/qresearch/ -  Q Research

>>21014490

On the record

That is all

>>21015318

Remember you from last night.

When I suggested you write, meant by email.

However: hard part is validating donation….

but if you will write (can use dummy email), will discuss.

>>21016619

most non-General threads are supported by a small number of persistent posters.

>>21016693

tx, much appreciate your work.

>>21015318 me

>>21017396

ID changed.

I've already contacted Admin, so if I don't hear from Admin and it seems urgent again, I'll contact you.

ty

o7

>>21019122

https://fullchan.net/?1bf40fc8565c6e04#CULDBsKHHhzJfUjXbAyUa4wXj1azo44jee1AukLMBwdN

>>21018503

This wasn't a split bread situation, it was a decision to cut off the current bread and start another one, both because the bun was full and because bread was subject to a massive spam attack. Discussion was between me and Baker G.

>>21019122

done.

>>21009919

Dogequeefer, you are a redundant heap of tainted biomass that only exists to consume and generate background noise in META.

I very much doubt the BO is your fren.

>>21026515

Link thread on /pol/?

Reminder that autistic screeching is not an argument

>>21030236

says the autistic furry screecher living in mommy's basement

>>21031402

That's 'Sgt. Dogequeefer' to you.

Address me correctly or don't address me at all.

>>21032672

They deleted it. :^)

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/471324684/

Thanks BO, it took almost 3 hours, but the problem appears to be resolved.

Again, let me know if you want me to take over the bake each night around these times!

Am 100% available for the rest of the year.

GARY, PACK YOUR SHIT.

WE'RE GOING ON VACATION AGAIN/

>>21044712

You heard me Alexandre.

I QUIT Q ARMY.

See you tomorrow.

>>21039300

I doubt it's endorsed by anyone but shills

Accusation is somehow QR Admin is"blocking Q's tripcode"

I don't see how Q would be blocked by anything or anyone if Q wanted to post, the whole superior equipment thing

Slightly different angle on the "BO is evil" shit, and the "countdowns" to surrender the Board and the "operators" that are "testing" anons for "on-boarding"

I see it as an different angle on the "evil /comms/" and the "baker's union" shit that got them the boards before. Some idiot even tried "bakers union" like a month ago, but anons saw how that brought in OSS and the permabans for no reason entered in the Board Log so didn't fall for it a second time

>>21047276

> doubt it's endorsed by anyone but shills

i'm not admin but you are correct. it is the same collective of ip hopping / device swapping shills just doing the division fag thing. nothing moar nothing less. this has been muh casual observation and if i examine the post(s) lingo, it is two people and many devices / ip addresses

GM btw (or GA or GE - depending on what part of the world you are in)

BO / BV

can you give this anon a short time out? a short ban might work, say 3hrs? or am i over reacting?

fully 25% of the bread is trashed

ad9d19

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/21058802.html#q21059160

It would be impossible to get rid of spam completely.

I think if enough of us got together here and had a constructive discussion and post enough to fill up the spam, it would solve the problem.

I think it is important to first tell people that this is an effective place, in fact, the most important place, but I rarely hear people say that this is a constructive place.

There are even those who are against this place.

If you argue against them, they now take the position of the victim.

This is the reason why they leave the movement.

They make it one of the reasons.

They blame others for their choices and run away.

What can we do then?

I think I will just continue to advance my own research.

If you do that, you will see more and more differences.

They will pretend to be themselves to make up the difference.

Those who pretend to be something they are not, now band together, and this time they all start pretending.

This is what I've seen.

Proof?

You've already seen it.

I feel that what I have experienced and especially thought about this movement is that it is more of a battle against myself than others.

Specific solutions?

Just leave what each individual has learned about this movement, right?

>>21059707

Hello loving person,

So u cant get rid of spam completely?

What happens with programs that came pre installed in your pc from factory.

U shouldnt get rid of those right?

And what happens if ur oc iant really youra, and u are juat using it?

Then u should return it ti factory or the ine who lebt it to u, as receives right?

. in Ocassionz, one handles thibgs arent his forte and messes up?

One inly tries to di what is correct?

