/qresearch/ -  Q Research

>>19066181

Covid Is Genocide - A Biological Warfare Crime - Dr. David Martin Speaks To The European Parliament

https://rumble.com/embed/v3boe0n/?pub=4

>>19607875

THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCIMovie based on the 2021 RFK jr book "The Real Anthony Fauci".

"2022 The Real Anthony Fauci - Everyone Deserves To Know The Truth. Different experts make a stand against today's putatively criminal and harmful health system,

focusing on Anthony Fauci and his role in the shaping of the AIDS and COVID-19 epidemics."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MHjISMkB4kv0/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_Anthony_Fauci

Connections:

https://www.bwfund.org/ Borroughs Wellcome Fund - Notice the 2 "L"'s.

https://www.bwfund.org/about/board/ Board of Directors

https://www.bwfund.org/about/staff/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_Wellcome_Fund

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_J._Muglia President and CEO

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellcome_Trust Preceding Trust

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wellcome Original Founder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Hallett_Dale Original Founder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSK_plc GlaxoSmithKline plc

https://archny.org/ Archdiocese of New York

https://archny.org/ministries-and-offices/child-protection/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_of_Heaven_Cemetery_(Hawthorne,_New_York) Gate of Heaven Catholic Cemetary

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

NAOMI WOLF SPEAKS TO THE VAC ON MAY 13 2023

NAOMI WOLF TAKES THE STAGE AT 1.10:00 TIMESTAMP IN THE VIDEO !!!

Note: The full video is 2 hrs and 28 minutes. just forward to her speech. will watch later and write notes.

https://rumble.com/embed/v2ns9px/?pub=4

powerful evidence that Pfizer KNEW mothers and babies suffered and died when mothers got the vax.

>>19075071

the miraculous disappearance of PNEUMONIA DEATHS in April 2020.

Pascal Najadi, Son of WEF Co-Founder, Calls for the ARREST of Klaus Schwab, Other Globalist Elites

https://rumble.com/v3sib2l-pascal-najadi-son-of-wef-co-founder-calls-for-the-arrest-of-klaus-schwab-ot.html

https://rumble.com/embed/v3pwx7x/?pub=4

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PGHlUgE6rqGN/

Dr. Sam Bailey takes a look at Polio

JUNE 2023

She shares an article by F. William Engdahl, and touches on the history of the Rockefeller Institute and how that cabal directed Western medicine into the field of fraudulent "science" which they termed "virology."

Here is a fine sample of "viral isolation" as practiced by these "scientists." Why would you think any of the 111 had "polio?"

Why would you think a little girl who got, basically, a karate chop to the neck and has a stiff neck called "polio?"

Why is injecting blood into the brains of monkeys and waiting for one of them to develop Bell's Palsy a sign of polio?

Go figure https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC435564/pdf/jcinvest00597-0132.pdf

>>19905018

Dr. Sam Bailey Toxicology vs Virology - Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud

>https://www.bitchute.com/video/PGHlUgE6rqGN/

>>19905018

fantastic video

Talks about the origins of the corrupt Rockefeller Medical Cabal and how they successfully discredited naturopathy in favor of allopathy in the early 1900s until they controlled the entire medical establishment, including the AMA.

They pushed the germ theory of disease as well - a reductionistic theory that says one cause for each "disease." Because "viruses" unlike bacteria are hard to detect, they could be used to make claims about conditions that are untrue - also to recommend treatments in the forms of VACCINATIONS that do not work and may cause harm.

Later, they also enabled the field of virology to gain prestige, thus enabling

Simon Flexner to make the AS YET UNPROVEN CLAIM that a virus causes polio.

Very, very detailed -

show this to skeptical friends.

>>19905031

LINKS re Posts Critical of the Germ Theory from #24439

>>19903979, >>19903987, >>19903993, >>19903989, >>19904019, >>19904155 , >>19904168, >>19904218, >>19904278, >>19904327, >>19904338 "Bioweapons - the myth of the man-made pathogen" - FEAR is the best bioweapon!

#terrain theory

TokyoJapanF1さんの記事より

世界最大のコロナ対策費(293兆円)を費やし、10週連続感染者数世界一

そして

新規の死者数も世界で4位のマスク大国日本(12/6)

※8月迄の2022年の超過死亡12万人超(2020年基準)は、平年の6.5年分にも上る。出生数も24万人減。ちなみに寿命や他の病気、事故死までもごちゃまぜにした「コロナ死」は3年弱の累計で4万人程度。ちなみに厚労省職員のワクチン接種率10％。

