[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / aiproto / biz / comfy / cute / lumidor / random / socpl / tingles ]

/qnotables26/ - ===Q Notables 2026===

Anon Curated Notables 2026 Edition

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| QNotables | QNotables 2026 | QNotables 2025 | QNotables 2023 | QNotables 2022 | QNotables 2021 | QNotables 2020 | QNotables 2019 | QNotables 2018 | CBTS-Archive |

File: 4870557c1818a7f⋯.png (214.03 KB,1200x600,2:1,Clipboard.png)

70b232 No.6809 [Last 50 Posts]

/qresearch/ Australia

Re-Posts of notables

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38729

File: 9247cffac4c6929⋯.jpg (82.2 KB,1347x865,1347:865,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 90d562e71c51631⋯.jpg (779.08 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24354950 (080018ZMAR26) Notable: Commissioner assures Bondi families she will probe Hanukkah security, police delays - Royal commission head Virginia Bell has assured survivors and families of the Bondi Beach massacre that the inquiry will examine the police response to the attack and security arrangements at the Hanukkah celebration where 15 people were killed. During a private meeting with about 80 survivors, witnesses and relatives at Bondi, Bell said the commission would investigate “how long it took police to respond” and why only two officers were present at the Chanukah by the Sea event. She also explained the inquiry could not hear eyewitness accounts that might prejudice the criminal trial of alleged gunmen Naveed and Sajid Akram. The Albanese government said it would introduce legislation granting legal immunity for intelligence and operational information provided to the commission.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23978158 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24300096 (pb)

Commissioner assures Bondi families she will probe Hanukkah security, police delays

Matthew Knott - February 26, 2026

1/2

In an intimate meeting at the site of the nation’s worst terror attack, Virginia Bell has assured survivors of the Bondi Beach massacre the royal commission she leads will probe how long it took police to respond to the shooting and the level of security protection at the Hanukkah celebration.

The former High Court judge toured the scene of the attack on Thursday morning and held a two-hour meeting with about 80 survivors, witnesses and relatives of those who died on December 14.

Her meeting came as the Albanese government announced it would introduce new laws next week to strengthen legal protections for those providing intelligence and operational information to the royal commission and strengthen its ability to handle sensitive material.

Bell said this week there had been delays in receiving information from relevant agencies as they sought legal advice on how to interact with the royal commission.

Bell used the private, invitation-only meeting at Bondi to directly explain why she would not be able to accept any evidence about the day’s tragedy that could prejudice a criminal trial into the killings of 15 people, as she revealed at the royal commission’s first public hearings on Tuesday.

One participant, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the meeting was “very productive” and had largely reassured those present that Bell was determined to do everything within her power to understand why the atrocity had occurred.

“She was impressive,” the participant said.

As well as any intelligence failures that preceded the attack, Bell told those at the meeting that the royal commission would examine why there were only two police officers present at the Chanukah by the Sea event and how long it took other police to arrive at the scene after the gunmen began shooting.

Several survivors have questioned whether it took police too long to arrive at Bondi in substantial numbers after the attack started.

NSW Premier Chris Minns defended the police response to the massacre immediately after the attack. “If there’s any suggestion that NSW Police didn’t live up to their responsibilities to the people of this state, it should be rejected because it’s not consistent with the facts,” he said.

Bell held one-on-one conversations with members of the Jewish community to address their concerns.

Sources at the meeting said there was a strong sense in the room that the royal commission could be rushed as Bell scrambles to meet the government’s December 14 deadline.

While Bell said she was determined to deliver her report by the first anniversary of the attack, she said that she could request an extension to the inquiry if absolutely necessary.

She said on Tuesday: “I regard the delivery of my report on or before the first anniversary as a matter of critical importance. This imposes a tight time-frame, and it’s going to impose limitations on how the commission approaches its terms of reference.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38730

File: 5fdb7066d253eb6⋯.jpg (833.51 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24359209 (090145ZMAR26) Notable: Government considering request for military assistance from Gulf States attacked by Iran - Australia is considering requests from Persian Gulf states for defensive military support after Iranian drone and missile strikes targeted civilian infrastructure across the region during the second week of the Middle East war. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said several countries had sought help to protect against attacks but stressed Australia would not take part in offensive operations against Iran. Options under consideration include deploying a small Australian Defence Force detachment with NASAMS (National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System) to protect key infrastructure, according to defence analyst Malcolm Davis. Meanwhile about 11,000 Australians stranded in the region have registered with the Department of Foreign Affairs seeking assistance to return home as flights resume from Dubai following an Iranian drone strike.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

Government considering request for military assistance from Gulf States attacked by Iran

Holly Tregenza - 8 March 2026

1/2

The federal government is considering a request for military assistance from Persian Gulf States targeted by Iranian attacks as the war in the Middle East enters its second week.

All six Gulf States including Oman, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar have been impacted by Iranian strikes since the war began, which have targeted civilian infrastructure including airports.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong told Insiders the government had received requests from some of those countries for protection against drone and missile attacks.

"Many countries who are non-participants have been attacked by Iran through this," she said.

"You would anticipate as a consequence, that we have been asked for assistance and we will work through that."

She would not provide details on the type of military assistance being considered, but said the government would be transparent if it accepted the request.

The minister maintained the government's position that it would not participate in offensive action against Iran.

Shadow Defence Minister James Paterson said he had sought a briefing about the potential deployment of defence force personnel to the Middle East in defensive roles.

"Australia had a proud record of standing with our allies and friends in times of crisis, and the Coalition will carefully consider any deployment proposals in the national interest once briefed," he said.

What military help could the government provide?

There are narrow options available to the government if they decide to answer the call for help.

Malcolm Davis, senior defence strategy analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said it was likely the Gulf States' primary concern was the Iranian attacks on oil infrastructure by drones and missiles.

But he said Australia had limited capacity for counter-drone activity beyond a project called LAND156, which is still in early development.

The defence force does have a system called NASAMS, a short-range surface-to-air missile system, which could be deployed alongside a small detachment of soldiers.

"What they could do is deploy a small army detachment with NASAMS into the Middle East to protect critical targets," Dr Davis said.

"Theoretically they could deploy a naval vessel to help with that defence, but that would take longer. The warship would take time to get over there."

The alternative would be calling on Australian companies which have developed anti-drone products to sell to the Gulf States, which would not necessarily require support from the government.

Dr Davis said a small deployment with NASAMS to Gulf States would be the "limit" of what the government could do without an escalation to boots on the ground.

"We don't want a situation where we have Australians deployed in Iran itself, but this way they would be deployed into the Gulf States and not necessarily boots on the ground in terms of combat," he said.

"They might be able to get away with that, but I think that would be the limit. I don't see Australian troops going in Iran."

He also said it was unlikely Iran would respond beyond issuing diplomatic notes if Australia was to send a small deployment to the region in a defensive capacity.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38731

File: 7ab328375d1c61b⋯.jpg (171.05 KB,1968x1107,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 611a5bc741a1ca2⋯.jpg (355.09 KB,1354x903,1354:903,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24359367 (090232ZMAR26) Notable: TGA in the dark on use of puberty blocker drugs - Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has warned the federal government it lacks reliable data on how widely puberty blocker drugs are prescribed to gender-distressed minors because the medicines are used “off-label” and are not approved for treating gender dysphoria. Documents obtained under Freedom of Information show the regulator cannot assess the “risk-benefit profile” or calculate adverse-event rates for this use because it does not receive prescribing data for off-label indications. Health Minister Mark Butler sought urgent advice after the United Kingdom imposed an indefinite ban on routine puberty blocker prescriptions outside a proposed clinical trial following the Cass review. The TGA said it has not evaluated the drugs for gender-affirming care and relies largely on voluntary reporting of adverse events. Without comprehensive usage data, officials say regulators have limited oversight of safety, efficacy and prescribing patterns in Australian children’s hospitals treating gender-distressed minors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24006107 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24289977 (pb)

TGA in the dark on use of puberty blocker drugs

BERNARD LANE - February 23, 2026

1/3

Australia’s medicine safety officials have warned the government they are flying blind on the use of puberty blocker drugs for gender-distressed minors.

The country’s first safety assessment of the drug use – now revealed in documents obtained under Freedom of Information law – followed news of the 2024 UK decision to impose an indefinite ban on routine use of puberty blockers outside a proposed clinical trial. This prompted federal Health Minister Mark Butler to seek urgent advice on the safety of transgender puberty suppression used by state children’s hospitals.

But Australia has no official data to show how many children identifying as trans have been given these drugs to suppress natural sex hormones and interrupt their normally timed puberty, according to the April 22, 2025 report from the medicine safety regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

This is because these drugs, known as gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa), are used “off-label”, meaning they have not been tested for efficacy or safety in the treatment of gender dysphoria or incongruence.

For the same reason, the TGA noted on January 24, 2025 that it was “not possible to assess the risk-benefit profile [for this drug use] in the absence of efficacy data [and] it is not possible to calculate rates of adverse events for this indication as we do not have usage information from off-label prescriptions”.

“The efficacy and safety of GnRHas in gender-affirming care has not been assessed by the TGA as the TGA has not approved GnRHas for this indication,” it said.

The TGA safety report noted that the UK ban on routine provision of blockers for gender dysphoria rested on independent expert advice from the UK’s Commission on Human Medicines of “an unacceptable safety risk in the continued prescription of puberty blockers to [gender-distressed] children”.

If the TGA were to discover a new safety concern with puberty blockers for gender distress, it said it could require updating of the warnings in public product information for the drugs, but it could not suspend or cancel this use, because such use lacks approval in the first place.

Off-label use of medicines is not illegal, but “should always be in the setting of informed consent with consideration of the risks and benefits for that individual patient”, the TGA said.

The TGA-approved indications for these GnRHa drugs include prostate cancer, where suppression of the sex hormone testosterone may retard tumour growth, and the condition of central precocious puberty, when premature sexual development begins in very young children and the hormone suppression drugs are used until they are old enough to enter puberty in sync with their peers.

The use of puberty blockers for the psychological distress of gender dysphoria was pioneered in a small-group experiment in The Netherlands starting in 2000, then adopted internationally as routine treatment in children’s hospitals with low-quality treatment guidelines and no proper clinical trials.

On Friday, The Times of London broke the news that the proposed clinical trial of puberty blockers in the UK had been paused before it could start, after the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) raised ethical and safety concerns about “long-term biological harms” to children who are expected to progress from blockers to cross-sex hormones. The risks cited by the MHRA included sterilisation, irreversible bone damage, and interference with normal brain development.

Queensland has stopped new hormonal treatment of gender-distressed minors in its public health sector on safety grounds until the UK clinical trial reports its results, which without the current pause were not expected before mid-2032. Up to 250 girls and boys as young as 10 were due to be recruited for the UK trial, which was recommended by pediatrician Hilary Cass following her four-year review of gender dysphoria treatment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38732

File: a3cc6ff23bd4a28⋯.jpg (104.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e1c3272a045f958⋯.jpg (128.49 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9fe6e68997fcb0a⋯.jpg (225.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24359409 (090252ZMAR26) Notable: At least 2300 children given puberty blockers as states refuse to release data - At least 2387 Australian children have been prescribed puberty blockers for gender dysphoria since 2014, according to an analysis compiled from Freedom of Information data and limited figures released by some jurisdictions, as most states and territories refuse to disclose prescribing numbers. Health departments in six jurisdictions declined to provide data, leaving regulators and researchers without a comprehensive national picture of the treatment’s scale. The lack of official statistics has drawn criticism from experts who say such gaps “would not be countenanced for any other medical condition” and prevent scrutiny of long-term outcomes. Queensland reported 491 prescriptions between 2020 and October 2025 before banning new public-sector prescriptions, while Western Australia confirmed 20 new patients in 2025. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler has commissioned the National Health and Medical Research Council to review Australia’s guidelines for treating gender-distressed youth.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38731

At least 2300 children given puberty blockers as states refuse to release data

RACHEL BAXENDALE - 8 March 2026

1/3

Six of Australia’s eight states and territories have refused to release any data on the number of children prescribed puberty blockers to treat gender dysphoria, maintaining a veil of secrecy that prevents proper oversight of the highly controversial treatment.

Experts warn the lack of information wouldn’t be countenanced for “any other medical condition”, and is allowing claims of good outcomes to go “completely unchecked”, with little monitoring of the long-term impacts of medicalised gender therapy.

The refusal of most Australian jurisdictions to release any data stands in contrast with the position of UK Labour Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who in recent weeks put before parliament an order requiring previously unco-operative adult gender clinics to link data for patients who received puberty blockers as children, to assist researchers in assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of the drugs.

As The Australian revealed last month, documents obtained under Freedom of Information reveal the Therapeutic Goods Administration – Australia’s medical safety regulator – is unable to assess the risk-benefit profile of puberty blockers as it does for other medicines.

This is both because public gender clinics and the health departments and governments that fund them have chosen not to collate official data about their use, and because the drugs are used “off label” in the treatment of gender dysphoria, meaning they have not been tested for efficacy or safety when used for this purpose.

Ironically this means that while there is significant regulatory oversight when the same drugs are used to treat conditions such as prostate cancer and precocious puberty, no such oversight exists of their use to treat gender dysphoria in children.

Because their use for gender dysphoria often involves years of treatment in patients who never go through puberty, at least 90 per cent of whom go on to cross-sex hormones, the health risks to this group – which include almost certain infertility, reduced bone density and cognitive impacts – are much greater than those to patients being treated for other conditions.

Puberty blockers continue to be prescribed for gender dysphoria through the public health system in every Australian jurisdiction except Queensland and the Northern Territory, where they remain available privately.

This compares with bans or heavy restrictions in the UK, New Zealand, Scandinavian countries and more than half the states of the US.

The Australian contacted the offices of every and territory health minister and/or health department, and federal Health Minister Mark Butler, asking them to confirm the number of children in their jurisdiction who have been prescribed puberty blockers to treat gender dysphoria.

If they were unable to provide these figures, they were asked to provide an explanation.

They were also asked whether it was appropriate for these drugs to be prescribed in a manner that makes it impossible for the TGA to monitor their safety and efficacy given the health risks they pose.

Queensland Health, in the only state that has banned the prescription of puberty blockers to treat gender dysphoria in the public system, revealed that between 2020 and October 2025 (when the ban was reinstated after briefly being quashed by a court decision), 491 children were prescribed puberty blockers for gender dysphoria.

This included 471 Queensland Children’s Gender Service patients, and 20 at the Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service.

Western Australia did not provide any historic data, but confirmed that between January 1 and October 31, 2025, 20 patients had commenced puberty blocker treatment at the WA Child and Adolescent Health Service’s Gender Diversity Service.

No other states or territories provided data.

The only other way of obtaining this data is through the lengthy and sometimes imprecise process of making Freedom of Information requests to public gender clinics.

Using the information received from Queensland and WA, as well as FOI requests to Victoria’s Royal Children’s Hospital, and a large dataset spanning 2014-2023 that was collated by Queensland psychiatrist Andrew Amos using figures obtained via FOI requests made by NSW Labor MP Greg Donnelly, The Australian has sought to build as complete a picture as possible of the extent of puberty blocker prescription to treat gender dysphoria in Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38733

File: 3ea15fd5c0e1d11⋯.jpg (2.94 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5f08264ebeb19a0⋯.jpg (223.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24359696 (090414ZMAR26) Notable: Trump officials ‘asked why Australian Jews aren’t carrying guns’ - Trump administration officials have questioned whether Australia’s Jewish community should be armed following the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, highlighting Washington’s close scrutiny of antisemitism and security responses in Australia. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said US officials, including President Donald Trump’s antisemitism envoy Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun, asked why Australian Jews were not carrying firearms after the December massacre in which 15 people were killed. Ryvchin said he replied that widespread gun ownership “is just not part of our culture”, reflecting Australia’s strict firearms laws and different security mindset. The NSW government is examining whether the Community Security Group, which protects Jewish institutions, should be allowed to carry additional arms at public events. The Albanese government has launched a royal commission and security reviews following the attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23978158 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24096759 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24343330 (pb)

Trump officials ‘asked why Australian Jews aren’t carrying guns’

Michael Koziol - March 8, 2026

1/2

Washington: Trump administration officials asked a visiting Australian Jewish leader whether Jews were seeking to be armed following the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, as the White House continues to take a significant interest in the spread of antisemitism in Australia.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin met US officials, including President Donald Trump’s antisemitism envoy, Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun, during a visit last week, and briefed staff at the National Security Council, the State Department and Congress.

He said he received several questions in meetings about gun ownership in Australia and whether the Jewish community was proactively looking at taking up arms.

“I had to say to them, ‘Look, that’s just not part of our culture’,” he said in an interview in Washington. “Australians don’t think, ‘I better arm myself’. We’re not Second Amendment people; it’s not part of the mindset.”

However, the Minns Labor government in NSW is examining whether it should allow the Community Security Group, a non-profit Jewish security provider, to carry additional arms following the December 14 massacre, in which 15 people were killed at a Hanukkah celebration.

Under the group’s licence, personnel are allowed to carry pistols when protecting schools and synagogues, but not at public events.

Ryvchin said the Trump administration officials showed a lot of interest in whether the Bondi Beach event was sufficiently resourced and whether it had been “left vulnerable” by being unarmed.

“The American approach, being a very individualistic society, is: What are you guys doing? Rather than waiting for the police to protect you,” he said.

“But [it] makes you think: Are we still living in an old world, thinking that threats are contained and police and ASIO have everything under control when they clearly don’t?

“I’m not saying the solution is for Jews to arm themselves, but I think we need to modernise our thinking about the threats and how to meet those threats.”

Kaploun, who was confirmed as Trump’s antisemitism envoy just days after the Bondi massacre, says the US president is closely watching how Australia responds to the worst-ever terrorist attack on its soil.

In January, he told The Australian there were concerns within the administration that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had turned a blind eye to antisemitism. “There was a level of apathy and just no interest to deal with it until a tragedy occurred,” Kaploun told the newspaper.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38734

File: 81bc36f4a16b089⋯.jpg (39.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 496885ebb9e3b4c⋯.jpg (290.58 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24360122 (090717ZMAR26) Notable: Accused Bondi gunman Naveed Akram wants a gag order to protect his family - Alleged Bondi Beach terrorist Naveed Akram has sought a suppression order to prevent publication of identifying details about his mother, brother and sister, arguing publicity surrounding the case could endanger their safety. Barrister Richard Wilson SC told a Sydney court the application aimed to shield the family’s identities, home address and associated school or workplace details from public reporting as the case draws international attention. Magistrate Greg Grogin granted interim orders and scheduled a priority hearing, noting there appeared to be “no reason” relatives should be drawn into the “arena” of the trial, but questioned whether privacy protections could still be effective given extensive existing reporting. Akram faces 15 murder charges over the Hanukkah attack, alongside attempted murder and terrorism-related offences.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23978158 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23990943 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24264402 (pb)

Accused Bondi gunman Naveed Akram wants a gag order to protect his family

JAMES DOWLING - 9 March 2026

1/2

Alleged Bondi gunman Naveed Akram has sought a suppression order to protect his mother, brother and sister from public scrutiny, claiming he fears for their safety.

Barrister Richard Wilson SC appeared for the younger of the two alleged perpetrators behind the Bondi Beach terror massacre, pushing for non-publication and suppression orders that would shield the identities and address of the 24-year-old’s family.

The proposed order would also cover school and work addresses for the Akrams.

The order was opposed by News Corp Australia, the parent company of this masthead, with provisional orders granted in the interim by Magistrate Greg Grogin and a hearing set down as a ­priority for Tuesday next week.

Mr Grogin said “on first sight” there was no reason Mr Akram’s family should be drawn into the “arena” of a trial drawing international headlines, but questioned whether it was too late to protect their privacy given the extensive reporting already in the public ­domain about the family.

“To use a colloquialism, hasn’t the horse bolted on that?” he asked.

“The application is made on the basis of safety of the applicants, not only their mental safety but also for their physical safety. There is – it would appear at first sight – absolutely no reason why the relatives of the accused, Naveed Akram, should have their lives put in the arena both within Sydney, NSW, Australia, and in fact as it is now – the world.”

News Corp counsel Benjamin Regattieri said media would likely oppose the order because of its “futility”, and the “very high threshold” for safety concerns required to grant it.

Mr Wilson, a public defender provided to Mr Akram, cited the “considerable ongoing interest” in the case as a concern. He declined to comment further outside court.

A court-mandated suppression order on the identities of non-fatal victims in the Bondi Beach terror shooting was also extended, protecting wounded bystanders who had not spoken publicly about their injuries or been identified by the press.

Mr Akram and his father, Sajid, are accused of opening fire on Jewish families celebrating the first night of Hanukkah at Bondi Beach on December 14, killing 15 people. Sajid was killed at the scene.

Naveed was charged after waking from an induced coma in December with 15 counts of murder, 40 counts of attempted murder, committing a terrorist act, discharging a firearm with intent, displaying a prohibited terror symbol and causing explosives to be placed in or near a public place.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38735

File: 197b131420ef412⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24360128 (090730ZMAR26) Notable: Australians reach for VPNs, find porn sites blocked as online age-restrictions take effect - Australians have begun downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in large numbers as new online age-verification laws restricting minors’ access to adult content take effect nationwide. App store data showed three of the 15 most downloaded free smartphone apps were VPN services, with VPN – Super Unlimited Proxy ranking ahead of any social media platform. The measures require pornography websites to verify users are over 18 and compel AI-powered chatbot services to block harmful content from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million. Canada-based company Aylo responded by blocking Australian access to RedTube and YouPorn and limiting Pornhub to a version without explicit content. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the changes aim to bring the same protections for children online as those expected offline.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23873299 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23939208 (pb)

Australians reach for VPNs, find porn sites blocked as online age-restrictions take effect

Byron Kaye - March 9, 2026

SYDNEY, March 9 (Reuters) - Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world's largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country rolled out sweeping online age restrictions on Monday.

Last December, Australia became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires AI-powered chatbot services to keep certain content - including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material - from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million ($34.5 million).

The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of U.S. states requiring websites which disseminate pornography to verify users are over 18. App stores must also run age checks before allowing downloads of software labelled 18+.

The country's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the measures aimed to afford children the same protection online as the world expected offline.

"A child today can't walk into a bar and order a drink, they can't stroll into a strip club or browse an adult shop or sit down at a blackjack table in a casino," she told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

"This just really brings ... those protections that we put for kids in place to the digital realm."

Three of the 15 most downloaded free smartphone apps on Monday were VPNs, a chart published by iPhone maker Apple showed. The most downloaded VPN, called VPN - Super Unlimited Proxy, ranked ahead of any social media platform, the chart showed.

VPN - Super Unlimited Proxy did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. All internet-connected devices carry an individual code which discloses their location, and VPNs hide the user's location by assigning a new code to the device.

Canada-based Aylo, owner of a large network of pornography websites, meanwhile blocked Australians from accessing the platforms RedTube and YouPorn, while presenting a version of Pornhub without explicit content.

All the websites carried a banner saying it was "not currently accepting new account registrations in your region".

Aylo said in an email it had "restricted access to our platforms in a number of locations, including the UK, France, and a number of US states, due to ineffective and haphazard age verification laws".

Tom Sulston, deputy chair of advocacy group Digital Rights Watch, said it was unsurprising that people were reaching for VPNs.

"My hope is that, not only will they discover that this works for looking at spicier internet sites, but that it's just generally a good idea to use VPNs when you're traversing the internet, because they do offer you some privacy protections."

($1 = 1.4351 Australian dollars)

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/vpns-up-porn-websites-down-australia-brings-new-online-age-restrictions-2026-03-09/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38736

File: 5c71ec38e58c3bb⋯.jpg (2.42 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c4926bc5ee30b5d⋯.jpg (694.85 KB,1754x1241,1754:1241,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24360139 (090750ZMAR26) Notable: ‘Some of the worst’:Dozens charged as police bust online paedophile ring- Thirty-five men across Victoria and New South Wales have been charged with more than 1000 offences after police infiltrated and dismantled an encrypted online network allegedly sharing extreme child sexual abuse material. The year-long undercover investigation, known as Operation Jac Beau, involved Australian Federal Police and Victoria Police officers posing as members of the group to identify suspects who believed encryption would conceal their activities. Authorities examined more than 300 hours of video footage and about 65,000 unique images during the investigation and executed more than 30 search warrants across Melbourne, regional Victoria and parts of NSW. Twenty-six arrests were made in Victoria and nine in NSW. Police said the material shared in the network depicted severe sexual abuse, torture and murder of infants and young children and bestiality, and was believed to have been produced overseas. Investigators have added the material to the International Child Sexual Exploitation database to assist global efforts to identify victims and offenders.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23925350 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23925388 (pb)

‘Some of the worst’: Dozens charged as police bust online paedophile ring

Melissa Cunningham - March 7, 2026

1/2

Warning: distressing content

Thirty-five men across Victoria and NSW are facing more than 1000 criminal charges after police spent a year infiltrating and dismantling a secret paedophile network in one of Australia’s most significant online child sexual abuse investigations.

Members of the online encrypted group allegedly shared collections of child sexual abuse material and texted each other about depraved fantasies, including their desire to find children and infants in real life.

The material depicted the sexual abuse, torture and murder of infants and young children and bestiality.

Twenty-six men have been arrested and charged as a result of the investigation in Victoria, and another nine have been arrested in NSW.

Police said no newly generated material involving Australian children was identified during the investigation, and it was believed the offending in the material being shared occurred offshore.

The year-long undercover investigation by the Australian Federal Police and Victoria Police’s Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team (JACET) began in late 2023 after Queensland police shared intelligence about the group.

Police examined more than 300 hours of distressing video footage and 65,000 unique images as part of the operation.

Investigators said the men mistakenly believed the app’s encryption would shield them from detection by authorities.

As part of the operation, a team of investigators went undercover posing as members of the group so they could infiltrate the online network and gather evidence to identity and arrest the men.

Victoria Police Detective Sergeant Jason Regan worked on the operation, and has been a police officer in the child exploitation space for more than eight years.

“It was very horrific sex offending,” he said. “It was some of the worst stuff we’ve ever dealt with.”

“It was a group that we were able to infiltrate, but also in that space, we also had to speak like them.”

Regan said the undercover investigators faced the difficult task of maintaining conversations with the members for almost a year, while trying to identify the offenders.

“You’re just trying to get some little piece of information ... any snippet of their life that you can to work on and try and identify them,” he said.

The investigation also sparked a major international manhunt. Nineteen referrals were made to Australian and international agencies.

“We had so many offenders identified, not just in Victoria, but also in NSW and overseas as well,” Regan said.

He said that after every arrest, an offender’s devices would be searched.

Investigators would find out who they were talking to and sharing material with. Police then arrested those alleged offenders and examined their devices, triggering a cascade of arrests.

“It’s like a pyramid scheme that just starts with one person and then just spreads out,” he said.

“We’re getting a lot more offenders based on the information or intelligence we’re able to gather from people’s devices.”

Dozens of police from investigations, covert operations, digital forensics and victim identification worked on the operation known as Jac Beau.

More than 30 search warrants were executed all over Melbourne and homes were raided in suburbs including Ascot Vale, Flemington, Greenvale, Wollert, Reservoir, Kingsbury, Chirnside Park, Cranbourne West, Clyde, Kew, Richmond, South Melbourne, Williamstown and Footscray.

Search warrants were also executed in Bendigo. Police seized about 100 electronic devices during the raids.

The 35 men were charged with a range of offences including possession, accessing, transmission, solicitation and production of child sexual abuse material.

A 46-year-old Melbourne man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was identified as the group’s creator and administrator. He was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment in September 2024 at the Victorian County Court.

A Central Victorian man, who also cannot be named, was charged with more than 250 offences including transmitting, accessing, producing and soliciting child abuse material.

He was sentenced to six years imprisonment in December last year.

Several other alleged perpetrators are still being prosecuted, while others have been sentenced and jailed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38737

File: 020cfd049a9076c⋯.mp4 (15.75 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24360152 (090810ZMAR26) Notable: More than two dozen men charged with more than 1000 child abuse material offences - (Video) Twenty-six men in Victoria have been arrested and charged with more than 1000 offences after police dismantled an encrypted online group used to share large volumes of extreme child abuse material. Investigators said the network distributed more than 65,000 images and more than 300 hours of video depicting the sexual abuse, torture and murder of infants and young children, as well as bestiality. The two-year investigation by the Australian Federal Police and Victoria Police targeted suspects who allegedly used encrypted messaging platforms to exchange material and discuss plans to sexually abuse children. Australian Federal Police Detective Superintendent Bernard Geason said the material uncovered was “among the worst of the worst” and reflected the “sad reality” that some offenders exploit children for “their own perverse desires”. Victoria Police Detective Superintendent Tim McKinney said investigators faced the distressing task of reviewing hundreds of hours of video material, along with written conversations where participants expressed their desire to find children and infants in real life. Detective Acting Inspector Scott Amjah said the “volume and depravity” of the material uncovered “will stay with all of us” and warned the public would be “absolutely horrified by the content of the material that is circulated online these days”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38736

More than two dozen men charged with more than 1000 child abuse material offences

Patrick Brischetto - Mar 8, 2026

Warning: This story contains references to child sexual assault.

An online group in which more than 65,000 images of child abuse material were shared has been shut down, resulting in the arrest of 26 Victorian men.

In an investigation lasting over two years, police allege the men were part of a group using encrypted messaging to share text and image-based material, as well as sourcing children to sexually abuse.

In a statement released this morning, the Australian Federal Police and Victoria Police claimed images and videos depicted the sexual abuse, torture and murder of infants and young children, as well as bestiality.

No newly generated material involving Australian children was identified during the investigation.

Several of the men have already been charged, convicted and imprisoned, while others remain before the courts.

However, police could only go public with the findings now as the investigation using a covert operation has concluded.

In addition to the tens of thousands of photos recovered, police also found more than 300 hours of child abuse videos.

AFP Detective Superintendent Bernard Geason said the investigation uncovered a "sad reality" lurking in corners of the online world.

"Our society has many individuals who will exploit children for their own perverse desires," he said.

"The contents of this chat group are among the worst of the worst. This investigation has stopped people sharing violent abuse material and disrupted an online market of misery. But there is a tidal wave of this material on the internet and constant demands for more."

The 26 men who were charged were located in Victoria, and most were not previously known to police.

A Melbourne man, 46, was charged with creating and administering a group on the encrypted messaging application for the sharing of child abuse material.

He was sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment in September 2024.

A Central Victoria man was charged with more than 250 offences relating to transmitting, accessing, producing and soliciting child abuse material through various individuals he met in the group.

He was sentenced to five years' imprisonment at the end of last year.

Detective Superintendent Tim McKinney from Victoria Police said some of the material was among the worst police had ever seen.

"Our investigators faced the distressing task of combing through 300+ hours of material," he said

"There were also written conversations where these participants expressed their desire to find children and infants in real life."

AFP Detective Acting Inspector Scott Amjah said he was stunned by the "volume and depravity" of the material his team uncovered during the investigation.

"[It] will stay with all of us," he said.

"I think members of the public would be absolutely horrified by the content of the material that is circulated online these days."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/two-dozen-men-charged-with-more-than-1000-child-abuse-material-offences-australia-victoria/270772a1-4291-49cc-83e2-ee54db76daca

>Children are being kidnapped, tortured, raped, and sacrificed in the name of PURE EVIL.

>Stay the course.

>We are FIGHTING a deeply entrenched enemy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38738

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363854 (100806ZMAR26) Notable: Aussie, Aussie, Aussie’: Cheers after five Iranian players granted asylum after escape - (Video) Five Iranian women’s footballers, including captain Zahra Ghanbari, have been granted humanitarian visas to remain in Australia after escaping government minders at a Gold Coast hotel during the Women’s Asian Cup. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the players fled on Monday night following days of confidential discussions with officials and were now under the protection of the Australian Federal Police. The athletes had faced condemnation in Iran after refusing to sing the national anthem before their opening match, raising fears they could face severe punishment if forced to return. Burke said the remaining members of the team would also be offered assistance if they sought to stay. The incident drew international attention, with US President Donald Trump contacting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and urging Australia to grant the players asylum.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

‘Aussie, Aussie, Aussie’: Cheers after five Iranian players granted asylum after escape

Matthew Knott - March 10, 2026

1/2

Five Iranian soccer players, including team captain Zahra Ghanbari, have been granted humanitarian visas to stay in Australia after a daring escape from their minders at a Gold Coast hotel on Monday night.

“Once everything had been signed off last night, there were lots of photos, lots of celebrating, and then a spontaneous outbreak of Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, oi, oi oi,” a smiling Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke announced at a press conference at Brisbane Airport on Tuesday morning.

“These women are great athletes, great people, and they’re going to feel very much at home in Australia.”

Revealing that the government had been in secret talks with the players for days, Burke acknowledged that fleeing was a “difficult decision” and assured the remaining 15 or so members of the team that they would be welcome if they wished to stay.

“Even though the offer continues to be there for other members of the team, it is quite possible and indeed likely that not every woman in the team will make a decision to take up the opportunity that Australia would offer to them,” Burke said.

“What matters here is that they have the best agency they can over those decisions, and so we’re making sure that the opportunity to seek assistance is there. But I don’t want to begin to imagine how difficult that decision is for each of the individual women, but certainly last night, it was joy, it was relief, and people were very excited about embarking on a life in Australia.”

The five players – captain Zahra Ghanbari and teammates Fatemeh Pasandideh, Zahra Sarbali, Atefeh Ramezanizadeh, and Mona Hamoudi – are now under the protection of the Australian Federal Police and have given permission for their names and faces to be published.

They were condemned in Iran as traitors after they failed to sing the Iranian national anthem before their opening match of the Asian Cup, escalating moves to provide assistance because of the risk they would face serious punishment and possible executions once they returned.

Exiled crown prince Reza Palavi named the women as he paid tribute to them last night.

News of the matter prompted US President Donald Trump to intervene overnight, first by demanding on social media that Australia give the women asylum, and then by speaking with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

“He’s on it!” Trump posted after their conversation. “Five have already been taken care of, and the rest are on their way. Some, however, feel they must go back because they are worried about the safety of their families, including threats to those family members if they don’t return.

“In any event, the prime minister is doing a very good job having to do with this rather delicate situation.”

Less than two hours earlier, Trump had warned Albanese he would be making a “terrible humanitarian mistake” if he allowed the team to be forced back to Iran, and offered to give the women asylum in the US if Australia would not.

“Everyone is so happy for the girls. They would not have been safe if they went home,” said Shahzad Shirkhanzadeh, an active member of the Iranian-Australian community.

She praised the government for moving swiftly to ensure the players had the option to seek asylum in Australia before being forced to return to Iran.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38739

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363902 (100849ZMAR26) Notable: Tony Burke grants five Iranian footballers asylum as two players stay behind at team’s hotel - (Video) Five members of Iran’s women’s national football team, including captain Zahra Ghanbari, have been granted humanitarian visas after escaping team minders at a Gold Coast hotel during the Women’s Asian Cup. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the players fled on Monday night with assistance from the Australian Federal Police and are now being housed at a secure location in Brisbane. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government had been preparing for possible defections and assured remaining team members that help would be available if they sought asylum. Two additional players reportedly remained at the team’s hotel as the squad prepared to depart Australia. The dramatic escape drew international attention, with US President Donald Trump speaking with Albanese and urging Australia to ensure the players were not forced to return to Iran.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

Tony Burke grants five Iranian footballers asylum as two players stay behind at team’s hotel

AMANDA HODGE - March 10, 2026

1/3

Anthony Albanese has declared five defectors from the Iranian women’s football team are safe in their new home of Australia, and assured the other team members that help is here if they want it as a further two players split off from the rest of the squad.

A pair of suitcases were removed from the team’s bus shortly before the Iranians departed the Royal Pines Resort on the Gold Coast around 1pm. The Australian understands they belong to two players who have stayed behind at the hotel. Home Affairs minister Tony Burke’s office did not return calls from The Australian.

On Monday night, five women - including the squad’s captain Zahra Ghanbari and teammates Fatemeh Pasandideh, Zahra Sarbali, Atefeh Ramezanizadeh, and Mona Hamoudi - escaped the hotel with the help of Australian Federal Police, and broke out into chants of “Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, Oi, Oi, Oi” when they were told they could stay. The five players granted humanitarian visas are being held in a safe house in Brisbane.

On Tuesday afternoon, the Iranian team left the Gold Coast resort where they have been on lockdown for the past fortnight for the Asian Cup.

Around 11am local time, almost a dozen police officers gathered outside the doors of the Royal Pines Resort as staff and security watched on from inside the lobby.

Over the next hour, players, their coaches and team officials brought down their luggage to the drop off point. Some returned their room keys, while one handed a mobile phone back to the concierge.

One sportswoman could be heard wailing as she said goodbye to a supporter, who was then confronted by a team official. Police were called over to intervene.

“Shame on you,” the female supporter shouted at a suspected IRGC-aligned team member. Players were ushered back upstairs.

As this occurred, hotel staff loaded their bags into the awaiting bus.

The team, known as the Lionesses, had been staying at the resort throughout the football tournament, playing their opening match just days after the USA and Israel started a war with Iran.

During their stay, there were subjected to regime rule, under constant surveillance from its aligned officials and hired security.

Mr Burke, who was earlier in Brisbane to lead the assistance effort, said other members of the team are being offered the same chance to apply for asylum.

In Canberra, Mr Albanese said his government had been preparing for some time for the defections. “Australians have been moved by the plight of these safe women,” he said. “They are safe here and they are at home here. We are willing to provide assistance to other women in the team ... we say to them: ‘If you want our help, help is here.’”

Mr Albanese had an early morning call with Donald Trump on Tuesday regarding the asylum issue. The call came amid the US President’s declaration that the Albanese government would be making a “terrible humanitarian mistake” if it let the soccer players leave with their Iranian regime handlers.

Mr Burke said conversations began in the “very early hours of yesterday morning”, and that a number of players were moved to a safe location by the AFP.

“Last night I met with them at that location. I signed off last night for their applications to go onto humanitarian visas. And a little bit after, the processing was completed by the Department of Home Affairs,” Mr Burke said on Tuesday morning.

“I say to the other members of the team, the same opportunity is there. Australia has taken the Iranian women’s soccer team into our hearts. These women are tremendously popular in Australia, but we realise they are in a terribly difficult situation with the decisions that they’re making.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38740

File: 73935032010ea3b⋯.mp4 (14.41 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363915 (100903ZMAR26) Notable: Australia deploys aircraft to Middle East as analyst warns ‘we’re now part of this war’ - (Video) Australia will deploy an E-7A Wedgetail surveillance aircraft, advanced air-to-air missiles and about 85 troops to the United Arab Emirates after the Gulf state requested assistance following Iranian missile and drone attacks. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the deployment would focus on defensive operations, including protecting airspace and supporting Australian citizens and facilities in the region. Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge warned the move effectively tied Australia more closely to the conflict, saying “we’re now a part of this war”. The government said the Wedgetail would provide long-range reconnaissance for an initial four-week mission. Officials also noted around 24,000 Australians remain in the UAE as the conflict disrupts flights and escalates what Foreign Minister Penny Wong has described as Australia’s worst-ever consular crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

Australia deploys aircraft to Middle East as analyst warns ‘we’re now part of this war’

Brittany Busch and Paul Sakkal - March 10, 2026

1/2

Australia will deploy a surveillance aircraft, missiles and 85 Australian troops after a plea for help from the United Arab Emirates as the Gulf state endures strikes from Iran, a move analysts said tied Australia more directly into the war in the Middle East.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Tuesday that the E-7A Wedgetail and advanced air-to-air missiles would be used to defend the UAE at the request of Abu Dhabi.

The government emphasised that Australian forces would exclusively be used for defensive purposes, limiting its support in the face of calls from the Greens and Labor figures, including Bob Carr, to remain neutral.

“The Wedgetail will provide long-range reconnaissance capability, which will help to protect and secure the airspace above the Gulf,” Albanese said at a press conference in Canberra, adding it would be deployed for an initial four weeks.

“Iran’s reprisal attacks continue to escalate, already at a scale and depth we haven’t seen before.

“Our involvement is purely defensive, and it’s in defence of Australians who are in the region, as well as in defence of our friends in the United Arab Emirates … and Australians.”

Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge said the goal of protecting Australian troops at Al Minhad, Australia’s military base in the UAE, gave Labor, which opposed Australia’s involvement in Iraq in 2003, a narrow and clear justification for getting involved in the conflict.

Shoebridge warned that the government’s hope to adopt a defensive posture was complicated because Iran would not differentiate between combatants.

“We’re best just admitting to ourselves that we’re now a part of this war, not just sitting in some quarantined corner,” Shoebridge, a directer of Strategic Analysis Australia, said. “Offence and defence are just different sides of the coin of war.”

Albanese said 24,000 Australians remained in the UAE, many of whom will rely on departures from Dubai airport to return. The airport has been repeatedly targeted since the conflict began, forcing the cancellation of flights and what Foreign Minister Penny Wong has labelled as Australia’s worst-ever consular crisis.

Australia’s military headquarters in the Middle East is also located at the Al Minhad Air Base.

Albanese spoke with US President Donald Trump at 2am, Australian time, on Tuesday. The president wanted to lobby Australia to grant asylum to players in the Iranian women’s soccer team, a move the government was preparing before Trump’s intervention.

The prime minister did not say if the pair talked about Australian involvement in the conflict, which Trump said on Tuesday could end “very soon” as oil prices spiked and global markets were hit hard on Monday.

“Australia has been a part of every war the US has fought since Federation,” Shoebridge said. “The UK didn’t go to Vietnam, so not going to this one would have represented Mr Albanese breaking that record as a US ally.

“Whether this is a good war to join is an open question, but the dominant thought in the government’s mind is how do we be a part of this war but quarantine the risk.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38741

File: 65f29c9fd73940e⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,6283x4191,6283:4191,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363919 (100909ZMAR26) Notable: No need for panic’: Bowen calls urgent summit as fuel fears grip regions - Energy Minister Chris Bowen has convened an urgent fuel security taskforce as panic-buying and supply concerns spread through regional Australia amid rising oil prices and conflict in the Middle East. Bowen said there was “no need for panic”, stressing that shipments of diesel, petrol and jet fuel to Australia had not been disrupted and that the country held roughly a month of fuel reserves. The taskforce, including farming groups, fuel suppliers and ministers Tim Ayres and Julie Collins, will examine supply chain pressures and reports of hoarding. Farmers warned fuel and fertiliser shortages could threaten upcoming winter crop planting, while the Coalition urged the government to intervene to guarantee distribution. Oil markets have been volatile as tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global supply, faces disruption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

‘No need for panic’: Bowen calls urgent summit as fuel fears grip regions

Mike Foley - March 10, 2026

The Coalition is uniting with farmers to demand the Albanese government ensure critical industries do not run short on fuel, as fears over price spikes and a protracted war in Iran drive widespread panic-buying in regional areas.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen assured Australians there was currently no shortage based on the fuel stocks held in Australia or in the volumes coming into the country. The government called an urgent meeting of a new fuel taskforce on Tuesday afternoon, where ministers and industries including farming and transport committed to work together to identify and address supply chain issues.

Bowen said on Tuesday that no shipments of diesel, petrol or jet fuel to Australia had been interrupted, declared that shortages of fuel were caused by panic buying in regional communities and said Australia had a months worth of petrol and diesel in reserve.

“When demand goes up so much, it puts huge pressure on supply chains, but… fundamentally Australia’s fuel security is good because of the minimum stock obligations that we have put in place.”

The taskforce includes farming organisations, fuel suppliers, Industry Minister Tim Ayres and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins, as well as the peak lobby group for the fertiliser industry, which is facing a global supply crunch. It will discuss concerns that fuel wholesalers are hoarding supplies and reports that farmers are panic-buying to avoid future price spikes.

Bowen on Tuesday clashed with Queensland’s deputy premier, rejecting Jarrod Bleijie’s suggestion that Australia’s strategic fuel reserve of 36 days’ worth of petrol had already been reduced by 10 days, and accused him of intentionally spreading fear in the community.

“The deputy premier of Queensland has intervened in the debate in an irresponsible, dishonest fashion for which he should be ashamed,” Bowen said.

“Either he doesn’t understand how the law works, or he has deliberately misled Australians and engaged in encouraging panic buying.”

The future of Australia’s energy security remains uncertain while oil tankers are unable to sail through the Strait of Hormuz – which typically carries a quarter of global oil supply – while Iran attacks neighbouring nations in retaliation for the bombardment of its country by the US and Israel.

The Middle East region also produces about 45 per cent of the global fertiliser supply.

Independent fuel suppliers have reported difficulty in filling orders, as major companies restrict distribution. Social media is awash with reports of regional motorists claiming their local service station is empty, and farmers reporting diesel price spikes and delays to orders from private suppliers.

Victorian Farmers Federation president Brett Hosking said grain growers were particularly concerned about fuel and fertiliser supplies because they will soon start planting winter crops such as wheat and barley.

“We want to see some level of government intervention to ensure robust supply chains, and that agriculture is treated with a degree of importance because we only get one window to plant a crop,” Hosking said.

While there is believed to be enough urea on hand to plant, which typically starts in April, prices were already rising, and farmers are worried about how expensive it could be to fertilise their crops as they grow.

“Government will need to act swiftly and decisively to resolve this issue for all Australians,” said NSW Farmers grains committee chairman Justin Everitt. “The next couple of weeks are a critical window for farmers to start growing next year’s bread, pasta and Weet-Bix, so this needs to be resolved this week.”

Opposition energy spokesman Dan Tehan said Bowen should have already used federal powers to commandeer supply chains.

“He’s not using those laws to get that full transparency in place to get that fuel moved,” Tehan said.

“What is he doing to make sure it’s distributed evenly across the country so that we don’t have certain areas and key industries that are missing out? And he needs to be doing the same when it comes to fertiliser.”

A meeting overnight of G7 nations and the International Energy Agency decided against releasing strategic oil reserves but said it was ready to do so in the future.

The global benchmark for oil, Brent, soared to $US116 ($165) a barrel but has since fallen to less than $US90 since US President Donald Trump declared the war would be over soon.

Regular unleaded fuel was retailing for around 219.9¢ at many service stations in Sydney and Melbourne on Tuesday morning.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-need-for-panic-bowen-calls-urgent-summit-as-fuel-fears-grip-regions-20260310-p5o8yx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38742

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363939 (100945ZMAR26) Notable: ‘I’m buggered and I’ve had enough’: David Littleproud quits as federal Nationals leader - (Video) Nationals leader David Littleproud has announced he will step down, saying he is “buggered” after months of internal conflict and political pressure within the party and the Coalition. Littleproud said he would remain the member for Maranoa but had lost the energy to continue leading after intense criticism and factional disputes. A leadership contest will be held with Matt Canavan, Kevin Hogan and Bridget McKenzie declaring their intention to run, while former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack is also considering a bid. Littleproud said he was proud of his record shaping Coalition policy, including opposition to the Indigenous Voice and net-zero emissions targets. His departure follows party divisions and several high-profile defections that have fuelled concerns about the Nationals’ electoral prospects.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24231295 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24253442 (pb)

‘I’m buggered and I’ve had enough’: David Littleproud quits as federal Nationals leader

GREG BROWN and ROSIE LEWIS - 10 March 2026

1/2

Matt Canavan, Kevin Hogan and Bridget McKenzie will run to be the next Nationals leader, after David Littleproud stunned the party by revealing he would step aside because he was “buggered”.

Nationals sources on Tuesday evening said Senator Canavan, Mr Hogan and Senator McKenzie had declared their intention to run for the leadership at a special Nationals party room meeting to be held at 10am on Wednesday.

Former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack was also considering running according to sources.

Mr Hogan, the deputy ­Nationals leader, is expected to be supported by Mr Littleproud and was told of the pending ­resignation ahead of most ­Nationals MPs just before parliament’s question time on Tuesday afternoon.

Other Nationals MPs said they found out about the resignation when a statement was released to the party room just after question time. The move surprised most MPs given Mr Littleproud’s leadership was not under any immediate threat.

Mr Littleproud is leaving open the option of staying on the Coalition frontbench, with some Nationals sources suspecting he would push to retain the agriculture portfolio.

Mr Hogan revealed he would run for leader. “While still feeling David’s resignation as leader, after being approached by a number of my colleagues, I have formally put my hand up for the leadership position,” he said.

Senator Canavan, who will consider running for the lower-house seat of Capricornia at the next election if it is vacated by sitting member Michelle Landry, also said he planned to run.

The north Queenslander, who ran for the leadership against Mr Littleproud after the last election and was a key figure in the Coalition dumping net zero, said he would “put my case to my Nationals colleagues in the coming days”.

“I have consistently been against the excessive government spending and crazy net-zero policies that have left Australia with the highest inflation and interest rates in the developed world,” Senator Canavan said in a statement on social media platform X.

“I believe I have the best chance to help win the battle for an Australia first plan that can deliver a better life for all Australians.

Moderate Liberal MPs were petrified of the party’s chances in city seats if Senator Canavan prevailed, with one declaring it would be akin to being in Coalition with One Nation.

After a controversial tenure as leader that included two damaging splits with the Liberals and the resignations of high-profile MPs Barnaby Joyce and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, a teary Mr Littleproud claimed to be the most consequential Nationals leader since John McEwen. He said he shaped policy within the Coalition by opposing the voice and net zero.

Mr Littleproud pointed to intense criticism he received after the second Coalition split as a reason he had lost the energy to lead.

Nationals MPs believe contributing factors to him quitting would also include his unpopularity among Liberal MPs, the rise of One Nation, bad polling ahead of the Farrer by-election, residual pressure from the resignations of Nationals MPs and internal criticism.

Mr Littleproud said: “It’s not probably since John McEwen has a National Party leader had to stand up and show the courage of their character and their party room and stand for what their party room wants them to stand for. So I’m proud but I’m tired. I don’t intend to retire from parliament; I love the people of Maranoa. I’ve been a human punching bag for the last couple of months. At some point you have got to look after yourself.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38743

File: 7ba4872b2a3f6f5⋯.jpg (165.87 KB,1044x697,1044:697,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e29119563b319f8⋯.jpg (245.64 KB,1498x918,749:459,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0355711f72f43ce⋯.jpg (689.76 KB,3316x2211,3316:2211,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24363966 (101000ZMAR26) Notable: Australian footballer Barry Cable on trial for alleged sexual abuse of girl in 1960s - Former Australian football Hall of Famer Barry Cable has gone on trial in Western Australia accused of sexually abusing a girl aged under 13 at his Perth home in the late 1960s. The woman, now in her sixties, told the District Court the alleged abuse occurred when she was between eight and 11 years old after she was taken from an orphanage to stay with Cable and his family. Prosecutor Kim Jennings said the case would reveal a “dark side” behind Cable’s celebrated football career and told the court three additional women would give evidence about alleged offending. Cable, 82, has pleaded not guilty to seven charges. Defence lawyer Tom Percy said the allegations were “completely denied” and argued records and witness evidence would show the alleged incidents could not have occurred.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian footballer Barry Cable on trial for alleged sexual abuse of girl in 1960s

David Weber - 10 March 2026

1/2

WARNING: This article contains details that some readers may find distressing.

Ex-Australian football Hall of Famer Barry Cable picked up a girl from an orphanage in Perth and sexually abused her multiple times, a court has been told.

The alleged victim, who was aged under 13 at the time, told the District Court the abuse happened in Mr Cable's home in Perth in the 1960s and said "he told me that he loved me and that's how we showed each other love".

The woman, who is now in her sixties, claimed he touched her genitals, tried to have sex with her, and made her touch him and perform oral sex.

She testified Mr Cable said to her "if I told anyone they wouldn't believe me because he was Barry Cable".

But Mr Cable's lawyer said the allegations were "completely denied" and the former footballer's wife would give evidence and say the alleged victim never stayed at their home.

'Dark side' behind football career

On the opening day of the trial, lawyer Tom Percy suggested there was a financial motive as the complaint emerged at the time of a 2023 civil case which found Mr Cable sexually abused a different victim, who was awarded more than $800,000.

Mr Cable, 82, is facing a judge-alone trial, charged with seven offences involving a girl under 13.

The offences allegedly happened between December 1966 and December 1969 at times when the woman said she stayed at the Cable family home as a young girl.

The girl's age ranged between 8 to 11 during that period.

Prosecutor Kim Jennings told the court Mr Cable had an "illustrious career" playing hundreds of games in Victorian and WA football leagues, but behind that spotlight was a "dark side".

Ms Jennings said along with the alleged victim, the court would hear from three other females who would say Mr Cable offended against them.

"This other conduct shows a tendency of Barry Cable to be sexually attracted to young underage girls and to act upon that sexual interest," she told the court.

Abuse started while wife slept

The alleged victim, who testified via video-link, described to the court in graphic detail what she alleged Mr Cable did to her — which the ABC has chosen not to publish.

She claimed Mr Cable and his wife had picked her up from an orphanage and taken her to their home.

The woman said Barry Cable "treated me good" but things changed when "he started touching my body, just fondling me".

She told the court she wore dresses with no underwear when she was with him after Mr Cable told her "they don't wear underwear in the house".

The woman testified Mr Cable would come into her room when his wife Helen was asleep.

She said "he tried to put his penis inside me" but walked out of the room "because he couldn't get it in", telling her she was "useless".

Other instances happened in the lounge room, she told the court.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38744

File: c7686917c1af33f⋯.mp4 (15.71 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367769 (110914ZMAR26) Notable: Squad member granted asylum reverses decision as Iran claims players ‘kidnapped’ - (Video) One member of Iran’s women’s football team who accepted an Australian offer of asylum has reversed her decision and chosen to return to Iran, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed, after speaking with teammates who had already left the country. Burke said Australia respected the player’s right to change her mind and confirmed authorities had immediately moved other asylum seekers to a new secure location after the Iranian embassy was informed of their whereabouts. Iranian officials accused Australia of taking the players “hostage”, claims rejected by the government. Six members of the squad, including five players who earlier escaped team minders on the Gold Coast, have sought asylum in Australia. Most of the remaining team departed on Tuesday night amid emotional scenes at the hotel and airport, with supporters protesting and police maintaining a strong presence while Department of Home Affairs officials and Australian Border Force officers ensured players could privately consider asylum options.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

Squad member granted asylum reverses decision as Iran claims players ‘kidnapped’

MACKENZIE SCOTT - 11 March 2026

1/3

One of the two members of the Iranian women’s football squad who were granted asylum before the team’s flight to Sydney has changed her mind, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed, as Iranian government officials claim the players were taken ‘hostage’.

Mr Burke in Question Time said that shortly after 10am this morning, one of the women who had taken up a government offer to remain in Australia had decided instead to return to Iran.

“I was advised that one of the two who had made the decision to stay last night had spoken to some of the teammates who had left, and had changed her mind,” he said.

“In Australia, people are able to change their mind, people are able to travel. So, we respect the context in which she has made that decision.”

In the process of reversing her decision, the Iranian embassy had been informed of the location of her fellow teammates that had been issued with humanitarian visas — and those staying were urgently moved.

“I immediately gave the instruction for people to be moved and that’s been dealt with immediately,” Mr Burke said.

“I think we can all be very proud of the Australian Federal Police, of officials, of everybody who’s been involved.”

Iran’s ‘hostages’ claim

Mr Burke’s comments came as Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Esmail Baghaei claimed the players had been taken ‘hostage’, and said: “Iran awaits you with open arms. Come home.”

“They slaughtered more than 165 innocent Iranian schoolgirls in a double-tap Tomahawk attack in the city of Minab, and now they want to take our athletes hostage in the name of ‘saving’ them? The audacity and hypocrisy are staggering,” he wrote.

The head of Iran’s football federation, Mehdi Taj, echoed the claims of kidnap in an interview with state television.

“After the game, unfortunately, the Australian police came and intervened, removing one or two of the players from the hotel, according to the news we have,” Mr Taj said.

“They martyred our girls in Minab, 160 of them, and in this incident they are taking our girls hostage.

“They did a terrible thing. Last night, some people came and lay down in front of the car they were driving to the airport.”

The fate of the woman and the majority of the ­Iranian women’s football team is now in the hands of the regime in Tehran, with the majority of the squad flying out of Australia on Tuesday night in a dramatic departure that saw one athlete physically ­escorted onto the team bus and another heard crying in their hotel lobby.

Mr Burke confirmed on Wednesday morning that two additional members of the group, including the woman who has now decided to return, sought asylum – one player and one staff member – in Brisbane before the travelling party flew onto Sydney.

This brings the number of those defecting to six.

Mr Burke said border force officials made multiple representations to the team members before they departed, including in private meetings.

“All the players remaining and most of the support people were taken into interview rooms, without any minders present, simply themselves and the Department of Home Affairs and an interpreter. And they were given a choice,” Mr Burke said.

“Obviously, the one thing, the one pressure we couldn’t take away was the context. We couldn’t take away the pressure of the context for these individuals of what might have been said to them beforehand, what pressures they might have felt, were there (any) on other family members.

“None of those individuals made the decision to take up the offer from Australia after the plane had taken off.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38745

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367805 (110928ZMAR26) Notable: Home Affairs Minister to halt entry of temporary visa holders who may seek asylum to Australia - (Video) The Albanese government has introduced legislation allowing the Home Affairs Minister to temporarily block certain visa holders from travelling to Australia if authorities believe they may seek asylum after arrival. Assistant Multicultural Affairs Minister Julian Hill said the power would allow the government to respond quickly to international crises and prevent large groups of visitors entering on temporary visas before claiming protection. The proposed law would permit travel suspensions for specific visa cohorts for up to six months without cancelling visas outright. Critics, including Greens Senator David Shoebridge and independent Zali Steggall, warned the measure could concentrate excessive ministerial power and undermine confidence in Australia’s visa system.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

Home Affairs Minister to halt entry of temporary visa holders who may seek asylum to Australia

SARAH ISON - March 10, 2026

1/2

Labor will introduce new powers for the Home Affairs Minister to halt some temporary visa holders due to come to Australia and prevent a flood of people claiming asylum once they arrive, in a change that the government says is “vital” at a time of global upheaval.

As the government granted five Iranian football players asylum on Tuesday, it revealed just hours later that it was pursuing law changes that would “close loopholes” in the migration system.

Pointing to the prospect of non-citizens from countries like Iran coming to Australia on tourist visas and other temporary visa classes and then claiming asylum, Assistant Multicultural Affairs Minister Julian Hill said the new bill would ensure Australia could respond to “rapid international developments”.

“There are many temporary visa holders outside Australia holding a temporary right of entry to Australia, granted to support travel for a genuinely temporary purpose, like a holiday or attending a conference,” Mr Hill told parliament as he introduced the legislation to the lower house on Tuesday afternoon.

“The current situation in the Middle East demonstrates how quickly circumstances can change. That may impact whether those temporary visa holders fulfil that temporary purpose in Australia, including whether they would leave Australia should they travel here.

“In these circumstances, it is vital that the government can respond appropriately, including by placing temporary limitations on the ability of certain cohorts of non-citizens from travelling to Australia.”

Without the proposed legislative change, the only way the government can currently prevent travel to Australia by valid visa holders is to individually assess whether there are grounds to cancel each visa.

Mr Hill said this process was “not suited to responding efficiently to international conflict or other rapid international developments where thousands of visas may be affected simultaneously”.

“If a non-citizen’s temporary visa expires during the period of the determination, they are eligible to apply for a further visa,” Mr Hill said.

“The determination suspends travel to Australia while it is in force. It is not a bar on visa applications. Any new visa application would be appropriately considered having regard to the applicant’s circumstances and other relevant matters at that time.”

It follows a wave of Palestinians entering Australia on tourist visas after the escalation of the Middle East conflict in 2023, which was met with concerns from conservative political parties over the future of such cohorts.

To exercise the new powers, the Home Affairs Minister must be satisfied that it is in the national interest to do so.

The bill will not cancel anyone’s visa or refuse the grant of a visa application, instead only enforcing a temporary stay on individuals from some visa classes travelling to Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38746

File: b3e849dbe6cd285⋯.jpg (224.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9dbd3a984406b25⋯.jpg (180.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 57afa29edbbd834⋯.jpg (233 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367820 (110936ZMAR26) Notable: Hundreds more Australians return as Gulf repatriation effort gathers pace - More than 2600 Australians stranded in the Middle East have returned home as repatriation efforts accelerate following the conflict sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran. A further 160 Australians arrived in Sydney on Tuesday aboard an Emirates flight from Dubai, bringing the total number of repatriation flights to 18. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said officials had been working “around the clock” to assist Australians and urged those wishing to leave the region to take available commercial flights while they remained operating. Several more flights are expected to arrive on Wednesday. Some evacuees criticised the level of assistance provided while stranded, with travellers describing cancelled flights, drone attacks near airports and costly alternative routes through Saudi Arabia to reach flights home.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24328519 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24334212 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24338592 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

Hundreds more Australians return as Gulf repatriation effort gathers pace

JACK QUAIL - 10 March 2026

The repatriation of thousands of Australians stranded in the Middle East is beginning to gather pace, with another planeload of evacuees arriving in Sydney.

More than 2600 Australians have now returned home since ­Israel and the US launched air strikes against Iranian targets in late February, triggering retaliatory action across the Gulf that shuttered airports and closed airspace, leaving tens of thousands stranded.

On Tuesday morning, 160 Australians arrived on an Emirates repatriation flight from Dubai, with flight EK412 landing at Sydney International Airport at 10.34am and bringing the total number of repatriation flights to 18.

At a press conference hours earlier, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said her department had been working “around the clock” to support affected Australians, with the small number of commercial flights still the best option for those seeking to leave the Gulf.

“We encourage those who do wish to leave, do so now. Do so while commercial flights are still available, however limited,” she told reporters in Canberra.

A further four commercial flights are expected to arrive in Australia on Wednesday.

They include Emirates flights EK412 and EK414, which both departed from Dubai Airport on Tuesday morning local time, while flight EK406 is slated to travel to Melbourne and EK420 to Perth.

Among those who have now returned to Australia is Melbourne business owner Sharon Benjamin, who had travelled to Dubai with his wife Gal for meetings with distributors for his environmentally friendly tableware company when he became caught in the crossfire.

Speaking with The Australian after finally returning to Australia on Sunday, Mr Benjamin said that while the federal government had “talked a lot on TV”, they received little practical assistance while stranded.

“We were flooded with emails from the government but there was no help, no one reached out, nothing happened,” he said. “It was very, very stressful. They don’t have shelters in Dubai so it was very scary.”

After their original flight was cancelled, the couple were eventually able to re-book seats on an Emirates service to Melbourne, paying $1700 each. Even then, their departure was delayed for five hours after a drone crashed near the airport.

“We felt like sitting ducks on the plane,” he added.

“People are still stuck there now in Dubai, in Qatar, I don’t think they’ll be getting out soon. I think we were very lucky.”

Data consultant Anthony Millican, also from Melbourne, was similarly caught in the Gulf following Iran’s retaliatory strikes and described the task of returning from Qatar to Australia as a “nightmare”.

“Compared to other countries like Germany and Italy, the support provided by Australia seemed very minimal,” Mr Millican said, adding that his hotel had organised him transport to the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh where the airport remained open.

“By the time I was on the bus, that’s when we found out it was an option (from DFAT),” he said. “It’s pretty appalling for the people still there, it seems like the government is having an each-way bet.”

At Riyadh, Mr Millican spent thousands for an airfare home.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Ted O’Brien, who was initially critical of the government’s response to assist stranded Australians, on Tuesday said the Coalition was now more content with repatriation efforts.

“I think the government was flat – footed … (but) we are nevertheless pleased that repatriation efforts have picked up,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hundreds-more-australians-return-as-gulf-repatriation-effort-gathers-pace/news-story/3e6bbb906ba2d6bc78194a9ef9c36dad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38747

File: 9b419e0a1af5dca⋯.jpg (222.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c401a082fc08a28⋯.jpg (195.42 KB,1024x1023,1024:1023,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367825 (110942ZMAR26) Notable: Mastermind jailed for antisemitic firebombings ordered by overseas group to divide communities - A Sydney man who coordinated a series of antisemitic firebombings and vandalism attacks has been jailed for five years after a court found he acted on instructions from unidentified overseas figures seeking to inflame tensions between Jewish and Arab communities. Nicholas James Alexander, 32, was sentenced in the Downing Centre Local Court after pleading guilty to organising attacks including the firebombing of a Maroubra childcare centre, swastika graffiti at the Newtown Synagogue and arson targeting the former home of Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin. Magistrate Jennifer Atkinson said Alexander was the “dominant figure” locally but had been directed by a foreign criminal group. The court heard he organised weapons, stolen vehicles and payments to accomplices while relaying instructions from overseas handlers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24354968

Mastermind jailed for antisemitic firebombings ordered by overseas group to divide communities

WILL SEITAM - 11 March 2026

1/2

The co-ordinator of a wave of antisemitic firebombings and graffiti attacks targeting one of the country’s most respected Jewish leaders, a Sydney synagogue and a childcare centre was instructed by shadowy overseas masterminds intent on striking fear into the Jewish community, a court has found.

Nicholas James Alexander, 32, appeared via audiovisual link at the Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday before presiding magistrate Jennifer Atkinson, who sentenced him to an aggregate five-year jail term.

Magistrate Atkinson accepted Alexander was the “dominant figure” operating within Australia but that he was ultimately commissioned by “unknown persons overseas”.

“There was a deliberate tactic to divide the Arab and Jewish communities to further the aims of the larger criminal group overseas, which instructed Mr Alexander in that regard,” Ms Atkinson said.

Between late 2024 and early 2025, Alexander hired his co-accused on behalf of mysterious foreign actors, ordering them to firebomb a Maroubra childcare centre, paint swastikas on the Newtown Synagogue and torch cars outside the former home of Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin.

Months later in August, The Australian revealed the attack co-ordinated by Alexander on the former Dover Heights home of Mr Ryvchin was one of a number of such crimes being examined for links to the Iranian regime by ASIO.

Ms Atkinson noted each attack required a “high degree of planning” and rejected claims by his defence team that his principle motive was to clear a looming drug debt.

Alexander was in possession of a Porsche Macan and a $20,000 motorcycle, which were seized by police. He also had a paying job as a gas dealer during this period.

However, Ms Atkinson accepted his offending was motivated to a lesser extent by “financial reward”.

According to the court, Alexander had procured a Glock pistol to be passed on to his co-accused, Leon Sofilas and Adam Moule; organised stolen getaway cars; explained to his associates how molotov cocktails were to be made and used; and directed them to dispose of phones and delete messages.

Evidence submitted to the court showed Alexander had passed on instructions from the overseas criminal group about what to say if caught by police and that he paid his co-accused significant amounts of money.

“Here’s the spill for anyone that gets grabbed, save it, wrote Alexander to his accomplice.

“Why do you do this? To pay off drug debt. To who?” asked the accomplice.

“Arabs,” replied Alexander.

Where are they from?” asked the accomplice.

“I don’t know. I buy it from a run number. Get a SIM card,” wrote Alexander.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38748

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367830 (110946ZMAR26) Notable: Matthew Canavan elected new Nationals leader after David Littleproud’s resignation - (Video) Queensland senator Matt Canavan has been elected leader of the Nationals following David Littleproud’s resignation, defeating NSW MP Kevin Hogan and Victorian senator Bridget McKenzie in a partyroom ballot. Canavan said his leadership would focus on rebuilding Australian industry, supporting coal-fired power and promoting what he called a “hyper-Australian” vision centred on national self-sufficiency. He argued coal remained the cheapest source of baseload energy and said proposals for new coal-fired power stations should be eligible for government underwriting. Canavan also suggested stronger trade measures could be needed to protect Australian manufacturing from subsidised Chinese imports. Victorian MP Darren Chester was elected deputy leader as the party prepares for what MPs described as a “mighty battle” with Labor, the teals and One Nation ahead of the next federal election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38742

Matthew Canavan elected new Nationals leader after David Littleproud’s resignation

ROSIE LEWIS - 11 March 2026

1/2

New Nationals leader Matt Canavan has put new coal-fired power stations and industry protection on his agenda, threatening a stoush with moderate Liberal MPs who are worried his elevation will further alienate the Coalition’s brand in cities.

Speaking in Canberra about a bill the Nationals are pushing in the Senate, Senator Canavan said coal-fired power was the cheapest form of baseload energy and that it was crucial those projects were eligible for government underwriting after the capacity investment scheme.

He said he would re-engage with the proponents of a junked proposal for a coal-fired power station in the north Queensland town of Collinsville, with that project put on ice in 2022 over Labor’s refusal to subsidise it.

“We need baseload power and we need to have a scheme that all power systems can compete,” Senator Canavan said.

“All the evidence, including the CSIRO evidence, is that coal-fired power remains the cheapest form of baseload power.”

Senator Canavan also suggested tariffs should be considered to protect Australian industry from cheaper Chinese imports.

“I’m very concerned about our steel fabrication industry. I’ve been to many businesses through regional Queensland, in particular, who are seeing their market share be completely undermined by Chinese imports,” Senator Canavan said.

“Clearly something needs to be done.

“Those steel industries have applications in right now with the Anti-Dumping Commission. I do think they need to be looked at very, very closely. But I also do think we need to rethink our approach here.

“Is the ad hoc, regular reviews of the Anti-Dumping Commission the right way to protect steel production and other types of manufacturing in our country for the long term?

“That has to be at the centre of us bringing self-sufficiency back to this country.”

When asked if protecting Australian industry should include tariffs, Senator Canavan said this was what the steel industry applications to the Anti-Dumping Commission were proposing.

“So we do have these ad hoc tariffs that come on from time to time,” he said.

“The problem we’ve got is we’re always slapping a Band-Aid on here, sometimes after the patient’s already died.

“We want Australian-made goods. There’s no reason we shouldn’t be able to compete. It’s clearly because China continues to massively subsidise its industry, and we shouldn’t let that expose Australian jobs to those sort of trade practices.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38749

File: 29824d595bfc0ab⋯.jpg (209.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 19e8cc13b339eba⋯.jpg (88.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367838 (110952ZMAR26) Notable: Linda Reynolds ‘delighted’ as commonwealth ordered into mediation over Brittany Higgins settlement - Former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has welcomed a court order requiring the Commonwealth to enter mediation over her lawsuit challenging the handling of Brittany Higgins’ $2.4 million settlement. Reynolds is suing the government and law firm HWL Ebsworth, alleging she was excluded from mediation discussions that led to the payout and that officials failed to properly defend allegations against her. Federal Court Justice Craig Colvin ordered the parties to undertake mediation before the case returns to court in June. Reynolds said the Commonwealth’s legal defence suggested it believed parliamentary regulations allowed it to settle claims without regard to her wishes or reputation. The dispute follows Reynolds’ defamation victories against Brittany Higgins and her husband David Sharaz over claims Reynolds mishandled the rape complaint.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Linda Reynolds ‘delighted’ as commonwealth ordered into mediation over Brittany Higgins settlement

PAUL GARVEY - 10 March 2026

1/2

Former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds says MPs from all sides of parliament should be deeply concerned about the defence put forward by the commonwealth in the legal action she brought in the fallout from the Brittany Higgins saga.

Ms Reynolds is suing the commonwealth and its lawyers, HWL Ebsworth, over the way they conducted the mediation process that ended in Ms Higgins being awarded a controversial $2.4m settlement. The senator was excluded from the mediation talks, which focused on both Ms Higgins’ alleged rape by co-worker Bruce Lehrmann and the alleged mishandling of Ms Higgins’ rape complaint by Ms Reynolds and her chief of staff Fiona Brown.

The Federal Court and the WA Supreme Court have since found Ms Higgins’ complaints about Ms Reynolds and Ms Brown were without merit.

Federal Court Justice Craig Colvin on Tuesday ordered Ms Reynolds, the commonwealth and HLB Ebsworth to engage in mediation before the case returns to court in late June. In a statement to The Australian following the hearing, Ms Reynolds said she was “delighted” by the prospect of mediation.

“I am sure this irony is not lost on most Australians,” she said. “For telling the truth, I am still having to fight the Labor government in court for justice and a ­mediation, quite the opposite from their approach to Brittany Higgins’ mediation and settlement for allegations they should have known were lies.”

She said the defence flagged by the commonwealth made it clear it intended to argue that parliamentary business regulations ­allowed the commonwealth to act “not only without consideration or regard to my wishes, but to act contrary to my wishes” and “without regard for the truth or the impact their actions would have on my life”.

“That position is alarming, particularly when they intentionally deprived me of a fair opportunity to decline the financial assistance of the commonwealth on the oppressive terms it proposed,” she said.

“It should be of great concern to all members of parliament that a political opponent can use the regulations in concert with parliamentary privilege to damage political opponents by denying them natural justice, declining to defend a defendable claim, and settling spurious claims without disclosure of the terms.”

The commonwealth reached its settlement with Ms Higgins three days after Ms Reynolds put the government on notice of the concerns she had with the proposed defence. Ms Reynolds said she was looking forward to seeing the evidence of what happened inside the government and the relevant departments during those three days.

“Notably this conduct is in circumstances where the commonwealth admits that at the date it elected to take over my defence and refuse to allow me to attend the mediation it knew that Ms Higgins claim against me contained her serious allegations about my involvement in a political cover up, that my reputation was likely to be affected if those allegations were found to be true and than Ms Higgins continued to make public statements about my involvement in her alleged political cover up,” she said.

“Yet despite all of this, it failed to include any non-disparagement clauses in the deed of settlement and acceded to Ms Higgins’ request for the deed and terms of settlement to be kept confidential which meant that the fact the settlement was on a no admission basis was never made public.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38750

File: 242c32d88e15657⋯.jpg (193.66 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24367856 (110956ZMAR26) Notable: Mining billionaire Clive Palmer re-enters politics with tilt at Queensland seat of Fadden - Mining billionaire Clive Palmer has announced a return to politics, declaring he will contest the Liberal-held Gold Coast seat of Fadden and revive the United Australia Party ahead of the next federal election. Palmer said he was motivated by what he described as a “national crisis” in Australian politics and insisted his campaign would focus on policy solutions rather than traditional left–right divisions. The 71-year-old had previously said he was too old for politics but told reporters improved health after losing weight had restored his energy. Palmer also pledged $10,000 to each member of the Iranian women’s football team who sought asylum in Australia following the Women’s Asian Cup controversy. His re-entry follows heavy spending on previous election campaigns that failed to secure lower-house representation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24202018 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24214739 (pb)

Mining billionaire Clive Palmer re-enters politics with tilt at Queensland seat of Fadden

Only last year, the mining billionaire said he was too old for politics, but it seems he’s changed his mind after announcing his plans to run for a Liberal-held seat in Queensland.

Caitlyn Rintoul - 11 March 2026

Clive Palmer has announced that he will run for the Liberal-held seat of Fadden, kicking off his return to politics with a $10,000 gift to asylum seekers from the Iranian soccer team.

The mining billionaire’s United Australia Party has resumed an advertising blitz in recent weeks outlining what Mr Palmer has dubbed a “new deal” for the country.

In a wide-ranging press conference at Parliament in Canberra, Mr Palmer said that he was making a fresh tilt after concern over what he described as a “national crisis” in politics.

“It’s time to stop the rot in Australian politics. A new era is coming,” he said.

Despite saying in 2025 that he was too old to make a return to politics, the 71-year-old said a “keto diet” had given him the stamina and capability to run again.

“I’ve lost a lot of weight. I’ve been on a keto diet. I’ve been running. I’ve been reinvigorated by not having too much sugar and too much carbohydrates,” he said.

“Every day I feel better, I feel stronger. And every day I watch the appalling situation of politics in Canberra.

“How much lower can we go as a nation with the politicians we’ve got.”

Mr Palmer said that his return at the 2028 poll would be driven from a call to duty rather than a quest for power or pay cheque.

“I’m one of the nation’s wealthiest people,” he said.

“I really don’t need further income or further wealth but I think I do need, at a time of national crisis, to provide some sort of leadership to the nation.”

Mr Palmer bankrolled the previously-unknown Trumpet of Patriots party at the 2025 election, having disbanded the UAP shortly after the 2022 poll, but it failed to win a single seat despite the $53 million campaign.

He is now seeking to re-register the UAP.

The party has one sitting senator, Victorian Ralph Babet, who is up for re-election in 2028.

Mr Palmer opened his press conference to acknowledge the plight of the Iranian women’s soccer team, with several seeking asylum in Australia after their Women’s Asian Cup silent protest.

“I want to donate $10,000 to each soccer player so they’ve got some money to spend here in Australia, so they feel welcome in our country, and they know that they’re not alone,” he said.

“I encourage other wealthy Australians such as Angus Taylor to join me and make my donation.”

Mr Palmer stated several times that he does not believe in the “left or right” debate, instead insisting he’d focus on issues rather than ideological debate.

“We don’t want to have parliamentarians not thinking about ideas or pressing the boundaries left or right to give different choices to the Australian people,” he said.

He also took a swipe at One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and her ballooning support in public polling.

“All respects to Pauline Hanson, she doesn’t seem to have any policies that provide solutions to the Australian people,” he said.

“I have to recognise that Pauline Hanson spent a lot of effort over a long time pointing out what’s wrong with the Australian Government and what needs to be done to fix it.

“But, unfortunately, there hasn’t been policy development in one nation to provide you with solutions.

“What we’re trying to provide is a comprehensive way of what Australia could be.”

Mr Palmer said that he decided to run in the Lower House seat of Fadden after living there for about 15 years.

“That’s my home and I’ve been there for about 15 years,” he said.

“There’s often media that come and gather outside my house.

“Every morning, at 11 o’clock, you’ll see boats outside with tourists pointing fingers at me saying, ‘That’s where Clive Palmer lives’.”

https://thenightly.com.au/politics/australia/mining-billionaire-clive-palmer-re-enters-politics-with-tilt-at-queensland-seat-of-fadden-c-21903400

https://qresear.ch/?q=Clive+Palmer

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38751

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24371525 (120834ZMAR26) Notable: ‘I was surplus to requirements’: PM’s top security expert Dennis Richardson quits antisemitism royal commission - (Video) Former ASIO director-general Dennis Richardson has resigned from the antisemitism royal commission, saying he concluded he was “surplus to requirements” after his independent review into intelligence and law enforcement was folded into the inquiry’s legal framework. Richardson said the structure limited his ability to deliver the type of timely, security-focused recommendations he believed were necessary following the Bondi massacre. He described his role as effectively that of a “research officer” despite being paid $5500 a day, raising concerns about value and purpose. The resignation has sparked criticism from the Coalition, which warned the move undermines the credibility of the inquiry. The government said the commission remains independent, while commissioner Virginia Bell maintained work on an interim report into security agency responses was well advanced.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

‘I was surplus to requirements’: Why the PM’s top expert Dennis Richardson quit antisemitism royal commission

RICHARD FERGUSON - 12 March 2026

1/3

Former spy boss Dennis Richardson has abruptly quit the antisemitism royal commission over concerns his authority and ability to make recommendations ­relating to intelligence and law enforcement in the wake of the Bondi massacre had been ­diminished under the structure of the inquiry.

“Probably there wasn’t enough discussion right at the beginning about the precise way things would work. And ultimately, I came to the conclusion that I was surplus to requirements,” he told Radio National on Thursday morning.

In a crisis for the royal commission and the federal government, Mr Richardson shocked Jewish leaders, the families of massacre victims and the security community on Wednesday night with his decision to quit a role for which Anthony Albanese said he was the best person in the country.

The former ASIO director-general’s decision to pull the pin followed concerns over the structure of the royal commission, after the government folded the veteran bureaucrat’s examination of potential failings by security agencies into royal commissioner and ex-High Court justice Virginia Bell’s inquiry.

The Australian understands that Mr Richardson believed there were impediments preventing him from maximising the type of investigation he felt was essential into the intelligence and law-­enforcement situation surrounding the Bondi massacre.

It is understood there had been a failed integration of Mr Richardson’s investigation into intelligence and law enforcement with the heavily legal structure of a royal commission. The effort to bring the two processes together did not work.

While Mr Richardson came to the view he was “surplus to requirements”, he said Australians could still have total confidence in Virginia Bell’s investigation.

“The report which I had been doing prior to the royal commission being formed was folded into the royal commission and as soon as it became folded into the royal commission a particular legal framework was put around it. So the interim report that will now be done by the royal commission will be a very different document to the one that I would have done,” he said.

Mr Richardson said he thought having a standalone investigation independent of the royal commission would have ameliorated his concerns, but he had come to a view that what the government was paying him for was not consistent with the work.

“Look, the royal commission will go on and I think everyone can have total confidence in the royal commission. Virginia Bell is one of the finest jurists in this country. She has a very fine legal team around her and she has very fine people helping her mostly,” he said.

Mr Richardson said he was being paid $5500 a day to effectively be a research officer and claimed it would have been inappropriate to raise concerns about his role with the government.

In interviews with ABC radio in Canberra and Sydney, Mr Richardson said he felt that he was being “grossly overpaid” for the work required of him as part of the royal commission.

“I was being paid very well, so the question about payment really goes to the fact that, quite frankly, I was being well overpaid for what I was effectively doing,” he said.

“Different people would have different perspectives on what I’m about to say. I think it would be challenged by others. But in my own view, when you stripped everything down, I was essentially being employed as a research officer and to lead a team of researchers.

“It would be quite wrong to suggest that a royal commission is bogged down in legalese that is unnecessary. But it does take a certain amount of time, and at the end of the day, to be very blunt, I was being way overpaid for what I was doing.”

Mr Richardson made the decision himself. The Albanese government played no role in the events leading to Mr Richardson’s resignation since the royal commission under the law is independent from the executive government.

The resignation will inevitably become a major embarrassment for the Prime Minister and his government. Mr Richardson’s credentials in security and intelligence gave him special authority in this area and the fact he felt the current structure was unsuitable and that his own role was unsatisfactory will raise serious problems for both Mr Albanese and Ms Bell.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38752

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24371534 (120845ZMAR26) Notable: Intelligence agencies say they’ll struggle to give full evidence to Bondi royal commission; Dennis Richardson ‘felt like the fifth wheel’ - (Video) Australian intelligence and law enforcement agencies have warned they may be unable to provide full evidence to the antisemitism royal commission due to legal and secrecy constraints, as former ASIO chief Dennis Richardson said he resigned after feeling like a “fifth wheel”. AUSTRAC said its chief retains final authority over disclosures due to international obligations, while the Australian Federal Police confirmed it had redacted material and faced legislative barriers in sharing telecommunications data. The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and ASIO also flagged limits on disclosure. Richardson said the inquiry’s legal structure reduced his role to that of a “research officer”, raising concerns about the commission’s effectiveness.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38751

Intelligence agencies say they’ll struggle to give full evidence to Bondi royal commission; Dennis Richardson ‘felt like the fifth wheel’

NOAH YIM - 12 March 2026

1/3

Intelligence agencies say they might not be able to produce full evidence to the antisemitism royal commission and one agency has already had to redact documents provided because of legislative hurdles, as former spy boss Dennis Richardson abruptly quit the investigation saying he was “surplus to requirements”.

Australia’s financial intelligence agency could not guarantee it could provide full information to the royal commission and that instead, its chief executive was the final decision maker on whether or not to share information.

The Australian Federal Police also said that it had already had to redact some material from documents provided to the royal commission due to legislative hurdles and had been “navigating challenges associated with producing material”.

But the agency said the government’s new legislation would “provide the necessary clarity” to ensure it can provide intelligence containing telecommunications data.

This comes despite the fact Labor said its bill, aimed at protecting the provision of information to the royal commission, would “ensure secrecy provisions are not a reasonable excuse not to comply with an order to produce information to a royal commission”.

On Thursday Mr Richardson said he “felt like the fifth wheel” in the antisemitism royal commission, confirming he had been thinking about resigning for a “couple of weeks” and that his exit from the Bondi massacre judicial inquiry was an “embarrassment”.

After Anthony Albanese touted Mr Richardson as one of the most eminently qualified people to investigate security failures related to the Bondi massacre, the former ASIO boss said the structure of the royal commission meant he was not needed and was he essentially left as “a research officer”.

“Very simply, I felt I was the fifth wheel. It’s a very legally driven process, the way it’s structured and the way it proceeds as such, that means there is not much need for someone like myself,” he told Sky News on Thursday.

“The onus was on Virginia Bell and me to sit down and have a hard headed discussion on day one. And, while we did have lots of discussions, I think we both took things forward based upon different assumptions.”

“But I’ve been thinking about this for a while. I first raised the possibility, with the commissioner a couple of weeks ago … It continued to become clear to me, that the value that I could provide was becoming more limited.”

His resignation has sent shockwaves through the Jewish community and security leaders, with a former Amy chief warning it will undermine the royal commission’s findings and an ex-federal police boss saying the commission was running on two different courses.

A month ago, royal commissioner Virginia Bell also ­revealed Mr Richardson’s probe had been hampered by early ­delays after it was folded in to the royal commission, prompting ­security agencies to seek legal ­advice “to consider questions of public interest immunity, statutory nondisclosure provisions and legal professional privilege”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38753

File: 9eb69c40d508bca⋯.jpg (3.04 MB,7167x4780,7167:4780,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24371545 (120852ZMAR26) Notable: Clash over security report led to sudden resignation from royal commission - A dispute over the timing and scope of security recommendations following the Bondi massacre has led to the resignation of former ASIO chief Dennis Richardson from the antisemitism royal commission. Richardson had been preparing detailed findings on intelligence and policing failures for the interim report, but commissioner Virginia Bell opted to defer substantive recommendations until the final report due in December. Sources said Richardson believed delaying urgent security advice risked missing an opportunity to act, while Bell prioritised meeting deadlines and further evidence gathering. Richardson said his role had been reduced to that of a “highly paid researcher” and that his “value-add” was limited. The disagreement has raised concerns about the commission’s direction and its ability to deliver timely national security outcomes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38751

Clash over security report led to sudden resignation from royal commission

Paul Sakkal and Matthew Knott - March 12, 2026

1/2

A clash over the urgency of fixing the security gaps that led to the Bondi massacre prompted the resignation that has plunged the royal commission into disarray.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion was thrust into the spotlight on Wednesday night when former ASIO boss Dennis Richardson quit his role as a special adviser to Commissioner Virginia Bell, saying he felt surplus to requirements.

The former spy boss and US ambassador had finished interviewing heads of the intelligence agencies in mid-January, and was focused on delivering a concrete set of recommendations about intelligence and policing failures in the commission’s interim report, due in April.

But sources with knowledge of the commission’s workings said Richardson felt his role became untenable when Bell decided the interim report would not contain substantive recommendations or findings.

Bell, according to the sources not permitted to speak about the commission publicly, wanted the interim report to leave open key questions for “further exploration”, reserving key recommendations for the final report in December.

Richardson was willing to delay the interim report to allow time for hearings to inform more substantial findings about intelligence failures.

But Bell, who prides herself on meeting deadlines, did not seek a time extension from the government.

According to sources familiar with the disagreement, Richardson believed delaying substantial recommendations on security until December would mean missing the opportunity to implement lessons from the worst terror attack in Australian history. He also feared any security recommendations would be lost in the other findings on antisemitism.

Richardson, who was being paid $5500 per day, said his resignation was “an embarrassment all around” but insisted the credibility of Bell’s royal commission remained intact.

“I didn’t necessarily see my last job of this kind being more of a highly paid researcher,” Richardson told reporters in Canberra on Thursday before conducting a round of media interviews. “I saw my job as being a little bit more than that.”

“It’s just that it’s now reached a point where I think my value-add is pretty limited.”

Sources familiar with the relationship between Bell and Richardson said they had “different views of the world” that proved irreconcilable despite their respect for each other.

“The cultural and philosophical differences were too great” between the former High Court justice and the security establishment figure, one source said.

Richardson has told confidantes he concluded he was the “odd one out” in the relationship and that he should step aside so Bell could complete the work as she saw fit.

Richardson had been contracted until May, with an option for extension.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38754

File: c771789839424b0⋯.jpg (299.87 KB,1451x997,1451:997,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4f663cbf3f98d4b⋯.jpg (111.32 KB,994x656,497:328,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ffd13926f453e70⋯.jpg (127.36 KB,900x600,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f5988f8dbb92bd0⋯.jpg (224.88 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24371560 (120907ZMAR26) Notable: Wife of Australian footballer Barry Cable takes stand in his child sex abuse trial - The wife of former AFL player Barry Cable has told a Perth court the alleged victim in his child sexual abuse trial never stayed at their home, rejecting key elements of the prosecution case. Cable, 82, is accused of abusing a girl under 13 in the late 1960s after she was allegedly taken from an orphanage to the family home. The complainant has testified the abuse occurred over multiple visits while Mrs Cable was asleep, but Helen Cable said she had never heard of the orphanage and “can’t imagine it ever happened”. Under cross-examination, she denied documents suggesting the girl had stayed with them. A relative of the alleged victim told the court she was informed of the abuse decades earlier. Cable denies the allegations and did not take the stand to testify in his own defence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38743

Wife of Australian footballer Barry Cable takes stand in his child sex abuse trial

David Weber - 12 March 2026

WARNING: This story contains details about alleged sexual assault some readers may find distressing.

The wife of Barry Cable, the former footballer on trial for allegedly sexually abusing a child from an orphanage in the early stages of his illustrious career, has testified in defence of her famous husband.

Mr Cable, who was once inducted into the Australian Football League Hall of Fame, is on trial in Perth accused of sexually abusing a girl aged under 13 in the late 1960s.

The WA District Court has heard the girl was abused at Mr Cable's home, where she stayed for some weeks, after he and his wife Helen picked her up from an orphanage.

The woman, now in her 60s, testified that Mr Cable would come into her room when Helen was asleep and abuse her.

But Mrs Cable, who's been married to the 82-year-old since 1965, told the court the girl had never stayed with them in any of the suburban Perth homes they lived in before Mr Cable went to play for North Melbourne — the club where he later won two premierships.

Mrs Cable also said she had not heard of the orphanage where the girl was staying until recently, and she and her husband had never visited there.

She also said Mr Cable never spent that much time alone at their home.

"Can't imagine it ever happened," she said.

Girl 'never' stayed at Cable home

Under questioning from Prosecutor Kim Jennings, Mrs Cable repeatedly denied the girl had stayed with them.

Ms Jennings showed Mrs Cable documents from the early 1970s that suggested the girl had stayed with the Cables before, and had been welcome to stay with them on weekends.

"Never happened," Mrs Cable said.

"I wasn't well at the time."

Earlier on Thursday, a relative of the alleged victim told the court the girl had confided in her decades ago that Mr Cable "molested her".

She said the alleged victim told her Barry Cable "touched her and made her do stuff to him, sexually".

The court has heard the alleged victim was between the age of 9 and 10 when she stayed at the family home where Mr Cable forced her to perform sexual acts on him.

On Tuesday, she testified Mr Cable told her if she told anyone, "they wouldn't believe me because he was Barry Cable".

She denied claims from Mr Cable's lawyer that she only came forward to police about the abuse because she "wanted to cash in".

Damages were awarded to another woman in 2023 after a civil case involving Mr Cable.

Mr Cable was considered a champion footballer, winning three WAFL premierships with Perth in the 1960s.

He was captain-coach of the East Perth team that won the premiership in 1978.

He also won three Sandover Medals for being the WAFL's best and fairest player.

After moving to Victoria in the 1970s, he won two VFL premierships with North Melbourne, in 1975 and 1977, and returned to coach the side in the 1980s.

Barry Cable did not take the stand to testify in his own defence, and the case is expected to hear closing arguments on Friday.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-12/wife-of-barry-cable-takes-stand-in-child-sex-abuse-trial/106447342

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38755

File: bf1142258b13f7b⋯.jpg (203.85 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24371570 (120916ZMAR26) Notable: ‘He’d laugh’: Disgraced football great Barry Cable accused of abusing girls in spa - A Perth court has heard new allegations that former AFL player Barry Cable abused multiple young girls, including claims he exposed himself and committed indecent acts in a backyard spa. Cable, 82, is on trial over historical child sexual abuse charges relating to a girl aged about eight in the late 1960s, with prosecutors alleging repeated abuse at his family home. Two additional witnesses told the court Cable fondled them and exposed himself during spa incidents in the 1980s, with one alleging attempted penetration. Both said the behaviour occurred in the presence of other children and that complaints were dismissed. The defence has rejected the allegations and accused witnesses of fabrication and financial motivation. Cable denies all charges as the trial continues.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38743

>>38754

‘He’d laugh’: Disgraced football great Barry Cable accused of abusing girls in spa

Aaron Bunch - March 11, 2026

Disgraced football legend Barry Cable fondled two young girls in a backyard spa and exposed himself in front of other children, a court has been told.

The 82-year-old former Australian rules player is fighting a slew of historical child sexual abuse accusations relating to a girl aged about eight in a criminal trial in Perth.

He allegedly abused the girl at his family home in the late 1960s when she was staying with Cable and his wife Helen for about a month.

The abuse allegedly involved intimate physical contact and attempted penetrative sex on multiple occasions when Cable’s wife was asleep.

A different woman told the court on Wednesday that Cable touched her breasts and pulled his erect penis from his bathers in a spa in Melbourne in the early 1980s when she was about 10 years old.

“He would always say, ‘Oh, come on girls, give me a cuddle’,” she told the judge-only trial in the WA District Court.

“When he got really confident, he actually pulled my bathers to the side [when he had] an erect penis.”

The former North Melbourne player also allegedly put the girl on his knee and tried to penetrate her with his penis, the woman said.

The incidents allegedly involved one other child.

“Every time we were in the spa, it would happen,” she said.

“We would say ... ‘Barry, stop it’ and he would laugh.”

Defence lawyer Tom Percy KC accused the woman of making up the allegations and suggested the incident never happened.

“It certainly did ... who would want to go through this?” she replied.

The woman’s childhood friend also testified about her alleged interactions with Cable at a spa when she was about 12.

“I was sitting on his knee and I remember him pulling his bathers aside, and I saw his penis,” she said.

The woman said she remembered feeling Cable’s penis against her bottom.

“I got off [his lap], it was really uncomfortable,” she said.

“Then he was, like, fondling my breasts.”

Other young children, including the first witness, were in the spa when the incident happened, the woman said.

Percy repeatedly accused the woman of exaggerating the allegations and suggested she was motivated by financial gain.

“I’ve told you my truth and what happened, and I’m under oath,” she said.

The complainant in the criminal trial alleges Cable’s abuse continued on a near-daily basis while she stayed at his home as a child.

He has denied five counts of indecent dealing with a girl aged under 13 and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 13 between December 31, 1966 and December 31, 1969.

Percy accused the woman of making up the allegations after she learned his client had been found guilty of similar allegations during a civil trial in 2023.

She forcefully denied trying to “cash in” during her evidence on Tuesday.

The civil trial found Cable abused another girl over five years from 1968, when she was aged 12. The woman was awarded $818,700 in damages.

The judge in that trial said there was compelling evidence the former footballer had violated other children. Cable denied the abuse.

He had an illustrious playing career in the 1960s and ’70s for Perth and East Perth in the WAFL and North Melbourne in the VFL, going on to coach in both leagues.

The criminal trial continues.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://archive.md/QQmMD

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38756

File: 9e22ceca526ef50⋯.jpg (2.65 MB,5143x3429,5143:3429,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24379374 (140742ZMAR26) Notable: Top Iranian diplomat defected, received asylum in secret escape - Iran’s second most senior diplomat in Australia, Mohammad Pournajaf, secretly defected and was granted asylum in Australia in 2023, a development only now revealed. Pournajaf, formerly charge d’affaires at Iran’s embassy in Canberra, applied for protection before the current Middle East conflict and was granted permanent residency, according to government sources. Members of Australia’s Iranian diaspora said he had been assisting anti-regime activists prior to seeking refuge, though others were unaware of his defection. The disclosure comes amid heightened scrutiny of Iranian officials in Australia following recent unrest and the defection of members of the Iranian women’s football team. The government last year expelled Iran’s ambassador after intelligence findings linked Tehran to attacks on Jewish targets in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23921099 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24318774 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

Top Iranian diplomat defected, received asylum in secret escape

Brittany Busch and Matthew Knott - March 13, 2026

Iran’s second most senior diplomat in Australia defected from the hardline regime and received asylum in Australia three years ago in a remarkable development that has stayed secret until now.

News of the defection of Mohammad Pournajaf, the former charge d’affaires at Iran’s embassy in Canberra, came after a week dominated by the dramatic escape of seven members of the Iranian women’s football team delegation, one of whom later changed her mind and decided to return to Iran.

The London-based Iran International news service, which is not aligned with the regime in Tehran, reported on Friday that Pournajaf, a diplomat at the Iranian embassy in Canberra had submitted an asylum request.

But government sources, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said that Pournajaf applied for protection and was granted permanent residency in 2023, well before the latest conflict began.

His defection had not been previously reported.

Nader Ranjbar, a member of Canberra’s Iranian-Australian community, said Pournajaf was co-operating with anti-regime activists before seeking asylum in 2023.

“He decided to change his ways and help us. He decided to join the people and seek refuge,” Ranjbar said.

“No one knows where he is.”

Other active members of the Iranian diaspora in Australia said they were not aware of his defection.

As recently as February 2023, Pournajaf was hosting events in Canberra celebrating the Islamic revolution that brought the current theocratic regime to power.

According to reports from the time, Pournajaf told guests that the “Islamic Republic from the very beginning of its establishment faced extreme challenges that no other nation had to face”, and described it as “one of the very few nations in the region that has successfully conducted regular democratic elections since 1979”.

The federal government last year expelled Iran’s ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, after domestic spy agency ASIO concluded that Iran had orchestrated the bombings of a synagogue in Melbourne and a kosher restaurant in Sydney.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told parliament this week that 21-year-old player Mohaddeseh Zolfi had changed her mind less than an hour after he publicly announced her defection.

“Unfortunately, in making that decision, she’d been advised by her teammates and coach to contact the Iranian embassy to get collected,” he said. “As a result of that, it meant that the Iranian embassy now knew the location of where everybody was.”

The other members of the soccer team who defected had to be moved to a new secure location.

A senior Iranian diplomat based at the United Nations’ European headquarters in Geneva, Alireza Jeyrani Hokmabad, reportedly left his post and applied for asylum in Switzerland last month, claiming he was concerned about political repercussions if he returned to Iran.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/top-iranian-diplomat-defected-received-asylum-in-secret-escape-20260313-p5oa58.html

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603122641

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38757

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24379388 (140759ZMAR26) Notable: Australia taps fuel stockpile in urgent bid to fill shortages and stem panic buying - (Video) The Albanese government will release about 760 million litres of fuel from national reserves in an unprecedented move to ease shortages and curb panic buying as the Middle East conflict disrupts global oil supply. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the release, equal to about six days’ supply, aims to stabilise distribution networks strained by surging demand, particularly in regional areas. Fuel prices have risen to around $2.20 a litre, with warnings they could exceed $3 if shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. Bowen urged motorists to avoid stockpiling, while ruling out immediate rationing or fuel excise cuts. Critics argue Australia remains vulnerable after years of underinvestment in fuel security, with heavy reliance on imports and limited domestic refining capacity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

Australia taps fuel stockpile in urgent bid to fill shortages and stem panic buying

Mike Foley - March 13, 2026

1/2

Six days’ worth of fuel supply will be released from the national reserves in an unprecedented effort to stem panic buying amid fears of country-wide shortages as the oil crisis squeezes the global supply.

The hundreds of millions of litres of fuel Energy Minister Chris Bowen will pump into the nation’s supply is aimed at shoring up short-term confidence, but he resisted announcing further measures to ration fuel if the Iran war continued to affect shipping from the Middle East.

Labor faces questions over its ability to deal with a long-run squeeze on global oil supply, after successive federal governments ignored for decades the warnings of experts and public servants that Australia was not prepared for a major energy shock.

As the war between Iran and the US and Israel stretches into its second week, attacks on the Gulf states have closed the Strait of Hormuz, which carries about 20 per cent of global oil supply.

Fuel prices have shot up to an average of around $2.20 in Sydney and Melbourne and analysts have forecast that unless ships start moving through the strait again soon, petrol prices could rise above $3 a litre.

Farmers and regional service stations are reporting that local distribution networks are breaking down, as demand from nervous customers drives a doubling of typical national fuel consumption.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen on Friday announced the release of 760 million litres of petrol and diesel into the local market. It will be drawn from the domestic holdings of fuel companies, representing 20 per cent of the national stockpile, over the coming days and weeks.

He also said the government was not currently contemplating a cut to fuel excise taxes, which would lower petrol prices, nor enacting rationing powers to control the volume of fuel motorists can buy.

Friday’s fuel release swiftly followed Thursday’s announcement that the Albanese government had struck an agreement with Ampol Australia to supply the domestic market with fuel containing higher sulphur content, which would otherwise be exported. Ampol will prioritise the fuel to regional suppliers.

US President Donald Trump’s initial predictions that the war would be over within days have given way to uncertainty as the regime in Tehran has fought back with greater ferocity than the White House anticipated, according to reports in The New York Times.

Bowen assured drivers that Australia’s fuel imports had not been disrupted, urged motorists to stop buying up extra petrol, but acknowledged people’s fears and conceded the future was unknowable.

“It’s understandable that Australians are concerned about the fuel supply in Australia,” he said.

“These international circumstances are uncertain. Let’s not kid ourselves that everyone knows exactly how the next few weeks are going to play out, because no one does. What governments can do is respond to the circumstances as they arrive.”

Bowen’s assurances were challenged by opposition energy spokesman Dan Tehan, who said the energy minister should have moved sooner to address fuel security fears.

“There is nothing that has reassured me and reassured the Australian people, because it’s clear [Bowen] doesn’t have a plan,” Tehan said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38758

File: fa033be95fe1371⋯.jpg (3.38 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5176028ee3ea4c7⋯.jpg (164.17 KB,1064x804,266:201,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 04da84743cb4600⋯.jpg (2.69 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c88102bd766d756⋯.jpg (524.6 KB,2680x2833,2680:2833,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24379408 (140818ZMAR26) Notable: Australia to turn WWII site on ‘valuable’ Indonesian island into training base - Australia and Indonesia have agreed to redevelop a World War II-era site on Morotai island into a joint military training base, deepening defence ties as regional tensions rise. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the facility would support land and sea exercises and strengthen interoperability between the two nations, with Indonesia also set to embed a senior officer within Australia’s 1st Brigade in Darwin. The strategically located island sits near the Philippines and key maritime routes, and the base may be opened to partners including Singapore and the Philippines. The move follows a new bilateral security treaty and reflects efforts by both countries to enhance regional cooperation amid China’s rise and uncertainty around US leadership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24223355 (pb)

Australia to turn WWII site on ‘valuable’ Indonesian island into training base

Zach Hope and Karuni Rompies - March 12, 2026

Singapore/Jakarta: Australia and Indonesia, drawing ever closer on matters of security, plan to redevelop World War II-era defence facilities on the small island of Morotai into a joint training base.

Defence Minister Richard Marles also announced in Jakarta on Thursday that an Indonesian with the rank of colonel would embed with Australian troops from early next year as a deputy commander of 1st Brigade in Darwin.

Of Australia’s three infantry brigades, 1st Brigade interacted most closely with the annual rotation of US Marines, he said.

The initiatives were flagged by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in February when he signed the Treaty on Common Security with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, but details were scant.

The strategically located island of Morotai lies at the northernmost point of Indonesia’s North Maluku province and is just south of the Philippines. In World War II, it was captured from the Japanese by Allied forces, including Australians, and used as a base to liberate the Philippines.

Indonesia’s Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin said the facilities would also be open to Singapore and the Philippines, the latter of which faces ongoing tensions with China in the South China Sea.

In a day of announcements, Indonesia and Australia also now plan to expand their joint security cooperation to include Japan and Papua New Guinea, Australia’s new security ally.

Australia has always sought closer ties with Indonesia. The moves detailed on Thursday, however, highlight Prabowo’s eagerness to cement stronger friendships in the region amid the rise of China and an unpredictable US under the stewardship of Donald Trump.

The former general is also keen to play a bigger role in global affairs, signing up Indonesia to Trump’s Board of Peace and becoming the first leader to promise troops for any peacekeeping force in war-ravaged Gaza.

Indonesia also maintains good relations with China, and Prabowo has met several times with President Xi Jinping in Beijing, but it too has friction points with the superpower in the South China Sea.

“Indonesia wouldn’t sign up to [developing a training base with Australia] if it were going to be overtly provocative towards China,” said Dr Natalie Sambhi, executive director of Verve Research, an independent think tank.

“Given the location, it makes sense that the Philippines would be able to use it. It’s advantageous for the Indonesian armed forces to work together with the Philippines and Singapore, especially in light of the latter’s professionalism and capability.

“That said, there are questions worth raising, such as, would Indonesia be allowed to invite China or other partners to use the facility, and to what extent might it impact Indonesian sovereignty.”

Marles said the announcements were about focusing on the bilateral relationship “on our own terms”.

“This is not about any other third country,” he said. “This is about building the shared capability between Indonesia and Australia.”

In April last year, respected military website Janes caused a flap in Australia with a report that Russia had asked to base warplanes in Indonesia’s easternmost province of Papua. Indonesia rejected the story.

If Russia did make the request, Indonesia appeared to have said no. The country is staunchly non-aligned with military power blocs. Prabowo, however, has been perceived at home as pushing the doctrine’s limits, particularly in relation to the Board of Peace.

Sjafrie said the Morotai island development opportunity, which would be used for land and sea training, was previously put to Singapore, which declined. A separate training facility with that nation would go ahead in North Kalimantan, he said.

Echoing previous statements, Marles said the Australia-Indonesia relationship was at a high watermark, “characterised by the deepest of friendships at the highest of levels”.

“I think what is different today is … there is a clear understanding about the strategic value which each of us brings to the other,” Marles said.

“For Australia, we understand that our national security lies in the collective security of the ASEAN region, of South-East Asia – and of course Indonesia is at the heart of that. And for Indonesia, Australia provides strategic depth.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/australia-indonesia-deepen-security-ties-with-joint-training-base-20260312-p5o9yk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38759

File: c7b0f7db4794ade⋯.jpg (349.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 41afd638530d0cf⋯.jpg (236.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f15d41d49c2b8b1⋯.jpg (251.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24379483 (140927ZMAR26) Notable: Abuse survivor Beth Heinrich wins public apology from Anglican Church for decades of failure - Abuse survivor Beth Heinrich will receive a formal public apology from the Anglican Church after decades of campaigning over its handling of her abuse by former bishop Donald Shearman and subsequent treatment by senior figures. Brisbane Archbishop Jeremy Greaves will deliver the apology at St John’s Cathedral, acknowledging institutional failures, including those of former archbishop Peter Hollingworth, who suggested Heinrich was partly at fault. Heinrich, 86, said she hoped the moment would “be an inspiration to others” to act on their own abuse and seek accountability. Greaves, who is also a survivor, said victims often carry “shame and guilt that belongs to the perpetrators” and that an apology could help Heinrich move “one more step on her journey of healing”. The case highlights longstanding criticism of the church’s handling of abuse complaints and the enduring impact on survivors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24260283 (pb)

Abuse survivor wins public apology from Anglican Church for decades of failure

JAMIE WALKER - March 13, 2026

1/2

Beth Heinrich had to wait more than 70 long years for this reckoning with the Anglican Church and how fitting that it’s been engineered by a man who not only understands her pain as a survivor of sexual abuse, but shares it.

On Sunday week, the Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane, Jeremy Greaves, will formally apologise to Ms Heinrich in St John’s Cathedral for being failed by both the church and one of his predecessors, Peter Hollingworth.

The former governor-general is unlikely to attend the special service but Ms Heinrich, 86, will be there to savour the moment. She has fought a bitter and bruising battle to secure redress for the wrongs inflicted by her abuser, defrocked bishop Donald Shearman, and then by Dr Hollingworth when he suggested she was at fault.

As she sees it, the apology from Archbishop Greaves is not the end of the story – rather, the start of something positive for sexual abuse survivors who are afraid or reluctant to come forward. “I just want it to be an inspiration to others who’ve never done anything, for whatever reason,” she told The Australian.

“I’m hoping it might give them the idea to do something about their own abuse.”

Archbishop Greaves’ mea culpa is the culmination of months of talks with Ms Heinrich, who lives in regional Victoria. When he was elevated two years ago to one of the highest posts in the Anglican ministry, succeeding Phillip Aspinall, the prelate who stepped into Dr Hollingworth’s shoes as leader of the big Brisbane diocese, the 56-year-old clergyman promised to do better by the victims of predatory priests and church workers.

He has an intensely personal stake in this. He too is a survivor of sexual abuse, having been assaulted by a Scouts leader when he was a teenager in Adelaide during the early 1980s.

As Archbishop Greaves explained ahead of his installation in December 2023: “While my story is not anyone else’s story, hopefully it brings me a bit of understanding or a bit of sensitivity or compassion.”

Asked this week whether personal experience had influenced his dealings with Ms Heinrich, he said: “Victim-survivors so often carry shame and guilt that belongs to the perpetrators and others who have failed them.

“They are also at the mercy of legal and other processes that move incredibly slowly and can retraumatise people again and again as they have to re-tell the story of their abuse. I know from experience how exhausting this can be.

“If a public apology and admission of the church’s failures can help Ms Heinrich, in even a small way, move one more step on her journey of healing, then it’s a good thing. There are many parts of these processes over which I have no control, but I can do this one thing.”

Dr Hollingworth, 90, is said to be in poor health and did not respond to an interview request or written questions. He was forced to resign as governor-general in 2003, barely 18 months after trading in his clerical vestments, when the outcry over his self-interested handling of sexual abuse cases while archbishop of Brisbane made his position at Yarralumla untenable.

His behaviour towards Ms Heinrich was particularly egregious, culminating in a notorious appearance on the ABC’s Australian Story program in 2002 at the height of the crisis engulfing Government House and John Howard’s government. There, he implied she had instigated the abusive relationship with Shearman.

Ignoring the fact that Ms Heinrich was barely 15 when the married priest took her to bed, Dr Hollingworth said: “My belief is that this was not sex abuse. There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that. Quite the contrary. My information is that it was rather the other way around.”

He went on to apologise to Ms Heinrich, though in terms she considered hollow. They spoke in 2002, about 10 days after his trainwreck TV appearance. “He tried to say sorry to me by starting off with a lie,” she said.

“Every journalist in Australia was ringing me and there was the governor-general telling me that he had taken so long to call because they couldn’t find my number. It was a deliberate lie and I was not prepared to listen to someone who did that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38760

File: 93e7679cd8fb0ec⋯.mp4 (14.94 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24382751 (150936ZMAR26) Notable: 3 Iranian soccer players abandon Australia asylum bid to return home - (Video) Three Iranian women’s football team members who had sought refuge in Australia have abandoned their asylum bids and left for Malaysia to rejoin the squad, amid claims a staff member helped persuade them to return. Iranian-Australian activist Tina Kordrostami said technical staffer Zahra Meshkinkar had acted as “a mouthpiece for the regime” and “was there the whole time to convince the girls to go back”. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the government had provided “multiple opportunities” and “genuine choices” but could not remove the pressure surrounding the players’ decisions. Iranian state-aligned media cast the reversal as a rejection of the West, declaring the women were returning to the “warm embrace” of home. Concerns remain that the final three players still on humanitarian visas, including captain Zahra Ghanbari, may also decide to leave Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

3 Iranian soccer players abandon Australia asylum bid to return home

Staffer ‘convinced Iranian soccer players to abandon Australian asylum’

MACKENZIE SCOTT and RICHARD FERGUSON - 15 March 2026

1/2

Members of Australia’s Iranian community believe Iran used a support member of the Women’s Football team to convince the players who sought asylum in Australia to return home.

Iranian diaspora member Tina Kordrostami believes the team’s technical staff member, Zahra Meshkinkar, who was one of the late defectors from the national team, had stayed in Australia as a mouthpiece for the regime.

Ms Kordrostami, who was instrumental in persuading half a dozen players to stay following their short-lived campaign in the Women’s Asian Cup tournament, told The Australian that the federal government was unprepared to counter the reach of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

“The team member was there the whole time to convince the girls to go back,” Ms Kordrostami said. “But we were hopeful (she intended to stay) because she looked genuinely happy.

“People in Iran have been depending on each other for so long, they don’t know how to trust a Western country because it’s all they know.”

Ms Meshkinkar and the two players, Zahra Sarbali and Mona Hamoudi, left Australia on Saturday for Malaysia, where the remainder of the squad is waiting until it is safe enough to continue their journey home.

The claims by Ms Kordrostami have been supported by independent Iranian broadcaster, Iran International, which reported that Ms Meshkinkar has been encouraging the women from inside the safe house.

There are now fears among the local Iranian community that the last three players granted humanitarian visas in Australia – including national team captain Zahra Gambari – may choose to return to their war-torn homeland.

Five players of the Iranian national team, known as the Lionesses – who had been based on the Gold Coast for the tournament – managed to escape their Revolutionary Guard handlers at the Royal Pines Resort with the help of federal police last week.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revealed on Sunday morning that the squad members had decided to return despite being ­offered multiple opportunities to reconsider.

“While the Australian government can that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which the players are making these incredibly difficult decisions,” Mr Burke said.

“The Australian government has done everything we could to make sure these women were provided with the chance for a safe ­future in Australia.

“Australians should be proud that it was in our country that these women experienced a nation presenting them with genuine choices and interacted with authorities seeking to help them.”

A third player, midfielder Mohaddeseh Zolfi, returned to Iran with the team last week after previously indicating she would opt for asylum.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38761

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24382789 (150948ZMAR26) Notable: Three more Iranian soccer team members return home, amid fears of group infiltration - (Video) Three more members of Iran’s women’s football delegation who had sought asylum in Australia have reversed course and left to rejoin the team, shrinking the number still seeking refuge and deepening fears of regime pressure. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the women were given “repeated chances” to discuss their options, but the government could not remove the surrounding pressure. Iranian-Australian activists Tina Kordrostami and Sara Rafiee said community members feared a support staff member may have been used to influence players from within, though a government source said all asylum recipients were “thoroughly vetted” and no infiltrator claim had been established. Tasnim News Agency framed the departures as a patriotic rejection of Australia’s offer, while diaspora leaders warned threats to families may drive further reversals.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

>>38760

Three more Iranian soccer team members return home, amid fears of group infiltration

Matthew Knott - March 15, 2026

1/2

The number of Iranian women’s soccer players seeking asylum in Australia is rapidly diminishing, raising alarm about the hardline Tehran regime’s efforts to convince the players to return home, including the possible use of infiltrators.

Three more of the seven members of the delegation who sought asylum changed their minds and decided to return to Iran on Saturday night, and Iranian-Australian community leaders fear more reversals could follow.

Multiple sources in the Iranian diaspora said they believed at least one further player planned to leave Australia, but this had not been confirmed on Sunday evening.

The Iranian regime leapt upon the latest news as a propaganda victory, declaring it a failure for US President Donald Trump, who called for the women to be allowed to remain in Australia.

“Overnight, three members of the Iranian Women’s Football Team made the decision to join the rest of the team on their journey back to Iran,” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said in a statement on Sunday morning.

“After telling Australian officials they had made this decision the players were given repeated chances to talk about their options.

“While the Australian government can ensure that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which the players are making these incredibly difficult decisions.”

The Tasnim News Agency, an outlet with close links to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said the players had joined their teammates in Malaysia before returning to Iran.

The outlet said the players had “rejected Australia’s seductive and political offer of asylum”, branding it a “patriotic decision”.

It earlier called the players’ decision to leave Australia a “disgraceful failure of the American-Australian project and another failure for Trump.

“The national spirit and patriotism of the Iranian women’s national football team girls defeated the enemy’s plans against this team,” the news agency said.

Tina Kordrostami, an Iranian-Australian community leader, said she feared the regime would use threats to convince the remaining players in Australia to return to Iran.

“I am not too hopeful. I have real concerns,” she said.

Kordrostami said she and other diaspora activists believed technical staffer Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar – one of the three women who left the country on Saturday night – played an important role in convincing the players to change their minds.

Kordrostami said she believed Meshkehkar was a regime infiltrator, although this claim has not been verified.

“She is a mother figure – they look up to her,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38762

File: 26394c3f838a69d⋯.jpg (141.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bca570b3c648f47⋯.jpg (346.28 KB,1536x2047,1536:2047,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ef4aa3dbcc09a8⋯.jpg (285.13 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e28c0f3a72abcca⋯.jpg (165.87 KB,800x557,800:557,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dde53161543c863⋯.jpg (81.58 KB,800x557,800:557,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24382832 (151004ZMAR26) Notable: Obedient and stupid’: Iran blasts Australia as three soccer players reverse asylum claim - Three more members of Iran’s women’s football delegation who had sought asylum in Australia have withdrawn their claims and opted to return, as Iranian state-linked media hailed the move and lashed Australia as an “obedient and stupid” actor in Donald Trump’s orbit. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the women were given repeated chances to discuss their options, but the government could not remove the wider pressures shaping their decisions. Reports from Iran International and Australian-Iranian community groups raised fears that technical staff member Zahra Meshkinkar may have relayed regime messages from inside the safe house, though Iranian officials denied coercion and instead accused Australia of interference. Supporters said some players feared for relatives in Iran, with one message reportedly stating: “They have all of our families hostage in Iran.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

>>38760

>>38761

‘Obedient and stupid’: Iran blasts Australia as three soccer players reverse asylum claim

Samantha Maiden - March 15, 2026

1/2

There are fears that one of the late Iranian defectors to Australia – a football team manager – has been organising and relaying messages from the regime to the women.

Raha Pourbakhsh, a journalist at independent Iranian broadcaster Iran International has reported that Zahra Meshkinkar, a member of the team’s technical staff, has been encouraging the woman to return home from inside the safe house.

She is among the group of three members of the country’s women’s national football delegation who has backflipped on her late asylum claim and opted to return home to the war zone.

Iran blasts Aus after asylum backflip

Iran blasted Australia as an “obedient and stupid presence in Trump’s playground” after the three members reversed their asylum claims.

Iranian outlets aligned with the regime earlier reporter two more players and a support staff member — Mona Hamoudi, Zahra Sarbali, and Ms Meshkinkar — opted to return home overnight.

Midfielder Mohaddeseh Zolfi — had previously her withdrawn asylum requests returned to join the team in Malaysia.

In a post published by the Tasnim News Agency, a media organisation closely aligned with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iranian officials framed the decision as a patriotic rejection of Western influence.

The statement said in full:

“The disgraceful failure of the American-Australian project and another failure for Trump,” the statement said.

“Mona Hamoudi, Zahra Sarbali and Zahra Meshkinkar, two players and a member of the technical staff of the national women’s football team, have withdrawn their asylum application in Australia and are currently leaving for Malaysia and returning to the warm embrace of their family and homeland.

“This is while previously, Mohaddeseh Zolfi, another player of our country’s national women’s football team, with her heart for the homeland and the Iranian flag, rejected the offer to stay in Australia and decided to return to Iran.

“The national spirit and patriotism of the Iranian women’s national football team girls defeated the enemy’s plans against this team, which had been widely reflected in the hostile media with numerous projections.”

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed the group had been given the opportunity to remain in Australia after several athletes indicated they feared repercussions if they returned home.

“After telling Australian officials they had made this decision the players were given repeated chances to talk about their options,” he said.

While the Australian Government can ensure that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which players make these incredibly difficult decisions.

“The Australian Government has done everything we could to make sure these women were provided with the chance for a safe future in Australia.

“Australians should be proud that it was in our country that these women experienced a nation presenting them with genuine choices and interacted with authorities seeking to help them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38763

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386719 (160831ZMAR26) Notable: Everything will be fine’: Iranian player poses at Brisbane waterfront as captain flies home - (Video) Iran captain Zahra Ghanbari has abandoned her asylum claim and left Australia, while teammate Fatemeh Pasandideh posted from Brisbane that “everything will be fine”, underlining how rapidly the number of defectors has fallen. Five delegation members have now reversed decisions to stay, amid fears from Iranian-Australian activists that Tehran is pressuring players through threats against relatives and possible promises of rewards. Former Iranian player Shiva Amini said authorities had targeted Ghanbari’s family, including her mother after her father’s death. Activists Tina Kordrostami and Sara Rafiee also raised concerns that technical staffer Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar may have influenced players to return, though a government source said those granted asylum had been vetted and no infiltration had been established. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said returnees were repeatedly offered chances to discuss their options.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38744

>>38760

>>38761

>>38762

‘Everything will be fine’: Iranian player poses at Brisbane waterfront as captain flies home

Matthew Knott - March 16, 2026

1/2

One of the two remaining Iranian soccer players in Australia has uploaded a smiling social media photo in Brisbane declaring that “everything will be fine”, as the number of team members seeking asylum rapidly diminishes.

Team captain Zahra Ghanbari became the latest player to abandon an asylum claim in Australia on Sunday, sparking fears the players’ relatives are being threatened with retaliation by the Tehran regime.

Five members of the Iranian delegation have now abandoned their asylum claims, and members of the diaspora in Australia have expressed concerns the remaining two players will follow.

One of those players, Fatemeh Pasandideh, posted a photo from the Brisbane waterfront on Instagram on Monday afternoon with a peace sign emoji and the caption “everything will be fine”.

Pasandideh, 21, posed for the photo alongside Jill Ellis, FIFA’s head of football.

Five members of the delegation sought asylum late last Monday, followed by two others on Tuesday evening.

Iranian player Mohaddeseh Zolfi, 21, contacted Iranian officials on Wednesday morning and asked to be collected from a safe house soon after Burke announced she had sought asylum in Australia.

Three more members of the delegation changed their minds and decided to return to Iran on Saturday night, followed on Sunday by captain Ghanbari, who is joining her fellow players in Malaysia.

Ghanbari, 34, is Iran’s top female goalscorer at a national level. She is Kurdish and grew up in Kangavar, the largest Kurdish-populated city in Iran.

The Iranian regime has leapt upon the reversals as a propaganda victory as it fights against Israel and the United States in a war that has entered its third week.

Shiva Amini, a former Iranian soccer player, said in a post on X that “the Iranian Football Federation, working with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard IRGC, has placed intense and systematic pressure on the players’ families in Iran”.

“They have even targeted the family of Zahra Ghanbari,” Amini said.

“Despite the fact that she has just lost her father, authorities are putting pressure on her mother. This shows the level of cruelty and desperation they are willing to use to force these athletes to comply.”

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said on Sunday that the players who had decided to return to Iran were given repeated chances to talk about their options.

“While the Australian government can ensure that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which the players are making these incredibly difficult decisions,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38764

File: b8b808b07ea2ebf⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,2000x1428,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386729 (160839ZMAR26) Notable: Dire strait: No ships for Trump’s mission from Australia’s shrinking fleet - Australia has ruled out sending a warship to the Strait of Hormuz, with Transport Minister Catherine King saying it “won’t be sending a ship” even if asked, as attention turns to the Royal Australian Navy’s shrinking surface fleet. The report says the navy will fall to nine surface combatants by year’s end, with HMAS Arunta due to be decommissioned before a replacement arrives in 2029, leaving Australia with limited capacity to support any United States-led coalition. Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said any formal request would have to be weighed against Australia’s national interests, while reiterating that the country’s “primary focus remains the Indo-Pacific”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>>/qresearch/24356088

>>38730

Dire strait: No ships for Trump’s mission from Australia’s shrinking fleet

Matthew Knott - March 16, 2026

Australia will not send a warship to the Middle East as US President Donald Trump demands neighbouring countries join a naval coalition to give oil tankers safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

The government ruling out the possibility of sending any naval assets to the Middle East has focused attention on the navy’s shrinking fleet of warships, which will number just nine surface combatants by the end of the year, down from 11 two years ago.

HMAS Arunta, the oldest of the navy’s seven remaining Anzac-class frigates, is expected to be decommissioned this year, and will not be replaced by a Japanese-made Mogami-class frigate until 2029.

Two in three naval vessels are typically out of action for maintenance or preparations, meaning the navy could have just two available frigates at any one time when HMAS Arunta retires.

Transport Minister Catherine King said Australia had not received a request from the US to send a warship to the Strait of Hormuz, where 20 per cent of the world’s oil trade passes through, and would not send one if asked.

“We’ve been very clear about what our contribution is in relation to our requests, and so far that is to the [United Arab Emirates], obviously providing aircraft to assist with defence, particularly given the number of Australians that are in that area in particular,” Transport Minister Catherine King told ABC radio on Monday.

“But we won’t be sending a ship to the Strait of Hormuz. We know how incredibly important that is. That’s not something that we’ve been asked or we’re contributing.”

This masthead reported on Sunday that the government was not keen to send any warships to the Middle East as it is focused on the Indo-Pacific region.

Defence experts also pointed out that Australia would struggle to send a vessel.

“Ideally, we should be able to support our allies on such a mission, but we simply don’t have enough ships,” Jennifer Parker, an adjunct fellow in naval studies at UNSW, said.

Over the weekend, Trump named China, France, Japan, South Korea and Britain among the countries he would like to see send warships to the Strait of Hormuz to make it easier for oil tankers to pass through the crucial waterway.

Transit through the strait has collapsed since the US-Israel war against Iran began following attacks from Iranian drones and missiles, fuelling a massive surge in global oil prices.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump singled out the UK for threats if it fails to contribute to his coalition, saying: “We will remember.”

Moving on to countries in the Gulf, he said: “We need – really, I’m demanding that these countries come in and protect their own territory.

“It is their territory. It’s the place from which they get their energy. And they should come and they should help us protect it.”

Trump’s call for a naval coalition has so far received a tepid response.

While Britain is considering his request, China has not responded and Japan has indicated it is unlikely to send any warships to the region.

“We have not made any decisions whatsoever about dispatching escort ships. We are continuing to examine what Japan can do independently and what can be done within the legal framework,” Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told parliament on Monday.

Trump called on NATO countries to do “whatever it takes” to help the US military operation in Iran, warning of dire consequences for the alliance if he is rebuffed.

“If there’s no response or if it’s a negative response I think it will be very bad for the future of NATO,” he told the Financial Times.

He said in the interview he could delay his long-awaited trip to China to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, scheduled for March 31, if China does not help reopen the flow of tankers through the strait.

The Coalition attacked the government’s decision not to send a warship to the Red Sea in 2023 to help protect shipping routes from attacks by Houthi rebels in Yemen, but has offered the government room to decline any US request with bipartisan backing.

“If a formal request is made by the United States, it would need to be assessed against our national interests, including their ability to safely operate in a highly contested strategic environment,” opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said.

“Australia’s primary focus remains the Indo-Pacific.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dire-strait-no-ships-for-trump-s-mission-from-australia-s-shrinking-fleet-20260316-p5oaxj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38765

File: c13ddcbf36ee93a⋯.mp4 (15.25 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386734 (160845ZMAR26) Notable: Australian expat was Chinese spy asset, jury finds - (Video) A New South Wales District Court jury has found Australian businessman Alexander Csergo guilty of reckless foreign interference after deciding he “recklessly compiled reports” for individuals he should have suspected were Chinese spies linked to China’s Ministry of State Security. Prosecutors said Csergo, approached on LinkedIn while running a business in Shanghai, produced “fake, plagiarised reports” using open-source material on mining, politics, defence and security, and falsely claimed to have interviewed figures including former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd. The reports were handed over in person, sometimes in near-empty venues, in return for envelopes containing thousands of dollars in cash. Judge Craig Smith continued Csergo’s bail until Monday, with conditions requiring him to report to police twice a day, after prosecutors sought his immediate detention.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24276632 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24295251 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24305717 (pb)

Australian expat was Chinese spy asset, jury finds

Miklos Bolza - March 13, 2026

An Australian businessman recklessly compiled reports for individuals whom he should have suspected were Chinese spies, a jury has found.

Alexander Csergo, 59, was running a business in Shanghai when he was approached on LinkedIn in November 2021 by a woman claiming to be from a Chinese think tank.

His decision to then prepare fake, plagiarised reports for two individuals only known as Ken and Evelyn was enough for a NSW District Court jury on Friday to find him guilty of one count of reckless foreign interference.

He faces a maximum penalty of 15 years behind bars.

But the IT consultant will get at least one more weekend of relative freedom after prosecutors relented on a request to immediately detain him.

The 59-year-old should have suspected Ken and Evelyn were working for China’s Ministry of State Security, the jury found.

The former Waverley College athletics captain and holder of a bachelor’s degree in science began working in China in 2002 after time at Telstra and Hyatt International.

He went on to work with a large American ad agency, led a data analytics infrastructure build for Shanghai Volkswagen and later helped develop systems for China Telecom and French advertiser JCDecaux.

After being approached in November 2021, Csergo used open-source information to compile reports on a variety of topics including mining, politics, defence and security.

He falsely claimed he had interviewed a number of individuals, including former prime minister Kevin Rudd.

The reports were handed to Ken or Evelyn in person – sometimes at restaurants and cafes devoid of other people – in exchange for envelopes containing the equivalent of thousands of dollars in cash.

Despite this information being worthless, the jury found Csergo guilty after being told by crown prosecutors the relationship with him and his contacts was valuable.

Ken also handed the 59-year-old a “shopping list” of sensitive topics to research when he returned to Australia in early 2023.

This document was found by domestic spies and police when they raided his Bondi home in eastern Sydney in March that year.

Csergo was the second person charged by the federal police’s Counter Foreign Interference Taskforce since new laws came into effect in 2018.

In her closing submissions to the jury, crown prosecutor Jennifer Single said trust increased between Csergo and his two handlers, shown by cash payments rising from the equivalent of about $1000 to more than $6000.

After the guilty verdict, Single applied to detain Csergo again.

But it was resisted by the businessman’s barrister.

Because of the complexities of the matter and the timing, Judge Craig Smith continued Csergo’s bail until a full hearing could be held on Monday morning.

The Crown consented on the condition Csergo report to police twice a day over the weekend.

Csergo declined to comment to reporters as he left court on Friday afternoon.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/australian-expat-was-chinese-spy-asset-jury-finds-20260313-p5oaag.html

https://www.9news.com.au/national/jury-finds-expat-businessman-was-chinese-spy-asset/484f8830-4085-425e-995e-6a79031d478c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38766

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386739 (160849ZMAR26) Notable: Alexander Csergo who sold reports to Chinese spies jailed after guilty verdict - (Video) Sydney businessman Alexander Csergo has been taken into custody ahead of sentencing after a judge found it was “realistically inevitable” he would receive a further jail term for reckless foreign interference. The District Court jury had earlier found Csergo guilty over reports he prepared for two people he believed were linked to China’s Ministry of State Security, with the Crown describing the case as a “very serious example” of the offence over a 16-month period. Judge Craig Smith said he did “not accept that there are exceptional circumstances”, rejecting defence arguments about Csergo’s earlier custody and strict bail conditions. Csergo, who said he supplied only open-source material, is due back in court on March 20.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38765

Alexander Csergo who sold reports to Chinese spies jailed after guilty verdict

RHIANNON LEWIN - 16 March 2026

A Sydney-born businessman who was found guilty of reckless foreign interference after he sold reports to Chinese spies has been taken into custody ahead of sentencing.

Alexander Csergo acted as a source for two spies believed to have worked for China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS).

A District Court jury in Sydney last Friday found that Csergo was reckless as to whether his conduct would support the intelligence activity of a foreign principal.

The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment.

Csergo remained on bail over the weekend; however, on Monday he was taken into custody after Judge Craig Smith SC allowed a detention application by Crown prosecutor Jennifer Single SC.

“Ultimately, I am of the view that it is realistically inevitable that a period of jail will be imposed … I do not accept that there are exceptional circumstances,” he said.

“My formal orders are that the detention application is allowed.”

Among the Crown’s submissions, Ms Single told the court that this was a very serious example of this type of offending.

“Particularly in light of the length of offending … so, a 16-month period … the extent of the interactions between the offender and Ken and Evelyn … so it wasn’t just one report being reckless,” she said.

Ms Single also said Csergo himself admitted in an interview that from very early on he had suspicions he was dealing with MSS.

“So not even just an aspect of the Chinese Communist Party … or an aspect of the government, from the very beginning he had suspicions that it was the MSS he was dealing with,” she said.

However, Csergo’s barrister Iain Todd said the time already spent in custody must be taken into account.

“The time spent in custody by the offender … and the manner in which it was spent, that is that there were 12 months in solitary confinement and then even post-dating that, the manner of the bail conditions were significant and a substantive factor when it comes to whatever sentence your honour is to impose,” he said.

“And because this is relatively new legislation … we have no real parity arguments that we can run.”

Judge Smith rejected Mr Todd’s submission and found it was inevitable that a further period of full time jail will be imposed.

“I consider it realistically inevitable that the sentence to be imposed here would involve an effective non parole period that goes beyond that period of time Mr Csergo has spent in jail to date … even accepting the very onerous way in which he has served that period of time in custody,” he said.

Guilty verdict

During trial, the jury heard that while living in Shanghai, Csergo prepared reports for two people who were introduced to him as “Ken” and “Evelyn” from a Chinese think tank.

The 59-year-old was living and running a business in Shanghai in November 2021 when someone claiming to be from the think tank with clients from a state-owned Chinese company approached him on LinkedIn, asking if he wanted to do paid part-time consultancy work.

The Crown case was that Csergo intentionally engaged in reckless conduct that began after November 18, 2021, when he was first contacted on LinkedIn.

He was then later introduced to “Ken” and “Evelyn”, whom he met in empty cafes and restaurants and asked him to prepare reports on lithium, defence, the Quad alliance, AUKUS and iron ore.

While preparing the reports, Csergo approached colleagues for information as well as reaching out to former prime minister Kevin Rudd. Mr Rudd isn’t accused of any wrongdoing.

The Crown said Csergo knew the questions he was asking in order to prepare the reports included sensitive information.

On one occasion, Csergo suggested a meeting on the street in order for him to receive a cash payment from “Evelyn” of about 20,000 RMB (A$4200) in what the Crown described as “clearly a covert act”.

However, his defence argued that while he received money for preparing the reports, he only supplied open source information and not state secrets.

Csergo said the documents did not reveal any information about national security or “secret information”.

He was arrested in April 2023 after returning to Sydney from Shanghai on March 3, 2023, intending to stay in Australia for three months.

Csergo will next appear in court on March 20.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/alexander-csergo-who-sold-reports-to-chinese-spies-jailed-after-guilty-verdict/news-story/169a260218b08d3248843327d5d8bb76

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x5jOtZ5Z8I

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38767

File: 5c3f16641d1fe23⋯.jpg (316.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 28f30726dc4da59⋯.jpg (323.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3277739d74d07e5⋯.jpg (172.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dfa1d82dd2353e2⋯.jpg (182.25 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386745 (160856ZMAR26) Notable: ABF holds secret China talks as tobacco giant slams Australia’s black market failure - Australian Border Force deputy commissioner Tim Fitzgerald has held “friendly talks” in Beijing with Chinese tobacco regulators as concern grows over Australia’s illicit tobacco and vape trade. Chinese state media said Fitzgerald met officials from China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, though it remains unclear whether any agreement was reached or whether the talks will affect Australia’s black market. The report says toxic Chinese-made vapes and illicit cigarette brands have flooded the country, while British American Tobacco chief corporate officer Kingsley Wheaton argued Australia is now “the blackest of the black tobacco markets in the world” and warned illicit products account for “two in every three cigarettes”. He said collapsing excise revenue and rising criminal violence showed the policy settings had “backfired spectacularly”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23895384 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24119726 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24243853 (pb)

ABF holds secret China talks as tobacco giant slams Australia’s black market failure

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - March 15, 2026

A Border Force chief has held ­secret talks with Chinese ­tobacco regulators in Beijing about the illicit trade gripping Australia.

Deputy ABF Commissioner Tim Fitzgerald travelled to Beijing this week to meet officials from China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration.

Chinese state media said Mr Fitzgerald held “friendly talks” on Monday with deputy director Liu Sanjiang, alongside officials from the agency’s “monopoly supervision and e-cigarette regulatory” departments.

It is thought to be the third visit Mr Fitzgerald has made to China in 18 months, while Chinese tobacco officials have also travelled to Australia several times.

It is unclear whether any agreements were reached or whether the latest meeting will have any impact on Australia’s lucrative illicit market.

The ABF was approached for comment but did not respond.

Toxic Chinese-made vapes, particularly the Alibarbar brand, have swamped the market in the past year. The brand has been ­exploited by Middle Eastern and Chinese organised crime gangs that are known to use threats and extortion to facilitate a global distribution network.

Double Happiness cigarettes, also manufactured in China, are among the most popular illicit brands available.

The meeting comes as one of the world’s biggest tobacco companies called on Anthony Albanese to intervene, warning Australia has climbed to the “top of the podium” for illicit tobacco.

British American Tobacco chief corporate officer Kingsley Wheaton said Australia was now so overwhelmed by black-market cigarettes and vapes that legitimate companies were ­effectively locked out of the transition to so-called “smokeless” alternatives.

“Australia is now the blackest of the black tobacco markets in the world,” Mr Wheaton said. “Last year we were probably talking about it just reaching the podium. Now Australia is at the top of that podium.”

His intervention comes as crime groups battle for control of the tobacco trade following the arrest of Iraqi kingpin Kazem Hamad, known as “Kaz”.

Hamad was detained in Iraq in mid-January after running a global tobacco and drug empire from Baghdad following his deportation from Australia in 2023.

Since his arrest, police across Victoria, NSW, Queensland and Western Australia have been grappling with a surge of violence linked to the black market trade, including more than a dozen arson attacks, two shootings and a violent assault.

Mr Wheaton said the criminality was the predictable result of government policy that had pushed smokers into the black market. “Two in every three cigarettes in the country is illicit,” he said. “If you fast-forward the projections that are out there, maybe 80 per cent of the cigarette market will be illicit within a year from now. This is out of control.”

Australia’s aggressive tobacco tax regime, celebrated by Labor as a global public health success, has instead “backfired spectacularly”, Mr Wheaton said.

Federal tobacco excise revenue has collapsed from about $17bn a year to roughly $6.5bn and could soon fall to about $5.5bn. “That’s at least a $10bn excise hole,” he said. “I think that’s a scandal because it could be avoided.”

A pack of illicit cigarettes can sell for about $10, compared with $40 for legal brands.

“When you’re faced with that retail environment, I don’t think you can expect consumers to see two markets – a legitimate one and an illegitimate one,” he said. “It’s fairly simple economics.”

Mr Wheaton said responsibility for fixing the crisis sat with the Prime Minister.

“I think this is something that is on the Prime Minister,” he said.

“He has to take it very seriously, but as of yet it doesn’t seem he cares. Unless the leadership has the will to see the problem, diagnose the problem and make the bold, courageous decisions to do something about it, this will only get worse.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/abf-holds-secret-china-talks-as-tobacco-giant-slams-australias-black-market-failure/news-story/17283c6aa629b5b0d815d907f425bffc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38768

File: 13eaae78515fc0b⋯.jpg (982.04 KB,4011x2567,4011:2567,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e77dadf00a46016⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,3969x2566,3969:2566,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f421c5833cf0b82⋯.jpg (500.65 KB,835x886,835:886,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386759 (160920ZMAR26) Notable: Error of judgment: Swans admit to script change before pre-game Bondi tribute - Sydney Swans chief executive Matthew Pavlich has admitted the club changed a pre-game Bondi tribute script to remove specific reference to the Jewish community, calling it an “error of judgment” made internally in an effort to use “inclusive language”. The club said the Australian Football League was not involved in the decision, after earlier questions about whether the omission had been directed externally. Pavlich said he took “full responsibility” for the wording used before the March 5 season-opener against Carlton, and the Swans apologised again for failing to specifically name the Jewish community. Liberal senator James Paterson said the admission raised concerns about “deeply ingrained cultural problems” in sporting institutions, while Rabbi Mendy Litzman said the Swans had made affected families and community representatives feel “very loved and welcomed”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

‘Error of judgment’: Swans admit to script change before pre-game Bondi tribute

Jon Pierik and Jonathan Drennan - March 16, 2026

1/2

Sydney have admitted to changing the script of a pre-game tribute to victims of the Bondi terror attack to remove reference to the Jewish community, and say the AFL was not involved in the decision.

The Swans said their intention was to use “inclusive language” that recognised the impact the attack had on members of the Jewish community, other heroes and first responders in the ceremony before the March 5 season-opener against Carlton at the SCG.

Sydney chief executive Matthew Pavlich led a moving tribute to victims in front of families and first responders before the game, but the Jewish community was not referenced during the ceremony.

“As we mentioned on Saturday night, in statements from both our chairman and CEO, we were made aware that our on-field tribute neglected to specifically name the Jewish community. We apologised for this omission and have taken full responsibility for it,” Sydney’s statement said.

“The tribute was a heartfelt attempt to show compassion to everyone impacted by the terrible events on 14 December, and most of all the Jewish community.

“There was no directive or instruction from the AFL to remove or change the reference to the Jewish community in the script.

“That script change was made within our club in a genuine effort to use inclusive language by referring to the whole community.

“We acknowledge that was an error of judgment, and again we apologise.”

Pavlich reiterated the club’s apology at a press conference on Monday. He took full responsibility as chief executive, given he ultimately gave the speech.

“It went through many different edits and in the end, I saw the speech, obviously gave it and so I take responsibility for that,” he said.

“The focus of last week’s Bondi tribute was to honour those impacted by the tragedy and to stand with the Jewish community as we did in December and continue to do so. Whilst we didn’t specifically reference the Jewish community in the script, this was in the context of those people that were on the field with us that evening, which included many of the brave first responders, community heroes, and of course, those impacted the most, the Jewish community. And it was through that lens in which we finalised the words spoken.

“We apologised on Saturday night for this, and we do so again today. To be very clear, there was no directive from the AFL to remove reference to the Jewish community in the script and we’ve never suggested this was the case.”

After being asked if it was a group decision to remove specific reference to the Jewish community, Pavlich said: “I own it, as a CEO, that’s on me, I take full responsibility. We were workshopping it, clearly and as I said, it was about trying to be as inclusive as we could for many people affected as of the tragedy of 14 December.

“But, clearly, because we’re here today (at Monday’s press conference), that’s an oversight that we got wrong and we own that.”

Earlier on Monday, federal Liberal senator James Paterson confirmed he wrote to former High Court judge Virginia Bell, who is leading the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, calling for the AFL to explain the error.

On Monday evening he told this masthead that the Swans’ admission was “further evidence of deeply ingrained cultural problems in our sporting institutions that must be probed thoroughly by the royal commission”.

“It is incredibly disappointing to learn that someone at an AFL club believes it was ‘inclusive’ to remove all references to Jews in a script about the antisemitic Bondi terror attack, whose victims were overwhelmingly Jewish,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38769

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24386771 (160935ZMAR26) Notable: AFL referred to Royal Commission over removal of Jewish community references from Bondi tribute - The Sydney Swans have admitted they removed references to the “Jewish community” from a pre-match Bondi tribute script and said the change was made internally without any direction from the Australian Football League. The omission prompted Victorian Liberal senator James Paterson to refer the league to the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, urging commissioner Virginia Bell to request that the AFL preserve documents and communications so witnesses can be examined about “who ordered the removal” and why. The Swans said the wording was changed in an attempt to use “inclusive language” focused on the “whole community”, but acknowledged this was an “error of judgement” and apologised again. Paterson said “erasing” the victims’ Jewish identity was “a travesty and an insult” to their families.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38768

AFL referred to Royal Commission over removal of Jewish community references from Bondi tribute

Michael Warner - March 16, 2026

1/2

The Sydney Swans have confessed to removing references to the “Jewish community” from a pre-match tribute honouring victims of the Bondi terrorist attack - and insist they did so without any direction from the AFL.

The Herald Sun revealed on Monday that the league had been referred by Victorian federal Senator James Paterson for investigation by the Royal Commission into anti-Semitism.

Embattled AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon failed to explain during a series of weekend interviews how a speech delivered by Sydney CEO Matthew Pavlich before the Opening Round Swans-Carlton match at the SCG had failed to mention the Jewish community.

“I don’t know what happened with the script,” Dillon told 3AW on Saturday.

But footy great Gerard Healy revealed that “the script was changed” in a bid to de-politicise the tribute.

On Monday afternoon the Swans released a statement taking responsibility for the omission.

“There was no directive or instruction from the AFL to remove or change the reference to the Jewish community in the script,” the Swans said.

“That script change was made within our club in a genuine effort to use inclusive language by referring to the ‘whole community’.

“Noting that the focus of the script was to recognise those people present on field on the night. This included members of the Jewish community, community heroes and first responders.

“We acknowledge that was an error of judgement and again we apologise.”

The move to delete the reference incensed members of the Jewish community and prompted Mr Paterson to refer the league to the Royal Commission on anti-Semitism and Social Cohesion.

In a letter to former High Court judge Virginia Bell, who is leading the commission, Mr Paterson said he encouraged her to “urgently request the AFL to preserve all documents and communications, including any correspondence with the Sydney Swans and any internal communications within the AFL, in relation to this matter”.

“It would be unfortunate if answers cannot be provided as to who ordered the removal of any references to the Jewish community or why they did so because documents were not retained by the AFL,” Mr Paterson said.

“Counsel-Assisting (the Royal Commission) must have the opportunity to review the documents and cross-examine any potential witnesses to establish the facts in relation to this serious incident.

“While the Sydney Swans chairman (Andrew Pridham) has apologised to the Jewish community, the reported involvement of AFL staff in this incident should be closely examined as part of the Commission’s inquiries into the nature and prevalence of anti-Semitism in Australia.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38770

File: 562ea22fa2bd5e3⋯.jpg (546.18 KB,3508x2480,877:620,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 10be8a09b1c47c2⋯.jpg (115.75 KB,1417x1033,1417:1033,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24391086 (170846ZMAR26) Notable: Bondi terrorist hangs head as vigilante threats against family revealed - Accused Bondi attacker Naveed Akram has appeared in court as his lawyer said his mother and siblings were “under siege” and “living in fear” after receiving vigilante threats and harassment following the alleged December attack. Defence barrister Richard Wilson sought final suppression orders to force the removal of identifying details about Akram’s mother, brother, sister and home, arguing they were not accused of any wrongdoing and had faced threats including calls to “torch the house”, abuse, suspected intimidation and damage. Barrister Matt Lewis, SC, for media organisations opposing the bid, said it was “futile” because the family’s identities were already widely known and argued open justice was vital as the public sought confidence the case would be handled transparently. A decision is due on April 2.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38734

‘Bondi terrorist’ hangs head as vigilante threats against family revealed

Perry Duffin - March 17, 2026

1/2

Accused Bondi Beach terrorist Naveed Akram has hung his head after learning his mother and siblings are “under siege” and “living in fear” having been targeted with vigilante death threats and harassment after he allegedly murdered 15 people in Australia’s worst terror attack.

The targeting of the Akram family, who are not accused of any wrongdoing by police, emerged as part of a legal bid to suppress their identities. The move has been opposed by media including this masthead.

Akram, 24, allegedly opened fire on crowds of Jewish families at Chanukah by the Sea in mid-December alongside his father, Sajid.

Sajid, 50, was shot and killed by police. Naveed was badly injured but survived and is now in Goulburn Supermax prison charged with murder and terrorism.

Akram appeared in the Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday via videolink with a freshly shaved head, in a small grey and blue metal room.

His publicly funded barrister, Richard Wilson, asked Magistrate Hugh Donnelly to make final orders that would force media and the public to take down any information identifying Akram’s mother, brother and sister, or their home.

“(Akram) is charged with the most serious and the most notorious terrorist attack this country has ever seen,” Wilson acknowledged.

“The outpouring of public grief, outrage and anger at what he and his father allegedly did are unprecedented, extraordinary and absolutely understandable.

“But there is no suggestion his mother, brother or sister has anything to do with it.”

Akram’s legal team said his surviving family were “under siege” in their Bonnyrigg home in western Sydney, and the continued media attention kept them in the spotlight.

Wilson said the threats began within 24 hours of Naveed’s alleged attack, when someone suggesting on social media people should “torch the house”.

Dozens expressed their support for the comment, the court heard.

Over the following weeks, people would call or message the family with threats and abuse; “die c*nts die” and “are you still alive?” among those aired on Tuesday.

Sometimes utes would drive past slowly with music turned up as occupants shouted more threats from behind tinted windows.

“C*nts we are coming to kill you!” one group called after parking their ute across the Akrams’ driveway.

Earlier this year, a group of large men banged on the Akrams’ door late at night. The family watched them move down the side of the home and called police, but no one was caught.

Around that time, other people were heard inside the Akrams’ garage one night. They told neighbours they were “mechanics” who lived on the street. Police were called but again no one was found.

The following morning, Akram’s mother’s car wouldn’t start.

These are not the actions of “keyboard warriors”, Wilson said, but rather “misguided and dangerous people”, would-be vigilantes and those keen to exact revenge rather than wait for the slow grind of lawful justice.

The family’s “misfortune”, Wilson said, was being related to Australia’s worst accused terrorist.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38771

File: c92eb064bce1f0a⋯.mp4 (15.59 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24391111 (170905ZMAR26) Notable: Grace Tame sparks outrage by saying Hamas October 7 terror attack rapes were ‘debunked’ - (Video) Israel’s embassy in Australia has condemned former Australian of the Year Grace Tame after she described claims of sexual violence by Hamas during the October 7 attacks as “propaganda” that had been “debunked” in an ABC Radio Sydney interview. The embassy said Tame had “lost [her] moral compass”, while Executive Council of Australian Jewry head of legal Simone Abel said she had engaged in “the ultimate stonewalling” by denying sexual violence recognised by United Nations bodies. The National Council of Jewish Women Australia also criticised Tame’s remarks, saying claims the allegations had been “debunked” ignored extensive evidence gathered by international bodies, survivor testimony and investigations into the October 7 attacks. Tame said she did “not support any of it” and was “outraged by all of the violence”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24240141 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24264411 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

Grace Tame sparks outrage by saying Hamas October 7 terror attack rapes were ‘debunked’

WILLIAM ELLIOTT and THOMAS HENRY - 17 March 2026

1/2

Israel’s embassy in Australia has blasted former Australian of the year Grace Tame for her dismissal of sexual abuse perpetrated by Hamas in the October 7 attacks, claiming she had “lost her moral compass”.

After Ms Tame claimed that testimony from Israeli women of horrific sexual abuse at the hands of Hamas terrorists was “propaganda” that had been “debunked”, the Israeli embassy urged her to watch the testimony and educate herself.

“When you find yourself denying documented sexual violence, turning victims into perpetrators, and drawing false moral equivalences just to fit an anti-Israel or anti-Jewish narrative, you’ve lost your moral compass,” the embassy posted on its social media.

“Israel, like any country, has the right to defend its civilians from Hamas and Iranian attacks. Blinded by self-righteous populism, this isn’t human rights activism. Watch the testimonies. Educate yourself.”

The UN Special Representative on Sexual ­Violence in Conflict had found there were reasonable grounds to believe conflict-related sexual ­violence occurred during the ­attacks.

In an interview with ABC radio, Ms Tame dismissed corroborated reports Israeli women were raped and sexually abused by Hamas terrorists during the October 7, 2023, attack as “propaganda”.

The Former Australian of the Year, appearing on ABC Radio Sydney with host Hamish Macdonald on Monday, said claims about abuse of Israeli women during the massacre “have been debunked”.

“I’m not going to sink to the level of … of entertaining any kind of propaganda, Hamish. Let’s not do that,” Ms Tame said.

Macdonald noted the UN Special Representative on Sexual ­Violence in Conflict had found there were reasonable grounds to believe conflict-related sexual ­violence occurred during the ­attacks. “Are you saying that that is propaganda?” he asked.

Accused of being “selective in her outrage”, Ms Tame said violence had been committed by both sides in the conflict.

“Awful things are being perpetrated by both sides, but this is not about ‘whataboutism’. This is not about selective outrage. I’m outraged by all of the violence. Would that we could get it all to stop,” she said.

“I am a human rights activist who advocates for the safety of all human beings, no matter their background, whether they are Jewish, whether they are Muslims, whether they are Christian, whether they are atheist.”

Executive Council of Australian Jewry head of legal Simone Abel said the comments amounted to a denial of the sexual violence perpetrated by Hamas.

“For a survivor of sexual abuse, it is hard to imagine anything worse than another survivor discrediting or denying their abuse,” Ms Abel said.

“Grace Tame has engaged in the ultimate stonewalling by denying the sexual violence perpetrated by terrorist organisation Hamas on October 7.

“In doing so she has shown that she is not an advocate for all survivors of sexual assault, but only an advocate for some.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38772

File: 3b81f7c70d46048⋯.jpg (208.85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3bdfa8ad81f9f2c⋯.jpg (96.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b29e94aae705df4⋯.jpg (153.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b655fa688e81dc6⋯.jpg (146.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24391128 (170916ZMAR26) Notable: Remaining Iranian soccer players join A-League training - Iran’s women’s team has left Malaysia for Oman after days of uncertainty, while the two remaining players seeking asylum in Australia joined Brisbane Roar for training. Fatemeh Pasandideh and Atefeh Ramezanisadeh were photographed at the A-League Women session in Brisbane, with chief executive Kaz Patafta saying the club was providing a “supportive environment” as they navigated “the next stages”. The departure of the rest of the squad followed the reversal of five asylum claims in Australia and their reunion with teammates in Kuala Lumpur before flying on. Asian Football Confederation general secretary Windsor John said officials would monitor the players’ welfare with Iran’s federation and said they “didn’t look afraid”, while Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite described the case as a “very complex situation”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

>>38761

>>38763

Remaining Iranian soccer players join A-League training

Duncan Murray - March 17 2026

The Iranian women's soccer team has left Malaysia for Oman as the two remaining members seeking asylum in Australia joined a local A-League club for training.

The departure ends days of uncertainty after five of the seven squad members who sparked a diplomatic furore by seeking asylum in Australia reversed their decisions and rejoined the team in Kuala Lumpur.

Members of the squad declined to speak to reporters as they spent several hours at the airport checking in and waiting for their flight on Monday night.

Meanwhile, the two players who remained in Australia joined a training session with the women's A-League club, the Brisbane Roar.

The club released photos of Monday's training session, with Fatemeh Pasandideh and Atefeh Ramezanisadeh smiling and wearing the Queensland team's colours.

Brisbane Roar CEO, Kaz Patafta said his club welcomed and supported the players but declined to comment further, directing questions to the Department of Home Affairs.

"We remain committed to providing a supportive environment for them whilst they navigate the next stages," he said.

Asian Football Confederation general secretary Windsor John earlier told The Associated Press his organisation was supporting the Iranian team in Kuala Lumpur.

He said the AFC was told they are flying to Oman, but that isn't their final destination and that he wasn't aware of their full travel plans.

Asked if the confederation was satisfied that the women would be safe back in Iran, Mr Windsor said the AFC and FIFA would check up on them regularly with the Iranian football federation "as they are our girls as well".

The squad flew from Sydney to Kuala Lumpur a week ago after being knocked out of the Women's Asian Cup in Australia, initially leaving behind six players and a support worker who had accepted protection visas.

Four players and the staffer have since rejoined the team in Kuala Lumpur, the latest flying in on Monday.

No reasons have been given for the changes of heart. The Iranian diaspora in Australia blames pressure from Tehran.

Mr Windsor said at a news conference earlier his confederation had not received any direct complaints from players about returning home, despite media reports their families in Iran could face retaliation for the team failing to sing their national anthem before the opening match.

The silence during the anthem was variously reported as an act of resistance or a show of mourning. The team didn't clarify, and it sang at the opening of a later match.

"We couldn't verify anything. We asked them and they said, 'No, it's okay,'" he said.

"They are actually in high spirits ... they didn't look afraid."

Iranian authorities welcomed the women's decisions to reject asylum as a victory against Australia and US President Donald Trump.

Iran's squad had arrived in Australia for the tournament shortly before the war in the Middle East began on February 28, complicating travel arrangements.

Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite described the women's plight in Australia as a "very complex situation".

"These are deeply personal decisions, and the government respects the decisions of those that have chosen to return. And we continue to offer support to the two that are remaining," Mr Thistlethwaite said.

The two players who stayed in Australia have been moved to an undisclosed safe location and are receiving assistance from the government and the Iranian diaspora community, he said.

Concerns about the team's safety in Iran heightened when the players didn't sing the Iranian national anthem.

The Australian government was urged to help the women by Iranian groups in Australia and by Trump.

The embassy in Canberra, remains staffed, despite the Australian government expelling the ambassador last year.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9200812/remaining-iranian-soccer-players-join-a-league-training/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38773

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24391153 (171001ZMAR26) Notable: Daniel’s Law: Two charged via Queensland’s public sex offender register - (Video) Two people have become the first in Queensland to be charged after community reports generated through the state’s public sex offender register, with Acting Police Commissioner Denzil Clark saying nine offenders had so far been identified as having access to children. Clark said two were facing charges for allegedly failing to properly report to police, while investigators were examining whether the other seven had breached their obligations. The register, launched on December 31 as Daniel’s Law, has been accessed more than 205,000 times in its first 10 weeks and lets users check a public list of offenders whose whereabouts are unknown, conduct locality searches for reportable offenders in their area, and make parent or guardian inquiries about whether a person with unsupervised contact with a child is a current reportable offender. Premier David Crisafulli said the scheme was “shining a spotlight on monsters” and would not be watered down.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23800897 (pb)

Daniel’s Law: Two charged via Queensland’s public sex offender register

Catherine Strohfeldt - March 15, 2026

Two people have become the first in Queensland to face charges as a result of community reports stemming from the public sex offender registry.

Acting Police Commissioner Denzil Clark said on Sunday that so far, the community had reported nine offenders who had access to children, including two who were facing charges for not properly reporting to police.

“Of course, there have been several instances where, although they may not have been reportable offenders, we held concerns about that person and their access to children, and we engaged with that family and had conversations about protecting those children,” Clark said.

He said the reportable offenders could have had access to children or unsupervised contact with them in several scenarios, such as through sports clubs or personal relationships.

Police were investigating whether the remaining seven offenders said to have had access to children had breached their reporting obligations.

The register – named Daniel’s Law after slain Sunshine Coast schoolboy Daniel Morcombe – was launched on December 31.

Premier David Crisafulli said at the time, it had given police and parents the tools to do their job.

“We are shining a spotlight on monsters who, for too long, have easily been able to lurk in the shadows,” he said.

In the first 10 weeks after the registry’s launch, it was accessed more than 205,000 times. Of those searches, just under half were made within the first week.

The register allows three kinds of searches: a full list of offenders who had breached reporting duties; locality searches; and a tool to make inquiries about suspected offenders.

Elements of Daniel’s Law available to the public

• Tier 1: A list of reportable offenders who have failed to comply with obligations and whose whereabouts are unknown (an offender’s full name, photograph and year of birth are accessible to members of the public who agree not to misuse the information).

• Tier 2: An online application for residents to view photographs of reportable offenders living in their local area.

• Tier 3: An online application for parents or guardians to inquire as to whether a particular person with unsupervised contact with their child is a reportable offender.

The state reported that during the first 10 weeks, 36,889 Tier 2 local searches were carried out, providing images of registered sex offenders living nearby.

All of the information is freely accessible, but users must agree to strict access guidelines.

However, people using the website have criticised it for having unclear boundaries on a “local area”, with some searches failing to bring up reportable offenders living as close as 5 kilometres from an address.

The premier said on Sunday he would “never shut the door on improving it [the register] and strengthening it”, but ruled out watering it down.

“I will always side with a victim and a family over a predator and a monster every day of the week … and everything we do should be about making the state safer,” he said.

Clark said police had only seen one case of misuse of the register’s information – when Brian Allan Smith posted identifying information on social media.

Crisafulli said that by abiding by the website’s rules, users had disproved claims raised before its launch that it would be misused for vigilantism.

“I have this view that, overwhelmingly, people are good, and they just want their kids to be safe, and this is proving it,” the premier said.

“You heard me speak a lot about community safety, and I won’t change in that regard – I want that to be a legacy of our government.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/queensland/shining-a-spotlight-on-monsters-two-charged-via-public-sex-offender-register-20260315-p5oalq.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXWEZ_fchvQ

https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Morcombe

Daniel's Law

Daniel's Law enables members of the public to access information about convicted child sex offenders who are on Queensland's Child Protection Register. It aims to help all Queenslanders play a role in protecting children and restoring safety in the community.

You can find out if there are any Queensland reportable offenders whose whereabouts are unknown by visiting the Missing reportable offender page, make a disclosure application as a parent or guardian to find out if someone who currently has or may have unsupervised contact with your child or children is a current reportable offender in Queensland, or request a locality search to find out whether there are any reportable offenders who have a history of repeat child sex offending or have been considered to be a high risk to children in your residential area.

https://www.danielslaw.qld.gov.au/daniels-law/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38774

File: 1fa10faec60d0ef⋯.jpg (263.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 36f42fc2802046c⋯.jpg (127.48 KB,1491x1491,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f68890749314c1b⋯.jpg (277.54 KB,1044x1392,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24391161 (171010ZMAR26) Notable: Parents flock to Daniel’s Law website in overwhelming response - Queensland’s public child sex offender registry has been accessed more than 205,000 times since launching in December, with the Daniel’s Law website attracting a new visitor about every 30 seconds as parents and carers seek information about convicted offenders. The scheme gives users access to three levels of checks: a public list of reportable offenders whose whereabouts are unknown, locality searches that allow residents to view photographs of certain offenders living in their area, and parent or guardian applications to find out whether a specific person with unsupervised contact with a child is a reportable offender. Premier David Crisafulli said the early results showed the reforms were giving “parents and police the power to act”, while Daniel Morcombe’s father Bruce Morcombe said the law was “making a difference” by helping protect Queensland children. - Daniel’s Law website: https://www.danielslaw.qld.gov.au/daniels-law/

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38773

Parents flock to Daniel’s Law website in overwhelming response

Since Queensland launched a public sex offender registry, parents and carers have flocked to the website in massive numbers.

Georgia Palgan - March 15, 2026

Every thirty seconds, a concerned parent and carer visited the Daniel’s Law website, the landmark child sex offender public registry.

Since its launch, the online website has given parents and carers access to vital information about convicted child sex offenders in Queensland - and the numbers are staggering.

One of the most significant reforms to child safety laws in Queensland’s history, the Community Protection and Child Sex Offender Public Register - also known as Daniel’s Law - came online in December.

In a little over two months, the online platform has been accessed more than 205,000 times, with a new visitor clicking through every 30 seconds.

“We promised reforms to make our community safer and that is exactly what Daniel’s Law is delivering,” Premier David Crisafulli said.

“It’s still early days but these results are already proving having this knowledge gives parents and police the power to act.”

The scheme includes three levels of information designed to protect children.

Tier one is a publicly searchable website listing offenders who’ve vanished, failed to comply with their obligations and whose whereabouts are unknown.

Their full name, photograph and year of birth are available to anyone willing to agree not to misuse the information.

Tier two lets residents apply to view photographs of registered offenders living in their local area.

Tier three allows parents and guardians to apply to check if a specific person with unsupervised access to their child is a reportable offender.

It is a criminal offence to misuse information from the registry, including engaging in vigilantism.

The registry is named in honour of Daniel Morcombe, the Sunshine Coast schoolboy whose abduction and murder in 2003 devastated a state.

His parents refused to let their son’s death be in vain and have become prominent child safety advocates.

Daniel’s parents, Bruce and Denise Morcombe, who founded the Daniel Morcombe Foundation, celebrated 21 years at the annual Dance For Daniel, a fundraising event supporting “a safer world for children.”

“A law is a law, but a law that makes a difference is truly something that we value.” Mr Morcombe said to their crowd of supporters on Saturday night,” Mr Morcombe said.

“To have it named in honour of our son is truly something special because it is making a difference, it’s protecting Queensland’s kids.”

“We owe this to Daniel, to his family, and to every Queensland child who deserves to grow up safe.” Premier Crisafulli said.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/parents-flock-to-daniels-law-website-in-overwhelming-response/news-story/0b65e8fd3431ca8e8d825bd0f0f44a66

https://www.danielslaw.qld.gov.au/daniels-law/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38775

File: 9f228ec55a2cb79⋯.jpg (753.68 KB,5284x3523,5284:3523,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395459 (180847ZMAR26) Notable: Australia and European Union poised to sign trade deal - Australia and the European Union are nearing a long-delayed free trade agreement, with negotiations said to be in the “final stretch” and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expected in Australia as soon as next week to help seal the accord. Talks that collapsed in 2023 over access for Australian beef, sheep meat, dairy and sugar have regained momentum amid escalating global trade tensions and United States tariff action. Trade Minister Don Farrell said he was “confident we can do a deal”, while outstanding disputes over red meat access may be resolved at leader level between Anthony Albanese and von der Leyen. The package is also expected to cover issues including mobility arrangements for skilled professionals and possible changes to Australia’s luxury car tax, which European manufacturers say prices their vehicles out of the Australian market in favour of cheaper Chinese electric vehicles.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia and European Union poised to sign trade deal

Michael Read - Mar 17, 2026

Australia and the European Union could sign a long-awaited free trade deal as soon as next week, as escalating global trade tensions force them back to the negotiating table after years of deadlock.

The negotiations collapsed in October 2023 over Australia’s demands for greater market access for locally produced beef, sheep meat, dairy and sugar.

But momentum to finalise a deal gathered steam as US President Donald Trump waged a trade war and imposed swingeing tariffs globally.

The EU has also clinched deals with South American countries and India.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was expected in Australia as soon as next week to finalise the deal, after telling EU leaders on Monday that talks were “in the final stretch”, according to Bloomberg.

“This will mark yet another milestone in diversifying Europe’s international partnerships,” she said.

The accord would enhance “Europe’s ability to shape global standards and ensure resilient supply chains”.

Access for Australian red meat exports to Europe remains a sticking point, but the matter can be settled only at the leader level by Albanese and von der Leyen.

Trade Minister Don Farrell met virtually overnight with his EU counterpart, Maros Sefcovic, to cover off on outstanding issues.

“I am confident we can do a deal and look forward to continuing to work with him to reach an agreement that is in Australia’s national interest,” Farrell told The Australian Financial Review.

The deal has been held up by opposition from Irish and French farmers who are wary of the prospect of greater competition from Australian meat exports.

However, Ireland’s ambassador to Australia, Fiona Flood, said on Tuesday she looked forward to closing the trade deal with Australia.

“I think we can all be very hopeful that, in these turbulent times, it’s a beacon of hope that we can close that trade deal,” she told the ABC.

A potential compromise on meat exports could mean Australia cuts or drops the luxury car tax, which was introduced in 2000 to protect the now-extinct local car manufacturing industry and which disproportionately affects European manufacturers such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz.

The tax levies an additional 33¢ on every dollar spent above $80,567 for petrol and diesel vehicles or $91,387 for hybrids and electric vehicles sold, raising $1.2 billion a year revenue for the federal government.

Europeans, concerned their vehicles have been priced out of the Australian market by cheaper Chinese electric vehicles, want to see the tax relaxed.

The free trade deal was also expected to include a two-way mobility agreement, where highly skilled professionals and investors would be able to work in Europe more easily.

It would not, however, allow Australians to live and work freely in the EU, nor would it allow Europeans to live and work freely in Australia.

Since negotiations for an FTA began in 2018, the EU had demanded Australian businesses stop using so-called “geographical indicator” product names, arguing they should be the sole domain of European growers.

However, it appeared a compromise had been reached allowing Australian growers to continue using the product labels, according to two sources speaking on condition of anonymity, although they stressed that negotiations were continuing.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/australia-and-european-union-poised-to-ink-trade-deal-20260317-p5obw0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38776

File: 9058b7ea4c33a3d⋯.jpg (174.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395475 (180919ZMAR26) Notable: Winston Peters warns Australia and NZ made ‘serious mistakes’ on fuel security - New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters says Australia and New Zealand made “serious mistakes” on fuel security by allowing refineries to close and being “far too cocky” about global stability before the Iran war disrupted oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Peters said both countries should have maintained stronger contingency planning, with New Zealand holding about 52 days of fuel supply and Australia about 30. He urged Canberra and Wellington to keep “cool heads” over United States requests for support, saying they should consult closely “before we jump in and make a mistake”. Defence Minister Richard Marles meanwhile said targeting data gathered by Australia’s E-7A Wedgetail in the Gulf was being processed through the United States-led air operations centre, while reiterating Australia was “not contemplating sending a ship”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38757

>>38740

>>38764

Winston Peters warns Australia and NZ made ‘serious mistakes’ on fuel security

BEN PACKHAM - 18 March 2026

1/2

New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters says his country and Australia should have been better prepared for the Iran war oil crisis and made “serious mistakes” in allowing fuel refineries to close because they were “too cocky” about the state of the world.

In an interview with The Australian, Mr Peters said the trans-Tasman allies needed to keep “cool heads” on the conflict and take a cautious view of Donald Trump’s requests for support ­“because the message changes by the day”.

Mr Peters’ warning came as ­Defence Minister Richard Marles revealed targeting data on Iranian forces collected by Australia’s E-7A Wedgetail in the Persian Gulf was being fed to the US and Israel, but he insisted the aircraft was a “fundamentally defensive capability”.

Mr Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong sat down in Canberra on Tuesday for annual ANZMIN “2+2” talks with Mr Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins, at which they agreed to a new plan for the nations’ defence forces to co-operate more closely and develop capabilities together.

While New Zealand has about 52 days’ fuel supply in storage or en route to the country compared with Australia’s 30 days, Mr Peters said both countries had been caught off-guard by the conflict and Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which choked off about 20 per cent of the world’s oil ­shipments.

“You’re learning that some of your refineries should have been kept open; so are we,” he said.

“These are not extremes we’re at now, but we should have always had those contingencies covered off in all of our forward planning. We made some very, very … serious mistakes by being far too cocky about the world circumstance we’re in. Here comes the present reality, right here, right now. Things are very unstable. We hope we get out of here. But it would have been … great to have the comfort of a backup just in case anything went wrong.”

Australia has two remaining refineries, down from eight in the early 2000s, while New Zealand no longer has any domestic refineries.

US allies have baulked at answering the US President’s call for help to secure oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz, with Australia ruling out sending a warship to the region before a formal request was received.

Mr Peters said it was vital for Australia and New Zealand to “keep our eyes wide open and consult with each other before we jump in and make a mistake”. “We have been in so many other theatres, but we’re watching this with the greatest of caution,” he said.

The government committed the Wedgetail aircraft, 85 crew members and an undisclosed number of air-to-air missiles to the region following a request from the United Arab Emirates.

Mr Marles said data collected by the hi-tech surveillance aircraft was being processed by the US’s Combined Air Operations Centre – making it also available to Israel – to ensure a “co-ordinated air defence of the countries of the Gulf”.

The government has sought to draw a line under the contribution, with Transport Minister Catherine King declaring this week: “We won’t be sending a ship to the Strait of Hormuz.”

Mr Marles endorsed the position on Tuesday, declaring “we’re not contemplating sending a ship”. But he said the discussion was also premature as no request for a ship had been received from the US.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38777

File: f2084ef3417aa36⋯.jpg (247.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395481 (180926ZMAR26) Notable: PM warns Australians are stockpiling petrol causing shortages that shouldn’t exist - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged motorists not to panic buy petrol, warning that stockpiling is creating shortages “that shouldn’t occur” and putting unnecessary pressure on supplies despite fuel continuing to arrive as scheduled. Albanese said Australians should “just take what you need, be sensible”, while insisting the country still had fuel security. He also warned service stations against profiteering, saying the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission would act against “inappropriate behaviour” and that penalties had been increased. The intervention came as major fuel companies and retailers were called to an emergency meeting with the regulator over price rises and supply concerns, and after Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles declined to rule out rationing if the conflict driving market disruption were to continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38757

PM warns Australians are stockpiling petrol causing shortages that shouldn’t exist

Samantha Maiden - March 18, 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese pleaded with motorists not to panic buy petrol, warning that surging demand puts unnecessary pressure on supplies.

Ahead of a planned fuel summit, the Prime Minister delivered a blunt message to drivers as the government also considers longer term measures including extending the life of two oil refineries beyond 2027.

“My message to Australians as well is to not take more fuel than you need,” Mr Albanese told reporters in Tasmania.

“That is how you can help think of others, be a good neighbour, a good community member and a good Australian.”

In his strongest comments to date, Mr Albanese warned that recent behaviour at the bowser was causing bigger problems than the fuel supply.

“It’s not the Australian way. Just take what you need, be sensible.”

“There has been, in some places, a doubling of demand that shouldn’t occur.

“We do have fuel security here in this nation, but we need to be sensible about these issues, and that’s my message.”

Crackdown on Petrol Pricing

He also warned service stations against exploiting the situation, putting them on notice over pricing.

“My message to service stations which are overcharging is that the ACCC will take action against any inappropriate behaviour,” he said.

“There’s no place for any company to try to take advantage of this to increase their profits at the expense of Australians.”

Mr Albanese pointed to strengthened enforcement powers, adding: “Well, we’ve doubled the potential fines, and we’ve empowered the ACCC to do that, to make sure that consumers’ interests are looked after, and will continue to do so.”

Despite the surge in demand, Mr Albanese sought to reassure motorists that supplies remain stable.

“The fuel is arriving as expected,” he said.

“At this point in time, we’re continuing to monitor all of what is going on in global markets as well, but we continue to see ships arriving as has been scheduled, and that is a good thing.”

Rationing Concerns Raised

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles declined to rule out fuel rationing in Australia amid this week’s panic buying before Treasurer Jim Chalmers walked back the comments.

But asked whether the government would ever consider fuel rations as an additional measure, Mr Marles did not rule out the possibility.

“Obviously, this is a function of how long this conflict continues, and that’s not something that I can answer in terms of what’s going to happen,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38778

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395485 (180930ZMAR26) Notable: Emergency National Cabinet meeting called over fuel supply - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called an emergency National Cabinet meeting for Thursday to coordinate Australia’s fuel response as Middle East conflict disrupts supply chains and adds pressure to regional deliveries. Albanese said leaders from every state and territory would take part virtually and would be asked to nominate a contact to work with the Commonwealth on fuel supply issues. He said the government was responding by releasing 20 per cent of the baseline Minimum Stockholding Obligation for petrol and diesel, temporarily amending fuel standards to boost local supply, and working with industry to direct fuel where it is needed most, “particularly regional communities”. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said expected deliveries were still arriving and urged Australians not to panic buy, while Opposition Leader Angus Taylor accused the government of failing to stay on top of the crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38757

>>38777

Emergency National Cabinet meeting called over fuel supply

Chris Johnson - 18 March 2026

Anthony Albanese has called an emergency meeting of National Cabinet to discuss Australia’s fuel supply, as shortages worsen across the globe due to the Middle East war.

It will be conducted virtually from Tasmania on Thursday (19 March) with the leaders of all government jurisdictions, and will have a particular focus on getting fuel to regional outlets.

Speaking in Burnie on Wednesday, the Prime Minister said he will chair the meeting from Hobart and will ask each state and territory to appoint someone to coordinate with the Commonwealth on fuel supply issues.

Earlier in Sydney, the PM told an Australian Automotive Dealer Association breakfast meeting that Australia will not be immune from the economic impacts of the war.

“The war in the Middle East is disrupting supply chains, pushing up fuel prices and adding to pressure on inflation, here and right around the world,” Mr Albanese said.

“Australians understand this. People are not just reading about this conflict in the news, they are seeing the economic consequences in their daily lives … and it is obvious, but important to say, that the longer this war goes on, the more significant those effects will be.”

The PM pointed out that the current war is the third major shock to hit the global economy this decade, following COVID and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Even if this one is a relatively short conflict, he said, it will have a long economic tail, and Australia will not escape its impact despite its distance from the action.

“This is why we have been working to build our fuel security over the last four years, and why we are taking new action now,” he said.

“Empowering the ACCC to protect motorists from unfair price rises; boosting fuel supply by releasing 20 per cent of the baseline Minimum Stockholding Obligation for petrol and diesel; getting more fuels made in Australia, into the Australian market, by temporarily amending the fuel standards; and working closely with industry and states and territories to ensure fuel gets where it is needed most, particularly regional communities.”

The PM will meet with all premiers and chief ministers tomorrow to discuss ensuring that coordination across the country maximises benefits for “business, for farmers, for our communities, in our cities, and in particular, in our regions”.

Transport Minister Catherine King is holding a fuel security roundtable with key transport industry stakeholders today.

Agriculture Minister Julie Collins has planned a meeting with the National Food Council next Monday to discuss fuel supply concerns.

“I have asked it to focus its agenda for this meeting squarely on the current situation in the Middle East — receiving briefings from the public service and industry,” Ms Collins said.

“I look forward to meeting with the council to hear their insights and discuss how we can continue to support farmers and producers through the immediate situation.”

Energy Minister Chris Bowen has repeated his call for Australians not to panic buy or stockpile fuel, saying there remains plenty in the supply chain.

All expected fuel deliveries are arriving as planned, and fuel retailers have told the Federal Government that supplies into next month appear fine.

“We have seen some, you know, what I’ve called an un-Australian activity, buying jerry cans, selling them on Facebook marketplace,” Mr Bowen said.

“That’s just, that’s just nuts. It’s really unhelpful. It should stop. But I do think we are seeing … people understand more and more that, you know, our fuel supplies are secure.

“Yes, it can also be the case that we’re facing very real shortages in rural and regional areas because of the big spike in demand, because obviously it’s harder to get fuel to some of these places. The supply chain is a little bit more complicated.”

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said Mr Bowen was failing Australians over the fuel crisis and was not sufficiently across the supply issue.

“He told us last week there was no problem. By the end of the week he admitted there was a national crisis,” Mr Taylor said.

“The answer to this is simple. He has to be across where the fuel is, working with the companies to get it to customers, to get it to farmers, to get it to truckies. He has failed in doing that.

“He allowed one of our two refineries in this country to export their fuel at this time. I mean, they should be selling it to Australians.

“We should have Australian fuel serving Australians, and that has not been the case … It’s not that hard, but at the moment we’ve got a minister who’s checked out.”

https://region.com.au/emergency-national-cabinet-meeting-called-over-fuel-supply/951113/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0_z8qTjV8Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38779

File: 5d81336ddfbeb4d⋯.mp4 (9.09 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 60f8fa980a28349⋯.jpg (754.44 KB,814x1014,407:507,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3b5ffe660f94486⋯.jpg (3.32 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: df487663bf661f9⋯.jpg (2.67 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395498 (181002ZMAR26) Notable: We don’t need anyone’s help: Trump lashes out at NATO allies, Australia over Iran war - (Video) US President Donald Trump has declared the United States did “not need the help of anyone” after lashing out at NATO allies and Australia for refusing to support efforts to secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump said countries he believed had failed to assist should be remembered, and suggested Washington should think about its future relationship with the alliance when allies “don’t help us”. His comments followed decisions by countries including Australia and France not to join naval operations linked to the Iran war. The broadside came as Joe Kent, Trump’s appointee to lead the National Counterterrorism Centre, resigned, saying he could not “in good conscience” support the conflict. Trump dismissed Kent as “very weak on security” and said “it’s a good thing that he’s out”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

‘We don’t need anyone’s help’: Trump lashes out at NATO allies, Australia over Iran war

Michael Koziol - March 18, 2026

1/2

Washington: Donald Trump has reversed course and claimed he never needed or wanted other countries’ help in Iran, while lashing out at US allies – including Australia – after previously demanding their assistance.

He went as far as saying that the US should rethink its involvement in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, or NATO, while adding that he had no immediate changes in mind.

The US president’s latest broadside came as his top counter-terrorism official resigned, saying he could no longer “in good conscience” support the ongoing war in Iran, and accusing Israeli officials and lobbyists of sowing pro-war sentiment in the administration.

Asked about the resignation, Trump said that he always thought the man he appointed to run the National Counterterrorism Centre was “very weak on security” and “it’s a good thing that he’s out”.

Trump has been asking US allies – primarily Gulf partners and NATO members – to send warships to the Strait of Hormuz to help unblock the crucial shipping passage, with oil tanker traffic grinding to a halt amid the ongoing US and Israeli campaign against Iran.

But most NATO allies had informed him they would not take part, he said on Tuesday (US time), adding that it was not surprising, as he had long considered NATO to be a one-way street. “We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us, in particular, in a time of need.”

Trump went on to say the US military had decimated Iran’s navy, air forces, defences and the regime’s leadership. “Because of the fact that we have had such Military Success, we no longer ‘need’, or desire, the NATO Countries’ assistance – WE NEVER DID! Likewise, Japan, Australia, or South Korea,” Trump wrote on social media.

“In fact, speaking as President of the United States of America, by far the Most Powerful Country Anywhere in the World, WE DO NOT NEED THE HELP OF ANYONE!”

The Australian government has ruled out sending a ship to the Strait, with Transport Minister Catherine King saying no such request had been made of Canberra.

Trump had not mentioned Australia during his previous public requests for help. Rather, he had referred to China, Japan and South Korea as countries that were dependent on oil from the Strait and should help.

The White House was contacted for clarification on whether Trump had ever explicitly sought Australia’s participation.

Later, in a bilateral meeting with Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin at the White House, the US president continued to savage the “foolish mistake” NATO was making.

“This was a great test. We don’t need them, but they should have been there,” he said. “We as the United States have to remember that - because we think it’s pretty shocking.”

Asked by a reporter whether he was rethinking the US’ relationship with NATO, or considering withdrawing from the 77-year-old alliance, Trump said: “When they don’t help us, it’s certainly something we should think about … I have nothing currently in mind, but I will say that I’m not exactly thrilled.”

After Trump again expressed his disappointment with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for not assisting at the outset of the war, Martin defended the British PM, calling him an earnest and sound person with whom Trump could repair his relationship.

The Irish leader also defended allied military support for Ukraine after Trump complained that the US helped NATO with Ukraine, but NATO was not helping him with Iran.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38780

File: a375afba8f4b248⋯.jpg (302.52 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d20ab81aae35257⋯.jpg (243.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395505 (181011ZMAR26) Notable: Andrew Hastie hits back at Trump broadside on Western allies over Strait of Hormuz - Opposition industry spokesman Andrew Hastie has criticised Donald Trump’s attack on Australia and other allies over the Strait of Hormuz, calling it a “petulant post” that showed a lack of respect for longstanding partners. Hastie said “you don’t treat allies like that” and argued the episode was a wake-up call for Australia to strengthen its own energy security and defence capabilities rather than rely too heavily on the global “rules-based order”, which he said was “dead”. He said Australia would remain close to the United States but needed to “stand on our own two feet”. The criticism followed Trump’s declaration that America did “not need the help of anyone” after allies including Australia declined to commit naval support in the Gulf.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24165785 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

Andrew Hastie hits back at Trump broadside on Western allies over Strait of Hormuz

THOMAS HENRY - 18 March 2026

Senior Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie has criticised Donald Trump’s “petulant” attack on Australia and like-minded allies over their reluctance to become involved in US-led operations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

After the US President declared America “no longer” needed the help of its allies in unclogging the critical waterway – name-checking Australia, Japan, South Korea and NATO – the opposition industry spokesman said Mr Trump’s comments showed a lack of respect.

“I thought it was a petulant post from a president under immense pressure yesterday. He said from the Oval Office, I think it was, that he didn’t expect the Strait of Hormuz to be closed for this long. Well, as I like to quote Mike Tyson, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face, and the enemy always has a vote,” Mr Hastie told Radio National.

“You don’t treat allies like that. Relationships that are longstanding, you show respect, and I don’t think it was a respectful post at all.”

Mr Hastie said Australia would remain close to the US, but the former special forces soldier called for Australia to be self-sufficient in energy and defence, claiming that the global rules-based order was “dead”.

“This is a president who is very unique in American history, in global history, and he’s coming up to two years this November in the role. It’s his second and final term, and I’m sure the relationship will continue regardless of who sits in the Oval Office,” he said.

“This is a new stage of history. This is a new way of doing business. I think the global rules-based order that we’ve relied upon for the last 85 years for our security is now dead. And I think it’s a wake-up call for Australia that we must take care of things that only we can take care of.

“We can’t outsource our energy security. We can’t outsource our defence force to other countries. We’ve got to be able to stand on our own two feet.”

It is not the first time Mr Hastie has hit out at the US President. Earlier this year he criticised Mr Trump’s claims that allied forces in Afghanistan hadn’t fought on the front lines.

“This is a massive slur, not just against allied troops, but against our Aussie Diggers who fought, bled and died alongside Americans,” he said at the time.

“One of the most important things in building coalitions and alliances is mutual respect. And a really important virtue in a leader is restraint. And President Trump, by dumping on allied troops, has shown neither.”

During US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last year, Mr Hastie called for caution as a “veteran of the forever wars”, describing Mr Trump as “opportunistic and transactional”.

“You never know really what he’s going to do next. And I think his social media account, it’s an instrument of statecraft for him,” he said.

On the current US campaign in Iran, Mr Hastie took a more positive view of the President’s foreign policy stance, describing him as an “apex opportunist” looking to re-establish US military dominance.

“He hit Nigeria. He’s hit Venezuela. They’ve gone into Iran, or at least they’ve struck Iran. I think part of the plan here is also to re-establish deterrence. And the US military is the apex military,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/andrew-hastie-hits-back-at-trump-broadside-on-western-allies-over-strait-of-hormuz/news-story/5aeb4f91ddbe737f3daa81bb66c16455

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38781

File: e4e63845691e7ce⋯.jpg (160.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ebe6c002776452a⋯.jpg (237.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24395515 (181022ZMAR26) Notable: Everyone’s issue: Fetterman calls out Australia on antisemitism, Strait of Hormuz - Democratic senator John Fetterman has said Australia has a responsibility to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, arguing the issue is “everyone’s issue” and questioning why a key United States ally would not assist. Fetterman also said antisemitism in Australia was “a real issue” for him and criticised large anti-Israel demonstrations he said effectively helped Hamas. His remarks came as Donald Trump’s criticism of Australia for not backing United States operations in the Gulf exposed divisions on the conservative side of politics, with Andrew Hastie calling Trump’s attack “petulant” and disrespectful while Barnaby Joyce argued it suggested frustration in Washington over Australia’s response. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected Hastie’s criticism and said he would continue to engage diplomatically with Trump.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

>>38780

‘Everyone’s issue’: Fetterman calls out Australia on antisemitism, Strait of Hormuz

JOE KELLY - 18 March 2026

1/2

Democratic senator John Fetterman has declared Australia has a responsibility to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as Donald Trump’s rebuke of Australia for failing to back his mission to get oil flowing in the Middle East split the conservative side of politics.

Senior Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie lashed the US President’s “petulant” post on Truth Social, in which he hit out at NATO “allies” who didn’t want to get involved in America’s war against Iran, but One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce warned the swipe raised “a lot to be concerned about”.

Mr Trump wrote: “Because of the fact that we have had such military success, we no longer ‘need’, or desire, the NATO countries’ assistance – We never did! Likewise, Japan, Australia, or South Korea.

“In fact, speaking as President of the United States of America, by far the most powerful country anywhere in the world, we do not need the help of anyone!”

Senator Fetterman said he had been alarmed by “huge” anti-­Israel demonstrations in Australia that “effectively help Hamas”, and he questioned why Australians wouldn’t stand alongside Israel and the US.

“That’s strange why you wouldn’t want to help your key ally, America, that has broken and effectively destroyed the ­Iranian regime,” he said.

“The antisemitism (in Australia) is a real issue for me. So that gives me an opportunity to speak to the Australians.

“I don’t know why our allies wouldn’t want to just assist in reopening the strait.”

Senator Fetterman is the only Democrat in the US congress to openly and strongly support the American operation in the Middle East, arguing the need to reopen the Strait of Hormuz was “everyone’s issue”.

Opposition industry spokesman Mr Hastie, a former SAS soldier who has criticised Mr Trump in the past, said the comments showed a lack of respect.

“I thought it was a petulant post from a president under immense pressure yesterday,” Mr Hastie told ABC radio.

“He said from the Oval Office, I think it was, that he didn’t expect the Strait of Hormuz to be closed for this long. Well, as I like to quote Mike Tyson, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face, and the enemy always has a vote.

“You don’t treat allies like that. Relationships that are longstanding. You show respect, and I don’t think it was a respectful post at all.”

Anthony Albanese dismissed Mr Hastie’s remarks while emphasising his own diplomacy in dealing with the mercurial president.

“Andrew Hastie can speak for himself. What I do is engage diplomatically with leaders right across the world, including President Trump. And I had a very constructive discussion with him just last week,” the Prime Minister said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38782

File: cbb2d63e6ae5809⋯.jpg (168.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 268e055ad052f62⋯.jpg (267.76 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 24fa5a16bc66090⋯.jpg (3.81 MB,1300x4057,1300:4057,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24400095 (190938ZMAR26) Notable: Colonial-style arrogance: China attacks Australia, New Zealand over Iran comments - China has condemned Australia and New Zealand for “colonial-style arrogance” after the two countries issued a joint statement criticising Iran’s missile and drone attacks and raising concerns about Beijing’s conduct on issues including the South China Sea, Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. In response, China’s embassy in New Zealand accused both governments of hypocrisy, “bias, misinformation” and double standards, and said they were ignoring the “root cause” of the Middle East war while criticising China’s internal affairs. The embassy also pointed to Australia and New Zealand’s own records on indigenous and minority issues, repeated Beijing’s positions on Taiwan and maritime disputes, and urged Wellington to take a “clear-eyed view” of the situation. The exchange reflects a renewed use of sharp diplomatic language as tensions over regional security, human rights and the Iran conflict deepen.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38776

‘Colonial-style arrogance’: China attacks Australia, New Zealand over Iran comments

Nathan Schmidt - March 18, 2026

China has lashed Australia and New Zealand for “colonial-style arrogance” and accused the two nations of overlooking the “root cause” of the war in the Middle East after their joint statement condemning Iran’s missile and drone attacks.

The statement, issued on Tuesday, also condemned Beijing over “destabilising activities” in the disputed South China Sea, its treatment of minority groups in Xinjiang and Tibet, and for stifling freedoms in semi-autonomous Hong Kong.

In a retaliatory statement, China’s embassy in New Zealand accused Australia and its trans-Tasman neighbour of staying silent on their own “poor records concerning human rights and ethnic minority issues”.

“Instead, it contains unwarranted, inappropriate, and extensive comments on China’s internal affairs,” the statement said.

“As a Chinese saying goes, one should first ensure one’s own conduct is beyond reproach before criticising others. In other words, it is important to reflect on one’s own actions before casting judgement.

“The sections concerning China’s internal affairs are marked by bias, misinformation, and inexplicable colonial-style arrogance, reflecting hypocrisy and double standards on issues of global peace, stability, and the wellbeing of people worldwide.”

It continued: “The international community and their own people are well placed to form a fair judgment regarding the treatment of indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities in those countries that level unfounded accusations against China”.

The Chinese mission accused Australia and New Zealand of overlooking “blatant violation of international law and the basic norms governing international relations” during the course of the Iran War, “which have resulted in civilian casualties and disruptions to the global economy”.

The statement reiterated China’s disputed claims regarding Xinjiang, where it has been accused of imprisoning Muslim Uyghur people, Hong Kong and self-governing Taiwan.

“Taiwan is an inalienable part of China and lies at the very core of China’s core interests, and this red line must not be crossed or challenged in any form,” the statement said.

It went on to claim the situation in the “East and South China Seas remains stable”.

New Zealand was urged to “take a clear-eyed view of the prevailing situation”, while the statement noted China remained “committed to developing friendly and cooperative relations with all countries, including New Zealand”.

Chinese foreign policy was marked by so-called wolf warrior diplomacy during the late 2010s, in which ambassadors often used strong rhetoric to attack foreign governments over criticism of Chinese policies.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/colonialstyle-arrogance-china-attacks-australia-new-zealand-over-iran-comments/news-story/d0552232f1b9e3f997e8fdc38682533d

https://nz.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zxgxs/202603/t20260318_11876749.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38783

File: 279a239f956ef19⋯.mp4 (5.27 MB,540x960,9:16,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 81a3fda87ee01a1⋯.jpg (2.03 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 16ea718e785955b⋯.jpg (439.91 KB,1229x1536,1229:1536,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24400114 (190949ZMAR26) Notable: Iranian women's football team back in Iran, state media announces - (Video) Iran’s national women’s football team has returned to Iran after several players sought asylum in Australia following their Women’s Asian Cup exit. Iranian media showed the squad arriving via Türkiye and crossing by bus at the border, where officials greeted them. Most of the team had left Australia last week through Malaysia and Oman, after a number of players who initially sought asylum reversed their decisions and agreed to return. Two players, Fatemeh Pasandideh and Atefeh Ramezanisadeh, remain in Australia and have been training with Brisbane Roar. The team had drawn international attention earlier in the tournament when some players stayed silent during Iran’s national anthem before later singing it in subsequent matches, amid wider concern about their safety if they returned during the Iran war.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

>>38761

>>38763

>>38772

Iranian women's football team back in Iran, state media announces

abc.net.au - 19 March 2026

Iran's national women's football team has returned to the Islamic Republic after several of the players sought asylum in Australia, Iranian media is reporting.

The outlets shared footage of the players entering Iran after landing in Türkiye and taking a bus to the border. They were greeted by some officials at the border.

Most of the team's players left Australia last week, travelling through Malaysia and Oman on their way to Türkiye.

Two Iranian female players, Fatemeh Pasandideh and Atefeh Ramezanisadeh, chose to remain in Australia and have been training with the Brisbane Roar club.

Others who initially sought asylum after the team was knocked out of the Women's Asian Cup later changed their minds and said they would return to Iran.

Iran's squad arrived in Australia for the tournament shortly before the Iran war began on February 28.

The team initially gained global attention after some players stayed silent during Iran's national anthem before their first game in the Asian Cup.

The silence was cast as an act of resistance or protest by some commentators and a show of mourning by others.

The players did not publicly disclose their views or explain their actions and sang the anthem before their next two matches.

When the team was knocked out of the tournament and faced the prospect of returning to a country under bombardment, calls grew for Australia's government to offer the women asylum.

Iranian groups in Australia and US President Donald Trump were among those who expressed fears for the women's safety.

Iranian first Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref last week dismissed suggestions the women would be unsafe if they returned home, saying the country "welcomes its children with open arms and the government guarantees their security."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-19/iran-war-womens-football-team-returns-home-australia/106471200

https://x.com/Tasnimnews_Fa/status/2034269519854596168

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38784

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24400123 (190955ZMAR26) Notable: Over-prepared: PM's pledge on growing fuel crisis - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appointed former Australian Energy Regulator chief executive Anthea Harris to co-ordinate Australia’s fuel response as governments confront “unprecedented” supply pressures and worsening shortages in some regional areas. After a snap National Cabinet meeting, Albanese said fuel supply was “currently secure” but that he wanted Australia to be “over-prepared” for further supply-chain disruption caused by the Middle East conflict. Harris will act as a single point of contact across Commonwealth, state and territory governments and provide regular updates on fuel security and distribution. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has also launched an urgent investigation into major suppliers over diesel availability and possible anti-competitive conduct, while the government has released extra stock and eased fuel standards to boost supply.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38757

>>38777

>>38778

'Over-prepared': PM's pledge on growing fuel crisis

Tess Ikonomou and Zac de Silva - 19 March 2026

A fuel tsar will manage "unprecedented" supply issues caused by the Middle East conflict as the finishing touches are put on measures to address dire shortages in many regional areas.

The prime minister convened a snap virtual national cabinet meeting on Thursday to discuss major price shocks and shortages driven by the US-Israel war on Iran.

The former chief executive of the Australian Energy Regulator, Anthea Harris, was announced as the co-ordinator of a fuel-supply taskforce.

She will oversee work involving the nation's different tiers of government on fuel-security and supply-chain issues.

The co-ordinator will give regular updates to the Commonwealth, states and territories on Australia's fuel-supply outlook and be a single point of contact for planning.

State leaders who demanded faster action and a long-term plan from the federal government have welcomed the move.

Anthony Albanese said there was a "good feeling of common purpose" during their meeting.

"My government will be announcing more measures to prepare the nation for supply chain challenges over coming days and weeks," the prime minister told reporters in Hobart.

"Our fuel supply is currently secure. However, I want us to be over-prepared."

His comments came as Australia's consumer watchdog launched an investigation into the major fuel suppliers, including Ampol, BP Australia and Mobil, over allegations of anti-competitive conduct.

The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission would assess issues relating to diesel availability to independent wholesalers and distributors servicing regional and rural communities.

"The ACCC is closely scrutinising all fuel markets during this period ... we are therefore investigating these matters urgently," watchdog chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

Regional fuel-buyers and retail outlets have complained of widespread shortages, leading to some petrol stations running dry.

The prime minister said it was wrong for any corporation to profiteer from the conflict.

An agreement to release extra petrol and diesel to regional areas suffering critical shortfalls was reached between Energy Minister Chris Bowen and fuel companies a day earlier.

NSW Premier Chris Minns backed the federal decision-making, adding that Australia's position at the end of supply chains in Asia made the pressure particularly intense.

"It's a near unprecedented situation to have an oil shock affecting global supplies of oil, petrol, jet fuel," he said.

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli said people had real concerns about access to affordable fuel, particularly among primary producers and in the mining industry.

"Our request on behalf of Queensland is very clear; we want two things to flow: information and fuel," he said.

Opposition energy spokesman Dan Tehan said Ms Harris needed to identify any gaps in supply and undertake an assessment of fertiliser stocks.

"The Albanese government is desperately trying to play catch-up to deal with the issues of fuel supply only a week after Chris Bowen claimed that Australia's fuel supplies were secure," he said.

On top of allowing fuel companies to release a week's worth of petrol and diesel from their emergency stockpiles, the government has eased quality standards to allow more fuel into the market.

Logistics companies have warned they are under significant pressure from fuel price rises, which will likely be passed on to shoppers.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/under-pump-extra-fuel-flow-180000850.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaL5-bqrGLY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38785

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24406599 (210045ZMAR26) Notable: Iranian deputy foreign minister labels US 'terrorists' and issues warning to Australia - (Video) Iran’s deputy foreign minister Esmaeil Baghaei has warned that Australian military assets in the Gulf could become targets, saying Tehran would not distinguish between countries acting in an “offensive” or “defensive” capacity after Canberra deployed an E-7A Wedgetail, personnel and air-to-air missiles to the United Arab Emirates. Baghaei said Australia had “decided to take sides with the aggressors” and accused the United States and Israel of “terrorist acts” over strikes that killed Iranian leaders and civilians. He also alleged members of Iran’s women’s football team had been offered asylum under false pretences in Australia, describing it as a “shameful sham posture”. Baghaei defended Iranian pressure on the Strait of Hormuz as justified retaliation, saying Iranian forces were “determined, willing, and capable” of defending the country.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>>/qresearch/24356088

>>38730

>>38740

>>38738

Iranian deputy foreign minister labels US 'terrorists' and issues warning to Australia

Paul Johnson - 19 March 2026

1/2

One of Iran's deputy foreign ministers, Esmaeil Baghaei, has told 7.30 that Australia's military assets in the Gulf may become a target and accused the United States of "terrorist acts".

The comments about Australia came after the government deployed an E7 Wedgetail surveillance aircraft, 85 personnel and defensive air-to-air missiles to the United Arab Emirates last week.

Mr Baghaei told 7.30 that Iran would not distinguish between countries acting in an aggressive or defensive capacity.

"The government of Australia has decided to take sides with the aggressors," he told 7.30.

"We cannot recognise, we cannot distinguish between offensive and defensive operation."

Asked if that meant Australian assets in the Persian Gulf were targets for Iran, he said they could be.

"We have the inherent right to self-defence against offensive or defensive operations against us," Mr Baghaei said.

"We cannot recognise that those military assets ... would be regarded simply as defensive.

"That's going to be part of this aggression."

He then turned his attention to other actions taken by Australia, including offering asylum to members of Iran's women's football team after their appearance at the Asian Cup.

He claimed the players were taken "hostage" and it was yet another act by the Australian government that showed its support for the US and Israel.

Asked how he could say the players were taken hostage, Mr Baghaei said:

"When they were first invited to go to a room under the pretext of clarifying the doping or something like that, then they put a paper beside them, 'Please sign these papers, you can be given asylum, you can be given all that you need.'''

He then accused Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke of posturing.

"Then the Australian minister poses for a photo with them. This was a shameful sham posture," he said.

'Terrorist acts'

During the wide-ranging interview, Mr Baghaei also accused Israel and the US of committing "terrorist acts" when they assassinated former ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"The United States and Israel have attacked against Iran," Mr Baghaei said from Tehran.

"They are killing our leaders. They are killing our innocent girls and boys.

"Let's call a spade a spade, this is an illegal war imposed on Iran, imposed on the whole region and has consequences for the whole international community.

"We understand that you are concerned about the groceries price, but we are concerned about the everyday lives of our citizens.

"They are being killed and maimed by the United States and Israel's missiles and bombs."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38786

File: 2ce70507a6d004b⋯.jpg (120.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24406727 (210121ZMAR26) Notable: Israel’s top diplomat in Australia lays out case for war against Iran - Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, has defended the war against Iran as an “urgent act of self defence” aimed at removing what he called two “existential threats” - Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and ballistic missile program. Amid escalating strikes on oil and gas infrastructure across the Persian Gulf, Newman said the conflict was not about “territory or resources” but a struggle between “barbarism and civilisation” that could no longer be delayed. His intervention came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the objectives of denying Iran a nuclear weapon capability and weakening its capacity to attack the region had been secured, while still urging de-escalation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24334226 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38785

Israel’s top diplomat in Australia lays out case for war against Iran

BEN PACKHAM - March 19, 2026

1/2

Israel’s top diplomat in Australia says the war with Iran is an “urgent act of self defence” and a struggle against “barbarism” as the targeting of critical oil and gas facilities on both sides of the Persian Gulf sparks fresh fears about global energy supplies.

Laying out Israel’s case for the war amid mixed messages from the US, ambassador Hillel Newman says Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons and its vast ballistic missile arsenal posed an escalating threat that needed to be dealt with.

The justification comes after Anthony Albanese declared the US and Israel had achieved their war objectives and he hoped the conflict would soon come to an end.

But the war continued to escalate on Thursday (AEDT), with an Iranian missile damaging the world’s largest LNG hub in Qatar and Israeli strikes on Iran’s vast South Pars gas field compounding the energy crisis caused by Tehran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Writing in The Australian, Dr Newman says the Iranian regime “posed existential threats which could not be overlooked or delayed any further”.

“This is not a war over territory or resources. It is an urgent act of self-defence for the protection of millions of innocent civilians, for regional stability, and for the values that underpin the free world. At its core, it is a struggle between barbarism and civilisation,” he says.

“The objectives of the current operation are to remove two existential threats, the regime’s nuclear ambitions and its ballistic missile program. Both had reached a critical and time-sensitive stage, with efforts under way to harden and conceal capabilities deep underground, placing them beyond the reach of any future intervention.”

His case for Israeli action follows Donald Trump’s claim that Iran posed an urgent nuclear threat while arguing at the same time that US and Israeli strikes last year had “obliterated” Tehran’s nuclear program.

US national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard’s became mired in the contradiction on Thursday (AEDT) when she refused to say whether Iran presented an “imminent threat”.

“It is not a responsibility of the intelligence community to determine what is or is not an imminent threat,” Ms Gabbard told a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, declaring only the President could make such a judgment.

Democratic Party senator Jon Ossoff interjected: “It is precisely your responsibility to determine what constitutes a threat to the United States.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38787

File: 9b607ac3502c2db⋯.jpg (121.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24406859 (210157ZMAR26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Evil Islamic regime posed existential threat to free world - "Three weeks ago, the United States and Israel launched a joint operation, “Roaring Lion”, also known as “Epic Fury”, against the brutal and destabilising Islamic Republic regime in Iran. This is not a war over territory or resources. It is an urgent act of self-defence for the protection of millions of innocent civilians, for regional stability, and for the values that underpin the free world. At its core, it is a struggle between barbarism and civilisation. The objectives of the current operation are to remove two existential threats: the regime’s nuclear ambitions and its ballistic missile program. Both had reached a critical and time-sensitive stage, with efforts under way to harden and conceal capabilities deep underground, placing them beyond the reach of any future intervention. The operation also targets the instruments of internal repression, including the IRGC and the Basij forces, which have brutally suppressed the Iranian people ... Millions of Israelis have lived for decades under constant threat, with mere seconds to seek shelter from incoming rockets. Australians, living more than 12,000km from our region, have also experienced the threat and impact of Iranian terror. Iranian-linked activities reached Australian soil, and the government has responded with firm diplomatic and security measures, including the designation of the IRGC as a terror entity and the expulsion of the Iranian ambassador ... Australia has acknowledged the threat and rightfully stood by its allies in confronting destabilising behaviour in the region. The dividing line today is not between religions or cultures, but between moderates and extremists. Israel, Australia and many countries across the Arab world stand firmly in the camp of moderation and want to see the circle of peace grow ... In taking action, we are not only defending our citizens, we are helping to secure a safer and more stable future for our region and for partners such as Australia who share these values." - Hillel Newman, Israel’s new ambassador to Australia - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38786

COMMENTARY: Evil Islamic regime posed existential threat to free world

HILLEL NEWMAN - March 20, 2026

1/2

Over the past few weeks, I have been asked repeatedly: Why, and why now?

Three weeks ago, the United States and Israel launched a joint operation, “Roaring Lion”, also known as “Epic Fury”, against the brutal and destabilising Islamic Republic regime in Iran. This is not a war over territory or resources. It is an urgent act of self-defence for the protection of millions of innocent civilians, for regional stability, and for the values that underpin the free world. At its core, it is a struggle between barbarism and civilisation.

Prior to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Israel and the United States maintained good relations with Iran. That changed overnight. The Islamic Republic regime declared itself an enemy of both Israel and the West, institutionalising calls of “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”.

These were not empty slogans; they became a blueprint for action.

Over decades, the regime built and financed a global network of terror proxies, including Hezbollah and Hamas, to export its ideology and violence. At the centre of this effort stands the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, responsible for orchestrating terror operations, weapons proliferation and regional destabilisation.

The Islamic Republic regime has relentlessly pursued nuclear capabilities and developed vast ballistic missile arsenals. For more than 20 years, the international community has sought to resolve this through diplomacy. Negotiations were pursued in good faith and extended repeatedly to give diplomacy every possible chance.

Throughout this period, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported repeated violations and noncompliance by Iran.

These efforts failed not because diplomacy was not tried, but because the regime chose delaying tactics and an uncompromising attitude. It chose escalation over compliance. It became clear that the Iranian regime will never cease its efforts to annihilate the state of Israel and Western civilisation.

So the “Why now?” is clear. The threat grew, till it posed existential threats that could not be overlooked or delayed any further.

The objectives of the current operation are to remove two existential threats: the regime’s nuclear ambitions and its ballistic missile program. Both had reached a critical and time-sensitive stage, with efforts under way to harden and conceal capabilities deep underground, placing them beyond the reach of any future intervention.

The operation also targets the instruments of internal repression, including the IRGC and the Basij forces, which have brutally suppressed the Iranian people.

In doing so, the operation seeks to create conditions in which Iranians themselves may determine their future, free from decades of violence and oppression. We draw a firm distinction between the Islamic Republic regime and the people of Iran.

Our confrontation is not with the Iranian people, but with a regime that has oppressed them for nearly half a century.

The hope is that this moment will also open a path for Iranians to reclaim their future.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38788

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24406916 (210208ZMAR26) Notable: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese heckled, protester thrown out after commotion at Lakemba Mosque - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were heckled at Lakemba Mosque ahead of Eid al-Fitr celebrations, as protesters shouted “shame”, “disgrace” and “genocide supporters” during a speech to the congregation. The pair remained seated as community members tried to calm the disturbance, before security later signalled for them to leave. Police attended and escorted out a 33-year-old man after ordering him to move on. The disruption reflected continuing tensions between parts of the Muslim community and the federal government over Gaza, Islamophobia and other grievances. Lebanese Muslim Association spokesman Hajj Gamel Kheir said the decision to invite government representatives was about ensuring the community could be heard directly, while Albanese later said it was an “honour” to attend the mosque.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24328532 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24334177 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>>/qresearch/24356132

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese heckled, protester thrown out after commotion at Lakemba Mosque

Yashee Sharma - Mar 20, 2026

The Muslim community's strained relationship with the federal government reached a boiling point today as protesters heckled Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Lakemba Mosque in south-west Sydney.

Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, whose electorate covers Lakemba, attended ahead of Eid al-Fitr celebrations tonight, which mark the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

They were sitting during a speech to the congregation when protesters came forward and booed the pair, yelling "shame", "disgrace", "genocide supporters" and "get them out of here".

The speaker and other members of the community tried to calm the protesters, but they continued to shout.

Albanese and Burke remained seated as the speech continued.

But after about 15 minutes, their security detail appeared to signal that they should leave.

NSW Police were called to the mosque over a disturbance about 8am and ordered a 33-year-old man to move on. He was escorted out without any further incident.

The man, Sheikh Mukhlis, said he was thrown off the stairs barefoot after heckling Albanese and Burke.

"The question we need to ask ourselves is why are they there in our sacred places, in our sacred times, put up in front, smiling for photos," he said in a social media video.

"The irony is, if you listen to what the sheikh was actually saying in his khutbah, about our happiness being incomplete because there isn't peace in Gaza and there's a war in Lebanon."

The Muslim community has been divided on whether the federal government should be invited to events due to their ongoing strained relationship.

There have been increased tensions due to criticisms of the government's response to the Israeli war in Gaza, the increase in Islamophobic attacks in Australia and the NSW Police's response to Muslim men who were praying during a protest in Sydney.

Lakemba Mosque itself has received several hateful and threatening letters this year, which it said have left the community fearful.

Today was the first time the Lebanese Muslim Association invited Albanese to the Lakemba Mosque since October 7, 2023.

Lebanese Muslim Association secretary and spokesman Hajj Gamel Kheir said choosing to re-engage with the government is a way to give their concerns a voice.

"Walking away from engagement has not advanced our community, nor has it changed outcomes overseas," he said in a statement after the incident this morning.

"We do not open our doors for appearances.

"We do so because real conversations require access, and because our community deserves to be heard directly, not spoken about from a distance."

In a social media post after the commotion, Albanese said it was an honour to attend the Lakemba Mosque.

"Eid Mubarak. An honour to join thousands for Eid al-Fitr at Lakemba Mosque this morning," he said.

Albanese also visited the Lakemba Ramadan Night Markets with his wife Jodie and Canterbury-Bankstown Mayor Bilal El-Hayek earlier this month.

9news.com.au has contacted Albanese and Burke for comment.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-heckled-lakemba-mosque/8492774d-2843-46c2-be1e-71fa75fbfa72

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vidXvJ2sW4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38789

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24406986 (210232ZMAR26) Notable: Albanese, Burke shouted at as anger erupts at Eid prayers at mosque - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were shouted at during Eid prayers at Lakemba Mosque, where a small number of protesters yelled “genocide supporters” and called for them to be removed as anger over Gaza and rising Islamophobia spilled into the gathering. Albanese later said more than 30,000 people attended and that the reception was “overwhelmingly” positive apart from “a couple of hecklers”, while insisting they stayed until the end of the speech. Lebanese Muslim Association secretary Gamel Kheir defended inviting the politicians, saying engagement with government was necessary to give the community’s anger and concerns a voice. The incident highlighted divisions within the Muslim community over whether politicians should attend Ramadan and Eid events at places of worship.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>>/qresearch/24356132

>>38788

Albanese, Burke shouted at as anger erupts at Eid prayers at mosque

Maani Truu and Rachel Holdsworth - 20 March 2026

1/2

Anger at the government has spilled over at an Eid prayer event attended by the prime minister and home affairs minister, with a couple of attendees calling for the politicians to be removed from the Western Sydney mosque.

Anthony Albanese and Tony Burke — whose electorate includes Lakemba, where the event was held this morning — sat quietly as a small number of people began yelling during a speech to the congregation following the prayers.

Hecklers could be heard shouting "boo Tony Burke, boo Albanese", "genocide supporters", and "get them out of here". Other attendees appeared to give the prime minister and local member a warm welcome.

The speaker urged calm from the crowd, many of whom remained seated, before continuing his address.

"You called him honourable, he's responsible for the deaths of 1 billion people, 1 billion of our brothers and sisters," another attendee shouted.

"You don't represent us anymore."

The prime minister downplayed the incident on Friday, telling reporters that there were more than 30,000 people in attendance and "overwhelmingly the reception was incredibly positive".

"I walked through the crowd to the mosque, and not a single person heckled. There were a couple of hecklers inside; they were dealt with," he said.

"Contrary to what's been suggested, no-one was rushed out. We just sat there … it was dealt with by the community themselves because overwhelmingly they did not want that to occur."

Both Mr Albanese and Mr Burke remained until the end of the speech, which was held to mark the end of Ramadan, before being led out of the mosque run by the Lebanese Muslim Association.

The organisation's secretary, Gamel Kheir, defended the decision to invite the two politicians to the event while acknowledging he knew it would upset some community members who felt frustrated and alienated over a rise in Islamophobia.

"This is controversial in trying to get the prime minister to a sacred place like a mosque, I appreciate that," he told the ABC.

"But there has to be a way where you have access to government in order to express the anger."

The event was not a photo opportunity for the prime minister, he said, but a chance for him to hear the concerns of the community.

Lakemba Mosque has received several threats in recent weeks, including one addressing Mr Kheir by name.

"I believe he saw first hand the fact that there is a very much divided and angry community over what's happening," he said.

In a separate statement, the Lebanese Muslim Association wrote that Mr Albanese was welcome at the prayers and that they would "continue to open" their doors.

"We understand emotions are high, particularly given the ongoing suffering in Gaza and the devastation in Lebanon. These are not distant issues for our community," it read.

