a ship. When we launch a ship we put it in the water and christen it by breaking a bottle of champagne across the bow. We know when that occurred. We have pictures names and dates. See attached.

Commissioning refers to when the ship is added to the official roster and its activities tracked. This is important because we have a year’s difference in the dates. If the ship was commissioned in 1912, then it had a full year to run around the planet causing havoc with no supervision what so ever.

But here’s the pickle. The historical documentation is a mess. It’s shocking think a four-star admiral would allow such incompetence in his ranks, but the evidence speaks for itself. And the Secretary of State’s Office of the Historian is no better. On both sites, the records are disorganized, incomplete, and sometimes missing all together. And to think they actually get paid to make such a mess. If this is America’s finest, then we’re in trouble. It kind of explains why the Navy is always wrecking their ships, lol.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.121160

File: 4c32910b898c246⋯.png (990.73 KB, 961x4613, 961:4613, OH WW1.png)

File: 2ad0a31a3b1b762⋯.png (148.34 KB, 1007x2162, 1007:2162, Vera Cruz claims.png)

File: 768381bdf4e8db6⋯.png (334 KB, 939x1498, 939:1498, USS Arkansas Vera Cruz 191….png)

File: 50d6c6bb09fa0e0⋯.png (346.64 KB, 943x1560, 943:1560, USS Arkansas boat race 191….png)

>>106634

In this post we’ll take a look how the Black Hats created a fictional version of the events at Vera Cruz.

It starts by concocting a believable story full of action and adventure. Something that tugs at the heart strings, like defending one’s honor by going to war. The Wikipedia article below is just such a story with the USS Arkansas playing the starring role.

So, we have this battle, this siege at Vera Cruz that lasts a whopping 20 days. Virtually every ship in the Atlantic Fleet is taking part. According to Wikipedia, more medals were handed out for this battle than any other single action. Wow, this must have been a really important event.

But, what do the records say about it? Let’s take a look, shall we?

- First, we have this Milestones article on the Office of the Historian website. For the period 1914-1917. Vera Cruz isn’t mentioned at all.

- Next, we have law suits the Mexican people filed against us for trashing their town.

- Then we have a picture that shows half of the alleged USS Arkansas’ casualties being carried off the field of battle. There were only two alleged deaths.

- And then we have a photo of the USS Arkansas judging the Jamestown yacht race a couple hundred miles from the battle field at the time of the siege.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Arkansas_(BB-33)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_(Veracruz)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.121785

File: 42faea79575bcce⋯.png (21.24 KB, 702x127, 702:127, Ambassador name search.png)

>>106634

The record keeping is so poor that we have to look to the lay person to get any real, substantial information. Fortunately, I found Mrs. O’Shaughnessy. Thanks to her we have two eye-witness accounts of those dark days in Mexico.

Edith O’Shaughnessy was the wife of Nelson O’Shaughnessy, the US Ambassador to Mexico that was assigned after Ambassador Wilson (no relation to Woodrow Wilson) to clean up the mess. Edith wrote to her dear, beloved mother almost every day. Later, she collected all the letters together and had them published in two volumes: The Diplomat’s Wife in Mexico, published 1916 and Diplomatic Days, published 1917.

Edith is a delightful writer, observant and witty. She takes us her through mundane days of tea with dignitaries, receptions with world leaders and charity with the Red Cross. She is quick to point out the tight-fitting dress of the buxom Madame Huerta as well as which warships are in the harbor. Since her letters are all dated, with a little sleuthing we can garner all manner of intel. It’s like a Nick and Nora movie, “The Thin Man Occupies Vera Cruz.” Only the O’Shaughnessy’s don’t drink.

Still, there is something a little too convenient about all this delicious intel. Something’s not quite right. For example, there is no record anywhere of Nelson; Only this one little blip on the Office of the Historian website regarding his service record indicating he worked for one year. But we know from the manuscripts that Edith and Nelson were in Mexico for three years.

And then there’s the uncanny resemblance between Edith O’Shaughnessy and Edith Wilson, President Wilson’s second wife the he married right about the same time that Edith O’Shaughnessy arrived on the scene. What a coincidence that they have the same name and are the same age and even have the same hair style.

But wait, that’s not all. There’s actually a third Edith. A third Edith who just happens to travel to Zurich for five years right about the same time the other two Edith’s show up. That Edith’s name is Rockefeller.

Hmmm, three Ediths and two Nelsons? I think that’s a full house. My full house beats their fake news. But, we know they cheat so….

This would all be comical if it wasn’t for the fact that President Wilson’s first wife had to be removed and President Wilson had to be incapacitated in order for this con to work. But, it did work. Edith Rockefeller et al was President of the United States for two years.

https://archive.org/details/diplomatswifeinm008716mbp

https://archive.org/details/diplomaticdays00oshauoft

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/wilsonstroke.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_O%27Shaughnessy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Wilson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Rockefeller_McCormick

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.122112

File: c495d2b77f3df51⋯.png (326.82 KB, 502x696, 251:348, Edith O.png)

>>121785

Here is Edith O'Shaughnessy's picture from her book The Diplomat's Wife in Mexico

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.122126

File: 57eb25e99a33888⋯.png (15.18 KB, 496x230, 248:115, Medals quote.png)

File: ab6693ee02b1308⋯.png (471.66 KB, 974x2353, 974:2353, Vera Cruz medals.png)

File: 17c6c9f19ad4913⋯.png (378.67 KB, 947x1521, 947:1521, Service Record Fletcher Sr.png)

File: 6ee164fc4c7e3cf⋯.png (570.41 KB, 970x2275, 194:455, Mc I at Vera Cruz.png)

>>106634

And then there’s the mystery of the medals.

