[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/philosophy/ - Philosophy

Start with the Greeks

Catalog  Archive

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File*
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
Flag*
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


[ Literature ] [ E-books ] [ Politics ] [ Science ] [ Religion ]

File: b558de1c470f45c⋯.jpg (28.95 KB,551x270,551:270,subjective-vs-objective1[1….jpg)

cc47bf No.6708 [Open thread]

What's the difference between objectively having meaning and having objective meaning?

5 posts omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cc47bf No.6714

>>6713

It's ok not to understand a question; you don't have to accuse the asker of being arrogant.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0787ba No.6716

In the objective/subjective dichotomy as a paradigm, you could objectively have meaning for yourself, objectively having a subjective meaning. Objective meaning would be counter to this, something that would be objective and beyond your self, a meaning more than just your own.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d43726 No.6718

In order to find the difference of two abstracts, you must quantify them with definitions. Otherwise you can’t determine any sort of meaning. In order the provide the definitions, we have to look at the lexical structure of the english phrases.

Having objective meaning (verb, adjective, noun) Objective is describing the meaning in this context, and it is being possessed.

Objectively having meaning (adverb, verb, noun) Objectively is describing the verb having, so the subject is having meaning in an objective way.

So here’s the difference. Is the meaning itself objective? Then it is having objective meaning. Is there an objective way for something to have meaning? Then it is objectively having meaning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

548204 No.7030

Objective means universal.

We all know what univeral meanings are.

But can you universally have meaning? The fuck does that mean?

Aren't all feelings objective? What the fuck is a subjective feeling.

Regardless of how you look at it, feelings are one or the other. You can't have subjective and objective feelings at the same time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d8f2ad No.7035

>>6708

The former is an object to which meaning is attached. The latter is a meaning that has a specific objective or goal.

>/thread

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 8efa5712f09be99⋯.jpg (5.43 KB,220x229,220:229,serveimage.jpg)

4195ec No.7018 [Open thread]

More like Socrades nuts. lol

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5cee4d No.7019

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4195ec No.7023

File: 8efa5712f09be99⋯.jpg (5.43 KB,220x229,220:229,serveimage.jpg)

haha

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4ee7b6 No.7025

Like Diogenes?

How about you Diogenes this dick in your stomach.

What about Stilpo?

Cause this dick's stillpoking your asshole!

I bet your wife loves Bolus.

Cause she's sucking on my Bolus!

What about Sextus? Ya like him?

You'll love the Sextus I'm about to give you.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: b9bedfccc5cb6b3⋯.png (1.21 MB,736x1239,736:1239,b9bedfccc5cb6b34237512dced….png)

c8e376 No.4806 [Open thread]

I was seeing Postmodernist "works" and I started to wonder what the hell was going through the minds of those people. Is this is the Nihilism that Nietzsche warned us about?

I mean, all the conditions are here. We're in a world of increasingly atheistic people that still cling to somewhat Christian morals(When they're not hedonists, that is). Nihilism is relatively popular compared to old times.

Question is, does Postmodernism actually hold any nihilist beliefs in itself? I don't know much other than those hipsters making shit art, so I went through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism for a minute in hopes of finding something.

Can anyone?

Lastly, does anyone have a tingling fear that Nietzsche was wrong on the "trans-valuation of values" and that there will be just more nihilism after we come past this ordeal?

30 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2035c0 No.6942

>>>4806

>Post-modernity is time we live in currently similar to how 19th to 20th centuries are considered modernity. It is usually signified by late capitalism, globalism, rapid technological advances, convergence culture and so on.

>So saying that you "was seeing postmodernist works" means nothing as everything we do is part of the post-modern age.

>This is the Jordan Peterson school of not understanding what he is talking about.

>Post-modernism isn't a school of thought.

>A lot of the philosophers and professors that have been labeled as "post-modern philosophers" like Baudrillard, Derrida and Foucault hated the moniker because it means nothing.

>"I am a philosopher of the now times". What a pointless phrase.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

aa8b8a No.6946

>>6889

so he was an individualist?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

93895b No.6973

>>6902

You can't just reject a philosophical position because it makes you feel uncomfortable or you think of it as nihillism. You have to show that the conclusions themselves are wrong.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5514 No.6979

>>6090

True though some blame lies in Spinoza and Voltaire

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5514 No.6980

Karl Popper made it worse. My end goal is to oppose all those

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 447cb228b85d1ea⋯.jpg (189.79 KB,709x900,709:900,the-apotheosis-of-saint-th….jpg)

dad4cc No.6951 [Open thread]

>The third way is taken from possibility and necessity, and runs thus. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated, and to corrupt, and consequently, they are possible to be and not to be. But it is impossible for these always to exist, for that which is possible not to be at some time is not. Therefore, if everything is possible not to be, then at one time there could have been nothing in existence. Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist only begins to exist by something already existing. Therefore, if at one time nothing was in existence, it would have beenimpossible for anything to have begun to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence---which is absurd. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary. But every necessary thing either has its necessity caused by another, or not. Now it is impossible to go on to infinity in necessary things which have their necessity caused by another, as has been already proved in regard to efficient causes. Therefore we cannot but postulate the existence of some being having of itself its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God.