"But we also need to be clear. Choosing to engage with the elected leadership of this country is not a betrayal of those concerns. It is how we give them a voice."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38790

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24407100 (210310ZMAR26) Notable: Randa Abdel-Fattah slams Muslim event organisers for inviting PM, Burke to Lakemba mosque - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has defended his appearance at Eid prayers at Lakemba Mosque after he and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were heckled as “genocide supporters”, saying the reception from a crowd of about 30,000 was “overwhelmingly” positive apart from “a couple of hecklers”. In the aftermath, pro-Palestine academic Randa Abdel-Fattah accused the Lebanese Muslim Association of rewarding Labor “for supporting the genocide” by inviting the pair, while Stand4Palestine and Sheik Wesam Charkawi also condemned the decision. LMA secretary Gamel Kheir said the invitation was intended as a “circuit breaker” after years without political engagement, arguing the community needed direct access to government to express anger over overseas conflict and rising Islamophobia in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>>/qresearch/24356132

>>38788

>>38789

>>>/qresearch/24354986

Randa Abdel-Fattah slams Muslim event organisers for inviting PM, Burke to Lakemba mosque

JAMES DOWLING - 21 March 2026

1/3

Anthony Albanese has played down a confrontation with protesters at a Sydney mosque, where he and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were heckled as “genocide supporters”, insisting the overall reception was “incredibly positive”.

The Prime Minister and Mr Burke clashed with attendees of an Eid prayer event at the Lakemba mosque on Friday morning, where members of controversial protest cohort Stand4Palestine criticised Labor’s support for Israel amid ongoing Middle East conflict.

In the hours after the tense scenes, pro-Palestine academic Randa Abdel-Fattah criticised the Lebanese Muslim Association, which invited Mr Albanese and Mr Burke to the event, for granting them a “reward for supporting the genocide”.

But the LMA defended the decision, and said there needed to be a “circuit-breaker” after years of blocking MPs from attending.

Footage shared by Stand4Palestine shows organiser Mukhlis Mah being frogmarched away from the mosque while a large crowd watched outside.

“How dare you come here, this is our sacred place,” Mr Mukhlis said. “How could you?

“Why are you inviting him here today? The shame is on you.”

A physical altercation broke out during the interruption, which was quickly settled while Mr Albanese and Mr Burke sat without intervening.

“Genocide supporters, this is bad, Allahu Akbar (God is the greatest),” one protester said while filming.

“Why is he here? Get them out of here … go home.”

Another said Mr Albanese was “responsible for millions of Muslim deaths”, and should not be introduced as “honourable”.

“Why are you protecting him,” they asked.

He was called a “putrid dog” and told to “get out of here, mate” as he left.

“You have killed our brothers and sisters,” another heckler said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38791

File: 7166961179f815f⋯.jpg (214.73 KB,750x854,375:427,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1565aa0a732d5d⋯.jpg (123.65 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3d1a3a776683817⋯.jpg (99.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 17eb9dabff60bdd⋯.jpg (156.86 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ecc7306c38edd68⋯.jpg (189.66 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24407150 (210332ZMAR26) Notable: Elon Musk’s brutal two-word Albo spray - Elon Musk has reacted to footage of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese being heckled at Lakemba Mosque by describing him on X as a “simple man” after protesters shouted “genocide supporters” during Eid celebrations. Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were seated at the front of the mosque when the disruption occurred, with one protester later identified as Stand4Palestine activist Mukhlis Mah. Albanese said the reception from about 30,000 attendees was “overwhelmingly” positive apart from “a couple of hecklers”, and said the disturbance was handled by the community. NSW Police said officers removed a 33-year-old man from the premises and issued a move-on direction. The Lebanese Muslim Association defended inviting Albanese, saying engagement with elected leaders was not a “betrayal” of community concerns over Gaza and Lebanon.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24107059 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24101293 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38788

>>38789

>>38790

Elon Musk’s brutal two-word Albo spray

Abisha Sapkota - 21 March 2026

Elon Musk has responded to the dramatic scenes of Anthony Albanese being heckled at Australia’s largest mosque.

Mr Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke were heckled and accused of being “genocide supporters” during Eid celebrations at Lakemba Mosque in Sydney’s southwest on Friday morning.

The pair are seated at the front of the mosque in video obtained by the ABC when a man in the crowd shouts “genocide supporters” while others audibly boo.

When another man attempts to intervene, the heckler says “genocide supporter, man”.

“Genocide supporters. Boo,” he shouts.

Mr Musk took to X to share that, “He is a simple man”, referring to Mr Albanese.

Speaking from South Australia, Mr Albanese said there were 30,000 people at the mosque and that “overwhelmingly the reception was incredibly positive”.

“I walked through the crowd to the mosque and not a single person heckled,” he said.

“There were a couple of hecklers inside, they were dealt with … no one was rushed out, we just sat there, it was dealt with.

“It was dealt with by the community themselves because overwhelmingly they did not want that to occur.”

Mr Albanese thanked organisers for the “very warm reception that occurred”.

“Yes, there were a couple of people who were heckling. Some people don’t like the fact that we have outlawed extremist organisations like Hizb ut-Tahrir, and that brought a response from a couple of people,” he said.

“But if you got a couple of people heckling in a crowd of 30,000, that should be put in that perspective.”

The incident was absent from a subsequent social media post by the Prime Minister.

Mr Albanese can be seen smiling and shaking hands with congregants in the post, which is captioned: “Eid Mubarak.

“An honour to join thousands for Eid al-Fitr at Lakemba Mosque this morning.”

In the video, a physical altercation also appears to break out between at least two men, with one man having his mouth covered by another man’s hand at one stage.

One of the men has since been identified as Stand4Palestine activist Mukhlis Mah.

“They threw him out and the police took over, throwing him down the stairs and giving him a move-on order,” the caption on a video posted to Stand4Palestine Instagram stated.

The group claimed Mr Mah was “thrown out” and that Lebanese Muslim Association (LMA) staff, who administer the mosque, put their hands on his mouth.

In the separate video, a voice shouts to get Mr Albanese and Mr Burke “out of here”.

“How dare you come here? How dare you come here? How dare you come here? This is our sacred place,” the voice shouts before being muffled by the scuffle.

In a statement, NSW Police said officers were called to the mosque after reports of a “disturbance during a meeting /service”.

“Officers attached to Campsie Police Area Command attended and removed a 33-year-old man from the premises before issuing him a move-on direction, which was complied with,” police said.

In a post, the LMA noted the Prime Minister’s visit was the first in the more than two and a half years since the October 7 attack and Israel’s subsequent war on Gaza, with no invitations to politicians having been issued in that time.

In a statement, the LMA said it was aware that “emotions are high”.

“But, we also need to be clear,” it stated.

“Choosing to engage with elected leadership of this country is not a betrayal of those concerns,” in regard to wars in Gaza and Lebanon.

“Walking away from engagement has not advanced out community, nor has it changed outcomes overseas.

“It has not reduced Islamophobia here, and it has not strengthened our ability to influence decisions that affect us.”

https://au.news.yahoo.com/musk-brutal-two-word-albo-214145060.html

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2034963059496952007

https://qresear.ch/?q=Elon+Musk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38792

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24407315 (210415ZMAR26) Notable: We always say yes to them: Trump wants Australia to participate in Iran war - (Video) US President Donald Trump has said he was surprised Australia “said no” to his request for help in Iran and urged Canberra to “get involved”, declaring “we always say yes to them”. Trump did not specify what request he was referring to, but his remarks followed earlier acknowledgments from Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles that Washington had sought Australian assistance, while Canberra instead agreed to deploy a Wedgetail surveillance aircraft to support the United Arab Emirates. Marles has said there was no United States request for an Australian warship in the Strait of Hormuz. Trump also indicated the United States was considering winding down operations in Iran and wanted other countries more dependent on Middle East oil shipments to police the strait once Tehran’s threat had been reduced.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

‘We always say yes to them’: Trump wants Australia to participate in Iran war

Michael Koziol - March 21, 2026

1/2

Washington: US President Donald Trump said he was surprised Australia “said no” to his request to help with the war in Iran, and called on Canberra to “get involved”.

Asked what he wanted Australia to do, Trump said: “They should get involved… I was a little bit surprised that they said ‘no’ because we always say yes to them.”

It was not immediately clear what Trump was referring to when he said Australia had refused a request to help.

The president was responding to a question from Sky News Australia as he boarded a US military helicopter to leave the White House, bound for Florida. He did not respond to further shouted questions.

Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles has previously acknowledged US requests for help with the Iran operation, without offering specifics.

Australia did not accede to that request, but agreed to provide defensive assistance to the United Arab Emirates by deploying a Wedgetail surveillance aircraft to the Gulf, following a request from the UAE.

Marles said there had been no request from Washington for Australia to send a warship to the Strait of Hormuz.

The Albanese government did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump’s latest remarks.

On Monday (US time), Trump called out Australia, Japan and South Korea for not assisting in the operation, at the same time as he said the US did not need their help. “WE NEVER DID!” he said in that post.

He has been especially critical of the United Kingdom for not sending aircraft carriers to assist, and of the US’s NATO allies for not participating in efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

However, on Thursday, the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Japan said they were ready to contribute to “appropriate efforts” to help unblock the crucial shipping passage.

The British government has now also signed off on allowing the US to use UK military bases for “defensive operations” to degrade Iranian missile sites and capabilities that are being used to attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38793

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411207 (220412ZMAR26) Notable: He hasn’t asked: Albanese denies Trump’s claim he requested Australia join Iran war - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected Donald Trump’s claim that Australia refused a request to help with the war in Iran, saying Canberra had “done what we have been asked to do” and insisting the US president “hasn’t asked” for more. Albanese said Australia had agreed to the United Arab Emirates’ request for an E-7A Wedgetail deployment and personnel, but Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles again said there had been no request from Washington for assistance in unblocking the Strait of Hormuz. The dispute came as the United States temporarily lifted sanctions on about 140 million barrels of Iranian oil already at sea to ease pressure on global markets, while Trump said he was considering “winding down” military operations but still rejected a ceasefire.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

>>38792

‘He hasn’t asked’: Albanese denies Trump’s claim he requested Australia join Iran war

Michael Koziol - March 21, 2026

1/2

Washington: Anthony Albanese has rejected Donald Trump’s suggestion that Australia refused his request to assist with the war in Iran, with the prime minister arguing Australia has “done what we have been asked to do” in relation to the conflict.

The disagreement came as the US temporarily lifted sanctions on about 140 million barrels of Iranian oil already at sea – its latest bid to boost global energy supplies amid surging prices.

Earlier, Trump told reporters in Washington that he was surprised Australia “said no” to his request to help with the war in Iran, and called on Canberra to “get involved”.

Asked what he wanted Australia to do, Trump said: “They should get involved … I was a little bit surprised that they said ‘no’ because we always say yes to them.”

The president was responding to a question from Sky News Australia as he boarded a US military helicopter to leave the White House, bound for Florida. He did not respond to further shouted questions.

It was not immediately clear what Trump was referring to when he said Australia had refused a request to help. However, Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles has previously acknowledged US requests for help with the Iran operation, without offering specifics.

Australia has agreed to provide defensive assistance to the United Arab Emirates by deploying an E-7 Wedgetail surveillance aircraft to the Gulf, following a request from the UAE.

But on Saturday, following Trump’s remarks, Albanese denied there had been any US request for Australia to assist with the war effort.

“I’m not conscious of that at all,” he said. “The truth is that we have said ‘yes’ to the request of the UAE for the E-7 Wedgetail aircraft. That’s operating there, with personnel. We continue to provide the support that we have been asked to provide.”

Pressed on Trump’s comments, Albanese said: “He hasn’t asked. So, I’m not going to go through hypotheticals. We have done what we have been asked to do. I don’t intend to comment on all of what someone else says.”

Marles, also appearing on Saturday, reiterated that there had been no request from Washington for Australia to assist with unblocking the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump has spent weeks pressing allies – particularly North Atlantic Treaty Organisation members – to support the war or assist in reopening the strait, through which a fifth of the world’s oil supply ordinarily moves.

On Monday (US time), Trump called out Australia, Japan and South Korea for not assisting in the operation, at the same time as he said the US did not need their help. “WE NEVER DID!” he said in that post.

However, on Thursday, the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Japan said they were ready to contribute to “appropriate efforts” to help unblock the crucial shipping passage.

The British government has now also signed off on allowing the US to use UK military bases for “defensive operations” to degrade Iranian missile sites and capabilities that are being used to attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38794

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411237 (220424ZMAR26) Notable: Exercise Kakadu 2026: Sydney Harbour hosts 31 international warships for navy anniversary - (Video) Sydney Harbour has hosted the largest gathering of international warships in more than a decade as the Royal Australian Navy marked its 125th anniversary with an Exercise Kakadu fleet review involving 31 ships from 19 countries. The ceremonial display began with ships entering the harbour early on Saturday and was set to include a formal review led by Governor-General Sam Mostyn, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, Defence Force chief Admiral David Johnston and Navy chief Vice Admiral Mark Hammond. Hammond said the event highlighted the depth of Australia’s regional partnerships and the importance of working together to maintain a secure maritime domain. The program also included an aerial display, a ceremonial gun salute and a historical flotilla procession later in the day.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

>>38792

>>38793

Sydney Harbour hosts 31 international warships for navy anniversary

Sydney Harbour is hosting the largest gathering of international warships in over a decade as Australia’s navy marks a historic milestone.

Anna Shreeves - March 21, 2026

The Royal Australian Navy has welcomed a fleet of 31 international warships into Sydney Harbour, marking its 125th anniversary with a powerful display of global maritime cooperation.

From 6am on Saturday, the ships cruised through the waterway, heading west towards the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

At 2pm, a ceremonial Fleet Review will be held in what is set to be the largest gathering of international warships on Sydney Harbour in more than a decade, with 31 ships from 19 countries assembled in the historic port.

While fleet reviews were once wartime preparations, this commemorative event now signifies the unity of global partners and their collective dedication to maritime security and international cooperation.

Vessels from 19 nations sailed into Sydney Harbour on Saturday March 21 for the Exercise Kakadu Fleet Review, commemorating 125 years since the foundation of Australia’s Navy.

The review is being held in conjunction with Exercise Kakadu, the Royal Navy’s premier multinational maritime exercise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38795

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411247 (220428ZMAR26) Notable: Exercise Kakadu 2026 (KA26) - (Video) Exercise Kakadu is the Royal Australian Navy’s premier multinational maritime engagement exercise, conducted biennially to strengthen maritime security cooperation, enhance interoperability, and build partnerships across the Indo-Pacific. Exercise Kakadu 2026 (KA26), held 2-31 March, will involve more than 6,000 personnel from Australia and 18 partner nations, with activities conducted across northern and eastern Australia. Through multinational training, professional exchange and complex maritime scenarios, KA26 strengthens collective readiness and enhances the ability of maritime forces to operate together in demanding environments, supporting a region that is safe, secure and prosperous.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38794

Exercise Kakadu 2026 (KA26)

Royal Australian Navy

Mar 18, 2026

Exercise Kakadu is the Royal Australian Navy’s premier multinational maritime engagement exercise, conducted biennially to strengthen maritime security cooperation, enhance interoperability, and build partnerships across the Indo-Pacific.

Exercise Kakadu 2026 (KA26), held 2-31 March, will involve more than 6,000 personnel from Australia and 18 partner nations, with activities conducted across northern and eastern Australia.

Through multinational training, professional exchange and complex maritime scenarios, KA26 strengthens collective readiness and enhances the ability of maritime forces to operate together in demanding environments, supporting a region that is safe, secure and prosperous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5X7C9NFagQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38796

File: 182d76800dd2012⋯.jpg (426.87 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 03d07fe3be95ae1⋯.jpg (99.06 KB,1431x805,1431:805,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5588ac0f882ca4⋯.jpeg (254.89 KB,1180x1683,1180:1683,Clipboard.jpeg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411547 (220750ZMAR26) Notable: Australia joins UK, Japan pledging ‘appropriate efforts’ in Strait of Hormuz - Australia has joined 21 other countries in backing a statement expressing readiness to “contribute to appropriate efforts” to ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, widening its public support for international action after earlier ruling out sending warships. The statement, first issued by countries including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan and Canada, condemned Iran’s attacks on commercial shipping and the “de facto closure” of the strait, warning of threats to global energy supply and international security. Australia’s endorsement came after ministers said Canberra had not been asked to send a ship and was instead contributing aircraft support to the United Arab Emirates. The shift also followed Donald Trump’s criticism of allies including Australia for failing to “get involved” more directly in the crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

>>38792

>>38793

Australia joins UK, Japan pledging ‘appropriate efforts’ in Strait of Hormuz

Australia is now among 22 countries issuing a stark warning after Iran’s actions threaten global energy supply and international security.

Nathan Schmidt - March 22, 2026

Australia has joined other US allies pledging readiness to “contribute to appropriate efforts” to ensure safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz after the Albanese government said it would not send warships to the region.

The United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan and Canada jointly issued the March 19 statement which condemned Iran for its attacks on commercial ships and the “de facto closure” of the Strait of Hormuz.

On Sunday, the statement was updated to include commitments from Australia, as well as New Zealand, Estonia, Romania, Sweden and Norway, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.

US President Donald Trump has been pressuring US allies, including the NATO alliance, to step up defensive actions in the strait, where about one fifth of the world’s oil transits.

The statement noted disruptions to international shipping and global energy supply chains “constitute a threat to international peace and security” under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2817, and called for a moratorium on attacks on civilian infrastructure, including oil and gas installations.

“We express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait. We welcome the commitment of nations who are engaging in preparatory planning,” the statement read.

“We welcome the International Energy Agency decision to authorise a coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves.

“We will take other steps to stabilise energy markets, including working with certain producing nations to increase output.

“Maritime security and freedom of navigation benefit all countries. We call on all states to respect international law and uphold the fundamental principles of international prosperity and security.”

Last week, Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia had not received any request from the United States in relation to the strait.

“We’re not contemplating sending a ship, but we we’ve not received a request,” he said.

That comment mirrored remarks last week by Transport Minister Catherine King, who also noted Australia had not been asked to, and was not contemplating, sending warships to the strait.

“Been very clear about what our contribution is in relation to requests, and so far that is to the UAE, obviously providing aircraft to assist with defence, particularly given the number of Australians that are in that area in particular,” she told ABC Radio National.

“But we won’t be sending a ship to the Strait of Hormuz.

“We know how incredibly important that is, but that’s not something that we’ve been asked (or) we’re contributing to.”

On the weekend, Mr Trump told Sky News he was “very surprised” Anthony Albanese did not send troops to the Middle East.

Asked about his criticism of Australia, South Korea and Japan, Mr Trump said he would like them to “get involved”.

“I was a little bit surprised they said no … we always say yes to them.”

The Republican has ramped up criticism of US allies who he has accused of failing to meaningful enter the war on Iran after the United States and Israel’s surprise attack.

Iran overnight reportedly fired missiles towards the US-UK military installations on the Chagos Islands, also known as the British Indian Ocean Territory.

The attack is the farthest reaching yet by the Islamic Republic three weeks into the war.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/australia-joins-uk-japan-pledging-appropriate-efforts-in-strait-of-hormuz/news-story/d637c33ec43ebe4ead303da9eff83362

https://x.com/mofauae/status/2035326341596446810

https://www.mofa.gov.ae/en/MediaHub/News/2026/3/21/UAE-Strait-of-Hormuz

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38797

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411596 (220804ZMAR26) Notable: Bowen warns of future ‘bumps’ in oil supplies as six ships cancelled - Energy Minister Chris Bowen has warned of future “bumps” in Australia’s fuel supply after six tanker deliveries due next month were cancelled or deferred amid disruption caused by the Middle East conflict. Bowen said the government was aware of six affected shipments out of about 81 monthly deliveries, with some already replaced by alternative sources, including from Malaysia. He said Australia’s latest stocktake showed 38 days of petrol and 30 days of diesel and jet fuel, and stressed ministers were not currently considering emergency rationing powers under the Liquid Fuel Emergency Act. Bowen said supply disruptions were more likely to come in waves rather than a complete halt, with government, refiners and importers working to manage interruptions and reduce impacts, particularly in regional and remote areas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38757

>>38777

>>38778

>>38784

Bowen warns of future ‘bumps’ in oil supplies as six ships cancelled

Nicola Smith - Mar 22, 2026

1/2

Energy Minister Chris Bowen has foreshadowed disruptions to fuel supply due to the Middle East conflict, revealing that six out of about 80 monthly fuel tanker deliveries to Australia in the next month have been cancelled or deferred.

However, he stressed the government was not currently planning to invoke emergency powers to ration fuel as prices surge and some petrol stations run dry because of Iran’s threat to supplies transiting the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Bowen told ABC Insiders that the government’s latest stocktake had shown that the level of petrol and diesel available in Australia had slightly risen since before the United States and Israel launched a military operation against Iran three weeks ago.

The country had 38 days’ worth of petrol and 30 days of diesel and jet fuel as both of its onshore refineries worked “full pelt” and supply ships delivering from Asia were arriving “in good numbers”, said Bowen.

“The flow of oil to Asian refineries has slowed, and that has had downward impacts on us,” he said.

“But also, I don’t want people to think … all the ships are coming now, and one day they’ll all stop in one go. That is highly unlikely to be the case.

“It’s much more likely that there’ll be bumps in supply, but that governments will work with the refiners and the importers to manage those and minimise impact.”

The energy minister said the government was “aware” of six fuel tanker deliveries that had been cancelled or deferred out of an average of 81 per month, adding that “some of those have already been replaced by the importers and refiners with other sources”.

He did not specify which ships had been cancelled, signalling only that they were from a combination of Australia’s main suppliers in Asia, and that some replacement shipments were coming from Malaysia.

Malaysia is Australia’s top supplier of crude and the third-largest source of petrol and diesel. The nation last week warned that shipments to Australia could be interrupted if the conflict in the Middle East drags on.

China and South Korea have already imposed export curbs on some refined fuel products, raising the stakes for Australia, which imports about 90 per cent of its oil.

Bowen said cancellation of the six ships was not linked to government policy. “It’s a matter of the refineries seeing some supply problems with their crude oil, which is then impacting on their ability to deliver to their customers, including Australia, but not exclusively Australia.”

A government source, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk more freely, confirmed the ships had been diverted elsewhere due to the spot market, adding that the government was consulting closely with diplomatic partners to secure supplies.

The crisis underscored the government’s commitment to establishing a strategic fleet of Australian-flagged ships to be called upon during national emergencies, said the source.

Security and industry experts have warned for years that the nation’s lack of Australian-flagged and -crewed fuel tankers, large cargo vessels, or international trading ships has left it more vulnerable to supply chain shocks.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38798

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411609 (220809ZMAR26) Notable: Labor’s Malinauskas secures second term in landslide despite significant One Nation surge - (Video) Peter Malinauskas has won a commanding second term in South Australia, with Labor on track to secure at least 32 of the 47 lower house seats despite a modest swing against the government’s primary vote. The result delivered one of Labor’s strongest mandates in the state’s history, while also exposing a fractured opposition as the Liberals collapsed and One Nation surged across regional and working-class areas, winning Hammond and strengthening its upper house presence. In his victory speech, Malinauskas urged a more generous and inclusive politics, saying diversity remained a source of strength and warning Labor not to mistake the result for “adulation”. Liberal leader Ashton Hurn conceded a “tough night”, while One Nation’s Cory Bernardi declared an “earthquake” had hit the major parties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Labor’s Malinauskas secures second term in landslide despite significant One Nation surge

Rob Harris - March 22, 2026

Peter Malinauskas has claimed a commanding second-term victory in South Australia, using a landslide result to call for a more generous and inclusive politics even as a surging One Nation carved deeply into the major parties’ vote.

With counting well advanced on Saturday night, Labor was on track to secure at least 32 of the 47 seats in parliament, cementing the premier’s authority despite a modest primary vote swing against the government. The Liberals were reduced to a handful of seats, while One Nation’s vote surged across regional and working-class areas, securing the seat of Hammond and boosting its upper house presence.

In a victory speech that leaned as much on tone as triumph, Malinauskas reached beyond his base, invoking the bush ethos of Henry Lawson’s poem The Duty of Australians to frame his appeal for unity.

“When we all combine, we can achieve anything,” he said. “When we work together, diversity has always been our greatest strength.

“If we focus on what unites us – a shared love of living in a peaceful, prosperous place, a state full of hard-working people that value care and compassion – then we can harness this moment with our newfound confidence.”

The result delivers Labor one of its strongest mandates in the state’s history, even as it underscores a shifting political landscape. Labor’s primary vote settled around 38 per cent, ahead of One Nation on about 21 per cent and the Liberals languishing near 19 per cent – a dramatic collapse of 16 per cent from four years ago.

Malinauskas, careful to temper the scale of the win, warned colleagues against complacency.

“Although this is a historic result, although it is the best result our party has ever achieved, it’s very important that no one confuses tonight’s result as adulation,” he said. “Instead, we should see it as only being an invitation to continue to work our guts out for the next four years.”

The premier confirmed he had received concession calls from Liberal leader Ashton Hurn and One Nation’s Cory Bernardi, signalling a willingness to work across an increasingly fractured parliament.

“I say to both Ashton and Cory, along with leaders of other political parties elected tonight, that my government stands ready to work with each and every one of you for as long as it is in the interests of South Australians,” he said.

The scale of the Liberal defeat was quickly apparent. Hurn conceded before 9.30pm, describing the outcome as “a tough night” and acknowledging the need for deep reflection. The party’s vote collapsed in suburban Adelaide and across key regional centres, squeezed by Labor on one side and One Nation on the other.

The party’s primary vote was sitting at single digits in several seats, including Kaurna, Reynell, Cheltenham, Ramsay, Florey, Elizabeth, Port Adelaide, Playford, Black, Giles, and Hurtle Vale.

Former leader Vincent Tarzia was among the casualties, losing Hartley.

“There’s absolutely no doubt about it, that things are tough,” Hurn said. “And lessons must be learnt.

“The voters never get it wrong. It’s up to us to heed their advice. Now is the time to come together as a party.”

The rise of One Nation, led federally by Pauline Hanson, translated strong polling into electoral gains, with at least one lower house seat. The party’s state leader Bernardi secured an upper house seat for himself and declared an “earthquake” had rattled the major parties.

Hanson said she felt “vindicated”, pointing to the result as part of a broader national shift. “I think the rest of Australia is going to be watching what’s happening here tonight,” she said, linking the outcome to looming contests including the Farrer byelection and November’s Victorian poll.

She later added the surge was “just the start”, describing an “undercurrent” of voters turning away from the political mainstream.

“It’s not just a protest vote … you have no idea what the hell has happened in this country, there is a movement and there is an undercurrent, and it is people saying we’ve had a gutful, we want our country back,” she said.

The election result reinforces Labor’s dominance – the party has now won five of the past six state elections – but also highlights the volatility beneath the surface. More than a third of votes were cast early, and several seats will remain in doubt for days as complex preference flows are counted.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/malinauskas-on-the-cusp-of-victory-as-one-nation-hit-by-election-day-scandal-20260321-p5rmby.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqzkQ3J-PlA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38799

File: 6118e8b87988803⋯.jpg (212.99 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411636 (220817ZMAR26) Notable: Coalition plans assault on One Nation’s credibility to avoid South Australia-style wipeout - Opposition Leader Angus Taylor is preparing a campaign to undermine One Nation’s credibility after the party’s surge in South Australia exposed the risk of a broader conservative collapse. Coalition figures have agreed they must directly challenge Pauline Hanson rather than pursue any right-wing alliance, with plans to highlight the economic damage of her zero-immigration policy and question the idea that One Nation could credibly govern. The move comes after South Australia’s election, where One Nation outpolled the Liberals on the primary vote, and ahead of the Farrer byelection, where the Coalition is expected to sharpen its anti-migration message while distinguishing itself from Hanson. Senior Liberals also want to pair attacks on One Nation with a clearer economic agenda, arguing voters still do not know what the Coalition stands for.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24142562 (pb)

>>38798

Coalition plans assault on One Nation’s credibility to avoid South Australia-style wipeout

Paul Sakkal - March 22, 2026

1/2

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor will lead an assault on One Nation’s credibility and warn about Pauline Hanson’s aim to form government, in a new plan to avoid a South Australia-style drubbing at a federal by-election in May.

As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese warned on Sunday against attacks on multiculturalism, the Coalition is planning to reveal big-picture economic reform, put more focus on its anti-net zero stance, and explain to voters the economic pain that would be caused by Hanson’s zero-immigration policy.

“There’ll be no ‘deplorables’ moment,” one senior Liberal source, who asked to remain anonymous in order to discuss internal party matters, said, referring to Hillary Clinton’s infamous remarks about Donald Trump’s supporters.

A Liberal MP added: “Just like Labor savages the Greens to keep progressives in the tent, we need to do the same on our side.”

South Australian Labor Premier Peter Malinauskas was re-elected with a thumping majority on Saturday. The Liberal Party will be left with about four lower house seats, with votes bleeding to One Nation, whose primary vote of 22 per cent was higher than that of the Liberals at 19 per cent.

Albanese delivered a veiled warning against One Nation’s brand of politics in a speech in Melbourne on Sunday.

“There are some, including some in political life, who want to turn back the clock to an Australia that is no longer who we are,” he said at the Immigration Museum in the CBD, warning about politicians harking back to the White Australia era.

“We need to call out those people.”

The federal Coalition’s senior shadow cabinet members held talks on Friday to formulate a strategy to claw back support from One Nation. A day later, the populist outfit rocked the political establishment by out-polling the Liberal Party in South Australia. It is also polling ahead of the Coalition nationally.

After months of confusion about how forcefully to attack Hanson and her recruit, Barnaby Joyce, the Coalition group reached consensus that it must attack Hanson and reject calls from conservative commentators to form some sort of right-wing coalition with her party.

Five sources familiar with the opposition’s strategy meeting, unable to talk about the confidential meeting publicly, confirmed elements of the discussion. The Liberal Party and Nationals directors, Andrew Hirst and Lincoln Folo, delivered briefings on voter attitudes towards One Nation, as the parties prepared to use social media to mobilise against One Nation ahead of the Farrer byelection sparked by Sussan Ley’s retirement.

Although Saturday’s South Australian election was influenced by local factors, the surge of support for One Nation proved that Hanson could turn support in opinion polling into votes, although preference distribution may mean the party ends up with only one seat.

Ahead of the Farrer byelection, Taylor is planning to announce the Coalition’s own plan to cut the migration intake. But the opposition wants to highlight the folly of reducing net migration to zero, as Hanson proposes, by warning tradespeople how badly the building sector would be hurt.

Opposition MPs intend to target what they see as Hanson’s hubris as she aims to supplant the Coalition.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38800

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411657 (220826ZMAR26) Notable: Albanese urges 'vigilance' against those seeking to 'turn back the clock' on Australia - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged Australians to be “vigilant” against politicians seeking to “turn back the clock” on multiculturalism after One Nation overtook the Liberals in South Australia on a strongly anti-migration platform. Speaking at an event recognising Vietnamese Australians, Albanese said modern Australia had been enriched by migrants who had become integral to the nation’s workforce and community life, and warned against nostalgia for a less inclusive era. His intervention came as Barnaby Joyce defended One Nation’s demand for assimilation and argued cultural division risked social conflict. The debate has intensified amid broader tensions over migration, social cohesion and the war in Gaza, with Labor presenting multiculturalism as a national strength while critics argue migration levels have outpaced infrastructure and services.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38798

>>38799

>>38788

Albanese urges 'vigilance' against those seeking to 'turn back the clock' on Australia

Jake Evans - 22 March 2026

1/2

The prime minister says the country must be "vigilant" against politicians seeking to return to a bygone era of Australia that was less accepting of migrants, following the South Australian election in which One Nation overtook the Liberal Party on a platform that included opposing migration and multiculturalism.

With just over half of the vote counted, One Nation has received about 22 per cent of the vote in SA, with the Liberals trailing behind at 19 per cent — an enormous 16.9 per cent swing against the party, almost entirely to the benefit of One Nation.

One Nation's federal party proposes deporting about 75,000 migrants currently residing in Australia on overstayed visas, capping visas to 130,000 a year, and banning migration from countries "known to foster extremist ideologies".

The party also opposes multiculturalism.

Barnaby Joyce, who defected to One Nation last year, told Sky News this morning that if people were upset by the party's demand for assimilation, "then be upset".

"When you get cultural Balkanisation, you get friction, you get heat, you get death," Mr Joyce said.

"We took a long while to get over the Catholic-Protestant thing, and we don't want to go back there again.

"There has got to be a form of assimilation … you have to conform with an Australian culture no matter where you come from."

Labor mounts defence of multiculturalism

One Nation has maintained an anti-immigration stance since its inception in the 1990s, but the party has rarely received more than a fraction of the federal vote.

Mr Joyce said the party's result at the SA election confirmed months of polling showing One Nation was no longer on the fringe of politics.

At his victory speech on Saturday night, returned Premier Peter Malinauskas reflected on a conversation he'd had with a Vietnamese man at a polling booth that morning, who had expressed pride in being able to vote.

Mr Malinauskas then read a poem about patriotism written by Henry Lawson not long after federation at the turn of the 20th century.

"It is the duty of Australians in the bush and in the town to forever praise their country, but to run no other down," Mr Malinauskas read aloud.

"It is our duty when he is foreign and his English very young to find out and take him somewhere where he will hear his native tongue."

The premier said Australians should be proud of Australia's "distinct" patriotism, which "sometimes means sitting with a stranger and having a cuppa or a frothy, and having an argument about the footy, not our faith".

This morning, speaking at an event recognising Vietnamese Australians, Mr Albanese mounted a defence of multiculturalism, saying Australia at its best was a beacon to the world of how a nation could be enriched by people of different faiths and backgrounds coming together.

Mr Albanese noted that it was only just before the wave of Vietnamese refugees arrived in Australia in the late 1970s that the former Whitlam government officially ended the longstanding White Australia policy, which restricted non-European immigration to Australia.

"We need to be vigilant. There are some, including some in political life [who] want to turn back the clock to an Australia that is no longer who we are, and we need to call out those people, and we need to continue to cherish our diversity as a strength for our nation, which it is," Mr Albanese said.

"The fact that people have come from all over the world … people who are now our doctors, our nurses, our teachers, our academics, our construction workers, our people who have made such an incredible contribution to Australia. We should not take it for granted."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38801

File: 0a9aaa3fbe3913b⋯.mp4 (10.02 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411700 (220839ZMAR26) Notable: Zev Serebryanski avoids further jail over child sexual abuse of Manny Waks in a Melbourne synagogue almost four decades ago - (Video) Zev Serebryanski has avoided further jail after being sentenced in the County Court of Victoria over the child sexual abuse of Manny Waks at the Yeshivah Centre in St Kilda East in the late 1980s. The 62-year-old received a 22-month sentence, but 19 months were wholly suspended for three years, while three months served in a New York prison before extradition to Melbourne were counted as time served, allowing him to walk free. A jury last year found him guilty of three counts of indecently assaulting a person under 16 and one count of sexually penetrating a child aged between 10 and 16. Judge John Kelly said the abuse caused profound harm and noted “damning admissions” and a partial apology captured in covert documentary footage. Before the hearing, Waks said the sentence made “little difference” from his perspective, adding: “My battle is over. I got him convicted for his heinous crimes against me,” and: “My ongoing battle has never been about revenge or retribution - rather, it’s about justice, accountability and prevention.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23947528 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23947563 (pb)

Zev Serebryanski avoids further jail over child sexual abuse of Manny Waks in a Melbourne synagogue almost four decades ago

A child abuser exposed making “stock pedophilic justifications” for his behaviour in a documentary has learned his fate.

Liam Beatty - March 20, 2026

1/2

A child abuser caught on a hidden documentary camera making “damning admissions” has avoided further jail time after a jury found him guilty of four crimes.

Zev Serebryanski, 62, was sentenced to 22 months imprisonment in the County Court of Victoria on Friday morning however 19 months of the sentence was “wholly suspended” for a period of three years.

With three months spent on remand in a New York prison before his extradition to Melbourne in 2023 recognised as time served, Serebryanski walked free from court.

The convicted abuser showed little reaction but was seen at one time turned to the right with his hands cupped to his ear as Judge John Kelly read his sentencing remarks.

Almost four decades earlier and aged between 22 and 24, Serebryanski sexually assaulted Manny Waks, then a boy aged between 10 and 12, at the Yeshivah Centre in St Kilda East, a synagogue and learning centre for Melbourne’s Jewish ultra-orthodox community.

Mr Waks, now a prominent advocate for survivors of child sexual abuse in Jewish communities, has given permission to be identified in relation to the case.

The court was told on the first night of the religious Shavuot festival in 1986, 1987 or 1988, Serebryanski followed Mr Waks upstairs at the centre when he went to rest on a bench about 1am to escape the “noisy debate” of the men downstairs.

Mr Waks gave evidence Serebryanski had previously made him feel uncomfortable at community events by staring at him.

Serebryanski began groping the young boy before leading him into a women’s bathroom where he sexually assaulted him.

He was found guilty late last year by a jury of three counts of indecently assaulting a person under the age of 16 and sexually penetrating a child aged between 10 and 16.

The court was told Serebryanski, who was born in New York City, moved to Melbourne with his parents and five siblings aged six for his father to serve as a minister for the ultra-orthodox Jewish community.

He returned to the United States in 1994 where he remained working a computer programmer until his arrest on April 19, 2023.

In 2017, Serebryanski was confronted outside his brownstone apartment by Mr Waks and Israeli journalist Yuval Agassi who secretly recorded the interaction with a hidden car key-shaped camera for a documentary about pedophiles in Jewish communities outside of Israel.

Judge Kelly said Serebryanski made “several damning admissions” and a “partial apology” in the footage which was played at trial but also gave “stock pedophilic justifications” for his behaviour, including claiming he was only following Mr Waks’ lead.

“I was completely infatuated with you and wanted to do what I thought you wanted,” he said at one point in the footage.

The judge told Serebryanski: “All child sex offending is grave, aberrant, transgressive and exploitative … it does enormous damage”.

“It is an attack on innocence, it is an attack on childhood.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38802

File: c4f972d9137b66c⋯.mp4 (10.91 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24411738 (220851ZMAR26) Notable: Velvel Serebryanski, convicted of sexually abusing Manny Waks, walks free from court - (Video) Velvel Serebryanski has walked free from the Victorian County Court after receiving a 22-month sentence, with 19 months suspended and three months already served on remand in the United States counted as time served. He was also placed on a three-year good behaviour bond and remains a registered sex offender. Manny Waks, who watched the hearing from Israel by videolink, described the outcome as a significant milestone, saying: “I feel vindicated and that justice has prevailed.” He added that although Serebryanski had “walked away today”, “for me it’s not about punishing him and making him miserable for the rest of his life”. Waks said the case “hasn’t been about revenge and retribution, it’s about justice, accountability and prevention”. Judge John Kelly said the offending was profound and involved an exploitation of trust inside “one of the most sacred sites in the Jewish community”, while rejecting Serebryanski’s attempt to minimise responsibility.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23947528 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23947563 (pb)

>>38801

Velvel Serebryanski, convicted of sexually abusing Manny Waks, walks free from court

Natasha MacFarlane - 20 March 2026

1/2

A member of Melbourne's ultra-orthodox Jewish community now living in Israel says he feels vindicated and free despite his abuser walking free from court and avoiding more jail time.

Velvel Serebryanski, 61, was last December found guilty of three counts of indecent assault and one count of sexual penetration of a child between 10 and 16.

On Friday the Victorian County Court handed Serebryanski a 22 month jail sentence, with 19 months suspended, meaning he would only be required to serve three months behind bars.

But because he had already spent time on remand in the United States in 2023, Serebryanski was able to walk free from court.

Serebryanski was also handed a three-year good behaviour bond and is now a registered sex offender.

Manny Waks, 49, who now lives in Israel, was of primary-school age when the assault happened in the women's bathrooms of Melbourne's Yeshivah Centre synagogue, in St Kilda East, in the 1980s. The assault occurred on the first day of Shavuot, an annual Jewish celebration.

Mr Waks watched the sentence being handed down by videolink from Israel in the early hours of Friday morning.

After the hearing, Mr Waks celebrated the outcome and described it as a significant milestone.

"I feel vindicated and that justice has prevailed," he said.

"I know he has walked away today but … for me it's not about punishing him and making him miserable for the rest of his life.

"It hasn't been about revenge and retribution, it's about justice, accountability and prevention."

Since 2011, when Mr Waks went public with the assault, he has been a vocal advocate for Jewish victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.

He founded several organisations to help support and give a voice to abuse victims within the ultra-orthodox Jewish community.

Mr Waks was an advocate for victim-survivors in the case against Malka Leifer, the former principal at the ultra orthodox Adass Israel School in Melbourne.

Mr Waks was also successful in advocating for the 2015 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual abuse to examine the response to allegations of child sexual abuse by three people at the Yeshivah Centre and the Yeshivah College in Melbourne.

He says while he is still dealing with the ongoing trauma of the assault, he will continue to fight for victim-survivors and will move towards helping people deal with PTSD and their mental health struggles.

"Years ago, uttering the words 'child sexual abuse' wasn't really accepted. You could see people feel uncomfortable," he said.

"[But] when I started talking about this issue, we have seen there has been a significant change in society.

"There is a lot to be done, but probably the most important thing is to talk about it openly and to change the culture around these issues."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38803

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24415984 (230855ZMAR26) Notable: Australia, Singapore to work together on fuel security after shipments cancelled - (Video) Australia and Singapore have agreed to work together to keep petrol, diesel and gas flowing after several fuel shipments scheduled for Australian ports next month were cancelled or deferred. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Singaporean counterpart Lawrence Wong said they shared deep concern about the Middle East conflict’s impact on regional energy supply chains and prices, and pledged to strengthen energy security, support open trade flows and consult each other on disruptions affecting petroleum oils and liquefied natural gas. The agreement came as the Albanese government intensified talks with Asian partners after six tankers from key suppliers including Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea were affected. Ministers also pointed to Australia’s position as a major liquefied natural gas exporter as leverage in maintaining reciprocal energy flows with regional partners.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38784

>>38797

Australia, Singapore to work together on fuel security after shipments cancelled

A major fuel exporter has thrown Australia a lifeline after several shipments scheduled for next month were cancelled.

Joseph Olbrycht-Palmer - March 23, 2026

Australia and Singapore have agreed to ensure petrol, diesel and gas continue to flow between the two after several fuel shipments bound for Australian ports next month were cancelled.

Anthony Albanese has been fiercely negotiating with Asian counterparts amid revelations six fuel tankers from Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea – Australia’s biggest suppliers – had been cancelled or deferred as their refineries grapple with no oil flowing out of the Middle East.

Following a call on Monday, the Prime Minister and his Singaporean counterpart Lawrence Wong said their countries “share deep concern over the situation in the Middle East and its consequences for our region, such as the impact on energy supply chains and prices”.

“We are committed to working together to strengthen energy supply chain resilience, including by deepening regional co-operation, accelerating renewable energy transition, addressing unjustified import and export restrictions, and maintaining open trade flows,” they said in a statement.

“In this context, we reaffirm our commitment to strengthen energy security, to support the flow of essential goods including petroleum oils, such as diesel, and liquefied natural gas between our two countries, and to notify and consult each other on any disruptions with ramifications on the trade of energy.”

Earlier, cabinet minister Mark Butler suggested Australia could leverage its status as a gas exporting giant to ensure fuel flows from Asia.

“This conflict does look like it’s going to go on for a little longer, and it’s reverberating right through the global economy,” Mr Butler told Nine’s Today show.

“But we are working very hard with our regional partners. They receive energy from us, we receive liquid fuels from them.

“We’re doing everything we can to get supply back into Australia and at the moment those supplies are holding up pretty well.”

Appearing on Sky News later, Assistant Foreign Affairs Minister Matt Thistlethwaite also noted that Mr Albanese was “negotiating with our Asian neighbours” and that the government was “doing everything we possibly can to ensure that we can maintain fuel security for Australia”.

“The beauty of Australia is that we are one of the largest distributors of (liquefied natural gas) anywhere in the world,” Mr Thistlethwaite said.

“And South Korea gets almost all of its LNG, it’s liquefied natural gas, through Australia.

“So, they’ve got a vested interest in ensuring that. It’s a two-way street.”

He added that he did not think it would come to Australia withholding gas, and the country “is a very reliable distributor of LNG”, but stressed “we’ve got that advantage in that we can work with our neighbours in Asia Pacific to ensure that they have access to their energy needs and we get access to ours”.

Fuel prices have soared across Australia since the US and Israeli launched strikes on Iran.

The Islamist regime’s retaliatory strikes have targeted oil tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, effectively shutting the marine passage and cutting off a fifth of the world’s oil supply.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen on Sunday revealed the six fuel tankers were cancelled after dismissing a warning from Malaysia days earlier that it would need to prioritise its own supply if the war against Iran dragged on.

In his comments on Sunday, Mr Bowen said some of the ships cancelled “have already been replaced by the importers and refiners with other sources”.

Reuters reported at the weekend that major fuel companies, including ExxonMobil, BP and Vitol, were shipping record volumes from the Gulf of Mexico.

But the route is significantly more costly, raising questions about its long-term viability.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/labor-flexes-lng-as-anthony-albanese-phones-asian-leaders-over-cancelled-fuel-shipments/news-story/b17cb383bcc001d85d6bc38b80668df7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbW0qcs0AZY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38804

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24415989 (230859ZMAR26) Notable: Iran may be using China’s advanced satellite system, ambassador concedes - China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has said Iran could be using Beijing’s BeiDou satellite navigation system to target United States and Israeli military assets, while insisting China is not directly involved in the conflict. In a rare interview with 60 Minutes Australia, Xiao said the system was available on a public or commercial basis and that Beijing did not discriminate over access. He also described the killing of Iran’s supreme leader in joint United States-Israeli strikes as a violation of international law and called for an immediate halt to the war and a return to negotiations. More broadly, Xiao said China’s military actions in places including the South China Sea and Tasman Sea showed it was no longer a country that could “easily be bullied”, while warning Australia to uphold its One China policy over Taiwan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23959526 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23959554 (pb)

Iran may be using China’s advanced satellite system, ambassador concedes

Amelia Adams and Anne Worthington - March 22, 2026

China’s ambassador to Australia says the country’s military activity in the South China Sea and Tasman Sea shows it can no longer be easily bullied by other big powers.

In a rare interview, ambassador Xiao Qian also conceded Iran could be using Beijing’s sophisticated satellite navigation system BeiDou to target US and Israeli military assets in the Middle East, but said his country was not directly involved.

He described the killing of Iran’s supreme leader in joint US-Israeli airstrikes as a violation of international law.

“The BeiDou system has been there for decades. It’s for everybody’s use, on a public basis or a commercial basis,” he told 60 Minutes. “And we don’t differentiate who can get access to it or not.

“We are asking for an immediate stop of the war, of the military actions, and for negotiations between relevant parties to solve their problems and solve their disputes through peaceful means.”

China has just increased its military spending by nearly 7 per cent and, as the conflict in the Middle East consumes American resources and shifts focus away from the Indo-Pacific, speculation about its plans to take control of Taiwan have been growing.

Late last year, China intensified military actions around Taiwan, a move Xiao described as “a warning” and a “direct response to the large American arm sales to Taiwan”. He said there was no timetable but “in my personal view, as soon as possible. We’ve been capable for decades … we’re waiting for a peaceful reunification.”

Xiao’s comments align with a new US intelligence assessment, which reported that while “Beijing probably will continue seeking to set the conditions for eventual unification with Taiwan … Chinese leaders do not currently plan to execute an invasion of Taiwan in 2027, nor do they have a fixed timeline for achieving unification”.

Nevertheless, Xiao warned that those who did not support China’s reunification, or attempted to obstruct the process, would pay the price.

“There are countries in the world who have been supporting China’s One China policy … but there are also countries who are going the other way around. I expect Australia to keep its promise on One China policy,” he said.

He also rejected claims by the Australian Defence Force that earlier this month a Chinese military helicopter had performed an “unsafe and unprofessional manoeuvre” when it flew dangerously close to an Australian Seahawk chopper over the Yellow Sea.

“The Chinese military has to take actions to protect our sovereignty, territory, integrity, and our reaction was legitimate, reasonable, it was appropriate,” Xiao said.

Last year, in separate incidents, a Chinese fighter jet released flares near an Australian surveillance aircraft in the South China Sea, and a flotilla of Chinese warships circumnavigated Australia and launched live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea.

While Xiao was keen to emphasise the incidents “had nothing to do with the China-Australia relationship”, he admitted they were a clear demonstration of China flexing its military muscle. “We’re no longer a country that can easily be bullied by other big powers.”

He also declared that China – an authoritarian state run by the Chinese Communist Party – was “a democracy in our own way, with Chinese characteristics”.

Tensions between Australia and China have largely thawed under the Albanese government, but the 2020 trade war between the two countries remains a sore point.

Xiao denied Beijing ever placed sanctions on Australian exports in response to the Morrison government calling for an inquiry into the origins of COVID-19.

“That was a response from the Chinese public. The Chinese public were so unhappy about the Liberal-led Coalition government on China’s question of Taiwan … the talk about China being the creator of COVID. When they are angry, they hate to go to the same shops to buy the same products,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/iran-may-be-using-china-s-advanced-satellite-system-ambassador-concedes-20260320-p5r641.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBxvcTwVA04

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38805

File: bfa459b2a70c3eb⋯.jpg (148.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24415993 (230903ZMAR26) Notable: EU leader touches down as PM hopes to land trade deal - European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has arrived in Australia for a three-day visit expected to culminate in the signing of a long-delayed free trade agreement, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pushes to secure expanded access for Australian exporters to the European market. Von der Leyen met Governor-General Sam Mostyn in Sydney after landing on Monday, while Trade Minister Don Farrell and his European counterpart Maros Sefcovic continued talks on unresolved issues. Agriculture remains the main sticking point, with Australia seeking greater access for meat exports and Europe still protective of its farmers, while disputes over geographic names such as feta, parmesan and prosecco are also expected to be settled through compromise. Albanese said a deal would deepen a relationship already worth about $109 billion in two-way trade.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38775

EU leader touches down as PM hopes to land trade deal

Zac de Silva and Andrew Brown - March 23 2026

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has arrived in Australia ahead of the potential signing of a long-awaited free trade agreement.

The head of the European Union's executive branch landed in Sydney on Monday, where she met Governor-General Sam Mostyn at Admiralty House and was welcomed with an Indigenous smoking ceremony.

It's the first day of a three-day visit to Australia by the president, which is expected to culminate in the final points of a trade deal being agreed to.

The deal has been years in the making, with naming products such as cheese and wine among the sticking points.

Trade Minister Don Farrell and his European counterpart Maros Sefcovic discussed the free-trade deal on Monday.

Previous negotiations have fallen apart largely because of disagreements over the agriculture sector.

The Australian side wants meat producers to be allowed to sell more of their product to the European market - a push resisted by EU negotiators who want to protect their farmers from increased competition.

Some farmers are likely to be disappointed with the level of access to European markets locked in by the deal, but the two sides have made positive progress, a source close to the negotiations who was not authorised to speak publicly told AAP.

Europe had also sought to strip Australian farmers of the right to use geographic naming indicators such as feta, parmesan and prosecco.

A compromise on the dispute is expected to be reached.

The deal is likely to be signed off on Tuesday following talks between Ms von der Leyen and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Canberra.

"This is a milestone moment for the relationship between Australia and the European Union, such an important relationship," Mr Albanese told parliament.

"Two-way trade is worth some $109 billion that represents jobs and economic prosperity and our government has been working constructively to take that to the next level."

Ms von der Leyen will become the first female foreign leader to address the federal parliament.

The trade deal would give Australian exporters better access to a market of 450 million people, Mr Albanese said.

"Agreement with Europe would, of course, strengthen that even further, but as well, we need to engage with Europe on matters of security," he said.

The drive for an agreement showed Europe and Australia were pushing back against US President Donald Trump's overturning of traditional trade systems, former Australian trade official Prudence Gordon said.

"The fact that Australia and the EU are negotiating this trade agreement now really signals their efforts to counter the chaos created by Donald Trump," the executive director of the Australian Centre for International Trade and Investment told AAP.

Mr Albanese has sought to frame the deal as a win for Australian exporters who could rake in an extra $10 billion annually.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9204610/eu-leader-touches-down-as-pm-hopes-to-land-trade-deal/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38806

File: 9c32478d1cdda15⋯.jpg (2.25 MB,3000x1977,1000:659,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 41608cdc2fd3414⋯.jpg (121.08 KB,1625x905,325:181,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 41e74deb009494f⋯.jpg (178.61 KB,1402x1309,1402:1309,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 72966f9fa4d32e5⋯.jpg (4.03 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b48fa7c78558142⋯.jpg (4.79 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24416011 (230916ZMAR26) Notable: Anglican church apologises to sexual abuse victim Beth Heinrich - Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane Jeremy Greaves has publicly apologised to Beth Heinrich, saying the church failed her both when she was abused as a teenager and when she later sought help. Speaking at St John’s Cathedral, Greaves said senior leaders in the Brisbane diocese, including former archbishop Peter Hollingworth, had compounded her suffering by failing to respond with “compassion, and justice, and accountability”. Heinrich, now 86, was abused in the 1950s by Reverend Donald Shearman while she was a minor in his care at an Anglican-run boarding house in Forbes, New South Wales. In 1995 she asked Hollingworth to have Shearman removed from the clergy, but he refused despite overseeing mediation in which the priest admitted the abuse. After the apology, Heinrich said Archbishop Greaves was “the first that appears to believe me, that I haven’t been treated properly by previous archbishops”, and added: “When they deny you something, it’s like you’re being abused again,” while expressing hope other survivors would seek justice too.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38759

Anglican church apologises to sexual abuse victim Beth Heinrich

Will Murray - 23 March 2026

The Anglican archbishop of Brisbane has issued an emotional apology to the victim of child sexual abuse perpetrated by a priest, saying the church failed her both as a child, and when she sought help later in life.

"Most grievously, those in positions of senior leadership within the Brisbane diocese, including former Archbishop Peter Hollingworth, failed Beth," Archbishop Jeremy Greaves told his congregation at St John's Cathedral on Sunday evening.

"Rather than responding with compassion, and justice, and accountability, the church's response compounded her suffering, and this was wrong."

Beth Heinrich, now 86, was sexually abused as a teenager by Reverend Donald Shearman in the central-west New South Wales town of Forbes in the 1950s.

She had been a minor in his care at an Anglican-run boarding house.

In 1995, after Mr Shearman had moved to Queensland, she asked the then-Archbishop of Brisbane Dr Peter Hollingworth for help to have Mr Shearman removed from the clergy.

Dr Hollingworth denied that request, despite overseeing mediation in which Mr Shearman admitted to abusing Ms Heinrich.

In 2002, after being appointed to the position of Governor-General, Dr Hollingworth was questioned during an interview with the ABC about his alleged failure to take action against Mr Shearman.

During the interview he suggested that Ms Heinrich, 15 at the time, had instigated the sexual relationship with Mr Shearman, a married priest.

Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003 amid findings by the church he acted unfairly over his handling of child sexual abuse.

In 2023, a subsequent Anglican Church inquiry found he committed misconduct by allowing paedophile priests, including Mr Shearman, to keep working while he was the Archbishop of Brisbane in the 1990s.

Dr Hollingworth accepted those findings and said at the time: ""I made mistakes and I cannot undo them. But I committed no crimes."

Archbishop: 'I honour your courage'

During the traditional Sunday Service, Archbishop Greaves also lamented the additional harm that was done to Ms Heinrich by the church's failure to act in a timely manner against Mr Shearman, who wasn't defrocked until 2004.

"Beth, what happened to you was not your fault," he said.

"On behalf of the Diocese of Brisbane, I apologise to you for the abuse you suffered, and for the distress, isolation and harm caused by our failure to respond with integrity and care when you sought help."

At the end of the apology, the two shared a tearful embrace.

It's a moment Beth Heinrich has waited decades for, and she travelled from regional Victoria to attend the service.

"[Archbishop Greaves] is the first that appears to believe me, that I haven't been treated properly by previous archbishops and previous church supporters," Ms Heinrich said.

"I want to encourage others … if I can do it, others can do it too."

More than 70 years on from her abuse, she spoke of the pain of trying to seek the assistance and redress through senior church officials, only to be disbelieved or pushed aside.

"When they deny you something, it's like you're being abused again," she said.

"And the more that happens, the bigger the restitution has to be because the problem in you grows and grows."

While she said the apology brought to an end her years of struggle with the church, she hoped others would be inspired to seek their own justice.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-23/anglican-church-apologises-to-sexual-abuse-victim-beth-heinrich/106483594

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38807

File: 74de6611a9941ee⋯.jpg (315.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24416043 (230929ZMAR26) Notable: Anglican Church issues formal apology to 86-year-old child sex abuse survivor Beth Heinrich - Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane Jeremy Greaves has formally apologised to Beth Heinrich at St John’s Cathedral, acknowledging that church leaders, including former archbishop Peter Hollingworth, failed her after years of abuse and mistreatment. Greaves said Heinrich had been abused by Donald Shearman in a context of “power and trust” and that when she later found the courage to speak, “her voice was dismissed”. He told her that “what happened to you was not your fault” and apologised for the Brisbane diocese failing to act with integrity and care. Heinrich, 86, said the apology marked a turning point after decades of being ignored, declaring: “This is the end for me. I’m making an example and I want to encourage others.” She urged other survivors to keep fighting, saying they should not “get dissuaded by knock-backs” because “you’ve just got to keep knocking at the door”, and said Greaves was the first church figure “that appears to believe me”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38759

>>38806

Anglican Church issues formal apology to 86-year-old child sex abuse survivor Beth Heinrich

SARAH ELKS - 23 March 2026

1/2

Under the grand stone-vaulted ceiling of Brisbane’s St John’s Cathedral on Sunday night, Anglican Archbishop Jeremy Greaves formally apologised to church child sexual abuse survivor Beth Heinrich.

More than seven decades after her abuse at the hands of bishop Donald Shearman, and years after then-archbishop Peter Hollingworth blamed her for her own assault, Ms Heinrich, 86, sat in the cathedral’s pews and watched as Archbishop Greaves stepped down from the pulpit and said sorry.

A survivor of sexual abuse himself, Archbishop Greaves clearly and frankly apologised for the failures of his predecessor Dr Hollingworth in his handling of Shearman, who died in 2019, and that bishop’s mistreatment of Ms Heinrich.

Shearman began grooming Ms Heinrich when she was 14 in the 1950s, sexually abusing her at 15 when she was sent to a church hostel. In 1977, Ms Heinrich fled a violent marriage and returned to Shearman, where he continued to exploit her vulnerability.

At the end of Sunday’s Evensong service, Archbishop Greaves said Ms Heinrich was subjected to abuse by Shearman in the context of “power and trust” and when she found the courage to speak to the church about what happened, she wasn’t listened to and her “voice was dismissed” by Dr Hollingworth.

“Most grievously, those in positions of senior leadership in the Brisbane diocese, including Archbishop Peter Hollingworth, failed Beth,” he said.

“Rather than expressing compassion, justice and accountability … the victim-survivor was blamed, while the person responsible was defended or excused.”

He stood in front of Ms Heinrich and told her that what happened to her was not her fault, apologised for the Brisbane diocese failing to act with integrity and care, and acknowledging the response had caused her terrible pain.

When Archbishop Greaves finished, he walked towards Ms Heinrich and the pair hugged.

Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003 after a Brisbane inquiry found he mishandled allegations of sexual abuse against pedophile priest John Linton Elliot. His exit from the nation’s top vice-regal office came the year after he told the ABC’s Australian Story that what happened to Ms Heinrich was “not sex abuse”.

“There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that. Quite the contrary. My information is that it was rather the other way around.”

Dr Hollingworth insisted the ABC’s reporting was wrong and his statement did not refer to Ms Heinrich. He apologised to her about 10 days after the television appearance.

Ms Heinrich has campaigned for years for justice, for herself and other victim-survivors.

Outside the cathedral, Ms Heinrich said she had pleaded with the church for years for help, and for understanding, but her trauma had been ignored, until Sunday’s apology.

“This is the end for me. I’m making an example and I want to encourage others … they’re to keep fighting if that’s what they need to do, (don’t) get dissuaded by knock-backs because you’ve just got to keep knocking at the door,” Ms Heinrich said.

She said Archbishop Greaves was the first person from the church “that appears to believe me, to believe that I haven’t been treated properly … by previous archbishops”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38808

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24420499 (240805ZMAR26) Notable: EU chief warns Australia of China threat as $10bn trade deal signed - (Video) European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned Australia against over-reliance on China, declaring it a strategic imperative to “get China right” as she and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese finalised a $10 billion trade deal and new security partnership. Addressing federal parliament, von der Leyen said both Europe and Australia faced a “dangerous moment” shaped by global conflicts and economic shocks, including rising fuel costs linked to the Iran war. She cautioned that dependence on single suppliers could be weaponised, noting Europe’s experience with Russian energy and trade deficits with China. The agreement includes closer co-operation on critical minerals and defence industry capabilities, with von der Leyen saying “our security is your security” as both sides seek to strengthen resilience and diversify supply chains.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38775

>>38805

EU chief warns Australia of China threat as $10bn trade deal signed

ROSIE LEWIS - 24 March 2026

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned against being over dependent on Beijing, declaring it a strategic imperative to “get China right” as she and Anthony Albanese signed a $10bn trade deal and new security partnership.

In a historic address to Australia’s federal parliament, Ms von der Leyen told MPs from across the political divide that Europe was in a “dangerous moment” shaped by war in Ukraine and the Middle East and diversification was and remained a necessity.

She acknowledged Europe and Australia wouldn’t be immune to the geopolitical and economic shocks brought by the war in Iran.

“None of us is immune to the shocks, both geopolitical and economic, that the war in Iran brings to our populations. Pain at the pump is hard for our citizens. And just another reminder that building our resilience is today’s job,” Ms von der Leyen said.

“We in Europe have been reckoning with our dependencies, particularly with Russian gas.”

Noting these dependencies on other countries’ resources and products, Ms von der Leyen, who leads a powerful bloc of countries representing the world’s second largest economy, said these could be weaponised as geopolitics reaches boiling point, making homegrown energy and independence crucial to shield constituents from energy price shocks.

“Australia knows this all too well. Europe too has been challenged by its dependencies, not just on Russian energy. But also, for our reliance on imports from a single supplier. We cannot and will not absorb China’s export-led growth model, and its industrial overcapacity,” Ms von der Leyen said.

“Last year, every single EU member state ran a trade deficit with China. Both the threat to our supply-chain security and the shock to our industrial base need urgent responses. These are responses we can only devise together.

“For both Europe and Australia, getting China right is a strategic imperative. This is why bringing life to our critical minerals partnership will be crucial to our success. We cannot be over-dependent on any supplier for such crucial ingredients. And that is precisely why we need each other. Our security is your security.”

The security partnership would create a new defence industrial base “so that we are ready, to keep our people safe” and the free trade agreement – which, after eight years of negotiations, she conceded “many thought we might never land” – would unleash a new era in the economic relationship between Australia and the EU.

“This reflects Europe’s changing approach. From Latin America to India, and I am so pleased to add, Australia. When it comes to trade, Europe is open for business,” Ms von der Leyen said.

“We are rearming. We are decarbonising. We are preparing. We are becoming an independent Europe. And this means a more outward Europe. And this is why I am here today. Because showing up matters.”

Ms von der Leyen is the first female leader to address a joint sitting of Australia’s parliament, as well as the first European Commission president. Twenty world leaders have been invited to speak to Australian MPs.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/eu-chief-warns-australia-of-china-threat-as-10bn-trade-deal-signed/news-story/6636dababef6f7b0064b5058baad8aff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gbm9JWuf-w

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38809

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24420502 (240808ZMAR26) Notable: EU leader urges democracies to band together in 'upside down' world - (Video) European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned democracies must unite in a “brutal, harsh and unforgiving” world that has been “turned upside down”, as she addressed Australia’s federal parliament. She said global instability, including conflicts and shifting alliances, meant nations like Australia and those in Europe could no longer rely on distance or old certainties. “The comfort blanket of yesterday is ripped away,” she said, urging a more independent and resilient strategic posture. Von der Leyen highlighted growing co-operation among authoritarian states and said democracies must respond in kind, declaring “when we stand side-by-side we are stronger”. She stressed the need to “get China right”, reduce economic dependencies, and deepen defence, energy and critical minerals co-operation under the new Australia-EU partnership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38775

>>38805

>>38808

EU leader urges democracies to band together in 'upside down' world

Stephen Dziedzic - 24 March 2026

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has struck a grim tone during a landmark address to federal parliament, saying democracies must band together in the face of a "brutal, harsh and unforgiving" world that has been turned "upside down".

The president also declared that Europe and Australia must rearm and decarbonise as they try to break economic and energy dependencies on China and Russia.

"The world we live in is brutal, harsh and unforgiving. It feels upside down. What we knew as certainties are in question," she said.

She also alluded to the strategic chaos stoked by US President Donald Trump's administration, saying Europe recognised it needed to embrace a more independent strategic posture.

"The comfort blanket of yesterday is ripped away. It is confronting," she told the joint sitting.

"But the world we are living in is also a more honest one. We are saying out loud what has changed and how we are changing."

The European Commission president — who was the first female world leader to address federal parliament — said Australia's distance from the rest of the world no longer protected it, or provided any meaningful barriers to its relationship with Europe.

"Distance is no longer a protection or a luxury. The world has changed, but we get to choose how to shape our responses," she said.

"While we have not always maximised this potential, our kinship has always bound us. And our cultures have always understood one another."

'Getting China right' is imperative

Von der Leyen said the "unimaginable" sight of North Koreans "fighting Ukrainians on European soil" was a powerful symbol of how authoritarian regimes were increasingly banding together against democracies.

And she celebrated the new security partnership signed by the European Union and Australia, saying it would help bolster defence industrial cooperation.

"As our adversaries adapt to cooperate together, we too must respond together," she said.

"Because when we stand side-by-side we are stronger."

The president warned that China's vast exports were undercutting Europe's economic model and forcing it towards de-industrialisation, urging Australia to back its efforts to rebalance global trade.

"Both the threat to our supply-chain security and the shock to our industrial base need urgent responses," she said.

"These are responses we can only devise together. For both Europe and Australia, getting China right is a strategic imperative."

Australia has agreed to liberalise access to critical minerals for Europe under a free trade deal unveiled today, and von der Leyen said the suite of agreements would bring real strategic benefits to both sides.

"We cannot be over-dependent on any supplier for such crucial ingredients. And that is precisely why we need each other," she said.

"Our security is your security. And with our new security partnership, we have each other's backs."

She also said that decarbonisation and green energy was a "defining pillar" of the new free trade agreement, saying climate change was "ravaging Europe" and taking steps to cut pollution was "hard-headed commonsense".

"We all know what we are seeing is more severe. Doreathea Mackellar wrote of Australia's droughts and flooding rains affecting your sunburnt country," she said.

"But the point is these climatic events have become more frequent and more intense. And it is our common responsibility to find solutions to power the planet we leave our children."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-24/ursula-von-der-leyen-addresses-australian-parliament/106487954

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMj3icbucNQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38810

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24420508 (240816ZMAR26) Notable: Australian farmers slam ‘subpar’ EU trade deal for failing to deliver - (Video) Australian farmers have criticised the newly signed Australia-European Union free trade agreement as “extremely disappointing”, arguing it fails to deliver meaningful gains for agriculture despite years of negotiations. National Farmers’ Federation president Hamish McIntyre said the $10 billion deal lacked “commercially meaningful access” for key exports such as beef, dairy and sugar, warning producers would “pay the price… for decades to come”. Industry groups said modest quota increases still fell short of previous market access levels, while the EU continued to protect its own farmers through subsidies. Critics also warned the deal could undermine local industries, including forestry, due to increased competition from imports. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended the agreement as a “very good deal”, highlighting expanded export quotas and broader economic benefits for Australian producers and consumers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38775

>>38805

>>38808

>>38809

Australian farmers slam ‘subpar’ EU trade deal for failing to deliver

ROSIE LEWIS - 24 March 2026

1/2

Australia’s farmers have slammed an “extremely disappointing” and “subpar” trade deal with Europe, saying there has been no meaningful gains for the agricultural sector in the last three years of negotiations.

In a scathing critique of the Australia-Europe free trade agreement, National Farmers’ Federation president Hamish McIntyre said the $10bn deal with the world’s second largest economy offered an opportunity to ease pressure on farmers amid global volatility but it hadn’t delivered “commercially meaningful access” for agricultural exports.

“They (farmers) will now pay the price for this subpar EU deal for decades to come,” Mr McIntyre said.

“We are concerned the EU has offered subpar access for Australian producers while potentially needing to deploy billion-dollar subsidies to get their producers to accept the deal.

“This is exactly what happened when the EU signed a deal with the Mercosur nations, fast-tracking nearly $80bn in farm subsidies, sending a clear signal protectionism is alive and well.

“While we acknowledge some progress on issues such as geographical indicators, preserving the use of names like prosecco and parmesan, and access conditionality, farmers will rightly be concerned that after years of negotiations this deal hasn’t delivered commercially meaningful access for Australian agricultural exports.”

Car Dealers say reform not meaningful

Australia’s automotive industry warned the FTA wouldn’t deliver meaningful reform to the Luxury Car Tax, with the introduction of a higher threshold for electric vehicles that car dealers said would affect less than 1 per cent of vehicles sold.

The LCT for EVs would be lifted to $120,000 and the 5 per cent Passenger Vehicle Tariff on vehicles imported from the EU would also be removed but many “everyday vehicles” used by Aussies and small businesses would still be captured by the tax.

“While the introduction of a higher LCT threshold for electric vehicles provides some benefit, it is a narrow change that will only affect less than 1 per cent of vehicles sold and does not address the fundamental flaws of the tax,” Australian Automotive Dealer Association CEO James Voortman said.

“The LCT is a legacy policy from a time when Australia had a domestic manufacturing industry. Today, it acts as a distortionary tax that no longer reflects the realities of the modern automotive market. This was a clear opportunity for the government to implement meaningful reform by either abolishing the tax entirely or ensuring it only applies to genuinely luxury vehicles.”

‘Worst trade deal ever’

Nationals leader Matt Canavan labelled the pact the “worst trade deal ever”, saying it wouldn’t help the beef industry and instead lower the standard of future pacts with other countries.

The Queensland senator, who is also opposition trade and investment spokesman, said increasing tariff-free beef exports from 3000 tonnes to 35,000 tonnes “barely restored” Australia’s market access prior to 2019, when a majority of the EU’s beef imports quota was allocated to the US.

Senator Canavan said he’d been fielding calls from graziers all morning and one of them produced 60,000 tonnes on his own farm.

“We have refused deals that were subpar … for that goal of free trade. This government has thrown out that history today by just signing any deal. On that measure then, in our history, this deal must go down as the worst trade deal ever,” he said.

“We have a proud tradition in this country of keeping a high standard for finalising what is called a free-trade agreement … now the government, by lowering that standard, makes it harder for us to take a tough line for countries in the future. These small morsels of additional access for our farmers are just not enough to throw out our strong and traditional heritage to stand behind free trade.”

Despite his criticism, Senator Canavan would not go as far as saying the government should have held off signing the trade deal with Europe on Tuesday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38811

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24420519 (240827ZMAR26) Notable: Fuel supply cliff to hit at end of April as petrol prices in Australia hit record highs - (Video) Petrol prices have surged to a record national average of $2.38 a litre as Australia faces a potential fuel supply “cliff” by late April, with Asian refineries that supply about 80 per cent of imports expected to run out of crude due to the Iran war. Officials and fuel companies are scrambling to secure alternative shipments as China pauses some exports and global supply chains tighten. Ampol warned that if disruptions persist, pressure on prices and supply will intensify, while analysts flagged uncertainty over deliveries beyond mid-April. The government has eased fuel standards to boost supply flexibility and is seeking new sources globally. Despite reassurances that shipments are arriving, regional shortages have emerged, driven partly by panic buying and strained distribution networks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38784

>>38797

>>38803

Fuel supply cliff to hit at end of April as petrol prices in Australia hit record highs

Mike Foley and Nick Toscano - March 24, 2026

1/2

Petrol prices have reached a record high of an average of $2.38 a litre, as Australia’s fuel supplies are set to hit a cliff by the end of April when the Asian refineries that deliver 80 per cent of Australia’s supply exhaust their inventories due to the Iran war oil crisis.

The government and Australian fuel importers are scrambling to lock in shipments of replacement fuel and are in talks with nations across Asia and Europe, as well as the US. The negotiations have become even more urgent after China, which supplies about 4 per cent of the nation’s diesel, paused exports until the end of March.

Ampol, which runs 1800 service stations across the country, is scrambling to find refined fuel to ship into Australia beyond mid-April.

“There is a lot of buffer in the system but, ultimately, if this runs longer than a few weeks, you’re going to see pressure on prices and global supply chains,” Ampol chief executive Matt Halliday said.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen has said that there are 81 fuel shipments bound to reach Australia by mid-May, and only six have been cancelled.

However, the fuel exporters operate just-in-time supply chains and have not yet filled these shipments.

Asian refineries will exhaust their stocks of crude oil within a month, so it remains unclear how these shipments would be filled.

The average national petrol price reached the unprecedented level of $2.38 for regular unleaded in the week ending March 20, according to the Australian Institute of Petroleum weekly price report, which eclipses the record average of $2.19 set the previous week and is up 27 per cent since the war began on February 28.

Regular unleaded petrol reached $2.12 in March 2022 at the peak of the energy crunch caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Bowen announced on Tuesday a temporary reduction of diesel standards, which he said would provide greater flexibility for Australian importers to source fuel from markets with marginally lower flashpoints – the temperature at which fuel can burn.

“This six-month adjustment will lower what’s known as the flashpoint for diesel, from 61.5 degrees Celsius, to 60.5 degrees Celsius, increasing diesel supply options from refiners and international sources,” he said on Tuesday.

Bowen earlier this month lowered petrol standards for 60 days, which he said would enable 100 million extra litres to flow into the local market.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38812

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424585 (250840ZMAR26) Notable: Bowen replaces cancelled oil ships, says rationing is a last resort - (Video) Energy Minister Chris Bowen has confirmed six cancelled fuel shipments have been replaced with alternative imports, with three additional deliveries secured to bolster supply, as the government insists rationing remains a last resort. Bowen said all expected April shipments had been restored via spot market sourcing and extra cargoes arranged for April and May. He also announced agreements to release fuel from Australia’s strategic reserves to support regional areas facing shortages. Despite growing outages at service stations, Bowen maintained there was no national supply shortfall, attributing disruptions to demand spikes driven by panic buying and stockpiling. He ruled out measures such as purchase caps, saying rationing would only occur in an “absolute worst-case” scenario, while the opposition pressed for clearer plans to address distribution gaps.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38797

>>38811

Bowen replaces cancelled oil ships, says rationing is a last resort

THOMAS HENRY - 25 March 2026

1/2

The government has confirmed replacements for six cancelled oil shipments and deals with companies to deliver fuel supplies released from Australia’s strategic reserves, denying that rationing is on the agenda.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the cancelled shipments had been replaced from alternative sources and that an additional three deliveries had been secured over and above what had been contracted for the next two months.

“I previously have informed the house that ... of the 81 expected ship arrivals over April, we were aware of six cancellations. All of them have now been replaced with alternative spot market orders from different locations,” Mr Bowen said.

“Industry has informed me this morning that in addition to replacing those six cancelled boats, they have been able to secure at least three more cargo deliveries for April and May for Australia, over and above the normal contracted deliveries to ensure that we are dealing with this demand.”

Mr Bowen also said two deals had been struck with companies to deliver supplies from Australia’s strategic reserves to regional areas.

Early on Wednesday the government said fuel rationing measures would be a last resort, ruling out a cap on the amount of petrol motorists could buy as recommended under a national fuel emergency plan.

After the release of the most recent version of Australia’s National Liquid Fuel Emergency Response Plan, which recommends, among other measures, car pooling and daily limits on fuel purchases, Mr Bowen said rationing would only be used in the “absolute worse-case” scenario.

He ruled out the possibility of a $40 cut-off for motorists looking to fill their tanks and said there was more fuel in Australia than at the start of the conflict in Iran.

“There’s a range of government measures. Rationing would be the absolute worst case. So it’s not on the agenda,” he said.

“In terms of that $40 approach … we wouldn’t go down that particular road. I’m not contemplating that.

“But we are working with states on their powers, on our powers, how they work together in terms of prudent contingency planning.”

With the number of service stations running dry continuing to rise, Mr Bowen maintained there was no hit to Australia’s supply of fuel and that shortages were entirely demand-driven.

The NSW government confirmed on Wednesday that of the state’s 2400 stations, 32 in regional areas had no fuel, 313 were without at least one type of fuel, and 187 had run out of diesel.

Mr Bowen attributed the shortages wholly to spikes in demand, which he said was “understandable”, but said the government was continuing to urge consumers only to buy what they needed.

“We’ve seen very big spikes in demand. Some of it has been panic buying. Some of it has been people getting ahead of price rises. Some of it has been farmers stocking up, which is fair, I get all that, that’s reasonable,” he said.

“Every ship that we’ve expected to arrive has arrived, and the two refineries are working perfectly well … It’s not a supply issue in Australia. Clearly we’ve had big increases in demand.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38813

File: 49c3e7d4c25aa9c⋯.jpg (245.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78ada06c5a0f2e1⋯.jpg (136.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424596 (250848ZMAR26) Notable: Japanese ambassador signals fuel-for-LNG swap to secure Australia’s energy supply - Japan’s ambassador to Australia, Kazuhiro Suzuki, has flagged the possibility of a fuel-for-LNG swap to support Australia’s energy security, as supply pressures intensify following the Iran war. He said Japan could assist if shortages became acute, noting “maybe we could collaborate and then do something together”, while stressing any support would depend on clearer evidence of market conditions. Suzuki highlighted Japan’s significant fuel reserves but warned against new Australian taxes on LNG exports, saying “surprise… is always bad” and could deter Japanese investment. The proposal reflects growing regional interdependence, with Australia supplying liquefied natural gas to Japan while relying on imported liquid fuels. Resources Minister Madeleine King said both nations understood “we rely on liquid fuels” and must work together on energy security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38797

>>38811

>>38803

>>38812

Japanese ambassador signals fuel-for-LNG swap to secure Australia’s energy supply

BRAD THOMPSON - 25 March 2026

Japan’s ambassador to Australia has left the door open to some form of fuel-for-LNG swap as alluded to by Anthony Albanese but warned any new taxes on oil and gas exports would be “bad news” for the relationship between the two countries and for investment.

Ambassador Kazuhiro Suzuki said on Wednesday that if fuel shortages in Australia became acute, Japan might be willing to help while hitting out any the prospect of Treasurer Jim Chalmers applying new taxes on LNG exports.

Mr Suzuki said such a move could jeopardise Japan investment in Australia and that Tokyo did not like surprises.

In a pointed message to energy security obsessed Japan and other Asian nations in recent days, Mr Albanese has said “we are reliable partners when it comes to energy security, and we expect that to be a two-way flow”.

Mr Suzuki stressed that Japan had so far maintained its relatively small but important exports to Australia.

Japan would be one of the countries hit if Australia imposed new so-called windfall taxes on the oil and gas industry. Supplying liquid fuel to counter shortages in Australia might weigh against any such move by the Albanese government.

Speaking at a Minerals Council of Australia conference in Canberra, Mr Suzuki said Japan had about 250 days of fuel supply in reserve, but that 90 per cent of its supply ultimately came from the Middle East.

He said Japan would pressure the International Energy Agency to release more of its strategic reserves at the appropriate time, and that Japan’s reserves were earmarked for domestic use if the situation became dire.

On the prospect of new LNG taxes, Mr Suzuki said that Japan didn’t like surprises.

“Surprise, in the Japanese business dictionary, it’s always bad. If there’s a retrospective taxing or something, I think that is really bad news,” he said.

“Japanese investors are saying, so if there’s a surprise, they just go to other countries. We love Australia, so Australia should be the first country that we should invest in, but if there’s a big surprise, then, you know because we hate surprise, causes a problem.”

Mr Suzuki said Japan would need to have a deep understanding of any actual fuel shortages in Australia before committing to help, but said it was a possibility.

He pointed to reports of panic buying in rural areas as part of the problem and to assurances from Energy Minister Chris Bowen that Australia was managing any shortages.

“We really need to see the market situation in Australia first and then we need to deepen our communication between the two countries,” he said.

“Maybe we could collaborate and then do something together. That’s the only answer that I can give it to you now.”

Dr Chalmers has not ruled out “windfall” taxes on LNG exporters that would be passed on to customers in Japan. The price of LNG has already spiked because of the conflict between Iran and the US and Israel.

Dr Chalmers said this week that Australians deserved a “fair return on the resources they own” when asked about a windfall tax being included in his May budget.

Resources Minister Madeleine King was on stage when Mr Suzuki broached the subject of co-operation on energy security in what could in effect represent a LNG-for-liquid fuel arrangement.

Asked about the prospect of a deal on the sidelines of the conference, Ms King said: “I believe very much in that relationship between our two countries and the government of Japan is well aware of how we can best work together, and it’s all about energy security, whether that be LNG from Australia to Japan or in liquid fuel security from Japan back to Australia.”

Ms King said Japan, South Korea, Singapore and other countries in Asia clearly understood the interdependence on energy security.

“They rely on our LNG for their energy security, and we rely on liquid fuels,” she said.

“I think the agreement between the Singaporean Prime Minister and our Prime Minister is really indicative of what the region all knows – that we have to work together.”

Mr Albanese and Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong released a joint statement on energy security on Monday.

Ms King noted that Singapore and Malaysia were major sources of liquid fuel for Australia, and noted that Australia was also in talks with China.

Iran has so far allowed oil tankers bound for China to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

“Minister (Penny) Wong has made it clear that Australia has discussed fuel security with a range of countries, including China. We have engaged with China both in Canberra and in country,” Ms King said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/japanese-ambassador-signals-fuelforlng-swap-to-secure-australias-energy-supply/news-story/dca7c429799751730264ccfd5bd5183d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38814

File: 8ac58bdf7370d7e⋯.jpg (312.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 693e89223f7cecd⋯.jpg (421.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424601 (250852ZMAR26) Notable: Shut the door: Australia to ban Iranian visa holders citing national interest - Australia has moved to restrict re-entry for certain Iranian visitor visa holders, citing national interest concerns linked to the Iran conflict following strikes involving the United States and Israel. The Albanese government will bar subclass 600 visa holders outside Australia from returning for six months, with exemptions for spouses, de facto partners, dependent children, or parents of minors already in Australia. The government said the war has increased the risk some temporary visa holders may be unable or unwilling to depart when visas expire, while allowing “flexibility in limited cases” and case-by-case assessments. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said existing visas “may not have been issued” under current conditions. Critics, including asylum advocates, said the changes “shut the door” on people seeking safety.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38738

>>38739

>>38744

>>38745

‘Shut the door’: Australia to ban Iranian visa holders citing ‘national interest’

NATHAN SCHMIDT - 25 March 2026

Iranians on temporarily visas will be restricted from re-entering Australia under controversial new powers.

The Albanese government will from Thursday restrict anyone with a visitor visa (subclass 600) linked to an Iranian passport and who is outside of Australia from re-entering the country, more than four weeks after the United States’ and Israel’s surprise attack on Iran.

Visa-holders are typically allowed to remain in Australia for up to 12 months, usually for tourism, business, or to visit family.

However, under the new rules, which will remain in effect for six months, only spouses, de facto partners, or a dependent child of an Australia citizen or permanent visa holder, or a parent of a child under 18 already in Australia, will be allowed entry.

The government claims the changes will bolster the integrity of Australia’s migration system and in the national interest.

It warned the war against Iran increased the risk temporary visa holders may be unlikely or unable to depart Australia when their visa expired, and that the new measures would afford government time to assess cases, while still allowing “flexibility in limited cases”.

“There are many visitor visas which were issued before the conflict in Iran which may not have been issued if they were applied for now,” Home Affairs Minister Tony burke said.

“Decisions about permanent stays in Australia should be deliberate decisions of the government, not a random consequence of who had booked a holiday.

“The Australian government is closely monitoring global developments and will adjust settings as required to ensure Australia’s migration system remains orderly, fair and sustainable.”

Under the changes, a person issued an active Permitted Travel Certificate – including people who may have already departed for Australia – or holding another time of visa may be allowed entry.

The changes would also not prohibit people outside Australia from applying for a new visa.

In limited cases involving parents of Australian citizens, “sympathetic consideration” would also be given, the government said.

Developed in consultation with the Iranian diaspora, the changes faced pushback when they were first introduced and passed in parliament earlier this month.

At the time, Asylum Seeker Resource Centre Chief Executive Kon Karapanagiotidis said the rules “shut the door” on people seeking safety in Australia.

“If people already have a visa to travel to Australia, and this kind of violence has broken out in their home country – why would we not want to help them?” he said.

“On the very same day that the Government has acted so swiftly and compassionately to protect members of the Iranian women’s soccer team, they want to slam the door on family members of Australian citizens.”

Mr Burke offered asylum to members of the Iranian women’s soccer team earlier this month – however, only two players ultimately followed through and remained in Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/shut-the-door-australia-to-ban-iranian-visa-holders-citing-national-interest/news-story/b405403d2bb032e08cd7bae0f90fa23f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38815

File: 6e429fd1876b0df⋯.jpg (2 MB,4820x3213,4820:3213,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424623 (250901ZMAR26) Notable: Palestinian flag to be lowered from city hall after fiery debate - A Palestinian flag flown above Darebin City Council in Melbourne’s north will be removed after councillors voted to ban international flags following a heated 90-minute debate. The new policy retains only Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags, with the Preston flag to be lowered within 10 working days and marked by a “brief respectful ceremony”. Councillors said community feedback from more than 500 submissions was “quite clear” in opposing international flags, describing the policy as a “careful balance” ensuring “transparency, equity and accountability”. Opponents argued the move “den[ies] our residents a right to have a say” and called it “outrageous”. The decision follows earlier disputes, including calls to replace the flag with a “peace flag” after the Bondi attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24248834 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24295203 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

Palestinian flag to be lowered from city hall after fiery debate

Rachael Dexter and Rachael Ward - March 25, 2026

A Palestinian flag flying above a council building in Melbourne’s north for more than two years will soon be lowered after months of debate over its future.

On Tuesday night, after a 90-minute debate, Darebin City Council voted on the municipality’s new flag policy, which includes no longer flying any international flags at all unless required by legislation.

The Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags will continue to fly in council buildings and are not affected by the vote. However, the Palestinian flag flying above the council’s main chamber in Preston must be lowered within 10 working days, and will be marked with a “brief respectful ceremony”.

The council reached a final decision on the drawn-out dispute over how and when to fly different flags after three formal attempts to pass a motion on Tuesday. During the meeting, some people in the public gallery jeered and shouted, and were warned multiple times by Mayor Emily Dimitriadis to remain silent during debate, with one threatened with ejection.

The Palestinian flag was raised above Preston City Hall after being endorsed by councillors on December 18, 2023.

Tuesday’s successful motion, moved by independent Councillor Connie Boglis, prohibits new international flags and removes the chief executive’s discretion to approve community requests. Boglis described the policy as a “careful balance” that provides “transparency, equity and accountability”.

The policy came after a community consultation process that received more than 500 submissions. Labor councillor Kristine Olaris noted that while councillors held strong personal views, the feedback was “quite clear” that a majority of the community did not want any international flags flown. Labor councillors Olaris, Dimitriadis, Matt Arturi and Vasilios Tsalkos all supported the motion, as did Boglis.

The motion was opposed by independent Councillor Angela Villella and Greens councillors Ruth Jelley and Alexandra Sangster.

Villella was most vocal in her opposition, saying councillors should be “ashamed of ourselves” for stripping residents of the right to have different flags flown.

“We are actually denying our residents a right to have a say. I can’t understand it … it’s outrageous,” she said. “How dare we say that to the community? Who the hell do we think we are that we can say that?”

Sangster successfully moved a subsequent amendment to provide the community with a 10-day “grace period” before the Palestinian flag is removed, allowing time for residents to prepare a ceremony for what she described as a “deeply distressing moment”.

Following the Bondi terrorist attack, an urgent meeting was called in late December 2025, where chief executive Anne Howard asked councillors to take down the flag and replace it with a “peace flag” – in part due to complaints made to council staff from locals after the mass shooting.

A special council meeting was held in February to discuss the future of the flag, where councillors voted to delay a decision until adopting a formal flag policy in March.

In both meetings, councillors knocked back the “peace flag” suggestion.

Darebin Council’s policy was developed partly by examining international flag policies elsewhere in Victoria. Council documents show Greater Dandenong, Surf Coast Shire, Manningham and Yarra Ranges councils permit international flags to be flown during official visits of dignitaries or under other strict conditions.

In Greater Dandenong, international flags may also be flown as a show of support during a crisis, in the Yarra Ranges only to acknowledge a significant event, while in the Surf Coast foreign flags can also be displayed as directed by state or federal governments. In Manningham, only the flags of nations recognised by Australia can fly alongside the Australian flag.

Palestinian flags were previously raised at Darebin, Merri-bek, Dandenong and Maribyrnong councils in the early months of Israel’s war on Gaza.

Merri-bek’s flag was flown until a ceasefire in 2025. However, last September councillors voted to fly it indefinitely outside the town hall in Coburg.

Darebin Council has been contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/palestinian-flag-to-be-lowered-from-city-hall-after-fiery-debate-20260325-p5x6zc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38816

File: 545e8284d665a9a⋯.jpg (2.46 MB,3552x4440,4:5,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e2080c9b65b5905⋯.jpg (3.02 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424631 (250910ZMAR26) Notable: US Admiral stares down AUKUS doubters over WA’s submarine deadline - The United States Navy’s operations chief has reaffirmed confidence that Virginia-class submarines will be delivered to Australia by 2032 under AUKUS, despite concerns about production capacity. Admiral Daryl Caudle said shipbuilding rates should exceed two submarines per year by the 2030s, addressing scepticism that current output of about 1.3 annually is insufficient. He said improvements in workforce, advanced manufacturing and modularisation would support a “transformational improvement” in output. Caudle visited HMAS Stirling to assess upgrades supporting a rotating US and UK submarine presence from next year. He said US personnel would have a minimal population impact but provide a “significant” economic boost, while describing Australia as a “great partner” in shared security and naval operations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23959445 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

US Admiral stares down AUKUS doubters over WA’s submarine deadline

Hamish Hastie - March 25, 2026

The US Navy’s operations chief says his country will make good on its commitment to start delivering Virginia-class nuclear submarines to Australia by 2032, while suggesting the US industrial base will be big and quick enough by the end of the decade to fulfil those orders.

US Naval Operations Chief Admiral Daryl Caudle has been in Australia for the past few days and on Tuesday visited HMAS Stirling and Rockingham in Perth’s south to see progress on base upgrades to begin accommodating a rotating force of US and British submarines from next year.

Under the $368 billion AUKUS agreement, Australia has agreed to purchase between three and five Virginia-class nuclear submarines, with the first set to be delivered by 2032.

Sceptics of the pact, including former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, believe that timeline will be impossible to meet because of the slow rate at which the US Navy is building its own submarines, around 1.3 per year.

In order to meet the “optimal pathway” outlined by the original AUKUS agreement, the US will need to improve that build rate to 2.3 submarines per year.

During his confirmation hearing in July last year, Caudle himself said there needed to be a “transformational improvement” in shipbuilding rates of 100 per cent to reach that target.

Speaking to WA media during his visit, Caudle said he was optimistic that it would happen.

“It’s a tough thing to predict, but I would say, I can confidently say that we should be above two submarines a year by the 2030s...based on our current projections,” he said.

“Improvements in shipbuilding are slow because it took a long time for it to get to the place that it is today and the things that we’re doing, I think, take time to get it back to the place that I mentioned in my confirmation hearing.”

Caudle said the Navy was doing a range of things to improve its industrial base, including improving workforces, advanced manufacturing and using modularisation.

He also said improved shipbuilding maintenance programs would see more US submarines in the water.

Caudle said he visited areas south of Perth where US sailors will eventually live and met with Defence Housing Australia, which will facilitate the housing needs of the sailors arriving from next year.

With Perth in the grips of a housing crisis, Caudle said the number of sailors would be a “blip” in the population increases, but that US sailors would fall in love with Perth and would have a big impact on the local economy.

“The actual impact of what US sailors will bring to the local economy there, I think, will be significant and a big opportunity for your country,” he said.

Caudle revealed the name of the squadron that would be based in WA as Submarine Squadron 3, which he commanded when it was based on Pearl Harbour before it was dismantled in 2012.

With Australia purchasing Virginia-class submarines Caudle said it would be an “implicit expectation” that the two countries’ respective navies would work closely together in the decades to come.

“You’re such a great partner. You’ve been with us in conflict since World War II, just in earnest,” he said.

“When you have a great relationship with a country, and you have the same, generally, the same national interest and to protect the international rules-based order to protect sea lanes of communication, to protect critical choke points, the flow of commerce. Those types of missions are just common to like-minded navies.

“I think what comes with the selling of Virginia-class submarines is that we will just naturally work together to accomplish those missions together.

“So I wouldn’t put it too much as a hard expectation is, I would just [say it’s] what two great partners do together.

“We operate together today with your Collins class, and we’ll operate together with the Virginia class of the future.”

The Australian Government is investing $8 billion to expand HMAS Stirling’s infrastructure over a decade so it can accommodate a rotating force of UK and US nuclear submarines, as well as eventually the Royal Australian Navy’s own Virginia Class submarines and the Australian-built SSN-AUKUS.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/western-australia/us-admiral-stares-down-aukus-doubters-over-wa-s-submarine-deadline-20260325-p5xn7d.html

https://www.navy.mil/Leadership/Flag-Officer-Biographies/Search/Article/2236204/admiral-daryl-caudle/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38817

File: 96c0ca1c5baca16⋯.jpg (184.82 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24424666 (250928ZMAR26) Notable: US Naval Operations chief Admiral Daryl Caudle confirms WA will house first nuclear-powered sub by 2034 - Western Australia is set to host its first sovereign Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine by 2034 under AUKUS, with at least two to be based at HMAS Stirling. US Naval Operations Chief Admiral Daryl Caudle said the United States would “stick to the agreement” to rotate four submarines through Submarine Rotational Force-West from next year, forming part of a broader five-submarine rotational presence. He said construction at HMAS Stirling was progressing steadily, with facilities for maintenance, housing and operations in place and “not behind” schedule. The Australian Government’s $8 billion upgrade is expected to support thousands of jobs. Caudle said US shipbuilding rates should exceed two submarines annually by 2030, reinforcing confidence in delivery timelines and long-term defence cooperation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

US Naval Operations chief Admiral Daryl Caudle confirms WA will house first nuclear-powered sub by 2034

Jessica Evensen and Andrew Greene - 24 March 2026

The United States top navy chief has declared Western Australia will be home to at least two nuclear powered Virginia-class submarines under the AUKUS agreement by 2034.

US Naval Operations Chief Admiral Daryl Caudle made the commitment in Perth on Tuesday afternoon following his visit to HMAS Stirling to meet with local authorities and strengthen the AUKUS trilateral partnership.

The Australian Government has already invested $8 billion into transforming HMAS Stirling into a “nuclear-ready” facility, with five nuclear-based submarines scheduled to have a rotational presence at the naval base from next year.

WA is relying on AUKUS to justify the mammoth upgrade, which is predicted to create around 10,000 new jobs.

Admiral Caudle — who was appointed to the top job by the new Trump administration in August — said he was “very pleased” with the construction timeline at HMAS Stirling.

“I wouldn’t say (construction is) ahead, but it’s certainly not behind, and I’m very pleased with where we’ve come,” he told local media.

“There’s lots of construction going on the base, we’re seeing all the facilities that we need, from secure locations, the maintenance facility and the emergency command centre.

“I got to tour ... the barracks that are on the base, where the sailors will live on the base, what they will experience (including the) galley, canteen and eating facilities.”

Admiral Caudle said the US would obey its promise to rotate four Virginia-class submarines as part of Submarine Rotational Force-West.

“You’re going to see us stick to the agreement here of what we’ve committed to,” he said.

“I wouldn’t say (the number of submarines) is going to get bigger, we’re going to stay on plan ... it’s going to be as currently designed.”

He said WA was on track to house its first sovereign Virginia-class submarine by 2034.

And when asked whether the US would meet its fleet requirements, he said: “I can confidently say we should be above two submarines a year.”

“By 2030 I would expected us to be above two submarines a year, based on current projections.”

Admiral Caudle said there was an “implicit expectation” Australia would stand with the US, and described AUKUS as a “match made in heaven”.

“(Australia is) such a great partner, you’ve been with us in conflicts since World War II,” he said.

“When you have a great relationship with a country and you have the same national interest and to protect international rules-based order ... those types of missions are just common to like-minded navies.

“We operate together today with your Collins-class (submarines), and we’ll operate together with the Virginia-class of the future.”

https://thewest.com.au/politics/aukus/us-naval-operations-chief-admiral-daryl-caudle-confirms-wa-will-house-first-nuclear-powered-sub-by-2034-c-22040981

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38818

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24428984 (260915ZMAR26) Notable: PM calls second emergency national cabinet meeting over fuel crisis - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will convene a second emergency national cabinet meeting as fuel shortages and surging prices disrupt industries and threaten broader economic impacts. About 470 service stations have run out of at least one fuel type, as the Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz blockade continue to strain global supply. Albanese said “coordinating that activity is important” to ensure national consistency, with Fuel Supply Taskforce Coordinator Anthea Harris working across jurisdictions. The government maintains the issue is driven by demand rather than supply, urging Australians to avoid panic buying, while securing additional tankers and releasing emergency reserves. Business groups warned supply chains are becoming “fragile and unreliable”, calling for “every option” to be considered, including rationing and tax relief measures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38778

>>38812

PM calls second emergency national cabinet meeting over fuel crisis

abc.net.au - 26 March 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will convene a second emergency national cabinet meeting as rising fuel costs and shortages threaten to disrupt a range of industries and push up consumer prices.

States and territory leaders will meet next week to further coordinate the national response to the fuel crisis as the fallout from the Iran war continues to escalate.

The government on Wednesday confirmed that about 470 service stations around the country have run out of at least one type of fuel, a small decrease from the day before

State premiers have called on the federal government to lead national coordination to tackle localised supply shortages, after Mr Albanese last week declared that states were responsible for fuel distribution.

"Indeed, coordinating that activity is important so that we have national consistency," Mr Albanese told parliament on Wednesday.

Last week, the national cabinet agreed to appoint Fuel Supply Taskforce Coordinator Anthea Harris to coordinate with the states on fuel security and supply chains.

Fuel prices have risen sharply around the world since Iran blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for about a fifth of the world's oil, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers now conceding recent modelling forecasting high oil prices and inflation of up to 5 per cent looks "pretty conservative now".

He has asked Treasury to undertake modelling of more challenging scenarios.

Labor insists the fuel situation is driven by demand rather than supply shortages, urging Australians to stop panic buying.

On Wednesday, Energy Minister Chris Bowen confirmed the government had replaced six oil tankers bound for Australia that had been cancelled.

He also revealed three additional tankers had been secured.

Voluntary measures are on the table, but 'not there yet'

The government has repeatedly said it's too soon to consider fuel rationing, but Mr Bowen has indicated there are several options available to ease pressure.

"There are also voluntary measures that the government can encourage," he said.

"Governments do have [measures] at their disposal, but neither are we at that point."

The opposition is calling on the government to better direct supplies to where they're needed.

"The stocks are there, that's what they keep telling us," Opposition Leader Angus Taylor told Channel Nine.

"So the answer has to be simple. Move the stocks to the sold-out servos."

Earlier this week, the government reduced the flashpoint for diesel to allow more fuel into Australia.

It has also released about six days' worth of petrol and five days' worth of diesel from its emergency stockpile as part of an internationally coordinated response to the disruption, and last week temporarily lowered fuel standards so onshore refineries could redirect supplies into the local market.

Business wants 'every option' considered

The Australian Industry Group is calling on national cabinet to consider rationing, cuts to the fuel excise and discounted public transport.

"The federal government should now lay every option on the table," chief executive Innes Willox said.

"Employers report existing supply chains are becoming more fragile and unreliable as other economies take steps to inoculate themselves. Those impacts threaten to ripple through the economy in the time ahead."

He said employers were already seeing workers not turning up and refusing shifts as a result of "deep concern about the future".

The Business Council of Australia says the government must prioritise maintaining fuel supply and supply chains, while also backing increased use of public transport and car pooling.

Both AIG and the Business Council are warning the government to avoid mistakes made during the COVID-19 crisis and ensure a coordinated national approach.

"While this isn't a pandemic, it will have real economic impacts, and we need to work together on practical solutions that support supply and minimise disruption," BCA head Bran Black said.

Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie believes cutting the fuel excise would actually punish the transport industry as truck operators are already eligible for tax rebates.

"Transport operations don't actually get relief," she told Channel Nine.

"That won't stop that flow in impact across goods into supermarket shelves."

She says the industry wants GST relief for a limited period instead.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-26/pm-calls-second-national-cabinet-over-fuel-crisis/106496520

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La2Qmsb02QQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38819

File: 7dd7ab322736726⋯.jpg (489.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3449ac50346f4a7⋯.jpg (431.1 KB,1943x2591,1943:2591,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24428994 (260919ZMAR26) Notable: Fuel caps hit cities as supply strains spread beyond regions - Fuel purchase limits have begun appearing in metropolitan areas as supply strains spread beyond regional Australia, signalling deeper pressure on distribution despite assurances inventories remain adequate. Some service stations, including sites in Sydney, have imposed caps such as 50 litres per vehicle and banned jerry cans to “stretch available supply” and discourage stockpiling. The shift into cities suggests disruptions are no longer isolated, with limits varying by operator and delivery schedules. Authorities maintain the issue is driven by demand and urge motorists to avoid panic buying, but industry participants say restrictions reflect growing strain. The development highlights the fragility of Australia’s just-in-time fuel system, with reliance on imports and uncertainty over Iran-linked disruptions raising concerns about replenishing stockpiles and maintaining consistent supply.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38778

>>38812

>>38818

Fuel caps hit cities as supply strains spread beyond regions

COLIN PACKHAM - 26 March 2026

Some petrol stations in metropolitan areas have begun limiting how many litres customers can pump, as supply strains once confined to regional Australia spread into major cities despite assurances fuel inventory remains adequate.

On Sydney’s Northern Beaches, a Shell-branded Viva service station informed customers they could not buy more than 50 litres per vehicle due to supply restrictions, with the filling of jerry cans or external tanks banned. The site is operated by an independent retailer.

The emergence of limits in urban centres marks a shift in the disruption, which until now had been characterised by patchy outages and empty bowsers, predominantly — though not exclusively — in regional areas. Their spread into metropolitan markets suggests the strain is beginning to affect Australia’s largest cities.

The restrictions are not uniform and are typically set at the discretion of individual operators, but the approach is consistent: cap volumes, discourage stockpiling and stretch available supply between increasingly unpredictable deliveries. Industry participants said such measures can vary widely between sites depending on delivery schedules and local demand, with some operators moving earlier than others to protect stock.

While governments and industry closely track how many service stations are running short of fuel, there is no central dataset capturing where purchase limits are being imposed, leaving one of the clearest indicators of stress in the system largely untraced.

The development sits uneasily alongside official messaging that Australia’s fuel supplies remain adequate. Federal authorities have said the disruption is being driven by surging demand as consumers worry about future supply and rising prices, and have urged motorists not to engage in panic buying — warnings some petrol stations say have gone unheeded.

The government has insisted there is no need for fuel rationing, while states have made clear that any formal scheme would need to be led and implemented at a national level, underscoring the political sensitivity.

The market may already be moving in that direction, even in the absence of co-ordinated action.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will convene a second national cabinet on the fuel crisis next week and has abandoned his push for the states to take the lead on petrol rationing, as Japan warns against Labor imposing higher taxes on gas exports while the government moves to secure additional energy supply deals with Asian trading partners.

But for motorists encountering caps at the bowser, the distinction is largely academic. A 50-litre limit is sufficient for only a partial fill for larger vehicles, forcing some drivers — including tradespeople and small businesses — to refuel more frequently or seek out multiple sites.

The crisis has again exposed the fragility of Australia’s just-in-time fuel supply chains, first laid bare during the Covid pandemic. The system is designed to operate efficiently under normal conditions, but offers limited redundancy when disrupted.

Australia relies on imported refined fuels for the bulk of its needs. Importers and the country’s two refiners must hold minimum stocks, but with concern about the longevity of the war in Iran and its potential impact on oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, there is growing alarm about the country’s ability to replenish those stockpiles.

The government could elect to implement restrictions in a bid to preserve stockpiles, though doing so would risk an economic hit and stoke public concern.

Purchase limits are typically among the first visible signs of stress at the retail level, often preceding more widespread shortages or sharper price movements. Their appearance suggests that while fuel continues to flow into the country, the system’s ability to distribute it smoothly is coming under increasing pressure — and that the effects of a tightening market are no longer confined to the margins.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/fuel-caps-hit-cities-as-supply-strains-spread-beyond-regions/news-story/389ecd9788ed3b8f71f6fffb1642a317

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38820

File: 754de07a34d3943⋯.jpg (3.88 MB,7276x4853,7276:4853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24429008 (260931ZMAR26) Notable: Bowen’s big stick spurs biggest intervention since WWII to secure fuel for bush - The federal government has launched its most significant intervention in the fuel market since World War II, forcing suppliers to prioritise regional service stations amid escalating shortages. Energy Minister Chris Bowen used the threat of emergency powers to compel companies to sell fuel to independent operators, after major retailers dominated supply through long-term contracts. The government has released 20 per cent of national stockpiles, equivalent to several days’ supply, to ease pressure in the bush. Bowen said deliveries to regional areas had surged, with some suppliers increasing volumes by more than 40 per cent. The move follows panic buying and a doubling of demand after the Iran conflict, exposing vulnerabilities in Australia’s fuel supply system.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38812

>>38818

>>38819

Bowen’s big stick spurs biggest intervention since WWII to secure fuel for bush

Mike Foley and Paul Sakkal - March 26, 2026

1/2

Labor has intervened to secure regional fuel supply chains in one of the most drastic market interventions since petrol rationing during WWII, as Energy Minister Chris Bowen forces suppliers to sell to independent regional service stations that are running on empty.

Bowen’s moves come as the federal government shows signs of tension after weeks of pressure to fix shortages and calls from state leaders for a national approach to fuel conservation.

This masthead revealed on Wednesday that a national cabinet meeting would be held the following Monday, while the Australian Financial Review reported on Thursday that senior ministers had raised concerns with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese about “needless secrecy” about the day of the meeting.

Albanese had initially pushed back against leading Australia’s response to the fuel shortages, saying that was the role of the states, but is now expected to discuss a national plan at Monday’s meeting.

Behind the scenes, Bowen is harnessing the mandate provided by the crisis to force companies to get fuel into regional areas.

Typically, wholesale suppliers sell most of their fuel under long-term contracts with major retail chains such as BP, Caltex and Ampol, while independent service stations make short-term deals on the spot market. Since the start of the war, major chains had crowded out the smaller buyers.

Bowen announced last week that the government would release 20 per cent of the nation’s fuel stockpile, which is held by the suppliers. He confirmed yesterday that this fuel, six days’ worth of average national diesel consumption and five days of petrol, was bound for regional areas.

It is the most dramatic intervention by a government in the private fuel industry since ration books were issued to motorists between 1940 and 1950 to reduce demand by 50 per cent.

Independent service stations in regional areas have struggled to keep up with demand in the weeks since the Iran war broke out, spurring panic buying and a doubling of fuel demand, while major retailers remained relatively better supplied under their long-term deals.

To ensure the fuel would go where it is needed in the bush, Bowen forced fuel suppliers to guarantee they would sell to regional independents.

Bowen has not declared a national emergency, which would grant him powers under the Liquid Fuel Emergency Act to control the management, allocation, and distribution of fuel supplies across the country.

But the threat he could do so secured the co-operation of fuel suppliers.

The National Roads and Motorists Association welcomed Bowen’s intervention and said if tougher action were needed in the future, the energy minister should not hesitate to use his emergency powers.

“Our message is: Go hard, minister. Do whatever you have to do. Reach in, shake every branch to make sure that the supply chain works to the benefit of the nation,” NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury said.

“If threats don’t work, he can always use the law. However, we’re of the view that with proper government scrutiny, we will get the right outcome for Australia.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38821

File: 5ac228a0ab6be0a⋯.jpg (345.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6d80f7df8fc9e1d⋯.jpg (122.95 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1ca24e3c425844f⋯.jpg (296.23 KB,1299x1732,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24429017 (260938ZMAR26) Notable: Broken Bay bishop Anthony Randazzo plucked by Pope Leo to become the Vatican’s top Aussie - Broken Bay Bishop Anthony Randazzo has been appointed by Pope Leo as Prefect of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts, elevating him to Archbishop and making him the most senior Australian resident in the Vatican. The surprise appointment places him at the centre of interpreting and applying canon law across the global Catholic Church. Randazzo, who studied canon law in Rome and previously served in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, will relocate within three months after a personal meeting with the Pope. He said he was “profoundly grateful” for the trust placed in him. The move signals a focus on rigorous legal interpretation within the Church and marks the highest-ranking Australian Vatican posting since Cardinal George Pell.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Broken Bay bishop Anthony Randazzo plucked by Pope Leo to become the Vatican’s top Aussie

DENNIS SHANAHAN - 25 March 2026

Pope Leo has personally plucked a Catholic bishop from the NSW central coast, promoted him to Archbishop and appointed him as the most senior, resident Australian in the Vatican.

In a surprise move, Broken Bay Bishop, Anthony Randazzo, has been appointed to head the Vatican’s religious texts and law prefecture and will be posted to Rome in three months.

Bishop Randazzo, as Prefect of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts, will become the most senior Australian posted to the curia in the Holy See and the most senior Australian at the Vatican since the late cardinal George Pell was appointed to the fourth highest post as the “treasurer” of the Catholic Church.

The appointment shows the intention of the new Pope to ensure a rigorous interpretation of what is correct and acceptable church law and teaching across the global Catholic Church and the Eastern orthodox churches.

Bishop Randazzo is a graduate in canon law from the pontifical Gregorian University and spent five years in Rome between 2004 and 2009 at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

“I am profoundly grateful to Pope Leo for the confidence and trust he has placed in me,” ­Archbishop Randazzo told The Australian.

Pope Leo personally informed Bishop Randazzo of the appointment at a meeting in the Vatican two weeks ago after the Australian bishop had been delayed in Dubai after an Iranian missile hit the airport in the United Arab Emirates city.

Although Bishop Randazzo thought he may have to abandon the trip and return to Australia the Vatican insisted he come to Rome, where the Pope informed him of his plans in an hour-long personal meeting in Rome.

Bishop Randazzo returned to Australia but will leave for the post in three months.

The Dicastery for Legislative Texts serves the Pope in promoting and safeguarding the proper understanding, interpretation, and application of canon law across the Latin Church and the Eastern Catholic Churches, ensuring that ecclesiastical laws are applied with fidelity, clarity, and juridical precision.

As Prefect, Archbishop Randazzo will oversee the Dicastery’s work in formulating authentic interpretations of universal Church law, offering authoritative clarifications on juridical questions, and assisting in the development and refinement of canonical legislation.

Bishop Randazzo’s posting to Rome is the second surprise Papal appointment for Australian Catholics after Pope Francis in 2024 appointed Mykola Bychok, then the bishop of the Eparchy Saints Peter and Paul of Melbourne of the Ukrainians, as a cardinal.

Bishop Bychok, a Redemptorist priest, was born in Ukraine in 1980 and served in Lviv in Ukraine, Poland and later in Serbia and Russia. He continues to serve in Melbourne as a Cardinal. But Cardinal Bychok is not an Australian Cardinal and there has been no Australian Cardinal since the death of Cardinal Pell in 2023. Cardinal Pell was posted from Sydney to the Vatican in 2014 with a brief to reform the antiquated finances of the Catholic Church and successfully uncovered millions of lost euros and corruption within Vatican spending.

Bishop Randazzo, who has been the bishop for Broken Bay for the last six years, said: “During my time as bishop of the Diocese of Broken Bay, the clergy and faithful have been a true joy in my ministry. I remain forever grateful to God, who entrusted me with the care of His flock.

“It has also been both a privilege and a joy to walk the journey of faith with the Ordinariate of Our Lady of the Southern Cross in Australia, an experience that has embodied the reality of lived ecumenism.”

Bob Prevost, as a bishop, before he became Pope Leo XIV, visited Australia four times, going to Brisbane and Cairns, Melbourne, Bendigo and Sydney – including the Diocese of Broken Bay which takes in northern Sydney and the central coast.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/broken-bay-bishop-anthony-randazzo-plucked-by-pope-leo-to-become-the-vaticans-top-aussie/news-story/9411d5e193e9445527ffab78943f2941

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2026/03/25/260325a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38822

File: 1b8e2e783c1dff2⋯.jpg (406.86 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 136499110ed7589⋯.jpg (426.09 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7cc30b67f55528d⋯.jpg (393.77 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8bc77412ebf64d0⋯.jpg (458.79 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24429028 (260947ZMAR26) Notable: Bondi hero Ahmed Al Ahmed awarded symbolic key to the city and recognised for bravery during terror attack - Bondi attack survivor Ahmed Al Ahmed has been honoured with a key to the city and lifetime beach parking pass for his actions during the December 14 terror attack. The 43-year-old was filmed confronting a gunman and disarming him before being shot, in an incident that left 15 people dead at a Hanukkah event. New South Wales Premier Chris Minns said his actions “showed … what true Australian courage looks like”, while Waverley Mayor Will Nemesh described his response as “unflinching resolve”. Governor Margaret Beazley called it “courage beyond courage”. Ahmed said his “heart cries” for the victims but urged unity, saying Australians must “stand with each other” in the face of violence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23981350 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24042410 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24295228 (pb)

>>38729

Bondi hero Ahmed Al Ahmed awarded symbolic key to the city and recognised for bravery during terror attack

Shannon Corvo - 26 March 2026

Bondi hero Ahmed Al Ahmed has been awarded a key to the city and a lifetime beach parking pass for his bravery during the December 14 terror attack.

The 43-year-old went viral after footage showed him sneaking up behind one of the two gunmen shooting at attendees of a Jewish event and wrestling a long-barrelled gun away from him.

He was shot several times following the altercation, requiring multiple surgeries at St George Hospital.

Fifteen people were killed at the Hanukkah celebration, called Chanukah by the Sea at Archer Park, with the youngest only 10 years old.

The father-of-two was presented with the gifts to honour his heroism at a ceremony hosted by Waverley Council, where Bondi Beach is located.

Recognition of 'unflinching resolve'

A video message from New South Wales Premier Chris Minns was played for the audience, in which he thanked and praised Mr Ahmed for his actions, which "showed the nation and the world what true Australian courage looks like".

"Without a second thought and without a sense of your own self-preservation, you put your own life at risk to save people you'd never met before," he said.

Waverley Mayor Will Nemesh said footage of Mr Ahmed disarming one of the gunmen "has become synonymous with heroism and the bravery of ordinary Australians displayed during that day".

"When confronted by hatred in the worst form, you acted with urgency and unflinching resolve," he said.

"The story of Hanukkah itself is about shining a light on darkness, of being brave when confronted with evil, and making a worthy contribution to our world, and I think we would all agree that this perfectly describes Ahmed.

"We all pray that you make a full and speedy recovery from your injuries."

Cr Nemesh said the Waverley community was "grateful" for what he did, and that the key to the city was "council's greatest recognition and symbolises our everlasting gratitude".

Mr Ahmed then became the second person in the council's history to receive a lifetime beach parking permit for the LGA, which also includes Bondi.

'We say to you, our beaches are your beaches and you will forever have a place here in Waverley," Cr Nemesh said.

'Courage beyond courage'

Governor of New South Wales Margaret Beazley also spoke at the ceremony, acknowledging Mr Ahmed's injuries sustained during the encounter.

She said his actions brought to her mind the motto of surf lifesaving: "Whomsoever you see in distress, recognise in them a fellow human being."

"What you exposed yourself to, I suspect no-one can fully gauge personally, other than to have an appreciation that it was courage beyond courage," Ms Beazley said.

"It was that good person in you, in which we and the rest of the community thanks you and stands in awe."

After making the joke, "Nothing's as good as a parking sticker," Ms Beazley presented Mr Ahmed with two gifts.

The first was a governor's coin, and the second a Christmas decoration.

'My heart cries'

Mr Ahmed thanked the attendees and officials, then opened up about the fateful day.

"With that day when I just enter Bondi … it was very easy. I don't know. It was God; God's choice to make everything by minute, by number. All the situation was 10 minutes from when I [had arrived]," he said.

"I feel honestly for all those lost and still I feel sadness about Bondi and my heart cries, but what I want to say, we have to be strong and stand with each other and wish peace for this beautiful land."

Mr Ahmed also shared a story about going to the barber before the ceremony, where he claimed someone said: "I still don't understand how you run into the guy with a gun … no-one can do that."

"I said, 'why can no-one do it?' If you have a heart and if you are Australian, and when you see someone evil come to hurt your people, are you going to stand and watch and look?'" he said.

"Myself, I'm choosing myself as Australian, as a good citizen, everyone has to go in and show in for Australia and for all our family."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-25/bondi-hero-ahmed-al-ahmed-awarded-key-to-city-terror-attack/106495970

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38823

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24433108 (271153ZMAR26) Notable: Albanese says he hasn’t received direct request for help after Trump takes swipe at ‘not great’ Australia - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has downplayed criticism from United States President Donald Trump, who said Australia was “not great” for not offering more support in the Iran conflict. Albanese said no direct request for additional assistance had been made, adding that “there is no request … that has not been agreed to”. Australia has deployed a Wedgetail surveillance aircraft and personnel to the United Arab Emirates in a defensive role, supporting regional operations. Defence Minister Richard Marles said current contributions align with national interests, while leaving open the possibility of further support if requested. The exchange highlights tensions over burden-sharing, with Albanese reiterating Australia’s focus on de-escalation and measured involvement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38740

>>38764

>>38779

>>38792

>>38793

>>38796

Albanese says he hasn’t received direct request for help after Trump takes swipe at ‘not great’ Australia

PM downplay’s Trump’s claims after US president criticises lack of support for war against Iran

Josh Butler - 27 Mar 2026

1/2

Donald Trump has taken another swipe at Australia, alongside Nato, the UK and most of the rest of the world, for not getting more involved in the US-Israel war against Iran.

But Australia’s prime minister, Anthony Albanese, again said he had not received any direct requests for help from Trump, and noted the government had not been given any advance notice of the US-Israel military strikes on Iran.

At a press conference on Thursday at the White House, the US president was asked to reflect on phone calls with the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer. He began by describing Starmer as a “lovely man”.

However, he continued, “[Starmer] did something that was shocking: he didn’t want to help us. And maybe in particular that country, you know, the longest bond, the longest ally.

“Australia, too, Australia was not great. I was a little surprised by Australia.

“I wouldn’t say anybody was great, other than the five countries in the Middle East. We never really had very much support.”

The Albanese government deployed an E7 Wedgetail surveillance aircraft and about 85 defence personnel to the United Arab Emirates, in what has been described as a defensive effort to help assist Australians in the region. Australia also operates military assets from a base in the UAE, and supplied missiles to the country’s government. The plane is feeding information into the Combined Air Operations Centre in Qatar, the facility that helps the US coordinate Middle Eastern operations.

Minister for defence, Richard Marles, this week did not rule out extending the deployment of the Wedgetail, which is now two weeks into what was described as an “initial four weeks”.

Trump described the Middle East conflict as “little league” and said: “If there’s ever a big [conflict], which I hope there’s not, but if there’s ever a big one, I don’t think they’re going to be there.

“And that’s not fair, and we have to remember that as a country, because we spend trillions of dollars protecting Europe.”

It followed an exchange where Trump had taken aim at Nato countries for their lack of involvement in the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran.

He said: “Actually made a statement, a couple of them, that ‘we want to get involved when the war is over’. No, it’s supposed to get involved with the war’s beginning, or even before it begins.

“We had the UK say – this is three weeks ago – ‘we’ll send our aircraft carriers’, which aren’t the best aircraft carriers, by the way. They’re toys compared to what we have. But ‘we’ll send our aircraft carrier when the war is over’. I said: ‘Oh that’s wonderful, thank you very much. Don’t bother. We don’t need it.’

“Now they all want to help. When they’re annihilated, the other side is annihilated, they said ‘we’d love to send ships’.”

Trump made a similar comment about Australia a week beforehand, when he was asked by an Australian journalist what he wanted from Australia in the Iran conflict. He responded: “Well, they should get involved, and I was a little bit surprised they said no, because we always say yes to them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38824

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24440485 (290514ZMAR26) Notable: Ready for what may come: Australia to scour the globe for extra fuel - (Video) The federal government will rush emergency laws into parliament to secure additional fuel supplies, underwriting private importers to source petrol, diesel and crude oil amid escalating shortages linked to the Iran conflict. The plan will amend legislation to allow Export Finance Australia to provide insurance and financial backing, encouraging companies to purchase high-cost shipments without bearing full commercial risk. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the aim was to ensure Australia is “ready for what may come” as global oil supply tightens and prices surge. While supply remains stable in the short term, Australia’s heavy reliance on imports and dwindling refinery stocks have heightened concern about future availability, prompting a broader national response across industry and government agencies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38741

>>38812

>>38818

>>38819

>>38820

‘Ready for what may come’: Australia to scour the globe for extra fuel

Mike Foley - March 28, 2026

1/2

Emergency laws will be rushed into parliament on Monday in an urgent bid to boost Australia’s fuel stocks, and importers will be given unprecedented government backing to scour the globe for increasingly rare and expensive shipments of petrol, diesel, crude oil and fertiliser.

The Albanese government on Saturday moved to seize the agenda on the unfolding crisis sparked by the Iran war, unveiling the new powers after criticism of its leadership and ahead of a meeting with state premiers when national cabinet is convened on Monday.

It will amend the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act to underwrite purchases by private companies. The government will not pay upfront for fuel, but public funds will be put up as insurance for importers that are having to buy fuel at the current sky-high prices.

The scheme is designed to send a signal to importers to buy up whatever supply they can and bring it to Australia, without worrying about suffering a loss.

Announcing the new laws, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that, while Australia’s fuel supply would remain stable over coming weeks, the country needed to be as prepared as possible.

“The longer this war goes on, the more the impacts will be,” he said.

“I want us to have the strongest possible plans so we’re ready for what may come. I want to keep our people, our economy and our nation moving.”

Oil prices have skyrocketed since the war began on February 28, as 25 per cent of the global oil supply – which typically comes from the Middle East through the Strait of Hormuz – is cut off.

A barrel of oil now costs $US115, up 60 per cent, which has driven petrol and diesel prices in Australia to record highs.

Fuel companies are concerned that, if they buy now at eye-watering prices and then the war suddenly ends, in several weeks they would incur massive losses after the market cools and their shipments land in Australia.

Australia imports 90 per cent of its fuel and nearly all of it comes from Asian refineries. The last seaborne shipments that left the Middle East before the war are now rolling into refineries, which may exhaust their stocks within a month.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Saturday that fuel supply remained secure and in fact had increased slightly on typical levels. While six out of 81 fuel import shipments due by May were cancelled in recent weeks, the government and industry have secured three additional deliveries.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38825

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24440495 (290521ZMAR26) Notable: PM announces new powers to boost fuel supply amid Middle East tensions - (Video) The federal government will underwrite the purchase of additional fuel shipments to boost supply as shortages spread across Australia during the Middle East conflict. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the plan would see public funds absorb financial risks for high-cost imports, giving suppliers confidence to secure “additional and discretionary cargoes” beyond normal contracts. Hundreds of service stations are already experiencing shortages, particularly in New South Wales and Queensland. The legislation, to be introduced Monday, will amend existing laws to grant new fuel security powers. The government insists shortages are driven by demand, warning panic buying is “not sensible”, while maintaining reserves exceed one month. The opposition has signalled cautious support, calling the measures appropriate for “extraordinary times” while continuing to push for fuel excise cuts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

PM announces new powers to boost fuel supply amid Middle East tensions

Samantha Dick and Shari Hams - 28 March 2026

The Albanese government will use public money to underwrite the delivery of extra fuel in a bid to shore up supply during the Middle East conflict.

Hundreds of service stations across Australia are experiencing shortages of either unleaded petrol or diesel, particularly in New South Wales and Queensland.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced the government will take further measures to boost supply by underwriting the purchase of additional fuel from the international market.

Under the plan, petrol giants will still buy fuel, but the government will take on the financial risk of shipments that might otherwise be too expensive.

"This support from the government will not be business as usual," Mr Albanese said.

"It has to be additional supplies that are available on the international market and it literally will be underwriting the purchase of shiploads of fuel to get here to Australia.

"It will give suppliers the confidence to secure additional and discretionary cargoes and can be used to service uncontracted demand, including for regional and independent fuel suppliers."

Requires legislation to be implemented

Labor will introduce legislation to parliament on Monday, seeking to amend the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act to grant new fuel security powers to acquire additional supply.

Tony Wood, a senior fellow in energy and climate change at the Grattan Institute, backed the move during an interview on ABC's Weekend Breakfast.

Mr Wood said he did not know how much the measures would cost taxpayers.

"How long it goes on will dictate absolutely how much money it entails," he said.

"That has some implications for the upcoming budget as well."

He said the action made sense and provided an "insurance against high costs that the companies themselves are finding hard to deal [with]" .

Panic buyers told to stop

The government has repeatedly insisted Australia's fuel shortages are being caused by panic buying — not supply constraints.

Footage circulating on social media shows people filling up multiple jerry cans with fuel at service stations.

"This isn't toilet paper that's being piled up in some garages," Mr Albanese said.

"It's actually fuel, and that's not sensible on a range of levels."

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia had more than a month's worth of fuel in reserve, including petrol and jet fuel.

While the government is taking further steps to target supply, the opposition has been focused on the cost.

Opposition signals cautious support for bill

The Opposition appears open to back the fuel support legislation.

Shadow Energy Minister Dan Tehan said the party will examine the bill to ensure its powers remain proportionate.

"The Coalition believes in freedom of navigation and the free market," Mr Tehan said.

"But as these are extraordinary times, extraordinary powers, such as supporting the costs and insurance of commercial shipping, should be considered as a short-term measure."

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor today repeated his call for the government to halve the fuel excise — a 53 per cent flat tax per litre applied at the petrol pump.

"Our proposal will reduce the price of fuel by 26 cents a litre," he said.

"We are in a fuel-affordability crisis right now. They [customers] are coming to the bowser and they are shocked at what they are seeing."

Mr Albanese did not rule out cutting the fuel excise, but said his focus is on shoring up supply.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-28/government-backs-delivery-of-extra-fuel-cargoes/106506536

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNBHISbVL1Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38826

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24440510 (290528ZMAR26) Notable: Andrew Hastie says Iran war a “huge miscalculation” by Donald Trump - (Video) Shadow Industry Minister Andrew Hastie has warned the Iran war is damaging United States credibility and could erode Australian confidence in the alliance, calling the conflict a “huge miscalculation”. He said Australia had not been consulted and was now exposed to economic risks, with Iran able to “hold the whole world economy to ransom” through the Strait of Hormuz. Hastie said Australians would “question the judgement” of President Donald Trump, while describing criticism of Australia’s response as “petulant”. He also signalled openness to taxing gas exporters, saying the crisis marked a “new era” and that big business had “lost their social licence”. The government continues to focus on fuel supply measures, with further national coordination expected as economic pressures intensify.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38780

>>38823

Andrew Hastie says Iran war a 'huge miscalculation' by Donald Trump

Holly Tregenza - 29 March 2026

Coalition frontbencher Andrew Hastie has warned the credibility of the United States is being damaged and says Australians may be losing faith in the alliance as the war in Iran enters its second month.

The Shadow Minister for Industry and Sovereign Capability said the war in Iran was a "huge miscalculation", and criticised US President Donald Trump's failure to consult its allies including Australia, noting many are dependent on the export of fuel in and out of the Middle East.

"Iran has been able to pretty much hold the whole world economy to ransom," he told Insiders.

"The economic pain is going to be more acute, and [the Australian public] are going to question the judgement of the president.

"Had we had a bit more lead time, we would not be in the current crisis we are now."

Mr Hastie said as a "close friend" of the United States, Australia had a right to "be honest" and ask "hard questions".

Earlier this week, Mr Hastie said Iran had Australia "by the balls" in the Strait of Hormuz.

He described Mr Trump's criticism of Australia's refusal to heed calls to send war ships to the strait as "petulant".

Changing world order opens door to tax changes

Mr Hastie said the American president was testing the boundaries of the world order and would not rule out supporting a new tax on gas exports to shield Australians from the economic fallout.

"It's not just Iran, China and Russia testing this world order. Donald Trump and his team have said it's dead, and we need to take that seriously," he said.

The government has sought modelling from Treasury for new levy options on gas exporters profiting from the global energy crisis.

Unions, the Greens, crossbenchers and One Nation are among those who want gas profits levied, with pressure mounting on Labor to respond to growing calls to reform the current tax system.

Some members of the Coalition have joined the gas industry to argue the current energy crisis is the worst time to act.

But Mr Hastie signalled he may be open to the levy, and said the Iran war had changed Australia's position.

“I think multinationals and big business in this country have lost their social licence, they’ve made no effort to recover it," he said.

"Before February 28, we were in a different situation to what we are now. This is a new era. The world order has collapsed."

He said the "whole system" needed an overhaul, but cautioned reform would need to be made in the context of a potential recession.

"We're about to potentially slide into a recession, and one of the things we have going for us is our abundance of gas.

"Is introducing a new tax right at this time going to help our situation?"

Expected push against work from home

On Saturday, the government announced it would underwrite the delivery of additional cargoes of fuel to Australia to ease supply shortages.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was in discussions with suppliers to source additional fuel on the international market.

State and territory leaders will meet on Sunday afternoon ahead of Monday's meeting of national cabinet.

They are expected to push against the possibility of a COVID-style mandate to work from home, and focus on working in unison on any future steps like fuel rationing.

Last week, Mr Albanese said it would "make sense" for people to work from home if they could do so.

But Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said the supply pinch was not at the point where work from home measures were being considered.

"We are not at the stage yet where we are suggesting people should work from home because of the fuel shortages," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-29/australians-may-be-losing-faith-in-us-alliance-hastie-says/106508216

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1BdOfsRLbw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38827

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24443520 (300850ZMAR26) Notable: Dezi Freeman killed by police in Victoria's north-east after seven-month hunt - (Video) A man believed to be fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman has been shot dead by police following a three-hour stand-off in Victoria’s north-east, ending a months-long manhunt. Police surrounded a remote property near the Murray River early Monday before Freeman emerged and allegedly pointed a firearm, after which he was fatally shot. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said officers gave “every opportunity” for a peaceful resolution and acted appropriately. Freeman had been on the run since the fatal shooting of two police officers in August, prompting one of the state’s largest search operations involving thousands of leads and extensive regional searches. Authorities said the outcome brings “closure” to a “tragic and terrible event”, though formal identification is still underway and investigations into the shooting will continue, including oversight by professional standards. Police said no officers were injured, the suspect was believed to be alone, and the investigation had examined more than 2,000 leads across difficult terrain over the past months.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23947365 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24205831 (pb)

Dezi Freeman killed by police in Victoria's north-east after seven-month hunt

Tim Callanan and Steve Vivian - 30 March 2026

1/3

Police have shot dead a man believed to be fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman following a three-hour stand-off in Victoria's north-east this morning.

Victoria Police is yet to officially confirm the identity of the man but the ABC understands it was Freeman, who had been on the run since the fatal shooting of two police officers last August.

Freeman, 56, was shot at a property on Murray River Road in Thologolong, on the border with NSW, about 150 kilometres north-east of the site of the police shootings at Porepunkah.

Early on Monday morning police officers surrounded a building, described as a cross between a shipping container and a long caravan, where Freeman had been hiding.

A stand-off began about 5:30am before Freeman was fatally shot about 8:30am after he emerged from the shipping container, police said.

Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said Freeman was "given every opportunity to resolve [the situation] peacefully, but did not do so".

"Everything I have seen, everything I have briefed upon, tell me that our officers acted appropriately," he said at a press conference late this afternoon.

Chief Commissioner Bush said he had seen footage showing the person leaving the shipping container on the property and pointing a firearm at police.

"We tried everything possible, every tactical option that we have, to encourage the deceased to end this in a safe and peaceful manner," he said.

"They weren't taken."

He said that, in video he had seen, Freeman was wearing something like a blanket over his shoulders when he emerged from the shipping container.

He said it was from this cloak that he produced a firearm and pointed it towards police.

Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said a "very formal identification process" had to be carried out before the man's identity could be confirmed.

"The very first people to be made aware of the outcome of this operation were the families of the officers tragically killed on the 26th of August and all of the members that were involved on this day.

"Should it be confirmed that the deceased is Freeman, this brings closure to what was a tragic and terrible event."

Aerial footage from a helicopter show the remote property at a secluded location on the banks of the Murray River.

Photos of the property show heavily armoured police vehicles in attendance, parked next to derelict vehicles and shipping containers.

Chief Commissioner Bush said police believed Freeman was alone on the property.

"The information I have at the moment is that over the last 24 hours … there has been no one else except for the deceased at the property," he said.

He said it was quite possible the weapon found at the scene was a firearm taken from one of the slain police officers.

Earlier, Chief Commissioner Bush declined to provide detail on what led to police locating Freeman.

"The perseverance and the persistence of this investigation team exploring every other avenue that was open to them is what's led to this," he said.

"I'm not at liberty to share any confidential information."

He said the shooting brought to a close one of the biggest search operations in the history of Victoria Police.

"It was a horrendous crime where two of our officers were murdered and one was seriously injured. For that reason, it was our primary investigation," he said.

"It brings closure for every member of Victoria Police, not just those who have been directly involved."

Victoria Police said no officers were injured in the operation on Monday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38828

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24443533 (300911ZMAR26) Notable: Firearm found near Dezi Freeman’s shipping-container hideout - A firearm has been recovered near the site where police fatally shot suspected double cop killer Dezi Freeman, with images showing a discarded pistol beside his remote hideout in Victoria’s north-east. Police confirmed video captured Freeman emerging from a shipping-container structure and pointing a weapon at officers, prompting the fatal shooting after a prolonged stand-off. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said the action removed any chance of a peaceful resolution, with officers given “every opportunity” to surrender. Investigators are examining whether the weapon belonged to one of the officers killed in August. Authorities believe Freeman was alone at the property, while the state coroner will oversee an independent investigation into the shooting as part of standard procedure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38827

Firearm found near Dezi Freeman’s shipping-container hideout

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 30 March 2026

1/3

A discarded pistol has been found by police near the scene of the deadly confrontation between accused double cop killer Dezi Freeman and heavily armed police near the fugitive’s shipping-container hideout.

Photographs taken by The Australian from a helicopter clearly show the discarded weapon with a crime scene number placed beside it at an isolated property outside of Walwa in northeast Victoria.

The firearm photo emerged as it can also be revealed police video captured the deadly moment Freeman, wanted over the double shooting murders of two police officers in Porepunkah last August, pulled a gun on heavily armed cops as they surrounded him in his isolated country hideout.

Victoria’s top cop Mike Bush confirmed in a late afternoon press conference at the scene of the fatal climax to a 216-day manhunt had been recorded on police cameras.

Chief commissioner Bush revealed he had seen video of Freeman leaving the building, which appears to be a converted shipping container, and displaying a firearm at officers.

“That action took away any discretion our officers had to resolve this peacefully,” Mr Bush said.

Mr Bush said as far as police knew, there hadn’t been anyone apart from Freeman at the property in the past 24 hours.

“That doesn’t mean there haven’t been in the past,” he said.

He said police were yet to locate and speak with the owner of the property, believed to be Richard Arnold Sutherland. There is no suggestion Mr Sutherland knew Freeman was on the land.

Mr Bush said it was possible Freeman’s weapon had belonged to one of the officers shot dead in August.

He said police had been at the property for over 24 hours and began negotiating with Freeman at 5.30am.

“During those negotiations the deceased did share information to confirm who he was,” he said.

Freeman came out of his hiding spot wrapped in a blanket before exposing a weapon.

Victoria Police confirmed “it is understood a number of police discharged their firearms” during the confrontation around 8.30am.

Premier Jacinta Allan welcomed the development on Monday afternoon.

“Today an evil man is dead and it’s over,” Ms Allan said.

“And it’s good that this individual is no longer a threat to the Victorian community.”

Ms Allan said her thoughts were with the families of the killed police officers and the community of Porepunkah.

“The threat may be over, but for you the mourning will never end,” she said.

Mr Bush revealed on Monday that a 216-day manhunt for the accused cop killer had come to an end when police shot Freeman dead at a property in the northeast town of Walwa.

Special Operations Group police led the raid on the property.

At the late afternoon press conference at the scene of the confrontation, Mr Bush said the state coroner would lead the independent investigation into the shooting.

Mr Bush said the coroner would be supported by Victoria Police, but that he was “very comfortable” with the actions of officers.

“Everything I have seen, everything I have been briefed upon, tell me that our officers acted appropriately,” Mr Bush said.

“It’s quite clear to us now that the deceased was given every opportunity to resolve this peacefully and did not take that option.”

“Everything I know at this point tells me that this shooting was justified,” he said. Mr Bush said the police operation was conducted by professionals.

“There was an appeal to encourage the person to come out … it did result from a standoff. He then exited the building. There was an opportunity for him to surrender peacefully, which he did not. We strongly believe he was armed,” Mr Bush said.

Freeman, according to a report in the Herald Sun, was shot dead after he emerged firing a hand gun taken from one of the police he is suspecting of killing in Porepunkah. The Herald Sun has revealed the SOG surrounded the property overnight and threw stun grenades before the shootout.

The police raid started around 5.30am, the chief commissioner said. Mr Bush has stopped short of naming Freeman as the victim but said the families of the dead police had been informed.

A Filipino couple may become a key focus for investigators as they piece together his life on the run.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38829

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24443543 (300945ZMAR26) Notable: How Dezi evaded cops and secretly moved 200km during seven-month manhunt, as police reveal “strong theory” - (Video) Police believe fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman likely received assistance to travel nearly 200 kilometres during a seven-month manhunt, as investigators examine how he evaded capture after allegedly killing two officers. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said it would have been “very difficult” for Freeman to reach the remote property alone, with inquiries continuing into whether others harboured or supported him. Freeman was located in a container-style structure near Walwa before a fatal stand-off with police. Authorities had previously considered he may be dead, citing no confirmed sightings, but maintained multiple possibilities including survival in remote bushland. Experts said his ability to evade detection reflected “rat-like cunning”, while police continue investigating movements, support networks and the circumstances of his final location.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38828

How Dezi evaded cops and secretly moved 200km during seven-month manhunt, as police reveal ‘strong theory’

Harrison Christian and Cydonee Mardon - March 30, 2026

1/2

Police have a “strong theory” on Dezi Freeman’s movements in the days after shooting dead two police officers in August.

Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush did not share that information with reporters on Monday, but said it would have been “very difficult” for the fugitive cop killer to travel alone almost 200 kilometres to the remote container where he was found.

Sources told the Herald Sun that a Filipino couple had been hiding Freeman at the property and he emerged from a container firing a hand gun he stole from Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson in August.

Thompson was one of two police officers who Freeman allegedly shot before going on the run for seven months.

Officers had surrounded the container early on Monday morning in a three-hour siege and deployed flash bangs before Freeman emerged with the gun blazing, sources said.

Police confirmed a man had been shot about 8.30am at a property in northeast Victoria as part of the seven-month operation to locate Freeman, with no officers injured during the incident.

Cops were tipped off that Freeman was hiding in a container on a property near the isolated town of Walwa, 188km or a two-and-a-half hour drive northeast of Porepunkah, where he was last seen on August 26.

Chief Commissioner Bush said on Monday morning that police still had to “run through a very formal identification process” to confirm the man who was fatally shot was Freeman.

While the Professional Standards Command would investigate the shooting, “everything I know at this point tells me that this shooting was justified,” the Chief Commissioner said.

“There was an appeal to encourage the person to come out - we’re examining the sequence of events.

“It did result from a stand-off, the deployment of tactics; he then exited the building. There was an opportunity for him to surrender peacefully, which he did not.

“We strongly believe - yet to be confirmed as well - that he was armed.”

Chief Commissioner Bush described the dwelling where Freeman was shot as a “cross between a container and a very long caravan”.

He said “everyone in that environment will be spoken to” to see whether or not they assisted Freeman.

“It’s a rural property, at some point we’ll be able to describe it. It’s a very remote community. To my knowledge, no one else was in the immediate vicinity.”

Police were still investigating whether anyone had helped Freeman to travel from the Porepunkah area where the hunt began to where he was found, and aided him while he was on the run, Chief Commissioner Bush said.

“It would be very difficult for him to get to where he was - if that is in fact him - without assistance.”

‘Rat-like cunning’: How Dezi survived seven months

Criminal psychologist Tim Watson-Munro said Freeman had been found close to where the manhunt began because the area was a “safe haven for him” and he had used “rat-like cunning” to escape the law.

“He was able to evade people. He’s an intelligent man. Or he was, to survive like that for as long as he did - I think speaks to his capacity to survive in the bush,” Mr Watson-Munro told 7 News.

“So living in a container would not necessarily be that arduous for him.”

The psychologist added that the sovereign citizen ideology meant Freeman must have believed the law didn’t apply to him.

“They think that they create their own laws.

“So for him to commit the murders that he did to evade detection, he would think it’s his sovereign right not to be caught and not to be held accountable. It’s all part of their thinking.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38830

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24443548 (300953ZMAR26) Notable: Fuel price cut for Easter as fears grow nation will be in recession by Christmas - (Video) The federal government will halve the fuel excise for three months from April 1, cutting petrol prices by 26 cents per litre as part of a national response to the fuel crisis linked to the Iran conflict. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said supply would remain stable into May, while urging Australians to continue travel plans and support the economy. The plan includes releasing reserves, underwriting imports and preparing further measures such as carpooling and potential rationing if shortages worsen. Economists warned surging oil prices could drive inflation higher and force multiple interest rate rises, raising the risk of recession by Christmas. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the tax cut would deliver “targeted” relief, while opposition figures warned it could add pressure to inflation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

>>38825

Fuel price cut for Easter as fears grow nation will be in recession by Christmas

Mike Foley - March 30, 2026

1/2

Excise tax will be halved for three months to deliver a 26¢ cut to a litre of petrol, Labor has announced, as economists warn the Iran war could force interest rates up three more times by August and drive the economy into a recession by Christmas.

The dire economic outlook followed the release by national cabinet of a fuel crisis plan, to co-ordinate national response to the international energy crunch caused by the loss of 20 per cent of global oil supply from the Middle East.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia’s fuel supply remained secure into May, as the volume of fuel imports was expected to stay at normal levels, and he encouraged motorists not to ditch their plans for travel over Easter.

“People should enjoy their Easter. And it’s important as well that we keep the economy going. Easter is an important time for tourism destinations, for jobs,” he said.

The cut in excise will kick in on Wednesday, April 1, but further relief could come as state premiers consider a possible easing of the 10 per cent GST on fuel sales.

Australia imports 90 per cent of its diesel and petrol, and the fuel plan outlined four steps to keep the economy moving if supply runs short.

The nation is already at stage two of the plan under which the government seeks to boost fuel supplies. That includes releasing strategic reserves, underwriting the cost of importing petrol and diesel and lowering fuel standards.

State and federal governments are consulting industries about how, if the war drags on, to roll out the rest of the plan. That includes fuel-saving measures such as encouraging carpooling and working from home.

Fuel rationing would kick in under stage four if there are “significant” gaps in supply. This could include forcing motorists and non-essential industries to curb their use, with priority given to critical sectors such as agriculture, food distribution, transport and mining.

Panic buying has drained fuel at hundreds of service stations across the country and helped force prices to record levels. Regular unleaded petrol has reached $2.53 per litre, up 40 per cent compared to prices before the war began on February 28, while diesel is now at $3.10.

NSW Premier Chris Minns said he was working with industries about any potential fuel rationing.

“A lot of work is going into these different phases, and level three and level four are still under consideration and consultation,” Minns said.

Albanese, who made a plea to US President Donald Trump for a “de-escalation” of the war, also announced that the heavy vehicle road user charge, which affects companies that supply the nation’s supermarkets and food retailers, would be axed for the three months.

A fuel industry source, not willing to speak publicly, said the national plan would help alleviate panic buying, while spelling out later measures would have made things worse.

“There is nothing the government could have announced that would not have spurred panic buying,” they said.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said reductions in government taxes on petrol were designed to take “some of the sting” out of fuel prices sent skyrocketing by the war in the Middle East. He said it would result in a $19 reduction in the cost of filling a 65-litre petrol tank, and cost the budget an estimated $2.55 billion.

“This is timely. This is targeted. This is responsible cost-of-living relief to help people get through a difficult period,” Chalmers said.

But shadow treasurer Tim Wilson said the government had to take responsibility for an increase in inflation.

“Australia’s persistent inflation fire may be given extra oxygen from international events, but mortgage holders would be breathing easier had the government snuffed the fire before these events,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38831

File: 3cd22981598ff4d⋯.mp4 (15.73 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24443557 (301005ZMAR26) Notable: Albanese: I want “certainty” from Trump on Iran war aims - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for greater clarity from United States President Donald Trump on the objectives of the Iran war, urging “certainty” and de-escalation as tensions escalate. Albanese said a clearer strategy was needed as conflicting signals emerged, with Washington pursuing negotiations while increasing troop deployments and considering expanded military actions. Trump said a deal could be reached “fairly quickly” but also raised the prospect of seizing Iran’s oil, signalling potential escalation. Albanese said while Iran’s regime was “abhorrent and reprehensible”, history showed externally imposed regime change was difficult and often counterproductive. He said recent strikes had “clearly” degraded Iran’s nuclear and proxy capabilities, but broader outcomes remained uncertain, with negotiations and military activity continuing in parallel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38823

Albanese: I want ‘certainty’ from Trump on Iran war aims

Matthew Knott - March 30, 2026

1/2

Canberra/Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for more clarity from Donald Trump about his aims for the war in Iran, as the US president muses on the possibility of seizing the regime’s oil supplies.

Albanese’s more forceful language after a month of war in the Middle East came as Trump insisted that the war could end soon after progress in negotiations, even as the Pentagon orders the deployment of 10,000 more troops to Iran.

“I want to see more certainty in what the objectives of the war are, and I want to see a de-escalation,” Albanese told reporters on Monday. “So a de-escalation is in the global economy’s interests.”

Trump told the London Financial Times in his latest interview that the US military had “another couple of thousand targets to go” in Iran and that “a deal could be made fairly quickly”.

But in the same interview, Trump said he wanted to seize Iran’s oil resources, a move that would mark a major escalation in the conflict.

“To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran, but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘Why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said.

Taking Iran’s oil would require a risky military operation involving the invasion and occupation of its main export hub, Kharg Island, which also houses an Iranian naval base. Trump said that taking Kharg Island “would also mean we had to be there for a while”.

The US has sent dissonant messages about the next stages of the war. Trump has pushed for ceasefire talks with Iran even as the military ramps up forces in the region.

Thousands of US troops amassed in the Middle East at the weekend, including an amphibious assault team that arrived on Saturday. Members of the 82nd Airborne Division were also on their way.

Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday night (Washington time) that Iran “gave” America most of the 15 demands it issued to Tehran to end the war, even as it remained unclear whether either side was negotiating.

“They gave us most of the points. Why wouldn’t they?” he said, declining to specify what concessions Iran had offered.

Publicly, Iran has rejected the US’ 15-point list of ceasefire terms delivered by the Trump administration via intermediaries in Pakistan, and has countered with five conditions of its own – including maintaining sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

The president said on Sunday that the US and Iran had been meeting “directly and indirectly” and that Iran’s new leaders have been “very reasonable”, claiming they would permit 20 more oil cargo ships through the Strait from Monday (Washington time) as a “sign of respect”.

But negotiations did not preclude further military action.

“We’re doing extremely well in that negotiation,” Trump said. “But you never know with Iran because we negotiate with them and then we always have to blow them up.”

Trump also suggested that the US had already achieved its goal of regime change, saying: “We’re dealing with different people than anybody’s dealt with before” following the killing of many of Iran’s senior leaders, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38832

File: 6ba0547c354f5d6⋯.mp4 (5.03 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24447111 (310834ZMAR26) Notable: Anthony Albanese calls for “more certainty” on US objectives in Iran war - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged the United States to clarify its objectives and commit to an end point in the Iran war as global fuel prices surge, telling ABC’s 7.30 program he wanted “more certainty” and a “de-escalation”. Albanese warned the conflict was causing “devastating” economic damage and prolonged impacts. He said the US had likely achieved its initial goals of curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions and degrading its military capacity, but questioned the feasibility of externally imposed regime change. While reaffirming Australia’s “constructive relationship” with President Donald Trump, Albanese called for clearer direction as the US weighs further military steps. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor also called for the Strait of Hormuz to reopen to ease fuel costs, while broader political pressure grows for an end to the conflict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38823

>>38831

Anthony Albanese calls for 'more certainty' on US objectives in Iran war

Tom Lowrey and Paul Johnson - 30 March 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called on US President Donald Trump to commit to an end for the Iran War as global fuel prices continue to spiral.

Mr Albanese had earlier said he wanted "more certainty" from the US on its objectives in Iran, especially after Mr Trump's three stated ones had been met.

In the weeks since the conflict broke out the federal government has offered support for the United States' actions, arguing it is important to prevent Iran building a nuclear weapon, and to weaken the regime's capacity to threaten global security.

"I note the president today has said that there has been regime change," Mr Albanese told 7.30.

"I think the president is in a position whereby he can claim that he has achieved the objectives that he set out to."

Mr Trump has in recent days spoken of putting troops on the ground in the US but Mr Albanese called for the opposite, as the world battles skyrocketing fuel prices that have been caused by Iran slowing shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

"I want to see a recognition of the economic damage that this conflict is continuing to result in," Mr Albanese said.

"I want to see an end or a de-escalation to the conflict."

He said the economic pain the world and Australia was in was of particular concern to him.

"This has had a devastating impact and that tail will continue for some time.

"Quite clearly there is a need to see an end point. I think that's what people want to see."

Asked if his comments represented a rift between Australia and the US, the prime minister denied that was the case.

"Not at all," he told 7.30.

"We have a very constructive relationship personally, myself and President Trump."

Regime change difficult to achieve, PM warns

Mr Albanese said if the goal was the downfall of the Iranian regime, that could be a very difficult proposition.

"At the beginning of the conflict the objectives were outlined as one: stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, which has been clearly achieved," he said.

"Secondly, degrading the opportunity that Iran has for engaging in military action, either overt or through its proxies in Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis. Clearly there has been a substantial degrading of Iran's position.

"The third was regime change and I think that, very clearly, history tells us that regime change imposed from outside is very difficult."

Thousands of US marines and sailors have been sent to the region as US President Donald Trump reportedly weighs the next steps.

Mr Albanese said he would like to see the end of the "abhorrent and reprehensible" Iranian regime, but called on the US to be clear as to whether that is what it is pursuing.

"Whether that is going to occur or not is something that I think needs to be outlined," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38833

File: adb7d4548234f59⋯.jpg (3.4 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2f2eb21976c6fb⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,4558x2849,4558:2849,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 49507ed58c72bae⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,5000x3749,5000:3749,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24447120 (310848ZMAR26) Notable: Five social media platforms investigated over compliance with under-16 ban - Five major social media platforms are under investigation for potential breaches of Australia’s under-16 ban, with authorities shifting toward enforcement after identifying compliance failures. Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube were flagged for “potential noncompliance”, including allowing repeated attempts to bypass age checks and failing to prevent banned users from creating new accounts. Communications Minister Anika Wells said “big tech needs to do better”, warning companies face significant penalties if they fail to meet legal obligations. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said enforcement action would depend on evidence of systemic failures. A survey found many underage users remain active despite the ban, raising concerns about the effectiveness of safeguards as regulators prepare potential legal action.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23873299 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23939208 (pb)

>>38735

Five social media platforms investigated over compliance with under-16 ban

Maani Truu and Nicole Asher - 31 March 2026

1/2

Five social media platforms are being investigated by the government's online safety watchdog for potentially failing to comply with the ban on users under 16, almost four months after the world-leading laws came into force.

Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube are being investigated for "potential noncompliance" with the ban, Communications Minister Anika Wells revealed.

An update on the ban, released by the eSafety commissioner, has identified a range of what it called poor practices that encouraged children and teens to access the platforms.

The report detailed examples of social media companies allowing underage users to repeatedly attempt age assurance until they pass, and failing to do enough to stop teenagers and children from opening new accounts after being kicked off.

As a result, eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the commission was "moving into an enforcement stance".

"These platforms can comply today, and we certainly expect companies operating in Australia to comply with our safety laws," she said.

"They can choose to do so or face escalating consequences, including profound reputational erosion with governments and consumers globally."

The update also alleged that some companies had failed to introduce clear and effective mechanisms for parents and other people to report underage users.

An eSafety Commission survey of 898 parents, conducted at the tail end of January, found about a third of children still had social media accounts, down from half before the ban kicked in.

Of under-16s who had accounts before the ban, between 60 and 70 per cent had managed to stay on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Tiktok, the survey revealed, while just under 50 per cent still had an account with YouTube.

"That isn't the law failing, that isn't Australian parents or Australian kids not complying, that is big tech taking the piss, to be honest," Ms Wells said.

"We would have liked to see a drop [in] those figures and the fact that we're not seeing a drop in those figures is why I'm here telling you we are moving from investigations to enforcement because big tech needs to do better."

To continue to do business in Australia, the minister said the companies had to obey Australian law.

"If eSafety finds these companies have systemically failed to uphold their legal obligations then I expect the commissioner to throw the book at them," she said.

Social media giants face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to take reasonable steps to comply with the ban, but there is no penalty for parents or children who go around it.

Tech breaches no 'speeding fine'

Inman Grant said gathering enough evidence to show companies had not taken reasonable steps to comply with the ban would take time.

A decision on whether the first five investigations will lead to enforcement action is not expected until the middle of the year.

Ms Wells defended the time frame, telling reporters it "isn't a police officer issuing a speeding find on the spot".

"This is world-leading law that requires the eSafety commissioner to go to the Federal Court of Australia and to do that we need to build the evidence base," she said.

To build a case against the social media giants, Dr Inman Grant said the commission had to have sufficient evidence that they had failed to introduce systems and processes to make the ban work.

"That means more than simply demonstrating some children do still have accounts," she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38834

File: ab57ee3f6ec33fc⋯.jpg (210.94 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5a7ed570c9d5df2⋯.jpg (2.28 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 56209c44d552855⋯.jpg (4.96 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24447126 (310901ZMAR26) Notable: Police vow to track down the people who helped Dezi Freeman - Police have pledged to pursue anyone who assisted fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman during his seven months on the run, following his fatal shooting in Victoria’s north-east. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said it would have been “very difficult” for Freeman to travel nearly 200 kilometres without help, confirming investigators will examine who may have harboured or supported him. Authorities will question all individuals connected to the rural property where Freeman was found, seeking to determine how long he had been there and who provided assistance. Police warned anyone found complicit could face serious criminal charges, with potential penalties of up to 20 years’ imprisonment. The investigation continues alongside efforts to establish the full circumstances of Freeman’s movements and support network.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38828

>>38829

Police vow to track down the people who helped Dezi Freeman

Angus Delaney - March 30, 2026

1/2

Police have vowed to continue chasing the people who helped Dezi Freeman hide from the law after the dangerous killer was shot dead in an early morning raid on a rural property.

Chief Commissioner Mike Bush confirmed that police were investigating whether Freeman was being assisted or harboured by supporters hours after Freeman was gunned down at a property in Thologolong in north-east Victoria.

Bush said it was likely that Freeman had help during the seven months he was on the run after he shot dead two police officers who were attempting to serve a warrant on him at a property in Porepunkah.

The property where Freeman was found is nearly 200 kilometres from where he was last seen by authorities in Porepunkah in August last year.

“It would be very difficult for him to get where he was without assistance,” Bush said.

“We will be speaking to anyone we suspect has assisted him in avoiding detection and arrest.”

All people connected to the sprawling rural property in Walwa will be questioned by police about any connections to Freeman.

Bush said nobody else was present at the property when police confronted Freeman this morning, but any person connected to it would “form part of ongoing investigation”.

He added that while Freeman had been the only person at the property for at least 24 hours before the shooting but “that doesn’t mean they haven’t been in the past”.

“[It is] very important for us to understand how long he’s been here and who else was complicit in getting him here, and then caring for him or providing him with food and other things to this point,” Bush said.

“We will be speaking to anyone we suspect has assisted him to avoid detection and arrest.”

He said that those who were found to be complicit in helping Freeman escape or harbouring him would be held to account.

Police Association of Victoria secretary Wayne Gatt also issued a warning to anyone who might have harboured Dezi Freeman during his time on the run.

“Our members will chase every rabbit down every burrow,” Gatt told reporters at a press conference in Wodonga.

Criminal law specialist Melinda Walker said that in a case such as this, any charges would fall under section 325 of the state’s Crimes Act.

This includes cases in which a person has committed a serious indictable offence and another person, who knows or believes them to be guilty of this “principal offence”, acts with the purpose of assisting with their escape from authorities or impeding their apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment.

“Where the principal offence is the most serious offence, being life imprisonment, then that person [who assists them] could be liable to a penalty of a maximum of 20 years if they are found guilty,” Walker said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38835

File: 1b9039c296fc317⋯.jpg (236.29 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 887845cd7a476bd⋯.jpg (427.12 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 460b7edf80ec3b4⋯.jpg (359.13 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e3ba95adad69673⋯.jpg (290.73 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24447136 (310921ZMAR26) Notable: Eight snipers and a fatal choice: The high-stakes tactic that cornered Dezi Freeman - Police deployed specialist tactical units including at least eight snipers to end a three-hour stand-off with fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman at a remote property in Victoria’s north-east. Officers from the Special Operations Group surrounded the container-style hideout, using armoured vehicles and planning for multiple contingencies before attempting to negotiate a peaceful surrender. Police used non-lethal distraction devices to force Freeman from the structure after he refused repeated calls to surrender. Authorities said Freeman emerged armed and fired towards police, prompting snipers to open fire and fatally shoot him. The operation followed a seven-month manhunt after Freeman allegedly killed two police officers, with investigators now examining how he evaded capture and whether others assisted him.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38828

>>38829

>>38834

Eight snipers and a fatal choice: The high-stakes tactic that cornered Dezi Freeman

John Silvester - MARCH 31, 2026

When Desmond Freeman was located by police near a tiny country town not far from the banks of the Murray River, both sides had already rehearsed the likely outcome, and both sides stuck to the script.

Shortly after he shot dead Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart, 35, and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, and injured a third officer at a rural property in Porepunkah, he made a prophetic statement to his wife, Amalia.

“I love you and will see you in heaven.”

On August 26, 10 police had gone to the property to serve Freeman with a warrant over serious historical sex offences. This has been lost in the aftermath. Freeman was not a survivalist or a sovereign citizen. He was an accused child molester.

There had been discussions about calling in the specialist Critical Incident Response Team, but it was decided to conduct a local, low-key operation.

The reason general duties police are called first responders is that they respond to the situation at hand, which makes them vulnerable to an ambush as they approach with gun holstered. This is not America, where there is an assumption every suspect will be armed with a gun.

But when police were tipped off that Freeman was alive and hiding at a property near the town of Walwa (population 191), the odds were always on their side.

The Special Operations Group (known as the Sons of God) trains for sieges such as this and plans for every known contingency.

In its multimillion-dollar, secret indoor training facility, there are six container type constructions – coincidentally remarkably similar to Freeman’s rural hideout.

They use the containers to practice forced entries, setting off explosive charges and hostage extractions.

Before Monday’s operation the SOG scouted the property and drew up a plan, identifying every possible escape route, and placing armoured vehicles on the external perimeter to ram Freeman if he attempted to drive out.

The fact the armed offender was inside the container in relatively open country meant a forced entry would have been dismissed as too dangerous, leaving the only real chance of a non-lethal option in Freeman’s hands.

For three hours through dawn, he was encouraged to agree to a peaceful arrest. For three hours, he refused.

Before Freeman was called to surrender, at least eight specialist SOG snipers, trained to hit a target from up to a kilometre, were in place.

They were wearing top-level ballistic vests, camouflage gear and purpose-built helmets.

Freeman had a doona.

As planned, when he refused to surrender, police launched non-lethal distraction devices (known as flash bangs), forcing the suspect into the open.

Covered in his doona, he then showed he was armed, firing shots in the direction of a negotiator with Thompson’s police-issue Smith & Wesson semi-automatic pistol.

Several snipers fired simultaneously (they discharge their heavy calibre semi-automatic rifles at more than 10 shots a second) hitting him dozens of times.

Freeman had a death wish that was answered by the Sons of God. Publicly, police have said that this is now a matter for the coroner and the investigation is ongoing. Privately, they are relieved and delighted. That is why the labour-intensive and expensive manhunt for Freeman, called Taskforce Summit, continued when there were no real leads.

This had to be resolved, one way or the other.

For traumatised members at the Wangaratta station, where Neal Thompson was a much loved member, for the first time in seven months, there may be smiles.

For the families of the two dead officers and for the police force in general, Freeman’s death does not provide closure, but it does provide an answer.

Last week there was a memorial to recognise the 40th anniversary of the Russell Street bombing that cost Constable Angela Taylor her life.

Among those present were Carolina and Alain, the parents of Vadim de Waart-Hottart, who live in Belgium. They looked shattered and are still clearly in the depths of grieving. Now at least they will know the man who took their son’s life cannot hurt anyone else.

Detectives will now try to backtrack, to learn how long Freeman was at the property, how he managed to travel nearly 200 kilometres from Porepunkah to Walwa, and who harboured Australia’s most wanted man.

Then there is the question of whom, if anyone, may now be eligible for the million-dollar reward.

The absence of sightings of Freeman led police to believe it was likely he had killed himself.

On Monday, when he refused to surrender and left his hideout armed with a gun, he did just that. It is known as suicide by cop.

https://archive.vn/sC0oZ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38836

File: dee94410938d67f⋯.jpg (5.76 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a2dc3e469c987e0⋯.jpg (615.45 KB,1500x1941,500:647,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0db7c8b46fd4c09⋯.jpg (675.08 KB,1500x1941,500:647,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ced9852ff508c3a⋯.jpg (816.83 KB,1500x1941,500:647,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24451108 (010829ZAPR26) Notable: US slams Australia’s streaming quotas, PBS in new list of trade grievances - The United States has escalated trade concerns with Australia, criticising local content rules for streaming services and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in its latest annual trade report. The Trump administration said Australia’s requirement for streaming platforms to invest in local content could “distort” investment decisions, while raising objections to drug pricing policies that it claims undervalue American innovation. The report also highlighted declining US trade surpluses with Australia and flagged ongoing scrutiny of policies affecting technology and media companies. The Albanese government has acknowledged the concerns but indicated it will defend key policies, including the PBS, while continuing trade discussions with Washington. The formal inclusion of these issues signals continued pressure from the US in bilateral negotiations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23895404 (pb)

US slams Australia’s streaming quotas, PBS in new list of trade grievances

Michael Koziol - April 1, 2026

1/2

Washington: The Trump administration has outlined serious concerns about the Albanese government’s new local content rules for streaming platforms and the “unfair” Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, in an escalation of US trade grievances against Australia.

The United States Trade Representative’s annual report, released on Tuesday evening (US time), adds several items to the list of trade “barriers” with Australia, chiefly concerning government interventions in the market that would largely impact American tech companies.

Of particular concern to President Donald Trump’s top trade officials is Labor’s move last year to require major streaming services to invest at least 10 per cent of their total Australian expenditure, or 7.5 per cent of Australian revenue, on local drama, documentary, children’s or arts content.

“US industry has expressed concern that the measure employs a narrow, outdated definition of Australian content and will distort important investment and production decisions,” the trade report said. “The United States has raised serious concerns regarding this issue and continues to monitor it.”

The report noted the US’ goods trade surplus with Australia decreased nearly 75 per cent in 2025 to $US4.6 billion ($6.65 billion), while the services trade surplus shrank by 5.5 per cent.

It also introduced a new section on the PBS, based on complaints from the US pharmaceutical industry that Australia “significantly undervalues American innovation through unfair drug pricing practices”.

Canberra was accused of using “slow and outdated monetary thresholds in its valuation process, leading to artificially low prices for innovative therapies” when setting prices for new medications.

Furthermore, it criticised the PBS for mandating price cuts for new drugs after a certain period if no generic or biosimilar competitor entered the market.

“These price cuts are applied without considering inflation, production costs or the ongoing therapeutic value of the medicine,” the USTR report said.

“Furthermore, Australia’s Risk Share Arrangements (RSAs) – with expenditure caps and a clawback mechanism, requiring drug manufacturers to reimburse the government for up to 100 per cent of expenditures exceeding the cap – shift financial risks to the manufacturers, including US pharmaceutical companies.”

Trump has accused other countries of free-riding on American innovation with subsidy schemes that cut the costs of medication, and demanded American consumers are offered the same prices as people elsewhere.

The Australian government has acknowledged the shift in US policy under Trump, saying it is in talks with the administration but pledging to protect the PBS.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38837

File: b7907a437536dac⋯.jpg (393.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 73f6117f901e214⋯.jpg (196.64 KB,826x1033,826:1033,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3b0797f341f96b0⋯.jpg (430.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24451132 (010840ZAPR26) Notable: Secret IBAC probe into Dan Andrews and UFU nears release - Victoria’s anti-corruption watchdog is preparing to release findings from its long-running Operation Richmond investigation into dealings between former premier Dan Andrews and the United Firefighters Union. IBAC Commissioner Victoria Elliott said the report would be tabled by June 30, following a probe launched in 2019 into 2016 enterprise bargaining negotiations with the union. The investigation has examined allegations of corrupt conduct and the role of senior figures in securing a favourable agreement. Elliott acknowledged the inquiry had taken “too long” due to complex factors including court matters and the pandemic, with the report now in its natural justice phase. The release is expected to draw political attention ahead of the state election, as IBAC continues calls for expanded investigative powers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23996448 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24210120 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24260370 (pb)

Secret IBAC probe into Dan Andrews and UFU nears release

DAMON JOHNSTON - 1 April 2026

Victoria’s anti-corruption agency is poised to release the findings of its top secret investigation into dealings between former premier Dan Andrews and firefighter union chiefs in what looms as an election-year bombshell for Labor.

IBAC Commissioner Victoria Elliott has committed to tabling the Operation Richmond special report in parliament by June 30, in a move that threatens to ignite a fresh corruption crisis for Labor just five months before the election.

Operation Richmond, which has been running since 2019, has been probing the 2016 pay-and-conditions negotiations between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union and its state secretary Peter Marshall.

“IBAC is committed to publishing the Operation Richmond special report as soon as possible – with a view to publication before the end of the financial year,” Ms Elliott wrote in her April newsletter.

Operation Richmond has been dragging on for longer than World War II and Ms Elliott said the agency had reviewed its processes in an attempt to avoid future delays.

“We acknowledge the Operation Richmond special report process has been complex and has taken too long,” she wrote, adding that “there were a number of factors outside of our control which have delayed publication, including the pandemic and court matters”.

“We have reviewed our processes internally and made improvements to ensure what is within our control, is completed as efficiently as possible for future IBAC special reports.”

The Australian has previously reported during private examinations IBAC grilled witnesses about the role played by Mr Andrews in the negotiations which led to a favourable EBA deal with the UFU.

Mr Andrews, while still serving as premier, is believed to have been examined in a private hearing over the controversial events that handed the union generous allowances and effective operational control over the volunteer Country Fire Authority.

In a rare public statement about Operation Richmond, which has been conducted in complete secrecy, Ms Elliott confirmed the investigation was focused on “allegations of corrupt conduct during enterprise bargaining agreement negotiations between the Victorian government and United Firefighters Union in 2016”.

Ms Elliott said the report was in the natural justice phase, where witnesses and institutions referenced in the report are given the chance to respond before the final report is released in parliament.

In the newsletter, Ms Elliott has also renewed her push for IBAC to be granted broader powers to help the agency investigate corruption involving public funds.

“When a public body pays a contractor who hires subcontractors, and so on, the public funds move further down the line and into a gap – where any alleged corrupt conduct which occurs, is no longer within IBAC’s remit to investigate,” she wrote.

“Since 2016, IBAC has publicly advocated for ‘follow the dollar’ powers, which would provide IBAC the ability to follow the public funds through subcontractor arrangements and where evidence exists that suggests it was used corruptly, launch an investigation.

“I want to be clear, IBAC has many robust powers that allows us to thoroughly investigate what is within our jurisdiction. It is the jurisdiction, that we suggest, needs to evolve.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/secret-ibac-probe-into-dan-andrews-and-ufu-nears-release/news-story/67f97e6b0307be69d390431faaa02ce6

https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/Commissioners-message-Insights-47

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38838

File: 080c90a51ae1bd0⋯.jpg (364.34 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44bd5cb8c42431a⋯.jpg (1009.75 KB,1958x1305,1958:1305,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24451143 (010849ZAPR26) Notable: Dezi Freeman’s final days and the clues that could lead police to his helpers - Police believe fugitive gunman Dezi Freeman relied on external support in his final days, as investigators examine evidence from his remote hideout in Victoria’s north-east following his death. Authorities found a makeshift camp with shipping containers, supplies and modifications suggesting multiple people may have assisted him. Freeman is believed to have moved to the site only weeks before being located, after months evading capture by living off the grid. Police used surveillance and tactical planning to confirm he was alone before initiating the final operation. Items recovered at the scene, including phones and equipment, are being analysed to identify potential accomplices. Investigators are focusing on how Freeman travelled, who supported him, and how he sustained himself during the seven-month manhunt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38828

>>38829

>>38834

>>38835

Dezi Freeman’s final days and the clues that could lead police to his helpers

John Silvester - APRIL 1, 2026

1/2

Those who chase fugitives use the expression: “You can run, but you can’t hide.”

For double police killer Dezi Freeman, the opposite was true – he could hide, but he couldn’t run.

Backed by a grab bag of loyalists and sovereign citizen conspiracy believers, Freeman was able to avoid police for seven months by living off the grid and moving as little as possible.

But lacking the network to be supported interstate and the resources to flee overseas, he was effectively trapped and waiting out time.

Freeman’s desperate hope was that he could outlast the police investigation, but Chief Commissioner Mike Bush made it clear that Taskforce Summit would continue until resolution.

Using multiple police sources, not authorised to be identified, we can reconstruct the final days of Australia’s most wanted man – one who police believed, until less than two weeks ago, had probably taken his own life in the bush.

The first tip was well-informed but vague. Freeman was hiding on a property somewhere near Walwa.

Using electronic resources and sources cultivated since Freeman shot and killed two police in August, investigators found his hideout near the Murray River at Thologolong.

Three ageing shipping containers and a cobbled-together campsite were discovered. On the roofs of the containers were apparently newly fitted spinning air ducts, fitted to make them habitable in the summer heat.

More than one person was likely needed to attach the additions. The crime scene shows that a new ladder was placed at the container near the ducts.

Detectives will be checking where the units were purchased and if there is CCTV of the buyers.

Police believe Freeman only recently moved to the remote bush site, perhaps as little as two weeks ago. Three camp chairs and an open box of beer are visual proof that the double killer had external support.

Once the hideout was discovered, the isolation that had protected Freeman became his enemy. He was trapped in his camp with the police having 360-degree access. If they could have chosen any place to find the dangerous offender, this was it.

So isolated he couldn’t take hostages and so open that he couldn’t slip away, he was a sitting duck.

The spot, near heavily wooded national park, provided ideal spots for police surveillance to conceal themselves, while the open camp dotted with trees could provide cover for the police arrest team.

Freeman was living rough, surviving off dam water and supplies dropped in by supporters. He now had a beard and long hair.

Once police were satisfied that the man at the camp was Freeman and that he was alone, the Special Operations Group brought up a mobile team capable of making an intercept if he tried to move.

Then, more than 24 hours before they confronted Freeman early Monday, they moved into their preliminary locations. Some SOG officers remained hidden in their go positions for more than a day. It is believed that electronic surveillance was used to confirm Freeman was alone.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38839

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24451159 (010908ZAPR26) Notable: Rare National Address:‘The months ahead may not be easy’: PM urges Australians to save fuel, catch bus- (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has warned Australians the economic impacts of the Middle East conflict will be felt for months, urging reduced fuel use and greater reliance on public transport. In a rare national address broadcast across television and radio, he said motorists should “not take more fuel than you need” and consider alternatives to conserve supplies for critical industries. Albanese outlined government measures including fuel excise cuts, a national fuel security plan and coordination with states, while stressing that shortages are not yet widespread. He said the government could not eliminate pressures but would act to “protect Australia from the worst of it”, signalling concern about worsening conditions. Authorities are preparing contingency measures, including potential rationing and demand controls, as concerns grow about supply disruptions, panic buying and sustained economic strain in the months ahead.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

>>38830

‘The months ahead may not be easy’: PM urges Australians to save fuel, catch bus

James Massola and Paul Sakkal - April 1, 2026

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has warned Australians the economic shocks of war in the Middle East will be felt for months to come, urging people not to take more fuel than they need for Easter road trips and to consider taking public transport in coming weeks.

In a rare address to the nation broadcast across TV and radio stations at 7pm, hours before US President Donald Trump is due to deliver his own address to Americans on Thursday morning (AEDT), Albanese reassured Australians they could go about their business as normal and enjoy the Easter break.

But his three-and-a-half minute address from his office in Parliament House in Canberra made plain that the government expects months of economic pain, potential shortages and supply chain disruptions as the global oil crisis enters its second month, even as the Trump administration suggests that its war with Iran could be coming to an end.

“If you’re hitting the road, don’t take more fuel than you need – just fill up like you normally would,” Albanese said.

“Think of others in your community, in the bush and in critical industries. And over coming weeks, if you can switch to catching the train or bus or tram to work, do so. That builds our reserves and it saves fuel for people who have no choice but to drive,” he said.

“Farmers and miners and tradies who need diesel every single day. And all those shift workers and nurses who do so much for our country.”

The prime minister listed the measures the government had taken, including a 26¢ cut to the fuel excise for motorists and suspending the heavy vehicle road user charge, convening the national cabinet and adopting a national fuel security plan, and urged Australians to do their bit.

“No government can promise to eliminate the pressures that this war is causing. I can promise we will do everything we can to protect Australia from the worst of it,” he said.

“These are uncertain times. But I am absolutely certain of this: we will deal with these global challenges, the Australian way. Working together – and looking after each other.”

Albanese’s address is the clearest signal yet that while the government is publicly optimistic about Australia’s ability to handle the shortfalls and supply pinches affecting the availability of petrol, diesel and fertiliser around the world, privately there is mounting concern within government about shortages beyond April.

Ahead of the prime minister’s address on Wednesday night, several Labor MPs, who asked not to be named, flagged the potential for fuel rationing in the future or even the parliament reverting to remote parliament arrangements.

Albanese has emphasised several times that COVID-style emergency measures and lockdowns were not being considered.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38840

File: 664ce8e89da0694⋯.jpg (2.71 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a2c1db62c8e81dd⋯.jpg (4.14 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459070 (030931ZAPR26) Notable: Albanese calls for calm as world sits on edge of grim economic future - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged Australians to remain calm and continue normal activities over Easter, while warning of a prolonged economic shock from the Iran conflict in a rare national address. The prime-time broadcast, the first of its kind since 2020, signalled rising concern within government about fuel shortages and global instability. Albanese said “the months ahead may not be easy” and flagged potential tougher conservation measures, urging motorists to limit fuel use and consider public transport. He outlined contingency planning with states under a phased national fuel strategy, including possible rationing if supply worsens. The address comes amid panic buying and mounting economic pressure, with Albanese also preparing a major economic package aimed at supporting businesses and reshaping Australia’s industrial base in response to the crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

>>38839

Albanese calls for calm as world sits on edge of grim economic future

Paul Sakkal and James Massola - April 1, 2026

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged Australians to go about the Easter weekend as normal, but warned about grim times ahead and tougher measures to conserve fuel in a rare address to the nation designed to prepare the public for a prolonged economic shock caused by the war in Iran.

Albanese’s message to the nation on Wednesday night will be followed by a National Press Club speech on Thursday in which he will pledge $1 billion for interest-free loans for struggling businesses amid fears of a recession.

Under pressure to project leadership and calm after weeks of panic buying, Albanese will use the global oil shock to propel his vision to overhaul Australia’s economic model by subsidising critical industries and traditional manufacturers.

Albanese will pledge he is preparing his most ambitious budget, tying his manufacturing agenda to social cohesion and “progressive patriotism”, and opening the door for potential state investments in oil refineries and boosting the nation’s low fuel stock holdings.

While the prime minister’s Press Club speech was planned weeks ago, he decided this week to use the address to the nation to speak directly to voters about the war, opting for a sombre delivery that marked a significant change to more upbeat messaging earlier this week.

“The months ahead may not be easy. I want to be upfront about that,” Albanese declared in a three-and-a-half minute speech broadcast at 7pm on Wednesday, the first national address since Scott Morrison’s pandemic message on March 12, 2020, days before the nationwide lockdowns began.

Emphasising that Australia was not actively involved in the war after weeks of escalating frustration directed at the Trump administration, Albanese said Australians should “go about your business and your life as normal” over Easter.

In contrast, he laid the groundwork for harsher measures that might be taken along with state premiers in coming weeks should the supply of oil tankers slow as a result of the war.

“If you’re hitting the road, don’t take more fuel than you need, just fill up like you normally would,” he said. “And over coming weeks, if you can switch to catching the train or bus or tram to work, do so.

“That builds our reserves and it saves fuel for people who have no choice but to drive.”

Albanese, US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer all announced they would speak directly to their populations on Wednesday, underlining the growing level of public anxiety about the US and Israel’s strikes on Iran, and the global oil crisis triggered by Tehran’s decision to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said Albanese’s address to the nation was just “a rerun of Monday’s press conference”, and didn’t have the detail Australians needed.

“We need clarity, we need detail and we need a plan,” he said.

The Trump administration, via Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sent signals that the war may be wrapped up in the coming weeks, while reports suggested the United Arab Emirates was willing to use force to help the United States open the strait, through which 20 per cent of the global oil supply travels.

Australian state and territory leaders agreed to a phased plan on fuel conservation that would only require rationing if supply drops off. Fuel supplies have increased in the past week as the government helped secure additional tankers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38841

File: 95b1085645dc61f⋯.jpg (182.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459075 (030941ZAPR26) Notable: Anthony Albanese hands out $1bn in Iran War fuel crisis loans to farmers and truckies - The federal government will provide $1 billion in interest-free loans to businesses affected by the fuel crisis linked to the Iran conflict, targeting sectors critical to supply chains including freight operators, fuel producers and fertiliser manufacturers. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the funding would act as a “shock absorber” for industries under pressure from rising costs and supply disruptions. The announcement forms part of a broader economic response that includes fuel excise cuts, underwriting fuel imports and suspending heavy vehicle charges. Albanese said the upcoming budget would be the government’s “most ambitious”, balancing long-term reform with immediate cost-of-living relief. The measures follow a rare national address warning Australians of prolonged economic strain as the global energy shock continues to impact businesses and households nationwide across coming months and into the foreseeable future.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

>>38839

>>38840

Anthony Albanese hands out $1bn in Iran War fuel crisis loans to farmers and truckies

GREG BROWN - April 01, 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese will declare the May budget will be the most ­ambitious since Labor was elected and will balance long-term reform with addressing immediate cost-of-living pressures, as he unveils $1bn of interest-free loans for ­businesses being smashed by the impacts of the Middle East war.

The Prime Minister will deliver a major speech on Thursday after he issued a rare televised address to the nation on Wednesday ­evening to warn the “months ahead may not be easy” while ­urging Australians to consider catching public transport to work so fuel is reserved for those who need it most.

Mr Albanese’s comments followed West Australian Premier Roger Cook’s decision on Wednesday to declare a state of emergency to compel major fuel distributors to release detailed information on their supply chains.

Mr Albanese said Australians should “go about your business and life as normal” over Easter but cautioned people against hoarding fuel.

Mr Albanese’s address, carried simultaneously by television networks, came ahead of US President Donald Trump prepared to do the same on Thursday as he claimed the war could end in two to three weeks even if a peace deal with Iran was not struck (AEDT).

Hope of an end to the war prompted the share market to bounce by 2.2 per cent on Wednesday, its best result in nearly a year, while crude oil remained elevated at more than $US100 a barrel.

Mr Albanese used his televised address to urge Australians to ­consider changing their behaviour over the coming weeks amid ­uncertainty about the national supply of fuel from May.

“Over coming weeks, if you can switch to catching the train or bus or tram to work, do so,” Mr Albanese said. “That builds our reserves and it saves fuel for people who have no choice but to drive. Farmers and miners and tradies who need diesel, every single day.”

Angus Taylor said Mr Albanese’s address failed to provide Australians with a clear plan.

“There is a lack of confidence around Australia, there is confusion around Australia about the state of the fuel system,” the Opposition Leader said.

“How much fuel is out there?”

The address to the nation showcased a major U-turn in the government’s approach since the first fortnight in the conflict, when the prospect of fuel shortages were played down, formal press conferences were avoided and the main message from Mr Albanese and Energy Minister Chris Bowen was to urge Australians against panic buying.

Since Mr Albanese changed approach last Friday with a formal update on the fuel outlook in a press conference, he has made ­several expensive announcements aimed at reassuring Australians and addressing cost-of-living ­pressures.

These included committing to underwriting the purchase of fuel shipments, halving the fuel excise for three months at a cost of $25.6bn, suspending the heavy-­vehicle road-user charge for three months and allowing temporary relief for businesses unable to meet their tax obligations.

On Thursday, Mr Albanese will deploy $1bn from the off-budget National Reconstruction Fund to provide loans to companies suffering the worst impacts of the conflict including freight operators, fuel producers and fertiliser ­manufacturers.

Mr Albanese said the measure would provide a “shock absorber” to businesses hit by the crisis that were crucial to supply chains. “These firms are not just being ­affected by this crisis, they are essential to Australia getting through this crisis,” the Prime Minister said.

In his speech to the National Press Club on Thursday, Mr ­Albanese will describe the May 12 budget as the most important and ambitious since his government was elected in 2022 and will talk up the importance of boosting the nation’s economic self-reliance.

After Jim Chalmers on Tuesday left the door open to increasing overall government spending in the budget, Mr Albanese said there would be long-term reform but the priority would be on addressing the immediate pressures of Australians.

“Even as we plan and build for this stronger, more resilient ­future, our number one priority remains helping people with the cost of living,” Mr Albanese will say, according to a extracts released to The Australian ahead of his speech. “That is the balance we will strike in next month’s budget.

“It is our government’s most important budget to date and it will be our most ambitious.

“The scale of the challenge facing us – and the breadth of opportunities ahead of us – demands that ambition and that urgency.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38842

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459082 (030954ZAPR26) Notable: Fuel prices fall as Australian servos fast-track excise cuts - (Video) Petrol prices have fallen across major Australian cities as retailers moved early to pass on the federal government’s 26¢-a-litre excise cut, with some choosing to absorb short-term losses to deliver immediate relief. In Melbourne, average unleaded dropped 16¢ to $2.43 a litre, while Sydney fell about 13¢ to $2.44, and larger declines were recorded in Brisbane, Hobart and Adelaide. The cuts follow a temporary halving of the fuel excise introduced to ease cost-of-living pressures amid disruptions to global oil supply caused by conflict in the Middle East. Some operators “immediately passed on the full 26¢ excise reduction”, with prices at many outlets falling below $2.30. However, not all stations have reduced prices yet, as some are waiting to restock cheaper fuel, meaning relief will be uneven in the short term.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38824

>>38830

>>38839

>>38840

Fuel prices fall as Australian servos fast-track excise cuts

Nick Toscano and Mike Foley - April 1, 2026

1/2

Petrol prices in Australia’s biggest cities began falling on Wednesday as retailers moved unexpectedly early to pass on the federal government’s 26¢-a-litre excise cut in part or in full, even before most sites had depleted existing stocks and bought new fuel at cheaper prices.

In Melbourne, the average price of unleaded fell 16¢ a litre from nearly $2.60 a litre on Tuesday to $2.43 a litre by Wednesday morning, figures show. Service stations across Sydney had cut average prices by about 13¢ to $2.44 a litre.

Steeper cuts were recorded in other parts of the country: prices fell 15¢ in Brisbane and 18¢ in Hobart on average.

Adelaide led the nation with the sharpest fall, cutting prices by 25¢ to $2.34 a litre, while Perth had the smallest decline of 7¢ a litre to a citywide average of $2.44.

The Albanese government this week announced a temporary halving of the fuel excise – a flat tax that adds 52.6¢ a litre to the cost of petrol and diesel – to help ease cost-of-living pressures on households caused by the war in the Middle East.

In the month since the first US and Israeli attacks on Iran, attacks on oilfields and Iran’s de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz have paralysed up to one-fifth of the world’s supply of crude oil – the natural resource that is refined into petrol, diesel and aviation fuel – and sent prices soaring to record levels across Australia.

While the 50 per cent excise cut kicked in on Wednesday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers earlier this week said that the saving could take up to a fortnight to fully work its way through the fuel network.

However, some retailers made the call to start selling their higher-taxed stock at the discounted prices, choosing to take a short-term hit to their bottom line that could be offset once the excise returned to normal.

Viva Energy, which runs Australia’s Shell, Liberty Oil, Reddy Express and OTR petrol station chains, said it had immediately passed on the full 26¢ excise reduction, sending prices at many of its metropolitan outlets below $2.30 a litre.

The cuts “flowed through this morning when our stores were opening”, Viva chief executive Scott Wyatt said.

“In the end, the decision was an easy one,” he said. “We were keen to see the relief provided by the federal government passed on as quickly as possible ... to help people get on and enjoy their [Easter] holiday.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38843

File: cbb62463022841b⋯.jpg (3.49 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 86f96221a4f11a7⋯.jpg (3.88 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459089 (031002ZAPR26) Notable: Australia to join 34 countries - but not the US - in meeting on Strait of Hormuz - Australia will join 34 other nations in a United Kingdom-led virtual meeting to coordinate efforts to reopen and secure the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing global oil disruptions, with the United States notably absent from talks. Foreign Minister Penny Wong will represent Australia, which already has an E-7 Wedgetail aircraft and 85 personnel deployed to the United Arab Emirates. Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia was “talking with countries like the UK and France” about potential contributions but stressed conditions were not yet suitable for further action. The meeting follows a joint statement backing coordinated action, while Australia is also exploring regional diplomacy to safeguard fuel supplies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38823

>>38831

>>38832

Australia to join 34 countries - but not the US - in meeting on Strait of Hormuz

Tom Lowrey - 2 April 2026

Australia will join a virtual meeting of 35 countries to discuss plans to reopen and secure the Strait of Hormuz and ease an oil shock rocking global markets.

The meeting will be led by the United Kingdom, which has coordinated efforts to gather countries willing to contribute to reopening the Strait.

But the United States will be notably absent from discussions, as President Donald Trump has publicly berated Western allies for not doing enough to assist the US in its war with Iran.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong will represent Australia in the virtual meeting, scheduled to take place late tonight Australian time.

Other countries attending include France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan, Canada and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Australia already has military assets in the region, with an E-7 Wedgetail surveillance aircraft and 85 crew deployed to the UAE.

Defence minister Richard Marles said Australia remained willing to discuss what it could do to help.

"We are talking with countries like the UK and France about what contribution we could usefully make," he said.

"I'd emphasise that we have an E-7 Wedgetail in the region right now, helping in supporting the defence of the countries of the Gulf, and particularly the United Arab Emirates.

"But we will continue to talk with the UK and France and others about what we can usefully do."

The UK released a joint statement with a handful of other countries a fortnight ago, expressing a willingness to work together to reopen the Strait and ensure oil could be safely shipped through it.

Australia was among dozens of countries that later signed that statement.

But leaders within Australia, and in partner countries, have been clear that they are unwilling to take action until a ceasefire in Iran is reached.

Questions over naval capability

Mr Marles said it made sense that Australia would want to contribute to securing the Strait.

"All of those countries, and very much Australia, have an interest in seeing the Strait of Hormuz opened as soon as possible," he said.

"We will look to what Australia can do when conditions allow and that's not the circumstance that we're in right now.

"I'm reluctant to speculate in detail about all of that, other than to say our E-7 Wedgetail is in the region right now."

Defence experts have repeatedly cast doubts on Australia's capability to send a warship to the Persian Gulf, should Australia be asked to contribute.

The Royal Australian Navy's Anzac-class frigates are aging and poorly equipped to handle drone attacks, while the more capable Hobart-class destroyers are due for significant upgrades.

Opposition leader Angus Taylor told Sky News Australia would struggle to meet a request for a warship.

"Right now, the lack of sustainment, the lack of investment in our defence capability is putting us in a position where we have limited capacity to contribute," he said.

"But we need to give any possible consideration."

Meanwhile there are suggestions the prime minister could be preparing to visit Singapore and possibly Malaysia, in a diplomatic effort to shore up Australia's fuel supplies.

Almost all of Australia's fuel imports come from oil sourced in the Middle East and then refined in Asia.

Early planning is underway for a possible trip in coming weeks for talks with leaders in the two countries, which both host major refineries.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-02/global-meeting-australia-34-countries-strait-of-hormuz/106525100

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38844

File: 2f4d2ecf1a3c388⋯.jpg (321.2 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 715209f4a3684d6⋯.jpg (289.32 KB,1507x1199,137:109,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9e5ac923c0fe09d⋯.jpg (417.98 KB,1600x1067,1600:1067,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aa9e543038515d6⋯.jpg (625.09 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459121 (031041ZAPR26) Notable: Australia joins 40 other nations to condemn Iran for 'deliberately inflicting economic pain' during meeting over Strait of Hormuz strategy - Australia has joined more than 40 countries in condemning Iran’s “weaponisation” of the Strait of Hormuz during a United Kingdom-led meeting aimed at coordinating efforts to reopen the critical waterway. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Iran was “deliberately inflicting economic pain” but confirmed no military or offensive action would be taken, with discussions focused on “diplomatic and civilian initiatives” to restore safe passage. The meeting, which excluded the United States, also addressed freeing thousands of ships and seafarers trapped by the disruption. Australia reaffirmed its support for de-escalation while maintaining a surveillance presence in the Gulf. The Strait’s near closure has sharply reduced global oil flows and driven prices higher, intensifying economic pressures worldwide.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38823

>>38831

>>38832

>>38843

Australia joins 40 other nations to condemn Iran for 'deliberately inflicting economic pain' during meeting over Strait of Hormuz strategy

April Glover - Apr 3, 2026

1/2

Australia has joined a coalition of other nations to condemn the "weaponisation" of the Strait of Hormuz in a rare display of diplomacy and unity against Iran's maritime war strategy.

Britain hosted an extraordinary call with 40 countries to debate an international effort to reopen the critical waterway after Iran's de facto closure sent global oil prices soaring.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong accused Iran of "deliberately inflicting economic pain" following the meeting, but said no offensive action would be taken to lift Iran's blockade, despite US President Donald Trump telling allies to "just take" the strait.

"The focus of last night's meeting was diplomatic and civilian initiatives countries could pursue to make the Strait of Hormuz accessible and safe," Wong said.

"Ministers agreed on the importance of continued coordination and collective action."

The federal government lent its support to the universal condemnation of Iran's act of "deliberately inflicting economic pain".

Wong said the ministers in the meeting urged Iran to act in line with UN resolutions affirming the freedom of the seas for non-military vessels.

She repeated that Australia would not become militarily involved in the conflict nor would it take offensive measures to bring ships back to the strait.

"Australia is not taking offensive action against Iran and we are not deploying troops on the ground in Iran," Wong added.

"The Australian government continues to support de-escalation and the resolution of this conflict.

"The longer this war goes on, the more significant the impact on the global economy will be."

The foreign minister did not mention the US or Israel in her statement, despite their current warmaking being what triggered Iran's effective closure of the strait.

The 40 countries represented came from all continents except Antarctica.

The US didn't attend the virtual meeting, which came after Trump made clear that he thinks securing the waterway is not America's job.

Trump has also disparaged America's European allies for failing to support the war and renewed his threats to pull the US out of NATO.

The meeting also discussed working with the UN's International Maritime Organisation to free 2000 ships and 20,000 seafarers trapped by the conflict, she said.

No concrete measures were announced, however.

Wong's message comes amid conflicting reports which claim that Australia has Special Air Services (SAS) troops to the Middle East to remain on standby if the situation deteriorates further.

News Corp reports that around 90 SAS members were sent to the region two weeks ago.

The Department of Defence would not confirm where Australian military personnel or assets are located.

Australia deployed a spy plane known as a E-7A Wedgetail to the Gulf region to help "protect and defend Australians and other civilians" last month.

The Wedgetail provides long-range reconnaissance capability, which Australia's Gulf allies had requested to assist in airspace defence.

Iran's attack on Gulf continues

Iran fired more missiles at Israel and Gulf Arab states on Thursday, demonstrating Tehran's continued ability to strike its neighbours even as Trump claimed the threat from the country was nearly eliminated.

Iran's attacks on Gulf states along with its chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz have disrupted the world's energy supplies with effects far beyond the Middle East. That has proved to be Iran's greatest strategic advantage in the war.

Trump has insisted the strait can be taken by force – but said it is not up to the US to do that.

In an address to the American people on Wednesday night, he encouraged countries that depend on oil from Hormuz to "build some delayed courage" and go "take it."

Before the US and Israel started the war on February 28 with strikes on Iran, the waterway was open to traffic and 20 per cent of all traded oil used passed through it.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38845

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459136 (031100ZAPR26) Notable: Alleged Bondi shooter Naveed Akram’s bid to hide family’s identity denied by judge - (Video) A New South Wales judge has rejected alleged Bondi attacker Naveed Akram’s request for a 40-year suppression order to protect his family’s identities, ruling the order would be ineffective and not justified under open justice principles. The court heard the family had faced threats and harassment, including claims of vandalism and intimidation, but Judge Hugh Donnelly said such orders apply only in “exceptional circumstances” and this case did not meet that threshold. He noted “no one has been assaulted” and that claims of psychological harm lacked expert evidence. The judge also found the order would be “ineffective, futile and not enforceable”, particularly as identifying details were already known and some had entered the public domain. The court emphasised the need for the case to be “fairly reported”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38734

>>38770

Alleged Bondi shooter Naveed Akram’s bid to hide family’s identity denied by judge

BIMINI PLESSER - April 02, 2026

Bondi shooter Naveed Akram’s request to protect his family’s identity from “vigilantes” he feared might kill one or more of them has been denied after a judge deemed it impossible to effectively enforce a suppression order.

Mr Akram applied for a 40-year suppression order to obscure the names, addresses, schools and workplaces of his family after they allegedly received death threats, had eggs thrown at their home, and pork and urine left at their doorstep.

The younger of the two alleged perpetrators of the Bondi Beach terror massacre appeared via video link at Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court from Goulburn Supermax Prison on Thursday to hear judge Hugh Donnelly’s decision.

Mr Akram appeared on screen, smiling and waving, about seven minutes after his hearing began. He wore prison greens, and sported a beard and a shaved head.

Judge Donnelly addressed him for the first and only time at the start of proceedings to ask if he could hear him.

“Yep,” Mr Akram replied.

The alleged terrorist looked engaged and attentive during proceedings, rarely looking down or away from the screen.

Barrister Richard Wilson SC appeared as representation for Mr Akram. Barrister Matthew Lewis SC, who contested the non-publication order on behalf of publications including The Australian, was also present.

At a hearing last month, Mr Akram’s family detailed in affidavits the alleged harassment they had suffered, including when two men parked a ute in their driveway and yelled death threats.

Mr Wilson had argued that although a suppression order could not protect the family from people who already knew their identifying information, it could “mitigate” threats.

Mr Akram would not seek to hide his evidence or identity, he added, saying his client’s trial would be held in open court unless the police or prosecution objected.

Judge Donnelly told the court Mr Akram’s alleged actions had caused “unprecedented public interest, outrage, anger and grief”.

Despite the alleged threats made to Mr Akram’s family and their apparent fears for their safety, Judge Donnelly dismissed the suppression order application.

He said such orders “should only be made in exceptional circumstances”, and Mr Akram’s was “not an exceptional case”.

“No one has been assaulted, and none of the threats have manifested physical violence,” the judge said.

“Further, the claim of existing and respecting psychological harm for Naveed Akram’s mother and sister must be more than personal belief. The claim has not been supported by expert opinion evidence.”

Mr Lewis “also suggests the orders will be ineffective, futile and not enforceable”, Judge Donnelly added.

Because media outlets already know the Akram family’s address, a suppression order covering it now would “simply not be effective”, he said.

Additionally, when Mr Akram’s mother conducted an interview with Nine Newspapers shortly after the December 14 terror attack, she willingly introduced herself to the public domain.

“The court is not critical of her decision to talk to the media but any order limiting the publication of her name would not be effective and lack utility,” Judge Donnelly said.

While the “gravity” of Mr Akram’s alleged conduct would “inevitably” draw public comment and criticism, some of which may be directed at his family, the judge said “this alone is not enough to intrude on the principle of open justice”.

“It is essential that this case be fairly reported,” he said.

Mr Akram showed little emotion when Judge Donnelly revealed his decision.

The court was briefly adjourned to give Mr Wilson time to confer with his client about whether they would appeal the decision.

Before leaving the courtroom, Mr Wilson gestured to Mr Akram on the screen that he would call him. The alleged terrorist smiled back at him before getting up and waving to the court again.

Upon returning to court a short time later, Mr Wilson confirmed he would not be appealing Judge Donnelly’s “well-considered” decision.

Mr Lewis then requested access to the affidavits from Mr Akram’s family, which the judge immediately granted.

On his way out of court, Mr Lewis told reporters he believed Thursday’s decision was a win for open justice.

Mr Akram’s matter will be back in court on April 8 for a brief mention. Police will also serve a brief of evidence on that date.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/alleged-bondi-shooter-naveed-akrams-bid-to-hide-familys-identity-denied-by-judge/news-story/726fe29e3b9dc9ce301a2d674c2bf97c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7vGSHidM1A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38846

File: fb7d1ffb7489272⋯.jpg (2.1 MB,3750x5000,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cd07820c5ca46fa⋯.jpg (2.03 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459142 (031104ZAPR26) Notable: Liam Alexander Hall may enter insanity plea over alleged terrorism act at Perth Invasion Day rally - A man accused of throwing a homemade explosive into a crowd at a Perth Invasion Day rally may argue he was not criminally responsible due to insanity, his lawyer has told a court. Liam Alexander Hall, 32, allegedly tossed a device filled with ball bearings and screws into a gathering of about 2,500 people in Forrest Place, in what was described as a “potential mass casualty event”, though it failed to detonate. His lawyer said a psychiatric report would be obtained ahead of a possible Section 27 defence, which applies where a mental condition prevents understanding of wrongdoing. Hall is the first person charged with a terrorist act in Western Australia and remains in custody, facing multiple serious offences linked to the incident.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24269031 (pb)

Liam Alexander Hall may enter insanity plea over alleged terrorism act at Perth Invasion Day rally

abc.net.au - 31 March 2026

A man accused of tossing a homemade "fragment bomb" filled with ball bearings and screws into a crowd in Perth's CBD has flagged through his lawyer he may argue he is not criminally responsible for his actions due to insanity.

Liam Alexander Hall, 32, allegedly threw the device into a crowd of about 2,500 people that had gathered in Forrest Place for an Invasion Day rally on January 26.

Nobody was injured as the device did not detonate, but the incident — described at the time as a "potential mass casualty event" — caused widespread outrage, particularly with Indigenous Australians.

Mr Hall became the first person in Western Australia's history to be charged with engaging in a terrorist act.

Potential insanity plea

In the Perth Magistrates Court on Tuesday, Mr Hall did not appear in person, but his lawyer Simon Freitag said his client may enter a plea at his next hearing in late May.

Mr Freitag said a report from a psychiatrist would be sought before then.

He flagged he could launch a Section 27 defence, which under WA law allows a person to argue they were not criminally responsible for their actions if a mental condition deprived them of understanding what they were doing was wrong.

Mr Hall's identity remained under wraps for weeks after his arrest, due to a court-imposed suppression order.

It was lifted last month during a court appearance Mr Hall did not attend for medical reasons, but in which he was accused of engaging in a terrorist act, doing an act likely to endanger life or safety, and making or possessing explosives under suspicious circumstances.

WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch previously alleged Mr Hall's actions amounted to a "nationalist and racially motivated, attack … targeting members of the Aboriginal community, First Nations people".

Mr Hall, who has a treating psychiatrist, remains in custody.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-31/liam-alexander-hall-possible-plea-flagged-alleged-terrorism-act/106515414

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38847

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459199 (031158ZAPR26) Notable: Jayson Joseph Michaels: Alleged Perth terror plotter denied bail over ‘chilling’ mass casualty diary - (Video) A Western Australian court has denied bail to Jayson Joseph Michaels, accused of planning a “mass casualty” terrorist attack targeting a Perth mosque and other sites, citing the seriousness of the allegations and detailed material found in his possession. Magistrate Belinda Coleman said Michaels had not shown the “exceptional circumstances” required for release, describing a 19-page diary outlining a “day of justice” as “chilling” and indicative of intent. Prosecutors argued the writings detailed target selection, weapons research, logistics and escape planning, including disguising a vehicle as an ambulance, while also referencing other attacks. Defence counsel argued the material reflected “bigoted daydreams” and the “fantasy life” of a depressed and isolated young man, rather than a genuine plan. Michaels faces multiple terrorism-related and weapons charges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jayson Joseph Michaels: Alleged Perth terror plotter denied bail over ‘chilling’ mass casualty diary

PAUL GARVEY - April 01, 2026

The West Australian alleged white supremacist accused of plotting a “mass casualty” attack targeting a Perth mosque has been denied bail.

Magistrate Belinda Coleman said on Wednesday 20-year-old Bindoon man Jayson Michaels had failed to demonstrate the ­exceptional circumstances needed to allow him to be released back into the community.

The magistrate described the 19-page diary found in a locked drawer in Mr Michaels’ bedroom – which is central to the prosecution’s case – as “chilling” and ­rejected the argument put forward by his lawyer, former Liberal ­attorney-general Christian Porter, that they were nothing more than bigoted daydreams that would never actually manifest.

Commonwealth prosecutor Kirsten Nelson argued that the diary laid out plans for what Mr Michaels described as a “day of justice” in which he would attack the WA parliament, police headquarters and a mosque.

Ms Nelson told the court that a diary entry written on the day of the Bondi terror attack – in which Islamic State-inspired terrorists shot dead 15 people at a Jewish ­Hanukkah festival – said that “will be nothing” compared with what he wanted to do “to both of these groups”.

Ms Nelson said Mr Michaels saw the Bondi attack in “a very personal way” and considered how it would affect his own plan.

She said the diary was “a clear expression of his intent to engage in a terrorist attack” which made it clear that Mr Michaels was ­“anticipating some notoriety” as a result of his actions. One of his diary entries, she said, read “‘What will they all think when my face is on TV?”

Ms Nelson said the dairy and other actions demonstrated that Mr Michaels had considered how to finance and stockpile the equipment he needed. That included plans to procure a 3D printer with which to make his own weapons.

“He considered the type of weapons he would need,” she said. “He did his own research online. He selected the targets, he researched the entry and exit points, he prepared how he would execute the plan.”

Ms Nelson said Mr Michaels had given consideration to how he could escape, including an idea of disguising a van as an ambulance. She said he had worked out the distance between specific targets, had secured a lock-picking ­device, and had identified six locks on the door of a mosque in the Perth suburb of Rivervale. He had discussed his plans in online ­chatrooms, and was watching ­videos of people dying when police raided the home where he was living with his parents in the small town of Bindoon, northeast of Perth.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38848

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459234 (031229ZAPR26) Notable: Donald Trump slaps 100% tariff on pharmaceuticals, hitting Australian industry hard - (Video) The United States has imposed a 100 per cent tariff on imported pharmaceuticals, a move expected to disrupt Australian exports and strain trade relations despite assurances domestic medicine prices will remain unchanged. US President Donald Trump introduced the levy under national security powers, targeting patented medicines and linking it to broader efforts to pressure global drug pricing. Australia exported more than $US1.3 billion in pharmaceuticals to the US in 2025, with companies now facing uncertainty. Health Minister Mark Butler said the policy was “deeply disappointing” and “not the act of a friend”, but stressed the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme would shield Australian consumers from price increases. Industry groups warned the tariffs could impact exporters, while some firms with US manufacturing operations may secure exemptions or reduced levies under the new regime.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38836

Donald Trump slaps 100% tariff on pharmaceuticals, hitting Australian industry hard

US President Donald Trump has followed through on another tariff threat, putting a 100 per cent levy on a major Australian export.

Blair Jackson - April 3, 2026

1/2

Australia will not be strong-armed to pay more for medicines because of tariffs and higher prices in the US, Health Minister Mark Butler says.

Overnight US President Donald Trump ordered a 100 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals manufactured outside the United States, a move that could have a big impact on Australia.

Australia exported $US1.32bn of pharmaceuticals to the US in 2025, United Nations COMTRADE data shows.

The tariff plays alongside the President’s “most favoured nation” policy for drug companies, where the manufacturers are threatened with tighter regulation if they sell to comparable countries for cheaper or don’t manufacture in the US.

Australia’s subsidised Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme flies in the face of the President’s directives.

But following the 100 per cent tariff announcement, Mr Butler says drug prices will not increase.

“I want to be clear though that this will have no impact on medicine prices at Australian pharmacy counters. They are protected by the PBS,” Mr Butler told reporters on Friday.

He said American drug companies “don’t like our PBS”.

“They would like drug prices to be more expensive in Australia. They’d like drug prices to be more expensive in other countries that have good medicines policies as well,” he said.

“We’ve made it very clear the PBS is not up for negotiation here in Australia.”

As when the US imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium, and imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on ‘liberation day’ last year, Mr Butler said the levies flew in the face of the 2005 Australia-US free trade agreement.

“Why they would try to roll that back and impose tariffs on a relationship that has done so well from free and fair trade is something we just disagree with, something we do not see as a friendly act,” he said.

“ … and something we’ve taken up to them right through the course of these last 12 months as we’ve dealt with announcement after announcement.”

“This latest one (tariff), as with earlier ones, is deeply disappointing and deeply concerning, and is not the act of a friend.”

The US Supreme Court ruled in February the President’s sweeping ‘liberation day’ tariffs were illegal, however the pharmaceuticals levy has been enacted under different legislation.

The tariff applies to patented products, not generic medicines.

Melbourne-based CSL makes the bulk of Australia’s exports, but the company has been investing more and more in US manufacturing amid the President’s long-running threats to tax overseas products.

In an earlier interview Friday, Mr Butler said subsidised Australian prices under the PBS – which Mr Trump has been critical of – would not rise.

“That won’t have an impact on the price of our drugs here, but it certainly is going to create uncertainty for those exporters … and we will be working with them,” he told Sunrise.

“But we keep sending this clearest of possible messages to the US because we know they get the big drug companies in their ear trying to unpick the PBS here in Australia and equivalent schemes in other countries around the world,” Mr Butler said.

Australian companies had been exporting to the US under a free trade agreement for 20 years, Mr Marles said.

The government was “pretty confident” CSL would be carved out from the levies because of its US factories, Mr Butler added.

“There is no way we’re negotiating about those fundamental elements of the PBS that have served Australia so well for 80 years, bringing the best medicines from around the world to Australian patients and keeping prices affordable.

“Indeed, we’ve been cutting those prices, so there’s no way we’re negotiating about that.”

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said the coalition would back the government to deal with the fallout.

“This is obviously not welcome news. We don’t want to see it,” Mr Taylor said of the tariffs.

“We’ll work with the government to do anything we have to get it overturned or get an exemption for Australian exporters.”

Australia’s PBS effectively runs afoul of the US’ “most favoured nation” edict, as subsidies from Canberra make medicines cheaper for Australians than what Americans pay.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38849

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24459261 (031246ZAPR26) Notable: Butler ‘confident’ of CSL exemption as Australian drugs incur 100pc tariff - (Video) Australia’s pharmaceutical sector is facing disruption after the United States imposed a 100 per cent tariff on branded medicines, though the federal government says major exporter CSL is likely to secure an exemption. Health Minister Mark Butler said he was “confident” CSL would be largely shielded due to its US manufacturing footprint and the exemption of plasma-based therapies, while reiterating the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme would not be altered. The tariffs, introduced under US national security powers, apply at the highest rate to Australia despite lower deals struck with other countries. Industry groups warned of uncertainty for exporters and renewed calls for PBS reform, citing delays to new medicines. Butler described the move as “not the act of a friend” and said the government was pressing for the decision to be reversed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38836

>>38848

Butler ‘confident’ of CSL exemption as Australian drugs incur 100pc tariff

The Health Minister is hopeful the country’s largest biotech firm CSL will be exempt after Australia was hit with the highest penalties on branded pharmaceuticals.

JAMES DOWLING - 3 April 2026

1/2

Australia’s pharmaceutical industry has demanded the Albanese government push through reforms of its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme after the US slapped a 100 per cent branded medicine tariff on Australia, its highest rate under a new block of global import penalties.

Australia’s biggest biotech company CSL said it was assessing the impact of an executive order by US President Donald Trump, with early indications suggesting it would be largely exempt and face minimal impacts.

The order on Thursday solidified long-threatened tariffs on name-brand drugs from overseas, while giving partial or total exemptions for countries and exporters that struck a deal with his administration, committed to manufacturing on American soil by 2028, or agreed to offer their lowest price to the US market.

Australia was hit with the highest 100 per cent tariff, despite the Trump administration offering concessions to the EU, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland – which face 15 per cent tariffs – and the UK, at 10 per cent.

“We are disappointed by the United States’ decision to impose tariffs on pharmaceutical products,” a spokesperson for Trade Minister Don Farrell said.

“The Albanese government will always stand up for Australian jobs, industry, consumers and values and continues to make the strongest case for the removal of unjustified, unwarranted tariffs.

“We have made it clear Labor will never, ever negotiate on the design of the PBS.”

CSL, valued at $67bn, faces an uncertain fate under the policy, but said its main offering, blood plasma therapies, would not be impacted.

The company has plants in Australia, Europe and the US, namely a North Carolina vaccine factory and a headquarters in King of Prussia outside Philadelphia.

Health Minister Mark Butler said he was “confident” it would receive a carve-out under the policy.

CSL announced last year a $2.17bn US expansion, seen as a response to Mr Trump’s tough language on domestic drug manufacturing and threats of tariffs additional to his wide-ranging penalties on foreign markets.

This may be sufficient to secure it a partial exemption which would bring the tariff down to 20 per cent as incentive for providing American jobs. The order also stipulates plasma therapies, CSL’s stock in trade, will not be tariffed if they meet an “urgent” need.

CSL said it was “pleased” with the plasma exemptions and was still working through the nuance of the policy.

“We are pleased that the US administration has recognised the unique nature of plasma-derived therapies,” a spokesperson said. “This is consistent with longstanding precedent that affords special policy accommodations to ensure patient access to these lifesaving therapies, which are made from human-donated plasma and involve a complex and costly manufacturing process.

“We do not anticipate material impact from tariffs in FY26.”

In August, CSL bled on the stock exchange after announcing 3000 job cuts and the spin-off of its vaccine business Seqirus into a separate company.

It fell sharply twice more on October 28 and through the second week of February. Shares have almost halved in value since the spin-off.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38850

File: 60152ad964977b3⋯.jpg (238.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 64aee441681b03e⋯.jpg (223.42 KB,1577x887,1577:887,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24463084 (041221ZAPR26) Notable: Australia to take part in military talks to reopen Strait of Hormuz - Australian defence officials will join international military planners in United Kingdom-led talks to develop options for reopening and securing the Strait of Hormuz, as Iran’s disruption of shipping continues to drive a global energy crisis. The talks follow a 40-nation meeting condemning Iran’s actions, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong backing “diplomatic and civilian initiatives” while ruling out offensive involvement. Australia has deployed an E-7A Wedgetail aircraft and personnel to support Gulf partners, and maintains a special forces presence in the region as a precaution. Iran has moved to impose transit fees on vessels, with some ships already charged, while traffic through the strait has sharply declined. Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia was not committing troops to the conflict, amid concerns over limited naval capability to support any future operation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38823

>>38831

>>38843

>>38844

Australia to take part in military talks to reopen Strait of Hormuz

BEN PACKHAM and JACQUELIN MAGNAY - April 03, 2026

1/2

Australian military officials will meet with counterparts from around the world next week to devise a plan to make the Strait of Hormuz safe for international shipping as Iran prepares to charge vessels for using the vital strategic waterway.

The upcoming talks were flagged after a UK-chaired meeting of more than 40 countries condemned Iran’s attempts to “hold the global economy hostage” by closing the strait with mines, drones and missile attacks.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong joined the Friday morning (AEDT) videoconference, pledging support for co-ordinated “diplomatic and civilian initiatives” to pressure Iran to reopen the critical maritime corridor, which normally carries 20 per cent of the world’s oil and gas shipments.

The declaration came as it was revealed a contingent of up to 90 Australian Special Air Service Regiment personnel was on the ground in the Middle East to support the protection of Australian diplomats in the region.

Military sources said Australian special forces maintained an ongoing presence at Al Minhad Air Base in the United Arab Emirates, and the upgraded deployment was part of “prudent forward planning”.

Britain’s Defence Ministry said a multilateral meeting of military planners would take place in the UK next week “to discuss viable options to make the Strait of Hormuz accessible and safe for navigation”. An Albanese government source said Defence officials based in Brussels were likely to attend the talks on Australia’s behalf, as Senator Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles insisted Australia was not getting involved in the Iran war.

Tehran’s attacks on commercial shipping closed the Hormuz Strait, sparking a global energy crisis that forced Australian petrol prices well above $2 a litre, and diesel to more than $3 in many places.

