[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 55sync / ara / biz / fringe / inbouron / lit / qrb / rzabczan ]

/32/ - Psychopolitics

It's all in your head

Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


The IRC is active at Rizon's #32.

 No.1532

I found this text about the Overton Window but it is in Spanish. It is a step-by-step example of how to legalize cannibalism. It would be wonderful if we could get it translated to english for easier understanding and to post it eventually in other sites.

"¿Cómo legalizar cualquier fenómeno, desde la eutanasia hasta el canibalismo?

Evgueni Gorzhaltsán

En la actual sociedad de la tolerancia, que no tiene ideales fijos y, como resultado, tampoco una clara división entre el bien y el mal, existe una técnica que permite cambiar la actitud popular hacia conceptos considerados totalmente inaceptables.

Esta técnica, llamada “la ventana Overton” y que consiste en una secuencia concreta de acciones con el fin de conseguir el resultado deseado, “puede ser más eficaz que la carga nuclear como arma para destruir comunidades humanas”, opina el columnista Evgueni Gorzhaltsán.

En su artículo en el portal Adme, pone el ejemplo radical de cómo convertir en aceptable la idea de legalizar el canibalismo paso a paso, desde la fase en que se considera una acción repugnante e impensable, completamente ajena a la moral pública, hasta convertirse en una realidad aceptada por la conciencia de masas y la ley. Eso no se consigue mediante un lavado de cerebro directo, sino en técnicas más sofisticadas que son efectivas gracias a su aplicación coherente y sistemática sin que la sociedad se dé cuenta del proceso, cree Gorzhaltsán.

Primera etapa: de lo impensable a lo radical

Obviamente, actualmente la cuestión de la legalización del canibalismo se encuentra en el nivel más bajo de aceptación en la “ventana de posibilidades” de Overton, ya que la sociedad lo considera como un fenómeno absurdo e impensable, un tabú.

Para cambiar esa percepción, se puede, amparándose en la libertad de expresión, trasladar la cuestión a la esfera científica, pues para los científicos normalmente no hay temas tabú. Por lo tanto, es posible celebrar, por ejemplo, un simposio etnológico sobre rituales exóticos de las tribus de la Polinesia y discutir la historia del tema de estudio y obtener declaraciones autorizadas sobre el canibalismo, garantizando así la transición de la actitud negativa e intransigente de la sociedad a una actitud más positiva.

Simultáneamente, hay que crear algún grupo radical de caníbales, aunque exista solo en Internet, que seguramente será advertido y citado por numerosos medios de comunicación. Como resultado de la primera etapa de Overton, el tabú desaparece y el tema inaceptable empieza a discutirse.

Segunda etapa: de lo radical a lo aceptable En esta etapa, hay que seguir citando a los científicos, argumentando que uno no puede blindarse a tener conocimientos sobre el canibalismo, ya que si alguna persona se niega a hablar de ello será considerado un hipócrita intolerante.

Al condenar la intolerancia, también es necesario crear un eufemismo para el propio fenómeno para disociar la esencia de la cuestión de su denominación, separar la palabra de su significado. Así, el canibalismo se convierte en “antropofagia”, y posteriormente en “antropofilia”.

Paralelamente, se puede crear un precedente de referencia, histórico, mitológico, contemporáneo o simplemente inventado, pero lo más importante es que sea legitimado, para que pueda ser utilizado como prueba de que la antropofilia en principio puede ser legalizada.

Tercera etapa: de lo aceptable a lo sensato

Para esa etapa, es importante promover ideas como las siguientes: “el deseo de comer personas está genéticamente justificado”, “a veces una persona tiene que recurrir a eso, si se dan circunstancias apremiantes” o “un hombre libre tiene el derecho de decidir qué come”.

Los adversarios reales a esos conceptos, es decir, la gente de a pie que no quiere ser indiferente al problema, intencionadamente se convierten para la opinión pública en enemigos radicales cuyo papel es representar la imagen de psicópatas enloquecidos, oponentes agresivos de la antropofilia que llaman a quemar vivos a los caníbales, junto con otros representantes de las minorías.

Expertos y periodistas en esta etapa demuestran que durante la historia de la humanidad siempre hubo ocasiones en que las personas se comían unas a otras, y que eso era normal."

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1533

Cuarta etapa: de lo sensato a lo popular

Los medios de comunicación, con la ayuda de personas conocidas y políticos, ya hablan abiertamente de la antropofilia. Este fenómeno empieza a aparecer en películas, letras de canciones populares y videos. En esta etapa, comienza a funcionar también la técnica que supone la promoción de las referencias a los personajes históricos destacados que practicaban la antropofilia.

Para justificar a los partidarios de la legalización del fenómeno se puede recurrir a la humanización de los criminales mediante la creación de una imagen positiva de ellos diciendo, por ejemplo, que ellos son las víctimas, ya que la vida las obligó a practicar la antropofilia.