Here we have a screenshot from the Office of the Historian website. If we compare and contrast the list with the service records of some of the folks who were at the battle, some interesting inconsistencies popup.

- Fletcher is said to have received his medal on the USS Arkansas, but the Wikipedia article of his heroic deeds says he was on the USS Utah.

- Moffett, one of the candidates for captain of the USS Arkansas received a medal, but it doesn’t say what ship he was on. Isn’t that a bit odd?

- Furthermore, notice how many entries don’t identify the ship. Is this a case of sloppy record keeping or deliberate disinformation?

- And guess who was making his debut appearance at the Vera Cruz sham. He didn’t get a medal this time, but he would rise to a 4-star height, both him and his son. That’s right, Mc Sr, the very same Mc who inspired both the Caine Mutiny and McHale’s Navy and had his namesake battleship crash this year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_(Veracruz)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_occupation_of_Veracruz

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123113

>>121785

Most Americans have a false impression of the US just prior to WWI. We think that because we were neutral that meant we were a bunch of choir boys drinking fruit punch. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that the US was busy in far away lands toppling governments and rebuilding them in our own image. We were the Imperialist horde sweeping the lands.

- 1898 we fought the Spanish American war. The war started when the USS Maine was exploded in the Havana harbor. Why was out battleship there in the first place?

- As a result of the war, we acquired ownership of Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines plus custodianship of Cuba.

- We immediately began the process of setting up provisional governments in all of those locations

Edith O makes the comment that before the US was involved with Cuba, that island had a population of 1.6M people. Within a year the population had been reduced to 1M. I haven’t had time to verify, but it has a ring of truth

She also makes the statement that oil was the motivating force in the Siege of Vera Cruz. Again, this has a ring of truth. Edith O, aka Edith Rockefeller, should know about oil, black gold. Her family got its start from Standard Oil.

But, what was our great interest in Panama? For that, we turn to another wife’s book for assistance. Mrs. Taft’s book, Recollection of Full Years. Mrs. Taft was the wife of President Taft of the prior administration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish%E2%80%93American_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123269

>>123113

Mrs. Taft’s book isn’t formatted quite the same as Edith’s book. It’s not a series of letters, rather it’s a memorandum. It’s not quite as eloquent, but I think it’s written by the same team. It contains more contradictions and more blatant contradictions, almost to the point that it “doth protest too much.” Let’s start with something fairly simple: the gun salute.

On two different occasions Mrs. Taft says the guns salutes were loud: once when her husband was Secretary of War and once when he was President. In the latter case she goes to great length explaining when a President receives a gun salute, but she doesn’t say how many guns. With a little digging we learn it is a 21-gun salute for the President of the United States

Edith O also mentions the salute, only she specifies the number of guns. Nelson received an 11 gun salute. 21-11 = [10].

So, what are we to glean from this info? It could be that Edith is telling us that Nelson is a ruler on the par of a President, but not quite there.

In the case of Mrs. Taft, she doesn’t specify a number when her husband is Secretary of War. Is she implying that the Secretary of War deserves and garners such a salute? Or is she implying that the President is there with them? Or is she implying something similar to Edith’s implication, that they are rulers outside of the US government with almost as much power as the President himself.

https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/celebrate/gunsalute.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123363

>>123269

In 1905, Secretary of War Taft sets out on an Asian trip along with members of Congress and Alice Roosevelt. As Mrs. Taft points out in her book, many over-seas folks thought of Alice as US royalty. The itinerary is as follows:

• Start at San Francisco on July 4

• July 8-25 cruise with a stop in Hawaii where they received a 17-gun salute

• July 25- August 5 – Japan

• August 5 – September 2

• September 2 – September 12

Does this itinerary look familiar? It should. POTUS just made the same circuit. Was he un-doing what they had done? Notice they received a 17-gun salute. Not 21 as for a President. But not 11 either. Could Alice, and her perceived royalty, have made a difference?

http://www.ohiohistoryhost.org/taft/cruise.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123558

File: ad3e79ea074254e⋯.png (189.2 KB, 275x1743, 275:1743, Taft snapshot.png)

File: c486c98b249922a⋯.png (195.7 KB, 978x1460, 489:730, Taft travel.png)

File: fd56fe7d902d8b0⋯.png (289.74 KB, 983x1791, 983:1791, Panama travel pres.png)

File: 8da4dd3ab6fc966⋯.png (308.83 KB, 981x1917, 109:213, Panama travel sec.png)

>>123269

Mrs. Taft makes a big deal regarding the number of times her husband visits Panama. In her book, Recollections of Full Years, she tells us that he made seven trips in as many years. Taft was Secretary of War for four years and then President for four years. She is saying that within that eight-year period, he had made seven trips. However, the records do not support that assertion. The records show that in that 8-year period, Taft only made one trip to Panama. Why the discrepancy? Which side is correct? Have the historical documents been tampered with? Is Mrs. Taft mistaken or forgetful? Or is she deliberately misleading us?