A day after Donald Trump ruled out a US-led operation to clear the strait, Iran said it was developing a plan with Oman to “oversee transit” through the waterway. Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, told Russian media organisation Sputnik that draft rules for vessels to transit the strait were “currently in the final stages of preparation”.

He said all vessels passing through the waterway would have to obtain “necessary permits and licences in advance” for an undisclosed fee.

Iran has already charged at least one ship $US2m ($2.9m) to transit the strait, according to Lloyd’s List.

Mr Trump declared in a national address on Thursday (AEDT) that the US did not “need” the Strait of Hormuz, and nations that received oil through the passage “must take care of that passage”.

“They must grab it and cherish it. They could do it easily. We will be helpful, but they should take the lead in protecting the oil that they so desperately depend on.”

France’s President Emmanuel Macron hit out at the call for European nations to seize the strait, declaring: “That has never been the option we have chosen, and we consider it unrealistic.”

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said Friday’s meeting of 41 global partners, which was not attended by a US representative, discussed sanctions that would “bear down on Iran” if the strait remained closed.

Participants resolved to “comprehensively reject the imposition of tolls on vessels which seek to pass through” the strait.

“Iran is trying to hold the global economy hostage in the Strait of Hormuz. They must not prevail,” Ms Cooper said in a statement.

Earlier, she condemned “Iranian recklessness” for “hitting global economic security”, while avoiding questions on whether the US was still a British ally.

Ms Cooper said in the previous 24 hours, just 25 ships had navigated the strait, which would normally be used by 150 vessels a day. She said more than 25 attacks on commercial shipping had stranded about 2000 ships, with about 20,000 seafarers aboard.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38851

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24463097 (041229ZAPR26) Notable: Dezi Freeman associates arrested then released without charge - (Video) Two associates of Dezi Freeman have been arrested and released without charge as police continue investigating how the gunman evaded capture during a months-long manhunt. The man and woman were detained at separate properties in north-east Victoria before being freed pending further inquiries, with police confirming they were not family members. Authorities are seeking to identify who may have assisted Freeman while he was on the run for 216 days after killing two officers serving a warrant. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said it was “very important” to determine who was “complicit in getting him here” and supporting him. Investigators are examining evidence including burner phones recovered from Freeman’s remote hideout, as potential charges for assisting an offender could carry significant prison terms.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38829

>>38834

>>38838

Dezi Freeman associates arrested then released without charge

Tom Minear and Melissa Cunningham - April 4, 2026

1/2

Two associates of Dezi Freeman have been arrested as part of the investigation into how the police killer managed to evade capture for months.

Five days after Freeman was shot dead by heavily armed officers, a man and a woman were arrested at separate properties in north-east Victoria about 7am on Saturday.

Victoria Police issued a statement late Saturday afternoon that said the pair had been released without charge pending further inquiries.

Police confirmed the pair were not family members of Freeman, with a spokeswoman instead describing them as his associates.

“The investigation remains ongoing and, as such, we are not in a position to provide further details at this immediate time,” the spokeswoman said in a statement.

Police would not confirm where in the state’s north-east the pair were arrested.

Freeman had been on the run since August 19 last year, when he killed Neal Thompson and Vadim de Waart-Hottart at a Porepunkah property when they arrived as part of a group of 10 officers to carry out a search warrant in relation to child sexual abuse allegations against him.

In February, police said they strongly believed Freeman was dead.

But it emerged on Monday that Freeman had been hiding out in a shipping container on a remote bush property in Thologolong, near the border town of Walwa.

After an hours-long stand-off, Special Operations Group members shot dead the 56-year-old, having repeatedly called for him to surrender.

No officers were injured, despite Freeman firing the semi-automatic pistol he had stolen from one of the police he had killed in August.

The shootout brought to an end Australia’s longest and most expensive manhunt.

Speaking on Monday, after Freeman was killed, Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush repeatedly said he must have had help while on the run for 216 days.

“[It is] very important for us to understand how long he’s been here and who else was complicit in getting him here, and then caring for him or providing him with food and other things to this point,” Bush said.

“We will be speaking to anyone we suspect has assisted him to avoid detection and arrest.”

Four police sources, not authorised to speak publicly about the case, told The Age that the force was led to the Thologolong property by a tip-off from someone close to the country’s most wanted man.

Two burner phones were found at the scene – more than 150 kilometres away from Porepunkah – which police spent the week examining to try and establish who was assisting Freeman.

Police offered a record $1 million reward for any information leading to Freeman’s capture last year and warned that anyone caught harbouring or assisting Freeman would face severe penalties.

Criminal law specialist Melinda Walker previously told this masthead that in a case such as this, any charges would fall under section 325 of the state’s Crimes Act.

This includes cases where a person has committed a serious indictable offence and another person, who knows or believes them to be guilty of this “principal offence”, acts with the purpose of assisting with their escape from authorities or impeding their apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment.

“Where the principal offence is the most serious offence, being life imprisonment, then that person [who assists them] could be liable to a penalty of a maximum of 20 years if they are found guilty,” Walker said.

Walker said that for someone to be found guilty of helping a criminal, it must be proved they had done something “absolutely positive” with the knowledge of the accused offender’s crimes.

This could include deliberately misleading police, hiding the accused or providing them with food, transport or money to escape, she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38852

File: 00ea0db31d73de9⋯.jpg (152.8 KB,1560x877,1560:877,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24463109 (041238ZAPR26) Notable: Japan PM Takaichi plans Australia visit to discuss rare earths - Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is planning an official visit to Australia later this month to strengthen cooperation on critical minerals supply chains and regional security, including safe navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. The trip, marking the first by a Japanese leader since 2022, coincides with the 50th anniversary of bilateral ties and reflects efforts to reduce reliance on China for rare earths. Australia’s capacity to supply key minerals is expected to be central to discussions, alongside defence cooperation such as joint training and naval capability, including Canberra’s planned adoption of Mogami-class frigates. Leaders are also set to advance the “free and open Indo-Pacific” framework, with broader regional diplomacy potentially extending to Southeast Asia as Japan deepens strategic partnerships.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23954869 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23934631 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23934651 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38813

Japan PM Takaichi plans Australia visit to discuss rare earths

Security cooperation in Strait of Hormuz among likely topics of discussion

RINTO HORIKOSHI - April 4, 2026

TOKYO - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is planning a visit to Australia during the upcoming national holiday period starting later this month, Nikkei learned Friday, seeking to discuss strengthening supply chains for rare-earth elements and cooperation on safe navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

This will be the first visit by a Japanese prime minister to the country since Fumio Kishida's 2022 trip. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Basic Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between Japan and Australia.

Australia has the potential to replace China as a source of rare earths and other minerals. The Takaichi government has prioritized strengthening supply chains in response to Chinese economic pressure.

Australia has decided to adopt an upgraded version of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' Mogami-class frigate for its fleet of next-generation frigates. Expanding security cooperation, including joint training between the Japan Self-Defense Forces and the Australian military, will also be a topic of discussion during Takaichi's visit.

The Australian and Japanese leaders will also discuss the "free and open Indo-Pacific" initiative, which was first proposed by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago. In a policy speech this February, Takaichi emphasized that Japan will "strategically evolve its FOIP initiatives."

Takaichi is also considering visiting Southeast Asia before or after Australia.

https://asia.nikkei.com/politics/international-relations/japan-pm-takaichi-plans-australia-visit-to-discuss-rare-earths

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38853

File: ea02f719ccdbe90⋯.jpg (1.11 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 97285e171262e47⋯.jpg (2.99 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24466566 (051056ZAPR26) Notable: Australia given fuel supply assurances as plans in works for visit by Japan's prime minister - Australia has secured assurances from Japan that fuel supplies will continue uninterrupted, as the government moves to shore up energy security amid disruption linked to the Strait of Hormuz crisis. Assistant Trade and Foreign Affairs Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said Japan had confirmed “normal supply will continue” following recent talks, alongside similar commitments from South Korea and Singapore. The development comes as Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi considers a visit to Australia to discuss fuel security, rare earths and regional conditions, though Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has not confirmed the trip. Australia remains heavily reliant on imported fuel, with reserves covering only limited weeks of demand — about 39 days of petrol, 29 days of diesel and 30 days of jet fuel — underscoring vulnerability as more than 50 shipments remain en route and diversification efforts continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38813

>>38852

Australia given fuel supply assurances as plans in works for visit by Japan's prime minister

Nicole Asher - 5 April 2026

Fuel will continue to flow from Japan into Australia under assurances given during recent talks between the two countries.

It comes as Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi plans a trip to Australia to discuss conditions in the Strait of Hormuz as well as rare-earth minerals, according to reports by Japanese media.

That visit would come as the region's leaders work to shore up fuel security and supply networks.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has not confirmed the visit.

"Any plans for visits to Australia from foreign leaders will be announced when appropriate," a spokesperson said.

Assistant Trade and Foreign Affairs Minister Matt Thistlethwaite confirmed earlier that he had been in conversation with a Japanese counterpart about fuel in recent days.

"I met last week with the Japanese minister and requested that supply continue," Mr Thistlethwaite told Sky News.

"They've given us an assurance that normal supply will continue.

"I've done a similar thing with the South Koreans, and they've given us assurances and Singapore as well."

Further assurances being sought

Australia and Singapore had already signed a joint commitment to continue the trade of fuels.

The prime minister has reiterated that Australia will continue to be a reliable exporter of LNG into Asia and expects Asian partners to continue supplying Australia with the majority of its liquid fuel needs.

"Supply depends upon those relationships being adhered to," he said during an address to the National Press Club on Thursday.

"We expect countries that supply us to stick to agreements which are there; we think it's very important that the contracts that we have be fulfilled completely with countries in our region.

"That's the quid pro quo, if you like, and I think that is very important as we go forward."

About a fifth of the world's oil supply has in the past been shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, which is currently being blockaded.

Asian markets have signalled they may need to look for crude oil from other sources, including Russia, if the strait remains closed.

Japan talks on horizon

The supply assurance from Japan followed comments by its ambassador to Australia, Kazuhiro Suzuki, who late last month urged caution about imposing a windfall tax on LNG exports over investor confidence.

Speaking at a Mineral Council event, Mr Suzuki indicated Japan's domestic fuel reserves would be his country's priority.

The ABC revealed the prime minister's office had sought options for a new tax on gas and thermal coal exports ahead of the federal budget in May.

Australia sources just 0.7 per cent of its petrol and 6.8 per cent of its diesel from Japan, with the bulk of it coming from Singapore and South Korea, according to data published by the NRMA.

Japan is among the top five countries from which Australia sources refined fuels.

Australia now has fuel reserves equivalent to 39 days' worth of petrol, 29 days' worth of diesel and 30 days' worth of jet fuel.

More than 50 fuel shipments are on the way to Australian import terminals and are due to arrive over the next month.

Imports being diversified

Mr Thistlethwaite said work being done to diversify Australia's fuel sources meant some of those ships were inbound from the United States.

Australia gets 20.9 per cent of its crude oil and fuel needing refining from the US, making it the second highest contributor to Australia's stocks, topped only by Malaysia.

"We're covering all the bases to make sure that we diversify our supply and get as much through as we possibly can," he said.

The NRMA's Peter Khoury said the government's decision to lower the flashpoint for diesel opened the door to more from the United States.

"We've diversified our imports, which is great given what's happened in the Middle East," he said.

He added the assurance given by the Japanese was important, "particularly beyond April", when a potential fuel crunch point is forecast.

Shadow Assistant Minister for International Development Dave Sharma said Australia should have done more to secure its domestic fuel supplies in years past.

"Our ability to rely on international supply chains to get our liquid fuels has gone down significantly," Senator Sharma said.

He defended the former Coalition government's decision to store emergency fuel supplies in the US.

"Seaborne traffic between the west coast of the United States and Australia is still flying uninterrupted," he said.

"Now, if we had an option between no reserves anywhere and some reserves in the United States, I would take the latter."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-05/japan-fuel-supply-assurance-sanae-takaichi-visit-planned/106532548

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38854

File: 1bd4c3e9236a40a⋯.jpg (294.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 54c98d76a93cb54⋯.jpg (250.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 34afda2960ac6f7⋯.jpg (412.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24466593 (051129ZAPR26) Notable: Giuffre’s family urges King Charles to meet Epstein survivors during US visit - The family of Virginia Giuffre has called on King Charles to meet with Epstein survivors during his upcoming United States visit, saying the trip coincides closely with the anniversary of her death and presents an opportunity for engagement. Giuffre’s relatives said they “strongly urge” the King to hear directly from survivors, while acknowledging his past decision to strip his brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, of royal duties following the allegations. Palace officials have previously maintained the monarch cannot intervene while related investigations remain ongoing. Giuffre had accused Epstein of trafficking her to Mountbatten-Windsor, who has denied the claims and settled a civil case without admission of wrongdoing. The state visit comes as Britain seeks to steady relations with US President Donald Trump after tensions over the Iran war, placing additional attention on the monarch’s program in Washington.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24281824 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24281833 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24282003 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24282029 (pb)

Giuffre’s family urges King Charles to meet Epstein survivors during US visit

Sam Tabahriti - April 5, 2026

London: The family of Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre has urged Britain’s King Charles to meet with survivors during his state visit to the United States later this month.

In a statement, Sky and Amanda Roberts said the visit would take place two days after the one-year anniversary of Giuffre taking her own life.

“We strongly urge King Charles to meet with us and survivors and hear what we have to say,” they said.

“We are thankful to him for heeding our sister’s allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and for his decisive action in stripping his brother from his position as a prince.”

Buckingham Palace didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Palace officials have previously said the King could not become involved while investigations connected to sexual abuse by Epstein and his circle remain ongoing.

Giuffre accused the late US financier Epstein of trafficking her to King Charles’ younger brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, when she was 17.

Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied the allegations and reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing. He has said he had no recollection of meeting Giuffre.

Charles and his wife Queen Camilla are due to visit the US from April 27 to 30 on a trip timed to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence.

The state visit comes as Britain seeks to steady relations with US President Donald Trump after tensions over the Iran war, placing additional attention on the monarch’s program in Washington.

After renewed scrutiny over Mountbatten-Windsor’s friendship with Epstein, the King moved to remove his brother from public life, stripping him of military roles, patronages and the use of his royal titles.

Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested earlier this year on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations he passed confidential documents to Epstein. He has denied wrongdoing.

The Roberts said they hoped the King would meet survivors of sexual abuse by Epstein and his circle directly and that dialogue with survivors and their families could lead to action by the British government against Epstein’s co-conspirators.

Buckingham Palace has previously said that the royal family’s “thoughts and utmost sympathies” were with victims and survivors of abuse.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/giuffre-s-family-urges-king-charles-to-meet-epstein-survivors-during-us-visit-20260405-p5zleg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38855

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24469993 (060913ZAPR26) Notable: Australia's fuel shipments secured 'well into' May, Energy Minister Chris Bowen says - (Video) Australia has secured fuel shipments “well into” May, with the government extending supply certainty beyond earlier April forecasts as shortages ease across parts of the country. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said contracted shipments were legally locked in, with no cancellations reported and additional orders arriving from Asia, the United States and Mexico. The number of service stations without diesel has fallen from more than 400 to 274, with shortages easing nationally, though New South Wales remains more affected due to agricultural demand. Australia’s fuel reserves remain limited, covering about 39 days of petrol, 29 days of diesel and 30 days of jet fuel, unchanged since the conflict began. The government continues to pursue international supply agreements and has warned conditions remain uncertain as global disruptions persist.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38824

>>38839

>>38842

>>38853

Australia's fuel shipments secured 'well into' May, Energy Minister Chris Bowen says

Maani Truu - 6 April 2026

Fuel shipments to Australia have been secured "well into" May and the number of service stations with diesel and petrol shortages have fallen over the Easter weekend, Energy Minister Chris Bowen has said.

The government previously said Australia's fuel supplies were locked in until the end of April, but Mr Bowen told reporters today that authorities were now working to secure supplies for the following month.

"All the orders are locked in and contracted. Once it's contracted, the fuel belongs to the Australian company that's bought it … that is legally locked in, so that's encouraging," he told ABC RN.

"Of course, there is a risk in international circumstance and [the] international situation, but every step that can be taken is being taken."

According to the latest data, 274 service stations across the country are now out of diesel, down from more than 400 on Good Friday.

In New South Wales, the state with the highest number of shortages, 6 per cent of stations were now out of diesel, Mr Bowen said.

"Most of the other outages are around 2 to 3 per cent around the country. New South Wales has been higher because the farmers are seeding and sowing and they've been the priority, to get fuel to them," he said.

"That means we've had more outages in New South Wales than anyone would like, but that figure has been coming down, including over Easter."

On Friday, Mr Bowen said 53 ships carrying fuel were on the way to Australia from refineries around the world, including in Asia, the United States and Mexico.

Australia and Singapore have signed a joint commitment to continue the trade of fuels, with the government seeking to land similar deals with other Asian nations.

"The prime minister's been, of course, talking to his counterparts. I've been talking to mine. Foreign Minister [Penny] Wong has been talking to hers," Mr Bowen told reporters at a media conference in Sydney.

"We continue to see no ships cancelled that have been contracted for Australia, [and] extra orders being delivered."

The country's fuel stockpile remains at 39 days of petrol, 29 days of diesel and 30 days of jet fuel.

Mr Bowen said this had been "pretty consistent" since the beginning of the war.

Mr Albanese used a rare address to the nation last week to ask Australians to switch to public transport if they could in an effort to save fuel, but simultaneously stressed that people should continue to live as normal as the crisis rolled on.

But he also acknowledged that the coming months "may not be easy", as the war in the Middle East continued without a clear end in sight.

"These are uncertain times, but I am absolutely certain of this: we will deal with these challenges in the Australian way, working together and looking after each other, as we always have," Mr Albanese said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-06/australias-fuel-shipments-secured-well-into-may/106534572

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXjQNduUePs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38856

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474213 (070914ZAPR26) Notable: War Crime Murders:Ben Roberts-Smith arrested over alleged killings; five war crime murder charges carry life sentence- (Video) Australia’s most decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has been arrested and charged with five counts of war crime murder, with authorities alleging the killings of unarmed Afghan civilians and detainees between 2009 and 2012. The former Special Air Service soldier was taken into custody at Sydney Airport after arriving on a commercial flight and has been transferred to custody ahead of a bail hearing, facing potential life imprisonment if convicted. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said it would be alleged the victims were “detained, unarmed” and under the control of Australian Defence Force personnel when they were killed, including cases where others allegedly acted on his orders. The charges follow a five-year investigation, with officials describing the arrest as a “significant step” and confirming further charges against others remain possible as inquiries continue despite challenges accessing evidence since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ben Roberts-Smith arrested over alleged killings; five war crime murder charges carry life sentence

Australia’s most decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will spend the night in a police cell and face court on Wednesday for a bail hearing on charges of five counts of ‘war crime – murder’.

ELIZABETH PIKE - 7 April 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith will spend tonight behind bars after his bail hearing was pushed to tomorrow following his dramatic arrest at Sydney Airport this morning over five alleged war crime murders.

The former SAS hero faces the prospect of life in jail after Australian Federal Police officers swooped on him on board a Qantas flight.

He was taken to Mascot police station but has since been transferred to Silverwater Prison where he will remain unless he is granted bail at a hearing before the NSW Local Court tomorrow.

AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett said it would be alleged the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan.

“It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed, and were under the control of ADF (Australian Defence Force) members when they were killed,” she said.

“It will be alleged the victims were shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members of the ADF in the presence of and acting on the orders of the accused.”

The five charges relate to the decorated former special forces soldier’s alleged murder of unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners between 2009 and 2012.

The first count relates to intentionally causing the death of someone on or about April 12, 2009, at Kakarak, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

The second relates to the aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another person to intentionally cause the death of a person on or about April 12, 2009, at Kakarak, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

The third is aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another person to intentionally cause the death of a person, on or about September 11, 2012, at Darwan, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

The fourth is intentionally caused the death of a person on or about October 20, 2012, in Syahchow, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

The fifth count relates to aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another person to intentionally cause the death of a person, on or about October 20, 2012, at Syahchow, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

Office of the Special Investigator director Ross Barnett vowed that authorities will arrest and charge other people in relation to Mr Roberts-Smith if that is where the evidence leads them.

The agency head called the former SAS hero’s arrest a “significant step” in a five-year investigation into allegations of war crimes committed by ADF members in Afghanistan.

“We’ll continue this investigation until we get to the end point,” Mr Barnett said.

“Wherever the evidence leads, that’s where we’ll go.

“If the evidence leads to other people needing to be charged, you can be assured that will happen.”

Mr Barnett confirmed 39 of the 53 investigations into alleged war crimes had been finalised but ongoing work remained riddled with challenges.

The Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in 2021 had complicated investigations, limiting access to crime scenes and communication with contacts in the country.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38857

File: dbd882f06068bbc⋯.mp4 (15.03 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474276 (070936ZAPR26) Notable: Former Australian soldier arrested over alleged war crimes - (Video) A former Australian Defence Force member has been arrested at Sydney Domestic Airport and is expected to be charged with five counts of war crime - murder following a joint investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Office of the Special Investigator. The 47-year-old man faces allegations he "intentionally caused the death" of individuals or "aided, abetted, counselled or procured" killings during deployments in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, including incidents in Kakarak, Darwan and Syahchow in Uruzgan Province. The offences carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The investigation, launched in 2021, is examining alleged breaches of the Laws of Armed Conflict by Australian personnel between 2005 and 2016, with dozens of matters finalised and others still under active investigation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Former Australian soldier arrested over alleged war crimes

This is a joint media release between the AFP and the Office of the Special Investigator

Media Release - 07 APRIL 2026

A former Australian Defence Force member, 47, has been arrested and is expected to be charged with five counts of war crime – murder under a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and the AFP.

The man, who was arrested earlier today (7 April, 2026) at Sydney Domestic Airport, is expected to be charged with the following offences under section 268.70(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth):

• The war crime of murder, in that he intentionally caused the death of a person, on or about 12 April, 2009, at Kakarak, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan;

• The war crime of murder, in that he aided, abetted, counselled or procured another person to intentionally cause the death of a person, on or about 12 April, 2009, at Kakarak, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan;

• The war crime of murder, in that he aided, abetted, counselled or procured another person to intentionally cause the death of a person, on or about 11 September, 2012, at Darwan, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan;

• The war crime of murder, with another person, in that they intentionally caused the death of a person, on or about 20 October, 2012, in Syahchow, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan; and,

• The war crime of murder, in that he aided, abetted, counselled or procured another person to intentionally cause the death of a person, on or about 20 October, 2012, at Syahchow, Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan.

• The maximum penalty for the offence of war crime - murder is life imprisonment.

It is expected the man will appear in a NSW court later today.

The joint OSI-AFP investigation began in 2021, and inquiries are continuing.

The OSI and AFP are investigating allegations of criminal offences under Australian law related to breaches of the Laws of Armed Conflict by Australian Defence Force personnel in Afghanistan between 2005 and 2016.

Should you need health and wellbeing support, details for a range of services are available on the OSI website.

In an emergency or life-threatening situation, please contact Triple Zero (000).

Background information on the Office of the Special Investigator

The joint OSI-AFP investigation has, in total, commenced 53 investigations involving allegations of war crimes by Australian Defence Force members in Afghanistan.

Thirty-nine of these matters are no longer under active investigation, subject to any new evidence emerging. These matters have been comprehensively investigated, and sufficient evidence of a war crime does not exist to support the referral of a brief of evidence to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. A further 10 investigations are ongoing.

One other investigation has resulted in a former Australian Special Forces solider being charged with one count of war crime – murder. This matter has been listed for trial in February 2027 in the NSW Supreme Court.

The OSI and AFP are working to complete the remaining investigations as expeditiously as possible, cognisant of the welfare of those involved and the impact on the broader Defence community.

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/former-australian-soldier-arrested-over-alleged-war-crimes

https://www.osi.gov.au/support-services

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38858

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474281 (070939ZAPR26) Notable: AFP Commissioner opening statement following arrest of former Australian soldier - (Video) "Good afternoon. A former Australian Defence Force member has today been arrested and will be charged with five counts of War Crime - Murder after a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and the AFP. The former soldier was arrested at Sydney’s Domestic Airport this morning and is expected to face a NSW court later today. It will be alleged the man was a member of the ADF when he was involved in the death of Afghan nationals between 2009 and 2012 in circumstances that constitute war crimes under the Commonwealth Criminal Code. The offence of War Crime - Murder carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. It will be alleged the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan. It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed. It will be alleged the victims were shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members of the ADF, in the presence of, and acting on the orders of, the accused. Operation Emerald-Argon, began in 2021, and is a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator and the AFP. It has been a complex investigation that has been undertaken thoroughly and meticulously. We understand these charges will have an impact on several communities in Australia. Whenever I give a press conference, I do not just provide the facts in front of me, but I also address those impacted the most. So, I want to now directly address the concerns and questions some may have. The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF, which helps keep this country safe. The overwhelming majority of our ADF do our country proud. Today’s charges are not reflective of the majority members who serve under our Australian flag with honour, distinction and with the values of a democratic nation. Today, is a day to rally behind the ADF, and be mindful of the families whose loved ones have died while serving our country. Those charged, or facing charges under these joint investigations, will face the justice system in Australia. This is my message to the families of victims and the Australian community who want and deserve answers. Furthermore, this investigation remains ongoing. I encourage those who have relevant information to come forward to the OSI if they have not yet done so." - Krissy Barrett, Australian Federal Police Commissioner

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38857

AFP Commissioner opening statement following arrest of former Australian soldier

Media Release - 07 APRIL 2026

Good afternoon.

A former Australian Defence Force member has today been arrested and will be charged with five counts of War Crime – Murder after a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and the AFP.

The former soldier was arrested at Sydney’s Domestic Airport this morning and is expected to face a NSW court later today.

It will be alleged the man was a member of the ADF when he was involved in the death of Afghan nationals between 2009 and 2012 in circumstances that constitute war crimes under the Commonwealth Criminal Code.

The offence of War Crime – Murder carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

It will be alleged the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan.

It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.

It will be alleged the victims were shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members of the ADF, in the presence of, and acting on the orders of, the accused.

Operation Emerald-Argon, began in 2021, and is a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator and the AFP.

It has been a complex investigation that has been undertaken thoroughly and meticulously.

We understand these charges will have an impact on several communities in Australia.

Whenever I give a press conference, I do not just provide the facts in front of me, but I also address those impacted the most.

So, I want to now directly address the concerns and questions some may have.

The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF, which helps keep this country safe.

The overwhelming majority of our ADF do our country proud. Today’s charges are not reflective of the majority members who serve under our Australian flag with honour, distinction and with the values of a democratic nation.

Today, is a day to rally behind the ADF, and be mindful of the families whose loved ones have died while serving our country.

Those charged, or facing charges under these joint investigations, will face the justice system in Australia. This is my message to the families of victims and the Australian community who want and deserve answers.

Furthermore, this investigation remains ongoing. I encourage those who have relevant information to come forward to the OSI if they have not yet done so.

This is the second time a joint OSI and AFP investigation has laid War Crimes - Murder charges against a former ADF member in Australia.

I want to thank the hardworking members of OSI and AFP for their continued dedication. I also want to thank state and territory law enforcement agencies that have provided assistance during this investigation.

This matter is now before the court so I am constrained about what further information can be provided.

I will now hand over to OSI Director Investigations Ross Barnett, and then we will take some questions.

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-statement/afp-commissioner-opening-statement-following-arrest-former-australian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVFaYMVNT_E

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38859

File: 459ee29280a1d9e⋯.jpg (201.64 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 96c7aa86204d9d5⋯.jpg (464.94 KB,1861x1048,1861:1048,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474323 (071002ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith charged with multiple war crimes - Australia’s most decorated living soldier has been charged with five counts of war crime - murder following his arrest at Sydney Airport after a joint Australian Federal Police (AFP) and Office of the Special Investigator investigation. It will be alleged he "intentionally caused the death" of unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners or directed others to do so between 2009 and 2012, including incidents where victims were "not taking part in hostilities" and were "detained, unarmed and under the control" of Australian Defence Force personnel. Prosecutors will allege he executed detainees, kicked a civilian off a cliff and ordered subordinates to carry out killings, including so-called “blooding” incidents. Witnesses, including former Special Air Service soldiers, are expected to testify they saw or were directed to participate in executions of defenceless detainees. The charges carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, marking one of the most significant war crimes prosecutions in Australian history.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Ben Roberts-Smith charged with multiple war crimes

Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters and Perry Duffin - April 7, 2026

1/3

Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged with multiple war crimes over the alleged murders of unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners in what will become the most significant war crimes prosecution in Australian history.

The charges, five counts of war crime – murder, followed Roberts-Smith’s surprise arrest at Sydney Airport on Tuesday and after a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

“It will be alleged the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan,” AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett told media on Tuesday in Sydney.

“It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.”

The charging of the highly decorated former special forces soldier comes after a five-year investigation secured the co-operation of SAS eyewitnesses. They are expected to testify that they saw Roberts-Smith executing, or directing junior soldiers to execute, defenceless detainees during his time in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2012.

The 47-year-old was arrested at Sydney Airport after he arrived on a flight from Brisbane on Tuesday morning. AFP officers were seen waiting at the arrivals gate when his plane arrived just after 11am.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese refused to answer repeated questions on Roberts-Smith’s arrest at a press conference.

“I have no intention of commenting on a matter that’s clearly before the courts,” Albanese said, later adding that his commentary may prejudice the case.

“I’m not going to confirm anything to do with the legal matter. That is a matter that is very important, that there not be political engagement in what is a matter that is now the subject of legal proceedings.”

The federal police said the charges against Roberts-Smith, which he has previously strongly disputed, would allege that he:

• Kicked an Afghan civilian off a cliff and directed a subordinate to execute the man in September 2012;

• Executed a prisoner with a prosthetic leg during an Easter Sunday mission in southern Afghanistan in 2009 and ordered another subordinate to murder a second detainee, an old man, captured in the same compound;

• Ordered a junior SAS soldier to execute an unarmed detainee in a ritual known as blooding in October 2012, and was involved in a second murder during the same incident.

When Roberts-Smith was allegedly involved in the 2012 executions, he was the most decorated Commonwealth soldier to serve in Afghanistan. If proved, the allegations the Victoria Cross recipient faces may mean he will be stripped of his medals and jailed, potentially for life.

Barrett said it had been a “complex” five-year investigation into a small cohort of the ADF and their actions while fighting on behalf of Australia.

“The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF, which helps keep this country safe,” she said.

“The overwhelming majority of our ADF do our country proud. Today’s charges are not reflective of the majority members who serve under our Australian flag with honour, distinction and with the values of a democratic nation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38860

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474332 (071009ZAPR26) Notable: COMMENTARY: War crimes prosecutors will face challenges convicting Ben Roberts-Smith - "Ben Roberts-Smith has known for a long time that this moment would come. The former SAS soldier is to be charged with five counts of war crimes, including murders he allegedly took part in while serving in Afghanistan. If convicted, he faces the possibility of life in prison. The defamation action he brought to try to prove himself innocent ended as a spectacular own goal. To Roberts-Smith’s disbelief, former comrades-in-arms lined up to testify against him. That evidence in itself, given in a civil case, cannot be used against him in a criminal trial. But the defamation action allowed war crimes investigators from the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator to identify members and former members of the SAS who were willing to break the elite service’s code of silence. If the Victoria Cross recipient had left it to prosecutors to build a criminal case against him, that might never have happened - or least, not to the level that they could be confident they could achieve a conviction. They’ve taken five years just to get this far. Prosecutors aren’t allowed to go on fishing expeditions. Roberts-Smith saved them the problem by bringing his own case before they did. But proving war crimes offences to the criminal standard - that is, beyond reasonable doubt – will be much more difficult for commonwealth prosecutors than it was for Nine’s defamation defence team to prove them on the balance of probabilities. Office of Special Investigations director Ross Barnett made that clear in Tuesday’s otherwise uninformative press conference when he listed the difficulties OSI investigators had faced in gathering evidence from a country then at war and now ruled by the Taliban. The Crown prosecutor bears the burden of investigators who had little or no access to civilian witnesses, and no access to the crime scene, or even to the deceased, to conduct a post mortem. Some of the soldiers who gave evidence against Roberts-Smith in the defamation trial didn’t have to testify about their own sins on the battlefield, let alone be cross-examined on them. They may be reluctant to give evidence in a criminal case. Roberts-Smith had powerful backers in his defamation case, among them two of Australia’s richest people, billionaires Kerry Stokes and Gina Rinehart. They are unlikely to desert him as he gathers together what will be a formidable legal team to defend himself against the charges. This case has divided the nation like no other. Australia’s most decorated soldier lost his reputation in a failed defamation case. If he ultimately beats these charges, he will have won it back at a very high price." - Stephen Rice, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

COMMENTARY: War crimes prosecutors will face challenges convicting Ben Roberts-Smith

STEPHEN RICE - 7 April 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith has known for a long time that this moment would come.

The former SAS soldier is to be charged with five counts of war crimes, including murders he allegedly took part in while serving in Afghanistan.

If convicted, he faces the possibility of life in prison.

The defamation action he brought to try to prove himself innocent ended as a spectacular own goal.

To Roberts-Smith’s disbelief, former comrades-in-arms lined up to testify against him.

That evidence in itself, given in a civil case, cannot be used against him in a criminal trial.

But the defamation action allowed war crimes investigators from the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator to identify members and former members of the SAS who were willing to break the elite service’s code of silence.

If the Victoria Cross recipient had left it to prosecutors to build a criminal case against him, that might never have happened – or least, not to the level that they could be confident they could achieve a conviction.

They’ve taken five years just to get this far.

Prosecutors aren’t allowed to go on fishing expeditions.

Roberts-Smith saved them the problem by bringing his own case before they did.

But proving war crimes offences to the criminal standard – that is, beyond reasonable doubt – will be much more difficult for commonwealth prosecutors than it was for Nine’s defamation defence team to prove them on the balance of probabilities.

Office of Special Investigations director Ross Barnett made that clear in Tuesday’s otherwise uninformative press conference when he listed the difficulties OSI investigators had faced in gathering evidence from a country then at war and now ruled by the Taliban.

The Crown prosecutor bears the burden of investigators who had little or no access to civilian witnesses, and no access to the crime scene, or even to the deceased, to conduct a post mortem.

Some of the soldiers who gave evidence against Roberts-Smith in the defamation trial didn’t have to testify about their own sins on the battlefield, let alone be cross-examined on them.

They may be reluctant to give evidence in a criminal case.

Roberts-Smith had powerful backers in his defamation case, among them two of Australia’s richest people, billionaires Kerry Stokes and Gina Rinehart.

They are unlikely to desert him as he gathers together what will be a formidable legal team to defend himself against the charges.

This case has divided the nation like no other.

Australia’s most decorated soldier lost his reputation in a failed defamation case.

If he ultimately beats these charges, he will have won it back at a very high price.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/war-crimes-prosecutors-will-face-challenges-convicting-ben-robertssmith/news-story/96fc1de3f4164781ea35c21bd4ffdaf8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVLJYjvvE0w

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38861

File: 5ceffe1fca31d3e⋯.mp4 (10.59 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474340 (071017ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Didn’t help us’: United States President Donald Trump hits out at Australia, NATO over support in Iran conflict - (Video) United States President Donald Trump has criticised Australia and key allies, claiming they "didn’t help us" during the ongoing conflict with Iran while accusing NATO of going "out of their way not to help" US efforts. He warned of potential escalation, saying the US could strike Iranian infrastructure, including power plants and bridges, and set a deadline for Tehran to agree to terms aimed at ending the five-week war. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia had supported international efforts focused on keeping the Strait of Hormuz open through diplomatic coordination, stressing the government was "not taking offensive action" or deploying troops. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles confirmed Australia’s participation in international talks, while Nationals leader Matt Canavan said it remained unclear what additional support the US expected from Canberra.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38764

>>38779

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

‘Didn’t help us’: United States President Donald Trump hits out at Australia, NATO over support in Iran conflict

Donald Trump has taken another swipe at Australia, accusing the key ally of not helping the United States in its conflict with Iran.

Matt Hampson - April 7, 2026

Australia has been called out by United States President Donald Trump over its support of US efforts during the Iran conflict.

The President outlined his grievances towards NATO at a White House press conference, claiming the political and military alliance had “gone out of their way not to help” the US during the war.

“And it’s not just NATO. You know who else didn’t help us? South Korea didn’t help us,” President Trump told reporters on Monday, local time.

“You know who else didn’t help us? Australia didn’t help us.

“You know who else didn’t help us? Japan.”

President Trump said he will order sweeping attacks on Iranian civilian power plants and bridges unless Tehran makes a deal aimed at ending the five-week war with Iran.

“The entire country can be taken out in one night, and that night might be tomorrow night,” he said.

"I hope I don't have to do it."

The US President has set a deadline for 8pm EDT on Tuesday (10am AEST on Wednesday) for Iran to comply with US conditions of a deal aimed at ending the conflict.

Nationals leader Matt Canavan told Sky News he was not aware of President Trump asking Australia “to do more of things than we haven't done” in the conflict.

"I think it would be good for the Australian government to be clear exactly what we’ve been asked. Sometimes it's a bit vague,” he said, when asked for his reaction to the President's comments.

It comes after Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced last week that she had joined a ministerial call with over 40 countries regarding the Strait of Hormuz.

The talks were “part of Australia’s support for international efforts to ensure critical waterways are not held hostage by the Iranian regime”, a statement from Ms Wong said.

“Australia joined partners in condemning the Iranian regime’s weaponisation of the Strait of Hormuz,” she said.

“Ministers urged Iran to act in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2817, which reaffirmed that the exercise of navigational rights and freedoms by merchant and commercial vessels, in accordance with international law, must be respected, particularly around critical maritime routes.

“The focus of last night’s meeting was diplomatic and civilian initiatives countries could pursue to make the Strait of Hormuz accessible and safe.

"Ministers agreed on the importance of continued coordination and collective action."

Ms Wong reiterated that Australia was “not taking offensive action against Iran" and "not deploying troops on the ground".

“The Australian government continues to support de-escalation and the resolution of this conflict,” she said.

“The longer this war goes on, the more significant the impact on the global economy will be.”

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles had confirmed Australia’s participation the virtual meeting, which was hosted by the United Kingdom.

“We will work with countries like the UK and France to see how we can help in respect of the Strait of Hormuz,” he told Sky News last week.

“Obviously, we want to see the Strait of Hormuz open. That is to state the obvious.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/didnt-help-us-united-states-president-donald-trump-hits-out-at-australia-nato-over-support-in-iran-conflict/news-story/60b2e8c2f35e654f1a05abab94135585

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/no-happy-ending-us-president-donald-trump-takes-another-swing-at-australia-but-what-does-he-want/news-story/5fbb4bc0e77d8b3fdc1dfeb09011114e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38862

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24474347 (071037ZAPR26) Notable: Albanese in dash to Singapore to secure fuel as Trump deadline looms - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to Singapore to secure fuel supplies as Australia moves to shore up energy security amid threats to global oil flows during the Iran conflict. The government is seeking to ensure continued access to petrol, diesel and liquefied natural gas, with Singapore a critical refining hub supplying a significant share of Australia’s fuel imports. The trip has been brought forward as oil prices surge and concerns grow over disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, with Albanese saying Australia’s supply position is "currently in a secure position" but efforts are under way to keep fuel flowing. Ministers are also engaging regional partners and mediators to support de-escalation, while emergency measures, including funding and fuel management strategies, have been introduced to stabilise supply and reduce shortages.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38824

>>38839

>>38853

Albanese in dash to Singapore to secure fuel as Trump deadline looms

Paul Sakkal - April 7, 2026

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will dash to Singapore to lock in fuel imports from the oil superpower as Australia backs diplomatic moves from Turkey and Egypt, which, along with Pakistan, are seeking to mediate an end to the war in Iran.

As oil prices jumped again on Tuesday following the threat by US President Donald Trump to take out the “entire country” of Iran unless it reopened the Strait of Hormuz by 10am on Wednesday (AEST), Labor government ministers were in a full-court press to boost Australia’s chances of preserving liquid fuel supply should the flow of tankers dry in coming months.

Labor’s political opponents had for weeks accused Albanese of being slow to react to the oil shock caused by Iran’s effective blockage of the Strait of Hormuz.

In the past fortnight, the government has adopted a more aggressive stance and upended its planning for the May budget by announcing $2 billion in emergency funding to buy fuel at inflated prices, halving the fuel excise and planning meetings and calls with a slew of suppliers, including Singapore, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Brunei and Japan.

On Friday, Albanese will meet with Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong hoping to put Australia near the front of the queue should companies need to make hard choices on where tankers are directed.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Tuesday the government was now projecting steady demand until mid-May, an improvement on earlier estimates and an indication that emergency measures were paying off.

Australia’s oil supply was “currently in a secure position”, Albanese said, and that he was talking to Asian leaders to boost the chances “of keeping our fuel supply flowing”.

Wong, who last month signed an in-principle agreement with Albanese on maintaining fuel supply, is in demand in Asia and Europe as world leaders scramble to make deals with Singapore.

The wealthy city-state is Asia’s major oil hub and in the top three refining hubs globally. Australia imports more than half its petrol from Singapore, as well as 22 per cent of its jet fuel and 15 per cent of diesel.

Albanese had a trip to visit Wong planned for later this year but has brought this forward. Prime ministers rarely make impromptu trips, underlining the importance of the fuel crisis to domestic politics as petrol prices spike and economists forecast a downturn.

Crucially, Singapore is reliant on Australia’s plentiful supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for nearly one-third of its imports. Gas prices have spiked since a massive LNG plant in Qatar was hit in an Iranian airstrike last month, which put Australian product in even greater demand. Qatar is Singapore’s biggest LNG supplier.

“We’ll continue discussions on securing our trade in petrol, diesel and LNG,” Albanese said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38863

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24478314 (080925ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith to remain behind bars for more than a week after bail hearing - (Video) Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will remain in custody at Sydney’s Silverwater Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre until at least April 17 after his legal team did not seek immediate bail following his arrest on five counts of war crime - murder. The charges relate to alleged killings of unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012, with prosecutors alleging victims were "not armed" and were "shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members... acting on the orders of the accused". Former prime minister John Howard said the case would "test to the limits" public respect for the rule of law while stressing no individual is above it. Supporters, including Gina Rinehart, criticised the prosecution, as authorities confirmed further investigations remain ongoing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Ben Roberts-Smith to remain behind bars for more than a week after bail hearing

STEPHEN RICE and LACHLAN LEEMING - 8 April 2026

1/2

John Howard says while many Australians will find the arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith difficult, no one is above the law, as the former soldier appears set to remain behind bars for more than a week before applying for bail on war crimes charges.

In a statement released one day after the dramatic arrest of the Victoria Cross recipient at Sydney Airport, Mr Howard said Mr Roberts-Smith was the “modern personification of the great Anzac tradition” and pleaded for the nation to respect the right to the presumption of innocence.

Mr Roberts-Smith will stay in Silverwater jail in Sydney until at least April 17, when he next gets the opportunity for bail, but he faces a life behind bars if convicted on five counts of murder in a war crimes trial.

The former Liberal prime minister said the arrest of Mr Roberts-Smith “will tug at the heart strings of millions”, adding that the court case would “test to the limits” Australians’ respect for both the rule of law and the reverence in which the country’s servicemen and women were held.

Mr Howard, prime minister when Australian forces were first committed to the Afghanistan conflict in 2001, issued a rare statement on Wednesday afternoon in which he emphasised Mr Roberts-Smith’s right to a fair trial.

“The most decorated Australian serviceman alive, he is the honoured holder of the treasured Victoria Cross. To some Australians, Roberts-Smith is the modern personification of the great Anzac tradition,” Mr Howard said, adding Australians would expect his trial to be held as ­“expeditiously as possible”.

Mr Howard added: “Fundamental to the operation of the rule of law is that no man or woman is above or beyond its reach.”

“This is a difficult issue for many, as it tests to the limits not only our respect for Australian values but the deep and special reverence we have for those who put their lives on the line to keep us safe,” he said.

Earlier, billionaire mining magnate Gina Rinehart slammed the prosecution of Mr Roberts-Smith, urging that “his duty to our country in the hardship of war is never forgotten”, after the former soldier was charged with war crimes.

“I don’t understand how it can be justified to spend more than $300m to try for years to bring SAS veterans, who have served our country, towards criminal proceedings, and most recently the ­arrest of Ben,” Mrs Rinehart said in a statement.

She suggested the money spent on pursuing war crimes investigations would have been “far better spent strengthening Australia’s security and keeping Australians safe from terrorism, including removing terrorists and their supporters from our country”.

“Have we lost sight of the fact that in our inadequately defended country, facing uncertain times, the morale of our defence force has already been brought to its lowest ebb since inception, our defence personnel numbers are inadequate, and recruitment is suffering?” Mrs Rinehart asked.

The messages of support came as Mr Roberts-Smith’s legal team declined to apply for bail on Wednesday following his arrest on Tuesday on five charges of murder, crimes allegedly committed between 2009 and 2012 against unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS.

A bail application is set to be held at Sydney’s Downing Centre on April 17.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38864

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24478341 (080956ZAPR26) Notable: Anthony Albanese labels US President Donald Trump’s ‘whole civilisation will die’ comments inappropriate - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has criticised United States President Donald Trump’s warning that a “whole civilisation will die” if Iran failed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, describing the remarks as "inappropriate" and "extraordinary" for a world leader. He said threats involving damage to civilian infrastructure raised concerns and stressed that all conflict must adhere to international law, including protecting civilians. Albanese reiterated Australia’s support for de-escalation following a provisional ceasefire between the US, Israel and Iran, while maintaining the alliance with Washington remained strong. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said the comments were “not the words I would use” but emphasised the importance of reopening the Strait, while Nationals leader Matt Canavan described the remarks as beyond acceptable bounds.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

>>38861

Anthony Albanese labels US President Donald Trump’s ‘whole civilisation will die’ comments inappropriate

The Prime Minister has given US President Donald Trump a serve over his ‘inappropriate’ comments about Iran.

Caitlyn Rintoul - 8 April 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese has labelled US President Donald Trump’s warning to Iran that a “whole civilisation will die” if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened as inappropriate and “extraordinary” statements by a world leader.

The Prime Minister expressed his strongest criticism of Mr Trump’s actions to date when welcoming a ceasefire between the US, Israel, and Iran — which is subject to the Islamic Republic reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

“I don’t think it’s appropriate to use language such as that from the President of the United States, and I think it will cause some concern,” Mr Albanese told Sky on Wednesday.

“The potential of damage to civilian infrastructure in Iran was an extraordinary statement to make.

“We’ve said very clearly that the conduct of any conflict must be within international law, and that provides for making sure that civilians who aren’t parties to the conflict are given every protection possible.”

When asked if Mr Trump’s language constituted a “war crime”, Mr Albanese said: “It’s a long step between a tweet and that suggestion”.

“What we have called for is a de-escalation, and that is what has occurred, and that’s a good thing,” he added.

The President’s comments, which were posted to his Truth Social platform just an hour before his ultimatum deadline, have been condemned globally.

Among those calling for an end to the conflict had been Pope Leo XIV who criticised Mr Trump’s threats that Iran’s “civilisation will die” if the Strait of Hormuz remained closed as “unacceptable”.

Mr Albanese’s public rebuke of Australia’s closest ally comes after he and his frontbenchers have repeatedly stated they wouldn’t provide a running commentary of Mr Trump’s remarks.

Despite his objection to the rhetoric out of Washington, Mr Albanese said Australia’s alliance with the United States remained strong.

“The United States is our most important ally. They remain our most important ally,” he said.

“The relationship between our two nations is a relationship on many levels between leaders. I’ve had a constructive relationship with President Trump.

“But it’s also between our armed forces, between our economies and between business people, and people-to-people links as well.

“We are two great democracies, and that will continue into the future.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38865

File: d7c08f860d31f19⋯.mp4 (6.26 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 3ebba8f00e16e7e⋯.jpg (3.61 MB,3000x2013,1000:671,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 64158c3965296fb⋯.jpg (4.06 MB,3000x2138,1500:1069,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24483958 (100143ZAPR26) Notable: Inside Ben Roberts-Smith’s harsh Sydney prison - (Video) Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has entered the Silverwater Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre as a high-profile inmate after being charged with five counts of war crime - murder, marking a sharp shift from public prominence to strict custodial conditions. He has been processed through standard intake procedures, issued prison clothing, assigned an identification number and placed under protection arrangements, allowing him to remain in a single cell while housed among other remand prisoners. Authorities say he will spend extended periods confined, with limited daily exercise, monitored communications and tightly controlled routines typical of maximum-security remand facilities. The 47-year-old is expected to remain in custody until at least April 17, when he is due to reappear in court for a bail application, with the case set to unfold over an extended period.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38863

Inside Ben Roberts-Smith’s harsh Sydney prison

Bevan Shields - April 8, 2026

1/2

Even though he knew it was coming, the harsh reality of being arrested would have hit Ben Roberts-Smith hardest when he stepped out of a white Hyundai van and walked handcuffed into Silverwater Correctional Complex.

Inside, the man who has met the late Queen and been lionised by political leaders and corporate titans entered a world stripped of rank and reputation. After being checked in at a purple reception desk next to a row of steel-bar cells, the disgraced soldier was led through a scanner – used in place of standard strip searches – to check for any hidden banned objects or substances, before being put into a small changing room.

He was told to hand over his jeans and blue polo shirt, and change into bottle-green prison clothing and velcro sneakers made by fellow inmates. Any items that could be used for self-harm, including shoelaces, drawstrings, ties and belts, were removed and placed in a property tub.

Roberts-Smith was given a copy of the Male Inmate Handbook – the bible of what he can and can’t do inside – and assigned a six-digit Master Index Number, which he will hold for life.

This was all just the start of a strict screening process designed to prepare new inmates for a very different existence. The Inspector of Custodial Services has previously described the admittance process as a “stressful and volatile period”, which is also labour-intensive for stretched staff.

The Herald and The Age have confirmed Roberts-Smith has been designated a high-profile protection inmate, meaning he does not need to share a standard cell with another person for now. That is one small mercy: standard cells in Silverwater are small, sparse and have a shared open toilet. But Roberts-Smith has still been assigned to a standard wing with other prisoners, the majority of whom are on remand after being denied bail over alleged domestic violence offences, drug charges, gangland attacks, robberies and other violent crimes. He will spend time out of his cell in communal recreational areas with these men, their every move monitored by a network of cameras and other surveillance equipment.

Roberts-Smith is likely to spend many nights behind bars as lawyers and prosecutors thrash out his case over coming months and years. Time will not make his stay in Silverwater – one of Sydney’s busiest and most volatile prisons – any more bearable.

The 47-year-old arrived there at 6pm on Tuesday after his arrest that morning at Sydney Airport. The former Special Air Service Regiment corporal turned Seven media executive had flown in with his girlfriend and daughters from Brisbane only to be confronted on the plane by several police officers and investigators.

He was immediately arrested and later charged with five counts of war crime – murder after a joint investigation between the Office of the Special Investigator and the AFP. The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

The Silverwater team, led by no-nonsense governor, Patrick Aboud, had been alerted to prepare for a high-profile arrival. Aboud, a veteran of Sydney’s prison system, is no stranger to prominent visitors: he has overseen the imprisonment of Roger Rogerson, Abe Saffron and Neddy Smith, Harriet Wran, the daughter of former NSW premier Neville Wran, and more recently Daniel Billings, whose frenzied knife attack on Forbes childcare worker Molly Ticehurst shocked the nation.

Roberts-Smith, though, is in a category of his own. War crime charges are rare in Australia, and the only other person charged to date – Oliver Schulz – does not have the profile Roberts-Smith has, nor the support from billionaires like Gina Rinehart and media mogul Kerry Stokes. The stakes around the Roberts-Smith case – including how he is treated behind bars while the legal system runs its course – could not be higher.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38866

File: abf73463c2a5267⋯.jpg (4.3 MB,6840x5062,3420:2531,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc2d8290d725891⋯.jpg (1.53 MB,4500x3000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484093 (100223ZAPR26) Notable: ‘An utter disgrace’: National war museum urged to act on Ben Roberts-Smith display - Senior historians and former officials have criticised the Australian War Memorial for retaining Ben Roberts-Smith’s uniform and equipment in its Hall of Valour after he was charged with five counts of war crime - murder, arguing the display undermines historical accuracy. University of New South Wales historian and former Australian War Memorial deputy director Michael McKernan described the decision as "ludicrous" and an "utter disgrace", while UNSW Canberra historian and former principal historian at the memorial Peter Stanley said the display should be relocated to reflect the consequences of the Afghanistan conflict and “tell the truth”. University of Canberra historian Frank Bongiorno also questioned the memorial’s approach, citing its role as a national institution shaping public memory. The memorial said it would review the wording of its interpretive panel while monitoring developments, maintaining that curatorial decisions remain independent. Veterans’ Affairs Minister Matt Keogh said the institution’s role was to present the full story of conflict, including controversial aspects, as debate continues over how to represent the legacy of a decorated soldier facing serious criminal charges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

‘An utter disgrace’: National war museum urged to act on Ben Roberts-Smith display

Clay Lucas and Nick Newling - April 9, 2026

1/2

Senior historians and former leaders have accused the Australian War Memorial of undermining its commitment to historical truth in its refusal to remove or relocate its Ben Roberts-Smith display in the museum’s Hall of Valour.

In a move one prominent historian described as “disgraceful” and “ludicrous”, the memorial has said it will keep Roberts-Smith’s uniform and equipment on display in its Hall of Valour indefinitely, following the former SAS corporal being charged with five counts of murder over his actions in Afghanistan.

In the Hall of Valour – which honours recipients of the highest award for bravery in wartime, the Victoria Cross – Roberts-Smith’s military uniform and helmet remain on display, alongside that of another warrior.

In a statement, a spokeswoman confirmed the institution would only “review the wording” of an interpretive panel next to the display while monitoring developments and considering updates “as appropriate”.

The panel – which has been updated several times as Roberts-Smith brought and then lost defamation proceedings against this masthead – notes, now incorrectly, that Roberts-Smith “has not been charged with any offence under criminal law”.

Michael McKernan, a senior lecturer in Australian history at the University of NSW and deputy director at the memorial in the 1990s, said Australia should no longer celebrate Roberts-Smith and that his uniform display should be taken from the Hall of Valour.

“You can’t leave it there – it’s ludicrous. I mean, he is now charged with five murders; let’s get real – that’s not good,” he said, calling for urgent action.

“He has every right to be considered innocent until found guilty, but the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia upheld that, on the balance of civil probability, he is a war criminal.”

McKernan said when that decision came out, the memorial should have said: “‘OK, we can find many other heroes from Afghanistan to celebrate.’ It’s a serious thing when a judge says something as direct as that. It is an utter disgrace, and the war memorial has lost its head over Ben Roberts-Smith.”

Peter Stanley, former principal historian at the memorial and a UNSW Canberra professor, warned the nation’s commitment to honesty should impel the institution to acknowledge the actions of defence personnel, whatever they may be.

He said the war memorial should move the Ben Roberts-Smith display into the Afghanistan gallery.

“So we can see the consequences of Australia’s involvement in the conflict,” he said, adding that the associated interpretive panel needed to accurately describe what had unfolded relating to the soldier. “Just tell the truth,” he said.

University of Canberra historian Frank Bongiorno said the Australian War Memorial “deploys a very kind of nationalist framing – it is a kind of temple to Anzac really”. He said there was a strong sense that the war memorial was “a kind of repository of sacred national stories”.

“That was particularly elevated under [former director] Brendan Nelson. It’s not an ordinary museum in that sense; it’s part-memorial, part-museum, and really a national shrine,” he said.

“And I think that that makes this kind of process, involving a previously venerated Victoria Cross winner, a far more difficult thing for the war memorial.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38867

File: 55c13dca77a8c2f⋯.jpg (243.16 KB,1587x893,1587:893,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bfacfe3ca5915d4⋯.jpg (117.7 KB,1120x1493,1120:1493,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484331 (100357ZAPR26) Notable: Top lawyer joins Ben Roberts-Smith’s defence for ‘trial of the decade’ - Ben Roberts-Smith has begun assembling a legal team to fight five counts of war crime - murder, with the case expected to become one of the most significant criminal trials in Australia. High-profile criminal lawyer Karen Espiner has joined the defence, bringing experience from representing fellow accused war crimes defendant Oliver Schulz. Other senior counsel under consideration include Arthur Moses SC, known for his military law expertise, Bruce McClintock SC, who previously worked on the defamation case, and Bret Walker SC, who led appeal proceedings. Media and commercial lawyer Monica Allen has also been identified as a potential inclusion due to her detailed knowledge of the case. The defence team’s final composition may depend on financial backing from supporters such as Kerry Stokes and Gina Rinehart, with government assistance schemes expected to cover only basic legal costs.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Top lawyer joins Ben Roberts-Smith’s defence for ‘trial of the decade’

STEPHEN RICE - April 08, 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith has begun assembling the legal team that will defend him against war crimes charges in what is shaping up – for the nation’s top lawyers as well as the former soldier – as the biggest murder trial of the decade.

Much will depend on whether Mr Roberts-Smith’s backers in his defamation case against Nine newspapers, particularly media magnate Kerry Stokes, will stump up the funds for a similarly high-powered team in his criminal trial.

The commonwealth will provide basic legal assistance for the Victoria Cross recipient through the Afghanistan Inquiry Legal Assistance Scheme, which funds the reasonable costs of legal representation for current and former serving Australian Defence Force members who are the subject of criminal investigations and prosecutions.

However, “the reasonable professional costs of a legal practitioner” is unlikely to meet the going rate of even one of the junior barristers who sat alongside the silks representing him in his defamation case.

The maximum daily rate for senior counsel allowable under the scheme is $3650, and for junior counsel $2300.

Perhaps encouragingly for Mr Roberts-Smith, mining billionaire Gina Rinehart – a long-time supporter – on Wednesday slammed prosecutors for spending an estimated $300m “to try for years to bring SAS veterans, who have served our country, towards criminal proceedings, and most recently the arrest of Ben”.

However, neither Mr Stokes nor Mrs Rinehart has indicated whether they will provide additional funds for Mr Roberts-Smith’s defence in a trial that will run for months.

Among those already recruited for “Team BRS” is high-profile lawyer Karen Espiner, who is also acting for the only other Australian to have been charged with a war crime, Oliver Schulz.

Like Mr Roberts-Smith, Mr Schulz, 44, is facing a possible life sentence after allegedly gunning down Afghan man Dad Mohammad in a wheat field in Oruzgan Province, southern Afghanistan in May 2012. Mr Schulz has pleaded not guilty and will face trial in the NSW Supreme Court after committal hearings last year in which witnesses watched helmet-cam footage aired on ABC television’s Four Corners program showing the alleged killing.

Over the past decade Ms Espiner, 39, has been consistently recognised in the Doyle’s Guide as one of the best criminal lawyers in Australia.

Married to former attorney-general Christian Porter, Ms Espiner co-founded Younes + Espiner Lawyers but in 2023 moved to Western Australia to lead the opening of the Hugo Law Group’s Perth office.

In the Schulz matter, Ms Espiner applied for bail a week after Mr Schulz was arrested for allegedly murdering an unarmed Afghan.

It appears similar considerations were at play when Mr Roberts-Smith’s matter was briefly mentioned in an online bail court on Wednesday morning and his legal representatives elected not to apply for bail. He will get another chance on April 17.

Other members of Mr Roberts-Smith’s team have yet to be signed on, with a trial date possibly up to two years away.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38868

File: 4a5f64bed89eee8⋯.jpg (844.72 KB,3131x1761,3131:1761,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 817fbd1341346ab⋯.jpg (6.34 MB,7641x5096,7641:5096,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 58fec0ac2f2f180⋯.jpg (496.59 KB,2852x1900,713:475,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484464 (100510ZAPR26) Notable: From war hero to accused serial killer: The unravelling of Ben Roberts-Smith - The arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith on five counts of war crime - murder marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running saga that has reshaped his public standing from decorated soldier to accused criminal. It will be alleged he was involved in the killing of unarmed Afghan civilians and detainees between 2009 and 2012, with claims emerging from eyewitness accounts by former Special Air Service colleagues who later testified publicly. The case follows years of investigations, a failed defamation action and civil court findings that allegations of unlawful killings were proven on the balance of probabilities. Authorities have since built a criminal brief drawing on witness testimony, including accounts of detainees being killed after capture. Supporters, including prominent political and business figures, have continued to defend him, while investigators gathered evidence in Australia and overseas despite operational challenges. The matter will now be tested in court under the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

From war hero to accused serial killer: The unravelling of Ben Roberts-Smith

Nick McKenzie - APRIL 7, 2026

1/5

Australia’s most notorious soldier sat stony-faced among the great and the good of the Commonwealth. They, like him, had secured a rare palace invitation to the 2022 funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.

Ben Roberts-Smith told reporters before the ceremony he was genuinely mourning. But his presence inside the hallowed Westminster Abbey was also an act of defiance.

It told the Victoria Cross recipient’s detractors he believed he still deserved a place in high society, despite a judge’s declaration months earlier that he was a serial war criminal whose cruelty had indelibly stained the reputation of Australia’s defence force.

On Tuesday morning, he was not surrounded by knights and dames of the realm. It was detectives who had just arrested him for the alleged execution of unarmed Afghan detainees and civilians he was meant to protect. He was charged on Tuesday with five counts of war crime-murder.

The war memorial’s poster boy for Australia’s contribution to its longest war was now in custody, potentially facing life in prison.

The arrest of Australia’s most decorated living soldier over multiple counts of murder committed in Afghanistan is the latest and most stunning development in an extraordinary saga that has split society and will echo for decades, whether or not a jury eventually finds Roberts-Smith guilty.

It began publicly in 2017, when investigative reporters from this masthead began publishing evidence suggesting Roberts-Smith was not all he seemed.

Powerful supporters across Australia, including billionaire media mogul Kerry Stokes and ex-opposition leader and minister Brendan Nelson raced to Roberts-Smith’s defence. As evidence mounted and more stories were published, his influential backers doubled down.

The saga reached its first crescendo in 2023, when the decorated soldier comprehensively lost a $25 million Federal Court defamation action, known as the trial of the century, he had launched against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times in a misguided attempt to prove his innocence.

In 2024 and 2025, he lost two appeals – up to the High Court. Roberts-Smith remained defiant. He traded the public support of Stokes for another, even wealthier, billionaire in Gina Rinehart.

Rinehart refused to say if she funded Roberts-Smith but did criticise the coverage of his actions as weakening the nation’s Defence Force.

These backers, along with a chorus of voices on social media, helped amplify a narrative that Roberts-Smith’s descent from national icon to accused war criminal was the ultimate tall poppy takedown.

But the seeds of the criminal case he is now potentially facing were not planted by credulous reporters or a cabal of jealous special forces detractors.

The arrest that heralds this story’s second crescendo comes from eyewitness accounts in Afghan cornfields, mud huts and villages. Those making the allegations include soldiers who fought alongside Roberts-Smith in Australia’s most elite fighting unit.

There are many sliding-doors moments in the privileged life of Ben Roberts-Smith – a graduate of Perth’s finest private schools and son of West Australian Supreme Court Justice Len Roberts-Smith and his wife Sue.

Perhaps the most important was a secret operation on September 11, 2012.

On that day, the rising Afghan sun had yet to warm the chill of the air as the heavily armed men of the SAS raced towards the helicopters at the Tarin Kowt military base.

In the distance rose the mountains of southern Afghanistan, silent sentinels of a country famed for swallowing up the men and morale of invading armies.

Fifteen minutes later, the choppers settled on the outskirts of Darwan, a farming village next to the Helmand River, consisting of mud and stone compounds.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38869

File: 8c994427b78a140⋯.jpg (189.92 KB,1536x864,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e63de999429ae8⋯.jpg (254.85 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b75deb46994a89⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,2912x3960,364:495,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8db60182046534b⋯.jpg (49.66 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484599 (100707ZAPR26) Notable: Kill boards, trophy hunting and ‘blooding’: What courts have already heard about Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged crimes - Allegations aired in court proceedings have detailed a series of killings involving unarmed Afghan civilians and detainees that prosecutors are expected to rely on in a criminal trial against Ben Roberts-Smith. Evidence previously accepted in a civil case described victims as "not a threat" and under Australian control, with claims they were killed after capture. Testimony outlined alleged practices including “blooding” recruits by ordering them to shoot detainees, the use of “throw-down” weapons to stage scenes, and informal “kill boards” tracking deaths. Specific incidents include the alleged killing of a detainee with a prosthetic leg during the Whiskey 108 mission in Kakarak, the fatal shooting of prisoners in that operation, and the killing of a farmer in Darwan. Further allegations relate to operations in Syahchow, Chinartu and Fasil, where detainees were allegedly executed or killed after capture. While some allegations were proven to the civil standard, others were not, and the case will now be tested under the higher criminal threshold of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38868

Kill boards, trophy hunting and ‘blooding’: What courts have already heard about Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged crimes

Ben Roberts-Smith is in the unusual position of being expected to face a series of murder charges after a defamation judge already found he had killed defenceless Afghans. Those cases are detailed below. Warning: distressing content.

Michael Bachelard - APRIL 7, 2026

1/4

One of the people Ben Roberts-Smith allegedly murdered had a prosthetic leg. Another was a farmer collecting flour for his family. A third was simply removed from a house and taken out and killed.

Each was unarmed, under the control of the Australian troops, and not a threat.

On Tuesday, Roberts-Smith was arrested over five killings during his time in Afghanistan. He has now been charged with counts of war crime-murder for each of them.

Prosecutors in the criminal process that finally began 17 years – almost to the day – since the first alleged murder, are likely to argue that each of them was carried out in cold blood.

If the evidence in an eventual criminal trial follows that in the defamation case Roberts-Smith unsuccessfully launched against this masthead in 2018, the jury will hear not only that Australia’s most decorated living soldier is a serial killer, but that he relished his crimes.

Kill boards, trophy hunting and “blooding” recruits by ordering them to shoot bound prisoners were gruesome features of stories from the giant corporal’s later rotations in Australia’s longest war.

“Just a couple more dead c*nts,” he allegedly told a colleague after one killing, according to evidence accepted in the defamation trial.

The most high-profile of these killings – and the one first covered in detail in this masthead almost eight years ago – took place in a little village called Darwan.

Darwan and the ‘kick’

The day Roberts-Smith choppered into Darwan with 41 other Australian special forces soldiers was September 11, 2012 – 11 years after the Twin Towers terrorist attack that prompted the Afghan war.

The troops were on high alert, searching for an Afghan soldier, Hekmatullah, who almost two weeks earlier had killed three of his Australian army mentors.

The Australian raiders did not find Hekmatullah in Darwan. Instead, they were stuck questioning poor farmers.

As they were about to return to base, Roberts-Smith asked some final questions of handcuffed men in a compound at the village’s southern end. One of the men was Ali Jan. He was in Darwan buying flour for his family.

They were no threat. In military parlance, they were “Persons Under Control”, or PUCs.

Under questioning by the Australian soldier, who stands more than two metres tall, Ali Jan made the mistake of smiling, according to one Afghan witness in the defamation case.

Roberts-Smith’s response, according to two Afghan witnesses, was to manhandle the farmer to the edge of a small cliff, or steep slope, still bound. The Australian backed up a few steps. Then, like the Spartan king Leonidas in the violent Hollywood fantasy movie 300, he front-kicked the Afghan man, catapulting him backwards down the slope.

Roberts-Smith, who has a Sparta helmet tattooed on his ribcage and had worn a Crusader cross around his neck, descended the slope with two other soldiers. He ordered them to drag Ali Jan, blood pouring from a mouth full of broken teeth, to a berry tree in a cornfield.

There he ordered one of the soldiers to shoot Ali Jan dead. The other gave direct evidence against Roberts-Smith at the defamation trial.

With the testimony of the three Afghan witnesses it was, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko said later, “a strong, consistent and coherent body of evidence”.

Roberts-Smith denied wrongdoing, claiming Ali Jan was a “spotter” who evaded the intensive five-hour operation by hiding in the corn field.

He was only discovered late in the day. The judge found that explanation inherently unbelievable.

According to trial evidence, back at base, a fellow soldier and one of Roberts-Smith’s witnesses, immortalised the incident by drawing a whiteboard picture of a winged penis kicking a man off a cliff.

It’s worth noting that, in 2018, the incoming Australian Army chief, Angus Campbell, banned Australian soldiers from displaying Spartan paraphernalia, along with other “arrogant … symbols of death”.

Darwan might have been the first accusation of murder against Roberts-Smith that was brought into the public domain by this masthead, but it was not his first alleged murder.

That happened three years earlier, in 2009, on Easter Sunday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38870

File: 7f4ed6671401e57⋯.jpg (127.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5390c6ea4a590fd⋯.jpg (344.32 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a64d90dfb46d933⋯.jpg (987.04 KB,2304x3072,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3c6a2253634f764⋯.jpg (314.24 KB,1312x1693,1312:1693,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484743 (100903ZAPR26) Notable: His brother’s leg became a grisly trophy. Now, he wants justice - Families of Afghan men allegedly killed on the orders of Ben Roberts-Smith have welcomed his arrest on five counts of war crime - murder while criticising the years taken to bring charges. Relatives of victims, including Esmatullah, whose brother Ahmadullah and father Mohammad Essa were allegedly executed in 2009, said they were "very, very happy" but wanted to know what would happen next. The case also includes the alleged killing of Ali Jan in 2012. Evidence aired in prior proceedings alleged Ahmadullah’s prosthetic leg was taken after his death and later used by soldiers as a drinking vessel, a detail that became a defining symbol of alleged misconduct and breakdown of discipline. Members of the Afghan diaspora in Australia described mixed reactions, with some viewing the arrest as a step toward justice, while others questioned the focus on one soldier amid Taliban rule and ongoing suffering.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38868

>>38869

His brother’s leg became a grisly trophy. Now, he wants justice

Nick McKenzie and Amber Schultz - April 9, 2026

1/2

The families of two Afghans allegedly executed on the orders of Ben Roberts-Smith have welcomed the criminal charges but criticised the years-long delay in bringing the famous soldier to justice.

Australian filmmaker Pete Williams visited southern Afghanistan late last year and spoke with the family of the two allegedly murdered men.

On Tuesday, just hours after the Australian Federal Police announced Roberts-Smith’s five charges of war crime – murder, Williams contacted the son and brother of the two men who prosecutors will claim were summarily executed.

Esmatullah is the brother of a disabled man with a prosthetic leg, Ahmadullah, who was allegedly machine-gunned in the back by Roberts-Smith, and the son of Mohammad Essa, who was allegedly executed on Roberts-Smith’s orders, both in 2009. The leg was photographed being used as a trophy to drink alcohol from.

Speaking via a translator, Esmatullah said he welcomed the news.

“He said he was very, very happy, and he wants to know what’s next,” Williams said.

Esmatullah and the family members of Ali Jan, who was allegedly executed in 2012 on Roberts-Smith’s order, expressed concern to Williams late last year at the time it had taken for charges to be brought.

“They were very frustrated, they were angry, and they lost faith in the Australian justice system,” Williams said.

In the unsuccessful defamation case brought against this masthead, Ben Roberts-Smith claimed Ali Jan and the three other victims were all armed combatants killed during the heat of battle. Roberts-Smith has always denied any wrongdoing, and it is anticipated that he will fight criminal charges.

In Australia, the news of the arrests has brought back traumatic memories and mixed emotions among the Afghan diaspora.

Tahera Nassrat, who fled Afghanistan in 1998, said the initial reports of Roberts-Smith’s alleged crimes had shaken her sense of security.

Nassrat had been working with Medecins Sans Frontieres when the Taliban attacked the city she was in. She now lives in Sydney, is the founder of the Afghan Peace Foundation and a Refugee Council of Australia ambassador.

As a young girl in the war-torn country, Nassrat said she was taught to trust soldiers as they had a duty to protect civilians.

“We put our trust in them, and we put our lives in their hands, and we run to them for safety,” she said.

The allegations, she said, shook that perception of safety, but the news of Roberts-Smith’s arrest was the first step toward rebuilding trust between civilians and soldiers.

“Many Afghans have felt invisible and unheard for a long time, but this development offers a sense of recognition and a hope that justice is still possible,” she said.

She said soldiers had a duty to protect civilians and to act with humanity, discipline, and respect, and that the arrest meant if rules were broken, consequences would follow “regardless of a person’s status or reputation”.

“It sends a clear message to Afghan Australians that while it took a while, justice is there and the truth always comes first. It sends the message that their life matters and their suffering has not been completely forgotten.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38871

File: 4a5877a187d10b2⋯.jpg (378.47 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 37fa06952a15dd7⋯.jpg (339.1 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 143faaa19907aa3⋯.jpg (629.9 KB,2048x1153,2048:1153,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484771 (101012ZAPR26) Notable: Hastie could testify in Roberts-Smith murder trial - Shadow defence minister and former Special Air Service captain Andrew Hastie says he may be called as a witness in the criminal trial of Ben Roberts-Smith, who has been charged with five counts of war crime - murder over alleged actions in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. Hastie, one of multiple veterans subpoenaed in earlier defamation proceedings, said it was possible he would again give evidence, noting he had previously testified under oath. He emphasised the importance of preserving the integrity of the legal process, stating Roberts-Smith was entitled to the presumption of innocence and a fair trial free from political interference. Hastie also said Australia must acknowledge “wrongdoing” identified in past investigations while recognising that the conduct of a small number of individuals did not define the broader Australian Defence Force.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38780

>>38826

>>38856

Hastie could testify in Roberts-Smith murder trial

Clay Lucas - April 9, 2026

Australia must acknowledge “wrongdoing” in Afghanistan while also respecting the rule of law following the arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith, says shadow defence minister and former SAS captain Andrew Hastie.

Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most-decorated living soldier, was arrested on Tuesday and charged with five counts of the war crime of murder allegedly committed during his deployment to Afghanistan.

During the arrest, described by the BBC as “one of the most significant moments in Australian military history”, Roberts-Smith was escorted off a plane onto the tarmac at Sydney Airport and taken into custody.

The Victoria Cross recipient – whose legal fees in a failed defamation trial against this masthead were bankrolled by billionaire Kerry Stokes – will face a bail hearing on April 17.

Roberts-Smith has always denied the allegations against him.

Hastie, who served multiple tours of Afghanistan, said on Thursday that he might be called to testify against his former colleague. In a statement posted to his website, Hastie noted that he was one of 21 SAS veterans subpoenaed as a witness in Roberts-Smith’s defamation action.

“I gave testimony under oath, as required by law,” he said. “Mr Roberts-Smith is now facing criminal charges in relation to this operational mission, so it is possible that I will be called as a witness to this trial.”

Speaking earlier on Thursday to 2GB radio, Hastie warned that political commentary must not be allowed to prejudice the upcoming proceedings.

“Ben Roberts-Smith is entitled to the presumption of innocence,” he said. “He’s entitled to a fair trial, and that’s why I’m very circumspect about making comment, because the last thing we want is for his trial to be prejudiced by political commentary.”

Hastie said that Tuesday was a “sad and sobering day” for many Australians, but that the rule of law must prevail to ensure the former soldier received a fair trial.

In Roberts-Smith’s defamation loss, the Federal Court found that, on the balance of probabilities, Roberts-Smith was a war criminal.

Hastie said it was “hard to avoid the reality” of wrongdoing within the elite regiment following the handing down of the Brereton report into war crimes in 2020. “[It] found wrongdoing was done,” he said. “There was some wrongdoing that was found to be credible … part of us moving forward as a country is acknowledging where we’ve done well and done right, and also acknowledging where we’ve gone wrong.”

The West Australian MP, often touted as a possible future leader of the Coalition, said that while “things never go right” at the “pointy end” of combat, the actions of a few did not define the whole.

“I want to say to [veterans] that we all had a mission to serve our country, and 99 per cent of us did our job with honour, and we did it in a war that was incredibly frustrating,” he said.

Reflecting on his own service, Hastie spoke of the brutal complexities of the Afghanistan conflict, and the devastating civilian toll.

“Until you’ve, like me, stood over the dead bodies of an eight-year-old and a six-year-old boy, which have just been torn up by a 30-millimetre cannon [fired] by a US Apache, I’m just not going to take a lecture from people about the reality of war,” he said.

Hastie said the SAS remained a critical national capability and defended the men and women serving in the regiment. He said it was crucial that politicians like him said as little as possible about the upcoming trial of the former soldier.

“[Roberts-Smith] will have his day in court, and one way or another, there will be an outcome,” Hastie said. “But if this process is prejudiced, we’re actually not doing Ben Roberts-Smith a service.”

Some politicians have opted for silence when asked about the case – including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who cited the looming court case – while others, like Pauline Hanson and Tony Abbott, have forcefully condemned the charges.

Former prime minister John Howard said on Wednesday that “to some Australians, Roberts-Smith is the modern personification of the great Anzac tradition”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/hastie-could-testify-in-roberts-smith-murder-trial-20260409-p5zmoo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38872

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484792 (101040ZAPR26) Notable: Albanese says fuel stocks looking good almost to June as he jets to Singapore - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia’s fuel supplies are secured almost to June as he travels to Singapore to strengthen energy ties amid ongoing instability in the Middle East. He described the ceasefire in the Iran conflict as a "fragile peace" and urged restraint, warning of broader regional impacts including tensions involving Lebanon. The government has accelerated efforts to secure fuel imports, including emergency funding and negotiations with key suppliers, as concerns persist over disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said supply is now expected to last several weeks into May, while diesel shortages remain a concern. Albanese said the visit to Singapore, a major refining hub, was critical to maintaining supply, as Australia seeks to stabilise fuel access and manage economic risks linked to the global oil crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38853

>>38862

Albanese says fuel stocks looking good almost to June as he jets to Singapore

Paul Sakkal - April 9, 2026

1/2

Australia’s fuel stocks have been guaranteed almost to June and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged Israel to abide by a fragile ceasefire in a Middle East conflict that has roiled global oil markets, as he jets to Singapore to further bolster the nation’s fuel supplies.

Opposition frontbencher James Paterson suggested Labor was at odds with the US over the terms of a ceasefire deal that had raised hopes of the return of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

After heavy Israeli fire into Lebanon following the announcement of the deal, US Vice President JD Vance said on Thursday (AEST) that Israel’s campaign against Iran’s proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah, was not part of the agreement.

The dispute put the truce in flux and added urgency to the government’s upcoming blitz of Asian oil exporters that has upended Albanese’s schedule in the weeks leading up to an important federal budget.

“It is a fragile peace,” Albanese said at the Lytton oil refinery in Brisbane on Thursday.

“The Australian government also firmly believes that this has to apply to Lebanon as well … many Australians are concerned about the events that are occurring in Lebanon.”

Albanese’s opposition to Israel’s heavy bombing campaign, and its civilian toll, builds on its recognition of a Palestinian state last year, and increasingly sharp criticisms of Israel’s military action in Gaza.

The prime minister, usually reluctant to comment on Donald Trump’s actions, on Wednesday described the US president’s threats to wipe out the Iranian civilisation as “inappropriate”.

As Opposition Leader Angus Taylor demands more transparency on local fuel outages, Albanese and his ministers have overhauled the government’s agenda to be seen to be doing everything possible to lock in fuel supply.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Thursday that supply was now guaranteed “several weeks” into May.

Diesel, critical to many sectors of the economy, is a particular worry among government officials because Australia produces more petrol than diesel. Petrol stations are out of diesel more commonly than petrol, though the overall number of shortages is falling.

The government’s $2 billion in emergency finance has been opened up to Australia’s last two oil refineries, run by Ampol and Viva Energy, to allow them to buy expensive cargoes on the spot market.

Standing with the prime minister, Bowen faced scrutiny over whether Labor’s anti-pollution policies were hindering fuel and energy security. Toughening anti-pollution standards to meet its green energy targets was “not at the top of my to-do list right now”, Bowen said.

The stakes are high for the prime minister as he heads to Singapore, an Asian oil superpower with the third-highest production of transport fuel in the world.

When he decided to make a national televised address to the nation last week, Albanese staked his authority on steering Australia through what the International Energy Agency has described as the worst oil crisis in modern history.

Albanese downplayed the prospect of a binding agreement on fuel supply with Singapore before his meeting with Prime Minister Lawrence Wong on Friday. Late last month, Australia signed an in-principle agreement with Singapore to keep trading as a supply crunch loomed.

“Success looks like us going to Singapore,” Albanese said. “The fact that we have been welcomed at relatively short notice to Singapore speaks about the strength of the relationship.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38873

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24484796 (101045ZAPR26) Notable: PM lands in Singapore on mission to cement fuel supply - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has arrived in Singapore to secure fuel supplies, highlighting Australia’s reliance on the country which already provides more than half its petrol. The visit comes amid disruptions to global oil flows linked to instability in the Strait of Hormuz, with Albanese saying the relationship is based on "trust and mutual interest" as both nations seek to maintain reliable supply. Australia is positioning its liquefied natural gas exports as leverage in negotiations, while the government has introduced measures to guarantee fuel shipments and support domestic supply. Analysts said a deal is likely but warned broader agreements may be needed as supply tightens. Officials and experts cautioned that shipping through the Strait remains limited and recovery will take time, with uncertainty continuing to pose risks to fuel availability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38853

>>38862

>>38872

PM lands in Singapore on mission to cement fuel supply

9News Staff - Apr 9, 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has touched down in Singapore, talking up the chances of a deal to lock in supply from the country that already ships half of Australia's petrol.

The hastily organised meeting amid continued worries about Iran's effective closure of a critical shipping route is being pitched as a chance to guarantee gas supplies in return for oil.

Singapore refines Middle Eastern oil and ships fuel around the world, including more than half of the petrol imported by Australia, 16 per cent of diesel and some jet fuel.

Australia is Singapore's number one gas provider, something Albanese will be looking to stress as he tries to lock in a share of a shrinking supply of Singaporean fuel, if difficulties getting oil to the nation's Jurong Island refinery continue.

"This is a relationship of trust and of mutual interest as well," Albanese said after landing in Singapore this evening.

"We know that it is in both of our countries' interests to engage with each other to make sure that we are both reliable suppliers."

Nine's chief political editor Charles Croucher said a deal "can and probably should be done".

"The ingredients are all there. The leaders get along. Australia has gas. Singapore has fuel," he said.

"There are commercial complications but they will, and probably already have been, worked out.

"But that's not job done. As supply diminishes, there will be needing to be more agreements and guarantees from countries like Japan, Malaysia, Korea and even Brunei.

" … These are all individual pieces of Australia's petrol puzzle, and they all are vulnerable to the volatility in the Middle East."

In Queensland earlier in the day, Albanese announced a deal allowing Australian tax dollars to act as a guarantee for private companies securing shipments of fuel.

"This is not business as usual. Importantly this is additional supply to Australia," he said.

The government also announced investment fast-tracks for an electric truck transport hub in western Sydney and fuel hubs in Victoria and South Australia converting biomass - like crop residue and organic waste - into fuel.

Transport Minister Catherine King said it could be "turned into low-carbon liquid fuels for our jets, for our marine industry and for our heavy vehicles".

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor appealed for certainty.

"We need to know that fuel is going to come from Singapore to Australia, on time without cancellations, without delays," he said.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical shipping lane through which 20 per cent of the world's oil flowed before the US and Israel attacked Iran on February 28.

The narrowest part is only 33 kilometres wide and it sits between Iran and other Gulf countries, including Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Normally, 130 ships pass through every day. Today, that number is down to just seven.

It's a chokehold on oil supply, and ships that do pass through without any permission put themselves in great danger. Since February there have been close to 30 reported attacks on commercial vessels.

Post-ceasefire, Iran declared it would provide a safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz with coordination from the country's armed forces but what that means exactly is still unclear, including reports it will allow just 12 ships through a day.

The country has sought to formalise a "toll booth" regime charging ships to transit through the passage, splitting the profits with Oman on the other side of the water and using its share for reconstruction.

Australian National University National Security College expert associate Jennifer Parker said she didn't expect large numbers of ships to pass through the strait until there was confidence of the ceasefire holding and more understanding of what Iran was demanding of the ships.

"They won't want to set a precedent that they need to inform a coastal state when going through an international strait," she told 9News.

"And I think they'll be waiting for reassurance that if Iran starts attacking again, there'll be some sort of response from the US.

"So it'll take some time to get back through to normal numbers going through that strait."

https://www.9news.com.au/world/australia-oil-crisis-prime-minister-anthony-albanese-lands-in-singapore-on-mission-to-cement-oil-supply/0e9b8d55-8bc1-4e4b-a86a-d64af25b635a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64OuMEbW1bA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38874

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24488536 (111355ZAPR26) Notable: Singapore all but guarantees fuel supply as Albanese hails trip a ‘win-win’ - Singapore has pledged to continue supplying Australia with more than half its petrol as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese secured assurances during talks with counterpart Lawrence Wong, while warning supply depends on global crude availability. Albanese described the arrangement as a "win-win", with Australia offering liquefied natural gas exports in return for stable fuel access amid ongoing disruption to global oil markets. Both leaders committed to maintaining trade flows and strengthening energy cooperation, though no binding guarantee was reached. Wong said exports would continue as long as upstream supplies hold, highlighting risks tied to the Strait of Hormuz crisis. The agreement comes as Australia seeks to shore up energy security, with officials warning that continued instability and reduced tanker traffic could still impact supply and prices despite improved short-term outlooks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38853

>>38862

>>38872

>>38873

Singapore all but guarantees fuel supply as Albanese hails trip a ‘win-win’

Paul Sakkal - April 10, 2026

1/2

Singapore: Singapore has promised to do everything in its power to keep supplying Australia with more than half its petrol, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese flags an expansion of gasfields and special deals to keep powering the wealthy city-state.

However, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s confident tone was coupled with a warning that exports would hold “as long as upstream supplies continue”, pointing to the prospect of lower output if Singapore could not source enough crude oil as the trajectory of the war remained uncertain.

Also complicating an energy supply agreement between the two nations was an Australian proposal to more heavily tax gas firms. Albanese played down the revenue-raising idea and said his immediate focus was on “supply, supply, supply”, but he did not rule it out. Wong suggested that more expensive Australian gas could push Singapore to look elsewhere.

As only a few tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz and US Vice President JD Vance heads to Pakistan for peace talks, Albanese concluded the first stage of his blitz through Asia with a joint statement with Wong, urging the US and Iran to permanently end the war.

The prime ministers also pledged to exert “maximum efforts” to continue trading large volumes of fuel and gas between the two nations.

“This is a win-win,” Albanese said at The Istana government residence in Singapore, claiming the tie-up would help farmers and the Australian economy straining under high fuel prices.

As major gas projects such as Scarborough and Beetaloo loom, Albanese hinted at “additional fields” that would “continue to provide support for Singapore”, which sources most of its LNG from Qatar and Australia.

Wong and Albanese signed a statement on energy exports that, while not legally binding, was pitched by the Australian side as significant in a context where Wong was being pursued by other world leaders for similar pledges.

“It won’t happen,” Wong said when asked about cutting exports. “We didn’t have to do so even in the darkest days of COVID, and we will not do so during this energy crisis.”

Albanese visited Jurong Island – one of the world’s largest oil refinery hubs – on Friday morning. Australia is hoping to be prioritised if Singapore’s refineries keep reducing output.

Companies have sourced more crude from the US and Africa to replace oil from the Middle East, and Wong signalled an openness to using more Russian oil despite it being a revenue source used to fund the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38875

File: 6b2885cc5372cc7⋯.mp4 (15.85 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24490964 (120714ZAPR26) Notable: Police hunt for Dezi Freeman’s network using fingerprints from killer’s hideout - (Video) Detectives investigating the death of alleged police killer Dezi Freeman are pursuing possible collaborators, using fingerprinting and DNA testing to identify individuals connected to his hideout near the Victorian-NSW border. Police have contacted associates and people linked to the site, seeking forensic samples to both identify suspects and exclude innocent parties, with evidence collected from the container where Freeman had been staying. Investigators are examining items including swimming gear, paddles and other equipment as they explore how Freeman may have moved through the area after the fatal shooting of two officers. Authorities have also been analysing the crime scene for signs of external assistance, while continuing surveillance and intelligence operations focused on Freeman’s network. The investigation remains ongoing as police work to determine whether others were involved in supporting him.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38829

>>38834

>>38838

>>38851

Police hunt for Dezi Freeman’s network using fingerprints from killer’s hideout

LIAM MENDES and JOHN FERGUSON - April 10, 2026

Operation Summit detectives are aggressively pursuing potential Dezi Freeman collaborators, fingerprinting and DNA testing people as part of an investigation that has cast suspicion across the area he once lived in.

Multiple people connected to Freeman and the site where he was gunned down have been asked by police to provide potential forensic evidence in a bid to catch the collaborators but also rule out any innocent parties.

The Australian understands police have contacted key friends of Freeman’s who are suspected of helping him, using fingerprint evidence gleaned from outside the container where the cop killer had been hiding out.

The man and woman arrested and released without charge also will likely have been fingerprinted as part of the process, with police suspicion falling heavily on people from the area where Freeman gunned down the two police last August, about 300km northeast of Melbourne.

For three days Victoria Police detectives scoured the site when the killer was shot dead by police on March 30, investigators leaving behind fingerprint dust.

At that property on the Victorian-NSW border where he was shot dead, swimming flippers were found but, intriguingly, a single, unopened Carlton Dry bottle captured in helicopter photographs had disappeared after police had cleared the crime scene.

The silicon swim fins could be a clue for police on how Freeman possibly escaped from the Porepunkah property, about 300km northeast of Melbourne, after shooting the police.

One theory – considered unlikely at the time – was that Freeman, 56, had either floated down the Buckland River in a wetsuit or paddled in a canoe before the shallow, picturesque body of water merges with the larger Ovens River.

Days after Freeman shot the police, officers scoured the Buckland River, using a rubber dinghy to travel downstream.

When police trawled through the Freeman family belongings at Porepunkah they found swimming gear and goggles, as well as paddles.

Freeman was still carrying a Smith & Wesson police handgun when he was found last week, which would have had to have been kept dry, or mostly dry, if he escaped from Porepunkah, possibly with the help of someone else.

With fingerprint dust covering chairs, kitchen utensils and doors of the Thologolong property, 392km northeast of Melbourne, police have secured DNA profiles of others who have previously been at the scene, prior to Freeman’s arrival.

There were at least three chairs outside the container where Freeman had been staying and also a relatively new, small wood stove that appears to have been opened recently.

In Victoria’s northeast and southern NSW, it is only sold at select stores. A battery box, used to provide portable power, was also no longer visible after police had left the crime scene.

A source has also told The Australian the turbine vent roof ventilator that could be seen on top of the white container where Freeman was living had been installed before he shot and killed police in August.

Contractors for Parks Victoria had attempted to speak to the landlord in person in the weeks before Freeman was on the property in an attempt to gain access and to clear land which had been destroyed by a fire in January.

One local source affiliated with the Country Fire Association also said that the Walwa bushfire – one of several fires which raged across Victoria at the start of the year – started on a ridge line less than 2km from where Freeman was located.

Freeman had had an interest in fire while living in the Victorian Alps.

Police said last week that the proximity of that fire, which spread through over 120,000 hectares, was part of their inquiries.

Police have for months been closely monitoring people connected with Freeman using undercover surveillance and likely secret phone taps to determine where the killer may have gone.

His body has been released but it is unknown what service Freeman will have.

He had attended both Catholic and Baptist church services and was a committed Christian.

Also at the site by the Murray River were tarpaulins, a boat, a canoe, an outdoor bath, an outdoor kitchen, an old armoured van, two old yellow taxis and shipping containers.

Freeman had killed Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart-Hottart, 35. A third officer was shot and Freeman allegedly tried to shoot a fourth.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/police-hunt-for-dezi-freemans-network-using-fingerprints-from-killers-hideout/news-story/799976ba102fa518f364a508733da7d7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38876

File: 7e51851c14086b6⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,5566x3762,253:171,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3fd21c8141371c8⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,2990x1994,1495:997,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24490990 (120726ZAPR26) Notable: A cop once shot by a jailbreaker and a stickler for detail: The crime fighters who built the case against Ben Roberts-Smith - (Video) The prosecution case against Ben Roberts-Smith has been built over years by the Office of the Special Investigator and Australian Federal Police, relying heavily on eyewitness testimony from former Special Air Service soldiers who served alongside him in Afghanistan. Investigators led by operations head Ross Barnett, a former Queensland detective, and senior homicide investigator Matt Stock assembled evidence despite major obstacles, including no access to crime scenes, victims or forensic material overseas. Authorities focused on allegations supported by direct witness accounts, discarding cases that could not meet the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. The inquiry also required separating admissible evidence from earlier investigations to avoid legal complications and ensure the case could withstand scrutiny in court. Officials say the prosecution will hinge on testimony from multiple former soldiers expected to be called as witnesses, as proceedings move toward a complex trial likely to run for years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

A cop once shot by a jailbreaker and a stickler for detail: The crime fighters who built the case against Ben Roberts-Smith

We reveal the key people behind the war crimes prosecution of the former SAS soldier and the lengths they took to gather evidence.

Nick McKenzie and Michael Bachelard - APRIL 10, 2026

1/4

At noon on Tuesday, less than an hour after Ben Roberts-Smith was arrested at Sydney Airport, investigators from the most secretive federal crime-fighting agency in Australia sent out a series of co-ordinated messages.

They went to about two dozen men, all over Australia. Some were on friendly terms with each other. Others were not. Some hadn’t exchanged words for years. But all were bound together by a shared history they can never shake.

The messages came from the special war crimes investigation agency, the Office of the Special Investigator, and their recipients were former and serving soldiers or their lawyers.

These were men who had passed the rigorous physical and psychological testing to join Australia’s most elite fighting force, the Special Air Service Regiment. Then they served in Afghanistan with Roberts-Smith – the nation’s most famous soldier.

Now they will be bound by something else.

The messages indicated the start of a process in which they will be subpoenaed to give evidence for the prosecution in the Supreme Court of NSW. Their testimony will be about what they knew of allegations that Roberts-Smith had executed, or ordered the execution, of five Afghan prisoners and civilians.

Former war crimes prosecutors say that, in the absence of other evidence, the case against Roberts-Smith will stand or fall on the testimony of these men.

The story of how the OSI has built its strongly contested case will emerge in time as the court case proceeds over the next two years or so.

But an investigation by this masthead has pieced together some of these details by speaking to more than a dozen military sources, including some once close to Roberts-Smith.

The key investigators

OSI head of operations Ross Barnett has never been to war. But he has been shot.

In 1991, Barnett was a Queensland detective who received a tip-off that a heavily armed and violent criminal, Harold McSweeney, was hiding out in the Toowoomba area, west of Brisbane.

McSweeney was on the run after escaping from Boggo Road Gaol and Barnett had been warned that he would shoot cops to avoid capture.

“We found him ... We rammed his car into a parked car in the street,” Barnett told a reporter a decade ago. “We unfortunately ended up side by side with him in the driver’s seat, and I was in the passenger’s seat ... he just started shooting.”

Vision from the scene filmed shortly after the shootout shows a bleeding Barnett on the footpath.

“He got me once in the hip and missed a couple more times, so it was my lucky day. It was a very violent time and that was our job … not going after McSweeney was not an option because simply, if we didn’t capture him, there would have been more armed robberies, and he would have shot an innocent member of the public.”

Barnett eventually rose to deputy commissioner of the Queensland Police, then head of the anti-corruption unit for the state’s horse-racing industry.

In December 2020, his career took a big step in a different direction. Barnett, who appeared in a press conference alongside Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett on Tuesday to announce the war crimes prosecution against Roberts-Smith, was appointed to recruit and oversee detectives working for the newly established OSI.

The office was established by then-prime minister Scott Morrison to probe the “credible information” uncovered by the Brereton inquiry into war crimes that about 20 SAS soldiers may have executed several dozen civilians and detainees in Afghanistan.

Barnett has never explained what drew him to the role. Apart from the grim-faced press conference on Tuesday, he has given no interviews.

But law enforcement colleagues say that, on his appointment, he quickly grasped the enormity of his task.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38877

File: 4140a33b1826252⋯.jpg (317.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a1eb2fed469ada8⋯.jpg (379.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24491019 (120743ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith could stay in jail over claims of ‘flight risk’ - Ben Roberts-Smith could remain in custody for an extended period if prosecutors oppose bail on the grounds he is a flight risk following charges of five counts of war crime - murder. Commonwealth lawyers are expected to argue the severity of potential life sentences increases the risk of him fleeing or interfering with witnesses, while the defence is likely to counter that he has previously travelled overseas and returned voluntarily. Legal sources suggest bail is still likely but could come with strict conditions, including reporting requirements and limits on contact with former colleagues. Roberts-Smith’s legal team, led by Karen Espiner with barristers Slade Howell and James Godbolt, will argue custody would hinder preparation for a complex case expected to take years to reach trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38867

Ben Roberts-Smith could stay in jail over claims of ‘flight risk’

STEPHEN RICE - April 10, 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith could spend months in jail if the commonwealth opposes his bail application on the grounds he is a flight risk, a move that would be strongly resisted by his new defence team on the basis that he has had plenty of opportunity to leave the country and has repeatedly vowed to clear his name.

While most legal sources believe Mr Roberts-Smith will get bail at a hearing in Sydney on ­Friday over the war crimes charges against him, a decision to refuse it could mean a much longer stay in Silverwater Prison for the Victoria Cross recipient while his lawyers mount an appeal.

Commonwealth lawyers are expected to argue that Mr Roberts-Smith is a flight risk because even though he has been aware of the likelihood of charges for several years, circumstances have changed now that he has been charged with five offences all ­carrying a possible sentence of life imprisonment.

The defence is likely to respond that Mr Roberts-Smith has been overseas several times since the long-running saga began and has always returned.

The 47-year-old had previously offered to hand himself in at an agreed time and place if charges were to be laid, an offer the commonwealth ignored when it arrested him as he arrived in Sydney on a flight from Brisbane with his children on Tuesday.

It would also be extremely difficult for Mr Roberts-Smith to mount a legal defence while in custody, given the complexity of both the factual cases and the challenges of the National Security Information Act, the federal law that manages the disclosure of sensitive information in court.

While the commonwealth is unlikely to suggest Mr Roberts-Smith is at risk of reoffending, it could argue that he is at risk of interfering with witnesses, one of the accusations levelled at him during the defamation trial.

If bail is granted, it is expected the commonwealth will seek strict conditions, including regular reporting to a police station and he not speak to former soldiers who served with him in Afghanistan.

Mr Roberts-Smith would likely seek to be allowed to reside in Queensland, where he has lived for the past 14 years, and where his children live.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s bail application at Sydney’s Downing Centre will be made by his new legal team, consisting of Karen Espiner, from Hugo Law Group, with barristers Slade Howell and James Godbolt.

A Sydney barrister listed by Doyles as pre-eminent in criminal law in NSW, Mr Howell has represented former Comanchero boss Tarek Zahed in an appeal against his sentence for the destruction of evidence in a gangland killing, and appeared for former NRL star Curtis Scott over assault charges.

Mr Godbolt is a prominent Brisbane barrister who has appeared in several high-profile and serious criminal cases, ranging from multimillion-dollar frauds and murders to high-profile drug trafficking and manslaughter trials.

Mr Roberts-Smith declined to apply for bail last week following his arrest on Tuesday on five charges of murder, crimes allegedly committed between 2009 and 2012 against unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38878

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24491027 (120753ZAPR26) Notable: Australian War Memorial amends Ben Roberts-Smith display after former soldier charged with war crimes - (Video) The Australian War Memorial has updated its Hall of Valour display for Ben Roberts-Smith to reflect his charge with five counts of war crime - murder, with new wording noting the legal process is ongoing. The revised plaque now devotes significant space to events since 2016, replacing earlier text that stated he had not faced criminal charges. Memorial director Matt Anderson said the changes were made to ensure the display remained accurate and up to date, while emphasising the importance of the presumption of innocence and a fair trial. Roberts-Smith’s uniform, medals and equipment will remain on display, with the memorial maintaining they relate to his Victoria Cross actions in Afghanistan. The updated display is expected to remain in place as legal proceedings continue and public scrutiny persists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38866

Australian War Memorial amends Ben Roberts-Smith display after former soldier charged with war crimes

Text on plaque in Hall of Valour updated to include references to war crime – murder charges and the ongoing legal process

Kelly Burke - 10 Apr 2026

The Australian War Memorial has updated the display dedicated to Ben Roberts-Smith after the former Special Air Service (SAS) corporal was officially charged with five counts of the war crime of murder.

The changes, implemented on Friday, mean nearly half of the descriptive plaque in the museum’s Hall of Valour is now dedicated to events occurring after his military service, beginning with the initial reports of misconduct in 2016.

Previously, the display concluded by noting that Roberts-Smith had not been charged with any criminal offence.

As of Friday, the updated text now reads:

“In April 2026, Roberts-Smith was charged with five counts of the war crime of murder. The legal process is ongoing.”

At a media conference on Friday, Matt Anderson, director of the Australian War Memorial, said the museum remained committed to keeping the public informed but also to the principle of the presumption of innocence.

“The memorial’s commitment throughout this entire process … has been to ensure that the panel in the galleries is up to date and covers the facts,” Anderson said.

“I’m very conscious now, [given] the gravity of the charges that have been laid, the most important thing all of us can do now is allow justice to take its course … and there’s nothing I am going to say or do today or at any stage in the Australian War Memorial that will influence or impact on the opportunities of a fair trial.

“What we’ve done consistently is update the panel in the galleries to keep the visiting public abreast of where that case is at, and that’s what we’ve done again today.”

Anderson said Roberts-Smith’s equipment, uniform, and medal groups would remain on display.

“The reason Ben Roberts-Smith, VC, MG, is in the Hall of Valor at the Australian War Memorial is because of his actions in Tizak in the Shah Wali Kot district in Kandahar province in Afghanistan on 11 June, 2010,” he said.

“That’s why he’s up in the galleries in the Hall of Valor with other recipients of the Victoria Cross – for his actions on that day.”

The timing of the panel update as Roberts-Smith awaits a bail hearing has come at an inopportune time for the institution, which opened 7,000 square metres of gallery space on Friday as part of its controversial $500m expansion project.

The redevelopment was designed to modernise the site and provide more space to honour recent conflicts, but public and media attention has remained fixed on the Hall of Valour.

The Roberts-Smith panel in that hall is expected to remain in its current form until a verdict is reached in any criminal trial.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/apr/10/war-memorial-amends-ben-roberts-smith-display-after-former-soldier-charged-with-war-crimes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vycEf53e2rM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38879

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494406 (131034ZAPR26) Notable: Malaysia, Brunei next on Anthony Albanese’s fuel mission in Asia - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to Brunei and Malaysia as part of an expanded effort to secure fuel supplies, warning key Asian producers may prioritise domestic demand if the global oil crisis worsens. The trip follows talks in Singapore and aims to strengthen energy ties with major suppliers, with Malaysia providing a significant share of Australia’s diesel and Brunei contributing to diesel and fertiliser inputs. Albanese said the focus was on building confidence in trade rather than securing formal agreements, while highlighting Australia’s role as a reliable gas exporter. The government has confirmed fuel supplies are secured until late May but faces uncertainty beyond that, prompting a regional diplomatic push. Officials also warned disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz and potential export controls remain key risks to supply and prices.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38803

>>38862

>>38872

>>38873

>>38874

Malaysia, Brunei next on Anthony Albanese’s fuel mission in Asia

GREG BROWN - 13 April 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese has warned major Asian fuel producers may consider prioritising their domestic markets if the oil supply crunch worsens, ahead of a second consecutive week of travel to meet the leaders of Malaysia and Brunei in an aim to prevent Australia from being caught up in potential export controls.

After travelling to Singapore last week, the Prime Minister will arrive in Brunei on Tuesday to meet Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah ­before jetting to Malaysia to meet Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and returning to Australia on Friday.

In an interview with The Australian on his way home from Singapore over the weekend, Mr Albanese did not commit to striking a formal fuel supply agreement with the two nations but said the travel was important to “build confidence” in energy trade.

Malaysia supplies 13 per cent of Australia’s diesel and is Australia’s third-largest source of refined petrol, while Australia supplies 95 per cent of Malaysia’s imported gas.

Brunei supplies 9 per cent of diesel and about 10 per cent of Australia’s urea imports, which is used to make fertiliser, as the government acknowledges food ­prices are likely to increase.

With Australia talking up its ­reliability as a major gas supplier to Asia, Mr Albanese declared his confidence that gas fields will be brought online faster due to the government’s overhaul of environmental laws while distancing himself from the anti-gas campaigns led by the Greens and left-wing activists.

He also denied being flat-footed in the early weeks of the conflict when fuel shortages began in the regions, saying he hosted a ­national cabinet meeting on the issue “almost immediately” despite it not being held until nearly three weeks after the war began.

Mr Albanese said his televised national address – which was panned for containing little new information – had been successful in reassuring Australians the government had a plan to address the crisis. “I think we were forward leading from the very beginning,” Mr Albanese said.

“We were working very hard to get things in place.”

Australia has secured fuel supply until late May but the outlook from June is uncertain, prompting Mr Albanese undertake a charm offensive with Asian suppliers while launching a $20m ad campaign urging Australians to “consider simple actions to use less fuel” such as “using your car less”. The move to shore up fuel supplies comes as Foreign Minister Penny Wong said it was “disappointing” there was no peace deal struck during a 21-hour meeting in ­Islamabad between US Vice-President JD Vance and Iranian officials.

Calling for a “swift resolution” to the conflict, Senator Wong said any escalation would impose an even greater cost to human lives and the global economy.

The Albanese government has also warned against allowing Iran to charge tolls for commercial ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

Mr Albanese told The Australian “we don’t want to see export controls” and ramped up pressure for the Strait of Hormuz to be reopened, while saying it was “really helpful” Asian producers were ­diversifying their crude oil supply away from the Middle East.

Mr Albanese said Singapore, for example, was receiving more oil from West Africa and the US, and he acknowledged it was moving to procure more supply from Russia. “They’re an oil hub, they are able to do that,” he said.

When asked if export controls from Australia’s major fuel suppliers were inevitable if the war continued, Mr Albanese said “people will always, of course, look at their domestic considerations”.

“But Australia is a reliable supplier (of gas) as well, and that puts us in a strong position,” Albanese said. “What we want to see is the Strait of Hormuz reopened but we know there is a fragile truce for 14 days. So what we are doing is hoping for the best but planning for scenarios if things get more difficult.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38880

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494409 (131038ZAPR26) Notable: Australia won't join Trump's Strait of Hormuz blockade - (Video) Australia will not participate in a United States-led blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, with the federal government warning the move risks further destabilising global trade during an already volatile conflict. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia had not been asked to assist and did not expect a request, describing the US decision as unilateral while urging a return to negotiations. Resources Minister Madeleine King said the blockade placed global trade in a "very difficult" position and warned any ongoing Iranian toll on the strait would be unsustainable. Opposition figures said any involvement would need to meet national interest and capability tests. The Strait, a key oil transit route, has become central to escalating tensions, with both the blockade and toll measures raising concerns about supply disruptions and economic impacts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

>>38861

>>38864

Australia won't join Trump's Strait of Hormuz blockade

Zac de Silva - April 13 2026

Australia will not join the United States' efforts to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, with the federal government arguing the move puts global trade in a "very difficult" position.

A permanent Iranian toll on the critical waterway would also be unsustainable, senior ministers say.

After peace negotiations between American and Iranian negotiators collapsed over the weekend, President Donald Trump declared the US Navy will stop "any and all" ships from entering or leaving the key trade route, which until recently carried around one-fifth of the world's oil supplies.

Australia had not been asked to help with the blockade, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

"We've received no requests ... they've made this announcement overnight and they've done that in a unilateral way," he told Nine's Today Show on Monday.

"We haven't been asked, and I don't expect that we will be."

He also called for the strait to reopen and the conflict to end.

The American blockade presented a challenge to international trade at a time when de-escalation was sorely needed, Resources Minister Madeleine King said.

"That poses a very difficult position for global trade," Ms King told the ABC's AM program on Monday.

"Really, the best thing Australia can do is encourage that both parties go back to the negotiating table."

Iran has begun charging a toll for ships wanting to travel through the Strait of Hormuz. Mr Trump has ordered the US Navy to find and intercept any vessel which has paid the toll.

"No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas," he said on Truth Social.

An ongoing Iranian toll on the strait would be very difficult for Australia and other countries, Ms King said.

"Any suggestion there might be some kind of permanent tolling on an important trade route by a regime that's listed as a terrorist organisation, is just not a sustainable position," she said.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Ted O'Brien said any move to join the US blockade needed to meet two key tests: whether it was in Australia's national interest, and whether the military had enough capacity to send troops or equipment.

"It is in our national interest to have the Strait of Hormuz reopened, right? So big tick to that," he said.

"(But) what assets are required? Do we have the capability of sending them?"

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9221139/australia-wont-join-trumps-strait-of-hormuz-blockade/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4dG7WLmFfI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38881

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494419 (131049ZAPR26) Notable: Anthony Albanese appoints Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, as new defence chief - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appointed Vice Admiral Mark Hammond as Chief of the Defence Force, alongside naming Lieutenant General Susan Coyle as the new Chief of Army, marking the first time a woman has led the service. Rear Admiral Matthew Buckley will become Chief of Navy, as part of a broader leadership reshuffle ahead of the release of a new defence strategy. The appointments come amid heightened regional tensions and ongoing global instability, with Hammond confirming the navy is capable of deploying assets to support international operations if requested. Albanese said the changes would strengthen Australia’s defence capability and leadership, while Defence Minister Richard Marles praised outgoing leaders for overseeing major reforms and strategic initiatives, including AUKUS and expanded international defence cooperation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38880

Anthony Albanese appoints Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, as new defence chief

ROSIE LEWIS and THOMAS HENRY - 13 April 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese has appointed the Chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, as the new Chief of the Defence Force ahead of his government releasing an updated defence strategy and investment plan.

At a press conference in Canberra, the Prime Minister also announced the appointment of Chief of Joint Capabilities, Lieutenant General Susan Coyle, as the new Chief of Army. She is the first female chief of army.

“Enlisting as a soldier in the army reserves in 1987, Lieutenant General Coyle has worked at the tactical, operational and strategic levels and in command roles, including head information warfare, commander forces command, commander joint task force 633, commander six brigade, commander task force – Afghanistan, and commanding officer 17th signal regiment,” Mr Albanese said.

“Lieutenant General Coyle will be the first woman in our nation’s history to command the Australian Army.”

The next Chief of Joint Capabilities will be appointed in due course. Rear Admiral Matthew Buckley will be appointed on promotion as the Chief of Navy.

“He is the second submariner after Mark to be the chief of navy. He has commanded the HMAS Collins itself. He has been at the very beginning of the task force for acquiring nuclear-powered submarine capability under the banner of AUKUS,” Mr Albanese said. “Over the last few years he has served really well as the deputy chief of navy and we look forward to his promotion and becoming the next Chief of Navy.”

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said: “It is an honour to confirm these senior appointments to lead the Australian Defence Force. I know that in these roles, each of them will continue to make an enormous contribution to the safety and security of Australia, and I look forward to working with them to do so.

“My sincere thanks and gratitude go to Admiral David Johnston who has led the Australian Defence Force for the past two years with enormous impact, implementing some of the most significant and consequential decisions in decades – including Defence’s response to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veterans’ Suicide, driving AUKUS and the transformation of our Navy, and working with international partners to build our defence relationships.

“I would also like to personally thank Lieutenant General Simon Stuart for his contributions to the Australian Army at such a consequential time, and wish him and his family all the best as he retires.”

Newly announced Chief of Defence Vice Admiral Hammond confirmed that the Australian Navy was capable of deploying a warship to assist US-led efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, if a request were received.

“We’ve got 10 surface combatants right now, eight of them are at sea today. The navy is ready as it ever has been,” Mr Hammond said.

“They are fitted with one of the most advanced radars in the world … and some of the most advanced missile and point defence systems in the world. Are they capable of performing the mission as Admiral Johnston said last week? Absolutely.”

“The question of contribution is one for consideration by the Australian Government should they receive a request and there’s been no such request as yet.”

Mr Hammond’s predecessor Admiral Johnston last week said he was confident Australian warships could be deployed to the region, if required.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38882

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494424 (131055ZAPR26) Notable: First woman to lead the army, navy chief now new head of defence force - (Video) Vice Admiral Mark Hammond will become Chief of the Defence Force in July following a senior leadership reshuffle, while Lieutenant General Susan Coyle has been appointed as Australia’s first female army chief. Hammond said the navy was “absolutely” capable of deploying a warship to the Strait of Hormuz if requested, highlighting current operational readiness, though no request has been made. Coyle’s appointment was described as a historic milestone, reflecting her extensive experience across operational and strategic roles. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the changes marked an important moment for the Australian Defence Force, while analysts noted Hammond’s close involvement in the AUKUS submarine program. Critics, however, warned the appointment could reinforce a continued focus on naval capability at the expense of broader reform priorities within defence planning.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38880

>>38881

First woman to lead the army, navy chief now new head of defence force

Matthew Knott - April 13, 2026

New defence force chief Mark Hammond says the navy is ready to deploy a ship to the Strait of Hormuz after being promoted in a significant military reshuffle that includes the appointment of the nation’s first female army chief.

Hammond, a former submariner who has led the navy since 2022, will take up the role in July following the resignation of current defence force chief David Johnston after two years in the role.

Hammond told reporters the navy was “absolutely” capable of assisting operations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, despite widespread claims Australian warships were not equipped for the age of drone warfare.

“We’ve got 10 surface combatants right now, eight of them are at sea today. The navy is as ready as it ever has been,” he said.

“They are fitted with one of the most advanced radars in the world … and some of the most advanced missile and point defence systems in the world. Are they capable of performing the mission as Admiral Johnston said last week? Absolutely.”

Hammond continued: “The question of a contribution is one for consideration by the Australian government, should they receive a request, and there’s been no such request as yet.”

Susan Coyle, the current head of joint capabilities, will become army chief, replacing Simon Stuart following his retirement.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said Coyle’s appointment was “a deeply historic moment, one that should be noted”.

“As Susan said to me, ‘You cannot be what you cannot see’,” Marles said.

“And Susan’s achievement will be deeply significant to women who are serving in the Australian Defence Force today and women who are thinking about serving in the Australian Defence Force in the future.”

Coyle, who joined the Army Reserves as a soldier in 1987 before holding a series of senior roles, is the first woman to lead a branch of the defence force – army, navy or air force.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Hammond had enjoyed a distinguished career, including 40 years in the navy, including as a submarine commander.

Marles said Hammond had “been right at the heart” of the plan to acquire a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS pact, and had done an “incredible job” as navy chief since 2022.

Hammond and Albanese formed a strong working relationship, including on trips together to the US.

Johnston is retiring as expected after being appointed to a two-year term as defence force chief in 2024.

“The question of contribution is one for consideration by the Australian government should they receive a request and there’s been no such request as yet.”

Former submarine commander Matthew Buckley will replace Hammond as the chief of navy.

The government has yet to appoint a new secretary for the Department of Defence to replace Greg Moriarty, who is heading to Washington to become ambassador to the United States.

The government is also searching for a new head of the Australian Submarine Agency, which is tasked with delivering the plan to develop a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.

Jennifer Parker, an expert associate at the Australian National University, said Hammond’s appointment reflects the growing importance of the maritime domain in military planning, and the importance of delivering on the AUKUS pact.

Parker, a former naval officer, noted that Hammond had strong connections within the US military system and was well known in Washington, putting him in a strong position to drive AUKUS forward.

As for the appointment of Coyle as the nation’s first female service chief, she said the move “had been a long time coming and is well overdue”.

She noted that Coyle had experience in space and cyber capabilities, as well as traditional army platforms, making her well-placed to learn lessons from modern conflict, including in Ukraine.

Former defence official Michael Shoebridge said Hammond’s appointment was unfortunate, describing him as “Mister Continuity at a time when the defence force needs change and urgency”.

Noting Hammond’s long career as a submariner and his advocacy for nuclear-powered submarines, he said he was concerned he would be too focused on naval capabilities.

“This appointment locks us into an AUKUS obsession in a way that is unhealthy,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/first-woman-to-lead-the-army-navy-chief-now-new-head-of-defence-force-20260413-p5znfk.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B7O0bcbDvE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38883

File: d95cbdcfab3fdb3⋯.jpg (5.27 MB,6753x4502,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494445 (131102ZAPR26) Notable: OPINION: I served with the new army chief. I can confirm she has the right stuff - "With wars in Europe and the Middle East, and Chinese naval task groups operating closer to Australia, the familiar line that this is our most challenging strategic environment since World War II is starting to feel dated. We are certainly in a more dangerous period. That is the backdrop to today’s leadership announcements: Vice Admiral Mark Hammond as the next Chief of the Defence Force, Rear Admiral Matt Buckley as Chief of Navy, and Lieutenant General Susan Coyle as Chief of Army will lead the ADF through this. Coyle’s appointment stands out. Not just because she is the first woman to lead a service, but because she is the first Chief of Joint Capabilities to step into the role, bringing experience in cyber, space and the enabling elements of how the ADF fights. Coyle’s appointment is not about gender. But it is significant that she is the first woman to lead one of Australia’s armed services. It reflects not only her leadership, but the contribution of those who came before her ... Lieutenant General Coyle’s experience as commander of information warfare and chief of joint capabilities also points to where the army is heading. As the first service chief to come from joint capabilities command, she brings a clear focus on integration, not just across the joint force, but with emerging technologies, particularly space and cyber. Today is a significant moment. Three officers have been appointed at a time when the world is becoming more dangerous, to lead the ADF and prepare Australia for what lies ahead. That task will not be easy, and they deserve our support." - Jennifer Parker, adjunct professor with the University of Western Australia Defence and Security Institute and non-resident fellow at the Lowy Institute. She served for more than 20 years as a warfare officer in the Royal Australian Navy - The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38880

>>38881

>>38882

OPINION: I served with the new army chief. I can confirm she has the right stuff

Jennifer Parker, Defence and national security expert - April 13, 2026

1/2

With wars in Europe and the Middle East, and Chinese naval task groups operating closer to Australia, the familiar line that this is our most challenging strategic environment since World War II is starting to feel dated. We are certainly in a more dangerous period.

That is the backdrop to today’s leadership announcements: Vice Admiral Mark Hammond as the next Chief of the Defence Force, Rear Admiral Matt Buckley as Chief of Navy, and Lieutenant General Susan Coyle as Chief of Army will lead the ADF through this. Coyle’s appointment stands out. Not just because she is the first woman to lead a service, but because she is the first Chief of Joint Capabilities to step into the role, bringing experience in cyber, space and the enabling elements of how the ADF fights.

I first met Lieutenant General Coyle in the Middle East at Al Minhad in January 2020. The United States was pursuing “maximum pressure” on Iran over their nuclear program, a context that feels familiar again today. At the time, she was commanding Australia’s Middle East headquarters. Just days earlier, General Qasem Soleimani had been killed by the United States in Iraq. I had deployed to lead planning within the International Maritime Security Construct, established to protect shipping through the Strait of Hormuz after Iranian attacks on commercial vessels.

As I walked out of the mess, then Major General Coyle called out and introduced herself. Hundreds of Australians pass through that base, but she knew who I was and wanted to talk about the maritime reassurance mission I was there to support. She was already deeply experienced in the Middle East, including as deputy commander joint task force 636 in Afghanistan, where she was awarded a distinguished service medal. What stood out was her mission focus but also the time she took to get to know her people.

When COVID hit and rotations were extended, that did not change. Despite running operations across a tense region where war remained on the cards she made time to stay connected. She even dialled into the Zoom trivia nights I ran for my team to keep morale up during a difficult period, the only person who managed to get my random trivia questions about my home town of Broken Hill correct. That balance between mission focus and genuine care for her people was clear then, and it is why her appointment matters.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38884

File: b603e3836174c22⋯.jpg (2.49 MB,5000x3326,2500:1663,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bcb7847d6e989ea⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,4608x3072,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e7fd56361975927⋯.jpg (3.89 MB,5000x3055,1000:611,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 467629f1f6040fd⋯.jpg (1.84 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494451 (131109ZAPR26) Notable: Federal MP Luke Gosling warns colleagues against Ben Roberts-Smith commentary - Labor MP and former soldier Luke Gosling has urged federal politicians to avoid public commentary on the arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith, warning it could jeopardise a fair trial. In a message to colleagues, Gosling said the case had divided the veteran community, with some supporting the former soldier while others, including potential witnesses, were experiencing “moral injury and distress” over alleged events in Afghanistan. He cautioned that some former Special Air Service personnel may be called to testify and stressed the importance of allowing the legal process to proceed without interference. The warning follows public statements from several political figures, prompting concern about prejudicing proceedings, as Roberts-Smith remains in custody and prepares to face a bail hearing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Federal MP Luke Gosling warns colleagues against Ben Roberts-Smith commentary

Matt Garrick - 13 April 2026

A Northern Territory MP and former commando has warned his colleagues in federal parliament against speaking out about the arrest of Victoria Cross recipient and accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith, saying their commentary could risk jeopardising a fair trial.

Mr Roberts-Smith is in custody in New South Wales' Silverwater Correctional Complex after his high-profile arrest by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) last week.

The highly decorated 47-year-old former soldier has since been charged with five counts of the war crime of murder.

Solomon MP and veteran Luke Gosling, who served in the Australian Army between 1990 and 2001, is also the federal Labor government's Special Envoy for Defence and Veterans' Affairs.

In an email sent today to all federal MPs, seen by the ABC, Mr Gosling said he was sending a "quick confidential note to provide some perspective on the allegations of war crimes against a high-profile veteran that will be tested in court".

"A number of politicians, ex-pollies and veterans are coming out in support of someone who has been awarded our highest medals for individual bravery and they are doing so for a multitude of reasons and motivations," he said.

"There are also many other veterans who are quietly watching proceedings, including some who were witness to events and have been significantly and very negatively impacted.

"In particular, there are former SAS troopers that have extreme moral injury and distress over what they believe to be clear war crimes in Afghanistan that they believe were covered up. Some of these veterans will testify in court.

"The point is that we need a fair trial to resolve matters for all who have been impacted and there is a long way to go … can I just discourage everyone from joining the public commentary about the accused in any way, shape or form.

"It is not appropriate for MPs to comment on a serious criminal trial which will be before a jury."

Message sent following various public statements

Over the past week, statements have been made about Mr Roberts-Smith's arrest by high-profile former politicians, including ex-prime minister Tony Abbott and sitting senators including One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

Mr Gosling also wrote that the complexities of the situation "has divided the former serving SAS community and is causing distress in the broader veteran community".

"Particularly for those that have been impacted by their own service and as always this is also impacting their families," he wrote.

Mr Gosling isn't the first veteran in parliament to try and dissuade commentary over the ongoing case.

On April 9, Shadow Minister for Industry, Andrew Hastie, a former SAS veteran of the war in Afghanistan, released a statement on the matter, in which he said there was a possibility he would be called as a witness in Mr Roberts-Smith's trial.

"I urge every Australian to respect the rule of law, the criminal justice system, and the accused's right to a presumption of innocence and a fair trial," he said.

"Therefore, I will not prejudice this trial by making any further comment."

Mr Roberts-Smith is next expected to face a bail review hearing in Sydney on April 17.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-13/nt-labor-mp-luke-gosling-warning-over-ben-roberts-smith-trial/106559926

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38885

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24494454 (131117ZAPR26) Notable: ‘There’s no fog of war’: Former SAS veteran speaks out amid Ben Roberts-Smith alleged war crimes - (Video) A former Special Air Service soldier has spoken publicly following the arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith, alleging the accused was involved in unlawful killings of non-combatants during deployments in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. The veteran said the alleged actions occurred after combat had ended, stating “there’s no fog of war” and “no bullets flying around”, and described the conduct as “completely contrary to (the) mission”. He said “we weren’t there to kill civilians”, adding those who spoke out had been “vilified” despite showing “moral courage”. The comments come as Roberts-Smith faces five counts of war crime - murder, including alleged killings at Kakarak, Darwan and Syahchow. Former war crimes prosecutor Graeme Blewett said the trial would be complex, noting “you can never predict what a jury thinks of a case”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

‘There’s no fog of war’: Former SAS veteran speaks out amid Ben Roberts-Smith alleged war crimes

An SAS veteran who spoke out against the alleged war crimes of Ben Roberts-Smith has broken his silence following the arrest of the decorated former soldier.

Alexandra Feiam - April 12, 2026

1/2

An SAS veteran who saw Ben Roberts-Smith in action while serving in Afghanistan and accused him of committing war crimes has broken his silence.

Mr Roberts-Smith, who is one of the country’s most-decorated soldiers, was arrested and charged on Tuesday by the Australian Federal Police over alleged war crimes.

He was arrested by members of the Australian Federal Police after being charged with five counts of war crimes – murder – where he is accused of taking part in five killings between 2009 and 2012 during his deployment in Afghanistan.

He has not entered any plea and is entitled to the presumption of innocence. He has at all times denied the allegations.

Speaking to Nick McKenzie on 60 Minutes, the former SAS soldier, known as “Person X”, said he wanted to believe the former soldier was a “hero”.

“There’s a lot of people that do not agree with what he (allegedly) did in Afghanistan,” he told 60 Minutes.

“On the other hand, there are a lot of people that are on his side. Most of them are the general public, who want to believe in our so-called heroes.”

An unnamed former SAS veteran alleged Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in war crimes during the deployment in Afghanistan.

“A hero is not someone who harms individuals – innocent individuals,” he said.

He has told authorities the alleged actions were done “after the dust has settled”.

“There’s no fog of war. There’s no bullets flying around, there's nothing like that,” he said.

“Person X” told 60 Minutes said he believed the alleged actions were “completely contrary to (the) mission”.

“We weren’t there to kill civilians or people who didn’t deserve to die – non-combatants,” he said.

“I don't think any Australian would want our soldiers, our ADF, going overseas and (allegedly) committing murder, essentially in their name.”

The unnamed veteran said the other soldiers who spoke out against the alleged war criminal were “vilified” and labelled “rats”.

He described them as “heroes” who have “physical courage” and “moral courage”.

“Those fellas that (spoke out), they’ve suffered greatly,” he told 60 Minutes.

“It’s sad, but I believe that the blokes who ... stood up in court … they’re the heroes.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38886

File: 996b5da7d77961e⋯.jpg (160.43 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 64151e4daa5d192⋯.jpg (447.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24498482 (140944ZAPR26) Notable: Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has welcomed Australia’s planned increase in military spending but signalled Washington expects further commitments before Canberra is regarded as a leading Indo-Pacific ally. In testimony to Congress, Hegseth praised Australia’s latest National Defence Strategy and support for AUKUS while emphasising the Trump administration’s focus on “burden sharing” among allies. He pointed to South Korea and Japan as examples of nations sharply increasing defence investment, while Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby said the United States wanted “partners - not dependencies”. Australia recently announced plans to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product by 2033, although the Trump administration has previously pushed for a higher 3.5 per cent target. Hegseth also revealed the US campaign in Iran had cost at least $US25 billion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38881

>>38882

ALP learns war lessons: extra billions for drones

BEN PACKHAM - 14 April 2026

1/2

The Albanese government has vowed to heed the lessons of the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine in its new 10-year ­weapons-investment plan, which will include an extra $2bn-$5bn on drones and counter-drone ­systems.

The new defence shopping list to be unveiled this week is also ­expected to address key ­vulnerabilities in missile defence, guided weapons for the army, ­“national resilience”, and sovereign manufacturing of critical ­defence capabilities.

The new weapons blueprint will be revealed days after Anthony Albanese announced Chief of navy Mark Hammond would be Australia’s new chief of the defence force, and Lieutenant General Susan Coyle would become chief of army and the first woman to lead one of the ADF’s services.

Under the announcements on Monday, Rear Admiral Matt Buckley, the Australian Submarine Agency’s head of nuclear submarine capability, will replace Vice Admiral Hammond as chief of navy.

Defence Minister Richard Marles will release updated ­versions of the government’s ­national defence strategy and ­investment program at the National Press Club on Thursday amid stark warnings the ADF is unprepared to fight a 21st century war dominated by unmanned systems and expensive missile duels.

The defence blueprints will lift investment in drones from $10bn over the coming decade to $12bn-$15bn, including up to $3.1bn on smaller drones that have proven critical in the Ukraine conflict.

Over the decade, about $8bn will be spent on uncrewed aerial capabilities, $4.5bn on maritime drones including the Speartooth uncrewed submarine, and $2.3bn on drones for the army.

It’s understood Defence has ­already awarded several contracts for new counter-drone systems, including one to Australian company AIM Defence for its high-energy Fractl laser which can track and target drone swarms at distances of more than 100km. “Over the past two years, conflicts overseas have shown just how important drones and uncrewed systems are for our Defence Force,” Mr Marles said.

“The war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East underscore the rapid advancements in these technologies, and the ability for these systems to generate significant asymmetric advantage against larger, more expensive platforms.

“Expanding our fleet of autonomous and uncrewed systems across all domains will not only help the ADF keep our nation safe, but will boost Australia’s ­sovereign defence industry – supporting local jobs and harnessing Australian innovation.”

The investments will include new and re-reprioritised funding from within the Defence budget. It is unclear whether the funding will be front-loaded to deliver capabilities in the next few years to counter growing strategic threats, or fall in the latter half of the decade.

The government also revealed on Monday that a domestically built Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System missile was ­successfully fired at the Woomera Test Range in South Australia, in a milestone for the ­nation’s nascent guided-weapons industry.

Admiral Hammond, who has served in the navy for 40 years, will take over from outgoing CDF David Johnston in July. The former Collins-class submarine commander will become the first head of the ADF who began his career as an enlisted sailor.

Lieutenant General Coyle similarly began her ADF career as an enlisted soldier. Mr Marles said her appointment was a “deeply historic moment” and her achievement would show women considering a military career what was possible.

The government is yet to announce who will fill other looming vacancies, including replacements for Defence Department secretary Greg Moriarty and Australian Submarine Agency director-­general Jonathan Mead. It also needs to find a new national armaments director to lead Defence’s new capability delivery agency.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38887

File: 69edd72469e23de⋯.jpg (7.1 MB,9428x6286,4714:3143,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 403b6fe0682f904⋯.jpg (2.43 MB,4901x3267,4901:3267,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24498508 (140957ZAPR26) Notable: Australia joins strait-talking summit with France and UK, and without the US - Australia will participate in a European-led summit with France and the United Kingdom to coordinate a multinational effort to safeguard shipping in the Strait of Hormuz once the current conflict subsides. The initiative, involving about 40 countries, is intended to restore freedom of navigation through a “strictly defensive” mission separate from ongoing hostilities and independent of United States blockade actions. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese may attend remotely due to regional travel, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong a potential delegate. The summit comes as tensions escalate following a US naval blockade targeting Iranian-linked shipping, raising risks to global trade flows. Australian officials emphasised support for a diplomatic reopening of the strait, while international discussions continue on how to stabilise the key oil transit route.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38843

>>38844

>>38850

>>38861

>>38880

Australia joins strait-talking summit with France and UK, and without the US

Matthew Knott and Michael Koziol - April 14, 2026

1/2

Australia will join a summit organised by France and Britain this week to organise a global coalition to safeguard shipping in the Strait of Hormuz after the war between the US, Israel and Iran ends.

Neither the US nor Iran are expected to play a role in the multinational effort, which is not connected to Trump’s moves to impose a blockade on Iranian vessels using the strait in a bid to strengthen his hand in negotiations with Iran.

The European-led moves to reopen the crucial waterway came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese headed to Brunei and Malaysia on Tuesday to shore up Australia’s fuel supplies.

If Albanese cannot attend the summit in person because of his existing travel commitments, he could join the meeting by video link or send a senior colleague such as Foreign Minister Penny Wong to represent Australia.

Paris is a likely venue for the summit, which around 40 nations have been invited to attend, but that has yet to be confirmed.

French President Emmanuel Macron said the conference would involve “countries prepared to contribute alongside us to a peaceful multinational mission aimed at restoring freedom of navigation in the strait”.

“This strictly defensive mission, separate from the warring parties to the conflict, is intended to be deployed as soon as circumstances permit,” he said.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the summit would discuss a “co-ordinated, independent, multinational plan” to safeguard shipping in the strait.

Britain had convened “more than 40 nations who share our aim to restore freedom of navigation” and the summit will discuss ways to protect shipping “when the conflict ends”, Starmer said.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said on Tuesday that Australia would “most definitely participate in that summit”.

“We are very keen to see … an opening by diplomatic means of the Strait of Hormuz,” Conroy told ABC radio.

The blockade by US Central Command – an act of war – began at midnight on Tuesday (AEST) to choke Tehran’s key economic lifeline after talks in Islamabad failed to reach agreement on Iran’s nuclear capability and other issues that could end the seven-week-old conflict.

“We can’t let a country blackmail or extort the world,” US President Donald Trump said as the blockade started, after promising to “eliminate” any Iranian fast-attack ship that approached the US Navy.

Trump said the Iranians had contacted the US seeking to resume talks, and the Associated Press reported a new round of in-person meetings was under consideration, citing three officials familiar with the situation.

“We’ve been called by the other side; they’d like to make a deal very badly,” Trump said at the White House.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38888

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24498525 (141007ZAPR26) Notable: Angus Taylor targets non-violent migrants who quietly hate our freedoms - (Video) Opposition Leader Angus Taylor will unveil a tougher immigration policy targeting migrants who reject “Australian values”, proposing stricter visa rules, deportations and expanded screening powers. The plan includes prioritising housing and social security access for citizens, restoring temporary protection visas, and increasing scrutiny of visa applicants’ backgrounds, including social media checks. Taylor argues some migrants from non-liberal societies may be less likely to integrate, raising concerns about parallel legal systems and rejection of democratic principles. The policy also targets visa overstayers and proposes stronger enforcement across security agencies. The Coalition says the measures are needed to restore integrity to the migration system and reduce pressure on housing and infrastructure, while critics are expected to challenge the assumptions underpinning the approach.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38799

>>38800

Angus Taylor targets non-violent migrants who quietly hate our freedoms

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 13 April 2026

1/2

Angus Taylor will widen the ­immigration debate and attack the Albanese government for opening the door to “transactional” ­migrants and visa holders who are nonviolent but reject Australia’s “core values”, as part of a sweeping 12-point plan prioritising housing and social security for citizens.

On Tuesday the Opposition Leader will unveil the first phase of the Coalition’s immigration ­policy and declare that those who migrate from liberal ­democracies have a “greater likelihood of ­subscribing to Australian values compared to those ­migrating from places ruled by fundamentalists, extremists and dictators”.

The Coalition’s hardline immigration crackdown, which outlines sweeping visa and rule changes to defend Australian values and slash record migration levels under the Albanese government, would ­deport overstayers abusing the legal system, restore ­temporary protection visas and weed out ­foreign agents pretending to be students and migrant workers.

Mr Taylor will lament that Australia has accepted migrants who don’t believe in equal rights for men and women, don’t believe in the rule of law and want to establish parallel legal systems, and “don’t believe in freedom of speech, association and religion”.

Speaking at the Menzies Research Centre in Sydney, the Liberal leader will warn that “our door has also been opened to people who, while rejecting hate and ­violence, nevertheless still reject our core values”.

“For too long, we’ve turned a blind eye to a reality of immigration and integration: Those who migrate from liberal democracies have a greater likelihood of subscribing to Australian values compared to those migrating from places ruled by fundamentalists, extremists, and dictators,” Mr Taylor will say.

“In that vein, the cohort of ­Gazans let into Australia following the October 7 attacks present a clear risk to our country. They come to our country from a society run by the barbaric Islamist terrorist organisation of Hamas. That cohort must be reassessed entirely with far greater scrutiny.”

Mr Taylor, who is expected to announce additional immigration-focused policies ahead of delivering his first budget-in-reply speech on May 14, will commit the Coalition to “shutting the door to people who abuse our immigration system and show a red light to radicals”.

The Liberal leader, who won’t release a fixed net migration number until closer to the 2028 election, will say “our nation has paid the price for believing that anyone, from anywhere, will ­embrace our way of life”.

“Not everyone wanting to ­migrate to Australia has a noble ­intent,” he will says. “Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia will be a net benefit to Australia; indeed, many will be a net drain.

“Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia will integrate or assimilate. Just as energy policy under Labor is dominated by the ­ideology of net zero, immigration policy under Labor is dominated by the ideology of cultural relativism. For Labor, all immigration is good immigration. But that’s simply not true. It’s not what Australians are seeing with their own eyes. And Australians are fed up with politically correct preaching on immigration.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38889

File: 7abaaf795024dd6⋯.jpg (284.61 KB,1200x670,120:67,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ec3473a4a6a4a16⋯.jpg (27.72 KB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 441eaa11e5673ed⋯.jpg (1.87 MB,4928x3285,4928:3285,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24498549 (141015ZAPR26) Notable: Roblox reveals sweeping changes amid Australian crackdown - (Video) Gaming platform Roblox will introduce new age-based account systems and facial age-estimation technology to restrict children’s access to inappropriate content following regulatory pressure in Australia. The changes include “Roblox Kids” and “Roblox Select” tiers, limiting younger users to curated games and restricting chat functions, while older users gain broader access based on estimated age. The overhaul follows scrutiny from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over concerns about grooming and harmful content, with potential penalties flagged for non-compliance. Roblox said the measures are part of a long-term safety strategy, though regulators are continuing their investigation. The company will also introduce formal age classifications and stricter developer requirements, as authorities assess whether the new safeguards adequately protect young users on the platform.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24498546

2/2

The AI estimation tech isn’t perfect, carrying an average error margin of 1.4 years for minors, meaning a seven-year-old could theoretically be assessed as a nine-year-old. Kaufman equated the system’s imperfections to automobile safety.

“Is there a chance you’re going to get hurt by that seatbelt? Absolutely,” he said. “Could the child get hurt by the seatbelt? Yes. Is it categorically better than not having the seatbelt? Yes”. He said parents maintained the ultimate override as they can manually verify their own identity to adjust a child’s age bracket.

Games eligible for the younger tiers must clear a three-step screening process. Developers are required to complete ID verification, enable two-factor authentication, and maintain an active Roblox Plus subscription, a $4.99 a month tier launched separately on April 10.

New games are first played by verified over-16 users, whose abuse reports and signals from Roblox’s moderation system are used to evaluate content before younger users gain access. Games featuring social hangouts, free-form drawing, or sensitive issues are excluded from Kids and Select accounts by default.

Australia’s eSafety commissioner declined to comment directly on the announcement, noting its investigation into the platform remains active.

“In July 2025, eSafety opened an investigation into Roblox’s safety practices,” a spokesman said. “eSafety has been continuing to engage Roblox at senior levels, including within recent weeks. As these investigative measures are ongoing, we will not comment specifically on this announcement, but we certainly welcome any measures that improve the safety of users, especially children.”

The spokesperson said eSafety would continue to monitor compliance with the Online Safety Act, “including looking at the outcomes of these new safety measures, as well as measuring compliance against the recently commenced age-restricted material codes”.

Kaufman said he viewed safety investment as a commercial accelerant rather than a drag on growth. He said Roblox did not run traditional advertising.

“We don’t do giant billboards on the side of the road,” he said. “What we do is instil trust with our users and their families, and that’s what drives growth.”

https://www.theage.com.au/technology/roblox-reveals-sweeping-changes-amid-australian-crackdown-20260410-p5zmsx.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQwjmZM1R04

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38890

File: 0ec9ba40a639114⋯.jpg (333.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 873558a1f100711⋯.jpg (709.96 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a418c1e85cbe857⋯.jpg (238.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24502427 (150921ZAPR26) Notable: Military protection of Jewish sites urged in submission to antisemitism royal commission - A submission to the antisemitism royal commission has called for permanent security, including potential military protection, at Jewish schools, synagogues and community sites, citing ongoing safety concerns. Advocacy group StandWithUs Australia argued current arrangements are insufficient, urging a government-backed model similar to European systems where armed personnel guard institutions. Executive director Michael Gencher said security had become part of “day-to-day operational planning” and warned delays risk missing opportunities for immediate reform. Sydney Great Synagogue chief rabbi Benjamin Elton said military deployment “should definitely be on the table”, pointing to overseas examples. The proposal would require significant legal changes to allow routine domestic deployment of defence forces, as the commission continues to examine responses to rising antisemitism and broader community safety concerns.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38751

Military protection of Jewish sites urged in submission to antisemitism royal commission

JAMES DOWLING - 14 April 2026

1/2

Jewish institutions need around-the-clock security and possibly military protection, a global advocacy group has told the antisemitism royal commission, with its local director warning the inquiry had left Jewish communities to “wait and see” and delayed attainable change.

In one of the first submissions filed to the national probe, Jewish non-profit StandWithUs called for an overhaul of community security arrangements similar to the permanent safety fund considered by former spy chief Dennis Richardson.

StandWithUs Australia’s executive director Michael Gencher told The Australian in an exclusive interview the royal commission’s interim report, due in just over two weeks, risked being a missed opportunity if it did not contain practicable recommendations for community safety, and called Mr Richardson’s resignation from the inquiry a “loss”.

The esteemed public servant last month resigned from his role on the royal commission, being led by former High Court judge Virginia Bell, after advocating for quick reforms and having considered recommending safety funding for Jewish institutions.

“Security is no longer an occasional consideration. It is now part of day-to-day operational planning. That shift has carried both direct and indirect costs and has affected how Jewish organisations engage with the wider public,” the submission reads.

“The commonwealth, in partnership with state and territory governments, should urgently review the feasibility of establishing a permanent protective security presence for Jewish sites, schools and places of worship.”

The submission argues grants for community organisations, schools and religious institutions should be wiped away in favour of a government scheme modelled on those in Italy, France and Belgium – where military personnel are stationed at Jewish sites.

It would be “a loss” to have more visible security around Jewish institutions, Mr Gencher said, but a necessary one.

“We’ve seen loss of life, and we see nothing that shows us that was the last incident and there isn’t more to come,” he said.

“We are on a trajectory that is challenging, and the response is equally as challenging in terms of our level of comfort with what we see on our streets.”

Military guards would require large-scale changes to the Defence Act, which limits deployment on Australian soil to exceptional circumstances of “domestic violence” – a constitutional term for extreme civil ­unrest. Legislative reform could lower the threshold for civil deployment of defence forces, although it would not be a “nip and tuck change”, according to a source in the legal community.

“The real point is Australia’s current legal framework is built around exceptional call-out powers and short-term responses to major domestic security events. It is not designed for a standing or enduring protective presence around vulnerable communal institutions facing a sustained threat,” Mr Gencher said.

“That should form part of the policy discussion rather than be used as a reason to avoid it.

“The royal commission was established in the aftermath of the Bondi terrorist attack precisely because hard questions about social cohesion, public safety and institutional protection can no longer be put off.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38891

File: 2f7c3d2de708853⋯.jpg (316.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a2f5ffd30bf8968⋯.jpg (342.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24502430 (150929ZAPR26) Notable: Bondi royal commission to run through first half of May - The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission will hold its first public hearings from May 4 to 15, focusing on defining antisemitism, its historical and contemporary forms, and the lived experiences of Jewish Australians. The hearings will follow an interim report examining national security agencies and potential intelligence failures linked to the Bondi attack. Commissioner Virginia Bell said testimony from affected individuals would be central to the inquiry, while community leaders said the process would highlight incidents including attacks on synagogues and harassment. Local and national figures have framed the hearings as a key step in addressing rising antisemitism and strengthening social cohesion, with further policy discussions expected as the commission continues its work.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38751

Bondi royal commission to run through first half of May

JAMES DOWLING - 15 April 2026

Public hearing dates have been set for the Bondi royal commission, which will hear evidence on experiences of antisemitism five months on from the terror massacre at Bondi Beach.

The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission will hold its first block of public hearings from May 4 to 15, starting days after the release of its interim report on national security agencies and potential intelligence failings contributing to the mass shooting.

Later this year, the Australian Mayors Summit Against Antisemitism will hold its next meeting in and around Bondi just weeks before the first anniversary of the massacre.

According to a memo released on Wednesday afternoon, the first royal commission hearings will have four focuses:

• “Defining antisemitism”

• “The nature of antisemitism, in its historical and contemporary manifestations”

• “Lived experiences of antisemitism, and its impacts on Jewish Australians in various domains”; and

• “Metrics for assessing the prevalence of antisemitism in institutions and society, including through incident reporting and survey data”.

Royal commissioner Virginia Bell – a former High Court judge – said case study testimony would be integral to her federal inquiry.

“It is vital for the work of the royal commission that we hear directly from Australians who have experienced antisemitism first-hand,” she said.

Hearings will be livestreamed. A breakdown of session times during the hearing block is not yet available.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said the hearings would provide a chance to acknowledge rising anti-Jewish hatred.

“We hope the public hearings are an opportunity for Australians to hear directly from Jewish community members about their lived experiences of antisemitism, including firebombings, attacks on synagogues, doxxing, harassment and threats against community institutions, as well as everyday acts of exclusion,” he said.

“We know this process will be difficult for many in our community. Giving evidence is an act of courage, and we hope each ­account contributes to making Australia a safer place.”

Waverley mayor Will Nemesh told The Australian he would use the mayors’ summit in November to push councils across the country to stamp out antisemitism and hold together fracturing social cohesion, after he used last year’s inaugural summit to release a model strategy councils could use.

“Local government is the closest level of government to the people – we can have real impact on our communities and it’s incumbent on us to lead,” he said. “Enough is enough – ‘never again’ can’t just be a slogan. We need a collaborative approach at all different levels of government.”

The summit is convened by the Combat Antisemitism Movement Australia, which recently appointed Sheina Gutnick, the daughter of Bondi victim Reuven Morrison, as its public affairs officer.

“This is the community that bore the cost of antisemitism in its most brutal form and this is where the national response has to deepen,” Ms Gutnick said.

“If this summit is to mean anything, it has to confront that hatred at its source – bringing councils together with interfaith leaders, educators and youth people together to invest in the deradicalisation, early-intervention and prevention measures that stop the next attack before it is ever planned.”

News of the royal commission hearings come one month after the resignation of former spy chief Dennis Richardson. First hired to head up an internal review of national security apparatus, his role was folded into the royal commission after its announcement and he became a co-author to the April 30 interim report.

He resigned on March 11, saying he was “surplus to requirements” and the report would now be “a very different document to the one that I would have done”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bondi-royal-commission-to-run-through-first-half-of-may/news-story/5833e223dd70a93ddf2b983a6593a452

https://asc.royalcommission.gov.au/

https://asc.royalcommission.gov.au/hearings/hearing-block-1-sydney

https://www.youtube.com/@ASCRoyalCommission

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38892

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24502433 (150934ZAPR26) Notable: Brunei pledges to strengthen fuel supply to Australia - (Video) Brunei has assured Australia it will not impose export restrictions on fuel supplies, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese secured commitments during talks with Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah to maintain and expand energy trade. The leaders expressed “deep concern” over the Middle East conflict and agreed to strengthen supply chains for petrol, diesel and fertiliser, with Brunei a key supplier of diesel and urea to Australia. Albanese reiterated calls for de-escalation and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, warning ongoing disruption was affecting regional supply and global markets. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia continued to support freedom of navigation and was working with international partners on post-conflict arrangements. The visit forms part of a broader regional effort to stabilise fuel access and reduce risks to the domestic economy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38874

>>38879

Brunei pledges to strengthen fuel supply to Australia

Zac de Silva and Andrew Greene - April 15 2026

The Sultan of Brunei has assured Anthony Albanese his oil-rich nation is not looking to impose any export restrictions on Australia as the prime minister tours Southeast Asia trying to ensure fuel supplies keep flowing south.

During a meeting at Brunei's Royal Palace, both leaders expressed "deep concern" over the war in the Middle East and pledged to strengthen energy supply chains and maintain open trade flows.

Following the bilateral talks the prime minister again called for a de-escalation in the conflict between the United States and Iran and for a return to the negotiating table.

"There's no more important time to engage with our neighbours than the current time," Mr Albanese told reporters.

"The conflict in the Middle East is a long way away but it's having an impact, particularly in Asia, in our own region, because of the relationship of supplies that come through the Strait of Hormuz and the disruption that has occurred and the uncertainty that is there with regard to a resolution to this conflict.

"Australia wants to see a de-escalation. We want to see talks between the United States and Iran resume and we want to see a resumption of normal economic activity that is so important for the global economy."

Asked whether his government would be more willing to join military efforts to protect the Strait of Hormuz that are not led by the United States, Mr Albanese responded that international discussions were taking place.

"We have said that we want the Strait of Hormuz to be open and we've been a signatory along with other countries to statements along those lines.

"We want safe passage of trade that is in Australia's interest, we're a trading nation, one in four of our jobs is dependent upon trade."

Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who is travelling with the prime minister, noted that Australia had made its position clear that it supported "freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, as do many other countries".

"We continue to engage, as the deputy prime minister has made clear, with the United Kingdom, with France, with all countries including the US, in terms of making sure post the conflict, we can see a return to freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz," she said.

Earlier in the day, Mr Albanese and Senator Wong toured a fertiliser plant in Brunei which produces nearly 10 per cent of Australia's urea supplies.

Wearing grey and green safety jackets, the Australian guests were given a tour of the facility by the chief executive of Brunei Fertiliser Industries, who explained how ammonia was produced before it was converted into fertiliser-grade urea.

The prime minister and Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah discussed the need for more petrol, diesel, oil and fertiliser to be sent to Australia in coming months, during their meeting in an opulent gold-plated room inside the royal palace.

Brunei provides nine per cent of Australia's annual diesel imports, as well as 11 per cent of annual crude oil imports and 11 per cent of annual fertiliser-grade urea imports crucial for agricultural production.

"What's guaranteed is that they are not looking at imposing export restrictions on Australia," Mr Albanese later told reporters at the Australian High Commission in Bandar Seri Begawan.

"Not only did we speak about ... existing supplies coming, we spoke about additional supplies as well," he said.

The prime minister will end his latest visit to Asia with a stopover in Malaysia for similar petrol and diesel supply talks with his counterpart Anwar Ibrahim on Thursday in Kuala Lumpur.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9223464/brunei-pledges-to-strengthen-fuel-supply-to-australia/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evt6p0cWV4s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38893

File: 15faad9a775df9e⋯.jpg (349.98 KB,960x1280,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b0e29ce1fb20c6a⋯.jpg (214.35 KB,1729x1020,1729:1020,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e59a81b48115ebb⋯.jpg (630.56 KB,2758x1551,2758:1551,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24502437 (150945ZAPR26) Notable: Childcare predator Ashley Griffith in bid to reduce life sentence - Convicted child sex offender Ashley Griffith will seek to reduce his life sentence at a Queensland Court of Appeal hearing on May 28 after pleading guilty to 307 offences, including 28 counts of rape, committed over nearly two decades in childcare centres across Queensland and New South Wales. Griffith, described by the sentencing judge as “depraved” and presenting a high risk of reoffending, was given a non-parole period of 27 years, with his legal team arguing the sentence is excessive and should be reduced to a shorter fixed term. The case involved at least 65 victims, some as young as one, with evidence he filmed nearly all assaults and mocked children during the abuse. Separate proceedings remain pending in New South Wales over a further 180 alleged offences involving 23 identified victims, with extradition expected after the appeal process concludes. Families have raised concerns about delays, saying the process has been retraumatising.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23954894 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23954929 (pb)

Childcare predator Ashley Griffith in bid to reduce life sentence

Cloe Read - April 15, 2026

One of Australia’s worst paedophiles, who was jailed for life for sexually assaulting children during his 19 years working in childcare centres, will face the Queensland Court of Appeal next month in a bid to have his sentence reduced.

Ashley Paul Griffith was sentenced in 2024 for hundreds of offences against children dating back to 2003, with the youngest victim a one-year-old. He pleaded guilty to 307 charges, including 28 counts of rape.

The former childcare staffer had worked in centres across both Queensland and NSW. He is yet to be extradited interstate to face charges over 180 offences allegedly committed while employed at a Sydney daycare centre, after police identified 23 victims from NSW.

One of the NSW victim’s parents spoke to this masthead last month, saying delays within the justice system were retraumatising and distressing.

The parent wrote to NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley to ask for Griffith’s extradition to be expedited. Daley said he would do everything in his power to ensure Griffith was transferred and subject to justice in NSW.

Daley said Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington had written to him in February this year advising that there were no objections to Griffith being transferred to NSW following the conclusion of his pending appeal.

Griffith was described as “depraved” by his sentencing judge, and was deemed to have a high risk of reoffending.

His legal team submitted that he should face a sentence of 25 to 30 years with a non-parole period of 15 years.

He was given a non-parole period of 27 years.

In January last year, Griffith’s legal team confirmed they had lodged an appeal on the grounds his sentence was manifestly excessive.

With the appeal first lodged before Christmas 2024, Queensland’s Court of Appeal will now have a half-day hearing on May 28 for Griffith’s case.

Dozens of parents and victims were present in court when Griffith was sentenced, with the case sparking questions over the safety of children in the childcare industry.

The court heard Griffith had filmed all but one of his 65 victims as he sexually assaulted them, and could be heard in the footage mocking victims for saying his abuse was “yucky” and telling him to stop.

The sentencing judge said the children were awake or asleep, and Griffith frequently gave them an iPad to distract them.

Griffith made admissions about the assaults during 13 police interviews, but initially denied committing any offence. He also played down the number of victims and seriousness of the assaults, the court heard.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/queensland/childcare-predator-ashley-griffith-in-bid-to-reduce-life-sentence-20260415-p5zo5w.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ashley+Griffith

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ashley+Paul+Griffith

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38894

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505851 (161001ZAPR26) Notable: Workers flee massive fireball as explosions rock Geelong refinery - (Video) A major fire at the Geelong oil refinery has damaged one of Australia’s two remaining refineries, forcing output cuts and raising pressure on fuel supplies already strained by Middle East conflict. The blaze, sparked by an equipment failure in piping just after 11pm, triggered explosions and a large fireball, with workers fleeing as flames reached up to 60 metres. About 100 personnel contained the fire within 13 hours, with no injuries, as officials said it “could have been a catastrophic fire”. The facility, supplying 50 per cent of Victoria’s fuel and 10 per cent nationally, has reduced production to “minimum rates”, though authorities said imports would offset losses. Workers described scenes like a “war zone” and “a big bloody fireball”, while residents reported homes shaking and skies glowing red as emergency warnings were issued across Geelong.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38874

>>38879

>>38892

Workers flee massive fireball as explosions rock Geelong refinery

Alexander Darling - April 16, 2026

1/2

A major fire has damaged the Geelong oil refinery that is one of only two in Australia, adding pressure to the country’s fuel stocks, which are already under strain due to the war in the Middle East.

Fire Rescue Victoria said an equipment failure caused the blaze at the Viva Energy refinery in Corio that broke out just after 11pm on Wednesday, triggering explosions and sending a cloud of smoke towards Geelong.

The fire burned out of control on Thursday morning, severely damaging the facility that supplies 50 per cent of Victoria’s fuel and 10 per cent of Australia’s fuel.

Viva Energy chief executive Scott Wyatt said the fire damaged two of the refinery’s gasoline production units.

The company ramped up production recently after Donald Trump’s war against Iran led to the Islamic Republic closing the Strait of Hormuz, sparking global fears of fuel shortages.

But the Geelong refinery has now temporarily cut its output of petrol, diesel and jet fuel down to “minimum rates” following the fire damage.

Fire Rescue Victoria said on Thursday afternoon that the blaze began in some piping at the refinery, where there was a mechanical failure.

About 100 people – 50 firefighters and 50 from Viva’s workforce – tackled the blaze across 13 hours, extinguishing it just after midday and keeping the damage footprint to 50 square metres.

“They contained this fire really, really quickly to a small part of the refinery,” FRV deputy commissioner Michelle Cowling told reporters at the scene.

“A fantastic job was done, no firefighters were injured or impacted by the firefight.”

Cowling said the blaze would have been worse had it started around one of the plant’s fuel storage tanks.

“This could have been a catastrophic fire,” she said.

Cowling later said firefighters would likely remain at the scene until at least Friday.

She told the ABC: “It looks like a valve has given way, which has started a small leak which has increased due to the pressure of that LPG being stored … which has obviously found an ignition source and ignited into a significant explosion.”

Police, WorkSafe and Viva are also at the site to investigate.

Earlier, FRV assistant chief fire officer Mick McGuinness described the blaze as “quite ferocious” and said it started in the plant’s Mogas section.

FRV’s boat in Corio Bay also helped fight the blaze, which was declared extinguished in an updated VicEmergency alert at 12.11pm.

Geelong refinery manager Bill Patterson said the affected units converted LPG into gasoline.

“That gasoline component is used for a number of purposes, including in the blending of normal, regular gasoline that you buy from your service stations, but also in some specialty products, like low aromatic gasoline that’s provided to remote communities around the country,” he said.

“It is also an ingredient in aviation gasoline, which shouldn’t be confused with jet fuel. Jet fuel is what the large airliners run on, and that’s not impacted.”

Patterson said the refinery had pushed back some maintenance as the Middle East conflict raised fuel supply concerns, but stressed the works had nothing to do with where the recent fire started.

“Clearly, there was some sort of failure or issue last night,” he said, “but exactly as to what the reasons are will be subject to very thorough investigation.”

Patterson added: “We’re still running at pretty decent rates at the moment, given that these units are relatively small in the scheme of things, but they are important units for the longer term.”

At another press conference on Thursday afternoon, Patterson said the part of the refinery affected by fire hadn’t been running in “any sort of abnormal conditions” since the Middle East conflict roiled energy markets.

“The material that’s made from the unit that was impacted is an ingredient into petrol, but it’s not an … ingredient that we can’t do without,” he said. “So with the loss of that unit, we will lose a little bit of production capacity on that front, but not a very large amount.”

FRV incident controller Anthony Pearce said on Thursday afternoon a community meeting would be held at the Henty Street community centre in Corio at 6pm.

“The remainder of the plant still is functioning, although every action that occurs on this plant potentially has an impact on the area of fire,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38895

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505893 (161028ZAPR26) Notable: Cause of Geelong refinery blaze confirmed, refinery ‘still making fuel’ despite incident - (Video) Authorities have confirmed a gas leak from a mechanical component caused the fire at Viva Energy’s Geelong refinery, which remains operational despite the incident at the critical facility supplying 50 per cent of Victoria’s fuel and 10 per cent nationally. Fire Rescue Victoria said the leak ignited, triggering explosions in what was described as a “very, very dangerous” and “quite ferocious” blaze. The fire was contained and extinguished by early afternoon, with no injuries reported, and officials confirmed there is “no threat to the community”. Viva said the plant is still producing petrol, diesel and jet fuel at “pretty decent rates”, though at reduced capacity, while authorities warned it “will impact on production” particularly petrol output. The incident comes amid “huge pressure” on fuel supplies linked to the Middle East conflict, with investigations continuing into the exact cause.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

Cause of Geelong refinery blaze confirmed, refinery ‘still making fuel’ despite incident

Benedict Brook and Brielle Burns - April 16, 2026

1/3

Authorities have confirmed the cause of the “significant fire” that erupted at Viva Energy’s Geelong refinery overnight.

The fire broke out around 11pm on Wednesday at the crucial facility, which supplies 10 per cent of Australia’s fuel and 50 per cent of the fuel used in Victoria.

Fire Rescue Victoria said it will stay at the facility “until at least tomorrow due to safety concerns,” after firefighters worked quickly to contain the blaze and prevent it spreading.

FRV crews were joined by Viva’s own emergency teams, with Incident Controller Anthony Pearce describing the early stages as “very, very dangerous” with explosions occurring.

Authorities later revealed the fire was caused by a gas leak from a mechanical component.

“The gas has then appeared to have ignited,” Mr Pearce said, adding the exact ignition source is still under investigation.

Despite the incident, much of the refinery remains operational.

“The remainder of the plant still is functioning,” Mr Pearce said, though he noted ongoing activity could still affect the damaged area.

Viva Energy representative Bill Patterson said the plant is running at reduced capacity as a precaution, but continues to produce fuel. “We’re still making petrol, diesel and jet fuel at pretty decent rates… It hasn’t been a very large impact at this stage,” he said.

FRV said the fire was extinguished and the incident deemed under control at 12.04pm.

“Firefighters remain on scene to ensure the safety of the area,” it said in an updated statement. “There is currently no threat to the community, but you should continue to stay informed and monitor conditions.”

Speaking to press in Melbourne, Victoria Premier Jacinta Allen said she was “really pleased to hear the news that no one was injured as a result of what was the result of a very dangerous and difficult incident”.

“It’s an incident that continues to be under active management by Fire Rescue Victoria,” she said, thanking emergency services for performing a “difficult job in dangerous conditions”.

Deputy Commissioner Michelle Cowling earlier said the fire was caused by “an equipment failure in the refinery”.

“Viva is looking into that,” she told ABC Radio Melbourne.

“So there’ll be a thorough investigation into the failure of how this fire started.”

She said the damage would not impact production, contradicting earlier comments by Energy Minister Chris Bowen.

“It’s not impacting diesel or gasoline and petroleum production. So that won’t add to the already stressed fuel issues that we’re having.”

A FRV spokesman said firefighters arrived on scene to find a “significant fire impacting the refinery”.

“All refinery staff have been accounted for,” the spokesman told the ABC.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38896

File: 0126f501f164864⋯.mp4 (9.57 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505908 (161040ZAPR26) Notable: Refinery blaze may impact Australia's petrol production 'for some time' - (Video) A fire at the Geelong oil refinery may impact Australia’s petrol supply “for some time”, Energy Minister Chris Bowen has warned, as the government manages fuel pressures linked to the Middle East conflict. The blaze, which broke out just after 11pm with explosions reported, is believed to have been an accident, with no suspicious circumstances identified. The refinery continues producing diesel and jet fuel at “reduced levels”, while petrol output is expected to be most affected. Viva Energy said damaged units converting LPG to gasoline components are offline, but other production areas remain operational and output is still running at “pretty decent rates”. Officials said any shortfall would be covered by imports, though analysts warned the disruption could “increase the risk of fuel shortages” and place pressure on the nation’s only other refinery as global supply constraints intensify.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

>>38895

Refinery blaze may impact Australia's petrol production 'for some time'

Maani Truu - 16 April 2026

1/2

A blaze at one of Australia's two operational oil refineries may impact petrol supply "for some time", Energy Minister Chris Bowen has warned, as the government continues to grapple with the global oil crisis triggered by the Middle East war.

The fire at Viva Energy Refinery in Geelong broke out just after 11pm yesterday, with authorities called to the site after multiple reports of explosions and flames.

Mr Bowen said it appeared to be an accident at this stage and that there were no suspicious circumstances.

The refinery is continuing to produce diesel and jet fuel "at reduced levels" due to safety precautions, Mr Bowen said, with petrol production likely to be most impacted.

"At this point, production of diesel and jet fuel continues and [there is] no reason to believe at this point that it will stop that," he told the ABC.

"I'm sure that petrol production will continue, but it may be impacted for some time."

Viva Energy chief executive Scott Wyatt said the company's first priority was the safety and wellbeing of its workers and that it would take time to determine the full extent of the damage to the site.

The fire occurred in a unit that transforms LPG to gasoline components, but Mr Wyatt said there were other areas of the facility dedicated to petrol production that were unaffected.

"We'll only start increasing production again once we're confident that we can do that safely," he said.

"We'll obviously have to do it without these two units in operation and we'll work through how we do that over the next couple of days and get back to the highest level of production we can across the site."

Mr Wyatt said any shortfalls in production would be covered by the company's imports, which are "quite full for the next couple of months".

The Viva refinery and the Ampol-owned Lytton refinery in Brisbane each provide about 10 per cent of Australia's fuel, with the remainder of the country's petrol, diesel and jet fuel imported from overseas.

Mr Bowen conceded that it was "not great timing" for the blaze, given the ongoing global oil crisis and domestic fuel shortages.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is visiting Malaysia today as part of a broader tour of some of Australia's key fuel suppliers.

During a stop in Brunei yesterday, Mr Albanese signed a joint statement with his counterpart vowing to work together to "strengthen energy supply chain resilience".

"What we can do is, one, work closely with the two domestic refineries … and two, work to maximise Australian access to the fuel, particularly in South-East Asia," Mr Bowen said.

"That's why the prime minister is in South-East Asia, playing an absolute blinder, I might say, to ensure that we are maximising the chances of Australia in this very difficult international environment."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38897

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505912 (161046ZAPR26) Notable: PM confirms purchase of 100m litres of diesel in bid to boost supply amid Iran war oil crisis - (Video) The federal government has used new fuel security powers to secure 100 million litres of diesel, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed two shipments totalling 570,000 barrels from Brunei and South Korea to bolster supply during the Middle East conflict. The scheme allows companies to purchase fuel while the government underwrites financial risk for costly shipments. Albanese said the move was a “practical outcome” of regional engagement, with fuel able to be directed where needed most, “including to our farmers”. The diesel was purchased by Viva Energy, as the Geelong refinery outage adds pressure to domestic supply. Albanese said agreements with Malaysia, Brunei and Singapore aim to secure ongoing supply, as global markets face “unprecedented energy supply shocks” linked to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38874

>>38879

>>38892

>>38894

PM confirms purchase of 100m litres of diesel in bid to boost supply amid Iran war oil crisis

Romy Stephens - 16 April 2026

The prime minister has confirmed that new powers allowing the federal government to underwrite the delivery of additional fuel cargoes have been used to purchase 100 million litres of diesel.

Under the laws, which passed parliament last month, petrol companies still buy fuel but the government takes on the financial risk of shipments that might otherwise be too expensive.

On Thursday Anthony Albanese announced that the fuel security powers had been used to purchase two shipments of diesel - totalling 570,000 barrels - from Brunei and South Korea..

"This is the first of many expected shipments secured under the government's new strategic reserve powers, with the support of Export Finance Australia," he said.

Mr Albanese said the conflict in the Middle East had prompted the move.

"This is welcome news, it's a practical outcome of the engagement," he said of recent discussions with regional trading partners.

"Additional fuel can be directed to where it is needed most, including to our farmers."

The additional diesel was purchased by Viva Energy, the company that operates the oil refinery that caught ablaze at Geelong in Victoria.

Mr Albanese said they were "distressing scenes" but it was positive that no-one was harmed.

He said there would "clearly" be a consequence for fuel supply.

"We'll continue to work with the company to do what we can to make sure anything that is offline is brought online as soon as possible," Mr Albanese said.

'No surprises' agreement with Malaysia

Mr Albanese made the diesel shipment announcement during a joint press conference with his Malaysian counterpart Anwar Ibrahim in Kuala Lumpur.

During their meeting, Australia and Malaysia reached an agreement to engage in energy trade on a "no surprises basis".

It marked the third agreement Mr Albanese reached with Asian nations in less than a week to ensure fuel supply continued amid the Middle East war.

"This is a conflict that has caused unprecedented energy supply shocks right across the globe," the prime minister said.

"We're working together to prepare and shield our citizens from the worst of the impacts of this global conflict.

"I am pleased that we've agreed a joint statement on energy security. This underscores our commitment to ensuring that essential goods both food and energy continue to flow between our two countries."

Mr Ibrahim said the world looked very different to when Mr Albanese was in Kuala Lumpur last year.

"The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed for nearly seven weeks, global energy markets are under serious stress, supply chains are disrupted and the consequences are pummelling through the seven seas," he said.

"Malaysia will always be a reliable partner to Australia."

Malaysia is one of Australia's top suppliers of crude oil and refined fuel. It supplies 14 per cent of Australia's diesel, 10 per cent of its petrol and 11 per cent of its jet fuel.

Similar to engagements with with other countries in the region over the past week, Mr Albanese sought to leverage Australia's importance as a trade partner to reach a supply guarantee.

Australia provides almost all of Malaysia's liquefied natural gas imports and a significant amount of agricultural goods.

"Australian resources help to power our region and our farmers help to feed the region," Mr Albanese said.

"Nearly 60 per cent of Malaysia's wheat and 75 per cent of its lamb and beef come from Australia and our neighbours know that providing fuel and fertiliser to Australia helps put food on the table in this region."

The talks with Malaysia's prime minister came after Mr Albanese signed similar agreements with Brunei and Singapore.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-16/new-powers-used-to-secure-additional-diesel-shipments/106571682

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p94u8hnMpZU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38898

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505916 (161054ZAPR26) Notable: Accused military man Daniel Duggan loses fight to stay in Australia - (Video) Former United States Marine pilot Daniel Duggan will be extradited to the United States after the Federal Court rejected his bid to remain in Australia, where he faces allegations of aiding the Chinese military. Duggan, an Australian citizen and father of six, is accused of arms trafficking and money laundering linked to training activities in South Africa in 2012, which he denies. Justice James Stellios found no jurisdictional error in the extradition decision and ruled arguments around dual criminality were “inconsequential”. Duggan has been held in a maximum security prison since his 2022 arrest in New South Wales and faces up to 65 years’ imprisonment if convicted. His wife described the ordeal as “1,273 days of… terrible trauma”, saying he has spent 19 months in solitary confinement. Supporters argue he was solely an Australian citizen at the time, a claim central to their position that US jurisdiction should not apply to his alleged conduct.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accused military man Daniel Duggan loses fight to stay in Australia

KATE STEPHENSON - 16 April 2026

A former United States Marine pilot accused of unlawfully aiding the Chinese military will be extradited from Australia following a Federal Court decision.

Daniel Duggan, an Australian citizen and father of six,will be sent back to the US charged with four offences under the country’s law.

He is alleged to have committed arms trafficking and money laundering by conspiring with the Chinese military while at a South African training school in 2012.

Mr Duggan has denied the allegations against him.

He was arrested in Orange, country NSW, in 2022 at the request of US officials and is currently being held in a maximum security prison.

Supporters for Mr Duggan claim he was solely Australian citizen at the time of the alleged training and was no longer a citizen of the United States.

In the Canberra sitting of Federal Court on Thursday, Justice James Stellios ruled Mr Duggan would need to comply with the extradition order.

At a hearing before the court in October 2025, Mr Duggan’s legal team argued the decision to extradite was invalid; further claiming dual criminality – the concept that an alleged crime must be recognised as an offence in both the requesting and requested countries – did not apply.

Justice Stellios found dual criminality principles were inconsequential as they relied on irrelevant legal provisions.

He found there was no jurisdictional error made in the decision to extradite Mr Duggan.

If found guilty of the alleged offences, Mr Duggan faces a maximum of 65 years imprisonment in the United States.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38899

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505926 (161101ZAPR26) Notable: Former US Marines pilot Dan Duggan loses bid to avoid extradition from Australia - (Video) Former United States Marine Corps pilot Daniel Duggan will be extradited to the United States after the Federal Court dismissed his bid to block the transfer over allegations he trained Chinese military pilots. Duggan, an Australian citizen, denies charges including arms export violations and money laundering linked to activities between 2009 and 2012, and faces up to 65 years’ imprisonment if convicted. Justice James Stellios ruled the court’s role was limited and rejected arguments that the offences must have equivalent Australian laws, focusing on legal eligibility for extradition rather than the underlying allegations. Supporters argue he “broke no Australian law” and warn against “US overreach”, while his legal team said the decision turned on a narrow legal point rather than the merits of the case. Duggan has 28 days to appeal, with final approval resting with the federal government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38898

Former US Marines pilot Dan Duggan loses bid to avoid extradition from Australia

Tahlia Roy - 16 April 2026

1/2

Former United States Marine Corps pilot Daniel Duggan has had his bid to avoid extradition from Australia dismissed.

Mr Duggan, an Australian citizen, denies allegations he helped train Chinese military pilots at a South African training school in 2012.

The father-of-six was arrested in the New South Wales regional city of Orange in 2022 at the request of the US, and has since been detained in a maximum security prison.

Mr Duggan is facing four US charges including allegations he violated and conspired to violate the US Arms Export Control Act, as well as a charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

He is accused of committing these offences between 2009 and 2012.

If found guilty, he could face up to 65 years in a US prison.

In the Federal Court today, Justice James Stellios dismissed Mr Duggan's legal bid to avoid extradition.

'Into the hands of the Trump administration'

In the judgement, Justice Stellios quotes the Extradition Act which says "courts may determine whether a person is to be, or is eligible to be, extradited, without determining the guilt or innocence of the person of an offence".

Mr Duggan had tried to argue that the extradition treaty between Australia and the US stipulated that any overseas charges must have equivalent charges at the time in the jurisdiction receiving the request. In this case, that was NSW.

Justice Stellios also threw out his argument that most of the alleged offences took place in a third country and therefore the extradition should be prevented.

Today outside court, Collaery Lawyers legal clerk Lynn Stocker said her "law-abiding" client had 28 days to appeal the decision.

Ms Stocker issued a plea to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese:

"The decision was based on solely a legal point. The merits issue has always been with the government," she said.

"Now it's a decision for the Prime Minister whether he wants to send an Australian citizen … into the hands of the Trump administration who has taken a close interest [in the case].".

'Australia should not be America's deputy sheriff'

Donald Rothwell, a professor of international law at the Australian National University, said Mr Duggan's legal team could "seek not to appeal, in which case they've accepted that the extradition will proceed".

"Or they can seek to appeal to a full bench of the Federal Court … but in doing so they would have to mount a legal argument that challenges the decision of the single judge of the Federal Court," he said.

Professor Rothwell said that despite the legal processes, all extradition matters were inherently political as the final decision rested with the government.

"There's always the potential that the attorney-general, who needs to issue a certificate before extradition occurs, might seek to deny extradition on a range of grounds. Mostly they would be humanitarian grounds," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38900

File: ac99e90b4c0c0fd⋯.jpg (184.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505937 (161113ZAPR26) Notable: Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has welcomed Australia’s planned increase in military spending but signalled Washington expects further commitments before Canberra is regarded as a leading Indo-Pacific ally. In testimony to Congress, Hegseth praised Australia’s latest National Defence Strategy and support for AUKUS while emphasising the Trump administration’s focus on “burden sharing” among allies. He pointed to South Korea and Japan as examples of nations sharply increasing defence investment, while Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby said the United States wanted “partners - not dependencies”. Australia recently announced plans to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product by 2033, although the Trump administration has previously pushed for a higher 3.5 per cent target. Hegseth also revealed the US campaign in Iran had cost at least $US25 billion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24334245 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38881

>>38886

>>38887

Richard Marles nails colours to the mast: ‘it’s the time for allies and order’

NOAH YIM - 16 April 2026

Defence Minister Richard Marles has left the door open to a potential post-war role for Australia in the Strait of Hormuz, while launching an impassioned defence of the US alliance and the rules-based international order.

As Australia braces for further downstream impacts from the war in the Middle East, Mr Marles said that the temporary ceasefire under way marked a “critical opportunity to move back from the brink” and to “restore the global fuel supply chain and place events on a path to peace”.

“Australia will do all within its power to help make this temporary ceasefire permanent,” he said.

Australia has already sent a Wedgetail surveillance aircraft to the United Arab Emirates and incoming chief of the defence force Mark Hammond this week said the navy was “as ready as it ever has been” to deploy a warship to assist US-led efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said the ­Coalition would be “very open” to Australian involvement in reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

“We should be very open to being part of a multinational ­coalition because it will be after the cessation of hostilities and because we do have an interest in the … free Strait of Hormuz,” he told ABC TV on Thursday.

While US President Donald Trump’s attacks on allies, including Australia, and threats that “a whole civilisation will die” in the Middle East have elevated doubts about the alliance, Mr Marles rejected suggestions the rules-based order was no more and stressed the ongoing importance of the US to the region.

“There is no effective balance of power in the Indo-Pacific absent the continued presence of the United States,” he said.

“The alliance remains critical to Australia’s national security and the government welcomes the United States’ 2025 national ­security strategy and national defence strategy, which set out a critical US commitment to the Indo-Pacific.”

Mr Marles defended a commitment to a rules-based international order going forward. “As the world enters this current period of disorder, some argue that the idea of the global rules-based order – an order where nations can pursue their security and economic interests, consistent with international law and free from coercion – is now extinct,” he said.

“I disagree. The global rules-based order provides a middle power like Australia with agency. A world defined purely by power and might does not.

“And it is most definitely against Australia’s national interest to rush – as some Australians have – to the conclusion that this order no longer has any role.

“For all the failings of the global rules-based order – and there have been many – we have been far better off with it than without it.

“Our challenge is not to discard the imperfect, but rather to make the promise of an ideal ­better, because if we let it go the world will deeply regret its disintegration.”

Mr Marles connected this back to the US alliance, saying the “global rules-based order would not have existed without American leadership based on an enlightened conception of its own self-­interest”.

The comments served as a rebuttal to Angus Taylor, who said last month that “the rules-based international order has been exposed as wishful thinking of a bygone and benign era”.

Mr Taylor said that instead, middle powers must “work together … act together … closer than ever on defence, on secure supply chains and sovereign capabilities, on maintaining free trade”.

The Opposition Leader said this was especially the case “in these times where autocratic ­regimes act with impunity”.

This comes after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney – an acclaimed centre-left global leader – came to Australia last month calling for a renewal of that rules-based international order.

“Middle powers like Australia and Canada hold this rare convening power,” he told the Australian parliament.

“Because others know we mean what we say and we will match our values with our actions.”

He said that while the world would always be “shaped by great powers”, he urged Australia not to discount the collective power of middle powers – like Canada and Australia – “that trust each other enough to act with speed and ­purpose”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/richard-marles-nails-colours-to-the-mast-its-the-time-for-allies-and-order/news-story/a76a8719fa15ac9148dcc69eed8ca0fc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38901

File: cd0727d4abbdf87⋯.jpg (395.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fe0b1ed8376fb5e⋯.jpg (300.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b551b59fffd9ae3⋯.jpg (317.7 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505940 (161126ZAPR26) Notable: Australia-Papua New Guinea Pukpuk treaty faces challenges, PNG soldiers confined to barracks amid unrest - Papua New Guinea has confined military personnel to barracks for a month after unrest linked to nepotism and fraud allegations forced Defence Minister Billy Joseph to step aside, as Australia prepares to ratify the Pukpuk treaty. PNG Defence Force chief Philip Polewara ordered bases closed and access to weapons restricted after soldiers set up roadblocks in Port Moresby and others in Lae defied orders demanding Joseph’s arrest. Prime Minister James Marape, now overseeing defence, warned misconduct would not be tolerated, stressing “discipline is the foundation” of the force. The crisis follows claims of recruitment “irregularities” involving fake documents, which Joseph denies. Australia will support an inquiry and deepen defence ties under the treaty, though analysts warn standards have declined, while supporters argue the partnership is vital as PNG faces internal instability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia-Papua New Guinea Pukpuk treaty faces challenges, PNG soldiers confined to barracks amid unrest

BEN PACKHAM - 16 April 2026

Australia’s soon-to-be ally Papua New Guinea has ordered its military personnel to be confined to barracks for a month amid fears of unrest over nepotism and fraud allegations that forced the country’s defence minister to step aside.

The crisis comes as the Albanese government prepares to ratify the countries’ Pukpuk treaty and recruit Papua New Guineans to the Australian Defence Force.

PNG Defence Force chief Philip Polewara directed all bases to be closed and personnel be denied access to weapons and ammunition after soldiers set up roadblocks in Port Moresby in protest at courts-martial against up to five alleged whistleblowers.

Some soldiers in PNG’s second city of Lae defied the order, leaving the city’s Igam Barracks to demand the sidelined minister, Billy Joseph, be arrested.

Prime Minister James Marape assumed responsibility for the defence portfolio last week after Dr Joseph stood aside over allegations of recruitment “irregularities”. It followed the emergence of videos on social media of would-be recruits allegedly using fake documents to meet the force’s 25-year age cap. The applicants were allegedly known to Dr Joseph, who denies any interference in the recruitment process.

Senior ADF officers will support an independent inquiry into the matter by PNG’s chief secretary and state solicitor.

Mr Marape called for calm, warning those involved in unlawful or disorderly conduct risked disciplinary action and dismissal.

“Discipline is the foundation of our defence force, and any actions that undermine order and stability will not be tolerated,” the Prime Minister said.

He said he had asked Rear ­Admiral Polewara to pause an ­internal investigation into the ­actions of the alleged whistleblowers pending the results of the cabinet-ordered inquiry.

Australia last year pledged 3500 new automatic rifles for the PNGDF and improved armouries to prevent the weapons being stolen and used in tribal conflicts.

The ADF opened recruitment of eligible Papua New Guineans on January 1, though it is unclear whether any applicants have been accepted. It will draw its recruits from the ranks of school leavers and university graduates rather than the country’s military.

PNG Institute of National ­Affairs executive director Paul Barker said the PNGDF’s governance and standards had been allowed to deteriorate over the years and work was needed to rebuild morale and standards.

“In the old days you’d find the defence soldiers smart, washed and so on,” he said.

“Now they’re a lot more lackadaisical, not in every instance, but you do find standards, including levels of fitness, well below what people recall from older days.

“Obviously through the partnership (with Australia) you want to see those standards improved.”

Retired Major General Mick Ryan said the challenges made the Pukpuk treaty all the more important. “At times like this, when your friends are having trouble, that’s when you step up in the relationship,” he said.

“PNG is a consequential country for Australia, and we should stand by them.”

Australia will pour hundreds of millions of dollars into the PNGDF under the Pukpuk treaty, which requires each country to “act to meet the common danger” if there is an armed attack on ­either. It flags expanded defence co-operation through “through enhanced capability, interoperability and integration”.

The treaty was signed by Anthony Albanese and Mr Marape last October after initial headaches in getting the support of the PNG cabinet for the agreement.

It was a diplomatic coup for Labor, reinforcing Australia’s strategic buffer by sidelining China’s ambitions for closer ­security ties with Port Moresby.

Mr Albanese said at the time that the nations’ militaries would work more closely together than ever before. “The treaty ... speaks about interoperability,” he said. “So, that means defence ­assets, but our greatest asset is our people.”

The PNGDF has been facing acute budget constraints in recent years. The Australian revealed last October that the force faced a shutdown in its food services over an unpaid $6.2m catering bill.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/australiapapua-new-guinea-pukpuk-treaty-faces-challenges-png-soldiers-confined-to-barracks-amid-unrest/news-story/b169db8d78cc2764a3116f0baabedd2e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38902

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24505952 (161138ZAPR26) Notable: NSW’s post-Bondi protest laws struck down by court - (Video) Criminal charges against 26 protesters are in doubt after the NSW Court of Appeal struck down sweeping anti-protest laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack, ruling they unlawfully restricted political communication. Chief Justice Andrew Bell said the laws “impermissibly burden” the implied freedom of political communication, adding democratic systems accept “disharmony, incivility and disruption” as part of public debate. The legislation had allowed police to ban moving protests for up to 90 days after a terrorist event and was used during demonstrations against Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s visit. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees hailed the ruling as “a big win” for protest rights and civil liberties, while legal representatives said prosecutions were likely to fail. Premier Chris Minns said he was “obviously disappointed”, defending the laws as necessary in response to the attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23996417 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24210131 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24231304 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24235918 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24240047 (pb)

NSW’s post-Bondi protest laws struck down by court

BIMINI PLESSER - 16 April 2026

1/2

Criminal charges brought against 26 protesters over the infamous Sydney demonstration against Israeli President Isaac Herzog are in doubt after sweeping anti-protest laws were struck down in a landmark decision by the NSW Court of Appeal.

The protest and hate speech legislation, hurried through parliament in the wake of the Bondi terror attack, gave police unprecedented powers to ban moving protests for up to 90 days following a terrorist event.

Three activist groups – Blak Caucus, Palestine Action Group and Jews Against the Occupation ’48 – launched a constitutional challenge against the laws, which was heard in February by Chief Justice Andrew Bell, Court of Appeal president Julie Ward, and Justice Stephen Free.

Delivering the court’s unanimous decision on Thursday, Justice Bell declared the laws invalid on the grounds that each “impermissibly burdens the implied constitutional freedom of communication on government and political matters”.

Australia’s system of government “entails acceptance of the potential for disharmony, incivility and disruption that is part and parcel of democratic intercourse”, Justice Bell said.

“Suppressing public debate of certain kinds may be a means to a legitimate end, but it cannot be a legitimate end in itself.”

Justice Bell ordered the state to pay the plaintiffs’ legal costs. The three groups say they expect the amount to be in the “tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars”.

NSW Premier Chris Minns issued a statement saying he was “obviously disappointed” by the verdict.

“The NSW government absolutely stands by the decision to introduce this legislation that allowed police to restrict authorised assemblies in specific areas for 14 days following a terrorism declaration,” Mr Minns said.

“This was in the aftermath of the worst terrorist attack our country has seen, in which 15 innocent lives were lost. We believe it was necessary and important for Sydney at the time.”

Mr Minns did not immediately indicate whether the government would appeal to the High Court or look to relegislate in a bid to get around the court’s findings.

PAG organiser Josh Lees, a plaintiff in the case, was present in court and celebrated with supporters in the gallery when Justice Bell delivered his decision.

Group members were hugging, smiling and crying when the court was adjourned.

Outside the court, Mr Lees called the decision “a big win for everyone who cares about the right to protest, who cares about democracy in NSW and … who cares about a free Palestine”.

“These laws were terrible … as our wonderful barristers argued, (these laws) were like using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut,” he said. “But worse than that, these laws were never really about … community safety, social cohesion … this was merely his latest attempt to ban protests against war and genocide.”

Mr Lees also declared any legislation passed by the state to ban phrases such as “globalise the intifada” and “from the river to the sea” would be contested, just as the protest laws had been.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38903

File: 1defb39cf9c3532⋯.jpg (168.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: df3b3a31a4103f3⋯.jpg (393.57 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ae5b56a0e30d77⋯.jpg (364.66 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512128 (180411ZAPR26) Notable: Angus Taylor hits back after Paul Keating accuses him of embracing ‘racism’ over migration policy - Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has rejected claims by former prime minister Paul Keating that his immigration policy reflects “racism”, saying the criticism shows Keating is “out of touch with Australians”. Keating accused Taylor of echoing the “dumb bigotry” of One Nation and abandoning the Liberal Party’s “best instincts”, while also criticising former prime minister John Howard’s past migration stance. Taylor responded that prioritising “Australian values” was not racist, arguing “immigration numbers are too high” and standards “too low”. The Coalition policy includes deporting migrants who fail to meet national values, tracking 65,000 expired visa holders and expanding social media screening. Keating warned the approach was “at primary odds with an immigrant nation” and likened it to “Trump ICE-style policies”, as political tensions escalate over migration settings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38888

Angus Taylor hits back after Paul Keating accuses him of embracing ‘racism’ over migration policy

LACHLAN LEEMING and GREG BROWN

1/2

Angus Taylor has called scathing criticism of his immigration policy from Paul Keating a sign he is out of touch with Australian values, after the former Labor prime minister accused the Opposition Leader of embracing racism out of fear of losing votes to One Nation.

Mr Keating, in a blistering statement released on Thursday afternoon, claimed Mr Taylor had walked away from the “best instincts” of the Liberal Party, while also attacking former prime minister John Howard, who he described as “Mr Racial Opportunism himself”.

Mr Taylor hit back shortly after, saying he “always suspected that Paul Keating didn’t support Australian values, but now he has dropped any pretence”.

“To suggest it is ‘racist’ to put Australian values at the centre of our immigration policy shows just how out of touch he is with Australians, as is the Labor Party,” Mr Taylor wrote on social media.

Mr Keating, who lost the prime ministership to Mr Howard in a landslide election defeat in 1996, claimed in his statement that Mr Taylor’s policy echoed the “dumb bigotry” of One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

“The Liberal Party, battling an extreme version of itself, One Nation, has again fallen back to its default political policy: racism,” Mr Keating said. “And, to hammer the point, sitting beside Taylor at his policy launch was Mr Racial Opportunism himself, John Winston Howard, late of anti-Asian migration in 1988.”

Mr Keating also accused Mr Howard of “wilful anti-humanitarianism (in) his electorally driven Tampa atrocity of 2001”, referencing the then Coalition government’s decision to refuse entry to a Norwegian-flagged tanker that had rescued a large boatload of asylum-seekers bound for Australia.

Mr Taylor in response invoked Mr Keating’s famous phrase about the 1990s recession – when Mr Keating labelled the downturn as “the recession we had to have” – by saying the Coalition’s immigration plan was the “policy we have to have”.

“Immigration numbers are too high. Immigration standards are too low. And both must change,” Mr Taylor said.

“It’s time for Paul Keating and the Labor Party to put Australians and Australian values first.”

Mr Keating stated the Coalition’s stance was “at primary odds with an immigrant nation”, adding the Labor leader’s plan would lead to “Trump ICE-style policies to weed and ‘boot out’ people who fail to adhere to ‘national values’”.

The former Labor prime minister also claimed that “by adopting racism with its shabby appeal to differentiation and primal instincts, Angus Taylor marks himself out as a political leader unworthy of the leadership of a party that has managed Australia for the greater part of the last century and which celebrated the country’s unifying values”.

Mr Howard declined to comment on the remarks from Mr Keating.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38904

File: 2bc13fbc91dd05d⋯.jpg (116.48 KB,1296x729,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 52ae3ce9149196c⋯.jpg (608.19 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512142 (180416ZAPR26) Notable: Viva Energy denies delayed maintenance caused major Corio refinery fire - Viva Energy has denied that delayed maintenance contributed to the Geelong refinery fire, as authorities point to a likely “mechanical or engineering failure” and investigations continue into the cause of the explosions. Fire Rescue Victoria said early assessments indicated an equipment fault, while the company attributed the incident to a gas leak in a transfer section of the plant. General manager Bill Patterson said there was “no delayed maintenance” linked to the affected unit, despite acknowledging some works had been postponed amid Middle East instability. He stressed there was “no link” identified so far, though a full investigation would examine both the release of flammable material and ignition source. The ageing 70-year-old facility has reduced some output, but Viva said supply impacts would be limited, as officials warned the incident could increase pressure on national fuel security settings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

>>38895

>>38896

Viva Energy denies delayed maintenance caused major Corio refinery fire

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - April 16, 2026

1/2

Viva Energy has moved to hose down links between delayed maintenance at its Corio refinery and explosions that tore through the plant.

Victorian fire authorities confirmed the inferno was likely sparked by an engineering fault, as questions intensify over the ageing facility and the circumstances that led up to the ­explosion.

Fire Rescue Victoria Deputy Commissioner Michelle Cowling said early assessments pointed to a “mechanical or engineering failure” within equipment in a transfer section of the plant, though she said the exact cause remained under investigation.

Viva Energy has blamed a gas leak.

“It appears to be a mechanical, engineering failure in some of the equipment,” Ms Cowling said, adding the blaze was brought under control within 13 hours.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has left open the prospect of escalating to stage three of the ­national fuel security plan following the fire at Geelong’s oil refinery, saying the impact on supply remained unclear.

Viva Energy’s general manager of energy and infrastructure Bill Patterson said the company had found no evidence linking postponed works at its 70-year-old refinery near Geelong to the incident. “There was no delayed maintenance in relation to this specific unit,” he said.

He acknowledged some maintenance had been deferred last month amid instability in the ­Middle East, but said it did not relate to the affected plant. “That maintenance didn’t relate to the integrity of equipment on the site,” he said. “There wasn’t a link between any delays of maintenance and this event that we know of.”

Mr Patterson repeatedly stopped short of ruling anything out entirely, emphasising a full forensic investigation was still in its early stages. “All aspects of the cause of the fire, both the release of flammable material and what caused it to ignite, will be part of that investigation,” he said.

While the damage has reduced some production capacity, Mr Patterson said it would not significantly disrupt fuel supply, insisting the company had sufficient reserves and alternative supply arrangements in place.

AMWU Geelong organiser Tony Hynds said maintenance of the refinery had improved in recent years and he did not believe maintenance issues were a contributing factor to the fire.

He said the company told him direct employees would be paid but it was a union ­responsibility to pursue contractors.

He said he told Viva that “no one is going back to work until everyone is paid. We’re not having people losing money out of this.”

“You walk around that place and you see some of the rusty shit around there and you think how can this be? Look at the rust on that. Look at the condition of the concrete foundations,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38905

File: 00931a834ca5b82⋯.jpg (134.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512222 (180502ZAPR26) Notable: Fuel farce inflamed as Chris Bowen declares no crisis of petrol supplies - Energy Minister Chris Bowen has said the Geelong refinery fire will not trigger an immediate escalation of the national fuel security plan or cause higher petrol prices, despite warnings it will reduce domestic supply. Bowen said the disruption was “not a good development” but insisted it would not move Australia beyond stage two, as Viva Energy could replace lost petrol production with imports. Experts warned the outage could cut petrol output for months, increase reliance on overseas fuel and raise the risk of rationing during the Middle East conflict. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the fire would “clearly” have consequences, while analysts argued the government may need to act sooner to secure supply. Bowen also signalled support for new domestic oil projects if they meet environmental and economic criteria.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

>>38895

>>38896

Fuel farce inflamed as Chris Bowen declares no crisis of petrol supplies

GREG BROWN - April 16, 2026

1/2

Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen says a massive fire at one of the nation’s two oil refineries will not trigger an immediate escalation in the national fuel security plan nor lead to higher prices at the bowser, as he backs drilling for crude oil in Australia as long as projects stack up environmentally and financially.

Anthony Albanese has cut short his trip to Malaysia and will arrive at Viva Energy’s oil ­refinery in Geelong on Friday to ­receive an in-person briefing on the impact of the 13-hour fire, which began after a gas leak caused an explosion late on Wednesday night.

Speaking in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday, the Prime Minister said the fire that consumed the Geelong refinery, which produces about 10 per cent of Australia’s fuel and about half of Victoria’s petrol, would have ­consequences for fuel supply but he was awaiting a “proper ­assessment”.

Energy experts are warning the fire is a major blow to the government’s aim to secure fuel supply if the Middle East war continues, predicting a hit to domestic production of petrol for at least three months, although there will be little impact on the refining of diesel and jet fuel.

Experts warned that the fire increased the risk of petrol and diesel rationing and required an even higher reliance on offshore fuel at a time of global shortages.

With the Iran war highlighting Australia’s lack of self-­sufficiency, Santos chief executive Kevin Gallagher said drilling oil out of Western Australia’s Bedout basin had “come very much to the top of our thinking” as long as it was supported by the government.

“What the current crisis has shown and highlighted is the importance of energy security and oil security,” Mr Gallagher said.

Despite this week declaring an expansion of fossil fuels was not a lesson from the Middle East war, Mr Bowen said he would welcome Santos’s proposal and the Queensland government’s push to drill in the Taroom Trough as long as the projects stacked up environmentally, economically and “in an engineering fashion”.

“Some people try and drag us to a culture war,” Mr Bowen said. “If there are sensible proposals to drill in Australia which will ­replace imports, great.”

Speaking in Malaysia as part of his Asian charm offensive to prevent Australia from being caught up in export controls, the Prime Minister revealed an extra 100 million litres of diesel had been secured under the government’s policy to underwrite the purchase of new fuel cargoes.

The Albanese government has also helped secure an extra 250,000 tonnes of agricultural-grade urea from Indonesia.

Mr Albanese and Malaysia Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim signed a joint statement to continue energy trade on a “no surprise basis”, but Mr Ibrahim made clear he would prioritise the domestic market if there were shortages. “I did express our concern on the issue of diesel because our supply is inadequate in the medium term,” Mr Ibrahim said.

“Once the domestic requirements are met, there is clearly some excess (forecast). And we (have) given an assurance that the priority will be to Australia.”

Mr Albanese again played down the prospect of a gas tax in the budget that could hit existing export contracts, while several Labor sources have said it was unlikely there would be any changes to the taxation of the sector announced by Jim Chalmers in May.

The Treasurer on Thursday night said from Washington that the Viva refinery fire was a “serious setback” and felt like the “worst luck at the worst time”.

But Mr Bowen said the nation’s fuel supply was now guaranteed until June despite petrol production to be reduced at Viva ­Energy’s refinery. The Energy Minister said the fire limiting petrol production in the middle of a global oil supply crunch was “not a positive development” nor “good timing”, but played down the prospect of it directly forcing the ­nation into stage three of the fuel security plan.

Stage three of the plan would likely see more comprehensive but still voluntary requests to reduce fuel through working from home, catching public transport, car pooling and avoiding air travel.

“This is not a good development when it comes to what we’re managing, but we’re managing it,” Mr Bowen said. “This in and of itself – because Viva have told us that they’re very confident they can replace the petrol with imports – won’t lead to a change in the status of the four-point fuel plan.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38906

File: 31ca099d7549532⋯.mp4 (15.38 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 832c64e73050514⋯.jpg (69.73 KB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b1aa1ddbf1c051b⋯.jpg (196.48 KB,1200x801,400:267,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512238 (180513ZAPR26) Notable: Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has welcomed Australia’s planned increase in military spending but signalled Washington expects further commitments before Canberra is regarded as a leading Indo-Pacific ally. In testimony to Congress, Hegseth praised Australia’s latest National Defence Strategy and support for AUKUS while emphasising the Trump administration’s focus on “burden sharing” among allies. He pointed to South Korea and Japan as examples of nations sharply increasing defence investment, while Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby said the United States wanted “partners - not dependencies”. Australia recently announced plans to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product by 2033, although the Trump administration has previously pushed for a higher 3.5 per cent target. Hegseth also revealed the US campaign in Iran had cost at least $US25 billion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38881

>>38882

>>38886

>>38900

Australia banks on Ghost Bat and Ghost Shark in drone warfare shift

Annika Burgess - 18 April 2026

1/2

Australia is on a push to "maintain pace" with how rapidly drones are reshaping modern warfare.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East had shown the ability of drones "to generate significant asymmetric advantage against larger, more expensive platforms".

"Autonomous systems now are really central to how war happens," he said.

The government announced it would be investing $12–15 billion on drone and counter-drone technologies over the next decade.

It is an increase of between $2–5 billion since the release of the 2024 National Defence Strategy.

Central to the Defence Department's drone focus are its flagship Ghost Bat and Ghost Shark programs, which are both larger uncrewed military systems.

About $2.2–3.1 billion will be dedicated to smaller drones.

This is a look at some of the big-ticket technology and whether defence experts think Australia is on the right track.

A look at the Ghost Bat

As the name suggests, the MQ-28A Ghost Bat is made for the skies.

Developed for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), the autonomous drone was first unveiled in 2019 as the Loyal Wingman.

The new name was later chosen because the Ghost Bat is "an Australian native mammal known for teaming together in a pack to detect and hunt", according to Boeing.

The Defence Department says the Ghost Bat is "the first military aircraft designed and built in Australia in over 50 years".

The project has cost the government about $2.3 billion since 2019, including a $1.4 billion investment announced in December to fast track the acquisition of six fully operational aircraft.

The Ghost Bat has a range of more than 3,700 kilometres, and was designed to work in tandem with other piloted aircraft.

For instance, it can be deployed to protect and support traditional military assets, such as F-35 fighter jets, in contested environments.

Marcus Hellyer, head of research at defence think tank Strategic Analysis Australia, said having uncrewed aircraft such as Ghost Bats surrounding expensive jets would be beneficial.

"I'm quite open to options like Ghost Bat, because when you look at F-35s, they cost US$150 million a pop," he told the ABC.

"So anything we can do to generate a force multiplier effect is a good thing."

The government has described the drone as among its "low-cost, expendable" systems.

But Dr Hellyer flagged that Ghost Bats were still on the more expensive side compared to the cheap, mass-produced drones used in other conflicts.

A Ghost Bat reportedly costs between $12 million and $15 million per unit.

"So, we're not exactly talking the kind of mass-producible stuff that we are seeing in Ukraine and the Middle East," he said.

The Ghost Bat can perform intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions, electronic warfare and strike operations.

It was designed to carry a range of payloads, which can be swapped out through its reconfigurable nose depending on the mission.

Overall, about $8 billion will be allocated to uncrewed air systems.

The MQ-4C Triton is among the other remotely-piloted aircraft Australia is investing in.

Developed by the US, the Triton is also a larger drone, with a range of about 15,000km.

"The endurance of the Triton means that it can stay airborne for longer than a traditional aircraft where the pilot is inside," according to the Department of Defence.

It will be used primarily to support maritime patrol.

The extra-large Ghost Shark

Resembling a mini submarine, the Ghost Shark is classed as an extra-large autonomous underwater vehicle (XLAUV).

But just how extra large the drone is has not been disclosed.

Other details, such as its maximum range, speed, and endurance, are also limited.

Jennifer Parker, a former naval officer and maritime security expert at the Australian National University National Security College, said the secrecy was intentional.

"One of the things you'll find about the Ghost Shark is there is not a lot of information about it," she said.

"That is intentionally kept secret behind closed doors, because we don't want our potential adversaries to know everything about its capability, including exactly how many we're getting."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38907

File: fc460d43a718e47⋯.jpg (805.97 KB,2244x1497,748:499,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5227a18b3870690⋯.jpg (408.75 KB,3508x2480,877:620,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6da114bf62e811b⋯.jpg (1.97 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 79b4bfb312868a4⋯.jpg (2.32 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512269 (180531ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith granted bail in Sydney court - Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has been granted bail after being charged with five war crimes counts over the alleged murders of unarmed detainees in Afghanistan. Judge Greg Grogin ruled there were “exceptional circumstances” justifying release after 10 days in custody, noting bail is “not punitive in nature” and Roberts-Smith is entitled to the presumption of innocence. The court heard any trial could take years, with concerns raised that secrecy provisions may “severely restrict” access to legal material if he remained in custody. Prosecutors opposed bail, citing the “gravely serious” nature of the allegations and potential risks of flight and interference with witnesses, but the judge found strict conditions could mitigate those risks. Roberts-Smith, who denies the charges, faces life imprisonment if convicted.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

Ben Roberts-Smith granted bail in Sydney court

Michaela Whitbourn - April 17, 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith has been granted bail after being charged with war crimes over the alleged murders of five unarmed detainees in Afghanistan.

Judge Greg Grogin granted the former Special Air Service corporal bail after a hearing in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court on Friday. His release, after 10 days in custody, is subject to a series of strict conditions.

Roberts-Smith, dressed in prison greens, appeared at the bail hearing via audiovisual link from Silverwater’s Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre.

Outside Silverwater Correctional Complex, a lone Roberts-Smith supporter waved a placard at passing traffic. “Free Ben Roberts Smith,” the sign read.

Grogin said the court needed to be satisfied, in part, that there were “exceptional circumstances” justifying bail.

He said there was no dispute the offences with which Roberts-Smith were charged were serious and, if proven, would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.

But he made clear that bail was “not punitive in nature” and Roberts-Smith was entitled to the presumption of innocence.

The matter would take “years to get before the court”, Grogin said, and Roberts-Smith would “surely” spend years in custody if he was not released on bail.

He said Commonwealth secrecy provisions might “severely restrict” visits by Roberts-Smith’s legal team to a correctional facility, and “severely restrict access to material against” him.

Grogin said there was “no way anyone today can predict what the outcome of the trial would be”, when it would be, or “if” it would be.

Bail conditions were sufficient to ameliorate risks raised by Commonwealth prosecutors and there were exceptional circumstances, he said.

Roberts-Smith is subject to tight travel restrictions and is not to contact any prosecution witness directly or indirectly.

“One acceptable person is to enter into an agreement, and deposit security, to forfeit $250,000 if the applicant fails to comply with his bail acknowledgement,” Grogin said.

Roberts-Smith’s barrister, Slade Howell, had told the Local Court his client’s defamation proceedings, which resulted in findings on the balance of probabilities that he committed war crimes in Afghanistan, were “not criminal proceedings”.

The defamation case was “decided on a body of evidence that is likely to be nothing like the body of evidence in this case”, Howell said.

“By the time all the evidence is disclosed or otherwise produced, we say a very different picture may emerge as to the strength of this case.

“The court should be conscious of this because there are many unknowns at this stage.”

‘Substantial surety’ offered

Howell said Roberts-Smith’s father, former judge Len Roberts-Smith, was offering a “substantial surety with a deposit”. The suggestion the former elite soldier was a flight risk was “fanciful”, Howell said.

Howell raised the prospect the Supreme Court may be asked to consider whether “the extraordinary pre-trial publicity surrounding these allegations … means that a fair trial of the allegations is simply not possible”.

“The prosecution of these allegations will take many, many years and will have many twists and turns,” he said.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions opposed bail being granted. Barrister Simon Buchen, SC, appearing for the CDPP, said the application did not involve “wholly untested” allegations.

The charges were among “the most serious known to the criminal law”, Buchen said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38908

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512280 (180544ZAPR26) Notable: Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith granted bail over alleged war crime of murder offences - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has been granted bail after more than a week in custody over five alleged war crime murders in Afghanistan, with a Sydney court finding “exceptional circumstances” justified his release. Judge Greg Grogin said the case could take years and bail was “not punitive in nature”, noting concerns about access to evidence and the ability to prepare a defence from custody. Prosecutors argued the charges were “gravely serious” and pointed to risks of flight and interference with witnesses. Defence lawyers said the matter involved “uncharted legal territory” and warned prolonged pre-trial publicity could mean a fair trial was “simply not possible”, as strict conditions were imposed to mitigate risks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith granted bail over alleged war crime of murder offences

Jamie McKinnell - 17 April 2026

1/2

War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith has left Sydney’s Silverwater Correctional Complex in a car with blacked out windows after being granted bail over alleged war crimes earlier on Friday.

Two escort cars were seen blocking pursuing media as the car left the jail just after 5:30pm.

Mr Roberts-Smith was granted bail after spending more than a week in custody over allegations of war crimes.

The 47-year-old was arrested at Sydney Domestic Airport last week and charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, alleged to have occurred in Afghanistan in 2009 and 2012.

His lawyers have told a Sydney court on Friday the case was unprecedented and involved "uncharted legal territory", arguing it was likely to take years, with "many twists and turns".

They said the fairness of the proceedings would be compromised if their client had to defend himself from custody.

In opposing bail, the Crown highlighted the "gravely serious" nature of the charges, citing the risk of flight and the risk of Mr Roberts-Smith interfering with witnesses or evidence.

Fair trial may be 'simply not possible'

Slade Howell, representing Mr Roberts-Smith, argued it was likely a superior court or courts may need to consider how the "extraordinary" pre-trial publicity about the allegations may impact the proceedings.

That publicity had "persisted for many years and still persists", he said, and a superior court may need to consider whether it meant a fair trial of the allegations was "simply not possible".

Mr Howell said the fairness of the proceedings would be "compromised" if Mr Roberts-Smith had to defend himself from custody.

Although it is not clear how long the trial would take, the defence lawyer referenced the case of former SAS soldier, Oliver Schulz, who was charged with the offence of war crime murder in 2023 and is awaiting trial.

"The other matter that was in the court for three years before it was committed for trial," he said.

"We do not resile from the prosecution of these allegations will take many, many years and will have many twists and turns."

Local Court Judge Greg Grogin found that it would take years before the matter was resolved.

He granted bail and said the concerns raised by prosecutors could be mitigated through strict conditions proposed by his lawyers.

Mr Roberts-Smith has not yet entered pleas, but he denied the allegations throughout a defamation case which he lost against Nine newspapers.

That civil test is different to the criminal test now before the courts, where prosecutors must prove allegations beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judge said there was no dispute the charged offences were serious, and said bail was not "punitive in nature".

He made a finding that "exceptional circumstances" existed in part due to the likely amount of time the matter would take as it proceeded through the courts.

The judge also made reference to a fundamental right of defendants to be aware of material presented against them, and how the need to classify material as sensitive and non-sensitive might impact Mr Roberts-Smith's ability to prepare his defence.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38909

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512317 (180624ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith released from prison amid chaotic scenes - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has been released on bail after 10 days in custody over five alleged war crime murders in Afghanistan, as court documents detail evidence from four soldiers who admitted killing detainees on his orders. Prosecutors allege the victims were unarmed, handcuffed and under Australian control, with evidence staged to portray the killings as lawful, including claims of planted items and fabricated combat scenarios. Witnesses granted immunity have provided accounts of acting “at the direction or with the complicity” of Roberts-Smith, who denies the allegations. Judge Greg Grogin granted bail citing “exceptional circumstances”, including expected lengthy delays and challenges accessing evidence, while warning strict conditions would apply. The case, following a five-year investigation, is expected to take years, with dozens of soldiers likely to be called as witnesses.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Ben Roberts-Smith released from prison amid chaotic scenes

Amber Schultz - April 17, 2026

1/2

Four Australian soldiers have admitted they killed Afghan nationals on the orders of Ben Roberts-Smith and have given detailed evidence to prosecutors in the war crimes case against him, court documents allege.

The testimony of the soldiers, who have been granted immunity from prosecution for their involvement, was revealed in a police statement of facts, as Roberts-Smith was granted bail by a Sydney court while awaiting trial for five charges of war crime – murder.

New details about one of the alleged victims also emerged from the police document, including how he was punched in the stomach and pushed to the ground while handcuffed by the Victoria Cross recipient, who then ordered the man to be shot.

Roberts-Smith was released from Silverwater Correctional Complex in chaotic scenes on Friday night, having spent 10 days in custody.

Corrective Services officers escorted him out through a back exit of the facility, avoiding a waiting media throng at the front gate.

Officers obstructed the street in an attempt to stop this masthead from photographing Roberts-Smith as he left the complex.

Some officers actively blocked photographs being taken on the roadside, having left their vehicle to intervene. “Stop, stop, you can’t take pictures,” they shouted.

Earlier, Roberts-Smith appeared via video link for his bail hearing in Downing Centre Local Court, dressed in prison greens, sitting bolt upright and with his hair neatly combed. His parents, Len and Sue, had flown into Sydney to support their son and sat in the front row of Court 5.2 for the hearing.

Court documents released after the hearing reveal prosecutors will allege that five people killed by, or on the orders of, the decorated soldier had been unarmed and handcuffed, and evidence was then staged to portray their deaths as legal.

There were “common themes” underlying the five charges of war crime – murder, each allegedly committed, directed or facilitated by Roberts-Smith in Afghanistan, the statement of facts alleges. Three of the four soldiers granted indemnity by the Commonwealth are relevant to the current prosecutions.

The witnesses have given prosecutors written evidence of their personal involvement in executing one or more of the alleged Afghan victims. The soldiers allege they carried out the killings “at the direction or with the complicity” of Roberts-Smith.

The 47-year-old did not react as Judge Greg Grogin granted him bail on “exceptional circumstances” in front of a courtroom packed with dozens of journalists.

“I take it by tonight you will probably be home,” Grogin said.

“Thank you, your honour,” Roberts-Smith replied.

The facts as alleged by the Crown prosecution state that each victim was unarmed and present in a place where it would be suspected insurgents were located. However, in each case, there was no active combat with enemy forces, and Australian troops had control of the battle space.

The alleged victims were handcuffed, detained, and questioned before their alleged execution. Forensic analysis found marks and injuries on the wrists of several of the alleged victims, the alleged facts state.

Evidence was planted or falsely associated with each deceased “to enhance reporting that each of the killings were within the lawful rules of engagement”.

In one instance, Roberts-Smith “threw a grenade” towards those who had been detained, causing it to detonate, to support a “later false claim” that the deaths occurred during legitimate warfare. A handheld radio device was allegedly planted next to the body of another.

In another instance, Roberts-Smith is alleged to have directed a junior to kill an Afghan, telling him to “shoot that c*nt”, according to the alleged facts.

In granting bail, Grogin found the expected lengthy delays of the coming trial, coupled with issues conferring with his legal team and accessing sensitive documents from prison, meant Roberts-Smith should be released.

“There is no way anyone today can predict what the outcome of the trial would be,” he said.

He agreed that any potential risk of absconding or interfering with witnesses could be managed with strict bail conditions, issuing a warning to Roberts-Smith that he would find himself back in custody should he breach them.

“His arrest would no doubt come very swiftly and he would no doubt find himself again donned in green,” Grogin said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38910

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512324 (180641ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith leaves Silverwater prison, free on bail, ahead of war crimes trial - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has been released from Silverwater prison on strict bail conditions after being charged with five war crime murders allegedly committed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. Judge Greg Grogin found “exceptional circumstances” justified bail, citing the presumption of innocence, the likelihood the case would take years to reach trial and concerns that access to sensitive national security material could “severely restrict” his ability to prepare a defence in custody. Roberts-Smith must surrender his passport, report regularly to police and avoid contact with witnesses, with a $250,000 surety imposed. Prosecutors opposed bail, arguing the charges were “amongst the most serious”, while the defence said the case involved “uncharted legal territory” and would face prolonged delays.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Ben Roberts-Smith leaves Silverwater prison, free on bail, ahead of war crimes trial

STEPHEN RICE and LIAM MENDES - 17 April 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith has left Silverwater prison after being granted bail pending his war crime trial.

The Victoria Cross recipient appeared to be driven away by his girlfriend, Sarah Matulin. Ms Matulin was also present when Mr Roberts-Smith was arrested on five counts of war crime – murder aboard a Qantas flight at Sydney airport.

Corrective services staff frantically attempted to stop media from capturing photographs of Mr Roberts-Smith, and assisted him out of a back exit.

When he was in a public street there were two female corrective services guards blocking the photographers from taking pictures of him in the front seat of an ACT-plated Audi Q7.

Judge Greg Grogin, granting Mr Roberts-Smith freedom after nine days behind bars on Friday, said the court needed to be satisfied before bail could be granted, that there were exceptional circumstances which exist to justify bail.

“There is a presumption of innocence in, in place for every person who appears before the court,” he said. “Bail is not punitive in nature.”

There would be a large amount of national security information to be assessed, Judge Grogin said, with material kept in secure facilities.

That could severely restrict access to material against Mr Roberts-Smith, which could severely restrict access to legal visits by his team and interfere with his right to access the evidence.

“The reality of the situation is that this matter, I find, will take years to get before the court,” Judge Grogin said.

“The fact that Mr Roberts-Smith would surely spend not weeks or months, but years and possible years and years in custody before a trial is reached. I find that exceptional circumstances have been found.”

Mr Roberts-Smith is facing five charges of murder, crimes allegedly committed between 2009 and 2012 against unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS.

