[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / brit / erp / fa / htg / lewd / pdfs / sapphic / wx ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Voice recorder Show voice recorder

(the Stop button will be clickable 5 seconds after you press Record)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Welcome Page | Index | Archive | Voat Subverse | Poal Sub | Q Posts | Notables | Q Proofs
Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Bakers Board: /Comms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS/ /TheStorm/ /GreatAwakening/ | Politics News & Debate: /pnd/

File: 78c94b5e80798dc⋯.png (37.81 KB, 328x381, 328:381, ES.png)

dd49d1  No.9087093

Stepping down is a first step but Eric Schmidt is worth 16 billion US. How do you de-fang these guys without confiscating their vast wealth? It goes back to thread on the Rothschilds:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9080892.html#9086810

These people still control all their vast amount of wealth. How do you neuter these people without confiscating their wealth? Moreover, why should they be allowed to keep their wealth if large amounts of it were accumulated through corruption and or misdeeds?

Eric Schmidt made his money as a leader at Google, which has been implicated in so many crimes - NK we know but monopolistic behavior, being an asset of the US State Dept under HRC, election fraud, and on and on

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / brit / erp / fa / htg / lewd / pdfs / sapphic / wx ]