Or no?

Man you is the nicest persin.

Look, ten times i told you.

Say is. No Figuring out SandStorm tadada da da, da dada da da da.

Duplex Apartments in London are empty now. And Stuff is for just for Squared people from Canada.

But hang in there for a moment,

Not done with stuff. Es, pissed off.

Say moon and say They. Decay.

Care for Mit students that live like they party all night?

Stabd for jesus.

I know i can count on loving

Pepes. Ao tell me or not,

Dont be a ahit head.

First thingz first, then you tell me if u nderstand my post.

>>21059801

What's there to talk about?

I don't understand, so I don't have anything to say.

>>21059801

Don't be silly?

If you have time to tell me that, why don't you say something constructive?

>>21059843

Mira, te voy a ser bien Sincerote,

Porque yo ya no se que mas dar.

Una vida destruyendo a gente,

en cada paso, y cadas lugar

Deciles, que se bañen bien

y laven el Mais de su cOmal.

Nadie que amas te entiende?

>>21059707

>It would be impossible to get rid of spam completely.

amendment.

Maybe if humanity changes, the spam will go away…

>>21062368

I would like to quote you because of what I think of your statement.

There is no negativity towards you.

I think that individuals are free to express themselves.

But I think the problem here is that those who take advantage of this movement and profit from it will have a problem.

Of course, it is understandable that they would participate in this movement and profit from it, and then channel their profits to 8kun and JW.

If they have also fallen into a state of living in poverty, that may also be understandable.

But other than that, isn't it a different story?

I think that using this movement to enrich yourself will undermine this movement and delay it.

Isn't it strange that you are participating in this movement for the purpose of profiting from it in the first place?

Well, as a tactic, we can think of ways to direct the flow of money to this movement.

However, I think it is important to state clearly that this movement is not a movement to get rich.

And I don't think it's about creating another cult or group,

I also think that creating a cult or group like that would undermine the movement and lead to retardation.

I also think that such behavior can be problematic.

I also thought that Q mentioned outside comms for the above reasons and others.

Of course, I think this also conveys a message about induction into closed spaces and communication in a transparent environment. (etc.)

I think freedom of expression is good.

However, I think it is only natural that problematic expressions should be pointed out.

And to think that by clearly stating these things, it will lead to improvements and other better ways.

So I shit posted it here.

>>21059707, >>21060724 me

P.S.

The 8kun is a great place to create a comfortable space.

>>21063218 edit.

we can think

>I can think

>>21063218

>this movement is not a movement to get rich.

add.

I think this movement is about true freedom and peace.

I think it will lead to true abundance.

Does this come across well?

Please forgive any typos.

Please forgive any grammatical errors.

I think that even if a post here is aimed directly at someone, it affects the world and someone else.

What is the impact of daring to say this?

And isn't posting in digital space a place where 'you' can lead to influences that are not exclusive to 'you'?

The world is watching?

>>21064461

I just think it's kind of ironic that all I've done beside slap the fuck out of shills is compulsively post pictures of dogs as an oldfag who posted on boards before IDs were a thing.

Any other explanation to this phenomena is mental illness.

TIDY THE SHIP.

IT'S UNFIT FOR DOGS.

>>21064557

hmm

This is a little confusing, which leads to multiple responses.

I am not the BO/BV of QResearch here so I don't know what to put away.

If I am supposed to clean up my 'somethings', I am trying to clean up or improve what I notice on a daily basis.

Well, I think it also has to do with one's own perspective and discretion.

(Degree of tidiness.)

I didn't understand what you were talking about with your dog.

>>21064836

>I didn't understand what you were talking about with your dog.

I am not sure what you are talking about regarding dogs.

>>21059171

bans don't work, if they did, we'd set things up differently.

>>21059707

if there are many shills, it's hard to shut them out, it's even hard to delete them quickly, espec at the end of bread.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/21096722.html#q21097449

🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺

some help needed…

email

can you check your emails?

sheesh

>>21097470

>>21097688

>>21097870

was out, IRL

>>21097470

please consider getting Reporter creds, can always use dummy proton acct, just use for Reporter.