Australia’s most decorated soldier appeared on screen from D Block in the Silverwater Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre during the bail hearing, dressed in prison greens and listening intently to the proceedings.

Mr Roberts-Smith will be subject to strict bail conditions, including the provision of a surety of $250,000 and surrender of his passport.

He is required to report to police three days a week. He cannot leave Australia under any circumstances or leave Queensland except to travel to Sydney or Perth for the purposes of the case. He is not permitted to approach anyone he served with in Afghanistan and is not permitted access to firearms.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers had earlier told the court he was not a flight risk, while raising the possibility that the “extraordinary pre-trial publicity” surrounding the allegations against him meant that a fair trial may be “simply not possible.”

Barrister Slade Howell, acting for Mr Roberts-Smith, argued that strict conditional bail should be granted, saying the Victoria Cross recipient’s case was “exceptional in the sense that it is out of the ordinary”.

“The use of domestic courts to prosecute alleged war crimes committed by a highly decorated Australian soldier, deployed overseas repeatedly by the Australian government to fight a war on its behalf, is unprecedented and is uncharted legal territory in the common law of this country,” Mr Howell said.

The proceedings would be “beset by a multitude of delays” including because of the possibility of other soldiers being charged in the interim.

“It is very likely in due course that a superior court or courts may need to consider whether the extraordinary pre-trial publicity surrounding these allegations publicity, which has persisted for many years and still persists, means that a fair trial of the allegations are simply not possible.”

“The prosecution of these allegations will take many, many years and will have many twists and turns.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38911

File: f36e883f5173e66⋯.jpg (667.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 87898e9f359362d⋯.jpg (3.98 MB,4288x2848,134:89,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512331 (180701ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Executions’ and immunity: prosecutors give soldiers deals to testify against Ben Roberts-Smith - Prosecutors have granted immunity to four Australian soldiers who admitted involvement in executing detainees, securing their testimony in the war crimes case against former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith. Court documents allege the soldiers acted “at the direction or with the complicity” of Roberts-Smith, with their accounts forming a central part of the prosecution’s case. The allegations include claims detainees were handcuffed and killed, with evidence staged to portray the deaths as lawful engagements through planted items and fabricated reports. The Office of the Special Investigator acknowledged the case will rely heavily on witness recollection from events up to two decades ago, with limited forensic evidence available. Roberts-Smith denies the allegations, with his defence expected to challenge the credibility of witnesses who received immunity in exchange for their evidence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

‘Executions’ and immunity: prosecutors give soldiers deals to testify against Ben Roberts-Smith

STEPHEN RICE - 18 April 2026

1/2

In a stunning development in Ben Roberts-Smith’s impending war crimes trial, prosecutors have ­revealed that four Australian ­soldiers who have admitted ­complicity in executing detainees have been granted immunity from prosecution in return for their evidence.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has provided formal undertakings to the four witnesses, three of whom – identified by the court pseudonyms Person 4, Person 56 and Person 66 – are directly involved in the Roberts-Smith prosecution.

The move to admit evidence from soldiers given immunity for their role in multiple murders is likely to be strongly challenged by Mr Roberts-Smith’s defence team. The revelations in the CDPP’s statement of facts came as the Victoria Cross recipient was granted bail after spending 10 days in Silverwater prison, following his arrest last week on five charges of murdering unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS. Mr Roberts-Smith was released late on Friday, giving a thumbs up to waiting media as he was driven away from the Sydney prison by his smiling partner, Sarah Matulin.

While many of the allegations in the statement of facts were aired during the failed defamation case Mr Roberts-Smith brought against the Nine/Fairfax newspapers, the newly released document sheds light on the witnesses who will be central to the prosecution’s case.

It was alleged in the defamation case that Mr Roberts-Smith was directly involved in the “blooding” of several junior troopers, including Persons 4, 56 and 66, whose testimonies now appear to form the backbone of the prosecution. “Each of these witnesses has admitted their personal involvement in executing one or more detainees at the direction or with the complicity of Roberts-Smith,” the statement says. In each instance, Mr Roberts-Smith was their military superior.

“These witnesses have provided written accounts of their ­actions. Each details other murders they witnessed.”

Recollection key

The Office of the Special Investigator has acknowledged that the case will depend on the recollection of witnesses from a war zone almost 20 years ago in the absence of any forensic or crime scene ­evidence.

Person 4 was an SASR trooper on his first Special Operations Task Group (SOTG) deployment in 2009 and, as the junior member of his patrol, he was referred to as “The Rookie”.

During a mission to a compound named Whiskey 108 in April 2009, according to the statement of facts, an elderly Afghan man named Mohammad Essa and his son Ahmadullah, who wore a prosthetic leg, were discovered hiding in a tunnel and handcuffed.

Mr Roberts-Smith allegedly ordered Person 4 to shoot Essa, which he allegedly did, later boasting that they had “blooded the rookie”.

“Person 4 has made admissions to killing Mohammad Essa at Whiskey 108,” according to the statement of facts.

Person 4 was also present at another of the centrepiece allegations made by the Nine/Fairfax newspapers, that Mr Roberts-Smith had kicked a handcuffed villager named Ali Jan off a 10m-high cliff in the village of Darwan before the injured man was shot by another trooper.

Person 4 was not required to give evidence about the alleged killing at Whiskey 108 in the defamation case, but instead gave evidence about Mr Roberts-Smith’s actions in Darwan.

It appears Person 4 has been given immunity for his role in the alleged Whiskey 108 killing in return for his testimony about Mr Roberts-Smith’s actions in both incidents.

But Person 4’s credibility is likely to be challenged by the defence as it emerged during the defamation case that he has a long history of mental health issues and a long-held animosity to Mr Roberts-Smith.

Person 4 was said to be aggrieved because Mr Roberts-Smith was awarded the Victoria Cross for his actions at the battle of Tizak, where Person 4 also fought.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38912

File: 4a4b37f0771acc0⋯.jpg (1.97 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0ebf8382c29ac04⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,3520x1980,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512339 (180710ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith prosecution for alleged war crimes complex, legal expert says - The prosecution of former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith will test Australia’s war crimes legal framework, with experts warning the case is unprecedented and highly complex. Roberts-Smith faces five charges of war crime murder over alleged killings of unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012, which he denies. Australian National University international law professor Donald Rothwell said Australia is obligated to prosecute its own citizens under laws aligned with the International Criminal Court, making this one of the first modern cases of its kind in decades. He said the trial will rely heavily on witness testimony due to limited access to crime scenes and evidence, with each charge requiring extensive proof. Rothwell also cautioned the earlier defamation case used a lower standard, with criminal proceedings requiring proof “beyond reasonable doubt”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Ben Roberts-Smith prosecution for alleged war crimes complex, legal expert says

Victoria Pengilley - 18 April 2026

1/2

A legal expert says the criminal prosecution of former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will test Australia's war crimes legal framework in ways never seen before, as the case moves towards a trial.

Australia's most decorated living soldier has been charged with five counts of war crime murder, alleged to have occurred during tours in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

Prosecutors allege the victims were unarmed Afghan nationals not taking part in hostilities, shot by Mr Roberts-Smith or by soldiers acting under his orders.

The Victoria Cross recipient consistently denied the allegations throughout a high-stakes civil defamation case against Nine newspapers, which he lost in 2023.

Mr Roberts-Smith was on Friday granted bail after a Sydney court found the potential risks of him leaving the country or interfering with evidence and witnesses could be addressed through strict conditions.

Local Court Judge Greg Grogin said it would likely take years to resolve the matter, which Mr Roberts-Smith's lawyers described as "unprecedented and unchartered legal territory".

First modern war crime trial in decades

Australian National University professor of international law Donald Rothwell said nothing like this had come before Australian courts for years.

"We haven't had a contemporary modern war crimes trial in Australia for decades," he said.

The charges were brought under a legal framework updated when Australia ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which expanded laws around the investigation and prosecution of war crimes.

Professor Rothwell said under that framework Australia was obligated to prosecute its own citizens for alleged war crimes rather than leave the matter to international bodies.

"Australia incurs obligations to prosecute Australians who have allegedly committed war crimes or crimes against humanity," he said.

Because Australia has established its own investigative and prosecutorial process, Professor Rothwell said the International Criminal Court (ICC) would have no jurisdiction over the case, even in the event of an acquittal.

Mr Roberts-Smith is the second Australian serviceman charged under that framework.

Former soldier Oliver Schulz was the first to be charged and faces trial in early 2027.

Professor Rothwell said both cases would break new ground in Australian legal history.

Civil versus criminal standard of proof

The Office of the Special Investigator led the investigation into Mr Roberts-Smith alongside the Australian Federal Police (AFP), which started in 2021.

It was one of more than 50 investigations involving alleged war crimes in Afghanistan, 39 of which were finalised.

Investigators were unable to access crime scenes, physical evidence, or witnesses on the ground in Afghanistan, with the prosecution expected to rely heavily on witness testimony.

"All of those factors add immense complexity to the prosecution and then, ultimately, for a judge and a jury in terms of being absolutely convinced beyond reasonable doubt," Professor Rothwell said.

He said each separate charge would require its own body of evidence, meaning the scale of the task facing prosecutors is significant.

"Each one of them will involve voluminous amounts of evidence," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38913

File: cd250d14127be83⋯.jpg (4.3 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 93b64ef80020fb6⋯.jpg (4.09 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0b49c09cc39e2e9⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,5094x3396,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512378 (180829ZAPR26) Notable: The Ben Roberts-Smith photograph Corrective Services tried to stop - (Video) Corrective Services NSW is reviewing the handling of Ben Roberts-Smith’s release from Silverwater prison after officers escorted the accused war crimes suspect out a back exit in a coordinated effort to avoid media scrutiny. Roberts-Smith, charged with five counts of war crime murder, was driven away in a convoy after being granted bail, with officers blocking roads and attempting to prevent photographers capturing images. Footage shows an officer pushing a camera and shouting “you can’t take pictures” as media pursued the vehicle along public roads. Authorities said the measures followed a risk assessment due to “high levels of public interest”, aimed at ensuring safety for the inmate and public. Corrections Minister Anoulack Chanthivong said any breaches of protocol would be addressed, as Roberts-Smith remains subject to strict bail conditions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

The Ben Roberts-Smith photograph Corrective Services tried to stop

Riley Walter and Sam Mooy - APRIL 18, 2026

1/2

The arrival of a silver Audi SUV at Silverwater Correctional Complex was the first sign of movement.

For hours, a growing media pack had patiently waited outside the jail for a glimpse of Australia’s most decorated living soldier, seen only fleetingly since his arrest on war crimes charges on April 7.

When Ben Roberts-Smith’s girlfriend, Sarah Matulin, drove through the camera flashes and approached the designated pick-up point for released inmates, the moment seemed to have arrived.

But as reporters and photographers readied themselves, a cunning plan involving Corrective Services NSW officers to whisk Roberts-Smith out of the sprawling complex and away from the cameras was under way.

Throughout Friday, inmates released from Silverwater had discarded their prison greens, collected a small bag of personal belongings and trudged out of the western Sydney facility.

None were escorted out, and all were forced to make the long walk past the media pack on foot; no special treatment was offered. The same could not be said for the accused murderer.

Long before Judge Greg Grogin granted the 47-year-old bail during an hours-long hearing in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court, arrangements were being made to help Roberts-Smith give the media the slip.

A longstanding agreement allows media to wait at a designated point near the prison’s main entrance. Corrective Services NSW officers throughout the day asked members of the media, who obliged, to remain on grassed areas either side of the entry and exit to the facility and clear of nearby footpaths. Maintaining that position, they said, would ensure the safety of both the media and Roberts-Smith as he left the complex.

But just after 5.30pm – about 30 minutes after Matulin had driven into the gated section of the prison – officers formed a convoy and began escorting the disgraced former Special Air Service corporal out the back exit. Footage shows a vehicle carrying several Corrective Services officers preparing to escort Roberts-Smith from the facility.

Shortly after, several vehicles followed Roberts-Smith, sitting in the passenger seat of an Audi Q7 being driven by Matulin, out of the facility and along Jamieson Street – a public road – bordering Silverwater’s eastern perimeter. As Roberts-Smith left the complex, a white 4WD blocked off Jamieson Street, which leads to a public park on the banks of the Parramatta River, to prevent him from being followed. Footage shows the 4WD leaving the complex at the head of the convoy.

Media tracked Roberts-Smith’s exit via a live chopper feed. The Herald, suspecting the 47-year-old may try to evade media, was positioned on Jamieson Street as his taxpayer-funded convoy approached. A team of Herald photographers positioned at the front of the complex captured Matulin’s entrance and tracked the convoy’s exit.

As Roberts-Smith’s vehicle approached the end of Jamieson Street, a black ute that had exited Silverwater behind him veered off the road and into the path of the Herald’s moving vehicle, blocking it. As the Herald tried to manoeuvre around the vehicle, photographer Sam Mooy dashed towards Roberts-Smith, capturing an iconic photograph of the accused murderer.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38914

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512388 (180852ZAPR26) Notable: Trump again lashes Australia over war but says peace coming soon - (Video) US President Donald Trump has criticised Australia for not supporting efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while claiming a deal to end the Iran war could come “fairly soon” as negotiations progress. Trump said he was “not happy with Australia” and other allies for failing to assist, as the US expanded naval operations to block Iran and prevent resupply. The conflict has disrupted global energy markets, with the strait effectively closed and fuel supplies strained. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia had engaged “constructively” with Washington, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers said he was unaware of any formal request for assistance. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned combat operations could resume “at the push of a button” if talks fail, as diplomatic efforts continue alongside military pressure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

>>38861

>>38880

Trump again lashes Australia over war but says peace coming soon

The US president said he was “not happy with Australia” over its reluctance to help the war effort, as Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the US was prepared to restart combat operations.

Andrew Tillett and Jessica Gardner - Apr 17, 2026

1/2

London/Washington | Donald Trump claims Iran has made key concessions in negotiations with the United States and that a deal to end the war which sparked an energy crisis and left thousands dead could happen “fairly soon”.

Despite the president’s apparent optimism after seven weeks of war, he also on Thursday (Friday AEST) lashed out at the Albanese government for failing to help the US reopen the crucial Strait of Hormuz.

The US military also said it would expand its naval blockade of the strait to the Indo-Pacific to prevent foreign ships resupplying Iran with weapons and other contraband in a bid to end the war which has roiled global markets.

Trump said it may be unnecessary to renew a two-week ceasefire with the Islamic Republic before it expires next week, defying expectations that an extension would be needed to allow more time for diplomacy.

“Iran wants to make a deal. They are willing to do things today that they weren’t willing to do two months ago,” Trump said. “We have a very successful negotiation going on right now. If it happens, it will be announced fairly soon.”

Some leaders in Arab states in the Persian Gulf and Europe expected it would take about six months to agree a peace accord and that the ceasefire should be extended to cover that period, officials familiar with the matter were quoted by US media as saying.

Tehran has yet to comment on the US president’s claims that Iran has dropped its opposition to key American demands, including over its nuclear program.

Since the US and Israel launched military offensives against Iran on February 28, and Iran retaliated with strikes against Gulf states and effectively shut down transit through the Strait of Hormuz, global energy supplies have been in chaos, with oil and gas prices soaring and fuel shortages emerging.

Trump has ordered the US Navy’s own blockade of the strait – through which about a fifth of the world’s oil and gas normally passes – to prevent ships entering or leaving Iranian ports in an attempt to starve the regime of oil revenue.

Trump has been furious that key allies, including Australia, Japan and European NATO members, have not helped with the war effort or reopening the strait.

Asked about the Albanese government’s announcement that it would increase defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, as measured by NATO benchmarks – still short of the White House demands for 3.5 per cent – Trump launched into a fresh attack over Canberra’s unwillingness to help in the strait.

“I’m not happy with Australia because they were not there when we asked them to be there,” he said.

“Australia was another one, they were not there having to do with Hormuz. I’m not happy with them.”

Bombarded with questions about Trump’s comments, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in Geelong on Friday, consistently responded by saying “we’ve engaged with the US administration constructively”.

Albanese is set to address a summit hosted by the UK and France late on Friday with about 40 nations that includes Australia to discuss a multinational naval force to secure Hormuz, though any deployment remains unlikely until a broader agreement is reached.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, speaking to reporters in Washington, said he was not aware of a formal request from the US for Australia to assist in Iran. He said the president’s remarks were “consistent with comments he had made in the past”.

“We will continue to work with the Americans, President Trump and his colleagues in Australia’s interest,” said Chalmers.

The treasurer warned that the global economy faced “a dangerous moment”. “From an economic point of view, the end of the war can’t come soon enough,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38915

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512394 (180858ZAPR26) Notable: Donald Trump repeats he is 'not happy with Australia' as Strait of Hormuz crisis continues - (Video) US President Donald Trump has again criticised Australia for not supporting efforts in the Strait of Hormuz, saying he was “not happy with Australia” for failing to assist when asked, though he did not specify what action he wanted. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there had been “no new requests” from the United States, while Defence Minister Richard Marles confirmed no “specific request” had been received despite ongoing discussions with US officials. The disagreement comes as Iran’s closure of the strait and a US naval blockade disrupt global energy supplies, with American forces expanding operations to intercept vessels linked to Tehran. Opposition figures have urged clarification of the conflicting claims, while Australia continues to secure fuel imports and participate in international talks on safeguarding shipping routes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

>>38861

>>38914

Donald Trump repeats he is 'not happy with Australia' as Strait of Hormuz crisis continues

Brad Ryan - 17 April 2026

Donald Trump has again accused Australia of refusing to help the US in the Strait of Hormuz, but Anthony Albanese says there has been "no new" request.

Mr Trump made the comments in response to reporters' questions outside the White House, but he did not directly answer when asked what exactly he wanted Australia to do.

"I'm not happy with Australia because they were not there when we asked them to be there," Mr Trump said.

"They were not there, having to do with Hormuz, the Hormuz Strait."

Mr Trump also did not directly address questions about Australia's decision to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP — a level that falls short of the 3.5 per cent requested by the Trump administration.

The US president has now been complaining for weeks about Australia's lack of support in the Strait of Hormuz. The critical shipping route was declared closed by Iran's Revolutionary Guard after the US attacked Iran in February, and is now subject to a US blockade of Iranian ports.

This month, Mr Trump made similar criticisms of Australia and other allies — including Japan, South Korea and NATO — at a White House press briefing.

"You know who else didn't help us? Australia didn't help us," he said.

In March, while criticising allies during a cabinet meeting, Mr Trump said "Australia was not great" and he "was a little surprised by Australia".

Senior government ministers in Australia have long maintained that there has been no "formal" request for assistance from the US regarding the Strait of Hormuz.

Asked repeatedly to explain the president's comments during a media conference on Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese referred to his previous remarks on the matter.

"Australia's position is the same as it was yesterday," he told reporters.

"There have been no new requests, at all."

Earlier on Friday, Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia "had not received a specific request in relation to the Strait of Hormuz".

"But we'll work with all of our partners, our allies, and that very much includes the United States, in terms of whatever needs to be done in relation to the Strait of Hormuz," he said.

Members of the government speak to the Trump administration "at different levels" every day, Mr Marles said, adding that they would "continue to do this in an orderly and methodical way".

The Coalition has called on the prime minister to clarify what, if any, requests have been made of Australia, labelling the discrepancy between the two leaders' comments as "very unfortunate".

"The Australian government asserts that there have been no requests to Australia, and I take them at their word," Shadow Defence Minister James Paterson told Radio National.

"But President Trump has now repeatedly said there have been requests, so my question is: What has the prime minister done to clarify this with President Trump?"

US blockade to extend to Iranian ships in Pacific

Earlier this week, the United States imposed its own naval blockade in the Gulf of Oman, in response to Iran cutting access to international ships using the waterway since the start of the war.

More than 12 American military vessels were stationed in international waters in the Gulf of Oman, beyond the strait, the New York Times reported, citing a US official.

In a description of the US naval operation, General Dan Caine said Navy warships would enforce the blockade "inside Iran's territorial seas" and "in international waters".

"The joint force, through operations and activities in other areas of responsibility, like the Pacific area of responsibility … will actively pursue any Iranian-flagged vessel or any vessel attempting to provide material support to Iran," he told a press conference at the Pentagon.

"This includes dark fleet vessels carrying Iranian oil."

Australia is preparing for what could be a protracted fuel supply crisis as oil tankers remain unable to cross the Strait of Hormuz.

Yesterday, Mr Albanese announced purchases of 100 million litres of diesel from Brunei and South Korea.

In a later interview with the ABC, he foreshadowed further deals as a result of talks with Indonesia.

Australia will also take part in a summit, hosted by the UK and France, to discuss efforts to safeguard shipping in the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, Paris time.

But Mr Marles said "any particular operation" in the Strait of Hormuz could only happen "when circumstances allow".

"We need to wait for that, but we will be seeking to contribute in whatever is the best way that we can," he told ABC News Breakfast.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-17/trump-repeats-he-is-not-happy-with-australia-hormuz-crisis/106574622

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7Z9Atwr1Uk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38916

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512401 (180930ZAPR26) Notable: Anthony Albanese rejects Donald Trump swipe at Australian involvement in Strait of Hormuz - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected criticism from US President Donald Trump over Australia’s role in the Strait of Hormuz, insisting there has been “no new requests” from Washington despite repeated claims from the White House. Albanese said the US had indicated it “has got this”, while Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed Australia was providing “defensive capability” at the request of the United Arab Emirates and was “not taking offensive action against Iran”. Defence Minister Richard Marles said no “specific request” had been received, as Treasurer Jim Chalmers also said he was unaware of any “formal request”. The dispute highlights a growing divergence in public messaging between the allies, with opposition figures warning the difference in understanding is “not a good thing” for the security relationship as tensions persist.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38823

>>38861

>>38914

Anthony Albanese rejects Donald Trump swipe at Australian involvement in Strait of Hormuz

THOMAS HENRY - 18 April 2026

Anthony Albanese has rejected US President Donald Trump’s swipe at Australia for failing to support efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, declaring there has still been “no new” request from Washington.

Fresh off a two-week charm offensive in southeast Asia aimed at shoring up the nation’s fuel and fertiliser supplies, the Prime Minister repeatedly evaded questions on Mr Trump’s latest broadside, claiming the President had made it clear the US “has got this”.

The government’s language on its engagement with the Trump administration over the Strait of Hormuz has morphed in recent days, from a blanket rejection of any request from the White House by Mr Albanese on Monday, to Defence Minister Richard Marles’ on Friday morning saying that there’d been no “specific” requests.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government had “made clear what we have been doing in terms of defensive operations in relation to this conflict”.

“We’ve made clear that we are not taking offensive action against Iran,” she told ABC.

“We haven’t had a formal request.”

Grilled on the change in language regarding a “formal” request and whether a request of any other nature had been made, Senator Wong said: “No”.

“I was making I think the same point the Deputy Prime Minister has made and we have been clear about what we have provided in response to this conflict which is defensive capability at the request of the UAE and that operates in defence of regional countries,” she said.

Mr Trump vented his frustration while departing the White House on Thursday local time saying:, “I’m not happy with Australia because they were not there when we asked them to be there.

“Australia is another one. They were not there having to do with Hormuz,” he said.

“So I’m not happy, I’m not happy with them.”

Speaking outside the Geelong oil refinery on Friday morning after a blaze crippled its petrol production capacity, Mr Albanese sidestepped a number of questions probing what Mr Trump had asked of Australia in its efforts to reopen the critical shipping route.

“That’s a question for Donald Trump by definition, rather than by myself … We’ve engaged with the US administration constructively (and) will continue to do so,” he said.

Pushed further on the issue, Mr Albanese said there had been “no new requests” and claimed Mr Trump had made clear the US did not require the assistance of allies.

“I refer to my previous answers day after day after day when I’ve been asked. They are exactly the same. There’s been no new requests at all. And indeed, President Trump has himself said that he has got this and he has made that ­position clear,” he said.

Earlier on Friday, Mr Marles said Washington had not made any “specific request in relation to the Strait of Hormuz” but refused to engage in a running commentary on Mr Trump’s hit-outs.

Jim Chalmers similarly said he was not aware of any “formal request along those lines” and was not interested in engaging in a public dispute with the President.

“I’m not interested in engaging in some kind of dispute with President Trump when it comes to these issues. The facts are, as I understand them, that a formal request hasn’t been made,” the Treasurer said in Washington.

Australia is set to take part in a virtual summit led by France and the UK on Friday night to map out a plan to safeguard shipping in the Strait of Hormuz after a ceasefire is struck.

According to French President Emmanuel Macron, the European-led coalition is comprised of “countries willing to contribute alongside us to a multinational peaceful mission aimed at restoring freedom of navigation in the strait”.

Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said the government had poorly managed its communication with the Trump administration, demanding clarity from Mr Albanese on what had been done to reconcile the “difference in understanding” with Australia’s largest ally.

“Clearly, the President has a different understanding of that, and it is not a good thing in our most important security alliance that there is a public difference of understanding between the US president and the Australian government,” he told Sky News.

“What steps has the Australian government and the Prime Minister taken to resolve this? Has the Prime Minister spoken to the President about this? Has he asked him why he keeps making these statements repeatedly, publicly?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-rejects-donald-trump-swipe-at-australian-involvement-in-strait-of-hormuz/news-story/3cae22ca9747fd78f1365330bfe7ffda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csl6loP6A0s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38917

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512402 (180939ZAPR26) Notable: Slammed by Trump in the morning, Albanese dials into call with Macron, Starmer on reopening the strait - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will join a call with European leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss restoring navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, amid renewed criticism from US President Donald Trump. Trump again said he was “not happy with Australia” for failing to assist, though he did not specify what was requested. Australian officials maintain there has been no request to join combat operations, noting Australia has contributed “defensive capacity” supporting the United Arab Emirates. Albanese reiterated there had been “no new requests”, while Defence Minister Richard Marles said none had been “specific”. The planned talks are expected to outline a potential “strictly defensive mission”, as Western allies weigh post-conflict measures to secure the vital shipping route.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38792

>>38793

>>38861

>>38880

>>38914

Slammed by Trump in the morning, Albanese dials into call with Macron, Starmer on reopening the strait

Paul Sakkal and Michael Koziol - April 17, 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will join a call with European leaders to signal their intent to help restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz after weeks of criticism from US that allies were not pulling their weight.

On Friday, President Donald Trump repeated his criticisms of Australia, claiming he was “not happy with Australia because they were not there when we asked them to be there”. He did not offer details on what he wanted from Australia.

Australian officials, who asked for anonymity, insisted the US had made no request of Australia to help combat Iran or to open the strait whose closure has crippled the global economy. Australia sent forces to help the UAE counter Iranian drones in what the government said was defensive capacity.

Trump said in response to a question from Sky News Australia while taking questions as he left the White House on Friday morning [AEST]: “They were not there having to do with Hormuz. So I’m not happy, I’m not happy with them.”

Albanese was forced to respond on Friday, ducking questions at his press conference at the Geelong refinery and saying: “There’s been no new requests at all.”

“That’s a question for president Trump. What my job is, is to engage constructively with the US administration. That’s what we do,” the prime minister told reporters at an oil refinery in Victoria.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles told ABC’s Radio National the US had made no “specific request”.

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said Albanese was “telling us one thing” but appeared at odds with the US. He declined to say if the Coalition supported Trump’s criticisms or if Australia should join the war against Iran.

Sources in the federal government said Australia’s approach to Trump was not to get too close to him, as leaders such as the UK’s Keir Starmer have tried this and suffered blowback. Trump’s increasingly erratic statements were best to be swerved or just endured, the sources said, while admitting Trump could punish Australia at some stage, even though the alliance is now embedded in the $368 billion AUKUS submarine pact.

Britain, France and others have said that joining the US blockade of the strait, designed to stop Iran exploiting its control of oil from the Middle East, would amount to entering the war. However, they have said they would help keep the strait open in the future if there were a ceasefire or the conflict ended.

French President Emmanuel Macron and Starmer will host a phone hook-up at 10pm Friday night, Australian time, joined by Albanese and several other world leaders.

Reuters news agency reported that a statement is expected at the end of the meeting to give a more tangible sense of what such a mission could entail.

“It can involve intelligence sharing, mine-clearance capabilities, military escorts, information procedures with neighbouring countries and more,” a French representative told reporters in Europe, according to Reuters. “The objective is clear, and the resources deployed will naturally depend on the situation.”

Macron said earlier this week: “This strictly defensive mission, separate from the warring parties to the conflict, is intended to be deployed as soon as circumstances permit.”

Australia boosted defence spending by $14 billion extra over the next four years in an announcement on Thursday. After pressure from the Trump administration for allies including Australia to hike military spending, Australia used an accounting change to estimate that defence spending would grow from about 2.8 per cent of GDP to just over 3 per cent by 2033.

Asked about the defence spending announcement, Trump initially said, “we’re gonna see what happens” and then spoke about the US success in Iran.

Asked again, he condemned Australia for not helping with the war.

“Australia is another one. They were not there having to do with Hormuz. So I’m not happy, I’m not happy with them,” he said.

He did not respond to further questions about whether he was still on good terms with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, speaking to reporters in Washington in the hour after Trump made the remarks, said they were consistent with sentiments the president had expressed in the past.

Chalmers, too, said he was not aware of a formal request from the US for Australia to assist in reopening the Strait of Hormuz as Trump described.

“It’s not unusual for President Trump to call for more investment from partners and allies when it comes to defence,” Chalmers said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/i-m-not-happy-trump-renews-criticism-of-australia-ignores-defence-spend-boost-20260417-p5zolt.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvEQm-oL1Og

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38918

File: e3ae039f50c0a97⋯.jpg (230.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 32f8910d4178242⋯.jpg (168.14 KB,1515x852,505:284,Clipboard.jpg)

File: beca2ce73763072⋯.jpg (173.87 KB,750x633,250:211,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c4dfb8010680d3⋯.jpg (99.26 KB,750x363,250:121,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78081e78171698f⋯.jpg (188.61 KB,814x361,814:361,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512409 (181003ZAPR26) Notable: Australia joins UK-France military mission to police Strait of Hormuz - Australia has signalled it is prepared to support a UK and France-led “strictly defensive” mission to secure the Strait of Hormuz, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese warned the global energy crisis is already impacting domestic supply chains. Albanese said Australia was “working around the clock” and remained prepared to assist, with further talks to determine contributions following a 49-nation summit led by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron. Australia has already deployed a Wedgetail E-7A aircraft to support defensive operations in the region. Leaders agreed reopening the strait was a “global necessity”, with plans for a mission focused on protecting shipping and mine clearance. US President Donald Trump criticised NATO allies on Truth Social, saying they were “useless when needed” and telling them to “stay away” unless they “just want to load up their ships with oil”, while confirming the US naval blockade would remain in force until a deal with Iran was complete.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38880

>>38914

>>38917

Australia joins UK-France military mission to police Strait of Hormuz

STELLA MCKENNA and LYDIA LYNCH - 18 April 2026

Anthony Albanese says Australia is prepared to support international efforts to secure the Strait of Hormuz, warning the global crisis is already being felt at home.

Speaking in Sydney on Saturday, the Prime Minister said the government was “working around the clock” to shield Australians from the fallout.

“Australia remains prepared to provide assistance,” Mr Albanese said, confirming further talks in London would determine what military and diplomatic support the country may contribute.

His comments came after he joined a 49-nation summit led by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, where leaders pushed for de-escalation and the urgent reopening of the vital shipping route.

Australia has already deployed a Wedgetail E-7A aircraft to the region, supporting defensive operations and helping protect Australian citizens in the area.

Mr Albanese said there was a “consistent approach” among global leaders that the strait must remain open.

He warned the impact of the disruption would linger, with delays, damaged infrastructure and ongoing security risks continuing to weigh on global supply chains.

“We want de-escalation. We want safe and open passage of trade … that is in Australia’s interests and in the interests of the world.”

Sir Keir and Mr Macron hosted a virtual summit on Friday night AEST with counterparts from more than 40 countries, including Mr Albanese. Neither the United States nor Iran participated.

Sir Keir said “as soon as conditions allow” a defensive military mission would be launched to “protect freedom of navigation” in the strait, through which 20 per cent of the world’s oil passes in peacetime

He said “over a dozen countries have already offered to contribute assets” adding the operation would be “strictly peaceful and defensive as a mission to reassure commercial shipping and support mine clearance”.

“Reopening the strait is a global necessity and a global responsibility,” Sir Keir said.

Mr Albanese joined the meeting to warn of the far-reaching consequences the war was having on the global economy.

“Australia and our Indo-Pacific partners are experiencing first-hand the impact of unprecedented disruptions to energy supply chains and impact on oil and fuel prices,” he said.

“Here, in Australia, we are working around the clock to shield Australians from the worst of the impacts.

“Australia is calling for the Strait of Hormuz to be fully reopened for all countries.”

Asked earlier this week if Australia could play a role in helping secure trade through the strait with Britain and France, Mr Albanese said “there are discussions taking place”.

“We have said that we want the Strait of Hormuz to be open and we’ve been a signatory, along with other countries, to statements along those lines,” he said.

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has confirmed her country would contribute “naval units” to the “purely defensive” mission. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said it would be “desirable” to have US participation in any mission but his country would “take part in the further military planning discussions that are taking place”.

Shortly after the meeting ended, US President Donald Trump told NATO allies to “stay away” from the Strait of Hormuz.

“Now that the Hormuz Strait situation is over, I received a call from NATO asking if we would need some help,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform.

“I TOLD THEM TO STAY AWAY, UNLESS THEY JUST WANT TO LOAD UP THEIR SHIPS WITH OIL.

“They were useless when needed, a Paper Tiger!”

While the virtual meeting was underway in Paris, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced the Strait of Hormuz would be been “completely open” to commercial shipping during the 10-day Israel-Lebanon ceasefire.

Donald Trump thanked Iran, but said the US navy blockade on Iranian ports would remain “in full force and effect” until his administration’s deal with the regime was “100 per cent complete”.

The Paris talks’ participants welcomed Tehran’s announcement of the strait’s reopening, but urged a “full, unconditional reopening by all the parties”, French President Emmanuel Macron said.

He said the announcement made the multinational mission “all the more important because it is what will allow these announcements to be consolidated in the short term and, above all, to have a chance of lasting.”

Mr Macron said the coalition would meet again next week.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/australia-could-join-ukfrance-military-mission-to-police-strait-of-hormuz/news-story/1e5d37e7faa08b05ba8fe10d923268d3

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/2045265967413113040

https://x.com/araghchi/status/2045121573124759713

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116420456436213944

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38919

File: 65edc1f9fc8241c⋯.jpg (5.64 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fe6e2cdf2d861f3⋯.jpg (3.44 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 421e4f9193e7231⋯.jpg (2.74 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fd9c11fb5934fca⋯.jpg (541.22 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512447 (181123ZAPR26) Notable: Albanese and Anwar find common ground in defending the Pope against Trump - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim have united in defending Pope Leo amid criticism from US President Donald Trump, while navigating tensions over the Iran war and its economic fallout. Speaking in Kuala Lumpur, Albanese described the Pope as a “thoughtful, dignified, and extraordinary person”, in remarks widely seen as an implicit rebuke of Trump, who had denounced the pontiff on social media as “weak on crime” and “terrible for foreign policy” and posted a since-deleted AI image depicting himself as a Jesus-like figure. Anwar said both leaders shared the Pope’s “desire for peace, for justice, and for an end to atrocities”. The talks focused on fuel and food security as the Strait of Hormuz crisis disrupts global supply chains, with Malaysia offering Australia priority access to excess fuel supplies. However, Anwar also defended ties with Iran and Russia, highlighting differing geopolitical positions as both nations seek stability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38864

>>38897

Albanese and Anwar find common ground in defending the Pope against Trump

Lisa Visentin - April 16, 2026

Kuala Lumpur: Separated by religion but united in their support for the Pope, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese backed in his Malaysian counterpart’s veiled criticism of US President Donald Trump’s war on Iran and his attacks on the Catholic leader.

Albanese was in Kuala Lumpur for urgent talks with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on fuel and food security concerns, triggered by a worsening energy crisis as Iran and the US fight to choke the critical shipping lane through the Strait of Hormuz.

Speaking at a joint media conference, the leaders found common ground in defending Pope Leo, who has ignited Trump’s rage for condemning the Iran war, even as the crisis has exposed their conflicting geopolitical leanings when it comes to relationships with Tehran and Moscow.

Albanese described the Pope as a “thoughtful, dignified, and extraordinary person” and a “very significant figure in global affairs” and said he was honoured to have met him last year.

The remarks will be widely interpreted as an implicit rebuke of Trump’s outburst this week when he denounced the pontiff on social media as being “weak on crime” and “terrible for foreign policy”, and posted a since-deleted AI image of himself as a Jesus-like figure.

Anwar, citing his Muslim faith and Albanese’s Catholic upbringing, said the two leaders otherwise shared the Pope’s “desire for peace, for justice, and for an end to atrocities”.

“I think any reasonable or sane person, and even I as a Muslim and Malaysians generally, certainly support the position taken by the Pope,” Anwar said.

Both men refrained from directly condemning Trump for his decision to wage war on Iran in concert with Israel, underscoring the delicate geopolitical tightrope they are walking as they grapple with the downstream consequence of strangled access to oil, diesel, fertiliser and food.

Standing beside his Australian guest, Anwar said he had assured Albanese that Australia would be given “primacy” in access to excess fuel supplies through Malaysia’s state-owned oil giant Petronas, but with the caveat that his own country’s requirements must first be met.

He also defended Malaysia’s “good relations” with Russia and Iran, which have been heavily sanctioned by the US and its allies, when asked for his views on buying oil from the two countries.

“My priority is to protect the interests of the people of this country,” Anwar said.

Malaysia recognises only sanctions imposed by the United Nations, not sanctions imposed by individual countries. It imports hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Russian oil and fuel each year, some of which is sold on to Australia, undermining Canberra’s commitment to sanctions against Moscow for waging war on Ukraine.

Anwar said Malaysia was using its ties with Tehran to advocate for peace and an opening of the strait, but signalled support for Iran’s call for guarantees against future US attacks as part of the negotiations to end the war.

“Whilst supporting the position of freedom of navigation, we also want guarantee from countries, big powers included, to end that animosity and attack and even sanctions against other countries,” he said.

It is a contrast with Australia’s severed relationship with the Islamic Republic, which prompted Canberra to expel Iran’s ambassador last year over the government’s links to antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

In Muslim-majority Malaysia, Israel’s war on Gaza is a visceral issue. While Albanese’s decision last year to formally recognise the State of Palestine has been contentious domestically, particularly among Jewish groups, it has been welcomed by Australia’s Muslim Asian neighbours, and drew praise from Anwar.

“I appreciate Australia’s stance on Gaza, calling for an end to hostilities, supporting humanitarian assistance and working towards a lasting resolution. That position matters,” he said.

https://archive.vn/mpCqe

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38920

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512455 (181137ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Worst nightmare’: 137 abuse charges hit Sydney childcare worker - (Video) A Sydney childcare worker has been charged with 137 offences spanning more than a decade, as federal police prepare to contact families of suspected victims following an extensive investigation into alleged child abuse material. The man faces 68 counts of producing child abuse material, 29 counts of filming a private act without consent, 29 counts of using a child under 14 to make abuse material, including 11 aggravated counts, seven counts of sexually touching a child under 10, and other related offences, with some carrying penalties of up to 20 years’ imprisonment. Authorities analysed 2.4 million files after being alerted by the US-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, with police warning many victims may be unaware they were targeted and the number of victims remains undisclosed. Detective Superintendent Luke Needham described the case as “a parent’s worst nightmare” and said specialist teams were preparing to support affected families, as further charges remain possible and investigations near completion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23939181 (pb)

>>38893

‘Worst nightmare’: 137 abuse charges hit Sydney childcare worker

JAMES DOWLING - April 17, 2026

1/2

Federal police are preparing to contact families of suspected child abuse victims, having accused a Sydney childcare worker of 137 offences over 16 years after trawling through millions of files and finding “a parent’s worst nightmare”.

The man was first charged with eight counts of using a child to make abusive material in July last year. A further 129 charges were laid on Friday at Parramatta Local Court.

He now faces 68 counts of producing child abuse material, 29 counts of filming a private act without consent, 29 counts of using a child under 14 to make child abuse material – 11 of which were aggravated – seven counts of sexually touching a child under 10, three counts of filming of a person’s private parts without consent-aggravated and one count of possessing child abuse material collected through a carriage service.

Number of alleged victims undisclosed

Authorities have not said how many alleged victims and how many childcare centres are affected.

The man has not yet entered a plea.

Each charge against him is a jailable offence, with aggravated use of a child under 14 in abuse material carrying up to 20 years in prison.

It is understood police are preparing to argue his offending was opportunistic and many of his victims likely would not know they had been abused. He seemingly did not share the alleged abuse material, but had access to other material he did not produce himself.

There was “no evidence of any sexual assault taking place” beyond the alleged touching and filming of children, according to AFP detective superintendent Luke Needham.

More charges could be laid as police finishing processing all the files.

The man did not apply for bail and will return to court on July 17.

‘Worst nightmare’

“We know matters like this are a parent’s worst nightmare, and we have investigators and digital forensic experts working around the clock,” Mr Needham said.

“We are only a few weeks away from concluding the review of the 2.4 million files, and at that point in time the AFP and our state partners will be ready to talk to impacted families and victims.

“The AFP has trained professionals to speak to impacted families and victims. We understand this is going to be a traumatic time for parents, and we just ask for patience.”

Police were first alerted by the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, a private US company acting as a digital clearing house, which reported an online user syncing a child abuse file to a Google cloud service.

Investigators processed and analysed 2.4 million files after the childcare worker was served with a warrant on June 20 last year.

“The victim identification process in alleged child abuse matters is a painstaking and detailed process that can take months to carry out, but it is crucial we identify all the victims and capture the evidence in a way that will stand up to the rigours of a criminal trial,” Mr Needham said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38921

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512470 (181145ZAPR26) Notable: US ex-Marine loses extradition appeal in China pilots case - (Video) Former US Marine pilot Daniel Duggan has lost an appeal in an Australian court against his extradition to the United States, where he faces charges of illegally training Chinese military pilots. Duggan, 57, has been in custody since his 2022 arrest in regional New South Wales after returning from China, and denies the allegations. The US claims he committed offences between 2009 and 2012, including breaching an arms embargo and money laundering linked to pilot training in South Africa. Federal Court Justice James Stellios rejected arguments that the conduct was not illegal under Australian law at the time. Duggan’s wife urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to intervene, while his legal team has 28 days to consider further appeal. The case has drawn attention to foreign military training links and Australia’s tightened laws in this area.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38898

US ex-Marine loses extradition appeal in China pilots case

straitstimes.com - Apr 16, 2026

CANBERRA – A former US Marine pilot lost an appeal on April 16 in an Australian court against his extradition to the United States, which has accused him of illegally training Chinese military pilots to land on aircraft carriers.

Daniel Duggan, 57, has been held in prison since his arrest in a rural town in New South Wales state in 2022, shortly after he returned from living in China for close to a decade as an aviation consultant.

Duggan has denied the US charges.

His arrest came days after Britain warned its former military pilots not to work for a South African flight training school that was training large numbers of Chinese pilots, where Duggan had worked a decade earlier.

Outside the court on April 16, his wife Saffrine said she was disappointed with the ruling and urged Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to stop the extradition, which has already been approved by the Attorney-General.

“Our prime minister can overrule this at any time,” she said.

Duggan’s legal team said it had 28 days to consider whether to make another legal appeal.

He is alleged by the US to have committed four offences between 2009 and 2012 in relation to training pilots in South Africa, including breaking a US arms embargo and money laundering.

A 2017 indictment in the United States, unsealed after his arrest, showed Duggan was one of several former military pilots linked to the South African company and a Chinese recruiter who were alleged to have broken the US law.

Federal court judge James Stellios did not accept the argument made by Duggan’s legal team that the US offences were not illegal acts in Australia at the time.

Duggan’s lawyers had argued there was no evidence the Chinese pilots he trained had worked for the military.

The Chinese state aviation giant they worked for, AVIC, has since been sanctioned by the US as a Chinese military-linked company.

Duggan moved to China from Australia in 2013.

His lawyers have previously said he was barred by China from leaving in 2014 and came to fear for his family’s safety.

Duggan came to the attention of US investigators through his e-mails to a Chinese national, Su Bin, who was recruiting western ex-military pilots.

Su Bin was convicted in the US in 2016 for hacking US defence contractors.

Duggan is a naturalised Australian citizen and renounced his US citizenship at the Beijing embassy in 2016, seeking to backdate it to 2012, a Sydney court previously heard.

Australia toughened its laws on former defence staff training foreign militaries seen as a security risk in 2023.

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/australianz/us-ex-marine-loses-extradition-appeal-in-china-pilots-case

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCVpyYuabaQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38922

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24512473 (181150ZAPR26) Notable: Ex-US Marine loses extradition appeal over Chinese pilot training allegations - (Video) Former US Marine Corps pilot Daniel Duggan has lost his appeal against extradition to the United States, where he faces allegations of illegally training Chinese military aviators more than a decade ago. Federal Court Justice James Stellios ruled there was no jurisdictional error in the 2024 decision by then attorney-general Mark Dreyfus to approve extradition. Duggan, who denies the allegations and describes them as “political posturing”, is accused of providing training in South Africa without the required licence and receiving payments and travel benefits. He has been held in maximum security custody since his 2022 arrest in New South Wales. His wife said the family was “very disappointed” and would consider further legal action, while also urging Attorney-General Michelle Rowland to intervene and reverse the extradition order.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38898

Ex-US Marine loses extradition appeal over Chinese pilot training allegations

Mr Duggan is fighting extradition to the United States over allegations he illegally trained Chinese military aviators

Rod McGuirk - 16 April 2026

An Australian judge has dismissed an appeal by Daniel Duggan, a former US Marine Corps pilot, who is fighting extradition to the United States over allegations he illegally trained Chinese military aviators more than a decade ago.

Mr Duggan is accused of training Chinese military pilots while working for the Test Flying Academy of South Africa. He denies the allegations, calling them "political posturing" and claiming the US unfairly singled him out.

Federal Court Justice James Stellios ruled no jurisdictional error was made in 2024 by then Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in ordering Duggan's extradition.

Outside the Canberra court, Duggan’s wife, Saffrine Duggan, a mother of six, said his lawyers would consider a further appeal. They are also urging the current Attorney-General, Michelle Rowland, to reverse the extradition order.

“We are very disappointed by this ruling and we will consider our options carefully. But make no mistake, we will not give up,” Saffrine Duggan said. “Today does not end our search for justice.”

Rowland’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A 2016 indictment from the U.S. District Court in Washington, which was unsealed in late 2022, alleges Duggan conspired with others to provide training to Chinese military pilots in 2010 and 2012, and possibly other times, without applying for an appropriate license.

Prosecutors allege Duggan received about nine payments totaling around 88,000 Australian dollars ($61,000) from another conspirator as well as travel to the U.S., South Africa and China for what was sometimes described as “personal development training.”

Duggan, who is 57 and was born in Boston, has been held in maximum security prisons since he was arrested in 2022 at a supermarket near his family home in New South Wales.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/daniel-duggan-extradition-appeal-australia-b2958787.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQoUlL0hCM4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38923

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515519 (191156ZAPR26) Notable: Protesters arrested at Brisbane pro-Palestine rally featuring banned phrase - (Video) Police have arrested 20 people at a pro-Palestine rally in Brisbane after protesters chanted and displayed phrases banned under Queensland’s new hate speech laws. Hundreds gathered near the Supreme Court to oppose the legislation, with arrests made after a banner reading “from the river to the sea” was unveiled and later removed by officers. Authorities laid 14 charges for displaying a prohibited expression and seven for reciting one, with the laws outlawing certain phrases when used to menace or offend. Premier David Crisafulli said people were free to protest but not to call for others to be “erased, eradicated, exterminated”. The arrests follow earlier charges under the laws, including one against a protester outside Parliament House last month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24235860 (pb)

>>38902

Protesters arrested at Brisbane pro-Palestine rally featuring banned phrase

abc.net.au - 18 April 2026

Police have arrested 20 people at a pro-Palestine rally in Brisbane where protesters intentionally chanted banned slogans.

Hundreds of pro-Palestine protesters gathered near Brisbane's Supreme Court on Saturday to voice objections to Queensland's hate speech laws.

During the protest, a group unveiled a banner featuring the banned phrase "from the river to the sea".

Several minutes later police removed the banner, and a number of people who were holding it up were led away.

Queensland police confirmed 20 people had been arrested on 14 charges of display prohibited expression and 7 charges of recite prohibited expression.

The phrases "from the river to the sea" and "globalise the intifada" are outlawed in the state when used to menace or offend.

Premier David Crisafulli said people were still allowed to protest.

"I encourage people to protest and call for change, if that's what they believe in," he said.

"We just don't want people to call for a type of people to be erased, eradicated, exterminated after all that's happened over the years."

Before Saturday, at least three people had been arrested in Queensland after the hate speech laws came into effect last month.

Liam Parry, 33, became the first person arrested and charged under the new laws, over a protest outside Queensland's Parliament House on March 11.

Mr Parry is facing one count of reciting or publicly displaying a prohibited expression that is reasonably expected to menace, harass or offend a member of the public.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-18/protesters-arrested-at-pro-palestine-rally/106579810

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXgPh9HMbFs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38924

File: 313e714dc7bad0b⋯.mp4 (15.9 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515545 (191211ZAPR26) Notable: Australia and Japan seal $10 billion warship deal with 3 Mogami frigates ordered first - (Video) Australia and Japan have signed a $10 billion deal for a new fleet of Mogami-class frigates, with the first three to be built in Japan and delivered within three years as part of a major naval upgrade. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will construct the initial vessels, while a further eight are planned to be built in Western Australia. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the acquisition would deliver a “larger and more lethal surface combat fleet” at the fastest pace ever for the Royal Australian Navy, with the first ship due in 2029. The vessels will replace ageing ANZAC-class frigates and feature advanced missile systems and reduced crew requirements. Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said the agreement marked a “major step” in defence cooperation, strengthening ties as both nations deepen strategic alignment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38764

>>38852

Australia and Japan seal $10 billion warship deal with 3 Mogami frigates ordered first

Associated Press - Apr 18, 2026

Australia and Japan signed contracts on Saturday to deliver the first three of a $10 billion fleet of Japanese-designed warships, with the first due for delivery in three years.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will build the first three Mogami-class frigates in Japan. Australia plans to build another eight in a shipyard in Western Australia state.

Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi and his Australian counterpart Richard Marles attended a signing ceremony aboard the Mogami-class frigate JS Kumano, which is part of the Japan Maritime Self-Defence Force, docked off the Australian city of Melbourne.

The Kumano had taken part in the recent Exercise Kakadu, biennial multinational maritime drills hosted by Australia.

Australia announced in August last year that the Japanese bid had won the contract to provide Australia's next generation of general purpose frigates over Germany's MEKO A-200 from Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems.

The deal gave a major boost to Japan's still-underdeveloped defence industry after it lost out on Australia's submarine contract to a French company in 2016.

The Japanese-designed fleet will replace Australia's ageing ANZAC-class frigates that are considered increasingly vulnerable to modern missile and drone attack.

Marles said the Japanese frigates were a major step toward delivering Australia with a larger and more lethal surface combat fleet. The first of the Mogami-class frigates is due to arrive in Australia in 2029.

"The timeframe that we've announced is the fastest acquisition of a surface combatant into service in the Royal Australian Navy ever, and so this is a very rapid timeframe," Marles told reporters.

Japan has been accelerating its military build-up while expanding its defence ties beyond its only treaty ally, the United States. It now considers Australia to be a semi-ally.

Marles said Australia welcomed Japan's relaxation of export controls on defence equipment and technology with "trusted partners like Australia".

"Japan is an industrial powerhouse and it offers so much opportunity for Australia and the development of our own defence industry as the Mogami project represents," Marles said.

Koizumi said that the introduction of Japanese vessels into the Australian navy meant "a major step is finally being taken to elevate our bilateral defence cooperation to a greater height".

He said Japan continued to be Australia's "indispensable partner" in a new Australian defence strategy announced this week, in which $53 billion will be added to the defence budget over a decade.

Koizumi said a "decisive factor" in Australia choosing the Japanese frigate was that it could be operated with just 90 personnel, around half the crew of Australia's current ANZAC-class version.

Australia says its Mogami-class frigates will be equipped with surface-to-air and anti-shipping missiles and could operate combat helicopters. They will be crewed by 92 sailors and officers.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/australia-japan-sign-historic-10-billion-warship-deal-with-3-mogami-frigates-ordered-first/0beac358-8c84-4faa-8f6f-01612f310767

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38925

File: b75c46c2282a619⋯.jpg (213.94 KB,1280x733,1280:733,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515562 (191218ZAPR26) Notable: Japan reportedly seals largest-ever postwar defense deal with frigate sale to Australia; move exposes Tokyo’s dangerous overconfidence, risks jeopardizing regional security: experts - "Tokyo signed a contract on Saturday with Canberra to supply the first three of a planned fleet of 11 upgraded Mogami-class frigates to the Australian Navy, the largest defense export contract in Japan's postwar history, Japan Times reported, and the was described by Reuters as "Tokyo's most consequential military sale since ending a military export ban in 2014," which signals Japan's push away from postwar pacifism and a move "to counter China." The sale deal risks intensifying an arms race in the Asia-Pacific, Chinese experts said, adding that Japan, by doing so, is misjudging the situation and being overconfident on its part in its capabilities and security environment - assuming it can expand its military role at will without jeopardizing its own security, Chinese experts said. ... For Japan, the ability to export offensive weapons marks a fundamental breach of the "three principles on transfer of defense equipment and technology", enabling a major step in exporting advanced arms and moving toward becoming a major arms exporter. If such vessels are deployed near the South China Sea, they could also affect China, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times. It is actually Japan's ulterior motive to exporting weapons to China's neighbors to complicate regional security reality and indirectly counter China, Song pointed out, slamming Japan's dangerous militaristic resurgence. However, Song believes by doing so, Japan is overconfident in its capabilities of managing the situation - assuming it can expand its military role without risking domestic security. Such misplaced confidence could lead to serious strategic misjudgment, Song added. ... Song said that under the umbrella of the US Asia-Pacific strategy, Japan and Australia are growing closer. However, Australia needs to recognize that if it chooses to interfere in East Asian affairs, a place far away from itself, by joining hands with Japan to counter China - it would be seen as a reckless and self-damaging move." - Zhao Yusha and Xia Wenxin, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23959526 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23959526 (pb)

>>38924

Japan reportedly seals largest-ever postwar defense deal with frigate sale to Australia; move exposes Tokyo’s dangerous overconfidence, risks jeopardizing regional security: experts

Zhao Yusha and Xia Wenxin - Apr 18, 2026

1/2

Tokyo signed a contract on Saturday with Canberra to supply the first three of a planned fleet of 11 upgraded Mogami-class frigates to the Australian Navy, the largest defense export contract in Japan's postwar history, Japan Times reported, and the was described by Reuters as "Tokyo's most consequential military sale since ending a military export ban in 2014," which signals Japan's push away from postwar pacifism and a move "to counter China."

The sale deal risks intensifying an arms race in the Asia-Pacific, Chinese experts said, adding that Japan, by doing so, is misjudging the situation and being overconfident on its part in its capabilities and security environment—assuming it can expand its military role at will without jeopardizing its own security, Chinese experts said.

Australian defense minister Richard Marles and his Japanese counterpart Shinjiro Koizumi signed a memorandum "reaffirming the Australian and Japanese governments' shared commitment to the successful delivery" of the warships, Marles said in a statement, per Reuters.

Japan's ministry of defense posted on X that "the two ministers confirmed their commitment to further strengthening Japan-Australia defense cooperation, taking into account the announcement of Australia's National Defence Strategy and the conclusion of the contract for Australia's Multi-Role Frigates, among other developments."

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is to supply the Royal Australian Navy with three upgraded Mogami-class multi-role frigates built in Japan from 2029. Eight more frigates will be built in Australia, Reuters reported.

Contracts were signed for the first three frigates, to be built in Japan, before there is a "transition to an onshore build" at the Henderson shipyard near Perth in Western Australia, Marles said, according to Reuters.

Reuters said the deal anchors Japan's push away from its postwar pacifism to forge security ties beyond its alliance with the US to counter China.

Under the current "three principles on transfer of defense equipment and technology", exports of weapons with lethal capabilities are restricted, but transfers are permitted if they are for the purpose of joint development and production. The new vessels are scheduled to be built in Japan initially, effectively amounting to an export of escort ships, Japan's Kyodo News reported.

Japan regards Australia, a US ally, as a "quasi-ally" and places importance on it as a partner in the Indo-Pacific region. Through the joint development of the new vessels, Japan aims to strengthen defense cooperation between the two countries, Kyodo News claimed.

Japan Times also reported that "in a major breakthrough for Japan's defense industry, Tokyo on Saturday reached a landmark agreement with Canberra."

For Japan, the ability to export offensive weapons marks a fundamental breach of the "three principles on transfer of defense equipment and technology", enabling a major step in exporting advanced arms and moving toward becoming a major arms exporter. If such vessels are deployed near the South China Sea, they could also affect China, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times.

It is actually Japan's ulterior motive to exporting weapons to China's neighbors to complicate regional security reality and indirectly counter China, Song pointed out, slamming Japan's dangerous militaristic resurgence.

However, Song believes by doing so, Japan is overconfident in its capabilities of managing the situation - assuming it can expand its military role without risking domestic security. Such misplaced confidence could lead to serious strategic misjudgment, Song added.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38926

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515570 (191226ZAPR26) Notable: Accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith ‘categorically’ denies allegations - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has issued his first public statement since being granted bail, saying he “categorically” denies war crimes allegations and will fight to clear his name. Speaking after his release from custody, Roberts-Smith criticised what he called a “deliberately sensational arrest” at Sydney Airport and pleaded for privacy for his family, particularly his children. He faces charges over the alleged murders of unarmed Afghan detainees, with prosecutors claiming some victims were handcuffed and that evidence was staged to portray killings as lawful. Court documents also reveal testimony from soldiers granted immunity who allege they acted on his orders. Roberts-Smith said he acted within the rules of engagement and remains “extremely proud” of his service, as the case moves toward a complex and lengthy trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith ‘categorically’ denies allegations

Michael McGowan - April 19, 2026

1/2

Accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith has issued his first public statement since his release from a Sydney jail on bail last week to categorically deny allegations against him and plead for privacy, hitting out at police over what he described as his “deliberately sensational arrest” at Sydney Airport.

Roberts-Smith was released from Silverwater Correctional Complex on Friday evening, having spent 10 days in custody. His release was marked by chaotic scenes as NSW Corrective Services officers sought to escort him out through a back exit of the facility to avoid a waiting media throng.

Speaking from the Gold Coast on Sunday, Roberts-Smith said he categorically denied the accusations against him.

“For the past 10 years my family and I have been subject to a campaign to convince Australians that I’ve acted improperly in my service in Afghanistan,” he said.

“As I’ve always maintained, I categorically deny all these allegations. While I would’ve preferred these charges not have been brought, I will be taking this opportunity to finally clear my name.”

The decorated SAS soldier was arrested last week following a five-year investigation by the secretive Office of the Special Investigator, a team of experienced state and federal police detectives set up in 2021 to investigate the involvement of Australian troops in alleged war crimes in Afghanistan.

He also pleaded for privacy, particularly for his children, whom he said had “already unfortunately suffered” due to what he called the “deliberate, sensational arrest” after arriving at Sydney Airport on a flight from Brisbane on April 7. It was, he said, “an unnecessary spectacle”.

Roberts-Smith was charged with multiple war crimes over the alleged murders of unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners.

Court documents, released after the hearing on Friday, reveal prosecutors will allege that five people killed by, or on the orders of, the decorated soldier had been unarmed and handcuffed, and evidence was then staged to portray their deaths as legal.

Four Australian soldiers admitted they killed Afghan nationals on the orders of Ben Roberts-Smith and have given detailed evidence to prosecutors in the case against him, court documents allege.

The testimony of the soldiers, who have been granted immunity from prosecution, was revealed in a police statement of facts.

The documents also revealed new details about one of the alleged victims, including how he was punched in the stomach and pushed to the ground while handcuffed by the Victoria Cross recipient, who then ordered the man to be shot.

On Sunday, Roberts-Smith maintained he was proud of his service in Afghanistan.

“While I was there I always acted within my values, within my training, and within the rules of engagement,” he said.

“I’d also like to say that I’m extremely proud of all of the men and women who served alongside me in Afghanistan, and their service and sacrifice should never be forgotten. Particularly those who made the ultimate sacrifice, many of whom were my friends.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38927

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515576 (191232ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith makes first public comments since war crime charges - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has issued his first public comments since being charged with five counts of war crime murder, saying he “categorically” denies the allegations and will fight to clear his name. Speaking from the Gold Coast after his release on bail, Roberts-Smith said he and his family had faced a decade-long “campaign” against him and described his arrest as a “deliberate, sensational” and “unnecessary spectacle”. He said he acted within his training and the rules of engagement in Afghanistan and was “extremely proud” of his service and those he served with. Roberts-Smith, who did not take questions, remains subject to strict bail conditions including regular police reporting, as he awaits a lengthy legal process over allegations he unlawfully killed unarmed Afghan civilians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38926

Ben Roberts-Smith makes first public comments since war crime charges

The ex-SAS soldier has made a huge claim in his first comments since being charged with the alleged war crime of murder.

Ria Pandey - April 19, 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith has made his first public statement since being charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, allegedly committed while he served in the Australian Special Air Services in Afghanistan.

The Victoria Cross recipient told reporters on Sunday: “For the past 10 years my family and I have been subject to a campaign to convince Australians that I’ve acted improperly in my service in Afghanistan.”

“As I’ve always maintained, I categorically deny all these allegations. And while I would’ve preferred these charges not have been brought, I will be taking this opportunity to finally clear my name,” he said.

Mr Roberts-Smith said he was proud of his service in Afghanistan.

“While I was there, I always acted within my values, within my training and within the rules of engagement,” he said.

Mr Roberts-Smith was “extremely proud” of the men and women who served alongside him in Afghanistan, particularly those who he said paid the “ultimate sacrifice”, he said.

He thanked his family, as well as his supporters, whose well-wishes meant a “great deal” to him and were “extremely humbling”.

Mr Roberts-Smith said his children and family “already unfortunately suffered” due to what he described as a “deliberate, sensational arrest” on April 7.

He described the encounter as “an unnecessary spectacle” and asked the media to give his family privacy.

“I understand this journey will be long, I understand this journey will be difficult,” he said.

“But I can promise everybody that I have never run from a fight in my life. I will never give up, and I will always be in the fight.”

Mr Roberts-Smith made the comments to the media, speaking from the Gold Coast, where he had travelled after being freed from Sydney’s Silverwater Correctional Centre on Friday.

He did not take any questions.

Mr Roberts-Smith spent nine nights in custody on remand before Judge Greg Grogin granted him bail.

He is accused of war crimes linked to his Afghanistan service, including the alleged unlawful killing of unarmed Afghan civilians during SAS operations. He has not entered pleas to the charges but has consistently maintained his innocence.

Mr Roberts-Smith is now living under conditions that include regular police reporting and restricted movements.

Under his bail conditions, he must report to the local police station three times a week, beginning Monday, while the legal process continues.

https://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/ben-robertssmith-to-make-first-public-comments-since-war-crime-charges/news-story/7678d453904702951589bcf70cb0902d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUgPCE052hw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38928

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515579 (191236ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith issues first statement after his release from Sydney jail on bail - (Video) Former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has publicly denied war crimes allegations, vowing to use a criminal trial to clear his name after being released on bail. Speaking on the Gold Coast, the Victoria Cross recipient described his arrest as a “sensational” and “unnecessary spectacle” and said he had been the target of a decade-long “campaign” against him. He faces five charges of war crime murder over alleged killings of unarmed Afghan nationals between 2009 and 2012, which he denies, saying he acted within the “rules of engagement”. Roberts-Smith thanked his family and supporters, while refusing to take questions. A review is underway into his prison release after officers attempted to shield him from media, as he remains subject to strict bail conditions ahead of further court proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38926

Ben Roberts-Smith issues first statement after his release from Sydney jail on bail

Victoria Pengilley - 19 April 2026

Decorated war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith has publicly denied all allegations against him, vowing to use a criminal trial to clear his name.

The 47-year-old addressed the media on the Gold Coast on Sunday - for the first time since his bail release from a Sydney jail - categorically rejecting the charges of war crime of murder.

The former soldier said his case was "unprecedented", describing his arrest at Sydney Airport earlier this month as a "sensational" and "unnecessary spectacle".

"For the past 10 years, my family and I have been subject to a campaign to convince Australians that I've acted improperly in my service in Afghanistan," he said.

"As I've always maintained, I categorically deny all of these allegations, and while I would've preferred these charges not be brought, I will be taking the opportunity to finally clear my name.

"I have never run from a fight in my life. I will never give up, and I will always be in the fight."

He refused to take questions.

The Victoria Cross recipient has been charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, related to what investigators allege were unarmed Afghan nationals in 2009 and 2012.

He has not yet entered a plea and has previously denied the allegations throughout a lengthy defamation case against Nine newspapers, a case which he ultimately lost.

Roberts-Smith says he acted 'within the rules of engagement'

On Sunday he said he was proud of his time in Afghanistan, praising his fellow soldiers.

"While I was there, [Afghanistan] I always acted within my values, within my training, within the rules of engagement.

"I'd also like to say that I'm extremely proud of all the men and women that served alongside me in Afghanistan and their service and sacrifice should never be forgotten, particularly those who made the ultimate sacrifice, many of whom were my friends."

Standing by his side was his partner, Sarah Matulin, who he thanked, along with her family, for their "unwavering support".

He also extended his gratitude to his "beautiful daughters" and his parents, Len and Sue Roberts-Smith, who have supported him during his many court appearances.

"I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank the millions of Australians who have reached out to me publicly and privately to offer their support and well wishes. It means a great deal to me and is extremely humbling."

Mr Roberts-Smith was released from Sydney's Silverwater Correctional jail on Friday evening before travelling back to Queensland.

Review into handling of release

Earlier on Friday, Local Court Judge Greg Grogin granted bail on a set of strict conditions and a $250,000 security deposit, saying it would likely take years before the matter was resolved.

A review has been launched into the handling of his exit from jail after it appeared that corrective services staff were shielding him from public view.

At one stage, vision from the scene showed officers interfering with a photographer on public property.

Corrective Services NSW has since said the measures were necessary to ensure the safety of the high-profile inmate and the public.

Corrections Minister Anoulack Chanthivong said he expected any breaches of protocol to be addressed.

Mr Roberts-Smith's case is expected back in court on June 5.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-19/ben-roberts-smith-issues-first-statement-after-bail-release/106581144

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hctJAZSrnro

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38929

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24515597 (191246ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith’s lawyers consider making a bid to stop his war crimes trial - Lawyers for former Special Air Service corporal Ben Roberts-Smith are considering a bid to permanently halt his war crimes prosecution, arguing extensive pre-trial publicity could prevent a fair trial. Roberts-Smith, who faces five counts of war crime murder over alleged killings in Afghanistan, has denied the allegations and described his arrest as a “deliberate, sensational” and “unnecessary spectacle”. His legal team is examining a permanent stay application, which would end proceedings entirely, citing the “extraordinary” level of media attention surrounding the case. Similar applications in high-profile cases have previously failed, though courts have delayed trials to address fairness concerns. Roberts-Smith remains on strict bail conditions and said he would “never give up” as the case, expected to take years, progresses toward potential trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38926

Ben Roberts-Smith’s lawyers consider making a bid to stop his war crimes trial

ELLIE DUDLEY and LIAM MENDES - 19 April 2026

1/2

Lawyers for murder-accused Ben Roberts-Smith are considering an application to permanently halt proceedings because of concerns that he may not get a fair trial, as the decorated soldier condemned the “unnecessary spectacle” caused by police arresting him in front of his daughters at Sydney airport.

In a statement delivered to reporters on Sunday, Mr Roberts-Smith vowed to fight the five war crime charges brought against him, saying he had been targeted as part of a decade-long “campaign” painting his conduct in ­Afghanistan as improper.

The Australian understands that while it could be years before Mr Roberts-Smith faces trial, his legal team, led by criminal solicitor Karen Espiner, is examining the prospect of a permanent stay application because of exceptional media attention on the case.

A successful application would stop the legal proceeding from continuing for good. If it proceeds to trial, the matter must be heard before a jury because it is a commonwealth offence. The jury must reach a unanimous decision.

Mr Roberts-Smith addressed the media directly on Sunday for the first time since his “deliberate, sensational” arrest aboard a ­Qantas flight.

“I understand this is an unprecedented case and the public interest is huge and the media has a job to do, which they should be allowed to do,” he said. “But I would ask that the media please allow my family their privacy at this time.”

Standing alongside his partner, Sarah Matulin, outside the property to which he was bailed on Friday, Mr Roberts-Smith said while he would have preferred the ­charges were never brought, he would “be taking this opportunity to finally clear my name”.

“I’m proud of my service in ­Afghanistan. While I was there, I always acted within my values, within my training, and within the rules of engagement,” he said.

Mr Roberts-Smith also thanked the Australians who had reached out to him with words of support and well wishes, saying it meant a “great deal” to him and was “extremely humbling”.

He thanked Ms Matulin and her family, his two daughters and his parents.

“I understand this journey will be long, I understand this journey will be difficult,” he said. “But I can promise everybody I have never run from a fight in my life.

“I will never give up, and I will always be in the fight.”

The only other man to be charged in Australia over alleged war crimes, Oliver Schulz, is down for a five-month trial from February next year on one count of murdering an unarmed Afghan.

He was first arrested in 2023.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38930

File: 5222166e5fb9296⋯.jpg (3.66 MB,5184x3456,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24518282 (200915ZAPR26) Notable: Australia’s plea to Iran and US as Strait of Hormuz closes again - Australia has urged Iran and the United States to intensify negotiations after the Strait of Hormuz was closed again, with Iranian forces firing on vessels just a day after reopening the key shipping route. Defence Minister Richard Marles described the escalation as a “disappointing development” and called for diplomatic efforts to turn a fragile ceasefire into a permanent resolution to restore global fuel supply chains. The closure has heightened risks to global energy markets, with ships turning back after coming under fire. US President Donald Trump accused Iran of breaching the ceasefire and warned the US could target infrastructure if a deal is not reached. Australia is preparing to assist international efforts to secure the strait while launching a $1 billion emergency loan program to support businesses affected by the fuel crisis.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38880

>>38900

>>38917

>>38918

Australia’s plea to Iran and US as Strait of Hormuz closes again

Matthew Knott - April 19, 2026

1/2

Australia is calling on Iran and the United States to intensify efforts to negotiate an end to their war after the Iranian regime again closed off the Strait of Hormuz and began firing at ships, just a day after reopening the critical waterway.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) announced on Sunday that it would prevent ships passing through the strait while a US blockade on Iranian ports remains in place, a move Iran says violates the terms of a ceasefire agreement.

As the regime claimed victory in the war, Iranian state media confirmed reports that two Indian ships came under fire and had to turn around after trying to pass through the strait over the weekend, underlining the precarious situation in an area crucial to the global oil trade.

The Australian government will on Monday open an emergency loan program to help businesses hit by the fuel crisis, as Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Sunday the closure of the strait was “a disappointing development” that highlighted the fragile nature of the ceasefire agreement struck this month.

“I think what we need to see now is every diplomatic avenue being pursued to turn this temporary ceasefire into one that is permanent, to obviously open the Strait of Hormuz, to return the global fuel supply chain to normality and to put events on a pathway to peace,” Marles told the ABC’s Insiders.

“That’s certainly what’s in Australia’s interest. It’s obviously what’s in the world’s interests, and that that’s really the direction that we need to see events take.”

The current ceasefire is set to expire within days, heaping pressure on Iran and the US to make progress to prevent a return to full-scale combat.

US President Donald Trump said that American negotiators will be in Pakistan on Monday for talks with Iran.

Trump, in a post on social media Sunday, didn’t detail which officials the US would send to a second round of in-person talks with Iran in Islamabad. The White House and office of US Vice President JD Vance, who led the first round of talks, didn’t immediately respond to messages Sunday morning.

In his post, Trump accused Iran of violating the ceasefire agreement by firing bullets on Saturday in the Strait of Hormuz and threatened to destroy civilian infrastructure in Iran if it doesn’t take the deal that the US is offering.

“If they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran,” Trump wrote.

Marles said he would not “second guess” the US decision to block ships from leaving Iranian ports, describing it as “a reaction to the fundamental decision that Iran has made to block the Strait of Hormuz”.

“I can understand the American reaction to that,” he said.

“They are the ones who are in the midst of whatever negotiations are happening right now, and ultimately what we want to see is the Strait of Hormuz open.”

As the government prepares for another meeting this week to co-ordinate global efforts to safeguard the strait, Marles said that “we are clearly going to help”.

Australia will join a military planning conference to be held in London this week after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined dozens of world leaders on a phone hook-up on Friday night to begin co-ordinating efforts to allow safe passage through the strait when the conflict ends.

Marles declined to comment on exactly what assistance Australia would provide.

“There is a lot of thought going on about what kind of operation there might be when circumstances allow,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38931

File: dc6b4a4ef5c7af7⋯.jpg (178.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24518286 (200923ZAPR26) Notable: Australia ‘hostage’ to US-Iran war with potentially ‘severe’ consequences, warns Jim Chalmers - Treasurer Jim Chalmers has warned Australia’s economy is effectively “hostage” to decisions made by the United States and Iran, with the Middle East war expected to drive higher inflation, rising unemployment and slower growth. Chalmers said the outlook depended on how quickly the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened and global conditions stabilised, noting Treasury was modelling downside scenarios including more severe economic disruptions. He described recent developments as a “wild ride”, with progress towards a ceasefire quickly reversing, adding the consequences were already “serious” and could become “severe”. The warning comes ahead of the May budget, where Chalmers confirmed curbing growth in the National Disability Insurance Scheme would form the “most important” savings measure, amid concerns the program’s rapid expansion is becoming unsustainable.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

>>38896

Australia ‘hostage’ to US-Iran war with potentially ‘severe’ consequences, warns Jim Chalmers

ROSIE LEWIS - 20 April 2026

Jim Chalmers has warned Australia’s economy is hostage to decisions made by the US and Iran, with expectations weeks out from the May 12 budget that inflation and unemployment will increase while the economy slows.

The Treasurer said the consequences of the war in the Middle East risked becoming severe, after meeting with G20 finance ministers in Washington last week who were frustrated about how long the conflict had been going on.

The caution on Australia’s economy came as Dr Chalmers conceded the $50bn National Disability Insurance Scheme was “easily the most important part of the savings package” he would deliver in the budget, announcing he would meet virtually with his state counterparts on Tuesday ahead of the government revealing how it would rein in the program’s massive growth.

Dr Chalmers said higher inflation and slower growth would depend on how long the war continued, how long it took to reopen the Strait of Hormuz “in an enduring way” and how long it took the global economy to return to “something which looks a little bit more like normal”.

While he didn’t name it stagflation or a recession, he pointed to such severe economic situations as something Treasury was modelling.

“If you think about the last few days, it’s been a pretty wild ride when it comes to developments in the war in the Middle East. We had some very welcome progress and very welcome developments only a few days ago, but obviously we’ve seen some of that progress unwound, potentially quite significantly. It does feel like two steps forward and one step back when it comes to these developments,” Dr Chalmers said.

“Even if and when the ceasefire ends, even when the war ends, even when the strait is properly reopened, we don’t expect things to go back to normal straight away. The consequences of this war in the Middle East are already serious, and there is still a risk that they become severe. And so all this means that there is more than the usual amount of uncertainty.

“It relies on decisions taken in Washington and Tehran and elsewhere. The Australian economy is, in lots of ways, hostage to those developments and those decisions ... As you’d expect us to do, as you’d expect Treasury to do in their usual diligent and professional way, is to think about a range of scenarios, and that’s what they’re doing now. We published some of those scenarios a couple of weeks ago to give you a sense of how we come at these sorts of deliberations and contingencies, and in the course of the next week or two we’ll settle those forecasts.

“I’ve also asked them to make sure that when we publish the budget that there is some discussion of the downside scenarios where this plays out even worse than what we’re currently anticipating.”

Dr Chalmers acknowledged conversations with the states on the NDIS could be difficult because of the large amount of money involved, but said “even the biggest supporters of the NDIS would acknowledge the growth in spending … is beyond what Australians can afford”.

“In particular, the NDIS is growing too fast for Australians to afford. It’s about $49bn this year. By the end of the forward estimates, not that far away, it’s about $62bn – that’s in 28-29,” he said.

“It’s important, given we are huge believers in the NDIS, massive supporters in the care that it provides Australians who need it, we need to make sure that it is sustainable, and that’s what our efforts are all about.

“This has been a really big part of our pre-budget deliberations. It is easily the most important part of the savings package that we will present on budget night. There have been many, many hours of deliberations.

“We’ve all got a stake in this. We’ve all got an interest in making sure that we provide that high standard of care in a way that we can afford, in a sustainable way, so that the important work of the NDIS and all the people who work in the NDIS benefit from the NDIS and are supported by the NDIS, are done so in a way that we can continue to afford.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australia-hostage-to-usiran-war-with-potentially-severe-consequences-warns-jim-chalmers/news-story/8c4b76c2985acba341d05d4c291542de

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38932

File: 9f1f33a5d5ccf75⋯.jpg (629.94 KB,3613x2710,3613:2710,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24518289 (200930ZAPR26) Notable: Fire-ravaged Geelong oil refinery charts path back to 90% output - Viva Energy expects its Geelong refinery to return to more than 90 per cent of output within weeks after a fire damaged a key processing unit, easing concerns about domestic fuel supply during the global energy crisis. The company said the blaze was confined to the alkylation unit, with other major systems unaffected, allowing production to recover to around 60 per cent for petrol and 80 per cent for diesel and jet fuel. Chief executive Scott Wyatt said imports could bridge any shortfall, with the refinery supplying up to half of Victoria’s fuel and about 10 per cent nationally. Petrol prices have begun easing, though diesel remains elevated, as the government considers extending fuel excise cuts. Officials said supply would remain stable in the short term despite ongoing global uncertainty.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38894

>>38895

>>38896

>>38904

Fire-ravaged Geelong oil refinery charts path back to 90% output

Nick Toscano and Mike Foley - April 20, 2026

1/2

The owner of one of Australia’s only two oil refineries expects to ramp back up to above 90 per cent of its maximum output within weeks, as it recovers from a major blaze that crippled key production units and heightened worries about Australia’s vulnerability to an ongoing global supply crunch.

The update from Viva Energy points to a recovery timeline that is quicker than first feared when the fire struck last Wednesday, and helps stabilise the outlook for domestic fuel security as the war in the Middle East continues.

Petrol prices have already begun easing – from $2.50 a litre to as low as $1.90 for regular unleaded at some service stations – amid growing hopes of a peace deal, while federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has signalled that the government is weighing an extension to its 26¢-a-litre cut to fuel excise that was scheduled to end in the middle of the year.

In a statement on Monday morning, Viva said that damage assessments at its Geelong oil refinery, on the shores of Corio Bay, had confirmed the blaze was confined to the alkylation unit, which converts gases into a component needed in petrol. Other major processing units in the petrol-production complex were unaffected.

The fire, sparked by an equipment fault, forced Viva to cut back to minimum output levels across the facility at an inopportune time. Until last week, the Geelong refinery had been operating at full capacity, delivering up to 50 per cent of all the fuel used in Victoria, and 10 per cent of the national total. Viva Energy has been seeking to pump out as much as possible to help Australia withstand global supply pressures caused by the war in the Middle East.

While acknowledging that the timing could hardly have been worse, the company insists the impact of the fire will be limited, and that it will not worsen the availability of fuel for Australian motorists and businesses.

The refinery had already clawed back the majority of its production capacity – returning to 60 per cent of its petrol volumes and 80 per cent of diesel and jet fuel – and was expected to return to 90 per cent “over the next few weeks”. Viva Energy said it had sufficient fuel stocks to cover this reduced production and that it expected to “maintain normal fuel supply to our customers following this incident”.

Chief executive Scott Wyatt said any ongoing drop-off in refinery output from Geelong could be comfortably bridged by increasing imports from overseas suppliers.

“I think there will be no impact to what we supply into the Victorian market as a result of this incident,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38933

File: b8c61aabad9dcdf⋯.mp4 (15.89 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24518296 (200948ZAPR26) Notable: Ex-Aussie rules football legend Barry Cable cleared in historical child sex abuse case - (Video) Former Australian Rules footballer Barry Cable has been acquitted of historical child sexual abuse charges after a judge-alone trial in the Perth District Court. Judge Michael Bowden found Cable not guilty of multiple offences, including indecent dealing and unlawful carnal knowledge, despite accepting the complainant’s account as “more probable than not” true. He ruled the evidence did not meet the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, citing the absence of corroboration and the impact of a 60-year delay, which created “significant forensic disadvantage” for the defence. The case involved allegations the girl was abused at Cable’s home, which he denied. His family welcomed the outcome, describing the case as distressing, while the court emphasised the limitations imposed by missing records and deceased witnesses.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24518294

Ex-Aussie rules football legend Barry Cable cleared in historical child sex abuse case

EMMA KIRK - 20 April 2026

Former Aussie rules football legend Barry Cable has walked free from court over historical sexual abuse allegations involving a young girl.

Judge Michael Bowden found Mr Cable not guilty of indecently dealing with a girl aged under 13 and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 13.

Mr Cable denied the allegations against him and walked free from the Perth District Court on Monday after being cleared of all allegations against him.

The 82-year-old football great was accused of repeatedly abusing a young girl at his Perth home in the 1960s and cleared of seven charges.

Judge Bowden said in his judgment while he was satisfied prosecutors established Mr Cable had a tendency to be sexually attracted to underage girls and to act upon that interest, tendency evidence alone could never prove guilt.

“I am satisfied that tendency was entrenched and existed over decades and existed at the time of each alleged offence,” he said.

“As a result of the delay of over 60 years between the alleged offence occurring and the matter being reported to police Mr Cable has suffered significant forensic disadvantage.

“The delay has affected Mr Cable’s ability to properly defend himself and reduces his capacity to fully test (the alleged victim’s evidence).”

Judge Bowden said records presented as evidence were incomplete, potential witnesses were now deceased and the 60-year delay in reporting the matter to police affected Mr Cable’s ability to properly defend himself and test the victim’s evidence.

“I generally accept (the alleged victim’s) evidence and have found that Mr Cable has the tendency alleged and I consider it more probable than not that she is telling the truth,” he said.

“I am not persuaded of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in respect of any count on the indictment and acquit Mr Cable in respect of each count.”

Speaking outside of court following the verdict, his son Shane Cable said they were pleased with the outcome.

“It’s the first and only criminal case that our dad has ever faced in his 82 years and he has always maintained his innocence,” he said.

“To our family, dad is always someone that’s always inspired so many people through his sport, dedicated his life after football to community works and the allegations that were made were at extreme odds with the Barry that we know and love.

“It’s been a stressful and chaotic period in our lives and for the whole family and today’s acquittal hopefully brings some closure.

“But we do ask that obviously, mum and dad both in their 80s, I think they need to live the twilight of their lives with some dignity and we would ask that you respect their privacy.”

Mr Cable faced a week-long judge alone trial in the Perth District Court last month where a woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, accused Mr Cable of abusing her as a child while his wife slept in another room.

Mr Cable was regarded as one of the greatest players of his era and was regarded as a footy legend in Victoria and Western Australia.

He played in the West Australian Football League with Perth, then North Melbourne where he was a dominant player in one of the club’s most successful eras.

He won two premierships with the Kangaroos in 1975 and 1977 and was the club’s best-and-fairest player in 1970.

He was also named in North Melbourne’s Team of the Century.

Mr Cable was inducted into the Australian football Hall of Fame in 1996 and elevated to legend status in 2012.

In WA, he won the WAFL’s Sandover Medal three times and played in four premierships.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/exaussie-rules-football-legend-barry-cable-cleared-in-historical-child-sex-abuse-case/news-story/1564d92c5d55593515b2bf00ec05736c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38934

File: d3b3cd8cd45b2c5⋯.mp4 (15.45 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24518298 (200957ZAPR26) Notable: Barry Cable found not guilty in historical child sex abuse trial - (Video) Former Australian Rules footballer Barry Cable has been acquitted of historical child sexual abuse charges dating back to the 1960s following a judge-only trial in the Western Australian District Court. Cable, 82, had pleaded not guilty to five counts of indecent dealing and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge involving a girl under 13, with prosecutors alleging the abuse occurred at his family home. The judge found the allegations were not proven beyond reasonable doubt and cleared him of all charges. Cable’s family said they were “pleased” and “not surprised” by the outcome, noting he had always maintained his innocence. The case follows a separate civil ruling in 2023 that found Cable liable for abuse of another girl, resulting in damages and the loss of honours, including removal from the Australian Football Hall of Fame and the stripping of his legend status.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24518294

>>38933

Barry Cable found not guilty in historical child sex abuse trial

The 82-year-old had pleaded not guilty to all historical charges.

Cassidy Mosconi and Bryce Luff - 20 April 2026

Former footballer Barry Cable has been found not guilty of several historical child abuse accusations dating back six decades.

During a three-day judge-only trial in March, Cable, 82, had pleaded not guilty to five counts of indecent dealing with a girl aged under 13 and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 13.

The victim was allegedly abused in the late 1960s, and the prosecution had claimed the girl was exploited at Cable’s family home.

But the judge did not believe it happened beyond a reasonable doubt and Cable was acquitted of all charges in the WA District Court in Perth on Monday.

“We’re obviously pleased with the court’s decision today - certainly not surprised,” Cable’s family said in a statement outside court.

“It’s the first and only criminal case that dad’s ever faced in his 82 years and he’s always maintained his innocence.”

Cable is a former champion footballer with North Melbourne in the VFL and Perth and East Perth in the WAFL.

“To our family, dad is someone that’s always inspired so many people through his football,” the statement said.

“He dedicated his life after football to community works and the allegations that were made were at extreme odds with certainly the Barry that we know and have loved our whole life.”

They said they hope Monday’s acquittal brings closure to a “stressful and chaotic” period in their lives.

A civil trial in 2023 found Cable abused another girl over five years from 1968 when she was aged 12, and the victim was awarded $818,700 in damages.

Cable was later stripped of several honours, including being removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame and losing his legend status.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://7news.com.au/news/barry-cable-found-not-guilty-in-historical-child-sex-abuse-trial-c-22166870

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38935

File: 0472f5d33ea4abf⋯.jpg (390.75 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 58050de8d81fdf1⋯.jpg (1.7 MB,1568x2280,196:285,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24521943 (211015ZAPR26) Notable: Vanuatu denies China security deal as Australia monitors regional ties - Vanuatu has denied claims it is negotiating a security agreement with China, as Australia closely monitors the Pacific nation’s engagements with Beijing amid ongoing talks over a separate pact with Canberra. Officials said recent meetings, including a ministerial visit to a Hong Kong technology summit, focused on cyber security and development, with no agreements signed. Both Vanuatu and the Chinese embassy rejected suggestions of a defence arrangement, stressing cooperation centred on infrastructure and capacity building. Vanuatu also insisted discussions on the stalled Nakamal Agreement with Australia were “not at all linked to China”. The deal collapsed last year over provisions seen as limiting Beijing’s role in regional security and infrastructure, highlighting tensions as Australia seeks to maintain influence in the Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Vanuatu denies it is about to sign a security deal with China as Australia works to ink its own pact

Stephen Dziedzic and Lillyrose Welwel - 21 April 2026

1/2

Vanuatu has furiously denied that it is on the cusp of signing a security pact with China and warned that it will not be "dictated to" by Australia in a row which threatens to disrupt delicately poised negotiations for the landmark Nakamal Agreement.

Multiple sources have confirmed that China and Vanuatu have spent months discussing a comprehensive new pact called the Namele Agreement.

In Vanuatu, the Namele leaf is a sacred symbol of peace and authority used to enforce kastom or customary laws.

On Tuesday morning the Vanuatu newspaper the Daily Post reported that Australian officials in Port Vila were concerned the deal could have security elements, quoting a source who said it might "affect agreements with Australia" and undermine Vanuatu's push to make Canberra ease visa restrictions.

But later that day Vanuatu's Prime Minister Jotham Napat issued a forceful statement calling the report "grossly misguided and inaccurate" and insisting the proposed agreement was a "comprehensive development cooperation agreement" not a security pact.

He also took a thinly veiled swipe at Australia saying that "Vanuatu will decide what is good for Vanuatu. We will not be dictated to."

"Our foreign policy is guided by our national interests, not by external speculation or pressure," Mr Napat said.

"Suggestions that our partnerships could affect visa arrangements or other bilateral matters are unhelpful and not a cultural reflection of Nakamal values.

"Vanuatu's relationships are not exclusive."

Airing of concerns 'serious' amid negotiations

The dispute risks poisoning the atmosphere between Australia and Vanuatu just as the two countries prepare to finalise protracted and sometimes difficult negotiations over the Nakamal Agreement — a landmark security and development pact between the two countries.

Last week Vanuatu's Climate Minister Ralph Regenvanu said the government was on the "cusp" of finally signing the deal, almost eight months after it was given initial approval on the summit of Mt Yasur.

One diplomat in Vanuatu from a third country said the fact Australian officials still pressed ahead with raising public concerns about the pact with China, albeit by an anonymous leak to a newspaper, showed they must have "serious" concerns that it would have security implications.

The ABC has been told that Australia is not opposed to Vanuatu building up its economic links with China, but wants to ensure that the Namele pact is not a security agreement which might undermine Nakamal, or threaten Australia's interests.

The Pacific Minister Pat Conroy would not confirm if Australia had concerns, or say whether officials in Vanuatu had tried to use the Namele agreement as leverage to secure a better deal in negotiations on the Nakamal Agreement.

But he said Australia was in a "daily contest" with unnamed other countries throughout the Pacific.

"We've been very honest with the Australian public that we're in a permanent state of contest for influence in the Pacific," Mr Conroy said.

"That's why we've put so much resources and so much ministerial energy into this area."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38936

File: 756a23571f085f0⋯.jpg (282.08 KB,1920x1081,1920:1081,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0a652579ee948ff⋯.jpg (766.63 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: db689a6d413a8c9⋯.jpg (288.98 KB,664x897,664:897,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24523341 (211801ZAPR26) Notable: Fiji drug kingpin Jone Vakarisi ‘beaten to death’ on Aussie-linked military base - A death in custody at Fiji’s main military barracks has become a murder investigation after alleged drug kingpin Jone Vakarisi was found to have suffered fatal blunt force injuries, contradicting initial claims of a “medical emergency”. Authorities said the 36-year-old died during questioning at Queen Elizabeth Barracks in Suva, where Australian Defence Force personnel are also stationed, though none are believed to have been involved. The incident has raised concerns about the conduct of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces, with family members alleging Vakarisi was taken from his home and beaten. The case comes amid deepening defence ties between Australia and Fiji and growing scrutiny over drug trafficking networks in the Pacific, as calls mount for an independent investigation into the circumstances of his death.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Fiji drug kingpin Jone Vakarisi ‘beaten to death’ on Aussie-linked military base

STEPHEN RICE - 21 April 2026

1/2

The Australian military is becoming embroiled in an unfolding scandal in Fiji after a drug overlord was allegedly tortured and beaten to death last week in the country’s main military barracks in Suva where ADF personnel are currently stationed.

The chief of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces claimed drug kingpin Jone Vakarisi suffered “a sudden medical emergency” during a “formal interview process” on Thursday, but a post mortem over the weekend found that the gangster suffered severe traumatic head and chest injuries from blunt force trauma while in custody.

Late on Monday police declared the death at RFMF headquarters at Queen Elizabeth Barracks was now a murder investigation.

The scandal threatens the standing of RFMF Commander Major General Ro Jone Kalouniwai, who personally signed off on now disputed claims that Vakarisi and three associates had attended the barracks voluntarily and that a “pre-existing condition” had contributed to the man’s death.

The crisis has erupted as Australia pushes for closer military engagement with Pacific nations, including recruiting soldiers from Fiji, with frequent exchanges of personnel between the two countries. At least 16 ADF personnel are posted with the RFMF in Fiji, most based in the Queen Elizabeth Barracks, but it is understood none was directly ­involved in the incident.

The episode has highlighted Fiji’s emergence as the principal hub of a Pacific “superhighway” for drugs headed to Australia, with corrupt police and military officers suspected of passing information to emboldened drug syndicates about police and RFMF operations.

Vakarisi had reportedly tried to break into an armoury earlier this month to steal weapons for use by the drug cartels, entering the Queen Elizabeth Barracks with accomplices in two vehicles, allowed to pass through the gates by the guards.

That attempt sparked a warning from Commander Kalouniwai – who graduated from the prestigious Australian War College and is very close to the Australian defence establishment – that an organised criminal network was attempting to destabilise the country.

The group had gained access to “unauthorised weaponry, verified as being outside of the RFMF’s official inventory”, Commander Kalouniwai said.

Commander Kalouniwai claimed the four men questioned had “voluntarily presented themselves … to assist with investigations”, but relatives say Vakarisi was forcibly taken from his home on Thursday night by military officers without any explanation.

A post mortem over the weekend found that Vakarisi had suffered severe traumatic head and chest injuries from blunt force trauma.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38937

File: 7eefe98df9a1f45⋯.jpg (304.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bdb207df19a01a9⋯.jpg (260.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24523351 (211803ZAPR26) Notable: Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has welcomed Australia’s planned increase in military spending but signalled Washington expects further commitments before Canberra is regarded as a leading Indo-Pacific ally. In testimony to Congress, Hegseth praised Australia’s latest National Defence Strategy and support for AUKUS while emphasising the Trump administration’s focus on “burden sharing” among allies. He pointed to South Korea and Japan as examples of nations sharply increasing defence investment, while Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby said the United States wanted “partners - not dependencies”. Australia recently announced plans to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product by 2033, although the Trump administration has previously pushed for a higher 3.5 per cent target. Hegseth also revealed the US campaign in Iran had cost at least $US25 billion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38886

>>38900

>>38906

Australia pledges up to $7bn for counter-drone defences

CAMERON STEWART - 21 April 2026

The Albanese government says it will invest up to $7bn in counter-drones in the next decade as it seeks to plug a key weakness in the capability of the Australian Defence Force.

The commitment reflects a growing if belated recognition by the government of the critical function of counter-drones in modern warfare, as shown by the central role they have played in conflicts in Ukraine and the ­Middle East.

The vital role played by drones and counter-drones in current conflicts has forced the government to up-end its long-term defence spending priorities and pivot quickly towards the new technologies.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Tuesday announced a $30m investment in two Australian companies to develop drone defences as part of a $7bn plan over 10 years to arm the ADF with counter-drone technology.

The commitment effectively doubles the amount earmarked for counter-drone technology from $3bn over a decade in 2024 to up to $7bn over the next decade in the 2026 Defence Integrated Investment Program.

The announcement follows the release last week of the government’s updated defence strategy, which foreshadowed a rise in spending on drones from $10bn over the coming decade to $12bn-$15bn, including up to $3.1bn on smaller drones that have proven critical in the Ukraine conflict.

Mr Conroy said drones and drone defences had become the “modern face of warfare” and Australia needed to adjust to the trend. “Anyone who has seen ­vision of the conflict in Ukraine or the current conflict in the Middle East understands the ability of drones and so called asymmetric warfare to pose challenges for conventional military forces. It’s incumbent upon the government to give the best equipment to the ADF to defend our national interests and protect the Australian people,” he said.

“At the moment, we’re seeing nations having to use $3m mis­siles to take out a $100,000 drone. These (new Australian) systems can be deployed and cost tens of thousands of dollars to take out a $100,000 drone. So this is rebalancing that cost-benefit ratio in the interest of the ADF”.

The government’s initial $30m investment will allow Australian defence company SYPAQ Systems to further develop its Corvo Strike interceptor drone designed to track, target and destroy larger drones, and Australian company AIM Defence to further enhance the capability of its high-powered counter-drone laser system, Fractl, to counter individual drones and swarms of drones.

Marcus Hellyer of Strategic Analysis Australia said the greater investment in counter-drones was to be welcomed but the government had been slow to respond to the rise and rise of drones and counter-drones as a feature of modern warfare. “Broadly speaking, we are moving in the right direction but we have a lot of ground to make up; I still don’t think we’ve got the balance right on drones and counter-drones.”

Mr Hellyer said the announcement lacked transparency because it was unclear from where the new money for counter-drones was coming or if it was new money at all. “The government keeps making these announcements but there’s no way from public evidence to validate where the money is coming from,” he said. “When the government says it will spend $7bn over the decade on counter-drones, you can’t see it in the Integrated Investment Program that came out last week, so you assume it is there, maybe.”

The government last week used the release of its updated defence strategy to announce an extra $14bn on defence spending over the next four years, and an extra $53bn over the decade.

It says that this will increase Defence spending, under its new NATO-style of measurement, from 2.8 per cent of GDP to 3 per cent of GDP by 2033.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/australia-pledges-up-to-7bn-for-counterdrone-defences/news-story/7b37cb94da21855067817f829a49e624

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38938

File: b2aa0917eb47ca7⋯.mp4 (1.87 MB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 67a05b56c9cbccb⋯.jpg (290.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24526195 (220954ZAPR26) Notable: Gaming giants Roblox and Fortnite put on notice over extremist fears - (Video) Major gaming platforms including Roblox, Minecraft, Fortnite and Steam have been issued legally enforceable notices by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner over concerns they are being used to groom children and spread extremist content. Julie Inman Grant warned “predatory adults” were targeting platforms with a “critical mass” of young users, citing evidence of grooming, cyberbullying and games glorifying terrorism, Nazi imagery and mass violence. Companies must now explain how they are mitigating risks such as child sexual exploitation, radicalisation and online abuse, with penalties for non-compliance. Authorities said millions of children use these platforms, making them attractive targets for offenders, while also raising concerns about linked messaging services used to contact minors. The move aims to force stronger safeguards and transparency across the gaming sector.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24240263 (pb)

>>38735

>>38833

>>>/qresearch/24498546

Gaming giants Roblox and Fortnite put on notice over extremist fears

GEOFF CHAMBERS and JACK QUAIL - 22 April 2026

1/2

Gaming giants Roblox, Minecraft, Fortnite and Steam have been put on notice by the online safety watchdog over fears that extremists, sexual predators, neo-Nazis and cyber bullies are using the platforms to target a “critical mass” of young Australians.

The Australian can reveal ­eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has issued legally enforceable transparency notices to gaming platforms amid concerns that extremist groups and pedophiles are using online games as vehicles to spread violent propaganda and groom children.

In a global trend that has shocked governments, cyber­security experts and parents, games are being created to glorify Nazis, re-enact Holocaust camps, re-create mass shootings and allow players to fight under the Islamic State banner and execute innocent people.

Authorities are increasingly worried about gaming-adjacent platforms like encrypted message services being used by offenders to directly contact children, groom and sexually extort vulnerable kids and radicalise youth.

Ms Inman Grant, who has overseen the government’s ban on children under 16 using social media accounts and clashed with US tech moguls including Elon Musk, warned that “predatory adults” are targeting platforms with a “critical mass” of children.

“We’re seeing a lot more seriously harmful content popping up everywhere – whether it’s AI companions and chat bots, specific instructions around self-harm and suicide or to encourage young people to engage in explicit tasks,” she told The Australian.

While gaming platforms will say they are taking action, Ms Inman Grant said “Let’s be honest here – these companies have developed some of the most sophisticated classification systems”.

“They have the ability to pick up this content now, but it’s still easily discoverable. We need to know they’re actually doing the due diligence with the gaming developers … and enforcing their own terms of service,” she said.

After issuing legally enforceable transparency notices to Roblox Corp (Roblox), Mojang AB (Minecraft), Epic Games (Fortnite) and Valve Corp (Steam), Ms Inman Grant warned about reports of “grooming taking place on all four of these platforms as well as terrorist and violent extremist-themed gameplay”.

“Our own research into children and gaming showed around nine in 10 children aged eight to 17 in Australia had played online games. Predatory adults know this and target children through grooming or embedding terrorist and violent extremist narratives in gameplay, increasing the risks of contact offending, radicalisation and other off-platform harms.

“This includes Islamic State-inspired games and recreations of mass shootings on Roblox, as well as far-right groups recreating fascist imagery in Minecraft.

“Media reports have also pointed to games in Fortnite gamifying the horrific events of the World War II Jasenovac concentration camp and January 6 US Capitol building riots, while Steam is reportedly a hub for a number of extreme-right communities.

“These online game and ­gaming-adjacent platforms are used by millions of children; it is imperative they take every possible step to protect them and continue to improve safeguards.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38939

File: c16791e60baa10f⋯.jpg (206.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 55fcd924629b22c⋯.jpg (709.6 KB,1950x1463,1950:1463,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d0e3862712e1350⋯.png (100.61 KB,680x672,85:84,Clipboard.png)

File: 9f9eacee9d151d3⋯.jpg (286.21 KB,2023x2048,2023:2048,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 33691433f47165b⋯.jpg (244.68 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24526238 (221031ZAPR26) Notable: Fiji military in about-face as gangster’s death at Aussie-linked base becomes murder probe - Fiji’s military has reversed its initial account of drug figure Jone Vakarisi’s death, as police launch a murder investigation into allegations he was beaten while in custody at a Suva barracks shared with Australian personnel. Republic of Fiji Military Forces commander Ro Jone Kalouniwai had described the death as a “medical emergency”, but a post-mortem found severe blunt force injuries to the head and chest, prompting authorities to reclassify the case. The incident has sparked a political and security scandal, raising concerns in Canberra given close defence ties, though no Australian personnel are believed to be involved. Family members dispute claims Vakarisi attended voluntarily, alleging he was forcibly taken, as officials pledge a “thorough” investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38936

Fiji military in about-face as gangster’s death at Aussie-linked base becomes murder probe

STEPHEN RICE - 22 April 2026

In an embarrassing about-face, Fiji’s top military chief has reversed his claim that drug overlord Jone Vakarisi died of natural causes as police launch a murder probe into allegations the gangster was beaten to death at an army barracks in Suva shared with Australian troops.

The brutal death of the kingpin while in the custody of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces has sparked a scandal in the island nation and concerns in Canberra about implications for Australia’s close defence ties with Fiji.

At least 16 Australian Defence Force personnel are posted with the RFMF in Fiji, most based in the Queen Elizabeth Barracks where Vakarisi died, although it is understood none was directly ­involved in the incident.

RFMF commander Major General Ro Jone Kalouniwai had claimed Vakarisi suffered “a sudden medical emergency” during a “formal interview process” last Thursday, and that a “pre-existing condition” had contributed to the man’s death.

However, a post-mortem examination at the weekend revealed the 36-year-old had suffered severe traumatic head and chest injuries from blunt force trauma. The injuries caused internal bleeding, including to his heart, with “aspiration of gastric contents leading to asphyxia”, according to the death certificate.

In the face of the mounting scandal, police announced late on Monday that “the investigation into the death of Jone Vakarisi has been classified as murder”.

After a crisis meeting with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, senior ministers and police chiefs, Commander Kalouniwai acknowledged that “the earlier description of the incident as a ‘medical emergency’ does not fully reflect the medical findings now available”.

“The RFMF recognises the seriousness of these findings,” he said in a statement described as a “correction of record”.

“Where wrongdoing is established, it will be addressed in accordance with the law,” he added.

The RFMF reaffirmed “its full and unreserved co-operation with police to ensure all facts are established in a thorough, independent and transparent manner”.

Commander Kalouniwai did not address his earlier claim that Vakarisi had “voluntarily presented himself” at the barracks, a statement disputed by the man’s family, who said he was picked up and taken forcibly by military officers.

Vakarisi’s former wife, Kuini Osbourne, who viewed his body at the morgue, told MaiTV Fiji on Tuesday that his face was “bruised and swelled up”.

She said the doctor who conducted the post-mortem told her Vakarisi had choked on his own blood and fluids because of the severe trauma to his chest and head.

“He couldn’t vomit it or spit it out so it just came up and went back in and he choked on it,” she said the doctor had told her.

Ms Osbourne claimed another group of men were taken to the barracks and beaten up on Tuesday, two days before Vakarisi was picked up: “They were told to take off their clothes and duck walk on the gravel”, but later released.

Vakarisi had reportedly tried to break into an armoury this month in a bid to steal weapons for use by drug cartels that increasingly use Fiji as a hub for drugs headed to Australia. That attempt sparked a warning from Commander Kalouniwai that an organised criminal network was trying to destabilise the country.

The ADF is watching developments in the Vakarisi probe. A spokesperson declined to comment, saying only that ADF personnel in Fiji were “focused on defence co-operation, professional military engagement, and strengthening the longstanding defence relationship between Australia and Fiji”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/fiji-military-in-aboutface-as-gangsters-death-at-aussielinked-base-becomes-murder-probe/news-story/64d710ca9eedefafacd5f747bdb64a57

https://www.grubsheet.com.au/murder-at-the-camp-the-commander-is-forced-to-change-his-story-after-a-scandalous-cover-up/

https://www.facebook.com/FijiPolice/posts/1404889788334029

https://www.facebook.com/RfmfMedia/posts/1286689206980729

https://x.com/stansimpsonfj/status/2045749502007717944

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38940

File: 78d3866c6dd9a0d⋯.mp4 (15.93 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24526266 (221057ZAPR26) Notable: US commander says Australia is ready for AUKUS subs, warns of 'increasingly aggressive' China - (Video) The United States Indo-Pacific commander has warned Congress that China’s rapidly expanding military poses a growing threat, while praising Australia’s readiness to host AUKUS submarines. Admiral Samuel Paparo said the US needed to “supercharge” shipbuilding and weapons production, citing shortages of submarines, destroyers and amphibious vessels as demand outpaces supply. He said upgrades to HMAS Stirling in Western Australia were progressing well and could host submarines “today”, but acknowledged concerns about delays in US submarine production that may affect delivery of Virginia-class vessels to Australia in the 2030s. Paparo also highlighted China’s increasing military output and global ambitions, warning its actions could reshape regional security dynamics, as US resources are stretched by commitments including the ongoing war in the Middle East.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

US commander says Australia is ready for AUKUS subs, warns of 'increasingly aggressive' China

Brad Ryan - 22 April 2026

The United States military commander for the Indo-Pacific has told Congress he needs more naval firepower in the region as an "increasingly aggressive" China rapidly expands and modernises its military.

Admiral Samuel Paparo also praised the pace of upgrades to Australia's AUKUS submarine base — but appeared less confident about the US's ability to deliver the nuclear submarines promised under the pact.

Appearing before the US Senate's Armed Services Committee, Admiral Paparo argued the US needed to "supercharge" the production of ships, weaponry and other equipment to deter Chinese aggression in the region.

"I don't have enough amphibious ships," he told the committee.

"We don't have enough surface destroyers.

"We certainly don't have enough attack submarines, and our trajectory is on the wrong side."

In an accompanying written statement, he also argued for more aircraft carriers and air wings, and faster production of hypersonic missiles, low-cost drones and advanced maritime mines.

"Current production timelines are misaligned with operational expenditures and the threats we face in today's global security environment," he wrote.

Praise for Australian base upgrades but concern over US submarines

The admiral was more optimistic about upgrade work at Western Australia's HMAS Stirling, where American and British nuclear-powered submarines will soon have a rotational presence.

The naval base is undergoing a decade-long upgrade to accommodate the AUKUS partners' submarines and hundreds of extra US troops from next year.

"From the capability that they have … we could move submarines to Stirling today," Admiral Paparo told the committee.

"I laid eyes on it multiple times. The commitment is there, the progress is there.

"The place where we have to make the most progress is in the defence industrial base to deliver the capability."

Under the AUKUS pact, the US should provide the Australian fleet with at least three Virginia-class submarines in the 2030s.

But submarine production is lagging well behind target in the US, which has long fuelled questions about America's ability to provide them on time or at all.

China's goal to 'set the rules around the globe'

In his written testimony, Admiral Paparo said China's "increasingly aggressive actions towards Taiwan" and other "provocative pressure operations" demonstrated its growing military capabilities.

China was building "a global military that will project power beyond its near geography to set the rules for every relationship around the globe", he wrote.

He told committee members that, since 2024, China had delivered 12 submarines — including nuclear attack and nuclear ballistic-missile submarines — an aircraft carrier, two cruisers, 10 destroyers and seven frigates.

Its deepening cooperation with North Korea and Russia could exacerbate existing disputes in the region and the overall security challenge, he wrote.

His evidence came on the same day the Pentagon released more details about US President Donald Trump's military budget request for 2027.

The $US1.5 trillion ($2.1 trillion) request represents the largest in history and includes a significant boost to shipbuilding and the industrial base.

But it does not include additional money for the US's war on Iran, which many analysts believe is costing well over $US1 billion each day.

Push for 'more truth-telling' over resources moved to Middle East

In recent months, the US has moved some military assets from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East to support the war on Iran.

They include the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and its strike group, which had been in the South China Sea.

Questioned about the effect of that, Admiral Paparo said he would not go into specifics in public.

"But there are finite limits to the magazine," he said. "And I have all the faith in the world that they're being employed judiciously."

Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal said he was "tremendously concerned" about the impact of moving military equipment from the region.

"I'm under the impression that the impact has been serious," Senator Blumenthal said.

He argued that the public should be better informed "so they can appreciate the seriousness of the costs of the Iran war" and the "urgent need" to replace the resources.

"I acknowledge that, sir," Admiral Paparo said, "and, you know, the secretary [of defense] is addressing that, as I can see".

"Well, I hope there will be more truth-telling to the American people," Senator Blumenthal said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-22/us-commander-warns-congress-of-increasingly-aggressive-china/106591886

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38941

File: e457684f07a4ba1⋯.jpg (2.46 MB,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 66b750958f5a6f8⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24531139 (231820ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith had vacated his rental and booked an international flight. Then the police arrived - Ben Roberts-Smith had vacated his Brisbane apartment, sought overseas relocation advice and booked international flights before his arrest on war crime charges, court documents show. The former SAS soldier had arranged travel to Spain via Singapore, with departure scheduled days after Australian Federal Police detained him on April 7 following a five-year investigation into alleged unlawful killings of Afghan detainees. Prosecutors argued he posed a flight risk, citing his plans to relocate abroad, past findings of witness interference during defamation proceedings, and allegations of evidence destruction. His legal team said he had long cooperated with authorities and was entitled to continue his life. He was granted bail under strict conditions, including surrendering his passport, reporting regularly to police, and avoiding contact with prosecution witnesses.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Ben Roberts-Smith had vacated his rental and booked an international flight. Then the police arrived

Amber Schultz - April 23, 2026

1/2

In the months before his dramatic airport arrest in Sydney, Ben Roberts-Smith had vacated his Brisbane apartment, paid thousands of dollars to an immigration lawyer, and booked flights to Spain, newly released court documents reveal.

That’s when the Australian Federal Police swooped in, taking the former SAS soldier into custody and charging him with five counts of war crime – murder over the alleged executions of Afghan detainees. It was five days before his scheduled Qantas flight out of the country.

The arrest on April 7 came after a five-year investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and Office of the Special Investigator (OSI). Roberts-Smith denies the allegations and has been released on bail.

Court documents released on Thursday, following an application by this masthead, reveal the prosecutor’s unsuccessful application to keep Roberts-Smith in custody, citing concerns about his history of witness interference, allegations of evidence destruction, and his plan to move abroad.

Roberts-Smith was first officially made aware of the OSI’s investigation on November 25, 2025, when senior investigating officer for the Australian Federal Police and OSI Stephen McIntyre wrote to Roberts-Smith’s lawyer, Karen Espiner, requesting an interview with Roberts-Smith.

That same month, the OSI had intercepted information that he was seeking financial advice on paying his partner a wage to help her obtain a visa to live and work in Spain, court documents reveal.

Two weeks later, Roberts-Smith paid a Spanish law firm $5400 for immigration advice, information intercepted by the OSI revealed.

By March, Roberts-Smith had vacated his rented Brisbane apartment and booked flights departing on April 11 to Singapore, before travelling on to Spain. He had return tickets for June of this year.

“The OSI holds concerns that Roberts-Smith is attempting to relocate to reside in a jurisdiction outside of Australia … the possibility that [he] has attempted to disguise his travel plans cannot be excluded,” McIntyre’s statement provided to the court reads.

McIntyre also raised concerns about Roberts-Smith interfering with and harassing witnesses during the defamation case he brought against this masthead, and ultimately lost.

He was found to have made a false report to the Australian Federal Police and organised for threatening letters to be sent to a witness to have them retract evidence; colluded with another witness to put forward false evidence about an eyewitnesses’ presence at an alleged execution; and there were allegations he buried USBs in his backyard, erased digital media, and used burner phones and encrypted devices to evade monitoring by the police.

“OSI also holds evidence of the supply of a ‘burner phone’ to a separate witness appearing on [his] behalf,” McIntyre wrote.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38942

File: 7b9b50758039294⋯.jpg (141.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a176dfcdd5fe31c⋯.jpg (102.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1e9bf11c3e7cdb2⋯.jpg (168.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d36075a79c7aab⋯.jpg (146.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 59e85a4219b574c⋯.jpg (272.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24531150 (231822ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith ‘never planned’ to flee overseas - Ben Roberts-Smith’s partner Sarah Matulin has told a court the former SAS soldier never intended to flee Australia despite making plans to live and work overseas before his arrest on war crime charges. Affidavits released from his bail hearing show the couple explored business opportunities in Thailand, Myanmar and Spain, with visa processes underway, but maintained he would return if charged. His lawyer had also offered that he be arrested by arrangement if authorities indicated charges were imminent. Roberts-Smith said he had travelled internationally dozens of times while under investigation and always returned. Prosecutors allege he murdered or ordered the killing of unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012 and staged evidence. He denies the allegations and remains on bail with strict conditions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38941

Ben Roberts-Smith ‘never planned’ to flee overseas

Miklos Bolza - 23 April 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith was eyeing business opportunities overseas before his arrest, but his partner says the war veteran always intended to return home if criminal charges were laid.

The former SAS soldier was arrested on April 7 and charged with murdering or ordering the murders of five unarmed detainees while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

Roberts-Smith was released from prison on bail on Friday after his father Len Roberts-Smith, a former Western Australia Supreme Court judge, paid a $250,000 surety.

Documents from the 47-year-old's bail hearing in Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court released on Thursday detail plans made with his partner Sarah Matulin to open a business overseas.

In an affidavit filed with the court, Ms Matulin wrote they had wanted to move out of Australia to create some normalcy in their lives, but her partner had always intended to return if charged.

"We have never planned to run away from this and have always intended to face the criminal charges if they presented," she wrote.

"We have had countless discussions that if he was ever requested to do so, he would hand himself into police custody voluntarily."

In March 2023, Roberts-Smith contacted the chief executive of an outdoor weather protection firm in Chiang Mai, Thailand, looking to meet business contacts over a beer.

By October, the couple had become serious about moving overseas, contacting a friend who owned an avocado farm in Myanmar to discuss opportunities, Ms Matulin wrote.

Later that month, Roberts-Smith had started inquiring about buying a fitness and wellness business in Spain, and began the visa process to move there.

Ms Matulin said it was no secret they wanted to move to Spain because they had openly discussed this with family and friends.

In his own affidavit, Roberts-Smith said he had flown overseas 28 times since 2018 - including a taxpayer-funded trip to the UK for Queen Elizabeth II's funeral in 2022.

He had always returned despite knowing he was being investigated for war crimes, he wrote.

His lawyer Karen Espiner revealed in another affidavit that she offered to have her client arrested by "appointment" by handing himself in at a police station if police disclosed he was going to be charged.

The solicitor said Roberts-Smith did not tell the Officer of the Special Investigator - which was probing the war crime allegations - of the Spanish plans because there were no restrictions on his travel at the time.

The Victoria Cross recipient has consistently proclaimed his innocence, including during a failed defamation action against publisher Nine over articles detailing a number of alleged war crimes.

While the war veteran's former employer Kerry Stokes had funded the defamation proceedings, Roberts-Smith revealed he had to liquidate all his assets to fund the later failed appeals.

His parents also coughed up $400,000 to pay for his legal costs, his affidavit says.

"I have no assets and my personal savings are significantly depleted," he wrote.

Roberts-Smith receives a service pension of $4500 a fortnight, his affidavit says.

He is accused of machine-gunning an Aghan prisoner Mohammed Essa and ordering the execution of his son Ahmadullah to "blood the rookie" during a raid at a compound called Whiskey 108 in April 2009.

Ahmadullah had a prosthetic leg.

The then-SAS soldier placed firearms on the bodies to falsely claim they were enemy combatants, court documents seen by AAP say.

In August 2012 at the village of Darwan, Roberts-Smith is accused of kicking a hand-cuffed Ali Jan off a 10 metre cliff before ordering that he be dragged over a creek bed and shot.

Two months later at Syahchow, he allegedly lined up two prisoners in a corn field, shooting one of them with another soldier.

He ordered a subordinate to shoot the other before throwing a grenade on the bodies to cover up what he had done, court documents say.

The matter will return to court on June 2.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/ben-roberts-smith-never-planned-081908335.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38943

File: 1f1fcde83aa8bcc⋯.png (962.48 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.png)

File: 052433c0daa8957⋯.jpg (220.06 KB,1049x1398,1049:1398,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c51c2b42b600f1d⋯.jpg (520.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24531154 (231824ZAPR26) Notable: Islamic State urges followers to copy Bondi shooters in new propaganda - Islamic State has urged supporters to replicate the Bondi attack in Sydney, praising the perpetrators and presenting the killings as a model for further violence in its Voice of Khurasan newsletter, according to new propaganda material. The Afghanistan-based Islamic State Khorasan branch promoted the December attack in its English-language publication, encouraging followers to carry out similar acts and framing the violence as part of a broader ideological campaign. Australian security experts warn the material reflects patterns seen in previous waves of extremist activity, with propaganda acting as a trigger for lone-actor attacks. Analysts say the messaging highlights ongoing risks from radicalisation both online and in-person, prompting calls for stronger measures to restrict extremist preachers and limit the spread of violent ideology within Australia’s national security framework.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23986486 (pb)

>>38729

>>38734

Islamic State urges followers to copy Bondi shooters in new propaganda

AMANDA HODGE - 23 April 2026

Terror group Islamic State has urged Muslims to follow the example of the Bondi shooters responsible for the murder of 15 people in December last year and conduct similar attacks, describing the Sydney massacre as an “instruction” manual for how to liberate Jerusalem, in its latest English language newsletter.

The article, carried in the latest Voice of Khurasan newsletter produced by the Afghanistan-based Islamic State Khorasan branch and headlined “The Sydney Attack – Revenge of the Oppressed Ummah”, has prompted warnings that Australia must do more to clamp down on hate preachers in both the physical and digital space.

Islamic State first embraced the father and son shooters as “soldiers” in a February speech and newsletter that described the attackers as “brave lions”.

But the latest seven-page feature released on Wednesday, with pictures of the father and son shooters and mourners at the site, lavishly praises Naveed and Sajid Akram for delivering a “major blow” to Jews and their supporters, and demonstrating to Muslims worldwide “that the path to salvation and the honour of Islam lies precisely in the way adopted by the attackers”.

The Islamist propaganda sheet brands Muslims who issued condolences and condemnation of the attack as “shameful” for not understanding “there is no such thing as a non-combatant Kafir” (non-believer).

It also claimed one of Australia’s deadliest terrorist attacks had stirred the conscience of Muslims worldwide and would now serve as a model for “many other Muslims like them; (who) have no direct connection with us, nor do they stand physically alongside us, yet in creed they are with us and they are our brothers”.

“This attack represents the demonstration of the path to the entire Islamic Ummah (Muslim community) and an announcement to all about the means to liberate Bayt al-Maqdis,” the article claims, using the Islamist term for Jerusalem. “The Sydney attack was only a pebble from a mountain; we will continue to kill, by the permission of Allah, until you grow weary of burying the dead.

“For the liberation of (Jerusalem) begin with the Kafir and apostates closest to you, for they are the ones who prevent you from killing the Jews and liberating Jerusalem. Support the Islamic State in this great jihad cause.”

Naveed Akram, 24, is facing close to 60 charges over the shooting at a Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach on December 15 in which 15 innocent people were killed, including a 10-year-old girl. The charges include 15 counts of murder, dozens of counts of attempted murder and one of committing a terrorist act.

Father Sajid Akram was shot dead by police; Naveed also was shot and injured before his arrest.

Australian terror experts have said they believe the pair – whose car contained two homemade Islamic State flags – were inspired by a 2024 ISIS speech that urged Muslims to turn Jewish and Christian celebrations into “bloody massacres”.

The speech, titled And Kill Them Wherever You Find Them, was seen as a renewed call for Islamic State supporters to wage jihad on Israeli and Western targets in their home countries.

Australian National University counter-terrorism expert Levi West, who with security analyst Andrew Zammit co-authored the paper on the likely motivation for the Bondi attack, told The Australian the Voice of Khurasan exhortation was “exact­ly the type of article and instructional material that underpinned the last wave of IS-inspired attacks in the West”.

“What we have seen since the Gaza war is a trend line of increased attacks on Jews and targets across the West,” Dr West said. “These articles are the kinds of things that inspire people to act and are a reminder, whether we want it or not, that counter-terrorism has to be a significant aspect of what our national security posture looks like.”

Rohan Gunaratna, professor of security studies at Singapore’s S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, said the article highlighted the ongoing risks Australia faced from Islamist extremists, and the “hate preachers” who incited them in the physical and digital realms.

“Australia’s laws permit radical and hate preachers who espouse exclusivist and extremist ideologies that lead to violence and terrorism,” he said. “Australia needs to take firm action and create a blacklist to prevent them entering the country.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/islamic-state-urges-followers-to-copy-bondi-shooters-in-new-propaganda/news-story/4b98b4c0540091590393ebe51e438d57

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38944

File: e31f77650449340⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f5f597adbb3ab8b⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 809d4b2f4a41405⋯.jpg (982.72 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5b43c3f98f1afd0⋯.jpg (947.01 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24531161 (231826ZAPR26) Notable: Resplendent heroism': Bondi Beach massacre glorified by ISIS in seven-page propaganda spread - Islamic State has glorified the Bondi Beach attack as “resplendent heroism” in a seven-page feature in its Voice of Khurasan newsletter, urging supporters to follow the example and framing the killings as a model for further violence. The Islamic State Khorasan branch publication praised the attackers and described the incident as a demonstration of tactics for broader ideological objectives, while criticising Muslims who condemned the attack. Security analysts warn such propaganda mirrors material linked to past extremist activity, reinforcing concerns about its role in inspiring lone-actor attacks. The development comes amid heightened domestic concern about antisemitism and ongoing national security risks, with Australia’s terrorism threat level set at “probable”, indicating authorities assess a continued likelihood of attack planning or activity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23986486 (pb)

>>38729

>>38734

>>38943

'Resplendent heroism': Bondi Beach massacre glorified by ISIS in seven-page propaganda spread

Islamic State has glorified the Bondi Beach terror attack in a chilling seven-page propaganda article, calling the massacre “resplendent heroism” and urging Muslims to follow the example.

Oscar Godsell - April 23, 2026

1/2

Islamic State has praised the Bondi Beach terror attack as “resplendent heroism” in a terrifying seven-page propaganda article, urging Muslims to follow the example.

In its latest English-language issue, Voice of Khurasan, produced by the Islamic State Khurasan branch, the terror group devoted a feature article to the Bondi Beach attack.

The article, titled “The Sydney Attack – Revenge of the Oppressed Ummah”, praised the alleged terrorists as “brave lions” and called the mass murder “resplendent heroism”.

“This attack represents the demonstration of the path to the entire Islamic Ummah and an announcement to all about the means to liberate Bayt al-Maqdis,” the article said.

“If you have seen the videos, the father and son, in a calm atmosphere, present the message of action to the Ummah.

“In practice, they offer the method and instruction for the liberation of Bayt al-Maqdis. With every bullet, they shattered the skulls of the Jews, and not a single shot missed.

“They were neither fearful nor did their resolve weaken, until the father was martyred and the son, while wounded, was captured."

The article also criticised Muslims who condemned the attack.

“Despite this resplendent heroism, Muslims in name only condemned this attack and said that those targeted were not combatants but ‘civilians,’ labelled the father and son as ‘terrorists,’ and sent curses and insults upon the Islamic State.”

The chilling story was published as public sentiment reflects widespread domestic alarm about rising hatred toward the Jewish Australian community.

According to the latest Sky News Pulse / YouGov poll, 63 per cent of Australians believe antisemitism has emerged as a serious problem across the country.

Twenty-seven per cent of respondents said it was “a very serious problem” and 36 per cent said it was “a somewhat serious problem”.

Only 28 per cent of people said that antisemitism was not a serious issue, while 10 per cent were unsure.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38945

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533704 (241150ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith vows to take part in Anzac Day commemorations - (Video) Ben Roberts-Smith has said he will attend Anzac Day commemorations despite facing war crime charges, describing the occasion as “sacred” and encouraging others to participate. The Victoria Cross recipient plans to appear at events in Queensland, with support from fellow VC holder Keith Payne, who said he would be “very, very bloody surprised” if Roberts-Smith was not welcome among veterans. The planned appearance comes as the former SAS soldier remains on bail over allegations of murdering Afghan detainees, which he denies. Some supporters have organised separate rallies, while veterans’ organisations said attendance at public commemorations remains open to all. Roberts-Smith said he was “extremely proud” of his service and maintained he acted within the “rules of engagement” during deployments in Afghanistan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

Ben Roberts-Smith vows to take part in Anzac Day commemorations

JAMIE WALKER - 24 April 2026

1/2

Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith has declared that Anzac Day is so “sacred” that his prosecution for war crime-related murder won’t stop him attending the public commemorations on Saturday.

In a move that threatens to overshadow the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings, a day of solemn remembrance for Australians, Mr Roberts-Smith will front an Anzac Day event in Queensland and defy reported calls by some of his supporters to boycott the annual services and marches. This follows intervention by the doyen of Australia’s four living VC holders, Vietnam War hero Keith Payne, to back the former SAS operator’s right to participate in the April 25 ceremonies.

Mr Roberts-Smith told The Australian: “I greatly appreciate the support from Keith Payne VC and everyone else that has made contact. Anzac Day is sacred to me and every other veteran. I will be attending to pay my respects and I encourage everyone else to.”

Mr Payne, 92, the soldier’s ­soldier who earned his VC in 1969, said he would be proud to march alongside his “mate”, Mr Roberts-Smith.

Far from turning his back on him, Mr Payne – as full of fight as ever – reached out to Mr Roberts-Smith after he was arrested and initially held in custody over the alleged murder of five Afghan nationals.

Mr Payne told him: “Keep a smile on your face, mate. There’s a big win in front of you.”

Asked by this masthead whether Mr Roberts-Smith should attend Anzac Day given his notoriety, Mr Payne said forthrightly: “Of course he should march or be at the Dawn Service, whatever he wants to. I’ll be very, very bloody ­surprised and so will the ­remainder of the ­veteran community if he’s not bloody ­welcome wherever he goes.”

Contrary to popular belief, the feisty nonagenarian – not Mr Roberts-Smith, 47 – is Australia’s most decorated living soldier.

Mr Payne’s VC recognising his feat of valour in rescuing 40 men during the Battle of Ben Het in 1969 despite being wounded himself, complemented the three other medals for gallantry and 27 additional decorations he received during a military career spanning nearly a quarter of a century. He also fought in the ­Korean War and the Konfrontasi conflict between Indonesia and Malaysia.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s impressive tally runs to three medals for bravery, headed by the VC he was awarded in 2011 for charging two Taliban machine gun positions under intense fire in Afghanistan. He boasts 11 other decorations.

As Mr Payne told The Australian in 2024, breaking his silence about the war crimes investigation into Mr Roberts-Smith, “what happens in war, stays in war”.

“I am very, very sorry that that sort of thing happened to him,” he said at the time. “Because what happens in war, stays in war. There are many, many things that happened during the First World War, the Second World War and the campaigns since that have never been mentioned because it belongs to war and it should remain in the war.”

That remained his position, he said this week, before jetting to the remote external territory of Norfolk Island for Anzac Day.

“Look, I’ll give you one answer to the whole question of Ben’s treatment,” Mr Payne said. “My belief is what happens in war, stops in war. You can’t second guess it when you weren’t there.”

Mr Payne, who retired from the army in 1975 in the senior non-commissioned rank of warrant officer, said he was dismayed that Mr Roberts-Smith, a corporal, had been prosecuted when those above him in the chain of command were seemingly not held to account.

“The poor bugger, he’s just waiting for the big day,” Mr Payne said, referring to the impending war-crimes trial. “What’s going to come out there and through everything else means there’s a lot of people ducking and weaving at the moment … there’s a lot of ifs and buts and maybes that should be investigated right the way through to the (commissioned) officer bracket, right up to the commanding officer.

“Because there’s going to be a lot more to come out of this case dealing with the whole of the military structure than what there is for Ben. How it ends up for him is anyone’s guess but I’m of the opinion … that Ben will come out of this very lightly and be welcomed back into society.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38946

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533754 (241207ZAPR26) Notable: From Gallipoli to today: How Australia and New Zealand remember Anzac Day in 2026 - (Video) Australians and New Zealanders will gather at dawn on April 25 to mark Anzac Day, continuing a century-old tradition of remembrance while reflecting evolving perspectives on service and national history. Commemorations will include Dawn Services, marches, gunfire breakfasts and community rituals, alongside growing recognition of previously under-represented groups, including Indigenous service members and female veterans. The day also reflects the shared history of the two nations, forged during the Gallipoli campaign and reinforced through subsequent conflicts. Attention this year includes Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith, who is expected to attend while on bail, describing Anzac Day as “sacred”. Veterans such as Shirley Harris, now 100, reflect on service and loss, saying the day remains focused on those who “didn’t come back” and the enduring meaning of sacrifice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38945

From Gallipoli to today: How Australia and New Zealand remember Anzac Day in 2026

As dawn breaks on April 25, Australians and New Zealanders will again gather in silence, continuing a tradition that stretches back more than a century.

Andrew Hedgman - April 24, 2026

1/2

On Saturday, thousands of Australians and New Zealanders will gather before dawn, standing in silence as the first light breaks, continuing an Anzac Day tradition that traces back to the Gallipoli landings more than a century ago.

But while the rituals remain familiar, the national conversation surrounding Anzac Day is becoming increasingly layered, shaped by broader histories, evolving perspectives and renewed reflection on what remembrance means in modern Australia.

That conversation is shifting toward a broader understanding of the nation’s past. It includes greater recognition of the Australian wars and frontier conflicts.

There is also growing attention on voices previously under-represented, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander service members who served despite facing discrimination at home and female veterans whose contributions were often overlooked.

Together, these shifts reflect a changing Australia, where Anzac Day continues to evolve alongside modern conflicts, shifting demographics and a more detailed understanding of service and remembrance.

Ben Roberts-Smith

That evolving focus has also drawn attention to high-profile veterans such as Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith, who has confirmed he will attend commemorations this year while on bail facing five counts of alleged war crime murder relating to his service in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

Mr Roberts-Smith has maintained his innocence throughout the ongoing proceedings and is expected to attend services in Queensland. Speaking ahead of the day, he said Anzac Day held deep significance for him and others who had served.

“Anzac Day is sacred to me and every other veteran. I will be attending to pay my respects and I encourage everyone else to,” Mr Roberts-Smith told The Australian.

His planned participation has been publicly supported by fellow Victoria Cross recipient Keith Payne, who said veterans should be able to take part in commemorations regardless of circumstance.

“Of course he should march or be at the Dawn Service, whatever he wants to,” Mr Payne told the masthead.

Mr Roberts-Smith also expressed gratitude for the support, saying he had been contacted by fellow veterans.

An enduring ritual

Across Australia and New Zealand, Dawn Services will begin from about 5.30am, marked by the playing of the Last Post, a minute’s silence, and the recitation of The Ode.

Communities will then gather for gunfire breakfasts, marches involving veterans and families, and moments of reunion that sit alongside remembrance.

Later in the day, two-up will be legally played in pubs and clubs, while Anzac biscuits are shared and sprigs of rosemary and red poppies are worn in remembrance of those who served at Gallipoli.

Increasingly, commemorations also incorporate purple poppies for animals and an infinity symbol recognising military personnel who have died by suicide.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38947

File: 2186f88c5055c4b⋯.jpg (680.97 KB,2048x1463,2048:1463,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 56e3635f3e1917d⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,2048x1463,2048:1463,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533785 (241220ZAPR26) Notable: French town where war dead are not forgotten - The northern French town of Villers-Bretonneux continues to honour thousands of Australian soldiers killed in the First World War, with annual Anzac Day ceremonies reinforcing a lasting connection between the two nations. The Australian National Memorial commemorates more than 10,000 Australians with no known grave, while meticulously maintained cemeteries reflect the scale of loss among a generation that “never came back”. Each year, visitors gather at dawn as names are read and wreaths laid, before the site returns to quiet stillness. Local residents help preserve the memory, with the town embracing the fallen as its own and affirming “N’oublions jamais l’Australie” - “let us never forget Australia”. The commemorations highlight both the enduring bond and the human cost of war across generations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

French town where war dead are not forgotten

Captain Annie Richardson - 20 APRIL 2026

1/2

In the farming country of northern France, a small town carries a quiet Australian accent.

Villers-Bretonneux does not announce itself loudly. A small town that sits amid the rolling hills and broad skies along the river Somme in Picardie, its quaint redbrick buildings were rebuilt after the devastation of a war more than 100 years ago.

School children here learn of a distant nation in the southern hemisphere, street signs nod to Melbourne, and on the far edge of town, carved in white Portland stone, hundreds of young Australians, Canadians and Brits lie in ordered rows. It is here the names of 10,700 Australians who died in France and have no known grave are commemorated on a vast memorial that dominates the landscape.

Each April, as Anzac Day dawns, visitors gather at the Australian National Memorial a kilometre outside Villers-Bretonneux. As the service unfolds in the half-light, the sound of a lone bugle carries across the fields. Names of those Australians who died in France are read and wreaths are laid in their memory – a ceremony binding two nations across oceans and generations.

But after the catafalque party from Australia’s Federation Guard marches off, the crowd disperses and the buses pull away, the memorial returns to silent stillness.

The graves are tended with meticulous care by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Grass remains trimmed, roses bloom in orderly clusters, and headstones are cleaned bright white so they catch the sun.

Yet beneath each of these stones lies a story that stopped abruptly. Walking among the headstones, the scale of loss is palpable. Most of the men buried here were scarcely older than boys.

The rows at Villers-Bretonneux ... speak of a generation that left home and, for thousands, never came back.

Young farmhands from regional Victoria; junior clerks from Sydney; shearers, labourers, teachers, sons. They crossed half the world for a war, never to return home.

For some families, the body was never repatriated, and the grave in France became the only physical place to grieve. With a four-week journey by sea, many of the graves were never visited, and time has carried their mourners away.

There are no weathered fingerprints on the stone, no fading flowers, or personal trinkets tucked discreetly at the base, no fresh handwriting on a card from a grandchild. Parents who once wept over telegrams are long gone. Sweethearts who may have stood here in black, are themselves now under their own headstones in other cemeteries back home.

Occasionally, an inscription breaks the uniformity, a final message from home: “Beloved son of …” or “Until we meet again”. Those words paid for by grieving families who were oceans away, etched into stone in hopes that anyone walking through would know he was loved.

The saddest headstones are those that bear only the regiment, date and age. The most gutting show not even that, marked “Known unto God”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38948

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533803 (241228ZAPR26) Notable: ADF | Chief of the Defence Force ANZAC Day Address 2026 - (Video) "On Anzac Day, we mark the landings at Gallipoli of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) soldiers in 1915 and commemorate all Australian personnel who served and died in wars, conflicts and peacekeeping operations. We reflect on their courage, discipline and self-sacrifice. The Anzac spirit lives on in the hearts and minds of all Australians as we acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of those who contributed so much to shaping the identity of our nation. Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel across Australia and serving around the world will commemorate Anzac Day through dawn services and commemorative services. In Australia, ADF personnel will support the Australian War Memorial services as well as services in each capital city and in dozens of smaller cities and towns. Overseas, ADF personnel will also support services at Gallipoli in Türkiye, Villers-Bretonneux in France, as well as services across the Indo-Pacific." - Defence Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

ADF | Chief of the Defence Force ANZAC Day Address 2026

Defence Australia

Apr 24, 2026

On Anzac Day, we mark the landings at Gallipoli of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) soldiers in 1915 and commemorate all Australian personnel who served and died in wars, conflicts and peacekeeping operations. We reflect on their courage, discipline and self-sacrifice.

The Anzac spirit lives on in the hearts and minds of all Australians as we acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of those who contributed so much to shaping the identity of our nation.

Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel across Australia and serving around the world will commemorate Anzac Day through dawn services and commemorative services. In Australia, ADF personnel will support the Australian War Memorial services as well as services in each capital city and in dozens of smaller cities and towns.

Overseas, ADF personnel will also support services at Gallipoli in Türkiye, Villers-Bretonneux in France, as well as services across the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjEkRqyWE7o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38949

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533816 (241235ZAPR26) Notable: ADF | Anzac Day message from deployed personnel - (Video) Anzac Day is a time to remember, reflect, and honour those who have served, past and present. From Gallipoli to today's operations overseas, the Anzac spirit endures. Lest we forget. - Defence Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

ADF | Anzac Day message from deployed personnel

Defence Australia

Apr 22, 2026

Anzac Day is a time to remember, reflect, and honour those who have served, past and present.

From Gallipoli to today's operations overseas, the Anzac spirit endures.

Lest we forget.

#AnzacDay #LestWeForget #WeWillRememberThem #YourADF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1A6KRw9iiE

https://x.com/DefenceAust/status/2047601439044755934

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38950

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533827 (241240ZAPR26) Notable: Anzac Day 2026 LIVE: National Dawn Service - Official Broadcast - Join us as we go LIVE from around Australia for Anzac Day 2026, including the National Commemorative Service in Canberra. This stream will include the following services: Sydney Dawn Service (4:19am to 5:30am AEST), Canberra Dawn Service (5:30am to 6am AEST), Melbourne Dawn Service (6am to 6:30am AEST), Adelaide Dawn Service (6:30am to 7:30am AEST). - ABC Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Anzac Day 2026 LIVE: National Dawn Service | Official Broadcast | ABC Australia

ABC Australia

Apr 25, 2026

Join us as we go LIVE from around Australia for Anzac Day 2026, including the National Commemorative Service in Canberra.

This stream will include the following services:

Sydney Dawn Service (4:19am to 5:30am AEST)

Canberra Dawn Service (5:30am to 6am AEST)

Melbourne Dawn Service (6am to 6:30am AEST)

Adelaide Dawn Service (6:30am to 7:30am AEST)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5_Q5gWOaZc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38951

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533833 (241243ZAPR26) Notable: Anzac Day 2026 LIVE: Gallipoli & Villers-Bretonneux Services - Official Broadcast - Join us as we go LIVE from the Gallipoli and Villers-Bretonneux dawn services on Anzac Day 2026. - ABC Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38947

Anzac Day 2026 LIVE: Gallipoli & Villers-Bretonneux Services | Official Broadcast | ABC Australia

ABC Australia

Apr 25, 2026

Join us as we go LIVE from the Gallipoli and Villers-Bretonneux dawn services on Anzac Day 2026.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpoi5TrfgfM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38952

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533845 (241247ZAPR26) Notable: ANZAC Day 2026 Melbourne Dawn Service - Watch the 2026 Melbourne Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance. The Service will commence at 5.30am. In solemn tradition, we gather to commemorate those who served and died in defence of Australia. The service is held at dawn to coincide with the time of the Gallipoli landing in 1915 - the first major military action by Australian and New Zealand forces (ANZACs) during the First World War. The event includes recitations, hymns, wreath-laying and an address by the Governor of Victoria. - ShrineMelbourne

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

ANZAC Day 2026 Melbourne Dawn Service

ShrineMelbourne

Apr 25, 2026

Watch the 2026 Melbourne Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance.

The Service will commence at 5.30am.

In solemn tradition, we gather to commemorate those who served and died in defence of Australia. The service is held at dawn to coincide with the time of the Gallipoli landing in 1915—the first major military action by Australian and New Zealand forces (ANZACs) during the First World War.

The event includes recitations, hymns, wreath-laying and an address by the Governor of Victoria.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQRt0dLNKXo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38953

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533854 (241250ZAPR26) Notable: Anzac Day 2026 March & Commemoration Service - Watch the live stream of the Anzac Day March and Commemoration Service. Honour and recognise those who have served and who currently serve in defence of Australia and its interests. The march commences in Swanston Street (near Federation Square) along St Kilda Road to the Shrine of Remembrance. The march is normally complete by midday, and is followed by a commemoration service at the Shrine of Remembrance. - ShrineMelbourne

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Anzac Day 2026 March & Commemoration Service

ShrineMelbourne

Apr 25, 2026

Watch the live stream of the Anzac Day March and Commemoration Service.

Honour and recognise those who have served and who currently serve in defence of Australia and its interests.

The march commences in Swanston Street (near Federation Square) along St Kilda Road to the Shrine of Remembrance.

The march is normally complete by midday, and is followed by a commemoration service at the Shrine of Remembrance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9giX1Q9Jh4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38954

File: 3bd9be49d1c26fc⋯.mp4 (10.15 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24533861 (241253ZAPR26) Notable: Video: The Last Post - Anzac Day 2026 - "They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old; Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them." Lest We Forget.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

ANZAC Day 2026

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;

Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.

At the going down of the sun and in the morning

We will remember them.

Lest We Forget.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38955

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536189 (251240ZAPR26) Notable: Two women charged with allegedly vandalising RSL on Anzac Day - (Video) Two women have been charged after allegedly defacing a Melbourne RSL ahead of Anzac Day dawn services, as police investigate a series of vandalism incidents targeting war memorials and veterans’ venues across the city. Police allege the pair spray-painted the Heidelberg RSL before being arrested nearby, while other sites including Reservoir, Fawkner and Port Melbourne were also targeted with anti-military graffiti and red paint. Messages included “kill the troops”, “death to ADF” and “death to Australia”. Veterans’ groups and political leaders condemned the incidents as “disgraceful” and “cowardly”, while ceremonies proceeded with strong attendance despite the damage. Investigations are continuing into multiple incidents, including vandalism of memorials in Port Melbourne and Moonee Ponds in the lead-up to Anzac Day.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Two women charged with allegedly vandalising RSL on Anzac Day

Two women have been charged after allegedly being caught vandalising an RSL in Heidelberg, while police are investigating after two more Melbourne RSLs were targeted overnight.

Fergus Ellis - April 25, 2026

1/2

Two women have been charged for allegedly defacing an RSL in Melbourne’s northeast ahead of this morning’s Anzac Day Dawn Services.

It comes as police confirmed two more RSLs across Melbourne were targeted by alleged vandals overnight, following damage done to an RSL sub-branch in Fawkner.

Police allegedly caught two women in the act of defacing the Heidelberg RSL about 1.45am this morning.

The women, aged 22 and 20-years-old, allegedly spray-painted a wall of the venue before police spotted them.

A constable and a senior constable chased the women on foot as they tried to flee the area in opposite directions.

After a short pursuit, the women were arrested and were charged criminal damage, mark graffiti on property without consent and possess graffiti implement to mark graffiti.

The pair has since been bailed and are set to appear before Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court on May 19.

A Victoria Police spokesman said they believed the alleged vandalism was linked to damage done to the Reservoir RSL sub-branch.

Messages including “kill the troops”, f*ck Anzac”, “death to ADF”, “Gallipoli — do it again” and “death to Australia” were sprayed in red across multiple external walls of the club on Saturday morning.

Secretary Anton Cabunilas said the graffiti and slurs were “disgraceful”.

“Reservoir RSL Sub-Branch condemns in the strongest possible terms the cowardly act of vandalism committed against our Sub-Branch in the early hours of ANZAC Day,” he said.

“To deliberately target a veterans’ organisation on Anzac Day is disgraceful.

“It was clearly intended to cause hurt, division and distress to veterans, serving members, their families, and the broader community who gather each year to honour sacrifice and service.”

Mr Cabunilas said despite the “hateful act”, the vandals had “failed in their objective”.

“Our Dawn Service proceeded with a strong turnout from the Reservoir community, who stood together in dignity, respect and remembrance,” he said.

“Our Cenotaph, the heart of our commemorations, remained untouched, and the spirit of Anzac Day could not be diminished.

“Following the service, many attendees and members were unfortunately exposed to the graffiti while attending our traditional Gunfire Breakfast.

“While upsetting, the overwhelming response from the public was one of unity, support and condemnation of those responsible.”

Mr Cabunilas said the Sub-Branch would not be “intimidated by cowardice, hatred or ignorance”.

“Those who commit such acts should remember they enjoy the freedoms of this country because generations of Australian servicemen and women answered the call to serve, often at great personal cost,” he said.

Police are also investigating an incident at the Fawkner RSL on Lorne St where graffiti was spotted at 5am on Saturday morning.

Investigators believe vandals defaced the venue sometime between Friday night and early this morning.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38956

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536218 (251248ZAPR26) Notable: PRESS STATEMENT: Anzac Day - "On behalf of the United States of America, I am honored to join the people of Australia and New Zealand in commemorating Anzac Day on April 25. As we mark the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings, we pay tribute to the Anzac forces who answered the call of duty. The valor demonstrated at Gallipoli has been an inspiration for generations and exemplifies the courage and selflessness of those who served and continue to serve. As we reflect on this solemn day, we honor the memory of the fallen, express gratitude for all who have served, and reaffirm our shared commitment to the values and partnerships that unite us." - MARCO RUBIO, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE - APRIL 24, 2026

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Marco Rubio pays tribute to Anzac Day in a message of unity

Sky News Australia

Apr 25, 2026

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has paid tribute to the Anzacs in a message of unity.

The US Secretary of State called the valour demonstrated in Gallipoli an “inspiration for generations”.

Mr Rubio also expressed gratitude for all who have served.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Ij4kRivUY

PRESS STATEMENT: Anzac Day

MARCO RUBIO, SECRETARY OF STATE - APRIL 24, 2026

On behalf of the United States of America, I am honored to join the people of Australia and New Zealand in commemorating Anzac Day on April 25.

As we mark the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings, we pay tribute to the Anzac forces who answered the call of duty. The valor demonstrated at Gallipoli has been an inspiration for generations and exemplifies the courage and selflessness of those who served and continue to serve.

As we reflect on this solemn day, we honor the memory of the fallen, express gratitude for all who have served, and reaffirm our shared commitment to the values and partnerships that unite us.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/04/anzac-day

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38957

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536239 (251259ZAPR26) Notable: Prime Minister joins thousands gathered at Australian War Memorial to commemorate Anzac Day - (Video) Tens of thousands gathered before dawn at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra to mark the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese among those attending the national Anzac Day service. The ceremony featured a didgeridoo performance by Wiradjuri man and Flight Lieutenant James Evans before wreaths were laid by Australian and New Zealand representatives. Royal Australian Air Force Flying Officer Kbora Ali delivered the commemorative address, reflecting on her family’s escape from Afghanistan and her later decision to join the military. She linked the sacrifices of modern service personnel to the “legacy and sacrifices” of the Anzacs. The day’s commemorations also included an Indigenous service, smoking ceremony and veterans’ march through Canberra.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Prime Minister joins thousands gathered at Australian War Memorial to commemorate Anzac Day

Niki Burnside - 25 April 2026

Tens of thousands have gathered before sunrise at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra for Anzac Day, commemorating the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings.

The dawn service began with a didgeridoo performance by Wiradjuri man and Flight Lieutenant James Evans before the crowd participated in a hymn.

Up to 35,000 people attended the ceremony, according to the War Memorial, with wreaths laid by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the New Zealand High Commissioner, Andrew Needs.

Since the Anzacs fought alongside one another in Turkey during World War I, experiencing high casualties, April 25 has come to represent a bond between the two nations.

'My bags are always packed'

The commemorative address was given by Flying Officer Kbora Ali of the Royal Australian Air Force, whose family fled Afghanistan when she was a child.

"In 2001, in the early hours of the morning, a tiny wooden boat in the Indian Ocean was on the verge of sinking," her speech began.

She said the boat was slammed down "onto the unforgiving water" and those on board, including children, "didn't have much time left".

"Water was quickly filling up the broken boat and there was no land in sight," she said.

"Among the people that our courageous Navy personnel saved from that sinking boat was my father, who risked his life to try and find us safety.

"I didn't see my father for many years — our family wasn't together much during my childhood."

She said when she was 18 years old and her family was "living comfortably in Australia", she left home and went on to join the military.

"Now I am the one who is never home, my bags are always packed," she said.

"This is the kind of sacrifice that men and women of the Australian Defence Force make every single day.

"They do this so that other families can be spared the suffering and separation that occurs when home is no longer a safe place to stay."

Now an aviator, Flying Officer Ali said she gets to "carry the hope and now the promise to give back to a place I now call home".

The long 'legacy' of the Anzacs

Flying Officer Ali spoke of the meaning of Anzac Day and the courage shown by those who were in Gallipoli in 1915.

"We acknowledge that we can only serve on this journey because of their legacy and sacrifices," she said.

She said that in times of war and conflict, "our guiding principle should always be as those of the Anzacs before us, to uphold the values we cherish as Australians".

"And through our actions to always honour the sacrifices of all our personnel and their families, with an unwavering commitment to the preservation of peace," she said.

Smoking ceremony and march follow

Later in the morning, a commemorative ceremony was held in the Sculpture Garden to honour Indigenous Australians who have served.

The ceremony was held in front of the For Our Country memorial, a sculpture created by artist Daniel Boyd.

It was designed to invite reflection, with light filtering through its glass lenses.

The service included a smoking ceremony, and wreaths were laid, with ACT Senator David Pocock among those present.

After 9:30am, more than 1,800 people participated in the veterans' march, held along Anzac Parade in front of the war memorial.

The Governor-General, Sam Mostyn, was in attendance, along with ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr, Shadow Defence Minister James Paterson, and former prime minister Tony Abbott.

The march began with a fly-past by an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft and a guard of honour made up of first, second and third-year midshipmen and officer cadets from the Australian Defence Force Academy.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-25/thousands-gather-at-australian-war-memorial-for-anzac-day/106601498

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjA_USjwoOk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38958

File: 877d35aeb29295f⋯.mp4 (15.8 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536322 (251332ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith attends Anzac Day event in Queensland - Ben Roberts-Smith has attended an Anzac Day ceremony on the Gold Coast while on bail over war crime charges, saying he “never thought about not coming” to the commemorations. Wearing his medals, the former SAS soldier said the day should focus on Australians who served and the sacrifices made by military families. Supporters gathered to shake his hand and take photographs following the Currumbin service, while a banner reading “we support BRS” was displayed overlooking the ceremony. Former Australian War Memorial director Brendan Nelson described Roberts-Smith as “a national hero” and defended his attendance, while RSL Australia said all veterans were entitled to participate in commemorations. Roberts-Smith denies allegations relating to the murder of Afghan detainees during deployments between 2009 and 2012.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38945

>>38946

Ben Roberts-Smith attends Anzac Day event in Queensland

Liana Walker and Elias Clure - 25 April 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith has spoken after attending an Anzac Day ceremony on the Gold Coast, wearing his medals.

He said he had not considered not attending the ceremony in Currumbin.

"I've never thought about not coming, I was always going to be here," he said, briefly speaking to the media.

He said it was a day "everyone should be reflecting and commemorating the service of all of those Australians that have given us the country that we live in".

Mr Roberts-Smith said he was thinking about service families.

"Their sons are the ones that I'm thinking about today because that's what this is all about, and we should never forget their sacrifice because it is enduring," he said.

"They think about that every day, they live with that, they've given that to us, and we owe them a deep, deep debt."

He was seen with his girlfriend, Sarah Matulin, among others in the crowd watching the service.

After the Dawn Service, supporters flocked to shake hands and take photos with Mr Roberts-Smith.

A banner with the words "we support BRS" was seen hanging from a balcony on a house on a hill overlooking the ceremony.

Mr Roberts-Smith has been residing in Queensland since he was released from Sydney's Silverwater jail to await trial for five counts of the war crime of murder.

While he has yet to enter a plea, he has strenuously denied the allegations, which stem from alleged actions during his service in Afghanistan.

Brendan Nelson defends 'war hero'

The former director of the Australian National War Memorial, Brendan Nelson, has strongly defended Mr Roberts-Smith's attendance at the ceremony.

Dr Nelson, who is now a senior executive at aerospace company Boeing, told the ABC at a dawn service event in London: "Ben Roberts-Smith, as far as I'm concerned, is a national hero.

"All of us have a responsibility to support and respect all of our veterans, including Ben Roberts-Smith."

Yesterday, a spokesperson for RSL Australia said all Australians, including Mr Roberts-Smith, were able to attend Anzac Day commemorations.

"As a service veteran, and like any member of the community, Ben Roberts-Smith is able to attend Anzac Day commemorations should he so choose," they said.

RSL Australia national president Peter Tinley added: "Our responsibility is not only to honour the fallen, but to fiercely advocate for and support the living."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-25/queensland-ben-roberts-smith-anzac-day-event/106603940

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwtFE67-yJ8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38959

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536347 (251340ZAPR26) Notable: Roberts-Smith attends Anzac Day dawn service on the Gold Coast - Ben Roberts-Smith was surrounded by supporters after attending an Anzac Day dawn service at Currumbin on the Gold Coast while on bail over war crime charges he denies. The former SAS soldier, wearing military medals and accompanied by partner Sarah Matulin, attended the beachside service alongside veterans, serving personnel and members of the public. Following the ceremony, supporters thanked him for his service, with one telling him to “keep fighting, mate”. Roberts-Smith described the public response as “overwhelming” and said Anzac Day was about commemorating Australians who served and the sacrifices endured by military families. RSL Australia said veterans were entitled to attend commemorations, while organisers of a separate Melbourne rally backing Roberts-Smith were reportedly not associated with him or his family.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38946

>>38958

Roberts-Smith attends Anzac Day dawn service on the Gold Coast

James Hall and Jack Gramenz - April 25, 2026

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith was swarmed by supporters after attending a beachside dawn service on the southern Gold Coast, where the accused war criminal sat in the rain adorned in medals received from serving in Afghanistan.

Roberts-Smith, who is on bail at present facing war crime charges that he has denied, arrived at the Currumbin Anzac Day service about 4.30am wearing a suit alongside girlfriend Sarah Matulin to little fanfare.

He sat a number of rows back from the stage with family, among service personnel and veterans in the car park below Elephant Rock on Currumbin Beach, as thousands of attendees lined the street above and the sand along the beach on either side.

Roberts-Smith did not lay a wreath during the service and there was no direct mention during formalities of the Victoria Cross recipient.

But the towering figure was mobbed by supporters after the sun poked through damp clouds when the service concluded, many thanking Roberts-Smith for his service and one older gentleman telling him to “keep fighting, mate”.

Roberts-Smith described the attention at the south-east Queensland beach as “overwhelming”.

“It’s a day that everyone should be reflecting and commemorating the service of all those Australians that have given us the country that we live in,” he told media.

“We should never forget their sacrifice because it is enduring – they [families who have lost loved ones at war] think about that every day.”

When asked if he had considered not attending a dawn service given the spotlight and the accusations he faces, Roberts-Smith said: “I never thought about not coming, I was always going to be here.”

An RSL Australia spokesman had said Roberts-Smith could attend Anzac Day commemorations “as a service veteran, and like any member of the community”.

RSL Australia national president Peter Tinley said in a statement that the organisation existed to serve all veterans and their families.

“Our responsibility is not only to honour the fallen, but to fiercely advocate for and support the living,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38960

File: fdf5cf55d405fb9⋯.mp4 (15.61 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536418 (251401ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Today is bigger than me’: Ben Roberts-Smith on attending Anzac Day service - (Video) Ben Roberts-Smith has attended Anzac Day commemorations on the Gold Coast, saying the occasion was “bigger than me” as he joined thousands at the Currumbin dawn service while facing war crime charges he denies. Wearing his military medals, including the Victoria Cross, the former SAS soldier said it was important to honour Australians who had served and sacrificed for the country. Supporters and veterans gathered around Roberts-Smith following the ceremony, while former defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon said his presence would “provide a boost” to morale. Fellow Victoria Cross recipient Keith Payne has also publicly supported his attendance at commemorations. Roberts-Smith remains on bail over allegations relating to the deaths of Afghan detainees during deployments between 2009 and 2012 and has not yet entered a plea.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38946

>>38958

>>38959

‘Today is bigger than me’: Ben Roberts-Smith on attending Anzac Day service

MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - 25 April 2026

1/2

Accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith has fronted an Anzac Day event in Queensland, defying reported calls by some of his supporters to boycott the annual services and marches.

The Victoria Cross recipient joined a crowd of thousands to mark Anzac Day commemorations at Currumbin on the Gold Coast, his first since he was charged with war crimes.

Mr Roberts-Smith arrived at the Currumbin service at about 4.30am with little fanfare. Dressed in a dark suit and purple tie and wearing his military medals including his Victoria Cross – the country’s highest military honour – he was seen mingling with fellow soldiers, before taking a seat several rows back from the stage.

Following the service, Mr Roberts-Smith posed for photos with other military veterans and supporters.

Speaking to The Australian, Mr Roberts-Smith said it was important for him to attend the Anzac Day service to honour the countless men and women who have served for Australia.

“I needed to commemorate the service and everyone that went before me – as I always have,” he said.

Mr Roberts-Smith said the support had been “overwhelming”.

“Today is bigger than me,” he said. “This is a day … about remembering every single person that has given us the country that we live in.”

Former defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon is among those who have emphatically backed the Victoria Cross recipient.

Mr Fitzgibbon on Friday said Mr Roberts-Smith presence at Anzac Day commemorations would “provide a boost”.

“Ben’s presence will provide a boost in morale for those lucky enough to be marching with him,” he said. “It would be an honour to march by his side if I had the opportunity, as I’m sure most Australians would.”

This followed public support from the nation’s most decorated living soldier, fellow VC holder Keith Payne, who declared he would also be proud to stand and march alongside him.

Mr Payne has opposed the prosecution of Mr Roberts-Smith, saying “what happens in war, stays in war”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38961

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536485 (251421ZAPR26) Notable: Boos mar Melbourne’s Anzac Day dawn service - (Video) Booing during a Welcome to Country and anti-Anzac graffiti at several Melbourne RSLs disrupted Anzac Day commemorations in Victoria, prompting condemnation from political leaders, veterans’ groups and attendees. About 55,000 people gathered at Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance, where Bunurong elder Mark Brown’s Welcome to Country was repeatedly jeered by a small group linked to former members and associates of the disbanded neo-Nazi National Socialist Network. Many in the crowd applauded in response to drown out the disruption. Overnight vandalism targeting RSLs in Reservoir, Heidelberg and Fawkner included slogans such as “kill the troops” and “f*ck Anzacs”, with two women charged over alleged graffiti offences. Despite the incidents, ceremonies proceeded with large crowds and messages of remembrance, unity and respect for veterans and their families.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

Boos mar Melbourne’s Anzac Day dawn service

Ashleigh McMillan - April 25, 2026

1/3

Booing of the Welcome to Country has once again marred the solemnity of Melbourne’s Anzac Day dawn service, while people gathering at three RSL sub-branches in Melbourne’s north and north-east before dawn were confronted with anti-Anzac graffiti.

About 55,000 people gathered in the dark at the Shrine of Remembrance on Saturday morning to honour Australia’s servicemen and women. An estimated 10,000 lined the march route afterwards.

But when Bunurong elder Mark Brown commenced his Welcome to Country, jeers could be heard from the crowd amassed in the Shrine’s forecourt.

The booing continued throughout his speech and was picked up by microphones near the stage.

Among those booing were former members and known associates of the recently disbanded neo-Nazi group the National Socialist Network (NSN). In the lead-up to Anzac Day, Nazi social media accounts and channels encouraged followers to attend and boo at the ceremony.

Many people at the Shrine clapped in response to Brown’s words, trying to drown out the booing.

A small group of men again jeered when Victorian Governor Margaret Gardner acknowledged the Bunurong people of the eastern Kulin nation at the start of her speech.

Brown was also booed during the Welcome to Country at last year’s Anzac Day dawn service. The stunt at the Melbourne’s Shrine, involving 50 undercover neo-Nazis led by NSN leader Jacob Hersant, was part of a series of disruptions orchestrated by the group to funnel more mainstream recruits into their extreme ideologies.

Hersant and two other high-profile neo-Nazis were charged over the incident.

Similar booing occurred on Saturday morning at Sydney’s dawn service at the Martin Place Cenotaph, where some crowd members displayed rowdy behaviour during an Acknowledgment of Country by Uncle Ray Minniecon.

In Melbourne’s north and north-east, those gathering in solemn remembrance of the Anzacs were left distressed after offensive, anti-veteran rhetoric was graffitied on three RSL sub-branches.

Two women have been charged with offences including criminal damage, after police allegedly spotted them spray-painting a wall of the West Heidelberg RSL about 1.45am on Saturday.

The pair, aged 20 and 22, ran from the scene in opposite directions but were arrested after a short foot chase. They will appear before Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court on May 19.

Graffiti including “kill the troops” and “f*ck Anzacs” was sprayed in red paint on the walls of the Reservoir RSL overnight, before the commemorative service on Saturday morning.

Police believe the incident in Reservoir is linked to the graffiti in Heidelberg.

Reservoir RSL sub-branch secretary Anton Cabunilas said the “disgraceful” graffiti was intended to cause “hurt, division and distress to veterans” and their loved ones.

But instead, those who gathered for the dawn service were further united to ensure the spirit of Anzac Day lived on, he said.

“Those who commit such acts should remember they enjoy the freedoms of this country because generations of Australian service men and women answered the call to serve, often at great personal cost,” Cabunilas said.

Police said the Fawkner RSL was sprayed with similar graffiti, and the damage was discovered at 5am on Saturday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38962

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536548 (251450ZAPR26) Notable: Booing during Welcome to Country at Melbourne, Sydney and Perth Anzac Day services draws condemnation - (Video) Booing and heckling during Welcome to Country ceremonies at Anzac Day services in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth have drawn widespread condemnation from political leaders, veterans and attendees. Disruptions occurred during addresses by Indigenous elders at dawn services, with some crowd members jeering while others applauded to drown out the noise. Defence Minister Richard Marles described the behaviour as “deeply disgraceful”, while Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan called it “bastardry”. RSL leaders said the incidents disrespected veterans and overshadowed a day intended for remembrance and reflection. Police investigated disturbances at several events, including one arrest in Sydney and move-on notices issued in Perth. Attendees said the crowd response in support of speakers reflected the broader spirit of respect and unity that characterised the commemorations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38961

Booing during Welcome to Country at Melbourne, Sydney and Perth Anzac Day services draws condemnation

abc.net.au - 26 April 2026

1/2

Racist booing and heckling from crowd members during multiple Welcome to Country speeches at Anzac Day services across the country have drawn widespread condemnation.

Political leaders, veterans and service attendees described the disruptions at dawn services in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth as "disgraceful" and "bastardry".

At Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance, loud booing was heard as Bunurong Elder Uncle Mark Brown spoke for his Welcome to Country address, while at Sydney's service, Pastor Ray Minniecon was also disrupted, prompting him to ask those who booed to show some respect.

Uncle Ray, whose family has served over the decades, told the ABC he had a message to the hecklers: "This always was and always will be Aboriginal land.

"They have to show that respect to that, to us as traditional owners, sovereign owners to this country," he said.

Uncle Ray said it was disappointing, but he called upon his military background to stand strong.

"What crime did we commit? What are we doing to incite that kind of rage and that kind of hatred? I can't fathom that," Uncle Ray said.

Ricky Morris, a veteran and Gunditjmara man who introduced the Melbourne Welcome to Country, condemned the response.

"For me to stand alongside Uncle Mark, a true warrior of the Bunurong people, how he conducted himself today is [nothing] short of extraordinary," he said.

"I didn't hear much booing because of the applauding of our audience that were there to respect the traditions of what Anzac Day is about."

Later, the Welcome to Country speech by Elder Di Ryder at Perth's dawn service was similarly disrupted by some booing.

Major General Richard Vagg, acting chief of army, said the heckling would upset those who had, and were still, serving the nation.

"Anzac Day is a day where I reflect on the service and sacrifice of well over two million Australians that have served in the Australian Defence Force since Federation," he said on ABC News Breakfast.

"Just about every service person, serving and past, would be upset with that type of behaviour. It misses the point," he said.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, who was at the Melbourne service, described the disruptive behaviour as "bastardry".

"To break the stillness of dawn service is not just ugly behaviour towards our Aboriginal servicemen and women who defended this country — it disrespects everyone who fought and died for our freedoms," Ms Allan said.

"Politicising this sacred day is bastardry. I condemn it, and so should every leader."

On ABC News Breakfast, Defence Minister Richard Marles described the booing as "deeply disrespectful".

"Acknowledgements to Country are just an act of respect, and what characterises today is that it is a day of respect," he said.

"To boo in that way goes completely against that. It is deeply disgraceful."

Last year, Elder Uncle Mark Brown was similarly booed as he delivered the Welcome to Country at the Melbourne dawn service.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38963

File: b85b00d8629c6be⋯.mp4 (15.68 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536578 (251504ZAPR26) Notable: Standing and applauding:Incredible scenes at Collingwood and Essendon clash after Anzac Dawn Services around Australia marred- (Video) Tens of thousands of AFL fans at the Melbourne Cricket Ground applauded and cheered throughout a Welcome to Country before the Anzac Day clash between Collingwood and Essendon, contrasting with booing that disrupted dawn services in several Australian cities earlier in the day. Wurundjeri elder Uncle Colin Hunter Jr received a standing ovation from the crowd of almost 100,000 before delivering his address and paying tribute to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and military personnel who served Australia. Supporters online described the moment as “moving” and praised the atmosphere of “mutual respect”. The response followed disruptions during Welcome to Country ceremonies at Anzac Day services in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth, where Indigenous speakers were heckled by sections of the crowd during commemorations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38961

>>38962

Incredible scenes at Collingwood and Essendon clash after Anzac Dawn Services around Australia marred

There were incredible scenes on Saturday afternoon as footy fans reunited to send a stirring message during the Welcome to Country.

Ben Talintyre - April 25, 2026

After Anzac Day Dawn Services in Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide were marred by booing during the Welcome to Country acknowledgment, footy fans have taken a stand, standing and applauding it at the AFL on Saturday afternoon.

Ahead of Essendon and Collingwood’s Anzac Day clash, a near 100,00 strong MCG crowd gave Uncle Colin Hunter Jr a hero’s welcome before cheering and clapping throughout his several minute speech.

After it was announced he would give the Welcome to Country, the crowd burst into rapturous applause. And from there on the cheers only intensified.

“I would like to start by saying that this afternoon we are gathering on the lands of my ancestors, the Wurundjeri people,” he began.

After paying his respects to the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people, he then made a special acknowledgement to those who have served Australia, which was met by more cheers.

“Today I want to make a special acknowledgement,” he continued.

“I want to acknowledge the men and women who have served this country and I want to pay my deepest respects to them.”

The crowd then continued to clap and cheer as he paid his respects to everyone past and present, in what was heralded as one of the most moving Welcome to Country’s.

The beautiful moment of respect was also praised online by those watching at home.

“95000 people showed respect to the Welcome to Country from Uncle Colin. And showed the same respect to the Ode to the fallen. This is how we should all be, showing respect to each other,” one fan wrote on X.

“Big cheer for Uncle Colin before his Welcome to Country at the MCG,” another added.

“That was perfect by Uncle Colin,” a third commented.

While a fourth simply said, “That genuinely moved me. One of the best I have heard. Mutual respect and what Australia is all about”.

While during the first NRL game of the afternoon, the traditional Anzac Day clash between the Dragons and Roosters, there was no Welcome to Country.

The respectful pre-match scenes at the AFL were in stark contrast to some scenes at Dawn Services around the country on Saturday morning.

Indigenous serviceman Uncle Ray Minniecon, whose grandfather served in the Light Horse Brigade, was booed during the Martin Place service.

Later at Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance, Uncle Mark Brown’s Welcome to Country address was also interrupted by loud heckling and boos from the crowd.

In Perth, the RSL WA chief executive had to apologise to Whadjuk Noongar elder Di Ryder, a female veteran, whose Welcome to Country address was disturbed by some booing from the crowd at the Dawn Service.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/incredible-scenes-at-collingwood-and-essendon-clash-after-anzac-dawn-services-marred/news-story/94519021ed21568859679c5b51c12209

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38964

File: 1bfa06e62383189⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4c33e03cdd92bcb⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 341e6690618bcfa⋯.jpg (3.2 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8a2a7e625ad7eb5⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 19814668c494ba1⋯.jpg (420.78 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536645 (251532ZAPR26) Notable: ‘War never solves anything’: Veterans honoured across Australia on Anzac Day - Thousands gathered across Australia for Anzac Day commemorations marking the 111th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings, with veterans, political leaders and families attending dawn services, marches and memorial events. Second World War veteran Roy Pearson, 99, reflected that “war never solves anything”, while other veterans spoke of remembrance, sacrifice and military service. Ceremonies in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth were disrupted by booing during Indigenous acknowledgments and Welcome to Country addresses, drawing condemnation from political leaders and veterans’ organisations. In Sydney, a 24-year-old man was arrested over an alleged disturbance at the Martin Place service. Despite the disruptions, large crowds attended commemorations nationwide, with attendees describing the ceremonies as “moving” and focused on honouring Australians who served and those who never returned from war.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

‘War never solves anything’: Veterans honoured across Australia on Anzac Day

Patrick Begley - April 25, 2026

1/2

Roy Pearson, 99, sat in a wheelchair near the start of the Anzac Day march in Sydney’s city centre with slippers on his feet, medals on his chest and a red poppy crocheted by his late wife as a buttonhole. As the military bands warmed up, the WWII veteran smiled and spoke of peace.

“War never solves anything,” said Pearson, who served as a machine gunner in the airforce. “We need to wake up to ourselves.”

Pearson was one of many thousands who gathered in ceremonies across the country on Saturday to honour Australians who have served and died for their country. The day was marked by music and banners, hearty greetings, tears, the singing of hymns and the laying of wreaths – as well as outbreaks of loud booing from some during Aboriginal acknowledgments of Country.

In Sydney, police confirmed that a 24-year-old man was arrested for “an alleged act of nuisance” and others were moved on from the dawn service at Martin Place.

Saturday marked the 111th anniversary of Australian and New Zealand forces landing on the Turkish coast at Gallipoli on April 25, 1915.

More than 8000 Australian soldiers died during the unsuccessful campaign, which failed to wrest control of the Dardanelles.

Betty Niblett, a 92-year-old veteran of the Women’s Royal Australian Army Corps, said she was glad to see young people involved in the defence forces and sorry that national service was no longer in place.

“The world’s all upside down, isn’t it,” she said. “You’ve got to be prepared. Don’t get caught with your pants down.”

By 4.20am, large crowds had assembled in the dark for the dawn service at the Martin Place Cenotaph, wearing everything from neatly pressed uniforms to hoodies. A camera drone winked above the proceedings, whose attendees included Premier Chris Minns, Opposition Leader Kellie Sloane, federal Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek, Governor Margaret Beazley and acting head of the RSL, Brigadier Vincent Williams (retired).

John Murray, a Vietnam veteran, made the trip from Brisbane to see what he believed was the biggest dawn service in Australia. “It’s much bigger than I thought,” he said. The son of a Rat of Tobruk, Murray wore a blue RAAF cap and a row of medals pinned to his coat, including a British Empire Medal for his services in medical evacuation.

“They do it very well here,” he said of the ceremony.

The minute of silence was solemn, unbroken. But earlier, a number of crowd members booed loudly and repeatedly during an Acknowledgment of Country by Uncle Ray Minniecon.

Minniecon, whose grandfather served with the Light Horse Brigade, continued despite the interruption and was applauded when he finished.

“We have experienced this type of racism for over 200 years,” he told media after the service. “One of the questions that we have in our minds is: What crime did we commit to attract this kind of racism?”

NSW Police confirmed that a 24-year-old man was arrested over the incident and charged with committing a nuisance at a war memorial. He was granted conditional bail to appear at Downing Centre Local Court on June 3.

Welcome to Country addresses in Perth and Melbourne were also interrupted. At Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance, a small group of men booed when Victorian Governor Margaret Gardner acknowledged the traditional owners at the start of her speech and when Bunurong and Gunditjmara man Uncle Mark Brown delivered his Welcome to Country. Last year, a Welcome to Country during a dawn service in Melbourne was booed by members of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Network.

Politicians and military leaders condemned the actions, with Defence Minister Richard Marles branding the booing “deeply disappointing”.

“Acknowledgments of Country are just an act of respect – and what characterises today is, it is a day of respect,” Marles told ABC TV. The NSW premier also said he was disappointed by the actions of a small number of people.

“Whilst I’ve never before heard booing like that at a dawn service, I’ve also never heard a crowd spontaneously applaud as they did for Uncle Ray Minniecon,” Minns said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38965

File: 9163d9e63e987cb⋯.jpg (475.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 926fd925ca131b7⋯.jpg (1.77 MB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9843269c80afa97⋯.jpg (181.86 KB,768x1023,256:341,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24536678 (251551ZAPR26) Notable: How a tin of bully beef sparked a truce between enemies at Gallipoli - A brief truce between Australian and Turkish soldiers at Gallipoli was sparked by a tin of bully beef thrown across enemy lines, according to the family of Major Leslie George Fussell. Stationed at Quinn’s Post in 1915 amid constant bomb attacks, Major Fussell reportedly tossed the food tin towards Turkish trenches before receiving tobacco and a note in return reading: “Thank you for the meat.” Shortly afterwards, a Turkish soldier reportedly called out “we are not your enemy”, allowing Australian troops to recover the bodies of dead comrades from the parapet before fighting resumed. Major Fussell later served on the Western Front and received the Military Cross for bravery at Pozieres. His son Douglas said the story remained deeply significant to his family and reflected the enduring meaning of Anzac Day.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

How a tin of bully beef sparked a truce between enemies at Gallipoli

MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - April 24, 2026

Major Leslie George Fussell had not long been posted to Quinn’s Post at Gallipoli to defend against the Turks when he was tasked with trying to organise the removal of the bodies of a major and two soldiers lying on top of the parapet.

It was an impossible task.

Bombs were thrown from both sides at all hours of the day. Sometimes, the bombs were hurled back to the enemy before they had ­ detonated.

But one day in September 1915, Major Fussell, who would later go on to fight on the Western Front, picked up a tin of beef bully and, as his son Douglas recalls, “bowled it back towards the Turks”.

Sometime later, a brown paper parcel landed near the wire outside the parapet. The Australian Diggers were terrified, fearful the brown package would detonate.

“There was great concern shown amongst the Diggers as they waited for it to explode,” Douglas, 84, tells The Australian.

“Dad eventually retrieved it and found it contained tobacco and a note in French.”

Douglas’s father, who died when Douglas was just 17, trans­lated the note. In it, the Turks wrote: “Thank you for the meat. Do you have a knife? Here is some ­tobacco.”

Shortly thereafter, a Turk called out “we are not your enemy”. And suddenly the fighting stopped.

Douglas says his father, upon hearing the call, stood up and with the help of his soldiers, finally recovered the bodies of the dead Australians.

“He (then) waved towards the Turkish trench and very soon the bomb-throwing recommenced,” Douglas says.

Major Fussell became very ill towards the end of November 1915 and plans were put in place for him to be evacuated to Egypt.

And once he recovered, Douglas says, his father joined his men on the Western Front in France where he would go on to be awarded the Military Cross for bravery and organisational skill at the ­battle of Pozieres.

It is an extraordinary story for the Fussell family, and one with particular resonance given they are part of what is now a very small group of Australians with a direct, first-generation link to a Gallipoli veteran.

As Douglas explains from his home in Brisbane’s northern suburbs: “My dad was 56 when he married my mother. That makes me a little bit different from a lot of other sons of World War I veterans. There aren’t a lot of people around Australia of (my) age whose fathers fought in that war,” he adds.

Asked what Anzac Day meant to him, Douglas said: “I was in military college the day my dad died … Anzac Day is very important to me. I lost some very good friends … and I feel for all those people and also families of soldiers who’ve served in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-a-tin-of-bully-beef-sparked-a-truce-between-enemies-at-gallipoli/news-story/34680c52727f86d7300e80071691f4b7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38966

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24540678 (261051ZAPR26) Notable: Trump shooting: Suspect ‘armed with guns and knives’ charged after shots fired at presidential dinner - (Video) US President Donald Trump was rushed from the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington after an armed man allegedly charged towards the ballroom and shots were fired near a security checkpoint. Authorities said the suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen of California, was carrying firearms and knives before being taken into custody. No attendees were injured, although a Secret Service agent was struck in a bulletproof vest and later released from hospital. Guests at the event, including journalists and political figures, took cover as security agents evacuated Trump, Vice President JD Vance and First Lady Melania Trump from the venue. Trump later said he believed he had been the intended target and vowed the annual dinner would continue despite the incident.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Trump shooting: Suspect ‘armed with guns and knives’ charged after shots fired at presidential dinner

Michael Koziol - April 26, 2026

1/4

Washington, DC: A man armed with guns and knives stormed the lobby outside the White House Correspondents’ Dinner attended by US President Donald Trump on Saturday night (US time), charging towards the ballroom in a chaotic encounter with Secret Service agents as guests dived under tables at the sound of gunshots.

The president was uninjured and was rushed off the stage, along with other dignitaries. The armed man, who officials said was staying at the Washington Hilton where the dinner was being held, was taken into custody. He was expected in court on Monday. Police believe he opened fire and acted alone but they did not name his intended target or describe a motive.

Trump, safe and still in his tuxedo, said at a White House press conference two hours later that he guessed he was the target, saying he had “studied assassinations” and they tended to go after people who made a difference.

“When you’re impactful, they go after you. When you’re not impactful, they leave you alone,” Trump said. “I hate to say I’m honoured by that, but I’ve done a lot.”

The alleged gunman was identified as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, California. He is facing two firearm-related charges, including a count of assaulting an officer with a deadly weapon. More charges are expected to follow.

The annual dinner for White House journalists was just getting under way when armed security rushed in. Attendees were eating a spring pea and burrata salad, and waiters were preparing to bring out the next course, when a security detail appeared on the ballroom floor and yelled for everyone to get down.

People were seen hiding behind chairs about 8.30pm Washington, DC time when Secret Service agents rushed the stage to escort Trump and other dignitaries, including Vice President JD Vance and First Lady Melania Trump, from the long table at the front of the room.

Secret Service agents yelled “shots fired”, “stay down” and “out of the way, sir!” as Trump and cabinet members were rushed out. No one was injured.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38967

File: ed160d6c9c5d6e0⋯.mp4 (15.36 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24540744 (261135ZAPR26) Notable: Donald Trump evacuated from Washington dinner as ‘shooter’ arrested - (Video) US President Donald Trump was evacuated from the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington after a man allegedly armed with firearms and knives stormed a security checkpoint and opened fire near the ballroom. Authorities identified the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Thomas Allen of California, who was taken into custody and is expected to face multiple charges. A Secret Service officer was struck in a bulletproof vest but was not seriously injured. Guests, including senior US officials and journalists, took cover under tables as security agents rushed Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and Vice President JD Vance from the event. Trump later praised Secret Service officers for acting “quickly and bravely” and said the annual dinner would be rescheduled despite the incident.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38966

Donald Trump evacuated from Washington dinner as ‘shooter’ arrested

Heath Parkes-Hupton - April 26, 2026

1/4

Dramatic footage of the moment a man armed with a “very powerful gun” stormed a security checkpoint at a Washington hotel where Donald Trump was attending a media industry ball has been released.

The US President said the gunman, named as Cole Thomas Allen, shot at a Secret Service officer but his life was saved by a bullet proof vest.

Mr Trump, his wife and a host of senior US government officials were in attendance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton when the shooting unfolded about 8.30pm on Saturday, local time.

Authorities have said the gunman, identified in US media as Californian school teacher Mr Allen, was armed with a shotgun, handgun and multiple knives.

The 31-year-old was expected to be charged with multiple offences including using a firearm during a crime of violence and face court on Monday, US time.

It is believed he was staying at the hotel, according to DC police chief Jeffery W Carroll.

Allen is believed to have acted alone, Mr Carroll said.

FBI agents swarmed Allen’s home in Torrance, California – a city about 30km south of Los Angeles – early on Sunday morning, while awaiting a search warrant expected to be signed by a federal judge in the Central District of California, the US Attorney’s Office told Fox News.

A LinkedIn profile with the name “Cole Allen” showed a picture of a man which appeared to match a photo of the suspect shared by Mr Trump.

The social media profile said Allen was a mechanical engineer, computer scientist, game developer and teacher.

Allen has no criminal record and was unknown to police in Washington DC, law enforcement sources told NBC News.

Speaking at the White House on Saturday night, Mr Trump called the gunman “sick” and said he had “attacked our constitution”.

“And he was taken down by some very brave members of Secret Service, and they acted very quickly,” he said.

“One officer was shot, but saved by the fact that he was wearing a obviously a very good bulletproof vest. He was shot from very close distance with a very powerful gun.

“And the vest did the job. I just spoke to the officer and he’s doing great.”

Mr Trump said at first be believed the loud noise was a dropped catering tray before he realised what had occurred.

“It was a matter of seconds before we were out the door”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38968

File: 96250f631964034⋯.jpg (131.98 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf93257d9eb9fc8⋯.jpg (113.6 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7bd97eb6f8a2ed3⋯.jpg (90.28 KB,750x360,25:12,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c5b0b682a3d4325⋯.jpg (122.59 KB,750x360,25:12,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24540768 (261148ZAPR26) Notable: Trump shooting: Anthony Albanese speaks out following Donald Trump’s attempted shooting in Washington - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and other world leaders have expressed relief after US President Donald Trump was safely evacuated following a shooting incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington. Albanese praised the “swift action” of the US Secret Service and law enforcement agencies after an armed man allegedly stormed a security checkpoint near the event attended by about 2500 guests. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said “political violence has no place in any democracy”, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was “shocked” by the attempted assassination. British ambassador Christian Turner also commended the “professional response” of security personnel. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump were unharmed, while a Secret Service officer injured during the incident was later released from hospital.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38966

>>38967

Trump shooting: Anthony Albanese speaks out following Donald Trump’s attempted shooting in Washington

Sophie Gannon - 26 April 2026

Anthony Albanese and other world leaders have saluted the US Secret Service for their work and bravery in protecting US President Donald Trump and 2500 guests at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

“I am pleased to hear the President and the First Lady, along with all attendees at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, are safe,” Australia’s Prime Minister said in a statement on Sunday.“We applaud the work of the Secret Service and law enforcement agencies for their swift action.”

Other international leaders also shared their support and relief that the President was uninjured in what is believed to have been a failed assassination attempt.

Canadian prime minister Mark Carney said on Facebook said he was relieved that the president, First Lady Melania Trump and all the guests are safe following the reports of gunfire.

“Political violence has no place in any democracy and my thoughts are with all those who have been shaken by this disturbing event,” he said.

Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum also said it was “good” that Mr Trump and his wife are safe following the event.

“We send them our respect. Violence must never be the way,” she said.

The British ambassador to the United States, Christian Turner, and some other embassy officials were also in attendance at the dinner.

He said on X that he and others were “grateful for the swift and professional response of the secret service”.

“We are thankful that the President and those in attendance were unharmed & our best wishes are with the injured officer,” Turner said.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a post on X that he and his wife, Sara Netanyahu, were “shocked” by the attempted assassination.

“We are relieved that the President and the First Lady are safe and strong,” he said.

“We send our wishes for a full and speedy recovery to the wounded police officer and salute the US Secret Service for their swift and decisive action.”

https://thewest.com.au/politics/donald-trump/trump-shooting-anthony-albanese-speaks-out-following-donald-trumps-attempted-shooting-in-washington-c-22195205

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/2048261887692005585

https://x.com/netanyahu/status/2048290585228746798

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38969

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544644 (270910ZAPR26) Notable: Far-right group supporting Ben Roberts-Smith marches through Melbourne amid heavy police presence - A far-right rally supporting Ben Roberts-Smith marched through central Melbourne under heavy police supervision, with officers separating demonstrators from anti-Nazi protesters nearby. About 200 people attended the protest outside Parliament House, where a banner describing the Victoria Cross recipient as a “Warrior Not Criminal” was displayed. Some participants wore masks while marching through the CBD as anti-Nazi protesters shouted “Nazi scum off our streets”. One rally attendee was briefly detained after a confrontation outside the Windsor Hotel before being released. Organisers acknowledged turnout was lower than hoped and urged supporters not to be discouraged. The rally followed Roberts-Smith’s appearance at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gold Coast while on bail over war crime charges relating to alleged killings in Afghanistan, which he denies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38945

>>38958

Far-right group supporting Ben Roberts-Smith marches through Melbourne amid heavy police presence

EWIN HANNAN - April 26, 2026

Dozens of Victoria Police officers have been deployed to keep anti-Nazi protesters separated from members of the far-right National Workers Alliance who organised a Melbourne rally in support of accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith.

About 200 people, including a group of men wearing masks to conceal their identity, were at the Parliament House rally on Sunday, standing in front of a banner that read: “Ben Roberts Smith VC Warrior Not Criminal”.

A significant police presence separated the rally attendees from a small nearby gathering of protesters who yelled: “Nazi scum off our streets”.

The far-right protesters were permitted to march down Bourke Street, along Swanston Street and up through the Paris end of Collins Street, blaring out music including AC/DC’s Jailbreak.

One far-right protester was detained by police officers outside the Windsor Hotel after a brief skirmish with an anti-Nazi protester. He was released after a short period.

Organisers told the attendees that they had hoped for thousands to be at the far-right rally, and urged them not to be disillusioned or disappointed by the small turnout.

They suggested many Melburnians chose to stay home and spend their Sunday afternoon watching the AFL instead.

Mr Roberts-Smith fronted an Anzac Day event in Queensland on Saturday, ignoring reported calls by some of his supporters to boycott the annual services and marches.

The Victoria Cross recipient joined a crowd of thousands to mark Anzac Day commemorations at Currumbin on the Gold Coast, his first since he was charged with war crimes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/farright-group-supporting-ben-robertssmith-marches-through-melbourne-amid-heavy-police-presence/news-story/c4c820df741b887d0ea3158ff409c5af

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zfxH-t_PMM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38970

File: 9857be121f9cfa0⋯.jpg (952.59 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544663 (270923ZAPR26) Notable: Jews should not be required to pay ‘safety tax’: Royal commission swamped with submissions - Australia’s royal commission into antisemitism has received more than 3500 submissions detailing experiences across education, health, employment, media, sport, the arts and online platforms following the Bondi terrorist attack. The commission’s interim report, due next week, will examine security agency responses and potential intelligence failures linked to the mass shooting at a Hanukkah event in December, in which 15 mostly Jewish people were killed. Commissioner Virginia Bell said the inquiry would avoid prejudicing criminal proceedings against alleged gunman Naveed Akram. Some submissions have called for stronger government-funded protections for Jewish communities and institutions. King David School principal Marc Light argued Jewish Australians should not face a “safety tax”, while advocacy group StandWithUs proposed permanent protective security at Jewish sites and schools.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38890

>>38891

Jews should not be required to pay ‘safety tax’: Royal commission swamped with submissions

Alexandra Smith - April 24, 2026

Exposure to antisemitism in education and health settings as well as the arts, sport and online is detailed in a “significant number” of the 3500 submissions lodged with the royal commission, launched in the wake of the Bondi killings.

The royal commission on Friday provided an update on the number of submissions it has received and confirmed that it would highlight “issues requiring urgent or immediate action” and make recommendations related to the Bondi attack in its interim report, due next Thursday.

The commission’s first report since its inception earlier this year will focus on the security agencies and any potential intelligence failures that may have led to the terrorist attack, in which 15 mostly Jewish people were killed on the first night of Hanukkah at an event at Bondi Beach on December 14 last year.

However, Commissioner Virginia Bell has previously stressed that the commission “must do its work without risking any prejudice” to criminal proceedings involving alleged gunman Naveed Akram, who was charged with 15 counts of murder and 40 of attempted murder after the mass shooting.

For this reason, she said that hearing evidence from “people who may be witnesses in the criminal proceeding would create that risk and, for that reason, it will not occur”.

The commission has so far received more than 3500 submissions, which are yet to be made public.

“At this point a significant number of submissions cover the breadth of the royal commission’s terms of reference, detailing lived experience of antisemitism across various sectors including education, employment, media, health, the arts, sport and online,” a commission spokesperson said.

Some groups have decided to share their submissions or detail what they contain, including a school principal from The King David School, a progressive Jewish school in Melbourne. Principal Marc Light in a blog post on the school’s website said taxpayers must foot the bill for protecting the Jewish community.

“We ask that the commission recommends that the government takes full responsibility for the full cost of security measures,” Light said in the post.

“We assert that it is unconscionable that it is more expensive to be safe if you are Jewish than if you are not. Jews simply should not be required to pay a ‘safety tax’ to live normal lives.”

Similarly, the Jewish non-profit group StandWithUs says in its submission that Australia should follow the lead of European countries, such as Italy, where the army has a permanent role in protecting Jewish sites and places of worship.

The group calls on the Commonwealth, in partnership with the states and territories, to “urgently review the feasibility of establishing a permanent protective security presence for Jewish sites, schools and places of worship”.

The first block of royal commission public hearings will start in Sydney on May 4 and will focus on defining antisemitism, the lived experiences of antisemitism and its impacts on Jewish Australians, and metrics for assessing the prevalence of antisemitism in institutions and society.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/jews-should-not-be-required-to-pay-safety-tax-royal-commission-swamped-with-submissions-20260424-p5zqrx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38971

File: e4f35d8f6e1339a⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ddd5983d3eb16b0⋯.jpg (289.36 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f8ef13881144352⋯.jpg (419.19 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544690 (270943ZAPR26) Notable: Authorities suspect Gaza war drove Bondi shooter to terror - Australian authorities suspect anger over Israel’s war in Gaza helped drive Bondi attacker Sajid Akram towards violent Islamic extremism, with investigators alleging he played a major role in planning the December massacre that killed 15 people at a Hanukkah event. Security and police sources said Sajid’s Islamic State-influenced ideology intensified during the Gaza conflict and that he allegedly directed efforts to avoid electronic communication and law enforcement detection. Separate classified reviews reportedly found no major intelligence failure by the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation in their earlier assessments of Naveed Akram. However, officials and former ASIO director-general Dennis Richardson are said to have raised concerns about whether Australia’s counter-terrorism settings, intelligence scrutiny and resourcing were sufficiently strengthened after the national terror threat level was raised in 2024.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38734

>>38729

>>38891

Authorities suspect Gaza war drove Bondi shooter to terror

Nick McKenzie - April 24, 2026

1/3

A fixation with Israel’s war in Gaza is suspected by authorities to have served as a key motivation for Islamic State adherent turned Bondi Beach mass killer Sajid Akram.

State and federal police have also gathered information raising the prospect that Sajid played a significant role influencing his son, Naveed, to carry out the December attack that left 15 people dead, allegedly demanding his son engage in a strict no-communication policy to evade law enforcement detection.

This masthead can also reveal two separate classified inquiries have broadly concluded neither the federal police nor the nation’s spy agency acted negligently or failed to act on intelligence in a manner that could have prevented the Bondi attack, one of the worst attacks on Jews anywhere in the world in decades.

The inquiry assessing the Australian Federal Police was undertaken by former deputy commissioner Neil Gaughan, while Australian Security Intelligence Organisation’s conduct was assessed by a former intelligence agency counter-terrorism expert.

But federal and state counter-terrorism agency insiders also acknowledge that the royal commission prompted by the Bondi attack has concluded that Australia’s counter-terror and antisemitism regimes can be hardened.

Before his resignation from the royal commission, sources said, ex-ASIO director Dennis Richardson expressed alarm about whether agencies, and governments more broadly, sufficiently responded when the terror threat level was raised by ASIO in 2024.

He also encouraged further scrutiny of ASIO’s 2019 assessment of Naveed.

Richardson’s observations could pave the way for firm questioning of intelligence agencies at the royal commission, which delivers an interim report next week.

The revelations about the shooters’ motivations and actions and the subsequent reviews are based on briefings from a dozen sources including investigators with deep knowledge of different aspects of Australia’s counter-terrorism regime or the alleged actions of Sajid and Naveed. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are unable to discuss the matters publicly.

Naveed is facing terror charges over the killings, while police shot Sajid dead during the attack. Naveed’s fate lies with the NSW justice system, but understanding his father’s motivation and path to terrorism have emerged as vital issues as counter-terror agencies and the royal commission examine Australia’s worst terror attack.

Security sources, including state and federal police, told this masthead that Sajid’s role in organising the attack was far greater than publicly acknowledged.

His motivation, they said, was suspected to be his growing Islamic State-influenced anger about Israel’s conduct of its war in Gaza, where more than 70,000 people have died, which it launched after the Hamas terrorist attack in October 2023.

Sajid was a religious fundamentalist or “hardliner” for years before a relatively rapid descent into violent Islamic extremism, and was absorbed by the Gaza conflict, one source said.

Another well-placed counter-terrorism official described Israel’s war in Gaza as a key motivator, while a third source aware of confidential assessments from state and federal agencies confirmed Sajid’s anger over Gaza, fused with the terrorist ideology of Islamic State, had contributed to the attack.

“He had views about Gaza,” this source said in reference to material gathered by state and federal agencies.

Court files say the pair recorded a video manifesto in October wearing black T-shirts and sitting in front of an image of an IS flag.

A source who had seen the video said Gaza was mentioned in the terrorists’ manifesto as part of their broader IS mission.

The court documents note only that the Akrams allegedly “condemn the acts of Zionists” in the video.

Gaza’s central role in the attack will probably fuel the political debate about the rise of antisemitism in Australia since 2023, and whether governments and state and federal agencies did enough to protect Australian Jews.

Islamic State has sought to exploit the Gaza conflict as an opportunity to regain momentum after the collapse of its caliphate.

The sources said Sajid designed the terror plot’s modus operandi enabling the Akrams to avoid the law enforcement radar.

Most significantly, under Sajid’s guidance, the pair studiously avoided phone and computer communications and avoided radical Islamic networks and prayer centres.

Single-man or two-man self-contained terror cells are the most difficult for authorities to investigate.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38972

File: cebcaea68e677f8⋯.jpg (840.51 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544697 (270949ZAPR26) Notable: Scepticism after federal agencies clear themselves over Bondi attack - Reviews clearing the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation of failures before the Bondi terror attack have been met with scepticism by stakeholders preparing for the antisemitism royal commission. Separate inquiries reportedly concluded the AFP properly handled intelligence before the December massacre and that ASIO’s 2019 assessment of Naveed Akram as not adhering to violent extremism was reasonable at the time. However, critics and national security figures said those findings should be closely examined by the royal commission led by former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Former Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo said broader questions remained about whether counter-terrorism resources and intelligence scrutiny were sufficiently increased after the Gaza conflict and the raising of Australia’s terror threat level in 2024. The commission has received more than 3500 submissions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38734

>>38729

>>38891

>>38971

Scepticism after federal agencies clear themselves over Bondi attack

Paul Karp and Michael Read - Apr 24, 2026

Reviews of the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation that found neither organisation failed in its duties in the lead up to the Bondi attack have been met with scepticism by stakeholders preparing to engage with the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.

A review by the former AFP deputy commissioner Neil Gaughan into the AFP concluded there was no evidence police failed in handling of known intelligence before the December Bondi terror attack, which left 15 people dead.

A second review by a former intelligence agency counter-terrorism expert into the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation said ASIO was correct to conclude that Naveed Akram did not adhere to or intend to engage in violent extremism in 2019, two sources have told The Australian Financial Review.

The reviews have been provided to the antisemitism royal commission led by Virginia Bell, which will begin public hearings in May. But stakeholders familiar with the workings of the royal commission, who are preparing to appear before it, and who asked for anonymity to discuss the inquiry, said those conclusions would need to be tested.

On Friday, a Sydney Morning Herald report quoted security sources saying Bondi shooter Sajid Akram was fixated on Israel’s war in Gaza before the attack. Police killed Akram during the attack. His son Naveed is facing 56 criminal charges.

In February, ASIO boss Mike Burgess told Senate estimates that although the review was highly classified, the spy agency stood by its 2019 assessment that “the Akrams did not adhere to or intend to engage in violent extremism at that time. In other words, many of the claims and criticisms being made about ASIO’s handling of the case are baseless”.

One Labor MP, who asked not to be named, said it was “outrageous” for the agencies to clear themselves and any such conclusion had “to be tested by the royal commission”.

“Those reviews were done by one person on each occasion, and they had a limited amount of time,” said another source familiar with the reviews. “Those reviews are useful and important but only go so far.”

Former Home Affairs Department secretary Michael Pezzullo said it “would not surprise me to learn that ASIO and AFP had both followed procedure and assessed the younger [alleged] attacker as being of negligible concern”.

“Obviously, the internal reports have to be assessed by the royal commission,” Pezzullo said. “That needs to be tested by Bell.”

“The larger question is whether resourcing for counter-terrorism was ramped up after October 2023 and again after August 2024, when the threat level was raised. If not, why not?

“Had more resources been thrown at the problem, old marginal cases could have been reopened. It’s not a matter for ASIO and the AFP as such. Resourcing is ultimately a matter for the minister and the department.”

Opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam said the opposition was concerned “there was not enough support for our intelligence agencies, including by way of funding, from the Labor government”.

“The Coalition expects a thorough assessment of our agencies and importantly, the actions of the Labor government and its ministers through the royal commission process, including a comprehensive examination of the government’s oversight of counter-terrorism resourcing, intelligence co-ordination, information-sharing frameworks, and the broader national security architecture.

“The shifting of ASIO back to the Department of Home Affairs was an admission that the Labor government had the intelligence apparatus wrong. The extent to which these changes contributed to broader national security failures – including any breakdowns in information sharing arising from ill-considered machinery-of-government decisions – should be thoroughly examined by the royal commission.”

A spokeswoman for the AFP said reporting on the alleged motives of the Akrams and the outcomes of the two reviews was “extremely unhelpful, as it has the potential to negatively impact the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, as well as the NSW Joint Counter Terrorism Team investigation into the mass shooting at Bondi Beach on 14 December, 2025”.

On Friday, a royal commission spokeswoman said so far it had received more than 3500 submissions.

“At this point a significant number of submissions cover the breadth of the royal commission’s terms of reference, detailing lived experience of antisemitism across various sectors including education, employment, media, health, the arts, sport and online,” the spokeswoman said.

https://www.afr.com/politics/scepticism-after-federal-agencies-clear-themselves-over-bondi-attack-20260424-p5zqv2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38973

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544711 (270958ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Sitting ducks’: Hastie says overreliance on US has weakened Australia - (Video) Opposition industry and sovereign capability spokesman Andrew Hastie says Australia has become overly dependent on the United States for defence and must rebuild its own military and industrial capacity to strengthen the ANZUS alliance. In a speech at the Robert Menzies Institute, the former SAS soldier argued Australia had “outsourced” its security to the US over decades, weakening sovereign defence capabilities and strategic independence. Hastie warned the navy had not kept pace with missile and drone technology and said Australian forces could become “sitting ducks” without close US support in a major conflict. He also pointed to the US-Israeli war on Iran and global fuel instability as evidence Australia needed stronger domestic energy security, including expanded oil drilling and refining capability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38780

>>38826

‘Sitting ducks’: Hastie says overreliance on US has weakened Australia

Brittany Busch - April 24, 2026

Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie says Australia has allowed an overreliance on the United States military to weaken the country.

The opposition spokesman for industry and sovereign capability argued in a speech at the Robert Menzies Institute on Thursday that the nation must rebuild its industrial and defence capabilities to rebalance the ANZUS Treaty and be a better partner to Australia’s historic ally.

“To put it bluntly, if ANZUS is going to continue for another 75 years, we need to invest in our industrial base and our defence force,” Hastie said.

The Afghanistan veteran and former SAS soldier said that since the ANZUS treaty was signed in 1951 and Australia’s defence became more reliant on US power, “we forgot the hard lessons of war, and outsourced our security to the United States”.

“It has cost us sovereign capabilities, like a robust defence industry, and our strategic freedom of action in ways that we are now discovering.”

Hastie said for the past 30 years, Australia had neglected its commitment in the treaty to develop its capability for self-defence and to protect partners.

He said ANZUS was built on the understanding that both parties would build their military capability, and Australia must lift itself back to the standard of self-reliance set up by Robert Menzies in the postwar era.

Hastie added that the Australian navy had not kept pace with drone and missile technology and was not prepared to deploy vessels to a conflict, such as the US-Israeli war on Iran.

“Even if we send young Australians into harm’s way, we’d be sitting ducks without the intimate support of the US navy.”

Hastie said the US had made clear in its National Defence Strategy that it would seek only to guarantee its own strategic interests.

“President Trump confirms this reality almost every day with his robust messaging about America’s traditional allies.”

Hastie said that Trump’s war in Iran had also exposed Australia’s “industrial atrophy”, as the global oil shock squeezed markets and sent petrol and diesel prices soaring. He called for Australia to drill for and refine its own oil to ensure supply into the future.

Australia has sent a Wedgetail – a sophisticated military surveillance plane – to the United Arab Emirates to guard against Iranian drone threats. The country has also thrown its support behind an international mission to keep the Strait of Hormuz open.

Earlier this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced an extra 200 million litres of diesel had been secured for Australia from South Korea, Brunei and Malaysia.

On Tuesday, the defence industry minister also unveiled an anti-drone laser system capable of hitting targets as small as a 10-cent piece.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/sitting-ducks-hastie-says-overreliance-on-us-has-weakened-australia-20260424-p5zqp7.html

https://www.menziesrc.org/news-feed/andrew-hastie-anzac-oration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRpof9Xt3PI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38974

File: 7c6870628a6df0a⋯.jpg (171.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ffe06f319070d9c⋯.jpg (376.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544719 (271005ZAPR26) Notable: US Navy awards first AUKUS submarine contract using Australian funds but experts warn of production strain - The US Navy has awarded its first AUKUS-related submarine contract using Australian funding, marking a significant milestone in the trilateral security partnership while raising fresh concerns about strain on American submarine production capacity. Electric Boat, the United States’ primary nuclear submarine designer and builder, received a $US196 million contract funded through Australia’s $US3 billion contribution to the US submarine industrial base. US congressman Joe Courtney described the agreement as evidence AUKUS was “tangibly moving forward”, while Admiral Samuel Paparo said preparations for a rotational submarine force in Western Australia remained on schedule. However, congressional analysts warned America’s submarine production lines were already under pressure and may struggle to meet both domestic naval requirements and commitments to deliver Virginia-class submarines to Australia under AUKUS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

US Navy awards first AUKUS submarine contract using Australian funds but experts warn of production strain

JOE KELLY - April 24, 2026

The US Navy has awarded its first contract for $US196m ($275m) of AUKUS-related work to Electric Boat, America’s primary designer and manufacturer of nuclear-powered submarines, with the funds coming from the $US2bn provided by Australia under the landmark security partnership.

US Democrat congressman Joe Courtney, who represents Connecticut’s second congressional district that includes Groton, home to Electric Boat’s historic shipyard, said the new contract was a major milestone for the AUKUS program.

Mr Courtney, the ranking member of the US House of Representatives seapower and projection forces subcommittee, said the contract would support “engineering and design work for submarine capabilities in the AUKUS program” and was “powerful evidence that this security program, authorised by congress in 2023, is tangibly moving forward”.

“These funds, which come from Australia’s $3bn investment into the US submarine industrial base, are proof that AUKUS is not just a plan on whiteboards but a real enterprise that eastern Connecticut will make a success,” he said.

Mr Courtney, co-chairman of the bipartisan Friends of Australia congressional caucus, made his comments one day after the head of US Indo-Pacific Command defended the progress being made under the AUKUS partnership.

Admiral Samuel Paparo told the house armed services committee the US could “operate a rotational submarine squadron out of Australia tomorrow”.

He said HMAS Stirling was “on track for the rotational force that will arrive here in Perth in a little over a year” and “in every regard, in pillar one, we’re on track”.

The reassurance over the progress of the AUKUS partnership follows the review of the trilateral security partnership between the US, Britain and Australia conducted by the Pentagon last year that endorsed the deal.

While the US President has recently expressed frustration towards the lack of Australian assistance in the Strait of Hormuz – declaring last week that he was “not happy” – he also has stood firmly by the AUKUS agreement.

Under the AUKUS agreement, the US will sell Australia at least three Virginia-class submarines starting in 2032. But concerns remain about whether the US submarine industrial base can produce replacement vessels quickly enough to avoid a weakening of America’s own fleet.

Congressional Budget Office senior analyst for naval forces and weapons Eric J Labs informed the subcommittee on seapower and projection forces this week that under the 2025 shipbuilding plan – covering the period 2025 to 2054 – the increases in workload were “considerable for the submarine industrial base, in particular”.

“The amount of submarine tonnage under construction has grown by more than 70 per cent since 2014,” he said. “Under the 2025 plan, it would grow by an additional 70 per cent by 2031; in other words, it would have tripled in 17 years.

“Those estimates do not include building replacements for any of the attack submarines that the United States will sell to Australia under the tripartite security pact among those two countries and the United Kingdom, which is known as AUKUS.”

He warned the additional burden placed on the submarine industrial base by AUKUS would “add another challenge to an already stressed production line”.

Dr Labs noted that for the past two years the rate of production has averaged 1.1 submarines per year even though the navy typically had been purchasing them at a rate of two a year for most of the past decade. To provide Australia with three to five Virginia-class submarines under AUKUS, the US will need to increase its production rate to 2.33 a year.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-navy-awards-first-aukus-submarine-contract-using-australian-funds-but-experts-warn-of-production-strain/news-story/fdead93f7b5bd091d0c0d1216206acdb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38975

File: 1025972464607ae⋯.jpg (310.33 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544728 (271013ZAPR26) Notable: Australia’s long wait for a US ambassador just took a new turn - Australia’s prolonged wait for a permanent United States ambassador is set to continue, with acting embassy chief Erika Olson expected to leave Canberra in coming months without a replacement yet announced by President Donald Trump. Olson, who has served as Charge d’Affaires since former ambassador Caroline Kennedy departed after Trump’s election victory in late 2024, is reportedly moving to another diplomatic posting. The continued vacancy has fuelled concerns about strains in the Australia-US alliance amid disputes over tariffs, Iran and defence expectations, although analysts say long ambassadorial delays are common under the Trump administration. A White House official said a nomination was expected “soon”, while Republican congressman Michael McCaul has been discussed as a possible candidate. More than 100 US ambassadorial positions worldwide reportedly remain vacant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38823

>>38861

>>38914

Australia’s long wait for a US ambassador just took a new turn

Jessica Gardner - Apr 24, 2026

Washington | Fifteen months into Donald Trump’s term, Australia’s wait for a permanent United States ambassador is entering a new, more uncertain chapter.

The acting ambassador at the US embassy in Canberra, Erika Olson, will leave her post in the coming months, according to sources in both capital cities, who cite private conversations with State Department officials.

Her departure highlights the ongoing diplomatic void at the top of the relationship at a time of growing distrust in the alliance among Australians, and as Trump continues to stall on appointing a representative.

Olson, officially the Charge d’Affaires at the embassy in Canberra and a veteran of the US foreign service, will move to a new assignment, likely in Canada, the sources said.

Australia has been without a US ambassador since December 2024, when Caroline Kennedy, who was appointed by former Democrat president Joe Biden, departed following Trump’s election win.

The lack of an ambassadorial appointment by Trump, fifteen months on from his inauguration in January 2025, makes Australia an outlier among allies such as France, New Zealand and Britain, which all have top diplomats in place.

Trump’s repeated criticisms of the Albanese government for not doing more to help in the war in Iran, his imposition of tariffs on Australian goods despite a 25-year free-trade agreement, and his cavalier attitude towards diplomatic norms have put strains on the usually close relationship.

The tumultuous time has led some to wonder if Australia’s lack of an ambassador is reflective of a serious and worsening problem, but Kathryn Paik, deputy Australia chair of the DC-based think tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, dismissed those concerns.

“People in general globally are often quick to see a lack of ambassador as an indicator of some issue in the relationship, but it rarely is,” she said.

“Many posts remain vacant for extended periods of time, and this is nothing new in this administration or in past administrations. At the same time, I can see why, given the high importance of the Australian-US alliance to both sides, that the longer this goes on without having an ambassador in place, the more those types of rumours exist.”

A White House official, when asked for an update on the recruitment process, said: “We expect to nominate a United States Ambassador to Australia soon.”

One person who has been speculated about as a candidate is Republican Congressman Michael McCaul, who co-chairs the Friends of Australia Congressional Caucus, and has deep geopolitical experience as a former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

McCaul said in September last year he would not seek re-election at this year’s midterm vote, meaning he will be looking for something to do come November.

But given Republicans’ slim margin in the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson cannot have more than two defections if he wants to pass legislation along party lines, the White House might prefer McCaul stays put for now. His office declined to comment.

The picking and confirming of ambassadors has been glacial for many countries, not just Australia. Of 190 ambassadorial appointments tracked by the American Foreign Service Association, including some United Nations roles, 113 are vacant.

Australia is among countries such as Germany, Brazil and Indonesia still without an ambassador.

Underlining how slow the process has been, and perhaps how low down the White House’s priority list these appointments have been, only three new ambassadors have been named since September 2025.

Olson, a State Department veteran who has had other foreign postings, including in Slovakia, Georgia and Uzbekistan, has worked as the deputy head of the mission since late 2024 when Kennedy left.

Her departure has been described as a normal diplomatic rotation and she is expected to be replaced by another foreign policy expert.

A State Department spokesperson said: “We have no personnel announcements to make at this time.”

https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/australia-s-long-wait-for-a-us-ambassador-just-took-a-new-turn-20260424-p5zqrc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38976

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544743 (271036ZAPR26) Notable: Memorial held to mark one year since the death of Virginia Giuffre - (Video) A memorial has been held marking one year since the death of Virginia Giuffre, the most high-profile victim of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. She took her own life on a farm in Western Australia last year. Ms Giuffre was known for accusing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of sexually abusing her when she was just 17 years old. The 66-year-old former prince has denied the allegations. Ms Giuffre’s family members and other survivors of Epstein praised her courage at the event. - Sky News Australia, Apr 26, 2026

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38854

Memorial held to mark one year since the death of Virginia Giuffre

Sky News Australia

Apr 26, 2026

A memorial has been held marking one year since the death of Virginia Giuffre, the most high-profile victim of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

She took her own life on a farm in Western Australia last year.

Ms Giuffre was known for accusing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of sexually abusing her when she was just 17 years old.

The 66-year-old former prince has denied the allegations.

Ms Giuffre’s family members and other survivors of Epstein praised her courage at the event.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hspx-WvMJs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38977

File: cd09b843539e9a0⋯.jpg (1.6 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 819dc8921682a85⋯.jpg (138.86 KB,1244x842,622:421,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 960ea058a6cf0bd⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,3936x2624,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53a9f784f5bd311⋯.jpg (322.52 KB,852x725,852:725,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24544749 (271042ZAPR26) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38854

>>38976

Epstein fallout: Virginia Giuffre remembered as ‘hero to the ages’ on first anniversary of her death

Michael Koziol - April 26, 2026

Washington: Prominent Jeffrey Epstein survivor and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accuser Virginia Giuffre has been hailed as a hero who changed the world at a memorial to mark a year since her death, as advocates prepare for the imminent US visit of King Charles.

A small crowd gathered in Washington’s National Mall, just a block from the White House, on Saturday (US time) to honour Giuffre, who died by suicide on Anzac Day last year at her farm north of Perth. She was 41.

Her younger brother Sky Roberts, who with his wife Amanda has become a key voice demanding reform of sex -trafficking laws and the release of all the so-called Epstein files, read a letter to his sister from the stage.

“I want you to know: you changed the world, sis,” he said. “Your survivor sisters, your friends, your family and thousands of amazing survivors from all walks of life – they continue to change the world and refuse to stay silent because you showed us the way, and we carry your torch with honour.”

Democrats have introduced a bill to Congress, dubbed Virginia’s Law, that would remove the statute of limitations for adult survivors of sexual abuse to file civil claims against their abusers.

Giuffre accused the late American financier Epstein of trafficking her to King Charles’ younger brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, when she was 17.

Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied the allegations and reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing. He has said he had no recollection of meeting Giuffre.

The former prince was stripped of his remaining royal titles and honours as the fallout from the release of the Epstein files intensified, and earlier this year was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He was released but remains under investigation.

Addressing the crowd in Washington, Arisha Hatch, executive director of social justice lobby group UltraViolet, said the group would launch a new initiative, the Epstein Accountability Project, in coming days, likely during the King’s visit.

The project’s aim was “to make sure the individuals and institutions that enabled the largest child sex abuse network of our lifetime face accountability”, she said.

Sky and Amanda Roberts have called for the King to meet with them and survivors of Epstein’s abuse while he is in the US. Democratic congressman Ro Khanna had also requested the King meet with survivors during his visit.

However, through their lawyers, the King and Queen said they were unable to hold the meeting due to “ongoing police inquiries”.

Democratic congressman Jamie Raskin told the memorial that Giuffre was a leader whose legacy sat alongside the contributions of America’s great civil rights activists.

“Generations to come will marvel at her toughness and celebrate her personal conviction and her moral determination to change American society and to change the world,” he said.

“She is now not just a hero to this movement, but she is a hero to the ages who dwells with other great leaders and heroes of history, like Dolores Huerta, like Rosa Parks and like Frederick Douglass.”