マスク着用率99％以上の日本が新規の死者数が世界で4位。

マスク着用率が高い韓国が世界で9位。

公共交通機関においてマスク着用率が高いドイツが世界で2位。

もしマスクに効果があるのなら、なぜ「マスク率高い国＝死者数少ない」「マスクしない国＝死者数多い」という単純な結果にならないのでしょう・・・？

なぜマスク着用率の高い国々が新規の死者数世界トップ10にランキングされるのでしょう・・・？

新規死者数1位から10位までの人口100人あたりのワクチン追加接種回数を見てみると・・・

接種回数

1位　日本（死者数4位）人口12560万人

2位　ペルー（死者数10位）人口3370万人

3位　韓国（死者数9位）人口5130万人

4位　ドイツ（死者数2位）人口8390万人

5位　フランス（死者数5位）人口6560万人

6位　ブラジル（死者数3位）人口21540万人　

7位　メキシコ（死者数6位）人口13160万人　　

8位　アメリカ（死者数1位）人口33480万人　　　

9位　インドネシア（死者数8位）人口27910万人　　　

10位　ロシア（死者数7位）人口14580万人

これを人口比別の新規死者数ランキングになおしてみると・・・

☟

人口比別の新規死者数ランキング

1位　ドイツ（接種回数4位）人口8390万人

2位　フランス（接種回数5位）人口6560万人

3位　日本（接種回数1位）人口12560万人　

4位　ブラジル（接種回数6位）人口21540万人

5位　アメリカ（接種回数8位）人口33480万人　　

6位　ペルー（接種回数2位）人口3370万人　

7位　メキシコ（接種回数7位）人口13160万人

8位　韓国（接種回数3位）人口5130万人　

9位　ロシア（接種回数10位）人口14580万人

10位　インドネシア（接種回数9位）人口27910万人　　

もしワクチンに効果があるのなら、なぜ「ワクチン接種率高い国＝死者数少ない」「ワクチン接種率低い国＝死者者多い」という単純な結果にならないのでしょう・・・？

なぜワクチン接種率の高い国が世界の新規の死者数トップ10にランキングされるのでしょう・・・？

なぜワクチン接種率の低い国が世界の新規の死者数トップ10にランキングされないのでしょう・・・？

==TokyoJapanF1さんの記事より

世界最大のコロナ対策費(293兆円)を費やし、10週連続感染者数世界一

そして

新規の死者数も世界で4位のマスク大国日本(12/6)

※8月迄の2022年の超過死亡12万人超(2020年基準)は、平年の6.5年分にも上る。出生数も24万人減。ちなみに寿命や他の病気、事故死までもごちゃまぜにした「コロナ死」は3年弱の累計で4万人程度。ちなみに厚労省職員のワクチン接種率10％。

マスク着用率99％以上の日本が新規の死者数が世界で4位。

マスク着用率が高い韓国が世界で9位。

公共交通機関においてマスク着用率が高いドイツが世界で2位。

もしマスクに効果があるのなら、なぜ「マスク率高い国＝死者数少ない」「マスクしない国＝死者数多い」という単純な結果にならないのでしょう・・・？

なぜマスク着用率の高い国々が新規の死者数世界トップ10にランキングされるのでしょう・・・？

新規死者数1位から10位までの人口100人あたりのワクチン追加接種回数を見てみると・・・

接種回数

1位　日本（死者数4位）人口12560万人

2位　ペルー（死者数10位）人口3370万人

3位　韓国（死者数9位）人口5130万人

4位　ドイツ（死者数2位）人口8390万人

5位　フランス（死者数5位）人口6560万人

6位　ブラジル（死者数3位）人口21540万人　

7位　メキシコ（死者数6位）人口13160万人　　

8位　アメリカ（死者数1位）人口33480万人　　　

9位　インドネシア（死者数8位）人口27910万人　　　

10位　ロシア（死者数7位）人口14580万人

これを人口比別の新規死者数ランキングになおしてみると・・・

☟

人口比別の新規死者数ランキング

1位　ドイツ（接種回数4位）人口8390万人

2位　フランス（接種回数5位）人口6560万人

3位　日本（接種回数1位）人口12560万人　

4位　ブラジル（接種回数6位）人口21540万人

5位　アメリカ（接種回数8位）人口33480万人　　

6位　ペルー（接種回数2位）人口3370万人　

7位　メキシコ（接種回数7位）人口13160万人

8位　韓国（接種回数3位）人口5130万人　

9位　ロシア（接種回数10位）人口14580万人

10位　インドネシア（接種回数9位）人口27910万人　　

もしワクチンに効果があるのなら、なぜ「ワクチン接種率高い国＝死者数少ない」「ワクチン接種率低い国＝死者者多い」という単純な結果にならないのでしょう・・・？

なぜワクチン接種率の高い国が世界の新規の死者数トップ10にランキングされるのでしょう・・・？

なぜワクチン接種率の低い国が世界の新規の死者数トップ10にランキングされないのでしょう・・・==

>>19958076

Translation via Yandex:

== From TokyoJapanF1's article

Spend the world's largest corona countermeasure cost (293 trillion yen), the world's first number of infected people for 10 consecutive weeks

and thenて

New death toll also ranked 4th in the world Mask power Japan (12/6)

*8 deaths in 2022 over 12 million people (2020 baseline) will be 6.5 years of normal.The number of births also fell by 24 million.By the way, "corona death", which was jumbled up to life expectancy, other diseases, and accidental death, totaled less than 3 years, about 4 million people.By the way, the vaccination rate of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare staff is 10%.