Quinta etapa: de lo popular a lo político

Esta categoría supone ya empezar a preparar la legislación para legalizar el fenómeno. Los grupos de presión se consolidan en el poder y publican encuestas que supuestamente confirman un alto porcentaje de partidarios de la legalización del canibalismo en la sociedad. En la conciencia pública se establece un nuevo dogma: “La prohibición de comer personas está prohibida.”

Esta es una técnica típica del liberalismo que funciona debido a la tolerancia como pretexto para la proscripción de los tabúes. Durante la última etapa del “movimiento de las ventanas” de Overton de lo popular a lo político, la sociedad ya ha sufrido una ruptura, pues las normas de la existencia humana se han alterado o han sido destruidas con la adopción de las nuevas leyes.

Gorzhaltsán concluye que el concepto de las “ventanas de posibilidades”, inicialmente descrito por Joseph Overton, puede extrapolarse a cualquier fenómeno y es especialmente fácil de aplicar en una sociedad tolerante en la que la llamada libertad de expresión se ha convertido en la deshumanización y donde ante nuestros ojos se eliminan uno tras otro todos los límites que protegen a la sociedad del abismo de la autodestrucción."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1534

>>1532

>>1533

Essentially it is about how our society is ruptured, that means that it has a fundamental flaw where human conduct and its rules have been ultimately denied, so that there are no real solid rules. That means that in the end, our tolerant society is unique so that you can technically legalize anything as there are no societal rules really holding the society together, but political interests ("societal constructs")

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1538

I will try to translate it in the next couple of days, and then will post it here.

This seems to deal with the topic of the Overton Window, and as such I suggest that you post this on the existing thread about this topic (>>1171) as soon as the translated version is available. It would make sense for the board owner to delete this thread as redundant once that is done.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1539

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1558

How do you legalize any phenomenon, from euthanasia to cannibalism?

Evgueni Gorzhaltsán

In today's society of tolerance, which has no fixed ideal and as a result, no clear division between good and evil, there is a technique to change the attitude toward popular concepts considered totally unacceptable.

This technique, called "The Overton Window" and consists of a specific sequence of actions to achieve the desired result, "may be more effective than the nuclear charge as a weapon to destroy human communities," writes columnist Evgueni Gorzhaltsán.

In his article in the Adme portal puts the radical example of how to turn acceptable the idea of ​​legalizing step by step, from the stage is considered a disgusting and unthinkable action, completely oblivious to public moral cannibalism, to become a reality accepted by mass consciousness and the law. This is not achieved by washing direct brain but in more sophisticated techniques are effective due to its coherent and consistent implementation without society realize the process, create Gorzhaltsán.

First stage: the unthinkable to radical

Obviously, now the question of legalization of cannibalism is at the lowest level of acceptance in the "window of opportunity" Overton, because society considers as absurd and unthinkable phenomenon taboo.

To change that perception, can, relying on freedom of expression, refer the matter to the scientific field, as for scientists there is normally no taboo subjects. Therefore, we may conclude, for example, an ethnological symposium on exotic rituals of the tribes of Polynesia and discuss the history of the topic and get authoritative statements about cannibalism, ensuring the transition from negative and intransigent attitude society to a more positive attitude.

Simultaneously, create a radical group of cannibals, although there is only on the Internet, you will surely be noticed and quoted by numerous media. As a result of the first stage of Overton, taboo subject disappears and starts unacceptable discussed.

Second stage: from radical than acceptable at this stage, follow quoting scientists, arguing that one can not shield themselves to be knowledgeable about cannibalism, because if someone refuses to talk about it will be considered a bigoted hypocrite .

In condemning intolerance, it is also necessary to create a euphemism for the phenomenon itself to dissociate the essence of the issue of its name, spread the word of its meaning. Thus, cannibalism becomes "cannibalism" and later on "anthropophily".

Similarly, you can create a precedent reference, historical, mythological, contemporary or simply invented, but more importantly is it legitimate, so it can be used as evidence that the anthropophily in principle can be legalized.

Third stage: from acceptable to the sensible

At that stage, it is important to promote ideas such as: "the desire to eat people is genetically justified", "sometimes a person has to resort to that, if compelling circumstances exist" or "a free man has the right to decide that eats ".

The real opponents to these concepts, ie, the ordinary people who will not be indifferent to the problem, intentionally turn public opinion in radical enemies whose role is to represent the image of crazed psychopaths, aggressive opponents anthropophily callers burn alive cannibals, along with other representatives of minorities.

Experts and journalists at this stage show that during the history of mankind always were times when people ate each other, and that was normal.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1560

>>1558

Fourth stage: from the sensible to the popular

The media, with the help of known and political people, and speak openly about the anthropophily. This phenomenon begins to appear in movies, popular lyrics and videos. At this stage, begins to also function technique which involves the promotion of references to prominent historical figures who practiced anthropophily.

To justify the legalization advocates phenomenon can resort to the humanization of criminals by creating a positive image of them saying, for example, that they are the victims, because life forced them to practice anthropophily.