Giuffre’s friend and publicist Dini Von Mueffling said Giuffre was the most extraordinary person she had ever met, fondly recalling their long international phone calls during COVID pandemic lockdowns.

She said she wished Giuffre had been alive to see the introduction of Virginia’s Law and Mountbatten-Windsor lose his remaining privileges. “Gloating was not her thing. Justice and accountability were,” she said.

Prior to her death, Giuffre accused her estranged Australian husband, Robert, of years of physical and emotional abuse.

He pleaded guilty to a domestic violence charge involving a 2015 incident, 60 Minutes reported.

He has denied the abuse allegations through lawyers, and earlier this year sent a concerns notice to 60 Minutes, the first step in defamation proceedings.

In the crowd, Hannah Holden, who was visiting Washington from Brazil, and works for an organisation that supports survivors of sexual harm and domestic violence, said she felt compelled to attend the memorial.

“She’s fearless, and she deserves so much more, she deserves justice, she deserves all the love in the world,” Holden said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/virginia-giuffre-remembered-as-hero-to-the-ages-on-first-anniversary-of-her-death-20260426-p5zr2r.html

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38978

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24548222 (280916ZAPR26) Notable: Donald Trump taps Tea Party conservative David Brat as US ambassador to Australia - (Video) US President Donald Trump has nominated former Republican congressman David Brat as the next United States ambassador to Australia, ending a 15-month vacancy in the diplomatic role. Brat, a conservative economist and former Tea Party figure, rose to prominence after defeating senior Republican Eric Cantor in a shock 2014 primary upset widely seen as an early sign of the political movement that later fuelled Trump’s rise. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would work constructively with “whoever is determined to be the ambassador”, while Foreign Minister Penny Wong welcomed the nomination and reaffirmed the importance of the alliance. Brat previously backed Trump’s agenda in Congress and campaigned strongly on border security, fiscal conservatism and opposition to “crony capitalism”. His appointment remains subject to US Senate confirmation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38975

Donald Trump taps Tea Party conservative David Brat as US ambassador to Australia

JOE KELLY and THOMAS HENRY - 28 April 2026

1/2

Donald Trump has nominated David Brat – a former US congressman, anti-establishment Tea Party Republican and conservative free market economist – as America’s next ambassador to Australia after the position was left vacant for 15 months.

Dr Brat, one of the early supporters of the US President’s political career, is set to replace former ambassador Caroline Kennedy, who left Canberra after Mr Trump’s November 2024 election victory.

Anthony Albanese said that he would work constructively with “whoever is determined to be the ambassador”.

“That is a decision for the United States. I understand that the president will put forward David Brat as ambassador. And there’s a process of confirmation that occurs through the US processes,” the Prime Minister said.

“We respect, the sovereignty of countries, to put forward ambassadors, just like we expect our choices to be endorsed.”

Dr Brat, 61, shot to prominence more than a decade ago when he won an upset victory in the Republican primary for the 7th congressional district in Virginia against the then House majority leader Eric Cantor after taking a hard line on border protection and “crony capitalism”.

He warned that illegal migration depressed wages and argued that granting amnesty to illegal migrants undermined the rule of law, depicting Mr Cantor as soft on border security.

On economic policy, Dr Brat supported fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, and reducing the national debt.

But he also sounded the alarm on “big business in bed with big government,” arguing this resulted in special deals and bailouts for larger players that edged out smaller businesses while hurting ordinary Americans.

That race was widely seen as David v Goliath contest leading into the 2014 midterms, with Mr Cantor massively outspending the Tea Party-backed Dr Brat.

Mr Cantor was the second-highest-ranking Republican in the House and seen as the likely successor to speaker John Boehner with the party having held the majority since 2010.

The comfortable victory enjoyed by Dr Brat in the primary – besting Mr Cantor by a margin of about 56 per cent to 44 per cent – is now widely interpreted as one of the early signs of the broader shift happening within the Republican Party and its voter base.

It is also seen as one of the precursors to the success enjoyed by Mr Trump when he ran for the presidency for the first time in 2016 – a symbol of grassroots anger and frustration towards the GOP establishment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38979

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24548231 (280926ZAPR26) Notable: King Charles plays the AUKUS card to mend fractured alliance with Donald Trump - King Charles III is expected to use a historic address to the US Congress to emphasise the AUKUS security partnership and broader defence ties as part of efforts to reinforce relations between Britain and the United States during a period of tension involving President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Buckingham Palace has indicated the King will frame the relationship around “reconciliation and renewal”, highlighting NATO and AUKUS as examples of enduring strategic co-operation despite disagreements over Iran, migration and defence policy. The four-day state visit includes meetings with Trump at the White House, a formal state dinner and a congressional address marking the 250th anniversary of American independence. King Charles is also expected to reference the recent security incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner during his speech.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

King Charles plays the AUKUS card to mend fractured alliance with Donald Trump

JOE KELLY and JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 28 April 2026

1/2

King Charles III will deliver a historic address to a joint session of the US congress aimed at renewing the special relationship between the UK and the US, reaffirming shared security interests by promoting co-operation under the landmark AUKUS submarine pact with Australia.

The speech is the centrepiece of a state visit timed to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence when America broke free from British rule, with previews from Buckingham Palace indicating that King Charles will frame the relationship as one marked by “reconciliation and renewal.”

Coming at a time of heightened strain between the two nations amid conflict between Mr Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over the war in Iran, King Charles will argue that both nations have nonetheless forged “one of the greatest alliances in human history”.

The speech, coming 35 years after his mother, Queen Elizabeth, did the same, is to be a gentle reminder to Mr Trump of the value of defending and reaffirming shared democratic values which he says are woven deeply into the fabric of the UK and the US.

While Mr Trump has been critical of the NATO alliance for its lack of support in the fight against the Islamic regime in Tehran, King Charles is expected to refer to the treaty along with the AUKUS security pact as evidence of the close connection between London and Washington.

Shared geopolitical challenges in the Middle East and Ukraine will also be touched upon in the speech, with defence and security issues thought to feature prominently and the King is expected to reflect on his own time serving in the Royal Navy during the 1970s.

While he will acknowledge differences between the UK and the US, with both nations not always seeing eye-to-eye, the King will reflect on how “time and again, our two countries have always found ways to come back together”.

King Charles, who heads the Church of England, will also speak of his faith and how in the hearts of the two nations lies “a generosity of spirit and a duty to foster compassion, to promote peace, to deepen mutual understanding and to value people of all faiths and none”.

Thought to run to about 20 minutes in length, it is also anticipated that the King’s speech will mention the incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday night where a 31-year-old gunman attempted to storm security and attack the US President and other administration officials.

King Charles and Queen Camilla arrived in America on Monday afternoon local time, commencing their four-day state visit by meeting with Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump at the White House in the afternoon for tea.

The royal couple also attended a garden party at the British Embassy in Washington, with the new British ambassador Christian Turner hosting more than 600 guests, including White House deputy chief-of-staff Stephen Miller, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and former speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

Queen Camilla met Michelle DeLaune, chief executive of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, as the royal family continues its work in support of vulnerable women and children amid the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein scandal involving the King’s brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38980

File: b8a994ec983903f⋯.mp4 (15.95 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24555726 (300026ZAPR26) Notable: Man accused of booing at Anzac Day dawn service Welcome to Country in Sydney identified - (Video) A 24-year-old man accused of booing during the Welcome to Country at Sydney’s Anzac Day dawn service has defended his actions after being identified by media three days after the event. Police allege Eli Toby was involved in disruptions during the Martin Place ceremony that prompted widespread condemnation from political leaders, veterans and attendees. Speaking outside his parents’ home near Penrith, Toby said he was “not sorry for it” and argued he “should be able to say what I like”. The report also noted he had attended a neo-Nazi rally outside Parliament House last year. Witnesses at the dawn service described the disruption as “appalling” and distressing, while the incident has intensified broader public debate over Welcome to Country ceremonies and acknowledgments at national commemorative events.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38961

>>38962

>>38963

Man accused of booing at Anzac Day dawn service Welcome to Country in Sydney identified

‘I’m not sorry for it. I should be able to say what I like.’

Clementine Cuneo - 28 Apr 2026

The man who is accused of booing during the Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day dawn service in Sydney’s Martin Place has been tracked down and he is making no apologies.

Eli Toby, 24, was confronted by 7NEWS at his parents’ home near Penrith three days after the remembrance service that triggered widespread debate about Welcome to Country acknowledgments.

Police will allege the young man and a band of other dawn service spoilers were behind 66 seconds of booing.

When asked if he had any apology to make to the diggers and their families, Toby responded: “How’d you find me?”

Toby lives at home with mum and dad and when asked if his parents know about the incident, he responded: “I haven’t told them yet. I’d rather you guys not tell them.”

But the secret’s out, and it’s not the first time Toby has been in the spotlight. He was also present at last year’s neo-Nazi rally outside Parliament House.

When questioned about the Welcome to Country, Toby claimed “it’s not right” because “it’s designed to humiliate the memory of white Australia.”

Asked whether the dawn service was the right forum for his protest, he admitted: “I haven’t really given it much thought to be honest.”

The disruption has triggered widespread disgust across the community, with witnesses describing their horror at the incident.

“I was appalled,” one person said, while another admitted: “It actually made me cry.”

Saturday’s shout down has also triggered broader debate, with the RSL now reviewing the entire Welcome to Country concept.

“Welcome to country has been overdone and I think that is unfortunate,” federal opposition leader Angus Taylor said.

But there’s no retreat from Toby, who remains defiant about his actions.

“I’m not sorry for it. I should be able to say what I like,” he said.

He is due to appear in court in June.

https://7news.com.au/news/man-accused-of-booing-at-anzac-day-dawn-service-welcome-to-country-in-sydney-identified-c-22204973

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38981

File: 5d5e58646edceca⋯.jpg (965.58 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6f6efe89c2426be⋯.jpg (910.84 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: afdb0cd6d2027c2⋯.jpg (599.79 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24555802 (300040ZAPR26) Notable: Eli Toby: Man accused of booing Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day dawn service - A 24-year-old man accused of booing during the Welcome to Country at Sydney’s Anzac Day dawn service has been publicly identified after being confronted by a television reporter outside his family home near Penrith. Police allege Eli Toby was part of a group that disrupted the Martin Place ceremony during an address by Indigenous elder Uncle Ray Minniecon. Toby defended his actions, claiming the Welcome to Country was “not right” and saying he was “not sorry for it”. The incident drew widespread condemnation from political leaders, veterans and attendees, with Opposition Leader Angus Taylor describing the behaviour as “inappropriate and un-Australian”. NSW Police said Toby was charged with committing a nuisance at a war memorial and is due to appear in court in June.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38961

>>38962

>>38963

>>38980

Eli Toby: Man accused of booing Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day dawn service

The man accused of a booing the Welcome to Country during a dawn service on Anzac Day has been named and shamed by a TV reporter.

news.com.au - April 28, 2026

A man accused of booing during the Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day dawn service in Sydney has been confronted by a TV reporter.

Eli Toby, 24, looked like a deer caught in the headlights after he was approached by 7News reporter Clementine Cuneo outside his parents’ home near Penrith, where he also resides.

“Do you have any apology to make to the Diggers, to their families,” says an incredulous Cuneo.

“How’d you find me?” replies Toby.

He then requested that the reporter didn’t tell his mum and dad what he has been accused of.

“I haven’t told them yet. I’d rather you guys not tell them,” he said.

Police will allege that Toby was part of a group of people who booed at the Welcome to Country, the second time booing has marred the event in two years.

Indigenous elder Uncle Ray Minniecon, who was giving the Welcome to Country, said after the event: “Why do people hate us so much? What crime did we commit that brings this out from people? What did we do wrong to them? It’s mysterious to us”.

Opposition leader, Angus Taylor, has called booing at Anzac Day ceremonies “inappropriate and un-Australian”.

When questioned, Toby said the Welcome to Country was “not right” because “it’s designed to humiliate the memory of white Australia”.

The booing was widely condemned with one witness saying they were appalled while another admitted it made them cry.

NSW Police said in a statement: “There were about 11,000 people at the Martin Place dawn service. Thousands of people lined Elizabeth Street, Sydney, to honour service men, women and relatives during the march”.

“About 4.30am (Saturday 25 April 2026), police responded to an alleged act of nuisance during a war memorial service at Martin Place.

“Officers attached to Operation Anzac Day identified a 24-year-old man attending the service and arrested him.

“Other people were moved on from the service.

“The 24-year-old man was taken to Day Street Police Station where he was charged with commit nuisance in, on etc war memorial.

“He was granted conditional bail to appear at Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday 3 June 2026.

“Police will allege in court the man booed while at the Cenotaph site.”

Operation Commander, Acting Assistant Commissioner Paul Dunstan, added that the overwhelming majority of those who attended Anzac Day commemorations showed respect and acted appropriately.

“Anzac Day is one of the most significant dates on our national calendar, and police were pleased to see the community honouring the courage and sacrifice of our service personnel with respect,” he said.

“Thousands of people attended the dawn service, with family, friends and supporters lining the route to honour those marching.

“Apart from a small handful of people, those who attended the dawn service and march were well behaved and respectful.

“Police urge anyone continuing to mark the day to act responsibly, know your limits and look out for each other.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/eli-toby-man-accused-of-booing-the-welcome-to-country-at-the-anzac-day-dawn-service/news-story/7938da203be2f67f73625f4396ce60ee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l46UInurn40

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38982

File: 16ab15089912d33⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,2160x1440,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 91e60222f07697e⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24555875 (300057ZAPR26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith’s girlfriend calls potential criminal witness and MP Andrew Hastie a ‘traitor’ - Ben Roberts-Smith’s partner Sarah Matulin has apologised after calling Liberal MP and former SAS officer Andrew Hastie a “traitor” on social media over Anzac Day weekend. Matulin posted the comment beneath an Instagram photo of Hastie attending commemorations with his children before later deleting it. Speaking through Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Karen Espiner, she said making the comment publicly was a “mistake” and had occurred without Roberts-Smith’s knowledge. Hastie, a potential witness in Roberts-Smith’s upcoming war crimes trial, responded that people should “reflect carefully on the seriousness of these matters before commenting online”. Roberts-Smith faces five war crime murder charges relating to Afghanistan deployments, which he denies. Legal experts said contact with potential witnesses could, in some contexts, raise concerns about intimidation or interference, though there was no suggestion Matulin acted illegally.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38871

>>38907

>>38945

>>38958

>>38969

Ben Roberts-Smith’s girlfriend calls potential criminal witness and MP Andrew Hastie a ‘traitor’

Clare Sibthorpe - April 27, 2026

1/2

The girlfriend of Ben Roberts-Smith has accused former SAS soldier and potential war crimes witness Andrew Hastie of being a “traitor” after the Liberal MP posted a photo of himself and his children remembering the fallen on Anzac Day.

Sarah Matulin commented “Yeah you’re a traitor” on the Instagram post made by Hastie on Saturday that the former SAS captain had captioned that “honouring our veterans and ADF” was “a responsibility for all Australians, young and old”.

“Lest we forget,” the Hastie post said, under a photo of the politician holding hands with his young daughter as his son carried a wreath at an Anzac Day event.

Matulin’s comment was later deleted. On Monday, speaking via Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Karen Espiner, Matulin said it was a “mistake to make that comment in a public forum and wasn’t done with Ben’s knowledge”.

Hastie said it was important that people “reflect carefully on the seriousness of these matters before commenting online”.

The now West Australian-based Liberal-MP was deployed to Afghanistan while serving in the SAS as a captain in 2013. Hastie also deployed to the war serving in the regular army in 2010. His Anzac Day post was also attacked by disgraced ex-Liberal party staffer Bruce Lehrmann, who was found by a civil court judge to have raped his former colleague Brittany Higgins.

Lehrmann commented: “your betrayal of BRS… won’t be forgotten.”

Hastie is a potential witness against Roberts-Smith over his connection to an alleged mission in which a junior soldier alleged Roberts-Smith ordered him to execute an Afghan detainee and then cover it up.

Hastie was one of 21 SAS veterans subpoenaed as a witness in the defamation case Roberts-Smith brought against this masthead and lost.

When Roberts-Smith was arrested and charged with five counts of war crimes – murder this month, Hastie released a statement saying that he had given “testimony under oath, as required by law” during the defamation case.

“Mr Roberts-Smith is now facing criminal charges in relation to this operational mission, so it is possible that I will be called as a witness to this trial.”

Several legal experts who did not want to comment publicly due to the sensitivity of the case explained there are certain contexts in which contacting a criminal witness could be illegal, including those with the potential to obstruct the course of justice.

Other instances may not be illegal but could be seen to be intimidatory, inappropriate or improper, they said.

There is no suggestion Matulin acted illegally, particularly given Hastie has not yet been confirmed as a witness in the criminal proceedings.

The charging of Roberts-Smith with allegedly executing, or ordering junior soldiers to execute, unarmed Afghan detainees has sparked a particularly hostile response from ultra-conservative and nationalistic figures on social media.

Some reporters and public commentators have also weighed into the debate.

An article published in The Nightly by journalist Aaron Patrick last Thursday quoted a legal expert, Professor Gary Edmond, warning that a junior soldier expected to testify against Roberts-Smith about ordering to execute a prisoner might be considered “unreliable because they are involved in the surrounding events”.

The Nightly is a Perth-based digital newspaper launched by Kerry Stokes’ Seven West Media and heavily backed by billionaire mining magnate Gina Rinehart.

However, in an email, Edmond said that he had also told Patrick that “as a type or class of witness, those who are or might be criminally concerned in the events [or associated events] might also be considered to be credible, and their evidence accepted as compelling”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38983

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24555948 (300111ZAPR26) Notable: King Charles hails AUKUS pact as he calls on US to defend alliances - (Video) King Charles III has used a rare address to the US Congress to highlight the AUKUS submarine pact as a symbol of enduring strategic ties between Britain, the United States and Australia amid rising global instability. Describing AUKUS as “the most ambitious submarine program in history”, the monarch said the partnership strengthened “shared resilience” and reinforced long-term security for allied nations. The speech, delivered during celebrations marking 250 years since American independence, also stressed the importance of NATO, support for Ukraine and continued co-operation between Western allies. King Charles referenced the recent assassination attempt against President Donald Trump, declaring such violence would “never succeed”. Trump welcomed the King and Queen Camilla at the White House with full ceremonial honours and praised the “special relationship” between Britain and America.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38979

King Charles hails AUKUS pact as he calls on US to defend alliances

JOE KELLY - 29 April 2026

1/2

King Charles highlighted the landmark AUKUS security partnership as evidence of enduring trans-Atlantic ties, urging the United States to stand firm with its Western allies amid mounting global tensions.

In a rare address to Congress, the monarch pointed to the trilateral submarine pact between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia as “the most ambitious submarine program in history” and a testament to shared security interests facing an increasingly volatile world.

“We have agreed the most ambitious submarine program in history – AUKUS – in partnership with Australia, a country of which I am also immensely proud to serve as Sovereign,” Charles told lawmakers during celebrations marking 250 years since American independence.

“We do not embark on these remarkable endeavours together out of sentiment. We do so because they build greater shared resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for generations to come.”

The speech came at a delicate moment in trans-Atlantic relations, with strains over Iran and Ukraine threatening to undermine Western unity. Charles carefully skirted tensions between President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, insisting the partnership between the two countries was “born out of dispute, but no less strong for it.”

The address – the first by a British monarch since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 – ranged across sensitive issues from climate change and presidential power to the importance of NATO and the defence of Ukraine. Despite touching on subjects that have divided Republicans and Democrats, the speech was warmly received by both sides of the aisle.

“The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear alone,” Charles warned, stressing that global threats required closer co-operation between the United States and its traditional partners.

The monarch emphasised that “unyielding resolve” was needed to secure a “just and lasting peace” in Ukraine, which has been fighting a full-scale Russian invasion since 2022. He noted the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks to highlight NATO’s continued importance, recalling how alliance members had “invoked Article 5 for the first time” and “answered the call together.”

Charles also referenced the recent assassination attempt on Trump and senior administration officials, declaring that “such acts of violence will never succeed” – a statement met with sustained applause from Congress.

Earlier, Trump had welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla to the White House with full ceremonial honours, including a 21-gun salute and military fly-past. The president struck a markedly warmer tone than in recent criticism of Starmer, hailing Britain as America’s closest ally and praising the “special relationship.”

“In the centuries since we won our independence, Americans have had no closer friends than the British,” Trump said on the South Lawn.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38984

File: 5e2a485a6b21d33⋯.mp4 (15.96 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556044 (300128ZAPR26) Notable: Inside Trump’s state dinner for the King, where Australia took centre stage - (Video) Australia and the AUKUS partnership featured prominently during King Charles III’s state dinner at the White House, with the monarch presenting President Donald Trump a historic submarine bell linked to wartime operations in Australia. Charles described the bell from HMS Trump, a British-built World War II submarine that later served with an Australian-based squadron, as an “AUKUS predecessor” symbolising shared military history and future co-operation. The King also elevated AUKUS alongside NATO as a key alliance helping Western nations confront an “increasingly complex and contested world”. Trump warmly received the gesture during the intimate East Room dinner attended by senior US officials, billionaires and business leaders, including Australian packaging executive Anthony Pratt. The evening also featured speeches, humour and renewed emphasis on the “special relationship” between Britain and America.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38979

>>38983

Inside Trump’s state dinner for the King, where Australia took centre stage

Michael Koziol - April 29, 2026

1/2

Washington: The special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom may have been the focal point of the state dinner at the White House on Tuesday night (US time), but Australia had the most memorable moment.

King Charles, who had charmed his way through the US Congress hours earlier, made similarly light work of his candlelit East Room audience, which lapped up his jokes and applauded his niceties.

But when it came time to hand President Donald Trump a personal gift, it was to Australia and the AUKUS pact to which the King turned.

He gave Trump the original bell from the HMS Trump, a British-made, World War II-era submarine launched in August 1944, which spent most of its life attached to the fourth submarine squadron in Australia, and played a critical role during the war in the Pacific.

“May it stand as a testimony to our nations’ shared history and shining future,” Charles said. “And should you ever need to get hold of us – just give us a ring.”

Not only that, but the King explicitly linked his gift to the Australian alliance, describing HMS Trump as an “AUKUS predecessor”.

And he elevated AUKUS to the level of NATO, saying: “Today, our partnerships in NATO and AUKUS deepen our technological and military co-operation and ensure that together we can meet the challenges of an increasingly complex and contested world.”

Trump adores such gifts and gestures, and the moment received one of the greatest seals of approval possible in the Trump administration – being featured on the White House’s Rapid Response account on X.

For a state dinner, this was an intimate affair, held exclusively within the East Room for about 100 guests. Among them was Australian packaging billionaire Anthony Pratt, seated at the far end of one of two room-length tables – conveniently next to the press riser.

Pratt, whom Trump once described as a “red-haired weirdo”, flicked through his phone for parts of the King’s speech.

At the end, as the media were being ushered out, he told this masthead it was “a great honour” to be there.

Asked whether he had anything else to say to his home-town newspapers, Pratt said: “Hello to Australia.”

He was far from the only billionaire on the guest list, joined by Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, outgoing Apple boss Tim Cook and the chief executive of media conglomerate Paramount Skydance, David Ellison.

Also on the guest list, though not visible from the media stand, was BP chief executive Meg O’Neill, who was until recently the chief executive of Woodside in Perth.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38985

File: a376a99ee89ea20⋯.jpg (2.55 MB,4890x3260,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e64bd07518643b5⋯.jpg (901.85 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9e2bb7e36c8e5bf⋯.jpg (568.14 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5b798660d07b435⋯.jpg (566.73 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556451 (300251ZAPR26) Notable: UK parliament's AUKUS inquiry report questions if Britain can keep submarine promises - A British parliamentary inquiry has raised concerns about whether the United Kingdom can deliver nuclear-powered submarines promised under the AUKUS pact on schedule, warning delays or funding shortfalls could undermine the trilateral partnership with Australia and the United States. The House of Commons Defence Committee said the SSN-AUKUS program would require sustained financial commitment across multiple governments and described signs of weakness in the investment pipeline as “deeply concerning”. The report also highlighted risks linked to low submarine production rates in the United States, where Virginia-class boats are intended for sale to Australia from the early 2030s. While broadly supportive of AUKUS, the inquiry noted criticism that geopolitical changes and Donald Trump’s “America First” approach had complicated the agreement’s long-term reliability and strategic assumptions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

UK parliament's AUKUS inquiry report questions if Britain can keep submarine promises

Riley Stuart and Elias Clure - 28 April 2026

1/2

British politicians have cast doubt on their country's ability to develop and deliver nuclear submarines promised as part of the AUKUS defence pact.

The House of Commons Defence Committee on Tuesday released the findings of its year-long review into the trilateral partnership.

While the report was broadly supportive of AUKUS, it also "laid bare the scale of the endeavour that will be required to deliver it".

As part of the deal, the United Kingdom and Australia are working together to design and build a new class of nuclear-powered attack submarine, known as SSN-AUKUS, scheduled to enter service in the late 2030s and the early 2040s.

"For the UK, delivering SSN-AUKUS will be a lengthy and complex undertaking requiring a sustained financial commitment from government across several electoral cycles," the report noted.

"It is deeply concerning that there are signs that the investment pipeline that underpins that commitment has already faltered."

The report urged the UK government to devote more money to the partnership.

"Shortfalls or delays in funding risk a failure to deliver SSN-AUKUS on time, with potentially severe consequences for UK and wider Euro-Atlantic security, and our standing with our trilateral partners," it read.

The ability of the United States and Australia to make good on their AUKUS commitments was also under the inquiry's microscope.

As part of the pact, the US is supposed to sell Australia several of its Virginia-class nuclear submarines, the first two of which are due to be delivered in the early 2030s.

The House of Commons report described low production rates in the US as "a matter of concern" and "a potential risk" to the deal.

While the White House has reiterated its commitment to the partnership, and Australia has already given the United States $US500 million ($798 million) to try to reinvigorate the country's shipbuilding industry, critics contend the AUKUS deal's fine print means nothing is guaranteed.

Australia is expected to invest a total of $US3 billion in US submarine manufacturing capabilities as part of the deal.

It has been estimated AUKUS could cost Australia about $368 billion by the mid-2050s.

"For Australia, AUKUS is an unprecedented undertaking to be delivered to ambitious timescales," the House of Commons report noted.

"The UK will need to work closely with Australia at both industry and government level to share expertise and support Australia in meeting its own milestones."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38986

File: ef80a73748daaa9⋯.jpg (480.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 26c4a140d645e92⋯.jpg (269.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b69966990ccc9e0⋯.jpg (344.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9260fed87716910⋯.jpg (460.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556469 (300302ZAPR26) Notable: New Defence chief Meghan Quinn faces AUKUS test amid UK doubts - Meghan Quinn has been appointed Australia’s new Defence Department secretary, becoming the first woman to hold the role as the government confronts mounting concerns over delays and risks to the AUKUS submarine program. Quinn, previously the architect of Labor’s Future Made in Australia agenda, will oversee major reforms ordered by Defence Minister Richard Marles to address procurement failures and cultural problems within the department. Her appointment coincided with a British parliamentary inquiry warning “shortcomings and failings” could threaten AUKUS delivery timelines, particularly around UK shipyard upgrades and investment. Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson urged Labor to consider purchasing US B-21 stealth bombers as insurance against potential capability gaps. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insisted the submarine pact remained “full steam ahead” despite the British concerns.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38985

New Defence chief Meghan Quinn faces AUKUS test amid UK doubts

BEN PACKHAM and ELIZABETH PIKE - April 28, 2026

The architect of Anthony Albanese’s $23bn Future Made in ­Australia agenda has been parachuted in to fix the Department of Defence, as British MPs warn the AUKUS agreement is under threat and the opposition urges Labor to take out insurance by asking to buy US B-21 bombers.

Department of Industry, Science and Resources secretary Meghan Quinn was named on Tuesday as the new secretary of Defence, making her the first woman to occupy the role.

Her appointment comes after Defence Minister Richard Marles ordered a massive overhaul of the $59bn-a-year department to overcome ingrained cultural problems and repeated procurement failures.

The Prime Minister said Ms Quinn, who also designed the government’s National Reconstruction Fund and its 2030 critical minerals strategy, was “the standout candidate” for the role.

Progressing the AUKUS submarine program will be one of her top priorities. However, the ­government’s claims the agreement is on track were thrown off course by a British parliamentary inquiry, which warned “shortcomings and failings” could scuttle the trilateral enterprise.

The House of Commons Defence Committee said in a new report that leadership failures and investment woes were already threatening the program. It urged British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “to take a more visible role in promoting and driving forward AUKUS to counter the political drift that could see it derailed”.

Mr Albanese dismissed the ­report, saying the British government “overwhelmingly” supported the submarine plan, while US President Donald Trump had declared it “full steam ahead”.

Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson, an “AUKUS true believer”, told the National Press Club he believed the program would succeed, “but not on baseline settings; not on status quo expenditure and investment”.

He urged the government to consider other “supplementary capabilities”, including the stealthy B-21 Raider – the US’s most advanced bomber which is yet to enter service.

“It is not yet clear whether the US would be willing to share the B-21 with Australia, or how we would fit into their production schedule,” Senator Paterson said.

“However, they did export the F-35A to Australia, and if they are willing to share the crown jewel of the US Navy, a nuclear submarine, we are better placed than any other ally to ask.”

While past Defence reviews had rejected the capability, he said the nation’s strategic environment had since deteriorated, and the government needed to address a “serious, potential capability gap”.

Ms Quinn, who previously worked for BHP and the Bank of England, will replace outgoing defence secretary Greg Moriarty, who is headed to Washington to become Australia’s new ambassador to the US.

Her appointment comes just a fortnight after Mr Albanese installed Lieutenant General Susan Coyle as the nation’s first female chief of army.

Sources said Ms Quinn was close to the Prime Minister, earning his respect by delivering Labor’s key industrial policies.

Her department’s Future Made in Australia program is the government’s flagship plan to revitalise the nation’s industrial capabilities and implement Labor’s planned “net-zero” transformation, while its $15bn National Reconstruction Fund provides concessional finance and equity investments for economy-strengthening initiatives.

Its critical minerals strategy includes the $1.2bn strategic reserve, created to keep Mr Trump onside in negotiations over tariffs.

Mr Albanese praised Ms Quinn’s work on the Gillard government’s 2012 Asian Century White Paper. But many believe the document was self-congratulatory and failed to seriously grapple with the risks posed by China’s rise.

Senator Paterson said the white paper “hasn’t aged well”.

“It was incredibly optimistic about Australia’s relationship with China, in particular,” he said.

“To be fair to Secretary Quinn though, the world has changed. Presumably, her views have been updated in that time.”

The strategic threat posed by China will be central to her new role, and is at the heart of the urgency around delivering new ­defence capabilities.

Former senior Defence official Michael Shoebridge said as an “outsider”, Ms Quinn would see the challenges facing the department “with fresh eyes”, and she had the advantage of not being “captured” by the Defence establishment.

Despite the government’s upbeat take on AUKUS’s progress, the House of Commons inquiry found funding for shipyard upgrades at Barrow, where the British AUKUS subs will be built, had “already slipped”.

“Any further failures could lead to delay in delivering SSN-AUKUS,” the report stated.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/aukus-submarine-pact-at-risk-from-uk-failings-parliamentary-report-warns/news-story/01675b3316f69b65d24634003208b133

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38987

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556563 (300400ZAPR26) Notable: Australia to sell fleet of Bushmasters to Netherlands, locks in commitment to build 268 more for itself - (Video) Australia will supply Bushmaster armoured vehicles to the Netherlands while committing $1.2 billion to build 268 additional Bushmasters for the Australian Army, alongside upgrades to Hawkei vehicles and military trucks. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the Australian-made Bushmaster and Hawkei were regarded as “world-leading protected mobility vehicles” and confirmed most new production would remain with the Australian Defence Force. The investment will sustain production at Thales’ Bendigo facility until 2033 and support hundreds of defence industry jobs. Some Bushmasters will also be adapted for the StrikeMaster project, which mounts Naval Strike Missiles capable of targeting enemy ships and land positions at long range. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said future variants could include laser-based systems designed to destroy drones.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38886

>>38900

>>38906

>>38937

Australia to sell fleet of Bushmasters to Netherlands, locks in commitment to build 268 more for itself

Nicole Asher - 26 April 2026

1/2

Australian Bushmaster armoured vehicles are being sent to the Netherlands following a request by the Dutch government.

A fleet of troop carriers has been sold to the Netherlands, building on the country's existing Bushmaster fleet.

The sale comes as the Australian government commits $1.2 billion towards 268 new Bushmasters, as well as upgraded army trucks and smaller Hawkei tactical vehicles.

"The Australian-built Bushmaster and Hawkei are recognised as world-leading protected mobility vehicles — supporting not just the Australian Defence Force, but the defence forces of our international partners as well," Defence Minister Richard Marles said.

The Australian government has not revealed how many Bushmasters have been bought by the Dutch government, or how much the Dutch are paying for the armoured vehicles.

"The number that we're building well exceeds, by multiples, the number that we are providing to the Netherlands," Mr Marles told RN Breakfast.

"Out of respect to the Netherlands, we're not releasing the number that we are sending to them."

He said the vast majority of the roughly 300 Bushmasters being built were destined for the Australian Army.

"What this is, is a major reinvestment in Australia's own protected mobility fleet and Bushmasters are at the heart of that," the Defence Minister said.

Mr Marles will join Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy in Bendigo today to announce the Netherlands deal and the local investment.

Bushmasters have attracted significant international attention after the Australian government gifted more than 100 to Ukraine for use in the war with Russia.

The government has confirmed that the Bushmasters now scheduled for production were in addition to vehicles already being built to replace those sent to Ukraine.

“Through this $1.2 billion investment, the Albanese government is sustaining local jobs, strengthening our national defence industry and delivering a capability that protects the lives of Australian Defence Force personnel," Mr Marles said.

Builds on StrikeMaster commitment

The pending 268 Bushmasters will also be in addition to the vehicles diverted to project "Land 8113", which is looking at adding missile launching capability to the armoured carriers.

So far, 59 of the Bushmasters have been acquired for that project.

Known as StrikeMaster, the Australian-developed product utilises a pair of Naval Strike Missiles (NSM) mounted on top of the Bushmaster, which can be fired at enemy targets on land and sea out to at least 250 kilometres.

First unveiled in 2022 by defence companies Kongsberg and Thales, the StrikeMaster and its ship-killing NSMs have been touted as a sovereign and cost-effective option for delivering a potent "area denial" capability across Australia's top end.

The new construction pipeline has, the government said, ensured production out of French company Thales' Bendigo factory until 2033.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38988

File: 07b59032ccc34a9⋯.jpg (251.79 KB,1620x911,1620:911,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb3dbfe979dac89⋯.jpg (218.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ae0537e12889c6b⋯.jpg (241.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556580 (300411ZAPR26) Notable: Iran’s embassy in Canberra recruiting Australians for ‘martyrdom’ - Iran’s embassy in Canberra has removed social media posts promoting a “Janfada” or “martyrdom” campaign that encouraged supporters in Australia to register through an Iranian government portal and contribute funds to causes linked to Tehran. The Australian Federal Police said it was aware of the material, which reportedly described participation as a “sacred” act connected to self-sacrifice and loyalty to the Iranian regime. The posts appeared amid heightened tensions following Australia’s expulsion of Iran’s ambassador and senior diplomats over intelligence findings linking Tehran to antisemitic attacks in Australia. Opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam said the campaign crossed “a clear red line”, while Iranian-Australian community figures urged an investigation into whether the embassy was operating beyond its diplomatic mandate through ideologically charged messaging and fundraising activity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23921099 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24318774 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38756

Iran’s embassy in Canberra recruiting Australians for ‘martyrdom’

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - April 26, 2026

1/2

The Iranian embassy in Canberra has scrubbed social media posts recruiting Australians for a “martyrdom” campaign and instructing loyalists to register through a state-run digital portal to pledge their support and funnel money to Tehran for a “sacred” cause.

A cryptic Telegram message shared by the embassy last week urged participation in a “Janfada” or “martyrdom” campaign, raising fresh questions about the activities of Iran’s diplomatic mission in Australia following the near-collapse of formal relations between the two countries.

Janfada is a potent Persian term referring to self-sacrifice, and is closely associated with the concept of martyrdom in Iran, multiple sources have confirmed.

It is used to describe people willing to lay down their lives for the regime, often in devotion to defending Iran’s sovereignty against threats.

The message shared by Iran’s embassy is understood to have come from Tehran’s foreign ministry and is being amplified by embassies around the world.

The Australian Federal Police said it was aware of the posts and it would provide an update “at an appropriate time”.

Concerns have been raised as the message comes at a time of heightened tensions after the rogue nation’s leadership was decapitated by Israel and the United States.

The call to action directs Iranians living abroad, including in Australia, to register through a platform called the “Mikhak system” and contribute funds to Iranian humanitarian organisations, including the Iranian Red Crescent Society.

Multiple Iranian sources have confirmed that the “Mikhak system” is a digital platform the Iranian Foreign Ministry uses to provide consular services to Iranians living overseas.

“In response to repeated requests from Iranians residing abroad to enable participation in the Janfada campaign, and given the lack of access to domestic websites from outside the country, the possibility has been made available through the Mikhak system for Iranians who wish to take part in this sacred campaign,” the message states.

People are then instructed to access the system, select the “Janfada option,” and complete a registration form.

A separate message shared by the embassy references donations for those “affected by the excesses of America and Israel” and provides details for bank and cryptocurrency transfers to the Iranian Red Crescent Society. It says the funds will be used to “assist those affected, support the vulnerable, and implement humanitarian programs” in line with “transparency, accountability and relevant laws and regulations”.

The questionable activity is likely to further inflame tensions between Canberra and Tehran, after Australia expelled Iran’s ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three senior officials last year following intelligence findings linking Iran to antisemitic attacks on Australian soil.

In August, ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess said the Iranian government was behind at least two attacks – the December 2024 firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and the October 2024 attack on Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen – and warned Iran was likely responsible for further incidents.

Anthony Albanese described the actions as “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression” aimed at undermining Australian social cohesion.

Following the expulsions, Australia suspended diplomatic operations in Tehran – the first such move since the second World War – while designating Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation.

Iran’s embassy in Canberra remains operational despite the breakdown in diplomatic relations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38989

File: 458a5b8711ec21b⋯.jpg (2.41 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f745eaf011e996c⋯.jpg (495.07 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556590 (300425ZAPR26) Notable: Penny Wong to press Asian countries for fuel guarantees during regional tour - Foreign Minister Penny Wong is pressing major Asian trading partners for assurances on fuel supplies as Australia confronts ongoing shortages linked to disruption in the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran war. During talks in Tokyo, Wong argued Australia could only continue supplying key exports such as liquified natural gas, coal and food to the region if it maintained reliable access to diesel, jet fuel, petrol and fertiliser. She said Australia wanted to remain a “reliable supplier” but needed fuel-exporting nations to “continue to be reliable” in return. Wong is also travelling to China and South Korea to discuss fuel security, trade and broader strategic issues. The visit comes as Japan reportedly raised concerns over possible Australian taxes on gas exporters and their impact on investment certainty and economic relations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38874

>>38879

>>38892

>>38897

Penny Wong to press Asian countries for fuel guarantees during regional tour

Natalie Whiting and Stephen Dziedzic - 28 April 2026

1/2

Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Australia needs to keep on receiving fuel from its major suppliers in Asia if it is going to continue sending them critical energy and food supplies, as the region continues to grapple with oil shortages.

Senator Wong has met with her Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi, the Minister of Trade, Economy and Industry Ryosei Akazawa and the Minister of Economic Security Kimi Onoda in Tokyo on the first stop of a regional tour aimed, in part, at shoring up Australia's fuel security.

The government has been intent on securing guarantees from its major fuel suppliers in South-East Asia and North Asia, as countries throughout the region face major oil shortages due to the Iran war, which has choked the Strait of Hormuz.

Senator Wong told the ABC in Tokyo that she would carry the same message to Japan, China and South Korea on her regional tour, saying Australia could only fulfil its critical role as a major food, coal and liquified natural gas (LNG) exporter in Asia if it had fuel and fertiliser to keep its economy running.

"We are reliable suppliers. We want to continue to be reliable suppliers," Senator Wong told the ABC.

"And to do that, we need to have diesel, we need to have jet fuel, we need to have petrol, and we need to have fertiliser too."

She denied that Australia was using its energy exports as a cudgel with major fuel exporters in the region, saying her argument was both an assertion of "partnership" and an "assertion of the reality".

"We want to be a reliable supplier, and if we are to be a reliable supplier, we need others to be reliable," she said.

The visit comes as Japan and Australia confirm that Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will visit Canberra next Monday for talks with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Japan raises gas tax concern

The federal government has also been mulling an additional tax on gas exporters, but Japan has warned that could undermine investment and business ties at a fragile moment in the global economy.

The ABC revealed last week that Mr Albanese has killed off the proposal, in part because the government does not want to anger key trading partners who it relies on for fuel.

Senator Wong effectively confirmed that Japan had pressed its concerns with her during her visit to Tokyo, although she would not go into detail.

"I don't go into every discussion, but of course, you'd understand that reliability and predictability are something they seek," she said.

But she would not be drawn on the government's final decision on the gas tax, saying it was a "discussion in Australia which I'll leave for the moment".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38990

File: 7d7c745aaf8609b⋯.jpg (354.51 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3b195aca32c12e1⋯.jpg (416.92 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556607 (300437ZAPR26) Notable: Chinese firms to engage Australian businesses on jet fuel sales - Chinese state-owned oil companies have begun direct discussions with Australian businesses over jet fuel sales following diplomatic negotiations led by Foreign Minister Penny Wong in Beijing. Wong described the development as an encouraging sign of co-operation after talks with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, as Australia seeks to avoid worsening fuel shortages linked to the Strait of Hormuz crisis. State-owned energy giant Sinopec is reportedly co-ordinating the negotiations, while China has also approved increased fuel exports for May. Wong argued Australia’s ability to continue supplying coal, liquified natural gas, iron ore and food to regional markets depended on maintaining reliable access to jet fuel and diesel. The diplomatic mission was briefly overshadowed when a Chinese official reportedly obstructed an Australian government photographer during a meeting with Vice President Han Zheng.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38874

>>38879

>>38892

>>38897

>>38989

Chinese firms to engage Australian businesses on jet fuel sales

YONI BASHAN - 29 April 2026

Chinese state-owned oil companies have begun engaging directly with Australian businesses on jet fuel sales in a breakthrough emerging from intensive diplomatic negotiations between Foreign Minister Penny Wong and her counterparts in Beijing.

Speaking to reporters after meeting Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday evening, Senator Wong described the development as an early but positive sign of co-operation, crediting the Chinese government with responding to Australia’s urgent fuel security needs.

“I expressed my appreciation of this co-operation to Minister Wang Yi this evening,” she said. “We are committed to working with China to further areas of practical co-operation, including in energy security, and of course, supporting China to host APEC.”

The breakthrough follows discussions initiated earlier this month when Anthony Albanese and Chinese Premier Li Qiang held a telephone call amid mounting fears over Australia’s fuel supplies.

State-owned oil major Sinopec is co-ordinating the discussions, though Senator Wong declined to name the company or specify how many Australian businesses are involved.

Separately, China has reportedly approved 500,000 metric tons of fuel exports for May to regions outside of Hong Kong, nearly double April’s forecast shipments but still less than half pre-war averages.

The diplomatic win is likely to be read as a vindication of Senator Wong’s strategy to reframe Australia’s critical fuel shortage as a threat to China’s own economic interests. Throughout the day, she pressed the message that without adequate jet fuel and diesel imports, Australia cannot maintain the reliable supply of coal, iron ore, LNG and food that Chinese markets depend upon.

“You need jet fuel to get the FIFO workers to the mines. You need diesel to run your mining industry, you need diesel to run your agricultural sector,” Senator Wong told The Australian in an interview earlier on Wednesday. “The delivery of jet fuel to Australia enables us to continue providing the exports to the region.”

Yet the carefully choreographed visit was briefly overshadowed during Senator Wong’s morning meeting with Vice President Han Zheng when a Chinese official physically blocked an Australian government photographer from filming part of her remarks. The confrontation created palpable tension and prompted intervention from a senior Australian diplomat who insisted the pathway be cleared.

The incident underscored the delicate nature of Senator Wong’s mission, one in which the stakes remained high on arrival. Airlines have warned their fuel supply assurances will run out by the end of May, with China — Australia’s largest jet fuel supplier — among several nations imposing export restrictions or bans amid the Strait of Hormuz crisis. Thailand and South Korea have implemented similar measures.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38991

File: 497a8116e378795⋯.jpg (314.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556735 (300608ZAPR26) Notable: Age legend Michael Gawenda to air left-wing media’s failure on antisemitism at royal commission - Former The Age editor Michael Gawenda is expected to tell the antisemitism royal commission that major Australian media organisations failed to adequately report on rising antisemitism following the October 7 attacks on Israel. Gawenda plans to criticise “the left liberal media”, including The Age, Sydney Morning Herald, ABC and Guardian, arguing they minimised the impact of antisemitism on Jewish Australians and elevated fringe voices over mainstream Jewish opinion. He also said he had lost friendships and publishing opportunities because of his support for Israel. The royal commission’s interim report, focused on intelligence and security matters linked to the Bondi attack, is expected to contain heavy redactions for national security reasons. Public hearings beginning next month will examine lived experiences of antisemitism across education, media, health, employment and other sectors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38971

>>38972

Age legend Michael Gawenda to air left-wing media’s failure on antisemitism at royal commission

JAMES DOWLING and STEPHEN RICE - April 28, 2026

1/2

The antisemitism Royal Commission will hear evidence from the former editor of The Age, Michael Gawenda, that Australia suffered a major failure of journalism after October 7, accusing “the left liberal media” – the Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and the Guardian – of not doing any detailed reporting of what the Jewish community is going through.

Multiple sources have told The Australian that the commission's intelligence and security report, due to be handed down on Thursday, will be released with heavily redacted findings. Some sections will be confidential in order to protect the evidence and testimony of national security and intelligence agencies – with some arguing “by necessity”.

It will be followed a week later by the first public hearings in the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission, which will lean on the testimony of Jewish Australians. Many of those who made submissions, including Gawenda and singer-­songwriter Deborah Conway, have been told by the commission’s staff to prepare witness statements.

Gawenda’s statement to the commission will focus on his experiences as a writer and a journalist as a supporter of Australia, and on the loss of friendships and writing opportunities.

The veteran journalist was scathing of the way mainstream media outlets had covered the wave of antisemitism that followed the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

“So it’s about that experience, not about the war itself, but the way anti-Semitism was covered in Australia, and why it was that after all the years that I worked for The Age and edited The Age, I couldn’t be published in The Age,” he said.

“I think the left liberal media – the Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC, the Guardian – have basically not done the sort of job that I would expect mainstream media organisations to do.

“They have minimised in their commentary the effect on Jews of what is clearly an increase in antisemitism. They have favoured minority Jewish organisations and used them as if they represent some sort of mainstream Jewish opinion.”

Gawenda was scathing of the way those media outlets had covered the report of antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal.

“That media was shocking in its treatment of the antisemitism envoy’s report,” he said.

“So I think they’ve done a ­terrible job. I think it’s got to do with the fact that journalists see themselves now, not as reporters, but as social activists wanting to change the world rather than report the world.”

Gawenda will speak about the loss of his friendship with publisher Louise Adler, which occurred before the October 7 attack, but which he says was caused by his support of Israel.

“Louise Adler was one friendship that absolutely ended,” he said. “She had been my publisher and my friend for a very long time. And that friendship ended before October 7th … I am content with the fact that I still have a voice. I still have outlets which will publish me. The Australian has been terrific to me. I’ve written for Haaretz in Israel; not about the war, but about the Australian ­situation. So yes, ending friendships has been painful, very painful, that is true. Professionally, it is ridiculous that I can’t get published in The Age, it’s just absurd. But it says more about them than anything else.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38992

File: 6a3a72fa89ab28d⋯.jpg (108.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9fccf6854eea73b⋯.jpg (114.93 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556743 (300618ZAPR26) Notable: eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant stares down abuse, death threats - Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant says regulators facing intense online abuse may require security protections similar to those provided to politicians, after enduring widespread threats linked to the government’s social media restrictions for children. Inman Grant said billionaire Elon Musk publicly labelled her a “censorship commissar” following the announcement of Australia’s social media age limits, triggering tens of thousands of hostile posts, including alleged death threats, doxxing and deepfakes targeting her and her family. Speaking with former prime minister Julia Gillard, she said much of the abuse was “gendered” and designed to intimidate women in leadership roles. Despite the attacks, Inman Grant said the experience had strengthened her resolve, arguing that attempts to silence regulators only made her “dig in” further on online safety reforms.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38735

>>38833

>>>/qresearch/24498546

>>38938

Online safety leader stares down abuse, death threats

Maeve Bannister - April 29 2026

As more women take on public leadership and regulatory roles, Australia’s first eSafety commissioner warns they could require security protections similar to elected parliamentarians due to plausible online threats made against them.

Julie Inman Grant made history when she was appointed to lead Australia’s eSafety Commission in 2017, a world-first government regulatory body dedicated to keeping citizens safer online.

She has driven significant regulatory reform, including developing industry standards to address illegal content, age-restricted material and emerging AI harms online.

But it is in leading the implementation of Australia’ landmark social media ban, which delays children’s access until they are 16, that Ms Inman Grant herself has endured the most significant online threats.

Following the ban announcement, billionaire Elon Musk, who owns social media platform X, made a public post calling Ms Inman Grant a “censorship commissar”.

Within 24 hours, 75,000 posts had been directed at her, 80 per cent of which were toxic, harmful and plausible death threats.

Speaking to Australia’s first female prime minister Julia Gillard during Women Deliver, Ms Inman Grant said she had been doxxed and had deepfakes and death threats made against her.

The pair’s conversation was part of a live recording for Ms Gillard’s podcast, A Podcast of One’s Own.

“It is gendered and it is designed to wear you down, just like any other form of sexualised, violent online abuse that plays upon gendered standards,” she said.

“My issue is when they dox my children and my family members … it makes you sit back and go, am I putting my family and my kids in danger, and how do I protect them?”

Doxxing is a form of online harassment where an individual’s private information such as their home address, phone number or photos are published without their consent.

Ms Inman Grant noted there were security protections for elected officials, who can face similar threats due to their work, but not the same for regulators.

“There are protections – and I support them – provided to elected members of parliament, but there aren’t the same protections provided to regulators like myself,” she said.

“I’m kind of a new case, because I guess there aren’t that many regulators around the world that have been issued a dog whistle from Elon Musk.

“It comes with a cost, but what (perpetrators) don’t realise is: the more they target me, the more I dig in.”

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9235406/online-safety-leader-stares-down-abuse-death-threats/

https://womendeliver.org/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38993

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556764 (300637ZAPR26) Notable: Hundreds of child abuse files found on devices belonging to police killer Dezi Freeman - (Video) Police allegedly discovered hundreds of child abuse files on devices belonging to Dezi Freeman after the sovereign citizen shot dead two Victorian police officers during a raid on his property in August last year. Officers had attended Freeman’s makeshift home near Porepunkah to execute a search warrant linked to a child abuse investigation when he opened fire, killing constables Neal Thompson and Vadim de Waart-Hottart before fleeing into bushland. Freeman remained on the run for 216 days before being shot dead by police in March after an armed standoff in north-east Victoria. Authorities are also investigating alleged historical sexual offences connected to Freeman. Detectives are now focusing on identifying people who may have helped him evade capture while living as a fugitive across regional Victoria.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827

>>38829

>>38834

>>38838

>>38851

>>38875

Hundreds of child abuse files found on devices belonging to police killer Dezi Freeman

Danny Tran and Antonia O'Flaherty - 29 April 2026

1/2

Police killer Dezi Freeman was on the verge of having his secret stash of child abuse material discovered when he gunned down two officers outside his makeshift home.

Freeman, a so-called sovereign citizen, was living with his wife and children in a ramshackle bus in the north-east Victorian town of Porepunkah, about 330 kilometres from Melbourne, at the time of the shooting in August last year.

The ABC can reveal police were at the property to execute a search warrant for the 56-year-old's devices, on which hundreds of files containing child abuse material were later found.

But the raid went horribly wrong when Freeman opened fire on police, killing Neal Thompson and Vadim de Waart-Hottart, and injuring a third officer, before disappearing into the bush.

There have been scant details about the warrant police were executing at Freeman's home, which police have previously said was part of an investigation by the Wangaratta Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team.

Detectives discovered the child abuse material in the aftermath of the August shooting as they scoured Freeman's devices.

Multiple law enforcement sources have since told the ABC the investigation into historical sex offences included allegations of sexual exposure.

The ABC understands detectives are in contact with one alleged victim, but Freeman will never face charges, having been shot dead by police last month after 216 days on the run.

Officers from the Victoria Police's elite Special Operations Group negotiated with Freeman for three hours while he was holed up in a converted shipping container on a property in Thologolong, more than 150 kilometres north-east of Porepunkah, on March 30.

Freeman emerged wrapped in a blanket and cradling a service-pistol he took from the body of a slain police officer before he pointed it towards police and was shot multiple times.

It brought to an end an unprecedented manhunt by police, who issued a $1 million reward for any information leading to his capture.

The 56-year-old had regularly come into contact with police over the years for traffic offences, harassing neighbours and at anti-COVID restriction protests.

The conspiracy theorist was known for his hatred of police, who he had once described as "f*cking Nazis".

Since the shooting, sovereign citizen circles have mythologised Freeman and claimed, without evidence, that any allegations against him were fabricated.

Freeman privately told his circle that the police investigations against him involved a "skinny-dipping" incident, which he brushed off.

The ABC understands a skinny-dipping incident has formed part of the investigation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38994

File: 0194b16bfa83cce⋯.jpg (556.23 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0a1468d58767266⋯.jpg (3.78 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1c68a0eae52b4ec⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,3744x2496,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556785 (300652ZAPR26) Notable: Multinational Forces Validate Defensive Readiness During Exercise Balikatan 2026 - More than 500 military personnel from the United States, Philippines, Australia and New Zealand have conducted a large-scale counter-landing live-fire exercise during Exercise Balikatan 2026, simulating the defence of a beachhead against an amphibious assault. Forces coordinated missile systems, fighter aircraft, mortars, machine guns and anti-armour weapons through a combined multinational command structure designed to integrate intelligence, surveillance and real-time targeting. Australian troops from the 5th/7th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment, joined Philippine, US and New Zealand forces in what organisers described as the first four-nation counter-landing live-fire event held during Balikatan. Philippine military spokesman Colonel Dennis Hernandez said the exercise strengthened “precision, speed and overwhelming coordination”, while Australian commander Lieutenant Colonel Benjamin Woolmer said the training reinforced “shoulder-to-shoulder” co-operation between allied forces.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Multinational Forces Validate Defensive Readiness During Exercise Balikatan 2026

war.gov - April 28, 2026

Over 500 service members from the United States, Philippines, Australia and New Zealand successfully coordinated fires from land and air to defeat a simulated adversary attack as part of Exercise Balikatan 2026, April 27.

During the counter-landing live-fire training, forces demonstrated their ability to sense the actions of a dynamic notional enemy, make collective decisions in real time and coordinate an array of fire from missile systems, fighter aircraft, mortars and machine guns. They combined advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities with lethal firepower through a multidomain, combined command and control node to think, decide and act as one team.

"We can talk about all the capabilities we have, but the integration of those capabilities is the cornerstone of how this is done right," said U.S. Marine Corps Col. G. J. Flynn III, commanding officer of Marine Rotational Force – Darwin. "The friendships that we made being in the dirt in defensive positions alongside each other, that is what really matters about this event."

This training marked the first time these four nations conducted a counter-landing live-fire event during Exercise Balikatan. Participants included U.S. Marines assigned to the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, U.S. soldiers assigned to the 7th Infantry Division/Multi-Domain Command-Pacific, Philippine marines assigned to the 3rd Marine Brigade and elements of the Philippine Air Force and Philippine Army. They were joined by soldiers assigned to the 5th/7th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment, and for the first time, soldiers assigned to the 2nd/1st Battalion, Royal New Zealand Infantry Regiment.

"Beach defense is not the responsibility of a single unit or domain; it requires seamless integration across services and with our allies," said Philippine Marine Corps Col. Dennis Hernandez, Armed Forces of the Philippines spokesperson for Balikatan 2026. "Exercises like this ensure that we are prepared to protect our coastal communities and territorial integrity with precision, speed and overwhelming coordination."

The training began with intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets detecting a mock enemy amphibious vessel and providing intelligence to the C2 node for decision-making. As the vessel approached the coast, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems engaged targets from their position at the beachhead.

As enemy assault amphibious vehicles and fast boats raced toward the beach in the training scenario, targets were met with fire from mortars, Stingers and anti-armor systems like the Javelin and tube-launched, optically tracked, wire-guided missiles.

The event culminated with a final defensive line of direct-fire weapons from all participating nations engaging the last wave of targets, neutralizing the threat and successfully defending the beachhead.

"We participated in Exercise Balikatan to strengthen interoperability with partner nations and our ally, Australia," said New Zealand Army Capt. Will Hutchinson, acting second-in-command of Combat Team Jackal. "The soldiers got a lot from working with a combined force and it's something we're looking to continue in the future."

The counter-landing live-fire exercise and other military training events conducted during Balikatan 2026 built tactical proficiency, compatible capabilities and military-to-military coordination, exemplifying the "shoulder-to-shoulder" spirit of the exercise.

"It's fitting that Balikatan in Tagalog means shoulder-to-shoulder. The counter-landing live fire showcases sophisticated capabilities and down at a low level, the soldier-to-soldier partnership with the Philippines Armed Forces," said Australian Army Lt. Col. Benjamin Woolmer, commanding officer of the 5th/7th Battalion, RAR. "Being able to share lessons with the Armed Forces of the Philippines and work shoulder-to-shoulder is a great end in itself."

https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4472230/multinational-forces-validate-defensive-readiness-during-exercise-balikatan-2026/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38995

File: 0183f2828c9b329⋯.jpg (131.25 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 09d03b06d693d6d⋯.jpg (2.28 MB,3543x1993,3543:1993,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d7fd599c5df0637⋯.jpg (363.72 KB,871x1377,871:1377,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556810 (300716ZAPR26) Notable: Landon Germanotta-Mills: Bail win for alleged leader of global satanic child abuse ring - (Video) Alleged child abuse network figure Landon Germanotta-Mills has been granted Supreme Court bail despite prosecutors warning the accusations against him involved some of the “most extreme” material investigators had encountered. Police allege the 27-year-old played a leading role in an international child abuse ring involving satanic imagery and material relating to babies and young children. Germanotta-Mills, who had been held on remand since November, faces multiple charges involving the alleged possession, transmission and access of child abuse material. Justice Belinda Rigg acknowledged the prosecution case appeared strong and carried a “real prospect” of imprisonment if convicted, but ruled strict bail conditions could manage community risks. He will live under home detention with his mother in regional New South Wales while awaiting further court proceedings alongside several co-accused men.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23925350 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23925388 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24202126 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24214753 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24231315 (pb)

Landon Germanotta-Mills: Bail win for alleged leader of global satanic child abuse ring

Clare Sibthorpe and Perry Duffin - April 28, 2026

1/2

The accused leader of a global “satanic paedophile ring” that allegedly includes a swimming coach and former police officer has been released back into the community following months in custody on remand.

Landon Ashton Versace Germanotta-Mills, who describes himself online as an “investigative and forensic journalist” who railed against child abusers, was granted Supreme Court bail on Tuesday despite prosecutors expressing concerns about his release.

The 27-year-old is alleged to have played a leading role in an international satanic child sexual abuse ring that police described as “the most extreme we’ve seen”, with its details so “depraved” it has shocked court authorities.

Germanotta-Mills was arrested several months ago alongside ex-police officer David Turner and former Victorian swim coach Mark Andrew Sendecky, both 42.

Detective Superintendent Jayne Doherty, the head of the NSW Sex Crimes squad, said at the time that the material consisted of victims aged from babies to 12, was “among the most extreme we have seen” and that its “use of satanic iconography demonstrates the level of depravity”.

She said police were working with international law enforcement and had gathered evidence identifying 145 alleged overseas offenders.

Germanotta-Mills was charged a string of offences, including accessing, transmitting and possessing child abuse material and some relating to bestiality material.

He had been in custody on remand since his arrest from a Waterloo apartment in November.

Justice Belinda Rigg said the “serious allegations” involved a “large number of files” and a “real prospect of full-time imprisonment” if he was convicted.

“There is apparent strength to the prosecution case on my analysis of the detailed fact sheet, including the ways in which the applicant is linked with the different devices and platforms relied upon by the prosecution, and also a number of admissions made by him,” she said.

However, she found concerns about Germanotta-Mills committing a serious offence, endangering individuals or the community – with potential access to minors and the internet – and failing to appear at court could be managed.

The alleged predator was bailed to live with his mother in his childhood town of Wellington in the state’s Central West. The court heard the NSW government was trying to terminate his Sydney public housing tenancy through Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) over allegations he used his home for “an illegal purpose”.

His conditions include home detention (with no children visitors), daily police reporting, drug and alcohol abstention, not contacting witnesses, a phone and internet ban, surrendering his passport and staying away from international departure points.

He must also continue receiving mental health support.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38996

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556912 (300951ZAPR26) Notable: REVEALED: Bondi terror attack Royal Commission delivers 14 interim recommendations, with five withheld and confidential - (Video) The Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has delivered 14 interim recommendations following the Bondi Beach terror attack, warning Australia’s counter-terrorism system may have faced resourcing pressures while the national threat level remained “probable”. Nine recommendations were publicly released, while five remain classified for national security reasons. The report called for increased police protection at high-risk Jewish events, annual counter-terrorism briefings to National Cabinet, updated crisis-management procedures and nationally consistent gun reforms, including a proposed buyback scheme. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the National Security Committee had accepted all Commonwealth recommendations and would work with states on implementation. Public hearings beginning next week will examine antisemitism, lived experiences within the Jewish community and the prevalence of antisemitic incidents across Australian institutions and society.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38971

>>38972

REVEALED: Bondi terror attack Royal Commission delivers 14 interim recommendations, with five withheld and confidential

The interim report into the Bondi Beach terror attack has warned that security agencies may have been under-resourced at a time when the threat of a terrorist attack was “probable”.

Oscar Godsell - April 30, 2026

1/2

The Royal Commission into Antisemitism has handed down its interim report into the Bondi Beach terror attack.

Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell delivered the interim report to Governor General Sam Mostyn on Thursday.

The report outlined 14 recommendations, nine of which were made available to journalists and the public and five which were withheld.

The first of the recommendations suggested police increase presence at “high-risk” and public-facing Jewish Australian festivals and events.

The government was instructed to consider making the counter-terrorism coordinator’s role permanent, and better include the Australia New Zealand Counter-Terrorism Committee (ANZCTC) in the crisis management framework.

It also recommended the counter-terrorism “handbook” be updated at least every three years, and that the ANZCTC provide annual briefings to National Cabinet.

The report suggested the ANZCTC commission a review into joint counter-terrorism teams, and that senior MPs, including the PM, undergo counter-terrorism exercises.

It also recommended prioritising a “nationally-consistent” National Firearms Agreement and the national buy-back scheme.

Mr Albanese has confirmed that his National Security Committee has accepted all the recommendations and will work to adopt a national approach with the states.

"The Interim Report contains a small number of classified recommendations which cannot be publicly released because they could compromise sensitive national security information," he said.

"The government will respond swiftly to these recommendations and Australians will see practical outcomes through a range of policy, program and funding measures."

Jewish safety

The interim report suggested NSW Policing procedures in respect to Operation Jewish High Holy Days be expanded following the December 14 attack.

“(The procedures) should apply to other high-risk Jewish festivals and events, particularly those that have a public-facing element,” it said.

The report stated that since October 7, 2023, rising antisemitic incident reports have increased contact between state police and the Jewish Community Security Group (CSG) surrounding cultural days of significance.

The report suggested there could be “scope for exploring different modes of collaboration between all parties”.

That collaboration could include “meeting together regularly with CSG NSW at the operational level, to discuss the threat environment faced by Jewish Australians, planning for upcoming events and receiving CSG assessments and threat information”.

Speaking to the specific recommendation, Mr Albanese said the recommendation was one “for the New South Wales government”.

“What we say from the Commonwealth is that we are adopting all of the recommendations that go to the Commonwealth.”

Counter-terrorism

Several of the report's public recommendations pertained to the nation’s counter-terrorism framework.

The government was instructed to consider making the counter-terrorism coordinator’s role permanent. The coordinator assumes a leadership role in terrorism crises, co-chairing a key committee and ensuring nationally coordinated responses.

It was also recommended to better include the Australia New Zealand Counter-Terrorism Committee (ANZCTC) in the crisis management framework.

It suggested the committee be better embedded in crisis-management frameworks to more clearly define its role.

The ANZCTC has no operational role but provides strategic guidance and policy coordination to and between agencies, developing nationally consistent capabilities.

An earlier report had previously found the committee was the “most appropriate” body to ensure national coordination of counter-terrorism measures.

A further recommendation suggested the “Counter-Terrorism Handbook” be updated “promptly”.

That handbook should then be updated at least every three years in coordination with the ANZCTC triennial review and the counter-terrorism plan.

The non-public Counter Terrorism Handbook provides operational and governance guidance to the relevant Australian agencies.

It was also suggested the ANZCTC provide annual briefings to the National Cabinet and commission a review into joint counter-terrorism teams.

“The review should include consideration of leadership structures, team integration, systems access and information sharing arrangements,” the report said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38997

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556922 (301001ZAPR26) Notable: Terror training for PM, national cabinet among 14 recommendations in Bell report - (Video) Royal commissioner Virginia Bell has recommended major reviews of Australia’s counter-terrorism systems following the Bondi massacre, including terrorism response exercises for the Prime Minister and National Cabinet ministers. The interim report into the Bondi attack found counter-terrorism capabilities at federal and state levels “could be improved”, despite concluding no agency had identified urgent failures that would have prevented the attack. Public recommendations included stronger protection for Jewish community events, a review of Joint Counter-Terrorism Teams, improved intelligence sharing and nationally consistent gun reforms. Justice Bell also highlighted concerns around police resourcing and risk assessments linked to the Chanukah by the Sea event targeted in December. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government would implement all Commonwealth recommendations and respond to classified findings through further security and policy measures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38996

Terror training for PM, national cabinet among 14 recommendations in Bell report

Antisemitism royal commissioner Virginia Bell has called for a review of the nation’s joint counter-terrorism arrangements, saying capabilities ‘could be improved’.

BEN PACKHAM and JAMES DOWLING - 30 April 2026

1/2

Antisemitism royal commissioner Virginia Bell has called for a review of the nation’s joint counter-terrorism arrangements, saying capabilities at commonwealth and state levels “could be improved” in light of the December 14 Bondi massacre.

In her interim report, tabled on Thursday morning, Justice Bell urges heightened security at major Jewish events, and for a national firearms register and gun buyback to be prioritised.

Her report recommends the government look at making the role of commonwealth counter-terrorism co-ordinator a full-time position, and that it consider making national security ministers, including the Prime Minister, take part in a counter-terrorism exercise.

It also flags that recent conflict in Iran is “likely to have increased the risk of attack directed at the Australian Jewish community”.

Anthony Albanese said the National Security Committee of cabinet had met on Thursday and committed to implementing all recommendations relevant to the federal government.

Bell calls for review of joint counter-terrorism teams

Flagging concerns over state and federal counter-terrorism co-operation, and the way police work with intelligence agencies, Justice Bell calls for a review of joint counter-terrorism teams, with a “particular focus” on arrangements in NSW.

“The review should include consideration of leadership structures, team integration, systems access and information-sharing arrangements,” Justice Bell recommends.

NSW police procedures to extend to more ‘high-risk’ events

Her report contains 14 recommendations to the government, five of which are confidential. Among her public recommendations, she says NSW police procedures adopted for Jewish High Holy Days such as Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur be extended to “other high-risk Jewish festivals and events, particularly those that have a public-facing element”.

Justice Bell says no commonwealth or state intelligence or law enforcement agency gave evidence that they were prevented from taking actions that would have avoided the December 14 Bondi massacre, and “no issue requiring urgent or immediate action has been identified”.

“Nonetheless, the review of this considerable body of material by officers with relevant experience and expertise, and by counsel assisting and me, has revealed aspects in which counter-terrorism capability at commonwealth and state levels could be improved,” her report says.

“The commission notes that neither the AFP nor NSW police have given unqualified support for the present functioning of the (Joint Counter-Terrorism Team NSW). It is clear that the agencies involved consider there may be room for improvement, in particular in respect of information management and sharing.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38998

File: b581e24b6fbf8f3⋯.jpg (196.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 039361f064e9063⋯.jpg (295.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556937 (301013ZAPR26) Notable: NSW Police did no risk assessment before Chanukah attack, says Commission - The antisemitism royal commission has found NSW Police provided no written risk assessment for the Chanukah by the Sea event targeted in the Bondi terrorist attack, despite warnings from Jewish security groups that the threat level facing the community was “high”. Commissioner Virginia Bell’s interim report said police resource decisions were informed by a “risk assessment process”, but no formal document had been supplied to the inquiry. NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon insisted an assessment had been undertaken using intelligence from the Jewish Community Security Group, which had requested police support for the event. The report also revealed differences between police and community organisers over expected security arrangements. Potential failures involving intelligence handling and police resourcing before the attack will be examined during upcoming public hearings of the royal commission.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38996

NSW Police did no risk assessment before Chanukah attack, says Commission

ELIZABETH PIKE - 30 April 2026

1/2

NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon says a risk assessment was undertaken for the Chanukah By the Sea event, despite the royal commission’s interim report finding no evidence of one.

Mr Lanyon told reporters at a press conference on Thursday afternoon that a “risk assessment was undertaken” before the event where 15 people were gunned down, based on intelligence and information from the Jewish Community Security Group (CSG), which had requested assistance at the event.

However, the antisemitism royal commission’s interim report on the Bondi Beach attack stated that NSW Police have not provided a risk assessment to the inquiry.

“NSW Police said that decisions on event resource allocation were ‘informed by a risk assessment process’ … (and) where warranted, a comprehensive written risk assessment would be produced. Otherwise, the risk assessment process would be less formal,” the report read.

“No written risk assessment for Chanukah by the Sea 2025 has been provided by NSW Police.”

Mr Lanyon insisted at the press conference that an assessment had been done and police “provided their own risk assessments”. He called questions about whether such an assessment was inadequate “premature”.

“I said there was a risk assessment. I said the risk assessment was undertaken. We work closely with the CSG in the lead-up to it,” Mr Lanyon said.

“As an organisation we are committed to working with the community.

“ASIO has also been very clear to say there had been no specific threat for that event or any event like it.”

When asked why NSW Police and CSG had different interpretations of the level of support that was to be provided at the Chanukah By the Sea event, Mr Lanyon said he assumed CSG’s request did not specify “numbers” or “types of deployment”.

The report found that CSG wrote to NSW Police requesting resources for the “entirety of the event” due to the heightened threat level at the time. In response, four officers were sent to the event but were told via email that there was “no need to stay the entire duration”.

“There certainly was a request from CSG to the New South Wales Police,” Mr Lanyon said.

“I assume that request was not specific in terms of numbers of resources and types of deployment.

“That is something that the royal commissioner has indicated that she will examine under evidence and I think it’s appropriate we let it go to that process.”

Mr Lanyon also deflected questions about whether additional police resources were not provided because the organisers were expected to pay for them.

“That’s an unreasonable assumption. As I said, there were police at the scene,” he said.

“The event had been assessed by the command itself. Policing resources had been deployed. I don’t think that’s a relevant factor in this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.38999

File: d539208ccb44939⋯.jpg (4.92 MB,5555x3705,1111:741,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a1a2b9fb4eca2a5⋯.jpg (3.01 MB,7193x4798,7193:4798,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556944 (301023ZAPR26) Notable: ‘Incubated in hatred’: Warnings, risks laid bare as Bondi royal commission zeroes in on security flaws - The Bondi royal commission will examine whether intelligence agencies and police adequately responded to repeated warnings about a likely antisemitic terror attack before the December massacre that killed 15 people at a Hanukkah event. Commissioner Virginia Bell’s interim report revealed NSW Police were advised by the Jewish Community Security Group that the threat level facing the Jewish community was “HIGH”, but officers assigned to the event were reportedly told there was “no need to stay the entire duration”. NSW Premier Chris Minns described the findings as “sobering” and said the attack had been “incubated in hatred”. The report also raised concerns about declining counter-terrorism investment despite Australia’s terror threat level being raised to “probable” in 2024, with further scrutiny of intelligence agencies and police planned during upcoming public hearings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38996

‘Incubated in hatred’: Warnings, risks laid bare as Bondi royal commission zeroes in on security flaws

Alexandra Smith - April 30, 2026

1/2

The nation’s top spy agency and police forces will be probed on whether they understood and acted on repeated warnings of a likely antisemitism terror attack as it emerged that NSW officers were told to send a “car crew or two” to the December 14 Bondi Hannukah celebration but did not need to stay for the whole event.

Former High Court judge Virginia Bell on Thursday delivered the Interim Report of the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, with a focus on NSW Police, security agencies and possible failures that may have led to the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, in which 15 mostly Jewish people were killed on the first night of Hanukkah.

The report contained 14 recommendations, including five in a confidential section, and was released ahead of the first round of public hearings, which starts on Monday.

A focus of Bell’s report was the communications between the Community Security Group (CSG) – the volunteer-led Jewish organisation that arranges security for synagogues, religious schools and community events – and NSW Police in the lead-up to the Bondi event.

The report also raised whether ASIO and other Commonwealth and state intelligence and law enforcement agencies understood and acted on assessments, detailed several times by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess, of a probable terror attack.

“It can be seen from the course of the director-general of security’s public statements from 5 August 2024 until late 2025 that ASIO publicly and repeatedly drew attention to the heightened risk of a terrorist attack and to an environment of ‘disturbing escalation’ of antisemitic incidents,” the report said. “These are matters that will be explored in hearings.”

The report also looked at NSW law enforcement and security measures, and noted that CSG emailed the state’s police in late November with a “Jewish Festival Calendar Notification – Chanukah, 2025”, with the correspondence starting with a request for assistance with “any policing measures that the command may deem appropriate”.

CSG’s email stated that the security level alert for the NSW Jewish community is “HIGH”. “A terrorist attack against the NSW Jewish community is likely and there is a high level of antisemitic vilification,” the email, cited in Bell’s report, said.

The report said the eastern suburbs command’s response was to send a “car crew or two” to “ensure the community feel safe” and provide a high-visibility policing presence, but noted “that there was no need to stay the entire duration” of the event.

NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon on Thursday defended his officers, saying there “was a policing response [and] NSW Police had worked with CSG” in the lead up to the Bondi event.

“There were police present on that occasion, there had been a risk assessment, and there were certainly roving police throughout the area,” Lanyon said.

NSW Premier Chris Minns said the interim report was “sobering reading” and highlighted that the terror attack was “incubated in hatred”.

“The reality is, for a state government, is that its highest responsibility is to protect its people. And on December the 14th last year, we didn’t do that,” Minns said.

Minns said all recommendations would be adopted, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the national security committee of cabinet met on Thursday morning and also agreed to implement all Bell’s recommendations.

“I can assure the Australian public that the government will do everything necessary to protect the community in the wake of the Bondi attack,” Albanese said.

Asked how long it would take for the initial recommendations to be implemented, Albanese said, “we’re not sitting back and just reading this document, we’re acting on it”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39000

File: b0d6971b7a27b29⋯.jpg (348.76 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12b9185343de635⋯.jpg (197.27 KB,1082x742,541:371,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dee94410938d67f⋯.jpg (5.76 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556959 (301034ZAPR26) Notable: Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has welcomed Australia’s planned increase in military spending but signalled Washington expects further commitments before Canberra is regarded as a leading Indo-Pacific ally. In testimony to Congress, Hegseth praised Australia’s latest National Defence Strategy and support for AUKUS while emphasising the Trump administration’s focus on “burden sharing” among allies. He pointed to South Korea and Japan as examples of nations sharply increasing defence investment, while Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby said the United States wanted “partners - not dependencies”. Australia recently announced plans to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of gross domestic product by 2033, although the Trump administration has previously pushed for a higher 3.5 per cent target. Hegseth also revealed the US campaign in Iran had cost at least $US25 billion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38886

>>38900

>>38906

>>38937

Hegseth notes Australia’s defence spending hike, says there’s more to do

Michael Koziol - April 30, 2026

Washington: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth noted the Albanese government’s commitment to boost military spending but indicated there was still more to do before Australia would be considered a “model ally” in the Indo-Pacific.

He also confirmed the cost of the US military campaign in Iran was at least $US25 billion ($35 billion), while lashing out at Democrats for labelling the two-month-old war a “quagmire”.

In a formal statement to Congress, Hegseth reiterated that the Trump administration was prioritising burden sharing in the Indo-Pacific and praised South Korea as a model ally. Seoul has announced it will raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2035.

Japan, too, “clearly recognises the threat environment confronting all of us, and has signalled that it will raise defence spending and align investments accordingly”, Hegseth said in the statement.

“Australia likewise understands the need to increase defence spending and Canberra has taken another step with the release of its latest National Defence Strategy,” he said.

“We look forward to building on that progress with our Australian allies to be able to do more in the alliance together, move full steam ahead on AUKUS and build capability to promote meaningful deterrence.”

Those remarks were reiterated by the Pentagon’s head of policy, Elbridge Colby, who said on social media: “In sum, Americans want partners – not dependencies.”

Hegseth’s defence posture statement went on to name Israel, South Korea, Poland, Finland and the Baltic States as model US allies who had stepped up and would receive “special favour”.

“Allies that do not [step up] – allies that still fail to do their part for collective defence – will face consequences,” he said.

“President Trump likes helping countries that help themselves. That’s the nature of partnerships rather than dependencies. It’s what we owe our friends – and most importantly – the American people.”

Earlier in April, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled plans for Australia to spend 3 per cent of its gross domestic product on defence by 2033, using a broader formula that also counts spending on military pensions and additional infrastructure. The current figure is about 2 per cent.

The Trump administration has previously pressed Australia to increase that figure to 3.5 per cent, which it considers the new global standard after securing a commitment from NATO allies to reach that level.

Trump himself did not engage with questions about Australia’s announced increase in defence spending when asked recently, instead focusing on his claim that Canberra and others had not helped him in Iran.

Albanese has long argued his government’s approach to defence spending is about funding what is required for Australia’s own defence needs.

At an at-times fiery hearing with lawmakers on Wednesday (US time), Hegseth and Pentagon comptroller Jules Hurst revealed for the first time that the cost of Operation Epic Fury – the US military campaign in Iran – was $US25 billion, mostly on munitions.

Hegseth did not answer clearly when asked whether that figure included the cost of replacing spent munitions in 2026 dollars.

He became agitated after Democratic congressman John Garamendi called the Iran war a “quagmire” that would gravely injure America’s standing in the world.

“You should know better, shame on you,” Hegseth said. “Calling this a quagmire two months in … handing propaganda to our enemies. Who are you pulling for?”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/hegseth-notes-australia-s-defence-spending-hike-says-there-s-more-to-do-20260430-p5zsf7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39001

File: e632a6b914753f7⋯.jpg (277.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb9d31bb827754d⋯.jpg (201.15 KB,1638x922,819:461,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24556964 (301043ZAPR26) Notable: Japan’s first female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to visit Australia as fuel security talks intensify - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will visit Australia next week for talks with Anthony Albanese as both nations confront mounting fuel security concerns linked to the Iran conflict and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. The visit, Takaichi’s first to Australia since taking office, coincides with Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s regional diplomacy campaign aimed at securing reliable fuel and fertiliser supplies from key Asian partners. Albanese said Australia and Japan shared “strong strategic alignment” and highlighted the importance of maintaining stable trade and investment ties. Australia exports significant quantities of liquefied natural gas, coal and iron ore to Japan, while Japan supplies large volumes of diesel to Australia. Wong is expected to stress the need for uninterrupted two-way trade and energy flows during discussions across the region.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38852

>>38853

>>38924

>>38989

Japan’s first female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to visit Australia as fuel security talks intensify

THOMAS HENRY - April 28, 2026

Japan’s first female Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, is set to meet Anthony Albanese next week on her first visit to Australia since taking office late last year.

Mr Albanese’s announcement of Ms Takaichi’s visit comes as Foreign Minister Penny Wong touched down in Tokyo for meetings with her Japanese counterparts to shore up fuel and fertiliser supplies.

The Prime Minister confirmed he would hold an annual leaders meeting with Ms Takaichi in the first week of May, noting this year marked the 50th anniversary of the Basic Treaty of Friendship and Co-operation between the two nations.

“I am honoured to welcome Prime Minister Takaichi to Australia for our annual leaders meeting where we will continue to work together under our special strategic partnership for the benefit of our people and the region,” he said in a statement.

“Fifty years ago, our nations laid the foundation for a partnership based on trust, shared values and mutual respect by signing the Basic Treaty of Friendship and Co-operation.”

With Senator Wong’s three-nation fuel diplomacy mission to Japan, China and South Korea under way, Mr Albanese also touted Australia’s strong trade and investment ties with Japan.

“Australia and Japan share strong strategic alignment. Our co-operation is essential to maintaining a peaceful, stable and prosperous region,” he said.

“Our enduring trade and investment ties underpin our relationship, creating jobs, providing opportunity and delivering economic growth to both our nations.”

Mr Albanese and Ms Takaichi’s fourth official meeting comes amid a global fuel supply crunch driven by war in Iran. In her meetings this week Senator Wong is expected to leverage the nation’s commodity exports to argue that fuel shipments to Australia should be prioritised.

Japan supplies Australia with about 35,000 barrels of diesel a day, and Australia is a significant supplier of liquefied natural gas, coal and iron ore.

A government source said Senator Wong would focus on the need to keep bilateral trade flowing rather than raising the prospect of interruptions to Australia’s critical exports.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/japans-first-female-prime-minister-sanae-takaichi-to-visit-australia-as-fuel-security-talks-intensify/news-story/d29ffd9b1c408a13afcf048d1745b352

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39002

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24561233 (011212ZMAY26) Notable: Australia in talks over latest US proposal to open Strait of Hormuz, but PM says 'no determination' made - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia is discussing a United States-led proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but “no determination” has been made on military support. The Trump administration is seeking allied participation in a “Maritime Freedom Construct” to restore commercial shipping and freedom of navigation after conflict disrupted the key waterway. Mr Albanese said Australia was engaging privately with the United States and partners including the United Kingdom and France, while stressing the government wanted “de-escalation” and “peace in the region”. Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed Australia had been briefed on the proposal and was considering options after already providing “defensive and diplomatic support”. United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also renewed calls for greater allied defence contributions and stronger co-operation through the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) partnership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38844

>>38850

>>38861

>>38880

>>38887

Australia in talks over latest US proposal to open Strait of Hormuz, but PM says 'no determination' made

Isabella Tolhurst - 30 April 2026

1/2

The prime minister says discussions are underway with the United States about joining the latest US proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as the Trump administration tries to build an international coalition to restore freedom of navigation in the critical waterway.

Anthony Albanese said "no determination" had been made about the possibility of providing military support to the US-led efforts.

The development could mark a significant step in Australia's involvement in the Middle East, after the government spent weeks brushing off criticism from US President Donald Trump for not assisting in his blockade of the strait.

According to a US State Department cable cited by Reuters, the Trump administration is seeking the participation of other countries to form an international coalition to open the Strait in a "post-conflict" scenario.

It is to be called the Maritime Freedom Construct, and was described as a joint initiative by the State Department and the Pentagon.

Anthony Albanese said talks with US counterparts were underway.

"We'll have those discussions privately, we'll engage in anything that can assist," he said.

"We'll engage with the United States, but we've also been participating in meetings that have been convened in London as well.

"We want to see the Strait of Hormuz open, we want to see international trade resume, because this is having a devastating effect on the global economy, it's impacting inflation here as it is around the world."

Asked about the possibility of Australian military assistance, Mr Albanese said that was still being considered.

"There hasn't been that determination. We'll discuss those things respectfully," he said.

"What we want to see is a de-escalation. We want to see peace in the region."

Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed during a press conference in Seoul on Thursday evening that Australia had been briefed by the US about its latest proposal.

"We are working with all of our partners, the United Kingdom, France and the United States," she said.

"We are engaging on options, noting that we have already provided defensive and diplomatic support to the region".

One Australian government source also stressed that it was "early days" in the discussions, and that Australia had not yet made any decisions about what it would do.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39003

File: ab3cb8f92fd3912⋯.jpg (3.2 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1cf2edb953cb0a3⋯.jpg (2.88 MB,4592x3448,574:431,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4b3c6e62e62e49e⋯.jpg (2.58 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8949c6d8f2c5146⋯.jpg (424.26 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24566025 (030223ZMAY26) Notable: Chinese-owned Landbridge launches international legal action over forced sale of Port of Darwin - Chinese-owned Landbridge has launched international legal action against Australia over the federal government's plan to force the sale of Darwin Port, arguing the move is “discriminatory” and breaches obligations under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA). Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election to return the strategically sensitive port to Australian ownership on national security grounds, with the government negotiating for an Australian buyer while considering compulsory acquisition powers. Landbridge owner Ye Cheng has now sought arbitration through the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investor Disputes, marking the first such case brought against Australia at the tribunal. Transport Minister Catherine King said the government was “disappointed” by the action but intended to continue negotiations. Coalition defence spokesman James Paterson said Canberra should not “cave in” to Landbridge’s.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24184927 (pb)

Chinese-owned Landbridge launches international legal action over forced sale of Port of Darwin

Stephen Dziedzic and Tom Lowrey - 1 May 2026

The Chinese-owned company which owns Darwin port has launched international legal action to try and stop the federal government from stripping it of the strategically sensitive asset.

It says the government's move is "discriminatory" and breaks Australia's obligations under its free trade pact with Beijing.

Anthony Albanese pledged at the federal election that Labor would return the port to Australian hands, saying it was necessary for national security.

The government has since been locked in negotiations with Landbridge as it tries to secure an Australian buyer and has flagged that it is willing to force the company to hand over the port if necessary.

But last month the owner of Landbridge, Ye Cheng, lodged a case with the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investor Disputes requesting "arbitration proceedings".

It is the first time a case has been brought against Australia at the international tribunal, according to trade publication Global Arbitration Review.

In a statement, Landbridge said the actions by the federal government were "discriminatory and inconsistent with Australia's obligations under ChAFTA".

"Landbridge acquired its interest in the port through a fair, open and competitive process in full compliance with all applicable Australian laws and regulatory approvals," it said.

"Multiple Australian government reviews have confirmed there are no national security concerns.

"Having engaged with the Commonwealth in an effort to reach a constructive resolution, Landbridge has regrettably been unable to achieve a satisfactory outcome through dialogue alone and is now taking the necessary steps to protect its legal rights."

In a statement the Transport and Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the government was "disappointed by this decision" and would "defend the claim in accordance with established processes".

"The government has been in good faith discussions with Landbridge to reach a mutually acceptable deal to return the Port of Darwin to Australian ownership for several months," Ms King said.

"We intend to continue these discussions."

As recently as November last year, Ms King said the ongoing negotiations with Landbridge were "constructive".

The legal action could make it difficult for the government to deliver on its promise on Darwin Port within this term of government, with legal experts warning that international legal action at the tribunal can stretch on for years.

The Coalition has also pledged to return Darwin Port to Australian hands, and the Shadow Defence Minster James Paterson said the government should not "cave in" to Landbridge's "tactics".

"The Port of Darwin must be returned to Australia's sovereign control — as the Prime Minister promised it would during the election," Senator Paterson said.

"If the operator won't sell on reasonable commercial terms, the Commonwealth should use the powers available to them under the constitution to force a sale without any further delay."

Ms King said the government "remains committed to returning the Port of Darwin to Australian hands".

"We have been conducting discussions in a respectful and private manner and do not think it is in either party's interest to carry the dispute out in the public domain," she said.

Associate professor Colin Hawes from the University of Technology Sydney, who specialises in Chinese corporate governance, said a dispute in the ICSID could take years to resolve.

He said the tribunal has been used by an increasing number of Chinese-owned companies, where they have been blocked from global markets on national security grounds.

"It is being used in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, I believe," he said.

"Various Chinese companies that have been excluded from markets based on national security reasons have challenged those decisions, using this dispute forum.

"So in that sense, it's not unusual for a Chinese company to go through that body."

The ABC has also contacted Mallesons — the law firm representing Ye Cheng — and requested comment.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-01/chinese-owned-darwin-port-launches-legal-action/106633362

https://landbridgegroup.com.au/news/landbridge-media-statement/

https://qresear.ch/?q=Landbridge

https://qresear.ch/?q=Port+of+Darwin

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39004

File: 81b597df72d526b⋯.jpg (534.2 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 87f38677d618b7e⋯.jpg (277.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24566044 (030227ZMAY26) Notable: Chinese firm launches legal bid to retain Darwin Port - Chinese-owned Landbridge has launched a World Bank legal challenge against the Albanese government's plan to return Darwin Port to Australian ownership, arguing the move breaches the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA). Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election to end the company’s 99-year lease over the strategically located port, but the government has not detailed how it would reclaim the asset. Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said Canberra was “disappointed” by the action and would defend the claim while continuing “good-faith discussions” with Landbridge. The company said it acquired the port through an “open and competitive process” and noted previous Australian government reviews found “no national security concerns”. The Trump administration has continued pressing Australia over the port’s Chinese ownership because of its proximity to shared military facilities in Darwin.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24184927 (pb)

>>39003

Chinese firm launches legal bid to retain Darwin Port

BEN PACKHAM - May 01, 2026

The Chinese company that controls the Port of Darwin has launched a legal challenge against Anthony Albanese’s pledge to axe its long-term lease over the strategically located facility, arguing it violates the nations’ free trade agreement.

The Prime Minister went to the election last year vowing to return the port to Australian hands but since the poll has said nothing on how it will do so.

Landbridge, which secured a 99-year lease over the Port of Darwin for $506m in 2015, launched an investor-state dispute settlement claim with the World Bank last week, arguing the government’s attempt to reclaim the asset violated the terms of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.

Infrastructure Minister Catherine King vowed to resist the challenge.

“The government is disappointed by this decision and will defend the claim in accordance with established processes,” she said. “The government has been in good-faith discussions with Landbridge to reach a mutually acceptable deal to return the Port of Darwin to Australian ownership for several months.

“We intend to continue these discussions.”

Ms King said discussions had been respectful and private, and it was in no one’s interest to carry out the dispute in public. She said the government “remains committed to returning the Port of Darwin to Australian hands”.

Landbridge, whose billionaire owner Ye Cheng is a confidant of senior Chinese ­Communist Party figures, said it acquired the port through an open and competitive process.

It said the Albanese government’s efforts to reclaim the facility were “discriminatory and inconsistent with Australia’s obligations under ChAFTA”.

“Landbridge acquired its interest in the port through a fair, open and competitive process in full compliance with all applicable Australian laws and regulatory approvals. Multiple Australian government reviews have confirmed there are no national security concerns,” the company said.

“Having engaged with the Commonwealth in an effort to reach a constructive resolution, Landbridge has regrettably been unable to achieve a satisfactory outcome through dialogue alone and is now taking the necessary steps to protect its legal rights.”

The company said it expected the commonwealth to refrain from taking any adverse action over its claim to the port ahead of a resolution of the dispute.

The Albanese government is facing pressure from the Trump administration to deliver on its election promise, amid concerns the port’s Chinese ownership undermines the US’s defence co-operation with Australia given its proximity to shared military facilities in the Northern Territory capital.

The Australian revealed last year that US private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management was seeking to buy the port. Australian logistics company Toll would operate the port under the proposal. Australia’s IFM Investors, owned by industry superannuation funds, is also interested in purchasing the asset.

China’s ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said earlier this year that Landbridge secured the asset through an open and transparent bidding process, and Beijing “has an obligation to protect the … legitimate interest of Chinese companies overseas”.

“So if anything happens, like the port will be taken back by force or forceful measures, then we have an obligation to take measures to protect the Chinese company’s interest,” Mr Xiao said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/chinese-firm-launches-legal-bid-to-retain-darwin-port/news-story/93c7545c169271a5a973661a0c97f670

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39005

File: a2e688abf62a7f9⋯.jpg (965.82 KB,2400x1800,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24566278 (030354ZMAY26) Notable: Chinese firm reportedly sues Australian govt over Port of Darwin; case tests Canberra’s commitment to international investment obligations: analyst - "Landbridge, a Chinese-owned company that owns Darwin Port, has launched international legal action to try and stop the Australian government from acquiring the port on so-called "national security" grounds. In a statement posted on its website on Friday, the company said that it considers the Commonwealth's proposed approach to return the Port of Darwin to Australian hands to be discriminatory and inconsistent with Australia's obligations under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. The company said it acquired its interest in the port "through a fair, open and competitive process in full compliance with all applicable Australian laws and regulatory approvals." Multiple Australian Government reviews have confirmed there are no national security concerns ... Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Saturday that Chinese enterprises' proactive legal action signals that this is more than a commercial dispute over port operating rights - it fundamentally tests Australia's commitment to contractual commitments, the rule of law, and international investment obligations. "If Australia forcibly reclaims the port without a solid legal basis, it would send a highly negative message: legitimate contracts could be stigmatized as security threats and overturned simply due to political needs. Against this backdrop, the filing of the lawsuit elevates the matter from Australia's domestic political discourse to the framework of international law and investment protection," Chen said ... If Australia truly values the stability and improvement of bilateral relations, it should avoid turning the Darwin Port issue into a new political flashpoint, especially amid the warming of China-Australia ties and the recovery of economic cooperation, Chen said. Chen noted that Australia must stop intervening in normal business deals under the pretext of national security and grant Chinese enterprises the same transparent, predictable treatment as other foreign investors. "Otherwise, Australia will not only bear legal and economic costs through arbitration but also damage its international reputation as an open and reliable investment destination."" - Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24184927 (pb)

>>39003

>>39004

Chinese firm reportedly sues Australian govt over Port of Darwin; case tests Canberra’s commitment to international investment obligations: analyst

Global Times - May 02, 2026

1/2

Landbridge, a Chinese-owned company that owns Darwin Port, has launched international legal action to try and stop the Australian government from acquiring the port on so-called "national security" grounds.

In a statement posted on its website on Friday, the company said that it considers the Commonwealth's proposed approach to return the Port of Darwin to Australian hands to be discriminatory and inconsistent with Australia's obligations under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.

The company said it acquired its interest in the port "through a fair, open and competitive process in full compliance with all applicable Australian laws and regulatory approvals." Multiple Australian Government reviews have confirmed there are no national security concerns.

Having engaged with the Commonwealth in an effort to reach a constructive resolution, Landbridge has regrettably been unable to achieve a satisfactory outcome through dialogue alone and is now taking the necessary steps to protect its legal rights, per the statement.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had pledged at the federal election in 2025 that Labor would return the port to Australian hands, saying it was necessary for national security, according to Australian media outlet ABC News on Friday.

The government has since been locked in negotiations with Landbridge as it tries to secure an Australian buyer and has flagged that it is willing to force the company to hand over the port if necessary.

Landbridge Group's filing of the lawsuit with the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investor Disputes is the first time a case has been brought against Australia at the international tribunal, the ABC News report said, citing trade publication Global Arbitration Review.

Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Saturday that Chinese enterprises' proactive legal action signals that this is more than a commercial dispute over port operating rights - it fundamentally tests Australia's commitment to contractual commitments, the rule of law, and international investment obligations.

"If Australia forcibly reclaims the port without a solid legal basis, it would send a highly negative message: legitimate contracts could be stigmatized as security threats and overturned simply due to political needs. Against this backdrop, the filing of the lawsuit elevates the matter from Australia's domestic political discourse to the framework of international law and investment protection," Chen said.

Once the arbitration proceeds, the Australian government's political promises must be subject to legal constraints and will no longer rely solely on domestic public opinion or security narratives, Chen said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39006

File: 8a7b24a0b1e9962⋯.jpg (501.16 KB,1993x1089,1993:1089,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ada31658c5dede9⋯.jpg (199.02 KB,1424x937,1424:937,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24566300 (030407ZMAY26) Notable: Fiji considers state of emergency over drugs and gangs as police and military crackdown ramps up - Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka says the country could enter a state of emergency as police and military forces expand a nationwide crackdown on drug gangs and organised crime networks. Joint checkpoints have been established across Fiji amid growing concern the country is becoming a gateway for cartels targeting Australian and New Zealand markets. The proposal has triggered unease because former prime minister Frank Bainimarama previously used emergency powers during military rule. The crackdown follows the suspected murder of alleged underworld figure Jone Vakarisi during military interrogation, with Fiji police now treating the death as homicide after reports of traumatic injuries contradicted the military’s original account. Human rights groups and some commentators have questioned the military’s role in policing operations and warned against possible overreach and restrictions on civil liberties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38936

>>38939

Fiji considers state of emergency over drugs and gangs as police and military crackdown ramps up

Nick Sas and Lice Movono - 2 May 2026

1/2

Fiji's prime minister says the country may soon enter a state of emergency, as the police and military combine for a highly visible crackdown on drug-related gang activity in the island nation.

In a move that has triggered mixed responses in Fiji, military and police checkpoints have been set up around the country as the "joint taskforce" operation aims to stop the infiltration of organised crime networks.

Fiji has been described as ground zero in the Pacific's drug crisis, with cartels increasingly using the island nation as a gateway into the lucrative Australian and New Zealand markets, with locals increasingly lured into underworld activity.

A recent ABC investigation found links between the drug trade in Fiji and two notorious criminal syndicates based in Sydney — the Alameddine crime network and the KVT.

The KVT is a street gang consisting mostly of young Pacific Islander men, many Fijian, that NSW police say is also "associated with the highest levels of serious and organised crime".

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka this week flagged the potential of the state of emergency in response to the drugs crisis, which would give the military and police special powers.

It could also mean curfews and strict controls over public movement and freedom of expression.

The proposal has created nervousness in some sections of the community, as former prime minister and military strongman Frank Bainimarama, who led the country under an iron fist for 15 years, used the tactic as a way of stifling public debate and cementing military rule.

Former Fijian attorney-general Graham Leung told the ABC's Pacific Beat program that states of emergency were typically only used in "extraordinary specific circumstances".

He said that such a declaration could have a huge effect on the country.

"Do we want to excite alarm and reservation in the influx of tourists that we are used to having? What message will we be sending?" he said.

"It is unprecedented, it's an unusual step, and it's not a decision to be taken lightly.

"And it cannot be used as a pretext to put the country on hold, diminish civil liberties or censor the media."

'Culture of impunity'

The crackdown and potential state of emergency comes in the aftermath of the suspected murder of high-profile underworld figure Jone Vakarisi during an interrogation by Fiji's military.

Vakarisi, described by local media as a "Fijian drug lord", was brought in for questioning two weeks ago by Fiji's military over an attempted break-in at its armoury.

He was later pronounced dead, in what the military called a "sudden and severe medical emergency".

But a leaked death certificate posted to social media after the death contradicted the military's public statement, instead listing Vakarisi's cause of death as asphyxia, severe traumatic head injuries and blunt force trauma to both the head and chest.

The head of Fiji's military, Major General Ro Jone Kalouniwai, later corrected the record and Fiji police are now classifying the death as a murder.

However, two weeks into the murder investigation, no one has been charged.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39007

File: 84af5f35a955d92⋯.jpg (3.34 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 430969c16fc4b9b⋯.jpg (4 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24566687 (031005ZMAY26) Notable: Saved by the bell: How the King charmed Trump and elevated Australia - King Charles III’s visit to Washington has been hailed by foreign policy analysts as a diplomatic success after he used a White House state dinner to reinforce support for the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) partnership and strengthen ties with President Donald Trump. During the visit, the King presented Mr Trump with the bell from HMS Trump, a British-made submarine later attached to an Australian squadron, describing it as an “AUKUS predecessor”. The symbolic gesture drew praise from supporters of the trilateral security pact in Washington. The visit also coincided with the Trump administration nominating former Republican congressman David Brat as United States ambassador to Australia, while continuing pressure on Canberra over defence spending targets, technology regulation and tariffs affecting American companies operating in Australia and broader bilateral strategic co-operation efforts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38979

>>38983

>>38984

>>38978

>>39000

Saved by the bell: How the King charmed Trump and elevated Australia

Michael Koziol - May 3, 2026

1/2

Washington: King Charles III charmed his way through Washington during the week with a mix of royal air, humour and good old-fashioned English charm.

In a town that has grown accustomed to Donald Trump’s unfiltered monologues, obsequious odes from his underlings and awkward Oval Office appearances by foreign leaders, the King’s visit was a breath of fresh air widely regarded as a diplomatic masterstroke.

Political scientist and Eurasia Group founder Ian Bremmer called it “the most deft diplomacy – by a long margin – that we’ve seen visiting the Trump administration this term”.

The gesture that won the highest praise was Charles’ personal gift to Trump, presented during the White House state dinner on Tuesday night – the bell from the HMS Trump, a British-made submarine launched during World War II which spent most of its life as part of an Australian squadron.

Charles described the vessel as an “AUKUS predecessor”, repeating his enthusiasm for the trilateral pact between Australia, the US and UK. In so doing, he put Australia at the centre of arguably his warmest moment with Trump.

For AUKUS proponents, it was manna from heaven – and that was exactly as the King intended it.

Sophia Gaston, a foreign policy researcher and geopolitical analyst at King’s College London, who is deeply involved in AUKUS, said the existence of the HMS Trump – and how to capitalise on it – had been a “constant theme of discussion” since the president returned to office.

Some people in the AUKUS community had even mused whether the SSN-AUKUS – the next-generation nuclear-powered submarine Australia and Britain will build together – should be renamed the SSN-Trump, she told this masthead.

“This is a generational project, so it was ultimately thought it would be best to retain a more neutral name,” Gaston said.

“But there was definitely a strong feeling that we needed to find a way of eliciting the president’s personal buy-in for the AUKUS endeavour, and to underscore the deep links between the allied naval forces, and so every effort was then made to find a tangible souvenir from the HMS Trump to achieve both goals in this historic moment.”

The King’s nod to AUKUS was noted by its champions in Congress, too, such as Republican Robert Aderholt of Alabama, who said he appreciated the shout-out.

It was an important week for Australia’s relationship with the Trump administration, involving what might best be described as a mixed bag of developments.

Trump finally nominated a new US ambassador to Canberra, 15 months into his term. He selected David Brat, a former Republican congressman from Virginia, now a senior executive at a Christian university. He is also an economics professor and deeply religious theological scholar.

Brat was part of the pre-Trump Tea Party movement of conservative Republicans, and ousted the then House of Representatives majority leader, Eric Cantor, in a surprise primary victory in 2014.

White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said Brat was a champion for Trump’s America First policies, and the right choice to serve US interests in Canberra.

“The United States looks forward to strengthening our long-standing partnership with Australia through economic investments, defence co-operation, critical minerals and more,” she said.

Charles Edel, the Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, said Brat’s closeness to Trump’s way of thinking made him well placed to steer an important relationship.

“Speaking directly to decision-makers in Washington and accurately conveying the administration’s positions are two of the most important attributes an ambassador can possess,” Edel said.

“By every indication in the public record, Brat shares the president’s policy views, and hails from the right-wing of the Republican Party.

“While his views on defence issues, AUKUS and critical minerals are less clear, if he is confirmed, it’s a safe bet that he will accurately reflect the White House position on those issues.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39008

File: 8188b515a2d0200⋯.jpg (2.31 MB,4103x2307,4103:2307,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2709c4d74599d7a⋯.jpg (2.76 MB,4752x2672,297:167,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f6f3da08013ea11⋯.jpg (4.98 MB,4856x3237,4856:3237,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5a7c609b1421a3f⋯.jpg (1.83 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0fa37f21a2d7309⋯.jpg (12.72 KB,288x320,9:10,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569442 (040959ZMAY26) Notable: Alleged Anzac Day hecklers face court over 2025 Shrine of Remembrance booing - Four men accused of disrupting Melbourne’s 2025 Anzac Day Dawn Service have faced court, with witnesses describing the alleged booing and heckling as “disgusting” and deeply disrespectful. Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson and Ballarat dentist Ian Lomax are contesting charges including offensive behaviour and breaches of the Shrine of Remembrance Regulations Act. Prosecutors told the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court the disruptions began during a Welcome to Country delivered by elder Mark Brown, with yelling and booing allegedly audible across the crowd. Witnesses said attendees repeatedly urged the men to “show respect” during the ceremony. Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson, identified in court as white supremacists, are representing themselves and plan to argue the case involves “political communication”. Prosecutors are expected to call up to 12 witnesses during the five-day hearing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38946

>>38961

>>38962

>>38963

>>38980

>>38981

Alleged Anzac Day hecklers face court over 2025 Shrine of Remembrance booing

Kristian Silva - 4 May 2026

Witnesses have told a Melbourne court they were "disgusted" when a group of men interrupted last year's Anzac Day Dawn Service by booing and heckling.

Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson and Ian Lomax have been charged with behaving in an offensive manner, and two counts of breaching the Shrine of Remembrance Regulations Act.

The men are fighting the charges in a contested hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court.

Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson are well-known white supremacists, while Mr Lomax, a Ballarat dentist, was suspended from practising after allegations surfaced linking him to neo-Nazi rallies.

The court heard the men booed and yelled racist slogans during parts of the service on April 25, 2025.

The disruptions started while elder Mark Brown was delivering a Welcome to Country, prosecutor Ryan Mallia said.

"The yelling and booing was loud enough to be heard across the entire crowd," he said.

One woman testified that she was near Mr Nelson and Mr Lomax, who were booing.

"I was really upset and disgusted. So many people were asking to show respect at this really important ceremony for so many Australians," she said.

Footage played to the court showed members of the crowd urging the pair to be quiet and to "show respect", while Mr Nelson could be seen smiling when an ex-serviceman dragged him away.

Another man gave evidence that the ceremony was interrupted by "a continual disruptive barrage".

"People came for the Anzac Service. They didn't come to hear him," the man said of one of the hecklers.

In the aftermath, political leaders and the RSL condemned the actions of the disruptors.

Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson are representing themselves in the court hearing.

Today, Mr Hersant said he would be relying on "the implied right of political communication" as part of his legal defence.

Mr Bull added: "Political communication is just that. It can't be offensive".

Mr Lomax's lawyer, Sam Norton, said none of the video footage in the case would depict his client "saying or doing anything that could amount to the offences to which he is charged".

Prosecutors were expected to call up to 12 witnesses for the case, which has been set down for five days.

In a separate matter, Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson are facing charges over an alleged attack on Camp Sovereignty, an Indigenous site in Melbourne.

In 2024, Mr Hersant became the first Victorian to be found guilty of making a Nazi salute in public. He was jailed for a month after losing an appeal against the conviction.

Mr Hersant and fellow neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell were also convicted for violent disorder after attacking hikers in a state park in 2021.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-04/alleged-anzac-day-hecklers-face-court-melbourne/106639340

https://qresear.ch/?q=Jacob+Hersant

https://qresear.ch/?q=Nathan+Bull

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39009

File: 3924abc41aa9818⋯.jpg (406.2 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ce2cdbc355e8c74⋯.jpg (828.41 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7c97c925c3b1190⋯.jpg (761.79 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3ba961d1465f1c4⋯.jpg (825.67 KB,1683x2244,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a3c74d8bc6f8d02⋯.jpg (302.01 KB,1554x2073,518:691,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569445 (041009ZMAY26) Notable: Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson, Ian Lomax: Quartet accused of offensive behaviour at 2025 Anzac Day Dawn Service - Retiree Nigel Meinrath has told a Melbourne court he was “disgusted” by alleged disruptions during the 2025 Anzac Day Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance, where four men are accused of offensive behaviour and breaching shrine regulations. Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson and Ian Lomax allegedly booed and yelled slogans during a Welcome to Country delivered by elder Mark Brown and later during remarks by Victorian Governor Margaret Gardner. Prosecutors said some statements referenced “white Australians” and opposition to the ceremony. Witnesses told the court attendees repeatedly asked the men to “show respect” during the service. Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson are representing themselves and intend to argue their conduct involved protected “political communication”, while Mr Lomax denies engaging in conduct amounting to the alleged offences.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38961

>>38962

>>38963

>>38980

>>38981

>>39008

Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson, Ian Lomax: Quartet accused of offensive behaviour at 2025 Anzac Day Dawn Service

A retiree attending the Anzac Day Dawn Service has told a court he was “disgusted” by an alleged effort to disrupt the Welcome to Country.

Liam Beatty - May 4, 2026

An attendee at Melbourne’s Anzac Day Dawn Service has told a court he was “disgusted” by an alleged effort to disrupt the Welcome to Country.

Retiree Nigel Meinrath was called to give evidence in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Monday for the first day of a hearing for four men accused of offensive behaviour.

Mr Meinrath told the court that he attended the service with his brother, and was standing next to a man who began calling out.

“I could hear particularly a fella to my left who was sort of denigrating the Welcome to Country, saying the Anzacs didn’t need to be welcomed to country and similar statements,” he said.

“He was trying to be disruptive … It was a continual disturbed barrage, it didn’t stop at the end of the Welcome to Country.”

Mr Meinrath said he didn’t believe the man was being “aggressive” and could hear others also calling out, but he believed it wasn’t a “pro-Anzac sentiment”.

“I was disgusted,” he said.

“It just showed no respect for the people who were there for Anzac Day to honour their parents and grandparents.”

Four men, Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson and Ian Lomax, are each facing charges of offensive behaviour, offending against decency in the Shrine of Remembrance and taking part in a disturbance within the Shrine.

Each were previously affiliated with the now-disbanded National Socialist Network group and were supported in court by other associates.

Outlining the Crown’s case, prosecutor Ryan Mallia said it was alleged the four men were booing and yelling during the service on April 25 last year.

Mr Mallia said the alleged incident began when Indigenous Elder Mark Brown began a Welcome to Country ceremony about 5.40am and later continued when Victorian Governor Margaret Gardner was speaking.

Mr Hersant was alleged to have called out “what about the Anzacs?” and “We don’t need to be welcomed to our own country”, while Mr Nelson was allegedly heard yelling “The Anzacs fought for white Australians” and “The first heads of the RSL were pro-White Australia”.

Mr Hersant, Mr Bull and Mr Nelson are fighting the charges self-represented, each flagging they would argue their alleged acts were protected political communications, while Mr Lomax is represented by lawyer Sam Norton.

“Political expression and political communication is just that. It can’t be offensive. It’s just expression,” Mr Bull said.

Mr Norton told the court the evidence in relation to his client was “quite different” to the other three accused men.

“Your Honour will see in due course footage; none of it will depict my client saying or doing anything that could amount to the offences by which he was charged,” he said.

About 2 ½ minutes of footage from Network 10 cameraman Trung Ly was played to the court, capturing one man, alleged to be Mr Nelson, arguing with members of the crowd before he is removed.

Another witness, teacher Leanne Carr, said she was standing near two men who began booing during the Welcome to Country.

She told the court she was “really upset and disgusted” that the two men continued after “so many people were asking them to show respect”.

Ms Carr said one, alleged to be Mr Nelson, was making “a lot of what you would consider white supremacy statements”.

“At one point he said, ‘I’ve done more for this country than any of the Anzacs’ which was highly offensive,” she said.

Ms Carr was challenged on this by Mr Nelson who said the comment was “not true”.

“No I stand by it,” she replied.

The hearing will continue on Tuesday.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/jacob-hersant-nathan-bull-michael-nelson-ian-lomax-quartet-accused-of-offensive-behaviour-at-2025-anzac-day-dawn-service/news-story/4399569de0152a7b68001fb91870cd3f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39010

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569450 (041019ZMAY26) Notable: Sanae Takaichi visit: Japan's PM arrives in Australia to discuss China and energy security - (Video) Former senior defence official Richard Gray says Australia should consider leasing submarines from Japan as a fallback option if the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) nuclear submarine program encounters major delays or capability gaps. The proposal comes as Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi arrives in Canberra for talks with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese focused on energy security, critical minerals and China’s regional influence. Mr Gray said Japan’s modern diesel-electric submarine fleet could provide Australia with an interim sovereign capability if problems emerge with the Collins-class extension program or planned United States Virginia-class acquisitions. Former Japanese ambassador Shingo Yamagami urged Australia and Japan to “speak with one voice” in the Indo-Pacific amid concerns the Trump administration’s focus on Iran could create a regional “power vacuum” that China may seek to exploit.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38853

>>38924

>>39001

Sanae Takaichi visit: Japan's PM arrives in Australia to discuss China and energy security

Australia urged to consider back-up plan for subs ahead of top-level meeting

Matthew Knott - May 3, 2026

1/2

Australia’s plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines through the AUKUS pact is so risky the nation should ask to lease submarines from Japan as a fallback option, a former senior defence official has said as Sanae Takaichi arrives in the country for her first visit as Japanese Prime Minister.

Japan’s first female prime minister, who won a landslide election victory in February after taking a hawkish approach to China, was due to arrive in Canberra late on Sunday night ahead of meetings with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Canberra on Monday.

It is expected that Albanese and Takaichi will focus on bolstering economic security by shoring up energy and gas supplies in response to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and partnering on critical minerals to minimise the risk of economic coercion by China.

Japan’s former ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, urged the leaders to work together to ensure the Trump administration remains focused on the Indo-Pacific and does not allow Beijing to fill a power vacuum in the region.

Richard Gray, who served in several senior defence roles, including as deputy director of defence intelligence, called for Albanese to ask Takaichi whether Japan could offer Australia a “plan B” in case AUKUS hits major hurdles.

Gray said there was a troubling chance Australia could be left without a sovereign submarine capability if problems emerged with the plan to extend the life of the navy’s ageing Collins-class submarines, to acquire Virginia-class submarines from the United States and to develop a new class of nuclear-powered submarine with the United Kingdom.

“To assist in managing these three areas of separate but compounding significant risk, Australia should explore the back-up option of leasing or otherwise rapidly acquiring small numbers of an advanced conventional submarine capability from Japan,” Gray writes in a new report for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

“Japan has a comparatively large, ‘young’, highly capable conventional submarine fleet. It has two active production lines that together turn out an advanced submarine each year and have the potential to ramp up production even further.

“It’s also one of Australia’s few international partners with the depth of trust and a similar view of the international security situation necessary to make this option a viable one.”

Leasing conventionally powered diesel submarines from Japan could tide Australia over until the more potent, long-range nuclear-powered submarines arrive, he said.

“Given the depth of the request that Australia would be making of Japan, engagement needs to begin now for this option to be a realistic possibility,” he said.

“As well as the political and diplomatic dimensions, there would be a significant number of practical matters that would need to be put in train as soon as possible, including investigating costs and funding, industrial production, visits by crew and vessels to begin familiarisation, and so on.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39011

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569454 (041029ZMAY26) Notable: Japan to test more advanced weaponry in Australia as ‘quasi allies’ deepen co-operation - (Video) Japan and Australia have agreed to deepen defence co-operation, including expanded testing of advanced weapons systems in Australia, during talks between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Canberra. A joint statement identified “testing of new equipment, advanced weapons and emerging technologies” as a priority as both nations strengthen military ties amid regional security concerns linked to China. Ms Takaichi described the relationship as operating at a level comparable to “quasi-allies”, while Mr Albanese said the countries had “never been more strategically aligned”. The discussions also covered energy security, critical minerals and cybersecurity co-operation. Separately, former defence official Richard Gray urged Australia to consider leasing Japanese diesel-electric submarines if the AUKUS nuclear submarine program faces delays, although Foreign Minister Penny Wong reaffirmed Canberra remained committed to AUKUS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38853

>>38924

>>39001

>>39010

Japan to test more advanced weaponry in Australia as ‘quasi allies’ deepen co-operation

Matthew Knott - May 4, 2026

1/2

Japan’s military will expand the test firing of missiles and other advanced weapons in Australia as part of a suite of agreements struck during a visit to Canberra by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

As a former senior defence official called for Australia to seek to lease Japanese submarines as a “plan B” in case the AUKUS pact falters, Foreign Minister Penny Wong insisted the government was committed to the plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines from the United States and United Kingdom.

After meeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House, Takaichi hailed the deepening ties between Australia and Japan, saying: “The two countries have built a relationship as frontrunners in co-operation among like-minded countries by advancing pioneering security co-operation at a level that could be described as quasi-allies.”

Takaichi, making her first visit to Australia since becoming prime minister, said the nations would upgrade their defence partnership by “taking advantage of the geographical characteristics of Australia”.

A joint leaders’ statement said the “testing of new equipment, advanced weapons and emerging technologies” would be a priority for Japan and Australia as they bolster defence ties.

Japan is rapidly increasing its defence spending to respond to the rise of China, and investing in advanced equipment such as long-range missiles and hypersonic weapons.

The leaders also agreed to work together on critical minerals, energy security and cybersecurity.

Takaichi, Japan’s first female prime minister, plans to use her parliamentary supermajority to amend Japan’s postwar constitution, including by possibly renouncing a clause committing the nation to pacifism.

Japan conducted live-fire demonstrations of its surface-to-ship missiles in Australia during the Talisman Sabre training exercises in 2023 and 2025. Australia’s vast geography, including the Woomera test range, is appealing to Japan, given its small size and high population density.

“Our two countries have never been more strategically aligned,” Albanese said as he stood beside Takaichi.

“We work closely to advance our shared interests in a peaceful, stable and prosperous region, and I welcome Sanae’s commitment to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39012

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569462 (041043ZMAY26) Notable: Justice for the dead, freedom from the ‘worst of us’: Alex Ryvchin takes royal commission stand - (Video) Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin is set to urge the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion to confront what he describes as a “flaccid mindset” that has allowed extremism and antisemitism to spread in Australia. Mr Ryvchin will be the first major community leader to give evidence at the inquiry led by former High Court justice Virginia Bell, which begins public hearings this week. The hearings will examine the rise in antisemitic incidents following the October 7 attacks in Israel and the December 2025 Bondi terror attack. Mr Ryvchin said the commission was about securing “justice for the dead” and ensuring hatred and violence were not inflicted on other Australians. Other witnesses include Bondi victim Reuven Morrison’s daughter Sheina Gutnick, rabbis, community leaders and victims of antisemitism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38996

Justice for the dead, freedom from the ‘worst of us’: Alex Ryvchin takes royal commission stand

RICHARD FERGUSON - 4 May 2026

1/2

Australia’s most prominent Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin will implore the royal commission this week to drag the country out of a “flaccid mindset” that has let antisemitism flourish and allowed “the worst of us” to determine how good and honest people live.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive will be the first community leader to take the stand at former High Court justice Virginia Bell’s historic inquiry into antisemitism and social cohesion on Monday, kicking off the royal commission’s first fortnight of public hearings.

Mr Ryvchin is set to be joined by Sheina Gutnick, the daughter of Bondi victim Reuven Morrison, and a host of anonymous witnesses at the Monday session.

As an expert and author on antisemitism, a key leader in the fight against hate, and the target of threats and a firebombing, Mr Ryvchin has vowed to use his Monday testimony to help the nation heal and achieve justice for the 15 victims of the Bondi Beach massacre. “This is about justice for the dead, their families and those whose lives were permanently transformed. It is about answering the questions that allow us to heal and emerge stronger and ensure that this ­misery is inflicted on no other Australians,” Mr Ryvchin told The Australian.

“It is about wrenching this country out of a flaccid mindset that allows extremism and incitement to flourish and for the worst among us to dictate how the good and decent live.”

Mr Ryvchin was set to be joined from Monday by rabbis, victims of antisemitism, community leaders and experts as the Jewish community finally gives testament to the wave of hatred that started after the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel and led to last December’s terror attack.

The witness statements this week follow the release of an interim royal commission report last week that revealed Anthony Albanese presided over a crunch in counter-terrorism funding even as the nation’s ­terror threat level surged.

Ms Bell has warned Jewish Australians are now at a greater risk than they were in the lead-up to the Bondi massacre on December 14, 2025, as a result of the Iran conflict.

As he prepared to make his historic statement, Mr Ryvchin said on Sunday that the royal commission was an opportunity to “end this lunacy”.

“It is about restoring fairness and decency and making this country, the greatest country, what it always was and will be again,” Mr Ryvchin told The Australian.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39013

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24569474 (041100ZMAY26) Notable: Hearings begin: Royal commission into antisemitism told of 'real-world consequences of hatred - (Video) A Holocaust survivor and relatives of Bondi terror victims have told the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion that rising hatred has left many Jewish Australians fearful for their safety and identity. Peter Halasz OAM said he never expected to again feel afraid wearing his Star of David in public after surviving Nazi persecution in Hungary during World War II. Witnesses described online abuse, threats against children, anti-Semitic incidents in schools and hostility near synagogues following the October 7 attacks in Israel and the December 2025 Bondi massacre. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said extremists “go exactly as far as they're permitted to go”, while commissioner Virginia Bell said the sharp rise in antisemitism mirrored trends across other Western countries during the commission's opening hearings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38996

>>39012

Royal commission into antisemitism told of 'real-world consequences of hatred'

Millie Roberts - 4 May 2026

1/3

A Holocaust survivor has told a royal commission into antisemitism that Jews in Australia "have become targets" and that he is scared to wear his Star of David in public.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion was established about a month after the Bondi Beach terror attack, in which 15 people were killed and dozens more injured at a Hannukah event on December 14.

On Monday, Peter Halasz OAM told the royal commission the last time he saw his mother, she had come out of hiding in Hungary to wish his grandfather a happy birthday.

She was caught and shot by Nazis in 1944, and he said he only survived "because of the extraordinary courage" of those around him as a little boy.

"I lived through what hatred can do to people … what is happening in Australia today is not a faint echo of a distant past [but] something recognised … and cause for alarm," the Holocaust survivor told the commission.

Being Jewish was also seen as a "liability and a danger" under Soviet rule after the war, and as a teenager he escaped to Australia where he built a life in Sydney.

Mr Halasz said he never believed he would ever be "afraid to wear my Star of David" in public again.

"Jews in Australia have become targets, it brings back memories; I lived with antisemitism next to me for 17 years.

"I think people should learn what's going on … we are asking nothing more than the right to live."

Victim's daughter talks about threats

Sheina Gutnick is the daughter of Bondi victim Reuven Morrison. His family fled Ukraine under the Soviet Union.

She told the commission that antisemitism had changed how she "moved" through the world.

"Emotionally, I want to instil in my children as much pride in their Jewish heritage, but at the same time, have a real awareness," she said.

Ms Gutnick said she had felt a shift after Bondi that was "deeply alarming for all community members".

She said she had seen "hundreds of comments" online in recent months, including that she "should've been killed" as well, and that Jews had "staged" the attack for "attention or sympathy".

Ms Gutnick called for more education around antisemitism, Jewish identity and the "real-world consequences of hatred".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39014

File: d6b0b187450662d⋯.jpg (322.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3f675f91035d425⋯.jpg (353.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 071207ffd87499d⋯.jpg (393.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24572941 (051015ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish Council wins role to challenge antisemitism definition at royal commission - The Jewish Council of Australia has secured limited standing at the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion, allowing it to challenge expert evidence relating to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. Former High Court justice Virginia Bell granted the pro-Palestine Jewish organisation leave to appear specifically on issues involving the IHRA definition and survey evidence concerning antisemitic attitudes in Australia. The IHRA definition, adopted by the federal government, has drawn criticism from some groups who argue it risks conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism. Commissioner Bell said some criticisms reflected a “misconception”, noting alleged antisemitic conduct must always be assessed “in its overall context”. The commission’s first hearings are examining lived experiences of antisemitism, with later sessions to focus on the Bondi terror attack, social media, tertiary education and deradicalisation processes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Jewish Council wins role to challenge antisemitism definition at royal commission

JAMES DOWLING - 5 May 2026

A pro-Palestine Jewish group will cross-examine experts on the use of a globally recognised but controversial definition of antisemitism, after it successfully lobbied for a place in the Bondi royal ­commission.

The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission began its first hearing on Monday by outlining its objectives, the ­subjects of future hearings, and its legal procedures.

The Jewish Council of Australia will be given the chance to question the commission’s use of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism. It was one of four parties – along with the NSW and federal governments and a collective of seven major Jewish groups – granted leave to appear before the commission, and have lawyers involve themselves in it.

Royal commissioner Virginia Bell noted the JCA was a “distinct, but much smaller section of the Jewish community” than the other Jewish collective, which includes the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, but granted it “limited” leave to appear “to examine the expert witnesses giving evidence about the IHRA definition and on the prevalence of antisemitic attitudes, as reflected by surveys of the broader community”.

The IHRA definition was adopted by the federal government, but has attracted criticism by some who argue that it conflates anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

The definition contains a series of “contemporary examples of antisemitism”, which reference Israel and list “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination” and “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” among instances of antisemitism.

Ms Bell said the IHRA definition, which is used in the inquiry terms of reference, was sensible. She believed its critics were basing their views on a “misconception”.

“I’m conscious that some Jews and other members of the Australian community believe that the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism can be weaponised in order to suppress criticism of Israel. The commission has received a number of submissions to this effect,” she said. “I consider that some of the criticisms of the IHRA definition proceed on a misconception.

“The examples of conduct under that working definition that may constitute antisemitism are just that. In every case, the question of whether the conduct is to be assessed as antisemitic is considered in its overall context.”

The JCA first made clear it would lobby the royal commission as “an alternative perspective to the Jewish establishment” in a fundraiser message in January penned by former Adelaide Writers Week director Louise Adler, in which she said that the inquiry presented “an opportunity for pro-Israel propagandists” and “McCarthyites”.

“We must not allow the pro-­Israel lobby to speak for Jews as a whole, we must not accept the racism being fomenting (sic) in the aftermath of the tragedy at Bondi,” she wrote.

“As witnesses are called to give evidence to the commission, it is essential to present an accurate picture of the Jewish community in Australia.”

The first hearings, running until May 15, spotlight lived experiences of antisemitism. Ms Bell’s counsel assisting, Richard Lancaster SC, said the second block of hearings from May 25 to June 12 would hear evidence on the circumstances surrounding the December 14 Bondi massacre, when intelligence and enforcement agencies will give evidence. The third block would then focus on antisemitism on social media and in tertiary education.

In mid-July, its hearings will move down from Sydney to Melbourne. Later hearing blocks will consider community safety and security arrangements, and de­radicalisation processes.

The deadline for submissions was extended to June 14.

Counsel assisting Zelie Heger SC said the inquiry would rely on anecdotal experiences of antisemitism and evidence from community leaders with “more of a bird’s eye overview of antisemitism”, including Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal, Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief Peter Wertheim and Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler.

No adverse findings will be made over particular antisemitic conduct by persons or groups during the first block of hearings, and “particular individuals or organisations accused of antisemitic conduct” would be anonymised.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jewish-council-wins-role-to-challenge-antisemitism-definition-at-royal-commission/news-story/39663b361e80d17f2527d11fd7294c4b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39015

File: 841ecab5d44fddd⋯.jpg (135.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b63ce67959eaeb9⋯.jpg (264.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a9906e1db1c3f63⋯.jpg (110.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f5c72a8432afbbd⋯.jpg (235.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24572962 (051032ZMAY26) Notable: Royal Commission told anti-Semitism ‘interlaced’ with actions of Israel - Australia’s royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion has heard evidence that anti-Semitic incidents in Australia are increasingly linked to perceptions about Israel and the war in Gaza, despite Jewish Australians having “no agency” over Israeli government actions. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said many Jewish Australians were shocked by the response to the October 7 Hamas attacks, including anti-Semitic slurs heard during a pro-Palestinian rally outside the Sydney Opera House. SBS director Vic Alhadeff said anti-Semitism was often “interlaced” with events in the Middle East, while stressing Jewish Australians should not be blamed for decisions made by Israel. Melbourne school principal Jeremy Stowe-Lindner told the inquiry his students had experienced an “avalanche” of anti-Semitic incidents since late 2023, including graffiti, verbal abuse and spitting attacks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Royal Commission told anti-Semitism ‘interlaced’ with actions of Israel

Duncan Murray - May 5 2026

Jewish Australians should not be held accountable for the actions of the Israeli government, despite most holding a strong attachment to the country itself, an inquiry has been told.

Members of Australia's Jewish population were shocked to see the response to the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel, including a large pro-Palestinian rally outside the Sydney Opera House where anti-Semitic slurs were used.

The Royal Commission on Anti-Semitism and Social Cohesion on Tuesday heard more evidence about the lived experiences of Jewish Australians.

Prominent advocate Peter Wertheim said there is a lot of sympathy for Palestinians within the Jewish community, which was not reciprocated following the October 7 attack.

"This was an attack that had been initiated by Hamas," said Mr Wertheim, who is co-chief executive of peak body the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

"They had done it in the most appalling way.

"There was no sympathy expressed for those who were at the receiving end of that treatment."

The October 7 attacks, in which about 1200 people were killed and another 250 people taken hostage, marked a significant turning point for anti-Semitism in Australia, counsel assisting the commission Zelie Heger SC earlier told the inquiry.

Israel's subsequent military campaign in Gaza has killed more than 70,000 people in the Palestinian enclave, and been labelled a genocide by a United Nations commission, which the Israeli government disputes.

Vic Alhadeff OAM, a non-executive director at public broadcaster SBS, told the inquiry, "so much of the manifestation of anti-Semitism incidents and attacks is interlaced with, and references, what is taking place in the other side of the world."

In response to his concerns about rising anti-Semitism, Dr Alhadeff said a representative from another faith group told him, "but look what's happening to the Palestinians in Gaza".

"My response was, 'you have to be made of stone not to care about what is happening to the Palestinians in Gaza, however, why are you holding me responsible?'," Dr Alhadeff said.

"Jewish Australians have no agency in what the Israel Defence Force does, or indeed what the Israeli government does."

Former High Court Judge, Virginia Bell, who is heading the commission, asked Mr Wertheim if in his experience Jewish Australians have an emotional attachment to the idea of Israel.

"Very much so," Mr Wertheim replied.

"Most Jews in Australia have family in Israel and friends, and of course, the Hebrew language and our culture and our religion and our civilisation and values all come from Israel."

However, while the attachment is constant, opinions on various governments and policies have varied greatly in Australia as they have in Israel, he said.

Jeremy Stowe-Lindner, the principal of Melbourne's Bialik College which he describes as a Zionist school, compared Zionism to being a patriotic Australian in that it did not involve any affiliation to a particular political party or policy.

"Zionism is not a particular political belief. It is not a support for any government or coalition within Israel," he told the inquiry.

"It's simply the belief that Israel, as a homeland for the Jewish people, has a right to exist."

Mr Stowe-Lindner said since late 2023 his school had seen an "avalanche" of anti-Semitic incidents including graffiti, verbal slurs and students being spat on.

"We can't go into the CBD in Melbourne anymore in school uniform because of what we'll face," he said.

He agreed the catalyst did appear to be Jewish people, including children, being identified with the policies of the government of Israel.

The commission will hand down a final report before the end of the year.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9239301/anti-semitism-interlaced-with-actions-of-israel/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39016

File: 927ac38a9d25009⋯.jpg (2.31 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f2ddf9c564b87ef⋯.jpg (235.18 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24572987 (051046ZMAY26) Notable: Sydney mayor bans 'globalise the intifada' forum from being held at council building - Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore has directed the City of Sydney chief executive to stop a “Globalise the Intifada” forum from being held at a council-owned venue, citing concerns about social cohesion during the opening hearings of the royal commission into antisemitism. The event, organised by Stop The War On Palestine, was scheduled for Tuesday night and will proceed at another location. Ms Moore said freedom of speech and protest rights must be balanced against “public safety and respect for all members of our community”. Organisers rejected claims the event promoted violence or antisemitism, while the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies welcomed the decision and described the slogan as a recognised “call to violence against Jewish Australians”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24006040 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24205841 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24240141 (pb)

>>38902

>>38923

>>39012

Sydney mayor bans 'globalise the intifada' forum from being held at council building

Thomas Morgan - 4 May 2026

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore says she has asked the city's chief executive to bar an upcoming "globalise the intifada" event from being held in a council-owned building.

Event organisers Stop The War On Palestine have condemned the decision and said the forum would still proceed at a different venue.

The council's decision has been welcomed by the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, which said it had been "engaging intensively with the council" about the event.

The event, entitled "Why it is right to say Globalise the Intifada", is scheduled to be held on Tuesday night.

In a lengthy statement on Facebook, Ms Moore said she had made the decision due to "heightened anxiety and division and coinciding with the week of the first hearing block of the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion in Australia".

She said it was "essential that public events do not contribute to hostility and fear".

"I have long supported the principles of peaceful assembly, protest and freedom of speech," she wrote.

"However, these rights must always be balanced with a responsibility to ensure public safety and respect for all members of our diverse community."

Ms Moore also hit out at what she labelled as a "persistent media campaign", which she said had "[painted] complex issues in black and white".

"The media has an important role in how it presents and helps the community interpret challenging issues, and I am extremely concerned that in this case, some outlets are driving a discourse of division that has heightened tensions more than any small community event could," she said.

Spokesperson for Stop The War On Palestine Adam Adelpour said the group rejected "the implication from Clover Moore that our meeting risks public safety and respect for members of the community".

"The slogan, and other chants including the word 'Intifada', have been common at demonstrations for Palestine. But there is nothing violent or antisemitic about these demonstrations," he said.

"It is not a call for violence — it is a call to end the violence of Israel's occupation."

In a social media statement, the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies said the organisation was "greatly relieved" that the lord mayor had banned the event from being held in a council-owned building.

"The phrase 'Globalise the Intifada' has been recognised by a NSW Parliamentary Inquiry as a call to violence against Jewish Australians," it said in a Facebook post.

"It essentially means kill or maim a Jew wherever you find one.

"We have been engaging intensively with the Council — right up until this evening — to explain why this event would have endangered public safety and grievously undermine social cohesion."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-05/globalise-intifada-forum-cancelled-by-lord-mayor-clover-moore/106640912

https://www.facebook.com/clovermooresydney/posts/sydney-is-one-of-australias-most-diverse-cities-home-to-people-of-many-cultures-/1574488917371300/

https://www.facebook.com/NSWJBD/posts/1429192735905352

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39017

File: e4258844e1a715b⋯.jpg (282.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: acab77cc7362aa4⋯.jpg (222.82 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 99c9d534285cf20⋯.jpg (219.98 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5e10da3487e7ef5⋯.jpg (310.89 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5f53dc6fe81f8d1⋯.jpg (296.66 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24573004 (051058ZMAY26) Notable: Controversial ‘globalise the intifada’ event moves to park after council revokes booking - Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore has revoked a City of Sydney venue booking for a forum defending the phrase “globalise the intifada”, forcing organisers to relocate the event to a public park in Redfern. NSW Premier Chris Minns said the slogan was “antithetical” to the kind of community NSW wanted and described calls to “globalise the intifada” as support for a “violent uprising”. Organisers from Stop The War On Palestine condemned the cancellation and confirmed the event would proceed, with Cumberland councillor Ahmed Ouf among scheduled speakers. Ms Moore said the decision reflected concerns about “hostility and fear” during the opening week of the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion. NSW Opposition Leader Kellie Sloane welcomed the cancellation and called for guarantees similar events would not be hosted again.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39016

Controversial ‘globalise the intifada’ event moves to park after council revokes booking

LACHLAN LEEMING - 5 May 2026

A rally defending the use of the phrase ‘globalise the intifada’ will be held in a public park after its booking at a City of Sydney-owned venue was cancelled at the 11th hour following weeks of backlash.

A public forum, called “Why it’s right to say: globalise the intifada”, will be held on Tuesday evening at a park in the Sydney suburb of Redfern, after City of Sydney lord mayor Clover Moore announced council had revoked the organisers’ booking.

Cumberland councillor Ahmed Ouf, who ran in last year’s federal election against Jason Clare in Blaxland as an endorsed candidate from the Muslim Vote political movement, is one of the featured speakers at the event.

Confirming the move, Mr Ouf posted on social media on Monday morning: “We will globalise it whether you like it or not.

“The City of Sydney did withdraw the booking.

“Terrorism, occupation, oppression and genocide fear accountability. That’s why they target the voices calling it out. You can’t stop the light!”

NSW Premier Chris Minns on Tuesday said he was still “concerned” about the event going ahead, but appeared to rule out any bid to have it cancelled.

“I’ve made it really clear that I think that phrase, that phraseology, is, you know, antithetical to the kind of community that we want to live in, and my sense is that a call to ‘globalise the intifada’ is a call to globalise a violent uprising, which is the opposite of what we want to have in NSW,” he said.

The Premier said the forum was another reason other legislation introduced in the wake of the Bondi massacre, such as a move to strengthen the ability of councils to shut down to hate preachers’ prayer halls, should be supported by the state opposition.

Ms Moore confirmed the booking had been cancelled on Monday night following weeks of ignoring pleas from Jewish leaders and fellow political figures, including Mr Minns, who maintain the phrase “globalise the intifada” can be seen as a call to violence against Jews across the world.

The mayor said in a statement that she had marched across the Harbour Bridge in support of Palestine, as well as criticising NSW police for alleged “excessive force” against protesters.

But she pointed to the event being held during the first days of the antisemitism royal commission as a reason for canning it less than 24 hours before it was due to be held.

“During a time where global conflicts are already contributing to heightened anxiety and division, and coinciding with the week of the first hearing block of the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion in Australia, it is essential that public events do not contribute to hostility and fear,” she said.

“Therefore, I have asked the city’s CEO to withdraw the booking of an event in a city-owned venue that is advertised as ‘Why it is right to say globalise the intifada’.

“I have long supported the principles of peaceful assembly, protest and freedom of speech. However, these rights must always be balanced with a responsibility to ensure public safety and respect for all members of our diverse community.”

While Mr Minns publicly called on Ms Moore to shut down the event, he insisted he didn’t have authority to take stronger action himself.

NSW Opposition Leader Kellie Sloane said it had “taken two weeks for Clover Moore to realise what everyone else always knew”.

“We welcome the news that this event has been cancelled. But our Australian Jewish community shouldn’t have to fight as hard as this to feel safe in our city or state,” she said.

“The Lord Mayor must now give a clear guarantee: events of this nature will not be hosted again.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/controversial-globalise-the-intifada-event-moves-to-park-after-council-revokes-booking/news-story/c3f755171542002b641f4cedf7f6dac7

https://www.instagram.com/stopwaronpalestine/

https://www.instagram.com/stopwaronpalestine/p/DX6weZTD675/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39018

File: e0304f8478b3823⋯.jpg (220.2 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24573024 (051108ZMAY26) Notable: Takaichi pushes ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ with Australia to contain China, but effect will be limited: expert - "Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi started her visit to Australia on Sunday, and during a meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday, she promoted a “free and open Indo-Pacific” concept and pushed for deeper energy and critical minerals cooperation between the two countries. This marked a similar approach she had taken during her visit to Vietnam from Friday to Sunday. These moves have been criticized by Chinese experts as a calculated attempt to contain China's influence and build an exclusive regional bloc. Takaichi said she hopes Japan and Australia will play a leading role in regional stability under the updated "free and open Indo-Pacific" vision during her meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday in Canberra, NHK reported Monday ... Takaichi has also called for strengthening frameworks such as the Quad, and described the relationship between Japan and Australia as “quasi-allies” ... When asked to comment on Takaichi's scheduled proposal of a new version of the so-called "free and open Indo-Pacific" during her visit to Vietnam, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday that state-to-state interactions should not target or harm the interests of third parties. Under the pretext of freedom and openness, Japan is in essence stoking bloc confrontation and forming exclusive cliques. Such practices run counter to the shared aspiration of regional countries and the international community for peace, development and cooperation, and are unpopular, Lin said ... He further noted that countries such as Australia are unlikely to align with Japan in confronting China ... Penny Wong’s recent visit and remarks clearly show that Canberra fully recognizes China as one of its most important, stable, and structurally complementary economic partners, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times. Chen warned that the real danger lies not in normal Japan-Australia cooperation, but in militarization of their bilateral ties. For Australia, he stressed, the wisest choice is not to follow Japan’s push for military normalization or join the US-led camp confrontation, but to safeguard regional stability and preserve its own strategic autonomy." - Hu Yuwei and Wang Zixuan, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39001

>>39010

>>39011

Takaichi pushes ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ with Australia to contain China, but effect will be limited: expert

Hu Yuwei and Wang Zixuan - May 04, 2026

1/2

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi started her visit to Australia on Sunday, and during a meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday, she promoted a “free and open Indo-Pacific” concept and pushed for deeper energy and critical minerals cooperation between the two countries.

This marked a similar approach she had taken during her visit to Vietnam from Friday to Sunday. These moves have been criticized by Chinese experts as a calculated attempt to contain China's influence and build an exclusive regional bloc.

Takaichi said she hopes Japan and Australia will play a leading role in regional stability under the updated "free and open Indo-Pacific" vision during her meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday in Canberra, NHK reported Monday.

China, the Indo-Pacific and the conflicts in the Middle East were also discussed during Takaichi’s talks with Albanese, ABC News reported.

“Today, Anthony and I held the strategic discussions on issues beginning with China, Southeast Asia, Pacific Island countries,” Takaichi told the media in a post-talks press conference on Monday, reported News.com.au that is owned by News Corp Australia.

Takaichi has also called for strengthening frameworks such as the Quad, and described the relationship between Japan and Australia as “quasi-allies”.

“Japan's courting of Australia is not a recent development but has long been a diplomatic priority for Tokyo,” Xiang Haoyu, a distinguished research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Monday. He noted that with the deterioration of China-Japan relations and the risk of rare earth supply disruption, Japan is accelerating its efforts to strengthen energy cooperation with resource-rich countries such as Australia. The impact of the Middle East conflict has further driven this need. According to Xiang, broadly speaking, Japan’s moves are aimed at China, seeking to contain and counterbalance Beijing's influence.

Similarly, in a speech at Vietnam National University, Vietnam, Takaichi’s stop before Australia, she also reaffirmed Japan's vision of a "free and open Indo-Pacific," a framework originally proposed by former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe.

"In the past, the Indo-Pacific cooperation framework was centered on the US, with Japan as just one piece," Xiang said. Now some Western media are hyping that Japan is “moving, deliberately and at speed, to become a co-architect of Indo-Pacific order.”

Japan believes this "free and open Indo-Pacific" narrative can resonate and create strategic alignment with regional countries, incorporating various areas of cooperation – including energy, trade, critical minerals, defense equipment – into it, serving its overall strategic design, Xiang said. Facing the rising influence of China, Japan hopes to use this as leverage to counterbalance and hedge against it.

On April 18, Japan signed a $7 billion deal to supply warships to Australia, marking the most significant military sale since Tokyo lifted its ban on such exports in 2014. Moreover, Japan is weighing the supply of lethal weapons to Southeast Asian nations after revising its arms export restrictions.

Also, strengthening cooperation in energy, trade and critical minerals sits at the core of Takaichi’s recent visits to Vietnam and Australia.

In her speech at Vietnam National University, Takaichi hyped the risks of overdependence on a single country for critical supplies, a remark widely interpreted as targeting China, United Press International reported.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39019

File: adf2309efee984a⋯.jpg (214.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0595691fb41500e⋯.jpg (203.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9f5567ee148b5dc⋯.jpg (428.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24573048 (051115ZMAY26) Notable: One Nation makes accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith its poster boy for Farrer by-election - One Nation has made its public support for accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith a central feature of its campaign in the Farrer by-election, displaying posters featuring the former SAS soldier at pre-polling booths in Albury ahead of Saturday’s vote. The corflutes show Mr Roberts-Smith in SAS uniform alongside the slogan “He fought for us. One Nation stands with him”. Party leader Pauline Hanson, who authorised the material, said her backing reflected One Nation’s support for military veterans and criticised the treatment of Mr Roberts-Smith and his family. A party spokesman said the campaign targeted an electorate with a large veteran population. Mr Roberts-Smith, who was arrested last month on five murder charges linked to alleged war crimes, has denied wrongdoing and remains on bail.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38958

One Nation makes accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith its poster boy for Farrer by-election

ELIZABETH PIKE - 5 May 2026

One Nation has made its support for accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith a key plank of its campaign in the Farrer by-election, plastering the disgraced SAS commander’s face on pre-poll booth posters in a gambit to win over veteran voters in the southern NSW seat.

The minor party has promoted its support for the Victoria Cross recipient at pre-polling booths in Albury, the heart of former Liberal leader Sussan Ley’s electorate, less than a week before election day on Saturday.

Mr Roberts-Smith, 47, is pictured wearing the sandy-coloured beret and winged badge of the SAS alongside the message, “He fought for us. One Nation stands with him”.

He was released on bail last month following his arrest on five counts of war crime murder, and One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has positioned herself as his most vocal political backer.

Mr Roberts-Smith does not have a direct connection to the Farrer region. However, One Nation appears to have banked that its public support for him will appeal to voters.

One Nation’s media team and Farrer candidate David Farley were contacted for comment about the “BRS” corflutes, which were not featured on the other side of the electorate, in Griffith, where candidates descended on Monday for a pre-polling blitz.

A spokesman said One Nation was “the only party which has expressed support for Ben Roberts-Smith and we’re making sure voters in Farrer – where many veterans live – know it”.

“Our support for him reflects our strong commitment to support all Australian veterans much better than the Labor government currently does,” the spokesman said.

A spokesperson for Mr Roberts-Smith said that while the Victoria Cross recipient was not consulted on “any political advertising, he appreciates the support he has received from all corners of the country”.

Senator Hanson has previously rejected the idea that she was seeking to seize Mr Roberts-Smith’s arrest as a political opportunity by strongly backing the former war hero.

The Farrer corflutes have been authorised by Senator Hanson and her headquarters at Brisbane Airport.

“I haven’t made a political decision here,” she said. “I go on my gut feeling and what I feel is right – to support that man and his family,” Senator Hanson said last month.

“What they’ve been through for years now is appalling, and in some ways I can relate to it. What was done to me in the court system, I know what his family has gone through and I think it’s wrong what they’ve done.”

Senator Hanson said she remained “steadfast” in her support for Mr Roberts-Smith and criticised Anthony Albanese and Angus Taylor for their “pathetic” responses to his arrest at the time.

Despite the looming murder trial, which is expected to be one of the most consequential legal battles in the country, Mr Roberts-Smith has enjoyed a groundswell of public support as he stares down the prospect of life imprisonment if found guilty.

The SAS veteran attended an Anzac Day dawn service in Currumbin on the Gold Coast, and less than a day later more than 200 protesters marched through the Melbourne CBD in a show of support.

Lawyers have also cast doubt on whether Mr Roberts-Smith could ever receive a fair trial considering the media interest in his case, with this masthead previously revealing his legal team was considering applying for a permanent stay on his case.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/one-nation-makes-accused-war-criminal-ben-robertssmith-its-poster-boy-for-farrer-byelection/news-story/74d1fe8d1f73e5d429310557cba0b9d0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39020

File: df97c00a52cae6f⋯.jpg (3.71 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576260 (061328ZMAY26) Notable: Jasper Jones author Craig Silvey pleads guilty to distributing child exploitation material - West Australian author Craig Silvey has pleaded guilty to distributing and possessing child exploitation material after appearing in Fremantle Magistrates Court, while two other charges against him were dropped. The 43-year-old, best known for the novel Jasper Jones, was arrested in January following allegations he engaged online with other suspected child exploitation offenders over several days. Earlier court hearings were told Silvey allegedly distributed child exploitation material and expressed a sexual interest in children during online conversations. One possession charge and a charge of producing child exploitation material were withdrawn on Tuesday. Silvey remains on bail under strict conditions, including reporting to police three times a week and being banned from child-related work. His case now proceeds to the District Court for sentencing following the guilty pleas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24119716 (pb)

Jasper Jones author Craig Silvey pleads guilty to distributing child exploitation material

Rebecca Peppiatt and Jamie Freestone - May 5, 2026

West Australian author Craig Silvey has pleaded guilty to two child exploitation charges, while another two charges were dropped at a hearing in Fremantle on Tuesday.

The 43-year-old author was arrested in January over allegations he was actively engaging with other alleged child exploitation offenders online.

Silvey, best known for his 2009 novel Jasper Jones, was charged with producing child exploitation material, distributing child exploitation material and two counts of possession of child exploitation material.

In Fremantle Magistrates Court on Tuesday, one of the possession charges and the charge of producing child exploitation material were dropped, but Silvey pleaded guilty to another possession charge and the distribution charge.

Previous court appearances heard Silvey had expressed a sexual interest in children and distributed child exploitation material while engaging in online conversations over several days in January.

It was also alleged he had refused to provide passwords to police to gain access to his mobile, laptop and other devices after his arrest.

Silvey was granted bail on $100,000 surety on the condition he report to his local police station three times a week and was banned from any child-related work – including school visits.

In the wake of the charges, WA Education Minister Sabine Winton ordered schools to pull the author’s books from their curriculum, while other states swiftly followed suit.

Silvey has been writing for more than 20 years, with Jasper Jones selling nearly 1 million copies worldwide.

His 2022 novel Runt collected a number of awards and was adapted into a feature film in 2024.

He has three young children with his partner.

Silvey’s charges will now proceed to the District Court for sentencing.

http://archive.today/VUifz

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39021

File: 7b4589846777be1⋯.jpg (147.71 KB,957x778,957:778,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2f9a49635eabc5a⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: da8159e4e1be97d⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 729faca57ba8d8d⋯.jpg (381.9 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576312 (061341ZMAY26) Notable: Australian author Craig Silvey's books permanently pulled from WA public schools - Western Australia has permanently removed books by author Craig Silvey from the state’s public school curriculum after he pleaded guilty to possessing and distributing child exploitation material. Education Minister Sabine Winton said there was “absolutely no place” in schools for works by someone who admitted to “serious crimes”, confirming an earlier temporary suspension would become permanent. Premier Roger Cook backed the decision as “appropriate”. Silvey, best known for Jasper Jones, pleaded guilty this week after being charged following a police raid on his Fremantle home in January. His publisher Allen & Unwin said it would review steps to end its relationship with the author, while several libraries and bookstores have already removed his books from shelves.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39020

Australian author Craig Silvey's books permanently pulled from WA public schools

David Weber - 6 May 2026

The best-selling books of disgraced Australian author Craig Silvey will be permanently pulled from public schools in his home state of Western Australia, after he pleaded guilty to child exploitation offences.

Silvey's home in Fremantle was raided by detectives from WA Police's child abuse squad in January and he was charged with possessing and distributing child exploitation material.

The news of his arrest made international headlines, and many bookstores across the country immediately pulled his work from shelves, including his most popular novel, Jasper Jones.

The 43-year-old father-of-three pleaded guilty on Tuesday to the two charges, which related to images of child exploitation material.

WA Education Minister Sabine Winton has confirmed a temporary ban on Silvey's books being used as texts in public schools will now be made permanent.

"There is absolutely no place in our school system for works authored by someone who has admitted to such serious crimes," the minister said in a statement.

"Now that he has pleaded guilty, those texts will not return to the curriculum.

"Predatory behaviour against children is abhorrent and has no place in our community, let alone in materials studied by students in our schools."

Ms Winton said schools will be supported to adjust lesson plans and switch texts, while students who had already studied the text and planned to use it in their ATAR exams would not be penalised.

Premier Roger Cook said the action was "appropriate".

"I support the very strong decision from the minister of education yesterday to remove the books from the curriculum and the shelves of WA public schools," Mr Cook said.

"It is appropriate we act in this manner."

Shop owner removed books

Nat Latter, who co-owns Rabble Books & Games in Maylands, opted to remove Silvey's books when he was charged in January.

She said she felt she had a responsibility, given some of Silvey's books were targeted at children.

"When you have a book in your shop, you're responsible for promoting and marketing it, and I don't want to be a part of contributing to his income," Ms Latter said.

She said her focus was now on supporting customers concerned about Silvey's books.

"People do want to come and have conversations [about the charges] with us," she said.

"And we give them some advice, and provide them with some books and resources for people navigating age appropriate conversations with children about this."

Several local governments in the Perth metro area have confirmed they have removed Silvey's work from their library collections, including the Perth and Vincent libraries.

Publisher Allen & Unwin said it would end its relationship with Silvey.

"While legal proceedings were underway, Allen & Unwin paused the sale, distribution and promotion of Mr Silvey's work," it said in a statement.

"Following Mr Silvey's plea, Allen & Unwin will review all available steps it can take to end its relationship with the author."

Aside from Jasper Jones, which was adapted into a feature film, Silvey has won numerous accolades for other books, including Rhubarb, Honeybee and Runt, a children's novel that was also made into a film.

His books have been popular with children and young adults, often delving into profound themes such as racism, sexual identity and abuse, mostly featuring teenage protagonists.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-06/craig-silvey-books-permanently-banned-from-wa-school-curriculum/106647464

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39022

File: 148b963c3600249⋯.jpg (297.55 KB,1080x720,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 97a962605d80208⋯.jpg (1.54 MB,4155x3359,4155:3359,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d7fd599c5df0637⋯.jpg (363.72 KB,871x1377,871:1377,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576326 (061346ZMAY26) Notable: Landon Germanotta-Mills: Encrypted chats reveal horrific allegations against ‘satanic paedophile’ - Sydney man Landon Germanotta-Mills has been accused of participating in an online child abuse network uncovered during a NSW Police investigation into encrypted file-sharing platforms allegedly used to distribute exploitation material. Court documents allege the 27-year-old possessed and transmitted thousands of abuse images involving children and animals, while engaging in online conversations with other suspected offenders. Police arrested Germanotta-Mills at his Waterloo apartment in November under Strikeforce Constantine after tracing accounts linked to a New Zealand-based website. Detectives alleged he attempted to explain the material by claiming he was acting as an “investigative journalist” building a case. NSW Supreme Court Justice Belinda Rigg granted him bail last month under strict conditions including home detention, daily police reporting and bans on internet-enabled devices. Germanotta-Mills has not entered pleas and will return to court later this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38995

Landon Germanotta-Mills: Encrypted chats reveal horrific allegations against ‘satanic paedophile’

Perry Duffin and Clare Sibthorpe - May 5, 2026

A Sydney man accused of running a satanic paedophile ring allegedly hoarded almost 7000 abuse images involving babies and animals and told acolytes using encrypted chats that he “wished” to abuse children.

But when police burst through his door he tried to claim he was “building a case” as an “investigative journalist”.

Landon Germanotta-Mills, 27, was charged in late November by the NSW Police child abuse squad under Strikeforce Constantine, which was probing an online abuse cell operating on a New Zealand file sharing website.

Germanotta-Mills was arrested at his Waterloo apartment and remained in custody until last week, when he was released on bail by the NSW Supreme Court.

The town to which he was bailed cannot be revealed under court order.

A police document, released by the court on Tuesday, alleges Germanotta-Mills told 12 other users in encrypted one-on-one chats that he was into “young doesn’t matter what age” as well as “zoo” and “incest”.

The descriptions of images in the document are too horrific to repeat, but one user allegedly asked Germanotta-Mills if he had ever “f*cked young”, to which he allegedly replied “I wish”.

Police who dug into the New Zealand company’s servers discovered the images involving animals, adult men and infants, and tracked the emails and phone numbers used to register the accounts.

One email allegedly led police to Underground Media Network, Germanotta-Mills’ blog in which he claims he works as an investigative journalist exposing police corruption, racism and “trauma informed” stories including child abusers.

But Germanotta-Mills, who described himself online as an independent First Nations’ journalist, was allegedly using those accounts to chat with other users requesting and sending child abuse material.

“Trying to find some pervy porn,” Germanotta-Mills allegedly wrote to another user just two weeks before his arrest.

The person he was chatting to described abusing a child.

“You hot perverted pedo,” Germanotta-Mills allegedly added.

Police marched into Germanotta-Mills’ home in Waterloo on November 27 last year and found him on a lounge. He offered to “cooperate, if I get a chance to explain reasons”, according to the document.

“[The material] was on my devices to build a bigger case… I should have sent it straight away to you guys and reported it straight away,” Germanotta-Mills allegedly told police.

“Instead of trying to make my case… be a typical journalist.”

Detective Superintendent Jayne Doherty, then head of the NSW Sex Crimes squad, said the material consisted of victims aged from babies to 12, was “among the most extreme we have seen” and that its “use of satanic iconography demonstrates the level of depravity”.

She said police were working with international law enforcement and had gathered evidence identifying 145 alleged overseas offenders.

Germanotta-Mills was charged with a string of offences including accessing, transmitting and possessing child abuse material and some relating to bestiality material.

Germanotta-Mills was released on April 28 by NSW Supreme Court Justice Belinda Rigg who found the risks posed by releasing him could be managed by home detention, daily police reporting and bans from phones and internet devices.

“There is apparent strength to the prosecution case on my analysis of the detailed fact sheet, including the ways in which the applicant is linked with the different devices and platforms relied upon by the prosecution, and also a number of admissions made by him,” she said.

Germanotta-Mills was allegedly sexually involved with another man, Benjamin Drysdale, who had previously been convicted of child abuse material, the fact sheet says.

Drysdale, ex-police officer David Turner and former Victorian swim coach Mark Andrew Sendecky were among those arrested in connection with the alleged child abuse ring and remain before the courts.

Germanotta-Mills and the others charged have not yet entered pleas. They will next face the local court in May and June.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/encrypted-chats-reveal-horrific-allegations-against-satanic-paedophile-20260505-p5ztv4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39023

File: 67521ed0c7db9b0⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6aaeb96e57a4a67⋯.jpg (187.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576344 (061355ZMAY26) Notable: Social media giant fails to act as Jewish community fears ‘next Bondi’ - Witnesses at the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion have described growing fear within Australia’s Jewish community, including concerns about further violence following the December 2025 Bondi terror attack. Academic Tali Pinsky told the inquiry Meta failed to remove Facebook posts glorifying Adolf Hitler and spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories after complaints were lodged, with responses stating the content did not breach “community standards”. SBS director and former NSW Jewish Board of Deputies chief executive Vic Alhadeff said many Jewish Australians feared “the next Bondi”. Other witnesses described school bullying, online abuse, heightened security around Jewish schools and community events, and children being exposed to antisemitic slurs linked to the October 7 Hamas attacks and the war in Gaza. Meta said it remained committed to removing hateful content and improving enforcement systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Social media giant fails to act as Jewish community fears ‘next Bondi’

Alexandra Smith and Michaela Whitbourn - May 5, 2026

1/2

A Jewish academic who lodged complaints with Facebook over posts glorifying Hitler and likening the Jews to rats has told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that social media giant Meta failed to act after claiming the content did not “violate community standards”.

Israeli-born Tali Pinsky, who moved to Australia last year for an academic posting, told the commission on Tuesday she did not believe social media was “necessarily the main driver of antisemitism, but it’s certainly a great amplifier”.

Pinsky was one of 12 witnesses to give evidence to the commission about their lived experience of antisemitism during the second day of public hearings before former High Court judge Virginia Bell in Sydney.

SBS board director and former chief executive of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies Dr Vic Alhadeff also appeared, warning: “I know I’m confident that I speak for most Jewish-Australians when I say that we fear the next Bondi”.

“And that is our truth, that is our normal, that is our new reality,” Alhadeff said.

During Pinsky’s evidence, the commission was shown a series of social media posts glorifying Hitler, accusing Jews of masterminding the John F. Kennedy assassination and the September 11 terror attack, as well as likening Jewish people to rat plagues.

She told the commission that when she had tried to report the posts to Meta-owned Facebook she was given “the standard response” that they did “not violate the community standards”.

In a statement, a Meta spokesperson said its “hateful conduct policy” prohibits attacks against people based on protected characteristics, including religion and ethnicity, and this includes dehumanising speech, harmful stereotypes, and calls for violence.

“We use a combination of AI technology and human review to enforce our policies. While we do not always get it right, we are committed to improving our systems and we continuously invest in our ability to detect and remove hateful content at scale.”

The spokesperson said the company works with “Jewish community groups to understand how antisemitism is expressed online” and said when mistakes were made “people have the ability to appeal to us or the Oversight Board”. The board independently reviews Meta’s decisions.

Pinsky said she intended to return to Israel at the end of the year because she and her family no longer feel Australia is safe.

Another witness, a Victorian mother who used the pseudonym AAP, said her high school-age children attended single-sex Catholic schools and are “probably the only Jewish children there”.

“Very soon after [the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023], the sentiment towards Jewish people became very negative,” she said. Antisemitic messaging was “in their face” on social media.

She said slurs included “We owe Hitler an apology. The Nazis should have finished them off” and “Racism only applies to humans”.

Antisemitic comments like “dirty Jew” were thrown around by “ordinary kids”, AAP said.

AAP said some of her son’s friends joked about dressing up for year 12 muck-up day “as Adolf Hitler or the Bondi shooters”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39024

File: d97633445946549⋯.jpg (139.62 KB,1725x970,345:194,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9542de9eaf1c757⋯.jpg (399.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576398 (061409ZMAY26) Notable: Antisemites ‘blur the lines’ to attack Jewish identity, royal commission told - Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Jeremy Leibler has told the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion that antisemites deliberately “blur the lines” between criticism of Israel and attacks on Jewish identity, leaving many Jewish Australians feeling excluded from workplaces, universities and cultural institutions after the October 7 Hamas attacks. Mr Leibler said Jewish Australians discovered acceptance in some sectors was “conditional” on rejecting Zionism and support for a Jewish homeland. Other witnesses described antisemitic abuse in schools, including Nazi salutes, “dirty Jew” slurs and students being targeted during excursions. A 13-year-old girl who attended a bat mitzvah at Bondi Pavilion during the December 2025 terror attack told the commission she remained traumatised after seeing crowds fleeing in panic. Witnesses also criticised institutions for allegedly failing to properly respond to complaints of antisemitic behaviour.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Antisemites ‘blur the lines’ to attack Jewish identity, royal commission told

JAMES DOWLING - 6 May 2026

1/2

Antisemites intentionally “blur the lines” between criticism of ­Israel’s existence and its actions, one of Australia’s most eminent Jewish lawyers says, arguing that Jewish Australians have been forced to choose between their morals and their livelihoods.

Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Jeremy Leibler was one of a dozen witnesses who testified in the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission on Wednesday, along with a 13-year-old girl traumatised by the Bondi Beach massacre.

Royal commissioner Virginia Bell challenged Mr Leibler to distinguish between delegitimising Israel and the critical views of well-intentioned non-Jewish Australians of the actions of Israel.

“I don’t believe that it is difficult to draw the line,” Mr Leibler said. “I believe that there are many that have an agenda to make it very difficult, in order to blur the lines.

“It is perfectly acceptable to criticise Israel’s conduct of the war. It is not legitimate, it is not acceptable, and it does cross the line to describe the Jewish right to self-determination as something that is inherently evil or immoral.”

Mr Leibler, whose firm is acting for Jewish organisations in the royal commission, said ABL had taken on dozens of pro bono legal clients since October 7, 2023, who saw their livelihoods threatened for refusing to disavow Zionism.

“My phone was ringing off the hook after the 7th of October, and it was almost always from traumatised members of the community asking for help because of antisemitism, isolation, exclusion, discrimination,” he said. “It was particularly bad within the arts, within progressive spaces, within academia, but it was everywhere.

“Jewish artists … were having venues cancelled, often … not because the venue ideologically wanted to. Often the cancellation would be accompanied by: ‘I’m so sorry, but I’ve been told that there’s going to be a BDS boycott campaign if we allow you to perform, and we’re a small business, and we just can’t afford to be ­attacked online.”

Mr Leibler said the rise in antisemitism proved to successful Jewish Australians that their seat at the table “was conditional on them rejecting a core part of their Jewish identity”. “Their success, their contribution to this country, bought them a seat at the table, not with special treatment, but as an equal,” he said. “And they discovered after the 7th of October, very quickly, that that seat was conditional on them rejecting a core part of their Jewish identity: that being their Zionism, their belief in the right of Jewish people to have their own homeland.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39025

File: f45ed86182415ee⋯.mp4 (15.01 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 5521d5963782929⋯.jpg (262.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0defd07e598d7c0⋯.jpg (77.63 KB,1023x768,341:256,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f584f4868507569⋯.jpg (358.51 KB,1338x1003,1338:1003,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576463 (061430ZMAY26) Notable: Man arrested after wearing Nazi swastika T-shirt outside antisemitism royal commission - (Video) A man has been arrested after allegedly wearing a T-shirt displaying a Nazi swastika and anti-Semitic slogan outside the antisemitism royal commission hearings in Sydney. NSW Police said officers attached to Operation Shelter initially issued the man with a move-on direction outside the Clarence Street venue before later arresting him at Manly Police Station. The man, who identified himself to media as Ian Minus, questioned why he was being confronted and linked his actions to opposition to Israel’s conduct in Gaza. The royal commission said it was “appalled” by the incident and stressed witness safety remained paramount during hearings. Under NSW law, publicly displaying Nazi symbols without reasonable excuse is a criminal offence, along with behaving offensively near a public place or school.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Man arrested after wearing Nazi swastika T-shirt outside antisemitism royal commission

'JAMES DOWLING and WILL SEITAM - 6 May 2026

A man who sparked outrage after he was removed from outside the antisemitism royal commission in Sydney when he was spotted wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with a Nazi swastika has been ­arrested by police.

The man, who gave his name as Ian Minus of Killarney Heights to the media and wore a shirt depicting the slogan “Anti-Semitism: proud to be accused, speak up!”, was issued a move on by police, which he complied with about 11am on Wednesday.

“Officers attached to Operation Shelter were patrolling outside a building on Clarence Street, Sydney, where a man was seen to be wearing clothing which allegedly displayed an offensive slogan on the front,” a police statement read.

“About 2.45pm, the man attended Manly Police Station where he was arrested by officers attached to Operation Shelter. He remains in custody while inquiries continue,” police confirmed later on Wednesday afternoon.

The man calling himself Mr Minus was seen sipping coffee in a neighbouring cafe adjacent to the building’s entrance.

He told the media: “I have business in town, and I wear this all the time. I’m just … enjoying a cup of coffee in the streets of ­Sydney. Why am I being assailed in such fashion?

“What’s disrespectful is what’s happening in Gaza and Lebanon and overseas, the killing of innocent people and children. What is it about group punishment that Zionists don’t understand or ­object to?”

He questioned whether the symbol was “clearly a swastika”, and when asked what his objections to Zionism had to do with the antisemitism royal commission, he said, “I don’t know”.

A social media profile matching the name Ian Minus displayed the shirt online in a post on ­Sunday, offering to sell copies of it.

“Despite urgings of the press that this claim makes this T-shirt illegal, NSW police did not act immediately. I guess we shall see when Zionist ­influence raises its ugly head,” he wrote. “This T-Shirt is getting positive reactions now, not surprisingly as people ­realise the true agenda and its ­effects on the entire world. Time for a stroll along a beach.”

On Wednesday, the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission said it was “appalled” by the man, and confirmed the police were dealing with the matter. “The royal commission is aware that this morning an individual wearing an antisemitic shirt was moved on by NSW police from out the front of the royal commission hearing location. We understand the matter is being dealt with by NSW police,” it said in a statement.

“The royal commission is appalled that such an item of clothing was worn in the vicinity of our hearing venue. Safety of witnesses is paramount to the royal commission. We want to reassure ­witnesses and those wishing to engage with the royal commission that safety protocols are in place. The royal commission is determined to investigate antisemitism in Australia without fear or intimidation.”

Photos uploaded to the same account on February 9 show a Mr Minus attending the Town Hall protests wearing a similarly inflammatory T-shirt with Hebrew text which reads, “Israel, you are f*cked.”

The February 9 post read: “There were plenty of Jews Against Israel at the town hall protest today. Interestingly, none of the many I talked to could read Hebrew. Do I really look like a mossad (sic) agent recording dissent protesters?”

In NSW, it is a criminal offence to wear or display a Nazi swastika in public without a reasonable excuse.

It is also an offence to act in an offensive manner near or within view or hearing of a public place or school.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/man-arrested-after-wearing-nazi-swastika-tshirt-outside-antisemitism-royal-commission/news-story/9e67635cd5ab20b31f87013ce6208e79

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39026

File: 3d0d7f0339c1577⋯.jpg (193.74 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ddb4efc2a8d7394⋯.jpg (6.23 MB,6240x4160,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 47ea2df52dcd622⋯.jpg (569.8 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24576525 (061445ZMAY26) Notable: Man charged with hate speech after neo-Nazi rally outside NSW Parliament House - Neo-Nazi Joel Davis has been charged with publicly inciting racial hatred after speaking at a National Socialist Network rally outside NSW Parliament House in November 2025. More than 60 black-clad demonstrators attended the protest, chanting “blood and honour” and displaying banners targeting the Jewish community. Police allege Davis used a megaphone to spread offensive conspiracy theories during the gathering. The charge was laid under relatively new NSW hate speech laws introduced by the Labor government. Davis, 31, was granted conditional bail and is due to appear in court next month. NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley said people had a right to protest but not to “target Jewish people, intimidate communities or incite racial hatred”. The National Socialist Network earlier claimed it had disbanded to avoid potential prohibition under federal hate group laws.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23887892 (pb)

>>38980

>>38981

>>39008

>>39009

Man charged with hate speech after neo-Nazi rally outside NSW Parliament House

Jessica McSweeney and Patrick Begley - May 6, 2026

A notorious neo-Nazi who spoke at a rally outside NSW Parliament House last November has been charged with a hate crime.

More than 60 black-clothed members of the National Socialist Network (NSN) gathered outside parliament on November 8, 2025 after submitting a protest application that was unopposed by police. They chanted “blood and honour”, a Hitler Youth slogan, and held a banner that read “Abolish the Jewish lobby”.

Joel Davis, 31, was part of the gathering that went ahead after NSW Police sought legal advice only to be told police likely did not have the legal grounds to stop the protest.

Davis had shouted into a megaphone to promote baseless and offensive conspiracies about the Jewish community.

He was charged on Wednesday with publicly inciting racial hatred on the grounds of race causing fear, a relatively new offence created under the current NSW Labor government.

He was given conditional bail to appear at Downing Centre Local Court next month.

Davis was granted bail in April after several months in custody on a federal charge, following a message he posted on social media encouraging followers to “rhetorically rape” federal independent Allegra Spender.

After the rally, Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon had told parliament in an answer to a budget estimates committee submitted on March 26 that “a subsequent review of the actions of the protesters conducted after the protest identified no offence”.

However, a spokesperson for the police said on Wednesday that he had been charged in connection with the event.

“An investigation into this matter was undertaken by the Security Investigation Unit, Counter Terrorist and Special Tactics Command, who sought legal advice in relation to the public assembly and content of the speeches,” the statement said.

NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley described the behaviour of those at the rally as “completely unacceptable”.

“People have a right to protest. They do not have a right to target Jewish people, intimidate communities or incite racial hatred,” she said.

“These laws exist for a reason – to protect people from hate and fear, and the government will continue to support strong action against hatred and extremism.”

NSW Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip said in a statement: “It would be inappropriate to comment on this precise case, but fair-minded Australians have had a gutful of divisive and hateful language and calls for violence on our streets. Enforcing hate speech laws is key to repairing social cohesion and protecting public safety.”

The NSN claims to have disbanded earlier this year to avoid being listed as a prohibited hate group under new legislation introduced by the federal government. The government, which listed the Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir under the new laws, did not proceed with the NSN designation.

Despite this, neo-Nazi Jack Eltis, who spoke alongside Davis at the November rally, has signalled an intention to challenge the legislation in the High Court.

Davis is the first to be charged with a crime in relation to the rally. South African national Matthew Gruter, who stood alongside Davis at the protest, had his visa cancelled by the federal government and was deported in December.

“If you are on a visa you are a guest. If you’re a citizen you’re a full member of the Australian family,” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said in November.

“Like with any household, if a guest turns up to show hatred and wreck the household, they can be told it’s time to go home.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/man-charged-with-hate-speech-after-neo-nazi-rally-outside-nsw-parliament-20260506-p5zugy.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Joel+Davis

https://qresear.ch/?q=National+Socialist+Network

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39027

File: a8dbb6b4fec74b9⋯.jpg (284.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24577960 (062250ZMAY26) Notable: Alleged Bondi shooter Naveed Akram is set to be hit with 19 new charges, including attempted murder - Alleged Bondi Beach gunman Naveed Akram is expected to face 19 additional charges, including attempted murder offences, over the December 2025 antisemitic terror attack. Akram already faces 59 charges, including terrorism, 15 counts of murder and 40 counts of attempted murder. Court records show the additional allegations include shooting with intent to murder, wounding with intent to murder and firearm offences linked to resisting arrest, although police have not yet formally served the new charges. Akram has not entered pleas to any charges. During a brief court mention in Sydney, prosecutors successfully sought an extension of interim suppression orders protecting the identities of some victims, including children, while consultations continue over possible long-term non-publication orders. Akram’s next court appearance is scheduled for June.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38971

>>38734

>>39012

Alleged Bondi shooter Naveed Akram is set to be hit with 19 new charges, including attempted murder

BIMINI PLESSER - 6 May 2026

Alleged Bondi shooter Naveed Akram is set to face 19 new charges, including several counts of attempted murder, over his alleged role in the antisemitic terror attack.

Mr Akram, the younger of the two alleged perpetrators of the Bondi Beach massacre in December last year, has officially been charged with 59 offences, including terrorism, 15 counts of murder, and 40 counts of attempted murder.

A further 19 charges against Mr Akram were listed by the courts on Wednesday but have not yet been served by police.

Of these charges, 10 were for shooting with intent to murder, three were for wounding with intent to murder, and six were for discharging a firearm et cetera with intent to resist arrest.

Akram is yet to enter pleas to any of the charges laid against him.

There was no mention of any new or impending charges when Mr Akram’s case was mentioned in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday.

Outside court, Mr Akram’s lawyer Leonie Gittani said the alleged terrorist’s team “haven’t been served with any new court attendance notices or anything”.

“Things like this happen in criminal matters. It’s a big matter and a long road ahead,” Ms Gittani said.

“These things don’t come as a surprise, if I can answer it in that way. These charges, once they’re filed, we’ll deal with them at that point.”

Neither Mr Akram nor his barrister, Richard Wilson SC, were in court on Wednesday, but the alleged gunman had other legal representatives attend on his behalf.

Lawyers for the commonwealth asked Judge Susan McIntyre to extend the interim non-publication orders currently covering the identity of yet-to-be-named victims of the Bondi attack.

The orders were set to expire on Wednesday.

The commonwealth said they required more time to contact and consult dozens of victims – some of them children – about whether they wished to have their names suppressed before submitting a final application for a non-publication order.

Judge McIntyre agreed to extend the interim orders until Mr Akram’s next court appearance, which will take place some time in June.

Non-publication and suppression orders have been a key focus of the case against Mr Akram.

At a hearing last month, Mr Akram’s application to have the names, addresses, schools and workplaces of his family suppressed for 40 years was dismissed, despite his claims their lives were at risk.

Judge Hugh Donnelly said such suppression orders “should only be made in exceptional circumstances”, and Mr Akram’s was “not an exceptional case”.

While the “gravity” of Mr Akram’s alleged conduct would “inevitably” draw public comment and criticism, some of which may be directed at his family, the judge said “this alone is not enough to intrude on the principle of open justice”.

“It is essential that this case be fairly reported,” he said.

Mr Wilson said he would not be appealing against Judge Donnelly’s “well-considered” decision.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/alleged-bondi-shooter-naveed-akram-is-set-to-be-hit-with-19-new-charges-including-attempted-murder/news-story/d65388c004f988033235a9cbc929519e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39028

File: 182c87093ec8036⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,3744x2063,3744:2063,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 013a00d7ba1a560⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24577984 (062300ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Critical gap’: The 2020 warning to police before Bondi terrorist bought guns - NSW Police were warned in 2020 about a “critical gap” in Australia’s firearms licensing system that could allow extremists to legally obtain weapons before alleged Bondi attacker Sajid Akram acquired guns used in the December 2025 massacre. Psychologist and gun club official Daniel Gregg told police that gun clubs needed clearer systems for identifying and reporting concerning behaviour among members, arguing “static checks” alone could not detect evolving extremist risks. His briefing referenced the Christchurch terrorist attack and warned lone-actor extremists often displayed warning signs before acting. The revelations come after the royal commission into the Bondi attack urged governments to strengthen gun laws and improve information-sharing between agencies. Police insiders also said firearms licensing divisions across Australia remained under-resourced and overwhelmed by growing workloads.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38971

>>38734

>>39012

>>39027

‘Critical gap’: The 2020 warning to police before Bondi terrorist bought guns

Nick McKenzie and Perry Duffin - May 6, 2026

1/2

The NSW Police unit that gave a gun licence to shooters’ club member turned Bondi terrorist Sajid Akram was urged in writing five years ago to close a “critical gap” in the firearms licensing regime that could be leaving extremists unchecked.

During a meeting at police headquarters on December 8, 2020, psychologist and gun club official Daniel Gregg warned officials from the NSW Police Firearms Registry that far too little was being done to encourage club members to spot and report any signs of extremism among their fellow shooters.

In his presentation to NSW Police Clubs, Intelligence, and Licensing officials, Gregg warned that police were missing an opportunity to improve vigilance within gun clubs amid patchy and inconsistent official guidance about how and when a club member should identify and flag concerns about a fellow member. But Gregg said his warning went unheeded, with police never following up.

Gregg urged NSW Police in his 2020 presentation, which included a written briefing, to “address a critical gap in early detection of emerging risk among [gun club] applicants who may not trigger traditional disqualifiers but exhibit concerning behavioural patterns” indicative of extremism.

In his PowerPoint, Gregg warned the NSW Police that the existing system of firearms’ “regulation and the law” was flawed and there was a risk that “lone-actor extremists [who] exhibit observable behaviours before acting” were not having these behaviours reported to police.

“Clubs are often the first point of contact for new firearm users, giving them a unique opportunity to notice these behaviours. Static checks [by police] alone cannot detect dynamic risk – structured behavioural observation [within a club] can help fill that gap,” Gregg’s briefing stated.

The revelation of the warning comes as the royal commission prompted by the Bondi attack in December last week urged states, territories and the federal government to further strengthen rules across Australia around gun ownership, improve the inter-agency sharing of information about gun owners and “prioritise efforts to implement the proposed National Gun Buyback Scheme”.

But legislative reforms introduced post-Bondi have largely focused on restricting the number and types of weapons available to licensed gun owners, rather than encouraging and empowering firearm owners – who typically have to join a firearms club to get a licence – to help police detect extremists. Gregg said his 2020 warning to NSW Police stressed that this was a vital task that could be funded via state and federal grants. Earlier this year, Gregg submitted his 2020 briefing to the ongoing royal commission.

Reforming Australia’s gun laws is a complex policing and political task, given the division of responsibilities and a patchwork of laws across states, territories and the Commonwealth and pressure from the gun lobby and some conservative politicians to protect the rights of the vast majority of law-abiding gun owners.

More than 900,000 people have a firearms licence in Australia, including more than 250,000 in NSW and 243,000 in Victoria.

Police in NSW and Victoria, along with insiders at the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, have also told this masthead on condition of anonymity, that state police gun licensing divisions remain vastly under-resourced and often seen as a backwater. These problems were untouched by the interim commission report.

In both states, a relatively small number of firearms licensing police oversee huge numbers of gun owners, with multiple sources claiming police in gun licensing teams are “overwhelmed”. NSW Police sources said there was also increasing concern that “sovereign citizens” with firearms licences could descend into extremism, while previous reporting by this masthead has exposed the efforts of Australia’s largest neo-Nazi group to obtain firearms via associates with gun permits.

For years before the Bondi attack, the NSW Firearms Registry had been beset with problems and Police Minister Yasmin Catley had described it a “shambles”. There were serious backlogs between 2020 and 2023, and it was normal for applications to take two to three years to be processed. It was not fully digitised until 2023.

In January 2017, a man called John Edwards was approved for a permit to shoot at sporting ranges. There were 18 previous incidents involving Edwards on the police database, 15 of which related to AVOs, stalking, assault allegations or so-called adverse interactions in relationships. The following year, Edwards shot and killed his two children.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39029

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578172 (070003ZMAY26) Notable: Identities of Islamic State-linked families revealed ahead of return and arrest in Australia - (Video) Australian Federal Police are preparing to arrest several women linked to Islamic State when a group of four women and nine children arrives in Australia from Syria this week. The families are expected to land in Sydney and Melbourne after travelling via Doha, ending years spent in detention camps in north-east Syria following the collapse of Islamic State. Authorities said some adults would face terrorism-related charges while others remained under investigation. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said agencies had been preparing for the return of Australians linked to Syria since 2014. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess said security agencies would continue monitoring the families after arrival. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the government was not assisting the return but warned anyone who committed offences could expect “the full force of the law”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38943

>>38944

>>38971

Identities of Islamic State-linked families revealed ahead of return and arrest in Australia

Matthew Knott - May 6, 2026

1/2

Australian federal police are ready to arrest multiple women with links to Islamic State when they arrive in Australia on Thursday, in a dramatic end to the families’ tumultuous efforts to flee dire conditions in a camp in north-east Syria.

Four women and nine children are expected to touch down on Thursday evening in Sydney and Melbourne, travelling via Doha, with police waiting for their arrival at the airport.

Sources familiar with the group’s travel plans said former health science student Janai Safar and her child were expected to arrive in Sydney, where the mother faces likely arrest.

Safar, 32, left Australia in 2015 to travel to Islamic State-occupied Syria. She was married to an Islamic State fighter who is believed to have died in 2017.

Grandmother Kawsar Abbas is expected to fly to Melbourne with her adult daughters Zeinab and Zahra Ahmed, and their eight children.

This masthead reported last month that the group of 13 women and children had plane tickets to Australia and hoped to leave Damascus within days.

Their planned arrival follows a failed attempt by the group to return home in February before they were turned around by local authorities.

Their bid to return to Australia has been politically contentious, with the Coalition demanding the Albanese government block the women from entering the country and US officials expressing frustration at Australia’s reluctance to take back its citizens.

The Albanese government organised a repatriation mission for four Australian women and 13 children from Syria in October 2022, but the political blowback convinced the government not to authorise any such missions again.

Burke stressed on Wednesday that the government was “not assisting and will not assist these individuals”.

A source close to the process said the Syrian government has been heavily involved in the travel plans, including transporting the group from al-Roj camp in the north-east of Syria, holding them while they were in Damascus and organising their flights back to Australia.

The source said there had been a “total information blackout” since the group left the camp, and even their families were unaware of their wellbeing and status.

Burke said Australia’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies had been preparing for their return since 2014, “and have long-standing plans in place to manage and monitor them”.

“These are people who have made the horrific choice to join a dangerous terrorist organisation and to place their children in an unspeakable situation,” Burke said. “As we have said many times, any members of this cohort who have committed crimes can expect to face the full force of the law.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39030

File: b33b50ceb674ee3⋯.jpg (1.41 MB,5457x3583,5457:3583,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4970d7c1165029c⋯.jpg (222.99 KB,1761x1173,587:391,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578245 (070040ZMAY26) Notable: What is known about the Islamic State-linked families about to arrive in Australia - Four women and nine children linked to Islamic State fighters are expected to return to Australia from Syria this week, with authorities preparing arrests, investigations and monitoring arrangements upon arrival. The group includes Janai Safar, who travelled to Islamic State-controlled Syria in 2015, and members of the Ahmed family from Melbourne, whose male relatives allegedly joined the terrorist organisation. The families have spent years in detention camps in north-east Syria following the collapse of Islamic State. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett confirmed some adults would be arrested after landing, while other investigations remained ongoing. The children will enter community integration and counter-extremism programs. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess said security agencies would continue monitoring the group and warned authorities would act if any individuals displayed signs of extremist behaviour after returning to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>39029

What is known about the Islamic State-linked families about to arrive in Australia

Nick Newling - May 6, 2026

Four women and nine children linked to Islamic State fighters are bound to arrive in Australia from Syria on Thursday, after Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Wednesday confirmed they had acquired plane tickets.

Members of the group have been attempting to return to Australia since the rise of IS’s self-proclaimed caliphate in 2015.

Here’s everything we know about their return and what awaits them.

Who are they?

Kawsar Abbas – The 54-year-old grandmother is expected to fly to Melbourne with her adult daughters Zeinab and Zahra Ahmed, and their children. Abbas is married to Mohammed Ahmed, who worked for the charity Global Humanitarian Aid, which was at one time suspected of directing resources towards Islamic State – a charge the family denies.

Mohammed claimed in 2019 that the family travelled to Syria to attend the wedding of his son, Omar, in 2014 before being trapped in the country when the border closed. A number of the men of the family fought for Islamic State. Kawsar insisted the women were unwitting victims.

Zahra Ahmed – The 33-year-old daughter of Kawsar Abbas and Mohammed Ahmed is the widow of IS recruiter Muhammad Zahab and has insisted she and her family travelled to Syria to do humanitarian work. She told this masthead that men in her family chose to join IS, but women had no choice but to follow.

Zeinab Ahmed – The 31-year-old sister of Zahra told the ABC last year that she feared for the safety of her children if they remained in Syria, and that other repatriations had made the cohort “so happy”.

Janai Safar – The 32-year-old former health science student is bound for Sydney alongside her child, born in 2016. She travelled to Islamic State-occupied Syria from Australia in 2015 and was married to an IS fighter who is believed to have died in 2017.

Safar told The Australian in 2019 that she would never return to Australia because she feared arrest and didn’t want her son growing up in a non-Islamic country. Her father, Samer Safar, said at the time he believed his daughter wanted to return to Australia, but was “stubborn”.

The four women will be joined by nine children. They were all part of a larger group of 34 people who unsuccessfully attempted to return to Australia in February.

Where were they?

The families had been living in the al-Roj refugee camp in the north-east of Syria near the Iraq border. US officials have been frustrated by the Australian government’s reluctance to repatriate the group, as they seek to shut down camps in Syria amid the war in Iran.

Last week, members of the group acquired plane tickets to Australia but were turned back by Syrian authorities while travelling to Damascus International Airport. Syrian authorities appear to have been heavily involved in transporting the group within the country, and holding them in Damascus while they await flights.

A Syrian government official said the Australian government “had the ultimate authority” and was the “deciding factor” in the group’s departure, according to reports by the ABC.

The official said the two-week hold-up in leaving Damascus was due to the Australian government’s delay in putting “procedures in place” for the arrival of the women and children.

What awaits them?

The federal government has long maintained that no support was provided to the group, and they would face “the full force of the law” upon their return. The group was furnished with passports – a right that can be exercised by all citizens.

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said on Wednesday some of the women would be arrested upon landing in Australia, but would not confirm how many.

Other members of the group will face “continued investigations”, while the nine children will “be asked to undergo community integration programs, therapeutic support and countering violent extremism programs”.

How will they be monitored?

Head of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, Mike Burgess, said he was not concerned by the cohort’s return, but confirmed the group would be monitored in Australia.

“It’s up to them what they do when they get here. If they start to exhibit signs of concern, we and the police, through the joint counter-terrorism teams, will take action,” Burgess said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/what-is-known-about-the-is-linked-families-about-to-arrive-in-australia-20260506-p5zuaz.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Muhammad+Zahab

https://qresear.ch/?q=Mariam+Raad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39031

File: 8e9de4b09343eef⋯.jpg (904.3 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cb2f97c6c88452c⋯.jpg (355.95 KB,1540x1460,77:73,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578252 (070043ZMAY26) Notable: More than $10 billion slated to boost fuel supplies and emergency stockpiles - The Albanese government will spend more than $10 billion to strengthen Australia’s fuel security and emergency reserves amid global supply disruptions linked to the Iran conflict and effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The package, to be detailed in next week’s budget, includes $7.5 billion in financial support enabling fuel companies to acquire and store additional stock, plus $3.7 billion to establish a government-owned reserve holding one billion litres of diesel and aviation fuel. Australia’s mandatory fuel stockholding requirements will also increase, lifting reserves of petrol, diesel and jet fuel. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the measures would improve “energy sovereignty” and resilience during future crises. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor welcomed expanded reserves but argued Australia should move further by increasing emergency fuel stockpiles to 60 days.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>38757

>>38894

>>38897

More than $10 billion slated to boost fuel supplies and emergency stockpiles

Stephanie Borys - 6 May 2026

More than $10 billion will be spent bolstering Australia's fuel security as the federal government attempts to shield the nation from the long-term consequences of the war in Iran.

Countries have been scrambling to secure adequate fuel, gas and fertiliser since the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising questions about whether Australia has adequate emergency stocks in times of crisis.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed next week's budget will include an Australian Fuel Security and Resilience package, which includes:

• increasing Australia's minimum stockholding obligation by a further 10 days;

• $7.5 billion in financial support for fuel companies to access loans, insurance and equity to purchase and store more stock;

• $3.7 billion to establish a government-owned fuel security reserve that would hold 1 billion litres of emergency diesel and aviation fuel.

Currently, refiners and importers are required to store between 20 and 32 days of emergency supplies, depending on the type of fuel they hold.

Under the proposal, which will require government and private-sector funding, Australia's mandatory petrol stockpiles will increase to about 37 days, while diesel and jet fuel will be about 50 days.

Mr Albanese said the details of how the package would be funded would be announced in Tuesday's budget.

"This is aimed at making sure that Australians can have more confidence in protecting our energy sovereignty, not just during this crisis, but going forward," he said.

$10 billion for more fuel and storage capacity

The government's new funding package includes $7.5 billion in financial support for fuel companies to access loans, insurance and equity so they can buy and store more fuel.

Fuel companies have already used a portion of that funding to acquire extra stock through the government's new strategic powers, which allow Export Finance Australia (EFA) to underwrite fuel purchases.

Ampol, BP Australia and Viva Energy have used the scheme to secure about 450 million litres of extra diesel and 100 million litres of additional jet fuel.

The government will also spend $3.7 billion to set up a government-owned fuel security reserve that would hold 1 billion litres of diesel and aviation fuel for use in times of crisis.

These stockpiles would be scattered across the country, and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said there would be a focus on regional areas.

"Australia is actually in a minority of countries in the International Energy Agency who don't have a government-owned fuel reserve," he said.

"This is a big change in our approach as a country and a good one."

Federal and state governments will spend $10 million to determine whether Australia needs new or expanded fuel refinery capabilities.

Currently, there are two refineries in the country.

Mr Albanese said the overall package would significantly boost supplies and increase the emergency stockpile.

"This will support an overall expansion of Australia's onshore fuel reserves to ensure at least 50 days of fuel supply and storage of diesel and aviation fuel," he said.

Opposition calls for large stockpiles

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said it was a no-brainer to boost supplies and stockholding obligations.

"We need more fuel stocks … the government needs to get on with it," he said.

The Coalition had already proposed to go further than the government's plan by increasing Australia's fuel stocks to 60 days.

Mr Taylor said the government's plan did not go far enough, but said he would look at the details and determine which elements the Coalition would support.

"The minimum stockholding obligation should get to 60 days," he said.

"I have laid out a pathway to do that. The government needs to get on with it. They are not going that far, and that is disappointing."

Climate Council director Greg Bourne said the government's announcement should have included a greater focus on renewable energy.

"I hope there's an encore because this is not an energy security plan, it's a short-term petrol supply plan," he said.

"This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to provide genuine energy security, with renewable energy that we own and control."

Australian Airports Association chief executive Simon Westaway welcomed the announcement.

"Increasing Australia's minimum stockholding of jet fuel will help ensure future supply disruptions can be better managed, while supporting continued connectivity for communities, tourism and business," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-06/government-commits-10-billion-for-australian-fuel-supply/106582514

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39032

File: 292bafa346f3190⋯.jpg (4.28 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 20228adfcdf5649⋯.jpg (3.2 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 870275bce2d5e00⋯.jpg (426.31 KB,1365x2048,1365:2048,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578278 (070055ZMAY26) Notable: One Nation defends campaign corflutes supporting Ben Roberts-Smith in Farrer by-election campaign - One Nation has defended campaign signage supporting Ben Roberts-Smith displayed outside pre-polling booths in the Farrer by-election, despite concerns about politicising military service and affecting ongoing legal proceedings. The corflutes feature the former SAS soldier alongside the slogan “He fought for us. One Nation stands with him” and were authorised by party leader Pauline Hanson. A One Nation spokesman said the campaign reflected the party’s support for military veterans. Mr Roberts-Smith faces five murder charges linked to alleged war crimes in Afghanistan, which he denies. Defence advised political parties to avoid using images of current or former Australian Defence Force personnel in campaign material. Legal experts also warned public commentary on matters before the courts could raise sub judice concerns and affect future proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856

>>38907

>>38958

>>39019

One Nation defends campaign corflutes supporting Ben Roberts-Smith in Farrer by-election campaign

Jess Scully - 6 May 2026

One Nation corflutes expressing support of alleged war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith, have been erected outside of pre-polling booths across southern NSW, ahead of this weekend's Farrer by-election.

The signage contains a photo of Mr Roberts-Smith in service dress beneath the words: "He fought for us. One Nation stands with him."

The ADF has advised political parties to avoid using images of current or former ADF personnel in campaign material, while legal experts have warned about the risks of commentary around matters that are currently before the courts.

One of the signs at the North Albury pre-poll for One Nation candidate David Farley said it was authorised by party leader Pauline Hanson.

The ABC approached Mr Farley for comment and was provided with a statement from a One Nation spokesperson.

"One Nation is the only party which has expressed support for Ben Roberts-Smith and we're making sure voters in Farrer - where many veterans live - know it," the One Nation spokesperson said.

"Our support for him reflects our strong commitment to support all Australian veterans much better than the Labor government currently does."

Mr Roberts-Smith has been charged with five counts of war crime murder, alleged to have occurred during tours in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

He has consistently denied the allegations throughout a high-stakes civil defamation case against Nine newspapers, which he lost in 2023.

Defence politicised

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) said Australian electoral laws do not regulate signage content beyond requiring an authorisation statement.

Military emblems are protected under the Defence Act 1903 and Trade Marks Act 1995.

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) does not comment on individual cases about ADF imagery being used as part of political campaigns, however, it advises parties not to.

"Defence respectfully requests political parties and those standing for political office to refrain from using imagery of former or current ADF personnel as part of any campaign material," a Defence spokesperson said in a statement.

One Nation did not respond to the ABC's questions when asked whether Mr Roberts-Smith, the Department of Defence or the Australian War Memorial had given consent to the use of the images.

Veteran and Greens Candidate in the Farrer by-election Richard Hendrie said it was important Defence stayed apolitical.

"They're there to serve the interests of the foreign policy and domestic policy of the government of the day and the parliament of the day," he said.

Mr Hendrie said he was not comfortable with the use of Mr Roberts-Smith, or any veteran, in political discourse.

"I'm a veteran myself, it's caused me a lot of angst and distress. The veteran community is entitled to be heard on this issue and that's a healthy thing in democracy," he said.

"But what I object to … is having the veteran community used for political motivations or interference."

Sub judice concerns

The signs may impact proceedings before the courts under sub judice contempt laws.

"Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG is entitled to the presumption of innocence," Mr Hendrie said.

"Political parties need to distance themselves from these matters and let the courts do their job."

University of Sydney Law School Professor David Rolph said messages of support about a matter before the court could impact proceedings under the principle of sub judice.

"There have been examples in the past of prominent people who have made statements in support or against people who have found themselves on the wrong end of sub judice contempt," he said.

Professor Rolph said the laws existed to protect the presumption of innocence of an alleged offender, and to ensure a fair trial before the courts and not the "court of public opinion".

He said courts may impose non-publication orders that could impact the reporting of the trial if the courts deemed there to be a case of prejudicial publicity.

"Open justice is a really fundamental part of our legal system because for centuries we've proceeded on the basis that justice not only needs to be done, but needs to be seen to be done," Professor Rolph said.

"That constrains what the public can know about what's going on."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-06/one-nation-signs-support-ben-roberts-smith/106643228

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39033

File: 41a6d59cb1bb8a9⋯.jpg (985.8 KB,2600x1921,2600:1921,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d489ead8fb2a643⋯.jpg (410.27 KB,2600x1734,1300:867,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0135d8e3e9f3016⋯.jpg (601.99 KB,2600x1734,1300:867,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5e7ab87bf287f04⋯.jpg (424.7 KB,2600x1734,1300:867,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 077faf8c9216496⋯.jpg (669.88 KB,2600x1734,1300:867,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578419 (070152ZMAY26) Notable: Takaichi’s ‘kneeling’ tribute in Australian war memorial sparks controversy; a political calculation aimed at pleasing West, but offensive to Asian neighbors: Chinese expert - "Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, a prominent right-wing figure who has repeatedly offered tributes at the notorious Yasukuni Shrine which enshrines Class-A war criminals directly responsible for wars of aggression during the WWII, surprised many during her recent visit to Australia, during which she knelt on both knees in front of the Tomb of the Unknown Australian Soldier to lay flowers at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. Her such act has sparked controversy online, with many criticizing it a hypocritical political performance aiming to appease the West and showing the Japanese leader's white supremacy complex. A Chinese expert commented that Takaichi's behavior is full of political calculation and is offensive to Japan's Asian neighboring countries ... Despite the efforts of Japanese authorities and mainstream press to frame the event as a simple floral offering while downplaying the act of kneeling, the move indeed sparked controversy on the internet ... Xiang Haoyu, a distinguished research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday that Takaichi's "kneeling" is a world apart from former German Chancellor Willy Brandt's act of kneeling on both knees in front of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Memorial. "The latter represented genuine reflection and respect. In contrast, Takaichi's behavior is full of political calculation and has offended Japan's Asian neighboring countries." "This is merely a political show designed to please Western allies. It is not sincere repentance at all. If Japan truly wants to reflect and show genuine remorse, it should first properly answer and make amends to its Asian neighboring countries," Xiang noted. "The voices of supporting Takaichi to visit Yasukuni Shrine precisely reflects the spread of erroneous historical views within Japan, where right and wrong are blurred," the Chinese expert warned." - Deng Xiaoci, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39001

>>39010

>>39011

>>39018

Takaichi’s ‘kneeling’ tribute in Australian war memorial sparks controversy; a political calculation aimed at pleasing West, but offensive to Asian neighbors: Chinese expert

Deng Xiaoci - May 06, 2026

1/2

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, a prominent right-wing figure who has repeatedly offered tributes at the notorious Yasukuni Shrine which enshrines Class-A war criminals directly responsible for wars of aggression during the WWII, surprised many during her recent visit to Australia, during which she knelt on both knees in front of the Tomb of the Unknown Australian Soldier to lay flowers at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra.

Her such act has sparked controversy online, with many criticizing it a hypocritical political performance aiming to appease the West and showing the Japanese leader's white supremacy complex. A Chinese expert commented that Takaichi's behavior is full of political calculation and is offensive to Japan's Asian neighboring countries.

On May 4, Japan's Prime Minister's Office released a statement saying that Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who is visiting Canberra, the Commonwealth of Australia, laid a wreath at the Australian War Memorial during her visit to Canberra. The statement was accompanied by a photo of Takaichi kneeling on both knees while offering the flowers.

According to a post by the office, later on May 4, Takaichi also planted a tree at the Canberra Nara Peace Park and offered flowers and silent prayers at the memorial for the late former Japanese prime minister Abe Shinzo.

Based on public information available online, the Australian War Memorial (AWM), located in Campbell, a suburb of Australian capital city of Canberra, is a national war memorial, museum and archive dedicated to all Australians who have died as a result of war. In 1993, the Tomb of the Unknown Australian Soldier was installed inside the Memorial Building's Hall of Memory.

Although the memorial was initially envisioned to only commemorate those who had died as the result of the WWI, the institution's scope was changed to include service-members of the WWII in 1939, service-members from all other wars in 1952, and all Australians who died in conflict in 1975.

Japanese major media outlets, including the Nikkei, Jiji Press, and Asahi Shimbun, have simply outlined the itinerary and focused on the floral tribute while omitting the kneeling at the AWM. Instead, Global Times reporters noticed that Japanese local media such as the Sankei Shimbun has covered Takaichi's tribute to Abe's later on the day with more details, and highlighted that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was accompanying her and also honored the late former Japanese prime minister.

Despite the efforts of Japanese authorities and mainstream press to frame the event as a simple floral offering while downplaying the act of kneeling, the move indeed sparked controversy on the internet.

Some Japanese netizens said they approved of the gesture. Posting a video of Takaichi's visit to the AWM, Japanese netizen @don_mai_don_mai claimed in a post that "Prime Minister Takaichi visits the Australian War Memorial and lays a wreath. With the bond between Japan and Australia in heart, renewing the pledge for peace."

There is also a wave of backlash and criticism has also emerged among Japanese netizens

X user @ChiakTokai, taking a more extreme right-wing stance, claimed that "I'm not saying it's a bad thing to kneel at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier...But look, please pay your respects at Yasukuni Shrine before you do that!!"

However, there are also strong criticizing voices, especially over the double standards toward Asian neighboring countries. X user @SUZUKIYASUSHI55 wrote in Japanese that "Prime Minister Takaichi is pictured at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra, kneeling as she offers flowers at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. If she could show this same humility toward our neighbors, we might actually have peace. Instead, her stubbornness continues to escalate tensions with neighboring countries."

"I wonder why she can do this for Australia but not for East Asia. Is it because they're white? We've been taught since we were kids that apologizing is the bigger move and refusing to is just pathetic - so what happened there?" wrote another @rien4048323.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39034

File: e8de37a06a9ad42⋯.jpg (213.7 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d60527ae8b88321⋯.jpg (553.64 KB,2500x1563,2500:1563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bee67a36ba09bd0⋯.jpg (143.29 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578951 (070604ZMAY26) Notable: Australian Psychological Society slammed over gender care backflip - The Australian Psychological Society has faced criticism after releasing a revised position statement supporting gender-affirming care for children and teenagers while removing references to the United Kingdom’s Cass review and other studies questioning aspects of the treatment model. Retired clinical psychologist Sandra Pertot said the changes abandoned a more evidence-based and exploratory approach contained in an earlier draft, describing the outcome as a “betrayal” of members and taskforce contributors. Emeritus professor Dianna Kenny called the final statement “a disgraceful denial of evidence-based medicine”, while child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer labelled it “dangerously out-of-date”. APS president Kelly Gough defended the document, saying it was guided by “current evidence and ethical practice” and reflected a commitment to “respectful, person-centred, evidence-informed support” for people experiencing gender distress.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38731

>>38732

Australian Psychological Society slammed over gender care backflip

STEPHEN RICE - April 16, 2026

1/2

Australia’s peak psychology body has been labelled “disgraceful” and “dangerously outdated” after supporting gender-affirming medical care for children and teenagers, an about-face on its previous recommendations for a more evidence-based approach to dealing with gender dysphoria.

In a newly released position paper, the Australian Psychological Society deleted references in an earlier draft to the ground-breaking UK Cass report and more than a dozen other studies that cast doubt on the mental health claims of the gender-­affirming treatment model.

Statements in the 2024 draft document that “medical gender affirmation is not the only way to support transition” and more research was needed to determine long-term impacts have been entirely removed from the 2026 final position statement.

The revisions appear to have occurred after the draft was handed to an internal APS body called the Psychology of Diverse Bodies, Genders, and Sexualities Interest Group, according to clinical psychologist Sandra Pertot.

That was a “betrayal” of APS’s 25,000 members and “an insult to the taskforce members who spent their time and energy working towards a genuine consensus document’, Dr Pertot said.

The review was set up in 2022 after Dr Pertot successfully fought a complaint to the APS over suggesting that a comprehensive assessment of any ­gender-questioning young person was needed to arrive at the safest diagnosis for an individual.

While the 2024 draft report contained much with which Dr Pertot disagreed, it made reference to studies like the Cass review and acknowledged the marked increase in the number of young people being referred to medical gender clinics, “the reasons for which are debated”.

The draft also stated that “aspects of transition may not necessarily reduce the risk of suicide” and noted that the use of a new name or pronouns in children who were yet to be assessed might be considered “a form of active intervention”.

All these references have been deleted from the final position statement.

Dr Pertot said a common grievance of dissatisfied clients was that the clinician simply affirmed their belief they were transgender in the first session.

“I naively assumed that an in-depth assessment would be mandatory in the new APS document,” Dr Pertot wrote in a piece for the online Gender Clinic News.

“Instead, proper assessment comes across as just a possible option, outweighed by the dogma that if a client says they are trans, they are trans, and must be affirmed immediately, for example, by asking them their pronouns.”

Dr Pertot told The Australian she was able to speak publicly because she was recently retired “but many of my colleagues are just too scared to say anything – it’s nuts. So many people just won’t speak out because they know they’ll be called a bigoted transphobic. It’s awful and very hard to come back from.”

“I’ve worked with trans people throughout my 50-year career. The problem is not denying their existence, it’s that we have to be really sure that we’ve come to the right diagnosis,” she said.

“We have a responsibility to take our time to consider possibilities and some of these kids are likely not to be trans.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39035

File: 3f03191799961b8⋯.jpg (250.5 KB,2008x1129,2008:1129,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fe94272e5b2a303⋯.jpg (298.73 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578972 (070622ZMAY26) Notable: Australian psychologists treating gender distress may be working from a flawed evidence base - Claire Lehmann, editor of online magazine Quillette, has criticised the Australian Psychological Society’s revised position statement on gender-affirming care, arguing the organisation removed references to major international reviews and evidence questioning aspects of medical transition treatment for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. Lehmann states the United Kingdom’s Cass Review found evidence supporting puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors was limited and methodologically weak, contributing to Britain restricting some treatments and closing the Tavistock gender clinic. Lehmann argues the APS deleted references to the review and softened earlier draft cautions about long-term outcomes, suicide risk and the importance of exploratory assessment before affirmation. Lehmann also cites clinicians including Sandra Pertot, who warned psychologists could face professional or legal risks for using exploratory therapy approaches rather than immediate affirmation under conversion therapy laws operating in several Australian states. Lehmann argues the APS should revisit its guidance and more fully incorporate emerging international evidence into future policy development.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

Australian psychologists treating gender distress may be working from a flawed evidence base

CLAIRE LEHMANN - April 18, 2026

1/3

As an undergraduate psychology student in the early 2000s, I remember hearing jokes about “physics envy” – the insecurity that research psychologists sometimes felt about the robustness of their science. To compensate for this insecurity, we were put through the wringer on statistics and research design. It was hammered into us by our professors that all findings were provisional. If we were to go out into the world as proficient practitioners, we needed to stay across the best available evidence, and continually update our knowledge.

That insecurity wasn’t always warranted, of course. In some areas such as intelligence and personality research, psychological studies are highly robust. Nevertheless, psychology does remain a young science and evidence-based practice requires reading new research as it emerges. What counts as consensus today may not tomorrow.

This is easier said than done. Psychologists, like all practising professionals, are busy. Working clinicians rely on their professional bodies to summarise the literature, produce position statements that reflect current best practice and update them as the evidence evolves. The Australian Psychological Society is the largest such body for psychologists in Australia, and its 27,000 members pay annual fees expecting exactly this: reliable guidance they can trust when they don’t have time to read every journal.

This month, the APS has demonstrated it is unable to deliver this remit. Its new position statement, “Supporting the mental health and wellbeing of transgender and gender diverse people”, sacrifices scientific rigour for activism. It relies on circular reasoning, leans heavily on guidelines that are six years out of date and ignores the most significant reviews in this field. The result is that Australian psychologists treating children and young adults with gender distress may be working from a flawed evidence base.

As our professors drilled into us: unless we are certain our interventions are safe, there is always the possibility of causing harm. Damage is not caused only by mental health conditions. Damage also can be caused by our efforts to fix them.

Damning findings

In April 2024, the National Health Service of England published the Cass Review, the most rigorous inquiry conducted into care for gender-dysphoric children. It took four years to complete and was chaired by Hilary Cass, a retired pediatrician and former president of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health. The findings were damning.

The review found that the evidence base underpinning what is called gender-affirming treatment – which affirms the cross-sex identity of a young person presenting with dysphoria – was consistently poor. Gender-affirming treatment had spread around the world based on a single Dutch study involving a small, highly selected group of children who took puberty blockers and found some benefit. That study had no control group. Most participants didn’t complete a follow-up. It was too short to measure long-term effects on bone density or brain health.

It is difficult to imagine a weaker foundation for an international standard of care – but that is exactly what it became.

As a result of gender-affirming treatment being taken up so quickly, with so few studies to support it, gender-dysphoric youth had been “exceptionalised”, the Cass Review found. They were treated differently from other young people with complex needs.

They had been rushed on to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones while other causes of distress, such as trauma or autism, were ignored. They were given drugs by doctors when no long-term data had proven their safety. The usual caution that guides medical care for children went out the window.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39036

File: 10eb9d9179b44a5⋯.jpg (410.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc37e0542fa0290⋯.jpg (251.66 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24578982 (070641ZMAY26) Notable: Trans doctor Beth Upton at centre of UK dispute now working in Australia - Transgender doctor Beth Upton, who was involved in a high-profile United Kingdom legal dispute over female workplace spaces, has been registered by Australia’s medical regulator as “female” and is now working in two NSW hospitals under provisional supervision. Dr Upton previously gave evidence in a UK tribunal involving Scottish nurse Sandie Peggie, who challenged being required to share female hospital changing facilities with Dr Upton, who is biologically male and transitioned in 2022. The case prompted wider debate about sex-based rights, gender identity and workplace policies in healthcare settings. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency confirmed Dr Upton holds provisional registration in Australia. Advocacy groups criticised the decision, while Equality Australia defended the registration and said healthcare systems routinely manage patient preferences while respecting qualified practitioners.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

Trans doctor Beth Upton at centre of UK dispute now working in Australia

RACHEL BAXENDALE - April 21, 2026

1/3

Australia’s medical regulator has registered as “female” the transgender doctor at the centre of a landmark UK legal dispute over women’s spaces, allowing the emergency medic to work in two NSW hospitals.

Beth Upton, 30, who began transitioning from male to female in 2022, gave sworn evidence to the UK Employment Tribunal of an intention to treat patients who had specifically requested a female doctor.

Under oath, the medic also described the concept of biological sex as a “nebulous dog whistle”, claiming to be “biologically female” on the basis that “I’m not a robot, so I am biological and my identity is female”.

The case — which has so far cost UK taxpayers the equivalent of more than $750,000 — was brought by Scottish nurse Sandie Peggie, 56, after she was suspended from work as an NHS accident and emergency nurse for refusing to share staff female changing facilities with the biologically male Dr Upton.

In December, the tribunal upheld Ms Peggie’s harassment claim against her employer, NHS Fife, but dismissed claims of discrimination and victimisation over the Christmas 2023 incident. No findings have been made against Dr Upton.

Ms Peggie is appealing the ruling and could take the dispute all the way to the UK Supreme Court.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registered Dr Elisabeth Ruth Annikki Upton as an unaccredited emergency medicine trainee on April 9, listing the medic’s sex as “female”.

AHPRA defines a “female” as any individual “whose biological sex is that of a female” and anyone whose “gender identity or gender expression is that of a female”.

The registration enables Dr Upton, previously Theodore Upton, who graduated with a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery from the University of Dundee in 2021, to work under supervision at the Port Macquarie and Kempsey hospitals on the NSW Mid North Coast.

The Australian put questions to AHPRA over whether the regulator believes it is appropriate to register biologically male medical practitioners as female, and allow them to treat potentially vulnerable patients who have specifically requested a female doctor.

This masthead has also asked, given the relevance of biological sex to the treatment of many medical conditions, whether AHPRA believes it is appropriate to register a medical doctor who claims the concept of biological sex is a “nebulous dog whistle”.

A spokesman for AHPRA and Australia’s national medical boards did not directly address these questions, issuing a one-line statement.

“We can confirm that Dr Elisabeth Ruth Annikki Upton holds provisional registration as a medical practitioner in Australia, as shown on the public register of practitioners,” said the spokesman, who noted “he/him” pronouns in his email signature.

AHPRA says its registration process involves verifying an applicant’s identity, with applicants able to indicate their sex as male, female or intersex, and that information recorded and confirmed against legal identity documents.

In the UK, people with a psychiatric diagnosis of gender dysphoria, who have lived according to their chosen gender identity for two years, are able to change their legal sex, as Dr Upton has done.

In Australian states including NSW and Victoria, no medical test is required, and individuals simply need to present a statutory declaration signed by someone who has known them for at least 12 months to legally change their sex.

AHPRA says that when registering overseas-trained medical practitioners, it requires a certificate of good standing from its counterpart in the applicant’s country of registration, as well as local and international criminal history checks.

Overseas-trained doctors such as Dr Upton are initially given provisional registration, requiring them to work under supervision while they become familiar with the Australian health system.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39037

File: a59284bfc530d1f⋯.jpg (780.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 17f962d692ca8f1⋯.jpg (256.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1f851c9cf33abe8⋯.jpg (212.94 KB,741x953,741:953,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579005 (070724ZMAY26) Notable: Peak medical regulator ‘compromised’ by partnership with trans lobby group - Australia’s medical regulator AHPRA has faced criticism over its partnership with advocacy organisation ACON, with doctors and psychiatrists claiming the relationship undermines confidence in the regulator’s neutrality on gender medicine. Documents obtained under freedom of information laws show AHPRA incorporated guidance from ACON-linked inclusion programs into broader regulatory and workplace strategies. Critics, including child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer and a coalition of health professionals, argued the regulator appeared aligned with gender-affirming treatment approaches while investigating clinicians who publicly questioned aspects of gender medicine for minors. AHPRA rejected suggestions its engagement with community organisations compromised impartiality, saying regulatory decisions were based on evidence and public safety considerations. ACON also denied exerting influence beyond workplace inclusion programs and defended its role in supporting equity and inclusion initiatives.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

Peak medical regulator ‘compromised’ by partnership with trans lobby group

STEPHEN RICE - April 22, 2026

1/3

Australia’s peak medical regulator faces claims it has been hopelessly compromised in a string of controversial decisions because it is a signed-up member of Australia’s most powerful trans lobby group, ACON, which promotes gender-affirming medical treatment for children and teenagers.

Documents released under FOI reveal how the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency developed an LGBTIQA+ strategy based on adherence to the gender ideology of ACON, extending to the way it regulates health practitioners.