Japan, which has a mask wearing rate of 99% or more, ranks 4th in the world in the number of new deaths.

South Korea ranks 9th in the world with a high rate of wearing masks.

Germany ranks 2nd in the world with a high rate of wearing masks on public transport.

If the mask is effective, why is it not a simple result that "countries with high mask rate = few dead" or "countries without mask = many dead"い?

Why are countries with a high rate of mask wear ranked in the Top 10 new Death toll界?

If you look at the number of new deaths from 1st to 10th, the number of additional vaccinations per 100 people in the population・・・

Number of inoculations

1st Japan (4th dead) Population 125.60 million

2nd Peru (10th dead) Population 33.70 million

3rd South Korea (9th dead) Population 51.30 million

4th Germany (2nd dead) Population 83.90 million

5th France (5th dead) Population 65.60 million

6th Brazil (3rd dead) Population 21,540 million

7th Mexico (6th dead) Population 13,160 million

8th U.S. (1st dead) Population 33,480 million

9th Indonesia (8th dead) Population 279.10 million

10th Russia (7th dead) Population 145.80 million

if we re-add this to the new death toll ranking by population ratio・・・

☟

Ranking of new deaths by population ratio

1st Germany (number of vaccinations 4th) Population 83.90 million

#2 France (number of vaccinations #5) Population 65.60 million

3rd place Japan (number of vaccinations 1st place) Population 125.60 million

4th Brazil (number of vaccinations 6th) Population 21,540 million

5th U.S. (8th number of vaccinations) Population 33,480 million

6th Peru (2nd inoculation number) Population 33.70 million

7th Mexico (7th number of vaccinations) Population 13,160 million

8th place South Korea (number of vaccinations 3rd place) Population 51.30 million

9th Russia (number of vaccinations 10th) Population 145.80 million

10th Indonesia (number of vaccinations 9th) Population 279.10 million

If the vaccine is effective, why is it not a simple result that "countries with a high vaccination rate = few dead" or "countries with a low vaccination rate = many dead"い?

Why are countries with high vaccination rates ranked in the top 10 new deaths in the worldン?

Why are countries with low vaccination rates not ranked in the top 10 new deaths in the world? —==

Canada #49 >>20013823

Self-Amplifying RNA Shots Are Coming: The Untold Danger

Authored by Klaus Steger via The Epoch Times Friday, Dec 01, 2023

The next generation of RNA-based injections will contain self-amplifying RNA (saRNA). If the term “self-amplifying RNA” sounds frightening, it should. It likely brings to mind images of scientific experiments run amok.

As discussed in a previous article, “mRNA vaccines” are not made with messenger RNA but with modified RNA (modRNA). These so-called vaccines are actually gene therapy products (GTPs), as modRNA hijacks our cells’ software. We have no possibility at all to gain influence on modRNA (or saRNA) after it has been injected.

What Distinguishes saRNA From modRNA?

The term “self-amplifying” is self-explanatory: saRNA replicates itself repeatedly, which is not natural, as natural mRNA is always (without exception) transcribed from DNA (this is called the “central dogma of molecular biology”).

Compared to modRNA, a small amount of saRNA results in an increased amount of produced antigen; one shot of saRNA-based injection may be enough to generate sufficient antibodies against a virus.

Both saRNA and modRNA represent the blueprint for a viral protein, which, after entering our cells, will be produced by our cell machinery (i.e., ribosomes).

Scientists created the genetically modified modRNA sequence by replacing natural uridines with synthetic methyl-pseudouridines to generate a maximum amount of viral antigen. This modification is the basis of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 shots.

Unlike modRNA, saRNA does not contain methyl-pseudouridines, but uridines. Why? Since saRNA self-replicates and synthetic methyl-pseudouridines are not available in our cells, saRNA must rely on natural uridines that exist in our cells. Our cells will produce foreign proteins using their own cell machinery and their own natural resources—the main reason these cells finally become exhausted.

However, this causes a significant problem: mRNA is highly unstable and, therefore, has only a short lifespan—too short for our immune system to produce sufficient antibodies. The solution to this problem is the second difference between modRNA and saRNA.

Unlike modRNA, saRNA contains an additional sequence for the replicase, as destroyed (by RNases) saRNA must be replaced by new saRNA.

As natural mRNA will never self-replicate, saRNA definitely represents a genetically modified RNA (modRNA).

Put simply, saRNA is just another type of modRNA.

Why the Change to saRNA?

saRNA is the political solution: the same amount (or even more) of antigen in only one shot! The public will likely be told that due to the regular mutations of the virus, yearly adapted boosters will continue to be necessary.

Numerous preclinical and clinical studies applying saRNA technology have already been undertaken. A 2023 review in the journal Pathogens touts saRNA vaccines as “improved mRNA vaccines.” The journal Vaccines published a summary of five years of saRNA study findings. Once the requisite clinical studies are finished, these new vaccines can be approved for use. It can be expected that this process will be as quick as it was for the COVID-19 vaccines. The approval process will become simpler, as it could be argued that the technique (modRNA in lipid nanoparticles) is already approved and that only the modRNA sequence is different. Hence, these new saRNA vaccines could be injected into an unsuspecting public at any time.