The single trip that is documented in the official records occurs in February 1909 when Taft was President-Elect. In 1909, Inauguration Day was March 15th. If Taft had actually made six additional, unrecorded trips, how did he get there? What was his form of conveyance? Did he drive his own car, lol.

Furthermore, look at the dates for his trip, January 29 – February 7. Nine days. Is that enough time to get to Panama, inspect the canal, and get back? What can we use as a benchmark for travel?

Mrs. Taft gives us some information in her book. On page 287 she says that in Nov 1904 they went from Washington to New Orleans. Then they sailed on the little [USS] Dolphin from New Orleans to Pensacola. In Pensacola they changed to the cruiser Columbia. They arrived at Colon, Panama on a Sunday morning. On Dec 4, they had been on the Isthmus a couple of weeks. So, if they had left early in November, then this one-way trip with stops would have taken about five weeks. If they had left at the end of November, it might have taken only one week including stops. There’s really no way to calculate the travel time given the limited information we have. There’s really no way for us to know if this trip makes sense because we have nothing to compare it to.

https://archive.org/details/recollectionsfu02taftgoog

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123722

File: 77f6c6948c18c83⋯.png (878.27 KB, 984x4688, 123:586, Ark navy legacy.png)

>>123558

This Wikipedia article states that the USS Arkansas transported Taft to Panama in October 1912 and then from Panama to Florida in December 1912. I had a hard time reconciling this statement for two reasons. Firstly, this information didn’t display anywhere else. I couldn’t understand where Wikipedia had gotten it and started to question the validity of Wikipedia. Finally, I found the source hidden in the legacy webpages of the Navy website.

The second reason why this information was hard to reconcile is because 1912 was an election year and Taft was running for office. Election day would have been Nov 7, right in the middle of his trip. Was he out of the country on election day? Is the source fabricated?

My personal belief is that yes, he was out of the country on election day. Notice what transpired during this election cycle. First off, Roosevelt, the man whom he had beaten before, returns and divides the party thus ensuring the party won’t have enough votes to carry the election. Next, Taft’s running mate mysteriously dies just days before the election. If Taft is out of the country, then he isn’t a suspect. Taft wasn’t really needed at President – been there done that. He’d already left his influence on the Secretary of War position and the Presidency. Next it was time to spread his influence in the Judicial system where he could bend the laws to fit the globalist agenda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Arkansas_(BB-33)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.123847

File: 687dd251fbe9c85⋯.png (546.77 KB, 941x5058, 941:5058, Presidential visits.png)

File: 0e8fef5139e271e⋯.png (109.56 KB, 325x1094, 325:1094, Dolphin snapshot.png)

>>123558

Remember when Mrs. Taft said they had sailed on the little Dolphin? Let’s take a look at that real quick. First off, John D Jr is familiar with the boat according to this Wikipedia article:

In August 1900, Rockefeller was invited by the powerful Senator Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich of Rhode Island to join a party aboard President William McKinley Jr.'s yacht, the USS Dolphin, on a cruise to Cuba. Although the outing was of a political nature, Rockefeller's future wife philanthropist/socialite Abigail Greene "Abby" Aldrich was included in the large party; the two had first met in the fall of 1894 and had been courting for over four years.

The first thing to notice here is that Abby is Senator Aldrich’s daughter, so John D Rockefeller Jr is hobnobbing with his future father-in-law and the sitting President of the United States. As a reminder, Aldrich was also part of the Jekyll Island club.

The second thing to notice here is the boat, the Dolphin. Everybody loves dolphins. Their man’s best friend in the water. And this little outing looks like so much fun, cruising on the President’s personal yacht. But, tale a look at the description:

She was built with one 6-inch (152 mm)/30 caliber Mark 1 gun, two 6-pounder (57mm (2.24 n)) rapid-fire guns, and four 3-pounder (47mm (1.85in)) Hotchkiss revolving cannon.

She is a gunboat, pure and simple.

Furthermore, it’s not the only boat considered to be the President’s personal yacht.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller_Jr

http://www.myreporter.com/2011/01/whatever-happened-to-the-presidential-yacht-mayflower-once-moored-in-wilmington/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.125891

File: 4943723dc0f6239⋯.png (79.2 KB, 323x1688, 323:1688, Ark config snapshot.png)

File: d85055a09e51a60⋯.png (88.83 KB, 320x345, 64:69, gun 5_51.png)

File: 732d20c2944d001⋯.png (101.29 KB, 331x1144, 331:1144, gun12_50 snapshot.png)

>>106634

>>120855

>>120731

>>120531

>>120511

>>123722

>>123558

Let’s revisit the USS Arkansas situation.