Is there any refutation to the Saint Thomas Aquinas's third way?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

36541a No.6974

>>6951

I think the most obvious problem is he follows the now widely discredited idea that all things that are eternally the case are necessary, and contingent things cannot be eternally the case. Just because the world is contingent it doesn't follow that the possibility of there being nothing at all has to be realized at some point in time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

641b97 No.6978

I'm an advocate a no refutation from me

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: a66f2b53221a73a⋯.png (500.81 KB,800x450,16:9,kurisu somtimesi too have ….png)

b3fb83 No.5510 [Open thread]

Here is a form of atheism that you could explain to 4th century BC Greeks. Greeks were geniuses at abstract thinking and great at seeing through bullshit. Discuss.

https://elearning-gilman.remote-learner.net/pluginfile.php/54035/mod_resource/content/0/Ancient_Greece/Ancient_Greece_-_Critias_-_Fragment_on_Religion.pdf

2 posts omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b3fb83 No.5513

>>5512

Because there is no God keeping everything working in our perfectly designed universe.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2b2eb3 No.5542

>really implying The Greeks were secular in any sense of the word

simple refutation, they still believed in theocracy hierarchy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b3fb83 No.5544

>>5542

Can you read? Critias was allegedly an atheist and he was a greek, so whatever you're trying to say in bad English is false.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b7761c No.6972

File: 7c6f38e9f83eb00⋯.jpeg (15.59 KB,360x356,90:89,DvMqX57WsAALzOD.jpeg)

>>5510

There's a popular new book on the history of atheism in ancient philosophy which might interest you. It's called "Battling the Gods: atheism in the ancient world."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30bd7d No.7208

>>6972

>Empiricism has a claim over all other philosophy cause I say so

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: a674ed7a91f92bb⋯.pdf (77.87 KB,LARTC.1.pdf)

File: adffbd7124989af⋯.png (40.39 KB,300x100,3:1,1411410718074.png)

958c15 No.6971 [Open thread]

Both the history of philosophy and the new logic should be sufficiently taught to philosophy students.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


File: 6e5f514c2b4469c⋯.jpg (39.51 KB,500x775,20:31,phenomenology of thots.jpg)

549682 No.6256 [Open thread]

What's the best introduction to the philosophy of Hegel (specifically the aspects of it that have been relevant to Marx and the young-hegelians)? Is there any work by Hegel himself that's actually comprehensible without spending hours on one page?

12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43efc3 No.6928

>>6920

True. Lesbians are quarrelsome with one another. Gay men make the biggest whores look like saints. And for the most women voted for this carp because they are impressions children at heart. Even Hegel said "those that dont learn from the past are doomed to repeat it" and what does liberal democracy, they reinforce those mistakes and make them stick, the glue that does the opposite of its intention, the kind that tears society at its seams.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

79d149 No.6940

>>6927

was not american republicanism supposed to give voting rights for white men only? i remember seing infographic on it

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43efc3 No.6952

>>6940

yeah at first. then women whined. and POC whined.

fuck paying attention to whiners.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7f9d54 No.6958

>>6952

next step will be kids whining

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43efc3 No.6965

>>6928

Oh well

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 54fb54208a1c751⋯.jpg (25.96 KB,602x376,301:188,main-qimg-05a91f9e156ed50b….jpg)

6b58b6 No.6857 [Open thread]

It's not just that i am sad. The worst thing is the lack of motivation . I really fell no motivation for anything.. I feel that the man simply calves with age, I see it clearly. For me the world is no longer so interesting, fascination and enthusiasm are slowly extinguishing, I became boring person.

I fell loneliness of incomprehension - I am in a crowd of friends, family, buzz , but ... there is no one to share with my feelings, emotions. Only talks about clichés.

I fell loneliness by ignoring - I become invisible in the eyes of others. Loneliness is also when you pass several hundred people in the city center within an hour, and for each of them you are worth as much as nothing , when the only way that others perceive you is perceiving as a client .