While BioNTech performed experiments with saRNA (BNT162c2) but finally focused on modRNA (BNT162b2), Arcturus Therapeutics was the first to announce (in 2022) that its COVID-19 saRNA vaccine candidate ARCT-154—now the most advanced saRNA vaccine in trials—meets the primary efficacy endpoint in a phase-3 study.

In the Arcturus Therapeutics study, participants received two doses, each containing 5 micrograms of saRNA. This is far less than the modRNA concentrations used by Pfizer-BioNTech (30 micrograms/shot) and Moderna (100 micrograms/shot).

saRNA Injections Will Not Solve the Problems With modRNA Injections

As we discovered with modRNA, the spike protein is poisonous to our bodies. We know that modRNA results in the production of more spike protein than would be available during a natural infection, and we know that repeated boosters cause immune tolerance.

Compared to modRNA, a small amount of saRNA results in an increased amount of produced antigen.

The “dose” of viral antigen that current and future RNA-based vaccines bring about will show large fluctuations from one individual to the next, depending on the cell type producing the desired antigen, genetic predisposition, medical history, and other factors. This fact alone should prohibit the use of RNA-based injections as vaccines for healthy people.

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/self-amplifying-rna-shots-are-coming-untold-danger

>>20024371

Hero Health Worker Turned Whistleblower Faces Court After He Exposes Shocking Number of Deaths Linked to COVID Vaccine --- Shouts “FREEDOM” to Supporters in the Gallery

On Sunday, The Gateway Pundit reported that a 56-year-old employee-turned-whistleblower of Te Whatu Ora, New Zealand’s public health agency, was targeted by police raids.

The whistleblower was arrested Sunday afternoon for his alleged involvement in the “unauthorized disclosure and misuse of data,” according to police reports.

The police disclosed that the whistleblower’s true identity is Barry Young.

Young, responsible for managing New Zealand’s COVID-19 vaccination database, has come forward with alarming data regarding excess deaths that he claims are connected to specific batches of the Pfizer vaccine.

He played a key role in developing a project that established a vaccine payment system for providers, known as the pay-per-dose system. Under this system, providers receive a payment each time a vaccination is administered. As part of his responsibilities, he analyzed the data and noticed inconsistencies.

Liz Gunn, the leader of the NZ Loyal Party, a former mainstream media journalist and lawyer, interviewed Young, who chose to risk his job and personal safety to shed light on the statistical anomalies he encountered in his professional role.

“I was involved with building a project and helped with implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It’s called a pay-per-dose system. So that means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it, I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated,” Young said.

“As soon as the system went live, we noticed that people were dying almost straight away after being injected. So, that sort of prompted my curiosity a bit. So, I dug a little deeper,” he added.

“This cannot be a natural event. This is man-made,” Young argued, adding, “If it’s happening here, guarantee it’s happening everywhere, and we need more people like me to stand up and just come out. Don’t be scared, just do it.”

Young said that an accessible website, ‘Find My Batch’, provides the COVID-19 vaccine batch information.

“We take the security of our data very seriously and are extremely disappointed at this gross breach of trust by this individual and his alleged involvement in spreading harmful misinformation.

“We can assure the public that we are doing everything we can to respond to this incident and to safeguard their information.”

Instead of investigating this alarming data, the totalitarian government persecuted Young for exposing the truth and for questioning the quality and safety of the vaccines. The globalists were pissed that their cover-up was blown.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/hero-health-worker-turned-whistleblower-faces-court-after/

>>20024389

this is the link to the vaccine batch data:

https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html

>>20117943

The mandate could apply to any health care providers who receive federal money, such as those accepting patients on Medicaid or with ACA health insurance coverage, also known as Obamacare.

This "gender-affirming" care would extend to pediatric services and potentially bring about disciplinary action for physicians refusing for any reason to provide that care to children, Mr. Schandevel said.

The DOJ filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on July 19, 2022, claiming that the HHS hasn't mandated that health care providers "perform all kinds of gender transition services, even providers who have religious objections" and that the lawsuit begins on a "false premise" by suggesting that such a mandate exists.

HHS attorneys assert in the motion that their interpretation of President Biden's executive order means "sex discrimination extends to gender-identity discrimination."

But, they write, this doesn't indicate that doctors opposed to providing gender-altering treatments "fall within the scope of unlawful gender-identity discrimination, and HHS has consistently affirmed that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and other religious defenses may be raised, on a case-by-case basis, to a charge of discrimination."

But for Mr. Schandevel and the doctors he represents, that's not enough.

"Outside of the courtroom, in their public statements, the administration has given every indication that they plan to enforce this gender-identity mandate as broadly as possible," he said.

"They have given every indication that they plan to come after doctors, like our doctors, that we're representing in this case."

Mr. Schandevel cites a notice dated March 2, 2022, from the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) that invites patients and parents to file complaints with the OCR if they feel they have been denied "gender-affirming" care.