There are only a few things we know with any level of certain are:

- She was launched on January 14, 1911 – we have supporting visual evidence in the form of pictures, and this date appears to be undisputed across all sources

- She was a Wyoming class battleship originally configured with:

o Two 21-inch submerged torpedo tubes

o Twelve 12-inch /50 caliber Mark 7 guns mounted in six different turrets on the centerline, two forward and four aft

o Twenty-one 5-inch / 51 caliber guns mounted in casements along the sides

o An 11.5-inch steel plated conning tower

- She was commissioned on or before September 17, 1912

What we don’t know with any level of certain includes:

- Who the captain was at any point in time

- The whereabouts of the mysterious Captain Smith prior to 1916 Guam

- The whereabouts of the ship prior to September 17, 1912

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Arkansas_(BB-33)

http://maritimequest.com/warship_directory/us_navy_pages/uss_arkansas_bb33_data.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12%22/50_caliber_Mark_7_gun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5%22/51_caliber_gun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torpedo_tube

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conning_tower

https://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/detail.asp?ship_id=uss-arkansas-bb33-dreadnought-battleship

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.126500

File: e621ff532ef4c87⋯.png (1.08 MB, 976x4269, 976:4269, Merida.png)

File: a16aa34fa73cd67⋯.png (165.85 KB, 734x470, 367:235, Cumberland collission.png)

File: 4bd8f05e60dc69f⋯.png (226.72 KB, 969x882, 323:294, Farragut and Cumberland.png)

>>125891

What this means is that we (the world) had a heavily armed and dangerous battleship whose activities are completely undocumented for a period of 18 months from Jan 14, 1911 to Sept 17, 1912

We also have records of at least two maritime accidents occurring during this same period.

Accident # 1 – The RMS Titanic

On april 15, 1912 the Titanic allegedly struck an iceberg in the north Atlantic on her maiden voyage and sank.

-Over 1500 souls lost

-Passengers included millionaires as well as emigrants

-She was an ocean liner on the White Star Line

Accident #2 – The SS Merida

On May 12, 1911 the Merida sank off the coast of Virginia with a cache of gold, silver, and coin.

- The Merida was an ocean liner of the Ward Line

- The accident occurred in a fog bank with near zero visibility

- The Merida collided with a ship identified as the SS Admiral Farragut

The USS Farragut torpedo boat was in service at that time, but it was stationed on the other side of the country prior to the Panama Canal. Was this the same boat? Unlikely, but not out of the realm of possibility and needs more research.

Interestingly, the SS Admiral Farragut had been in another accident ten years earlier, and the description of that accident mirrored this one. Coincidence or copy and paste?

https://pilotonline.com/news/local/history/robert-hitchings/in-the-passenger-liner-merida-sank-off-the-coast-of/article_190a288b-52b8-5068-bd30-903052a35fd1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Farragut_(TB-11)

https://stillwoods.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-history-of-ward-line.html

https://www.sshsa.org/research/highlights.html

http://steamship-historical-society.tumblr.com/post/111302762364/as-sshsa-staff-and-volunteers-go-through

https://www.facebook.com/notes/shipwreckhunter/the-lost-treasure-of-the-ss-merida-/975391415809706

http://lubec.mainememory.net/page/961/display.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_RMS_Titanic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.127611

File: 5aa86ed245adcc0⋯.png (236.72 KB, 293x2417, 293:2417, Teddy Roosevelt.png)

File: 2fb026de05727df⋯.png (189.47 KB, 281x1279, 281:1279, Sherman snapshot.png)

File: 9822849ca8dcbde⋯.png (225.42 KB, 323x660, 323:660, Mckinnley assination snaps….png)

File: 1f692ca6d7c9c86⋯.png (101.25 KB, 283x811, 283:811, Hobart snapshot.png)

>>123363

Speaking of Alice Roosevelt, her father he was no stranger to unfortunate incidents. Today we speak a lot about the Clinton body count, but Teddy Roosevelt had quite a body count of his own.

1884 Roosevelt’s mother dies of typhoid fever. Later that day, in the same house, Roosevelt’s wife, Alice, dies while giving birth to their daughter, Alice. The death is a result of undiagnosed Bright’s disease (kidney failure) and is not related to the birth.

1899 President McKinley’s VP, James Hobart, dies in office. Roosevelt becomes VP.

1901 President McKinley is assassinated and Roosevelt becomes President

1912 Roosevelt comes back from retirement to run for President as an independent against his old friend and incumbent President Taft. Just a few days before the election, Taft’s VP dies.

And these are just the ones I found without trying.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/theodore-roosevelts-wife-and-mother-die

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garret_Hobart

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_William_McKinley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_S._Sherman

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.131943

>>126500

>>131876

The Titanic was also carrying over $5M in diamonds and bonds, which would have been a sizable fortune back then. Check out the Titanic thread to see a theory that the Titanic was a false flag, a setup, a sham, a fraud.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.131950

File: beb4367f58fed7d⋯.png (1.16 MB, 975x897, 25:23, NYT Feb 28 1912.png)

File: f0a71b4fdd182b6⋯.png (233.94 KB, 289x550, 289:550, NYT article Feb 28 1912.png)

>>120531

The whole Vera Cruz incident rests on the supposition that the US and Mexico are somehow linked due to the Spanish American War. And that war allegedly started with the sinking of the battleship Maine in the Havana Harbor. But that event turns out to be falsified.