Added to this is the feeling of my own mediocrity. If you are not unique, you do not look special, you do not have exceptional talent, you were not born in a unique place, you do not have special skills or have a bigger purpose in life, you will always be just a little gray man, about whom the world will never he has heard or he will never hear. I am 24 and I am overwhelmed by the thought that nothing interesting will happen to me anymore.

If I had any talents, could do something specific, maybe I would feel better and needed. In the meantime, I am such a gray man that it is no longer possible. Why do I need a life consisting of going to work every day which I do not like, coming back from work, killing time with something that neither develops or amuses me, going to sleep and waking up in the morning for work.. I am constantly afraid that I will not achieve anything in my life and experience it as if I have never really lived.

I feel that I am not being helped by drugs or by the advice of psychiatrists and psychologists, motivational speakers and I do not know what to do. Would anyone have any advice for me, a solution?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9ba978 No.6863

αβουλία

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7220c9 No.6953

Hello friend,

sorry to hear about your lack of enthusiasm for life, it is a sad feeling as I personally have been there before. What sense/use or purpose does it serve to live in this world.. a world surrounded by 'norm' and generally UN-authenticity. To truly know the answer or AID to your question and confusion, you first must dive into the deepest and darkest.. once you are almost there you will 'know'. The last grasp of energy will awaken inside of you to flick that switch inside your mind. To be fortunate enough to be alive in comparison to many others around this world, having the ability to eat/sleep without the fear of losing your life at any given moment is the 1st blessing. Perhaps you should consider traveling? I know you mentioned that you don't feel the need/want to work - home - rest (kill time with senseless & numbing activities to pass time) but maybe for the 'cause' it is worth it.. Maybe work for a little bit, it doesn't have to be anything granduous or something which you have a personal interest for.. Get some cash flow happening, save it up and set yourself up for an unlikely destination, somewhere which is not over ruled by modern western influences. (maybe try south east asia or if daring, india/africa) The reason for this suggestion is because once you go there, you first hand see the 'suffering' and struggles everyday people go through in order to 'survive' (NOT LIVE - SURVIVE).. maybe seeing this site will be able to give you inspiration in order for you to pave your way? Once you return from your trip (or perhaps you might even consider staying there for a short moment to do some volunteer work) .... What you lack is purpose/drive.. something more and outside of yourself... your mental & spiritual state is at a low... you need a CHANGE, this change is from within... I'm not here to preach to you, nor to tell you to turn to some religious craze fanatic.. you need some re-alignment and taste the nectar of life.. 24, you're still young dear friend.. there is more awaiting for you, if you are willing to open yourself to opportunities. I sincerely wish you the best and may you one day be able to reflect back on these dark days and know that you are LIVING.. 11:11 - you'll never know who I am, i'll never know who you are... i am among the many people you supposedly walk past, the random stranger who you know nothing about.. yet we do have 1 thing in common.. we are human, aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

99e128 No.6956

>>6953

:

If nothing would give you fun, what would you try to do? Any hobby, occupation? Limited budget:

I tried:

- computer games

- checkers

-reding books

-riding on the bike

-spaces and running

- putting the puzzle together

-cooking

-computer programming

I tried many things but everything is just forcing for me. Such a compulsion that I can't really get excited about any of these activities. I do not feel completely fascinated by anything. I can't even look at a film or a show, because I feel pressured to do it. When I forced myself to do it, I accelerated it 2x to finish it faster. With books the same. Computer games too. Music does not interest me either, everything that will go, I cant choose what I like and what I do not like. As for the difference between simply killing time with entertainment and real passion: you can simply ride a bike, and you can read about new trends, be interested in bicycle parts, assemble bikes from parts yourself, repair them, exchange parts and browse with fascination new catalog Specialized bicycle parts.

Another example: If a "fan of beer" drinks because he drinks, it is not a hobby. If, however, he knows everything about beer, not just drinking it, he can brew his own beer, he differentiates beer, he knows how they arise, what is the difference between beer foam A and beer B, it is a hobby in every way. Generally, people often say that they are interested in something, and in fact, just like with this beer, they just drink it and nothing else. Well, that's what I wanted to say in a nutshell to distinguish "quasi-hobbyists" from real hobbyists.

I feel the difference between a real, developing hobby (which even promotes social interactions and improving relationships between people), and a compulsive, addictive provision of instant, easy, unconditional pleasure (which you do not need to work) through various, intensified stimuli in excessive amoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 5a56908d3b57155⋯.jpg (625.94 KB,1024x683,1024:683,parthenon-golden-ratio-ori….jpg)

c100ed No.6790 [Open thread]

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

08b446 No.6936

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e9a4b0 No.6937

>>6936

This unironically

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2767e7 No.6943

Sloppily written. And the association of a bunch of arbitrary modern artifacts with Stoicism based on some vague surface resemblance apparent to the author, seems to be an indulgence of modern tastes with little meaningful to say about Stoic ideals.