Fifth stage: from the popular to the political

This category accounts and start preparing legislation to legalize phenomenon. Lobbyists are consolidated in power and supposedly published surveys confirm a high percentage of supporters of legalization of cannibalism in society. In the public consciousness a new dogma states: "The prohibition of eating people is prohibited."

This is a typical technique of liberalism that works due to tolerance as a pretext for the Prohibition of taboos. During the last stage of "moving window" Overton from the popular to politics, society has already ruptured, then the rules of human existence have changed or been destroyed by adopting new laws.

Gorzhaltsán concludes that the concept of "windows of opportunities", first described by Joseph Overton, can be extrapolated to any phenomenon and is particularly easy to implement in a tolerant society in which the so-called freedom of speech has become dehumanization and where before our eyes one after another all limits that protect society from the abyss of self-destruction are eliminated.

The beauty of google translate

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1687

How to memify this info to spread this knowledge?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1691

File: 1431841924406.jpg (52.97 KB,398x600,199:300,prop_yourcourage.jpg)

A clearer translation, compliments of >>>/BMW/

------------------------------------------------------

Guide to legalize ANYTHING, from cannibalism to pedophilia

In today's society of tolerance, which have no fixed ideals and a clear division between good and evil, there is a technique that allows you to change the concepts considered totally unacceptable.

This technique, called the 'Overton Window' consists of a specific sequence of actions in order to achieve the desired result, "may be more effective than nuclear weapons to destroy human communities", says columnist Evgueni Gorzhaltsán.

In his article in the ADME website, there is an example of how to convert to acceptable the idea of legalizing cannibalism step by step, from the stage at which it is considered disgusting and unthinkable to the public morals, until it becomes a reality acceptable by the mass consciousness and the law. This is achieved not by a direct brainwashing, but by more sophisticated techniques that are effective thanks to its consistent and systematic application without society perceive the process, believes Gorzhaltsán.

First stage: from unthinkable to radical

Obviously, now the issue of legalization of cannibalism is on the lower level of acceptance in the 'window of opportunities' of Overton, since society considers it as absurd and unthinkable, a taboo.

It is possible to change this perception by transferring the matter to the scientific sphere, as for scientists usually there is no taboo subjects. An ethnological symposium about exotic rituals of polynesian tribes can be used to discuss the history of the subject of study and obtain authoritative statements about cannibalism, and then ensuring the transition from negative and uncompromising attitude of society to a more positive attitude.

Simultaneously, you must create a radical group of cannibals, although they exist only in the Internet, they will surely be cited by numerous media outlets. As a result of the first stage of Overton, the taboo disappears and unacceptable issue begins to be discussed.

Second stage: from radical to acceptable

At this stage, one should continue quoting scientists, arguing that no one can say that has no knowledge about cannibalism, as if someone refuses to talk about it will be considered a hypocritical bigot.

By condemnming the intolerance, it is also necessary to create a euphemism for the phenomenon itself and thus separate the word from its meaning. Thus, cannibalism becomes 'anthropophagy' and later in 'anthropophilic'.

In parallel, one can establish a precedent of reference, historical, mythological, contemporary or simply invented, but the most important is to be legitimized, so it can be used as proof that anthropophily principle can be legalized.

Third stage: from acceptable to reasonable

For this step it is important to promote ideas such as the following: "the desire to eat people are genetically justified," "sometimes a person has to resort to this, if in favorable circumstances" or "a free man have the right to decide what to eat."

Real opponents to these concepts, ie, people who do not want to be indifferent to the problem, deliberately convert to public opinion in radical enemies whose role is to represent the image of crazy psychopaths, aggressive opponents of anthropophily clamoring to burn cannibals alive, along with other representatives of minorities .

Experts and journalists show that during this stage of human history there have always been times when people ate each other, and that this was normal .

Fourth stage: from reasonable to popular

The media, with the help of well-known people and politicians are already talking openly about anthropophily. This phenomenon begins to appear in movies, lyrics of popular songs and videos. At this stage, begins the promotion of historical characters who practiced anthropophily.

To justify to the proponents of legalization of the phenomenon, it can be appealed to the humanization of criminals by creating a positive image of them saying, for example , that they are victims, because life forced them to practice anthropophily.

Fifth stage: from popular to political

This stage is the preparation of legislation to legalize the phenomenon. Pressure groups are consolidated in power and publish research that supposedly confirm a high percentage of supporters of the legalization of cannibalism in society. In the public consciousness establishes a new dogma: "The prohibition of eating people is forbidden."

This is a typical technique of liberalism that works due to tolerance as a pretext for prescribing taboos. During the last stage of the 'moving windows' of Overton, from popular to political, the society has suffered a disruption because the norms of human existence have been altered or destroyed by the adoption of new laws.

Gorzhaltsán concludes that the concept of 'windows of opportunities', first described by Joseph Overton, can extrapolate any phenomenon and is especially easy to apply a tolerant society where the so-called freedom of expression became the dehumanization and where before our eyes removes one after all the other limits that protect society from the abyss of self-destruction.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 55sync / ara / biz / fringe / inbouron / lit / qrb / rzabczan ]