According to Wikipedia, the USS Maine was exploded in the Havana Harbor thus providing reason for the US to declare war on Mexico in 1989. This news clip indicates the Maine exploded in 1912 and that Cuban officials were very courteous in handling the situation. We have a 13 year discrepancy in dates.

Obviously, the explosion event was not the reason for the Spanish American war. The next logical question … was there are war at all?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Maine_(ACR-1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish%E2%80%93American_War

Pic – USS Maine/NYT article, NYT Feb 28

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4b2f4b  No.134830

Huge archived document dump on Clinton Foundation and much more…450 pages!

Happy hunting Patriot anons!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ihJEzb1trreKPgWlpW9m_CY9z0kQ6vXm4dqnbb8Xa4U/edit

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.136413

File: 24d70d50b4499de⋯.png (707.68 KB, 986x2249, 986:2249, Tampico salute request 2.png)

>>120531

>>121785

Why was the Dolphin in Mexican waters?

The Tampico incident occurs because sailors from the USS Dolphin go into Tampico. But why was the Dolphin there in the first place? The Dolphin is the USS Presidential yacht. We know this because in John D. Rockefeller Jr. met his wife Abby on the Dolphin according to Wikipedia, and the Dolphin is identified as the Presidential yacht. We also know it from the Office of Historiain website that it is one of thee boats identified as yachts visited by US Presidents. However, there is no record of Wilson visiting the Dolphin. So, when the Dolphin was I Mexican waters in 1913, was Wilson on board? If not, why was the Presidential yacht traveling without him?

In the Diplomat’s Wife in Mexico, Edith tells us that they had arrived in Mexico via the Monterrey, an ocean liner of the Ward Line, with Captain Smith. Checking the list of ships for the Ware line, we find there is indeed a Monterrey listed. So, that part of her story checks out. The Captain Smith, as mentioned in a previous post, appears to the be de facto caption for the Monterrey as this was his 99th trip into that harbor. However, things get a little muddy when we realize that there are three different Captain Smiths operating in this time frame:

-Captain Smith of the Monterrey

-Captain Roy Campbell Smith, the mysterious captain of the USS Arkansas

-Captain E J Smith of the Titanic.

In Edith’s books, she explains that she is traveling with Nelson O’Shaughnessy. I don’t recall her ever saying he was her husband, although the title of her book implies that relationship. She also mentions a blond haired boy named Elim that she never identifies as her son.

It is my contention that the actors are as follows:

-Nelson O’Shaughnessy= John David Rockefeller Jr.

-Edith O’Shaughnessy = Edith Rockefeller (John David Rockefeller Jr’s sister)

-Elim = Nelson Rockefeller (John David Rockefeller Jr’s son) when he was six years old

-Captain Smith = Captain Roy Campbell Smith

And that they were traveling aboard the Presidential yacht without the President, that they were operating as a de facto US rogue government, that the gun-salute is a symbol of that status, that the purpose was to subjugate Mexico in order to get the oil to enrich the Rockefeller coffers.

Furthermore, that on their return to the US, Edith adopted a different persona in order to fool the American People as the team moved Edith into the White House as President Wilson’s new wife so that the Rockefellers could impose their NOW and drain American coffers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller_Jr.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.136435

>>136413

*NOW should be NWO = New World Order

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.137743

File: 0e4edf314f188fb⋯.png (1.11 MB, 892x766, 446:383, Fleet NY EW100912.png)

File: 87d500c0a815a3c⋯.png (777.42 KB, 938x882, 67:63, Ghost_ships_key EW 100912.png)

File: d2c3664c6d612f4⋯.png (980.04 KB, 932x810, 466:405, Lights on EW 100912.png)

File: 76db36ffaae761e⋯.png (878.28 KB, 1031x964, 1031:964, Legion battle EW0912.png)

Ghost Ships

This article contains a lot of information. It’s talking about some kind of expo where lots of ships are in the harbor. Notice it mentions both the USS Maine and the USS Arkansas.

- USS Maine – We’ve already seen in previous posts that according to the official story the USS Maine was exploded in Havana Harbor in 1898 thus beginning the Spanish American War. We’ve also seen a newspaper article saying the USS Maine was exploded in 1912. So, the USS Maine shouldn’t exist at all, yet it’s included here on the list as being on display.

- USS Arkansas – We’ve already seen in previous posts that, contrary to the official story, this ship was not at Vera Cruz in 1914. We also don’t know when it was commissioned, and the captain is a complete mystery. We also don’t know it’s activities for the first 18 months.

Notice the highlighted areas of this article:

- Keep the lights on. Everyone is instructed to keep area well lit while the ships are in harbor

- It mentions visitors.

- It names the visitors as “they are legion.”