In correspondence obtained by The Australian, AHPRA boss Justin Untersteiner states that the regulator’s engagement with ACON and accreditation group Rainbow Health Australia guides “the way we regulate and fulfil our purpose of ensuring the preservation of public safety”.

The revelations follow claims Australia’s medical complaints system has been weaponised by gender activists using a compliant regulator to intimidate psychiatrists who speak out against gender-affirming treatment such as puberty blockers, while shielding doctors who promote them.

In recent decisions AHPRA has:

• Gagged Queensland psychiatrist Andrew Amos, banning him from making online statements about gender medicine and barring him from having direct clinical contact with any patients.

• Launched an investigation into prominent child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer for sharing on social media an article from The Australian that quoted her concerns about gender-affirming medical treatment for children.

• Registered as “female” the transgender doctor at the centre of a landmark UK legal dispute over women’s spaces, Beth Upton, allowing the emergency medic to work in two NSW hospitals.

• Dismissed a complaint against Michelle Telfer, chief of medicine at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, who pioneered the contentious gender-affirming treatment approach in Australia, following adverse findings against her by a Family Court judge.

Despite mounting concern from dozens of registered health professionals over AHPRA’s partnership with ACON, the National Health Practitioner Ombudsman has refused a request to launch an investigation into “serious concerns about perceived impartiality”.

Compounding the lack of transparency, AHPRA has also fought to keep key documents hidden from the public, partially refusing FOI requests to protect its deliberations with the lobby groups.

Code of conduct

On its website AHPRA advises that all registered health practitioners must adhere to a code of conduct, explicitly stating that good practice includes respecting diverse gender identities.

AHPRA declares it is “working with Pride in Diversity to ensure LGBTIQA+ inclusion in our workplace and participate in the Australian Workplace Equality Index”.

Both Pride in Diversity and the AWEI are arms of ACON, formerly known as the NSW Aids Council.

As the nation’s self-appointed arbiter of “workplace inclusion” for trans employees, ACON boasts that more than 500 member employers – including Australia’s largest government agencies, public and private companies, universities and research organisations – have signed up to its trans rights agenda.

This month the ABC was forced to abandon its partnership with ACON, following revelations that the broadcaster’s news and programming had been heavily influenced by the radical agenda of the trans lobby group.

AHPRA has consistently defended its participation in the AWEI and Rainbow Tick schemes by claiming they are designed only to help trans and gender-diverse employees in the workplace.

However, documents obtained under FOI suggest that AHPRA’s functions have been strongly influenced by its relationship with ACON.

Captured

Internal communications show AHPRA actively sought to use the advocacy-run schemes to guide its external operations and policies as a national health regulator.

In a December 2023 “Members Meeting” with Pride in Diversity, the ACON representative recorded a discussion about AHPRA’s “desire as a health regulator to be working on the service delivery/to consumer side of things now that the portfolio has opened to allow access to both Pride in Diversity and Pride in Health +Wellbeing content”.

The exchanges reflect the development of a structured commercial relationship, with ACON’s Pride in Diversity promoting specific training and consultancy packages, membership hours and renewal as part of AHPRA’s strategy work.

In a February 2024 National Executive agenda paper marked “In Confidence”, AHPRA details the development of a “National Scheme LGBTIQA+ Equity and Inclusion Strategy”, revealing the capture of regulatory processes was explicitly planned.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39038

File: a59284bfc530d1f⋯.jpg (780.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5bc3e3fa3d1fa2b⋯.jpg (251.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579031 (070746ZMAY26) Notable: AHPRA accused of ‘ideological capture’ amid calls to sever links with ACON - Australia’s medical regulator AHPRA has faced renewed criticism over its relationship with advocacy organisation ACON, with women’s rights groups and parents of gender-distressed adolescents claiming the regulator has become ideologically compromised on gender medicine issues. Critics argued AHPRA’s ties to ACON and related inclusion programs undermined confidence in its impartiality, particularly following regulatory action against psychiatrists Andrew Amos and Jillian Spencer, who publicly questioned aspects of gender-affirming treatment for minors. Women’s Forum Australia chief executive Rachael Wong accused AHPRA of suppressing clinical debate and prioritising ideology over evidence-based medicine. Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress also criticised the regulator’s handling of complaints and called for greater transparency. AHPRA has maintained its regulatory decisions are guided by public safety obligations and existing legal confidentiality requirements.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

>>39037

AHPRA accused of ‘ideological capture’ amid calls to sever links with ACON

RACHEL BAXENDALE - April 23, 2026

1/2

Women’s rights advocates and parents of gender-distressed adolescents say Australia’s peak medical regulator cannot be trusted to safeguard the health and safety of the Australian public if it does not cut ties with trans lobby group ACON.

The Australian revealed on Thursday documents released under FOI, showing how the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency developed an LGBTIQA+ strategy based on adherence to the gender ideology of ACON, extending to the way it regulates health practitioners.

In correspondence obtained by The Australian, AHPRA boss Justin Untersteiner states that the regulator’s engagement with ACON and accreditation group Rainbow Health Australia guides “the way we regulate and fulfil our purpose of ensuring the preservation of public safety”.

Women’s Forum Australia CEO Rachael Wong said an institution that had been “captured by an anti-scientific ideology that says human beings can change sex, that men can be women, that children can be born in the wrong body, and that denies biological reality, cannot be trusted to safeguard the health and safety of the Australian public”.

“As we have seen, the consequences of this ideological capture across Australian institutions have been most dire for vulnerable children and young people who have been irreversibly damaged by medical gender interventions, as well as for women and girls whose sex-based rights and protections are being destroyed,” Ms Wong said.

She referred to the cases of psychiatrist Andrew Amos, who in March was banned by AHPRA from making online statements about gender medicine and barred from having direct clinical contact with patients, and fellow child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer, who is being investigated by the regulator after she shared on social media an article from The Australian in which she was quoted regarding Dr Amos’s case.

Ms Wong’s comments also follow The Australian’s revelation on Tuesday that AHPRA has registered as “female” Beth Upton, the transgender doctor at the centre of a landmark UK legal dispute over women’s spaces, allowing the emergency medic to work in two NSW hospitals.

“Rather than taking a scientific, evidence-based approach, AHPRA has instead persecuted doctors trying to raise the alarm about the harm being done to children and young people, and has registered multiple trans-identified male doctors as ‘female’ knowing full well the issues this raises for single-sex spaces and care, and the privacy and consent of female colleagues and patients,” Ms Wong said.

“Its approach has contributed to a chilling effect on legitimate clinical debate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39039

File: 9c2dc914603bcb9⋯.jpg (363.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a58b1aa2266669⋯.jpg (691.51 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579051 (070757ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Take my treatment as a warning’: Psychiatrist Andrew Amos suspended for opposing youth gender treatments - Queensland psychiatrist Andrew Amos has been suspended by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists following earlier restrictions imposed by AHPRA and the Medical Board of Australia over his public comments opposing gender-affirming treatment for children and teenagers. Dr Amos said the college suspended his membership without warning or procedural fairness, while the college stated the move was an interim governance measure linked to restrictions on his medical practice. The National Association of Practising Psychiatrists criticised the decision and questioned whether regulators were suppressing dissenting views on gender medicine. NAPP president Philip Morris also raised concerns about AHPRA’s relationship with advocacy organisation ACON, arguing the regulator risked appearing aligned with one side of a contested medical debate regarding puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

>>39037

>>39038

‘Take my treatment as a warning’: Psychiatrist Andrew Amos suspended for opposing youth gender treatments

STEPHEN RICE - April 24, 2026

1/2

Australia’s peak psychiatry body has suspended prominent Queens­land psychiatrist Andrew Amos over his public statements opposing gender-affirming medical treatment for children and teenagers, in a move that has sent shockwaves through the medical profession.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists has withdrawn Dr Amos’s membership just weeks after the Medical Board of Australia and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency gagged him from making online statements about gender issues and barred him from clinical contact with patients.

In a measure of the split now dividing the profession on gender issues, the National Association of Practising Psychiatrists wrote to the RANZCP on Thursday asking it to support Dr Amos and defend his freedom of speech, only to discover that the college had ­already suspended him.

The upheaval comes after The Australian revealed claims that AHPRA’s membership of trans lobby group ACON compromised its ability to deal fairly with doctors who oppose gender-­affirming medical treatment for young people.

Dr Amos, an academic psychiatrist at James Cook University, said the RANZCP board gave him no warning of their decision to suspend his membership or ­opportunity to discuss it, “so I have no idea why they did it”.

“They had the authority to suspend me, but they also had the responsibility to provide procedural fairness, which they utterly failed to do.”

The board had not asked for his side of the story, Dr Amos said, “which proves they had no interest in a balanced decision.”

“Every psychiatrist who is a member of the RANZCP should take my treatment as a warning that the board cannot be trusted to honour its commitments to members.”

Dr Amos said one week after signing an agreement with him to resolve their differences, the board suspended his membership without warning or discussion, “which allowed them to avoid fulfilling their obligations to me”.

The suspension strips Dr Amos of the right to use the letters FRANZCP – Fellow of the RANZCP – the prestigious notation that he is qualified to practice as a specialist psychiatrist and has met rigorous standards of trust and clinical leadership.

A spokesperson for the RANZCP said the board had suspended the membership of Dr Andrew Amos “in response to significant restrictions placed on his right to practise by the AHPRA”.

“Under the college’s constitution, the board has a responsibility to act where a member’s right to practise is subject to regulatory restriction. This is an interim governance measure, taken to protect the integrity and standards of the college pending further review.”

The college did not respond to questions about why Dr Amos had not been given the opportunity to discuss the decision, or whether it was using its authority to silence legitimate concerns within the profession about psychiatric practice.

NAPP president Philip Morris said he had written to the RANZCP asking whether it had made attempts to support or defend Dr Amos, but did not want to provide details until the college had had a chance to reply.

Professor Morris said the RANZCP “has its head in the sand on these issues”.

“The college doesn’t want to touch it because it’s too frightened that it’s going to offend the pro-trans people. And it’s also frightened it’s going to offend the more conservative people, so it’s basically given no real guidance.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39040

File: a7e29197d7ae543⋯.jpg (327.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d0c0f420ae79ee⋯.jpg (153.13 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0ad84790c3d3d35⋯.jpg (114.32 KB,800x800,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579064 (070813ZMAY26) Notable: APS board member accused of ‘intimidation’ after questioning mother of detransitioned son - The Australian Psychological Society is reviewing correspondence from board member Andrew Chua after a mother accused him of “intimidation” during an exchange about the society’s position on gender-affirming care. The mother, whose adult son medically transitioned before later deciding he was not transgender, had written to the APS expressing concern about the organisation’s revised position statement on gender dysphoria treatment. In emails responding on behalf of the board, Mr Chua questioned whether the son had received “appropriate support”, prompting the mother to allege the exchange implied parents critical of the affirmation model could be viewed as harmful to their children. APS president Kelly Gough said the correspondence would be reviewed and stressed the organisation did not regard parents raising concerns as abusive or dangerous.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

>>39037

>>39038

>>39039

APS board member accused of ‘intimidation’ after questioning mother of detransitioned son

RACHEL BAXENDALE - April 27, 2026

1/2

The Australian Psychological Society is reviewing the correspondence of one of its own board members, after he suggested a mother who had expressed concern about the peak body’s controversial position on the treatment of transgender patients may have been preventing her son from receiving appropriate support.

The mother, whose 22-year-old son began medically transitioning with hormones at 18 but has decided he is not transgender, has accused APS board member Andrew Chua of “intimidation”.

She said his “completely outrageous” emails had insinuated that parents who dare to question the gender affirmation model “are to be viewed as potentially abusive and dangerous to their children”, and left her feeling “unsafe”.

Earlier this month, the APS issued a position paper which represented an about-face on its previous recommendations for a more evidence-based approach to dealing with gender dysphoria, deleting references in an earlier draft to the groundbreaking UK Cass report and more than a dozen other studies that cast doubt on the mental health claims of the gender-­affirming treatment model.

In response, the mother wrote to the APS board on April 11.

Key among her concerns was the society’s support for gender-affirming care for children and teenagers, which in her view denies patients and clinicians the ­opportunity to neutrally explore their feelings about their gender identity, and puts them on a path towards irreversible medical treatment, such as the hormones her son received.

Mr Chua responded to her email on behalf of the board, stating that a “common misunderstanding in this space is that ‘affirming care’ assumes we accept all information provided without critical questioning”.

The pair then exchanged a series of emails, with Mr Chua at no stage explaining how it was possible for a psychologist to engage in the “critical questioning” he had described when the APS position statement advises them that they must affirm a patient’s self-diagnosed identity.

In his third and final email to the mother, Mr Chua asserted: “It sounds like you chose to prevent (your son) engaging with appropriate medical or psychological care in Australia.

“You have not supplied any details of how he has been treated and what his current state of wellbeing is (now as an adult) and whether he feels supported with sound community around him now,” he wrote. “Your comments have raised my concerns that he might not have the appropriate support he deserves at this time.”

Mr Chua signed all emails “warmly” noting “he/him” pronouns and his location “on Wurundjeri Country”.

The mother wrote to the board to complain about Mr Chua, saying he had left her “feeling unsafe”.

“In response to my entirely natural frustration at the APS’s recent position statement, Mr Chua has chosen to suggest that my child is at risk because of me,” wrote the mother, whom The Australian has agreed not to name to protect her son’s privacy.

“This is not professional discourse; it is intimidation. It sends a clear message to every parent of a detransitioned or desisted child that raising concerns about the affirmation model may result in their parenting being questioned or reported as a safeguarding issue.

“Not only are Australian psychologists being warned away from offering truly neutral, exploratory therapy, but apparently parents of children who have desisted or detransitioned, and who dare to question such a model, are to be viewed as potentially abusive and dangerous to their children. This is completely outrageous.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39041

File: 7518308d4c8761a⋯.jpg (853.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c14582d4af7f2cf⋯.jpg (96.43 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6b70dc0034c3bc8⋯.jpg (445.93 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 36d3f1122ed75c1⋯.jpg (150.44 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579069 (070826ZMAY26) Notable: Parents plead for change to ‘highly irresponsible’ gender claims - Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress has urged the Australian Human Rights Commission to revise information materials supporting gender-affirming care, arguing the resources contain “misleading and inaccurate claims” about treatment for children experiencing gender dysphoria. The group, representing more than 50 families, said the materials relied too heavily on advocacy organisations while failing to adequately address disputed evidence, possible long-term health risks and experiences of detransitioned young people. The concerns follow the commission’s Equal Identities report endorsing gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers. PAGD said some children later improved after therapy addressing issues such as trauma, anxiety or autism without medical transition. The Australian Human Rights Commission defended the explainers, saying they were designed to outline legal protections and human rights obligations rather than provide clinical advice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

>>39037

>>39038

>>39039

>>39040

Parents plead for change to ‘highly irresponsible’ gender claims

STEPHEN RICE - April 28, 2026

A group representing more than 50 parents of children with gender dysphoria has slammed Australia’s peak human rights body as “highly irresponsible” over explainers it says contain “misleading and inaccurate claims”.

Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress (PAGD) has written to the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) pleading for an urgent review and revision of the materials to include balanced, evidence-based information.

“These explainers rely on and reference advocacy organisations in preference to independent peer-reviewed systematic reviews and contain misleading and inaccurate claims,” the PAGD says in a letter to AHRC president Hugh de Kretser.

“The highly controversial nature of these interventions is not conveyed, nor are the significant limitations in the evidence base quoted to justify their use.”

The group says that several of their children have now “desisted or detransitioned” and are flourishing after receiving therapy addressing underlying issues like autism, trauma or anxiety.

These benefits have been achieved “without resorting to irreversible interventions with known and unknown health complications”, it says.

“In contrast, benefits to wellbeing and mental health, claimed by these materials, have failed to appear, as families in our group can attest, having witnessed complications, regret and worsening mental health following hormonal or surgical interventions.”

The move comes on the eve of an address by Mr de Krestner to the National Press Club on Wednesday and follows the release in March of the AHRC’s Equal Identities report endorsing gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers.

The AHRC has been embroiled in multiple controversies over its support of gender-affirming treatment and its intervention in legal cases against women’s and lesbians groups seeking the right to female-only spaces.

Acting under the auspices of the AHRC, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody intervened in the lawsuit brought by transwoman Roxanne Tickle against Sall Grover’s female-only social app, Giggle for Girls.

The AHRC also tried to prevent a lesbian group banning biological males from attending its single-sex events, a move overturned earlier this month by Federal Court judge Mark Moshinsky.

Last year the AHRC named Melbourne Royal Children’s Hospital director of gender medicine Michelle Telfer as a finalist for its annual human rights award, just four months after a Family Court judge found she had misled the court in a case involving a 12-year-old boy whose mother sought to begin puberty blockers even though no formal diagnosis of gender dysphoria had been established.

Families using the AHRC resources for guidance “will be left with very little understanding of the risks involved, potentially leading to decisions that could have lifelong consequences for their children,” the letter says.

The AHRC had omitted critical information about the serious side effects and long-term risks of these interventions, such as impacts on bone density, fertility, sexual function, neurocognitive development, potential cardiovascular issues and increased risk for multiple health conditions.

Explainers that rely so heavily on unsubstantiated statements from advocacy organisations who support the highly contested ‘gender-affirming care’ model of treatment are “highly irresponsible” and fail to meet the standard of impartiality expected of the AHRC, the group said.

An AHRC spokesperson said the explainer resources were intended to provide clear and accessible information about the human rights of trans and gender diverse people in Australia.

“The explainers set out how Australian law and international human rights obligations apply to trans and gender diverse people, including children and young people. It draws on established clinical guidance and the positions of recognised Australian medical bodies. It does not provide clinical advice or recommend specific treatments.

“As with all the commission’s work, our focus is on ensuring the information is accurate and supports public understanding of the legal protections that apply to everyone.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/parents-plead-for-change-to-highly-irresponsible-gender-claims/news-story/709a399f8039576e89b67b7deacce6e1

https://humanrights.gov.au/know-your-rights/rights-of-individuals/lgbtiq-rights/trans-and-gender-diverse-rights-in-australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39042

File: 710ef812aecf787⋯.jpg (217.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 945169be5ef18ee⋯.jpg (393.99 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3bb9d1f359a95e4⋯.jpg (360.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579072 (070836ZMAY26) Notable: ANALYSIS: Witch hunt against Queensland psychiatrists critical of gender-affirming care rolls on as Australian institutions go all in on free speech crackdown - "In Australia today, women and doctors are being investigated, suspended and threatened with the loss of their livelihoods for daring to state what most Australians know to be true: there are only two sexes, sex is immutable, men cannot become women, and no child is ever born in the wrong body. These are not fringe views. They are the most basic facts of human biology. Yet gender ideology has flipped reality on its head. Speak these truths out loud and you risk being branded a bigot, dragged through the courts or stripped of your career. Look at two respected Queensland psychiatrists right now. Dr Jillian Spencer, a senior child and adolescent psychiatrist with more than two decades’ experience, was stood down from Queensland Children’s Hospital for raising legitimate clinical concerns about the rush to put children on puberty blockers. She now faces suspension, a termination notice under Supreme Court review, and an ongoing AHPRA investigation, simply for sharing a news article quoting her own views. Dr Andrew Amos has been suspended by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and gagged by the Medical Board. His offence? Publicly opposing the telling of dangerous lies to distressed children and the sterilising medical pathway that sometimes follows, as well as complaints made about his social media posts on the subject ... With the treatment of Drs Spencer and Amos, the medical establishment is ignoring overwhelming public sentiment and basic human instinct: we all know what a woman is and all doctors once knew too. Other countries have already woken up. Systematic reviews in the UK, Sweden, Finland and Norway found the evidence for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in minors dangerously weak. Yet here in Australia the institutions double down. We cannot allow our hospitals, regulators, courts and human rights bodies to be captured by an ideology that treats biological reality as bigotry. Australian citizens must not be punished for acknowledging basic reality. At the heart of this is free speech. If we cannot openly defend the most fundamental truths about human biology without fear of professional destruction, we are no longer a free society. No one is born in the wrong body. No one should lose their job, their licence or their reputation for saying so. Enough. Australia must stop punishing those who simply tell the truth." - Sall Grover, women’s rights campaigner and founder/CEO of the women-only social app Giggle - Sky News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39034

>>39035

>>39036

>>39037

>>39038

>>39039

>>39040

>>39041

ANALYSIS: Witch hunt against Queensland psychiatrists critical of gender-affirming care rolls on as Australian institutions go all in on free speech crackdown

Australia’s courts and hospitals are more ensnared than ever by a fringe transgender ideology that treats second opinions as heresy and grounds for dismissal, writes Giggle CEO Sall Grover.

Sall Grover, Giggle Founder and CEO - April 30, 2026

In Australia today, women and doctors are being investigated, suspended and threatened with the loss of their livelihoods for daring to state what most Australians know to be true: there are only two sexes, sex is immutable, men cannot become women, and no child is ever born in the wrong body.

These are not fringe views.

They are the most basic facts of human biology.

Yet gender ideology has flipped reality on its head.

Speak these truths out loud and you risk being branded a bigot, dragged through the courts or stripped of your career.

Look at two respected Queensland psychiatrists right now.

Dr Jillian Spencer, a senior child and adolescent psychiatrist with more than two decades’ experience, was stood down from Queensland Children’s Hospital for raising legitimate clinical concerns about the rush to put children on puberty blockers.

She now faces suspension, a termination notice under Supreme Court review, and an ongoing AHPRA investigation, simply for sharing a news article quoting her own views.

Dr Andrew Amos has been suspended by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and gagged by the Medical Board.

His offence?

Publicly opposing the telling of dangerous lies to distressed children and the sterilising medical pathway that sometimes follows, as well as complaints made about his social media posts on the subject.

Second opinions, once standard medical practice, are now treated as heresy.

This isn’t medicine. It’s ideology enforced by regulatory capture.

I know the cost.

In 2020 I created Giggle, a woman-only social app.

For refusing to include men who claim to be women, because they’re not biological women, I was cancelled, abused and taken to federal court in Tickle v Giggle, with the Australian Human Rights Commission against me.

Binary spokeswoman Kirralie Smith has been hit with hefty fines, public apologies and apprehended violence orders for defending women’s rights.

Jasmine Sussex has been dragged through a tribunal for comments including that men cannot breastfeed.

Tasmanian councillor Louise Elliot faced an anti-discrimination complaint for saying humans cannot change sex.

Victorian MP Moira Deeming was smeared and defamed for standing with women who know what a woman is.

Many more have lost jobs and been punished in silence.

With the treatment of Drs Spencer and Amos, the medical establishment is ignoring overwhelming public sentiment and basic human instinct: we all know what a woman is and all doctors once knew too.

Other countries have already woken up.

Systematic reviews in the UK, Sweden, Finland and Norway found the evidence for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in minors dangerously weak.

Yet here in Australia the institutions double down.

We cannot allow our hospitals, regulators, courts and human rights bodies to be captured by an ideology that treats biological reality as bigotry.

Australian citizens must not be punished for acknowledging basic reality.

At the heart of this is free speech.

If we cannot openly defend the most fundamental truths about human biology without fear of professional destruction, we are no longer a free society.

No one is born in the wrong body.

No one should lose their job, their licence or their reputation for saying so.

Enough.

Australia must stop punishing those who simply tell the truth.

Sall Grover is a women’s rights campaigner and the founder and CEO of the women-only social app Giggle.

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/witch-hunt-against-queensland-psychiatrists-critical-of-genderaffirming-care-rolls-on-as-australian-institutions-go-all-in-on-free-speech-crackdown/news-story/60229af3ccf38eda8890bfc3d1a095a8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39043

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24579116 (070951ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS brides returning to Australia from Syria may face historic slavery-related charges - (Video) Two Islamic State-linked Melbourne women returning from Syria are expected to face possible crimes against humanity charges connected to allegations involving the enslavement of Yazidi women during the Syrian conflict. Kawsar Abbas and one of her adult daughters are reportedly under investigation over claims made by Yazidi women who allege they were held captive by the family while Islamic State controlled territory in Syria. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said investigators had gathered evidence relating to terrorism offences and alleged slave trading crimes. Another returning woman, Janai Safar, may face charges linked to entering or remaining in a declared terrorist area. Legal experts said any prosecution could become the first Australian case involving crimes against humanity charges connected to alleged Islamic State atrocities committed overseas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021

>>39029

>>39030

ISIS brides returning to Australia from Syria may face historic slavery-related charges

AMANDA HODGE - 7 May 2026

1/2

Two of three ISIS-linked Melbourne women due to arrive in Australia from Syria on Thursday are expected to face crimes against humanity-related charges under Commonwealth law related to the alleged enslavement of at least one Yazidi woman during their time in Syria.

A fourth Australian woman, Janai Safar, a former Sydney nursing student who travelled to ISIS-occupied Syria in 2015, is likely to be charged with offences related to entering or remaining in a declared terrorist area.

Kawsar Abbas, 54, her two adult daughters Zahra, 33, and Zeinab, 31, and their eight children are scheduled to touch down in Melbourne late on Thursday afternoon on a Qatar Airways flight via Doha, accompanied by Kawsar’s brother and boxing coach, Abraham Abbas. Safar and her son will fly to Sydney.

The Australian understands Kawsar and one of her two adult daughters may be arrested on arrival in Melbourne and charged over serious allegations made by two women from the persecuted minority Yazidi community.

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett flagged the charges on Wednesday, saying evidence collected by the AFP in Syria since 2015 had been used to determine whether the returning women breached commonwealth laws, “including terrorism offences such as entering or remaining in declared areas, and crimes against humanity offences such as engaging in slave trading”.

Should the case against the women go to court it will be the first time any Australian citizen has been prosecuted for such crimes under domestic law.

“This is novel under Australian law. It’s untested before an Australian court, so would present challenges in terms of witnesses and evidence,” ANU international law expert Donald Rothwell told The Australian, likening the challenges of prosecuting a crime committed years ago in a foreign country to those faced by prosecutors in pursuing war crimes charges against decorated former SAS officer Ben Roberts-Smith.

Professor Rothwell said the women may face charges “under a provision of the Commonwealth Criminal Code which relates to enslavement of persons outside of Australia in the context of a non-international armed conflict”.

“There is an international law framework for that, but most importantly it is one under which Australia has criminalised that conduct by Australians, wherever they may engage in that type of conduct.”

Another possibility is that they could be charged with a Crime Against Humanity-Sexual Slavery, also under the Commonwealth Criminal Code.

Riyadh Adi, a former UN investigator into ISIS crimes, has told The Australian he personally connected both Yazidi women with the AFP and that they were interviewed at length about their experiences in the time they allege they were held captive in the household of the Melbourne family.

One of the women, Tayseer, who briefly lived in Australia, has alleged she spent 18 months enslaved by the family and was raped repeatedly by patriarch Mohammad Ahmad, whom she knew as Abu Omar (father of Omar).

Ahmad – who is understood to be among 5000 ISIS men transferred from Syria to Iraqi jails earlier this year – has denied the claims.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39044

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24583922 (081525ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS widows drop bid for freedom over alleged Yazidi slave trading - Former Islamic State-linked women Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad will remain in custody after shelving plans for an immediate bail application over allegations they enslaved Yazidi women while living under the Islamic State caliphate in Syria. The mother and daughter were arrested after arriving at Melbourne Airport last week following their repatriation from the al-Roj detention camp. Prosecutors allege Abbas helped purchase a Yazidi woman for $US10,000 and knowingly kept her as a slave, while Ahmad is accused of enslavement and using a slave. The offences are classified as crimes against humanity and carry maximum penalties of 25 years’ imprisonment. Ahmad is scheduled to apply for bail in June, followed later by her mother. Another daughter, Zahra Ahmad, was released without charges after returning to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39043

Crimes against humanity: Three returning ISIS brides charged over slave and terror offences

AMANDA HODGE - 8 May 2026

1/3

The two Melbourne former ISIS brides accused of keeping Yazidi slaves while living in Syria have been formally charged with crimes against humanity offences after arriving back in Australia.

Melbourne grandmother Kawsar Abbas, 53, and her younger daughter Zeinab, 31, will both appear before a Melbourne magistrate court today.

They were arrested by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team at Melbourne Airport on Wednesday night after successfully leaving a detention camp in north-east Syria.

Police allege Kawsar travelled to Syria in 2014 with her husband and children and was complicit in the purchase of a female slave for $US10,000 before knowingly keeping the woman in the family home.

She has been charged with four offences, including enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading. Each offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years’ jail.

Zeinab is accused of knowingly keeping a female slave in the home after travelling to Syria with her family in 2014. She has been charged with enslavement and using a slave, both carrying maximum penalties of 25 years’ imprisonment.

The pair had been detained by Kurdish forces since March 2019 and held at the Al Roj displacement camp alongside other family members.

The AFP laid charges against a third former ISIS bride, Janai Safar, late on Thursday night for allegedly entering and remaining in a declared conflict zone and joining the terrorist organisation.

The woman, 32, is expected to face Downing Centre Local Court today.

The charges came after The Australian exclusively revealed that Kawsar Abbas and one of her two adult daughters were to be charged over the alleged enslavement of at least one woman from the persecuted Kurdish speaking religious minority while they lived under the ISIS caliphate in northern Syria.

This is the first time an Australian ­citizen has faced prosecuted for such crimes under domestic law. Australian Federal Police ­Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt confirmed within hours of their arrival that a 53-year-old Melbourne woman would face four charges of crimes against ­humanity related to enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading, each of which carries a 25-year jail penalty.

Mr Nutt said the two women would appear before a Victorian court on Friday, but would not comment on why they were not subjected to an exclusion order – as has another Australian ISIS bride still in Syria – despite the gravity of the alleged offences.

“All I can say is that safety of the community is the No.1 priority for all agencies involved,” he said.

Sydney woman Janai Safar was arrested at Sydney airport and was formally charged late on Thursday night with the commonwealth offences of entering or remaining in a terrorist area and being a member of a terrorist organisation. Both offences carry a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment each.

It will be alleged the woman travelled to Syria in 2015 to join her husband, who had previously left Australia and joined ISIS.

The group of four women and their nine children arrived on two separate Qatar Airways flights after leaving the Roj internment camp in northern Syria in late April, only to be kept in limbo by Syrian authorities in Damascus for two weeks.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39045

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24583974 (081537ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS widows drop bid for freedom over alleged Yazidi slave trading - Former Islamic State-linked women Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad will remain in custody after shelving plans for an immediate bail application over allegations they enslaved Yazidi women while living under the Islamic State caliphate in Syria. The mother and daughter were arrested after arriving at Melbourne Airport last week following their repatriation from the al-Roj detention camp. Prosecutors allege Abbas helped purchase a Yazidi woman for $US10,000 and knowingly kept her as a slave, while Ahmad is accused of enslavement and using a slave. The offences are classified as crimes against humanity and carry maximum penalties of 25 years’ imprisonment. Ahmad is scheduled to apply for bail in June, followed later by her mother. Another daughter, Zahra Ahmad, was released without charges after returning to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39043

>>39044

ISIS brides remanded in custody in Melbourne and Sydney

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and BIMINI PLESSER - 8 May 2026

1/2

Three former ISIS brides accused of enslaving Yazidi girls and supporting the Islamic State terror group are behind bars in Melbourne and Sydney after being hauled before Australian courts within hours of their dramatic ­return from Syria.

In Sydney, accused terrorist Janai Safar has been refused bail despite claims that separating her from her son would be “particularly traumatic” after spending years detained in a Syrian camp.

It comes as accused slave owners Kawsar Abbas and her daughter Zeinab remain behind bars in Melbourne until at least next week, when they are expected to launch bail applications.

Court documents released to The Australian on Friday detail the slavery offences allegedly committed by the mother and daughter spanned between June 2017 and November 2018 across multiple places in the Deir ez-Zur province, about 450km northeast of the Syrian capital Damascus.

The co-ordinated legal action came less than 24 hours after the women and their children arrived back in Australia from the al-Roj detention camp in northeast Syria, ending years of uncertainty over whether they would ever be repatriated.

In Melbourne, Kawsar, 54, appeared in court wearing a hijab while her daughter Zeinab entered shortly afterwards as relatives and supporters packed the courtroom for the high-profile hearing.

Police allege Kawsar travelled to Syria in 2014 with her husband and children and was complicit in the purchase of a Yazidi woman for $US10,000 before knowingly keeping the woman as a slave in the family home.

Charge sheets reveal that Kawsar allegedly intentionally engaged in “slave trading” and held “ownership” of a slave at “Mayadin, Hajin, Gharanij, Abu Hamam, Walaa and other places in Deir ez-Zur province in Syria”. These crimes against humanity include three counts of enslavement, possessing a slave and using a slave. A further charge relates to slave trading, and each offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years’ imprisonment.

Her daughter Zeinab is accused of knowingly keeping a female slave in the family home after travelling to Syria with relatives in 2014. She has been charged with enslavement and using a slave during the same timeframe and across the same regions.

High-profile defence lawyer Bill Doogue indicated the pair would seek bail on Monday, while an interim suppression order was granted to protect the identities of the alleged Yazidi slave victims and witnesses.

Among those in attendance at the Melbourne court was Abraham Abbas, who arrived on Thursday with his sister, Kawsar, and nieces Zeinab and Zahra after travelling to Syria in February as part of a private effort to repatriate 34 Australian women and children from the al-Roj camp.

The Australian first revealed Mr Abbas was one of three Australian helpers who travelled to Syria in February in a bid to repatriate 34 Australian women and children detained in the al-Roj camp.

Mr Abbas was ushered through Melbourne Airport under heavy security on Thursday night, with about 20 guards pushing back journalists and photographers during a chaotic attempt to shield the returning group from media scrutiny. He was carrying a visibly distressed young girl, Layla, as the group exited the arrivals terminal.

In Sydney, after spending the night in Silverwater Women’s Prison, Safar, a 32-year-old former nursing student, appeared before the NSW Bail Division Local Court where her lawyer argued both she and her nine-year-old son were likely suffering PTSD after nearly a decade trapped in detention camps following the collapse of Islamic State.

But Judge Daniel Covington ruled the emotional distress caused by separating her from her child did not amount to the exceptional circumstances required for bail. She will remain behind bars until her next hearing on July 15.

Safar was formally charged late on Thursday night with entering or remaining in a declared conflict zone and being a member of a terrorist organisation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39046

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24584029 (081550ZMAY26) Notable: Albanese declares ‘zero sympathy’ for ISIS brides as Yazidi community lives in fear - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he has “zero sympathy” for Australians who travelled to join Islamic State, after three women returning from Syria were charged with terrorism and slavery-related offences. Members of Australia’s Yazidi community said the arrivals had retraumatised survivors of Islamic State atrocities and renewed fears of encountering former captors in Australia. Melbourne women Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad were charged with crimes against humanity offences linked to the alleged enslavement of Yazidi women, while Sydney woman Janai Safar was charged with entering a declared terrorist area and joining Islamic State. Albanese defended Australia’s decision to allow the women to return under the rule of law, while stressing sympathy for the children involved. Legal experts described the slavery-related prosecutions as unprecedented in Australian legal history.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39043

>>39044

>>39045

Albanese declares ‘zero sympathy’ for ISIS brides as Yazidi community lives in fear

Matthew Knott - May 8, 2026

1/2

Members of the local Yazidi community who fled persecution in the Middle East say they have been retraumatised by the high-profile arrival of four so-called ISIS brides. Community leaders have called on authorities to hold accountable anyone who enslaved or abused members of the minority group.

An estimated 20 ISIS-linked women and children who remain stuck in a camp in northern Syria could seek to return to Australia in coming weeks after a group of 13 people arrived on Thursday night. Three women were quickly taken into police custody and were charged with offences ranging from slavery to joining a terror organisation.

The crimes against humanity offences laid against two of the returning women are the first of their kind in Australia.

As the women faced court in Sydney and Melbourne on Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he had “zero sympathy” for any Australians who had travelled to join Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliphate as he welcomed the legal proceedings.

Zahra Ahmad, widow of Islamic State recruiter Muhammad Zahab, was not arrested after returning to Melbourne and left the airport surrounded by a phalanx of supporters operating as security guards.

Australian Federal Police assistant commissioner Stephen Nutt said investigations were ongoing as he announced charges against Zahra’s younger sister Zeinab Ahmad and her mother Kawsar Ahmad, as well as former health science student Janai Safar, on Thursday night.

“This remains an active investigation into very serious allegations,” he said.

Safar was refused bail in Sydney on Friday after being charged with entering a declared zone and joining a terror group. The accused Melbourne women will ask to be released back into the community at a bail hearing on Monday.

Kawsar Abbas (described in court documents as Kawsar Ahmad) and her daughter Zeinab Ahmad have been charged with crimes against humanity, including the enslavement of a Yazidi female.

“The Yazidi community still carries the pain of genocide, displacement, and the loss of thousands of innocent people,” Sami Sheebo, a Yazidi community leader who fled Iraq for Australia in 2018, said.

“For many survivors, especially women who endured ISIS captivity and slavery, these developments bring back very painful memories and emotional scars.”

Thousands of Yazidi men were killed, while women and girls were abducted, enslaved and subjected to horrendous abuse after Islamic State took control of parts of Iraq in 2014, recognised as a genocide by a United Nations commission of inquiry.

Sheebo said the community was urging authorities to fully investigate any Australians accused of supporting terrorism or participating in crimes against humanity.

“We respect Australia’s legal system and democratic values,” he said. “At the same time, survivors deserve justice, protection, and reassurance that their suffering is being taken seriously.”

Another Yazidi leader said members of the community lived in fear of encountering one of their former captors on the street.

Thousands of Yazidis, a Kurdish-speaking religious minority whose members are mostly based in northern Iraq, have settled in the Queensland city of Toowoomba in recent years. Others have found home in Coffs Harbour on the NSW North Coast.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39047

File: e1ea992f1aa0391⋯.mp4 (15.5 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24586892 (091120ZMAY26) Notable: ‘I want them to be punished’: Alleged Yazidi slave on ISIS brides - (Video) A Yazidi woman who alleges she was enslaved by an Australian Islamic State-linked family in Syria says she wants those responsible “to be punished” after Melbourne women Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad were charged with slavery-related crimes against humanity offences. The woman, identified under a pseudonym, alleged she was bought and held by the family for 18 months while living under the Islamic State caliphate, where she claims she was forced into domestic servitude and repeatedly raped by family patriarch Mohammad Ahmad. Ahmad has denied the allegations. The charges are believed to form part of Australia’s first domestic prosecution involving crimes against humanity linked to Islamic State atrocities against the Yazidi minority. Both alleged victims have reportedly told Australian Federal Police they are willing to testify in court proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39043

>>39044

>>39045

>>39046

‘I want them to be punished’: Alleged Yazidi slave on ISIS brides

AMANDA HODGE - 8 May 2026

1/2

Among the small community of Australian ISIS wives in Syria’s al-Roj internment camp, there had long been rumours that the Abbas family had secrets, things they had done inside the moral void of the Islamic State caliphate they did not want the world to know.

On Thursday night, as Kawsar Abbas, 53, her adult daughters Zahra, 33, and Zeinab, 31, and their eight children landed at Melbourne’s Tullamarine airport on a Qatar flight from Damascus, those secrets finally spilled out as the Australian Federal Police revealed the Melbourne grandmother and one daughter had been arrested on slavery-related crimes-against-humanity charges.

It has taken years and the courage of a woman who has allegedly suffered an unspeakable ordeal – to expose the dark heart of an Australian family accused of keeping a female slave during their time in Syria, and of looking the other way as the family patriarch is alleged to have repeatedly dragged her into a room and raped her.

Just hours before Kawsar and Zeinab faced Melbourne Magistrates Court on Friday to be formally charged, and another ISIS bride Janai Safar was refused bail in Sydney on charges including being a member of a terrorist organisation, the woman from Iraq’s persecuted Yazidi minority spoke to The Australian of the hell she allegedly endured at the hands of a ­couple who claimed to have moved to one of the 21st century’s most brutal conflict zones to do god’s work.

Like many survivors of extreme abuse, she speaks clinically of being used as a slave by all ­members of the household – ­Kawsar, her five daughters and one son – and of the alleged sexual abuse by Kawsar’s husband and charity worker, Mohammad Ahmad.

Now in her 20s and living in Europe, she says she is happy to hear of charges being laid.

“I want them to be punished for what they did to me. I want them to pay for that,” she says.

“But on the other side I am scared because I have seen what they can do and that makes me worried. Because of what happened to me in the past, I am afraid it will happen again in the future.”

Like thousands of fellow Yazidi women and girls, Nareen (a pseudonym) was kidnapped from northern Iraq’s Sinjar region near the Syrian border as a young ­teenager when ISIS fighters ­overran the historic enclave of the Kurdish-speaking, religious minority.

As many as 5000 Yazidi men were killed and more than 6000 women and children taken as spoils: the boys to be used as fighters, the girls and women traded on the ISIS slave market in Syria.

To read the 2016 UN report on Islamic State’s genocidal crimes as they were still unfolding against the Yazidis is an extreme exercise in endurance.

It describes how Yazidi women and girls in slave market halls and prisons “would scratch and bloody themselves in an attempt to make themselves unattractive to potential buyers”; it documents cases in which ISIS fighters murdered the young children of enslaved mothers to punish them for resistance, and how girls as young as nine were sold as sex slaves.

Nareen and her sister were the only members of their family to survive the 2014 ISIS genocide.

Enslaved, raped, tortured and traded between 12 ISIS men for the next five years, she had already ­endured hell by the time she says she was bought in 2017 by a broker and on-sold to Ahmad, Abbas and their family.

She tried to be obedient, to avoid the inevitable beatings that would come with defiance, but there was no way to avoid the sexual abuse, she says.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39048

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24589344 (100221ZMAY26) Notable: Dancin’ Hanson: Liberal Party left on 12pc in One Nation’s Farrer landslide - (Video) Pauline Hanson says One Nation’s shock victory in the Farrer by-election can be replicated nationally after the party captured the formerly safe Liberal seat with a swing exceeding 30 per cent. One Nation candidate David Farley defeated both the Liberals and Climate 200-backed independent Michelle Milthorpe, marking the party’s first House of Representatives win in its 29-year history. Former Liberal leader Sussan Ley said the result showed the party must “change or die”, while Liberal leader Angus Taylor conceded voters had lost trust in the Coalition and pledged reform. Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce, who campaigned against the Liberals, hailed the result as a broader warning to major parties. One Nation campaigned strongly on immigration, regional neglect and dissatisfaction with established political parties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38798

>>38799

>>38800

>>39019

Dancin’ Hanson: Libs left on 12pc in One Nation’s Farrer landslide

SARAH ISON - 9 May 2026

1/2

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has claimed she can replicate her stunning victory in the Farrer by-election all across the nation, as her populist party took ex-Liberal leader Sussan Ley’s seat with a swing of over 30 per cent and reduced the Coalition vote to rubble.

The former opposition leader broke months of silence following the Liberal loss to launch a thinly veiled swipe against her replacement Angus Taylor, urging he listen to his own warning that the party must “change or die” and not downplay the significance and scale of the Farrer defeat.

Senator Hanson on Saturday seized on her candidate David Farley’s emphatic win and declared it was just the beginning for One Nation.

“We’re coming after those other seats,” she said, in a clear threat to the major parties ahead of the next federal election, due in 2028.

“We’re taking our country back.”

Mr Farley said the win represented “the next big stepping stone” for the party and that he and Barnaby Joyce would be a “powerhouse” in the House of Representatives.

“We’re going through the ceiling from here,” Mr Farley told a crowd of One Nation volunteers and supporters on Saturday night.

“The price of a safe seat is neglect.

“We’ve got to have policy that fits Australia, not the world.”

Ms Ley held the seat for 25 years of the Liberals’ 77 year rein in Farrer, which was broken on Saturday night by humiliating defeat that saw the party claim just 12 per cent of the primary vote and come third behind One Nation and Climate 200-backed independent Michelle Milthorpe.

“I urge the Liberal leadership to accept this result with humility because the voters never get it wrong,” Ms Ley said in a statement, issued from the US.

“On the day the leadership spilt in February, the new leader said the Liberal Party needed to ‘change or die’. Three months later, the result in Farrer demonstrates that statement to be far truer today than it ever was then.”

As Senator Hanson danced with joy and sang with the crowds following One Nation winning its first House of Representatives seat in its 29-year history, Mr Taylor watched an emotional Raissa Butkowski address the handful of supporters gathered in the sparse Liberal HQ as the Liberal Farrer candidate conceded defeat.

“We have to take away hard lessons and from what we’ve seen since the last election and from the last election. For too long we have been a party of convenience, not conviction, that must change,” Mr Taylor said in a speech paying tribute to the efforts of Ms Butkowski and party volunteers.

“Moving forward, we need to take our medicine. We need to take our medicine. We have to be honest in our discussions with the Australian people.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39049

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24589378 (100253ZMAY26) Notable: Hanson takes victory lap in Farrer and warns major parties ‘we’re coming after other seats’ - (Video) Pauline Hanson has vowed One Nation will target more federal seats after the party won the Farrer by-election, ending 77 years of Coalition control in the regional NSW electorate. One Nation candidate David Farley secured the party’s first lower house seat, defeating Climate 200-backed independent Michelle Milthorpe while the Liberals collapsed to 12 per cent of the primary vote. Hanson said voters were no longer willing to be “forgotten people” and promised stronger action on immigration and energy policy. Liberal leader Angus Taylor admitted Coalition instability and internal divisions had damaged voter trust, while former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce described the result as a sign Australian politics had fundamentally changed. Voters cited cost-of-living pressures, regional neglect, migration and energy concerns as key issues influencing the outcome.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39048

Hanson takes victory lap in Farrer and warns major parties ‘we’re coming after other seats’

Natassia Chrysanthos - May 9, 2026

1/2

Pauline Hanson is vowing to come after more seats in federal parliament after One Nation seized the regional NSW electorate of Farrer from the Liberals, removing it from Coalition hands for the first time in its 77-year history.

Saturday night’s byelection result is a major upset for Liberal leader Angus Taylor, whose party recorded a paltry 12 per cent of the vote in a seat it held for 25 years. Taylor conceded a year of chaos for the Coalition had damaged his chances of retaining Farrer, which Sussan Ley vacated after being dumped as leader.

Hanson’s candidate, David Farley, surged ahead of community independent Michelle Milthorpe in almost every booth outside the major hubs of Albury and Griffith as the votes were counted, winning with about 60 per cent of the two-candidate preferred vote at 9.30pm.

His victory delivers One Nation its first lower house seat at an election. A triumphant Hanson took to the podium to promise that her minor party, which she founded 30 years ago, would seize on momentum to deliver action on a gas tax and lower immigration.

“We’re going to look forward to the future, and the people out there who may be watching this, we’re coming after those other seats,” Hanson said. “You are not going to be the forgotten people anymore. We are proud Australians. We want our country back. That’s what One Nation is about.”

The Liberals had held the seat since Ley snatched it from the Nationals in 2001, but they have been confronted by a backlash across regional centres and smaller towns. Much of the electorate was this week awash in rival orange campaign signage planted for One Nation and Milthorpe.

The Coalition parties recorded a combined primary vote below Milthorpe’s second-place result, ruling them out of the race within an hour. But both Taylor and Nationals leader Matt Canavan insisted that “we are back” and declared the Coalition would emerge stronger from Saturday.

Taylor said the byelection was always going to be “a mountain to climb for the Liberal Party” as he promised the Liberals would get tougher on immigration and net zero energy policy.

“We have to take away some hard lessons from this and from what we’ve seen since the last election,” he said.

“Over the last year or so, the Coalition hasn’t done what it should do: been united and stable and strong, with two breakups of the Coalition over that time. Of course, those days are over.

“We are a strong Coalition. We are back, and this will pay dividends over time. I will guarantee it. Moving forward, we need to take our medicine.”

Canavan said: “This is, in my view, the perfect platform for me and the Nationals party to write a new chapter for our great party, to tell the people of regional Australia, we are back.”

The Farrer byelection had shaped as a test of the Coalition’s electoral relevance and the staying power of One Nation after Hanson enjoyed a period of record-high opinion polling.

In the 2025 election, Ley recorded a 43.4 per cent primary vote for the Liberals, while Milthorpe came in second with almost 20 per cent of the primary vote. At that poll, One Nation only recorded 6.6 per cent of the primary vote.

But this year’s results tell a vastly different story. One Nation’s Farley had received about 42 per cent of first preference votes at 9.30pm, Milthorpe was on 26 per cent, Liberal candidate Raissa Butkowski was third on 12 per cent and Nationals candidate Brad Robertson was fourth on 10 per cent.

One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce, who was jubilant on the stage at the party’s Albury campaign event, said Taylor’s remarks sounded like “a victory speech from the person who came fifth”.

“What you saw tonight was not just a result for Farrer. It’s a result for Australia... And what we see is the Australian people saying: ‘I’m over this. I’m going to change things around’,” Joyce told the ABC.

“Politics has changed. It’s changed tonight.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39050

File: 7cc682db21cc79c⋯.jpg (353.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dd0be61b1cd4fcf⋯.jpg (319.44 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592829 (110839ZMAY26) Notable: ‘If I wanted to succeed, would I have to again hide part of myself’: antisemitism royal commission hears of lost livelihoods - Jewish Australians told the antisemitism royal commission they lost careers, friendships and workplace security following the October 7 Hamas attacks and the subsequent Gaza conflict. Witnesses including unionists, journalists, health workers and business owners described discrimination, social exclusion and fear linked to their Jewish identity or support for Israel. One anonymous witness said her employer encouraged her to adopt a less “Jewish-sounding” name to avoid problems with clients, while former Age editor Michael Gawenda warned Jewish journalists with “complicated and nuanced” views could struggle to advance professionally. Lewis’ Continental Kitchen owners Judith and Karyn Lewis described the emotional impact of their restaurant being firebombed during Sydney’s “summer of terror”. Several witnesses also criticised institutions including universities, media organisations and NSW Health for failing to adequately respond to antisemitism concerns.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>38991

>>39012

‘If I wanted to succeed, would I have to again hide part of myself’: antisemitism royal commission hears of lost livelihoods

JAMES DOWLING - May 07, 2026

1/2

A Jewish unionist says the Israel-Gaza conflict caused a schism in the progressive causes she devoted decades to, telling the antisemitism royal commission she was crushed by the “silence” that followed the October 7, 2023, Hamas terror attacks.

Jewish artists, activists, businesswomen, chefs, journalists and medical professionals described to the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission on Thursday how their livelihoods and workplace identities were lost to antisemitism and anti-Zionism in the 2½ years since the conflict in Gaza reignited.

Judith and Karyn Lewis, the mother-daughter duo behind Lewis’ Continental Kitchen, had their business firebombed in October 2024 at the instruction of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – kickstarting a period of antisemitic vandalism that would come to be known as the “summer of terror’.

“A lot of people came and met there and were able to sit and eat and then see other people there. It was a communal centre,” the older Ms Lewis said.

“For us, it’s devastating, because we’re not seeing all our friends, because the customers very much became our friends.”

Others faced less overt consequences. Trade unionist Stephanie Cunio described how her “comrades” in the progressive climate movement “cancelled and gaslit” her when an environmental justice group she co-founded “pivoted to Palestine” after October 7, 2023.

“One of the people from the chat group reached out and said: ‘I think this is going … to get increasingly uncomfortable for you’,” she said.

“(Colleagues) kept saying to me: ‘we work with Jews all the time, and we’ve got great Jews’, and the Jews they were working with were Jews that said they had hardcore anti-Zionist beliefs, that said Israel should not exist, and that don’t see Israel as our ancestral homeland.

“If I wasn’t taking that position, I was cancelled and gaslit.”

Ms Cunio spent years protesting against the actions of Israel, and remains critical of the Netanyahu government. But she argued the conflict had driven a wedge within progressive circles.

“There were some older people, people leading organisations, who could see the complexity, and then there was a real push from the younger folks, a lot of them who are people of colour and migrants, with their own stories of really bad experiences in their home countries or of racism here,” Ms Cunio said.

“There was a real battle and tension between these two groups, and I kind of belong to neither – 1200 people died on October 7, sexual violence was perpetrated towards women. The feminist movement here in this country was largely silent.”

A musician said he had been subjected to boycott campaigns and online vitriol for being Israeli and singing in Hebrew.

Anonymous witness “ABM” said the Australian company she worked for asked her to change her “Jewish-sounding name” to appease a client with “sensitivities” about Israel.

The company, which has branches overseas and a wide range of clients, told ABM the trouble with her name had come up in high-level internal discussions – per her testimony.

“My CEO raised the fact that my identifiably Jewish name could potentially add some complexity to the relationship and to that partnership, and it could potentially have negative commercial outcomes as well,” she said.

“He suggested, or sort of requested, that I would go by a different name in the workplace setting, particularly in external meetings, and use a name that was less obviously Jewish.

“I was in pure shock that this was a conversation being had. But … I was new to the role, I hadn’t yet established myself and I wanted to be perceived as co-operative and acting in the best interest of the company, and wanting to appease my boss.

“I thought that there was no other option but to comply with the request.”

ABM said she began to be referred to by the new name internally as well as in client meetings.

“I found myself questioning my value and questioning my impact, and part of my energy was being consumed in monitoring and managing that part of my identity,” she said. “I questioned whether I would have equal employ­ment opportunity in the future. If I wanted to succeed, would I have to again hide part of myself?”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39051

File: 3d0cd0dd6682eae⋯.mp4 (6.59 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: ff561665a51ae99⋯.jpg (219.07 KB,1459x820,1459:820,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de84e1d1ce08fb3⋯.jpg (808.86 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592837 (110853ZMAY26) Notable: Mother charged over alleged antisemitic incident at netball game in Sydney's east - (Video) A 42-year-old woman has been charged after allegedly directing antisemitic abuse at a junior netball match in Sydney’s east, prompting intervention from Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin. Police allege the woman made offensive remarks during an under-12s game between Saints and Maccabi netball clubs at Heffron courts in Maroubra. She was charged with using offensive language in a public place and is due to appear before Waverley Local Court in June. NSW Netball has banned her from attending or participating in matches. Mr Ryvchin said Jewish families should be able to attend children’s sport “with pride and pleasure” rather than fear. Saints Netball Club condemned the alleged remarks and apologised to the Jewish community and those affected.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

Mother charged over alleged antisemitic incident at netball game in Sydney's east

THOMAS HENRY - 10 May 2026

Police have charged a mother who allegedly hurled antisemitic abuse at a children’s netball game in Maroubra, forcing Jewish community leader Alex Ryvchin to intervene just days after giving evidence to the antisemitism royal commission.

NSW police confirmed officers were called to the Heffron netball courts in Sydney’s south just after 10am on Saturday after reports the woman had made “offensive comments” during an under-12s match between Saints and Maccabi netball clubs.

Police have since charged the 42-year-old woman with using offensive language in a public place and NSW Netball has banned her from attending or participating in any netball games.

The Australian understands the woman allegedly said “f*ck the Jews” and “you should have all been eradicated”.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin arrived at the courts shortly after the alleged incident and was filmed confronting the woman accused of making the antisemitic remarks.

Footage posted to social media shows the woman denying she had made any antisemitic comments, before urging Mr Ryvchin to call the police.

“It’s really horrible that Jewish families will be going to their games next week worried about what will happen rather than enjoying weekend sports with their kids,” Mr Ryvchin said.

“Team managers and referees should also be instructed to stop games the second such abuse occurs.”

Mr Ryvchin commended the response from police and NSW Netball, saying they had treated the matter with “appropriate seriousness”.

“The families who stood up yesterday should be commended and they have every right to attend weekend sports with pride and pleasure not concern as to what might happen next,” he said.

The incident comes just days after Virginia Bell’s historic Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion began hearing evidence from community members and leaders on the Australian Jewish experience.

NSW Netball in a statement said it would continue working with the Jewish community, declaring there was no place for hate speech in the sport.

“Netball is a special part of the fabric of so many communities in Australia. It is a place where everyone belongs, where everyone has a right to feel safe, and where teamwork, camaraderie, friendship, fun and community spirit thrive,” the statement read.

“In our game, there is no place for hate speech, racism or discrimination at any level. Where such behaviour occurs, we have processes in place to investigate it and to respond.

“We will continue to engage with the local netball and Jewish communities and work together to send a message that netball is safe and inclusive for all.”

The Saints Netball Club disavowed the alleged comments, apologising to the Jewish community and anyone affected by the incident.

“The Saints Netball Club unequivocally condemns and disavows antisemitism in all its forms. Such remarks do not reflect the values, principles or standards of our club, our members, our players or our wider community,” the club said in a statement.

The 42-year-old woman is due to appear before Waverley Local Court on June 17.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/mother-charged-over-alleged-antisemitic-incident-at-netball-game-in-sydneys-east/news-story/ebb377390de5b6e5f0aee56831ee2079

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39052

File: 4c06c723eb30b1f⋯.mp4 (15.64 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592848 (110906ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin told to ‘just deal with’ alleged antisemitic abuse at netball game - (Video) New footage has emerged showing Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin arguing with a bystander after an alleged antisemitic incident at a junior netball match in Sydney’s east. The confrontation followed claims a woman shouted antisemitic remarks, including “you should have been eradicated”, during an under-12s game between Saints and Maccabi clubs at Heffron Park in Maroubra. In the video, the unidentified man tells Mr Ryvchin to “just deal with it” and accuses him of escalating the situation. The exchange intensified when the man attempted to knock away a phone being used to record the interaction. The 42-year-old woman accused of making the remarks has been charged with offensive language and banned by NSW Netball from attending matches.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

>>39051

Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin told to ‘just deal with’ alleged antisemitic abuse at netball game

PAIGE FRYER - 11 May 2026

New footage has emerged of a confrontation between Jewish community leader Alex Ryvchin and a bystander who tells him to “just deal with it” after an alleged antisemitic outburst at a children’s netball game over which police have laid charges.

The footage shows the man accusing Mr Ryvchin of “exacerbating” the issue, with Mr Ryvchin alleging the man had said he and his wife Vicki were “playing the victim card”.

The heated discussion continues until the man tries to knock Ms Ryvchin’s phone away as she records the exchange.

The confrontation occurred after a mother allegedly yelled “f..k the Jews and “you should have been eradicated” during an under-12s match between the Saints and Maccabi clubs just after 10am on Saturday at Heffron Park netball courts in Maroubra, Sydney.

The 42-year-old woman was charged with using offensive language in a public place. NSW Netball has since banned her from attending or participating in matches.

A video broadcast by Sky News shows a second dispute between an unidentified man and Mr Ryvchin, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive, and his wife.

The man tells Mr Ryvchin to “just deal with it” and suggests they should “let the kids deal with it, sort it out”.

“The mum said ‘Jews should be eradicated’,” Mr Ryvchin says.

“Just deal with it, now you’re trying to create another concern, walk away,” the man replies.

The exchange escalates when Ms Ryvchin asks the man if the mother’s alleged comments that Jews should be eradicated are acceptable. The man tells Ms Ryvchin he did not say or hear the remarks.

As Ms Ryvchin continues to ask whether he thinks there is any scenario in which the comments are acceptable, the man tells her to “put your phone away, don’t film me”, then reaches to grab the device or knock it away.

Mr Ryvchin then steps in and says: “Don’t touch my wife.”

The incident took place days after the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion began hearing evidence regarding the Australian Jewish experience.

NSW Netball released a statement declaring there was no place for hate speech, racism or discrimination in the sport.

The Saints Netball club issued an apology to the Jewish community, stating the alleged remarks did not reflect the club’s values.

The woman will appear before Waverley Local Court on June 17.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jewish-leader-alex-ryvchin-told-to-just-deal-with-alleged-antisemitic-abuse-at-netball-game/news-story/574fbb000470d8751eb0b850c0db27af

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39053

File: c5f91ce40a5c7b1⋯.jpg (449.28 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c01311a48adf1c1⋯.jpg (54.97 KB,890x581,890:581,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592858 (110916ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish teen subjected to antisemitic slurs on Minecraft, royal commission told - A Perth teenager told the antisemitism royal commission he was subjected to antisemitic abuse by fellow students while playing Minecraft, including messages stating “I hate Jews” and describing him as a “filthy penny sniffer”. The 15-year-old said the online abuse left him isolated and distressed, prompting his parents to report the incident to his public school, which later facilitated apologies from the students involved. The commission also heard evidence from Rabbi Menachem Dadon, whose daughter was injured in the Bondi terror attack, and from Executive Council of Australian Jewry research director Julie Nathan regarding rising antisemitic incidents nationwide. Melbourne musician Joshua Moshe described losing work opportunities, online harassment and vandalism after raising concerns about antisemitism within creative industry circles following the October 7 Hamas attacks and subsequent Gaza conflict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

>>38938

Jewish teen subjected to antisemitic slurs on Minecraft, royal commission told

Phoebe Pin - 11 May 2026

1/2

A Perth teenager was bullied on the online worldbuilding game Minecraft because he was Jewish, a royal commission on antisemitism has heard.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion is in its second week of public hearings and has heard from people with a lived experience of abuse.

A family of three gave evidence using a pseudonym today, with the 15-year-old boy telling the inquiry that students from his Perth public school directed Jewish slurs at him while playing Minecraft.

The boy took screenshots of a number of the comments, which included "I hate Jews" and comments that called him a "filthy penny sniffer".

"It made my stomach turn upside down," the boy said of the comments.

He told his parents about the incident after he felt the situation had "got out of hand".

"I've got no friends left," he said he told his parents.

The boy's dad said he had been "furious" to learn of the incident, and reported the behaviour to his son's school.

He told the commission the school was "extremely supportive" and spoke to the students involved in the abuse and their parents.

He said the students eventually apologised for their comments.

The boy's mother converted to Judaism after moving to Australia and meeting her Jewish husband.

She told the commission she was disturbed by the hatred she had witnessed towards the Jewish community, as it mirrored the situation she experienced growing up during the civil war in the former Yugoslavia.

"It was like a deja vu for me," she told the commission.

"It's like a recurrence of a nightmare for me because I have seen it before and I know where it leads."

Rabbi pays tribute to Bondi victim

Rabbi Menachem Dadon has in the past helped organise the Chanukkah by the Sea event, which was last year the site of the deadly shooting attack.

His congregation contributed funding toward the celebration, during which Chabad of Bondi Rabbi and event organiser Eli Schlanger was killed.

Rabbi Dadon did not recount the events of the attack at the commission, but paid tribute to his "good friend" Rabbi Schlanger.

"He was such a special human being," he said.

"He was not interested in problems, always solutions."

Rabbi Dadon's 14-year-old daughter was injured in the attack at Bondi.

He said he would never forget what she said to him after the shooting.

"Father why do they hate us so much, why do they want to kill us?" He said she told him.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39054

File: 9810961703a9e04⋯.jpg (564.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 067aea899993b0a⋯.jpg (664.3 KB,1950x2600,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592865 (110928ZMAY26) Notable: Victoria Police abandon claims ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ chant by activist Hash Tayeh are antisemitic - Victoria Police has narrowed its prosecution case against pro-Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh, conceding it will no longer argue chants of “all Zionists are terrorists” were antisemitic. Mr Tayeh faces multiple offensive language charges linked to pro-Palestinian protests in Melbourne during 2024 and 2025, alongside co-accused Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan. Prosecutors told the Melbourne Magistrates Court the case would instead focus solely on whether the chant constituted “insulting words” under the Summary Offences Act and whether the accused intended the words to be insulting. Police also opposed defence attempts to introduce expert evidence about Zionism’s history and distinctions between Judaism and Zionism. Earlier this year, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal separately ruled the chant breached racial and religious vilification laws by inciting hatred against Jewish people.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24018738 (pb)

>>38902

>>39012

>>39016

Victoria Police abandon claims ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ chant by activist Hash Tayeh are antisemitic

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 10 May 2026

Victoria Police has abandoned claims that pro-Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh was motivated by antisemitism in a landmark hate speech prosecution over chants declaring “all Zionists are terrorists”.

In a submission filed to the Melbourne Magistrates Court last week and obtained by The Australian, prosecutors conceded they will not allege Mr Tayeh’s comments were antisemitic, despite previously arguing the chant effectively branded the majority of Jewish Australians as terrorists.

The case is being closely watched as a major test of Victoria’s offensive language laws amid escalating tensions surrounding pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

But in a significant narrowing of the prosecution case, police prosecutors will tell the court they are no longer seeking to link the chant to antisemitism or hostility toward Jews.

“The prosecution is not seeking to prove that the words were insulting because they were antisemitic,” the submissions state.

“Nor is the prosecution seeking to prove that the accused had a general intent to use words as insulting words because he is antisemitic.”

Mr Tayeh, former owner of the Burgertory fast-food chain, faces five charges under section 17(1)(c) of the Summary Offences Act over chants allegedly made during pro-Palestinian protests in Melbourne in 2024 and 2025.

His co-accused, Melbourne kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan, faces two similar charges.

If proven, the offences carry a maximum penalty ranging from two months’ jail for a first offence to six months’ jail for three or more offences.

Prosecutors will say the magistrate does not need to decide what Zionism is, or whether Mr Tayeh was antisemitic, but whether the chant was insulting in public.

Material about the history of Zionism and distinctions between Zionism and Judaism are not needed to determine whether the chant, “all Zionists are terrorists”, was insulting under the law.

On that basis, police will seek to have large parts of the expert report excluded, saying it risks distracting from the only issues the court must decide on: whether the words were insulting, and whether Mr Tayeh intended them to be used that way.

The concession emerged in a dispute over expert evidence prepared for the defence by academic Andrew Thomas.

Dr Thomas was asked to address the historical origins of Zionism, distinctions between Judaism and Zionism, criticism of Zionism, and whether Zionist groups had historically engaged in acts that could be characterised as terrorism.

But prosecutors argued much of that material should be excluded because it was irrelevant to the actual legal issues in dispute.

“The question posed under (b), and subsequent discussion in relation to Judaism and Zionism, is not relevant to either of the two elements in dispute,” prosecutors submitted.

Instead, police say, the case turns solely on whether the phrase “all Zionists are terrorists” constitutes “insulting words” under the Summary Offences Act, and whether Mr Tayeh intended the words to be insulting.

Prosecutors also rejected attempts by the defence to rely on historical examples of Zionist militancy to contextualise the chant.

“The impugned expression in this case is ‘all Zionists are terrorists’. Those words are all-encompassing,” the submission states.

Police argued that references to “isolated and historical instances” of violence by Zionist groups decades ago were not relevant to whether the phrase was insulting in a modern context.

The submissions also reveal prosecutors are seeking to play protest footage showing the conduct and chants of surrounding demonstrators, arguing the broader atmosphere at the rallies is relevant context for determining whether the words were insulting. The charges relate to two separate protests: the “Our Babies Matter” rally on May 27, 2024, and the “Protest Until Ceasefire” demonstration on March 30, 2025. The matter is continuing before the Melbourne Magistrates Court.

Separately, in February this year, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal ruled Mr Tayeh breached the state’s racial and religious vilification laws by leading the chant during a CBD rally.

The tribunal found encouraging thousands of protesters to chant an “absolute statement” attaching “a heinous label (terrorist) to an undifferentiated group of people (all Zionists)” amounted to conduct likely to incite hatred against Jewish people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victoria-police-abandon-claims-all-zionists-are-terrorists-chant-by-activist-hash-tayeh-are-antisemitic/news-story/422f81f1fb7582186fb5ae6fdbb6c065

https://qresear.ch/?q=Hash+Tayeh

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39055

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592868 (110934ZMAY26) Notable: Why Japan’s PM ‘kneeling’ in Australia should be alarming - (Video) '"Takaichi’s double standards are deafening. In Australia, she honored anti-fascist fighters. In Malaysia, she mourned invading Japanese troops. She eagerly courts the West, yet dodges history and provokes her Asian neighbors. To her, history isn’t for reflecting, it’s a bargaining chip. Her “reconciliation” in Australia? Just cover for Japan’s military ambitions." - Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39010

>>39011

>>39018

>>39033

Why Japan’s PM ‘kneeling’ in Australia should be alarming

环球时报 Global Times

May 7, 2026

Takaichi’s double standards are deafening.

In Australia, she honored anti-fascist fighters.

In Malaysia, she mourned invading Japanese troops.

She eagerly courts the West, yet dodges history and provokes her Asian neighbors.

To her, history isn’t for reflecting, it’s a bargaining chip.

Her “reconciliation” in Australia? Just cover for Japan’s military ambitions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOY0o0trPTo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39056

File: 4f7b18fc1f7028f⋯.jpg (142.82 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592869 (110937ZMAY26) Notable: Japan urged to stop hypocritical self-glorification: China’s MND slams Takaichi’s ‘a free and open Indo-Pacific’ claim during visits to Australia, Vietnam - "A spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defense (MND) on Saturday urged Japanese authorities to stop their hypocritical self-glorification and rein in their dangerous ambition of military expansion and war preparation, in responding to claims made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi during visits to Australia and Vietnam. It is reported that Takaichi recently visited Australia and Vietnam to strengthen security cooperation with the two countries. During her visits, she touted a so-called updated vision of "a free and open Indo-Pacific", and clamored that Japan's post-war constitution, drafted during US military occupation, should be periodically updated to meet the demands of the times. Asked to comment on this, Senior Colonel Jiang Bin, the MND spokesperson, said that under the pretexts of the so-called "free and open Indo-Pacific" and "security cooperation", governing authorities in Japan are instigating bloc confrontation and building "small circles." This undermines the strategic security and interests of other countries, and serves as an excuse for Japan to break free from the restrictions on its military development, which we firmly oppose, Jiang said. Post-war Japanese governments did promise to uphold the pacifist constitution and pursue the path of a peaceful nation. Later on, they started to pay lip service and take few actions to back up such promise. The Takaichi administration, however, openly pushes for amending Japan's constitution. This shows that the Japanese right-wing forces are shedding their pretense, and shifting from covert military buildup to overt war preparation, making Japan's "neo-militarism" a growing and more prominent threat to regional peace, the MND spokesperson said." - Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39010

>>39011

>>39018

>>39033

>>39055

Japan urged to stop hypocritical self-glorification: China’s MND slams Takaichi’s ‘a free and open Indo-Pacific’ claim during visits to Australia, Vietnam

Global Times - May 09, 2026

A spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defense (MND) on Saturday urged Japanese authorities to stop their hypocritical self-glorification and rein in their dangerous ambition of military expansion and war preparation, in responding to claims made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi during visits to Australia and Vietnam.

It is reported that Takaichi recently visited Australia and Vietnam to strengthen security cooperation with the two countries. During her visits, she touted a so-called updated vision of "a free and open Indo-Pacific", and clamored that Japan's post-war constitution, drafted during US military occupation, should be periodically updated to meet the demands of the times.

Asked to comment on this, Senior Colonel Jiang Bin, the MND spokesperson, said that under the pretexts of the so-called "free and open Indo-Pacific" and "security cooperation", governing authorities in Japan are instigating bloc confrontation and building "small circles." This undermines the strategic security and interests of other countries, and serves as an excuse for Japan to break free from the restrictions on its military development, which we firmly oppose, Jiang said.

May 3, 2026 marks the 80th anniversary of the commencement of the Tokyo Trials. Over the past eight decades, right-wing forces in Japan have spared no effort in downplaying and defying the solemn ruling of the Tokyo Trials that embodies human conscience and historical justice, distorting and denying Japanese militarists' crimes of aggression well-documented in black and white. Class-A war criminals, guilty of heinous atrocities, have been glorified as "heroes" and honored at the Yasukuni Shrine, Jiang noted.

Post-war Japanese governments did promise to uphold the pacifist constitution and pursue the path of a peaceful nation. Later on, they started to pay lip service and take few actions to back up such promise. The Takaichi administration, however, openly pushes for amending Japan's constitution. This shows that the Japanese right-wing forces are shedding their pretense, and shifting from covert military buildup to overt war preparation, making Japan's "neo-militarism" a growing and more prominent threat to regional peace, the MND spokesperson said.

"We urge the Japanese governing authorities to stop their hypocritical self-glorification and rein in their dangerous ambition of military expansion and war preparation, demonstrate the courage to face up to history, and take real actions to atone for Japan's crimes, so as to earn the trust of its Asian neighbors and the international community," Jiang said.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202605/1360607.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39057

File: 609be03a1fae561⋯.jpg (223.74 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 175eab33c9bc67b⋯.jpg (247.38 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8a15c875db51dfc⋯.jpg (3.92 MB,7237x4825,7237:4825,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 41c0a08570b4b57⋯.jpg (219.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2aea7c5d71c2ea3⋯.jpg (687.89 KB,1182x1603,1182:1603,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592895 (110958ZMAY26) Notable: Former Chinese defence ministers Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu receive suspended death sentences - Former Chinese defence ministers Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu have received suspended death sentences after being convicted on corruption charges by China’s military court. Wei was found guilty of accepting bribes, while Li was convicted of both accepting and offering bribes. Under China’s legal system, the two-year reprieves will likely be commuted to life imprisonment without parole if the pair demonstrate good behaviour. Both men were stripped of political rights for life and had all personal property confiscated. The punishments represent one of the harshest outcomes of President Xi Jinping’s long-running anti-corruption campaign targeting the military and defence sector. Wei and Li were both former members of the powerful Central Military Commission and disappeared from public view after being removed from office amid widening investigations into corruption within China’s armed forces and defence procurement system.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Former Chinese defence ministers Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu receive suspended death sentences

YONI BASHAN - May 08, 2026

China’s military court has sentenced two former defence ministers to death with a two-year reprieve over corruption charges, marking a dramatic escalation in the country’s attempts to root out graft and perceptions of disloyalty within its military establishment.

Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu, both former members of the powerful Central Military Commission, received their sentences separately on Thursday, according to a readout from Xinhua, China’s state-run news agency.

Wei was found guilty of accepting bribes while Li was convicted on charges of accepting and offering bribes. A death sentence with a two-year reprieve typically means both men will face life imprisonment if they are able to demonstrate good behaviour.

As well as the suspended death sentences, both will be stripped of their political rights for life and have all of their personal property confiscated, the readout said.

The court ruled that once the reprieve period expired, the sentences will be commuted to life imprisonment with no further commutation or parole eligibility — an unusually harsh condition that underscores the severity with which authorities view their behaviour.

The sentencing of two individuals who held such senior positions within China’s defence establishment represents one of the most dramatic developments and severe punishments in President Xi Jinping’s long-running anti-corruption campaign, which began when he assumed the role in 2012.

Wei Fenghe, who served as defence minister from 2018 to 2023, was a career military officer who rose through the ranks of the People’s Liberation Army’s Rocket Force before assuming the top civilian-military post. The role of defence minister is not typically considered among the most powerful positions in China’s government because greater authority is vested with the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party, headed by Mr Xi.

Li Shangfu succeeded Mr Wei as defence minister in March 2023 but disappeared from public view just months into his tenure. His removal from office was confirmed in October 2023, making his time in the role one of the shortest in the position’s history.

Neither Mr Wei nor Mr Li has been seen in public since disappearing from their official duties, and it remains unclear whether they will have opportunities to appeal their sentences. The investigation announcement for Mr Li accused him of “severely polluting the political environment of the military equipment sector’s atmosphere”. Both men were accused of corruption that “caused extremely egregious impact and exceptionally detrimental harm”.

The bribery convictions align with a broader pattern of corruption investigations within China’s military targeting the Rocket Force and the defence procurement system. Multiple senior officers and defence industry executives have been detained or dismissed in recent years as part of systematic efforts to root out corruption.

The limited release of detail through state media outlets is typical of how Beijing handles announcements regarding senior officials who have fallen from grace. The readout offered little insight into the specific allegations, the scale of the alleged corruption, or details about the trials themselves.

The sentencing also comes as China continues to emphasise military discipline and loyalty under Mr Xi’s leadership. The president has repeatedly stressed the importance of building a “clean” military capable of fighting and winning wars.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/wei-fenghe-and-li-shangfu-receive-suspended-death-sentences-in-most-severe-punishment-handed-down-to-chinese-defence-leaders/news-story/06f07fdb9592712afc5f299c51222dd0

https://english.news.cn/20260507/83586d8ffcc1457c8f32d0759a9cbcaf/c.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Wei+Fenghe

https://qresear.ch/?q=Li+Shangfu

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39058

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592911 (111016ZMAY26) Notable: Australian-born Catherine West gives Sir Keir Starmer one day to quit or face leadership challenge - (Video) Australian-born Labour MP Catherine West has threatened to launch a leadership challenge against British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unless Labour reshuffles its leadership within days following severe election losses across Britain. West, who was born in Mansfield, Victoria, said Sir Keir should move into an international role while Labour installed a new prime minister “with minimum fuss”. The pressure follows major local election defeats in England, Wales and Scotland, with dozens of Labour backbenchers publicly calling for Sir Keir to resign. West acknowledged she may act as a “stalking horse” candidate if broader support for a leadership spill emerges within the parliamentary party.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian-born Catherine West gives Sir Keir Starmer one day to quit or face leadership challenge

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - May 10, 2026

An Australian-born Labour MP has given the British government a day to sort out a new prime minister otherwise is threatening to launch a formal leadership bid against Sir Keir Starmer on Monday.

Catherine West was born in Mansfield, Victoria, in 1966 and is the current Labour MP for Hornsey and Friern Barnet in Greater London. A former shadow foreign office minister in Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet, Ms West has piled pressure on Sir Keir and his closest political allies after catastrophic election results last week.

It comes amid reports MPs on Labour’s left are urging former leader Ed Miliband to consider a leadership challenge this week.The Guardian reports the MPs are asking the Energy Secretary to step in to block Wes Streeting, who claims to have the 81 MPs necessary to trigger a challenge.

At least 37 Labour backbenchers have publicly called for Sir Keir to resign in the wake of the seismic results which saw Wales reject Labour for the first time in a century, coupled with deep and history making losses of 1446 councillors in England in local elections and a disastrous performance in Scotland.

In a wholesale rejection of Labour, which has been in power less than two years of a five-year term, voters across the country want a commonsense plan, but Sir Keir is promising to double down on his pro-welfare approach to appease the left wing of the Labour Party in yet another “re-set” on Monday.

Ms West wants the Cabinet to reshuffle within itself, and Sir Keir to be given an international role so that the leadership can change immediately “with minimum fuss”.

She warned if this didn’t happen she would launch a leadership bid herself, which may be a “stalking horse” move for others to then join the leadership race.

Within hours of her announcement, Ms West was attacked for being too hasty, and was urged to withdraw her threat so the favoured son of the Labour Party, the Mayor of Manchester Andy Burnham would have enough time to be elected to parliament later this year.

But she said: “he’s not here on the spot so he can’t really do it.’’

Ms West’s moves come as more than 100 Labour councillors and former candidates signed an open letter demanding that Sir Keir Starmer set out a timetable for an “orderly transition” of power.

If Ms West carries out her threat she will need the backing of 81 MP’s to launch the leadership bid.

Wes Streeting, the health minister, has been preparing a bid for months and is believed to have the requisite support but has not wanted to be the one to start the leadership race fearing a backlash by Labour Party members who will vote in a ballot for the leader if it goes to a full leadership battle.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/catherine-west-gives-sir-keir-starmer-one-day-to-quit-or-face-leadership-challenge/news-story/1f034c0a2a018ec9f102b86d7e060b4d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jku2ln2mvnw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39059

File: d811152df639c34⋯.jpg (1.93 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12e79c541b50e47⋯.jpg (247.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ef20e2af5b3f6b7⋯.jpg (446.16 KB,2400x1600,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 76eec6a9813f096⋯.jpg (284.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9debaf76e904443⋯.jpg (320.67 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592922 (111027ZMAY26) Notable: Solomon Islands PM toppled in no-confidence vote - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has lost power after parliament passed a no-confidence motion by 26 votes to 22, ending months of political instability in the Pacific nation. The vote followed cabinet resignations and the withdrawal of coalition partners, which left Mr Manele’s government weakened since March. Ahead of the motion, Mr Manele criticised the courts after judges ordered parliament to convene, describing the ruling as “judicial overreach”. Former foreign minister Peter Shanel Agovaka, considered a frontrunner to replace him, accused the government of weak leadership and inadequate transparency over spending linked to the Pacific Games and regional summits. Analysts said the leadership change would be closely watched internationally because the Solomon Islands has strengthened ties with Beijing in recent years while Australia has sought to counter growing Chinese security influence in the Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Solomon Islands PM toppled in no-confidence vote

AFP - May 07, 2026

Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has lost power in a no-confidence vote, ending months of political uncertainty in the Pacific nation.

The country’s parliament was adjourned to allow the governor-general to make arrangements for the election of a new prime minister.

Ahead of the vote, which he lost 22 to 26, Mr Manele heavily criticised the nation’s court for setting a “dangerous precedent” by ruling MPs must meet for the no-confidence motion.

His Government for National Unity and Transformation has been at an impasse since March, when it was hit by mass cabinet resignations and the exit of two coalition partners.

On Friday, an appeal court ruled Mr Manele, who avoided the no-confidence motion for seven weeks, must convene parliament by May 7.

The Solomon Islands has been seen as one of Beijing’s closest partners and backers in the South Pacific in recent years, and changes of leader in the strategically located archipelago are closely watched by Western diplomats.

Mihai Sora, director of research at the Lowy Institute, said Mr Manele’s ousting “will probably make things more difficult for Australia”, which sought to upgrade police ties with the Solomons to counter Beijing’s security influence.

“There’s every chance that Manele will be replaced by someone seen as more China-friendly,” he said.

There was a heavy police presence around parliament on Thursday as two camps of MPs arrived in separate buses.

The new opposition coalition of six political parties showed it commanded 27 seats as MPs entered the 50-seat chamber.

Former foreign minister Peter Shanel Agovaka, who quit cabinet in March and is the frontrunner to become the next prime minister, said Mr Manele had shown weak leadership as ministers conferred favours to business cronies.

“Here we have a group of people who are feeding themselves to the coffers,” he told parliament.

A lack of transparency included no audit reports produced for the large sums of government and donor country money spent to host the 2024 Pacific Games and last year’s Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting, he said.

The International Monetary Fund raised concerns over accountability, lack of audit reports and the need for anti-corruption reforms in March.

Mr Manele said it was the first time he had heard the complaints about his leadership, rejecting claims he was indecisive.

“I am greatly disappointed, literally not having time to prepare a response to these reasons and allegations,” he said.

“I believe the courts have set a dangerous precedent,” he added, calling the order to convene parliament for the vote “judicial overreach of the highest order.”

With a population of 850,000, the Solomons sits 2000km east of Australia and receives significant aid from Canberra and Beijing. Debt to China for infrastructure projects doubled last year, budget documents show.

Mr Manele was elected on the floor of parliament in 2024 by a coalition of parties that formed government after a national election did not deliver a clear majority to any single party.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/solomon-islands-pm-toppled-in-noconfidence-vote/news-story/06379008b5589cfde8e32ab28ffdd9b0

https://qresear.ch/?q=Jeremiah+Manele

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39060

File: 287909c2b17aab8⋯.jpg (214.57 KB,2048x1303,2048:1303,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 189543f7e3d7ae8⋯.jpg (2.44 MB,5109x3406,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592928 (111036ZMAY26) Notable: AUKUS champion to oversee top-secret defence committee - Labor senator Deborah O’Neill is expected to chair a new parliamentary defence committee established to oversee highly classified aspects of Australia’s expanding military build-up, including the AUKUS nuclear submarine program. The bipartisan committee, created through legislation passed in March, will receive access to sensitive defence and intelligence briefings usually withheld from public scrutiny. Membership has been restricted to Labor and Coalition parliamentarians, excluding the Greens and crossbench MPs because of the classified material involved. Senator O’Neill has been one of parliament’s strongest supporters of AUKUS, previously describing the nuclear submarine program as “transformational”. Liberal senator Dave Sharma is expected to become deputy chair. The committee will oversee a defence program projected to cost up to $368 billion, including Australia’s acquisition of Virginia-class and Australian-built nuclear-powered submarines.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816

>>38986

AUKUS champion to oversee top-secret defence committee

Michael Read - May 7, 2026

The Albanese government is expected to appoint one of its staunchest AUKUS advocates, Senator Deborah O’Neill, to chair a powerful new defence committee that will oversee the $368 billion program to acquire nuclear submarines.

The government passed legislation in March to establish a new parliamentary joint committee on defence, creating a dedicated bipartisan body to scrutinise Australia’s rapidly expanding military build-up as it confronts a more volatile strategic environment.

Modelled on the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, the new committee will examine highly classified defence and intelligence matters – including confidential details tied to AUKUS and other sensitive military capabilities – with members expected to receive access to top-secret briefings not ordinarily made public.

The handling of classified material was a key reason the government restricted membership of the committee to Labor and Coalition MPs and senators, excluding the Greens and crossbenchers from the new oversight body.

O’Neill, who played a prominent role in parliament’s inquiry into the PwC tax leaks scandal and is the chair of the defence subcommittee of parliament’s joint standing committee on foreign affairs, has emerged as one of the government’s most vocal proponents of AUKUS.

O’Neill in February described AUKUS as “transformational” during the Senate debate on whether to establish the new secretive defence committee.

“These platforms represent a step change in stealth, endurance and deterrent capability,” O’Neill said.

“They will also be a national endeavour that must deliver jobs, skills and economic opportunity across our regions and, indeed, across the entire nation.”

The creation of the committee reflects concern within Labor and the Coalition that parliamentary oversight of Defence had become too superficial because sensitive matters could not be discussed publicly.

O’Neill declined to comment.

Liberal senator Dave Sharma is likely to serve as the new committee’s deputy chairman, though no decision has been made.

The government’s latest defence investment blueprint, released last month, showed Australia would spend up to $96 billion on the AUKUS program over the coming decade.

That money will cover the delivery of the first two Virginia-class vessels, expected around 2032 and 2036. A third is due around 2040, followed by the first of the five Australian-built submarines expected soon after.

The government will also allocate up to $11 billion to keep the ageing Collins-class submarine fleet operating into the 2040s.

The unpredictability of the Trump administration has fuelled unease among defence experts about whether Australia can rely on the United States to deliver its side of the AUKUS bargain, even after Trump endorsed the program during a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last October.

Richard Gray, a former top defence official, this week called on Australia to consider leasing Japanese submarines as a fallback option in case problems emerged with AUKUS.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/aukus-champion-to-oversee-top-secret-defence-committee-20260507-p5zuko

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39061

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592941 (111055ZMAY26) Notable: One Nation believes migrants are on their side as they target Labor - (Video) Pauline Hanson says One Nation will target migrant-heavy Labor electorates following the party’s breakthrough Farrer by-election victory, arguing many migrants do not want Australia to become “like the place they left”. Hanson identified western Sydney seats held by senior Labor ministers Chris Bowen and Tony Burke as future targets after One Nation secured its first House of Representatives seat with a swing exceeding 30 per cent. Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce said multicultural working-class communities were increasingly receptive to One Nation’s message, pointing to strong support in Griffith and other diverse areas within Farrer. Liberal MPs acknowledged the result may force greater cooperation and preference deals with One Nation in future elections. Internal Liberal concerns have also intensified about party organisation, volunteer numbers and the ability to reconnect with conservative and regional voters.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39048

>>39049

One Nation believes migrants are on their side as they target Labor

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ELIZABETH PIKE - 10 May 2026

1/2

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation will target migrant-heavy seats where new Australians do not want the country to turn into “the place they just left” after its Farrer win, as Liberals face the likelihood of making more deals with the populist party to beat Labor.

After her party won its first House of Representatives seat on Saturday night with a more than 30 per cent swing, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson singled out the ALP stronghold of western Sydney as her next target.

The populist party believes its success in migrant-heavy parts of Farrer is a sign that One Nation is appealing to migrants and that its main opposition is coming from “established white areas”.

The beleaguered federal opposition on Sunday was left reeling after losing former leader Sussan Ley’s seat on Saturday, which they had held for more than 70 years, ending up with a humiliating primary vote of 12 per cent.

Liberal MPs said they would continue fighting One Nation but understood that preference deals and contemplation of future coalitions were a contemporary reality.

The Victorian state election will be the first test for Liberal campaigners on how they work with One Nation and whether they consider forming government with Senator Hanson’s party to oust a Labor state government led by Jacinta Allen.

“Even the moderates are going to have to shift on this resistance to preference deals with One Nation. On future coalitions with One ­Nation, it is always better for political parties and leaders to be upfront with voters rather than doing deals after the fact behind closed doors,” a Liberal MP said.

As she flew off on the plane gifted to her by Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, Senator Hanson in a private hangar in Albury said Labor was underestimating the support she had outside of Coalition electorates.

“I’ve been out to Fairfield and other areas in Sydney, and support has grown there over the years, and people do want change there,” Senator Hanson said. “A lot of ­migrants are very supportive of One Nation. There’s huge support there, because they say to me, Pauline, we came here, we are Australians, and we don’t want this place to become like the place we left.”

One Nation star recruit Barnaby Joyce said western Sydney was the “next step” moments after the party won the Farrer by-election on Saturday night.

Senator Hanson said she would put her trust in the New England MP to decide which seats to contest, while adding that her sights were set on ousting Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke from their Sydney electorates. “That would be a good start to get this country on track,” she said.

The Australian understands that internal polling for the Liberals at the start of the by-election campaign showed the party was sitting at 11 per cent. Senior party figures on Saturday night were concerned the final primary vote result could “end up in single digits” rather than the 13 per cent result expected once postal votes are counted.

Given the dire expectations, resources were held back for the by-election campaign run by outgoing Liberal federal director Andrew Hirst. Coalition figures said the most damning optics during the night were the competing post-election parties held by the Liberals and One Nation.

“The One Nation party was pumping. There were hardly any people at the Liberal Party. That actually pointed out a big problem for the Liberals; the party is losing members and campaign volunteers,” a Liberal source said.

The Australian understands that despite the Farrer by-election result, Angus Taylor retains the full support of key conservative and moderate Liberal MPs and isn’t being blamed by colleagues for losing the seat vacated by Ms Ley. The Opposition Leader has unanimous support to press boldly ahead with an ambitious first ­budget-in-reply speech on Thursday night.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39062

File: 33ea69d35d67a4c⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a259c6d6593ed48⋯.jpg (2.11 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592963 (111116ZMAY26) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s family seeks coronial inquest, says she was ‘let down’ in final months - Virginia Giuffre’s brothers have requested a public coronial inquest and police review into the circumstances surrounding her death, arguing she was “let down” by authorities in the months before she died by suicide in Western Australia. The family says Giuffre repeatedly sought police help over alleged domestic violence, coercive control and fears for her safety during divorce proceedings with her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre. They raised concerns that Giuffre may have been wrongly characterised as a perpetrator after an interim family violence restraining order was granted against her shortly after she reported an alleged assault. The family has asked WA Police to review frontline responses, risk assessments and domestic violence procedures. The WA Coroner confirmed investigations into Giuffre’s death remain ongoing, with no decision yet on a public inquest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38854

>>38976

>>38977

Virginia Giuffre’s family seeks coronial inquest, says she was ‘let down’ in final months

Carla Hildebrandt and Melissa Fyfe - May 7, 2026

1/2

In the months before her death, Virginia Giuffre was asking for help.

Her family says those calls went unanswered.

Now, just over a year after Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent abuse survivor died by suicide at her rural West Australian property, her brothers have requested a public inquest and a formal review of police actions they believe failed to protect her.

In letters sent on Wednesday to West Australian Coroner Rosalinda Fogliani and WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch, Giuffre’s US-based brothers, Sky Roberts and Danny Wilson, said their sister had been let down by police responses in the months leading up to her death, and raised concerns about how her domestic violence allegations were handled.

Giuffre died by suicide on April 25, 2025, at her property in Neergabby, an hour’s drive north of Perth, in WA’s Wheatbelt region.

While the family does not dispute their sister took her own life, they argue the circumstances leading up to her death warrant closer scrutiny.

“Our central concern is that Virginia may have been misidentified as a perpetrator,” the family wrote.

The family pointed to an alleged history of domestic violence, including a 2015 incident in Colorado in which Giuffre’s husband, Robert Giuffre, was convicted of assault-related offences.

At the time of her death, Virginia Giuffre was involved in divorce proceedings with her Australian husband, with whom she shared three children. She had health issues, having undergone extensive surgery to her spine over the years, and employed a carer.

According to her brothers, Giuffre reported an assault that occurred at holiday accommodation in Quindalup, a coastal town 2½ hours’ drive south of Perth, on the night of January 9 and early morning on January 10, 2025.

They said police attended a call-out and Giuffre had visible injuries, but no charges were laid. Robert was served by police with a 72-hour violence restraining order, which protected Giuffre, her brothers said.

On January 14, just after the restraining order expired, Robert Giuffre was granted an interim family violence restraining order in the Perth Magistrates Court against Virginia.

The hearing was undertaken in closed court and ex parte, meaning the other party was not in attendance and the evidence given by the applicant was not required to be tested.

This process with minimal barriers for applicants is in place to protect vulnerable victims escaping domestic violence situations.

The six-month interim order extended to Giuffre’s youngest children, which meant she could not see them or have any contact and could not enter her Ocean Reef home.

Her family claimed this raised serious questions about how she was characterised in police assessments, and what evidence was presented to the magistrate for them to grant the order.

“We are deeply concerned about how this occurred so soon after she had reported a serious assault, and whether police information sharing, risk assessment, and safeguarding processes adequately protected her,” the brothers’ letter to Blanch states.

The Perth Magistrates Court refused this masthead access to the transcript of the hearing and Robert Giuffre’s family violence application.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39063

File: f740b7513022cab⋯.jpg (144.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb70e7c997ecaa5⋯.jpg (347.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 09dd7d4682e78bc⋯.jpg (909.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592971 (111124ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS widows drop bid for freedom over alleged Yazidi slave trading - Former Islamic State-linked women Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad will remain in custody after shelving plans for an immediate bail application over allegations they enslaved Yazidi women while living under the Islamic State caliphate in Syria. The mother and daughter were arrested after arriving at Melbourne Airport last week following their repatriation from the al-Roj detention camp. Prosecutors allege Abbas helped purchase a Yazidi woman for $US10,000 and knowingly kept her as a slave, while Ahmad is accused of enslavement and using a slave. The offences are classified as crimes against humanity and carry maximum penalties of 25 years’ imprisonment. Ahmad is scheduled to apply for bail in June, followed later by her mother. Another daughter, Zahra Ahmad, was released without charges after returning to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39044

>>39045

>>39047

ISIS widows drop bid for freedom over alleged Yazidi slave trading

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 11 May 2026

Former ISIS brides and accused slave owners Kawsar Abbas and her daughter Zeinab Ahmad will be remanded in custody after shelving plans for an immediate bail bid over allegations they enslaved Yazidi women under the Islamic State caliphate in Syria.

They had been expected to launch an application for release from custody in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday, where prosecutors were preparing to outline a summary of the alleged offending.

Instead, Monday’s hearing dealt with procedural matters, with bail no longer to be sought at this stage.

It comes just days after accused terrorist Janai Safar was refused bail in Sydney despite claims separating her from her nine-year-old son would be “particularly traumatic” after years detained in a Syrian camp.

The legal battles mark the first major court test for the Australian women repatriated from the al-Roj detention camp in northeast Syria after the collapse of Islamic State.

Ms Abbas, 54, and her daughter Zeinab were arrested by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team moments after landing at Melbourne Airport on Thursday night last week following their dramatic return to Australia.

Before chief magistrate Lisa Hannan, the mother and daughter appeared for a brief filing hearing where they smiled brightly at their relative Abraham, who was flanked by Robert Van Aalst — a Sydney humanitarian lawyer involved in the successful repatriation of Australian citizens from Syria in 2019, including the children of Jihadist Khaled Sharrouf.

The Australian previously revealed Mr Van Aalst was directing Jamal Rifi and Mr Abbas while they were in Syria, and advised them not to speak to media.

Plans to bail both women in Melbourne have been put off for several weeks, which they will now spend in custody, likely in a high-protection unit due to the enormous public interest the case has attracted.

Ms Ahmad will be first to try for freedom, with her bail application listed on June 4 and 5.

The outcome of her application will be closely followed by lawyers for her mother, who are set to plead her case on June 16 and 17.

Ms Abbas was represented in court by barrister Peter Morrissey SC and her daughter had retained highly experienced lawyers from Doogue and George.

Police allege Ms Abbas travelled to Syria in 2014 with her husband and children and helped purchase a Yazidi woman for $US10,000 before knowingly keeping the woman as a slave in the family home.

She has been charged with four crimes against humanity offences: enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading. Each offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years’ imprisonment.

Zeinab is also accused of keeping a Yazidi woman as a slave after travelling to Syria with her family in 2014. She has been charged with enslavement and using a slave, offences also carrying maximum penalties of 25 years in prison.

Another of Ms Abbas’ daughters, Zahra Ahmad, was released into the community and had not been charged with any offences after landing in Melbourne.

The case will return to court on Tuesday for an interim suppression order over the identity of a witness in the proceeding.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/isis-widows-to-fight-for-freedom-over-alleged-yazidi-slave-trading/news-story/63fdf1190a2bf7912684201fdf649ee4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39064

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24592977 (111129ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS-linked mother and daughter Kawsar Ahmad and Zeinab Ahmad reveal new bail effort on slavery charges - (Video) Islamic State-linked mother and daughter Kawsar Ahmad and Zeinab Ahmad have abandoned plans for an immediate bail application after being charged with slavery-related crimes against humanity offences following their return to Australia from Syria. Prosecutors allege the pair exercised control over a Yazidi woman held in conditions akin to slavery between 2017 and 2018 while living under the Islamic State caliphate in Syria’s Deir ez-Zur province. Kawsar Ahmad is charged with enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading, while Zeinab Ahmad faces enslavement and using a slave charges. Both women will remain in custody until separate bail hearings next month. The court has also imposed interim suppression orders protecting the identity of alleged victims and a proposed prosecution witness.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39044

>>39045

>>39047

>>39063

ISIS-linked mother and daughter Kawsar Ahmad and Zeinab Ahmad reveal new bail effort on slavery charges

LIAM BEATTY - 11 May 2026

A mother and daughter accused of keeping a woman as a slave in Syria have abandoned their bid to be released on bail.

Kawsar Ahmad, 54, and Zeinab Ahmad, 31, appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday afternoon, four days after the pair were arrested when they landed at Melbourne airport last week.

The two Australian women have been charged with slavery offences after a Yazidi woman was allegedly used as a slave in the family’s home in the Deir ez-Zur province of Syria in 2017 and 2018.

Last Friday, the court was told lawyers acting for the two women were preparing applications for them to be released on bail.

However, in court on Monday, chief magistrate Lisa Hannan said she had received notice they would no longer be seeking bail, with both asking the court to find suitable dates for bail applications next month.

Following a short adjournment, Justice Hannan said Zeinab Ahmad’s bail application would now be listed for June 5 and Kawsar Ahmad’s for June 16.

The pair returned to Australia on Thursday evening and were among a cohort of four women and nine children who had left a refugee camp for the family members of alleged ISIS fighters in northern Syria.

According to the Australian Federal Police, it’s alleged the women travelled to Syria in 2014 and they had been detained by Kurdish forces at the Al Roj camp since March 2019.

It’s alleged Kawsar Ahmad was “complicit” in the purchase of a female slave for $US10,000 in about June 2017, with the two women alleged to have exercised control over the woman in conditions akin to slavery until about November 2018.

Kawsar Ahmad, also known as Kawsar Abbas, has been charged with four crimes against humanity offences of enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading.

Zeinab Ahmad, also known as Zeinab Ahmed, is charged with two offences of enslavement and using a slave.

According to charge sheets released by the court, warrants for the pair’s arrest were issued on February 17 with the AFP citing that they were “returning from extended period overseas”.

The charges allege both women “intentionally exercised any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership (of the woman) … in circumstances where the conduct was committed intentionally or knowingly as part of a widespread or systemic attack against a civilian population”.

Australian law prevents the media from naming the woman who was allegedly the victim of the slavery offences and the court has imposed an interim suppression order barring the identification of a second woman, who is expected to be called as a witness in the case.

It’s alleged this woman was also an victim of slavery-related offences, unrelated to the charges against Kawsar Ahmad and Zeinab Ahmad, but will give evidence “including interactions with the two accused”.

On Monday, prosecutors flagged they would apply for her to be designated under law a “special witness” which would also bar the media from reporting her name or anything that could identify her.

A hearing on the matter is expected to occur in court on Tuesday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/isislinked-mother-and-daughter-kawsar-ahmad-and-zeinab-ahmad-reveal-new-bail-effort-on-slavery-charges/news-story/bf40acb7264ab95f533c1b2223a4be7e

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ-zKDFjXPQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39065

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24596591 (121229ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Is this 2023 Australia, or 1933 Berlin?’ Deborah Conway stunned by pro-Palestinian protesters - (Video) Singer-songwriter Deborah Conway told the antisemitism royal commission she lost performance opportunities and faced hostile protests because of her support for Israel following the October 7 Hamas attacks. Conway described being shouted at during concerts and writers’ festivals, while recalling shock at pro-Palestinian demonstrations outside the Sydney Opera House in October 2023. Jewish musician Joshua Moshe also described online harassment, threats and vandalism after a WhatsApp group for Jewish creatives was leaked publicly. The commission heard further evidence from Jewish Australians describing antisemitic abuse in schools, workplaces and public life. Rabbi Daniel Rabin said some members of Melbourne’s Jewish community had begun questioning whether they should leave Australia, while Rabbi Menachem Dadon recounted his daughter asking why Jews were “hated so much” after surviving the Bondi terror attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

‘Is this 2023 Australia, or 1933 Berlin?’ Deborah Conway stunned by pro-Palestinian protesters

Alexandra Smith and Angus Dalton - May 11, 2026

1/2

Singer-songwriter Deborah Conway has been yelled and hissed at during her concerts and writers’ festivals because of her support for Israel, the Royal Commission into Antisemitism has heard, while another musician feared for his safety after the doxxing of a Jewish WhatsApp group.

The royal commission also heard from a Perth teenager, giving evidence under a pseudonym, as he described a series of hate comments directed at him on Discord in 2024 as he played Minecraft. The comments were written by other students at his high school.

One comment described the teen as a “rabid, filthy, rotten, gut-wrenching, grotesque Rabbi, yarmulke-wearing, bank-owning, iron-doming, Hashem-following Jew”.

Former High Court judge Virginia Bell heard more harrowing stories of lived experiences of antisemitism as the commission sat for its sixth day of public hearings in Sydney on Monday.

Conway told the commission that she regarded anti-Zionism as a “genocidal impulse” and said she had lost several performance bookings because of backlash to her views.

“I think it’s really important to say that I support Israel’s right to exist. I don’t support all of the Israeli government’s ways of prosecuting the war,” she said. “But, you know, we didn’t ask for America to be dismantled because it prosecuted the war in Afghanistan or Vietnam or Iraq badly … I think that idea of anti-Zionism is, in fact, a genocidal impulse.”

Conway also detailed an incident which took place while she was on stage in Western Australia, when “all these people rose to their feet within the auditorium and unfurled their signs and started screaming things at me, and I was shocked”.

At a writers’ festival, her interviewer pulled out, and “there was one person that hissed at me, ‘shame on you’. And I just thought, wow, you know, [that’s] kind of a very strange thing to find at a writers’ festival in a regional town”.

Conway also told of her horror watching pro-Palestinian protests at the Sydney Opera House on October 9, 2023, when the sails of the iconic building were illuminated in blue and white in support of Israel. She said the “glee, the jubilation” from the protesters stunned her.

“I just thought, am I living in 2023 Australia or is this 1933 Berlin?” Conway said.

Asked how her bookings were tracking in 2026, she responded: “There aren’t many.”

Jewish saxophonist Joshua Moshe told the commission about the fallout from the leaking of a WhatsApp group for Jewish creatives he was part of in 2024, which led to the band he had played with for seven years ejecting him from the group.

After the leak, a caller threatened the North Melbourne homewares shop Moshe ran with his wife, telling the pair to watch their backs, and sent a photo of their son taken from social media.

After reporting posts made about him and his family online to the police, an officer told Moshe they could investigate vandalism of their store and the threat involving his son, but not the other posts targeting Moshe because they didn’t “cross the line” into antisemitism.

“There were images of me taken from my press photos as a musician, saying that I’m a Zionist or a Zio, and that I’ve been plotting for the Zionist entity,” said Moshe, who was hit by a surge of abusive messages.

“We were receiving emails, we were receiving Google reviews, Facebook messages. It was relentless.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.39066

File: ebd457207ce118c⋯.mp4 (15.61 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 129f1fad9466b78⋯.jpg (259.37 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24596665 (121255ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish singer-songwriter Deborah Conway names Offspring actress Alicia Gardiner as the author of a vicious letter-writing, boycott campaign against her - (Video) Singer-songwriter Deborah Conway has told the antisemitism royal commission that actress Alicia Gardiner led a campaign urging venues to boycott her performances over Conway’s public support for Israel. Conway alleged letters sent to venues described her as a “supporter of genocide”, resulting in several cancelled shows. She also described protests outside venues, including masked demonstrators carrying “globalise the intifada” signs and pounding on windows during appearances. Conway said two of her daughters were also targeted, including one who allegedly lost industry friendships and another who faced abuse while selling food at markets. The commission additionally heard evidence from Jewish musician Joshua Moshe about threats made against his family after he was doxxed online, while Rabbi Daniel Rabin and Rabbi Menachem Dadon described growing fear within Jewish communities following the October 7 Hamas attacks and subsequent tensions in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38729

>>38891

>>39012

>>39065

Deborah Conway names Aussie actress who she says led vicious letter-writing, boycott campaign against her

Jewish singer-songwriter Deborah Conway has named Offspring actress Alicia Gardiner as the author of a vicious letter-writing campaign she says was made to have her boycotted from music venues.

Caroline Marcus - May 12, 2026

1/2

Deborah Conway has named television actress Alicia Gardiner as the leader of a vicious campaign to have the Jewish singer-songwriter boycotted from music venues.

Conway testified before the Royal Commission that the Offspring actress had written letters to music venues, trying to have the singer’s shows dumped following the release of her album in August last year.

“The advertising would go up - every venue that we would advertise at received a letter from an actress,” Conway told the Commission.

“An Australian actress took it upon herself to send a letter to all of these venues to say: ‘Deborah Conway is a self-confessed Zionist and a supporter of genocide’.”

Conway said five venues caved to the demand to cancel her show.

Outside the Commission, Conway named the actress, best known for her role on the Australian TV series Offspring in which she played nurse Kim Akerholt.

“Alicia Gardiner,” Conway said when asked by Sky News who the actress was.

“She signed her name very boldly.”

Melbourne prosecutors last month dropped assault charges against Gardiner, 50, who had been accused of grabbing a female parliamentary worker’s breast and twisting it during a pro-Palestine protest at Victorian Parliament on May 7, 2024.

Gardiner had been part of an activist group who yelled “shame on you” and “free Palestine” from the public upper gallery of Victoria’s Parliament House.

The actress had earlier pleaded guilty to failing to leave parliamentary premises and had been slapped with a $500 fine without conviction.

Gardiner did not dispute she may have touched the parliamentary worker’s breast, but her lawyer argued it was “unintentional” to stop herself from falling after being pushed.

Sky News contacted Ms Gardiner’s agents BGM about Conway’s new claim and a representative told the network: “We have no comment”.

Conway separately testified about the immense pressure venues faced to cancel her in the wake of her public support for Israel and campaigning against antisemitism.

She said one venue cancelled her performance after “70 people turned up wearing balaclavas beating pots and pans and threatening them”.

Conway said police attended the incident but did nothing, citing “free speech”.

On another occasion, a dozen protesters wearing masks turned up to her appearance at a suburban Brisbane bookshop, holding “globalise the intifada” and “Zionists equal Nazis” signs outside.

“They literally screamed for the next 45 minutes and pounded on the glass,” Conway said.

“The worst thing was that the police turned up and did nothing because they thought that was OK. It was ‘freedom of speech’. Somehow, this freedom of speech thing has become so holy, it’s OK to vilify us and not only us, but everyone who walked out of the shop felt deeply threatened by these people.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62677

File: 36172d554747412⋯.jpg (288.73 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599739 (130915ZMAY26) Notable: Pauline Hanson calls on Angus Taylor to back One Nation if she wins more seats at the election - Pauline Hanson has urged Opposition Leader Angus Taylor and Nationals leader Matt Canavan to work with One Nation to remove Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, while demanding the Coalition guarantee support for a One Nation-led government if her party wins more seats at the next election. Hanson said voters were “angry” and had “had enough” after One Nation secured the Farrer by-election, with David Farley joining former Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce in the House of Representatives to give the party two lower-house MPs. Anthony Albanese said the Coalition would “likely” require One Nation support to govern, accusing the Liberals and Nationals of “legitimising” the party through preference deals and similar policies. Matt Canavan rejected a formal coalition, while deputy Liberal leader Jane Hume said voters wanted a “united and strong Coalition” after recent internal instability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39048 (pb)

Pauline Hanson calls on Angus Taylor to back One Nation if she wins more seats at the election

ROSIE LEWIS - May 11, 2026

1/2

An emboldened Pauline Hanson has extended her hand to Angus Taylor and Nationals leader Matt Canavan to create a conservative plan to get rid of Anthony Albanese, as she demanded the Coalition guarantee support for a One Nation-led government if her party wins more seats than it does at the next election.

On a high after voters for the first time elected a One Nation MP to the House of Representatives at Saturday’s Farrer by-­election, taking the party’s lower-house representation to two, the One Nation leader declared the Coalition had to realise “I’m not the enemy” as she looked to pick up more electorates than the Liberals and Nationals in one term.

The Coalition holds 41 seats in the House of Representatives.

“If they get the numbers and they require our numbers to give them government, then I will give them supply and confidence,” Senator Hanson told The Australian. “I don’t want a ministerial position because that means they will be able to shut me down, dictate to me, and I have to pass bad legislation, support them on it. I’m not going to do that.

“But I also want to know: if we get more members than what they do, and we require their numbers (to form government), will they give me the same deal? We don’t know what the future holds. The people are angry. The people have had enough.”

As Liberals face the likelihood of making more deals with the populist party to beat Labor, the Prime Minister predicted it would be unlikely the Coalition could form government without One Nation but didn’t believe Senator Hanson’s cut-through would extend into metropolitan seats.

Senator Hanson agreed with Mr Albanese’s “bold” assertion that the Coalition now needed One Nation.

Pressed on whether she would sit down with the Opposition Leader and Senator Canavan to map out a possible pathway to government at the next election, due in 2028, she said: “We can do that closer to the election. There’s not going to be an election on for another two years and hopefully we’ll be able to work together with the Coalition government in Victoria and in NSW up to the (federal) election.

“I was just disgusted with the dirty fight that the Nats and Libs brought against One Nation in the seat of Farrer instead of working with us to stop the teal from winning the seat. It tells me that they’re very concerned about the rising support of One Nation. They’ve got to realise I’m not the enemy. If they are really conservatives, are there for the right reasons to get good government for the people and oust the Labor Party, they should be working with me, not against me.”

Senator Hanson denied One Nation was at its peak, describing the Farrer win as “breaking the ceiling”. It had not solidified her desire to switch from the Senate and run in the lower house at the next election, saying that move was still under consideration.

Senator Canavan said he had no interest in creating a formal coalition with One Nation and wanted to win government without Senator Hanson’s support, adamant that no more Nationals MPs would follow Barnaby Joyce and defect to the minor party.

The Liberals gained just 12.38 per cent of the first preference vote in the Farrer by-election, representing a swing of 31 per cent against the party, compared with 39.46 per cent for One Nation’s David Farley and 28.39 per cent for independent candidate Michelle Milthorpe, who was backed by Climate 200.

The Nationals picked up 9.72 per cent of the first preference vote, the first time the party had been able to field a candidate since losing the seat to the Liberals in 2001.

“One Nation finished first (in Farrer) but the problem has been traditionally ... the One Nation vote doesn’t always come back to our side of politics, that people’s preferences go all of which ways,” Senator Canavan said.

“There has to be a very clear message to the Australian people that if you want to change the government, you’ve got to put the Labor Party last. If that’s all you do, you’re going to get change. Everything else you can do, I don’t care. You can put the Greens one and they’ll get knocked out anyway.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62678

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599808 (131008ZMAY26) Notable: Australian soldier killed after two parachutes collide mid-air in training incident at Jervis Bay - (Video) Warrant Officer Lachlan Muddle, 50, has died after colliding mid-air with a parachute instructor during a training exercise at Jervis Bay Airfield in New South Wales. Major General Garth Gould said the two “collided several hundred feet above the ground” while manoeuvring towards the drop zone, with the instructor surviving with minor injuries. Gould said both men were “highly skilled” and had “several thousand jumps” between them. All Australian Defence Force parachute exercises have been suspended pending an investigation. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the incident was a “stark reminder that there are no easy days for those who defend our nation”, while Opposition Leader Angus Taylor described Muddle as an “honourable man”. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the investigation must be “as thorough as possible”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian soldier killed after two parachutes collide mid-air in training incident at Jervis Bay

Jack Nivison and Ria Pandey - May 12, 2026

1/2

An Australian special forces soldier has been killed in a “mid-air collision” during a parachute training exercise at a Defence Force base in coastal NSW.

Warrant Officer Lachlan Muddle, 50, was killed on Monday night when he collided mid-air with a parachute instructor as his paratrooper regiment was involved in routine training at the Jervis Bay Airfield.

Addressing media on Tuesday, Major General Garth Gould said the men “collided several hundred feet above the ground as they were manoeuvring towards the drop zone”.

“After the collision, both soldiers fell from height. One soldier, a sergeant from the Australian Defence Force parachute school, survived the fall with minor injuries,” General Gould said.

“A second soldier, Warrant Officer Lachlan Muddle, received fatal injuries as a result of the fall.

“Warrant Officer Muddle was provided immediate first aid on the scene by Australian Defence Force medics who were later joined by NSW Ambulance who arrived on the scene very quickly.

“Both paratroopers were highly skilled. Between the two of them, they had several thousand jumps to their credit.”

When asked by reporters if he believed the ADF parachute training safety protocols were up to scratch, General Gould said he had “a high degree of confidence”.

“I do believe they are up to scratch and fit for purpose. I’ve got a high degree in confidence in our training system,” he said.

“You’re right to bring up the tragic accident that involved Lance Corporal Jack Fitzgibbon about two years ago. That matter involved a single paratrooper. It was investigated through a number of lines of inquiry. Some of those inquiries have concluded and provided recommendations, others are close to concluding.

“I am very confident in the safety system as a whole.”

General Gould also added that all parachute exercises across the Defence Force had been halted pending an internal investigation into Warrant Officer Muddle’s death.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese paid tribute to Warrant Officer Muddle, stating “our hearts go out to his Army family and the broader Defence community”.

“This tragic accident is a stark reminder that there are no easy days for those who defend our nation,” the Prime Minister said in a statement.

“We are in the debt of every Australian who serves and puts themselves on the line for all of us.

“May Warrant Officer Class Two Muddle live on in every heart he touched.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62679

File: 4026c0dc68cba3f⋯.jpg (152.28 KB,1944x1093,1944:1093,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 93b406bbc46f732⋯.jpg (192.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6431b3bc613a6bb⋯.jpg (104.96 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5e03d26d74e10ac⋯.jpg (581.51 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599829 (131018ZMAY26) Notable: Defence Minister hails ‘one of Australia’s finest’ Lachlan Muddle after tragic collision - (Video) Warrant Officer Second Class Lachlan Muddle, 50, has died after a mid-air collision during advanced night-time parachute training at Jervis Bay Airfield in New South Wales. Defence Minister Richard Marles described the Special Air Service Regiment veteran as “one of its finest”, while Major General Garth Gould said Muddle was remembered for his “sense of humour” and “deep commitment” to service. The exercise involved low-light military freefall training using night-vision goggles when Muddle and another experienced paratrooper collided “several hundred feet above the ground”. The second soldier survived with minor injuries. All Australian Defence Force parachuting operations have been paused pending investigations into the fatal accident.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62678

Defence Minister hails ‘one of Australia’s finest’ Lachlan Muddle after tragic collision

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and PAIGE FRYER - May 12, 2026

1/2

One of Australia’s “finest” and “deeply experienced” SAS troopers has died after a catastrophic mid-air collision during a military drill to prepare soldiers to parachute in darkness.

Warrant Officer Second Class Lachlan Muddle, 50, an expert sniper and veteran special forces operator who served on five deployments including Afghanistan, died after colliding mid-air with another elite paratrooper during a night-time training exercise at Jervis Bay Airfield on the NSW south coast on Monday evening.

The incident that claimed Mr Muddle’s life took place during an advanced military freefall training conducted in low-light conditions using night-vision goggles, of which officers had completed four out of the planned six weeks of daring activities.

The second paratrooper involved was a sergeant from the ADF Parachute School, also an experienced military freefall parachutist. He survived the fall with minor injuries.

Between the two of them, the veterans had several thousand jumps to their credit.

The impact of the crash sent Mr Muddle spiralling towards the ground and caused him to crash into thick bushland and to suffer injuries that, despite the best efforts of his fellow soldier to perform CPR, proved fatal.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the force had “lost one of its finest”, adding that Mr Muddle was an “expert sniper” and experienced special forces operator whose death would be felt across the SAS community.

Addressing the media on Tuesday, Army Special Operations Commander Major General Garth Gould said despite both soldiers effectively deploying their canopies, the mid-air collision caused both men to fall from height.

Warrant Officer Muddle was provided immediate first aid on the scene by ADF medics, who were quickly joined by NSW Ambulance.

The second soldier, a sergeant from the ADF Parachute School survived, sustained only minor injuries.

Major General Gould said the accident occurred about 5.40pm, roughly four weeks into a six-week advanced military freefall training block.

Several investigations into the incident are now under way with Major General Gould saying he believes training safety protocols “are up to scratch”.

“After successfully opening their parachutes, what we know about the incident is that both paratroopers collided several hundred feet above the ground whilst they were manoeuvring towards the drop zone,” he said.

“After the collision, both soldiers fell from height.”

Major General Gould said the training environment was deliberately challenging, taking place in low-light conditions as part of a high-level capability course.

He said both men were among the most experienced parachutists in the Australian Defence Force.

When asked by reporters if he believed the ADF parachute training safety protocols were up to scratch, he said he had “a high degree of confidence”.

He said Warrant Officer Muddle was “highly regarded” within their community.

He joined the Army in 1994 before moving into Special Operations Command in 2007, where he spent most of his career serving with the SAS Regiment.

“He was a skilled professional, and he’ll be remembered for his sense of humour and his genuine and deep commitment to serving the nation, serving an army, and serving in the Special Air Service regiment,” Major General Gould told reporters.

“In a tight-knit community like ours, his loss has been very deeply and immediately felt.”

Major General Gould announced the ADF immediately paused all personnel parachuting operations pending an investigation.

“Our priority at the moment is supporting Warrant Officer Muddle’s family, and also providing support to the ADF members involved in the incident last night, as well as supporting the initial investigative matters,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62680

File: 96633922244849f⋯.jpg (634.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c6e960114b47e18⋯.jpg (492.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599846 (131028ZMAY26) Notable: Budget 2026: Cost of subs and frigates takes heavy toll on ADF’s purse - Taxpayers are expected to spend $17bn on the AUKUS submarine program over the next four years despite Australia remaining years away from receiving its first Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine. The defence budget is forecast to sit at about 2.02 per cent of gross domestic product in 2026-27, rising to 2.2 per cent by the decade’s end, while the submarine and Hunter-class frigate programs consume almost 9 per cent of annual defence spending. Budget papers show ongoing capability pressures, with the Collins-class submarines, Hobart-class destroyers and Anzac frigates achieving just 84 per cent of planned sea days. The MQ-4C Triton drone program and Royal Australian Air Force F-35 fleet are also forecast to fall short of operational targets, while Australian Defence Force personnel numbers are recovering after years of workforce shortages.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816 (pb)

>>38886 (pb)

>>39000 (pb)

Budget 2026: Cost of subs and frigates takes heavy toll on ADF’s purse

BEN PACKHAM - 12 May 2026

Taxpayers will spend a whopping $17bn on the AUKUS submarine program over the next four years without seeing even the first nuclear nuclear-powered boat, as core defence spending remains stuck at around 2 per cent of GDP.

Despite the government’s shift to “NATO standard” reporting of defence funding last month, which includes service pensions and other expenditure, the budget ­papers contained no detail of spending levels against the new measure.

Analysis by The Australian, however, reveals the defence budget is expected to be about 2.02 per cent of GDP under the old standard in 2026-27, rising to 2.2 per cent by the end of the decade.

The budget papers show the cost of the nation’s submarine ambitions hit $5.45bn this financial year alone, after about $4bn in payments to the US and UK governments to bolster their nuclear submarine industries so they can support the AUKUS plan.

The annual AUKUS cost will ease to about $3bn in 2026-27, growing steadily to nearly $5bn by the end of the decade when the navy will still be two to three years away from receiving its first ­Virginia-class boat from the US.

At the same time, the troubled Hunter-class frigate program is set to cost north of $2.5bn in the coming financial year, with the first of the ships not due to enter service until 2034 at the earliest.

The programs – defence’s most expensive – are draining nearly 9 per cent of the annual defence budget, which is set to hit $62.6bn in 2026-27, rising to more than $77bn by the end of the decade.

Meanwhile, the nation’s major combat fleet – including the Collins-class submarines, the Hobart-class destroyers, and the Anzac frigates – are falling short of their planned availability.

The platforms, which form the backbone of the navy, managed just 84 per cent of their planned days at sea forecast in last year’s budget.

The budget highlights ongoing problems in the rollout of the $3bn MQ-4C Triton surveillance drone program, which is on track to deliver just a third of its forecast flying hours for 2025-26.

The RAAF’s F-35 fleet is also on track to fall short of its forecast 2025-26 flying hours target by about 9 per cent.

In a budget bright spot, the ­Defence Department is turning around its workforce crisis, with the uniformed force on track to reach 61,711 personnel by June 30 – more than 2300 higher than forecast in last year’s document.

The budget numbers have the force growing to more than 67,400 uniformed personnel by 2029-30, a forecast that is still short of its 69,000 end-of-decade target.

The government is also making progress in slashing the numbers of star-ranked officers, which had ballooned in recent years, making the ADF one of the most top-heavy forces in the Western world.

The budget shows the number of navy one-star and above officers reduced from 74 to 79. The army has cut star-ranks from 89 to 86, while the air force numbers remain static at 63.

Much of the defence budget detail was released last month when Defence Minister Richard Marles released an updated capability investment plan and National Defence Strategy, vowing an extra $14bn over the forward estimates and $53bn over the decade.

He said defence spending was sitting at about 2.8 per cent of GDP under NATO accounting rules, and would hit about 3 per cent of GDP by 2033.

The budget confirms about $6.8bn of the new spending is from core defence funding over the coming four years, while about $4.8bn will come from the private sector in yet-to-be announced off-budget investments.

The budget is silent on how much the government hopes to raise from its sale of surplus Defence land, branding the forecasts as “not for publication” amid a major backlash over the loss of heritage properties, including Victoria Barracks sites in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

The navy’s future general purpose frigates have hit the budget’s “Top 30” list of defence acquisition projects for the first time, with forecast expenditure of $655m this coming financial year.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/budget-2026-cost-of-subs-and-frigates-takes-heavy-toll-on-adfs-purse/news-story/d53b690e2b48e95802b284efd4b936c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62681

File: 08030f328494ce4⋯.jpg (169.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 259ce6f66c2e781⋯.jpg (258.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599858 (131034ZMAY26) Notable: Canberra teenager accused of plotting racist terror attack faces historic prosecution - A 17-year-old Canberra boy has become the first person in Australia to face federal prosecution for allegedly planning a terrorist attack in the national capital. Police allege the teenager was preparing a “nationalist and racist extremist” attack targeting people not known to him and had shared violent extremist propaganda online. The youth appeared before the Australian Capital Territory Children’s Court after being charged with preparing or planning a terrorist act, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, and transmitting violent extremist material. Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Peter Crozier described the case as a “disturbing example” of young Australians being exposed to extremist ideology online, while ACT Policing deputy chief police officer Richard Chin said parents and teachers were often the first to notice signs of radicalisation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Canberra teenager accused of plotting racist terror attack faces historic prosecution

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 13 May 2026

A Canberra teenager has become the first person in Australia to face federal prosecution for allegedly plotting a terrorist attack in the nation’s capital, with police accusing him of preparing a “nationalist and racist extremist” attack on strangers.

The 17-year-old appeared before the ACT Children’s Court on Tuesday after being hit with additional terrorism charges by the ACT Joint Counter Terrorism Team.

It is alleges the teenager was planning an attack on people not known to him and was motivated by extremist nationalist and racist ideology.

The youth is now charged with one count of acts in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

He has also been charged with one count of transmitting violent extremist material, which carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.

The teenager was first arrested on November 5 after investigators allegedly uncovered violent extremist material during a search warrant.

He has remained behind bars since his arrest.

Police will allege further evidence uncovered during the investigation showed the boy had shared violent extremist propaganda and was preparing to carry out a terrorist act.

AFP Assistant Commissioner Peter Crozier described the case as a disturbing example of young Australians being exposed to extremist ideology online.

“Violent extremist material is circulated by terrorist organisations to promote violence, hate and division within Australian society,” Assistant Commissioner Crozier said.

“The AFP and our law enforcement and national security partners will continue to work tirelessly to keep Australians safe.

“It is our job to defend and protect the Australian community, and we will relentlessly pursue those who seek harm to our democracy or our social cohesion.”

Mr Crozier said parents, schools, social services and technology companies all had a role to play in preventing young people from accessing extremist propaganda.

ACT Policing deputy chief police officer Richard Chin said the priority of police was to prevent access to extremist material and to educate young people in Canberra.

He said parents and teachers were often the first to notice warning signs of radicalisation among young people.

“Recognising early signs of changes in a young person’s behaviour can play a crucial role in guiding young people to safe and supportive pathways,” he said.

The matter will return to the ACT Children’s Court at a later date.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/canberra-teenager-accused-of-plotting-racist-terror-attack-faces-historic-prosecution/news-story/4f4552f1bc2a98fb350473c5caf0e97d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62682

File: 559c10a5f27ea44⋯.jpg (306.29 KB,2500x1568,625:392,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8750e79f2cbc0fa⋯.jpg (290.54 KB,2406x2406,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599875 (131041ZMAY26) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s memoir named book of the year - Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir Of Surviving Abuse And Fighting For Justice has been named book of the year at the British Book Awards in London, alongside winning non-fiction narrative book of the year and sharing the Freedom to Publish prize with Meta whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams’ book Careless People. The memoir, released six months after Giuffre died aged 41 at her farm north of Perth, details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. Judges described the memoir as a “testament to the importance of serious non-fiction”, saying it “stands as the most important book of 2025 for its bravery” and could “change the world”. Sky Roberts said his family was “truly honoured” to accept the awards on behalf of his late sister, while judges praised the publisher for handling the memoir with “integrity”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38976 (pb)

>>38977 (pb)

>>38977 (pb)

Virginia Giuffre’s memoir named book of the year

Judges praise Epstein accuser’s bravery and say her book, Nobody’s Girl, could change the world

Andrea Hamblin - 12 May 2026

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s memoir about her time being sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein won the top honour at the British Book Awards on Monday night.

Giuffre’s book, which also detailed allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and other high-profile men, was named book of the year at a ceremony at Grosvenor House in London.

It also won the prize for non-fiction narrative book of the year, as well as being named the joint winner of the Freedom to Publish prize alongside Careless People, a book by Meta whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams.

In a video played during the ceremony, Sky Roberts, Giuffre’s brother, said his family was “truly honoured” to accept the awards on behalf of his late sister.

Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir Of Surviving Abuse And Fighting For Justice was co-written with Amy Wallace and released six months after Giuffre took her own life, aged 41, at her farm north of Perth, Western Australia.

In the memoir, Giuffre detailed how she was allegedly forced by Epstein, the paedophile financier, and his co-accused Ghislaine Maxwell, to have sex with some of the world’s most powerful men.

She claimed she was paid $15,000 (about £11,000) for “servicing the man the tabloids called ‘Randy Andy’” – a reference to Prince Andrew.

Giuffre wrote that the then Prince “was friendly enough but still entitled – as if he believed having sex with me was his birthright”.

She had accused him of raping and abusing her on three separate occasions when she was 17. Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has denied the allegations and a civil claim brought in the US was settled out of court with no admission of guilt.

The judges wrote that Giuffre’s memoir was a “testament to the importance of serious non-fiction”, with one noting: “I am a better person for having read this book”.

Nobody’s Girl “will stay in my bones”, one judge said. Another predicted that it would “change the world”.

They said Doubleday, the publisher, had “set the gold standard for how to publish bravely and with integrity”.

“The team did an incredible job at honouring Giuffre’s memory, her story and her words,” the judges said, adding that the memoir “stands as the most important book of 2025 for its bravery”.

The awards ceremony also commemorated Dame Jilly Cooper with a posthumous award.

Dame Jilly died unexpectedly in October 2025, aged 88. She was best known for her raunchy 1980s romance novel Rivals, which was adapted into an award-winning television series that is now in its second season.

Philip Jones, editor of The Bookseller and chairman of the judges at the British Book Awards, said: “Our winners represent the very best of the book trade, standing up for the books and the authors when others would try to stand them down.

“The British Book Awards affirms our creatives, our entertainers and our truth-tellers, and we applaud those who did so much to bring their work to the public.

“In 2025 the importance of the book was manifest, it was a beacon to many and a heartbeat for all.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/12/virginia-giuffre-memoir-british-book-award/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62683

File: de34f1c64604c23⋯.jpg (1.72 MB,5093x3395,5093:3395,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e573abc92f4e5d⋯.jpg (385.69 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599898 (131059ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Kevin, what the hell was that?’ Why Rudd thinks Trump will stand by Taiwan - Former Australian ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump’s “strongman” political image makes it unlikely he would abandon Taiwan if China attempted to alter the status quo by force. Speaking in New York after returning to the Asia Society, Rudd recalled telling China’s ambassador to the United States, Xie Feng, during the 2024 Republican National Convention that any move on Taiwan would force Trump to “double down” to avoid appearing weak. Rudd said he warned Chinese officials that such a scenario could trigger “escalation, crisis conflict and potentially war”. The comments came before Trump’s visit to Beijing, where Taiwan and future United States arms sales are expected to feature in talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump said he would discuss future weapons sales with Xi but stressed he did not want aggression similar to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘Kevin, what the hell was that?’ Why Rudd thinks Trump will stand by Taiwan

Michael Koziol - May 12, 2026

1/2

New York: The late Hulk Hogan was warming up the crowd for Donald Trump at the 2024 Republican National Convention (RNC) – by ripping off his shirt – when China’s ambassador to the United States, Xie Feng, leant over to Kevin Rudd and asked: “Kevin, what the hell was that?”

Rudd, then Australia’s ambassador to the US, and himself lightly bemused by the spectacle, replied: “We should have a chat tomorrow.”

The two men had tea the next day at the Milwaukee Club, where Rudd explained why it would not be wise for China to try to make a move on Taiwan under a Trump presidency.

“The whole Hulk Hogan phenomenon is seeking to underline, underscore, what President Trump has seen as his essential strength for office, and that is: I am a strongman,” says Rudd.

“And if you have anything in your mind which is likely to render me [Trump] to look weak, then frankly, I’m going to double down, retaliate, in order to reassert my strength.”

Rudd recounted this story on Monday night (US time) at an event in New York City with the Asia Society, the think tank he rejoined as global president and chief executive after resigning the ambassadorship last month.

They were among his first public comments since he left the role of Australia’s chief diplomat in Washington after three years to return to China scholarship.

Rudd said he told his Chinese counterpart at the RNC that if China believed it wise to use force to change the status quo in Taiwan, “the immediate consequence would be to make President Trump look weak in the world and also in the United States”.

Trump “could and would do anything in order to reassert his strength, and therefore we’re in the business of escalation, crisis conflict and potentially war”.

“To my Chinese friends, I said, ‘Do not do this’,” Rudd recounted. “President Trump, I think, understands this intuitively, which is why I’d be very surprised if the language [on Taiwan] was to change in any way.”

The remarks from Rudd, who is considered one of the world’s leading China scholars, came on the eve of Trump’s highly anticipated trip to Beijing. He leaves Washington on Tuesday (Washington time) for the first visit to China by a sitting US president since Trump went in 2017, during his first term.

Foreign policy commentators have speculated about Trump changing US policy regarding Taiwan as part of a grand bargain with Chinese President Xi Jinping on trade and other economic matters. But the administration has played down that possibility ahead of the visit.

“Not unlike discussions on Iran, Russia and all the hotspots – or potential hotspots – there is an ongoing conversation about Taiwan,” a senior US official said on a briefing call.

“The last couple of times [Trump and Xi] have interacted it has been a point of discussion. There has been no change of US policy coming out of those, and we don’t expect to see any changes in US policy going forward.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62684

File: 2b4b3298e36e19d⋯.jpg (229.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2aa56ab68cdfed6⋯.jpg (454.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599907 (131113ZMAY26) Notable: Donald Trump must appeal to China’s self-interest on Iran, says Kevin Rudd, as Taiwan tensions loom over Beijing summit - Former prime minister Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump should appeal to China’s economic self-interest during talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping over reopening the Strait of Hormuz, warning it would be a mistake for Washington to frame the issue as a request for assistance. Speaking in New York, Rudd said Beijing wanted the strait reopened because of fears the Iran crisis could further weaken global growth and China’s domestic economy. Rudd also dismissed expectations of any major shift in United States policy on Taiwan, arguing military action against the island would force Trump to respond aggressively to avoid appearing weak. Trump said he would discuss future United States arms sales to Taiwan with Xi during the Beijing summit, while Chinese state media described Taiwan as the “first inviolable red line” in relations between the two powers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62683

Donald Trump must appeal to China’s self-interest on Iran, says Kevin Rudd, as Taiwan tensions loom over Beijing summit

JOE KELLY and YONI BASHAN - 12 May 2026

1/2

Donald Trump must appeal to China’s urgent economic self-interest when he meets Xi Jinping this week to discuss reopening the Strait of Hormuz, according to former prime minister Kevin Rudd, who says it would be a mistake to frame the discussion as an American request for assistance.

In his first public comments as the returning chief executive of The Asia Society, the former Australian ambassador to Washington also told an audience in New York that he didn’t expect to see a rhetorical shift on Taiwan and that Beijing’s domestic economic concerns provided Washington with unexpected leverage to resolve the Iran crisis.

“It’s important for the United States to understand that China, for its own domestic economic reasons, wants to see the straits reopened,” Dr Rudd said. “As the President arrives, he needs to have in the back of his mind the fact that whatever is said publicly … China wants to see this over.”

Dr Rudd said China’s leadership had already voiced concerns that the Iran crisis would further depress global growth – a concern that could prove decisive as the two leaders meet in Beijing for a three-day summit beginning on Wednesday evening.

China is preparing an elaborate reception for Mr Trump, closing the Temple of Heaven for two days in a spectacle echoing his 2017 Forbidden City tour. The pageantry signals Beijing’s determination to stabilise a relationship still reeling from a bruising trade war.

The two presidents last met in South Korea six months ago, agreeing to pause hostilities in which the US imposed triple-digit tariffs on Chinese goods while Beijing threatened to restrict the global supply of rare earths.

Yet despite goodwill gestures, relations remain fragile. Washington has ramped up sanctions against Chinese companies in recent days, with the Treasury Department designating three individuals and nine companies over Iranian oil sales to China conducted through front companies. Separate sanctions have targeted Chinese organisations accused of helping Iran’s military secure weapons and raw materials, as well as companies allegedly providing satellite imagery of US facilities to Tehran.

A high-powered delegation of American business leaders with significant China exposure will accompany Mr Trump, including Tesla and SpaceX chief Elon Musk, Apple’s Tim Cook, GE Aerospace’s Larry Culp and Boeing’s Kelly Ortberg.

The roster also features Meta’s Dina Powell McCormick, Blackrock’s Larry Fink, Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman, Micron’s Sanjay Mehrotra, Mastercard’s Michael Miebach, Qualcomm’s Cristiano Amon and Visa’s Ryan McInerney.

Notably absent is Nvidia’s chief executive Jensen Huang, whose company powers the global artificial intelligence boom. Despite developing a strong relationship with Mr Trump and expressing a willingness to attend, Mr Huang was not invited.

The US President conditionally approved exports of Nvidia’s H200 AI chips to China in December, though Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in mid-April they had not been sold, citing difficulties with Chinese companies securing permission while being encouraged to invest in domestic technology.

Mr Ortberg is counting on the Trump administration to help unlock a long-awaited order that could include 500 737 MAX jets plus dozens of widebody aircraft to meet China’s surging domestic demand – the country’s first major Boeing order since 2017.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62685

File: 40054eeb5d4ae24⋯.jpg (273.13 KB,1544x869,1544:869,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a8c66aaa65c6bcb⋯.jpg (357.17 KB,1544x1029,1544:1029,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f1a2229f5734c9a⋯.jpg (271.49 KB,1544x1029,1544:1029,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599941 (131138ZMAY26) Notable: Australia’s Trump Tower plans scrapped as developer says brand has become ‘toxic’ - Plans to build Australia’s first Trump Tower on the Gold Coast have been scrapped three months after the project was announced, with developer David Young saying the Trump brand had become “toxic” in Australia. The proposed 91-storey Trump International Hotel & Tower Gold Coast was promoted as the country’s tallest tower and would have included a luxury hotel, retail precinct and apartments. Young said backlash linked to United States politics and the Iran conflict contributed to the decision to abandon the Trump branding, although the development itself would still proceed under a different name. The project attracted strong opposition after being unveiled by Altus Property Group and the Trump Organization, with a petition against the tower drawing more than 140,000 signatures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24295317 (pb)

Australia’s Trump Tower plans scrapped as developer says brand has become ‘toxic’

Lex Harvey - 13 May 2026

Plans to build Australia’s first Trump Tower have been scrapped just three months after it was announced, with the local developer saying the Trump brand has become “toxic.”

“Let’s just say that with the Iran war and everything else, the Trump brand was increasingly unpopular in Australia,” David Young, CEO of Altus Property Group, told CNN in a statement.

The 91-story Trump International Hotel & Tower Gold Coast was billed as Australia’s tallest tower, featuring a 285-room luxury hotel, high-end retail plaza, restaurants and residential apartments finished to Trump specifications, according to a February press release from Altus announcing the deal.

The project sparked backlash after it was announced by Altus and the Trump Organization, which is owned by US President Donald Trump but run by his sons Donald Jr. and Eric.

The luxury seaside property was the Trump Organization’s “first official project in Australia,” Eric Trump said at the time.

CNN has reached out to the Trump Organization for comment.

One petition aiming to stop the project garnered more than 140,000 signatures.

CK, who started the petition under an alias to avoid backlash from Trump supporters, told CNN in February she felt powerless while watching scenes of “anti-immigrant violence and the social division” in the US on social media, and looked for a way to express her opposition.

Young said the tower will still proceed — but without the Trump name.

In a LinkedIn post Tuesday, the Altus CEO called the backlash to the Trump Tower “grossly unfair” but said “the brand in this country has become toxic to Australians.”

“Trump Org is a non-political, free of the President run organization by Eric and Don Jr and run well with over 136 resorts and towers globally yet here in Australia both the media and certain orgs paint a picture of Donald Trump for pure sensationalism,” Young said.

He said there is “no acrimony between the Trump family and myself” and he has been in discussions with “many high-end luxury plans” about the tower.

Young had laid the groundwork for the tower in 2007 with a “cold call to Ivanka Trump,” according to a blog post on the Altus website.

Young recalled introducing himself to Trump’s daughter as a property developer from Australia, who was intent on building “Australia’s finest tourist property at Surfers Paradise.”

Almost 20 years later, when the deal was signed, Young said the tower “will be an Australian, not American project,” according to comments published in The Australian newspaper.

He had anticipated the building could be ready before the Brisbane Olympics in 2032.

But Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate — who once dined with Trump in Mar-a-Lago and was an enthusiastic supporter of the project — said a development application had never been submitted to City Council.

“This project was an agreement between two private parties,” Tate said in a statement to CNN, adding “we didn’t have a proposal to consider.”

Money could also have been a factor, according to Tate.

“The Trump Organization wants a lot more for their brand on the funding side of things, to operate it and the percentage of return,” Tate told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

“(Meanwhile) the developer’s going, ‘Well, I’m putting in all of my money in and you’re actually going to take quite a lot of profit’, so I think that’s why they’re parting ways.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/05/12/australia/australia-trump-tower-scrapped-intl-hnk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62686

File: 17944a6c71d3197⋯.jpg (2.19 MB,3200x2133,3200:2133,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c2faf97a71edf20⋯.jpg (306.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: df6329ed8e794e9⋯.jpg (191.72 KB,900x772,225:193,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 064435f498542ea⋯.jpg (534.04 KB,1911x959,273:137,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5592d9ac8dd717c⋯.jpg (948.61 KB,2048x1364,512:341,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24599944 (131140ZMAY26) Notable: The brief rise and fall of Trump tower in Australia - Plans for a $1.5bn Trump-branded tower on the Gold Coast have collapsed just months after the project was announced, with the developer and the Trump Organisation blaming each other for the failure. Altus Property Group chief executive David Young said the Trump name had become “increasingly toxic” in Australia amid backlash linked to United States politics and the Iran conflict, while the Trump Organisation said the developer failed to meet financial obligations tied to the agreement. The proposed 91-storey tower was promoted as potentially Australia’s tallest building and would have included luxury hotel rooms and apartments. Industry figures had questioned the project’s viability from the outset, while Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate said the parties had failed to reach a “win-win situation”. Young said he still intended to pursue a luxury development at the Surfers Paradise site without Trump branding.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>>62685

The brief rise and fall of Trump tower in Australia

Brittney Levinson - May 13, 2026

It was a deal supposedly 19 years in the making, but it took just a few months for a grand $1.5 billion scheme to build a Trump tower on the Gold Coast to fall apart.

The Queensland developer spruiking the project says the “increasingly toxic” Trump name was behind the deal’s demise, and insists the tower could still be built without the US president’s name on it. The Trump Organisation says it was the developer’s inability to meet basic financial obligations that scuttled the plan.

“In the end, they couldn’t reach a win-win situation,” Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate, who was previously an enthusiastic supporter of the plan, said on Wednesday.

In February, plans came to light for a 91-storey tower that at 335 metres could be Australia’s tallest, with 285 luxury hotel rooms and 272 residential apartments in a gold-tinted high-rise bearing the Trump name.

Late on Tuesday, the Trump Organisation revealed the project was no more. “While we were very excited about the opportunity to bring a world-class development to the Gold Coast, the project was dependent on our licensing partner meeting certain obligations. Unfortunately, those obligations were not fulfilled,” a spokeswoman said.

Altus Property Group chief executive David Young said the failure had little to do with not meeting obligations and all to do with what Australians had come to think about the US president.

“Let’s just say that with the Iran war and everything else, the Trump brand was increasingly toxic in Australia,” Young said.

Young later said on LinkedIn he found it “grossly unfair as the brand has nothing to do with the president”.

The Trump Organisation spokeswoman told The Brisbane Times Young’s attempts to blame the Iran war was “merely a ploy to distract from his own defaults and failures”. She added that Altus Property Group was unable to meet the most basic financial obligation that was due upon the execution of the agreement.

Young refused to comment further on what obligations he did not meet. However, he has still not reached settlement on the block of land and no development application was ever submitted for the project.

The project’s collapse will come as no surprise to industry figures who were sceptical from the start. In March, a leading Queensland property industry figure, speaking on the condition of anonymity, called it a “pipe dream”, while architecture experts said it was difficult to imagine it going ahead.

Luke Woollard, who owns a property management business in Victoria, wrote on LinkedIn he’d seen the project’s collapse “coming a mile away”. “Too ambitious,” he added.

Before the surprise Trump tower deal emerged, little was known about Young, who was born in the US and grew up in regional Queensland.

As he told it, Young’s story was compelling. In a blog post he described himself as a brash young pub operator in 2007 who cold-called Ivanka Trump to gauge the family’s interest in partnering on an Australian property. Nearly 20 years went by before Young and Eric Trump met at Mar-a-Lago to sign the hotel management and brand licensing agreement.

Young faced stumbling blocks almost from day one. After his big announcement, the developer was uncontactable, which was unusual for someone touting his most ambitious project yet.

Within days, Young was no longer working with the public relations firm he had engaged for the announcement and had hired an experienced crisis manager to run his communications.

By then, Young’s troubled business history had emerged, including two bankruptcies and hacking charges in the late 1990s. He was also unable to detail any large-scale properties he had developed or overseen, saying questions over whether he had experience in building high-rise towers were “not relevant”.

The latest in a series of failed plans

The Trump project is the latest failed plan for the prime piece of Surfers Paradise real estate.

The waterfront Trickett Street block has been vacant since 2013 when the Iluka resort was demolished.

In 2015, Chinese developer Forise proposed a $1.2 billion high-rise residential tower on the site, dubbed Spirit, but plans were quashed when Forise collapsed.

A company controlled by Macau casino boss Loi Keong Kuong took over the site and the luxury project in 2019, and still owns the land today.

The company has been attempting to offload the property for a number of years.

Despite the project’s collapse, Young said he would still pursue a luxury development at the Trickett Street site.

He insisted there was no acrimony between himself and the Trump family and said the project would go ahead without the Trump name attached.

“It is pure business,” Young said.

https://www.afr.com/property/commercial/the-brief-rise-and-fall-of-trump-tower-in-australia-20260513-p5zwan

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62687

File: a81e288a5e256ea⋯.jpg (223.63 KB,1834x1032,917:516,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d7807c3cb9f5ab6⋯.jpg (776.56 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24603494 (141012ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish aged care homes hire armed guards as police briefing warns of antisemitism - Jewish aged care homes in Victoria have hired armed guards following escalating antisemitic threats, including bomb threats, hate mail and a man allegedly threatening to kill residents and staff outside a facility. Jewish Care Victoria chief executive Gayle Smith told the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion the organisation faced a $1.8m security bill to protect about 400 residents, including Holocaust survivors and their families. Victoria Police documents released under freedom of information showed authorities warned Jewish community leaders after the October 7 attacks about rising extremist rhetoric and threats against synagogues. Victoria Police later established Operation Park to investigate offences linked to the Middle East conflict. 530 reports of antisemitism and 60 reports of Islamophobia lead to 313 arrests and thousands of patrols at Jewish community sites.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39013 (pb)

Jewish aged care homes hire armed guards as police briefing warns of antisemitism

Annika Smethurst and Grant McArthur - May 13, 2026

1/2

Jewish aged care homes have hired armed guards to protect residents after escalating security fears over antisemitic behaviour in Victoria.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has heard that incidents across three homes, which care for 400 residents, included a bomb threat, constant hate mail and a man who stood outside threatening to kill those inside.

Jewish Care Victoria chief executive Gayle Smith said the organisation was facing a $1.8 million bill for the guards and other security measures.

“For our aged care residents, obviously, that’s a very frightening experience to be advised that there’s a bomb threat occurring,” she told the commission last week.

“We have a number of direct Holocaust survivors, and then second and third-generation Holocaust survivors who are using our facilities, who are now walking past a guarded building for their aged loved ones.

“And no other aged care provider in Australia will be needing to do the same thing.

“It’s a really uncomfortable position for us to be, but the choice is not tenable ... if we did not take that action and something happened, I personally would never be able to forgive myself.”

Smith said the escalating threat of antisemitism after Hamas’s October 7, 2023, terrorist attacks and Israel’s military response included a man standing in front of a Jewish Care Victoria building telling staff, “if you are going to kill people, I am going to kill you”, and a bomb threat that forced one of their care homes into lockdown.

Smith said Jewish Care Victoria had applied for different rounds of Commonwealth funding to help cover the costs, in September and November 2023, as well as state government funding in May 2024, but was rejected each time.

Jewish Care Victoria was eventually able to gain a small amount of funding in August 2024 under a program administered through the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

Smith also used her time before the commission to accuse Premier Jacinta Allan and senior ministers of declining to act over claims a state government-funded multicultural agency refused to work with a Jewish social services organisation due to a “misalignment” of values.

Smith said Jewish Care Victoria had sought out the specialist multicultural youth services organisation in September 2025 because it wanted help in designing a mental health program for young Jewish people.

“They had originally agreed to work with us, and that had commenced,” she said. “We then received that communication that they would no longer work with us, and were advised that the decision had been made due to a misalignment of values.

“They then advised that, and I’m paraphrasing, that they were unable to work with us because their constituents and stakeholders would not approve of them working with a Jewish organisation.

“They also added that Jewish youth didn’t need their services because they weren’t poor.”

Smith said that, in separate responses, the premier and Minister for Multicultural Affairs Ingrid Stitt had deferred responsibility to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

“It looks like people are acting. We get a lot of acknowledgement and sympathy, but we get very little action.

“We came to the conclusion that we had to deal with it again on our own.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62688

File: 8c319987bd6cf91⋯.jpg (681 KB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 52f6a4c9e636952⋯.jpg (2.89 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ef10ebed568aed⋯.jpg (2.67 MB,4096x3072,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24603528 (141046ZMAY26) Notable: Peak Jewish body says $600 million federal budget response to antisemitic Bondi terror attack 'modest' - Australia’s peak Jewish body has welcomed a federal budget package worth about $600m responding to the antisemitic Bondi terror attack, while describing the funding as “really quite modest” given the scale of the impact on the community. Measures include funding for enhanced security, mental health support, counterterrorism programs, education initiatives and Australian Federal Police national security investigations. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said Jewish organisations across the country had been forced to spend heavily on guards, blast-proof windows and fireproof doors following advice from police and counterterrorism authorities. More than $130m has also been allocated to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, while further funding will target online extremism, youth radicalisation and antisemitism education programs in schools.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

Peak Jewish body says $600 million federal budget response to antisemitic Bondi terror attack 'modest'

Shannon Corvo - 13 May 2026

1/2

The head of Australia's peak Jewish body has welcomed a $600 million federal budget funding commitment in response to the antisemitic Bondi terror attack, but says it is a "small comfort" for those who lost loved ones.

Part of the funding would cover security enhancements, mental health resources and support for Jewish organisations.

It includes $8.1 million per year ongoing towards national initiatives such as firearms reform, changes within the education sector, and to the Australian Federal Police to strengthen national security.

As he announced the contents of this year's budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government was focused on national unity following the December 14 mass shooting, where 15 people were killed.

More than $218 million over four years would go towards the immediate response to support the victims, their families and the wider community, including:

• $102 million to the Executive Council of Australian Jewry for enhanced security for the Jewish community

• $22 million over three years from 2026-27 to the Executive Council of Australian Jewry to ensure enhanced security of the Australian Jewish community, funded via the confiscated assets account

• $68.8 million to the Australian Federal Police for the National Security Investigations teams

• $42.9 million over two years for immediate mental health support for the Jewish community, the broader Bondi community, first responders and young people

• $4 million for Jewish House and JewishCare to support the victims and families

A further $46.7 million over four years would provide financial support to the wider Jewish community, including $4.4 million for a closed non-competitive grant opportunity for priority projects in the Chabad of Bondi and $3.1 million over four years for the National Jewish Memorial Centre for infrastructure improvements.

In January, some Bondi terror attack victims and their families called for increased financial support and streamlined access to it, stating what was available at the time was "not appropriate".

'Very small comfort'

Executive Council of Australian Jewry Co-CEO Peter Wertheim said they welcomed the announcement but wished it was not necessary.

"We much prefer to live in an Australia without antisemitism and without the security funding," he said.

The executive council would be responsible for divvying out the funds to about 160 Jewish organisations across the country.

"Who have had to spend vast quantities of money now on guarding costs, in some cases on security infrastructure, like blast-proof windows and fireproof doors … which they wouldn't have had to do in the past," he said.

"This is on the advice of police, counterterrorism, and other security experts who have said that, unfortunately, this sort of expenditure is necessary."

Mr Wertheim said some of the funding had already been committed, including for enhanced security, mental health support and some services.

He said the new funding was "really quite modest".

More than $130 million was earmarked to pay for the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.

"I think it'll be very small comfort to those who have lost loved ones in the shootings of Bondi," Mr Wertheim said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62689

File: 9e3e3cb62d29494⋯.jpg (149.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9f4812a82f42953⋯.jpg (140.59 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4bd728ba51d8df7⋯.jpg (215.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24603539 (141105ZMAY26) Notable: NSW Police were warned of Bondi terror suspect months before ASIO knew - A Jewish community security organisation warned NSW Police about Bondi terror suspect Naveed Akram three months before he first came to the attention of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, according to documents seen by The Australian newspaper. The Community Service Group alerted police in July 2019 about Akram’s links to the Bankstown Dawah street preaching group, which investigators later connected to several convicted Islamic State extremists. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese previously said Akram first came to ASIO’s attention in October 2019. The revelations have raised questions about whether intelligence gathered by NSW Police was shared with federal counterterrorism agencies. The Community Service Group later warned police in December 2025 that a terrorist attack against the New South Wales Jewish community was “likely”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39027 (pb)

>>38971 (pb)

>>38972 (pb)

NSW Police were warned of Bondi terror suspect months before ASIO knew

STEPHEN RICE - 14 May 2026

1/2

A Jewish community security group warned NSW Police about Bondi terror accused Naveed Akram three months before he first came to the attention of ASIO, detailing his association with members of a street preaching group that operated as a major recruiting ground for Islamic State.

The Community Service Group (CSG) identified Akram in an email to the NSW Police Operational Assessment Centre on 10 July 2019, with information about the “key membership” of the Bankstown Dawah, to be disseminated to the NSW Terrorism Intelligence Unit and the Engagement and Intervention Unit.

That was three months earlier than Anthony Albanese stated as the first time the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation became aware of Akram, when he spoke on the day after the deadly shooting.

“The son first came to attention in October 2019,” the Prime Minister told a press conference on December 15. “He was examined on the basis of being associated with others, and the assessment was made that there was no indication of any ongoing threat or threat of him engaging in violence.”

That suggests that NSW Police may not have passed on the CSG intelligence to their federal counter-terrorism counterparts.

The timing of the CSG email also raises fresh questions about the highly unusual three year duration it took for NSW police to assess and approve an application for a gun licence by Akram’s father, Sajid, who was killed in the attack, and whether the delay was linked to suspicions about the associations of his son.

Sajid Akram applied for the licence in June 2020 but it wasn’t issued until July 2023.

An internal alert to NSW counter-terrorism police may not have reached the NSW Firearms Registry, which did not have digitised records until 2023.

The CSG email to police, which has been seen by The Australian, is headed: “Please be aware of Salafi organisation ‘Bankstown Dawah’ which maintains concerning membership and activity in Sydney.”

The email notes that the group conducts regular street preaching near the Bankstown train station, identifying Naveed Akram and seven other “closely associated individuals” including Youssef Uweinat, Radwan Dakkak and Joseph Saadieh, all later convicted of terror offences.

The email then names a further four “prominent Salafi individuals” who have attended Bankstown Dawah activities, including self-styled Islamic preacher Mohammad Junaid Thorne, jailed in 2021 on drug charges and recently refused parole because of his extensive correspondence with convicted terrorists while in prison.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62690

File: 34d8c4a12958066⋯.jpg (592.47 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: efcddec624ad1a6⋯.jpg (120.37 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e3204a6493255eb⋯.jpg (651.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24603571 (141140ZMAY26) Notable: Police barred from using ‘intifada’ chant footage in Hash Tayeh prosecution - A magistrate has barred Victoria Police from using footage of protesters chanting “intifada” and “from the river to the sea” in the prosecution of pro-Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh. Police had argued the footage from a 2025 Melbourne rally was relevant to proving Tayeh’s “all Zionists are terrorists” chant was criminally insulting, but Magistrate Malcolm Thomas ruled it risked unfair prejudice and could trigger a “collateral trial” over unrelated political slogans. Tayeh, the former owner of the Burgertory fast-food chain, faces offensive language charges linked to protests in 2024 and 2025. His legal team is also seeking to tender an expert report on the history of Zionism and Palestinian resistance movements, arguing the broader political context is central to understanding his remarks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39054 (pb)

Police barred from using ‘intifada’ chant footage in Hash Tayeh prosecution

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 14 May 2026

1/2

A magistrate has barred Victoria Police from using footage of protesters chanting “intifada” and “from the river to the sea” in the landmark prosecution of pro-Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh, dealing a major setback to police efforts to prove his “all Zionists are terrorists” chant was criminally insulting.

The ruling came as Mr Tayeh’s legal team fight to tender a lengthy expert report by Deakin University academic Andrew Thomas tracing the history of Zionism and Palestinian resistance movements, including political violence and terrorism.

Police are seeking to have large parts of the report thrown out, arguing the case is about whether the words “all Zionists are terrorists” were insulting in public, not a “history lesson” on the Middle East.

Police had sought to rely on footage from the “Our Babies Matter” rally in Melbourne in 2025 showing protesters chanting “intifada” in the minutes before Mr Tayeh grabbed the microphone and yelled “all Zionists are terrorists”, arguing the mood of the crowd mattered when assessing whether his own words were insulting.

But Melbourne Magistrate Malcolm Thomas ruled the footage risked unfairly prejudicing the court against Mr Tayeh and would spark a “collateral trial” over the meaning of politically charged slogans not tied to the charges.

The decision strips prosecutors of key evidence they had hoped to use to demonstrate the intent behind Mr Tayeh’s remarks, narrowing the case to whether his own words alone breached Victoria’s offensive language laws.

Mr Tayeh, the former owner of the Burgertory fast-food chain, faces multiple charges under section 17(1)(c) of the Summary Offences Act over chants allegedly made during pro-Palestinian protests in Melbourne in 2024 and 2025.

His co-accused, Melbourne kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan, also faces charges.

The charges relate to two separate protests: the “Our Babies Matter” rally on May 27, 2024, and the “Protest Until Ceasefire” demonstration on March 30, 2025.

Defence lawyer Sarala Fitzgerald told the court the controversial slogan, created by Mr Tayeh, was used to raise awareness of the “unlawful occupation of Palestinian lands”.

Magistrate Thomas is now weighing whether to admit the massive expert report by Dr Thomas, which details the history of Zionism and the “Nakba” or “catastrophe” of 1948.

While he has not yet ruled on the report’s admissibility, he flagged reluctance to ignore historical context, stating that the evaluation of the charges is a “difficult and delicate process” where “history cannot be divorced”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62691

File: f80bb969c4e1521⋯.mp4 (15.64 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24603593 (141203ZMAY26) Notable: More charges for Perth man accused of mass terror attack plan - (Video) A Perth man accused of plotting a mass casualty terror attack targeting public buildings and mosques has been hit with six additional charges, including possession of child abuse material. Jayson Joseph Michaels, 20, allegedly detailed plans in a diary to attack WA Police headquarters, Parliament House and places of worship in what prosecutors said he believed would surpass the Bondi mass shootings. The new charges include possession of a bulletproof vest, violent extremist material and objectionable computer game material. Police previously alleged Michaels researched bomb-making materials, entry points and escape methods, while officers allegedly found firearms, ammunition and knives during a raid on his family home north of Perth. Michaels remains in custody and is due to reappear in court in July.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38847 (pb)

More charges for Perth man accused of mass terror attack plan

Aaron Bunch - May 13, 2026

A man accused of plotting a mass casualty terror attack targeting public buildings and places of worship has been hit with a slew of new charges, including possession of child abuse material.

Jayson Joseph Michaels detailed his alleged plan for a violent assault on WA police headquarters, WA Parliament House and mosques in a diary, believing it would be worse than the Bondi Beach mass shootings.

The 20-year-old initially faced five charges, including acting in preparation for a terrorist act, after police seized the diary during a raid on his parents' home in the town of Bindoon, north of Perth, in February.

But today, Stirling Magistrates Court in Perth heard he had been charged with the six new offences.

These were possession of a bulletproof vest, two counts of possession of violent extremist material on electronic devices, two counts of possession of objectionable material related to computer games, and possession of child abuse material.

Michaels, who appeared via video-link from Casuarina Prison, confirmed he understood the charges and wasn't required to enter a plea.

He was remanded in custody to reappear in the same court on July 8.

Michaels' original charges also include three firearms and ammunition charges and one count of allegedly using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence.

His diary allegedly contained entries that amounted to a list of actions he planned to undertake, including making weapons and body armour for a "day of justice," prosecutors have previously told the court.

Michaels allegedly planned to buy a 3D printer to make a gun and got a job where he could access bomb-making materials, but left empty-handed after one day.

He also compared the Bondi Beach attack to his own terror plot and wrote notes about how it might impact it, Commonwealth prosecutor Kirsten Nelson told a failed bail application hearing in April.

"What I want to do to both these groups pales in comparison to today," he allegedly wrote after the December 14 shootings that killed 15 and injured many more.

"What will they all think when my face is on TV?" he wrote.

Michaels allegedly accessed online material about extremist white supremacist ideology, some of which was described as a manifesto and instruction manual from a declared terrorist organisation.

He wrote about researching entry points and door locks at his target locations and considered using a van that looked like an ambulance to make his escape.

He also allegedly penned a note about buying a ballistic helmet, designing and building body armour or an Iron Man-style metal suit.

"I think I'm addicted to the (Watch People Die) website," he wrote in another diary entry.

The website was open on his computer when police burst into his bedroom, allegedly finding two guns, 900 rounds of ammunition and various knives.

The court has previously heard that Michaels was an isolated and depressed young man who had no intention to carry out the plan.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/jayson-joseph-michaels-court-updates-more-charges-for-man-accused-of-mass-terror-attack-plan/ad01053d-0e42-4bb5-8b6b-b3a3c72bf94a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62692

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24610615 (160456ZMAY26) Notable: Sall Grover loses landmark appeal on women’s spaces against Roxanne Tickle - (Video) Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover has lost her Federal Court appeal against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, with the court finding Grover directly discriminated against Tickle by excluding her from the female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man. The Full Court overturned an earlier ruling that found only indirect discrimination, instead determining the exclusion amounted to unlawful direct discrimination based on “gender identity”. The court doubled damages awarded to Tickle from $10,000 to $20,000 and ordered Grover to pay legal costs up to $100,000. The judges ruled the Sex Discrimination Act protects gender-related appearance and social markers, not only a person’s internal identity. Grover said after the ruling she was “absolutely devastated” and argued “men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39042 (pb)

Sall Grover loses landmark appeal on women’s spaces against Roxanne Tickle

STEPHEN RICE - 15 May 2026

1/2

Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover has lost her appeal in her case against transwoman Roxanne Tickle, with the Federal Court finding that she directly discriminated against Ms Tickle by rejecting her from the female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man.

On Friday, the Full Court of the Federal Court ordered that a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that Ms Grover indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle be set aside and instead found ­unlawful direct discrimination on the basis of Ms Tickle’s “gender identity”.

Justices Melissa Perry, Wendy Abraham and Geoffrey Kennett awarded Ms Tickle $20,000 damages, doubling the original award, “taking into account aggravating conduct by Ms Grover”.

Ms Grover will also have to pay Ms Tickle’s legal costs up to an amount of $100,000 overall.

The landmark decision was delivered by Justice Perry and streamed live on the court’s YouTube channel.

The Full Court found that Ms Grover “excluded Ms Tickle from the Giggle app and refused to readmit her on the basis of her gender-related appearance by reference to her selfie, and this amounted to direct discrimination by reference to a characteristic that pertains to people of Ms Tickle’s gender identity, being transgender women”.

The court found that under the Sex Discrimination Act, “gender identity” broadly includes a person’s gender-related appearance and outward social markers, not just their internal sense of self.

During the proceedings, Ms Grover argued that sex is a purely biological, binary concept fixed at birth, and asserted that their app was a lawful “special measure” designed to achieve substantive equality between men and women.

The Full Court rejected this, ruling that taking a special measure to promote equality for one protected group does not provide a legal shield to expressly disadvantage another marginalised group, such as transgender women

Ms Grover has stated in the past that she would seek to appeal the case to the High Court if the Federal Court found against her.

After the appeal decision was handed down Ms Grover posted on social media that she was ­“absolutely devastated”.

“Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia,” she said.

“It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us. But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62693

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24610625 (160504ZMAY26) Notable: Damages doubled after trans woman’s landmark discrimination win - (Video) A transgender woman who successfully sued the founder of the Giggle for Girls app has had her compensation doubled after the Full Court of the Federal Court ruled the discrimination against her was direct rather than indirect. The court found Roxanne Tickle was excluded from the women-only app because of her gender-related appearance, amounting to unlawful discrimination based on gender identity. Judges increased damages from $10,000 to $20,000 and said some conduct by founder Sall Grover during the case, including repeated misgendering, had “aggravated the hurt suffered” by Tickle. Grover said she was “absolutely devastated” by the decision and argued that “women are being discriminated against” under the current interpretation of the law. The ruling is considered a landmark interpretation of protections for transgender Australians under the Sex Discrimination Act.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Damages doubled after trans woman’s landmark discrimination win

Michaela Whitbourn - May 15, 2026

1/2

A transgender woman who won a landmark discrimination suit after she was excluded from a social media app marketed as a “women-only safe space” has had her victory increased by an appeal court and her damages doubled.

Roxanne Tickle took the company behind the app, Giggle for Girls, and its founder, Sall Grover, to the Federal Court in 2022, alleging they breached Commonwealth discrimination laws.

The court ruled in Tickle’s favour in 2024 and ordered the company and Grover to pay Tickle $10,000 in compensation plus legal costs.

Grover and the company lodged an appeal. In a cross-appeal, Tickle asked the court to find the discrimination against her was direct, rather than indirect, and to increase the damages.

In a decision on Friday, the Full Court of the Federal Court dismissed the appeal and upheld Tickle’s cross-appeal.

Justices Melissa Perry, Wendy Abraham and Geoffrey Kennett found Giggle and Grover had excluded Tickle on the basis of her gender-related appearance, and this amounted to direct discrimination on the ground of her gender identity. The court increased her damages to $20,000.

The court said some of Grover’s conduct in the case, such as repeatedly misgendering Tickle, was “gratuitous, disrespectful and unnecessary” and “aggravated the hurt suffered” by her.

“It did not advance her defence,” the court said.

In a statement after the decision, Tickle said: “I brought my case to show trans people that you can be brave and that you can stand up for yourself.

“In the process, I surprised myself at just how brave I could be. Young Roxy would be surprised but overjoyed.”

She said there was “so much hate and bile cast on trans and gender diverse people, simply because of who we are”, and it was usually “by those who refuse to meet us or engage with us”.

Grover said in a statement that she was “absolutely devastated” by the decision, and it was “women who are being discriminated against”.

Under the Sex Discrimination Act, it is unlawful for providers of goods and services to discriminate against another person on the ground of the other person’s gender identity. Some exemptions are available.

Tickle, who was assigned male at birth, had gender-affirming surgery after 2017. Her birth certificate records her sex as female.

In his 2024 decision, Federal Court Judge Robert Bromwich found Tickle was excluded from the app because Grover reviewed Tickle’s “selfie”, which had been uploaded when she registered for the app, and concluded she was male.

The judge concluded it was most likely Grover did not know Tickle was a transgender woman “and instead excluded her on the quick or reflexive decision that she appeared to Ms Grover to be a male”.

He said Giggle for Girls and Grover indirectly discriminated against Tickle by imposing a condition that she must “have the appearance of a cisgender woman”, meaning a woman whose gender corresponds to the sex registered for her at birth.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62694

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24610801 (160626ZMAY26) Notable: Court upholds discrimination ruling on appeal after transgender woman excluded from Giggle for Girls app - (Video) The Full Court of the Federal Court has upheld a landmark ruling that transgender woman Roxanne Tickle was unlawfully discriminated against after being excluded from the Giggle for Girls app. The court found the app’s founder, Sall Grover, directly discriminated against Tickle on the basis of gender identity when her account was restricted after a manual review of her selfie. Judges doubled Tickle’s compensation from $10,000 to $20,000, including aggravated damages, and criticised aspects of Grover’s conduct during the case as “gratuitous, disrespectful and unnecessary”. Tickle said she hoped the decision would help “trans and gender diverse people and their loved ones to heal”, while Grover said she was “absolutely devastated” and argued women were being discriminated against under the current interpretation of the law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Court upholds discrimination ruling on appeal after transgender woman excluded from Giggle for Girls app

Jamie McKinnell - 15 May 2026

1/2

A landmark Federal Court ruling that the exclusion of a transgender woman from a female-only app constituted gender identity discrimination has been upheld on appeal.

In August 2024, Roxanne Tickle was awarded $10,000 in compensation plus court costs in a case against the Giggle for Girls app and its chief executive officer, Sall Grover.

Ms Tickle accessed the social networking platform in 2021 after submitting a selfie which was assessed by artificial intelligence software designed to distinguish between the facial appearance of men and women.

But her account was later restricted following a manual review.

Justice Robert Bromwich previously found there was indirect gender identity discrimination due to "the imposed condition of needing to appear to be a cisgendered female", which had the effect of "disadvantaging transgender women who did not meet that condition".

A claim of direct discrimination failed because it was not established that Ms Grover was aware of Ms Tickle's gender identity when Ms Tickle was blocked.

It was the first case to claim discrimination on the basis of gender identity since changes to the Sex Discrimination Act in 2013.

During an appeal hearing last year, Ms Grover sought to overturn the ruling, while Ms Tickle launched a cross-appeal which aimed to strengthen it through a finding of direct discrimination and an increase in the damages to $40,000.

More damages awarded

The full court of the Federal Court — comprised of Justices Melissa Perry, Wendy Abraham and Geoffrey Kennett — on Friday found there were two instances of direct discrimination against Ms Tickle.

That included when Giggle and Ms Grover refused to re-admit Ms Tickle.

The court has reassessed damages and awarded $20,000 plus limited court costs.

In the full judgement, the appeal panel said the case raised issues on which there were differing views in the community.

"It is important to emphasise that the issues for determination by the court involve the construction and application of provisions of the (Sex Discrimination Act)," they said.

"The desirability or otherwise of that law is not a matter open to this court to consider."

The judgement emphasised the case concerned "one form only of discrimination covered by the SDA, and with circumstances in which it has not been argued that any of the general exemptions under that Act apply."

Ms Grover left the Federal Court without making any comment but later said on social media she was "absolutely devastated" and "it is women who are being discriminated against".

Speaking outside court, Ms Tickle said she hoped the outcome “assists trans and gender diverse people and their loved ones to heal".

"I submitted my discrimination complaint against Giggle for Girls and its CEO Ms Grover to the Australian Human Rights Commission in December 2021, seeking justice for the discrimination that has since stolen over four of my eight years since I began my gender affirmation," she said.

"I now look forward to getting on with the rest of my life in the community we all know and love. One that embraces freedom and equality for all women."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62695

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24610926 (160729ZMAY26) Notable: Giggle v Tickle: Federal Court dismisses appeal in landmark 'What is a woman' case - (Video) The Full Court of the Federal Court has dismissed an appeal by Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover, upholding a landmark ruling that transgender woman Roxanne Tickle was unlawfully discriminated against after being excluded from the women-only app. The court found the exclusion amounted to direct discrimination based on gender identity and increased damages awarded to Tickle from $10,000 to $20,000, citing “aggravating conduct” by Grover. Justice Melissa Perry said gender identity under the Sex Discrimination Act includes “gender-related characteristics, including appearance”. Grover said she was “absolutely devastated” and vowed to continue the fight in the High Court, while One Nation leader Pauline Hanson described the ruling as a “sad day for upholding biological reality in Australia”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Giggle v Tickle: Federal Court dismisses appeal in landmark 'What is a woman' case

The Federal Court has dismissed the appeal of the Giggle v Tickle "what is a woman" ruling in a landmark judgement, laying the ground for an appeal to the High Court.

Max Aldred - May 15, 2026

1/2

The Federal Court has dismissed the appeal of the Giggle v Tickle "what is a woman" ruling in a landmark judgement.

The Full Court upheld the ruling on sex and gender identity under the Sex Discrimination Act, arising from an appeal by Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover on Friday.

Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle first sued Ms Grover after she was barred from the women-only app in 2021.

Justice Melissa Perry, Justice Wendy Abraham and Justice Geoffrey Kennett on Friday ruled Ms Grover’s appeal be dismissed, and Ms Tickle’s cross-appeal be allowed.

Shortly after the judgement was handed down, Ms Grover said she was "absolutely devastated".

“Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia,” she said.

“It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us.

“But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.”

Ms Tickle's cross-appeal centred on the Federal Court's ruling that Ms Grover and Giggle for Girls had "indirectly" discriminated against her.

It sought declaration that Ms Grover and her app had engaged instead in "direct" discrimination as well as a larger award of damages.

She was successful in that appeal on Friday, and the court awarded her $20,000 in damages “taking into account aggravating conduct” by Ms Grover.

“Gender identity is defined as meaning gender-related identity and gender-related characteristics, including appearance,” Justice Perry told the court.

“The full Court found that:

"A) Giggle and Miss Grover both excluded Miss Tickle from the Giggle app and refused to readmit her on the basis of her gender-related appearance by reference to her selfie; and

"B) this amounted to direct discrimination by reference to a characteristic that pertains to people of Ms. Tickles' gender identity being transgender women.”

The Federal Court has dismissed the appeal of the Giggle v Tickle "what is a woman" ruling in a landmark judgement.

The Full Court upheld the ruling on sex and gender identity under the Sex Discrimination Act, arising from an appeal by Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover on Friday.

Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle first sued Ms Grover after she was barred from the women-only app in 2021.

Justice Melissa Perry, Justice Wendy Abraham and Justice Geoffrey Kennett on Friday ruled Ms Grover’s appeal be dismissed, and Ms Tickle’s cross-appeal be allowed.

Shortly after the judgement was handed down, Ms Grover said she was "absolutely devastated".

“Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia,” she said.

“It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us.

“But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.”

Ms Tickle's cross-appeal centred on the Federal Court's ruling that Ms Grover and Giggle for Girls had "indirectly" discriminated against her.

It sought declaration that Ms Grover and her app had engaged instead in "direct" discrimination as well as a larger award of damages.

She was successful in that appeal on Friday, and the court awarded her $20,000 in damages “taking into account aggravating conduct” by Ms Grover.

“Gender identity is defined as meaning gender-related identity and gender-related characteristics, including appearance,” Justice Perry told the court.

“The full Court found that:

"A) Giggle and Miss Grover both excluded Miss Tickle from the Giggle app and refused to readmit her on the basis of her gender-related appearance by reference to her selfie; and

"B) this amounted to direct discrimination by reference to a characteristic that pertains to people of Ms. Tickles' gender identity being transgender women.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62696

File: d0ad8659a7f2743⋯.jpg (199.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ae0cb94b3e4c97a⋯.jpg (167.58 KB,750x462,125:77,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9fff103f6339b3e⋯.jpg (237.91 KB,750x630,25:21,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 452c3d0fc2a79a1⋯.jpg (944.21 KB,750x2123,750:2123,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1fce4b756267309⋯.jpg (181.46 KB,1181x1476,1181:1476,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611015 (160758ZMAY26) Notable: Pauline Hanson vows to defend female-only app founder after landmark transgender discrimination appeal - One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has pledged support for Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover after the Full Court of the Federal Court ruled Grover directly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by removing her from the female-only networking app. The court increased damages awarded to Tickle from $10,000 to $20,000, finding Grover treated her “less favourably” based on her gender-related appearance. Hanson said she was “disgusted” by the ruling and vowed to back Grover in parliament, while opposition spokeswoman for women Melissa McIntosh said the Sex Discrimination Act should be reviewed. The Australian Human Rights Commission and Equality Australia welcomed the judgement, arguing the ruling confirmed anti-discrimination protections apply to transgender women under Australian law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Pauline Hanson vows to defend female-only app founder after landmark transgender discrimination appeal

Pauline Hanson has weighed in on a landmark court ruling, after an app founder once backed by JK Rowling was ordered to pay double for discriminating against a transgender user.

Kate Stephenson and Nathan Schmidt - May 16, 2026

1/2

Pauline Hanson has vowed to back a woman found by a court to have discriminated against a transgender woman when she was removed from a female-only networking app.

The Full Court of the Federal Court has ruled in favour of transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, finding female-only app founder Sall Grover directly discriminated against her twice when she chose to remove Ms Tickle from the networking app.

In August 2024, Ms Grover was ordered to pay $10,000 in damages after the Federal Court found she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle when she removed Ms Tickle from the app Giggles for Girls, designed to be a “safe, online space exclusively for women”.

Ms Tickle was originally given access to the app after an AI software test designed to filter out male users cleared her.

However, Ms Grover personally removed her after seeing her profile in 2021.

Despite her attempts to be readmitted to the app, Ms Tickle was denied by Ms Grover.

Taking to X, Ms Grover said she was “absolutely devastated”.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said she was “disgusted” by the court's decision.

“I will back Sall Grover in parliament,” she wrote.

Friday’s result was disappointing for many “fighting for biological rights of women”, opposition spokesperson for women Melissa McIntosh said.

“The issue is the Sex Discrimination Act,” she said on X.

“It is time for a review of the Sex Discrimination Act. Our laws should be working for Australian women, not against them.”

Both Senator Hanson and Ms McIntosh were quick to claim their parties had attempted to amend the Act.

The Australian Human Rights Commission welcomed the court’s decision.

Sex Discrimination Commissioner Dr Anna Cody, who assisted in the appeal on an amicus basis, said the case had “prompted significant discussion about how our discrimination laws apply in practice”.

“The Sex Discrimination Act is intended to ensure all people are treated equally and can participate fully in public life. These protections extend to all women, including transgender women,” Dr Cody said.

Commission President Hugh de Krester said many people still faced discrimination.

“We welcome the Federal Court’s interpretation of this protection in its decision,” he said.

Equality Australia legal director Heather Corkhill said Friday’s decision affirmed trans Australian rights.

“This ruling affirms that all women deserve to live free from discrimination, without being judged on appearance, presentation or perceptions,” she said.

“For decades, Australian laws have recognised that a person’s legal sex is not limited to the sex they were assigned at birth – any other interpretation would deny the reality and existence of trans people.

“The judgment reinforces that anti-discrimination laws are intended to protect everyone, particularly groups such as trans women who often experience exclusion and disadvantage.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62697

File: 33e9b52a2b52329⋯.jpg (94.38 KB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611055 (160819ZMAY26) Notable: Australian court doubles payout for trans woman in landmark discrimination case - In a landmark Australian gender identity discrimination case, the Federal Court has dismissed an appeal by Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover and doubled compensation awarded to transgender woman Roxanne Tickle after finding she was directly discriminated against when removed from the female-only app. The court increased damages from $10,000 to $20,000 and ruled Tickle was treated “less favourably” than a person designated female at birth because of her gender identity under Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act. The case is the first gender identity discrimination matter heard by the Federal Court since major legal changes in 2013. During the original hearing, Grover said she removed Tickle after identifying “male facial features” in a profile photo. Grover has indicated she intends to appeal the decision to the High Court. - BBC News

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Australia court doubles payout for trans woman in landmark discrimination case

Lana Lam - 15 May 2026

A Sydney court has doubled the discrimination payout for an Australian trans woman who was kicked off a female-only app.

It comes almost two years after Roxanne Tickle successfully sued Sall Grover, founder of the Giggle for Girls app, for blocking her account on the grounds of gender identity.

Grover lodged an appeal against that verdict, but on Friday, the Federal Court dismissed it and further found that Tickle was directly - rather than indirectly - discriminated against by Grover.

Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a woman, was also awarded compensation of AU$20,000 ($14,000; £11,000), double the original amount.

Giggle's legal team argued throughout the original case that sex is a biological concept. They freely conceded that Tickle was discriminated against, but on the grounds of sex, rather than gender identity.

Known as "Tickle vs Giggle", the years-long dispute is the first time a case of alleged gender identity discrimination has been heard by the Federal Court in Australia.

During the original case, the court heard that Grover had removed Tickle from the app after spotting "male facial features" on Tickle's profile photo.

Grover told the court that when she looked at Tickle's profile picture, she decided Tickle was not a woman and removed the account, saying that the process was "the same as removing all males".

"I would have seen the photo and just gone, 'male', and blocked," Grover told the court during the initial hearing.

Under the country's Sex Discrimination Act, it is illegal for providers of goods or services to discriminate against another person on the ground of a person's gender identity.

In Friday's Federal Court judgement, the full court found that Grover had engaged in unlawful direct discrimination, saying she had treated Tickle "who is a transgender woman, less favourably than a person designated female at birth seeking access to the Giggle App".

The three judges also found that the original judge had erred by not deeming Tickle's removal from the app based on Grover's "first visual review" of the profile picture as direct discrimination.

The earlier ruling found that Grover had indirectly discriminated against Tickle.

Tickle downloaded the app in 2021 and passed the registration process which included a selfie, and used the app for about half a year before being blocked.

Grover founded the Giggle for Girls app in 2020 in response to online abuse by men during her time as a screenwriter in Hollywood.

"I wanted to create a safe, women-only space in the palm of your hand," she said earlier.

Shortly after Friday's ruling, Grover said she intended to appeal the decision in the High Court.

Update: This article has been amended to make clear Roxanne Tickle is a biological male who identifies as a woman.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjpzgppr7mo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62698

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611095 (160845ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Laughing stock of the world’: Giggle v Tickle discrimination case outcome stuns Women's Forum Australia CEO - (Video) Women’s Forum Australia chief executive Rachael Wong says Australia has become the “laughing stock of the world” after the Federal Court upheld a landmark ruling that Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. The court dismissed Grover’s appeal and found Tickle had been directly discriminated against when removed from the women-only networking app, increasing damages from $10,000 to $20,000. Wong described the ruling as “unbelievable” and said Grover should not have spent years “sacrificing her business” fighting the case. Grover said she was “absolutely devastated” and vowed to continue challenging the decision, while One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said the ruling “flies in the face of biological reality” and strips rights from women under Australia’s current interpretation of discrimination law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39038 (pb)

>>62692

‘Laughing stock of the world’: Giggle v Tickle discrimination case outcome stuns Women's Forum Australia CEO

Australia has been labelled the “laughing stock of the world” by a women’s rights advocate after the Federal Court dismissed the appeal of the Giggle v Tickle ruling.

Matt Hampson - May 16, 2026

1/2

A women’s rights advocate has labelled Australia the “laughing stock of the world” after a landmark ruling on sex and gender identity was upheld.

Giggle for Girls CEO Sall Grover has lost her appeal of a 2024 Federal Court decision that found she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle after barring her from the women-only platform.

Federal Court judges ruled that Ms Grover’s appeal be dismissed, and that Ms Tickle’s cross-appeal be allowed.

Speaking to Sky News Australia on Friday evening, Women's Forum Australia Chief Executive Rachael Wong said she was “still in shock” following the court’s decision.

“I don't think any of us thought that it was going to go this way. It's even worse than it was in the last instance,” Ms Wong said.

She described the outcome, which found that Giggle for Girls and Ms Grover had directly discriminated against Ms Tickle, as “unbelievable”.

“Australia is the laughing stock of the world right now,” Ms Wong said.

Despite Ms Grover having indicated she will take the case to the High Court, Ms Wong said “the reality is she shouldn't have to”.

“She shouldn't have had to have been spending the last four years of her life sacrificing her business, sacrificing time with her family to fight this absolute insanity,” Ms Wong said.

“Politicians could have stepped in and fixed this on day dot and they haven't.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62699

File: 3b89fb31a0ea2df⋯.jpg (372.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0b547d7e5fb6520⋯.jpg (447.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1eafbea8ebf027b⋯.jpg (125.75 KB,750x360,25:12,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611200 (160941ZMAY26) Notable: Analysis: Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover loses case against transwoman Roxanne Tickle - "Don’t let the seemingly frivolous title of this case - Giggle v Tickle - distract from the serious implications of Friday’s Federal Court decision. The right to access a women-only app called Giggle for Girls sounds harmless enough, but the appeal court’s determination means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men. The Federal Court has chosen gender ideology over biological reality. It didn’t need to. The Sex Discrimination Act was designed to promote equality between men and women - if necessary, by allowing “special measures” that might discriminate against men but help women. There was always a recognition that giving rights to one person might infringe on those of another. When parliament passed poorly drafted amendments to the act in 2013 giving protections for “gender identity”, it clearly never intended that biological boys would sleep in girls’ dormitories, or that biological men would be locked into prison cells overnight with vulnerable women. There is nothing, even now, in the omnishambles legislation that required the Federal Court to give gender identity precedence over sex. The judges did that all by themselves. Sex-based protections designed to protect women can now be employed by biological men who identify as women to ride roughshod over women who refuse to comply with their demands ... Justice Bromwich had originally found that [Sall] Grover only indirectly discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, because she didn’t know she was dealing with a transgender woman - she just saw someone who looked like a man. The appeal judges have said that doesn’t matter. You can be directly discriminating against someone because of their male appearance, according to the Full Court, because male appearance is a gender-related characteristic of transgender women. You might have thought male appearance was, well, because someone was born male. After this judgment, if someone who looks like a man but identifies as a transgender woman goes into a women’s toilet, it is illegal to challenge or exclude them ... In the face of this evidence, the Australian Human Rights Commission and its Sex Discrimination Commissioner backed the right of a biological male who identifies as a woman to insist on being admitted to a space established for women ... It is past time for parliament to step in and deliver some basic commonsense." - Stephen Rice, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Analysis: Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover loses case against transwoman Roxanne Tickle

Sall Grover after appeal loss: ‘You cannot take our protections to get yours’

STEPHEN RICE - 15 May 2026

Don’t let the seemingly frivolous title of this case – Giggle v Tickle – distract from the serious implications of Friday’s Federal Court decision.

The right to access a women-only app called Giggle for Girls sounds harmless enough, but the appeal court’s determination means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men.

The Federal Court has chosen gender ideology over biological reality.

It didn’t need to.

The Sex Discrimination Act was designed to promote equality between men and women – if necessary, by allowing “special measures” that might discriminate against men but help women.

There was always a recognition that giving rights to one person might infringe on those of another.

When parliament passed poorly drafted amendments to the act in 2013 giving protections for “gender identity”, it clearly never intended that biological boys would sleep in girls’ dormitories, or that biological men would be locked into prison cells overnight with vulnerable women.

There is nothing, even now, in the omnishambles legislation that required the Federal Court to give gender identity precedence over sex.

The judges did that all by themselves.

Sex-based protections designed to protect women can now be employed by biological men who identify as women to ride roughshod over women who refuse to comply with their demands.

Sall Grover, who has fought this case for more than four years, has actively supported trans people having their own spaces, their own clubs, their own sporting events.

“We’re not opposing other people having protections that they need, but you cannot take away our protections to get yours,” she says. “That’s not how human rights work.”

Alas, that is now how human rights law works in Australia.

We need to catch up with the rest of the world.

The UK Supreme Court ruled a year ago that sex and gender identity are not the same, and that sex-based rights must be protected.

Yet we’re now in an even more invidious position than before Grover’s appeal.

Justice Bromwich had originally found that Grover only indirectly discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, because she didn’t know she was dealing with a transgender woman – she just saw someone who looked like a man.

The appeal judges have said that doesn’t matter. You can be directly discriminating against someone because of their male appearance, according to the Full Court, because male appearance is a gender-related characteristic of transgender women.

You might have thought male appearance was, well, because someone was born male.

After this judgment, if someone who looks like a man but identifies as a transgender woman goes into a women’s toilet, it is illegal to challenge or exclude them.

Grover says the damages awarded against her are punitive. It’s hard to disagree.

The appeal court awarded aggravated damages to Tickle because of Grover’s “gratuitous” and “disrespectful” conduct in “misgendering” Tickle during the trial.

That is, Grover stated her sincerely held belief, in a court of law, that a man cannot be a woman.

It cost her $20,000.

The one-time scriptwriter has already paid a high price for taking on a battle that should have been fought by those entrusted with protecting women. Many women gave evidence in the proceedings that they needed their own spaces because of past experiences of sexual assaults and intimidation by men.

Grover was one of those women.

In the face of this evidence, the Australian Human Rights Commission and its Sex Discrimination Commissioner backed the right of a biological male who identifies as a woman to insist on being admitted to a space established for women.

Grover was 14 weeks pregnant when this saga began. Her daughter is now four. But Grover says she’s determined to do whatever it takes to ensure her daughter has the rights so many women have fought for.

“I want every woman and girl to be able to say “no” to a man, no matter how he identifies, and not be punished for it.”

It is past time for parliament to step in and deliver some basic commonsense.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sall-grover-after-appeal-loss-you-cannot-take-our-protections-toget-yours/news-story/dc0ff15e105589e90cd956d78329e3fa

https://x.com/salltweets/status/2055427093933314399

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62700

File: 79e8e300cceeb75⋯.jpg (207.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e50641aae54fbdb⋯.jpg (159.94 KB,1440x810,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8f097c1c0153b6c⋯.jpg (270.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44128b59c53d468⋯.jpg (611.87 KB,865x1235,173:247,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611227 (160952ZMAY26) Notable: Angus Taylor vows to change sex discrimination laws after Tickle v Giggle court ruling - Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has pledged to amend Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act after the Federal Court ruled transgender woman Roxanne Tickle was unlawfully discriminated against by Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover. The court found Grover directly discriminated against Tickle by removing her from the female-only networking app and increased damages from $10,000 to $20,000. Taylor said a Coalition government would define biological sex in law as “male or female” and strengthen protections for single-sex spaces for women and girls. He argued the ruling showed Australian law did not “properly protect” female-only spaces, while insisting the proposal would not remove existing protections for transgender Australians. The judgement has intensified political debate over gender identity, biological sex and anti-discrimination laws in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62696

Angus Taylor vows to change sex discrimination laws after Tickle v Giggle court ruling

The Liberal leader has pledged sweeping legal changes after a transgender woman won her discrimination case against a women-only app founder.

Kate Stephenson - May 16, 2026

Liberal leader Angus Taylor has vowed to redesign Australia’s sex discrimination laws after a female app founder lost her appeal case against a transgender woman.

On Friday, the Full Court of the Federal Court ruled in favour of transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, finding female-only app founder Sall Grover directly discriminated against her when she chose to remove Ms Tickle from the networking app Giggles for Girls.

Ms Grover had brought an appeal to the court in 2025 following a ruling in the Federal Court the year prior which found she had indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle and ordered she pay $10,000 in damages.

The Full Court set aside the original ruling, instead finding Ms Grover had directly discriminated against Ms Tickle on two occasions and ordered she now pay double the damages, increasing her dues to $20,000.

Ms Tickle was originally given access to the app after an AI software test designed to filter out male users cleared her.

However, Ms Grover personally removed her after seeing her profile in 2021.

On Saturday morning, Mr Taylor posted a statement to Facebook, claiming it would be his “first-term priority” to change existing sex discrimination laws.

“Yesterday the Full Federal Court confirmed that Australian law does not properly protect single sex spaces for women and girls,” he wrote.

“Most Australians would find that hard to believe. A coalition government I lead will fix this.

“We will amend the Sex Discrimination Act to ensure that women and girls (and men and boys) have protections based on biological sex.

“We will define biological sex in the act. Male or female. The sex you are born. And we will protect single-sex spaces across Australian life.”

Mr Taylor claimed the promise was not targeting transgender Australians.

“This is not radical. It is common sense,” he said.

“Let me be clear about what this is not. This is not about targeting transgender Australians.

“Every protection they currently have remains. We are not removing a single protection from anyone. But we are recognising something that should never have been in doubt: biological sex is real, it matters, and women and girls deserve spaces where it is respected.

“The Prime Minister now has a simple question to answer. Does he believe women and girls deserve protections based on biological sex?”

The court ruling has drawn both praise and criticism from politicians and advocacy groups alike.

The Australian Human Rights Commission welcomed the decision, with president Hugh de Krester stating many people still faced discrimination.

“We welcome the Federal Court’s interpretation of this protection in its decision,” he said following the verdict on Friday.

Equality Australia legal director Heather Corkhill said on Friday the decision affirmed the “reality and existence” of transgender Australians.

“This ruling affirms that all women deserve to live free from discrimination, without being judged on appearance, presentation or perceptions,” she said.

One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson posted to social media on Friday, stating she was “disgusted” by the ruling and promising to “back” Ms Grover in parliament.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/angus-taylor-vows-to-change-sex-discrimination-laws-after-tickle-v-giggle-court-ruling/news-story/01b3f5a95b0f1773a569fcabccc6541f

https://www.facebook.com/Angustaylor4hume/posts/1502783987894991

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62701

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611309 (161055ZMAY26) Notable: Burke uses Bondi powers to outlaw neo-Nazi hate group - (Video) The Albanese government has formally listed the neo-Nazi group formerly known as the National Socialist Network as a prohibited hate organisation under laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack. The designation makes it a criminal offence punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment to join or support the group, which has also operated under the names European Australian Movement and White Australia. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the decision was based on advice from the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and would prevent the group from organising rallies and activities promoting racial supremacy. Authorities said members remained active despite the organisation announcing it would disband earlier this year. Far-right activists responded by shutting down online chat groups and deleting propaganda channels to avoid prosecution under the new laws.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24119741 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24354986 (pb)

>>38961 (pb)

>>39026 (pb)

Burke uses Bondi powers to outlaw neo-Nazi hate group

Matthew Knott - May 15, 2026

1/2

The neo-Nazi group formerly known as the National Socialist Network has been listed as a prohibited hate organisation by the Albanese government under legislation introduced after the Bondi massacre, prompting far-right activists to shut down and wipe records of their online chat groups.

It will now be a criminal offence, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, to join or provide support to the far-right group, which has gone by various names.

The group announced it would disband in January to avoid being targeted under the new laws, but authorities believed its members have still been active.

The government announced in March that Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir would be the first group to be banned under the hate group scheme, created to target groups that previously skirted the definition of a terror organisation.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said he made the decision based on advice from domestic spy agency ASIO.

“Today, the organisation that would be colloquially known as the neo-Nazis, but has gone through different names – the European Australian Movement, the National Socialist Network (NSN) and White Australia – has been listed as the second prohibited hate group under the changes that were made to the Criminal Code,” Burke told reporters in Canberra.

“This sends a clear message to those who believe in racial supremacy that their views are not welcome in Australian society.”

The group organised an inflammatory rally outside NSW parliament last November in which participants held up a banner reading: “Abolish the Jewish lobby.”

After the Bondi terror attack on December 14, which led to the deaths of 15 people at a Hanukkah celebration, the government identified Hizb ut-Tahrir and the NSN as the two groups that showed the need for new hate group laws.

They typified behaviour that Burgess had identified as “lawful but awful”, Burke said on Friday.

“None of this will stop bigoted people from having ideas, but it does prevent this group from organising, from meeting, and prevents some of the sorts of horrific, bigoted rallies that we’ve seen around our country,” he said.

Burke said the government would be able to act quickly using regulation if the NSN tried to rebrand itself under another name.

Burgess said in a speech last year that the NSN had not engaged in terrorism but added: “I remain deeply concerned by its hateful, divisive rhetoric and increasingly violent propaganda, and the growing likelihood these things will prompt spontaneous violence, particularly in response to perceived provocation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62702

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611677 (161319ZMAY26) Notable: Neo-Nazi group banned in Australia under hate laws - (Video) The Albanese government has banned the neo-Nazi group known as White Australia, formerly the National Socialist Network and European Australian Movement, under new hate group laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said supporting, funding, recruiting or joining the organisation would now be a criminal offence punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment. Burke said the group had targeted Jewish, Muslim, Asian and First Nations communities and promoted white supremacist ideology linked to violent incidents and arrests across Australia. Authorities said the laws would also allow the government to quickly ban the organisation under any future name changes. The Coalition backed the listing, with shadow home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam describing the move as a “welcome development” against groups seeking to “destroy the Australian way of life”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

Neo-Nazi group banned in Australia under hate laws

Clare Armstrong - 15 May 2026

1/2

A Neo-Nazi organisation will be listed as a hate group in Australia, making it illegal to support the group in any way.

On Friday Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke announced that White Australia, previously known as the National Socialist Network (NSN) and the European Australian Movement, would be designated a prohibited hate group under laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack.

Mr Burke said the listing, effective as of midnight, meant "supporting, funding, training, recruiting, joining or directing" the group would be a criminal offence punishable by up to 15 years behind bars.

"It sends a clear message to people who believe in racial supremacy that their views have no place in modern Australia," he said.

Mr Burke linked Neo-Nazis to "violent action" in Melbourne and said there had been several arrests relating to people "motivated by white supremacist ideology".

South Australian police arrested 16 alleged Neo-Nazis, including one person who was charged with displaying a Nazi symbol, after they disrupted a Survival Day rally in Adelaide last January.

Three people were also arrested after a group of alleged Neo-Nazis attacked a First Nations protest camp in Melbourne in September.

Ban will limit 'horrific, bigoted rallies

Mr Burke said the federal government could not stop "bigoted people from having horrific ideologies," but banning certain groups would have an impact.

"It does prevent this group from organising, meeting and prevent some of the sorts of horrific, bigoted rallies we have seen around the country," he said.

Asked if Australians who continued to attend rallies organised by people linked to the banned group could be in breach of hate laws, Mr Burke said they would be taking a "risk" even if they did not realise who was behind the event.

"The criminal threshold will be determined on the facts, but the simple thing would be if anyone who associated with any organisation of this nature, they're taking a risk … and they need to be aware of the potential criminal offences that they'd be dealing with."

Mr Burke said the Neo-Nazis had "gone after almost every different group you can imagine" in Australia.

"Whether people are Jewish, Muslim, whether people are of Asian heritage, whether they are First Nations, they engaged in a series of examples of bigotry, all of which fit with their white supremacist ideology," he said.

"It has been made clear today that under Australian law they are now a banned organisation."

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim welcomed the group's listing.

"It doesn't matter what they call themselves, or how they structure themselves, these groups use all the well-known techniques of thuggery and menace that Nazis have always used against Jewish communities and other groups they have targeted," he said in a statement.

"This announcement is welcome and will send a much-needed message that these groups and their hateful, racist ideology has no place in Australia."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62703

File: 26f7a508f218e83⋯.jpg (152.48 KB,1515x852,505:284,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dc8425985332a21⋯.jpg (643.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611729 (161335ZMAY26) Notable: Jewish academics ‘targeted and silenced’ as universities face fines over antisemitism - Universities could face fines and regulatory action for failing to protect Jewish staff and students from antisemitism, following a government-commissioned review led by former Australian Catholic University vice-chancellor Greg Craven. The report found Jewish academics had been “targeted and silenced”, with some allegedly sacked, boycotted or afraid to identify publicly as Jewish on campus. Craven criticised universities for allowing aggressive protests, antisemitic slogans and intimidation to persist after the Bondi terror attack, describing the sector’s response as a “grave failure”. Education Minister Jason Clare plans to introduce laws granting the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency stronger powers to fine universities that fail to meet new standards on racism and antisemitism. Universities have until August 31 to implement enforceable definitions of antisemitism under the proposed reforms.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24309785 (pb)

>>62687

Jewish academics ‘targeted and silenced’ as universities face fines over antisemitism

NATASHA BITA - May 14, 2026

1/2

Universities face fines for failing to protect Jewish staff and ­students from hate speech and attacks, months after the Bondi massacre, a caustic review of antisemitism on campus has warned.

Jewish academics are being “targeted and silenced’’, sacked or boycotted, Emeritus Professor Greg Craven found in his government-initiated investigation of 32 universities. His damning report exposes ongoing intimidation and harassment of Jewish staff and students on campus – including academics “glorifying the leader of a proscribed terrorist organisation’’ to students.

Jewish students and staff have been verbally abused as “baby killers, defenders of genocide and fascists’’ while some student newspapers published Jewish tropes. “Though prohibited, chants such as ‘globalise the intifada’, ‘long live the intifada, ‘glory to the intifada’ and ‘from the river to the sea’ continue to be used … confronting flags are routinely flown on campus,’’ the report states.

“Jewish academics have needed to decide if they want to ‘come out’, identifying themselves as Jews, and in some cases have decided not to for fear of the consequences.

“Antisemitism is being directly used to repress the academic freedom of its victims.’’

Professor Craven – a constitutional lawyer and former vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University – lashed the university sector for failing to adopt clear and enforceable definitions of antisemitism – five months after 15 people were shot dead at a Jewish festival on Bondi Beach last December.

He deplored the “grave inability” of universities to stamp out antisemitism as a “sectoral failure’’, and questioned why they refused to treat hatred of Jews as seriously as discrimination on the grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability or mental health. “Given the attacks at Bondi, on synagogues … as well as the direct harassment of Jewish ­people – including on university campuses – it surely is the case that antisemitism should take a detailed definitional place among other contemporary forms of harassment and vilification,’’ he said in his report on Thursday.

Criticising “arcane and almost unusable complaints and disciplinary processes’’ across higher education, Professor Craven found that university campuses had hosted aggressive protests and sit-ins featuring antisemitic slogans, offensive symbols, antisemitic guest speakers and “loud harassment of Jewish students and others seen as supporting the state of Israel or ‘Zionists’.’’

“It is implausible for universities to deny any significant level of blame here,’’ he said. “Antisemitism is a continuing and very serious problem within Australian universities. Not only is any degree of antisemitism in our universities racist, bigoted, unethical and immoral, it undermines their international viability as institutions of research and learning.

“As institutions of free debate and intellect they cannot allow themselves – or others connected with them – to be perceived as discriminating against a vulnerable and fearful minority.’’

Professor Craven said a continued failure by universities to define antisemitism and stamp it out should be referred to federal Education Minister Jason Clare.

He said consequences for individual universities might impact funding and registration through referrals to the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, the regulatory watchdog he helped establish.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62704

File: 1d167796abfc127⋯.mp4 (15.06 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: e2793bd95260d73⋯.jpg (229.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7d54857f5f1211f⋯.jpg (372.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d79d8a04530e98f⋯.jpg (288.25 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611802 (161403ZMAY26) Notable: AUKUS pact a ‘once in a lifetime’ chance for Australia, says top US admiral - (Video) America’s highest-ranking naval officer has described the AUKUS submarine pact as a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to give Australia a “no kidding” nuclear-powered submarine force capable of strengthening allied operations in the Indo-Pacific. US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Daryl Caudle told the House Armed Services Committee he “fully support[s]” the agreement and was confident transferring submarines to Australia would not weaken United States defence capabilities. Under the pact, the United States is expected to begin selling Virginia-class submarines to Australia in the early 2030s. Admiral Caudle said the partnership would give allied commanders greater undersea capability alongside the Royal Australian Navy, while Defence Minister Richard Marles is expected to outline further progress on the $368bn AUKUS program during a defence summit in South Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38816 (pb)

>>38940 (pb)

AUKUS pact a ‘once in a lifetime’ chance for Australia, says top US admiral

America’s top naval officer has backed the AUKUS submarine pact as a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to give Australia a “no kidding” undersea force.

Vanessa Marsh - May 15, 2026

America’s highest ranking naval officer has described the trilateral AUKUS pact as a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to equip Australia with a “no kidding” submarine force that will bolster joint defence capabilities against threats in the Indo Pacific.

US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Daryl Caudle, the principal naval adviser to President Donald Trump, told the US House Armed Services Committee that AUKUS had his “full support” and he was confident the transfer of submarines to Australia would not impact US defence capabilities.

It comes as News Corp’s Defending Australia summit is held in South Australia today where Defence Minister Richard Marles is expected to deliver a keynote address detailing progress on the $368 billion submarine project.

Asked by ranking member of the House Seapower Joe Courtney about the findings of last year’s Pentagon review that endorsed the pact, Adm Caudle said he “wholeheartedly” agreed with it.

“I was part of it, I was in bed creating it,” he said.

“I made a lot of the recommendations in it that were actually adopted and fully support AUKUS Pillar I.”

“And I look forward to standing up submarine squadron three later this year and making sure that submarine rotational force west becomes alive and getting the first Virginia-class transfer to Australia next year as we continue to build out where they eventually buy US submarines. So I fully support it, sir.”

Under the AUKUS agreement, the US would begin selling nuclear-powered submarines to Australia beginning in the early 2030s.

Adm Caudle was asked if America’s marine industrial base would be able to fulfil its AUKUS commitments while also ensuring the US Navy had access to the undersea fleet it required.

He said the fleet requirements relied on force posture with homeports where the fleet could be maintained and operated, referencing the importance of existing squadrons in Guam, Hawaii and San Diego.

“And then what we’ve done, and I think in a very thoughtful way, is, for once in a lifetime, shared technology with a close partner, Australia, to give them a no kidding submarine force that will add an entirely new dimension to the threats we face in the Indo-Pacific,” Adm Caudle said.

“And so that, under the submarine squadron, and the way we will command and control that working with the Australian Navy, who are great partners and have been for decades, will give Admiral (Samuel) Paparo access to those submarines as well.”

Adm Caudle is a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and advises the White House, Pentagon and National Security Council.

He endorsed earlier support for the pact given to the same committee by Admiral Samuel Paparo, Commander of the Indo Pacific Command, who described the defence agreement as “essential”.

At the time, Adm Paparo said the AUKUS was on track and a rotational submarine squadron could be operated out of Australia as early as “tomorrow”.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/technology/innovation/aukus-pact-a-once-in-a-lifetime-chance-for-australia-says-top-us-admiral/news-story/9ccf71f13001a3e422ed396e5a525caa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62705

File: 8a5241cb736d369⋯.jpg (589.4 KB,2000x1151,2000:1151,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611825 (161414ZMAY26) Notable: Australia to retask E-7 Wedgetail aircraft to support multinational operations in Strait of Hormuz - Australia will retask a Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft to support multinational freedom of navigation operations in the Strait of Hormuz. Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia was prepared to support a “strictly defensive” mission led by the United Kingdom and France aimed at protecting international shipping routes and stabilising trade through the strategically critical waterway. Marles said the Wedgetail aircraft was already operating in the region and would provide a “valuable contribution” to the multinational effort. The deployment follows talks between defence ministers from more than 40 countries amid escalating tensions affecting maritime trade. Britain has also announced it will deploy the destroyer HMS Dragon, alongside fighter jets, autonomous mine-hunting systems and counter-drone capabilities, as part of the planned mission.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24355021 (pb)

>>39002 (pb)

>>38740 (pb)

Australia to retask E-7 Wedgetail aircraft to support multinational operations in Strait of Hormuz

Robert Dougherty - 13 MAY 2026

Australia has announced it will retask a Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft to support freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles confirmed intentions for the deployment on 13 May.

The deployment alongside allies under the multinational freedom of navigation operations follows a recent meeting of defence ministers from more than 40 countries.

“Australia stands ready to support an independent and strictly defensive multinational military mission, led by the United Kingdom and France, once it is established,” Deputy Prime Minister Marles said.

“Our intention is to contribute Australia’s world-leading E-7A Wedgetail aircraft to this defensive effort.

“While this platform is already doing work in the region, providing this capability would make a valuable contribution to the multinational mission and efforts to secure freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

“The multinational military mission is designed to complement ongoing diplomatic engagement and de-escalation efforts while demonstrating a tangible commitment to the security of international trade.

“We want to see this conflict end, the Strait of Hormuz open and freedom of navigation resume. The longer this conflict goes on the more significant the impact on Australia will be. Our government is doing all we can to shield Australians from the impacts.

“We will continue to consult and work with partners to support these efforts.”

The United Kingdom has announced it will send a Daring Class air defence destroyer, HMS Dragon, to join freedom of navigation operations in the Strait of Hormuz.

The Portsmouth-based Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer will be joined by autonomous mine hunting equipment, counter-drone systems and Typhoon fighter jets to conduct air patrols for the future multinational defensive mission.

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/air/18176-australia-to-retask-e-7-wedgetail-aircraft-to-support-multi-national-operations-in-strait-of-hormuz

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62706

File: c46c6b5ec57ebfa⋯.jpg (2.76 MB,3000x2250,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f2e798c3aa3c19a⋯.jpg (370.57 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c007bb6924dae8a⋯.jpg (680.84 KB,2400x1603,2400:1603,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611849 (161428ZMAY26) Notable: Vanuatu defiant on security pact as Beijing beckons - Vanuatu is pressuring Australia to abandon demands for veto powers over Chinese investment as negotiations continue over a new bilateral security pact designed to limit Beijing’s influence in the Pacific. The revised Nakamal Agreement would recognise Australia as Vanuatu’s primary policing partner and prevent foreign militarisation of critical infrastructure, but would remove Canberra’s ability to block Chinese-backed projects in sensitive sectors. The dispute comes as Vanuatu also pursues a separate “comprehensive economic co-operation agreement” with China known as the Namele Agreement. Australia has been seeking exclusive security arrangements across the Pacific to prevent China establishing a permanent military foothold in the region. Beijing already holds about 30 per cent of Vanuatu’s debt and has funded major infrastructure projects including ports, airports and surveillance systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38935 (pb)

Vanuatu defiant on security pact as Beijing beckons

BEN PACKHAM - May 14, 2026

Vanuatu has challenged Australia to drop its demand for a veto over Chinese deals if it wants to secure a far-reaching bilateral security pact, as it pushes ahead with a “comprehensive economic co-operation agreement” with Beijing.

The Albanese government is yet to agree to a new version of the countries’ Nakamal Agreement that was approved by Vanuatu’s Council of Ministers last Thursday, amid growing concerns over China’s surging influence in the region.

Vanuatu’s updated draft says Australia is the country’s primary policing partner and its critical infrastructure will not be militarised by another power but, unlike the original version, it would deny Australia the ability to block Chinese investment in sensitive sectors.

The proposed security deal is part of a region-wide effort by Australia to deny China a security foothold that could open the door to a permanent military presence.

“The government had reservations on certain parts of the (Nakamal) agreement it felt would compromise its longstanding position as a non-aligned state. We are friends to all, enemies to none,” a source in Vanuatu told The Australian.

“When the Nakamal Agreement came up it was going to have a lot of ramifications. It was going to limit us and put a lot of projects the government already had in the pipeline in jeopardy.

“It will be really up to Canberra whether they will assent on (the new draft agreement).”

The proposed agreement comes as Vanuatu negotiates a new bilateral partnership with Beijing called the Namele Agreement. The source denied the planned China pact had a security element, as widely reported.

Two-year limbo

“The Namele Agreement is totally different from the Nakamal Agreement. Nakamal is more like a security pact. Namele is more comprehensive economic co-operation with Vanuatu.”

The Australia-Vanuatu deal has been in limbo for years after Port Vila cancelled a previous security agreement in 2022, and then failed to finalise the Nakamal Agreement in 2025 when Anthony Albanese arrived to sign it. The deal was originally worth $500m to Vanuatu in infrastructure and other support.

If the Albanese government agrees to the terms of the revised agreement, Vanuatu’s Prime Minister Jotham Napat would likely travel to Australia for a formal signing ceremony in coming weeks.

Former Australian diplomat James Batley, who served in senior roles across the Pacific, said he believed the Albanese government would agree to the revised deal “assuming it hasn’t been completely gutted”.

The ANU distinguished policy fellow said that “like politics, diplomacy is the art of the possible”.

“Assuming it is concluded I expect the agreement will still represent a major milestone in relations between Australia and Vanuatu,” Mr Batley said.

“Depending on the scope of the agreement, it may open the way for greater Australian investment in Vanuatu’s national development, which is already considerable.

“The agreement won’t shut China out of Vanuatu, but that’s not a realistic objective at this point.

“Vanuatu wants an agreement with Australia, and I would expect an agreement to cement Australia as Vanuatu’s key development and security partner.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has said Australia is in “a state of permanent contest” with China in the Pacific – a contest others have referred to as a “knife fight” and a never-ending game of “whack-a-mole”.

The government has signed a string of security agreements with Pacific countries including a landmark defence treaty with Papua New Guinea, and pacts with Tuvalu and Nauru. It is also working towards a major treaty with Fiji.

It requires the deals to be exclusive, and for Australia to have a right of veto over Chinese investments in critical infrastructure.

Vanuatu is one of the South Pacific nations most susceptible to Chinese influence. Beijing owns 30 per cent of the country’s debt, and has delivered an array of major projects in critical areas including the $145m Luganville Wharf, a $66m upgrade to Port Vila’s international airport, and a Huawei data centre and surveillance facility.

One of the PLA-Navy’s most advanced destroyers and an accompanying cruiser docked at the Chinese-delivered wharf in October 2024, in a major show of strength.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/vanuatu-defiant-on-security-pact-as-beijing-beckons/news-story/fd142ace69b1363dd40f695da1e45a72

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62707

File: 48e19f9badc84e0⋯.jpg (92.75 KB,840x496,105:62,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d20838246c08a5d⋯.jpg (1.59 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 85e88061754b6d2⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24611895 (161438ZMAY26) Notable: Lawyer for notorious paedophile Peter Liddy says indefinite jail would be an 'abuse of process' - Lawyers for former magistrate and convicted paedophile Peter Liddy have argued in South Australia’s Supreme Court that keeping him imprisoned beyond the end of his 25-year sentence next month would be an “abuse of process”. Liddy, now in his 80s, was jailed in 2001 for sexually abusing four children between 1983 and 1986 and is due for release on June 4. His legal team argued a 2019 psychiatric assessment found he was capable of controlling his behaviour and that any risk to the community could be managed under supervision. The state government opposed ending the proceedings, arguing the report was outdated and did not fully assess his current risk. Prosecutors are seeking either continued detention or strict supervision conditions if Liddy is released.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Lawyer for notorious paedophile Peter Liddy says indefinite jail would be an 'abuse of process'

Jordanna Schriever - 13 May 2026

Keeping paedophile former magistrate Peter Liddy in prison at the completion of his 25-year jail term next month would be an "abuse of process", his lawyers have told South Australia's Supreme Court.

The notorious child abuser, who is now in his 80s, was jailed in 2001 for sexually offending against four children between 1983 and 1986.

He has remained in custody since, having previously been refused parole, but his prison term is due to expire in three weeks, on June 4.

Jeff Powell SC, for Liddy, asked the court to permanently stay the government's application to keep his client behind bars, suggesting his client's case was "rare and exceptional".

He said it would be "unjust to subject him to an inquiry" given a 2019 report by a forensic psychiatrist had already found Liddy was capable of controlling his sexual instincts.