"As a law enforcement agency, OCR is investigating and, where appropriate, enforcing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act cases involving discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in accordance with all applicable law," the notice reads.

>>20117943

"This means that if people believe they have been discriminated against in a health program or activity that receives financial assistance from HHS, they can file a complaint."

Mr. Schandevel said that doctors who ADF represents shouldn't have to just take the DOJ at its word and just hope that it won't violate the doctors’ rights.

“We should be able to get a court to say that their rights are protected," He said.

__"Our doctors have every reason to fear that if they say no, that they're not going to [perform a sex-change operation] that the federal government is going to try to take away their federal funding based on that conscientious practice of medicine."–

Concerned Pediatricians

Pediatricians represented by Mr. Schandevel are wary of "gender-affirming" care for children for reasons beyond personal convictions, he said.

Dr. Quentin Van Meter, a pediatrician and pediatric endocrinologist with five decades of experience, said he read "the broad medical literature across the spectrum on the subject” and came to a decision that he can live with his code of medical ethics.

Dr. Van Meter contended that the research used to validate pediatric gender-altering treatments is often "cherry-picked"—researchers make conclusions that don't support the data collected.

Proponents of helping children try to alter their gender identity argue that access to such childhood procedures lowers the rate of suicide among minors who identify as transgender.

They often cite a 2020 study, published by the American Academy of Pediatrics, that purportedly establishes that link.

A 2019 study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry studied the same phenomenon—the alleged lowered risks of suicide for children receiving "gender-affirming" care.

In that study's conclusions, researchers argued that children receiving gender-altering procedures have much higher levels of anxiety and mood disorders before treatment than other children. They wrote that these procedures, such as hormone blockers or surgery, lowered the need for anxiety and mood care once the child received treatment affirming a new gender.

However, that study drew ire from other researchers, who sent letters to the journal's editors challenging the statistical methodology employed in the study.

"Upon request, the authors reanalyzed the data," according to a correction published by the American Journal of Psychiatry on Aug. 1, 2020. "The results demonstratedno advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related health care visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts in that comparison."

Dr. Van Meter said he believes that "the scientific validity of what they're basing their treatment protocol on is based on so little valid science that it must cease and desist immediately."

The Swedish Approach

Dr. Van Meter also pointed to recent changes to the official position of the governments of Sweden and Norway on the issue.

Sweden, which has had broad tolerance for the LGBT community, recently reversed its previous official position on "gender-affirming" care for minors through its National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW), saying"the risks outweigh the benefits at this point."

"Uncertain science and newly acquired knowledge means that the National Board of Health and Welfare now recommends restraint when it comes to hormone treatment," a translation of the NBHW announcement reads.

Read the rest here…[at EPOCH TIMES, subscription reqd)

>>20144198 pb

More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms

It is not unreasonable to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are being used (without other forms of PPE protection), have no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus. Current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful. The body of evidence indicates that face masks are largely ineffective.

My focus is on COVID face masks and the prevailing science that we have had for nearly 20 months. Yet I wish to address this mask topic at a 50,000-foot level on the lockdown restrictive policies in general. I build on the backs of the fine work done by Gupta, Kulldorff, and Bhattacharya on the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) and similar impetus by Dr. Scott Atlas (advisor to POTUS Trump) who, like myself, was a strong proponent for a focused type of protection that was based on an age-risk stratified approach.

Because we saw very early on that the lockdowns were the single greatest mistake in public health history. We knew the history and knew they would not work. We also knew very early of COVID’s risk stratification. Sadly, our children will bear the catastrophic consequences and not just educationally, of the deeply flawed school closure policy for decades to come (particularly our minority children who were least able to afford this). Many are still pressured to wear masks and punished for not doing so.

I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children.

Table 1: The evidence on COVID-19 face masks and mask mandates and harms

https://brownstone.org/articles/studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/

>>20161890 PB AMA with RSA survivor

Sucks because it seems you're in for the same no matter where you post. Instead of trip or name, your content is your ID. If a copycat gets going, they shouldn't be able t copy exactly what you'd say and how you'd say it. If they did, that's a good thing, as that's one less question you'd have to answer.

Green socks was a supposed insider that posted here a long time back. Never came back or posted the sock-green proof.

Bret Weinstein Exposes the World Health Organization’s Dark Agenda

this is nothing that anons don't already know

but BW does a top kek job explaining this in a way that cuts thru the crap.

Great redpill for family, frens.

Tucker interviews evolutionary biologist Brett Weinstein

Tells the STORY OF COVID in condensed terms.

"Nobody wants to be talking about Covid anymore."

https://rumble.com/embed/v42rcji/?pub=4

BW:

Pharma is healthy when people are sick.

Has a bag of tricks - it's an intellectual property racket.

It owns certain products, and it's looking for something it can use its products.

Tries to persuade the med establishment to direct people towards drugs that wouldn't otherwise be taking.

but there are things happening just out of sight that are important.

Always trying to portray a disease as more widespread than it is - and to portray drugs as safer and more effective than they are.

Why did things unfold the way they did in COVID?