- It mentions battle

What we should glean from this article is the possibility that these ships are truly demonic apparitions and that even 100 years ago, the writer was aware of true essence and was trying to warn people.

https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030193/1912-10-09/ed-1/seq-4/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a08342  No.138013

Just in case it's not out there

HRC's SF Form 312

Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement

Signed 22 Jan 2009

>>>/pdf/881

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.138192

>>123558

Panama Canal Players

The Panama Canal was a big deal back in the early 1900’s. Here is a list of players on that project:

-William Nelson Cromwell – Attorney / lobbyist who affected early Congressional decisions regarding the canal

-Rear Admiral John Grimes Walker – President of the Isthmus Canal Commission

-John Findley Wallace – Chief engineer from 1904-1905

-John Frank Stevens – Chief engineer from 1906-1907

-George Washington Geothals – Chief engineer from 1907-1914

-General Davis – Governor of Panama 1904-1905

-Charles Edward Magoon – Governor of Panama 1905-1906

As President of the Isthmus Canal Commission, Walker was instrumental in determining the location of the Panama Canal. William Nelson Cromwell received the highest amount ever paid to a lawyer for his role in the Panama Canal deal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Panama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Frank_Stevens

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington_Goethals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Nelson_Cromwell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Grimes_Walker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Edward_Magoon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Whitefield_Davis

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.138198

File: feb9885ca26bca2⋯.png (56.57 KB, 696x706, 348:353, RADM Grimes geni.png)

>>138192

Rear Admiral Walker was a member of several fraternal organizaitons. Besides Walker, the Naval Order of the United States also includes in its membership:

-George H.W. Bush - Lieutenant, USNR

-Admiral John S. McCain, Jr. - Senior naval officer in Vietnam

John S. McCain, Jr was stationed in Panama, and John Sidney McCain III was born at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936.

Another interesting thing about Rear Admiral Walker was that he had a grandson named Herbert Walker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Grimes_Walker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Order_of_the_Loyal_Legion_of_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Order_of_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Order_of_Foreign_Wars

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.214940

File: 8f7661077dd8754⋯.png (59.39 KB, 236x295, 4:5, Edith Galt Wilson.png)

>>122112

Here is a picture of Edith Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson's second wife that he married while in office.

"Wilson’s first wife, Ellen, died in August 1914, just as World War I was beginning in Europe. Wilson met Edith Galt, a widow, in March 1915, and they fell in love quickly." He married her on December 18, 1915. Hi second term inauguration was in March 1917. and in 1919, he had an incapacitating stroke.

https ://seanmunger.com /2013/10/02/the-stroke-that-changed-history-woodrow-wilson-and-the-last-glass-ceiling/

http ://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/woodrow-wilson-marries-edith-bolling-galt

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.215200

>>121785

So, we don't really have any evidence other than the timeline that Edith Rockefeller was in fact the same person as Edith O'Shaughnessy and Edith Wilson. Perhaps it's just a coincidence. The timeline and visual similarity point to Edith O'Shaughnessy and Edith Wilson as being the same person.

In that case, does that mean that Wilson was actually in Vera Cruz? That might explain why the Dolphin, the Presidential yacht was there. It would also explain a bit about the gun salutes. However it all needs more digging.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

df965d  No.217308

Agenda - APEI

AMERICAN POOL

ENTERPRISES, INC.

11515 Cronridge Drive, Suite Q

Owings Mills, MD 21117-1550

I do not know if this is here yet in any thread. Follow this crumb leading to the children.. one of their major fronts, and the names I found attached to this operation.. WOW..

Cooper/Vanderbilt/ Podesta Pool/Painting - NO COINCIDENCES

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.219727

>>217308

Can you be more specific, provide examples, sources? I'm not seeing it on their website(s). Not saying it's not there, just that I'm not seeing it.

http:// americanpool.com/

http:// unitedworkandtravel.com/contact/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

df965d  No.219940

http://americanpool.com/about-us/

I cut and pasted this.

It is in the HUMA emails that were released.

http://huma-emails.thebradfordfile.com

If you put in the search bar APEI - You will find the email exchanges on this "program."

Other key words I used

Organization

Census

J-1

The HUMA emails will give you the extent of APEI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

791878  No.219988

>>219943

>>219916

I think they started outting on their 'shitting pants' after what went down in SA! Cutting off their money pit, billionaire Princes being locked up, assets frozen and tortured! Ahahaha I 'get a tingle up my leg' every time I think about 'Prince Dopey' hanging upside down being tortured!!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.220552

File: ff292871776815d⋯.png (436.18 KB, 878x727, 878:727, Shiela Jackson Lee headlin….png)

File: 4a2f9203a3069b4⋯.png (210.47 KB, 495x284, 495:284, Shiela Jackson Lee ring.png)

Who is Shiela Jackson Lee?

Texas Representative Shiela Jackson Lee was given a first-class seat on a United flight from Houston to DC. But to do that, they bumped another passenger. The congresswoman went on to play the race card in her defense. The real culprit in the story is United Airlines for not having the backbone to stand up to a bully congresswoman. However, news reports indicate that since coming to office in 1995, she has routinely used her position of power to demand upgrades and special treatment, “to be treated like a queen.” Additionally, she was seen sporting a ring with the pedophile logo.