>The affinities between modern art and archaic art are too obvious to need proof.

Come again mate?

Modern art is mostly random trash that’s been artificially inflated by cliquish investors as a financial scam. The whole category has no distinguishing aesthetic traits, by definition.

Seems like another presentist pleb trying to twist ancient culture to fit his own myopically modern worldview.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: ea42c1243b8bfdf⋯.jpg (57.56 KB,700x700,1:1,stephen-woodford.jpg)

3dfb80 No.6491 [Open thread]

Stephen Woodford founder of Rationality Rules, where we debunk and refute predominately religious and supernatural arguments. Does anyone follow him? And what do you think about his videos?

9 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c49d39 No.6905

Ungern was right that all atheists/secular jews/the same damn thing, should be dealt with fire and brimstone.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

aef4b8 No.6923

>>6905

why?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c49d39 No.6929

>>6923

Because atheists have become a cult into themselves, a cult of self-aggrandizing fart sniffers, just like jews. They don't need to keep replicating. Fuck off we're full.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0fa0db No.6935

>>6686

terrible bait

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c49d39 No.6939

File: 17e9c16156ac6da⋯.jpg (27.28 KB,843x843,1:1,FB_IMG_1546415955120.jpg)

>>6676

ORANGE MAN BAD

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: e07bc82ad122dd5⋯.png (49.96 KB,940x788,235:197,Is-Rambling-Speech-a-Sign-….png)

700b3f No.6879 [Open thread]

Anons with a degree in philosophy, if I also obtain a degree in philosophy, unless I demonstrate ineptitude, will my ramblings magically be given an audience and real scholastic consideration?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6ac389 No.6933

Didn’t continue down the path of philosophy because that would have been retarded.

I went into education, with an interest in philosophical education. What I’ve seen from philosophical education conferences is that all the philosophers in attendance were desperately looking for an audience and an employer.

Become a teacher instead. You get a job that meaningfully contributes to society and pays the bills, and you get to philosophise on a regular basis with a captive audience.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 035b918dd3bc0ea⋯.jpg (7.67 KB,210x240,7:8,images (10).jpg)

a03bc0 No.6907 [Open thread]

makes Schopenhauer seem sane

he seems to despise the jews because "they don't know death, only eternal life"

sheeiiiiit

https://aryanskynet.wordpress.com/2017/04/22/revolution-dictatorship-romanianism-and-transfiguration-emil-ciorans-taboo-book/

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

36606b No.6909

>Wordpress

Not even with a 10 foot iron pole.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a03bc0 No.6913

>>6909

Just read the god/man/thing you lesbian fuck

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: f6139c3e6b029c9⋯.gif (39.89 KB,210x200,21:20,p0YO7Ef.gif)

55b724 No.6876 [Open thread]

Thoughts on the Irenaean theodicy? I follow it as a deist.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

33a386 No.6896

File: a5ccd186d0a860b⋯.png (553.62 KB,2518x1024,1259:512,1545759377343.png)

>>6876

You're not a Chad yet. Be a chad, and be a catholic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7f859b No.6906

I would say that the problem of evil is not free will or determinism but a combination of both. I probably would be an Aquinian Theodicist, though a wiki for that does not exist. likely is not popular enough. Schopenhauer is/was sort of one in the secular world and its one place Kant and I break from philosophical unity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

84ffed No.6910

Better than Augustinian theodicy that's for sure.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: c72276a9bb9aa8d⋯.jpg (164.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,0fdd771c520ed9a44f2ae1dd69….jpg)

3ec2b3 No.6552 [Open thread]

There  is no phenoumenal world, we imagine it.

Qualia != phenoumenal.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

780138 No.6566

>>6552

Elaborate

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d79b6c No.6882

>>6566

The OP is merely a pseudointellectual advocation of solipsism. The furthest one could get from subjective != objective (there is always a less pompous word that yet captures the same meaning of the statement in every possible meaningful way. qualiaty of thought > authority by obscurity) is not knowing whether there is an objective world - not knowledge grasped magically from the ether that there is no objective world.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: d821c70e5d048bf⋯.jpg (120.85 KB,360x162,20:9,spiritualpilgrim-crop[1].jpg)

197a1c No.6807 [Open thread]

Name one metaphysic that isn't ontological

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b24a13 No.6816

>>6807

Is your argument that ontology contains all of metaphysics?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

18fc7d No.6878

>>6816

That isn't my argument but would seem to be the case lest someone provide an example of otherwise.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Random
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]