BW HYPOTHESIS:

BIG PHARMA needed an emergency to push the mRNA platform.

Why they were so obsessed about pushing the vaxxes and burying substances that would helps like IVM and HCL.

BC if owned a platform it wanted to push: mRNA. Once established as valid, could be used for all sorts of purposes.

Problem: the tech has a terrible safety flaw. Lipid nano particles can be taken up by any cell, it's a random process.

Immunity naturally develops like this:

Something has hijacked the cells of a sick person. The body's response to seeing a cell producing something that's not part of the body is to assume it's a pathogen. It destroys those cells. So if lipid nano particles attach to any cell, any cell can be attacked by the immune system. Heart is especially vulnerable. If intravenous, particularly dangerous - injections should NOT just be jabbed. Then you get a big bolus going wherever it goes. Like the heart - which has very limited regenerative powers.

[Tucker: Can it cause cancers too? JB implies yes but doesn't discuss much.]

JB resumes his HYPOTHESIS:

Normally, tests would DEMONSTRATE the dangers of these mRNA injections.

To get around that, what was needed was an EMERGENCY where the public would demand action.

STATS:

1 in 800 shots in Pfizer were shown to cause SERIOUS consequences.

Estimates 17 million death from Covid vax.

AND IT'S NOT OVER YET - STILL RECOMMENDED FOR CHILDREN.

WHO and other vax-promoters thought media could control public response to MAL-INFORMATION.

But instead, it enabled dissenters to identify one another and organize against it.

Their next move: to plug the holes from Covid OP so they can control public response to the NEXT fake pandemic.

THEY ARE SEEKING THE TURNKEY TO TOTALITARIAN STATE - only the "state" in now a PLANET.

What WEF and Tedros are trying to accomplish via treaties, etc.

Covid is just a trojan horse to world takeover.

Remainder is about the death of journalism in the West, collapse of Western values. As a liberal, he's pessimistic - no mention of Trump, God or prayer - kek. Weak ending to an otherwise informative interview.

ARCHIVING - THIS IS A EXCELLENT VIDEO TIMELINE AND EXPLAINATION PUT OUT BY DR DAVID MARTIN ON THE BIO-WEAPON VACCINE AND PSYOP RELEASED ON THE PEOPLE !!!

Note: Definitions matter, beware of them changing the definitions of words, very 1984 btw. plus Dr David Martin names names, like ron desantis and vivek amongst others who wanted to wait for primarys instead of doing the right thing and protecting their citizens. !!

==

THE GREAT SETUP WITH DAVID MARTIN - PART 1

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bAlEfxkWrKDS/

---—

Jan 2024 - David Martin Exposes the Truth about Covid-19 and the mRNA Gene Therapy Bioweapon "Vaccines"

source: https://rumble.com/embed/v40jn65/?pub=20eypw

>>20393335 Over 60 Studies Show No Mental Health Benefits from Transgender Treatments

Over 60 Studies Show No Mental Health Benefits from Transgender Treatments

CATHERINE SALGADO | 2:35 PM ON FEBRUARY 09, 2024

A new review by the American College of Pediatricians(ACPeds) of more than 60 studies found no evidence of long-term mental health benefits from transgender “treatments.” The medical group is thus urging a shift away from transgender ideology in medicine to helpful therapy and treatments.

The February review of dozens of studies confirmed the lack of benefits for “gender-affirming” treatments butalso highlighted how other problems are being overlooked. For instance, a higher percentage of LGB and transgender-identifyingyouth and adults had adverse childhood experiences (ACEs),which can help explain why these individuals are at a higher risk of depression and even suicide. Ultimately, individuals with gender dysphoria — most especially children — need help overcoming trauma and loving their bodies, not ways to damage their bodies in pursuit of biological impossibilities.

In a statement about its review, ACPeds Vice President Dr. Jane Anderson (the review’s main author) urged both medical professionals and parents dealing with gender dysphoric youth “to affirm the truth about childhood gender dysphoria in the presence of harmful thoughts and address the underlying mental illness, adverse events, and family dysfunction.”

The organization’s president, Dr. Michael Artigues,meanwhile, emphasized the dangers of getting youth hooked on unhelpful medical treatments. “The studies reviewed in this paper demonstrate what many who practice medicine intuitively understand that young patients experiencing gender dysphoria deserve help in accepting and loving themselves as they are, not interventions that destroy their healthy bodies and put them on track of medicalization for life,” he said.

From the review:

Adolescents who have a gender identity not congruent with their biological sex have an increased incidence of mental health issues, including depression and suicidal ideation. Both before and after “gender affirming therapy” (GAT), adolescents who have gender-identity incongruence are at higher risk for psychopathology than their peers who identify with their biological sex. Previous adverse childhood experiences may play a major role in that psychopathology and needs to be explored in helping these patients. There are no long-term studies demonstrating benefits nor studies evaluating risks associated with the medical and surgical interventions provided to these adolescents. There is no long-term evidence that mental health concerns are decreased or alleviated after “gender affirming therapy.” Many individuals who have been treated with “GAT” later regret those interventions and seek to align their gender identity with their sex. Because of the risks of social, medical, and surgical interventions, many European countries are now cautioning against these interventions while encouraging mental health therapy.