Head’s up you folks in the 18th District (Houston area). This is your representative at work. How long are you going to pay for it?

http:// www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/28/bumped-united-passenger-fires-back-at-rep-jackson-lees-racism-charge-airline.html

https:// hotair.com/archives/2017/12/28/united-passenger-accused-racism-jackson-lee-human-rights-activist/

http:// www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/27/rep-sheila-jackson-lee-once-named-meanest-member-congress.html

https:// truepundit.com/dont-know-im-congresswoman-sheila-jackson-lee-seafood-meal/

https:// fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/12/30/congresswoman-sheila-jackson-lees-pedophile-jewelry/

https:// jacksonlee.house.gov/

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_18th_congressional_district

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

468847  No.226563

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.232949

File: e84c8efa10b5541⋯.png (226.71 KB, 647x529, 647:529, Liberty cover up headline.png)

The Day Israel, our ally, attacked us.

On June 8, 1967 during the Israeli Six Day War, the USS Liberty was deliberately attacked by Israel. Israel attacked with bombs, napalm, strafing, and torpedoes. The Americans were caught off-guard. 2/3 of the entire crew was either killed or wounded. The attack was deliberate. President Johnson and Secretary of Defense McNamara covered it up in order to maintain friendship with Israel. Admiral John McCain Jr was the head of the board of inquiry, and he followed orders for the coverup. Thirty-four crew members lost their lives and 171 were injured. No one has ever been tried for this war crime or murder.

https:// youtu.be/0q7yEnMjQ6U

https:// youtu.be/tx72tAWVcoM

https:// youtu.be/0q7yEnMjQ6U

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War

http:// www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ussliberty.html

https:// www.lewrockwell.com/2015/06/roger-stone/the-uss-liberty-and-lbj/

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.233086

File: 76064efe4c836c9⋯.png (58.18 KB, 234x251, 234:251, Johnson and Kennedy.png)

File: eda89cd9585617d⋯.png (58.97 KB, 237x249, 79:83, Johnson oath.png)

>>232949

Many also feel that Johnson aka LBJ was responsible for the assassination of Kennedy aka JFK.

If you’ve ever been to the school book depository, you can see with your own eyes that the official narrative doesn’t make any sense. If my cousin Vinnie had been the lawyer, Oswald would have gotten off. But there wasn’t a trial, was there? Just like there wasn’t a trial after 9/11 and there wasn’t a trial after the Las Vegas massacre. The perpetrator is dead, nothing to see here folks, move along. And just to make sure there’s nothing to see, we’re going to seal the records for 50 years. Even the tour of the School Book Depository Museum speaks about the immediate speculation of conspiracy and coverup.

So why would LBJ be a suspect? LBJ was the Vice President that became President upon JFK’s death. And, he didn’t waste any time either. He took the oath of office right there in Dallas on Air Force One while waiting for the body to be loaded on the airplane. But here’s the thing. LBJ was from Texas. He was a member of the Texas good old boys network. He had been a US Congressman from Texas, just like his father before him. And where the murder take place? In Texas.

Now that many of the sealed documents are being released, there is hope that we will get to the bottom of this story. But for now, LBJ is a prime suspect.

https:// www.jfk.org/

http:// panoramaof.com/us/2736238-Texas-School-Book-Depository/

https:// youtu.be/0FCqjClIxuU

https:// youtu.be/iU83R7rpXQY

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.233232

File: ebdd178d588efa2⋯.png (71.82 KB, 564x262, 282:131, HRC concession.png)

>>233086

Goldwater’s Concession Speech – or lack thereof

In refence to HRC’s lack of a concession speech the night she conceded to Trump and left her fans and supporters waiting alone, Q asked when was the last time a candidate did not give a concession speech. The answer is 1964 when Goldwater lost to Johnson. Goldwater did not like Johnson one bit. And, even though the contest was a landslide, he refused to give Johnson the satisfaction of a concession that night. He waited until the following day, and sent a note.

There have been other instances throughout history of foot-dragging and perhaps even one instance of complete failure. But the most recent two would be HRC and Goldwater as per my count.

http:// thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/302759-what-trump-and-thomas-jefferson-have-in-common

http:// www.vdare.com/letters/an-arizona-reader-says-goldwater-was-right-about-concession-speeches

https:// www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/11/09/watch-live-hillary-clinton-addresses-supporters-after-defeat/93532872/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54bd25  No.240027

>>220552

Ring is fake.

VIDEO: https:// www.c-span.org/video/?290735-1/release-transportation-security-agency-information

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a2d70a  No.247034

File: 1a494a30acc40e8⋯.png (47.42 KB, 641x236, 641:236, Operation Northwoods headl….png)

>>233086

>>232949

Corruption in High Places – Operation Northwoods (1962)

Operation Northwoods is the root cause of the attack on the USS Liberty and the ensuing coverup. According to James Bradford, witnesses told him that they were threatened with court martial, imprisonment or death for disclosing the truth – that LBJ had orchestrated the attack on the USS Liberty with the intent of killing everyone on board.

“Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.” The purpose of all this? To galvanize the US public into accepting, wanting, and calling for war with Cuba.