"It would be an abuse of process of the court to do so," Mr Powell said.

Mr Powell said that report, by Dr Craig Raeside, had found there was "no indication that [Liddy] was incapable of controlling his sexual conduct" and that he "would not support a finding that Mr Liddy is unwilling to control his sexual behaviour".

He said Dr Raeside had further suggested that any risk Liddy may pose if released into the community "could be adequately managed with appropriate supervision".

He said a prison program had deemed Liddy to be at "average risk of sexual reoffending" which equated to a low-to-moderate risk.

Mr Powell criticised the timing of the government's application which was filed in February, just months before Liddy was due to be released.

"His circumstances have been fully known by the Crown for years, the fact of his offending hasn't changed, the unproven allegations haven't changed, the fact that there is ongoing denials is unchanged … there is nothing new here," he said.

"What has changed is that … he is now, of course, older, he is frailer and he is more unwell.

"He has an unblemished record as a prisoner for 25 years."

Mr Powell said Liddy's compliant conduct while in custody appeared to be viewed by the government as "a facade".

'Detain people until they confess'

Alison Doecke KC, for the government, said shelving the proceedings would be "inappropriate" and that the government was under "no obligation" to file its applications any earlier.

She said there were issues with Dr Raeside's 2019 report, because it was almost seven years old, did not include a current risk assessment and did not include the findings of a six-month sexual offender course Liddy had completed in prison.

She said it was also unclear how much consideration Dr Raeside had given unproven allegations against Liddy.

"Liddy has committed horrendous sexual offending which has been denied," she said.

She said those continued denials, meant a prison treatment program had been unable to assess his potential risk.

"I don't think it's the point that you detain people until they confess," she said.

"What is missing from Raeside's report … is how does this man's denial impact his current risk level?

"The reason to detain is that in the absence of accurate and reliable assessment of the risk, your Honour should not be reassured by what is an 'average risk of sexual re-offending'."

She said it was also "important to recognise" that Liddy's cognitive capacity had "fluctuated markedly over time" and that "in more recent times there is no concern about Mr Liddy's cognitive capacity".

"The court needs to have caution in closing off this application by granting a permanent stay on the basis of a report that is six-and-a-half years old for a man we know whose cognitive capacity has fluctuated over time."

The government has also sought Liddy be subject to a supervision order if released.

Ms Doecke said if granted, that order should include a six-month period of strict home detention conditions.

Liddy's lawyers, however, said any period of home detention should last only three months.

The court heard that the restrictions sought would also include limiting Liddy's access to a computer or the internet — even though he had "never used a computer and doesn't intend to".

The court heard the premises where Liddy would live were "currently being assessed", but Ms Doecke said there were "complexities" which could not be articulated in open court.

She said "practical steps" including connecting electricity were still required.

Justice Rachael Gray will deliver a decision next week.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-13/paedophile-peter-liddy-contests-indefinite-detention/106675082

https://qresear.ch/?q=Peter+Liddy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62708

File: 6da703cbdf672a8⋯.mp4 (13.62 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 13f2ff52098b893⋯.jpg (193.91 KB,1080x927,120:103,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0434b2846cd953a⋯.jpg (1.58 MB,3458x2304,1729:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24612038 (161513ZMAY26) Notable: The trouble in Surfers Paradise over grand designs of Trump clan - (Video) Plans for a Trump-branded skyscraper on Queensland’s Gold Coast have collapsed after months of disputes between the Trump Organisation and local developer Altus Property Group. The proposed development included a luxury hotel, residential tower, beach club and restaurants and was promoted as Australia’s tallest building. The Trump Organisation accused developer David Young of failing to meet financial obligations tied to the agreement, while Young argued the Trump brand had become “toxic to Australians” amid growing opposition linked to United States politics and the Iran conflict. The project faced strong local backlash, with more than 140,000 people signing petitions opposing the tower and concerns raised over beach access, traffic and rising property prices in Surfers Paradise. Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate said the collapse of the deal ultimately came down to disagreements over profit and branding arrangements.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62685

>>62686

The trouble in Surfers Paradise over grand designs of Trump clan

The first family’s plan for Australia’s tallest building came spectacularly unstuck on Queensland’s beloved beachfront, to the delight of opponents

Roger Maynard - May 15 2026

1/2

For a few short months after Valentine’s Day, the Trumps setting up shop in Surfers Paradise followed a similar pattern to the Trumps setting up shop anywhere else in the world.

The president’s sons, Donald Jr and Eric, had entertained a man called Tom Tate, mayor of Australia’s Gold Coast, at Mar-a-Lago, and in February they announced that a developer would build a skyscraper, the tallest in Australia at 1,099ft, bearing the Trump name.

It was talked up with great fanfare and made headlines as the country got its first of the beautiful buildings the president likes to declare he builds. Back in February, Eric Trump proclaimed the deal reflected “our unwavering commitment to delivering world-class luxury experiences in iconic locations around the world”.

Their commitment, however, would waver before too long. The 285-room luxury hotel bearing the Trump trademark has now been axed. So too has the 92-storey residential building, beach club, Michelin-starred restaurant and shops there were due to follow by 2030, all at a cost of around a billion dollars.

The Trumps have accused David Young, who leads the property developer, Altus, of short-changing them. “After months of negotiations and empty promises, one after another, about a supposed A$1.5 billion project, Altus Property Group was unable to meet the most basic financial obligation that was due upon signing the agreement,” a Trump Organisation spokesman told Reuters.

The Trumps claimed Young had attributed the contract termination to “certain world events”, describing this as “simply a strategy to deflect attention from his own failings and failures”.

Young, meanwhile, said the Trump brand had become “toxic to Australians” in recent months, not least due to the war in Iran. He stressed, however, that he knew the Trump Organisation had “nothing to do with the president”.

That may be, but there has been a growing divide between Australia and the White House. Last month, Penny Wong, the foreign minister, ruffled feathers in Washington when she said it had been “difficult” to watch Trump behaving “very differently to how we previously envisioned America”. She added: “We know that he prizes unpredictability.”

There was a general local unease with the project and its links to the first family, too. At least 140,000 people had signed four separate petitions demanding a halt to the work, with signatories “deeply uncomfortable with the Trump brand and what it represents”.

On the Gold Coast, the notion of a Trump tower limiting access to the beach prompted anger in a nation where sand and surf are sacrosanct. Craig Hill, one of the leaders behind the anti-Trump campaign, said the project did not fit in with Australian common values. He said the campaign against the project had united locals. “All these Australians working together for a common cause was fantastic and very inspirational,” he told The Times. “The Trump brand is toxic.”

“There is no bad blood between the Trump family and me,” Young wrote on LinkedIn, claiming he had maintained a relationship of almost two decades with the Trump family. “It’s purely business.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62709

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24616846 (172243ZMAY26) Notable: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vows to defend hate group laws as neo-Nazis plan court fight - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the federal government will defend new hate group laws after former members of the banned National Socialist Network prepared a High Court challenge against the legislation. The neo-Nazi organisation, along with affiliated groups White Australia and the European Australian Movement, was formally listed as a prohibited hate group under laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack. The designation makes supporting, recruiting for or directing the group punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment. Following the ban, former members reportedly deleted social media accounts and circulated warnings urging supporters not to “become an example made by the state”. Former NSN leader Thomas Sewell claimed the government targeted the group because it “hates white Australians”, while Albanese said the laws were necessary to combat antisemitism, hatred and extremist attempts to divide Australians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vows to defend hate group laws as neo-Nazis plan court fight

LIAM BEATTY and NATHAN SCHMIDT - May 16, 2026

Members and supporters of a now-banned hate group have rushed to delete their online footprints, warning “don’t allow yourself to become an example made by the state”.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke announced on Friday the National Socialist Network (NSN), and affiliated groups White Australia and the European Australian Movement, would be listed as a prohibited hate group under Australian law at midnight.

This was the second such listing after Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Under the designation, Mr Burke said supporting, funding, training, recruiting, joining, or directing this group constitutes a criminal offence with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

“It sends a clear message to people who believe in racial supremacy that their views have no place in modern Australia,” he said on Friday.

In response to the new laws passing parliament earlier this year in the wake of the alleged Bondi terror attack, the NSN announced the group would disband.

However, Mr Burke alleged they had changed their name and continued organising.

“Effectively what they did, for want of a better term, is phoenix,” he said.

“(They) changed their name, they did not change the fact they were still an organisation and still engaged in the exact sort of behaviour that met the threshold for this legislation.

“It doesn’t matter what they call themselves, or how they structure themselves, these groups use all the well-known techniques of thuggery and menace that Nazis have always used against Jewish communities and other groups they have targeted.”

Following the announcement on Friday, former members of the NSN have wiped their public social media profiles as a message is shared among supporters of the group.

It warns supporters to “proceed with extreme caution” and not praise the group online, share posts or footage and leave group chats containing “ex-members”.

“Please take this seriously,” it reads.

“Don’t allow yourself to become an example made by the state.”

In a statement shared online by former NSN leader Thomas Sewell, he claimed the move was because the government “hates white Australians” and was a response to his attempt to create a new political party.

Mr Sewell said he had filed a High Court appeal against the laws.

Speaking on Saturday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government was “absolutely confident” the challenge would fail.

“We’ve outlawed the neo-Nazis that have gone through various name changes but the policies remain the same; the policies of hatred, the policies of antisemitism, the policies of trying to divide people against and target people who are Australians,” he said.

“They’re important laws for Australians and we will stand by them, we will defend them.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-vows-to-defend-hate-group-laws-as-neonazis-plan-court-fight/news-story/0169bf98e3df39c86f4db74ba4c1def7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSLS0Po76RA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62710

File: 9726e540b586d4f⋯.jpg (680.41 KB,1882x1059,1882:1059,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8111bdf97873143⋯.jpg (3.13 MB,4000x2252,1000:563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dbb94706f918e33⋯.jpg (2.15 MB,4000x2252,1000:563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1fed70e9ebefd0f⋯.jpg (3.9 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ab32908289349b5⋯.jpg (386.92 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24616870 (172258ZMAY26) Notable: Protesters march at Nakba Day rallies around Australia - Hundreds of people attended Nakba Day rallies across Australia to commemorate the mass displacement of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Demonstrations were held in Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Hobart, with protesters carrying Palestinian flags, chanting “free Palestine” and hearing speeches calling for solidarity and justice. In Melbourne, Senator Lidia Thorpe said the “Nakba is not over”, while Greens senator David Shoebridge accused the Australian government of “silence and complicity” in the current Middle East conflict. Palestinian speakers at rallies across the country described the day as an ongoing symbol of dispossession and resistance. Police maintained a visible presence at several events, though authorities reported no major incidents during the demonstrations, including in Melbourne where pro-Israel counter-protesters gathered nearby.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

Protesters march at Nakba Day rallies around Australia

abc.net.au - 17 May 2026

1/2

Protesters have marched in cities across Australia to mark the Nakba, a day that recognises the mass displacement of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

The anniversary of the Nakba, which means "catastrophe" in Arabic, falls on May 15 each year.

About 500 people attended a rally to commemorate the Nakba in Melbourne on Sunday, marching from the State Library to Flinders Street Station.

Palestinian-Australian surgeon Dr Bushra Othman addressed the crowd assembled on the steps of the library.

"Seventy-eight years ago, Palestinian people were driven from their homes carrying keys they believed they would soon use again," Dr Otham said.

"Those keys became heirlooms, those homes became memories."

Senator Lidia Thorpe told the rally Aboriginal Australians stood with the Palestinian people.

"I wish these anniversaries could be events of healing. But the Nakba is not over and continues to this very day," she said.

Greens Senator David Shoebridge accused the Australian government of "silence and complicity" in the current Middle East conflict.

"There was no one day when the Nakba started, there is no one day when the Nakba ended. It continues," he said.

Several people held Israeli flags up across the road from the pro-Palestinian rally, but the two groups were separated by police.

Police said there were "no issues" during the event.

Organisers 'encouraged' by crowds

In Brisbane, about 350 protesters gathered in the CBD to commemorate Nakba Day.

During the rally, the crowd heard from multiple Palestinian speakers who spoke of resistance and recounted stories of Nakba survivors and the generations that have come after them.

There was a recurring theme of hope amongst the speakers, and chants of "free, free Palestine" could be heard ringing out across the CBD as the crowds marched with megaphones, signs and Palestinian flags.

Among those in attendance was Nick Hanna, the lawyer representing a number of Queenslanders who are facing hate speech charges in relation to banned phrases.

In Perth, about 300 people attended the city's Nakba Day rally, which included a march through the city.

Friends of Palestine WA secretary Nick Everett said the rally was an opportunity to stand in solidarity.

The Perth rally was attended by community groups including the Palestinian Community of WA.

"This is one rally in an ongoing campaign … we're really encouraged by the numbers here today," Mr Everett said.

"For Palestinians the term Nakba means catastrophe, and each year Palestinians protest the ongoing Israeli cleansing of their lands.

"We urge people to take notice, write to their politicians and join us in our call for justice."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62711

File: 27f1720743e2848⋯.jpg (425.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 70529166887ff28⋯.jpg (585.3 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b7907a437536dac⋯.jpg (393.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24616963 (172325ZMAY26) Notable: Secret IBAC report into Daniel Andrews’ firefighters union deal set for release - Victoria’s anti-corruption watchdog is preparing to release the findings of its long-running Operation Richmond investigation into dealings between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union. The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission has told witnesses the confidential report is expected to be tabled in parliament during the week beginning May 25, potentially creating political pressure for Premier Jacinta Allan ahead of the state election. The investigation has been examining the 2016 enterprise bargaining agreement negotiated between Daniel Andrews’ government and the firefighters union under secretary Peter Marshall. Former premier Daniel Andrews was among witnesses questioned in private hearings during the probe, which began in 2019 following a complaint from a Labor insider. IBAC commissioner Victoria Elliott acknowledged the investigation had “taken too long” because of pandemic and legal delays.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38837 (pb)

Secret IBAC report into Daniel Andrews’ firefighters union deal set for release

DAMON JOHNSTON - May 15, 2026

IBAC is moving to release the findings of its highly confidential investigation into dealings between Labor and Victoria’s firefighters union in little more than a week.

In a step that threatens to trigger a major integrity crisis for Premier Jacinta Allan just six months before the state election, the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission has told witnesses in the marathon probe that it plans to table the report in parliament during the week starting Monday, May 25. Wednesday, May 27, shapes as the most likely day for the release.

The anti-corruption agency has written to witnesses in the past week alerting them to the imminent release of the special report into Operation Richmond, an investigation that has dragged on for longer than World War II.

Operation Richmond has been running under tight secrecy since 2019 and while no public hearings were called, scores of witnesses – including then premier Daniel Andrews – were grilled in private by IBAC.

The investigation, sparked by a complaint from a Labor insider, has been digging into the 2016 pay-and-conditions negotiations between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union and its state secretary Peter Marshall.

The Australian has approached IBAC for comment.

In a newsletter released last month, IBAC Commissioner Victoria Elliott confirmed the agency was preparing to release the long-delayed findings and recommendations.

“IBAC is committed to publishing the Operation Richmond special report as soon as possible – with a view to publication before the end of the financial year,” Ms Elliott wrote in April.

In a letter to witnesses, IBAC has confirmed they won’t know if their response to IBAC’s draft findings and comments will be included in the final report until it’s tabled in parliament.

IBAC told witnesses it was not the agency’s practice to inform them if revisions had been made to a draft report, or to provide an updated draft report.

The agency said it intended to stick to this process.

The Australian has reported that in private examinations, IBAC grilled witnesses about the role played by Mr Andrews in the negotiations – which led to a favourable enterprise bargaining agreement with the UFU.

Mr Andrews and IBAC have repeatedly dodged questions about whether he was cross-­examined during closed-door Operation Richmond hearings.

The Australian believes Mr Andrews, as premier, was grilled in a private hearing over events that handed the union generous allowances and effective operational control over the volunteer Country Fire Authority.

One of the aspects that IBAC is believed to have looked at is whether the 2016 EBA deal Mr Andrews struck with the UFU was influenced by the UFU campaigning for Labor during the 2014 election.

In the April newsletter, Ms Elliott conceded Operation Richmond had dragged on for too long. “We acknowledge the Operation Richmond special report process has been complex and has taken too long,” she wrote, adding that “there were a number of factors outside of our control which have delayed publication, including the pandemic and court matters”.

“We have reviewed our processes internally and made improvements to ensure what is within our control is completed as efficiently as possible for ­future IBAC special reports.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/secret-ibac-report-into-daniel-andrews-firefighters-union-deal-set-for-release/news-story/16f9ea4e1de65f7d463571e9ee3e7608

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62712

File: 5eaa521561b02f5⋯.jpg (519.36 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5b5906dea337ecc⋯.jpg (1.58 MB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 560194ba5f5b0c7⋯.jpg (551.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24616984 (172330ZMAY26) Notable: Taxpayers face $134,000 bill for Dan Andrews statue - The Victorian government has confirmed work is under way on a $134,000 bronze statue honouring former premier Daniel Andrews after he qualified for the state’s long-serving premiers recognition program. Premier Jacinta Allan’s office said Andrews would join other Victorian leaders who served more than 3000 days in office, with the sculpture to be installed outside the premier’s office at Treasury Place. Andrews served 3219 days as premier between 2014 and 2023. Former premier Jeff Kennett criticised the decision, arguing the statue should be “melted down” to help repay Victoria’s rising debt and joking it should depict Andrews wearing a face mask because of Melbourne’s lengthy pandemic lockdowns. The government said Meridian Sculpture had been awarded the contract due to its experience producing statues of previous Victorian premiers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

Taxpayers face $134,000 bill for Dan Andrews statue

DAMON JOHNSTON - May 15, 2026

Dan Andrews will be immortalised in bronze, with Premier Jacinta Allan confirming work is under way on a statue to honour the controversial former Labor premier.

In a Friday afternoon announcement, Ms Allan’s office confirmed a $134,000 contract had been awarded to erect the statue, which will join sculptures of other premiers who have led Victoria for more than 3000 days.

“Daniel Andrews led Victoria through some of its toughest moments and never stopped fighting for working people,” a government spokesperson said.

Governments regularly time announcements they fear may be unpopular for Friday afternoons in what is known in politics as “taking out the trash” in a bid to minimise the coverage.

Under an honour system introduced by former Liberal premier Jeff Kennett in 1999, premiers who lead the state for more than 3000 days can be acknowledged with the permanent tribute.

Mr Kennett, while acknowledging Mr Andrews had led Victoria for 3219 days, quipped that the statue of the former premier should be melted down and sold to help repay the state’s debt, which will hit almost $200bn by 2030.

“Our children who will be saddled with paying his debt off would appreciate the help,” Mr Kennett told The Australian, before adding that the statue should feature Mr Andrews wearing a mask.

“The sculpture should definitely feature a mask,” he said, referencing the fact Mr Andrews locked down Melbourne for more than 260 days during the pandemic.

“After all, if the statue is meant to reflect a leader’s time in office, then a mask would be fitting.”

Four former premiers qualified for the honour; Albert Dunstan (3834 days, 1935-45), Henry Bolte (6288 days, 1955-72), Rupert Hamer (3209 days, 1972-81) and John Cain Jr (3047 days, 1982-90).

Their statues stand directly outside the premier’s office at No.1 Treasury Place.

Mr Kennett was closing in on being the fifth statue, but Victorians voted him out after 2571 days in office.

Until Mr Andrews’ dominance, Steve Bracks (who won elections in 1999, 2002 and 2006) was the only modern-day premier who came close to qualifying for a statue. But in 2007, just 159 days short, he retired.

The government confirmed that Meridian Sculpture was selected because “they’ve got specialist experience delivering major sculptural works, including statues of four other long-serving Victorian premiers”.

The total cost of the statue is $134,304. The government said work was under way and installation details would be announced at a later date.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/taxpayers-face-134000-bill-for-dan-andrews-statue/news-story/569d39da9411501fd7a7c28494d6e54f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62713

File: ea859c6243e3e4a⋯.jpg (216.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d4280f15ed28877⋯.jpg (157.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24617170 (180013ZMAY26) Notable: AFP to take on global drug cartels with Pacific-international strike force - Australia will join with Colombian, Mexican, United States, New Zealand and Pacific law enforcement agencies to target major drug cartels through a new international strike force aimed at disrupting narcotics trafficking before shipments reach the Pacific. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said the growing flow of cocaine and methamphetamine through the Pacific had become a major regional security threat, with more than 17 tonnes of illicit drugs seized so far this year. A new International Joint Investigations Team based in Colombia will work with local authorities to target cartel operations and intercept shipments at their source. Barrett said organised crime was damaging Pacific communities and institutions while also describing Australia’s high demand for illicit drugs as “our nation’s shame”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23895384 (pb)

>>38936 (pb)

>>38939 (pb)

>>39006 (pb)

AFP to take on global drug cartels with Pacific-international strike force

AMANDA HODGE - 17 May 2026

1/2

Australia will work with Mexican and Colombian law enforcers to target some of the world’s biggest drug cartels on their home turf in an aggressive new regional response with the US, New Zealand and Pacific island nations to stem a surge of illicit narcotics swamping the region.

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett will tell a landmark Pacific Transnational Crime Summit in Fiji on Wednesday, comprising Pacific police ministers and regional and international law enforcement agencies, that a bolder approach is needed to address the spiralling national security threat to Australia and its vulnerable Pacific neighbours posed by transnational drug criminals.

A new International Joint Investigations Team based in Colombia will see AFP officers work with local law enforcement, where they legally can, to stop illicit drugs at their source countries, to capitalise and build on the disruption to cartel trafficking networks caused by US strikes on suspected narco-vessels in the ­Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

AFP and New Zealand police will help fund the new strikeforce that will gather evidence on illicit shipments before they reach the Pacific region, supported by the Australian Border Force and NZ Customs.

“Coming together with trusted partners is how we will target and frustrate the cartels and other organised criminals,” Ms Barrett writes exclusively for The Aus­tralian. “We will do this with the Col­ombian Attorney-General’s Office, the National Police of Colombia, Colombian navy, Mexican authorities, US law enforcement authorities, NZ Police, Interpol and Pacific chiefs to ­target and disrupt organised criminals,” she says.

“We must do this for the collective health, security and sovereignty of like-minded countries that embrace the rules-based order and democracy,” she adds in a thinly veiled swipe at Beijing.

The Albanese government has been working hard to secure bilateral and Pacific-wide security and policing agreements, including the recently renegotiated Vuvale Agreement with Fiji, aimed in part at countering China’s persistent push for a security foothold on Australia’s doorstep.

The Pacific’s growing drug and associated public health crisis has added urgency to that mission.

Some 17 tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, have been seized by local and international law enforcement in the Pacific so far this year, up from 4.6 tonnes for all of 2025.

Even that statistic tells only part of the story. While many more tonnes have evaded law enforcement through the so-called Pacific narco-corridor to Australia, where street drugs command the highest prices in the world, cocaine and meth by the tonne are also pouring into the Pacific to tiny communities with far less capacity to deal with it.

“The increase is partly because greedy and ruthless narco-gangs are trying to make more money by identifying new ways to traffic illicit drugs. The use of semi-­submersible vehicles to cross the Pacific is one example,” Ms Barrett writes.

At least four have been discovered in Solomon Island waters since August last year as cartels employ ever more sophisticated technology to evade capture.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62714

File: 85b314bbe516826⋯.jpg (255.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5857df1a259a10a⋯.jpg (565.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24617189 (180019ZMAY26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Drug trade corrodes communities and threatens Pacific security - "Seventeen tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, have been seized by local and international law enforcement in the Pacific since January. That equates to about three tonnes of illicit drugs seized every month since the start of this year. In 2025, the total seizure of illicit drugs in the Pacific region was about 4.6 tonnes. The increase is partly because greedy, ruthless narco-gangs are trying to make more money by identifying new ways to traffic illicit drugs. The use of semi-submersible vehicles to cross the Pacific is an example. The magnitude and endless maritime trafficking of illicit drugs to, and through the Pacific, has become a serious security threat for the Pacific and Australia, one the AFP cannot ignore ... From the AFP’s perspective, there is no point mincing words - it is our nation’s shame that Australians consume too many illicit drugs and pay high prices for them. As police, we see every day the brutal reality of illegal drug use and serious organised criminals who direct their unlawful business here. They create misery in our communities and wreak havoc in our country. Some victims, who have endured the most shocking violence and cruelty, have suffered by perpetrators affected by illicit drugs such as methamphetamine. Too many victims are children. While law-abiding Australians work hard for their money, organised criminals are living life large, not paying tax, and are now tasking our youth to carry out crimes so they can put a distance between them and their criminal activity. These are the reasons why the AFP invests time and resources in combating and disrupting transnational organised crime. The Pacific Island Chiefs of Police group has watched from afar the impacts of illicit drugs on Australia and now they fear the diabolical reality facing their communities ... Colombia produces about 70 per cent of the world’s cocaine. Drug cartels send many tonnes of cocaine and other illicit substances to Australia each year. Our AFP members in Bogota, with Colombian law enforcement, have deployed to remote parts of the Colombian jungle to deliberately destroy cocaine production laboratories. Just this month, the AFP in Bogota supported Colombian law enforcement during the arrests of people allegedly supporting drug trafficking networks operating in narco-terrorist-controlled territories where cocaine is produced to send to Australia. In the past couple of years the AFP-Colombian co-operation has seized more than 20 tonnes of cocaine, including 5.5 tonnes located on a self-propelled semi-submersible in the Pacific Ocean bound for Australia in October 2024. But with like-minded law enforcement partners, it is time for us to be bolder and do more to help the Pacific, Australians and our region. It is a credit to law enforcement agencies in Colombia and Mexico that they are willing to help the Pacific ... Coming together with trusted partners is how we will target and frustrate cartels and organised criminals. We must do this for the collective health, security and sovereignty of like-minded countries that embrace the rules-based order and democracy." - Krissy Barrett, AFP Commissioner - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62713

COMMENTARY: Drug trade corrodes communities and threatens Pacific security

KRISSY BARRETT - 17 May 2026

1/2

Seventeen tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, have been seized by local and international law enforcement in the Pacific since January. That equates to about three tonnes of illicit drugs seized every month since the start of this year. In 2025, the total seizure of illicit drugs in the Pacific region was about 4.6 tonnes.

The increase is partly because greedy, ruthless narco-gangs are trying to make more money by identifying new ways to traffic illicit drugs. The use of semi-submersible vehicles to cross the Pacific is an example. The magnitude and endless maritime trafficking of illicit drugs to, and through the Pacific, has become a serious security threat for the Pacific and Australia, one the AFP cannot ignore. This serious vulnerability must be countered to protect our regional security and the safety of our communities.

The AFP and our international partners will step up for three clear reasons: 1) most of the illicit drugs being trafficked to, and through the Pacific, are destined for Australia, so we have a moral responsibility to act and a direct responsibility to the Australian public to stop these drugs from reaching our shores; 2) our Pacific family is seeking help, and; 3) the AFP, with like-minded law enforcement agencies, is the partner of choice to help fight this problem, consistent with Pacific leaders’ agreement security must be the shared responsibility of Pacific Islands Forum members.

From the AFP’s perspective, there is no point mincing words – it is our nation’s shame that Australians consume too many illicit drugs and pay high prices for them. As police, we see every day the brutal reality of illegal drug use and serious organised criminals who direct their unlawful business here. They create misery in our communities and wreak havoc in our country. Some victims, who have endured the most shocking violence and cruelty, have suffered by perpetrators affected by illicit drugs such as methamphetamine.

Too many victims are children. While law-abiding Australians work hard for their money, organised criminals are living life large, not paying tax, and are now tasking our youth to carry out crimes so they can put a distance between them and their criminal activity. These are the reasons why the AFP invests time and resources in combating and disrupting transnational organised crime. The Pacific Island Chiefs of Police group has watched from afar the impacts of illicit drugs on Australia and now they fear the diabolical reality facing their communities.

The illicit drug threat to Pacific communities is exponentially increasing – corroding their health systems, their family structures, and their future – their next generation. The effect on such small populations is devastating. It is a complete undermining of their faith, family structure and proud culture. This is where the leadership of Fiji Police Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu has come to the fore. He wants the Australian public to know Pacific communities have never been more at risk from the effects of illicit drugs. He is advocating for stronger responses to address the challenges of resourcing and expertise, as well as the timely sharing of information that takes into consideration the needs of all the Pacific.

He has implored the AFP and other partners to help protect his country and the wider Pacific because Pacific regionalism is about the collective, and nothing underscores this more than the influence of Pacific Island Chiefs of Police. The chiefs are vocal for the need for a significant intervention, and this has been heard by the AFP and around the world. With narco-gangs under threat because of strong law enforcement action in North America, the AFP will use its extensive partnerships to take new action. We will do this with the Colombian Attorney-General’s Office, the National Police of Colombia, Columbian navy, Mexican authorities, US law enforcement authorities, New Zealand Police, Interpol and the Pacific chiefs to target and disrupt organised criminals. From May 18-22, the Fiji Police Force and the AFP will co-host the Pacific Transnational Crime Summit in Fiji to strengthen regional co-operation on transnational crime. The summit will be held in partnership with the Pacific Transnational Crime Network, which includes crime units in 21 Pacific Island countries.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62715

File: 99181adea821149⋯.jpg (364.55 KB,1999x1124,1999:1124,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0db52e90057b906⋯.jpg (872.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a06398e6f435dd3⋯.jpg (270.36 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24617218 (180032ZMAY26) Notable: Tasmania moves to close legal loophole for child abuse survivor compensation - Tasmania will introduce new laws allowing child sexual abuse survivors to seek compensation from institutions following a High Court ruling that limited legal claims against organisations for abuse committed by non-employees. Attorney-General Guy Barnett said the legislation would address an “anomaly in the law” created by the 2024 Bird v DP decision and would apply retrospectively. The reforms follow similar legislation passed in Victoria earlier this year. Beyond Abuse founder Steve Fisher welcomed the move, saying survivors could finally pursue compensation and justice from institutions linked to abuse. Fisher praised the government for acting quickly after consultations with victim advocates and said the retrospective nature of the legislation was “brilliant” for people previously blocked from making claims.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23888045 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24260283 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24272813 (pb)

Tasmania moves to close legal loophole for child abuse survivor compensation

Tasmania will introduce legislation allowing sexual abuse survivors to claim compensation from institutions after a High Court ruling blocked such claims.

Sue Bailey - May 16, 2026

A move by the state government to legislate to allow for more survivors of sexual abuse to seek compensation has been hailed as “fantastic” by a leading advocacy group.

Attorney-General Guy Barnett announced that the government would seek feedback on the legislation which has been drafted in response to the High Court decision in the case of Bird v DP.

In a landmark decision in November 2024, the High Court ruled that institutions including churches and clubs cannot be held “vicariously liable” for child sexual abuse committed by a person who is not technically their employee.

Victoria passed legislation this year to address the implications of the court decision to also allow victims to claim compensation retrospectively.

Beyond Abuse founder Steve Fisher praised the Tasmanian government to follow other states and for acting swiftly to help victim survivors.

“We only had two meetings with the government and they listened to us and they have acted very fast,” he said.

“People who have been abused by institutions can finally get the compensation that they deserve.

“It’s going to create a level playing field for survivors. They’ll finally get the justice in monetary terms that they can and we just cannot thank the Tasmanian government enough.”

Mr Fisher was unable to say how many people he expected would take advantage of the legislation.

“If this legislation helps just one person it will be worth it,” he said.

“It’s very hard to know how many people will be affected, but what I would say to them is to come forward, come forward to us, anybody in your life, and we will point you in the right direction.

“The fact it has been made retrospective is just brilliant.

“It’s done in consultation with victim survivors and victim survivor advocates because that gives you a unique insight into what abuse survivors battle with every day and what is needed to help them have a life that they were robbed of by being abused.”

Mr Barnett described the legislation as a “major law reform” that would help victim survivors.

“It flows from the High Court case in Bird v DP and it will allow victim survivors to make claims to support their claims and concerns with respect to child abuse,” he said.

Mr Barnett said the High Court decision “created an anomaly in the law”.

“So where there’s been child sexual abuse in institutions and other organisations, victim survivors were not able to make that claim based on that High Court case,” he said.

“It could be any institutions of any colour or persuasion where there has been child sexual abuse and so that’s simply the justice system will be at work and there is likely to be some claims in the future.”

https://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/tasmania-moves-to-close-legal-loophole-for-child-abuse-survivor-compensation/news-story/066cb1d29369a8ab08c608c1a775d74b

https://qresear.ch/?q=Steve+Fisher

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62716

File: 4bab072a7b7d341⋯.jpg (1005.89 KB,4254x2836,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24618462 (181000ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Democracy is dead, act accordingly’: Neo-Nazis lodge High Court fight - Neo-Nazi figures linked to the banned National Socialist Network have launched a High Court challenge against new federal hate group laws after the organisation was formally outlawed by the Albanese government. The group argues the laws infringe political freedom and unlawfully allow the government to ban political organisations without judicial review. Former NSN leader Thomas Sewell is seeking an injunction to prevent arrests under the legislation while the case proceeds. The group had attempted to avoid proscription by formally disbanding in January, but authorities alleged members continued organising under new names including White Australia. Federal authorities cited the group’s alleged involvement in extremist violence and racist organising when designating it a prohibited hate organisation punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment for supporters or members.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

>>62709

‘Democracy is dead, act accordingly’: Neo-Nazis lodge High Court fight

Sherryn Groch - May 18, 2026

Neo-Nazis have lodged a constitutional challenge in the High Court against new federal laws outlawing them as a hate group, as they fight to form a political party.

The National Socialist Network disbanded on paper in January in an attempt to escape the government’s crackdown on extremism that could see its members and supporters face up to 15 years in prison.

But on Friday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke proscribed the group anyway, noting members had continued to organise covertly, “phoenixing” under new names such as White Australia.

Within days of the NSN disbanding, its leader Thomas Sewell had fundraised a war chest of more than $150,000 for his efforts to challenge the laws in court.

Documents released by the High Court on Monday reveal the group plans to use the reinstatement of the once-banned Communist Party of Australia – its ideological enemies – in the appeal, arguing that a government banning even “an unfashionable political party” infringes on the implied right to political freedom in Australia, and gives punitive power to the government without judicial review.

The group is seeking an immediate injunction voiding the proscription of the NSN, and so any potential arrests under the new law, until the appeal is heard. The case was filed by Sewell’s long-time lawyer, Matthew Hopkins, who has himself posted antisemitic and racist views online.

Despite claiming to have disbanded, neo-Nazis of the NSN have continued to meet in person throughout this year, including under the banner of the March for Australia anti-immigration rallies they helped organise around the country.

Last week, Sewell and other senior NSN figures admitted they had also continued with their plans to form a neo-Nazi political party, submitting the paperwork to register the “White Australia” party – with Sewell as party president – to the Australian Electoral Commission on Anzac Day.

On Friday, hours before the group’s midnight designation as a hate group, Sewell posted a video, which he said he hoped was not his final address.

“If our High Court injunction fails, then the fate of liberal democracy dies with the fate of white Australia, and you will be able to say to your grandchildren you were present when honorable men tried the peaceful method of resisting a government that is hell-bent on the destruction of our people,” he said.

Elsewhere online, prominent neo-Nazis told followers to research US neo-Nazi terror group the Order, which the NSN lionises, as their political options “dried up”. “Democracy is dead,” wrote one former NSN member. “Act accordingly.”

A new Telegram channel set up by the NSN in recent weeks, called Australian Vanguard, shut down on Friday as the news of the proscribing broke. Before it went dark, the channel warned that if all legal and political avenues were exhausted, “what avenues do [the government] think realistically remain? Do they think whites will submit?”

In January, this masthead revealed the extent of the NSN’s entanglement with terrorists and extremist groups overseas, and uncovered a secret chatroom run by March for Australia organisers and the NSN where an alleged $10,000 plot to kidnap Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, along with other threats, had led to multiple police raids.

The NSN’s political push – as revealed by this masthead in April – is part of its broader efforts to rebrand as “everyday Australians” concerned about immigration in order to recruit followers and use political expression as a shield against hate speech laws.

In outlawing the group on Friday, the home affairs minister noted the NSN’s involvement in violence, including an alleged attack on women and elderly people at an Indigenous camp in Melbourne last year, over which more than a dozen members, including Sewell, now face charges.

The federal government has also designated fundamental Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir as a hate group under the new laws, again at the recommendation of spy agency ASIO.

Since the NSN formally disbanded, Sewell has increasingly appeared on far-right manfluencer podcasts online, including alongside designated terrorist James Mason.

Some right-wing associates of the neo-Nazis said they were seeking legal advice about the proscribing on Friday, and March for Australia lead organiser Bec Freedom wiped her group’s main Telegram chat.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/democracy-is-dead-act-accordingly-neo-nazis-launch-high-court-fight-20260518-p5zyex.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62717

File: 24178ac70891ce8⋯.mp4 (10.1 MB,960x518,480:259,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 88eb2e9e88f3248⋯.jpg (248.55 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24618478 (181015ZMAY26) Notable: Pilot Daniel Duggan appeals decision to extradite him to US for allegedly training Chinese military personnel - (Video) Former US marine pilot Daniel Duggan has launched a new appeal against a court decision approving his extradition to the United States over allegations he illegally trained Chinese military personnel in South Africa between 2010 and 2012. Duggan, who became an Australian citizen, was arrested in regional New South Wales in 2022 at the request of US authorities and has spent more than three years in custody while fighting extradition. His wife, Saffrine Duggan, said the family would continue challenging the case, describing it as a fight for “Australia’s sovereignty”. Duggan denies breaching US arms trafficking laws and claims Australian and American intelligence agencies were aware of his activities. The family says the legal battle has cost about $500,000 and left them financially devastated.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38898 (pb)

Pilot Daniel Duggan appeals decision to extradite him to US for allegedly training Chinese military personnel

A former US marine pilot accused of illegally training Chinese military personnel is appealing a court decision that paves the way for his extradition.

Adelaide Lang - 18 May 2026

A former US fighter pilot is appealing a decision that greenlit his extradition over claims he illegally trained Chinese military personnel.

Daniel Duggan was arrested at the behest of the US government in 2022 at a supermarket in regional NSW, where he lived with his wife Saffrine and their six children.

He has been in custody for three and a half years - nearly half in solitary confinement - over claims he breached US arms trafficking laws by training Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

Mr Duggan denies the allegations and has for years resisted attempts to return him to the US to face charges, most recently in the Federal Court.

But the former fighter pilot’s appeal against the decision to approve his extradition was struck down in April.

Saffrine Duggan announced on Monday the family had lodged a challenge against the Federal Court decision.

“(We) will be continuing in our fight for Dan’s freedom and Australia’s sovereignty,” she said on Instagram.

“This is about my family and all Australians.”

The appeal will be heard by the Full Federal Court at a later date.

Ms Duggan argued then-attorney general Mark Dreyfus approved her husband’s extradition to the US despite him being an Australian citizen who “broke no law” while working in South Africa in 2012.

Mr Duggan had no criminal record or violent history but had been locked up for years without facing any Australian charges, she said.

The former US marine pilot has been kept in a maximum security prison in central NSW, about 100km from his family since his arrest.

Ms Duggan repeated her calls for the government to intervene in her husband’s case as she prepares for the next stage in the family’s fight against extradition.

“It’s time for Dan to come home,” she said.

In a letter from prison, Mr Duggan previously wrote that he believed his activities were not illegal, and Australian and US intelligence services were aware of his work.

His years-long legal battle has taken a crippling financial toll on his family, who estimate their legal bills total about $500,000.

Mr Duggan has been refused Legal Aid, while an injunction placed on his family’s half-built house means they can neither sell it nor live in it.

“We have been stripped of our property and we have been financially devastated by our ongoing fight for justice,” Ms Duggan said.

https://thenightly.com.au/australia/pilot-daniel-duggan-appeals-decision-to-extradite-him-to-us-for-allegedly-training-chinese-military-personnel-c-22298697

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYdVXeBvJV1/

https://chuffed.org/project/109154-dan-duggan-extradition-legal-fund

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62718

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621694 (190923ZMAY26) Notable: Malcolm Turnbull lashes AUKUS as ‘a huge wealth transfer’, tells UK its submarine industry is ‘in disarray’ - (Video) Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has criticised the AUKUS submarine pact as “a huge wealth transfer” to the United States and Britain, warning Australia may never receive the nuclear-powered submarines promised under the agreement. Speaking at Chatham House in London, Turnbull described the British submarine industry as being in “absolute disarray” and questioned whether the United States could meet production targets required before transferring Virginia-class submarines to Australia. He argued AUKUS was “a submarine deal with no submarines” and said Australia was committing billions of dollars to support foreign shipbuilding capacity. Turnbull also predicted China was unlikely to invade Taiwan militarily, arguing President Xi Jinping wanted reunification “without force” and preferred to “win without fighting”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38985 (pb)

>>62704

Malcolm Turnbull lashes AUKUS as ‘a huge wealth transfer’, tells UK its submarine industry is ‘in disarray’

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has unloaded on the AUKUS agreement, telling his UK audience that their own naval shipbuilding and submarine industry is in ‘absolute disarray’.

Andrew Greene - 18 May 2026

1/2

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has unloaded on the AUKUS agreement during a presentation in London, telling his UK audience that their own naval shipbuilding and submarine industry is in “absolute disarray”.

Appearing at the leading international affairs think tank Chatham House, Mr Turnbull has also predicted China will not launch a military invasion of Taiwan, with President Xi Jinping instead hoping to takeover the island “without fighting”.

During a wide-ranging discussion on foreign policy and Australia’s role in the world, the one-time Liberal leader who left politics in 2018 was asked about his concerns towards the AUKUS deal which was unveiled by his successor Scott Morrison in 2021.

Under AUKUS, Australia is expected to acquire at least three Virginia-class boats from the United States in the 2030s which will operate from Perth’s HMAS Stirling ahead of the arrival of a new fleet known as SSN-AUKUS being delivered with the UK in the 2040s.

To help ensure the delivery of the Virginia-class and SSN-AUKUS boats, Australian taxpayers are providing billions of dollars to the United States and United Kingdom to improve their domestic submarine building capacity.

“I worry we won’t get any submarines. It’s a submarine deal with no submarines,” Mr Turnbull told the Royal Institute of International Affairs, describing AUKUS as a “really stupid deal”.

“The UK ship building industry, particularly the submarine industry is in absolute disarray,” he warned.

“It’s a great deal for the UK. Why? Because they get lots of money from Australia so essentially, I think is a huge wealth transfer from the Australian government to the US and the UK.”

“America’s getting a base. We could argue that’s good for our security, you could argue it’s not. The UK is getting lots of lovely money. Again, what I’m saying about the problems with the UK submarine industrial base is not controversial.”

Last month British MPs warned that the UK’s contribution towards delivering the massive AUKUS nuclear submarine project was falling behind, highlighting “shortfalls or delays in funding”.

Although the Labour chaired House of Commons defence committee was broadly supportive of AUKUS, it also “laid bare the scale of the endeavour that will be required to deliver it”.

“For the UK, delivering SSN-AUKUS will be a lengthy and complex undertaking requiring a sustained financial commitment from government across several electoral cycles,” the British report warned.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62719

File: ce032f0195612cf⋯.jpg (6.07 MB,7688x5128,961:641,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a3872bd93500d28⋯.jpg (216.36 KB,1333x1000,1333:1000,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621702 (190931ZMAY26) Notable: Australia’s $11billion upgrade to keep subs afloat waiting for AUKUS - Australia will spend $11 billion upgrading its ageing Collins-class submarines to extend their operational life by up to a decade while waiting for nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS pact. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the overhaul was essential to avoid a major capability gap before United States Virginia-class submarines are expected to arrive in the early 2030s. The upgrades will include cutting open the submarines to modernise key systems, with HMAS Farncomb to undergo the first refit next month. The announcement comes amid growing doubts about AUKUS timelines and concerns over submarine production capacity in both the United States and Britain. Critics have warned the upgraded Collins fleet may still deliver reduced capability and higher long-term maintenance costs as Australia transitions toward nuclear-powered submarines.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62680

>>62704

Australia’s $11billion upgrade to keep subs afloat waiting for AUKUS

James Massola and Brittany Busch - May 19, 2026

Australia’s ageing Collins-class submarines will receive $11 billion worth of upgrades starting next month, as the navy extends their lifespan while waiting for the arrival of its first nuclear submarines from the United States.

The Collins-class submarines, which have had a troubled history over their lifetime, have to be upgraded because the first of the US-built Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines are not due to arrive until about 2032, and senior Trump administration and Pentagon figures have aired reservations about the pact with Australia and Britain.

Last month, a UK parliament review expressed grave reservations about whether Britain was capable of building Australia’s bespoke SSN-AUKUS class submarines by the early 2040s, noting that “cracks are already beginning to show when it comes to funding”.

Earlier this month, as Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi visited Australia, former senior defence official Richard Gray urged the federal government to consider leasing conventional diesel submarines from Japan as a plan B to avoid a capability gap.

There is also concern within government that despite US President Donald Trump’s endorsement of the submarine pact last year, there are key figures within the administration, such as Defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby, who have opposed the deal.

Defence Minister Richard Marles criticised the former Coalition government for estimating, in its 2020 force structure plan, that the cost of the life-of-type extensions to the Collins boats would be about $6 billion, rather than the more realistic $11 billion.

The need to extend the life of the Collins class has been reviewed by successive governments and predates the decision to sign the AUKUS deal with the US and Britain.

Marles announced the extension on Tuesday. It will add up to 10 years to the boats’ lifespan, and will include cutting open the vessels in dry dock to upgrade critical weapons systems.

In 2024, the government flagged that it would extend the submarines’ lives for another decade, but it will now scale back the upgrades to what it calls “a conditions-based sustainment approach”.

“These decisions reaffirm the Albanese government’s commitment to keeping the Collins class a potent and highly capable strike and deterrent capability today, and for years to come,” Marles said during a speech to the Lowy Institute think tank.

“Extending the life of all six Collins-class submarines is critical to maintaining that edge as we transition the navy from conventional to nuclear-powered submarines.”

HMAS Farncomb, which is one of the oldest of the six submarines, will be the first boat to get an overhaul.

After the speech, Marles said it was “unthinkable” that Australia could be left without long-range submarine capability, and $368 billion AUKUS deal was the solution once the Collins-class submarines expired.

“We don’t really have a choice but to do this,” he told the audience during a question and answer session.I mean, to concede that Australia would not operate that platform would be to really reduce our sovereignty. It is far and away the most significant capability that we have

“There seems to be a sort of almost an incredulity about the idea that this could really happen, but the truth of the matter is that AUKUS is now being pursued with vigor by each of the three participating nations,” he said.

Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior fellow Richard Gray, who wrote the “Hedging our Bets” report on the Japanese submarine option, said announcement “means it will like take longer, cost more and deliver a reduced submarine capability”.

“It might seem unusual that the cost goes up so much, but that increase in cost is almost certainly due to greatly increased maintenance on largely unchanged boats.”

University of Western Australia adjunct professor Jennifer Parker said the upgrade was necessary but “the Collins will have reduced capability, they already do, and it will be used to train submariners for the Virginia class. Their [the Collins] ability to operate far from Australian shores will be diminished”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australia-s-11billion-upgrade-to-keep-subs-afloat-waiting-for-aukus-20260519-p5zyqp.html

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/naval/18213-government-commits-to-collins-lote

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62720

File: 8e85519d9144b64⋯.jpg (340.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6128dfb8f9b0141⋯.jpg (188.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 787326ebce3f315⋯.jpg (286.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621710 (190939ZMAY26) Notable: Frank Lowy tells Bondi inquiry his soccer fix could help cure hate - Holocaust survivor and businessman Sir Frank Lowy says Australia can reduce antisemitism by rebuilding national identity and cultural confidence, drawing on reforms he introduced to Australian soccer to reduce ethnic division and violence. In a submission to the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion, Lowy said migrants should embrace Australian values, language and social expectations while warning imported overseas conflicts had increasingly shaped public life. He said the antisemitic protests outside the Sydney Opera House after the October 2023 Hamas attacks and the later Bondi terror attack shocked him deeply, recalling the hatred he witnessed growing up in Europe before the Holocaust. Lowy backed tougher laws against antisemitism, including bans on chants such as “globalise the intifada”, arguing Australia needed stronger leadership to restore “Australian decency”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

Frank Lowy tells Bondi inquiry his soccer fix could help cure hate

STEPHEN RICE - 19 May 2026

1/2

Billionaire businessman and Holocaust survivor Sir Frank Lowy has previously experienced violent antisemitism in his adopted country – once when a bomb exploded at the Israeli consulate in Westfield Towers, where he had his office, and again when another exploded at the Hakoah Club in Bondi, where he was president.

But nothing prepared him for the massacre of 15 people at Bondi Beach in December.

“I couldn’t believe that is happening to Australia – I used to go to Bondi Beach every morning to run on the beach,” Sir Frank tells The Australian in an exclusive interview.

“I still can’t believe it, but I must tell you that it didn’t happen overnight, so change is not going to be overnight.”

Change can happen, the Westfield shopping centre founder insists, in a powerful submission he has just handed the antisemitism royal commission – but it will require the same kind of cultural shift that saw ethnic divisions in Australian soccer transformed into loyalty to the country.

“In soccer, we didn’t try to take people’s ethnic identity away; we worked to stop the expression of ethnic conflict in public,” Sir Frank says in the submission.

“Similarly, it is probably not possible to eradicate a dislike of Jews, but it is possible to help people understand why, in Australian society, the public outpouring of this aversion is not right.”

Sir Frank, hand-picked by prime minister John Howard in 2002 to rescue soccer, broke up the ethnically divided structures that had encouraged violence in the game and established the A-League, bringing soccer – or football, as he prefers to call it – into the national mainstream.

“When I came to this country, I recognised its decency and the privileges it accorded me,” said Sir Frank, now 95. “I also recognised the obligations of living in a tolerant democracy. “There has been a drift away from these obligations and more should be made of them when people apply to live here. They should understand the penalties (up to deportation) for failing to demonstrate the values that have served Australia so well for decades.”

Stressing that deportation should only be a last resort, Sir Frank told The Australian that education had to be the first objective for migrants.

“There is a social contract, in my opinion, that when you come to Australia as an immigrant, you’ve got to learn the language, you adopt the Australian way of life,” he said.

“They have to adopt the country that they come to. If they love the country they came from so much, why didn’t they stay there?”

Sir Frank said he saw as a boy how quickly verbal violence in Europe mutated into the physical violence that took the life of his father and the lives of his mother’s entire family, leaving her the sole survivor.

“Now in my 90s, I heard the slogans shouted at the Opera House and then I heard the bullets find their target at Bondi Beach,” he said.

Sir Frank, who now lives in Israel, recalls that when he arrived in Australia his Jewishness was irrelevant. “When I came to Australia from Europe in 1952, I was called a New Australian, and I liked the title of New Australian because suddenly I belonged somewhere.

“When I heard about ‘mateship’ and ‘a fair go’, they represented noble national aspirations.

“You adopt the Australian way of life. If you don’t like Australia, well, leave.

“I was naturalised after a few years in Australia, and it was a major event that I am now an Australian. It gave me pride and I wanted that pride to be spread to the supporters of soccer.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62721

File: f599d319c57d712⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c1434fd65fcde5⋯.jpg (371.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3dad918e46e664d⋯.jpg (376.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621717 (190944ZMAY26) Notable: Syrian government clears way for ISIS brides’ return to Australia - The remaining Australian women and children held in northeast Syria’s al-Roj detention camp could return to Australia within days after Syrian officials and Kurdish authorities moved closer to finalising repatriation arrangements. Negotiations involving the United States, Syrian authorities and Kurdish camp administrators have focused on securing travel funding and flight approvals for six Australian women and their children. Sources said pressure from the US State Department helped break a prolonged dispute that had delayed transfers from the camp. One woman subject to an Australian exclusion order is expected to remain in Syria. The potential repatriations follow the recent return of four Australian women, three of whom were charged with historic terrorism-related and slavery offences after arriving in Australia. Authorities have not confirmed whether further criminal charges will be laid against the remaining women.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39044 (pb)

Syrian government clears way for ISIS brides’ return to Australia

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 19 May 2026

The remaining former ISIS brides and their children are expected to arrive in Australia as early as next week, with the Syrian government stepping in to unlock travel funds from their relatives and finalise flight arrangements needed for their departure.

The Australian has confirmed urgent negotiations are under way to extract six Australian women from northeast Syria’s al-Roj internment camp, which could see the remaining group return by next week.

Under direct pressure from the US State Department, the Syrian government and Kurdish authorities controlling the camps are understood to have come to an agreement for imminent and urgent repatriations.

It can also be revealed that Syrian officials quietly tried to pluck out the Australians this week but Kurdish authorities halted the transfer amid tensions over politically sensitive repatriations.

Sources with direct knowledge of the negotiations said the immediate focus had shifted to transferring funds set aside specifically to cover flights from Damascus to Australia, with approvals being sought to release the money and complete bookings.

The group had been expected to return to Australia as early as Tuesday night next week, coinciding with Eid al-Adha, the Islamic holiday commemorating sacrifice.

While diplomatic efforts continue, including involvement from the US, the timing remains contingent on the completion of travel arrangements.

One woman who is subject to an exclusion order imposed by the Albanese government is expected to remain in Syria. It’s not clear whether that woman has any children but 18 Australians remain trapped in the camp and all have passports.

Syrian authorities have effectively taken control of directing how and where payments linked to the travel of the Australians should be made because family members, government officials or helpers are not on the ground.

The Australian repatriation push comes after weeks of tension between Kurdish authorities controlling the camp and regional governments seeking to remove foreign nationals.

Sources described the delays as part of “hostage diplomacy”, with Kurdish authorities accused of using the transfers to extract international recognition before allowing departures to proceed.

The stalemate now appears to be easing, with recent discussions involving the US heaping pressure on Kurdish authorities to allow the Australians to leave. The return of the women and children now appears inevitable, sources have said.

It is unclear whether any of the women would face charges upon their arrival, but the AFP has previously said they would not rule out the possibility.

Three out of four brides who returned on May 7 were charged with historic crimes against ­humanity-related offences, and remain behind bars.

Melbourne grandmother Kawsar Abbas, 53, and her younger daughter Zeinab, 31, are expected to apply for bail in June after facing multiple slavery charges.

Another of Ms Abbas’s daughters, Zahra Ahmad, was released into the community and had not been charged with any offences after landing in Melbourne. It’s unclear whether she would undergo deradicalisation courses with the Victorian Board of Imams.

Sheik Mostafa Sarakibi previously told The Australian any counselling or interventions linked to countering violent extremism programs would need to be voluntary, unless a referral was made by police or the courts.

In Sydney, former nursing student and accused terrorist supporter Janai Safar was denied bail and remanded in custody despite claiming in court that separating her from her son would be “particularly traumatic” after spending years detained in Syria.

Kurdish authorities told The Australian the arrest of the three women initially sparked intense anxiety among the seven remaining brides at al-Roj, but they had been led to believe their group would fly together to Australia.

“They were told they could follow in the near future, and that the whole group would go together to Australia, not in separate groups,” camp director Hakmiyeh Ibrahim said. “The understanding was everyone would gather in Damascus first, and from Damascus the entire group would travel together to Australia.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/syrian-government-clears-way-for-isis-brides-return-to-australia/news-story/695a12d5b1e8b56e1bacd8aa6ac37da1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62722

File: a1266d8562456ab⋯.jpg (756.27 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621731 (191007ZMAY26) Notable: SAS veteran who could send Ben Roberts-Smith to jail for life promised immunity from own battlefield ‘crimes’ - Former SAS soldier Jason Peters, a pseudonym used to conceal the identity of a key prosecution witness, is expected to testify against Ben Roberts-Smith in Australia’s war crimes case after allegedly receiving immunity for his own admitted battlefield actions in Afghanistan. Court documents allege Peters, referred to as “Person 4” in previous court proceedings, admitted shooting an Afghan prisoner at the Whiskey 108 compound in 2009 after Roberts-Smith allegedly ordered him to “shoot that c*nt”. Prosecutors claim at least three other SAS veterans granted legal protection will also testify they either witnessed or participated in unlawful killings allegedly directed or enabled by Roberts-Smith, who denies all allegations. Peters previously described Roberts-Smith as someone he “loved … as a brother”. The criminal proceedings follow the Federal Court defamation case that found Roberts-Smith was involved in unlawful killings during Australia’s war in Afghanistan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38856 (pb)

>>38907 (pb)

>>38958 (pb)

SAS veteran who could send Ben Roberts-Smith to jail for life promised immunity from own battlefield ‘crimes’

The SAS ‘brother’ will testify against Ben Roberts-Smith and avoid jail for his own battlefield ‘crimes’.

Aaron Patrick - 21 APR 2026

1/3

Jason Peters used to say he loved Ben Roberts-Smith like a brother.

In recent days the former Special Air Service Regiment trooper, once his friend’s rival for the Victoria Cross, has emerged as the man who might send Mr Roberts-Smith to jail for life.

But as one of the lead prosecution witnesses, the veteran known as Person 4 will enter the witness box with a war record that both enhances and harms his credibility: he too is accused of murdering prisoners.

The allegation is not military or media gossip. It was made by the same barrister who convinced a Federal Court judge that Mr Roberts-Smith committed war crimes in Afghanistan, Nicholas Owens, now a judge in the same court.

“Your Honour, to be clear, we do allege that Person 4 is a murderer,” Mr Owens said during a defamation lawsuit in 2022.

Mr Peters, a pseudonym, will not go to jail for murder. Formal allegations tendered to court on Friday suggest he has been promised immunity for war crimes in return for testifying against Mr Roberts-Smith, who has been charged with five counts of war crimes — murder.

Federal prosecutors believe Mr Peters is a killer. He told them that on April 12, 2009, he executed a prisoner at a compound in southern Afghanistan that had been used by the Taliban to attack regular Australian soldiers, according to court documents.

Prosecutors will allege that after the building, known as Whiskey 108, was partially destroyed by a bomb dropped from a Western aircraft, a father and son were pulled from a tunnel.

The son, Ahmadullah Essa, who had one leg, was allegedly killed by Mr Roberts-Smith with a machine gun. Then “Roberts-Smith grabbed Mohammed Essa, placed him on his knees in front of Person 4, and said to Person 4, ‘Shoot that c..t,’” according to the allegations.

“Person 4, understanding this to be an order, shot Mohammad Essa in the head, killing him,” the 24-page document states. “Person 4 has admitted their role in this incident.”

Mr Roberts-Smith told a court in 2021 the allegations were “ridiculous” and he shot an insurgent running near a cornfield carrying a bolt-action rifle.

No excuse

Australian soldiers sent to Afghanistan received briefings from military lawyers that it was illegal to kill prisoners. Following orders is not an excuse under laws developed to prosecute Nazis and Japanese commanders after World War II.

Melanie O’Brien, a University of Western Australia law professor writing a book on war crimes in Afghanistan, said prosecutors should not protect soldiers who committed crimes to secure the convictions of their superiors.

“You can’t be acquitted because you carried out an unlawful order especially if you knew it was unlawful,” she said. “Our soldiers receive quite extensive training under the laws of war so they know they will not be allowed to execute someone who is unarmed and not a combatant.”

A lawyer who represented Mr Peters in Mr Roberts-Smith’s defamation lawsuit said revealing his identity “will knowingly potentially inflict severe harm”. Mr Peters was a witness for Nine, which Mr Roberts-Smith unsuccessfully sued in 2018 for accusing him of murder.

Mr Peters’ real name has not been made public, although the Australian War Memorial inadvertently published his first name in 2012.

A father of two, he describes himself as a farmer who was older than most of the SAS soldiers during the war. The greatest achievement of his military career was on June 11, 2010, when he attacked a machine-gun position in the village of Tizak with Mr Roberts-Smith and another SAS soldier known as Dean Roddan.

As the three men desperately fought three Taliban machine gunners and several firing assault rifles in the courtyard of a mosque, Mr Peters leaned out from behind a tree several times to protect Mr Roberts-Smith as he threw a grenade and charged the courtyard. Mr Peters followed and helped kill two men who had fled inside the mosque.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62723

File: 9c4fa7077196193⋯.jpg (264.5 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621748 (191026ZMAY26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Soldiers’ cases expose critical weaknesses in Australian law - "The real lesson from the Ben Roberts-Smith case is now apparent: this country’s flawed attempt to deal with war crimes has demolished the idea that everyone in the military is accountable to the law. The goal of dealing with war crimes through the civilian justice system has created a monster that guarantees some war criminals - and their commanders – will never be held to account. The most tangible evidence of this is that four former soldiers who admit they executed prisoners in Afghanistan have now been granted immunity from prosecution by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in return for giving evidence against Roberts-Smith ... Some have mistakenly asserted that the prosecution of Roberts-Smith, this country’s most decorated living soldier, proves this principle of legal equality is well-respected in Australian law. It proves the reverse. This country’s method of dealing with war crimes has a two-stage system that offers some war criminals a path to impunity, it significantly impedes the pursuit of those in command positions and, because of that, it has left the door open for intervention by the International Criminal Court. The decision by the four men to voluntarily attest to their role in killing prisoners might initially seem puzzling. After all, nobody in the justice system - police, prosecutors or judges – could have forced them to give evidence against themselves. But the war crimes system is more than that. It includes Paul Brereton’s non-judicial inquiry into allegations of wrongdoing. Because Brereton, who reported in 2020, was running an administrative inquiry for the military, he was effectively equipped with coercive power. Those who refused to make incriminating admissions could be charged with disobeying a lawful command. But in return for the destruction of their right to silence, they received a promise that their admissions would not be used against them in future proceedings. Those promises, however, were not absolute. While the Brereton admissions could not be used as evidence, the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator were free to use them to identify lines of inquiry and assemble evidence from other sources. One way to head that off and avoid prosecution would be to do a second immunity deal - this time with the DPP – and that is what appears to have happened. So instead of facing prosecution and a possible life sentence, four killers will be free - regardless of the outcome of the case against Roberts-Smith." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

COMMENTARY: Soldiers’ cases expose critical weaknesses in Australian law

CHRIS MERRITT - April 24, 2026

1/2

The real lesson from the Ben Roberts-Smith case is now apparent: this country’s flawed attempt to deal with war crimes has demolished the idea that everyone in the military is accountable to the law.

The goal of dealing with war crimes through the civilian justice system has created a monster that guarantees some war criminals – and their commanders – will never be held to account.

The most tangible evidence of this is that four former soldiers who admit they executed prisoners in Afghanistan have now been granted immunity from prosecution by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in return for giving evidence against Roberts-Smith.

Grants of immunity are exceptional in criminal justice – and for good reason.

In 1889, when AV Dicey was Vinerian professor of English law at Oxford, he identified one of the great, enduring principles of English law that has been inherited by this country. He wrote that the rule of law encompasses “equality before the law or the equal subjection of all classes to the ordinary law of the land administered by the ordinary law courts”.

Some have mistakenly asserted that the prosecution of Roberts-Smith, this country’s most decorated living soldier, proves this principle of legal equality is well-respected in Australian law.

It proves the reverse.

This country’s method of dealing with war crimes has a two-stage system that offers some war criminals a path to impunity, it significantly impedes the pursuit of those in command positions and, because of that, it has left the door open for intervention by the International Criminal Court.

The decision by the four men to voluntarily attest to their role in killing prisoners might initially seem puzzling.

After all, nobody in the justice system – police, prosecutors or judges – could have forced them to give evidence against themselves.

But the war crimes system is more than that. It includes Paul Brereton’s non-judicial inquiry into allegations of wrongdoing.

Because Brereton, who reported in 2020, was running an administrative inquiry for the military, he was effectively equipped with coercive power.

Those who refused to make incriminating admissions could be charged with disobeying a lawful command. But in return for the destruction of their right to silence, they received a promise that their admissions would not be used against them in future proceedings.

Those promises, however, were not absolute.

While the Brereton admissions could not be used as evidence, the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator were free to use them to identify lines of inquiry and assemble evidence from other sources.

One way to head that off and avoid prosecution would be to do a second immunity deal – this time with the DPP – and that is what appears to have happened.

So instead of facing prosecution and a possible life sentence, four killers will be free – regardless of the outcome of the case against Roberts-Smith.

The problems with this system do not end there.

The federal law on war crimes has been drafted in a way that protects senior officers who, had international law prevailed, could have been prosecuted because they should have known about the alleged misdeeds of those on the frontline.

This has been highlighted by Melanie O’Brien, of the University of Western Australia, and barrister Louise Clegg.

They have both pointed to the fact that Australia’s federal law on command responsibility differs from the wording of the Rome Statute, a treaty ratified by Australia that outlines how the International Criminal Court deals with war crimes.

Section 268.115 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code is derived from a provision in the Rome Statute that covers the legal responsibility of commanders.

But the Australian version has eliminated a section that would have imposed liability on commanders if they “should have known” about wrongdoing on the battlefield.

This preserves the precision of the Criminal Code. But it exposes this country to a new risk, as outlined in a 2022 critique of the war crimes provisions that was published in the Melbourne Journal of International Law.

“Australian law uses language that is potentially much more forgiving for superiors who fail to detect or investigate war crimes than the international law, and therefore could put Australia at odds with its obligations under international criminal law,” wrote legal academics Emily Crawford and Aaron Fellmeth.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62724

File: 90f5850398a11df⋯.jpg (1.02 MB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 79bd6ea41909138⋯.jpg (429.87 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621758 (191034ZMAY26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Soldiers granted immunity to testify against Roberts-Smith now risk ICC prosecution - "When Ben Roberts-Smith eventually faces his war crimes trial in Sydney, four other former soldiers could be in for a nasty surprise. They have been given immunity from prosecution in return for giving evidence they were complicit, with Roberts-Smith, in unlawful killings during the Afghanistan war. But while the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is content to see these four killers go free, that is not the end of the story. Their immunity deals cannot prevent the International Criminal Court from launching its own investigation. And because they have provided statements outlining their involvement, it is difficult to see how the ICC can turn a blind eye to Australia’s refusal to bring them to justice. Nobody should be affronted if this international court decides to investigate these four men despite their immunity deal. That is exactly what the Howard government signed up for when it ratified a treaty in 2002 known as the Rome Statute. That treaty empowers the ICC to investigate and prosecute war crimes when nations party to that treaty are unable or unwilling to do so. Australia has fulfilled that condition. What these men have said about Roberts-Smith has yet to be tested, and jurors will make up their own minds about how much weight to place on testimony that is part of their immunity deal. But the admissions about their own conduct leave no room for doubt. They engaged in unlawful killings and Australia is unwilling to bring them to justice. The ICC has clearly stated that domestic grants of immunity have no effect on its jurisdiction over war crimes." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62723

COMMENTARY: Soldiers granted immunity to testify against Roberts-Smith now risk ICC prosecution

CHRIS MERRITT - May 07, 2026

1/2

When Ben Roberts-Smith eventually faces his war crimes trial in Sydney, four other former soldiers could be in for a nasty surprise.

They have been given immunity from prosecution in return for giving evidence they were complicit, with Roberts-Smith, in unlawful killings during the Afghanistan war.

But while the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is content to see these four killers go free, that is not the end of the story.

Their immunity deals cannot prevent the International Criminal Court from launching its own investigation. And because they have provided statements outlining their involvement, it is difficult to see how the ICC can turn a blind eye to Australia’s refusal to bring them to justice.

Nobody should be affronted if this international court decides to investigate these four men despite their immunity deal.

That is exactly what the Howard government signed up for when it ratified a treaty in 2002 known as the Rome Statute.

That treaty empowers the ICC to investigate and prosecute war crimes when nations party to that treaty are unable or unwilling to do so. Australia has fulfilled that condition.

What these men have said about Roberts-Smith has yet to be tested, and jurors will make up their own minds about how much weight to place on testimony that is part of their immunity deal.

But the admissions about their own conduct leave no room for doubt. They engaged in unlawful killings and Australia is unwilling to bring them to justice.

The ICC has clearly stated that domestic grants of immunity have no effect on its jurisdiction over war crimes.

This was spelled out by the court’s Pre-Trial Chamber in 2019 in a case involving Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi, son of the late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, who claimed he was the beneficiary of an amnesty.

“There is a strong, growing, universal tendency that grave and systematic human rights violations – which may amount to crimes against humanity by their very nature – are not subject to amnesties or pardons under international law,” the Pre-Trial Chamber said.

In 2009, before Lorraine Finlay became Australia’s Human Rights Commissioner, she took a similar view.

Finlay wrote in the University of California Davis Journal of International Law and Policy that allowing states to shield people from prosecution by the ICC “would make a mockery of the system of international criminal justice”.

If the ICC does take an interest in Australia’s refusal to bring these men to justice it could turn the Roberts-Smith case on its head.

The Victoria Cross winner has denied any wrongdoing and if a jury agrees, the rule against double jeopardy would place him beyond the reach of the ICC.

But regardless of the outcome, the fate of the four men who intend to give evidence against him will be up to the ICC’s prosecutor, British barrister Karim Asad Ahmad Khan KC, who is on leave over allegations of sexual misconduct.

If a jury sides with Roberts-Smith and Khan decides to investigate, the tables would be turned: Australia’s most decorated living soldier would be free and his four accusers would be at risk of prosecution and life in prison.

At that point, the Albanese government would have little choice but to become involved.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62725

File: eb9bf20ebe24bcf⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 79c897931e19699⋯.jpg (243.74 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c2e53782b083ba6⋯.jpg (3.61 MB,5000x3750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 76916f573b0af2c⋯.jpg (2.26 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24621767 (191046ZMAY26) Notable: Institutional abuse victims call for closure of legal 'loophole' in Queensland - Queensland’s Labor opposition will introduce legislation aimed at allowing child sexual abuse survivors to seek compensation from institutions following a High Court ruling that limited liability for abuse committed by non-employees such as priests and volunteers. The proposed laws would align Queensland with reforms already passed in Victoria and the ACT after the 2024 Bird v DP decision found the Catholic Church was not vicariously liable for a paedophile priest because he was not technically an employee. Abuse survivors Diane Carpenter and Val Cooper said the legal gap denied victims a “pathway to justice” and prolonged trauma for people abused as children in institutional care. Shadow attorney-general Meaghan Scanlon accused the Crisafulli government of failing to act, while Premier David Crisafulli said the issue may ultimately require national legal reform.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62715

Institutional abuse victims call for closure of legal 'loophole' in Queensland

Stephen Clarke -19 April 2026

Queensland's Labor opposition will introduce a private member's bill to parliament seeking to close a "loophole" that it says is "protecting paedophiles and the institutions that gave them power".

In 2024, a High Court decision found the Catholic Church was not vicariously liable for the actions of a paedophile priest because he was not an 'employee'. His work arrangements were only similar to employment.

Since that decision the ACT and Victoria have passed legislation expanding the liability of churches, sporting groups and other organisations to include the actions of paedophiles.

Legislation has also been introduced in Western Australia, but has been delayed after upper house MPs could not agree on how far the law should reach.

Shadow attorney-general Meaghan Scanlon said the Queensland government needed to "stand with victims".

"It's been over a year since this High Court decision and yet the Crisafulli government has failed to do anything," she said.

'Pathway to justice'

Diane Carpenter was a ward of the state from the age of four until she turned 18 in an orphanage near Rockhampton.

She said she was eight years old when she was sexually abused by a priest.

"For all survivors, this is what we want," she said.

"What this means to us is that everybody deserves a pathway to justice."

Fellow abuse survivor Val Cooper said she was robbed of her childhood.

"I'm here as an adult. I'm safe, I feel safe. I have choices. As a child, I wasn't," she said.

"I was busy surviving while others were laughing and playing. I carried fear, sadness and responsibilities that were never meant for a child, and that part of me is still there and [it's] tired."

"So when legislation comes along an says 'no', do you know what that does to survivors? It just kills you."

Shadow attorney-general Meaghan Scanlon said Queensland survivors "deserve their day in court".

"Their trauma isn't different depending on whether the offender was an employee or a priest or a volunteer," she said.

"Their pain is the same, and that institution who put that person in power should be held to account.

Premier David Crisafulli said a recent High Court ruling "might very well close that loophole".

"Right across the board people have said it needs to be cleared up at a federal level."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-19/queensland-abuse-legal-loophole/106581110

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62726

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24625646 (201107ZMAY26) Notable: Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth dies after a long illness - (Video) Former governor-general and Anglican archbishop Peter Hollingworth has died aged 91 after a prolonged illness, prompting renewed debate over both his social justice legacy and his handling of child sexual abuse complaints within the church. Hollingworth rose to national prominence through the Brotherhood of St Laurence and was named Australian of the Year in 1991 before serving as governor-general from 2001 until his resignation in 2003 amid controversy surrounding church abuse cases during his time as Archbishop of Brisbane. Church leaders acknowledged his advocacy for disadvantaged Australians while also recognising the harm caused by failures in responding to abuse allegations. Hollingworth later admitted he had “made mistakes” in handling abuse matters but maintained he committed no crimes. He is survived by three daughters and four grandchildren.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38759 (pb)

>>38806 (pb)

>>38807 (pb)

Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth dies after a long illness

JOHN FERGUSON and JAMIE WALKER - May 19, 2026

1/2

Former governor-general and archbishop Peter Hollingworth, who resigned from the vice-regal role over his mishandling of child sex abuse in the church, died on Tuesday after a protracted period of ill health.

Dr Hollingworth, aged 91, was a retired Anglican archbishop who rose to prominence as a powerful advocate for the disadvantaged, principally through his role as the long-term head of the Brotherhood of St Laurence.

He was Australia’s most prominent social justice spokesman during the 1970s and 1980s.

Dr Hollingworth rose to become governor-general in 2001 but the appointment during the Howard government was short-lived, becoming mired in controversy over child sex abuse within the church while he was Archbishop of Brisbane.

Friends and family of the late church leader want Dr Hollingworth’s many achievements in social justice to be remembered.

His death will inevitably reignite debate about his handling of abuse within the church from 1989 until 2001.

He was governor-general from 2001 to 2003 and was 1991 Australian of the Year.

While leading the Brotherhood of St Laurence, Dr Hollingworth wrote a scathing front-page open letter published in The Age newspaper that accused the Hawke Labor government of failing children living in poverty. It contributed to the government formulating a family policy for the 1987 election campaign and to then prime minister Bob Hawke declaring: “By 1990, no Australian child will be living in poverty.”

This open battle with a Labor prime minister became the defining positive issue of his public life.

Anglican Church primate Mark Short remembered Dr Hollingworth’s commitment to justice.

“In reflecting on Bishop Hollingworth’s career I am reminded both of God’s call to do justice and speak for the vulnerable, and the harm caused when as leaders of God’s church we fall short of that calling,’’ he said.

“I encourage us to pray for Bishop Hollingworth’s family and to pray for all survivors of abuse, recognising that in Jesus we have a Lord who holds us to account and a saviour who is abundant in grace and mercy.’’

Dr Hollingworth’s rhetoric on abuse within the church while archbishop and then governor-general was at times judged as clumsy and hurtful, his friends arguing he was placed in a job that did not necessarily fit his skills set.

When he took over the Anglican Church in Brisbane, Dr Hollingworth became bogged down in the fight by lawyers and insurers to save the church’s coffers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62727

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24625667 (201119ZMAY26) Notable: Peter Hollingworth, former governor-general of Australia and retired Anglican bishop, dies aged 91 - Former governor-general and retired Anglican archbishop Peter Hollingworth has died aged 91, ending a public life marked by both major social justice advocacy and enduring controversy over his handling of child sexual abuse complaints within the church. Hollingworth rose to national prominence through the Brotherhood of St Laurence, where he became a leading critic of poverty and welfare inequality, and was named Australian of the Year in 1991. Appointed governor-general by prime minister John Howard in 2001, he became the first Anglican cleric to hold the office but resigned in 2003 after criticism over his response to abuse allegations involving clergy during his time as Archbishop of Brisbane. Hollingworth later apologised for “failures” and “serious errors of judgement” but maintained he had committed no crimes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62726

Peter Hollingworth, former governor-general of Australia and retired Anglican bishop, dies aged 91

Ciara Jones - 19 May 2026

1/2

Retired Anglican bishop and former governor-general Peter Hollingworth, who resigned in 2003 amid controversy over his handling of child abuse in the church, has died, aged 91.

Born in Adelaide in 1935 and raised in Melbourne, Dr Hollingworth was ordained in 1960 after studying theology.

Once described as "Australia's foremost spokesman for social justice", he joined the Brotherhood of St Laurence in 1964, serving 25 years with the Anglican welfare agency, including as executive director.

He was an outspoken critic of national welfare policy, arguing that poverty should be looked at "in terms of the structure of society, rather than the individual case"

In 1984, the clergyman famously clashed with former prime minister Bob Hawke after publishing a scathing open letter in which he accused the Labor government of failing to tackle child poverty.

Dr Hollingworth was named 1991 Australian of the Year and was recognised with an Order of the British Empire and an Order of Australia for his contributions to the community welfare sector..

Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane Jeremy Greaves confirmed to the ABC that Dr Hollingworth died in Melbourne on Tuesday morning.

In a statement, Archbishop Greaves said while he noted Dr Hollingworth's achievements, he also acknowledged with "deep regret the past failings of the Church".

"Anglican Church of Southern Queensland apologises unreservedly to those who have suffered abuse, distress, isolation, and harm caused by the Church's failure to respond with integrity and care when it was needed most," Archbishop Greaves said.

Archbishop Greaves said as he reflected on Dr Hollingworth's "complicated legacy", he was reminded of his "own frailty and capacity for sin".

"And I am thankful that, as we all seek to be Christ’s followers, we are offered the gift of grace that sustains us in the work we are called to do," he said in a letter to his clergy.

Bishop Mark Short wrote to his Anglican Church of Australia colleagues to inform them of Dr Hollingworth's death.

"In reflecting on Bishop Hollingworth's career, I am reminded both of God's call to do justice and speak for the vulnerable, and the harm caused when, as leaders of God's church, we fall short of that calling," he wrote in the letter.

"I encourage us to pray for Bishop Hollingworth's family and to pray for all survivors of abuse, recognising that in Jesus we have a Lord who holds us to account and a Saviour who is abundant in grace and mercy."

First and only cleric to serve as governor-general

Dr Hollingworth's steady rise through the Anglican hierarchy culminated in 1989 when he was elected the eighth Archbishop of Brisbane, overseeing 100 parishes.

He used his public profile to advocate for Indigenous rights, youth employment and the ordination of women.

After 11 years leading the Brisbane diocese, Dr Hollingworth was appointed the 23rd governor-general of Australia in 2001, the personal choice of then-prime minister John Howard.

He was the first and only cleric to serve in the vice-regal office.

Just six months into his term, Dr Hollingworth came under fire over allegations he failed to act on child sex abuse claims against Anglican clergy during his Brisbane tenure in the 1990s.

An Anglican church inquiry later found he failed to remove late paedophile priests Donald Shearman and John Elliot from the ministry, despite knowing they had sexually assaulted children.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62728

File: 0e88fd387114bd8⋯.jpg (1.54 MB,5000x3295,1000:659,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 656063d1e64750f⋯.jpg (2.87 MB,4608x3072,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f15d41d49c2b8b1⋯.jpg (251.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24625694 (201140ZMAY26) Notable: Death of former governor-general Peter Hollingworth sparks difficult feelings for church child abuse victim Beth Heinrich - The death of former governor-general Peter Hollingworth has reignited debate over his handling of child sexual abuse allegations within the Anglican Church, with abuse survivor Beth Heinrich describing him as a “sad example of a man”. Heinrich said Hollingworth’s failure to act against priest Donald Shearman, who abused her as a teenager, compounded her trauma and amounted to “abuse on abuse”. Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003 after controversy over his response to abuse complaints during his time as Archbishop of Brisbane. Church leaders and politicians acknowledged both his major contribution to social justice and the “complex legacy” left by his failures in abuse matters. Former prime minister John Howard praised Hollingworth’s welfare advocacy and “strong Christian faith”, while Anglican leaders recognised the harm caused to survivors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62726

>>62727

Death of former governor-general Peter Hollingworth sparks difficult feelings for church child abuse victim

Ned Hammond and Will Murray - 20 May 2026

1/2

The death of former governor-general Peter Hollingworth has attracted polarised reactions with former prime minister John Howard praising his "strong Christian faith" and an abuse survivor saying he was a "sad example of a man".

Dr Hollingworth, who was appointed as governor-general by Mr Howard in 2001, spent 11 years leading the Brisbane diocese of the Anglican church before becoming the first and only cleric to serve in the vice-regal office.

Just six months into his term, Dr Hollingworth came under fire over allegations he failed to act on child sex abuse claims against Anglican clergy during his Brisbane tenure in the 1990s.

For decades Beth Heinrich has spoken of how the then-archbishop's mishandling of her case compounded her suffering.

"He was a sad example of a man, a priest, and he was given honours and awards I don't believe he deserved or earned," Ms Heinrich said.

Ms Heinrich was abused by an Anglican priest while a schoolgirl in the 1950s.

In 1995 she sought assistance from then-Archbishop Hollingworth to have her abuser, Donald Shearman, removed from the ministry.

Despite hearing evidence from Mr Shearman that he groomed Ms Heinrich as a 14-year-old and started abusing her at 15, Dr Hollingworth took no action against him.

In 2002, during his tenure as governor-general, Dr Hollingworth was questioned about his failure to act against Mr Shearman during an interview with the ABC.

"My belief is that this was not sex abuse," he said.

"There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that, quite the contrary. My information is that it was rather the other way round."

Ms Heinrich said the news of his death was sad for the Hollingworth family, but his comments were deeply distressing.

"He was a priest and a father of girls, and then he chose to vilify and victim blame me on national television," she said.

"How do you think I feel about him?"

Ms Heinrich said she was also hurt by the failure of Dr Hollingworth to meet with her personally while he was archbishop.

She said on one occasion she drove 20 hours from regional Victoria to Brisbane for an arranged meeting, only to be told the archbishop was "busy."

"If he had met with me that day and helped me, I would've gone on and had another chance at life," she said.

"Every time you get knocked back it's a repeat of abuse. And so, it's abuse on abuse, and it just grows."

In May 2003, Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general of Australia, citing the impact of "continuing public controversy" on his ability to "uphold the importance, dignity and integrity" of the high office.

An Anglican church inquiry found Dr Hollingworth failed to remove late paedophile priests Donald Shearman and John Elliot from the ministry, despite knowing they had sexually assaulted children.

He died in Melbourne on Tuesday, aged 91.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62729

File: 12f19e1bf74d9f1⋯.jpg (184.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24628984 (210530ZMAY26) Notable: 'Very difficult for the world': Albanese sharpens criticism of Trump - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has criticised United States President Donald Trump’s shifting positions on the Middle East conflict, saying the uncertainty created by repeated policy reversals was “very difficult for the world” and was contributing to global economic instability. Albanese pointed to Trump alternating between threats of military action against Iran and suggestions of restraint within days, arguing the volatility was affecting inflation and economies including Australia’s. The comments mark some of Albanese’s sharpest public criticism of Trump’s approach to foreign policy. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has also warned the federal budget remains vulnerable to developments in Washington and disruptions linked to the Strait of Hormuz. The Australian government has responded by expanding fuel security measures and increasing domestic reserves of diesel, aviation fuel and fertiliser amid continuing instability in the Middle East.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38864 (pb)

>>62705

'Very difficult for the world': Albanese sharpens criticism of Trump

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Donald Trump's ever-changing positions on the war were hurting economies, including Australia.

Cameron Carr - 20 May 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described United States President Donald Trump’s approach to governing as "very difficult for the world" in remarking on Trump's foreign policy backflips.

Trump has come under criticism over his repeated shifts in peace deal deadlines with Iran, and the subsequent economic harms caused by the prolonged war in the Middle East.

Albanese on Wednesday morning described the ongoing war as "uncertain" and "volatile", telling ABC Radio Perth he was not privy to any intelligence as to when the conflict could end.

But he was more certain that Trump's ever-changing positions on the war are hurting economies, including Australia's.

"Two days ago, President Trump was saying he was going to bomb, yesterday he said he wasn’t going to bomb, this morning we awoke to him considering it again," Albanese said.

"It’s very difficult for the world, and we’re impacted by it, and inflation is rising right around the world, including in the United States, but we’re coming through this better than most countries."

It's not the first time Albanese has been critical of the US leader.

Hours before agreeing to a conditional two-week ceasefire last month, Trump posted on Truth Social that "a whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again".

In a television interview with Sky News Australia at the time, Albanese said language threatening civilian infrastructure and destruction was not appropriate. He warned that such statements cause international concern.

"We've said very clearly that the conduct of any conflict must be within international law and that provides for making sure that civilians — who aren't parties to the conflict — are given every protection possible," he said.

Global conflict impacting Australia

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has spoken of the impacts of the war in the Middle East and prolonged US-Iran negotiations as cause for concern.

Ahead of the May budget, Chalmers said last month it was "hostage" to decisions made in Washington.

One of the main global disruptions has been fuel supply, due to frequent closures of the Strait of Hormuz in the Arab Gulf, where 20 per cent of global oil ordinarily transits.

When asked about fuel supplies on Wednesday, Albanese said Australia had more petrol, jet fuel and diesel than on 28 February, when the United States and Israel attacked Iran.

It's not the first time he's used that line; it was first deployed in a fuel report in April.

"That is due to the hard work that we've put in place, but also the hard work of Australians who are doing the right thing, hoarding and taking more than people need has stopped," he said.

This year's federal budget, handed down last week, included a multi-billion-dollar fuel resilience package, including a $7.5 billion fuel and fertiliser security facility and a $3.2 billion Australian fuel security reserve.

The package is designed to facilitate at least 50 days of onshore fuel supply and storage of diesel and aviation fuel.

Australia has also been ramping up its efforts to secure fuel supplies, with an additional three spot-market diesel cargoes secured in May.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/albanese-criticises-trumps-actions-in-middle-east/60tn9hiof

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62730

File: 3e89faa0d55f978⋯.jpg (1.24 MB,5659x3773,5659:3773,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1e697e351c1f33f⋯.jpg (203.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1ad3b8b8d0c2cae⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24628989 (210537ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Marquee project’ on underwater vehicles to kickstart AUKUS pillar two - Australia, the United States and Britain are preparing to announce a major AUKUS pillar two project focused on uncrewed underwater vehicles at the upcoming Shangri-La Dialogue security summit in Singapore. The collaboration is expected to involve sharing advanced underwater technologies including sensors, payload systems and possibly weapons across autonomous submarine platforms. Defence Minister Richard Marles is expected to meet his American and British counterparts during the conference as the three countries seek to demonstrate progress on pillar two, which focuses on advanced military technologies rather than nuclear submarines. Supporters hope the announcement will address criticism that pillar two has lacked urgency and direction. United States senator Tim Kaine described autonomous underwater systems as a natural “marquee project” for the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

‘Marquee project’ on underwater vehicles to kickstart AUKUS pillar two

Michael Koziol - May 20, 2026

Washington: Australia, the United States and Britain are preparing to announce a significant collaboration on uncrewed underwater vehicles as part of AUKUS, a move that proponents hope will tamp down industry disquiet about the slow progress of the pact’s second pillar.

The marquee project will be announced at the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual security conference, at the end of this month, according to multiple sources familiar with the plans who were not authorised to speak publicly.

Three of the people said the project related to unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), which have recently been the focus of joint testing and maritime exercises by the three countries off Australia’s east coast.

One person familiar with the plans said the project would involve sharing critical payloads for a range of UUVs, such as submarine-detecting sensors, equipment or weapons. Such technologies would typically be classified.

Defence Minister Richard Marles is expected to meet his US and UK counterparts at next week’s Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.

At an AUKUS roundtable at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington on Tuesday, held under the Chatham House Rule, a person confirmed a significant statement on pillar two was expected at that meeting.

Now that the Pentagon’s review of AUKUS had been completed, “we are getting back to normal, we are getting back to business on delivering”, the person said.

The imminent announcement was also discussed at a recent AUKUS industry conference in Washington hosted by Pyne and Partners, the defence lobbying outfit founded by former defence minister Christopher Pyne.

“On the AUKUS pillar two signature project announcement – because it’s pre-decision, I can’t go into a huge amount [of detail] on that, but there’s already been more than one project discussed,” one person told the summit, also held under the Chatham House Rule.

“The idea is for it to be a drumbeat [for more projects]. The idea is that there will be both things that are relatively low-cost and high-production, in terms of scale, and other things that are going to be very high-cost but lower-batch quantities of items.”

The Pentagon declined to comment.

A spokesperson for Marles confirmed he would attend the dialogue in Singapore, “where he will have the opportunity to meet with counterparts from across the region and the world”. They did not otherwise comment on the plans.

Marles noted at a Lowy Institute forum this week that Australia was a world leader in autonomous underwater systems.

Natural marquee project

Democratic US senator Tim Kaine, who sits on the US Senate’s armed services and foreign relations committees and is heavily involved in AUKUS in Congress, said UUVs would be a natural marquee project for pillar two.

“Underwater, uncrewed systems can be really helpful in the straits; they can be helpful in so many places, and there’s already significant expertise,” he said.

“As I think about marquee [projects], I think about something that has enormous capacity that we already have enough expertise that we can convert it into something useful and deployable promptly. As I think about that, I do think about underwater platforms.

“It doesn’t have to just be one thing. If you do one or two things, and you show success, then success begets success.”

The second pillar of AUKUS, which involves the three countries sharing and developing advanced capabilities, differs from pillar one, which is about the use, development and construction of nuclear-powered submarines.

An absence of marquee projects has plagued pillar two, with industry leaders regularly complaining about the lack of focus and strategic direction from the government.

Abraham Denmark, who, as senior adviser to former US defence secretary Lloyd Austin, was one of the key architects of AUKUS, said last week that the second pillar of the agreement had been widely neglected.

“It has been underperforming, pillar two,” Denmark told the Capitol Hill Pacific Defence Outlook Summit in Washington. “Despite the enthusiasm with which it was initially announced, it has not gotten the focus, resources, senior attention that it needs to be successful.”

Troy Duggan, the chief executive of Australian company C2 Robotics, which recently sold three of its Speartooth uncrewed underwater vehicles to the US, said the point of AUKUS pillar two was to gain efficiency and accelerate development of these technologies.

“The potential is that we would then work on different payloads and then share them,” he said. “I’m hoping it is heading in that direction.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/marquee-project-on-underwater-vehicles-to-kickstart-aukus-pillar-two-20260510-p5zvee.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62731

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24628993 (210546ZMAY26) Notable: Inside the Australian mission to track Iranian missiles - (Video) Royal Australian Air Force personnel deployed to the Middle East have described witnessing Iranian ballistic missiles streaking across the sky while flying surveillance missions aboard Australia’s E-7A Wedgetail aircraft. About 80 Australian Defence Force personnel have been operating from a secret regional base since March, carrying out more than 40 missions to help detect missiles and drones threatening the United Arab Emirates. The Wedgetail’s advanced radar system allows crews to monitor air and surface threats across the Arabian Gulf without entering Iranian airspace. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the aircraft would form Australia’s main contribution to a future multinational mission led by Britain and France to help secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Australian ambassador to the United Arab Emirates Ridwaan Jadwat said regional stability remained critical to global fuel supplies and trade.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62705

Inside the Australian mission to track Iranian missiles

Andrew Probyn - May 20, 2026

Deployment to the Middle East felt truly real for RAAF pilot “H” a few weeks back when he saw missiles shooting across the sky in front of his hi-tech surveillance plane.

“A little confronting,” he told this masthead. “Definitely a sight that I never really thought I would see.”

We are sitting in the cockpit of his E-7A Wedgetail, parked on the apron of an airstrip at a secret location in the Middle East.

“Out the window, up the front here, as we were flying some of those missions, we were seeing some of those ballistic missiles coming out of Iran.

“They are quite bright, and they go very high in the sky – very surreal seeing that from the air.”

About 80 Defence personnel have been based here since early March, conducting more than 40 missions to detect Iranian drones and missiles to help protect the United Arab Emirates.

Squadron Leader “H”, as we have been asked to call him, is the commander of the task unit.

He always wanted to be a pilot and he has the quiet confidence of a man who must have sensed he’d always get to live his dream.

Perhaps that’s what gives him maturity beyond his years. With a fetching charm and an Errol Flynn moustache, H has a family back home — a wife and two kids — but for the past 10 weeks or so, his family has been a crew of young professionals who are having the adventure of their lives.

Two-thirds are on their first deployment and most are in their 20s and 30s.

They have job titles that reflect the lingo of clinical modern warfare: air battle managers, mission aircrew, force protection and air surveillance operators. Others simply call themselves IT experts or electricians, but one nuggety fellow describes himself as an expert in survival, should there be an emergency on the ground or in the air.

The E-7A Wedgetail is at the heart of this deployment. A mission can be as long as 12 hours, with air-to-air refuelling.

But the surveillance secret of the plane is the ludicrously shaped dorsal fin on top of the modified Boeing 737.

Its technical name is a Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array, or MESA, but it looks like a giant surfboard connected to the fuselage by a near full-length fin.

The genius radar embedded in the surfboard and broadside fin can see 360 degrees both out and down, allowing air and surface threats to be quickly observed by the 10 specialists monitoring the signal on 10 consoles inside the plane.

As one of them puts it, the Wedgetail “doesn’t get wet feet”; its missions in the Middle East are largely confined to those above land on the southern side of the Arabian Gulf.

That’s the operational strength of the E-7A Wedgetail: the aircraft doesn’t have to venture across the water or over the Strait of Hormuz to see hundreds of kilometres into Iran.

“The radar’s incredibly powerful, so it gives us really good coverage across the Arabian Gulf,” Flight Lieutenant “C” says.

Defence Minister Richard Marles, who visited ADF personnel at their secret Middle East base, says the Wedgetail will be Australia’s key commitment to a future multi-nation mission to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, but says that other assets may be promised.

“We have said that we will commit the E-7 and we will also work with France and the UK who are leading that, as to what other contributions we can make,” Marles says.

“We are a maritime nation where an increasing part of our national prosperity is derived from seaborne trade – this waterway really matters to Australia, it matters to the world.”

Australia’s Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates Ridwaan Jadwat says he has been very impressed by the UAE’s resilience in the face of unprovoked attacks.

“Almost 3000 drones and missiles have been fired at the UAE, and about 95 per cent of them were intercepted, so the UAE armed forces did an incredible job in defending the country.”

He said restoring stability to the region is in everyone’s interest.

“You ignore the Middle East at your peril,” he said. “The fuel crisis around the world has shown why the Middle East remains so important to average Australians.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/inside-the-australian-mission-to-track-iranian-missiles-20260520-p5zz6p.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvqsW3uYpxI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62732

File: 63fb66690b6cc4a⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,4015x3047,365:277,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24628997 (210608ZMAY26) Notable: Trump’s man for Canberra to be grilled on AUKUS, Australia ties - Donald Trump’s nominee for United States ambassador to Australia, former Republican congressman David Brat, is set to face Senate questioning over AUKUS and the Australia-US alliance as the administration moves quickly to confirm his appointment. Brat, a Tea Party figure known for defeating senior Republican Eric Cantor in 2014, is expected to be questioned about foreign policy experience and support for the AUKUS submarine and technology pact. Analysts in Washington said the accelerated confirmation process suggested the Trump administration viewed the Australian relationship as strategically important despite recent tensions over tariffs, defence spending and the Middle East conflict. Supporters argued Brat’s close ties to Trump could strengthen communication between Canberra and the White House.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38978 (pb)

Trump’s man for Canberra to be grilled on AUKUS, Australia ties

Jessica Gardner - May 20, 2026

1/2

Washington | The Trump administration appears to have fast-tracked the path to Senate scrutiny for its unlikely diplomatic pick for Canberra, Tea Party trailblazer David Brat, earning praise from Washington observers for prioritising the relationship with Australia.

The two-term former Republican congressman will give Senate testimony in Washington on Wednesday (Thursday AEST), where he is expected to be grilled on his support for the AUKUS submarine and technology pact and his foreign policy knowledge, three weeks after the surprise announcement that he was Donald Trump’s nominee for US ambassador to Australia.

Brat, best known for knocking off then-House majority leader Eric Cantor in 2014 to become the Republican candidate for a Virginia district he went on to win, “has good political ties with the president”, said Abe Denmark, a partner at geopolitical consulting firm The Asia Group.

Denmark said Brat’s Senate confirmation process was “moving quite quickly, which suggests getting him confirmed and to Canberra is a priority”.

His appearance comes as Australia’s incoming ambassador, Greg Moriarty, lands in Washington to begin his tenure. The former Defence Department secretary is expected to present diplomatic credentials to the White House this week for the customary ceremony.

Moriarty takes over from former prime minister Kevin Rudd, who had a rocky relationship with Trump and some of his close aides, but received accolades for the heavy lifting he did to maintain positive ties during a challenging period for the Australia-US relationship.

Brat’s late-April nomination to be the US ambassador to Australia came 15 months after Trump’s inauguration. The role had been vacant since December 2024, when Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of slain Democrat president John F. Kennedy, stepped down.

Although Trump still has about 100 ambassador spots to fill, meaning Australia’s vacancy was not a total anomaly, some observers had raised concerns that the vacancy sent a worrying signal about the strength of the alliance.

Partnership tested

Despite the decades-long close military and economic ties, the partnership has been tested by Trump’s tariffs, along with his demands on defence spending and presidential rebukes over Australia sitting out the war in Iran.

“Given it took some time for an ambassador to be nominated, it is good news that his confirmation is now getting under way,” said Arthur Sinodinos, the former Liberal senator who was Australia’s ambassador to the US between 2020 and 2023.

“While the relationship is in relatively good shape, it’s always good to have the ambassador on the ground in Canberra, as we do in Washington, to steward the relationship.”

White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said Brat was the right choice, given he was “a champion for President Trump’s America-First policies”.

“The United States looks forward to strengthening our long-standing partnership with Australia through economic investments, defence cooperation, critical minerals, and more,” Wales said.

Brat did not respond to requests for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62733

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629014 (210625ZMAY26) Notable: Incoming US ambassador urged to tackle anti-Semitism, counter China and advance AUKUS - (Video) Donald Trump’s nominee for United States ambassador to Australia, David Brat, has pledged to strengthen the alliance with Canberra while supporting AUKUS, countering Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific and addressing rising antisemitism. Appearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Brat described Australia as one of America’s most important allies and declared AUKUS was “full steam ahead” despite uncertainty created by previous Pentagon reviews. He said the partnership was “much more than just industrial economics” and central to Indo-Pacific security. Senators urged Brat to encourage Australia to fully enforce foreign influence laws targeting Beijing and to work closely with Canberra on critical minerals and defence technology. Brat also praised Australia’s role in Five Eyes intelligence sharing and the Quad security partnership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62732

Incoming US ambassador urged to tackle anti-Semitism, counter China and advance AUKUS

JOE KELLY - 21 May 2026

1/2

The man Donald Trump hand-picked to serve as America’s ambassador in Canberra, David Brat, has been urged to help Australia tackle rising anti-Semitism, counter malign Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific and advance the AUKUS partnership.

Dr Brat said he loved “everything” about Australia – including its people – and made clear he would closely follow the government of Anthony Albanese once he took up his post in the nation’s capital.

He stressed that few countries were more important to US interests than Australia and expected the alliance relationship to deepen over time, arguing that Mr Trump and Mr Albanese had used their White House meeting in October to “take the alliance to new heights.”

“They’ve been our best partner for 100 years,” he said.

Dr Brat pointed to Australia’s role in the Five-Eyes intelligence sharing arrangement, the Quadrilateral security dialogue and the AUKUS security partnership as evidence of its ongoing importance to Washington.

Speaking at his nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday, Dr Brat – a former US congressman and conservative free market economist – said that Australian expertise on critical minerals and rare earths would also be helpful for Washington because these materials affected “every aspect of the economy.”

On AUKUS, Dr Brat described the trilateral partnership between the US, the UK and Australia as “huge.”

He stressed that it was “not just a submarine deal.”

“It is a model for multilateral co-ordination with the US as we pivot to the Pacific,” he said.

“But that AUKUS framework is much more than just industrial economics … It’s security for the South Pacific.”

His comments echoed those of Democrat senator, Tim Kaine, who told The Australian earlier this week that the Australian government would find benefits in more forcefully promoting AUKUS as a strategic imperative to deter a more aggressive Beijing rather than framing it as a “workforce ­development initiative.”

Senator Kaine told the hearing there was a “huge opportunity” for American businesses to work on critical minerals in Australia and also within the AUKUS space.

Dr Brat responded by saying that he would “go all in on the business side.”

“I have a very positive feeling about the Australian people,” he said.

Referencing the Pentagon review of the AUKUS security partnership undertaken by Undersecretary of War for Policy, Elbridge Colby, Dr Brat said that “with respect to Bridge and all that, the President said full steam ahead.”

“It’s full steam ahead, and I’m full steam ahead.”

Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, James Risch, said Dr Brat would be charged with overseeing an “historic transformation of our alliance with Australia” as the US moved to step-up “diplomatic, economic and security co-operation through AUKUS and other initiatives.”

Mr Risch said Australia was crucial in helping the US counter Beijing in the Indo-Pacific and hoped Dr Brat would push the Albanese government to “fully implement their new investment screening and foreign influence laws to counter malign Chinese influence.”

He also urged Dr Brat to assist Australia as it sought to “counter the rise of anti-Semitism that we’ve seen in Australia and for that matter around the world.”

Democratic ranking member Jeanne Shaheen urged Dr Brat to encourage the advancement of AUKUS – the security agreement under which Australia will acquire a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, including the purchase of at least three Virginia-class submarines from America.

She noted Australia’s significance as a source of critical minerals and expressed concern at the Pentagon’s “prolonged” review of AUKUS in 2025 which she said had “created uncertainty” at a critical time in the region.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62734

File: 516565cb3d5e5d0⋯.jpg (157.18 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 39b70a5e0f9b7bb⋯.jpg (99.98 KB,1024x1024,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ebaf80165ec2b9f⋯.jpg (737.91 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7504a55b43f7f95⋯.jpg (168.55 KB,1448x814,724:407,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629021 (210634ZMAY26) Notable: Former SAS commander defends soldiers giving evidence in Ben Roberts-Smith trial - Former SAS commander Peter Winnall has defended soldiers preparing to testify in the upcoming Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes trial, arguing that reporting alleged misconduct is consistent with military honour rather than a betrayal of fellow soldiers. Winnall, who commanded 1 SAS Squadron in Afghanistan and received the Distinguished Service Medal and Bar, said Australians were being pushed into a false divide between supporting Roberts-Smith or supporting the legal process. He argued accountability for alleged war crimes should extend beyond junior soldiers to senior commanders and military leadership. Winnall, who knows both Roberts-Smith and former SAS officer Andrew Hastie, said witnesses raising concerns about alleged unlawful killings should not be branded “traitors or grubs”. Roberts-Smith denies all allegations and remains entitled to the presumption of innocence ahead of the criminal proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

Former SAS commander defends soldiers giving evidence in Ben Roberts-Smith trial

STEPHEN RICE - May 19, 2026

A former SAS commander who served in Afghanistan has come forward in defence of soldiers prepared to give evidence in the upcoming war crimes trial of Ben Roberts-Smith, arguing that pursuing the case is not a betrayal of the Anzac spirit but a defence of it.

Peter Winnall, who commanded 1 SAS Squadron in 2010 and saw frequent combat in Afghanistan, says accountability for alleged crimes must also extend to the top ranks of the military.

“Australians instinctively understand when accountability is uneven,” Mr Winnall writes in The Australian. “That instinct has been turned into a false choice: stand with the soldiers, or stand with the process. In reality, a professional military requires both.

“The fix is to follow accountability from the bottom all the way to the top, so that no one, whatever their rank or their medals, carries the weight of this alone.”

Mr Winnall, who earned the Distinguished Service Medal and Bar – one of Australia’s highest military decorations for command in combat – is the founder of consulting group Rekon.

He was never deployed overseas with Mr Roberts-Smith but did a sniper course with him and “got to know him relatively well then … but Ben was just another SAS soldier at that point.”

Mr Winnall also knows Andrew Hastie, now a leading figure in the Liberal Party but previously an SAS captain who gave evidence against Mr Roberts-Smith in the Victoria Cross recipient’s defamation case against the Nine newspapers.

Mr Winnall was one of Mr Hastie’s squadron commanders when he was doing the SAS reinforcement cycle, the 18-month course that follows SAS selection.

“I effectively helped mentor him through some of the courses and I’ve kept in contact with him. I think it’s fair to say that I’m a friend of Andrew’s, and I speak to him frequently.

“But equally, I also have relationships with other people on the other side, too.”

Mr Winnall says he is speaking out now because Australians are being pushed into two opposing camps: “You’re either a BRS person or a Hastie person … but when you break it down, there’s a third option.”

Mr Roberts-Smith is entitled to the presumption of innocence and the process must be allowed to run, fairly and to its end, Mr Winnall says.

“The jury will decide who’s innocent and who’s guilty, but both parties deserve to do so in a way where there’s no vitriol or social media attacks on people calling them traitors or grubs.”

The case has hijacked other SAS stories, he says, and the heroism of the soldiers he served with. “The current debate has been collapsed into a false binary. You either support the SAS, or you don’t. That framing is wrong, and it is corroding the country’s ability to think clearly about its own soldiers.”

Mr Winnall acknowledges the process to date has been “terrible”. “Soldiers and families have been put through hell by delay and leak. All of this is fair criticism. None of it is an argument for abandoning the principle. Otherwise, the message to the next generation is simple: the law applies to you only when it is convenient for the country to enforce it.”

He also acknowledges that accountability has been “uneven”.

“That’s probably been the hardest for the Australian public, and particularly Australian soldiers, they can smell bs a mile away. And you can’t say that only the soldiers were accountable when there’s a whole chain of commanders receiving medals.

“You can’t get a medal for leadership in action and then … say no, I didn’t know what was happening under my watch.”

The ADF has avoided acting on command responsibility for too long, he says. The courts must deal with alleged crimes but there must be a separate process for command, culture and oversight.

Pursuing these issues tells the next generation of Australian soldiers “that there is honour in the way we fight, not only in the fact that we fight”, he says.

“The people who reported what they believed to be war crimes are not jealous, or malicious, or weak. Like anyone who passes selection, they are tough professional soldiers. They deserve the right to raise their concerns without fear of reprisal, in the same way anyone accused deserves the chance to answer those allegations in court.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-sas-commander-defends-soldiers-giving-evidence-in-ben-robertssmith-trial/news-story/3cec99ffea5b57fee5970d5963e48a71

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62735

File: 16635863248fd6b⋯.jpg (315.47 KB,1280x1876,320:469,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f1e718ca0696424⋯.jpg (261.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629043 (210649ZMAY26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Individual criminal trials where evidence warrants it isn’t an attack on the SAS. It is how serious institutions preserve their integrity - "I served in the Special Air Service Regiment as a troop commander, squadron commander and operations officer. I was in combat in Afghanistan many times. I commanded 1 SAS Squadron in 2010. I served in the same theatre, in the same period, under the same rules as the people now in the headlines. I knew them. I knew the culture. I am watching a public debate about the regiment that is, in important ways, wrong. Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged with war crimes. He has always maintained his innocence. He is entitled to the presumption of innocence. He is entitled to a fair trial. He is entitled to defend the charges through every avenue the law allows. The country owes him that. So does everyone who served alongside him. Whatever the outcome, the answer is the same: let the process run, fairly and to its end. That is what the rule of law looks like. It is also what he, and everyone who served alongside him, is owed ... The current debate has been collapsed into a false binary. You either support the SAS or you don’t. That framing is wrong, and it is corroding the country’s ability to think clearly about its own soldiers ... The people who reported what they believed to be war crimes are not jealous or malicious or weak. Like anyone who passes selection, they are tough professional soldiers. They deserve the right to raise their concerns without fear of reprisal, in the same way anyone accused deserves the chance to answer those allegations in court. Both sides deserve that opportunity. Neither has been given it cleanly so far. Australia benefits from a loyal public that holds its soldiers, and the SAS in particular, in high esteem. That respect is well-earned. It is also conditional. It rests on the expectation the military acts with honour and within the laws Australia has chosen to adopt. The Anzac tradition is not abstract. It is grounded in conduct. The SAS is full of extraordinary people who have done extraordinary things for Australia. The allegations against a small number must be tested in the proper forum, with the rights of the accused respected at every step. Saying so is not an attack on the unit. It is the only way to keep it worthy of the name." - Peter Winnall, DSM and Bar, was an SAS troop commander, squadron commander and operations officer. He commanded 1 SAS Squadron in Afghanistan in 2010. He now runs a strategy consultancy in Perth - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62734

COMMENTARY: Individual criminal trials where evidence warrants it isn’t an attack on the SAS. It is how serious institutions preserve their integrity

PETER WINNALL - May 19, 2026

1/2

I served in the Special Air Service Regiment as a troop commander, squadron commander and operations officer. I was in combat in Afghanistan many times. I commanded 1 SAS Squadron in 2010. I served in the same theatre, in the same period, under the same rules as the people now in the headlines. I knew them. I knew the culture. I am watching a public debate about the regiment that is, in important ways, wrong.

Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged with war crimes. He has always maintained his innocence. He is entitled to the presumption of innocence. He is entitled to a fair trial. He is entitled to defend the charges through every avenue the law allows. The country owes him that. So does everyone who served alongside him. Whatever the outcome, the answer is the same: let the process run, fairly and to its end. That is what the rule of law looks like. It is also what he, and everyone who served alongside him, is owed.

But this case has hijacked other stories of the SAS, and those stories are worth telling properly. On the day Trooper Jason Brown was killed during the 1 SAS Squadron deployment to Afghanistan, a soldier I will call Sergeant D ran 30m across open ground under intense enemy fire to try to reach him. Jason was within metres of an enemy machine gun position. Sergeant D knew he would be hit on the way, hit when he got there, and hit dragging Jason back. He was. His equipment had no fewer than seven holes in it. The only reason they could not count more is because the material was shredded. On that same rotation, another soldier confided that during a separate gunfight he held fire on a Taliban fighter when he realised the man on the other side was a child, clearly terrified, who had been handed a weapon. He accepted the risk to himself rather than shoot the boy. These are the soldiers I served with. Fierce in the fight. Professional and humane after it. They are the majority. They are the unit.

The current debate has been collapsed into a false binary. You either support the SAS or you don’t. That framing is wrong, and it is corroding the country’s ability to think clearly about its own soldiers. The debate needs to be separated into three issues, because almost no one disagrees once they are.

The first is principle. Do the Laws of Armed Conflict apply to Australian soldiers? Almost no one says no. Where there are allegations, they must be investigated, tried in the proper forum, and the accused must receive a fair trial, including the chance to clear their name. Australia has signed up to this. To argue otherwise is to argue Australia should leave the company of nations it has spent a century helping to shape.

The second is process. The process to date has not been handled well. Evidence has apparently been compromised. Mistakes have been made. Soldiers and families have been put through hell by delay and leak. This is fair criticism. None of it is an argument for abandoning the principle. You learn the lessons, fix the process, and continue. Otherwise, the message to the next generation is simple: the law applies to you only when it is convenient for the country to enforce it.

The third is accountability, and this is where the debate has gone furthest astray. Accountability has been uneven. At one end, individuals face investigation and trial. At the other, institutions have absorbed reputational damage. The layer between them remains largely unaccountable. Operations were planned. Tempo was set. Tactics were endorsed. Citations were written. These were not patrol-level decisions alone. If accountability is to have legitimacy, it cannot sit only at the bottom. Extending it upward is not an attack on the institution. It is a requirement of it.

Command responsibility exists for a reason. The ADF has avoided acting on it for too long. This does not replace individual criminal trials. It complements them. Courts for alleged unlawful acts. A separate process for command, culture and oversight. The actions taken after the Brereton Report did not go far enough. Australians instinctively understand when accountability is uneven. That instinct has been turned into a false choice: stand with the soldiers or stand with the process.

In reality, a professional military requires both. The fix is to follow accountability from the bottom all the way to the top, so no one, whatever their rank or their medals, carries the weight of this alone.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62736

File: b518664e9e7319a⋯.jpg (870.75 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb4ff729098a8d1⋯.jpg (246.7 KB,1536x1533,512:511,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629058 (210703ZMAY26) Notable: ANALYSIS: If the SAS committed war crimes, where were the officers? - "Despite the hundreds of millions spent investigating allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, no government official, military veteran or investigative journalist has ever been able to publicly explain one of the great mysteries of the saga: where were the officers when prisoners and civilians were allegedly executed? The investigation by former NSW judge Paul Brereton cleared army commanders of blame, arguing corporals and sergeants were responsible. Even though 39 Afghans were unlawfully killed, according to Justice Brereton, including when there were dozens of Australian soldiers in the vicinity, the only men charged with the war crime of murder are an ex-private, Oliver Schulz, and the famous former corporal Ben Roberts-Smith. Into this fraught debate on Tuesday entered a former SAS officer who had previously operated mostly in the shadows. Peter Winnall, a former major in the elite regiment, is regarded by special forces veterans as a member of the group responsible for publicising misconduct allegations that have come to dominate Australia’s memory of the war. After being contacted on Monday by The Nightly over a social media comment critical of Mr Roberts-Smith, the business consultant published a 1300-word article in The Australian arguing for the civilian prosecution of the Victoria Cross awardee. While that was not surprising, Mr Winnall raised the question of culpability by his own class, the officers. He seemed to argue, obliquely, that soldiers above the level of leaders and deputy leaders of five or six-man teams (roles held by Mr Roberts-Smith) could have been expected to know if dozens of Afghans were being murdered by their men ... Promoted through his army career, Mr Winnall runs a small Perth-based management consulting firm, Rekon Group. “People who know me know I am quite demanding and I don’t suffer fools,” he said on a corporate video several years ago ... On the weekend Mr Winnall joked about the Darwan allegations. Responding to a satirical Instagram article proposing a paintball fight between Mr Roberts-Smith and one of his accusers, federal Liberal MP Andrew Hastie, he wrote: “I’d go watch except innocent bystanders likely to get kicked off a cliff!” The names and photographs of his staff were removed from the firm’s website on Tuesday after the comment was reported by The Nightly. The comment was deleted." - Aaron Patrick, The Nightly

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62734

>>62735

ANALYSIS: If the SAS committed war crimes, where were the officers?

AARON PATRICK: No Government official, military veteran or investigative journalist has been able to explain where the commanders were when prisoners were allegedly executed in Afghanistan.

Aaron Patrick - 19 MAY 2026

1/2

Despite the hundreds of millions spent investigating allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, no government official, military veteran or investigative journalist has ever been able to publicly explain one of the great mysteries of the saga: where were the officers when prisoners and civilians were allegedly executed?

The investigation by former NSW judge Paul Brereton cleared army commanders of blame, arguing corporals and sergeants were responsible. Even though 39 Afghans were unlawfully killed, according to Justice Brereton, including when there were dozens of Australian soldiers in the vicinity, the only men charged with the war crime of murder are an ex-private, Oliver Schulz, and the famous former corporal Ben Roberts-Smith.

Into this fraught debate on Tuesday entered a former SAS officer who had previously operated mostly in the shadows.

Peter Winnall, a former major in the elite regiment, is regarded by special forces veterans as a member of the group responsible for publicising misconduct allegations that have come to dominate Australia’s memory of the war.

After being contacted on Monday by The Nightly over a social media comment critical of Mr Roberts-Smith, the business consultant published a 1300-word article in The Australian arguing for the civilian prosecution of the Victoria Cross awardee.

While that was not surprising, Mr Winnall raised the question of culpability by his own class, the officers. He seemed to argue, obliquely, that soldiers above the level of leaders and deputy leaders of five or six-man teams (roles held by Mr Roberts-Smith) could have been expected to know if dozens of Afghans were being murdered by their men.

“Accountability has been uneven,” he wrote. “At one end, individuals face investigation and trial. At the other, institutions have absorbed reputational damage. The layer between them remains largely unaccountable. Operations were planned. Tempo was set. Tactics were endorsed. Citations were written.

“These were not patrol-level decisions alone. If accountability is to have legitimacy, it cannot sit only at the bottom. Extending it upward is not an attack on the institution. It is a requirement of it.”

The official theory that junior SAS soldiers went rogue was endorsed in 2020 by then-Chief of the Defence Force Angus Campbell, who placed more emphasis on culture — which leaders set — than criminal intent, which is what prosecutors will have to prove.

“But warrior culture Justice Brereton is, I think, speaking to a slow deviation from normal and good culture in a military environment where, instead of seeking to serve others, you seek to serve yourself and to do so in a manner that creates power and authority and prestige,” he said in 2020.

Aggressive and competitive

General Campbell, a former SAS officer, commanded all Australian forces in the Middle East in 2011 and 2012, when Federal prosecutors allege prisoners were executed.

The commander of all special forces at the time was Maj-Gen. Peter Gilmore, also known as Gus, now the deputy head of a civilian intelligence service.

The Brereton inquiry was not commissioned until 2016, when Maj-Gen. Gilmore had returned to the regular army. He declined to be interviewed.

Other veterans say the SAS’s geographic isolation at its Perth headquarters, an unusually high number of non-commissioned officers, wide-ranging mission and limited job swaps with other units created an aggressive and competitive culture that should have been identified and shaped by commanders.

Neil James, the executive director of the Australian Defence Association, referred to “the apparent noble-cause corruption problem” which he wrote on May 3 was why “commanding officers of the SASR have had to regularly address the ‘Sergeant’s Mess problem’ when tackling discipline, professionalism and culture-change problems in the unit.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62737

File: 88ff1e50becb224⋯.jpg (459.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629076 (210722ZMAY26) Notable: Australia, New Zealand and Pacific join forces to dismantle drug networks - Australia, New Zealand and Pacific Island nations have agreed to strengthen joint operations against transnational drug cartels through expanded maritime surveillance, intelligence sharing and co-ordinated policing. Police ministers meeting in Fiji said organised crime groups were increasingly using Pacific routes to traffic methamphetamine and cocaine across the region. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said criminal syndicates operated across borders and required a unified regional response. The agreement follows the creation of a new International Joint Investigations Team in Colombia involving Australian, New Zealand, Colombian, Mexican and United States authorities. Fiji Police Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu said authorities now had a clearer understanding of trafficking networks operating between Latin America, the Pacific, Australia and New Zealand.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39006 (pb)

>>62713

>>62713

Australia, New Zealand and Pacific join forces to dismantle drug networks

AMANDA HODGE - May 19, 2026

1/2

Australian, New Zealand and Pacific Island nations have agreed to co-ordinate maritime surveillance and interception of transnational drug shipments, share intelligence on money laundering, and harmonise legislation to fight organised crime syndicates now flooding the region with drugs.

Regional police ministers will also meet annually to ensure those co-ordinated efforts are keeping up with transnational criminal networks that are constantly adapting, and using increasingly sophisticated technology, to evade law enforcement.

“Organised crime keeps adapting. Organised crime will try to break every single system we put forward,” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said on the sidelines of Tuesday’s inaugural ministerial meeting in Nadi, Fiji.

“If organised crime is going to function on a transnational basis, then our response needs to be transnational as well.”

While Pacific Island nations already had a number of policing centres focused on fighting transnational crime, from drug trafficking to cybercrime, there had not been sufficient co-ordination to effectively fight the international syndicates, he added.

“That goes to exactly why this meeting was called and why (regional) police chiefs and commissioners wanted to make sure police ministers were leading. Because to be able to get that extra layer of co-ordination, you need extra engagement at the political level,” he said.

Mr Burke acknowledged intelligence sharing was complicated by the “insider threat” from widespread corruption within Pacific Island institutions, but insisted “if we were to say, ‘if not every system is perfect we may as well give up’, then organised crime would win”.

Australia has been working closely with Colombian authorities since 2000 to try to stop drug shipments before they left their source country.

But it needed to do more work in the Pacific “because it is not simply a transit location for these drugs”, Mr Burke said.

“It has also become a cruel destination in its own right. We need to stand together and go through every one of those levers to work as one,” he said. “Australia needs to do more and is doing more.”

The decision follows the Australian Federal Police on Monday announcing a new International Joint Investigations Team in Colombia focused on sharpening intelligence and interception of cartel drug shipments at their source.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62738

File: 78cf1404e682e8c⋯.jpg (308.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629091 (210733ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Very, very scary’: How Latin American cartels team up with Chinese syndicates to target Australia - Latin American drug cartels are increasingly collaborating with Chinese and other Asian organised crime syndicates to move methamphetamine and cocaine through the Pacific toward Australia, according to transnational crime experts. Virginia Comolli from the Global Initiative Against Transnational Crime said rival criminal groups were now pooling expertise, logistics and local contacts to strengthen trafficking operations across the region. One major example involved the Mexican Sinaloa cartel allegedly working with Chinese syndicates during an attempt to smuggle 4.1 tonnes of methamphetamine through Fiji in 2024 before the shipment was intercepted with Australian and United States assistance. Pacific police leaders meeting in Fiji this week warned organised crime networks were becoming more sophisticated, prompting greater co-operation between Australia, New Zealand, Pacific nations and Latin American law enforcement agencies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39006 (pb)

>>62713

>>62714

>>62737

‘Very, very scary’: How Latin American cartels team up with Chinese syndicates to target Australia

AMANDA HODGE - 20 May 2026

1/2

Latin America’s biggest drug cartels are increasingly co-operating with Chinese and other Asian organised crime syndicates to traffic drugs through the Pacific to Australian shores, a global trans­national crime expert says.

Virginia Comolli, Pacific Program head at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Crime, says growing collaboration between syndicates that once fought each other for territory has underscored a critical need for greater regional and international co-­ordination, including intelligence sharing.

“It is a fascinating development and a very, very scary one. We are seeing groups who in the past would fight with each other over control of particular turf or drug market … now collaborating,” she said on the sidelines of the Australian Federal Police-sponsored Pacific Transnational Crime Police Summit in Fiji.

“For me, what’s very concerning is that some foreign actors we see embedded in the Pacific are engaged in legitimate businesses … they might also be used for political interference, which brings up a wider question around geopolitics and strategic influence.”

One of the most serious recent examples of that criminal cross pollination was the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel’s attempt to traffic 4.1 tonnes of methamphetamine via Fiji to Australia.

The drug shipment was intercepted in January 2024 with the help of AFP and US intelligence, marking the biggest meth haul seized in the Pacific. “That investigation pointed to collaboration between Mexican actors, Sinaloa cartel, and Chinese drug syndicates,” Ms Comolli said.

“You see Mexicans take charge of the first segment of the supply chain from the Americas into Fiji, let’s say, and then they join forces with Chinese syndicates … who also have contacts with local facilitators, who would then deal with the movement of drugs on the ground and take charge of delivery onwards.

“That didn’t happen because the drugs were seized, but it’s a fascinating example – and we’re seeing more and more of this, of criminals from different parts of the world coming together.

“Ultimately they just want to make money and they realise by pooling their skills, expertise and knowledge they’re more likely to be successful, so they’ll do that.”

Ms Comolli did not name the Chinese group involved but said the Chinese 14K triad was “often mentioned in the Pacific”, a crime network with a deep footprint in online scam centres, money laundering and drug trafficking across Southeast Asia. Other Chinese and Southeast Asian organised criminal syndicates were also operating in the region, along with New Zealand and Australian crime gangs.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62739

File: 8bd8e3940a939da⋯.jpg (398.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: be0590ca9cea3ab⋯.jpg (276.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629102 (210740ZMAY26) Notable: Legal action delays bombshell Dan-era IBAC report into Labor - Victoria’s anti-corruption watchdog has delayed the release of its long-running Operation Richmond report into dealings between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union after a key witness launched legal action against IBAC. The report, originally due to be tabled in parliament next week, examines the controversial 2016 enterprise bargaining negotiations between the Labor government and the firefighters union under secretary Peter Marshall. IBAC confirmed court proceedings had forced the postponement but said the report remained ready for publication pending the outcome of the case. The investigation, running since 2019, involved private examinations of numerous witnesses including former premier Daniel Andrews. The delayed release threatens to prolong political pressure on the Allan government ahead of Victoria’s November state election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

Legal action delays bombshell Dan-era IBAC report into Labor

DAMON JOHNSTON - 21 May 2026

Extraordinary legal action launched by a key witness in IBAC’s marathon investigation into dealings between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union has forced the anti-corruption agency to delay the release of its findings.

Victoria’s Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission informed witnesses on Thursday morning that the last-ditch legal move by a witness would delay next week’s scheduled tabling of the report in parliament.

“Publication of IBAC’s special report on Operation Richmond has been delayed due to court proceedings commenced against IBAC,” the agency said.

“We remain committed to the release of the special report, which is ready for publication, pending the resolution of the proceedings.

“We acknowledge the impact this delay may have on witnesses and people involved in the investigation and continue to make IBAC’s independent, external support service available to witnesses. As the matter is before the court, we are unable to provide further information at this time.”

IBAC was planning to release the findings of its top-secret investigation – an investigation that has dragged on for longer than World War II – into dealings between Labor and Victoria’s firefighters union next Wednesday.

IBAC has not revealed who has launched the eleventh-hour legal move to block Operation Richmond being made public. But the UFU has previously court action against the agency which has contributed to the delays.

The Victorian Supreme Court has confirmed legal action relating to IBAC has been launched. “A matter involving IBAC has been filed with the Court. No further details will be released at this stage,” a court spokesperson said.

The release of the report threatens to trigger a fresh integrity crisis for Premier Jacinta Allan just six months before the state election. But the latest legal counterattack threatens to push the release of the bombshell report past the November 28 poll.

Operation Richmond has been running under tight secrecy since 2019 and while no public hearings were called, scores of witnesses – including then premier Daniel Andrews – were grilled in private by IBAC.

The investigation, sparked by a complaint from a Labor insider, has been digging into the 2016 pay-and-conditions negotiations between the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union and its state secretary Peter Marshall.

The Australian has reported that in private examinations, IBAC grilled witnesses about the role played by Mr Andrews in the negotiations – which led to a favourable enterprise bargaining agreement with the UFU.

Mr Andrews and IBAC have repeatedly dodged questions about whether he was cross-examined during closed-door Operation Richmond hearings.

The Australian believes Mr Andrews, as premier, was grilled in a private hearing over events that handed the union generous allowances and effective operational control over the volunteer Country Fire Authority.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/legal-action-delays-bombshell-danera-ibac-report-into-labor/news-story/0d3ea555d46a1689588e8b39cc2c7414

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62740

File: 7f7ead0e720f8f3⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f4175bc1e7389f6⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 97542feba0b1474⋯.jpg (375.54 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c8f215900fc0293⋯.jpg (393.54 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629112 (210755ZMAY26) Notable: Elon Musk's X Corp ordered to pay $750,000 after admitting it contravened Australian child protection request - Elon Musk’s social media company X Corp has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay $750,000 after admitting it failed to comply with an Australian child protection information request issued under the Online Safety Act. The penalty includes a $650,000 fine and $100,000 in legal costs following a dispute with eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over requests for information about measures used to combat child exploitation material on the platform. X argued it was not bound by the notice after Twitter merged into X Corp, but the court rejected that position. The case followed repeated clashes between Musk and the eSafety commissioner over censorship, transparency and online safety regulation, including an earlier dispute over violent footage linked to a Sydney church stabbing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38833 (pb)

>>38992 (pb)

Elon Musk's X Corp ordered to pay $750,000 after admitting it contravened Australian child protection request

Andrew Thorpe - 21 May 2026

Australia's Federal Court has ordered Elon Musk's social media company X Corp to pay $750,000 after it admitted to failing to comply with an order to provide information about steps it has taken to stop child exploitation.

In an order published online this morning, Federal Court judge Michael Wheelahan said the company had 45 days to pay a $650,000 fine and $100,000 in legal costs to the government, bringing an end to a three-year court saga.

"The respondent admits that it contravened the act," said Christopher Tran, a lawyer for eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant, referring to Australia's Online Safety Act during the Federal Court hearing this morning.

"There was ongoing noncompliance for some 38 days."

The notice from the commissioner was first issued in early 2023, when Ms Inman Grant asked some of the world's largest technology companies to provide a report on what they were doing about child abuse material appearing on their platforms.

A reporting notice, issued under Australia's Online Safety Act, was sent to Twitter in February that year, and Twitter merged with X the following month.

Arguments presented to the court by X Corp against complying with the notice included that Twitter no longer existed as a legal entity and that X did not carry its predecessor's regulatory obligations in Australia.

Those arguments were rejected by the Federal Court in July of last year. However, X had refused to pay the $610,500 fine levied against it.

Justice Wheelahan's order raises that amount to $650,000, and adds the commissioner's legal costs.

Questioning big tech 'a key part of our work', commissioner says

In a statement issued after the judge's decision, Ms Inman Grant said it was critical that tech companies engaged in "meaningful transparency", rather than simply offering form responses to questions around child safety.

"This is not only a key part of our work as Australia's online safety regulator, it also provides the Australian public with important information about how these companies are tackling the worst-of-the-worst content on their platforms," she said.

Ms Inman Grant has repeatedly clashed with Mr Musk and his companies in her role as eSafety commissioner, over issues of censorship and transparency related to its internal processes to protect children.

Mr Musk has issued a slew of public criticisms of the commissioner in response, labelling her an "unelected bureaucrat" and the "eSafety Commissar", which Ms Inman Grant told the ABC had resulted in her receiving death threats and the doxxing of her children.

The commissioner dropped a separate case against X in 2024 aiming to force it to remove graphic footage of a Sydney church stabbing from its platform.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-21/x-admits-noncompliance-with-australian-child-protection-request/106704850

https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/FEDERAL/P/VID1092/2023/order_list

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2026/2026fca0629

https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/VID1092/2023/3971416/event/32881705/document/2778938

https://qresear.ch/?q=Julie+Inman+Grant

https://qresear.ch/?q=Online+Safety+Act

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62741

File: 6fe57b00bebf755⋯.mp4 (14.51 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629129 (210810ZMAY26) Notable: Notorious paedophile Peter Liddy to be released from jail - for now - (Video) Convicted paedophile and former magistrate Peter Liddy will be released from prison when his 25-year sentence expires next month but will immediately be placed under strict home detention conditions while South Australia’s Supreme Court considers whether he should remain under supervision or indefinite detention. Justice Rachael Gray ordered Liddy, 83, to wear an electronic tracker, avoid contact with children, and face restrictions on internet access, alcohol and firearms. The state government is seeking either indefinite detention or an extended supervision order, arguing expert psychiatric assessments are needed to determine whether Liddy can control his sexual instincts. Liddy was jailed in 2001 for sexually abusing four boys in the 1980s. Previous parole bids were rejected over concerns he remained a risk to the community.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62707

Notorious paedophile Peter Liddy to be released from jail - for now

Abe Maddison - May 20, 2026

A paedophile ex-magistrate will be released from prison when his sentence expires but he will immediately be placed on home detention while awaiting a court's decision on his future.

Peter Liddy, 83, is due for release on June 4 after serving his 25-year sentence for child sexual offences in South Australia between 1982 and 1986.

SA Attorney-General Kyam Maher has applied to the Supreme Court for Liddy to either be indefinitely detained, or the subject of an extended supervision order.

Liddy's lawyer Jeff Powell SC had applied for a stay on those applications, which Justice Rachael Gray refused on Wednesday, meaning the applications would proceed.

Instead, she said it was "appropriate for the protection and safety of the community" that Liddy be released on home detention and subject to an intensive supervision regime for an initial period of six months.

Gray imposed restrictions on Liddy's internet access and banned him from contacting children.

He must also wear an electronic transmitter, not consume alcohol or drugs, or possess a firearm.

To make a decision on the applications for indefinite detention or extended supervision, the court now requires reports from two medical experts on whether Liddy is unwilling or incapable of controlling his sexual instincts.

At a hearing earlier in May, Powell said that in 2019, the Crown sought a report from their "trusted and hand-picked expert", forensic psychiatrist Dr Craig Raeside, on whether a similar detention application should be filed.

On Wednesday, Gray said she had noted that both parties considered Raeside to be an appropriate person to conduct an assessment.

"The evidence before this court supports that view," she said.

The matter will return to court on November 18 for further argument on the applications.

A spokesperson for Maher said the government's priority was the safety and protection of the community "and we've taken every step available to us".

"We welcome the court's decision to dismiss Liddy's application to permanently stay proceedings," the spokesperson said.

"The court has ordered expert medical reports to address whether Liddy is willing and able to control his sexual instincts.

"These reports are essential in determining whether he will be detained indefinitely."

Liddy was jailed in 2001 for a minimum of 18 years for sexually abusing four boys while working as a coach at Brighton Surf Life Saving Club and for offering to bribe one of the victims.

His previous bids to be released on parole have been rejected.

Parole Board chair Frances Nelson has said the board "doesn't feel comfortable that he's still not a risk to the community".

"He victim blames, and has no empathy for his victims," she said.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/peter-liddy-notorious-paedophile-to-be-released-from-jail-for-now/b4d45cb3-5dbd-464d-b364-9d01a24ac2a2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62742

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24629136 (210835ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Disgraceful’: Israeli ambassador condemns minister over shocking flotilla video - (Video) Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, has condemned Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir after videos emerged showing detained Gaza flotilla activists being taunted while handcuffed and kneeling on the ground. Newman described the behaviour as “disgraceful” and said it had been condemned by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior ministers, though he argued the incident reflected political divisions during Israel’s pre-election period. Foreign Minister Penny Wong summoned Newman to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade after describing the footage as “shocking and unacceptable”. Eleven Australians detained during the interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla remain in Israeli custody awaiting deportation. Israeli authorities said the activists would be processed and removed “as soon as possible” while flotilla organisers alleged some detainees suffered injuries during the operation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23158072 (pb)

>>38786 (pb)

>>62687

‘Disgraceful’: Israeli ambassador condemns minister over shocking flotilla video

Nick Newling and Bronte Gossling - May 21, 2026

Israel’s ambassador to Australia has condemned the actions of Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who taunted detained flotilla activists, but brushed off the incident as “politics”.

Hillel Newman, who was subject to an official rebuke from officials at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade over the incident on Thursday, joined Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and senior members of the country’s cabinet in condemning Ben-Gvir, but said an immediate penalty was impossible as the government had entered a pre-election “transitional” period.

Addressing journalists at Parliament House in Canberra, Newman, barely three months into his appointment, said of the incident: “It doesn’t happen in politics? Never happened in Australia that you’ve had a minister that does something which is not accepted by other ministers. There is politics.”

“There can be ministers in Australia, politicians in Australia, even part of a party that is ruling that can do things that are disgraceful. The question is, how you respond and whether you condemn it. In this case, Ben-Gvir was condemned by the leadership of the state of Israel.”

A series of social media videos published by Ben-Gvir show the minister taunting groups of activists who had been detained while sailing towards Gaza on board the Global Sumud Flotilla. Detainees were zip-tied and forced to kneel on the ground. Australian flotilla spokespeople have confirmed no Australians were depicted, but have yet to confirm the health of the 11 citizens currently held by Israel.

Newman said all Australians were well and would be swiftly processed.

The videos have received widespread international condemnation. Netanyahu, echoed by Newman, said the actions were “not in line with Israel’s values and norms”, but the flotilla’s mission amounted to unnecessary provocation.

Newman said Ben-Gvir was directly responsible for police forces who may have participated in the activity, and that an investigation into the incident was likely.

“I don’t know how it folded out, how he managed to get them into that position, but once it was known to the government of Israel, it was condemned by the government of Israel entirely,” Newman said.

“It’s not acceptable, it’s disgraceful … I say this also to the government of Australia: we have the same concerns. It does not reflect our values … and therefore is condemned and declared disgraceful and harmful to the state.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Thursday morning condemned the actions as “shocking and unacceptable” and ordered Newman to appear before DFAT. A meeting between Australian officials and the ambassador took place late on Thursday afternoon.

“The images we have seen posted by Israeli minister Ben-Gvir – who Australia has sanctioned – are shocking and unacceptable. We condemn his actions and the degrading actions of Israeli authorities towards those detained,” Wong said.

The government has called for all detained Australians travelling on the Global Sumud Flotilla to be released and for Israel to comply with international obligations to treat detainees respectfully.

This is the second time Israel’s ambassador to Australia has been called in, after his predecessor Amir Maimon was summoned amid accusations of starvation and famine-like conditions in Gaza last July.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62743

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636038 (230552ZMAY26) Notable: Israeli ambassador criticises Ben-Gvir's video but calls Gaza flotilla a 'provocation' - (Video) Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, has defended Israel’s interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla while distancing the Israeli government from controversial videos showing National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir taunting detained activists. Newman described Ben-Gvir’s conduct as “disgraceful” and said it had been condemned by Israel’s political leadership, but insisted no detainees had been physically harmed or sexually humiliated during the operation. Australian father Chris O’Connor publicly disputed those claims, alleging his daughter Neve O’Connor reported beatings, psychological abuse and harsh treatment aboard detention vessels after the flotilla was intercepted in international waters. Newman argued the flotilla itself was an “unnecessary provocation” intended to challenge Israel’s Gaza blockade. Australia is seeking the release of 11 detained citizens as deportation arrangements continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

>>62742

Israeli ambassador criticises Ben-Gvir's video but calls Gaza flotilla a 'provocation'

Paul Johnson - 21 May 2026

1/2

Israel's ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, has stopped short of apologising to the Global Sumud Flotilla activists detained in Israel, who were taunted by Ben-Gvir.

He also told 7.30 that activists on the flotilla had not been harmed, but Australian man Chris O'Connor, whose daughter Neve was on board, rejected that claim as untrue.

Ben-Gvir, who is Israel's national security minister, has been condemned by world leaders for a video in which he is seen taunting some of the more than 400 activists being held at Israel's Ashdod Port after they were intercepted and detained in international waters.

The group includes 11 Australians.

"The actions of Ben-Gvir himself have been condemned from wall-to-wall," Mr Newman told 7.30.

"The leadership of Israel has condemned what he did. It's disgraceful.

"That's the approach of the government of Israel.

"The prime minister of Israel, the foreign minister of Israel, [they] have all condemned thoroughly the actions of Ben-Gvir."

Federal government MP Julian Hill called for Mr Ben-Gvir to be sacked.

"To tolerate that man remaining a cabinet minister for one more day seems unconscionable," Mr Hill said.

"If Prime Minister Netanyahu were serious about those values and Israel's reputation, he'd sack him."

Mr Newman said Ben-Gvir could not be removed from government because of the looming Israeli election.

"The law in Israel is such that when a transitional government begins, you cannot expel," Mr Newman said.

"You can't change the format of a government until we go to elections."

Allegations of violence

Mr Newman denied that anyone on the flotilla would have been hurt and told 7.30 that any past or current allegations of violence or sexual humiliation were untrue.

"There's been no sexual humiliation," he said.

"I refute that completely.

"There's been no sexual attacks of any kind against the flotilla people.

"There are many accusations that are thrown out there, which are untrue. The government of Israel and the security forces of Israel have intercepted all these flotillas with great sensitivity.

"No one was hurt. The interception was done very smoothly."

That comment was then rejected by Mr O'Connor, live on 7.30 as he made allegations that beatings and rape had occurred.

"I absolutely reject that," he told 7.30.

"I will share with you what Neve has told me.

"The first time she was held hostage, she was beaten, and she was subject to psychological torture.

"She was hospitalised in Crete. And as she said to me, the beatings were not bad compared to what happened to men of colour.

"When she arrived in Türkiye, she was really weighing up whether she would do the final leg to Gaza.

"Part of the reason was that she spoke to two people who had [allegedly] been raped two weeks ago on the prison ship, one male, one female."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62744

File: 0f68993d9c04bce⋯.mp4 (5.82 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: d9fd026098c25f4⋯.jpg (905.24 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8b4d62d26f170dd⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,5000x3301,5000:3301,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636052 (230602ZMAY26) Notable: Eleven Australian activists from Global Sumud Flotilla released - (Video) Eleven Australian activists detained after Israel intercepted the Global Sumud Flotilla have been released and transferred to Türkiye, where Australian officials met them following international criticism of their treatment in custody. The activists, including Neve O’Connor and Violet Coco, alleged they were beaten, tasered, psychologically abused and denied food while detained by Israeli authorities after the flotilla attempted to challenge Israel’s blockade of Gaza. Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, rejected claims of mistreatment and said the interception had been conducted “with great sensitivity”. The incident triggered diplomatic pressure from Australia after Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir released videos showing detainees restrained on the ground. Foreign Minister Penny Wong condemned the footage and raised concerns with Israeli authorities over detainee treatment and delayed consular access.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

>>62742

>>62743

Eleven Australian activists from Global Sumud Flotilla released

abc.net.au - 22 May 2026

Eleven Australian activists who were part of the Global Sumud Flotilla crew detained by Israel are now in Türkiye.

Israel said it had deported all the foreign activists seized by its forces on Thursday, local time, as the first group arrived in Türkiye following global outcry over their treatment in custody.

On Friday afternoon the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) confirmed 11 Australian activists were released by Israel and were met by Australians officials in Türkiye.

"No Australians required immediate medical attention, beyond the provision of basic first aid supplies," a spokesperson said.

"Along with other countries, Australia has raised our concerns with Israeli authorities about the treatment of detainees and delays in providing consular access in line with international obligations.

"We continue to urge Australians not to attempt to break the Israeli naval blockade as they will be putting the safety of themselves and others at risk."

The 11 Australians who were detained are Neve O'Connor, Sam Woripa Watson, Anny Mokotow, Isla Lamont, Juliet Lamont, Surya McEwen, Zack Schofield, Bianca Webb-Pullman, Gemma O'Toole, Violet Coco and Helen O'Sullivan.

Upon arrival in Istanbul, activist Ms Lamont said it was "chaos" in the airport as they tried to regroup with other members of the flotilla.

Mr Schofield said the group of activists were "taken to prison and treated really poorly".

"Many of us haven't eaten for days," he said, speaking at Istanbul Airport to local media.

"I have friends that were shocked with tasers, stun guns for extended periods of time just on entry to prison, were beaten."

After being released overnight, Ms O'Connor recorded a video testimony in which she alleges that she was "brutalised" by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) while she was held captive.

"My shoulders were almost dislocated. I was kneed in the face again, I was kneed in the stomach," Ms O'Connor said.

"I had my head slammed into a table multiple times, I was kicked in the ankles so that I would fall … it was just constant abuse and oppression."

The ABC has contacted the IDF for comment in response to the allegations.

On Thursday evening, Israel's ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, told ABC 7.30 that activists on the flotilla had not been harmed.

"There are many accusations that are thrown out there, which are untrue," he said.

"The government of Israel and the security forces of Israel have intercepted all these flotillas with great sensitivity.

"No-one was hurt. The interception was done very smoothly."

A spokesperson for the flotilla group said the Australian activists were going through health checks at a local hospital.

They are expected to return to Australia in the coming days.

422 activists released

Hundreds of activists from countries around the world were placed in detention in Israel after they were intercepted at sea on Monday, while making the latest in a string of attempts to break the blockade of the Palestinian territory.

Turkish foreign ministry sources said 422 activists, among them 85 Turkish nationals, were flown from southern Israel on three planes chartered by Ankara.

Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, sparked widespread condemnation and a diplomatic backlash by posting a video showing the detained activists with their hands tied and foreheads on the ground.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the interception of the flotilla but said Mr Ben-Gvir's treatment of the activists was "not in line with Israel's values and norms".

Israeli ambassador Mr Newman said Israel's leadership condemned the actions of Mr Ben-Gvir.

"The prime minister of Israel, the foreign minister of Israel, [they] have all condemned thoroughly the actions of Ben-Gvir," he said.

Yesterday, DFAT also condemned Mr Ben-Gvir's actions "and the degrading actions of Israeli authorities towards those detained".

"Australia's ambassador to Israel has made representations to Israel, reiterating our call for the release of the detained Australians and for Israel to ensure no ill treatment of any detainees and to act in line with international obligations," Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said in a statement.

"I also directed DFAT to call in Israel's ambassador to Australia to reinforce this message."

Since then, Israel's foreign ministry spokesperson, Oren Marmorstein, said that "all foreign activists from the PR flotilla have been deported from Israel".

"Israel will not permit any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza," he added.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-22/australian-activists-released-from-israel-detention/106710590

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62745

File: d2b4d548d9aa478⋯.jpg (352.29 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 41642827b0d18a4⋯.jpg (562.9 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 729b80e989bb4b7⋯.jpg (204.76 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636062 (230610ZMAY26) Notable: Final group of ISIS brides and children extracted from Syrian camp for return to Australia - The final group of Australian women linked to Islamic State and their children have been removed from Syria’s al-Roj detention camp and are expected to arrive in Australia next week after negotiations involving Syrian, Kurdish and United States officials. The seven women and 13 children had spent years detained in northeast Syria following the collapse of the Islamic State caliphate in 2019. Syrian authorities approved their transfer to Damascus before travel arrangements to Australia were finalised. Among those returning are Nesrine Zahab and Sumaya Zahab, relatives of slain Islamic State recruiter Muhammad Zahab. Australian authorities have not confirmed whether any of the women will face criminal charges upon arrival, though previous returnees have already faced terrorism and slavery-related offences in Australian courts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

Final group of ISIS brides and children extracted from Syrian camp for return to Australia

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 23 May 2026

The remaining former ISIS brides and their children are expected to arrive in Australia as early as next week after being extracted from Syria’s al-Roj camp on Thursday.

The seven women and their 13 children had been trapped in the internment camp for the better part of a decade following the fall of the Islamic caliphate in March 2019.

As The Australian revealed this week, urgent negotiations had been taking place to facilitate their removal after the US State Department intervened, and an agreement was struck between Kurdish authorities and the Syrians for urgent repatriations.

An attempt by the Syrians to remove them earlier in the week was halted by the Kurds because they had been seeking some sort of recognition for their role.

But on Thursday morning, Syrian officials pulled up to the camp in a white bus to escort the group to Damascus, where they will be interrogated before making the journey to Australia.

The final decision to authorise their transfer was made by Syria’s Foreign Minister, Asaad al-Shaibani, who approved their departure from the detention camp in the north of the country.

It is understood that although airline tickets had not been purchased, proof of funds had to be issued to the Syrian government.

The group is expected to return to Australia next week, but the timing is contingent on when the flight tickets are bought.

The Australian government was not aware of their plans to travel and could not detail whether anyone would be detained on arrival.

On Friday The Australian revealed how retired lawyer Robert Van Aalst had lined up Australian community members to escort the women in Damascus and Qatar.

Among the group are children with reported medical complications, including one child previously reported to have suffered shrapnel injuries.

Nesrine Zahab, now in her early 30s, travelled from Sydney to the region in her early 20s. She has long maintained she did not knowingly enter Syria. Ms Zahab previously claimed she had been holidaying with relatives in Lebanon before slipping away with a cousin to deliver aid to refugees near the Turkish border.

According to her account, she surrendered her passport and only realised she had crossed into Syria when she saw an Islamic State flag. She later married Australian-born jihadist Ahmed Merhi, who was captured and sentenced to death. Ms Zahab has said marriage was a means of survival.

Her relative, Sumaya Zahab, who now has three children and is also in her early 30s, is the sister of former Sydney maths teacher Muhammad Zahab, who joined Islamic State and was killed in a 2018 airstrike. He was believed to have encouraged several relatives to follow him to Syria.

Their mother, Aminah Zahab, now about 50, also travelled to the conflict zone. Speaking from the Al-Hol camp in 2019, she said: “We’re clueless parents. We had a lot of trust in our children, a lot of trust.”

Her youngest son, Yusuf, is believed to be in an Iraqi prison and negotiations are under way to try to repatriate him.

Another woman, Kirsty Rosse-Emile, with two children, has spoken about wanting to reunite with her mother and take her children to the beach in Australia, while saying that how she ended up in Syria “might make problems for me”.

In 2020, it was reported that her Moroccan-born husband, Nabil Kadmiry, had been stripped of his Australian citizenship.

Hodan Abby, with one child, left western Sydney for Syria in 2015 as a teenager, seeking to become a ­jihadi bride.

Little is publicly known about Kawsar Kanj but it is understood she has five children and suffers from disabilities, while another woman called Hyam Raad has two children.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/final-group-of-isis-brides-and-children-extracted-from-syrian-camp-for-return-to-australia/news-story/a64063699056c4fd2fdccf2cf67900e5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62746

File: ad57288a7be3667⋯.jpg (85.57 KB,1319x741,1319:741,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6a6b278ea6b1ebd⋯.jpg (411.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 27c34557267d566⋯.jpg (222.94 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636076 (230617ZMAY26) Notable: Revealed: The retired Jewish lawyer who secretly orchestrated return of ISIS brides - Retired Sydney lawyer Robert Van Aalst has emerged as a key figure behind the secret negotiations that secured the return of the remaining Australian women and children detained in Syrian Islamic State camps. The Australian reports Van Aalst coordinated communications between families, intermediaries and Syrian-linked contacts while helping organise travel logistics and escorts for the women’s transfer from the al-Roj detention camp. Sources said the operation involved strict secrecy measures and negotiations with Syrian and Kurdish authorities under pressure from the United States. The effort secured the extraction of seven women and 13 children after years in detention. The operation also reportedly caused tensions among some relatives and supporters over Van Aalst’s highly centralised role in the final stages of the repatriation process.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62745

Revealed: The retired Jewish lawyer who secretly orchestrated return of ISIS brides

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 23 May 2026

1/2

He’s the retired Jewish lawyer who quietly pulled the strings in one of Australia’s most politically explosive operations: the return of the ISIS brides and their children from Syria.

While Sydney doctor Jamal Rifi became the public face of negotiations to repatriate stranded Australian women from a tumultuous detention camp in northeast Syria back in February, the real mastermind operating behind the scenes is retired lawyer and human rights campaigner Robert Van Aalst.

After the remaining Australians were plucked away from the squalid al-Roj detention camp by Syrian officials on Thursday night, The Australian can reveal Van Aalst emerged as the central figure controlling communications between families, intermediaries and overseas contacts during the final stages of the operation.

Sources directly involved in the latest negotiations say Van Aalst has spent the past few months orchestrating confidential meetings, managing travel logistics, liaising with Syrian-linked contacts and, most recently, privately speaking to up to four Australians being lined up to travel to the Middle East to help facilitate the latest extraction.

At least one Australian community member is expected to travel into Damascus after flight tickets are secured, while others could be stationed in Qatar and elsewhere in the region to escort the women and children back to Australia.

“He’s controlling everything,” one source said. “He wants everything under his control.”

Van Aalst’s role first became publicly visible this month, when The Australian witnessed him leaving Melbourne Magistrates Court alongside Abraham Abbas after his relatives, accused slave owners Kawsar Abbas and daughter Zeinab Ahmad, were remanded in custody on May 11.

At the time, little was known about why Van Aalst was present at court or his connection this year to the wider ISIS repatriation network.

But multiple sources have now confirmed Van Aalst has become embedded in the operation surrounding the women’s return, including maintaining close contact with relatives and obtaining unusual levels of access after some women arrived back in Australia.

The Australian understands Van Aalst, who did not respond to questions but prides himself online for having four decades of legal experience, has been able to visit at least some of the returned ISIS brides while they remain in custody, with sources saying his status as a lawyer provided him with access even relatives did not have.

The extraordinary behind-the-scenes role played by Van Aalst has blindsided even some figures involved in earlier repatriation efforts, particularly given the unusual alliance between a retired Jewish lawyer from Sydney and families linked to Australians who joined ISIS a decade ago.

But supporters say Van Aalst earned the trust of families after years of unpaid advocacy, legal assistance and constant engagement with relatives desperate to bring children home from the camps.

Some have accused Van Aalst of operating with extreme secrecy during the final stages of negotiations, including organising face-to-face meetings where people were asked to leave phones and smartwatches outside rooms before discussions began.

“He’d take his watch off, his phone off, and leave them in the car,” one source said.

“Everyone had to leave their phones in different rooms.”

The cloak-and-dagger atmosphere surrounding the operation comes as the Syrian government pushed to finalise the women’s departures from Kurdish-controlled territory on Thursday night local time.

The Australian revealed this week that Syrian authorities had stepped in to unlock travel funds and finalise flight arrangements for the remaining Australian women and children, amid pressure from the US State Department and growing tensions with Kurdish authorities controlling the camps.

Sources said Syrian officials wanted proof of funds or booked airline tickets before facilitating transfers out of the camps and into Damascus. This took place on Thursday evening, and a bus, with a convoy, was sent to pick up the women and children as promised.

Australia’s Islamic organisations and some of the most prominent Muslim figures in the country had also rallied behind funding efforts, including MyCentre director Abu Hamza (Samir Mohtadi), the man who loathed Zionists in fiery sermons first revealed by The Australian last year. Other organisations include the Australian National Imams Council, run by Anthony Albanese’s confidant, Sheik Shadi Alsuleiman, and the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ Melbourne affiliate, the Islamic Council of Victoria.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62747

File: 8b1ba0c7e106136⋯.jpg (4.19 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dec6fb43da8c570⋯.jpg (3.7 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2278be204b31a97⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,5400x3546,300:197,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636140 (230722ZMAY26) Notable: Mystery challenge to Andrews-era corruption report revives calls for law changes - Victoria’s anti-corruption watchdog says legal action delaying the release of its Operation Richmond report has strengthened calls for tougher IBAC powers and greater transparency. Two unidentified parties have launched Supreme Court proceedings to block publication of findings into alleged dealings between former premier Daniel Andrews and United Firefighters Union secretary Peter Marshall linked to a controversial 2016 enterprise agreement. The case forced IBAC to postpone releasing the report, which followed years of private examinations involving Andrews and other witnesses. IBAC Commissioner Victoria Elliott said current laws made it too difficult to hold public hearings or publicly release findings. The dispute has intensified scrutiny of Victoria’s anti-corruption framework ahead of the state election, with the Coalition promising stronger powers and greater public disclosure if elected.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

>>62739

Mystery challenge to Andrews-era corruption report revives calls for law changes

Chip Le Grand - May 22, 2026

1/2

Victoria’s peak anti-corruption body says the latest attempt to stymie a long-running investigation into dealings between former premier Daniel Andrews and a union boss shows it needs greater powers to do its job.

Two mystery parties who cannot be identified for legal reasons have launched Supreme Court action to stop the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission publishing a report into corruption allegations centred on 10-year-old dealings between Andrews and United Firefighters Union national secretary Peter Marshall.

Although the case has been listed for a “rapid hearing” at the end of next month, it forced IBAC to shelve its unpublished report into Operation Richmond, an anti-corruption probe in which both Andrews and Marshall were privately questioned about their conduct.

IBAC Commissioner Victoria Elliott – the third commissioner to have carriage of the Richmond investigation – said her agency’s powers needed to be boosted to enable it to hold more public hearings.

If these powers had been in place when Operation Richmond began, both Andrews and Marshall would have been questioned in open hearings and their sworn testimony widely reported.

“As a general principle of public integrity, Victorians deserve to know more about IBAC’s efforts to expose and prevent corruption and police misconduct – and we want to tell you,” Elliott said in a statement released on Friday.

“But to do that, IBAC’s legislation needs to change, as it currently limits our ability to share what we believe to be in the public interest.

“Victorians want – and should have – greater insight into what is being done to address allegations of corruption and misconduct.”

Under the current laws, IBAC must demonstrate “exceptional circumstances” to hold public hearings and clear significant legal hurdles to publish its findings.

A preliminary Supreme Court hearing into the fresh legal challenge was told on Friday that IBAC’s entire report into Operation Richmond was provided to one of the unnamed plaintiffs on Thursday. This was done to satisfy the agency’s requirement to provide natural justice to anyone subject to adverse findings.

The latest twist in Operation Richmond has elevated Victoria’s anti-corruption framework, which is substantially weaker than that in force in NSW, to a state election issue. Shadow attorney-general James Newbury said a Coalition government would give IBAC greater powers if elected.

“Corruption is growing in Victoria, and the Coalition will stamp it out,” Newbury told The Age.

“The Coalition will provide IBAC with follow-the-money powers, we will stop hearings from being held almost solely behind closed doors, and we commit to doing whatever it takes to publicly release the Operation Richmond corruption report.”

It was unclear after Friday’s hearing before Justice Claire Harris whether the Operation Richmond report will be published before the November 28 election.

Lawyers for the unidentified plaintiffs failed in an application to permanently conceal their identities – the application was opposed by IBAC and media companies including The Age – but immediately flagged an appeal.

Whatever the outcome of the “rapid hearing” into the substantive issues raised in the case, the plaintiffs will have further appeal rights.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62748

File: d7315b330f28067⋯.jpg (308.88 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 17923e1163832c6⋯.jpg (221.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d2dd583735f9ae5⋯.jpg (456.2 KB,1664x1280,13:10,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 510bfae9cf7d450⋯.jpg (570.72 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636188 (230759ZMAY26) Notable: Penny Wong signals interest in new Solomon Islands’ security pact - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has signalled Australia is open to strengthening security ties with Solomon Islands under newly elected Prime Minister Matthew Wale, while warning competition with China in the Pacific would remain ongoing. Wong said Australia was “very enthusiastic” about working with Wale’s government and would consider upgrading the countries’ 2017 security treaty if requested by Honiara. Solomon Islands signed a controversial security pact with Beijing in 2022 under former prime minister Manasseh Sogavare, raising Australian concerns about growing Chinese influence and the possibility of a future military presence in the Pacific. Wong said Australia was increasing regional policing, disaster response and security assistance efforts, while also negotiating separate security and economic agreements with Fiji and Vanuatu.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39059 (pb)

Penny Wong signals interest in new Solomon Islands’ security pact

BEN PACKHAM - May 21, 2026

1/2

Australia’s “job will never be done” countering Chinese influence in the Pacific, Foreign Minister Penny Wong has declared, as she flagged the government’s willingness to upgrade security ties with Solomon Islands under the country’s new leader, Matthew Wale.

In an exclusive interview with The Australian, Senator Wong said “democracy has spoken” in Solomon Islands, where longtime opposition leader and China critic Mr Wale was elected Prime Minister last week.

She said Australia was “very enthusiastic” about working with Honiara, and was open to upgrading the countries’ 2017 security treaty if Mr Wale and his government were prepared to do so.

“We congratulate him on his election, and we were looking forward to engaging with him and with the new government on Solomon Islands,” Senator Wong said. “We’re open to elevation of our relationships with the Solomon Islands, or with any Pacific country, but obviously we’ll listen to what the government and people in Solomon Islands want.”

Underscoring her past warning over Australia’s “permanent state of contest” with China in the Pacific, Senator Wong declared: “Our job will never be done, and Australia’s success demands sustained effort, and that’s what we’re delivering.”

Solomon Islands has been one of the most pro-China countries in the region, signing a controversial security pact with Beijing in 2022 under former prime minister Manasseh Sogavare, who is now opposition leader.

It allowed the deployment of Chinese police to the country, which The Australian revealed last year were fingerprinting Solomon Islands’ citizens and getting them to fill out household registration cards under the guise of “community policing”.

The deal complicated Australia’s longstanding policing support for the country and future assistance under a $190m commitment by Anthony Albanese to build a new police academy in Honiara and provincial policing posts. Senator Wong said the ­Albanese government had made clear that security support in the region should be provided by the Pacific Island Forum, of which Australia is a member.

Australia has committed $400m to a region-wide policing initiative, is pouring resources into fighting the flow of drugs through the Pacific, and is working with regional partners to develop a rapidly deployable natural disaster response group.

“We’re ramping up our efforts in the Pacific. Why are we doing that? It’s because it’s the region where Australia’s interests are most on the line,” she said.

Her comments came as Australia works to finalise a new ­security and economic treaty with Fiji and a security agreement with Vanuatu.

The Vanuatu deal has been held up by Port Vila, which has challenged Canberra to drop its demand for a veto over Chinese investments in critical sectors amid parallel negotiations with Beijing on a bilateral economic agreement.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62749

File: 3f862af0ce29603⋯.jpg (210.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6788048ed3f9a3a⋯.jpg (383.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636207 (230818ZMAY26) Notable: UK police considering sexual misconduct, corruption claims against Andrew - British police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have expanded their inquiry to include allegations of sexual misconduct alongside existing claims of misconduct in public office linked to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Thames Valley Police said investigators were examining whether Epstein trafficked a woman to Britain in 2010 for an alleged sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge, while also investigating claims sensitive official information was shared during his time as UK trade envoy. Police urged potential witnesses and alleged Epstein victims to come forward as detectives reviewed electronic material seized earlier this year. Andrew, who was arrested in February, has not commented on the latest allegations and previously denied any sexual encounter with Virginia Giuffre. Buckingham Palace declined comment because of the ongoing investigation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

UK police considering sexual misconduct, corruption claims against Andrew

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - May 22, 2026

1/2

In a bombshell development in the investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, British police have broadened their probe to include claims of sexual misconduct and corruption.

Mountbatten-Windsor, the former Prince Andrew, is already under investigation on suspicion of committing misconduct in a public office but police are now making an appeal for any witnesses who may have information about any alleged sexual misconduct to come forward.

Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested at Sandringham on his 66th birthday three months ago on suspicion of committing misconduct in a public office during his time as the UK trade and investment envoy.

He is being investigated for allegedly passing on sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein in that role. This includes details contained in the Epstein files of official reports forwarded from the then Prince’s office to Epstein from official trips to Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam and China in 2010.

Police are still combing through reams of information obtained from the February seizure of electronic equipment from Mountbatten’s properties in Sandringham and Royal Lodge.

But in hugely damaging news that has rocked the royal family, it has emerged that Thames Valley Police is also looking into claims that the convicted sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein trafficked a woman into the United Kingdom in 2010 in order for her to have sex with Mountbatten-Windsor at Royal Lodge in Windsor.

The woman has not yet been interviewed by the police as she hasn’t made a formal complaint, although officers have been in touch with her lawyer, who also represented the late Virginia Giuffre.

The woman has previously claimed Epstein flew her to London and she spent the night with the then Prince Andrew at Royal Lodge, his then residence near Windsor. She said the next morning she was taken on a private tour of Buckingham Palace and was given tea.

The police have stressed “their doors remain open,” as they encourage any women abused by Epstein to contact officers if they had information that would assist their investigation.

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidelines say that an individual can be guilty of misconduct in a public office if they use their position to instigate “sexual or inappropriate relationships”.

If any charges are to be laid, the prosecutors would have to prove any misconduct – whether it was sexual, or corruption and fraud – was a “wilful abuse of power”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62750

File: 12c4313df20eecd⋯.jpg (2.62 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636284 (230921ZMAY26) Notable: Kevin Rudd lifts lid on AUKUS, China and Trump-era tensions - Former Australian ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd says AUKUS has passed the “point of no return” and expressed strong confidence Australia would receive its first Virginia-class nuclear submarine by 2032. In his first Australian interview since leaving the role, Rudd said Donald Trump’s public endorsement of AUKUS last year removed lingering doubts about the pact’s future. He warned the risk of Chinese military action against Taiwan continued to rise and described any conflict between the United States and China as potentially catastrophic. Rudd also acknowledged tensions with Washington over Australian digital regulation, including streaming content rules and social media restrictions for children. He said managing Australia’s and America’s different approaches to China remained the alliance’s most complex challenge.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62683

>>62684

Kevin Rudd lifts lid on AUKUS, China and Trump-era tensions

Peter Hartcher and Michael Koziol - May 22, 2026

1/2

The AUKUS submarine project has passed the point of no return and will be delivered successfully, says Australia’s recently departed ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd.

“There is zero possibility of this coming unstuck,” Rudd said in his first Australian interview since leaving government service last month. It is the most emphatic expression of confidence yet by any of the high-level architects of AUKUS.

He confessed that he had harboured doubts about the joint Australian-UK-US undertaking, announced nearly five years ago, until the moment in October when US President Donald Trump declared publicly that AUKUS was “full steam ahead”.

The former Australian prime minister said: “I have a high degree of confidence – beyond the normal political chutzpah and the normal defence-of-record stuff – that, by the time we hit 2032, you’re going to have the first Virginia-class boat delivered” by the US to Australia on time.

At the same time, Rudd – who is an expert on China, a Mandarin speaker, and the author of a book on Chinese President Xi Jinping – said that China had not surpassed the US as the dominant world power “yet”. But, he said, it continued to move towards forcibly seizing control of Taiwan.

“Irrespective of President Trump’s posture and policy, I think you’d have to say that the risks of Chinese military action against Taiwan continue to increase,” he said.

“It would be foolhardy publicly to speculate on any timetable around that, but it’s not going in reverse.”

Rudd resigned from the ambassador’s post after three years – a year before his full term – at the end of March to resume his former job as head of the New York-based Asia Society, a 70-year-old cultural institute with an affiliated think tank, the Asia Society Policy Institute.

His “galvanising interest”, he said, was that “I don’t want us to end up in crisis, conflict and war over Taiwan”. He said he didn’t want to overestimate his influence but that “I’ve worked on this for decades” and would do what he could to avert war. A clash between the US and China would be “unbelievably catastrophic”.

Asked about Trump’s recent visit to Beijing, Rudd said he was not bothered by the US president discussing arms sales to Taiwan with Xi, as Trump had made no changes to US policy.

Beijing, he argued, would be deeply uncertain about how Trump would respond to any unilateral military action against Taiwan, because of the priority he places on showing strength.

Rudd also acknowledged challenges ahead for the Albanese government in managing the Trump administration’s expectations on digital governance.

The US has criticised Australia’s local content requirements for streaming platforms, and says it is monitoring Australia’s News Bargaining Incentive for any disproportionate effects on American companies.

“Obviously, there are complex negotiations to be had here,” Rudd said. “The disagreements … in my judgment would be relatively minor, and I think manageable. But I don’t want to underestimate some of the challenges.”

There were differing views within the administration about Australia’s social media ban for children under 16, he added.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62751

File: be4ff9381f3c4fc⋯.jpg (187.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 751efaa96cf1503⋯.jpg (281.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636292 (230928ZMAY26) Notable: AUKUS envoy warns UK and US cannot afford submarine delays for Australia - Britain’s special representative on AUKUS, Sir Stephen Lovegrove, has warned the United States and United Kingdom cannot afford delays in delivering nuclear submarines to Australia because of mounting concerns over the ageing Collins-class fleet. Lovegrove said Australia faced growing risks of a submarine capability gap during the 2030s as technical challenges complicated efforts to extend the life of the Collins boats. He described AUKUS as a “colossal task” requiring major industrial rebuilding and sustained political commitment, but insisted bipartisan support in Britain and the United States remained strong despite political instability and criticism over delays. Lovegrove said the strategic importance of nuclear-powered submarines had only increased since AUKUS was announced almost five years ago.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

AUKUS envoy warns UK and US cannot afford submarine delays for Australia

CAMERON STEWART - 23 May 2026

1/2

Britain and the US can no longer afford any delay in delivering nuclear submarines to Australia because of the growing challenge of keeping the navy’s ageing Collins-class boats in service, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Special Representative on AUKUS has warned.

Sir Stephen Lovegrove also says he believes AUKUS will survive the current leadership chaos in Britain and would be retained by any new prime minister because there is deep bipartisan support for the pact.

But he warned both the UK and Australia faced “very significant” challenges ahead to realise the plan to jointly design and build a new generation SSN-AUKUS boat.

In a rare interview in the Cabinet Office in London, Sir Stephen laid bare what he called the “colossal task” ahead for both nations. But he said the UK was completely committed to rejuvenating its own depleted submarine industrial base and jointly creating the next generation of attack-class submarines for both countries, to enter service in the UK in the late 2030s and Australia in the early 2040s.

The submarine force in the UK has been plagued by cost overruns, construction delays, poor maintenance, and reduced operational capacity.

‘There’s no point in pretending that standing up a nuclear endeavour of this type is not really difficult, a colossal task,” he told The Australian. “I mean, you’d be completely disingenuous not to say that it’s really hard, and it’s really expensive, and it requires a lot of clever people to devote a lot of time to do it. So, I mean, there have certainly been teething troubles on the way, but we are working very well … at the moment.”

Sir Stephen alluded to the risk of a capability gap in Australia’s submarine defences between the arrival of nuclear submarines from Britain and the US by saying that the challenges facing the Collins-class fleet made the timely delivery of the AUKUS nuclear submarines more important than ever.

“The best way to de-risk your capabilities in this area is to accelerate the introduction of the class coming down the track, so we have drive-to-dates, which are very ambitious for the production of the AUKUS boats … everybody is completely aware of the need for speed.”

His comments come after the Albanese government this week announced it would dramatically scale back the scope of its original plans to refit the six Collins-class submarines to extend their life for an extra decade.

The decision, caused by the difficult technical challenges of the refit, have cast grave doubt on the ability of the Collins boats to be sent into a conflict, meaning that Australia is likely to face a capability gap in its fleet for much of the 2030s.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62752

File: 7e4f9b444e6e0a9⋯.jpg (2.28 MB,3840x2160,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636328 (231033ZMAY26) Notable: Inside Andrew Hastie’s campaign against Ben Roberts-Smith - Senior Liberal MP and former SAS officer Andrew Hastie has become a central public figure in the campaign surrounding Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged war crimes, after years of tension dating back to SAS selection and later deployments in Afghanistan. Hastie reportedly clashed with Roberts-Smith during selection training, then developed deeper concerns after a 2012 mission in Syahchow, where prosecutors now allege Roberts-Smith ordered another soldier to execute a prisoner. Roberts-Smith denies all charges. Hastie later raised concerns with senior military figures and assisted journalists Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie as they investigated allegations that became central to Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case. The case has divided veterans and conservatives, with some accusing Hastie of betrayal and others arguing alleged war crimes must be tested through proper legal process. Former SAS commander Peter Winnall has defended soldiers who report suspected wrongdoing, while also arguing accountability should extend up the chain of command. Senior Liberals reportedly fear backlash over Hastie’s role could damage his political future or encourage a pro-Roberts-Smith challenger in his electorate. Prosecutors have not confirmed whether Hastie will be called at Roberts-Smith’s criminal trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38871 (pb)

>>38982 (pb)

>>62722

Inside Andrew Hastie’s campaign against Ben Roberts-Smith

The senior Liberal MP has played a central role in the campaign to send fellow SAS veteran Ben Roberts-Smith to jail for allegedly executing prisoners.

AARON PATRICK - 22 May 2026

1/6

“You f*cking officers, you always take the easy option,”

Ben Roberts-Smith barked at 25 officers trying to break into the famed Special Air Services Regiment in 2010.

The corporal could not know that among the men he was forcing to ground their knuckles into the red West Australian earth at 3am was an aspiring politician who would play a central role in the destruction of Mr Roberts-Smith’s reputation.

Andrew Hastie, now the Liberal Party representative for the Perth seat of Canning and Opposition industry spokesman, never forgot the bare-knuckle push ups nor how he was spoken to that morning.

Among the SAS veterans who turned on Mr Roberts-Smith, Mr Hastie is one of those whose identities are public, giving him a central role in the campaign to send the war hero to jail. His involvement has turned many of Mr Hastie’s previous supporters against him.

When the Liberal MP posted a photograph of himself laying wreath on Anzac Day — his chest full of medals — roughly half the 883 comments in reply expressed support for Mr Roberts-Smith, who has been charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, or criticised Mr Hastie for turning on his former colleague.

“Is Andrew really going to testify against BRS on the strength of a rumour?” said a comment posted by someone who called themselves James Mack.

Mr Hastie’s hostility towards the Victoria Cross awardee goes far beyond a grudge over an old workplace clash. The politician’s feelings were shaped by his experience with the SAS late in the Afghanistan war, when the regiment had shifted from long-range reconnaissance missions to hunting down and often killing Taliban leaders.

Senior Liberals are concerned that the abuse directed at Mr Hastie, who is often talked about as a future party leader, has taken a toll and could lead him to quit politics. They also worry One Nation, which won a byelection in NSW on May 9, might convince a military veteran to stand against Mr Hastie to tap into the anger over Mr Roberts-Smith’s charges and arrest in front of his partner and teenage daughters at Sydney Airport.

Commentators on Sky News and the Daily Mail have speculated this week that Mr Roberts-Smith may stand against Mr Hastie for election in Canning. Such a step would be difficult, given Mr Roberts-Smith’s bail conditions require him to live in Queensland and to report to a NSW police station three times a week.

Mr Hastie’s office did not respond to a request for comment. A One Nation spokesman said no decisions have been made about candidates in Western Australia. Mr Roberts-Smith hasn’t given interviews since he was released on bail on April 17.

TIGHT SHORTS

Although one was a corporal and the other captain, Mr Roberts-Smith played an outsized role in Mr Hastie’s military career.

They met in the summer of 2009 at Camp Russell, the Australian special forces base in southern Afghanistan where some of the toughest battles of the war were planned. Living at a Dutch base nearby, Mr Hastie was invited to tour the buildings with a friend.

They were greeted by one of the tallest men in the army, a 202cm-tall corporal dressed in tight football shorts, a pistol holstered to his hip. The son of a supreme court judge, radiated the confidence of a young soldier thriving in the army’s top regiment.

He “looked a million dollars,” Mr Hastie said later. “I thought, you know, this is a unit I want to be part of.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62753

File: e834917362552bd⋯.jpg (269.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c88686e1c57b064⋯.jpg (2.6 MB,4896x3264,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24636351 (231057ZMAY26) Notable: SALL GROVER: I will never be lectured on misogyny by Julia Gillard, and neither should you - "Next week, Julia Gillard will appear at the Hay Festival in Wales where she will be speaking on misogyny and sexism in politics - her pet subject. At the festival, Australia’s first female prime minister will dine out on her historic status, commanding her usual fee to ­lecture the world on what it means to be a woman in public life. All the while, back home, Australian women and girls continue to clean up the mess her government created with the 2013 amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act. Under her leadership, and with Mark Dreyfus as attorney-general, the Labor government quietly removed the biological definitions of “man” and “woman” from the act. Previously, the law explicitly defined a “man” as a member of the male sex and a “woman” as a member of the female sex. These were replaced with the vague, self-­declared concept of “gender ­identity”. There was no referendum, minimal public debate, and little scrutiny. It was sold as simple inclusion and progress. In reality, it laid the groundwork for the erosion of ­sex-based rights that we are living with today. I am living those consequences right now. In 2020, I launched Giggle, a social networking app designed as a safe digital space for women. It was created for women to connect, laugh, support one another, and simply exist without the male gaze that permeates so much of online life. The app was built on biological reality: women are adult human females. We deserve spaces where that reality is respected, free from intimidation or intrusion. Roxanne Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a woman, sought access. When I upheld Giggle’s women-only policy and excluded him, he sued under the Sex Discrimination Act. What followed was more than four years of gruelling litigation that has consumed my life, my start-up, my peace of mind, and women’s rights. In 2024, the Federal Court initially found indirect discrimination. I appealed. On May 15, 2026, the Full Federal Court dismissed my appeal, allowed Tickle’s cross-appeal, found direct discrimination as well, and doubled the damages from $10,000 to $20,000. The judges ruled that noticing a man looks like a man can itself be unlawful, because “looking like a man” is now treated as a protected aspect of gender identity. They declared that sex is changeable under the act. The legal category of “woman” has ­effectively been made unisex. Women’s rights to single-sex spaces, forged through decades of advocacy, were rendered invisible."''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

SALL GROVER: I will never be lectured on misogyny by Julia Gillard, and neither should you

Sall Grover - May 19, 2026

1/2

Next week, Julia Gillard will appear at the Hay Festival in Wales where she will be speaking on misogyny and sexism in politics – her pet subject. At the festival, Australia’s first female prime minister will dine out on her historic status, commanding her usual fee to ­lecture the world on what it means to be a woman in public life.

All the while, back home, Australian women and girls continue to clean up the mess her government created with the 2013 amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act. Under her leadership, and with Mark Dreyfus as attorney-general, the Labor government quietly removed the biological definitions of “man” and “woman” from the act.

Previously, the law explicitly defined a “man” as a member of the male sex and a “woman” as a member of the female sex. These were replaced with the vague, self-­declared concept of “gender ­identity”. There was no referendum, minimal public debate, and little scrutiny.

It was sold as simple inclusion and progress. In reality, it laid the groundwork for the erosion of ­sex-based rights that we are living with today.

I am living those consequences right now. In 2020, I launched Giggle, a social networking app designed as a safe digital space for women. It was created for women to connect, laugh, support one another, and simply exist without the male gaze that permeates so much of online life. The app was built on biological reality: women are adult human females. We deserve spaces where that reality is respected, free from intimidation or intrusion.

Roxanne Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a woman, sought access. When I upheld Giggle’s women-only policy and excluded him, he sued under the Sex Discrimination Act. What followed was more than four years of gruelling litigation that has consumed my life, my start-up, my peace of mind, and women’s rights.

In 2024, the Federal Court initially found indirect discrimination. I appealed. On May 15, 2026, the Full Federal Court dismissed my appeal, allowed Tickle’s cross-appeal, found direct discrimination as well, and doubled the damages from $10,000 to $20,000.

The judges ruled that noticing a man looks like a man can itself be unlawful, because “looking like a man” is now treated as a protected aspect of gender identity.

They declared that sex is changeable under the act. The legal category of “woman” has ­effectively been made unisex. Women’s rights to single-sex spaces, forged through decades of advocacy, were rendered invisible.

This is not abstract legal theory. It has real, personal costs. The fight has prevented me from growing Giggle into the thriving platform I envisioned. It has drained my resources and energy. I face potentially crippling High Court costs as I continue the battle.

Complete strangers have felt entitled to label me a bigot, a TERF, and a hater. The stress has been physical: my hair has fallen out in patches during the worst periods, sleepless nights have become routine, and a constant weight sits on my chest as I wonder what kind of country my daughter will inherit, a country that can no longer clearly define what a woman is in law, where men who identify as women are afforded more rights and access than actual women.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62754

File: 30d61c303126281⋯.jpg (260.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d09d481f98bcf0f⋯.jpg (590.78 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 13cb71482d70a96⋯.jpg (464.77 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 476d7693e91d629⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24640016 (240907ZMAY26) Notable: Protesters rally in London to back Sall Grover’s fight for women’s rights - More than 100 protesters gathered outside Australia House in London to support Sall Grover and call for changes to Australia’s sex discrimination laws following the Federal Court’s Giggle v Tickle ruling. Demonstrators argued the decision elevated gender identity over biological sex and threatened women-only spaces, drawing support from British women’s rights activists including sailor Tracy Edwards and campaigners linked to recent UK legal battles over sex-based rights. Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming sent a message backing the rally, while protesters criticised the Albanese government and the Australian Human Rights Commission over the interpretation of the Sex Discrimination Act. The protest highlighted growing international attention on the Australian ruling, contrasting it with Britain’s 2025 Supreme Court decision defining sex under equality law as biological sex.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

Protesters rally in London to back Sall Grover’s fight for women’s rights

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 24 May 2026

More than 100 protesters supported Australian woman Sall Grover and called for a change to Australia’s sex discrimination laws in front of the Australian High Commission in London on Saturday.

The group was sending a clear message to Ms Grover to continue her fight for women, after a recent shock Federal court ruling in Australia allows biological men to have access to women’s spaces.

The Australian court decision says that gender identity supersedes biological sex when it comes to the sex discrimination act, prompting women’s rights movements to believe the Australian government is now prioritising the feelings of men who claim to be women over the reality of biological women. The decision has appalled female supporters in the UK.

The trailblazing round the world sailor Tracy Edwards told The Australian: “We learn what happening to women (in Australia), we support Sall and other women at the same time. Australian politicians appear to be waking up that maybe this law is not as well thought as they thought”

She called for Australian politicians “to make changes to the law that we saw in the Giggle versus Tickle case because it's a great visual of what happens when you don’t listen to women’’.

The protesters heard messages from Australian women including the Victorian Liberal politician Moira Deeming.

“Women cannot be erased, but we can be pissed off,’’ Ms Deeming said.

“Don’t say we didn’t warn you. I want to thank everyone for coming out today and standing with Aussie women and girls. You all stood with me from the start and gave me hope when I felt alone.’’

Various protesters held up signs and blow up kangaroos and sang a ditty to the tune of Waltzing Matilda. There was even a purple dinosaur, which has been an emblem of some groups after the British deputy prime minister David Lammy called pro-women activists “dinosaurs” wanting to “hoard rights”.

Over the weekend Ms Grover issued an open letter to prime minister Anthony Albanese saying “we have a problem … the full Federal court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes, a male won the “what is a woman court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock”

She added: “This decision is seismic, I means women cannot run women only businesses for women. It confirmed the at the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law.“

She said the Australian Human Rights Commission was captured by ideology and that the commission has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect.

Ms Grover said the human rights commission even argued in “that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections’’.

In the UK, the interpretation by the court has been very different and the issue has been high profile, led by the author J.K. Rowling and top female athletes such as Ms Edwards and Olympic silver medallist Sharron Davis as well as a group of Scottish women, Trina Budge, Marion Calder and Susan Smith.

The Supreme Court in England ruled in April 2025 that women, under the sex discrimination act, applies to biology, and not the “feelings” or gender identity of people.

This means, under delayed legal guidance released last week by UK Equality and Human Rights Commission, that single-sex toilets and changing rooms in England, Wales and Scotland are to be used by people according to their biology. It also means transgender men and women must use public bathrooms according to their sex at birth or use gender neutral toilets.

However in Australia Ms Grover, who ran the women’s app Giggle, is now trying to get the laws changed.

She has been battling in the courts for five years after Roxy Tickle, a transwoman, complained of discrimination in being refused access to the app.

Ms Grover said the “real world” stakes aren’t inclusion, but the demise of women’s rights.

She said the silence from the Labour Party following the court decision “tells us everything.’’

She sent a message to Mr Albanese: “You boast about 50 per cent women in cabinet, good for you, you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. If you filled that Cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women?’’

Metropolitan Police kept a close eye on the Australia House rally, especially as a trans-rights gathering was being held outside of Parliament House at the same time and they were keen to keep the two groups well apart.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/protesters-rally-in-london-to-back-sall-grovers-fight-for-womens-rights/news-story/209a04ba95767cf6163388f37d134790

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62755

File: 50989c3ed1a60fd⋯.jpg (313.53 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24640021 (240915ZMAY26) Notable: ISIS bride will be stranded in Syria on Australian government’s orders - One Australian woman linked to Islamic State is expected to remain stranded in Syria after the Albanese government refused to lift a temporary exclusion order preventing her return to Australia. The woman, who has a child, was separated from the remaining six Australian women and 13 children extracted from the al-Roj detention camp after Syrian authorities approved their transfer to Damascus. Government and legal sources said the exclusion order would prevent airlines from allowing her to board any flight bound for Australia. Family advocates fear the woman will now remain trapped in Syria with her child for up to two years, while legal experts say the case may become the first major test of Australia’s temporary exclusion order laws governing suspected extremists returning from overseas conflict zones.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62745

ISIS bride will be stranded in Syria on Australian government’s orders

Michael Bachelard - May 24, 2026

1/2

One of the Australian women hoping to return from a detention camp in Syria will be blocked from coming home by the temporary exclusion order imposed on her by the Albanese government.

Representatives of the family had hoped the government would relent and allow the woman, who has a child, to return to Australia if Syria deported her – under the condition she would be placed under a terrorism control order or electronic surveillance once in Australia.

But legal experts, government sources and sources close to the Syrian government agree that, under the law, she will be blocked from travelling to Australia. The exclusion order would be flagged to the airline if she bought a ticket and the woman would be refused passage, sources said.

“In practice, a person with a [temporary exclusion order] will not be allowed onto a plane whose destination is Australia,” said a government source who declined to be named because he is not authorised to speak publicly.

This might happen at a hub such as Doha, or more likely in Damascus.

Under the order, the woman maintains her Australian citizenship so is not rendered stateless, but she is placed in limbo. It is unclear whether the single-entry passport the government has granted her could be used to travel anywhere else.

The situation poses a dilemma for the woman, whose child is not subject to the order. She can either stay in Syria with her child, who is also an Australian citizen, or send the child to Australia with the remaining six women and 13 children, who were the last of the Islamic State-linked family members to leave the al-Roj camp this week.

Four women and nine children who had been in the camp returned to Australia earlier this month, and three of the women were arrested. Two were charged with crimes against humanity relating to enslavement and using a slave, and one was charged with entering a terrorist zone.

The remaining seven women and 14 children left the camp late this week and arrived in Damascus. Camp director Haval Rashid confirmed the movement of the women, saying there were now no Australians left in al-Roj, where they have lived for the past seven years.

Family advocates say the mother under the temporary exclusion order (TEO) is unlikely to part from her child, so both would be trapped in Syria for up to two years – longer if the government issues a new exclusion order.

Asked if Australia would provide them consular assistance during that time, the government source said that since it had not offered assistance to the women and children in the camp, it would not offer help for someone in an airport in a “relatively safe part of the world”.

Another source who is close to the Syrian government but also not authorised to speak publicly agreed the woman would not be permitted to leave Damascus.

“We can handle her,” the source told this masthead. “I don’t think it’s going to be an issue for a single person – the issue is if there are any dependants. We’re going to seek advice about how to help them in Syria.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62756

File: 9559b4aa3e8b1d0⋯.jpg (251.27 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5d07757230bc3e⋯.jpg (238.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24640031 (240924ZMAY26) Notable: Royal commission, parliament to grill AFP on counter-terror funding report - Australia’s counter-terror agencies face renewed scrutiny over staffing shortages and security failures linked to the Bondi terror attack, with both a royal commission and Senate estimates hearings examining whether warnings were ignored. A leaked AFP report prepared in May 2024 allegedly warned of “critical shortfalls”, leadership gaps and dangerous staffing shortages within counter-terror operations more than a year before the December 2025 attack. Sources claimed vacancies sat near 20 per cent and some teams lacked experienced leadership. Opposition figures are demanding answers from AFP leadership over why the report was not escalated, while royal commissioner Virginia Bell is expected to examine broader intelligence and security failures surrounding Australia’s deadliest terror incident in years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

Royal commission, parliament to grill AFP on counter-terror funding report

JAMES DOWLING - 24 May 2026

1/2

ASIO and the federal police will face intense scrutiny on two fronts over their handling of the Bondi massacre, with the Senate investigating severe counter-­terror staff shortages and the royal commission focusing on the security failings that led to Australia’s worst terror attack.

Royal commissioner Virginia Bell in Sydney will hold three weeks worth of hearings from Monday on the Bondi massacre’s tragic prelude and questions outstanding from her interim report into the security services.

In Canberra, opposition home affairs spokesman Jonathon Duniam will interrogate Australian Federal Police officials at a Senate estimates hearing on Thursday over a report prepared more than year before the December 14 attack warning that officers were stretched to their limits.

The Australian first reported on the document and its contents a day after the terror massacre.

The AFP report, titled “CTSI (Counter-Terrorism and Special Investigations) Command Critical Staffing Levels — Impact Statement”, was co-written by three counter-terror commanders in May 2024.

A source who saw the report gave new details of its contents, saying “critical shortfalls”, “leadership gaps”, “operational risks” and “structural flaws” in the force’s counter-terror apparatuses were laid bare. Only one of five superintendent positions were substantively filled, the source said, and staffing levels were “critically low” with vacancies in the department floating at around 20 per cent, creating a “psycho­social hazard”.

ASIO raised the national terrorism threat level from “possible” to “probable” just three months later.

AFP commissioner Krissy Barrett in February told Senate estimates she had not seen the report and the AFP said it exposed only an “administrative error” that when found “was immediately rectified”.

Senator Duniam was not convinced. “The government and the relevant officials say that counter-terrorism is adequately resourced, but there appear to be very substantial discrepancies between their public and the frank concerns being raised by AFP sources about vacancies, workloads and capability,” he told The Australian.

“It seems either the warning was not escalated properly, or it was escalated and not acted upon adequately. Australians deserve clarity on which it was.”

As security chiefs come under the spotlight, Sky News’s Sharri Markson reported gunmen Naveed and Sajid Akram were able to fly freely to The Philippines and Uzbekistan – a common entry point to Afghanistan – despite ASIO demanding their travel be monitored. The report suggested AFP assistant commissioner Stephen Nutt and ASIO chief Mike Burgess would be among the first witnesses called before the commission on Monday.

Ms Bell last month revealed “the proportion of funding allocated to counter-terrorism significantly declined” across security agencies between 2020 and December 2025.

A senior AFP officer told The Australian in December suspected terror sympathisers and persons of interest far outnumbered the counter-terror officers monitoring them. “The ratio is something like, for every person – and they’re not all sworn police doing it – in those teams, they’re responsible for 20 or 30 people on the watch list,” the source said.

“It reached crisis point. We had brand-new recruits coming from the AFP college into CT because we couldn’t get the experienced staff we needed. That had never happened before.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62757

File: 22924713fd4230f⋯.jpg (5.47 MB,6626x4419,6626:4419,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0f519a3cd66dbb4⋯.jpg (6.24 MB,8192x5464,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24643178 (250927ZMAY26) Notable: I’m enraged’: Family demands answers from Israel, meeting with PM as activists arrive home - Melbourne activist Gemma O’Toole has returned to Australia alleging she and fellow Global Sumud Flotilla detainees were physically, mentally and sexually abused after Israeli forces intercepted their Gaza-bound aid mission on May 18. O’Toole said activists were strip-searched, repeatedly moved between rooms and deprived of sleep, while some detainees suffered serious injuries including broken vertebrae, fractured bones and a collapsed lung. Israel’s Australian ambassador Hillel Newman rejected allegations of violence and sexual humiliation. Foreign Minister Penny Wong condemned footage showing detainees restrained by Israeli authorities as “shocking and unacceptable”. O’Toole’s parents demanded stronger Australian government action against Israel and requested a meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

>>62742

>>62743

>>62744

‘I’m enraged’: Family demands answers from Israel, meeting with PM as activists arrive home

Roy Ward - May 24, 2026

1/2

A Melbourne woman has touched down in Australia, alleging she and fellow detainees were mistreated by Israeli authorities after their Gaza-bound flotilla was intercepted.

Gemma O’Toole was the first of 11 Australians released by Israel to arrive home on Sunday night. She was greeted by her parents and more than 100 supporters at Melbourne Airport.

Amid long hugs, tears, and chants of support, O’Toole – flanked by her parents, Dr Patrick Keyzer and Dr Suzie O’Toole – personally thanked all the people who came to welcome her home, vowing that this would not be the end of the matter.

O’Toole alleged that she and about 480 activists were physically, mentally and, in some cases, sexually abused after they were intercepted by the IDF on May 18 while sailing with the Global Sumud Flotilla towards Gaza intending to deliver aid.

The treatment of the detained activists was thrown into the international spotlight last Thursday when Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir published a video of him taunting groups of detainees who were zip-tied and forced to kneel on the ground.

The videos received widespread international condemnation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the actions were “not in line with Israel’s values and norms”, but the flotilla’s mission amounted to unnecessary provocation.

On Sunday, O’Toole and her family demanded an audience with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and called for more action against Israel following her experiences in Israeli custody.

“It was definitely the weirdest week of my life and definitely the worst week of my life,” O’Toole said.

“I haven’t seen much of the media reporting as I haven’t had a phone for a long time but I gather there is a lot of attention on the Ben-Gvir video which is so insane to me.

“What you saw in that video is an infinitesimal amount of what we actually went through.

“Then to think that is what they do to predominantly white people when they are being, relatively, held to account.”

In a video posted to Free Gaza Australia’s Instagram account, O’Toole said she was strip-searched multiple times and repeatedly “pushed in the chest” by male guards.

“Me personally, I was strip-searched, repeatedly pushed in the chest with a man grabbing my boobs, asking me if I was a girl or a boy,” O’Toole said in the video.

She added that they were unable to sleep as guards would wake them every 30 minutes to be moved rooms and recounted.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62758

File: 2fac0d34f2d74f4⋯.jpg (835.1 KB,3000x1688,375:211,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bec186444e2f7cb⋯.jpg (161.45 KB,1246x747,1246:747,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24643181 (250937ZMAY26) Notable: Child sex allegations against Porepunkah gunman Dezi Freeman aired in coronial inquest - Victoria’s Coroners Court has heard alleged child sexual assault and child abuse material offences were central to the police operation that preceded the fatal shootings of Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson in Victoria’s High Country in August 2025. Counsel assisting Lindsay Spence said police executed a warrant seeking electronic devices linked to alleged offences involving a child under 16. The court heard Dezi Freeman allegedly shot Thompson after officers entered a bus on the property, before fatally shooting de Waart-Hottart as police retreated. Body-worn camera footage allegedly captured Freeman yelling “I had no choice” and later making “appalling remarks” while standing over the officers’ bodies. Separate coronial proceedings will examine Freeman’s death following a 216-day manhunt ending near Walwa in March.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38827 (pb)

>>38834 (pb)

>>38875 (pb)

Child sex allegations against Porepunkah gunman Dezi Freeman aired in coronial inquest

Ashlee Aldridge - 25 May 2026

1/2

WARNING: This story contains information that may be distressing to some readers.

The Victorian Coroner's Court has heard Dezi Freeman made "appalling remarks" as he stood over the bodies of two police officers killed while executing a search warrant over the alleged sexual assault of a child.

Fresh details about the killings of Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart, 34, and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, in August 2025 at a property in Victoria's High Country were detailed in a Coroner's Court directions hearing on Monday morning.

A third officer was seriously injured in the incident after being shot in the leg.

Two separate directions hearings are being heard in the Coroners Court of Victoria before State Coroner Judge Liberty Sanger, the first of which will examine the deaths of the police officers.

Counsel assisting, Lindsay Spence, told the court police had executed the warrant after receiving disclosure of an alleged sexual assault involving a child under the age of 16, as well as an attempt to involve a child in the production of child abuse material.

Mr Spence told the court he would not repeat Freeman's alleged remarks out of respect for the families of the officers.

"The purpose of the search warrant was for the locating and seizure of electronic devices that were to be interrogated for the potential presence of child abuse material," he told the court.

"It was also intended that the person of interest was to be arrested and subsequently interviewed."

Family of the officers, including the partner and sisters of Detective Leading Senior Constable Thompson, attended the hearing, while Senior Constable de Waart Hottart's parents joined online.

More details of Porepunkah shooting emerge

The court heard police attempted to negotiate with Freeman for about 34 minutes after he refused repeated requests to leave the bus.

When he was told police were investigating the alleged sexual assault of a child, he responded "oh for f*ck sake, what bullsh*t".

After several attempts to get inside the bus, including one officer climbing on the roof to get entry, Detective Leading Senior Constable Thompson was able to open a window on the bus door and gain entry, the court was told.

He was shot in the face and neck after lifting himself through the window into the bus.

The court heard Senior Constable de Waart-Hottart was then shot in the head as officers tried to retreat from the annex attached to the bus.

The remaining officers took cover behind nearby vehicles, sheds and a shipping container as the shooting continued.

Mr Spence told the court that police body-worn camera footage captured Freeman repeatedly yelling "I had no choice, I had no choice".

He told the court that after the shooting, Freeman exited the bus with a shotgun before approaching Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart's body and removing his firearm and a spare magazine from its holster, before firing at officers sheltering near a white van.

One officer suffered cuts from shattered glass, while another narrowly avoided being hit after Freeman allegedly fired towards a shed where police had taken cover.

The hearing was told investigators have not recovered the shotgun allegedly used in the attack and do not know how Freeman obtained it.

"A police member was heard to call out 'Can you hear us Thommo?' with the offender replying 'F*cking scum. Die in hell … die in f*cking hell'," Mr Spence told the court.

Mr Spence said Freeman then used the stolen police firearm to shoot Thompson a second time.

"During this time the offender has stood over both bodies and said various things which, out of respect for the families, I will not repeat," Mr Spence said.

The court was also told Freeman said during the confrontation that the search warrant was "illegal" and he did not recognise police authority.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62759

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24643186 (250945ZMAY26) Notable: Manchester synagogue killings sparked warning before Bondi attack - (Video) Australia’s domestic spy agency warned Jewish holy days and major events were attractive targets for extremists months before the December 2025 Bondi massacre, a royal commission has heard. The inquiry was told ASIO circulated an assessment following a deadly synagogue attack in Manchester warning of risks around Hanukkah, Yom Kippur and the anniversary of Hamas’ October 7 attack. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess conceded the agency’s December threat assessment should have more clearly referenced concerns about rising anti-Semitism and terrorism threats. Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster said there was no evidence intelligence or law enforcement agencies had specific warning of the Bondi attack before two gunmen killed 15 people at a Hanukkah event. The commission is examining security planning, police resourcing and counter-terrorism co-ordination before the attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

>>62756

Synagogue killings sparked warning before Bondi attack

Duncan Murray - May 25, 2026

Australia's spy boss identified Jewish holy events as attractive targets for terrorists months before the Bondi Beach massacre.

But a royal commission has been told there was no evidence any intelligence agency specifically suspected a terror attack would take place before 15 people were killed in the anti-Semitic attack on December 14.

On Monday, the inquiry began looking at potential failures of security agencies to stop the mass shooting. It heard that in the first 29 seconds of the attack beginning, 11 people were shot.

After two people were killed by an assailant at a synagogue in Manchester in October 2025, ASIO circulated a threat assessment paper entitled: "Manchester Synagogue terrorist attack highlights enduring threat to Jewish interests."

The paper noted Jewish holy days and other significant dates were attractive targets for extremists, including Yom Kippur, the two-year anniversary of Hamas' October 7 attack, and Hanukkah.

Yet the spy agency's summer holiday threat assessment published in December did not specifically address warnings about terrorism to Jewish celebrations.

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess conceded in a written statement to the commission he should have noted the spy agency's general concern about terrorism threats and anti-Semitic conduct.

The December assessment should have been read in the context of Australia's terrorism threat level being at probable, meaning there was a greater than 50 per cent chance of an attack in the next 12 months, he said.

"We have very effective working relationships with the police services across joint counter-terrorism teams, so if they required further amplification to help them understand or even question our assessments, that was available to them," Mr Burgess told the inquiry.

The October assessment after the Manchester attack noted ASIO's greatest concern was lone actors using simple tactics and readily-acquired weapons.

Mr Burgess said it was extremely hard to detect such attacks if people were not discussing plans with a broader circle, including at prayer groups.

"We aren't all-seeing or all-knowing and we don't aspire to be," he said.

The spy boss said it was clear Jewish Australians were subject to more threats because rising anti-Semitism had "given more permission for violence".

He denied ASIO was under-resourced, despite less funding being directed to counter-terrorism between 2020 and 2025.

Before witnesses were called, counsel assisting the royal commission Richard Lancaster said the evidence was expected to show the massacre was a "surprise attack".

"There is no evidence any intelligence agency or law enforcement agency had any actual knowledge or specific information to suggest there might be an armed attack on the Hanukkah celebration," he told the inquiry.

Among the issues under scrutiny will be security arrangements for the Chanukah by the Sea event targeted by two gunmen, and what counter-terrorism agencies and police knew about the shooters.

Mr Lancaster said the Hanukkah community events were viewed by NSW Police as tier one security risks, compared with other Jewish celebrations held in September and October 2025 which were tier three, the highest threat.

Tier three events prompt counter-terrorism officers to manage policing of events, while tier one events are run by local officers.

In the lead-up to the attack, NSW Police has been warned a heightened atmosphere of anti-Semitism made a terror attack on the community likely, an interim report by the commission revealed in April.

Police planned to provide a high-visibility presence at the event, but ultimately only four officers and one area commander attended the event at various times.

Among 14 recommendations in the interim report was the need for tighter security arrangements at Jewish community gatherings.

Other endorsements included implementing nationally consistent firearm laws and a gun buyback scheme.

The report recommended considering making the role of commonwealth counter-terrorism co-ordinator full-time and clarifying the role of the Australia-New Zealand counter-terrorism committee.

The report also made five recommendations that were redacted from the publicly released version for national security reasons.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/police-intelligence-in-spotlight-bondi-terror-attack-royal-commission-antisemitism/bbd6b768-7157-46f2-9d8f-55a7e2277159

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6RiSWYRoS8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62760

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648021 (262111ZMAY26) Notable: Quad Nations Launch Fiji Port Plan, Critical Minerals Pact Amid China Tensions - The Quad nations have announced plans to jointly develop port infrastructure in Fiji and launch new critical minerals and Indo-Pacific energy security initiatives as the grouping seeks renewed momentum amid regional tensions with China. Foreign ministers Penny Wong, S. Jaishankar, Toshimitsu Motegi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the agreements would strengthen supply chains, including mining, processing and recycling of critical minerals. The group also voiced concern about militarisation in the South China Sea and attacks on commercial shipping routes. China criticised the Quad as an exclusive bloc targeting third parties, while analysts said the absence of a leaders’ summit had raised questions about the grouping’s momentum despite continued ministerial co-operation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Quad Nations Launch Fiji Port Plan, Critical Minerals Pact Amid China Tensions

Reuters May 26, 2026

NEW DELHI, May 26 (Reuters) – The foreign ministers of Australia, India, Japan and the U.S. agreed to jointly build a port in Fiji and signed pacts covering critical minerals and energy security, as they sought to inject fresh energy into their grouping known as the Quad.

The brief meeting between the countries’ top diplomats – Australia’s Penny Wong, India’s S. Jaishankar, Japan’s Toshimitsu Motegi and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio – was the third such gathering of the Quad since September 2024.

The group unveiled its first joint infrastructure project, a port in Fiji.

“We are going to be partnering on issues of port infrastructure, in particular in response to insufficient port capacity in the Pacific Islands, we are announcing plans to work with Fiji,” Rubio said.

The four-nation group had lost some momentum last year after failing to hold a leaders’ summit, amid tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Washington’s tariffs and other matters.

“We are beginning to show real achievements and real accomplishments,” Rubio said. “We are deeply committed to this partnership. It is a linchpin and a cornerstone of our global strategy as a nation in the United States.”

He said the group agreed to launch an initiative on Indo-Pacific Energy Security and a critical minerals framework.

ABSENCE OF LEADERS’ SUMMIT CREATES DOUBTS

The minerals framework will guide how to leverage economic policy tools and coordinate investment to strengthen critical minerals supply chains – including in mining and processing – and in critical minerals recycling, Rubio said.

The initiative could be significant for Japan after China halted shipments of some minerals used in aerospace, defense and semiconductor industries following a diplomatic dispute.

New Delhi has pressed for a Trump visit to India, a trip that would probably be tied to a Quad summit. Analysts have questioned whether a lack of leader-level engagement has downgraded the Quad’s importance.

The foreign ministers did not comment on the possibility of a summit this year, but over the weekend, Rubio said that diplomats would work toward a meeting later this year.

“The absence of a leaders’ summit has raised some doubts, but that does not necessarily indicate declining importance,” said Premesha Saha, a senior policy fellow at the Asia Society Australia in Melbourne.

“If the Quad can keep delivering at the ministerial and working levels, it can remain relevant even without regular leaders-level signaling.”

The Quad countries share concerns about China’s growing power and Rubio has stressed the importance of maintaining a “free and open Indo-Pacific.”

QUAD SHOULDN’T TARGET THIRD PARTY, CHINA SAYS

A joint statement from the four countries said they remained “seriously concerned about the situation in the East China Sea and the South China Sea” as well as the “militarisation of disputed features” in the South China Sea.

They also condemned attacks on commercial shipping vessels in the Middle East and said they were opposed to the imposition of tolls, stressing on safety and uninterrupted flow of global commerce through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea.

China claims almost the entire South China Sea and has built military facilities on disputed features. Several Southeast Asian countries also claim parts of the sea. China and Japan have a separate dispute over territory in the East China Sea.

Beijing has criticized the Quad as a Cold War-style grouping aimed at containing its development.

On Tuesday, it said cooperation between countries should contribute to regional peace, stability and prosperity, and should not target any third party.

“We also do not support the formation of exclusive cliques or bloc confrontation. No cooperation should undermine mutual trust and cooperation among regional countries,” China’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, told a daily press conference.

India, too, has territorial disputes with China, although Modi had signaled a willingness to improve ties with Beijing amid his tensions with Trump.

https://gcaptain.com/quad-nations-launch-fiji-port-plan-critical-minerals-pact-amid-china-tensions/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62761

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648147 (262155ZMAY26) Notable: ASIO's 2024 review of past terror cases didn't extend to prior flag on Bondi attackers - (Video) Australia’s domestic intelligence agency reviewed recent terrorism investigations after raising the national terror threat level to “probable” in 2024, but did not re-examine the Bondi gunmen because the review only covered the previous 12 months, a royal commission has heard. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said the limitation was a resourcing decision, despite warnings former terrorism subjects could re-engage in violent extremism years later. The inquiry heard ASIO had investigated Naveed and Sajid Akram in 2019 over links to an Islamic State cell before assessing they did not pose a terror threat. The commission also heard NSW Police rejected requests for a permanent police presence at the Hanukkah event targeted in December 2025, where 15 people were killed, despite escalating anti-Semitic incidents and prior ASIO warnings about threats to Jewish gatherings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

ASIO's 2024 review of past terror cases didn't extend to prior flag on Bondi attackers

Tom Lowrey and Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop - 25 May 2026

1/3

The head of Australia's domestic intelligence agency has revealed that ASIO reviewed past terrorism investigations after raising the threat level in 2024, but a resourcing decision meant it did not extend to a re-examination of the men soon to be the Bondi gunmen.

Called as the first witness in the latest phase of hearings at the royal commission investigating the massacre, ASIO director-general Mike Burgess also defended a significant decline in the share of funding devoted to counterterrorism.

Mr Burgess told the royal commission the raising of the terrorism threat level in August 2024 to "probable" was due to a deteriorating security environment in the wake of the October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel.

It sparked a decision to review the past 12 months of investigations into terrorism suspects.

ASIO's decision to limit the review of its counterterrorism caseload to just the past year meant the agency did not re-examine Bondi gunmen Naveed and Sajid Akram, who the agency had investigated five years earlier in 2019.

That investigation into the Akrams' links to an Islamic State (IS) cell concluded the father and son did not pose a terrorism threat or support IS.

It is an assessment that has since been questioned by the commission's former special adviser, ex-ASIO boss Dennis Richardson.

Today's revelation raises the possibility that ASIO could have learned that the Akrams had travelled around 2022 to Uzbekistan.

Uzbekistan is a gateway to Afghanistan and an active area for the influential Islamic State Khorasan Province branch.

ASIO could have also learned that Sajid Akram had obtained a firearms licence from NSW Police and was legally acquiring guns.

Counsel assisting the commission, Richard Lancaster SC, asked Mr Burgess why the review of previous terrorism suspects was limited to 12 months.

Mr Burgess said that was a resourcing decision, despite his insistence that ASIO's counterterrorism resourcing was adequate.

"That's a judgement made by our organisation in terms of where we've got our resources, what we need to do at that point in time," he said.

"We've got our immediate caseload that we have underfoot that needs resources applied.

"We made a judgement to go back 12 months just to satisfy ourselves those individuals and their circumstances haven't changed, and to make sure our assessment is still valid."

ASIO decided to limit the caseload under review despite warnings in the National Counter-Terrorism Plan that terrorism suspects from years earlier could pose a threat.

The commission did not draw attention to the fact in today's hearing.

The plan, which guides the policies and practices of ASIO and other agencies, says:

"Experience in Australia and overseas has shown the potential for … former subjects of counterterrorism investigations (known entities) to re-engage in violent extremist activity, including planning for or undertaking terrorist attacks.

"Some have undertaken attacks or attack planning years after a point-in-time assessment."

Mr Burgess told the hearing ASIO also reviewed the cases of young people involved in deradicalisation programs dating back to 2023 as a result of the raising of the threat level.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62762

File: 2f5f10e998e06db⋯.jpg (110.21 KB,1919x1080,1919:1080,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cdd1f5f5a37540b⋯.jpg (743.35 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fe403f5c9b867f0⋯.jpg (1.21 MB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648185 (262206ZMAY26) Notable: ASIO funding ‘stretched’ before Bondi, but spymaster Mike Burgess defends budget - ASIO director-general Mike Burgess says Australia’s domestic intelligence agency was stretched but not under-resourced before the December 2025 Bondi massacre, despite shifting resources from counter-terrorism to espionage and foreign interference investigations in the years before the attack. Giving evidence to the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission, Burgess said the national terror threat had risen to the “upper end” of “probable” amid increasing risks of lone-actor violence and anti-Semitic extremism. The commission heard ASIO believed Iran was linked to more attacks on Australia’s Jewish community than the two already publicly attributed to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Evidence also detailed repeated warnings from Jewish security groups and police threat assessments about possible attacks on Hanukkah events before the Bondi shooting, where 15 people were killed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

ASIO funding ‘stretched’ before Bondi, but spymaster Mike Burgess defends budget

JAMES DOWLING and BEN PACKHAM - May 25, 2026

1/2

Spymaster Mike Burgess says his counter-terror teams were stretched but not under-resourced ahead of the Bondi massacre, and if he’d asked for more money he would have had to find savings elsewhere in his budget.

The ASIO boss also revealed to the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission on Monday that the terrorist threat was at the “upper end” of its current “probable” designation, and Iran was believed to have carried out more than the two attacks on Australia’s Jewish community already attributed to the regime.

The second hearing block, set to run for three weeks from Monday, will focus on matters of ­national security, the events preceding the December 14 Bondi massacre, and questions outstanding from the royal commission’s interim report last month.

That report said funding for counter-terrorism had significantly declined over five years relative to an overall increase in the national intelligence community’s budget, which Mr Burgess agreed with but he said it did not reflect ASIO or its work.

“It’s not a one-for-one representation of what my organisation is doing in identifying and understanding its threats, including counter-terrorism,” he said.

“I still think our resourcing was sufficient for the problems we face. We’re operating in a budget environment where the government rules are very clear. If you ask for something … you have to offer an offset. So I might have got a plus up, but I would have had to take it from somewhere else.”

His agency had made a “pivot” to countering espionage and foreign interference before the ­October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, but when terror threats began to ­escalate, those other priorities “had not let up”.

“It certainly stretches us and stretched us at the time,” Mr Burgess said. “(But) we were not actually leaving serious matters untreated or uninvestigated. I stress, we are not all-seeing and all-knowing.”

ASIO had reduced the terror threat level from “probable” to “possible” in November 2022 after the fall of the ISIS caliphate, where it remained for more than a year. “So there was a reduction in effort required,” Mr Burgess said.

“At the same time, every rock we lifted up, we found espionage or foreign interference that needed to be investigated, and so resources were moved over there.”

The threat level returned to “probable” in August 2024, and has continued to climb to “the upper end of probable”.

Mr Burgess said the terror risk could not be escalated from “probable” to “expected” unless ASIO found evidence of a specific terror plot.

“In the absence of not having that, it won’t go to ‘expected’, but we’re flagging the environment is a lot hotter than it has been in the past when we first raised the threat level, and that concerns me and my agency,” Mr Burgess said.

“We have a concerning trajectory. There is more permission for violence, and an environment where people can go to violence with little or no warning.”

Last August, Mr Burgess declared the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had masterminded firebombing attacks on the Jewish kosher deli Lewis’ Continental Kitchen and Melbourne’s Adass Synagogue. He told the commission he suspected the Iranian government had masterminded more attacks – but he “can’t quite get there” proving it.

“We figured out that in those two cases, and we do believe there are more, we just can’t quite get there in terms of our level of ­assessment,” he said.

“There’s a number of activities we have under way to investigate matters … that would include any other potential actions under way from the state of Iran.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62763

File: 332ad745b142587⋯.jpg (62.41 KB,800x533,800:533,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7b19ed3a0e7f28a⋯.jpg (54.85 KB,861x769,861:769,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648242 (262223ZMAY26) Notable: New documents reveal Bondi gunman Naveed Akram remained on ASIO and police radar in 2022 - New evidence before the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission has revealed Bondi gunman Naveed Akram remained subject to NSW counterterrorism “residual risk processes” in 2022, three years before the December 2025 attack. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said Akram had been managed through systems designed to monitor former terrorism subjects for signs of renewed radicalisation after ASIO investigated him and his father Sajid in 2019 over links to an Islamic State cell. The commission heard Akram’s listing was later downgraded and eventually removed before the massacre. Burgess also revealed ASIO reviewed terrorism cases after the national threat level was raised in 2024, but the Akrams were not re-examined because the review only covered the previous 12 months. The inquiry is also examining firearms licensing processes linked to the attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

New documents reveal Bondi gunman Naveed Akram remained on ASIO and police radar in 2022

Tom Lowrey and Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop - 26 May 2026

Bondi gunman Naveed Akram was on the counterterrorism radar of police and intelligence agencies as recently as 2022, later than previously known, according to the domestic spy agency ASIO.

In a submission to the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, ASIO director-general Mike Burgess revealed Akram was subject to "residual risk processes" in NSW in 2022, three years before the Bondi attack.

ASIO has previously confirmed it investigated Akram in 2019, but assessed that he did not pose a terror threat at the time.

Anyone investigated as a potential terror risk can be listed by authorities as a "known entity".

The federal government's national counter-terrorism plan spells out the lingering risk posed by people who have been investigated and found not to pose a threat at that time.

"Some have undertaken attacks or attack planning years after a point-in-time assessment, which assessed that they did not pose a threat or were deemed to be of a lower threat level compared with other individuals, which security agencies were reviewing at that time," it reads.

Known entities are flagged in a database through the 'Known Entity Management Framework', which includes intelligence agencies and police forces across the country.

It aims to identify signs of radicalisation or re-engagement with networks.

Responding to questions from the royal commission, Mr Burgess conceded there was scope to improve the system as it currently works.

"Naveed Akram had been subject to residual risk processes in NSW in 2022," he said in the ASIO submission.

"While I am comfortable that reasonable judgements were formed through that process based on the known information, I would support a review of (redacted word) and supporting processes in each state and territory to ensure those processes remain fit for purpose, efficient and effective."

He suggested ensuring the current system aligns with best practice among Australia's Five Eyes partners — the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand.

The redacted version of Mr Burgess's submission does not refer to the Known Entity Management Framework, and it was unclear if there were other 'residual risk processes'; however, the ABC has previously reported that Naveed Akram was on the Known Entity Management database, which was managed by NSW Police.

His listing was downgraded in the years before the Bondi attack, by which time he was no longer on the database.

Authorities can prevent people from travelling abroad as part of the system, but Naveed Akram and his father, Sajid, were able to travel to Uzbekistan around 2022 and a former terror hotspot in the Philippines in the month before the massacre.