But not America. We’re too woke.

Even the New York Times previously did an exposé on the potential severe long-term side effects of puberty blockers. “Gender-affirming” surgeries permanently mangle youth’s bodies. Woke ideology is literally destroying America’s young people.

(In other fucking words they’ve needed therapy all their lives, while 50%+ of the population need therapy for childhood experiences. I hope they are not creating a new treatment guideline when most of them were convinced it was cool to be trans.)

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2024/02/09/over-60-studies-show-no-mental-health-benefits-from-transgender-treatments-n4926296

>>20395095

The Great COVID Cover-Up | Rand Paul

Nov 2023

This speech was given on November 1, 2023, at the Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship on Hillsdale’s Washington, D.C., campus, as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series.

Hillsdale College

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1nF8fYjPu0

https://youtu.be/-1nF8fYjPu0

https://twitter.com/CraigKellyPHON/status/1763534524955431051

@CraigKellyPHON

How stupid must the world feel, after having spent hundreds of billions on failed Covid vaccines, only for a peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 7 randomised controlled trials to fing that Vitamin D prophylaxis was associated with

🟠60% lower COVID-19 cases,

🟠68% reduction in ICU admissions and

🟠84% reduction in deaths.

The evidence is now clear and unequivocal - simple Vitamin prophylaxis (getting a bit of sun or taking a supplement) to ensure you weren’t Vitamin D deficient was substantially more effective than the ‘magic potion’ which people were forced to inject into their bodies.

Preventive Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

https://mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/5/679

Vitamin D for COVID-19 : real-time meta analysis of 311 studies

https://c19early.org/dmeta.html

The Barry & Honey Sherman Murders, Trudeau's Childbase Strangler Games, blackmail, and more

https://rumble.com/embed/v28atoe/?pub=4

Leaked WPATH Files – Breaking News with Gender: A Wider Lens

Streamed live 3 hours ago

https://youtu.be/-_IITJ9ZtGw

Join Sasha Ayad and Stella O'Malley, hosts of the Wider Lens podcast, along with guest Dr. Carrie Mendoza, Director, FAIR in Medicine, for a conversation about the release of the leaked WPATH files. What they are, and what this means for the future of WPATH and "gender-affirming care.

For more on the WPATH files: https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files

For more about Genspect: https://genspect.org/

SUMMARY:

The WPATH files were released to Michael Shellenberger and his organization, Environmental Progress (usually focused on environmental issues, expanded to include this whistleblower info on WPATH, the FOREMOST activist organization promoting the affirmative care model in so-called transgender medicine. This insider info shows that WPATH is in NO WAY a scientifically-based organization – and its organizers KNEW IT all along.

ATTACHED PAGE shows more info on the whistleblower files available at environmentalprogress.org, under NEWS.

PAGE 1 of 2

Canada #54 >>20531609

New Bill Would Strip COVID-19 Vaccine Manufacturers Of Liability Protection

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times Thursday, Mar 07, 2024

Legislation introduced on March 5 would strip COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers of liability protections, enabling Americans injured by the shots to sue the companies.

The bill, proposed by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), would retroactively remove protections from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers.

“No federal law … may make the manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine immune from suit or liability, or limit the liability of such a manufacturer, with respect to claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a COVID–19 vaccine,” the bill states.

The PREP Act currently protects manufacturers and people who administer the vaccines from liability, under a 2020 declaration entered by then-Health Secretary Alex Azar during former President Donald Trump’s administration in 2020. President Joe Biden’s administration has since extended the declaration.

The only exception to the PREP Act protection is in cases of death or serious injury caused by “willful misconduct.”

The protection even covers people who “reasonably could have believed” they were protected even if, in actuality, they were not, according to an opinion from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

“Millions of Americans were forced to take a COVID-19 shot out of fear of losing their livelihoods and under false pretenses. Many have faced injury from the vaccine, but few have been afforded little recourse,” Mr. Roy said in a statement.

He said he was introducing the new bill “to empower Americans to remove crony federal liability protections for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and empower injured Americans,” adding, “The American people deserve justice for the infringement on their personal medical freedom and those medically harmed deserve restitution.”

As part of the federal vaccine system, people who have suspected or confirmed injuries from COVID-19 vaccines can apply for compensation from the government under a program called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. But as of January, just 11 people have been compensated, with the highest payout being just $8,961.

The overwhelming majority of claims that have been processed have been rejected, according to the HHS, which both runs and administers the program. Some of the denials involved people whose doctors diagnosed them with vaccine injuries. A lawsuit has challenged the constitutionality of the program, describing it as a “kangaroo court.”

The new legislation makes clear that it does not affect the ability of people to apply for recompense through the compensation program.

Pfizer and Moderna did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the bill and have not appeared to comment publicly on it.

A spokesperson for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a trade group for pharmaceutical companies, told Fox News that “by upending the existing liability framework manufacturers rely upon to provide predictable vaccine development, our ability to address future public health threats will be at risk.”