But the bigger question is this: Is Operation Northwoods a standard operating policy of the United States? Had there been similar operations prior to 1962? Could 9/11 and the Las Vegas Massacre be Operation Norwood events?

https:// youtu.be/fRZSzdQuOqM

http:// abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

http:// www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

78a883  No.251015

Lmao

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a2d70a  No.252363

File: 29ce15176dbaf39⋯.jpg (76.77 KB, 997x456, 997:456, Udall foundation S 1818.jpg)

The Udall Foundation - Executive Branch of the United States Government

The Udall Foundation is an Executive Branch foundation established by Congress in 1992 during the Presidency of George Bush. Obama added to it in 2009 with S1818: Morris K Udall Scholarship ad Excellence in national Environmental Policy Amendments Act of 2009. Although the narrative on the websites indicates the foundation is funded from interest from the initial trust fund, the Planning Document indicates that more than 80% of its funding is appropriated by congress annually and it can’t keep the doors open without this funding.

We’ve seen in other research that foundations are often used as money laundering/ slush fund vehicles, which begs the following questions:

- Why does the Executive branch need a foundation?

- How is it that Congress could set up a foundation for the Executive branch?

- How much was the initial trust fund, where did the money come from and where is the money now?

- How many other such foundations are floating around the government?

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_K._Udall_and_Stewart_L._Udall_Foundation

https:// www.gop.gov/bill/s-1818-morris-k-udall-scholarship-and-excellence-in-national-environmental-policy-amendments-act-0f-2009/

https:// udall.gov/AboutUs/MissionAndHistory.aspx

https://udall.gov/ UdallFoundationGapinAppropriationsPlanningDocument2018FINAL.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a2d70a  No.252372

File: c089debc7b7a6e6⋯.jpg (136.26 KB, 973x600, 973:600, Udall foundation.jpg)

>>252363

The bill creating the Foundation was the result of a bipartisan effort led by Morris Udall's colleagues from Arizona, Democratic Senator Dennis DeConcini and Republican Senator John McCain.

Dennis Deconcini was investigated along with McCain in the Keating Five corruption scandal of 1989. Deconcini associated with two other foundaitons:

- Advisory council of Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation

- Board of Directors of International Center for Missing and Exploited Children

https:// udall.gov/AboutUs/MissionAndHistory.aspx

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_DeConcini

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a2d70a  No.252380

>>252363

The Udall Scholarship is a highly competitive award and is regarded by most universities as one of several "prestigious scholarships" (alongside the Churchill Scholarship, the Fulbright Scholarship, the Gates Cambridge Scholarship, the Harry S. Truman Scholarship, the Marshall Scholarship, the Mitchell Scholarship, and the Rhodes Scholarship, )

We’ve already seen in other posts that the Rhodes Scholarship established by Cecil Rhodes is a globalist activity with seditious intentions. Is this scholarship, and the associated foundation, also a globalist seditious activity? Needs more research.

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_K._Udall_and_Stewart_L._Udall_Foundation

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

03ee73  No.259422

>>226563

Cloward/Piven strategy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

Cloward and Piven's article is focused on forcing the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to take federal action to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare "would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "…deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."[3]

They further wrote:

“ The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[3] ”

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven "proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy."[4]

She was even at the occupy movement

https://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/4/frances_fox_piven_at_occupy_wall_street_we_desperately_need_a_popular_uprising_in_the_united_states

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

19273e  No.260511

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8a7c9b  No.261456

File: 4cde14241339d35⋯.jpg (3.93 MB, 4032x3024, 4:3, 20181017_154120.jpg)

File: 60fc1d8c67f298e⋯.jpg (846.51 KB, 1920x1440, 4:3, 20181017_154107.jpg)

https://www.facebook.com/kevin.dennison.984

KMX193

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

96c5d4  No.261528

File: f5eada0e5b8cfbe⋯.jpeg (353.89 KB, 1242x2128, 621:1064, AA7269E7-4790-4892-B57E-C….jpeg)

File: 293b3f207a03f91⋯.jpeg (65.98 KB, 1216x770, 608:385, 1C61DD08-2805-4ABB-983C-A….jpeg)

File: a811220be3a1e1d⋯.jpeg (349.77 KB, 1242x2208, 9:16, 4113A2E6-C0F3-4621-A642-C….jpeg)

longtime lurkerfag

Qpost #238

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/30/17 (Thu) 00:12:57 7db625 (2) No.13282>>13290 >>13292 >>13293 >>13296 >>13300 >>13307 >>13311 >>13316 >>13319 >>13325 >>13336 >>13340 >>13358

Sidley Austin.

Happy hunting.

Q

Huawei Technologies is a client of Sidley Austin LLP

Came across this fact after the chopper crash into a building housing an office of Sidley Austin LLC. Which it also caused the evacuation of.

>>13282

helicopter crash article bypassing paywall

https://www.outline.com/gHMfVP

original crash article with paywall

https://www.law360.com/articles/1167676/willkie-sidley-offices-evacuated-after-ny-helicopter-crash

court filing page with link to pdf

https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2016cv02787/299039/239

direct link to pdf of court filing

https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2016cv02787/299039/239/0.pdf?ts=1518598018

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / animus / desu / femdom / fit / komica / mu / pdfs / tech ]