HHS has said the PREP Act declaration “has been a key tool for ensuring that Americans have broad access to critical COVID-19 countermeasures including vaccines, tests, and treatments” and “has provided flexibilities and protections for those individuals and entities who have been involved in providing these critical tools that have helped the United States get to a better place with COVID-19.”

Mr. Roy’s bill already has 19 co-sponsors, including Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), Clary Higgins (R-La.), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), and Andy Harris (R-Md.).

“Many Americans were wrongly forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine,” Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), another co-sponsor, said in a statement. “Of course, they should be allowed to sue if they become injured by the shot.”

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/new-bill-would-strip-covid-19-vaccine-manufacturers-liability-protection

https://youtu.be/ZLUoX4YEjqk

Dr. John Campbell on Benefits of Vitamin D

March 13, 2024

he's talking about its impressive results in protecting against "covid" ("because that's where the data are"), but says should be widely generalizable.

Description:

Vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect, against the incidence of COVID-19 in RCT studies,

OR 0.403, (95% IC 0.218, 0.747)

In the RCTs performed on HCWs, the overall reduction in risk in the population supplemented with vitamin D was approximately 80%

Against the incidence of COVID-19 in analytical studies

OR = 0.592, (95% IC 0.476–0.736)

Against the incidence of COVID-19 ICU admission

OR 0.317, (95% IC 0.147–0.680).

Our meta-analysis suggests a definitive and significant association between the protective role of vitamin D and COVID-19 incidence and ICU admission.

Preventive Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/5/679

(28th Feb 2024)

Vitamin D, crucial roles

Bone homeostasis, muscle function, oncogenesis, immune response and metabolism.

In the context of the COVID-19

Numerous researchers have tried to determine the role vitamin D in the immune response to the virus.

Systematic review and meta-analysis, 15th May 2023

Preventive vitamin D supplementation, 16 publications

N = 1,262,235 participants,

A protective role in

Incidence of COVID-19

Mortality

Admission to intensive care units (ICUs).

We calculated the Odds Ratios

The assessment of potential bias and the evaluation of study quality will be conducted independently by two researchers.

Extra information

The majority of the effects of vitamin D are mediated by the VDR, which promotes the expression of genes containing specific DNA sequences and is expressed in almost all nucleated cells

Approximately 3 percent of the human genome is under the control of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

Vitamin D has been observed to contribute to the synthesis of defensins,

to be pivotal for enhancing the phagocytic activity,

and to modulate the immune system response by regulating the inflammatory cascade

Texas pulls 8.5 Billion from Blackrock.

Texas buys 8.5 Billion in gold bullion for the Texas Bullion Depository

Canada #55 >>20607403

FDA Loses its War on Ivermectin: Agrees to Remove All Related Social Media Content and Consumer Advisories on Ivermectin Usage for COVID-19

by Jim Hᴏft Mar. 22, 2024

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin, which “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.

“Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous,” FDA said at the time.

This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015, and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.

There have now been 101 Ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies that show a 62% lower risk in early treatment in COVID-19 patients.

A group of brave doctors had filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the agencies’ unlawful attempts to block the use of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Southern District of Texas in Galveston, argues that the FDA has overstepped its authority and unjustifiably interfered with their medical practice.

The plaintiffs, Drs. Mary Talley Bowden, Paul E. Marik, and Robert L. Apter, are contesting the FDA’s portrayal of ivermectin as dangerous for human consumption. They note that the FDA has approved ivermectin for human use since 1996 for a variety of diseases. However, they allege that with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA began releasing documents and social media posts discouraging the use of the anti-viral drug for COVID-19 treatment.

“We’re suing the FDA for lying to the public about ivermectin,” said Dr. Bowden.

Claims were made that the initial article misrepresented the law by stating the FDA’s official stance against Ivermectin use without mentioning that doctors were allowed to administer the medicine.

U.S. law is cited in the complaint, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.”

On Thursday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reportedly agreed to remove all its previous social media posts and consumer advisories that specifically addressed the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.

“FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship,” Dr. Bowden wrote on her social media.

Emily Post News reported:

The FDA agreed to delete the Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook posts from August 21, 2021 that read, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” (A screencap of the X/twitter one is above and still online here.)

It will also remove the Twitter post (below) from April 26, 2022 that reads, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.

Further, the FDA will delete all other social media posts on FDA accounts that link to its website (below) called “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”

It will “retire” this website (called a consumer update) originally posted on March 5, 2021 and revised on September 7, 2021. The FDA retains the right to post a revised update.

Bowden said she and her co-plaintiffs Dr. Paul E. Marik and Dr. Robert L. Apter decided to drop the lawsuit they got what they wanted.

“After nearly two years and a resounding rebuke by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the FDA has agreed to remove its misleading social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and Covid-19,” said Bowden.

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/fda-loses-its-war-ivermectin-agrees-remove-all/

>>20627627

I wouldn't use this shit on horses, let alone people.

>>20726011

Stuff has been successfully treating River Blindness in Africa for many years now

But you do you