Mr Burgess gave evidence to the royal commission yesterday, when matters relating to what was known about the Akrams ahead of the Bondi attack were not raised.

He revealed that after ASIO raised the terrorism threat level in 2024, the agency reviewed its caseload of known entities dating back 12 months, but a resourcing decision meant that it did not extend to a re-examination of the Akrams.

The commission is investigating why the Akrams were never re-examined after ASIO's 2019 investigation.

Mr Burgess is expected to give further evidence to the commission in closed hearings.

ASIO never consulted on firearms licenses

The submission also revealed that ASIO has never been consulted by a firearms registry on whether or not to issue a firearms license.

Rules around firearms licensing have been reviewed in the wake of the Bondi terror attack, after it was revealed the gunmen carried out the attack with firearms licensed to Sajid Akram.

Work is continuing on developing a national firearms registry, linking existing state and territory systems — some of which have until recently relied on paper documentation.

In the submission, Mr Burgess confirmed ASIO has provided no direct input to licensing decisions.

"I am informed that ASIO has never received a referral from a firearms licensing authority, and has never given a security assessment relating to a firearms licensing decision," he said in the submission.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-26/naveed-akram-on-asio-and-police-radar-2022/106723978

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62764

File: addfd57f34062ce⋯.jpg (402.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648264 (262231ZMAY26) Notable: Police ‘significantly understated’ risk to Hanukkah event, junior office ‘left to his discretion’ - NSW Police assigned the Chanukah by the Sea celebration the lowest internal risk rating without conducting a formal threat assessment before the December 2025 Bondi massacre, the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission has heard. The inquiry heard warnings from the Jewish-run Community Security Group describing the terrorism risk as “high” were not fully reviewed and requests for a permanent police presence were rejected. Senior counsel assisting Richard Lancaster said police had “significantly understated the risk” linked to the event, where 15 people were killed. The commission also heard Operation Shelter, a high-visibility Jewish protection operation, was no longer proactively guarding community events by December 2025 and police had received no specific intelligence warning before the attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

Police ‘significantly understated’ risk to Hanukkah event, junior office ‘left to his discretion’

JAMES DOWLING - 26 May 2026

1/2

The Bondi Hanukkah celebration where 15 people were shot dead had a diminished police presence and was assigned the lowest internal risk rating without a threat assessment, but NSW Police say federal authorities must answer how terrorists planned a massacre undetected.

Three senior NSW Police commanders on Tuesday were grilled at the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission about why there was no risk evaluation for the December 14 Chanukah by the Sea event, why warnings by Jewish-run Community Security Group were ignored, and why a police operation dedicated to protecting Jewish residents wasn’t ­patrolling it.

The hearing was told how the commander for Sydney’s eastern suburbs – who gave evidence under the pseudonym ABQ – did not read the entirety of an email from CSG warning there was a “high” terror risk at the Hanukkah celebration and she never questioned a subordinate classing it as a “tier one” community event.

Under a police “escalation model”, tier one events require ­little oversight and no mandatory engagement with counter-terror or major event authorities.

There were no guidelines to assist the junior officer – an operations inspector dubbed “ABV” – and it was “left to his discretion”. ABQ also made no attempts to seek extra protection for the ­celebration.

The royal commission’s senior counsel assisting, Richard Lancaster SC, was scathing of the decision, suggesting to ABQ it was “a categorisation that was obviously too low” and “significantly understated the risk associated with the event occurring”.

“The event was planned with the information available to us at the time, and we allocated resources that I believed at the time were appropriate,” ABQ said.

“We treated the event based on the information we had at the time. I had no specific intelligence of a direct threat.”

She said she was happy with ABV’s assessment and agreed she “took no steps to intervene with it”.

“If I was unsatisfied, he would have known,” she said.

The commission heard on Monday from two CSG officials who warned police about the risks facing Chanukah by the Sea. One said he spoke to ABQ on the phone and asked for police to stay through the duration of the event, but she challenged this on Tuesday and said the CSG liaison should have known she “would not be the person you would call to talk about resources”.

The second CSG officer had emailed a week before the event saying the risk of terrorism and antisemitic vilification was “high”.

ABQ told the commission she didn’t read past the start of the email, but it wouldn’t have changed her decision regardless.

“I don’t know that I got that far into the email. I’ve certainly read it since December 14,” she said. “I don’t see that anything in it would have changed my thoughts.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62765

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648285 (262239ZMAY26) Notable: Minns admits 'giant intelligence failure' led to Bondi terror attack - (Video) NSW Premier Chris Minns says a “giant law enforcement and intelligence failure” contributed to the December 2025 Bondi terror attack, while defending the state’s counter-terrorism system and the Joint Counter Terrorism Team. Minns was responding to reports that two calls to the National Security Hotline in 2007 and 2024 concerning gunman Sajid Akram were allegedly not passed to ASIO. He said the failure was more likely due to information having “slipped through the cracks” rather than deliberate withholding. Minns also defended intelligence and police agencies, noting the Joint Counter Terrorism Team had disrupted 32 terrorism plots since its formation. The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission is examining intelligence-sharing failures, security planning and counter-terrorism decisions before the Hanukkah attack, where 15 people were killed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

Minns admits 'giant intelligence failure' led to Bondi terror attack

Patrick Brischetto - May 26, 2026

NSW Premier Chris Minns has stopped short of calling the state's counter-terrorism system broken, but admits a "giant intelligence failure" led to the deaths of 15 people in the Bondi terror attack.

Minns defended the work of the Joint Counter Terrorism Team, a mix of senior police and intelligence agencies, in thwarting "32 terrorism events" in the state since its formation, as their actions in the lead-up to the attack are analysed at a Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Cohesion.

Earlier today, reports from The Daily Telegraph claimed two calls to the National Security Hotline in 2007 and 2024 reporting Sajid Akram were not passed on to ASIO.

Akram was killed by police in the shooting, while his alleged accomplice and son Naveed, is currently before the courts.

Speaking to 2GB, Minns said he did not want to send the wrong message to the state by suggesting the current structures to combat terrorism are not fit for purpose.

"We've clearly had a giant law enforcement and intelligence failure in December of last year that we need to correct and make better,' he said.

"But I also don't want the public believing that no one talks to each other."

"These are law enforcement agencies that work with sophisticated technology and have had success in the past.

"You often don't read about it because they've acted before someone's committed a horrible terrorism event."

He said the failure to share the alleged pieces of intelligence with ASIO was more likely because it "slipped through the cracks" rather than a malicious effort to withhold key information.

Speaking to media this morning, he doubled down on his defence of the state's counter-terrorism agencies, though acknowledged he looked forward to the findings of the ongoing Royal Commission to learn from the mistakes that led to the Bondi shooting.

Yesterday, ASIO's chief Mike Burgess revealed there had been warnings that Jewish holy events were targets for terrorism attacks months before the shooting, which occurred at a Chanukkah celebration.

"I think there's parts of the intelligence and counter-terrorism architecture that need to be examined, and they need to be examined by the Royal Commission, and we need to make sure that we're learning from the mistakes that have been made," Minns said.

"But I'm not going to say it's broken, I don't want to send the message out today that if people have suspicions or concerns about something in their community, then they should contact authorities.

"I don't want the good work of those senior police officers and hard-working intelligence agencies just washed away."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/royal-commission-minns-admits-giant-intelligence-failure-led-to-bondi-terror-attack/ffeb9365-4492-4b3a-bbdd-187b6f7074f6

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/classified-intelligence-bombshell-sajid-akram-was-flagged-in-hotline-tipoffs-years-before-shooting/news-story/16cba764c52893f5c6670810bdd2be64

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFhUB9mFIVY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62766

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648353 (262254ZMAY26) Notable: Nineteen women and children linked to Islamic State arrive home in covert operation - (Video) Nineteen Australian women and children linked to Islamic State have returned from Syria in a covert security operation involving federal and state counterterrorism agencies. The group arrived separately in Sydney and Melbourne under heavy police supervision, with Joint Counter Terrorism Teams conducting searches and downloading electronic devices for investigation. Authorities said no women had been charged, but investigations into Australians who travelled to Syria remained ongoing. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the government had provided no assistance to the returnees and warned any criminal conduct would face “the full force of the law”. One remaining Australian-linked woman in Syria is challenging a temporary exclusion order preventing her return to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62745

>>62746

>>62755

Nineteen women and children linked to Islamic State arrive home in covert operation

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 26 May 2026

1/2

Nineteen Australian women and children linked to the Islamic State terror group have arrived home in a high-security, covert extraction that culminated in a ­violent outburst from one of their handlers as the group was hurried through an airport.

Just one so-called ISIS bride remains in Syria, with The Australian on Tuesday revealing the family of Hodan Abby had recruited a high-profile lawyer to lodge a legal bid overturning an order banning her from entering the country.

No women were charged, but authorities indicated investi­gations into their activities were ongoing.

Two men transporting members of the Zahab family – who are linked to the Islamic State group – said the women and children were “of course” happy to be home.

The comments were made after the four women and six children were whisked away to Meriton Suites at Mascot, just minutes from Sydney airport.

“We are happy to be safe in our happy country,” the men, believed to be relatives transporting Nesrine, Amina and Sumaya Zahab, told The Australian.

While they were at Meriton, The Australian witnessed a Domino’s Pizza delivery driver dropping off four boxes of pizza to reception of the hotel.

While riot squad police were also seen at the hotel, when the Zahab family departed in a black Kia mini-van they were escorted from the hotel into the underground car park by a woman.

They then drove to the Zahab family home in southwest Sydney where more relatives were waiting as they arrived home.

Earlier, a BMW that is believed to have picked up Hyam Raad was also seen leaving the Meriton.

The Zahab family and Hyam Raad arrived in Sydney with their six children just after 5.30pm, while Kawsar Kanj and Kirsty Rosse-Emile landed in Melbourne with their seven children about an hour prior.

In Sydney, the women were offered NSW government support through which they could ask for health assistance from the Department of Communities and Justice upon arrival.

Riot squad cars were spotted at Sydney Airport ahead of the arrival, and there was a heavy police presence at the international ­arrivals terminal.

They were escorted off the plane upon their arrival, according to a passenger aboard the Qatar Airways flight, while other passengers waited for them to ­disembark.

A violent scuffle erupted in Melbourne when Rosse-Emile left the airport through the backdoor and one of her handlers punched a News Corp photographer in the camera, which hit his face. Rosse-Emily was picked up in a waiting BMW 5X.

The remaining Melbourne brides left the airport through side doors. An Australian Federal Police spokeswoman said assistance for the cohort leaving the airport in Melbourne was provided as part of a “joint agency operation decision in the interest of airport security”. She did not comment on what assistance was provided in Sydney.

The effort to bring back the cohort from the al-Roj detention camp was spearheaded by former lawyer and humanitarian campaigner Robert Van Aalst, who The Australian revealed as the mastermind behind the successful repatriations.

Mr Van Aalst was also seen leaving the airport in Melbourne on Tuesday night.

Nesrine left Sydney aged 21 but maintains she did not knowingly enter Syria but was taken into ISIS territory when trying to deliver aid to refugees in 2015.

She later married Australian-born jihadist Ahmed Merhi but claims it was a means of survival.

Sumaya, a mother of three, is the sister of former Sydney maths teacher Muhammad Zahab, who joined ISIS and was killed in a 2018 air strike.

Amina is the mother of Sumaya and Muhammad Zahab. She has expressed regret about following her son to Syria.

Rosse-Emile, who has two children, previously lived in ­Dandenong before travelling to Syria with her husband, ­Moroccan-born Nabil Kadmiry. Kadmiry later became an Islamic State fighter and was stripped of his Australian citizenship in 2019.

Little is publicly known about Kawsar Kanj and Hyam Raad but they were understood to have multiple children each.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62767

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648559 (262347ZMAY26) Notable: Anti-corruption chief Paul Brereton resigns amid misconduct scrutiny - National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Paul Brereton has resigned following months of scrutiny over alleged conflicts of interest linked to his ongoing ties with the Australian Defence Force. Brereton said attention on matters relating to him personally was distracting from the NACC’s work and the organisation was now established enough for new leadership. He has faced investigation for officer misconduct and criticism over undeclared advisory work with the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force while overseeing corruption referrals connected to Defence. The NACC also faced controversy after initially declining to investigate officials identified by the Robodebt royal commission. Brereton later recused himself from Defence-related referrals after concerns emerged over conflicts of interest and his continuing Army Reserve role.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62723

>>62736

Anti-corruption chief Paul Brereton resigns amid misconduct scrutiny

RICHARD FERGUSON and STEPHEN RICE - May 25, 2026

Besieged National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Paul Brereton has resigned after months of scrutiny over alleged conflicts of interest and criticism of his handling of corruption complaints.

It was revealed in February that Mr Brereton is being investigated for officer misconduct – and was reprimanded by federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland – for failing to adequately address the nature of his ongoing ties to the Australian Defence Force.

The move followed revelations of undisclosed work by Mr Brereton with the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force, and concerns about the potential for conflicts of interest in corruption complaints about Defence.

On Monday, Mr Brereton said the focus on him was taking away from the NACC’s work and he was ready to leave the organisation now the anti-corruption body was up and running.

“The ongoing focus on matters relating to me personally rather than the commission’s work is drawing attention away from the commission’s core purpose of strengthening integrity in the commonwealth public sector, which has always been my primary focus as commissioner,” he said in a statement.

“I believe that the commission’s success is paramount, and not due to any single person. While I will continue to resist any suggestion of impropriety, I have decided that it is time, now that the commission is established and functioning with quality staff and good processes, to step aside and allow a new commissioner to lead it into the next phase of its development into a key and respected component of the integrity architecture of the commonwealth.”

Mr Brereton had continued to act in an advisory capacity to the Inspector-General over the Afghanistan war crimes inquiry, which he had headed, despite confirming he had relinquished his role as assistant to the IGADF role prior to becoming NACC commissioner.

Mr Brereton, who holds the rank of Major General in the Army Reserve, was also given special permission to stay on in the reserves past retirement age so he could continue to provide advice.

Mr Brereton had said his work with the IGADF was infrequent when it was later revealed that he had provided advice on more than 20 occasions. He then recused himself from Defence-related corruption referrals to the watchdog.

Neither Ms Furness or NACC CEO Philip Reed had been aware of Mr Brereton’s consulting arrangement with the ADF.

The NACC has been mired in scandal since it declined to investigate six public officials identified by the Robodebt royal commission for possible corruption, a decision that led to a finding of “officer misconduct” against Mr Brereton over a conflict of interest in the case.

The NACC’s decision was overturned after an independent review, but alarm over the agency’s lack of transparency and accountability has continued.

Last June, the NACC announced it was abandoning any further investigation of the Albanese government’s $2.4m compensation payout to Brittany Higgins, stating it had “conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the settlement and found no corruption issue”.

Ms Rowland told Mr Brereton in October last year that his declaration of interests “do not provide details of the nature and extent of the activities you are undertaking at the request of IGADF”.

“No declaration was made of the extension in June 2024 of your compulsory Defence retirement age to August 2026. Nor did the commission’s responses to questions at Senate estimates in February 2025 adequately address the nature of your ongoing engagement and provision of advice to the IGADF.”

Greens senator David Shoebridge pointed out that Defence was “embroiled in a series of multi-million-dollar procurement scandals” and that the NACC had over 120 Defence referrals.

“Why is Commissioner Brereton being paid over $800,000 a year not to work on Defence referrals?’ Senator Shoebridge asked. “It remains untenable for Commission Brereton to stay as the NACC Commissioner given his repeated failure to deal with his own conflicts of interest.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anticorruption-chief-paul-brereton-resigns-amid-misconduct-scrutiny/news-story/b1f1212d4fa87464582159316938c0ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt785ERjO1Y

https://qresear.ch/?q=Paul+Brereton

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62768

File: 931faa9975f6684⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,3072x2304,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8965f10e5ec4124⋯.jpg (136.55 KB,1029x1372,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 770199afdf49bea⋯.jpg (210.01 KB,1061x796,1061:796,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648642 (270009ZMAY26) Notable: Coalition sounds alarm over law change easing war crimes prosecution - The Coalition has raised concerns over retrospective changes to Australia’s war crimes laws made by the Albanese government while former Special Air Service soldier Oliver Schulz was facing the nation’s first war crime murder prosecution. The 2024 amendment altered the definition of “hors de combat”, or “out of combat”, reducing the number of conditions prosecutors must prove in war crimes cases. The revised definition is also expected to apply in proceedings against former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith and future prosecutions linked to the Brereton Report. Critics warned the retrospective application of the law back to 2002 could undermine legal protections and make convictions easier to secure. The government says the changes correct a drafting error and align Australian law with international humanitarian law and the International Criminal Court framework.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

Coalition sounds alarm over law change easing war crimes prosecution

ELIZABETH PIKE - May 25, 2026

1/2

Labor lowered the threshold to prove a war crime while an Australian soldier was facing the charge for the first time in the country’s history, with expectations the change could also affect the upcoming trial of the nation’s most decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith.

The opposition is expected to use the legal and constitutional affairs Senate estimates on Monday to grill department heads on why former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus changed the definition of “hors de combat” in 2024 while the prosecution of Oliver Schulz was on foot.

But the government said the changes were designed to make the definition consistent with international law, which was intended from the outset, even though this reform was not acted on until the first war crime case was brought forward in Australia almost 22 years later.

The modified definition is also expected to be used by the commonwealth in its case against Mr Roberts-Smith and any future war crimes prosecutions, after the Office of the Special Investigator said it would pursue further cases following the Brereton Report.

Mr Schulz and Mr Roberts-Smith are facing charges of war crime murder for allegedly killing people who were hors de combat, or “out of combat”, during their service with the Special Air Service in Afghanistan.

Labor successfully changed the definition in 2024 to make it less difficult for the prosecution to prove a victim was “out of combat” by establishing just two grounds that must be satisfied, instead of all three.

Since the law was introduced in 2002, the prosecution had to prove a victim was under the power of an “adverse party”, expressed an intention to surrender or could not defend themselves, and did not act in hostility and attempt to escape.

The argument collapsed if all three criteria could not be met, but the government’s changes require only that the victim was not hostile and tried to escape, along with any one of the other elements.

The watered-down changes were also applied retrospectively, capturing “any conduct engaged in or after September 26, 2002”, including court cases that have not been finalised.

At the time, Mr Dreyfus told parliament the change was designed to correct a “drafting error” dating back to 2002 while aligning Australia’s definition with international legislation.

Senator Murray Watt also assured parliament the changes would “not change the substance of the law” and were in line with the practice of the Australian Defence Force, which trained and operated under the definition used in the International Criminal Court.

However, a Senate standing committee flagged significant concerns with the new definition less than one month before it passed parliament in October 2024.

The committee warned Labor had provided “no information” about the impact of applying the law retrospectively back to 2002, and cautioned that this would go against the “basic rule of law” that people cannot be charged with offences that were not illegal at the time.

“The committee notes that applying this retrospectively may have a detrimental impact on individuals,” the committee’s report read.

A legal expert, who preferred to remain anonymous, said retrospective legislation “increases the likelihood that a person will be tried and found guilty of criminal offences, particularly serious criminal offences”.

They noted that current legislation was “ripe” for review, with the trial of Mr Schulz set to begin next February. A trial date for Mr Roberts-Smith’s matter is yet to be set.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62769

File: 75367610a26f43a⋯.jpg (531.08 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648660 (270015ZMAY26) Notable: Two men held over alleged role in aftermath of Dezi Freeman shootings - Victoria Police have arrested two men in northeast Victoria as part of ongoing investigations into the movements of Dezi Freeman after the fatal shooting of two police officers near Porepunkah in August 2025. Detectives from Taskforce Summit detained a 48-year-old man and a 45-year-old man at separate locations and said both would be interviewed by investigators. Police said the investigation remained ongoing and declined to provide further details. The arrests follow the opening stage of coronial inquests into the deaths of Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart and Freeman. The Victorian Coroners Court recently heard Freeman fatally shot both officers during a police operation before later dying during a siege at Thologolong after a seven-month manhunt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62758

Two men held over alleged role in aftermath of Dezi Freeman shootings

JOHN FERGUSON - 27 May 2026

Two men have been arrested by police over the aftermath of the Dezi Freeman police killings.

The men from northeast Victoria were arrested in relation to where Freeman went after killing the officers outside Porepunkah on August 26.

Police said in a statement: “Detectives from Taskforce Summit arrested two people this morning as part of their ongoing investigation into the movements of Desmond Freeman following the fatal shooting of two police officers in Porepunkah last August.’’

“A 48-year-old man and a 45-year-old man were arrested on 26 May at two separate locations in northeast Victoria.

“The pair will now be interviewed by police.

“The investigation remains ongoing and as such, we are not in a position to provide further details at this immediate time.”

The arrests come after the first stage of the coronial inquiries into the deaths of the police and Freeman, in separate incidents.

It was revealed that Freeman asked Victoria Police’s elite tactical officers to “have a beer” with him moments before he was shot dead during the dramatic siege.

Details of Freeman’s final hours in Thologolong and the Porepunkah killings were aired in the Victorian Coroners Court on Monday, where an inquest into the deaths of two police officers was heard alongside a separate inquest into his fatal police shooting.

The Porepunkah inquest heard Freeman had shot Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson in the face after he breached his makeshift home on Rayner Track, then took Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart’s service handgun after shooting him in the head from behind, later using it to fire again at Thompson when he was already dead.

Both inquests were attended by family members of the fallen officers, including Thompson’s sisters Dianne Thompson and Lois Kirk. De Waart-Hottart’s family was dialled in from Belgium.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/two-men-held-over-alleged-role-in-aftermath-of-dezi-freeman-shootings/news-story/12d802980309bf7a36281fbba25ab025

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62770

File: 6f1660521dc4d9d⋯.jpg (1.57 MB,4617x3078,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 287909c2b17aab8⋯.jpg (214.57 KB,2048x1303,2048:1303,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648677 (270021ZMAY26) Notable: Joe Hockey says he is nervous about AUKUS - and wants Albanese to cold-call Trump - Former US ambassador Joe Hockey says he is increasingly concerned the United States may struggle to supply Virginia-class nuclear submarines to Australia under the AUKUS pact because of slow American production rates. Hockey said Australia needed stronger political engagement in Washington to ensure it remained a priority as US shipyards tried to increase submarine output. He also urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to build a closer relationship with US President Donald Trump through regular direct contact. Incoming defence force chief Mark Hammond defended AUKUS as achievable despite political and industrial risks, while former Trump chief of staff Mick Mulvaney questioned whether the US could build enough submarines to meet Australia’s timetable.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62750

Joe Hockey says he is nervous about AUKUS – and wants Albanese to cold-call Trump

Matthew Knott - May 26, 2026

1/2

Former ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey says he is worried about the possibility the United States will not supply nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as promised under the AUKUS pact because of faltering American production rates.

The former treasurer also urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to make a habit of cold-calling US President Donald Trump to improve their relationship and influence his thinking on world affairs.

Hockey’s remarks came as the incoming defence force chief Mark Hammond called for critics to “stop politicising” the AUKUS pact as he insisted the challenging project could be successfully delivered.

Under the AUKUS plan, the US is supposed to sell three Virginia-class attack submarines to Australia, starting from 2032.

But senior US navy officials have warned that US shipyards must start pumping out significantly more submarines to have any spare for Australia, raising the possibility of the defence force being left with a capability gap.

Hockey, who served as Australia’s top diplomat in Washington from 2016 to 2020, told the National Press Club that “for the first time, I’m a little nervous about the Virginias, and that’s after a few conversations on the Hill”.

The US, he said, “just has not got the production of the Virginia up to speed”.

Hockey’s remarks are notable because he runs a Washington-based lobbying firm that represents major defence companies and he has been a passionate champion of AUKUS.

His remarks differ from those of fellow former US ambassador Kevin Rudd, who told this masthead last week that there was “zero possibility” of AUKUS coming unstuck.

Asked whether there was a growing danger the sale of Virginia-class submarines could be delayed or pared back, Hockey said: “I think the risk has increased, and we need again to have a full court press on the ground in Washington.”

He said that “we’ve got to prove that we’re ready for the Virginias here and display the physical capability to house them and to support their presence here, not to give the Americans any hook not to deliver”.

Hockey did not join calls for Australia to develop a “plan B” for AUKUS, saying it was not like Albanese could “go down to Bunnings” and buy a fleet of alternative submarines.

Hockey singled out US Deputy Secretary of War Steve Feinberg as a powerful official that Australia needed to court to ensure Trump’s vow that AUKUS is going “full steam ahead” is followed through.

“We’ve got to get political buy-in, more political buy-in, so that the people who are actually making the decisions on US procurement are keeping us at the top of the list,” he said.

Hockey said there was “no problem at a military-to-military or bureaucracy-to-bureaucracy level, it’s just a question of whether they can actually build the Virginias fast enough”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62771

File: 3774ca638bbc21e⋯.jpg (305.12 KB,1440x1081,1440:1081,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5ced953fd5d5034⋯.jpg (368.26 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648692 (270026ZMAY26) Notable: Coalition pushes to amend Sex Discrimination Act after Giggle v Tickle - The Coalition is pushing to amend Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act to define sex as “binary and biological” following the Federal Court ruling against Giggle app founder Sall Grover in the Giggle v Tickle case. National Party MP Alison Penfold introduced a private member’s bill aimed at clarifying definitions of “man”, “woman” and “sex” within federal law after the court found Grover unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by removing her from a female-only networking app. Penfold said the proposal would not remove gender identity protections but was intended to preserve women’s spaces and legal protections based on biological sex. Nationals leader Matt Canavan said the changes sought to recognise the “uniqueness” of biological males and females within anti-discrimination law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62700

Coalition pushes to amend Sex Discrimination Act after Giggle v Tickle

Ria Pandey - May 25, 2026

The Coalition is pushing to rewrite sex discrimination laws to define biological sex after a woman was found by the Federal Court to have discriminated against a transgender woman by removing her from a female-only networking app.

Earlier this month, the court upheld its finding that Giggle app founder Sall Grover directly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle twice, when she chose to remove Ms Tickle from the networking app.

In 2013, the federal government – then led by Julia Gillard – amended the Act to make it unlawful to discriminate on the grounds of gender identity.

But the Act does not include a definition of man, woman or sex.

On Monday, National Party MP Alison Penfold introduced a private members bill which she said would include changes to ensure “sex is binary and biological”.

“The current Act sees sex as on a spectrum and that sex is changeable and that has enabled the court to take effectively rights away from women to their own spaces,” Ms Penfold said.

She clarified did not seek to remove gender identity as a protected attribute.

“I’m not seeking for blanket discrimination against transgender Australians,” Ms Penfold said.

“I’m simply trying to reflect reality and create the space and choice and safety where it’s necessary for women.

“And that should not be controversial.”

Nationals leader Matt Canavan, speaking alongside Ms Penfold, said the changes were about highlighting the “uniqueness” between biological men and women.

“We still then can also define and protect those that have different gender identities,” he said.

“But there is something unique about a biological female, a biological male, and it’s that binary definition of biological sexes that is now absent from our laws, possibly inadvertently absent.

“I’m not even sure the Julia Gillard government knew what they were doing that long ago.”

Ms Grover, also present at the press conference, welcomed the opposition’s support.

“Women and girls need protections in law,” she said.

“I would really just like this issue fixed as quickly as possible.”

https://www.news.com.au/technology/coalition-pushes-to-amend-sex-discrimination-act-after-giggle-v-tickle/news-story/4301ac031a2a2037485823c5121175ae

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62772

File: c865809f9dd2797⋯.jpg (420.88 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ade1424d5bdcf2⋯.jpg (225.61 KB,1600x901,1600:901,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 11e7c294365ad35⋯.jpg (472.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e3c9236cf24fa22⋯.jpg (428.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b82ad071a4d0813⋯.jpg (481.08 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648784 (270048ZMAY26) Notable: Julia Gillard ducks questions on gender-based rights at Hay-on-Wye literary festival - Former prime minister Julia Gillard faced protests and criticism at the Hay-on-Wye literary festival over amendments her government made to Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act in 2013. During a panel appearance, a protester accused Gillard of undermining women’s sex-based rights through gender identity protections introduced under the legislation before moderators ended audience questions. The protest followed demonstrations in London supporting Giggle app founder Sall Grover after the Federal Court ruled transgender woman Roxanne Tickle had been unlawfully discriminated against when removed from the female-only networking app. Grover has argued the ruling effectively weakened legal protections for women-only spaces. Gillard’s panel discussion focused on misogyny, toxic masculinity and social issues affecting younger generations, but she did not address criticism of the 2013 legislative changes during the event.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62753

Julia Gillard ducks questions on gender-based rights at Hay-on-Wye literary festival

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - May 26, 2026

Former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard has ducked a question at the Hay-on-Wye literary festival about the law she introduced in 2013 that restricts women’s gender-based rights.

A small number of pro-women campaigners attended the festival, where Ms Gillard was a panel member and introduced as a “kick-arse woman” on Monday evening local time. Earlier, the campaigners erected a large banner in the auditorium that read, “Julia Gillard Destroyer of Women’s Rights”.

One of the women attempted to ask a question of Ms Gillard towards the end of her hour-long talk, saying: “What about Sall Grover? Julia, you destroyed women’s sex-based rights with your legislation you passed in 2013, you made it impossible for women and lesbians to meet together without accepting men”, before she was interrupted by moderator Katya Adler, who said “we are finished”, to some applause from the audience members.

The attempted intervention comes just two days after a protest was staged outside the Australian high commission in central London in support of Ms Grover and amid increasing calls for a change to Australia’s sex discrimination laws. Around 100 people at the protest drew attention to the Australian legal position in relation to women’s spaces, demanding that the Act is changed similar to the UK Supreme Court ruling that has ruled that sex under the UK Act is based on biology, not feelings or identity.

Australian Ms Grover had attempted to create a women-only app called Giggle but was sued by Roxy Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a trans woman. In a full Federal Court appeal on May 15, the judges ruled biological men can have access to women’s spaces under the Sex Discrimination Act.

Ms Grover wrote in The Australian on the weekend: “The judges ruled that noticing a man looks like a man can itself be unlawful, because ‘looking like a man’ is now treated as a protected aspect of gender identity.

“They declared that sex is changeable under the Act. The legal category of ‘woman’ has ­effectively been made unisex. Women’s rights to single-sex spaces, forged through decades of advocacy, were rendered invisible.”

However, instead of prompting Ms Gillard about why she changed Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act and how it has now been interpreted by the law, the Hay festival panellists indulged themselves in an anti-male politician whinge-a-thon, discussing how “every single day” women are judged differently. No questions were taken from the floor.

Ms Gillard spoke about toxic masculinity, social media bans for young people, and how young Gen Z men are now more conservative than Baby Boomer males. But she failed to touch on how her government amended the Sex Discrimination Act to make it unlawful to discriminate on the grounds of gender identity.

Ms Grover had predicted such an outcome, writing: “As Julia Gillard steps on to the international stage this Monday to opine on misogyny and sexism, Australian women will keep cleaning up the disastrous legacy of her government’s 2013 changes.

“Everyone knows, deep down, that a woman is an adult human ­female. No court ruling, no quiet legislative amendment slipped through parliament and no amount of ideological pressure can rewrite that truth. This battle for women’s rights will not stop here. I will never be lectured on misogyny by that woman, and neither should you.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/gillard-duck-questions-on-gender-based-rights-at-hayonwye-literary-festival/news-story/748d9a0586763c5c8c8e75088848d78f

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/protester-confronts-julia-gillard-branding-her-a-destroyer-of-womens-rights/news-story/fc0f35d0d0728198c8431a57ada73a9c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62773

File: 09a2d285c0cf1bd⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,2048x3151,2048:3151,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 76b7aefc4f22bbe⋯.jpg (203.08 KB,968x1290,484:645,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 905795aa203fe2b⋯.jpg (220.68 KB,968x1291,968:1291,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5400195a9682858⋯.jpg (522.88 KB,2047x1536,2047:1536,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e0a7a36212a4fe2⋯.jpg (382.42 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24648876 (270111ZMAY26) Notable: ‘Bike boy’ Ryan Meuleman charged with carjacking - Ryan Meuleman, who was seriously injured in a 2013 collision involving former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews, has been charged with carjacking after an alleged attack on a woman in Pakenham. Police allege Meuleman, while on bail, entered the woman’s vehicle in a carpark while her two children were inside and fought with her before a bystander intervened and restrained him until police arrived. He was charged with carjacking, vehicle theft, breaching bail and providing a false name, before being refused bail in the Dandenong Magistrates’ Court. The woman and her children were uninjured. Meuleman is also pursuing defamation action against Andrews over public comments made after the 2013 crash, while his father blamed alleged drug use for his son’s behaviour.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24260370 (pb)

‘Bike boy’ Ryan Meuleman charged with carjacking

Seb Costello - May 7, 2026

The young man who nearly died after a collision with a vehicle carrying ex-premier Daniel Andrews and his wife has been charged with carjacking, after allegedly attempting to force a woman from her vehicle in front of her two young children.

Ryan Meuleman was allegedly on bail when he entered the woman’s vehicle while she sat with her family in a carpark off Henry Rd, Pakenham on Sunday May 3 at 9.55pm.

According to investigators, Mr Meuleman fought with the woman before a good Samaritan noticed the struggle and intervened, holding the alleged offender down until the police arrived.

He has been charged with carjacking, vehicle theft, stating a false name and breaching bail.

He appeared in the Dandenong Magistrates’ Court on May 4, where bail was refused.

Detectives from the Casey Crime Investigation Unit will allege the woman was not known to Mr Meuleman.

The woman and her children escaped the attack unharmed.

Mr Meuleman has been the subject of multiple court cases since he was injured in the dramatic collision with the Andrews’ Ford Territory in January 2013.

The crash, dubbed the “bike boy” case, resulted in Mr Meuleman – then 15 years old – being knocked off his bicycle while riding along a path in Blairgowrie.

Mr Meuleman was flown to the Royal Children’s Hospital where he spent 10 days battling life-threatening injuries and later lost part of his spleen.

Mr Meuleman’s father Peter told the Herald Sun there was “no excuse” for his son’s alleged actions, saying “the kid I knew and loved would never do this”.

“I knew he was in a bad place but this is unthinkable,” he said.

“There is absolutely no excuse for what has happened and Ryan wouldn’t be like this if he wasn’t drug affected.

“If children were involved, I don’t know what to say. Unforgivable. Absolutely unforgivable.”

Ryan Meuleman is currently suing Daniel Andrews in the Federal Court over public statements the former Premier has made in the years since the incident.

A person familiar with that case told the Herald Sun the recent charges do not change anything from their perspective and that they intend to proceed with the defamation action.

In court documents, Mr Meuleman alleges that due to Mr Andrews statements, he “has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial hurt, distress and embarrassment”.

In his 27-page defence document, Mr Andrews accused Mr Meuleman of using the action to gain publicity “rather than to seek vindication of his reputation or a solatium for injured feelings”.

The Herald Sun revealed in January that Mr Meuleman had checked himself into a Melbourne treatment centre for “psychological and other health issues”.

Those close to Ryan had noticed that his mental health had deteriorated in recent weeks.

Concerned friends attended Mr Meuleman’s Pakenham home on Monday and discovered the door open and his mobile phone lying unattended inside.

Mr Meuleman will return to court at a later date.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-victoria/bike-boy-ryan-meuleman-charged-with-carjacking/news-story/9eaf4f7dc92067dbf90c95f50124381a

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ryan+Meuleman

https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Andrews

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62774

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649775 (270832ZMAY26) Notable: Quad sharpens response to China with minerals and maritime push - (Video) Foreign ministers Penny Wong of Australia, S. Jaishankar of India, Takeshi Iwaya of Japan and Marco Rubio of the United States have agreed to strengthen Quad co-operation on critical minerals, maritime security and energy resilience, unveiling plans to mobilise up to $20 billion in public and private investment and jointly develop port infrastructure in Fiji. Meeting in New Delhi, the four nations announced a new framework to support critical minerals projects and improve supply chain security. The group also launched the Indo-Pacific Maritime Surveillance Collaboration to expand information sharing and maritime monitoring across the region. Members expressed concern about coercive actions in the South China Sea and East China Sea, while reaffirming support for freedom of navigation, international law and secure energy supply chains.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62760

Quad sharpens response to China with minerals and maritime push

JOE KELLY - 27 May 2026

1/2

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined fellow Quad nations in agreeing to mobilise $20bn in private and public funding to build more secure critical minerals supply chains and take fresh steps to champion energy and maritime security – including the joint delivery of port infrastructure in the Pacific Islands, starting with Fiji.

The new measures – announced at a meeting of Quad foreign ministers in New Delhi – are aimed at countering rising Chinese influence and building resilience in the wake of the US conflict with Iran which has disrupted global energy supply.

A meeting of the Foreign Ministers of Australia, India, Japan and the US has now elevated

co-operation on critical minerals as a major priority for the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, and the range of initiatives unveiled will be widely interpreted as a response to growing Chinese ambition.

A new framework will identify critical minerals projects that could supply Quad markets and support them through the mobilisation of private capital or other government tools “such as guarantees, loans, equity participation, insurance, subsidies, and offtake or other commercial arrangements as appropriate.”

In addition, the Quad nations have agreed to strengthen maritime surveillance efforts in the Indian Ocean through a new initiative dubbed the Indo-Pacific Maritime Surveillance Collaboration (IPMSC).

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whose goal has been to turn the Quad grouping into

a vehicle for action, said the launch of the IPMSC would “leverage each of our countries’ maritime surveillance capabilities” to enhance information sharing.

“Related to that is also the expansion of the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative, which provides and can provide near real-time commercial maritime domain awareness data to countries throughout the Indo-Pacific,” he said.

The idea is to enable the Quad partners to share real-time information about the vessels in the region in support of their shared objective to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region. The Quad aims to develop a comprehensive Common Operational Picture (COP) allowing member nations to share a common real time picture of maritime activity across the region.

Mr Rubio also said Quad members would be “partnering on issues of port infrastructure, in particular in response to insufficient port capacity in the Pacific Islands.”

“We’re announcing plans to work with Fiji to advance that country’s port infrastructure. It’ll be the first time that the Quad partners work together on a project, on a port infrastructure project,” he said.

“We believe it will be very successful and that it will serve as a model for other projects in the future.”

Member nations also issued a statement on Indo-Pacific Energy Security and are working to uphold energy stability following the widespread disruption to supply caused by the ongoing US/Iran conflict.

Areas of co-operation to deepen energy resilience among member nations will be identified, and a Quad Fuel Security Forum will be held to facilitate high-level discussions.

“On energy and fuel security, we’ll be announcing the Quad Initiative on Indo-Pacific Energy Security that will help strengthen regional energy resilience,” Mr Rubio said. “The Department of Energy from the United States will be hosting Quad partners later this year for a fuel security forum to further expand on this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62775

File: a6af153c7e0935b⋯.jpg (325.71 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2331aac3bb03e5f⋯.jpg (163.42 KB,600x469,600:469,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649780 (270839ZMAY26) Notable: Chinese FM says it opposes forming exclusive groupings after Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting; bloc a patchwork of interests with divergences: Chinese expert - "During the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting held in New Delhi, India, on Tuesday, the grouping expanded cooperation in critical minerals and energy while unveiling new measures to boost maritime surveillance and port infrastructure across the "Indo-Pacific," media reported. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson responded on the same day that China opposes forming exclusive groupings or engaging in bloc confrontation. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning made the remarks during Tuesday's regular press conference when asked to comment that the US, Japan, India and Australia have launched a maritime surveillance initiative for the so-called "Indo-Pacific" region, and also announced plans to partner with Fiji on port infrastructure. Mao said that China has stated its position on Quad on multiple occasions. Cooperation between countries should be conducive to regional peace, stability and prosperity, and not target any third party ... Seemingly focusing on maritime surveillance, port construction, critical minerals and energy security, the Quad actually securitizes economic matters and turns development issues into bloc-based competition with clear strategic aims, Chen Hong, director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times ... Chen said that their so-called cooperation on critical minerals and energy security is not a purely market-oriented collaboration ... Despite rhetoric about a "free and open Indo-Pacific," the grouping's true aim is to reshape regional order through exclusive blocs, Chen added. Regional security cannot be achieved via surveillance, nor can energy security be realized by excluding China ... Chen said that Quad members have a patchwork of interests. All seek to leverage the bloc but are reluctant to bear excessive costs for it. Their repeated emphasis on unity only reflects persistent internal rifts that need constant mending. However, if cooperation is turned into confrontation and development into containment, it will backfire and arouse vigilance among regional countries, Chen added." - Zhang Wanshi, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62760

>>62774

Chinese FM says it opposes forming exclusive groupings after Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting; bloc a patchwork of interests with divergences: Chinese expert

Zhang Wanshi - May 27, 2026

During the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting held in New Delhi, India, on Tuesday, the grouping expanded cooperation in critical minerals and energy while unveiling new measures to boost maritime surveillance and port infrastructure across the "Indo-Pacific," media reported. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson responded on the same day that China opposes forming exclusive groupings or engaging in bloc confrontation.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning made the remarks during Tuesday's regular press conference when asked to comment that the US, Japan, India and Australia have launched a maritime surveillance initiative for the so-called "Indo-Pacific" region, and also announced plans to partner with Fiji on port infrastructure. Mao said that China has stated its position on Quad on multiple occasions. Cooperation between countries should be conducive to regional peace, stability and prosperity, and not target any third party.

The Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting was chaired by Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and attended by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi, Indian media outlet The Hindu reported.

In his media statement on Tuesday, Rubio claimed the Quad meeting decided to launch an Indo-Pacific Maritime Surveillance Cooperation Initiative. Rubio also announced expansion of the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative among the Quad nations. He also claimed the Quad has decided to roll out a new initiative to boost port infrastructure in the Pacific Islands, according to The Hindu.

Rubio also announced the Quad Critical Minerals Framework, per The Hindu. This, he claims, will guide each of the countries to leverage economic policy tools and coordinate investment to strengthen critical mineral supply chains including in mining, processing and recycling.

This Quad cooperation was described by some media as having China in mind, with Reuters claiming that Quad countries share concerns about China. The Hindu report claimed the meeting came amid rising global concerns over the country.

Seemingly focusing on maritime surveillance, port construction, critical minerals and energy security, the Quad actually securitizes economic matters and turns development issues into bloc-based competition with clear strategic aims, Chen Hong, director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times.

Echoing Chen, Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times that securitizing economic issues runs counter to the interests and aspirations of countries in the Asia-Pacific region.

Chen said that their so-called cooperation on critical minerals and energy security is not a purely market-oriented collaboration.

Despite rhetoric about a "free and open Indo-Pacific," the grouping's true aim is to reshape regional order through exclusive blocs, Chen added. Regional security cannot be achieved via surveillance, nor can energy security be realized by excluding China.

The brief meeting was the third such gathering of the group since September 2024. The four-nation group had lost some momentum last year after failing to hold a leaders' summit, amid tensions between US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Washington's tariffs and other matters, per Reuters.

Japanese media outlet Mainichi also noted that no leaders' meeting has taken place since the launch of the second administration of US President, who has placed less emphasis on multilateral diplomacy.

The meeting comes against the backdrop of uncertainty over the pace of high-level Quad engagement, including delays in convening a leaders' summit that had been expected earlier, The Economic Times reported on Tuesday.

Foreign ministers did not comment on the possibility of a summit later this year, but over the weekend, Rubio said that diplomats would work toward a meeting later this year, Reuters reported.

Chen said that Quad members have a patchwork of interests. All seek to leverage the bloc but are reluctant to bear excessive costs for it. Their repeated emphasis on unity only reflects persistent internal rifts that need constant mending.

However, if cooperation is turned into confrontation and development into containment, it will backfire and arouse vigilance among regional countries, Chen added.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202605/1362013.shtml

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202605/t20260526_11918267.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62776

File: 034cf55c114c5eb⋯.jpg (201.53 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6617cd0cdf654b3⋯.jpg (285.71 KB,1923x1082,1923:1082,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649783 (270843ZMAY26) Notable: New Solomons Islands’ PM to visit Australia for talks with Albanese - New Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale will visit Canberra next week for talks with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his first overseas trip since being elected. The visit comes amid hopes Wale will strengthen ties with Australia while maintaining Solomon Islands’ relationship with China. Foreign Minister Penny Wong has signalled Australia is open to upgrading its 2017 security treaty with Honiara if the new government is interested. Wale previously criticised the 2022 security pact between Solomon Islands and China, although he has not pledged to overturn it. The talks are expected to focus on regional security, policing co-operation, climate change and Australia’s expanding engagement across the Pacific as Canberra seeks to counter growing Chinese influence in the region.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

New Solomons Islands’ PM to visit Australia for talks with Albanese

BEN PACKHAM - 27 May 2026

New Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale will visit Australia next week for talks with Anthony Albanese amid hopes the former China critic will prioritise ties with Canberra ahead of those with Beijing.

Mr Wale is due to meet with Prime Minister Albanese in Canberra on Wednesday, in his first overseas trip since he was elected by his country’s MPs nearly a fortnight ago.

The upcoming trip comes after Foreign Minister Penny Wong signalled Australia’s interest in upgrading the nation’s 2017 security treaty with Honiara if Mr Wale was prepared to do so.

Solomon Islands has been one of the Pacific’s most pro-China countries since it ditched diplomatic ties with Taiwan in 2019, signing a controversial security pact with Beijing in 2022.

Mr Albanese said Mr Wale would be “a most honoured guest” and would be accompanied by a number of his senior cabinet ministers.

“It says a lot that the first international visit which he is choosing to make is here in Australia,” he told parliament.

“Despite the global challenges that we confront, we recognise that we’ll be stronger if we face these things together. The challenge of dealing with climate change; the challenge of dealing with security issues in our region.”

Mr Wale opposed former Solomon Islands prime minister Manasseh Sogavare’s security deal with Beijing, which allowed Chinese police to operate in the country and opened the door to Chinese warships to visit for “logistics replenishment”.

He said in opposition he would publish the text of the security agreement, which has been kept confidential, but stopped short of saying he would overturn the agreement.

Australia’s former high commissioner to Solomon Islands James Batley has described Mr Wale’s election as an “opportunity for Australia”, but warned the new leader was unlikely to make any decisive shift against China.

Senator Wong told The Australian last week that Australia’s “job will never be done” countering Chinese influence in the Pacific.

She said the Albanese government was “very enthusiastic” about working with Honiara, and was open to upgrading the countries’ security ties.

“We congratulate him on his election, and we were looking forward to engaging with him and with the new government on Solomon Islands,” she said.

“We’re open to elevation of our relationships with the Solomon Islands, or with any Pacific country, but obviously we’ll listen to what the government and people in Solomon Islands want.”

The Australian revealed last year that Chinese police in Solomon Islands were fingerprinting residents and getting them to fill out household registration cards under the guise of “community policing”.

Their presence in the country has complicated Australia’s longstanding policing support for Solomon Islands and future assistance under a $190m commitment by Anthony Albanese to build a new police academy in Honiara and provincial policing posts.

Senator Wong said the ­Albanese government had made clear that security support in the region should be provided by the Pacific Island Forum, of which Australia is a member.

Australia has committed $400m to a region-wide policing initiative, is pouring resources into fighting the flow of drugs through the Pacific, and is working with regional partners to develop a rapidly deployable natural disaster response group.

“We’re ramping up our efforts in the Pacific. Why are we doing that? It’s because it’s the region where Australia’s interests are most on the line,” Senator Wong said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/new-solomons-islands-pm-to-visit-australia-for-talks-with-albanese/news-story/5cec85316da79c896d6a93e17a967e37

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62777

File: 48c1d3ad45c1348⋯.jpg (227.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649792 (270853ZMAY26) Notable: Returned ISIS bride Nesrine Zahab ‘wants to study nursing’ - Nesrine Zahab, one of 19 Australian women and children repatriated from Syria this week, hopes to return to university and study nursing or social work, according to her family. Zahab’s father, Zakaria, said she regretted travelling to Syria and described the past decade as “the worst ten years of her life”. He thanked Australia and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for facilitating the family’s return. Zahab, her cousin Sumaya, her aunt Amina and other returnees arrived in Sydney under a high-security operation, while additional women and children arrived in Melbourne. Family members said Zahab was concerned about public reaction to her return but would accept any legal consequences if wrongdoing was established. Authorities have confirmed no charges have been laid, although investigations remain ongoing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62745

>>62746

>>62755

>>62766

Returned ISIS bride Nesrine Zahab ‘wants to study nursing’

BIMINI PLESSER - 27 May 2026

The father of an ISIS bride repatriated to Australia says she wants to go back to university to study nursing or social work now that she’s home, and is apologetic for ever going to Syria.

Nesrine Zahab’s father, Zakaria, recalled the family’s emotional reunion on Tuesday night, and said the years she was in Syria were “the worst ten years of her life”.

“She’s sorry that she put us in this situation,” he said.

Nesrine Zahab, her cousin Sumaya and her aunt Amina were returned to Australia from Syria along with 16 other women and children in a covert and high-security extraction on Tuesday night.

The Zahab family and Hyam Raad arrived in Sydney with their six children just after 5.30pm, while Kawsar Kanj and Kirsty Rosse-Emile landed in Melbourne with their seven children about an hour prior.

Zakaria thanked Australia and Anthony Albanese for allowing the safe return of his family and told reporters he was overjoyed to have his daughter home.

“I’m flying,” the 71-year-old said, sitting outside the family home.

“I am very happy. I’m thanking Australia and especially the (Prime Minister).

“I hope Australia stays that way. The best of the countries.”

The three Zahab women, Hyam Raad, and their children, were taken to Meriton Suites at Mascot in Sydney after their arrival. While they were at Meriton, The Australian witnessed a Domino’s Pizza delivery driver dropping off four boxes of pizza to reception of the hotel.

Nesrine, who was a nursing student before she left Australia, wants to go back to university, Zakaria said.

Zakaria said his daughter hoped to study nursing again, or perhaps social work. He described her as someone who “loves helping people”.

Nesrine’s brother, Ibrahim Zahab, said she was afraid of how some members of the community would react to her being back in Australia.

“Of course she’s going to be fearful,” he told reporters.

“There’s people out there that don’t want her back.”

When asked about the family’s plan moving forward, Ibrahim and Nesrine’s other brother Mohamad said they “trust the government” and its processes.

“If my sister, or any of the sisters, have done anything wrong, then they’ll be faced with the full force of the law,” Mohamad said.

“If she’s done something wrong, then yeah, we do, we do accept the full force of the law,” he said.

“But at the same time, these guys are Australian citizens, their kids are Australian citizens … if you’re saying for them to leave, if you don’t like the law in Australia, then you must leave, because we, we’re accepting the law.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/returned-isis-bride-nesrine-zahab-wants-to-study-nursing/news-story/7b84d0176b030317dfd94e7d34aab923

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62778

File: 8225327857ac02f⋯.jpg (2.88 MB,4608x3072,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c319987bd6cf91⋯.jpg (681 KB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649800 (270903ZMAY26) Notable: Deputy police chief held 'reservations' over expanding powers of Jewish security groups - A senior NSW Police commander has told the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission he would have “considerable reservations” about granting additional law-enforcement powers to private Jewish security organisations. Deputy Commissioner David Hudson said giving special powers to one community group could create divisions and friction within society. The commission heard Community Security Group NSW had requested a permanent police presence at the Chanukah by the Sea event before the December 2025 Bondi attack, where 15 people were killed. Evidence also examined intelligence-sharing practices between agencies and staffing within the NSW firearms registry, including a period when no dedicated senior intelligence analyst was employed. Public hearings have now concluded, with further evidence to be heard in closed sessions due to national security and criminal justice concerns.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Deputy police chief held 'reservations' over expanding powers of Jewish security groups

Phoebe Pin - 27 May 2026

1/2

The head of the NSW Police's investigations and counterterrorism operations has said he would have "considerable reservations" about expanding the powers of private Jewish security groups.

Deputy Commissioner David Hudson on Wednesday gave evidence to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, which is examining the circumstances surrounding the Bondi terror attack on December 14, 2025.

Fifteen people were killed in the shooting, which occurred during a Hanukkah celebration called Chanukah by the Sea.

A number of volunteers from Jewish security organisation Community Security Group NSW (CGS NSW) were present at the time of the attack, but were not armed.

The commission has heard CSG NSW requested a static police presence for the entirety of the Bondi Hanukkah celebration, with one CSG NSW witness telling the commission he was told by NSW Police resources would not be available for the duration of the event.

Deputy Commissioner Hudson was on Wednesday asked about the relationship between CSG and NSW Police.

Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster SC asked Deputy Commissioner Hudson to explain his view that police would have "considerable reservations" about granting additional powers and privileges to CSG in respect to law enforcement.

"Isolating a particular group for additional powers within our community is problematic," Deputy Commissioner Hudson said.

"It creates a disconnect between groups. It can cause friction between groups if one particular element of society is afforded privileges that others aren't."

Weeks after the Bondi attack, NSW Premier Chris Minns flagged that arming CSG NSW would be considered.

Mr Minns said the state government needed to take a "deeper look at arming CSG" in a step that "we haven't taken in the past".

The premier addressed the issue again in late April, saying discussions were ongoing.

"The specifics in relation to that need to be sorted out around a de-escalation procedure," he said.

"Because if you've got police attending the scene of a crime or an active shooter, then we want to make sure that people are safe, both the CSG and New South Wales Police.

"It's not a straightforward change, but I'm convinced that it really is [in the] longer run, one effective measure we can make to ensure that the Jewish community feels safe when they go to the public event."

The premier’s office on Wednesday declined to comment further.

Intelligence sharing scrutinised

The second hearing block has also examined how intelligence about individuals who came to the attention of authorities was utilised and shared between agencies.

Deputy Commissioner Hudson said NSW Police had encountered some difficulty in that area.

"From our perspective we take a very open interpretation [of information sharing guidelines]. If there is risk or threat, we will share information with other agencies," he said.

"Other agencies can on occasions not be so forthcoming."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62779

File: e0d8ff5db051025⋯.jpg (352.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f4c324297a3a3db⋯.jpg (237.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649810 (270911ZMAY26) Notable: Holocaust denial, death threats directed at royal commission witnesses - More than 1,000 antisemitic and abusive online messages were directed at witnesses who appeared before the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission, according to analysis by the Dor Foundation. The organisation said it identified hateful posts across major social media platforms between May 4 and 25, including death threats, Holocaust denial, Holocaust glorification, racist slurs and intimidation campaigns targeting witnesses, including children. The most serious examples were referred to authorities, including the eSafety Commissioner and the royal commission. Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell said she was closely monitoring potential witness intimidation and reprisals, while the Australian Federal Police confirmed it was investigating at least one complaint. The report argued that online abuse directed at witnesses highlighted the issues the inquiry was established to examine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Holocaust denial, death threats directed at royal commission witnesses

JAMES DOWLING - 27 May 2026

More than a thousand hateful or antisemitic messages have been directed at witnesses appearing before the Bondi royal commission this month, according to a Jewish non-profit which handed over its findings to authorities.

The Dor Foundation, whose chief executive Tahli Blicblau gave evidence to the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission, released on Wednesday an analysis of online hate directed at witnesses from the first hearing block, in which 74 individual witnesses testified.

The Dor Foundation said it identified more than a thousand offensive posts and replies on Twitter/X, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube between May 4 and 25. One of those targeted was an anonymous teenage girl who detailed the antisemitic bullying she faced in school.

The “most egregious examples” were passed to authorities, it said, including eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant and the royal commission.

Royal commissioner Virginia Bell on Tuesday warned she was “keeping a close eye” on potential witness intimidation and reprisal, including through online commentary, which the Dor Foundation said its referral had prompted.

The material it flagged included numerous conspiracy theories, mockeries of the Holocaust, and misogynistic tropes wound into antisemitic stereotypes.

“The abuse included death threats, Holocaust glorification, dehumanising racist slurs and intimidation campaigns targeting ordinary Australians, including children. This was not abstract hostility, but the direct targeting of individuals giving evidence about this very subject matter,” Ms Blicblau said.

“Many of the people targeted were not public figures. They are individuals sharing deeply personal experiences, but the message sent to them online was unmistakeable: speak up, and you will be punished for it.

“The royal commission was established to understand the lived experience of antisemitism. The online abuse that followed the first block of witness testimony is not incidental to the commission’s work – it is the commission’s work. It makes the need for this inquiry abundantly clear, and its ongoing work absolutely vital.”

In examples annexed to the report, online users pushed to “execute all Zionists”, called one witness a “fat oven dodger” and praised Adolf Hitler.

The commission’s first witness Sheina Gutnick was targeted, along with her late father Reuven Morrison who was murdered in the Bondi massacre.

“F*ck her and her chabad subhuman father,” one comment reads.

Antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal was branded a “cockroach” who “needs to be sprayed”, while the son of Holocaust survivors, Anthony Halas, was taunted with the phrase “Holohoax”.

At the beginning of the inquiry’s second week, a young girl given the pseudonym AAG described how she was targeted for being a Jew. When her testimony circulated online a social media user replied to say it was “terrible, that only a couple of students” were using Nazi salutes.

“We need to pick up those numbers. That is how we used to salute the flag and pledge allegiance,” the post reads. “White Power. Heil Hitler. Deport K*kes.”

Ms Blicblau said social media platforms were fostering antisemitism.

“We wouldn’t tolerate this sort of language or conduct in the physical world, and we shouldn’t tolerate it online where it can reach millions of people,” she said.

“Our online spaces have become the front line in the fight against antisemitism. Extreme hate no longer stays on the fringes. It spreads fast, it amplifies fast, and it becomes deeply personal very quickly.”

Ms Bell on Tuesday said the Australian Federal Police were investigating one case of alleged intimidation, which the AFP confirmed.

“We have received reports from a number of witnesses concerning a dramatic increase in online hate messages after they have given evidence,” the commissioner said.

The Australian previously reported how prominent anti-Israel activist and columnist Clementine Ford had joined the pile-on against Melbourne saxophonist and composer Joshua Moshe after he detailed being doxxed and having his career stunted.

Ford replied to an article reporting his testimony, saying: “Oh well.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/holocaust-denial-death-threats-directed-at-royal-commission-witnesses/news-story/994612626d252ad1c1fc579cb936cbba

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62780

File: 5521d5963782929⋯.jpg (262.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12ab36626a5f05b⋯.jpg (231.53 KB,1170x1561,1170:1561,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3773655b9c74955⋯.jpg (92.1 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649818 (270919ZMAY26) Notable: Man banned from going near Jewish hate inquiry after allegedly wearing swastika shirt outside hearing - A Sydney man has been banned from approaching the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission after allegedly wearing a shirt displaying a swastika outside the inquiry’s hearings. Ian Minus, 68, is accused of wearing a T-shirt bearing a swastika and the words “Anti-Semitism. Proud to be accused. Speak up!” outside the commission venue in Sydney’s CBD on May 6. Court documents show his bail conditions prohibit him from coming within 200 metres of the inquiry and from promoting antisemitism in public or on social media. He faces charges including displaying a prohibited Nazi symbol in public and knowingly displaying a Nazi symbol without excuse. The matter is scheduled to return to court on June 3.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39025 (pb)

>>62759

Man banned from going near Jewish hate inquiry after allegedly wearing swastika shirt outside hearing

CLAREESE PACKER - 27 May 2026

A man who allegedly wore a swastika shirt outside an inquiry into Jewish hate in Australia has been banned from going near the inquiry and promoting anti-Semitism, court documents reveal.

Ian Minus, 68, is accused of wearing a swastika on a T-shirt outside a Clarence St building in Sydney’s CBD, where the Royal Commission on Anti-Semitism and Social Cohesion was being held.

The shirt read “Anti-Semitism. Proud to be accused. Speak up!”

Court documents seen by NewsWire show Mr Minus is now barred from going within 200m of the royal commission as per his bail conditions.

He has also been prohibited from promoting anti-Semitism in public or on social media.

The 68-year-old was issued a move-on direction by police officers outside Clarence St on May 6 during the first week of the commission’s hearings.

He was charged with behaving in an offensive manner in/near public place/school and cause prohibited Nazi symbol to be displayed in a public place.

Mr Minus has now been hit with an additional charge of knowingly display by public act Nazi symbol without excuse, according to court documents.

Mr Minus claimed he was just having a coffee when approached by reporters outside the commission, asking them “Is this a swastika?” and “Is there a royal commission here, is there?”

Just metres away inside, Jewish Australians were sharing their harrowing experiences of anti-Semitism.

“I’m sorry, I’m just enjoying a cup of coffee in the streets of Sydney. Why am I being assailed in such fashion?” he said, later pointing to his shirt and saying “I am proud of this statement”.

His matter will next be before the courts on June 3.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/man-banned-from-going-near-jewish-hate-inquiry-after-allegedly-wearing-swastika-shirt-outside-hearing/news-story/2a761425ccbf7ee1d2a6abe86e89ce14

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62781

File: b2de39958e483cd⋯.mp4 (15.46 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: e829e3c4051d5f3⋯.jpg (480.35 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649831 (270940ZMAY26) Notable: Human rights chief argues trans women could be victims of pregnancy discrimination - (Video) Debate over Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act has intensified after Australian Human Rights Commission president Anna Cody told Senate estimates that transgender women could potentially be protected from pregnancy discrimination if treated unfairly because an employer believed they were pregnant or intended to become pregnant. Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash challenged the interpretation, arguing biological males cannot become pregnant and describing the position as evidence the law lacked clarity. The exchange follows the Federal Court’s Giggle v Tickle ruling and renewed calls from Coalition MPs to amend the Sex Discrimination Act to define sex as biological and binary. Nationals MP Alison Penfold said the discussion highlighted ambiguity in the legislation and strengthened the case for reform. Women’s rights campaigners have cited the issue as part of broader concerns about sex-based protections.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62771

Human rights chief argues trans women could be victims of pregnancy discrimination

ELIZABETH PIKE - 27 May 2026

The Australian Human Rights Commission has shockingly suggested that men who identify as female could be discriminated against on the grounds of their “potential pregnancy,” despite conceding that biological males cannot get pregnant.

The AHRC’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner Dr Anna Cody told the opposition at a budget estimates hearing on Wednesday that transgender women were eligible for protection if an employer did not hire them because they wanted or planned to get pregnant.

Dr Cody also accepted there was nothing stopping a man from “putting on a dress, walking in, and claiming the protections” under the Sex Discrimination Act, as it would be up to the court to decide if he was discriminated against.

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash told the hearing she was “very confused” by the argument as a “biological male cannot get pregnant”.

“If they can’t become pregnant, how can you then become potentially pregnant?” Senator Cash asked.

Dr Cody said the issue was “about the unlawful treatment by the employer”.

“If someone is treated unfairly on the basis of pregnancy or potential pregnancy then that is unlawful discrimination on the basis of pregnancy,” Dr Cody said.

“Someone who is a trans woman may be assumed to be pregnant or to be able to be pregnant.”

Dr Cody said the protections would “not apply to a man” but she would not accept that men and trans women were “both biologically” male.

“It makes no sense,” Senator Cash said, “you stated, a biological man can’t get pregnant, am I correct? Because if not, I’ve got to go back to school, I seriously do.”

“With all due respect it is the absurdity of the law yet again, which shows again the law needs to be changed because for the record, biological men, doesn’t matter which way you cut it, you cannot get pregnant.

“And quite frankly, it is an insult to women who are actually discriminated (against) because they want to have children.”

Senator Cash’s call to reform the Sex Discrimination Act comes after the Federal Court rejected Sall Grover’s appeal in her case against trans woman Roxanne Tickle, who accused the Giggle for Girls founder of discrimination for blocking her from the woman-only networking app.

The decision revived the debate about safe spaces for women and the definitions of gender law in Australia.

Ms Grover posted the budget exchange to social media on Tuesday night and tore into the debate.

“A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be women, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it,” Ms Grover captioned the post.

Former Czech-American tennis champion Martina Navratilova told Ms Grover “the further they go, the farther they fall … not a matter of if but only a matter of when” in a comment on the post, as the exchange picks up international attention.

Nationals MP Alison Penfold introduced a private members’ bill to parliament on Monday proposing an overhaul of the Sex Discrimination Act to reinstate the biological definitions of “man” and “woman” that were stripped under the under the Gillard government reforms.

The bill was drafted before the Giggle vs. Tickle case but aims to address the issues raised by the case.

Author and women’s rights activist JK Rowling re-posted a video of Ms Penfold’s speech to parliament with her 13.8m followers. The MP for Lyne told The Australian that Dr Cody’s comments “once again” demonstrated the urgent need for reform and legal clarity.

“When a senior public official responsible for administering and interpreting the act argues that men can be ‘potentially pregnant’, ordinary Australians are entitled to ask whether the law has drifted so far from common understanding that it no longer provides certainty or confidence,” Ms Penfold said.

“This is precisely why parliament cannot continue to avoid the issue. The courts and now senior officials have exposed deep ambiguity in the law.”

One Nation Barnaby Joyce added his voice to the issue on Thursday morning, telling 2GB the “potential pregnancy” argument was “total and utter crap”.

Dr Cody and the AHRC were contacted for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/human-rights-chief-argues-trans-women-could-be-victims-of-pregnancy-discrimination/news-story/a2e38dde8d9f0e662931ba9b67904c2a

https://x.com/salltweets/status/2058732168101433693

https://x.com/Martina/status/2059219726656577683

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62782

File: 308faa49a39f459⋯.jpg (263.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 04e483ab92167e6⋯.jpg (197.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649835 (270944ZMAY26) Notable: ABC news boss Justin Stevens quits abruptly - ABC News director Justin Stevens has resigned effective immediately after four years leading the public broadcaster’s news division, citing “professional and personal” reasons. Stevens, who joined the ABC in 2007 and became news director in 2022, informed staff of his decision this week. His departure comes ahead of a Senate estimates hearing and follows a tenure marked by significant editorial challenges, including the 2024 controversy over inaccurate gunshot audio used in a 7.30 report on Afghanistan. ABC managing director Hugh Marks thanked Stevens for his 19 years of service and praised his editorial leadership. The broadcaster is expected to appoint an external successor, which would be the first time this century the role has not been filled by an internal promotion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ABC news boss Justin Stevens quits abruptly

JAMES MADDEN - 27 May 2026

ABC news director Justin Stevens has quit effective immediately, citing “professional and personal” reasons for his sudden departure.

Stevens, 42, has been the news chief at the public broadcaster for the past four years, having been promoted to the role by former ABC managing director David Anderson in 2022 despite having never previously held a senior managerial position.

He formally tendered his resignation to current ABC MD Hugh Marks late last week, and informed staff of his immediate departure in a statement on Wednesday afternoon.

The ABC is expected to announce Mr Stevens’ successor in coming days.

The Australian has confirmed that it will be an external appointment, which will be the first time this century that the ABC news boss hasn’t been promoted from within the organisation.

Mr Marks has worked closely with several senior news managers in commercial media, given his six years as CEO of Nine Entertainment from 2015 to 2021, prompting speculation that the next ABC news boss could be recruited from that organisation.

In his farewell note to staff, Mr Stevens said after 19 years in various roles at the public broadcaster, it was “the right time to move on”.

“There is no more complex news organisation in the country, no more scrutinised institution, and few so laden with public expectations,” he said.

“In that context, I have sought to strengthen and defend our journalism without being blind to our stumbles; to meet the state of constant change in the digital age; and to improve our culture in News to one where we hold ourselves to the same standards as we do of others in the broader community.”

Mr Stevens’ four-year tenure as ABC news boss was not without controversy, most notably in 2024 when he oversaw the notorious “fake gunshots” scandal that engulfed the 7.30 current affairs program when it was accused of misrepresenting the actions of Australian soldiers during a skirmish in Afghanistan.

A common criticism of Mr Stevens from within the ABC was that he was unwilling – or too slow to intervene – when some senior journalists at the public broadcaster operated outside the strict editorial guidelines of the organisation’s charter, and was too sensitive to external scrutiny of his editorial team.

Early in 2024, he sent an email to all editorial staff urging them to “stay united” following a wave of criticism of the ABC news department.

“During challenging times it’s important we stay united, not just for each other but for the public we serve,” he wrote in the email.

“There are those who, for their own reasons, want us to be divided, who downplay the progress we’ve made and who benefit from our internal conflicts.

“Let’s continue to pull together on this.”

It’s also understood Mr Stevens has not always seen eye-to-eye with Mr Marks, nor ABC chairman Kim Williams.

In a statement, Mr Marks thanked Mr Stevens for his “incredible commitment to the ABC in the various roles he has performed during his 19 years with the organisation”.

“I am grateful to have seen the strength of Justin’s editorial instincts and to have observed his commitment to the ABC and audiences,” Mr Marks said.

Mr Stevens’ resignation was publicly announced just 24 hours before ABC executives – including Mr Marks – were due to face a Senate estimates hearing.

It’s understood that although Mr Stevens has previously appeared alongside Mr Marks at Senate hearings, he was not scheduled to front Thursday’s inquiry.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/abc-news-boss-justin-stevens-quits-suddenly/news-story/b7ae07e1ddeb46b091a4e92ae13a4292

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62783

File: d00ebd46ff0235a⋯.jpg (249.8 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 63b2159a4e5b9ed⋯.jpg (3.46 MB,5280x2970,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649839 (270948ZMAY26) Notable: Two men arrested, then released after investigation into Dezi Freeman’s movements - Two men arrested as part of the investigation into the movements of police killer Dezi Freeman have been released pending further enquiries. Victoria Police confirmed the 48-year-old and 45-year-old men were arrested in northeast Victoria and questioned by detectives before being released without charge while investigations continue. The arrests were linked to inquiries into Freeman’s movements after he fatally shot Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart in August 2025, triggering Victoria’s largest manhunt. Freeman evaded capture for more than 200 days before being shot dead by tactical police near Thologolong in March 2026. The investigation is examining whether anyone assisted Freeman while he was on the run. Separate coronial inquests into the deaths of the officers and Freeman are continuing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62758

>>62769

Two men arrested, then released after investigation into Dezi Freeman’s movements

Isabel McMillan and Sherryn Groch - May 27, 2026

Two people who were arrested as part of the investigation into the movements of police killer Dezi Freeman have been released, “pending further enquiries”.

Police on Tuesday afternoon confirmed two men, a 48-year-old and a 45-year-old, had been arrested at separate locations in Victoria’s north-east and were being interviewed.

But in a statement on Wednesday morning, police said the two men had been “released pending further enquiries”.

“The investigation remains ongoing and as such, we are not in a position to provide further details at this immediate time.”

After killing Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart on August 26 last year, Freeman fled into the bush with one of their stolen guns, sparking the largest manhunt in Victoria’s history.

More than 200 days later, on March 30, surprise intelligence led police to a remote hideout in Thologolong, near the NSW border, where Freeman was shot dead by heavily armed tactical officers.

On Tuesday, some locals who were raided during the early manhunt for Freeman told this masthead they were bracing for police to come knocking again as detectives now hunt for those who may have helped the skilled bushman evade authorities for so long.

Jim Rech, a former friend of Freeman’s from the area, did not know who had been arrested but said a police drone had been spotted surveilling his own property last month in the middle of the night. “And I hadn’t seen Dezi in nearly four years,” he said.

A man and a woman were arrested in April in relation to the Freeman manhunt, but they were both later released without charge, pending further inquiries.

The latest arrests on Tuesday come just a day after new details were revealed at the Coroners Court of Victoria during two separate directions hearings into the three deaths.

State coroner Liberty Sanger was on Monday told that on August 26, 2025, 10 police officers attended the Porepunkah property where Freeman was living with his wife and their young children to execute a search warrant as part of an investigation into allegations of historical child sexual abuse.

At the time, Freeman was a person of interest in connection with an alleged sexual assault of a child aged under 16 and attempting to involve a child in the making of child abuse material.

What followed was a fatal shootout, after Freeman armed himself with a shotgun and opened fire, killing two officers and injuring two others, one seriously.

An inquest for the slain officers has been earmarked for March. A separate inquest will be held for Freeman with a date yet to be determined.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/two-men-arrested-after-investigation-into-dezi-freeman-s-movements-20260526-p600u4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62784

File: 4a4b37f0771acc0⋯.jpg (1.97 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a79f71a0a4342e8⋯.jpg (2.69 MB,4366x2910,2183:1455,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 96c7aa86204d9d5⋯.jpg (464.94 KB,1861x1048,1861:1048,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 803a706db321092⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,3520x1980,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649852 (270956ZMAY26) Notable: War crimes investigators refer media leaks on Ben Roberts-Smith arrest to corruption commission - The Office of the Special Investigator and the Australian Federal Police have referred an alleged media leak relating to the arrest of former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith to the National Anti-Corruption Commission. Officials are investigating how journalists appeared to have advance knowledge of Roberts-Smith’s arrest at Sydney Airport in April on multiple war crime murder charges. OSI director-general Chris Moraitis told Senate estimates the unauthorised disclosure was concerning and said both agencies had asked the NACC to examine the matter. The hearing also heard the OSI has discontinued 39 of the 53 war crimes investigations launched following the Afghanistan Inquiry, while 10 investigations remain active. Two matters have resulted in prosecutions, including cases against Roberts-Smith and former soldier Oliver Schulz.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62767

War crimes investigators refer media leaks on Ben Roberts-Smith arrest to corruption commission

Tom Lowrey - 27 May 2026

The leaking of information to the media ahead of the arrest of former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has been referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC).

The Office of the Special Investigator (OSI), which is investigating war crimes, and the Australian Federal Police (AFP), have jointly taken the matter to the corruption agency.

Mr Roberts-Smith's arrest on multiple charges of the war crime of murder took place at Sydney Airport on April 7, as he landed on a flight from Brisbane.

Media officers from the Australian Federal Police filmed his arrest taking place, and later distributed that vision to media outlets.

But during a Senate estimates hearing last night, officials from the OSI were questioned about how some media outlets came to be at the airport ahead of the arrest.

Nine News said it had reporters at the airport ahead of the plane's arrival, and it broadcast images taken from inside the terminal.

OSI director-general Chris Moraitis told the estimates hearing he was alarmed that details of the planned arrest had spread.

He said officers noticed media around before the arrest took place.

"That's a matter that concerns me, that media seems to have been privy to things," he said.

"We're taking steps to ascertain what happened there."

Mr Moraitis said the matter was being taken to the anti-corruption commission.

"The AFP and I have written to the NACC about this, asking them to consider and provide information about that," he said.

"We believe there was an unauthorised disclosure.

"It surprised me that that happened, because we've usually been pretty good at keeping a low profile."

Ten war crimes investigations continuing

In earlier evidence, the OSI detailed its continuing work investigating war crimes committed by Australian soldiers abroad.

The OSI was established in early 2021 to investigate findings from the Afghanistan Inquiry, which found credible allegations of war crimes committed by Australian soldiers.

Mr Moraitis said of the 53 investigations it launched, 39 had been discontinued and 10 remained ongoing.

Two have proceeded to prosecution, with charges laid against Mr Roberts-Smith and former soldier Oliver Schulz.

Mr Moraitis said the OSI was working to resolve the remaining cases "soon".

"Soon can mean anywhere from six months to a year and a half," he said.

"We are actively pursuing those investigations with a view of coming to a conclusion either way, whether we refer matters to the DPP, or decide there is insufficient evidence."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-27/ben-roberts-smith-media-leaks-investigated-corruption-commission/106725918

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62785

File: 42f0dda452622f5⋯.jpg (150.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ba05d82039ac145⋯.jpg (160.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6b9895b07b5472⋯.jpg (241.87 KB,1715x1286,1715:1286,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 21b92c48abe40e5⋯.jpg (560.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e046577d2314d5c⋯.jpg (701.26 KB,3072x2304,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24649871 (271014ZMAY26) Notable: War crime accused soldier Oliver Jordan Schulz to attend paratrooper funeral - Former Special Air Service soldier Oliver Schulz has been granted a temporary variation to his bail conditions so he can attend the funeral of Warrant Officer Lachlan Muddle, who died during a military parachute training exercise earlier this month. Schulz has pleaded not guilty to a war crime murder charge relating to the 2012 death of Afghan farmer Dad Mohammad. The NSW Supreme Court ordered that while attending the funeral, Schulz must not discuss any aspect of the criminal case against him with other attendees, including potential prosecution witnesses. The hearing also considered arrangements for Schulz’s upcoming trial, which is expected to involve classified national security evidence requiring special court facilities. Schulz is due to face pre-trial hearings in August ahead of a scheduled trial next February.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62678

>>62722

>>62768

War crime accused soldier Oliver Jordan Schulz to attend paratrooper funeral

Tom Wark - 27 May 2026

An ex-special forces soldier will have to stay tight-lipped about his upcoming war crimes trial when he attends the funeral of a fellow SAS veteran.

Oliver Jordan Schulz successfully applied to have his bail conditions varied in the NSW Supreme Court on Wednesday to attend the funeral of a fellow Afghanistan veteran in Sydney.

The former Special Air Services soldier has pleaded not guilty to the war crime of murder over the death of Afghan farmer Dad Mohammad in 2012.

His bail prohibits him from making any contact with people who may be prosecution witnesses, including some who served with him in Afghanistan, but the condition will be removed for one day to allow Schulz to pay his respects to a fellow serviceman.

A memorial service for Warrant Officer Lachlan Muddle, who died during a parachute exercise on May 11, will be held at Holsworthy Barracks on Friday.

WO Muddle collided with another soldier a few hundred feet above the ground while wearing night-vision goggles and suffered fatal injuries during the high-altitude training exercise for the Australian Defence Force's parachute school.

While Schulz has been allowed to attend the funeral, he will not be allowed to discuss any developments in his case with other attendees.

"For the duration of Mr Schulz's presence at the funeral, the applicant is not to discuss ... any aspect of the current prosecution against him," Justice Peter Hamill ordered on Wednesday.

Schulz was the first serving or former ADF member to face a war crime charge of murder under domestic law.

Footage from a helmet camera, first aired publicly by the ABC Four Corners program in March 2020, appears to show Schulz and his squad approach a 25- or 26-year-old man in a wheat field in Afghanistan's Uruzgan Province.

Schulz then seems to fire three shots at Mr Mohammad, who was on his back with his hands and knees raised.

Justice Hamill heard that prosecutors, defence lawyers and legal representatives of the federal government had been conducting tours of various Sydney courthouses to determine which might be suitable for Schulz's complex trial.

Complicating the matter is the need for two separate courtrooms to be available simultaneously, so evidence that is suppressed on national security grounds can be heard in a completely closed court.

Prosecutor Sean Flood SC was cautioned by the judge for asking for a Federal Court courtroom for the trial without consulting the chief justice of NSW.

"Any approach to our colleagues ... the preference is that you go through the chief justice," Justice Hamill said.

"The consequences of not doing so might not be what you're after."

Schulz's matter will return to court for two weeks of pre-trial hearing on August 10.

He is set to face a trial in February.

Fellow SAS veteran Ben Roberts-Smith became the second soldier to be charged with war crimes in April.

He faces multiple charges of the war crime of murder relating to incidents that allegedly occurred while on deployment in Afghanistan.

Lifeline 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

Open Arms 1800 011 046

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://au.news.yahoo.com/war-crime-accused-soldier-attend-035422262.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62786

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653712 (281024ZMAY26) Notable: ‘ISIS bride’ Rayann El Houli charged with terror offences as AFP reveals eight investigations - (Video) Melbourne woman Rayann El Houli has been charged with terrorism offences after Australian Federal Police said new evidence emerged following recent returns of women and children from Syrian detention camps. El Houli, who returned to Australia in September 2025, was charged with entering or remaining in a declared area and being a member of a terrorist organisation. AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett told Senate estimates that investigators had gathered additional evidence through an ongoing six-month investigation and recent developments linked to other returnees. El Houli appeared before the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court and is expected to apply for bail. Police also revealed eight separate counterterrorism investigations remain active into Australians who returned from camps in Syria, warning further charges remain possible as inquiries continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62766

‘ISIS bride’ Rayann El Houli charged with terror offences as AFP reveals eight investigations

Michael Bachelard - May 28, 2026

1/2

The return of Islamic State-linked women to Australia has opened up new avenues of investigation for federal police, leading to fresh charges against a Melbourne woman who arrived back from Syria eight months ago.

Australian Federal Police arrested Rayann El Houli, 34, on Thursday and charged her with terror offences, citing evidence they had obtained since the return of four other so-called ISIS brides earlier this month.

AFP commissioner Krissy Barrett told a Senate Estimates hearing that police initially did not have enough evidence to charge El Houli, but an ongoing “six-month investigation, plus the recent return of four women and their children from Syria three weeks ago, has collected new relevant evidence”.

Barrett did not elaborate on how the evidence was collected, but said it “enabled a number of search warrants” to be carried out in Broadmeadows and North Fitzroy.

Police charged El Houli with entering or remaining in a declared area and being a member of a terror organisation. These charges carry a maximum 10-year sentence.

El Houli fronted the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday afternoon, and will apply for bail on Monday. Her defence counsel, Peter Morrissey, SC, said she suffered from a significant post-traumatic stress disorder.

Morrissey said El Houli cared for four children who were “doing well” since they escaped from Syria camp with her and returned to Australia in September.

“My client is a mum [who] is very much caught up in [her children’s] life,” Morrissey said. “The reality of their situation is they too have come out of the camps.”

Sources close to the families have said one of El Houli’s children was wounded by a gunshot in the final days of the so-called caliphate in 2019.

Prosecutor Andrew Sprague told the court he wanted to play five videos during next week’s hearing that depicted El Houli’s children and showed battle scenes with music in the background. Morrissey said his client “was very distressed at the prospect of being shown any images” with her children in them.

“She suffers from significant post-traumatic stress disorder,” Morrissey said. “It’s a touchy, difficult thing, your honour.”

El Houli returned to Australia from Syria with her sister last September after the pair paid people smugglers to escape the al-Hawl detention camp and made their own way to Lebanon. They were issued passports at the Australian embassy in Beirut and returned to Melbourne.

The charges against El Houli are the same as those laid against another woman, Janai Safar, who returned to Sydney from Syria earlier this month.

None of the six so-called “ISIS brides” who returned on Tuesday to Sydney and Melbourne have been charged, but AFP commissioner Barrett flagged the possibility of further arrests, telling estimates that eight separate joint counter-terror team investigations were underway.

“Those who have returned from internally displaced persons camps in Syria are subject to a range of investigative strategies and will be held to account if they are found to have breached Australian laws,” Barrett said.

“Any perceived delay in charges does not indicate investigations have ceased.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62787

File: 254674b95db02f3⋯.mp4 (14.47 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653721 (281034ZMAY26) Notable: Rayann Elhouli remanded in Melbourne over alleged ISIS membership - (Video) Melbourne woman Rayann Elhouli has been remanded in custody after being charged with terrorism offences linked to her time in Syria. Australian Federal Police allege the 34-year-old entered or remained in a declared conflict zone and was a member of Islamic State. AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett told Senate estimates that new evidence obtained through an ongoing six-month investigation, combined with information gathered following the recent return of other ISIS-linked women from Syria, led to the charges. Elhouli returned to Australia from the al-Hawl camp in September 2025 after travelling through Lebanon. Police also revealed eight separate counter-terrorism investigations remain active into Australian ISIS-linked families who have returned from, or remain connected to, camps in Syria. Elhouli will remain in custody pending further court proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62766

>>62786

Rayann Elhouli remanded in Melbourne over alleged ISIS membership

BEN PACKHAM and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 28 May 2026

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has revealed the AFP and its partners have eight separate counter-terrorism investigations under way into Australian ISIS-linked families who spent time in Syrian camps.

In her opening statement to a Senate estimates hearing, Ms Barrett also revealed the arrival of four ISIS-linked women from Syria to Australia earlier this month allowed police to charge an alleged ISIS supporter who smuggled herself into the country eight months ago.

That woman, Rayann Elhouli, was formally charged for allegedly entering and remaining in a declared conflict zone and joining a terrorist organisation.

The 34-year-old woman, who was arrested in Broadmeadows after spending eight months in the country following her return from Syria’s al-Hawl internment camp, appeared for a brief filing hearing at the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court. She was remanded in custody.

Ms Barrett revealed that following the arrival of Kawsar Abbas, her daughters Zeinab and Zahra Ahmad as well as Janai Safar earlier this month, new evidence had been gathered against Ms Elhouli.

“Any perceived delay in charges does not indicate investigations have ceased. Today’s arrest and charge is a case in point,” Ms Barrett said.

“Furthermore, today I will reveal there are eight separate joint counter-terrorism team investigations into the families who have returned from camps in Syria or remain overseas.”

Ms Elhouli, a mother of four, returned to Australia on September 26 with her sister after the pair escaped the now closed al-Hawl camp with people smugglers and made their way to Lebanon.

They were issued passports at the embassy in Beirut with support from the Albanese government and arrived in the country without gaining any media attention.

“On their return, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions determined there was insufficient evidence to charge the two women,” Ms Barrett said.

“Off the back of that advice, the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team, which includes Victoria Police, the AFP and ASIO, continued Operation Howth while the returnees resettled in Australia.

‘That domestic six-month investigation, plus the recent return of four women and their children from Syria three weeks ago, has collected new relevant evidence for Operation Howth.”

That new evidence has enabled police to conduct a number of search warrants to be executed on Thursday in Broadmeadows and Fitzroy North, which led to the terrorism-related charges against Ms Elhouli.

Before chief magistrate Lisa Hannan, she appeared for a brief filing hearing where her lawyers said she suffered from PTSD and would require medical attention while in custody.

Although no bail application was sought, Ms Elhouli will remain behind bars until her next court appearance.

Members of the Victoria Joint Counter Terrorism Team seized a suspected stolen motor vehicle, electronic devices, documents and photographs, which will undergo forensic examination.

It will be alleged Ms Elhouli travelled to Syria with others, including a man, to join ISIS. The man is believed to be incarcerated in a Middle East prison.

Since 2019, seven men and three women have been charged with foreign incursion and terrorism-related offences.

A further two women (Kawsar Abbas and Zeinab Ahmad) have been charged with crimes against humanity and slavery offences relating to alleged incidents while in Syria.

Ms Elhouli was detained by Kurdish forces in March 2019 and held with other family members in the al-Hawl Internally Displaced Persons camp.

Earlier this month, Ms Abbas and her daughter Zeinab Ahmad were charged with crimes against humanity offences and accused of owning Yazidi slaves.

In Sydney, Janai Safar was arrested and charged with terrorism-related offences.

The latest revelations come as six women returned to Australia this week, amid violent outbursts in Melbourne.

None of those six women were charged.

Only one woman, Hodan Abby, was not allowed to come to Australia after the government issued her with a Temporary Exclusion Order (TEO).

Her young daughter, who suffers from shrapnel wounds, had not returned either, despite having a plane ticket.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/another-isislinked-australian-charged-with-terror-offences/news-story/a9d5d8513bba975267216497890098a9

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/victoria-jctt-charge-female-returnee-terrorism-offences

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62788

File: bc35eefce247b70⋯.jpg (101.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 417de7257e46814⋯.jpg (109.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 85745a05fe6ae46⋯.jpg (270.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653745 (281047ZMAY26) Notable: AFP defends Roberts-Smith arrest as media leak probed - The Australian Federal Police has defended the arrest of former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith while supporting an investigation into how media learned of the operation in advance. AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett told Senate estimates she was determined to identify the source of any unauthorised disclosure after a television crew was present when Roberts-Smith was arrested at Sydney Airport in April on war crime murder charges. The Office of the Special Investigator has referred the alleged leak to the National Anti-Corruption Commission. Barrett said there was no evidence the AFP had provided details of the arrest to the media and defended the airport operation on safety and operational grounds. She also said the AFP released official footage to provide an accurate public record of the arrest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62767

>>62784

AFP defends Roberts-Smith arrest as media leak probed

Kat Wong - 28 May 2026

The Australian Federal Police has defended its prosecution of the nation's most decorated living soldier as a media leak about his arrest comes under scrutiny.

Ben Roberts-Smith was charged with murdering or ordering the murders of five unarmed detainees while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, after he was sensationally arrested on the tarmac of Sydney Airport in April.

Following a flight from Brisbane, the Victoria Cross recipient was met by one media outlet's camera crew as AFP officers walked him off the plane.

No other media organisations were made aware of the arrest ahead of time.

The department responsible for investigating war crimes has asked the federal anti-corruption commission to probe the leak, and on Thursday, AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett backed the decision.

"I am not just disappointed the media outlet was there, but I am determined to find out how they knew of the arrest," she told Senate estimates.

"This could be an unauthorised disclosure and in my view anyone who disclosed that information should face consequences.

"I have no evidence to suggest the AFP provided information to the media about the date or details of the arrest."

Other details of his arrest have been questioned by Liberal senator Michaelia Cash and One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts, who asked why he was arrested in front of his teenage daughters and why the AFP shared its official footage - which blurred Roberts-Smith's face - after the arrest.

Acknowledging the "legitimate interest" in the issue, Ms Barrett offered a comprehensive statement.

A joint war crimes investigation into members of the Australian Defence Force deployed to Afghanistan was first launched in December 2021.

The Sensitive Investigations Oversight Board on March 31 proposed charging Roberts-Smith and on April 1 it received consent from Attorney-General Michelle Rowland, which led to the 47-year-old's arrest on April 7.

He was taken into custody at Sydney Airport due to operational reasons, the commissioner said.

The sterile environment at an airport, where people are screened and the area is contained, makes it safer for members of the public and for AFP officers to take action.

There were reports Roberts-Smith had offered to present himself to police, but this was "unviable" due in part to the seriousness of his charges, Ms Barrett said.

The AFP also makes footage available to the media to officially document an arrest and offer a source of truth in an era of misinformation.

"We take an oath that we will faithfully and diligently carry out our duties without fear or favour, without affection or ill will," Ms Barrett said.

"The Australian public can know the AFP will determine cases on the evidence in front of us, and not because of name, fame, or background of any individual, and that is the right thing to do."

The former SAS soldier has promised to use the upcoming trial to clear his name.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/afp-defends-roberts-smith-arrest-085136144.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62789

File: 93f2941ca8b1892⋯.jpg (357.37 KB,3800x3040,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653755 (281059ZMAY26) Notable: Reuters executive Simon Robinson to replace Justin Stevens as ABC news director - The ABC has appointed Reuters executive Simon Robinson as its new news director following the sudden resignation of Justin Stevens. Robinson, currently deputy to Reuters’ editor-in-chief, will take up the role in September after a journalism career spanning Time magazine and Reuters. ABC managing director Hugh Marks said the leadership change presented an opportunity to refresh and modernise the broadcaster’s news operations. At Senate estimates, Marks declined to discuss details surrounding Stevens’ departure, although he confirmed the pair had discussed a “very serious matter” before Stevens resigned. Robinson said he was committed to independent, fact-based journalism and viewed the ABC as playing a vital role in Australian public life. Stevens had led the ABC’s news division for four years and worked at the broadcaster for 19 years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62782

Reuters executive Simon Robinson to replace Justin Stevens as ABC news director

Amanda Meade - 28 May 2026

1/2

The ABC has confirmed a top news executive from Reuters, Simon Robinson, has been appointed as news director of the ABC, after Guardian Australia revealed the surprise appointee on Thursday morning.

Robinson will join the ABC in September, four months after Justin Stevens resigned abruptly after four years in the role, citing personal and professional reasons.

Robinson said he grew up listening to and watching ABC News and he was delighted the role brought him home.

“As a passionate believer in the power of fact-based, independent journalism, I believe the ABC plays a pivotal role in providing Australians with the reliable reporting we all need,” Robinson said.

Stevens’ resignation on Wednesday was a shock and was effective immediately.

At Senate estimates on Thursday, the managing director of the ABC, Hugh Marks, refused to confirm or deny that he threatened to terminate Stevens if he didn’t resign.

Instead Marks revealed that he held a meeting with Stevens about a “very serious matter”.

He said he didn’t know where that information would have come from, given there were only two, possibly three, people at the meeting. “I don’t make threats, senator,” he said.

Senator Sarah Henderson asked if it was true that he had threatened to terminate Stevens if he didn’t resign.

Marks replied: “Senator, I think it’s inappropriate for me to go into the details of individual discussions with Mr Stevens, you know, about a very serious matter in this forum, but I think the outcome is Mr Stevens has resigned, and we will be in due course in [the] near future making an appointment.

Marks also strongly suggested the changing of the guard at the top of ABC News signalled a period of change at the broadcaster.

“It is an opportunity for us to move forward and look at a refreshed and rejuvenated output as we work out what you know the future of the ABC is,” Marks said.

Marks said Stevens, who had responsibility for 2,000 journalists across the country, felt it was time to move on and he did not push back on a suggestion by senator Sarah Henderson that Stevens was “encouraged to resign”.

“Stevens felt, you know, it was the right time for him to move on and pursue other careers, and I think it’s an opportunity, obviously, for the ABC to enter into a new phase of operations, where we look to, you know, refresh and rejuvenate our output for what might be, you know, the next 20 years to make sure that we’re fit for the future,” Marks told Senate estimates.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62790

File: 56165f0e3e68b8c⋯.jpg (263.94 KB,2048x1194,1024:597,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653770 (281109ZMAY26) Notable: Southern Jackaroo 26: Japan, US, and Australia Begin Live-Fire Drills - Japan, the United States and Australia will conduct the Southern Jackaroo 26 military exercise in Queensland from May 29 to July 3, bringing together ground forces for an extended series of live-fire and combat-readiness drills. The exercise will be centred on the Townsville Field Training Area and is designed to strengthen interoperability and operational co-ordination between the three allies. Japan’s Ground Self-Defense Force will deploy infantry, artillery and intelligence units under the command of Lieutenant General Makoto Endo. Participating US forces include Marine Rotational Force-Darwin and the Army’s 11th Airborne Division, while Australia will contribute the Army’s 3rd Brigade. Southern Jackaroo has become a key trilateral exercise focused on enhancing military integration and reinforcing support for a free and open Indo-Pacific amid ongoing regional security challenges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62760

>>62774

>>62775

Southern Jackaroo 26: Japan, US, and Australia Begin Live-Fire Drills

Huang Hsin-wei - 2026-05-25

Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF) announced on May 22 that it will participate in a multilateral live-fire exercise called "Southern Jackaroo 26" alongside United States and Australian military forces, as part of efforts to uphold and reinforce a free and open Indo-Pacific.

The exercise is scheduled to run from May 29 to July 3, 2026, and will be held at the Townsville Field Training Area in Queensland, Australia, among other locations. The stated objectives include enhancing operational and combat capabilities, as well as strengthening interoperability with American and Australian forces.

Lieutenant General Makoto Endo, Commander of the JGSDF's Middle Army, will serve as the commanding officer representing the Japanese side. Participating units include the 7th Infantry Regiment, the Middle Army Artillery Regiment, and the Middle Army Intelligence Unit.

On the American side, the Marine Rotational Force-Darwin and the U.S. Army's 11th Airborne Division will take part. Australia will contribute the 3rd Brigade of the Australian Army. All three nations' forces will conduct joint live exercises together throughout the training period.

The exercise reflects growing trilateral defenseJapan's Ground Self-Defense Force will deploy alongside American and Australian troops for a major live-fire exercise in Queensland next week, the latest sign of deepening trilateral military cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.

Running from May 29 to July 3 at the Townsville Field Training Area, Southern Jackaroo 26 is designed to sharpen combat readiness and strengthen interoperability among the three allies. The JGSDF announced the exercise on May 22, citing its commitment to upholding a "free and open Indo-Pacific."

Forces on the Ground

Japan's contingent will be led by Lieutenant General Makoto Endo, Commander of the Middle Army. Deployed units include the 7th Infantry Regiment, the Middle Army Artillery Regiment, and the Middle Army Intelligence Unit — a combined-arms lineup that goes well beyond symbolic participation.

The United States will contribute the Marine Rotational Force-Darwin and the Army's 11th Airborne Division. Australia's 3rd Brigade rounds out the trilateral force. All three contingents will conduct joint live-fire drills throughout the five-week exercise.

Why It Matters

Southern Jackaroo has become an annual proving ground for Japan-US-Australia ground force integration, and the 2026 edition reflects how seriously all three nations are investing in that relationship. For Japan, deploying artillery and intelligence units thousands of kilometres from its home islands is a concrete expression of its broader push to expand military readiness and alliance coordination across the region.

With Indo-Pacific security remaining a pressing concern, exercises like this one send a clear signal — to allies and adversaries alike — about the reach and resolve of the trilateral partnership.

https://world.storm.mg/articles/1135052

https://qresear.ch/?q=Southern+Jackaroo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62791

File: b8bf3f720dd8d0c⋯.jpg (79.45 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1336b02f6cce396⋯.jpg (194.49 KB,1600x1068,400:267,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a154d69571235ca⋯.jpg (2.54 MB,4000x3000,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653826 (281131ZMAY26) Notable: Accused paedophile Joshua Dale Brown to admit childcare crimes, court hears - Former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown is expected to admit responsibility for a substantial portion of the offences alleged against him, a Melbourne court has heard. Brown, 27, faces 156 charges, including allegations that he sexually abused multiple children while working at childcare centres across Melbourne’s west. Defence counsel told the court Brown accepted “quite a significant amount of the offending”, although discussions continue over how the charges should be structured and which matters will ultimately proceed. Prosecutors and defence lawyers indicated they had exhausted negotiations and would seek guidance from the County Court. Brown entered not guilty pleas as a procedural step while legal issues are resolved. The allegations emerged after police uncovered child abuse material in 2025, triggering a major investigation into the childcare sector and widespread health testing of potentially affected children.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accused paedophile Joshua Dale Brown to admit childcare crimes, court hears

Erin Pearson - May 28, 2026

Accused childcare rapist Joshua Dale Brown is set to admit responsibility for his crimes, as the lawyers for both sides flag they will seek the assistance of a County Court judge to determine which of his 156 charges will proceed.

Brown, 27, faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court remotely from custody at Barwon Prison, where he is being held in the Banksia Unit, a specialised management and protection unit within the jail. He is facing more than a hundred charges, including sexually penetrating multiple children he was employed to care for.

Defence barrister Rishi Nathwani, KC, told the court his client, who appeared sporting a blond ponytail and green tracksuit, accepted “quite a significant amount of the offending”.

The issue that remained, he said, was how the charges would be presented. Nathwani said he’d been in constant contact with the prosecution, who agreed the parties needed the assistance of a higher court.

Brown then pleaded not guilty – as a technicality, Nathwani said – to 156 charges.

“He will enter not guilty pleas, really as holding pleas in the circumstances,” Nathwani said.

“You can take it from me, I saw Mr Brown last Monday, that he’s aware of all the charges.

“What I can say is that while Mr Brown accepts quite a significant amount of the offending, the issue appears to be what that means in terms of the charges concerned.”

Crown prosecutor Michael Stanton, SC, agreed that discussions between legal counsel had been exhausted, with three new charges filed and six recently withdrawn.

Brown stands accused of abusing multiple children during his work at four daycare centres in Melbourne’s west, including one he worked at weeks after graduating from high school.

In May 2025, police discovered a cache of child abuse material allegedly linked to Brown, which sparked an urgent police investigation and plunged Australia’s childcare sector into crisis.

At the time it emerged that Brown had worked at 24 centres across Melbourne over more than eight years.

Brown is charged with offences including abusing eight children at Point Cook daycare Creative Garden between April 2022 and January 2023. Police also allege he sent child abuse material to another man while recording himself contaminating children’s food with bodily fluids.

This prompted unprecedented testing for sexually transmitted infections for kids at affected centres.

Brown is also facing charges of bestiality offences, not related to childcare.

Magistrate Donna Bakos noted the plea and directed Brown face a directions hearing in the County Court of Victoria on June 23.

She also noted there was no application for bail made.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/accused-paedophile-joshua-brown-to-admit-childcare-crimes-court-hears-20260528-p601pf.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Joshua+Dale+Brown

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62792

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24653835 (281141ZMAY26) Notable: Notorious paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith fights 'excessive' life sentence - Convicted childcare offender Ashley Paul Griffith has asked Queensland’s Court of Appeal to reduce the 27-year non-parole period attached to the life sentence he received for abusing dozens of children over almost two decades. Griffith pleaded guilty to 307 child sex offences involving 65 victims aged between one and nine, including 28 rape offences committed while working in childcare centres. His legal team argued the sentence did not adequately recognise his extensive co-operation with police, including lengthy interviews, guilty pleas and admissions that helped investigators identify victims and additional offences. Prosecutors opposed the appeal, arguing the sentence reflected the extraordinary scale and duration of the offending, the deliberate abuse of vulnerable children, the severe breach of trust and the broader damage caused to public confidence in childcare services. The appeal court has reserved its decision.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24653832

Notorious paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith fights 'excessive' life sentence

Robyn Wuth - May 28, 2026

One of Australia's worst paedophiles, childcare worker Ashley Paul Griffith, has launched a bid to slash the life sentence he received for abusing dozens of young children.

Lawyers for the notorious predator today argued in the Queensland Court of Appeal that the 27-year non-parole period he was handed in 2024 was "manifestly excessive" as they sought leave to appeal.

Griffith is behind bars after a horrifying history of abuse stretching almost two decades was exposed.

He pleaded guilty to 307 child sex offences against 65 victims aged between one and nine.

It included 28 counts of rape against girls, mainly aged three to five, at Queensland childcare centres between 2007 and 2022.

Griffith used his trusted role to prey on toddlers and preschoolers as they slept or by taking them into isolated corners of childcare centres, often while their parents believed they were safe in his care.

In court, his legal team claimed the sentencing judge went too far, insisting the case could have been dealt with by a fixed term of 25 to 30 years with a much shorter non-parole period.

Barrister Sarah Cartledge conceded Griffith's crimes were "truly awful" and that he had preyed upon "the most vulnerable" while in a position of trust.

The appeal is tightly focused on the parole eligibility date, with the defence arguing that while a life sentence was open, the minimum term effectively imposed a harsher punishment than in similar cases of extreme child sex offending.

Cartledge said Griffith had co-operated fully and openly since his arrest, giving around 18 hours of interviews.

"This was not a case where the court had to drag the truth from him at trial," she said.

"His extensive co-operation and guilty plea saved an enormous amount of court time and spared child complainants from giving evidence.

"The co-operation here went well beyond what this court usually sees … he didn't just admit the allegations put to him — he volunteered further instances of abuse and helped police piece together who some of the children were."

Justice John Bond, presiding on the appeal panel, suggested it was more accurate to view the sentence as a judicial determination that Griffith should serve no less than 27 years.

He pressed counsel on the broader impact of his offending, suggesting the harm extended well beyond his victims.

"These crimes do not end with the children and their families," Justice Bond said.

"They corrode trust in childcare institutions, they wound the people who worked alongside this man, and they burden those who had to investigate and respond to his offending.

"The harm accumulated over nearly 20 years must factor into the sentence."

Throughout two decades of preying on children, Griffith filmed all but one of his victims, building a vast cache of abuse he shared online.

When detectives raided his Gold Coast home in 2022, they seized more than 4000 child abuse images and videos documenting much of his offending.

Prosecutors, led by Ruth O'Gorman KC for the Director of Public Prosecutions, urged the court to reject the appeal, saying the sentence barely reflected the scale and cruelty of the crimes.

"When you weigh the gravity of this offending, the number of victims and the deliberate way it was carried out over nearly 20 years, it cannot seriously be said that this sentence is excessive," O'Gorman submitted.

"It is a strong sentence, but it is a justified one."

She said psychiatric evidence showed Griffith would pose a danger of reoffending if released too soon.

Griffith is also wanted in NSW, where he is the subject of an arrest warrant over alleged child sexual offences during his time working there between 2014 and 2018.

The case prompted a wide-ranging review of Queensland's childcare system, which found repeated red flags and warning signs were raised but ignored.

The appeal court has reserved its decision.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/notorious-paedophile-ashley-paul-griffith-fights-life-sentence/81d12f2e-d903-4cf2-a1be-617d615e91ff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dohl1Kfaqho

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ashley+Paul+Griffith

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62793

File: ccb027ada982351⋯.mp4 (14.57 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 4f4d310479c5892⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,2780x1853,2780:1853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24656415 (290055ZMAY26) Notable: Australian ambassador Greg Moriarty makes the case for deepening the US alliance - Australia’s new ambassador to the United States, Greg Moriarty, has used a video released by the Australian Embassy in Washington to highlight the growing strategic and economic importance of the Australia-US alliance. After presenting his credentials to President Donald Trump, Moriarty pointed to AUKUS, critical minerals co-operation, defence industry investment and Australian superannuation investment in the United States as key pillars of the relationship. Drawing on previous roles as Defence Department secretary and ambassador to Iran and Indonesia, he said the partnership was evolving rapidly and would continue to deepen through collaboration on security, technology, artificial intelligence and quantum research. Moriarty also highlighted Australia’s $3 billion contribution to the US submarine industrial base under AUKUS and efforts to strengthen secure rare earth supply chains between the two countries.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62732

>>>/qresearch/24636287

Greg Moriarty makes the case for deepening the US alliance

JOE KELLY - May 27, 2026

The Australian Embassy in Washington has launched a video introducing Greg Moriarty as the nation’s new top diplomat stationed in Donald Trump’s America after he presented his credentials to the US President last week.

In the short two minute video clip, Mr Moriarty – who takes over the post from former Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd – underlined the value of the US alliance relationship with Australia and flexed his own professional credentials.

Mr Moriarty highlighted the transformational potential of the AUKUS security partnership, the Australian contributions to the US defence industrial base, the work being done with America to build secure rare earth supply chains and the massive capital being invested into the US through Australian superannuation funds.

He argued the partnership with Washington was “evolving faster than ever” and referenced his own career experience in the Department of Defence and as a top diplomat where he worked with “many great Americans.”

While negotiations continue to bring Donald Trump’s war against Iran to a satisfactory conclusion, Mr Moriarty noted that he had previously been attached to the headquarters of US Central Command in the Persian Gulf during the First Gulf War some 35 years ago.

He also noted his knowledge of Iran by referencing his time serving as Australian ambassador in Tehran from 2005-2008.

This experience led him to become one of the few Australian public servants to have ever advised a US president, with Mr Moriarty providing a briefing to George W Bush on the country.

While Mr Moriarty did not mention this in the short clip posted by the embassy, he noted that he had served as Australia’s top diplomat in both Iran and Indonesia where he “worked closely with my US counterparts on critical international security issues.”

“And most recently as Secretary of the Department of Defence, I supported the development and implementation of AUKUS and the direction of modern military ties between our two great nations,” he said.

“Today, our partnership is evolving faster than ever. Under AUKUS – a seismic shift in our shared defence capabilities – Australia is delivering a three billion investment into the US submarine industrial base,” he said.

“Our $8.5bn critical minerals framework lays the groundwork for the secure supply of rare earths the US needs to power the future,” he said. “Australian investment in the United States is at record levels thanks in large part to Australia’s pension funds which are supercharging their US investments and helping to build jobs, infrastructure and deliver growth right across the country.”

Mr Moriarty said that Australia’s work on AI and Quantum was also significant and would benefit both nations.

“In America’s 250th year, it’s an honour to make a contribution to advancing the partnership between Australia and the United States as I lead the Australian embassy in Washington.”

Mr Moriarty will take up his post at the same time as the United States moves forward with its own ambassador to Australia after Mr Trump selected David Brat for the role.

Speaking last week, Dr Brat said that he loved “everything” about Australia – including its people – and made clear he would closely follow the government of Anthony Albanese once he took up his post in the nation’s capital.

He stressed that few countries were more important to US interests than Australia and expected the alliance relationship to deepen over time, arguing that Mr Trump and Mr Albanese had used their White House meeting in October to “take the alliance to new heights.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/greg-moriarty-makes-the-case-for-deepening-the-us-alliance/news-story/6a45fc6b1171d8af25a9c7f82c148b50

https://x.com/AusAmbUSA/status/2059374704725467399

https://x.com/AusAmbUSA/status/2059273447524471001

https://archive.vn/4OWXq#24170674

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62794

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24656491 (290113ZMAY26) Notable: (Video) A new documentary alleges the BBC was aware of concerns about Rolf Harris’s behaviour toward women for years but failed to act because of his value as a popular television personality. Rolf Harris: Primetime Predator features testimony from victims, journalists and former investigators who claim warnings about Harris were widely known within parts of the organisation. One Australian woman says she reported Harris to NSW Police in 1984 after inappropriate behaviour but felt her complaint was dismissed. The documentary examines allegations that institutional failures in both Britain and Australia allowed Harris to continue offending for decades. It also revisits evidence from his UK criminal trials and the experiences of several victims. Harris was convicted in 2014 of multiple child sexual abuse offences committed between 1969 and the 1980s and was later imprisoned before his release in 2017.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BBC management ‘knew Rolf Harris was a problem’ but protected star presenter

In a searing new documentary, the television giant has been damned for choosing millions in revenue over child safety by shielding the disgraced artist from consequences.

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - May 26, 2026

1/2

The BBC has been accused of providing convicted child sex abuser Rolf Harris with “bulletproof glass” protection, despite knowing of his propensity to sexually assault women, so the organisation could continue to make money off him in his role as a famous and well-loved television personality.

One British journalist said it had been so well-known about Harris’s shocking behaviour toward women that they were warned not to be alone with him and not to walk ahead of him up stairs.

It has also been alleged that one girl, then aged “barely 14”, had gone to the police in Australia to make a report about Harris’s behaviour in 1984, but she says her complaints were not taken seriously.

In a two-part series, “Rolf Harris: Primetime Predator”, on ABC, the woman, Nina, said she had made an official report to NSW police about Harris, who had been groping her, including playing with her breasts while reciting a nursery rhyme while she was in a hotel dining room.

“I went straight to the police and tried to report Rolf Harris, and I sat down with two male officers and they were not interested, they were looking at their watch and yawning,’’ she said on the documentary.

“It makes me really angry that by not taking it seriously; dismissing it and disregarding it, this behaviour has escalated, it’s continued and he has repeated it over and over again with children and all of those children have been damaged by him.

“Police could have addressed that in 1984 and they just didn’t choose to.”

NSW police have been unable to find any record of Nina’s correspondence and have encouraged all victims of sexual abuse to come forward.

Harris, the superstar presenter and artist, was convicted in the UK of child sexual abuse of four girls and women between 1969 and the 1980s, and sentenced to five years and nine months in jail in 2014. He was released in 2017 and died at his riverside home in Bray in May 2023, aged 93.

Executive-produced by four-time Emmy award-winning producer Karina Holden and Oscar nominee John Smithson, and directed by Nick Sweeney, the documentary marks the most comprehensive reckoning yet with Harris’s decades of abuse, bringing together survivors who have never previously spoken publicly. Tracing his rise from suburban Perth to the pinnacle of British entertainment, early promotions for the investigation claim to map the pattern of predation that ran beneath his celebrity his entire career.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62795

File: 1b7a3b03e64a66d⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,3300x2550,22:17,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 42809d4e3a147ed⋯.jpg (565.39 KB,2150x1500,43:30,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 609e8096fe4dc96⋯.jpg (821.11 KB,1979x2512,1979:2512,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c900ab71a520b67⋯.jpg (1.71 MB,2449x3009,2449:3009,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a7eb7864d89cd3a⋯.jpg (471.18 KB,1411x1802,83:106,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24656677 (290207ZMAY26) Notable: ABC documentary gives Rolf Harris’ Australian accusers a chance to be heard - (Video) A new ABC documentary revisits the crimes of convicted child sex offender Rolf Harris while giving Australian accusers an opportunity to publicly tell their stories decades after the alleged abuse occurred. Rolf Harris: Primetime Predator features women who allege they were abused by Harris but whose claims never reached court, despite some incidents occurring in Australia. Executive producer Karina Holden said the project aimed to provide a respectful platform for victims who had not received public acknowledgement, justice or legal resolution. The documentary examines how Harris’s celebrity status, public image and trusted position in entertainment helped conceal his offending for years. It also explores the lasting impact on victims, many of whom carried feelings of shame, guilt and disbelief after reporting their experiences. Harris was convicted in Britain in 2014 of multiple indecent assault offences and died in 2023.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62794

ABC documentary gives Rolf Harris’ Australian accusers a chance to be heard

Paul Kalina - MAY 28, 2026

1/2

“You have shown no remorse for your crimes at all. Your reputation now lies in ruins, you have been stripped of your honours but you have no one to blame but yourself.”

With those damning words, a British judge in 2014 sentenced Rolf Harris on 12 counts of indecent assault. The offences were committed against four women between 1969 and 1986. The victims were between eight and 19 years of age.

Before his spectacular fall, Harris was one of the most renowned, popular and successful entertainers to grace the stage, TVs and music business in both his native Australia and adopted homeland, England.

One of the four complainants at Harris’ trial, Tonya Lee, was a 14-year-old Australian touring London with a theatre troupe when she was assaulted by Harris in 1986. But the claims of many of Harris’ victims never went to trial. He was never charged in Australia, despite many of the offences, including those of the principal complainant in the British trial (who remains known only as victim “C”), having taken place here. Since his death in 2023, more victims have come forward.

“Here in Australia, the women never really had their day,” says Karina Holden, executive producer of the new two-part ABC documentary Rolf Harris: Primetime Predator.

Now in their 50s and 60s, these women grew up with guilt, shame and broken trust.

“To bring them back into the room again to talk about that inciting incident, you can’t take that lightly,” Holden says. “There has to be a sense of catharsis, of healing. Hopefully, when you’re talking about people who haven’t necessarily had their day in court and haven’t had their crimes against them acknowledged, hopefully there is that sense of healing that comes from at least telling their story in a respectful way, and giving them the space to do so.”

Surrounded at the time by adults, the women experienced the ultimate betrayal. “I think that for young people who haven’t formed their own sexual identity and sense of relationships, there’s also the question of, ‘What did I do to bring this on myself?’” Holden says. “Some of the women tried to tell people around them, [but] they weren’t believed. I think that this is just far too common, that abuse happens to young people and children who haven’t learnt about standing up for themselves.”

As well as giving voice to victims, the documentary paints a chilling picture of how Harris used his celebrity – a combination of eccentric stage routines, silly songs, larrikinism, folksiness and fawning reverence for the British establishment – to mask his crimes all the while in full public view.

Some of the most incriminating evidence that would be used in court came from Harris himself. In Primetime Predator, archival footage of Harris is reframed to draw attention to the striking contradiction between his public persona and what was happening only barely off-stage. In one of many cringe-inducing and re-contextualised clips that we see here, Harris is on-stage with a group of children when he makes a throwaway remark commending a young girl’s lipstick.

“It’s all there in plain sight in the archive, and even the way that he tells his own story,” Holden says. (Hiding in Plain Sight is the title of a 2024 ITV documentary about Harris.)

And then there is the public awareness campaign for child protection that Harris fronted (yes, you read that right) in the 1980s.

“At the same time as he was actively abusing children, he was the public face of child protection campaigns in the Antipodes,” Holden says. “It was just ridiculous to think that he’s telling children how to say no and is actually taking advantage of [them]. It’s shocking, and I think that spoke very powerfully to why this particular person made it a worthy documentary subject to really look at.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62796

File: 4513926bb25eaab⋯.jpg (5.59 MB,6820x4549,6820:4549,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24659794 (300354ZMAY26) Notable: Government confirms bid to hide counter-terror details from royal commission - The federal government has confirmed it is seeking to withhold cabinet-related documents from the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion as it examines whether counter-terrorism resources were reduced before the Bondi attack. Environment Minister Murray Watt told Senate estimates the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet had made a public interest immunity claim to protect cabinet confidentiality, although Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell will decide whether to uphold or reject the claim. ASIO officials said the agency did not seek to block access to the material. The dispute centres on whether cabinet or the National Security Committee directed intelligence agencies to shift resources away from counter-terrorism. The commission’s interim report found funding dedicated to counter-terrorism declined between 2020 and 2025 despite overall intelligence spending increasing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

Government confirms bid to hide counter-terror details from royal commission

Matthew Knott - May 29, 2026

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s department has sought to block royal commissioner Virginia Bell from considering whether the government directed intelligence agencies to reduce counter-terrorism resources in the lead-up to the Bondi massacre, a senior minister has confirmed.

ASIO officials told a Senate estimates hearing on Thursday night that they had not sought to prevent the royal commission from accessing the relevant material, backing up a written statement by ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess to the royal commission.

Burgess said in his statement that the Commonwealth had made several public interest immunity (PII) claims to block public release of documents, including a cabinet memorandum.

Asked about the matter on Thursday night, Environment Minister Murray Watt said the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet had made a public interest immunity claim regarding cabinet documents.

“All I can say is that the PII claim was made by the Commonwealth on advice from Prime Minister and Cabinet Department to protect cabinet process, but of course the royal commissioner makes the final decision on all PII claims,” he told Liberal senator Jonno Duniam.

“Indeed, and as you would know, cabinet confidentiality is not exactly a new concept.”

Asked whether ASIO had sought a public interest immunity claim relating to the cabinet deliberations, senior ASIO official Lisa Alonso Love said: “No, I’m not aware that ASIO has asked for that.”

Burgess did not appear at Thursday’s hearings because he was ill.

On Friday, Watt denied that the move to block the release of cabinet documents undermined the purpose of the royal commission, and said the government was “actively supporting” the inquiry.

“It has been a longstanding convention that governments do not need to reveal cabinet discussions to royal commissions,” Watt told reporters in Canberra.

“But the royal commissioner is totally within her rights to reject the public interest immunity claim that the government has made, and that will be a decision that she makes going forward.”

In a written statement to the royal commission, first reported by The Australian Financial Review this week, Burgess wrote: “I understand this [classified] question as asking whether a decision was made, or a direction issued, by those bodies or people in that period, that either ASIO or the [national intelligence community] as a whole are to reduce [counter-terrorism] efforts to service other priorities.

“I am informed that the Commonwealth intends to assert public interest immunity in relation to whether cabinet or the National Security Committee of cabinet made a decision or issued a direction of that kind.”

Duniam demanded the government release the documents to the royal commission, accusing it of using public interest immunity protections “as a shield from political embarrassment”.

“I cannot see how who made the decision relating to funding and resourcing of intelligence agencies is something that should be held back from consideration by the royal commissioner,” Duniam told Sky News on Friday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62797

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24659807 (300359ZMAY26) Notable: Attorney-general defends blocking counterterror documents from Bondi royal commission - (Video) Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has defended the government’s decision to seek public interest immunity over cabinet documents being sought by the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. The commission is examining counter-terrorism resourcing and policy decisions made before the December 2025 Bondi attack. Rowland said cabinet confidentiality was a long-established legal principle and that the government’s position was consistent with normal practice. The issue arose after ASIO director-general Mike Burgess stated he was unaware of any minister directing intelligence agencies to reduce counter-terrorism efforts in favour of other priorities. Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonathon Duniam argued the documents should be released to ensure full scrutiny of government decision-making. The final decision on whether the material remains protected rests with Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

>>62796

Attorney-general defends blocking counterterror documents from Bondi royal commission

Tom Lowrey - 29 May 2026

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has defended moves by the government to block the public release of cabinet documents relating to counterterrorism funding.

The federal government has made a public interest immunity claim over the documents before the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, essentially arguing it is not in the public interest for the documents to be released.

The royal commission has been looking into decisions made around resourcing for counterterrorism in the years leading up to the Bondi terror attack in December.

Cabinet documents are rarely made public, and the government argues it is simply following that ordinary process of keeping them secret.

Ms Rowland said there was nothing unusual going on.

"There is nothing that the Commonwealth is doing that is novel in terms of there being cabinet confidentiality," she said.

But the government does have the discretion to release the documents if it wishes.

In a written submission to the royal commission, the director-general of domestic spy agency ASIO, Mike Burgess, refers to the documents the government is seeking to keep secret.

His answers to questions on cabinet considerations are redacted within the documents.

But he does make clear that ASIO was not asked by the government to shift resources away from counterterrorism.

"ASIO was not directed by any minister between January 1, 2023 and November 2025 to reduce [counterterror] efforts to service other priorities," he said.

"I am not aware of any such decision or direction by any minister to any [intelligence] agency."

Ms Rowland said the government was following typical procedures, and the final decision rested with commissioner Virginia Bell.

If Commissioner Bell decides to uphold the public interest immunity claim, she cannot consider the information contained within the documents in her findings.

"It's a well established legal principle that cabinet documents and information of that nature attract public interest immunity in legal proceedings and royal commissions, but it's important also to note that decisions about whether to disclose cabinet information are ultimately a matter for the commissioner," she said.

"Commissioner Bell can see this information and can release it, she has the authority to do so and if it's determined to be in the public interest then that is the case."

The government has repeatedly insisted that Australia's national security agencies, including ASIO, have had funding increases since Labor came to office in 2022.

Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonathon Duniam argued the government should drop the public interest immunity claim in the interest of transparency.

"The royal commission must be able to examine the full range of information and chain of decisions around counterterrorism funding, including what ministers and cabinet knew and what actions they did or didn't take," he said.

"This looks far less about protecting the public interest than about hectically protecting the government from scrutiny."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-29/government-defends-hiding-documents-bondi-royal-commission/106736718

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3x1_fwj0h4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62798

File: 2be6765abfbda3a⋯.jpg (227.97 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 29e412b89f24521⋯.jpg (209.93 KB,1200x900,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24659895 (300427ZMAY26) Notable: Aussie kids being radicalised ‘within days’ according to the top cop Krissy Barrett as online extremism surges - Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has warned some young Australians are being radicalised online within days, describing the trend as a growing national security threat. Speaking at Senate estimates, Barrett said extremist content, terrorism propaganda and online exploitation were increasingly targeting children through social media, gaming platforms and private chat groups. She said the issue would be a major focus at next month’s Five Eyes law enforcement summit, where authorities will push technology companies to help counter online radicalisation. The federal government has allocated $74 million to establish a National Counter Terrorism Online Centre. Officials also revealed 19 of 32 people charged with violent extremist material offences were aged between 13 and 17.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38938 (pb)

>>38943 (pb)

>>62681

Aussie kids being radicalised ‘within days’ according to the top cop Krissy Barrett as online extremism surges

Australian children are being radicalised ‘within days’, according to the nation’s top cop who said urging tech giants to step up will be the primary focus of next month’s high-level police summit in the UK.

Caitlyn Rintoul - 29 May 2026

1/2

Australian children are being radicalised “within days” as online extremism and exploitation surges, according to the nation’s top cop.

So alarmed by the worsening situation — Krissy Barrett will work with international partners at a high-level police summit in the UK next month to urge tech giants to step up.

The Australian Federal Police Commissioner said an accelerating speed and scale of radicalisation would be a key priority for the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group annual meeting — involving counterparts from the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand.

It comes as she painted a picture of deteriorating online landscape during a Senate Estimates hearing on Tuesday night — increasingly filled with extremism, terrorism, child exploitation, sadistic digital abuse — where crime is borderless and commercialised.

“Where it used to take months or years to radicalise a person, in some cases, it’s happening in days,” Ms Barrett said.

“The speed and scale of radicalisation is becoming one of our more significant challenges especially when it comes to young people.

“We are seeing that across the world. A lot of our law enforcement colleagues, particularly our Five Eyes colleagues but indeed right across the globe are challenged by the same significant concerns,” she said.

“So much so that when I travel to the UK next month for the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group annual heads meeting there will be a focus at that meeting on vulnerable communities — specifically young people and how we build an alliance with big tech companies to use AI and other emerging tech to combat these challenges.

“As we all know the tech companies have a big responsibility here. So, we will be working with the tech companies in terms of what they can bring to the table to assist use to protect young people.”

Australia has allocated $74 million over the next two years to establish a national Counter Terrorism Online Centre on home soil.

“It will also provide an early warning system for our counter terrorism teams about hate groups and individuals who are using online platforms to enlist or commit violence,” Ms Barrett said.

AFP Deputy Commissioner National Security Investigations Hilda Sirec said the centre will help agencies triage threats and enhance coordination between jurisdictions to disrupt and intervene early.

She describe it as an “evolving threat” with “more people seeking to advocate hatred fear and violence online”.

“This threat is materialised through terrorists and violent extremist using social media, gaming platforms, online forums, and dark webs to recruit and radicalise others to plan violent acts and build capabilities to executive those acts,” Ms Sirec said.

“We’re seeing online areas as being grievance-filled, where people — children particularity — are being desensitised to graphic material they’re seeing.

“We’re seeing private chat groups on social media act as echo chambers and channels for radicalisation and promotion of violence.

“Of particular concern as the commissioner mentioned is the growing number of young people being targeted and manipulated by violent extremist and terrorists.”

Ms Sirec also revealed 32 people had been charged with violent extremism material offences by Australia’s joint counter-terrorism team — of which 19 were aged between 17 and 13.

Greens Senator David Shoebridge also questioned Home Affairs over funding the department received for tackling online radicalisation of young people and why it wasn’t doing more to clamp down dangerous algorithms.

He said young Aussies were increasingly “offered up the menu of hate”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62799

File: 8ce4cf8b8e9f3b9⋯.jpg (445.59 KB,1891x1064,1891:1064,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e504090391d817⋯.jpg (271.59 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 04b77f5b4f19c33⋯.jpg (297.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f85d32d72768d2f⋯.jpg (213.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24659921 (300446ZMAY26) Notable: 1996 gun reform architect slams ‘spineless’ leaders as national buyback collapses - Simon Chapman, a leading advocate of Australia’s 1996 gun reforms, has criticised state governments for abandoning a proposed national firearms buyback announced after the Bondi terror attack. Chapman said political leaders were showing a lack of resolve and accused some of prioritising electoral concerns over public safety. The criticism follows Victoria’s decision not to participate in the scheme, joining Queensland and the Northern Territory in rejecting the proposal, while South Australia has also indicated it will not change its laws. NSW Premier Chris Minns said his government was prepared to proceed alone if necessary and remained committed to stricter firearms controls. Chapman contrasted the current response with the rapid implementation of reforms after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, arguing progress on the latest buyback had been too slow.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38996 (pb)

>>39028 (pb)

>>62759

1996 gun reform architect slams ‘spineless’ leaders as national buyback collapses

LACHLAN LEEMING - 29 May 2026

One of the driving forces behind gun reforms actioned in John Howard’s 1996 buyback has criticised the “glacial pace” of Anthony Albanese’s 2026 version, as NSW faces being the only state participating in the scheme.

Simon Chapman, who as co-convener of the Coalition for Gun Control in the 1990s championed legal changes including a buyback and banning semiautomatic weapons, also claimed state leaders were showing a “lack of political spine” after Premier Jacinta Allan this week confirmed Victoria wouldn’t join in on the key reform.

Mr Chapman said former Nationals leader Tim Fischer, who as deputy prime minister strongly supported Mr Howard on the 1996 buyback, would be “turning in his grave to see this spinelessness and backsliding”.

NSW Premier Chris Minns this week said he was prepared to “go ahead alone” as the only state committed to the reform announced by Mr Albanese in the days after the Bondi terror attack.

The Premier said discussions on funding for the scheme were still under way with the commonwealth. “We need help from the ‘feds’ here,” he said.

“If we have to go ahead alone on gun law reform in NSW, we will go alone – we’re going to be the only state with the toughest laws when it comes to firearms in the country.”

His remarks followed Ms Allan becoming the latest state leader to ditch the buyback, after announcing on Monday that Victoria wouldn’t participate.

Mr Chapman lashed the withdrawal of Victoria, which comes amid concerns within state Labor that a cap on gun ownership could hurt the party in regional and outer-suburban seats at the election later this year.

“There’s a lack of political spine – people are putting their electoral positions in critical electorates ahead of the national interest,” Mr Chapman said.

He added there was “absolute unity” among political parties during the 1996 buyback – with prime minister Mr Howard backed by his Nationals deputy, Mr Fischer.

“Tim Fischer would be turning in his grave to see this spinelessness and backsliding going on,” Mr Chapman said.

He added the “the glacial pace” of implementing the buyback had also hindered keeping the states on board.

“(In 1996) it was all done and dusted within about 10 days of the Port Arthur shooting,” he said.

Ms Allan on Monday confirmed Victoria wouldn’t pursue the buyback, with state Police Minister Anthony Carbines saying: “The government is not engaging in caps, and so the government won’t be engaging in the buyback scheme as it sits currently through the commonwealth.”

Ms Allan on Monday defended the position, saying she was “just not necessarily convinced that caps is the way to go”.

She said the state would instead focus on evil actors and criminals “who get their hands on a single gun”.

While her state will implement other measures, including a citizenship requirement for gun owners and tighter licensing requirements, the rejection leaves the Albanese government’s plans for a wider buyback in tatters.

Contacted about Victoria’s stance and slow commonwealth progress on the scheme, a federal government spokeswoman said the responsibility was on the jurisdictions over whether they would try to clamp down on gun ownership.

“It’s for states and territories to justify to Australians if they intend to stand in the way of getting those guns off our streets,” she said.

“All governments should be working to help to keep Australians safe.

“National cabinet agreed to strengthen gun laws across the nation … We anticipate the buyback scheme will lead to a significant reduction in the number of firearms within our community.”

Victoria joins Queensland and the Northern Territory in rejecting the national buyback.

South Australia has also signalled it won’t change its gun laws.

Western Australia completed its own buyback earlier this year while Tasmania has cobbled together its own scheme.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/1996-gun-reform-architect-slams-spineless-leaders-as-national-buyback-collapses/news-story/9967fc2b1c33d5d40142507e3a528f06

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62800

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24659938 (300504ZMAY26) Notable: ‘We are the patriot party’: Taylor sets up Albanese fight after Abbott’s Liberal rallying cry - (Video) Liberal leader Angus Taylor has used the Liberal Party’s federal council meeting to sharpen attacks on the Albanese government, accusing Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of breaking promises on taxation and economic policy. The speech followed Tony Abbott’s election as federal Liberal Party president, where he described the party as facing an “existential crisis” and declared it should be Australia’s “patriot party”. Abbott pledged support for Taylor’s leadership and urged the Liberals to rebuild membership and reconnect with voters. Taylor promoted Coalition policies on tax, migration and government spending while positioning the opposition as the only party capable of removing Labor from office. The speeches reflected the party’s efforts to rebuild after its election defeat.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘We are the patriot party’: Taylor sets up Albanese fight after Abbott’s Liberal rallying cry

James Massola and Daniella White - May 29, 2026

1/2

Angus Taylor will issue a rallying cry to a shattered Liberal Party and accuse Anthony Albanese seven times in the one speech of lying to Australians about tax hikes, a day after Tony Abbott declared the party was in an existential crisis and needed to be Australia’s “patriot party”.

Abbott, elected unopposed as president on the first day of the Liberal Party’s federal council meeting in Melbourne, said he had returned to public life because “I owe the Liberal Party big time, and that’s why I regard it as my duty to serve the party in this time of existential crisis”.

“As the last successful federal leader of the opposition, I do believe that I have the ability to help Angus Taylor to be the next successful federal leader of the opposition and to become our 32nd prime minister,” Abbott said.

“We are the freedom party, the tradition party, but above all else, we are the patriot party, which is why, at our best, we should be absolutely unbeatable.”

The former prime minister, who has long been a mentor to Taylor, is widely considered to have been one of the most effective opposition leaders in Australian history, though his prime ministership ended after less than two years amid a protracted slump in the polls and a divisive 2014 budget.

He is seen by some within the Liberals as a divisive figure, and his ascent to the presidency – the most senior position in the organisational wing of the party – is a boost for the conservative faction and another sign of the stranglehold the group has over future direction.

Abbott was visibly emotional as he spoke, lamenting the fact the party would be “lucky to have 50,000 members around the country” and pointing out the Canadian conservative party had about 400,000 members.

He took a swipe at the Labor government for breaking promises not to change capital gains or negative gearing taxes and employed a series of three-word slogans strikingly similar to those he used while opposition leader more than a decade ago.

“Angus has declared an agenda for our country to stop the toxic taxes, to end mass migration, and put Australia first, to abolish net zero, and to permanently restrain big government by indexing forever the tax thresholds,” he said.

The fierce speech from the former prime minister comes against the backdrop of the Coalition securing the primary-vote support of just 23 per cent of Australians in the most Recent Political Monitor, trailing Labor on 29 per cent and One Nation on 24 per cent.

Abbott also re-ignited the culture war over Australia’s national flag – both Abbott and former leader Peter Dutton refused to stand in front of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags, along with the Australian flag, at certain official events – and lashed Albanese for his “inability to stand in front of just one national flag, an inability to acknowledge that this country belongs to all Australians equally”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62801

File: b66b0edec0100f2⋯.jpg (254.18 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cfbc8e0c2ea2d69⋯.jpg (157.06 KB,1037x1383,1037:1383,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0fd4b7cbc4d322a⋯.jpg (141.35 KB,874x1166,437:583,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 704bbaaebc931aa⋯.jpg (286.39 KB,1612x2149,1612:2149,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660443 (301322ZMAY26) Notable: Regulators asked to investigate ACON’s gender clinic despite ties with the trans lobby group - Complaints have been lodged with Australia’s consumer and health regulators alleging Sydney’s Kaleido Health Centre, operated under ACON, engages in misleading advertising by promoting gender-affirming treatments without adequately disclosing potential risks. The complaints, submitted by advocacy group Active Watchful Waiting, argue the clinic’s website describes hormone therapies and referral services as safe and evidence-based while omitting information about possible adverse effects and issues relating to treatment of minors. The complaints also raise concerns about institutional links between ACON and regulatory bodies including the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Kaleido rejected the allegations, stating risks, benefits and treatment alternatives are discussed directly with patients during consultations. Regulators said any assessment would be based on evidence and public safety considerations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39037 (pb)

>>39038 (pb)

>>39039 (pb)

Regulators asked to investigate ACON’s gender clinic despite ties with the trans lobby group

STEPHEN RICE - May 29, 2026

1/2

Australia’s most powerful transgender lobby group, ACON, runs a gender clinic in Sydney that systematically hides potentially life-threatening medical risks from patients in its advertising, complaints filed with the national health and corporate regulators allege.

The Kaleido Health Centre, which provides gender-affirming hormone therapy and surgical referrals to transgender patients – including children – operates as a trading name of ACON Health Centre and has the same chief executive officer and chair/president as the trans advocacy group.

The clinic, largely funded by the NSW government, engages in false and misleading advertising, according to detailed compliance audits conducted by child protection and advocacy group Active Watchful Waiting Inc.

Kaleido acknowledges it treats patients aged under 18 only on a hidden Q&A page not accessible via the main navigation menu, the complaints say, but the clinic provides no information on the website about parental consent requirements, minor-specific assessment protocols or age-differentiated risks.

The audits allege the clinic violates Australian Consumer Law and the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law by prominently advertising gender-affirming medical interventions without disclosing any of the known material risks.

But both the government watchdogs tasked with investigating potential breaches, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, have signed up to partnerships with ACON, which aggressively promotes gender-affirming medical treatment for minors.

Kaleido Health Centre’s website describes its GP-led hormone therapies and surgical referral pathways as “safe”, “high-quality” and “evidence-based”. However, the audit found no public disclosure of severe risks such as venous thromboembolism, stroke, cardiovascular disease, irreversible physical changes and permanent infertility.

The Kaleido clinic’s website page stating it treats under-18s was accessible via the main navigation menu until February 2025 but has since been moved off the menu.

The clinic claims it is “a separate entity to ACON, with its own CEO and board of directors”, but more than a year after the clinic opened lists ACON CEO Michael Woodhouse as “interim CEO” and ACON president Justin Koonin as chair of the board.

The audits on the clinic were run by AWW executive director Catherine Anderson-Karena, a qualified Association of Software Testing compliance analyst.

“This is a textbook case of misleading by omission,” Ms Anderson-Karena told The Australian. “The website prominently advertises services as ‘safe’, ‘evidence-based’ and ‘high-quality’ – but doesn’t tell consumers about blood clots, cardiovascular risks, fertility impacts, or that many effects are permanent and irreversible”.

Kaleido’s unqualified claims of “evidence-based care” omit any reference to ongoing medical debates and independent international reviews – such as the UK’s Cass Review – that have found the evidence for youth gender medicine to be remarkably weak, she said.

“We’re not asking regulators to take a position on gender medicine,” Ms Anderson-Karena said. “We’re asking them to enforce the same informed consent transparency standards they’d enforce for any medical service offering irreversible interventions to minors.”

A former ACCC lawyer who reviewed the audits, but asked not to be identified, told The Australian there appeared to be clear breaches of consumer law by Kaleido and that, under the legislation, conduct only had to be “likely” to mislead or deceive.

“Parents will be going to these websites who are confused about what’s happening to their children, and they’ll be using them as an important source of information at a very difficult time,” the lawyer said. “When you’re talking about adolescents and young people, it’s not just the patient who’s going to be looking at that information, it’s crucial for parents trying to understand what their child is getting involved with.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62802

File: b839f481af23e91⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,3280x2187,3280:2187,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 37fd3a13c115f43⋯.jpg (57.45 KB,700x882,50:63,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e5fac900c7e95f⋯.jpg (3.52 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660459 (301327ZMAY26) Notable: Trump says Murdoch indicated he would 'handle' newspaper's Epstein story - US President Donald Trump has refiled a US$10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, alleging publisher Rupert Murdoch indicated he would “handle” a story linking Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The amended lawsuit claims Trump contacted Murdoch after reporters sought comment about an article concerning a purported birthday card bearing Trump’s signature. According to the filing, Trump interpreted Murdoch’s response as meaning the story would not be published. The Wall Street Journal’s parent company, Dow Jones, has previously defended its reporting and said it will contest the case. The lawsuit names Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson and two reporters as defendants. An earlier version of the case was dismissed before being refiled with revisions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Trump says Murdoch indicated he would 'handle' newspaper's Epstein story

abc.net.au - 29 May 2026

Donald Trump has refiled a $US10 billion ($14 billion) lawsuit against News Corporation's Wall Street Journal, claiming that Rupert Murdoch told him he would "handle" a story about Mr Trump's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

The lawsuit is one of several the US president has brought in his personal capacity against news organisations, part of what critics say is a wider pressure campaign against the media.

Last month, a judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit filed against the Journal over legal deficiencies but allowed Mr Trump to revise and refile.

Mr Trump's lawsuit alleges the Journal tarnished his reputation with an article describing a birthday card to deceased sex offender Epstein as bearing Mr Trump's signature.

Mr Trump and his lawyers said the card is fake. Politicians investigating Epstein's case later released a copy provided by his estate.

According to the amended lawsuit, Mr Trump called Mr Murdoch on July 15 after Journal reporters contacted the White House about the story.

"In response, Murdoch stated, 'I will handle it,' which President Trump reasonably interpreted as meaning that Murdoch believed President Trump, and that the article would not be published," the lawsuit says.

Representatives of Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company and a defendant in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the filing or on the allegation regarding Murdoch.

Dow Jones, which News Corp owns, has previously said it has full confidence in the Journal's reporting and will defend itself in court.

Mr Murdoch, who was born in Melbourne, is chairman emeritus of News Corp.

Epstein, the disgraced financier and sex offender, died in a New York jail cell in 2019 in what the city's chief medical examiner determined was a suicide.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, names Mr Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp and its CEO, Robert Thomson, along with two Wall Street Journal reporters as defendants, saying they defamed Mr Trump and caused him to suffer "overwhelming" financial and reputational harm.

In throwing out Mr Trump's first lawsuit in April, US District Court Judge Darrin P. Gayles, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said Mr Trump had not met the "actual malice" legal standard for public figures in defamation cases, which requires evidence that a defendant published a statement that they knew or should have known was false.

The US president has also filed defamation and other lawsuits against other media organisations, including the New York Times, the British Broadcasting Corporation and Iowa's Des Moines Register.

Those outlets have denied wrongdoing and are fighting the cases in court.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-29/trump-says-murdoch-would-handle-epstein-story/106735742

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62803

File: 5493451a8b68501⋯.jpg (335.89 KB,1968x1107,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660484 (301340ZMAY26) Notable: First ship in government’s long-awaited ‘strategic fleet’ revealed - The federal government has announced the cargo vessel ANL Kokoda as the first ship in Australia’s planned strategic fleet, a program intended to strengthen national resilience during crises and supply chain disruptions. Transport Minister Catherine King said the Australian-flagged and crewed vessel would form part of a broader plan for up to 12 commercially operated ships that could be requisitioned during emergencies. The initiative has gained urgency following disruptions to global shipping caused by conflict in the Middle East, including the temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime chokepoint for energy and trade. Built in 2011, the ANL Kokoda has a cargo capacity of 23,000 tonnes and a crew of 36. Supporters argue the fleet will improve sovereign capability and supply chain security, while critics question its economic viability and long-term cost effectiveness.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62705

First ship in government’s long-awaited ‘strategic fleet’ revealed

Matthew Knott - May 28, 2026

The federal government has begun assembling a long-awaited strategic fleet of Australian-flagged and crewed vessels, starting with a 175 metre-long cargo ship that can be used to deliver essential supplies in times of crisis.

The maritime sector has been frustrated by a lack of action on Labor’s 2022 election pledge to create a strategic fleet of 12 merchant vessels, but the closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to the war in Iran this year has created a new sense of urgency.

The number of large Australian-flagged ships has dwindled to just nine – down from a peak of more than 100 large ships 50 years ago, according to peak body Maritime Industry Australia Limited.

A 2023 report prepared for the government found the precipitous decline in Australian commercial vessels meant the nation would have “great difficulty accessing and controlling the maritime assets that we might require” in times of emergency.

“This puts us in a dangerous position and needs to be reversed,” the report found.

Transport Minister Catherine King will announce on Friday that the government has signed a contract for container ship ANL Kokoda, which is 175 metres long and 27 metres wide, to be the first of three vessels in a pilot program for the strategic fleet.

Built in 2011, the ship has a maximum capacity of 23,000 metric tonnes and has a crew size of 36. It had previously been sailing under the Maltese flag.

The government still hopes to create a fleet of 12 privately owned and commercially operated ships that can be requisitioned in times of crisis, including natural disasters and supply chain disruptions.

King said the move marked an “incredible chapter in Australia’s maritime history” and would make the nation more resilient.

“Recent global events have emphasised the importance of Australia having a resilient domestic maritime sector,” she said.

“The ANL Kokoda will provide critical maritime capabilities, including by adding a new tool to be able to respond to disruption events.”

An estimated 99 per cent of Australia’s trade occurs via sea, and virtually all of this travels in foreign-flagged and owned vessels.

Australian-flagged and crewed ships are estimated to cost operators around $7 million a year more than foreign vessels, explaining the decline in the local industry.

Angela Gillham, chief executive of Maritime Industry Australia Limited, said the announcement “could not have come soon enough”.

“Our geography dictates that a strong sovereign maritime industry should be fundamental to the fabric of our economy,” she said.

“The strategic fleet is an appropriately strong response to the troubling decline in Australian maritime capability, which calls for urgent and aggressive policy action to turn the trajectory of the industry around.”

The idea is controversial. The Productivity Commission argued against a strategic fleet in 2023 on the grounds that there were cheaper alternatives to address skill shortages and supply chain disruptions.

Jim Wilson, policy manager at Shipping Australia, has argued that a strategic merchant fleet is bad policy and “the whole thing is going to fail because of its economics”.

Unions have been strong supporters of the idea as a way to improve pay and conditions for Australian workers.

International Transport Workers Federation President Paddy Crumlin, a former head of the militant Maritime Union of Australia, said the decision “puts shipping back, front and centre, in the national supply chain and the national psyche”.

“Shipping is the lifeblood of Australia’s social and economic wealth, but for too long we have been dependent on foreign multinational-owned and controlled ships that pay vulnerable workers slave wages to deliver it,” he said.

“Not only is this exploitative ... it undermines our national security and supply chain sovereignty.”

Maritime executive Peter Court wrote in a piece for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute last year that “Australia lacks an Australian-controlled, internationally trading merchant shipping fleet”.

“This means we have no national capability to move essential fuel, food, medical supplies or military stores. In a crisis – be it conflict, global logistics breakdown, fuel disruption or natural disaster – we rely entirely on foreign-flagged vessels to move crucial imports and exports,” he wrote.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/first-ship-in-government-s-long-awaited-strategic-fleet-revealed-20260528-p601ot.html

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/naval/18278-australia-announces-large-cargo-ship-anl-kokoda-as-first-vessel-in-maritime-strategic-fleet

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62804

File: 275b2fb73f357ba⋯.jpg (458.86 KB,2560x1472,40:23,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c5281d934ef23c1⋯.jpg (517.31 KB,2560x1707,2560:1707,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e98868a4b3b2eb6⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660508 (301357ZMAY26) Notable: Aussie Submarine sold to US: C2 Robotics commissions first US export Large Uncrewed Undersea Vehicle - Australian defence technology company C2 Robotics has commissioned and delivered its first Speartooth Large Uncrewed Undersea Vehicle (LUUV) to the United States, marking the company’s first export of the autonomous submarine platform. The christening ceremony, attended by US Naval Attache Captain Josh Fagan and Royal Australian Navy representatives, signalled the transition of the Speartooth program from development into operational service. Designed around a “Small, Smart, Many” concept, the LUUV is intended to provide cost-effective intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and strike capabilities in contested maritime environments. The sale highlights growing defence-industrial co-operation between Australia and the United States and reflects increasing interest in autonomous undersea systems as part of broader allied efforts to expand maritime capability and undersea deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38906 (pb)

>>62704

Aussie Submarine sold to US: C2 Robotics commissions first US export Large Uncrewed Undersea Vehicle

c2robotics.com.au - May 1, 2026

C2 Robotics has today marked a significant milestone with the commissioning and christening of its Speartooth Large Uncrewed Undersea Vehicle (LUUV), the first to be delivered to the United States.

This ceremony represents a defining moment for the company, signalling both the transition of Speartooth from development, into operational service, and C2 Robotics’ expansion into international markets.

While ship christenings are a longstanding naval tradition, this event is a first for C2 Robotics and was conducted with a modern twist – as it was christened by a robotic arm, with a ‘Human-on the-loop’! A philosophy that extends to Speartooth’s operational context.

“This is a proud and important step for our company,” said Troy Duggan, CEO of C2 Robotics. “We don’t typically conduct christening ceremonies for all of our boats, but this moment reflects the maturity of the Speartooth program and the strength of our partnership with the United States.” “The LUUV program is incredibly fast paced with payload options and mission roles continuously expanding”, Duggan said.

The christening ceremony was officiated by Guest of Honour and Sponsor’s representative – Captain Josh Fagan – the US Naval Attache based in Canberra. Representing the Director General of Maritime Integrated Capabilities (who oversees the RAN’s autonomous systems program) was Captain Tony Miskelly RAN. C2 Robotics team members and suppliers were also in attendance.

The Speartooth LUUV has been designed to deliver scalable, cost-effective undersea capability across intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and strike missions. Its smaller size and lower unit cost enable it to operate in contested environments and generate force mass in ways that traditional platforms cannot.

“This partnership demonstrates a shared commitment to advancing allied autonomous undersea capability,” Duggan said. “Speartooth is built on the principle of ‘Small, Smart, Many’—and today’s event brings that concept one step closer to operational reality.”

C2 Robotics extends its sincere appreciation to CAPT Josh Fagan for supporting the ceremony and formally marking the entry of Speartooth into service with the United States.

A further announcement on overseas sales with our European partner, Eurobotics GmbH, will be released soon.

https://c2robotics.com.au/aussie-submarine-sold-to-us-c2-robotics-commissions-first-us-export-luuv/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62805

File: 844145715c67524⋯.jpg (236.6 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3c01f8f520f1948⋯.jpg (172.91 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f24566573f4679e⋯.jpg (168.94 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 24949d0e48ce1e5⋯.jpg (140.07 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e44e77dbba0436⋯.jpg (285.84 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660589 (301423ZMAY26) Notable: READOUT: Pacific Fleet Commander’s travel to Perth, Australia, May 25-27 - US Pacific Fleet commander Admiral Steve Koehler visited Perth for the Indian Ocean Defence & Security Conference, where he met Australian defence officials, government representatives and industry leaders to discuss regional security and defence co-operation. Koehler reaffirmed US support for AUKUS and highlighted the importance of deeper integration and interoperability between allied forces in the Indo-Pacific. During the conference he joined a naval leadership panel with senior Australian and Japanese military leaders to discuss deterrence, capability development and trilateral co-operation. Koehler also visited HMAS Stirling, the Royal Australian Navy’s major western fleet base and a key future hub for AUKUS submarine activities, where he toured training and support facilities. The visit underscored the continuing importance of the Australia-US alliance to regional security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

READOUT: Pacific Fleet Commander’s travel to Perth, Australia, May 25-27

U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs - 28 May 2026

U.S. Navy Adm. Steve Koehler, commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, visited Perth, Australia, May 25-27, 2026, to attend the Indian Ocean Defence & Security (IODS) 2026 Conference & Exhibition, Australia’s premier forum on defense and security in the Indian Ocean region designed to facilitate high-level engagement on shared regional challenges, capability development, and sovereign industry growth.

At IODS 2026, Koehler met with senior Australian defense and government officials and industry partners to reinforce the strength of the U.S.-Australia alliance, emphasize U.S. commitment to AUKUS, and to deepen ties with allies and partners to achieve a shared commitment to maintaining peace and security in the region.

During the conference, Koehler participated in a senior Naval leadership panel alongside Hammond and Vice Adm. Yasuhiro Kunimi, vice chief of staff, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force. The leaders reflected on the strong partnership between the three nations, capability integration, and increased interoperability between allies and partners in the region which provides credible deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.

Koehler also visited the Royal Australian Navy base HMAS Stirling on Garden Island to tour the training, housing, and gym facilities. He also visited Kings Park to view a plaque given by U.S. Navy Adm. James D. Watkins, commander in chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet, in 1982 thanking the people of Western Australia for their hospitality over the many decades to the U.S. Navy.

Koehler’s visit to Australia reaffirmed the U.S. – Australia alliance remains a cornerstone for peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific. U.S. Pacific Fleet delivers combat-ready naval forces to defend the homeland and U.S. interests throughout the region, provide credible deterrence, and strengthen U.S. alliances and partnerships to ensure a secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific.

https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4502366/readout-pacific-fleet-commanders-travel-to-perth-australia-may-25-27/

https://iods.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62806

File: 93fce78ab9f8897⋯.jpg (290.99 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 92804842e761a53⋯.jpg (220.7 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e66811071b5bedc⋯.jpg (126.3 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ad74f19fb5feb57⋯.jpg (177.88 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ffe563c203e4198⋯.jpg (285.33 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660647 (301437ZMAY26) Notable: U.S., Australia, Japan begin Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 - Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 has commenced in Queensland, bringing together military personnel from Australia, the United States and Japan for five weeks of live-fire and combined-arms training. Running from May 29 to July 3, the exercise involves Australia’s 3rd Brigade, United States Marine and Army units, and Japan Self-Defense Force personnel. Training will focus on improving interoperability, communications, tactics and operational procedures across the three forces while testing their ability to conduct coordinated combat operations. Activities include offensive and defensive field exercises, mounted weapons training, mortar operations and live-fire manoeuvres, culminating in a multinational combined-arms live-fire exercise. Military leaders said the drills are designed to strengthen combat readiness, deepen trilateral defence co-operation and ensure allied forces can operate effectively together across the Indo-Pacific region.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

U.S., Australia, Japan begin Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026

1st Lt. Chase Fortier, Marine Rotational Force - Darwin - 29 May 2026

TOWNSVILLE, Australia – Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 officially commenced today following an opening ceremony that brought together forces from the United States, Australia, and Japan. Scheduled from May 29 to July 3, 2026, the exercise serves as a premier training venue to build a cohesive, multi-national force capable of operating seamlessly across the Indo-Pacific's complex environments.

Throughout the exercise, U.S. Marines and Sailors assigned to 1st Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment and Combat Logistics Battalion 5, both with Marine Rotational Force – Darwin 26, will work alongside the Australian Defence Force’s 3rd Brigade, as well as maneuver elements from the U.S. Army and Japan Self Defense Force.

The primary focus of this year's exercise is interoperability advancement. By actively aligning communications, tactics, and procedures during rigorous field training, participating nations are eliminating friction points and building a seamless allied force. This integration ensures that U.S., Australian and Japanese forces are ready to respond to regional challenges as a unified front in any future crisis.

In addition to interoperability, Southern Jackaroo 2026 is designed to test and prove combined arms integration. Participating forces will execute a demanding progression of training, including force-on-force offensive and defensive operations, mounted machine-gun gunnery, and mortar employment.

Through these coordinated live-fire attacks and mounted maneuvers, multinational forces will demonstrate their ability to synchronize fires, maneuver, and effects to achieve a distinct and decisive battlefield advantage. The exercise will culminate in a multi-national combined arms live-fire exercise.

"Exercise Southern Jackaroo enhances our collective capability by integrating U.S. Marines alongside our allies in realistic, demanding scenarios," said Lt. Col. Mark Saville, commanding officer of 1st Bn., 5th Marines. "By practicing how we communicate and work together on the ground, we ensure that our combined forces maintain a high state of combat readiness and a decisive tactical edge."

Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 brings together U.S. Marines, Sailors, and Soldiers, the Australian Defence Force and Japan Self Defense Force for a month-long, multi-national training event. The exercise focuses on advancing combined arms integration and tactical interoperability through rigorous live-fire scenarios, ensuring these allied militaries can operate seamlessly as a unified front across the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4504650/us-australia-japan-begin-exercise-southern-jackaroo-2026/

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/566384/us-australia-japan-begin-exercise-southern-jackaroo-2026

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62807

File: f27ed66b0eb8bd5⋯.mp4 (15.86 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24660738 (301459ZMAY26) Notable: Exercise Southern Jackaroo unites Australian, US and Japanese forces for drills - (Video) Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 has begun near Townsville, bringing together about 3,000 military personnel from Australia, the United States, Japan, South Korea and Papua New Guinea in the largest iteration of the exercise to date. Running until July 3, the training combines manoeuvre operations and live-fire activities designed to improve interoperability and combat readiness between partner forces. Australian Army commander Major General Ash Collingburn described the exercise as the Army’s largest onshore international activity for 2026 and said it was focused on building the trust and integration required for coalition operations in future crises or conflicts. Japanese and US commanders highlighted the value of Australia’s expansive training areas and the opportunity to improve shared tactics, procedures and operational co-ordination across allied forces in the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

Exercise Southern Jackaroo unites Australian, US and Japanese forces for drills

Australia’s largest onshore international military exercise has kicked off near Townsville, with 3000 troops from five nations training to fight together should conflict arise.

Evan Morgan - May 30, 2026

1/2

Five nations stood as one on a clear blue winter’s day for the opening ceremony for Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 at the Townsville Field Training Area, 80km southwest of Townsville yesterday.

This year is the largest iteration of the multilateral military training exercise which runs from this week through to July 3 with 3000 soldiers from the Australian Defence Force and personnel and partner nations, including the United States, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Papua New Guinea.

Commander 1st (Australian) Division Major General Ash Collingburn said the joint interoperability exercise helped build a readiness between allied forces.

“Every patrol, every radio check, every ambush, every rehearsal, every hard day in the field, it all contributes to one outcome. A fighting force that can integrate, endure, and fight as one,” the Major General said.

“This is where we build trust. Trust in procedures, trust in capability, but above all, trust in each other as one team. That trust built here in training is what carries forward into crisis and conflict.”

The Major General said Exercise Southern Jackaroo would be the largest onshore international activity for the Australian Army this year.

“We’re bringing together more than 3,000 troops and a suite of the most modern military hardware that we have.”

He said the Townsville Field Training Area (TFTA) is one of the best training areas in the world.

“....We are able to use all of our different capabilities and engage targets at maximum range. We can operate in close country, we can operate in open country, and we can operate in urban terrain. So, it’s a perfect mix of the different environments where we may have to fight.

“The duration of the exercise is around three weeks and there’s a combination of dry fire activity or a manoeuvre exercise and we’ll conclude with a life fire exercise at the end.

“We are a fighting force that is preparing for war. And that requires rigorous training. And the great thing when we bring our international partners together is we are able to build interoperability and the key to interoperability is trust and confidence.

“When we exercise like this, we’re able to build trust and confidence in our capabilities, in our tactics, and most importantly, in our team, such that when we have to fight together, it is instinctive,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62808

File: 288ba1bd027447e⋯.jpg (391.49 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 31d27414307df30⋯.jpg (255.39 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fbaa4bc8aa6f7f6⋯.jpg (240.83 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3ee6c5a2acc1721⋯.jpg (177.18 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 26998bee14f5a1d⋯.jpg (245.6 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24662093 (310054ZMAY26) Notable: US, Japanese forces join Australian army’s largest military drills of the year - Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026 has begun in Queensland, bringing together Australian, United States and Japanese forces for what Australian officials describe as the Army’s largest onshore exercise of the year. The drills, running until July 3 at the Townsville Field Training Area, involve around 1,500 Australian personnel, 400 Japanese troops and 300 US Marines, alongside elements of the US Army’s 11th Airborne Division. Training includes offensive and defensive operations, live-fire attacks, indirect-fire exercises and a multinational combined-arms live-fire finale. The exercise is designed to improve combat readiness, interoperability and coalition warfighting capabilities across the Indo-Pacific. Japanese officials said the training supports efforts to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific, while analysts noted the importance of Queensland’s terrain for jungle and littoral warfare training.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

US, Japanese forces join Australian army’s largest military drills of the year

SETH ROBSON, STARS AND STRIPES - May 29, 2026

American soldiers and Marines helped kick off the largest Australian army exercise of the year alongside Japanese troops on Friday.

Southern Jackaroo is slated to run until July 3 at Townsville Training Ground in the eastern state of Queensland, according to U.S. and Japanese officials.

Marine Rotational Force-Darwin, the Alaska-based 11th Airborne Division, the Australian army’s Townsville-based 3rd Brigade and the Japan’s Middle Army are participating, according to the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force.

About 300 U.S. Marines are involved in the drill, along with 1,500 Australian troops and 400 from Japan, Capt. Kevin Hicks, a spokesman for the rotational Marines, said by email Friday.

The Marines will “conduct offensive and defensive operations, live-fire platoon attacks, small-arms/indirect-fire employment, and a capstone multi-national combined-arms live-fire exercise,” he said.

Southern Jackaroo “is the largest Australian Army exercise this year,” he said. A Jackaroo is an Australian ranch hand.

South Korean troops are also in Australia participating in Exercise Tiger Dingo, which runs concurrently with Southern Jackaroo, Hicks said.

U.S. forces are training for littoral combat, which means jungle warfare, Australian defense researcher Allan Orr told Stars and Stripes by email Friday.

“The only place in Australia that has a jungle environment is North Queensland,” he said of the area that encompasses Townsville.

There could be a reorientation of the American presence in Australia to Queensland now that the Marines’ footprint in Darwin has been accepted by Australians politically, Orr added.

The Japan Ground Self-Defense Force said Southern Jackaroo aims to maintain and strengthen a “free and open Indo-Pacific,” according to a May 22 news release.

Japanese forces will boost their combat capabilities and cooperation with U.S. and Australian forces during the drill, the release said.

Troops from the three nations trained together in September in Niigata, Kyoto, Hyogo, Chiba and Kanagawa prefectures on Japan’s main island of Honshu during the annual Orient Shield exercise.

A reciprocal access agreement that took effect in August 2023 allows Australian and Japanese forces to train in each other’s territory.

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/asia_pacific/2026-05-29/southern-jackaroo-australia-japan-21813787.html

https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9711320/southern-jackaroo-26-us-marines-soldiers-receive-mission-brief-australian-army

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62809

File: e430c133a8359ad⋯.jpg (805.5 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fd857cf370c7a19⋯.jpg (252.05 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 05ae48cee701308⋯.jpg (409.36 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24662191 (310118ZMAY26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith’s lawyer slams media leak as ‘serious breach’ of integrity - Lawyers for Ben Roberts-Smith have called for a full investigation into how media organisations received advance notice of his arrest on war crime charges in April. The National Anti-Corruption Commission has confirmed it is considering a referral from the Office of the Special Investigator and the Australian Federal Police regarding an alleged unauthorised disclosure. Roberts-Smith’s lawyer described the leak as a serious breach of protocol and integrity. Investigators told a Senate committee they were concerned journalists appeared to have prior knowledge of the arrest and were attempting to identify the source of the disclosure. Officials said the arrest location was chosen for operational reasons and rejected suggestions it was staged for publicity. Roberts-Smith has denied the allegations and intends to plead not guilty.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62767

>>62784

>>62788

Ben Roberts-Smith’s lawyer slams media leak as ‘serious breach’ of integrity

Aaron Patrick - 27 MAY 2026

1/2

A lawyer representing Ben Roberts-Smith called for the person or people responsible for leaking advance notice of the Victoria Cross recipient’s arrest last month to be identified and held responsible.

The National Anti-Corruption Commission confirmed it had received a complaint from the Office of the Special Investigator and Federal Police about the advance notice provided to journalists before the arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith on April 7.

The commission said the matter was under “active consideration” and commissioner and former war crimes investigator Paul Brereton would not be involved, avoiding another conflict-of-interest headache for the agency.

Criminal lawyer Karen Espiner welcomed the unusual referral by the two law-enforcement agencies, which have arrested two veterans of the Afghanistan war after investigations that have taken five years. Hundreds of millions were re-allocated from the Defence budget to the Office of the Special Investigator.

“The leak that allowed Nine journalists to be tipped off before Ben’s arrest represents a serious breach of protocol and integrity, and the commission must now fully investigate its origins and hold those responsible to account,” Ms Espiner said.

Nine reporters

Online data suggests that newspapers owned by the Nine media group may have prepared an article about the arrest of the famous ex-soldier the day before. Journalists and photographers from the company may have also been waiting for the arrest when Mr Roberts-Smith was detained at Sydney Airport after arriving with his partner and twin daughters on a shopping trip.

OSI Director-General Chris Moraitis said he called Attorney-General Michelle Rowland that morning to inform her of the impending arrest, which triggered blanket media coverage. When she didn’t answer, one of his staff called the minister’s office but did not disclose where the arrest would be taking place, he told a Senate committee Tuesday evening.

“We believe there is an unauthorised disclosure,” he said. “That’s a matter that concerns me. The media seems to have been privy to things and we’re taking steps to ascertain what happened there.

“We were aware of the media being present because we saw media on the morning around various places. It surprised me that happened because we have usually been pretty good on keeping a low profile.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62810

File: 0b47e5dbb98a587⋯.jpg (158.05 KB,1200x1029,400:343,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24662277 (310146ZMAY26) Notable: Exclusive: BRS ‘zip ties’ contradict Defence claims - Court documents in the war crimes case against Ben Roberts-Smith reportedly indicate prosecutors will rely on battlefield photographs and eyewitness testimony to argue that several Afghan men were detained before being killed. According to the prosecution case, sensitive site exploitation images taken after operations show marks on the wrists of deceased Afghans that are alleged to be consistent with the use of zip ties or other restraints. The evidence is said to relate to incidents at Whiskey 108 in 2009 and operations at Darwan and Syachow in 2012. The photographs are expected to form a key part of the prosecution case. However, the same photographs and associated testimony also raise questions about whether senior commanders, legal officers and others reviewing after-action reports should have identified, investigated or acted upon potential war crimes concerns at the time. Roberts-Smith has pleaded not guilty to all charges and maintains he acted lawfully throughout his service.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62736

Exclusive: BRS ‘zip ties’ contradict Defence claims

Prosecutors say their war crimes murder case against Ben Roberts-Smith includes images that appear to show slain Afghans were tied up before being killed.

Ben Mckelvey - May 30 – June 5, 2026

1/2

Evidence outlined in a prosecution summary of the war crimes case filed against Ben Robert-Smith challenges the Australian Defence Force’s longstanding position that officers and commanders could not have known about illegal killings in Afghanistan while they were happening.

The prosecution statement of its war crimes murder case presents eyewitness accounts, including at least five accounts of one killing at a compound known as Whiskey 108 in 2009.

More importantly, the prosecution says it will also be relying on official Defence imagery that was taken on the battlefield to ensure, among other things, adherence to legal conduct.

It says this imagery shows ligature marks on the wrists of the deceased Afghans, which the prosecution says is evidence the men were detained and zip-tied by Roberts-Smith or men in his patrol before being killed.

Evidence of zip-tying would be inconsistent with Roberts-Smith’s statements and official reporting. It would show that Defence should have been aware of potential war crimes as they were happening and, indeed, had imagery suggesting this.

Roberts-Smith has pleaded not guilty to the war crime murder charges and claims that he never breached the law during his service in Afghanistan. He will defend these allegations in court.

Special Air Service Regiment patrols were obliged when possible to take photographs of bodies after all engagements in Afghanistan, during a process called sensitive site exploitation (SSE).

These images were attached to after-action reports filed by SASR patrols and sent for review by legal officers attached to the Special Operations Task Group.

According to Dr Glenn Kolomeitz, an international humanitarian law consultant who served as a Special Operations Task Group legal officer in 2009, legal officers reviewing SSE imagery are required to do so by comparing them against the after-action reports. “This review should be quite forensic,” he says.

The prosecution summary says that SSE photography features as evidence in the case of the 2012 killing of Ali Jan in Darwan. It is alleged that Ben Roberts-Smith kicked Ali Jan off a cliff and then ordered another soldier to shoot him.

The summary says the SSE imagery shows injuries beyond the gunshot wounds as well as a “linear void of bloodstaining” on the arm of Ali Jan and linear marks “in keeping with the application of a ligature”.

Roberts-Smith has asserted his innocence in relation to this killing.

The prosecution statement also relies on SSE imagery as evidence for the two murder charges that Roberts-Smith faces over a raid undertaken in the village of Syachow in 2012.

According to official after-action reporting about the Syachow raid, Roberts-Smith and his patrol shot two men and threw a grenade at them after the men were seen “moving through a cornfield to gain a tactical advantage” and refused to stop after being told to do so.

The prosecution case is that both men were detained and interrogated by Roberts-Smith, who punched one of them, that both were lined up on the edge of the cornfield, and at least one was blindfolded and zip-tied before they were executed, after which the grenade was thrown at the bodies.

The prosecution says that imagery shows one man had injuries consistent with having been zip-tied before his death.

Roberts-Smith has asserted his innocence in relation to these killings.

The prosecution statement of evidence indicates that multiple images of slain men with ligature damage on their wrists were reviewed by Special Operations Task Group legal officers – military officers with legal qualifications and extensive training on the laws of armed conflict who were attached to special forces.

The 2016 direction of the chief of the defence force that ordered the inspector-general of the Australian Defence Force (IGADF) to undertake the investigation that would eventually result in the report by Paul Brereton specifically targeted legal officers and other officers who may have had access to after-action reports and SSE imagery.

Of five directives, one called for the IGADF to investigate the potential for there to have been a “systemic failure, including by commanders and legal officers at multiple levels within SOCOMD [Special Operations Command], to report or investigate the stories as required by Defence policies”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62811

File: 1278132b933d6dd⋯.jpg (381.39 KB,2500x1563,2500:1563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f5f6d6b48dabf34⋯.jpg (459.91 KB,2236x1399,2236:1399,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d6fb792dbf4087⋯.jpg (225.32 KB,2500x1568,625:392,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24662516 (310305ZMAY26) Notable: Epstein victims ‘lack confidence in police needed to submit Andrew evidence’ - A lawyer representing Jeffrey Epstein victims says several women with information concerning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reluctant to co-operate with British police because they lack confidence in previous investigations and fear media intrusion. US attorney Brad Edwards said multiple clients possessed relevant information but were unwilling to come forward. One woman alleges Epstein sent her to Britain to have sex with Mountbatten-Windsor in 2010. Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently denied wrongdoing. The allegations follow those previously made by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein trafficked her to meet Mountbatten-Windsor in 2001. Thames Valley Police has said it remains willing to receive evidence and has engaged with legal representatives. Lawyers for alleged victims say privacy concerns and public scrutiny continue to discourage potential witnesses from speaking to authorities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62749

Epstein victims ‘lack confidence in police needed to submit Andrew evidence’

Patrick Sawer - 29 May 2026

Victims of Jeffrey Epstein who claim to have evidence concerning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor do not have enough confidence in the British police to come forward, according to a US lawyer.

Brad Edwards, who represents hundreds of Epstein’s victims, claimed to have “multiple clients” who have information about the former prince but are reluctant to speak to police because they lack faith in the investigation.

His clients include a woman who claims Epstein sent her to Britain to have sex with Mr Mountbatten-Windsor in 2010, when she was in her 20s.

Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) has said that people who come forward will be “treated with care, compassion and respect”.

However, Mr Edwards told the BBC: “Our multiple clients, plural, with information about [Mr Mountbatten-Windsor] will not speak with authorities in the UK for two reasons.

“First, the authorities did not care to do anything when Epstein was alive, so their confidence is low. Second, and most important, the harassment by the British press has dissuaded them from ever cooperating with UK authorities or speaking with the British press.”

The woman represented by Mr Edwards has made an allegation against Mr Mountbatten-Windsor regarding a purported encounter at Royal Lodge, then the former prince’s home, in 2010, before he had invited her to Buckingham Palace for tea.

Thames Valley Police confirmed in February that it would assess that claim.

She is the second woman to allege she was abused in the UK, following Virginia Giuffre’s claims that Epstein brought her to the UK in 2001 to have sex with Mr Mountbatten-Windsor.

Mr Edwards told the BBC that “more than one client” had initially been willing to co-operate with British police in relation to that allegation, but had been put off from doing so when UK-based journalists began investigating the woman and her family.

The lawyer said “other victims took notice” of the fact that speaking out had resulted in the woman’s privacy being threatened.

Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman’s legal team, but that her lawyer had said she would not communicate with police over fears regarding her privacy. Mr Edwards confirmed that Thames Valley Police had been in contact with him.

Sexual misconduct claims to be assessed

The force said last week that its investigation into Mr Mountbatten-Windsor will assess claims of sexual misconduct as part of its ongoing inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office.

It is understood detectives are concerned that the public believes they are focused only on claims that the former prince leaked documents to Epstein, when the legal terms of the offence under investigation are much broader.

Sigrid McCawley, a US lawyer who represented Giuffre and is acting for other women whom Epstein may have trafficked to the UK, said she did not believe she had received any form of communication from the Metropolitan Police.

Giuffre, who took her own life last year, made a complaint to the Metropolitan Police in 2015. Officers interviewed her a number of times, but she was told there would not be an investigation.

Mr Mountbatten-Windsor settled for an estimated £12m in a civil case she brought against him in 2022. The settlement was made without admission of liability.

The former prince was arrested on Feb 19 and released under investigation on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

He has denied any personal gain from his role as a UK trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.

Epstein, who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008, died in a New York prison in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.

An NPCC spokesman said: “As part of the UK policing response, efforts have been made to contact victim-survivors who have already chosen to share their experiences publicly.

“In some cases, this has involved engagement with legal representatives; however, we recognise that we have not yet been able to reach everyone and our efforts continue.

“We understand that coming forward can be incredibly difficult, and we want anyone affected to know they can do so in their own time, when they feel ready. Our door remains open.

“Should any victim-survivors choose to contact UK policing, they will be treated with care, compassion and respect, with their well-being, privacy and right to anonymity at centre of our response.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/29/epstein-victims-lack-confidence-in-police/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62812

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663222 (311246ZMAY26) Notable: Shangri-La Dialogue 2026: 'Where is China' ask delegates at Asian defence forum - (Video) China’s decision to send a low-level delegation to the Shangri-La Dialogue for a second consecutive year has drawn attention at Asia’s premier security forum, with delegates questioning Beijing’s absence from high-level discussions. Defence Minister Dong Jun did not attend, missing opportunities to meet counterparts including US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles. Instead, China was represented by military academics and researchers, and its traditional keynote address was absent from the program. Analysts suggested Beijing may be seeking to avoid scrutiny over issues such as Taiwan tensions, military corruption investigations and regional security disputes. While some participants described the absence as a missed opportunity for direct engagement, others argued the forum’s primary purpose remains maintaining strategic dialogue and defence ties across the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Shangri-La Dialogue 2026: 'Where is China' ask delegates at Asian defence forum

Claire Fu and Xinghui Kok - May 30, 2026

SINGAPORE, May 30 (Reuters) - The big question hanging over this year's Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defence forum, is: "Where is China?"

For the second year running, Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun has given the free-wheeling Singapore security meeting a miss, skipping opportunities to meet U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as well as counterparts from Australia, France, Britain, Japan and other nations.

In his place, Beijing sent a low-profile delegation of People's Liberation Army "experts and scholars" - a step down from the usual high-powered presence.

A highlight of the dialogue's annual programme has been a robust speech by China's defence minister or senior official laying out Beijing's defence doctrine and outlook on global tensions. But the speech helmed by China has been dropped from this year's programme, like in 2025.

Even Hegseth took note.

"I wish my counterpart was here at this conference, but I look forward to other options when we can cross paths and communicate, talk about things where often actions at sea or actions in the air are perceived differently," he said during his own keynote speech on Saturday.

Australia's Richard Marles called it a lost opportunity for countries to have frank, face-to-face talks on flashpoints.

Dong Jun however, did meet Hegseth during U.S. President Donald Trump's visit to China earlier this month.

Zhou Bo, a retired PLA senior colonel and a member of China's delegation to the meeting, downplayed his absence.

"This is not the first time the defence minister is not attending," he said. "And academic delegations have come before. But it is true that the level of the delegation is relatively low this time."

Some analysts point to a more calculated choice: avoiding questions like Taiwan tensions and the effect of military corruption purges on China's combat readiness.

"My feeling is that they are trying to avoid tough questions," said Chong Ja Ian, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore.

"The question that comes up with the (Chinese) delegation, since it is so researcher heavy, is their representativeness and authoritativeness."

HEGSETH'S COMMENTS ON CHINA THIS YEAR RESTRAINED

Diplomats said Beijing may also have wanted to avoid a repeat of last year's dialogue, when Hegseth described China as a threat in the Indo-Pacific and urged Asian allies to boost defence spending.

Beijing responded at the time by accusing the United States of vilifying China.

This year, Hegseth struck a more measured tone, although he cautioned that "no state, including China, can impose its hegemony and hold the security or prosperity of our nation and our allies in question".

He added that U.S.-China relations were better than they had been in many years.

China began sending a usually high-powered delegation to the 23-year-old event in 2007. It dispatched its defence minister in 2011 and again in 2019, and continued the practice from 2022 to 2024. The Shangri-La Dialogue was suspended in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bilahari Kausikan, a veteran Singapore diplomat, said the Shangri-La Dialogue was always primarily about anchoring the U.S. in Southeast Asia and ensuring its defense chief comes to Singapore and Southeast Asia at least once a year.

"Whether China is represented by its defence minister is a secondary factor. It would be nice but not essential to have the Chinese defence minister here.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/where-is-china-ask-delegates-asian-defence-forum-2026-05-30/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0kq2yVV7zU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62813

File: 6da7d8b637b192a⋯.jpg (6.2 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663227 (311252ZMAY26) Notable: Hegseth praises Australia for ‘stepping up’ as he shifts tone on China - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore to praise Australia’s growing defence investment and deeper military integration with the United States, describing Australia as “stepping up” while criticising some allies for underinvesting in their own security. Hegseth reaffirmed US commitment to maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific and preventing any single power from dominating the region. However, his remarks on China were notably less confrontational than in previous years, reflecting an apparent shift in tone following recent talks between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping. Hegseth rejected suggestions that US arms sales to Taiwan had been paused because of the Iran conflict, while Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles separately highlighted concerns about maritime security, grey-zone activities and damage to Taiwan’s undersea communications cables.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62812

Hegseth praises Australia for ‘stepping up’ as he shifts tone on China

Lisa Visentin - May 30, 2026

1/2

Beijing: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has rejected claims that weapons sales to Taiwan had been paused due to the Iran war, as he chided allies for not spending enough on their own defence while praising Australia for “stepping up”.

At the Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore, Asia’s top defence summit, Hegseth also noted there was “rightful alarm” about Beijing’s military build-up and assured allies that America remained committed to ensuring China was not allowed to dominate the region.

But he said relations with China were better than they had been in years in a less strident speech than he gave last year, reflecting a broader shift in the Trump administration’s tone towards Beijing.

He scolded “free-riding” allies who he said were not carrying their weight by investing enough in their own defences, but singled out Australia along with other Asian partners, including South Korea, the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, while taking aim at Europe.

“Australia is stepping up. Together, we are expanding the rotational presence of US forces and collaborating to ensure our defence industrial bases build and sustain weapons required for a high-end fight,” Hegseth told the room of top defence officials, diplomats and politicians.

“We appreciate Australia’s investment in real combat power and the commitment to integrate more deeply with the US joint force across South-East Asia.”

His comments will be welcomed by the Albanese government, which has pledged to invest an extra $53 billion in defence over the next decade – a figure that still falls short of Hegseth’s call for Australia to spend 3.5 per cent of GDP.

Hegseth did not mention Taiwan or Iran in his speech, only discussing them in response to questions in the Q&A section. On Iran, he noted “any deal will be a good deal” as negotiations with Tehran continue and said the US was ready to restart attacks if one couldn’t be reached.

He said there had been no change to US policy on Taiwan and no link should be made between US arms stockpiles and the Iran war. But his remarks will likely do little to assuage anxiety in Taiwan about Trump’s ongoing commitment to helping the democratic island defend itself as it waits on his decision to approve an estimated $US14 billion ($19.5 billion) arms package.

“On the Taiwan arms sales, I would very much decouple the two, and we feel very good about our stockpiles, both how we use them, and in Epic Fury in this historic moment,” Hegseth said, referring to the US military operation in Iran.

“Any decision about future Taiwan arm sales, as the president said, will rest with him.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62814

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663242 (311303ZMAY26) Notable: Pete Hegseth tells Shangri-La Dialogue that US won't allow China to dominate Asia - (Video) US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Shangri-La Dialogue that the Trump administration would not allow any power to dominate the Indo-Pacific, stressing that Washington remained committed to maintaining a favourable balance of power in the region. Hegseth urged allies to increase defence spending and said the United States needed “partners, not protectorates” as it expanded military investment and strengthened its regional presence. While warning against Chinese hegemony, he adopted a less confrontational tone than in previous appearances and did not mention Taiwan in his main address, despite ongoing debate over delayed US arms sales to the island. Separately, Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles highlighted concerns about damage to undersea communications cables and warned that maritime “grey-zone” activities could threaten regional stability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62812

Pete Hegseth tells Shangri-La Dialogue that US won't allow China to dominate Asia

Stephen Dziedzic - 30 May 2026

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has declared that the Trump administration will not let China impose "hegemony" on the region, but has skirted any mention of Taiwan in a closely watched speech at Asia's premier defence summit.

Mr Hegseth, also known as the Secretary of War, is the highest-profile speaker at this year's Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, after China decided not to send its defence minister for the second year in a row.

He once again heaped pressure on allies in both Europe and Asia to spend more on defence, saying the US needed "partners not protectorates", declaring America would "speak softly" but "carry a big stick".

He boasted about the Trump administration's record US$1.5 trillion (A$2.085 trillion) defence budget request, saying it would "unleash America's arsenal of freedom and expand America's military dominance for decades to come".

The defence secretary also pointed to US efforts to bolster its military presence along the first island chain, the line of archipelagos stretching from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines, stressing that Washington DC would not abandon Asia and would work with partners to create a "genuinely stable equilibrium" and a "favourable durable balance of power".

"A Pacific dominated by any hegemon would unravel the regional balance of power and undermine the equilibrium we all seek to preserve," Mr Hegseth said.

"The Department of War is working with the utmost focus to prevent any such unravelling."

Taiwan not mentioned in speech

Most officials, ministers and military at Shangri-La were most closely focused on what the secretary said on Taiwan in the wake of the summit between Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing earlier this month, and the stalled arms sales worth US$14 billion (A$19.5 billion) to Taiwan.

China has poured large amounts of energy into trying to prise the US away from Taiwan, and the Trump administration's recent moves have fuelled anxieties in Taiwan that US support could be ebbing.

Mr Hegseth did not directly mention Taiwan once in his speech to the conference, in stark contrast to his speech last year, when he warned against a potential Chinese invasion of the self-ruled island.

When asked about the arms sale, he denied that the US had held up sales because its stockpiles had been drained by the war in Iran, saying the administration felt "very good" about its stocks.

"Any decision about future Taiwan arms sales, as the president said, will rest with him and the nature of that relationship," he said.

He also said there was "no change" in America's overall position on Taiwan, although successive US administrations have refrained from using arms sales as a bargaining chip since Ronald Reagan issued the Six Assurances in 1982.

Meanwhile, Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles used his speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue to warn about the risks to subsea cables in the wake of incidents that have damaged the critical arteries in both the Baltic Sea and the Taiwan Strait, with analysts pointing the finger at China and Russia as the likely culprits.

Mr Marles said it was "striking" that "several cables have been severed across the Baltic and the Taiwan Strait since November 2024", although he did not directly blame either Beijing or Moscow.

"Now, maybe these were accidents. But even if they were, it highlights the vulnerability of this crucial part of the globe's infrastructure," Mr Marles said.

"If they were intentional, we are left to wonder: Are countries testing our response times, testing our attribution thresholds and testing our political will to respond?"

His speech came in the wake of a sometimes pessimistic keynote speech to open the conference on Friday night by Vietnam's General Secretary of the Communist Party, Tô Lâm.

The Vietnamese top leader said the challenges facing the world included an erosion of international rules and law, a crisis of development models, including slowing growth and climate change, and a crisis of trust among nations.

He said the erosion of trust was a "silent, yet dangerous crisis" which fuelled mistrust and anxiety — sometimes further exacerbated by the rise of new technologies like AI.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-30/pete-hegseth-us-will-prevent-china-hegemony-shangri-la-dialogue/106740596

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xLIy4a9Ilc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62815

File: c979dd4251a76e1⋯.jpg (123.88 KB,1396x930,698:465,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e8f70f6b0eadac7⋯.jpg (172.79 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6dd1c9acd93562d⋯.jpg (143.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663254 (311310ZMAY26) Notable: Attacks on subsea critical infrastructure at a scale unprecedented, says Marles - Defence Minister Richard Marles has warned that damage to undersea communications cables is occurring at an unprecedented rate, describing the seabed as an emerging “battlefield” and calling for stronger international action against maritime “grey-zone” activities. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Marles highlighted multiple cable-cutting incidents in the Taiwan Strait and Baltic Sea, noting that some cases have been attributed to Chinese and Russian-linked vessels. He urged greater transparency from Beijing regarding its maritime operations and called for tighter regulation of “shadow fleet” vessels often linked to sanctions evasion and other illicit activity. Marles argued that existing legal frameworks have struggled to keep pace with these tactics and said stronger monitoring, enforcement and accountability measures were needed to protect regional security and stability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62812

Attacks on subsea critical infrastructure at a scale unprecedented, says Marles

BEN PACKHAM - May 30, 2026

Defence Minister Richard Marles says a surge in damage to subsea cables has transformed the seabed into a “battlefield”, urging greater transparency from Beijing around its maritime operations and tighter international controls over “shadow fleet” vessels.

Mr Marles declared at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Singapore that internet cables, “the arteries of modern civilisation”, were being cut at an unprecedented rate, with Australia and the Indo-Pacific particularly vulnerable.

“Over the past 18 months, we have witnessed a series of attacks against subsea critical infrastructure at a scale and frequency that is historically unprecedented,” he told the annual strategic forum.

“The seabed is becoming a battlefield. The shadow fleet is becoming a weapon.”

Mr Marles pointed to five separate cases of cables being cut in the Taiwan Strait in the past 18 months, and three in the Baltic Sea, which have been attributed to China and Russia respectively.

“Maybe these were accidents. But even if they were, it highlights the vulnerability of this crucial part of the globe’s infrastructure,” he said.

“If they were intentional, we are left to wonder: are countries testing our response times, testing our attribution thresholds and testing our political will to respond?”

Mr Marles called on Beijing, which has a huge shadow fleet, to come clean on its activities at sea.

“A commitment to transparency around its maritime operations would be a meaningful contribution to the regional stability upon which China’s own prosperity depends, and a commitment to international law as the basis for managing and resolving maritime disputes would do the same, because in truth our region’s stability is under pressure,” Mr Marles said.

He said the international community also needed to band together to introduce tighter controls over maritime traffic, to undermine “gray zone” activity on the high seas.

“We must close legal and institutional gaps that make attribution and accountability so difficult,” Mr Marles said.

“The very doctrine of plausible deniability works precisely because our legal frameworks have not kept pace with tactics. We need stronger national legislation mandating vessel registration and monitoring, regardless of the flag state, we need enhanced enforcement of port state measures. We need financial and criminal penalties that are a genuine deterrent.”

He also reiterated Australia’s call for China to abide by the 2016 decision under the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea that rejected its claim over most of the waterway.

Taiwan reported five separate cases of seabed cable damage in 2025, compared with three in 2024 and three in 2023.

In one case, in February 2025, Taiwan convicted Chinese cargo ship captain Wang Yuliang of damaging the Taiwan-Penghu No. 3 submarine cable, sentencing him to three years in prison and ordering him to pay approximately $US570,000 ($790.000) in damages to Chunghwa Telecom.

Following two incidents in the Baltic in November 2024, which severed cables between Germany and Finland, and between Sweden and Lithuania, Finnish coastguards seized a Russian shadow fleet vessel Eagle S.

Mr Marles said the shadow fleet problem also extended to sanctions-evasion, the transport of Russian oil, illegal fishing and drug trafficking.

“According to Australia’s own fisheries agency, a third of the total fish catch in Southeast Asia and the Pacific is illegal.

“The fisheries of this region support the livelihoods of nearly two hundred million people. Their systematic plunder is not just an environmental problem. It is a security problem.”

He said technology, including satellite-based monitoring and AI-enabled vessel tracking, already existed to deal with the problem. But it required political will to implement.

“The sea connects our great region. What we must all decide is whether that connection will be governed by the laws we have built together, or contested by the tactics of those who prefer the alternatives,” Mr Marles said.

“Australia’s answer is clear. Rules are essential. And operating by them is the pathway to regional peace, security and prosperity.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/attacks-on-subsea-critical-infrastructure-at-a-scale-unprecedented-says-marles/news-story/15fa18832232f90ff19040ada26195fc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62816

File: e7598be6a963b39⋯.jpg (201.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12154073e9e5840⋯.jpg (414.38 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663282 (311323ZMAY26) Notable: Sub shake-up: Australia to receive only used Virginia submarines under revised AUKUS plan - Australia will now receive three in-service Virginia-class submarines from the United States under AUKUS rather than the previously planned mix of used and new boats, with Australia, the US and Britain describing the change as a way to simplify logistics, maintenance and supply chains. Under the original plan, the third submarine was to be a new Block VII Virginia-class boat delivered in 2038. The revised arrangement is expected to shorten the service life of Australia’s interim Virginia fleet before Australian-built AUKUS-class submarines enter service in the mid-2040s. The change comes amid continuing concerns about US submarine production rates and pressure on British shipbuilding capacity. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said AUKUS was making “great progress”, while Defence Minister Richard Marles described it as the biggest leap in Australian military capability in more than a century.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62812

Sub swap: No new Virginia submarines under AUKUS

BEN PACKHAM - May 30, 2026

1/2

The US will now sell Australia three used Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of new and in-service boats as planned, in a move pitched as a way to “streamline” the AUKUS program.

Defence Minister Richard Marles, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, and British Defence Secretary John Healey said the approach was about “simplifying supply chain management, operational and maintenance requirements, and maximising cost efficiencies”.

“This approach would enable Australia to acquire three in-service VCS in lieu of a mixture of new and in-service VCS variants,” they said in a joint statement after meeting at the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore, where Mr Hegseth said the program was making “great progress”.

Under the previous plan, Australia was to get at least one new submarine. The first two, scheduled for 2032 and 2035, were to be used boats. The third was planned to be an improved and brand new Block VII boat arriving in 2038.

The decision will shorten the life of Australia’s Virginia-class fleet by some years. The first Australian-made AUKUS-class boat is scheduled to enter service in the mid 2040s.

There have been ongoing concerns that US Virginia-class submarine production will not be high enough to meet US needs while also providing boats to Australia, while the UK’s submarine industry is also under strain.

Mr Hegseth said the partnership was at an inflection point ahead of rotational deployments of US submarines to Western Australia next year under AUKUS “Pillar One”.

“Last year President Trump directed that we move full steam ahead on AUKUS, and I’m proud to say that we’ve made great progress on that front,” Mr Hegseth told the media.

“We’re encouraged to continue to see continued Australian investment in its sovereign submarine capabilities, and a willingness for both Australia and the UK to increase burden sharing.”

The leaders also announced a new partnership to develop common payloads for undersea drones under the AUKUS “Pillar Two.”

Mr Marles did not mention the change of plan in a press conference, focusing on the coming rotational force and Australian maintenance on US and British submarines.

“All of this represents the biggest leap in Australia’s military capability in more than a century, really, since the establishment of the navy, and it is being achieved through the co-operation with UK and with the United States,” he said

Mr Healey said “for too long with AUKUS we talked too much and delivered too little.”

“That has now changed under our three governments,” he said.

The first four reactors for the future AUKUS-class submarines, which both the UK and Australia will build, were already under construction, Mr Healey said, amid a £6bn ($11.2bn) investment by the Starmer government.

Mr Hegseth said the new Pillar Two project would deliver “a suite of highly adaptable multi mission … payloads designed to support undersea operations and maintain our collective advantage in maritime building”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62817

File: 96dd5c273c7dda6⋯.jpg (2.02 MB,3967x2645,3967:2645,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663306 (311331ZMAY26) Notable: Marles points to savings after US downgrades AUKUS sub to second-hand version - Defence Minister Richard Marles has defended a major change to the AUKUS submarine plan under which Australia will receive three used Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of used and new boats. Marles said the shift would reduce costs, simplify training, maintenance and logistics, and provide greater consistency across the fleet. However, defence experts warned Australia would receive a less capable submarine with a shorter operational lifespan than the advanced Block VII vessel originally planned. Critics argued the change reflects ongoing pressure on US submarine production, with Washington potentially retaining newer and more capable boats for its own navy. Supporters said operating three submarines of the same configuration would reduce risk and complexity in what remains Australia’s largest-ever defence procurement project.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62812

>>62816

Marles points to savings after US downgrades AUKUS sub to second-hand version

Matthew Knott and Lisa Visentin - May 31, 2026

1/2

Defence Minister Richard Marles says taxpayers will save money by ditching a plan to acquire a new and upgraded nuclear-powered submarine from the United States, but experts warn Australia will receive a less capable vessel with a shorter lifespan under the AUKUS shift.

Marles and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday said the last of three Virginia-class submarines Australia plans to buy from the US will now be second-hand rather than a new boat as originally planned.

Under the AUKUS plan announced in 2023, Australia was to buy a mix of new and second-hand submarines from the US. The vision was for two second-hand US submarines to arrive beginning in 2032 and the third submarine was to be a new and improved Block VII Virginia-class boat.

All three vessels will now be used Block IV submarines that may already have been in service for years, and possibly over a decade, each, compared with the 33-year lifespan of a new boat.

Marles defended the decision on the basis that it reduced complexity by ensuring all Virginia class boats were a consistent set, and there would be a “significant” reduction to the purchase price of the final US submarine and the associated training and operational costs.

“We don’t get the additional cost and complexity of operating a one-off submarine which is different to all the rest,” Marles said in an interview.

“The reality here is that is the single biggest issue and challenge associated with that third submarine if we keep it as it is, which is why we see this as a significantly good outcome.”

He declined to quantify what the saving would be, but he said it wouldn’t substantially change the underlying cost of the AUKUS project.

“We need to be chasing savings where we can and be as prudent as possible, so [this decision] matters. But this is a big program, and we get this one submarine cheaper — it doesn’t fundamentally alter the overall envelope here, which is 0.15 per cent of GDP.”

Pressed on why Australia had sought a new submarine under the “optimal” AUKUS pathway if a used model represented a better outcome, Marles said: “We are just as happy to go down this path because it very much does give us consistency.”

He declined to put a figure on how many years left of service the third submarine would have by the time it was transferred to Australian hands, but he said it would arrive in a condition consistent with the first and second used boats and that it would still have “a lot of years of service left”.

“What we’re getting is a submarine well within its life, immediately after deep maintenance,” he said. It would have “more than half” of its operational life left, he said.

The decision is widely believed to be linked to senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby’s AUKUS review, which was completed at the end of last year but has not been made public.

Colby had previously expressed concern that providing Virginia-class submarines to Australia could deplete the US Navy’s reserves, given sluggish American production rates.

Asked whether lags in the US production schedule had contributed to this shift in direction, Marles said: “It’s definitely not part of this decision at all.”

Marles, Hegseth and British Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement that the decision was about “simplifying supply chain management, operational and maintenance requirements, and maximising cost efficiencies”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62818

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663327 (311338ZMAY26) Notable: AUKUS partners unveil plan to develop underwater drones by 2027 - (Video) Australia, the United States and Britain have announced a new AUKUS Pillar II project to jointly develop advanced payloads, sensors and weapons systems for uncrewed underwater vehicles from 2027. The initiative is designed to improve surveillance, protect critical undersea infrastructure, and strengthen the allies’ ability to detect and respond to maritime threats. Defence Minister Richard Marles described the project as “hugely significant”, while US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said it would help maintain a technological edge in undersea warfare. British Defence Secretary John Healey said the program marked a shift from discussion to delivery after criticism that Pillar II had lacked tangible outcomes. The announcement came as all three countries also reaffirmed support for the broader AUKUS partnership and its nuclear-powered submarine program.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62804

>>62812

>>62816

AUKUS partners unveil plan to develop underwater drones by 2027

Stephen Dziedzic - 30 May 2026

The US, Australia and United Kingdom have unveiled a new "signature" project to develop cutting edge weapons systems and sensors for underwater drones as they try to reinvigorate the second pillar of the AUKUS agreement.

The new "marquee" project was unveiled by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Defence Minister Richard Marles and UK Defence Secretary John Healey at the US embassy in Singapore, on the sidelines of the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue.

While most of the public debate on AUKUS has focused on the Pillar I nuclear-powered submarines plan, there has been less attention on the Pillar II initiative to develop sophisticated military technology, with numerous critics saying the program has been drifting.

Mr Healey told journalists that "for too long on AUKUS we have talked too much and delivered too little" but declared that the three current governments were intent on changing that.

Mr Marles called the announcement "hugely significant" and said all three countries would move to deliver the new technology from 2027.

"This is all three countries putting real money behind a capability we will put into the hands of the war fighter next year," he said.

Mr Hegseth told journalists in Singapore that the new drones would help the three nations maintain their "collective advantage" in the technology.

The exact quantum of the new investment in underwater drone technology is not clear.

Mr Healey said he had committed more than $US170 million ($236m) to the project, but neither Australia or the US have yet publicly committed to a figure.

All three governments hope the new initiative will help develop underwater drones that can protect undersea cables, engage in sophisticated surveillance missions and strike enemy targets.

Mr Healey said the new drone technology would help all three countries "detect, deter and deal with threats, including to the underwater pipelines and cables which so much of our daily life depends on".

Earlier in the day Mr Marles also sounded the alarm about the number of subsea cables which have been cut in the Baltic Sea and near Taiwan, saying if they were intentional acts then some countries could be "testing our political will to respond".

The head of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute Justin Bassi said the three nations were "smart" to reveal what work was being done on the underwater drones.

"Democracies are being tested by Russia and China with hybrid threats, including cable cutting and illegal naval actions," he said.

"This signals that these acts of sabotage and aggression will no longer be tolerated by AUKUS nations."

China has previously described cable damage incidents in the Taiwan Strait as "common maritime accidents", while Russia has dismissed accusations of involvement in similar incidents in the Baltic as "completely groundless".

All three AUKUS defence ministers also again backed in the plan to sell Virginia Class nuclear powered submarines to Australia in the 2030s.

The three ministers said in their joint statement the US would "streamline" the process to ensure Australia could acquire three of the submarines "already in service".

That appears to be a slight shift from previous statements and opens the door to Australia buying three submarines from the existing fleet of Virginia class submarines — rather than buying a mixture of submarines both in the water and off the production line.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-30/aukus-announcement-to-develop-undersea-vehicles/106741398

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg4DvgGUgdk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62819

File: c04f0e425adf6b1⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,3000x1929,1000:643,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6e444e239ce670⋯.jpg (278.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24663375 (311350ZMAY26) Notable: ANALYSIS: Switch to only used Virginia-class subs a sign of deeper problems - "The AUKUS partners were cock-a-hoop at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth claiming “great progress” was being made on the submarine program. It emerged only later that a significant change had been made to the $368bn AUKUS plan that underscores concerns over the enterprise. Australia originally negotiated to buy what would be the US’s most advanced Block VII Virginia-class submarine straight off the production line in 2038. Now we learn we will get another in-service submarine, after two used models scheduled to arrive in 2032 and 2035. The Block IV boats will still have plenty of service life left in them. The first two at least will go for another 20 years. But they will not last as long or be as capable as a new boat, placing added pressure on Australia’s domestic submarine build ... But the real story here is not about Australia. It’s about the lack of confidence in the US system about its submarine industrial base. The US Navy wants the most advanced submarines it can get for a potential war against China and fears it won’t have enough. Virginia-class production is running at 1.3 boats a year, according to the latest reports from the US. US Navy officials have said for years that rate needs to get to 2.33 boats a year to sell Australia its promised subs ... This all comes barely a fortnight after Marles confirmed another change to Australia’s pathway to nuclear submarines - the scaling back of upgrades to the navy’s Collins-class boats that will still have to operate for 10 years’ beyond their original design life. The Auditor-General found the government wasted $700m of taxpayers’ money pursuing more substantial upgrades that now won’t happen. The Albanese government wants Australians to believe that all is well with AUKUS, but there is much to be concerned about." - Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62719

>>62812

>>62816

>>62817

ANALYSIS: Switch to only used Virginia-class subs a sign of deeper problems

BEN PACKHAM - 31 May 2026

The AUKUS partners were cock-a-hoop at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth claiming “great progress” was being made on the submarine program.

It emerged only later that a significant change had been made to the $368bn AUKUS plan that underscores concerns over the enterprise.

Australia originally negotiated to buy what would be the US’s most advanced Block VII Virginia-class submarine straight off the production line in 2038.

Now we learn we will get another in-service submarine, after two used models scheduled to arrive in 2032 and 2035.

The Block IV boats will still have plenty of service life left in them. The first two at least will go for another 20 years.

But they will not last as long or be as capable as a new boat, placing added pressure on Australia’s domestic submarine build.

Defence Minister Richard Marles argues the change of plan will make things simpler and cheaper for Australia, reducing training and maintenance requirements.

“In the context of a very complicated endeavour, we need to place a premium on simplicity,” he says.

This argument has some merit. Operating three of the same Virginia-class variant will make it easier for Australian crews and those who will maintain the boats.

But the real story here is not about Australia. It’s about the lack of confidence in the US system about its submarine industrial base.

The US Navy wants the most advanced submarines it can get for a potential war against China and fears it won’t have enough.

Virginia-class production is running at 1.3 boats a year, according to the latest reports from the US.

US Navy officials have said for years that rate needs to get to 2.33 boats a year to sell Australia its promised subs.

Many suspect the hand of US Under Secretary of Defence Elbridge Colby in the decision to sell Australia only in-service boats.

Colby, the Pentagon’s chief strategist, said just over a year ago in his confirmation hearing that the US’s attack submarines “are absolutely essential for making the defence of Taiwan”.

“So, if we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great. But if we can’t, (supplying Australia) becomes a very difficult problem, because we don’t want our servicemen and women to be in a weaker position and more vulnerable and, God forbid, worse because they are not in the right place in the right time.“

He has also warned it would be “highly imprudent” for the US to hand over Virginia-class boats to Australia without an “an iron-clad guarantee they can be employed at the will of the United States”.

No Australian government would never provide such a commitment, because the nation needs to maintain sovereign control over its own military capabilities.

This all comes barely a fortnight after Marles confirmed another change to Australia’s pathway to nuclear submarines – the scaling back of upgrades to the navy’s Collins-class boats that will still have to operate for 10 years’ beyond their original design life.

The Auditor-General found the government wasted $700m of taxpayers’ money pursuing more substantial upgrades that now won’t happen.

The Albanese government wants Australians to believe that all is well with AUKUS, but there is much to be concerned about.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/switch-in-us-submarines-priority-a-sign-of-deeper-problems/news-story/a6ee0b1d1030f6630d5ef66480cdb479

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62820

File: 694c1aba4e2f1fc⋯.jpg (525.2 KB,2567x1571,2567:1571,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 35c1daff37dacc8⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,3120x2688,65:56,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8f42c5b4d32fc2e⋯.jpg (426.21 KB,2048x1600,32:25,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2bdd586d54b1809⋯.jpg (425.13 KB,1648x2464,103:154,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f4b97b675871ba9⋯.jpg (115.23 KB,1244x842,622:421,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665814 (010641ZJUN26) Notable: Woman at centre of fresh Andrew allegation was Royal Ascot waitress - New details have emerged about an allegation being examined as part of the investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, with reports identifying the complainant as a temporary waitress working at Royal Ascot in 2002. The alleged incident is being considered within a broader Thames Valley Police inquiry into possible misconduct in public office during Andrew’s decade as a UK trade envoy. Police have indicated the investigation is examining a wider range of potential matters than previously understood, including whether any allegations should be pursued as standalone offences. The reported incident predates Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein becoming a major public controversy. Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing. Thames Valley Police said it was continuing to pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry, while Buckingham Palace declined to comment because of the ongoing investigation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62749

>>62811

Woman at centre of fresh Andrew allegation was Royal Ascot waitress

Dipesh Gadher - May 31, 2026

The woman at the centre of allegations of inappropriate behaviour by Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor at Royal Ascot was working as a waitress at the racing festival.

The Sunday Times revealed last week that detectives are examining the alleged incident as part of a broader investigation into Andrew over the offence of misconduct in public office.

Andrew is said to have behaved inappropriately towards the woman in 2002 when his mother, Queen Elizabeth, attended the meet in Berkshire with other senior royals during her Golden Jubilee Year.

Police have not commented on when they were first made aware of the allegation. However, it is not thought to have been reported by staff to race course management at the time.

Andrew attended at least two days of the five-day festival in June 2002, and was photographed alongside his older brother, the future King, and his younger brother, Prince Edward.

A highlight of the annual sporting and social calendar, Royal Ascot lays on lavish hospitality, including champagne lunches, for its guests, and hires hundreds of additional catering staff on temporary contracts.

In 2000, Andrew hosted Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced paedophile financier, and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former girlfriend, in the royal enclosure on Ladies’ Day.

He last attended the event in the summer of 2019, just months before he was forced to step back from his royal duties following an interview with the BBC’s Newsnight programme in which he failed to express any sympathy for Epstein’s victims.

In February, Andrew was arrested on his 66th birthday at his new home on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office (MiPO).

He was held in custody for 11 hours before being released under investigation. Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing.

Detectives at Thames Valley Police are focusing on Andrew’s ten-year stint as a government trade envoy from 2001-11. During this time, files released by the US Justice Department suggest he shared confidential government reports with Epstein.

However, the force disclosed earlier this month that its inquiry is considering a much wider range of potential crimes than was previously understood, including sexual offences and corruption.

Police chiefs said any new evidence could either form part of its ongoing MiPO investigation or be pursued as “standalone” offences.

Asked a series of questions about the alleged incident at Royal Ascot, a Thames Valley spokeswoman said: “We cannot go into specifics of our ongoing investigation, but we are following all reasonable lines of inquiry.”

Ascot Racecourse declined to comment. However, a source indicated that it will co-operate with police if asked to do so.

On Saturday, BBC News reported that emails which appeared to show Andrew sharing confidential government information with a business associate were passed to Buckingham Palace six years ago.

The emails are alleged to have been stolen from Jonathan Rowland, whose banker father, David, has been described by Andrew as his “trusted money man”.

The cache of documents formed part of a High Court dispute between the Rowlands and a business rival, Kevin Stanford, who is said to have passed on the emails to the lord chamberlain, the most senior figure in the royal household, in May 2020.

The King has previously offered to “fully co-operate” with the police investigation into Andrew.

Buckingham Palace said: “Since there is an ongoing police inquiry concerning Mr Mountbatten-Windsor, it is not possible to provide any comment on these matters.”

Andrew was contacted for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/royal-ascot-waitress-at-center-of-new-andrew-mountbattenwindsor-allegation/news-story/b2856b9fcb1cbe766ea8919494a9b7ee

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-royal-ascot-waitress-7g8n2rp53

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62821

File: 70f5cc9259f1263⋯.jpg (3.88 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c247e8530300537⋯.jpg (6.93 MB,7910x5273,7910:5273,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665824 (010653ZJUN26) Notable: How a heckle brought Australia’s gender wars to Hay-on-Wye - A protest at the Hay Festival in Wales has drawn international attention to Australia’s debate over sex, gender identity and women-only spaces following the Federal Court’s decision in the Giggle v Tickle case. During an appearance by former prime minister Julia Gillard, two women protested over the 2013 amendments to Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act, which added protections for gender identity and later became central to the legal dispute between Giggle founder Sall Grover and transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. The case has attracted support and criticism beyond Australia, including from activists, politicians and legal commentators in Britain. Grover argues the law has undermined sex-based rights and says she hopes to challenge the ruling in Australia’s High Court, while supporters of the judgment maintain it upheld protections against discrimination and strengthened legal rights for transgender Australians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62753

>>62772

How a heckle brought Australia’s gender wars to Hay-on-Wye

Two gay Welsh women protesting at the literary festival has thrust a bitter legal battle over an Australian women-only app onto the world stage

Hugo Daniel - 30 May 2026

1/2

Sall Grover was not aware that her name had been shouted at a former Australian prime minister, on stage at the Hay Festival, until she saw a post about it on social media.

On Monday a female protester attending the Women in Politics event at the literary festival in Hay-on-Wye, yelled “what about Sall Grover?” at Julia Gillard, Australia’s first and only female leader. A second protester held up a banner that read: “Julia Gillard, DESTROYER OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS.”

Grover, a 41-year-old former journalist, saw a post about it on X. She has been at the centre of a row over transgender rights in Australia after founding a social app for women called Giggle for Girls.

This month Grover lost an appeal against a ruling by Australia’s federal court that found she had discriminated against a transgender woman, Roxanne Tickle, who had been blocked from using Giggle for Girls. The court in Sydney found Grover discriminated against Tickle and awarded Tickle A$20,000 (£10,700).

Gillard has been a target for protesters who argue that biological women’s rights were diluted in Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act under her government. The 1984 law was amended in 2013 to include a person’s self-identified gender, which was a factor in this high-profile court case.

Gillard appeared taken aback by the heckler at Hay, in Powys, but did not respond. Grover, however, was pleased to see it. “I am so grateful,” Grover told The Sunday Times by email. She has since been put in touch with the protesters and thanked them, describing them as “two amazing lesbian women in Wales”.

“It takes time and effort to do what they did, and the whole point is it’s everyday women taking time out of their lives to showcase bravery to cowardly politicians who crumble at the mere sight of challenge,” she said.

Grover said British women had led the way in bringing “attention to the madness of gender ideology and holding the people responsible for it to account”. She added: “Australia is about four years behind the UK on the issue of gender ideology.”

Of her former prime minister, Grover pulled no punches. “Julia Gillard’s decision to amend the Sex Discrimination Act has directly led to the erosion of woman-only spaces, sports and events, including lesbian-only events … [Her] actions have directly destroyed women’s rights and we are now cleaning up her mess,” she said.

“Julia Gillard is going to have to address this issue eventually. You cannot dine out on being the first woman prime minister and then ignore the fact that you removed women from law … I think that [she] is going to have to get used to women asking her what a woman is, and it will travel with her around the world until she takes responsibility for it.”

On stage alongside Gillard were the former Scottish Conservative leader, Baroness Davidson of Lundin Links, the Labour peer Baroness Harman, and the Sky News political editor Beth Rigby, with the panel moderated by the BBC’s Europe editor and Today show presenter, Katya Adler.

After the heckle, Adler said: “It’s not the time for this right now,” drawing applause from the crowd. The panel members then left the stage and Gillard was escorted from the venue through a rear exit and away from public view. Grover criticised Adler’s handling of the situation. “A decent journalist would lean into the ‘controversy’,” she said. “Julia Gillard should have been asked if she was aware of the Giggle v Tickle decision and what it means for women’s rights. She should be asked, ‘Is this the future for women and girls that she wanted?’”

Mary Douglas, one of the hecklers at Hay, told The Sunday Times in a statement that she and her fellow protester “have been fighting for lesbian and women’s rights for decades and are horrified at the way everything we fought for seems to be at risk”. She added that they have been “shocked at the way things have been going in Australia” and, after hearing Gillard was speaking at Hay, had hoped to question her at the event. “We’ve been going to Hay for decades and almost every event we’ve ever been to has involved a Q&A session in the last 10 minutes.”

The Tickle vs Giggle court row, as it has become known in Australia, has been rumbling on for four years. The Sex Discrimination Act prohibits providers of goods or services from discriminating against people on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and marital status. The case was the first to legally test the gender identity protections added in 2013.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62822

File: f9a6381bff1f1cf⋯.jpg (181.98 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78fe4780cb46026⋯.jpg (196.31 KB,750x796,375:398,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 606ad7215ffc657⋯.mp4 (14.63 MB,640x354,320:177,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665865 (010754ZJUN26) Notable: The exchange which proved the absurdity of Australia’s gender laws - (Video) Debate over Australia’s sex discrimination laws intensified after a parliamentary exchange between Opposition senator Michaelia Cash and Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody regarding whether transgender women could be protected from discrimination on the grounds of “potential pregnancy”. The discussion followed renewed scrutiny of the Federal Court’s Giggle v Tickle decision, which upheld findings that Giggle founder Sall Grover unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle under gender identity protections added to the Sex Discrimination Act in 2013. During the estimates hearing, Cody argued a transgender woman could potentially face discrimination if an employer assumed she could become pregnant, prompting Cash to challenge the consistency of the law. The exchange has fuelled calls from critics for legislative reform, while supporters maintain existing protections are necessary to prevent discrimination based on gender identity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62753

>>62772

>>62821

>>62781

The exchange which proved the absurdity of Australia’s gender laws

Terry Barnes - 31 May 2026

Almost 150 years ago, the famed British jurist A. V. Dicey wrote that sovereign parliaments ‘can do everything but make a man a woman, and a woman a man’. Yet in Australia, Britain and elsewhere, parliaments now have done just that. Ideological and legislative contortions over biological sex and gender fluidity have created concomitant absurdities, something crystallised by an Australian court case attracting global attention: the improbably-named Giggle v Tickle.

Roxanne Tickle was born male but identifies as female. Tickle had gender reassignment surgery and erased her birth name, with a new birth certificate.

Sall Grover is an Australian businesswoman running an online safe space for women called Giggle. She vets who applies to join Giggle. Tickle applied, providing a selfie for identification. Grover reviewed the photo and determined Tickle was not a woman; Tickle took Grover to court, and in 2024 not just won the case, but was awarded exemplary damages because Grover was amused by something in court, to which Tickle had taken offence.

Earlier this month, the full court of the Federal Court of Australia – equivalent to England’s Court of Appeal – handed down its decision. The full court not only upheld the trial judge’s decision that Tickle was unfairly and unlawfully discriminated against by Grover and Giggle, but the exemplary damages award against was doubled.

The trial judge’s reasoning was upheld: that gender is a fluid concept and not grounded in biological reality; that services intended for biological woman must be open to self-identified transgender women; and that all of this is sanctioned by a 2013 reworking of the definition of sex and gender in Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act, which extended the Act’s protections against discrimination to self-identified – transgender – women.

The furore around the Federal Court’s judgment has accelerated momentum for the law to be changed, both to safeguard the rights of biological women, and to afford them safe spaces lawfully excluding biological men, be that Grover’s online app, or physical spaces including women’s toilets and dressing rooms. With her party’s support, this week an Opposition MP, Alison Penfold, introduced a private member’s bill to do just that. Her second reading speech endorsing Sall Grover went viral, tweeted by J.K. Rowling amongst others.

Regardless of the higher principles at stake, the current law patently needs changing because of the absurdities it’s created. These were highlighted this week in a surreal exchange between a senator and former Attorney-General, Michaelia Cash, and Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Anna Cody, at a parliamentary estimates hearing.

Cash asked Cody about how the Sex Discrimination Act protected pregnant women, and whether trans women were covered by it. After initially agreeing trans women, as biological males, couldn’t get pregnant, Cody became entangled in a self-created web of illogic, asserting that while trans women couldn’t become pregnant, they could be discriminated against as ‘potentially pregnant’.

‘I’m very confused. A biological male can’t become pregnant’, Cash responded, astonished. Cody then tried, tortuously, to explain her position that a trans woman looking for a job could be discriminated against if she looked to be of childbearing age, which would make her ‘potentially pregnant’.

‘So if a bloke came in and (an employer) said, “were they going to have children?”, and he said “yeah, maybe”, are you saying he could also claim that ground?’

‘No, not a man,’ said Cody.

‘But they’re both biological men, it makes no sense…a biological man can’t get pregnant’ snapped back Cash.

‘But a trans woman may be assumed to be pregnant, or to be able to be pregnant’, Cody responded, her very bureaucratic earnestness making her sound even more absurd.

‘So what’s stopping a man in a dress walking in and claiming the protections?’, asked Cash, closing for the kill.

‘That would be up to a court’, replied the hapless commissioner, effectively conceding being ‘a bloke in a dress’ is enough to qualify as trans in Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62823

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665905 (010902ZJUN26) Notable: AUKUS ministers commit to 2027 submarine base milestone - Australia, the United States and Britain have confirmed that Submarine Rotational Force-West will be established at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia by 2027, marking a key milestone in the AUKUS partnership. The initiative will see US and British nuclear-powered submarines operate on a rotational basis from Australia while local infrastructure, maintenance capability and workforce capacity are expanded. The announcement was accompanied by confirmation that Australia will acquire three in-service Virginia-class submarines, replacing the previous plan for a mix of used and new vessels. The three nations also unveiled a major AUKUS Pillar II project to develop advanced uncrewed underwater systems from 2027. The agreement highlights the growing strategic importance of Western Australia as a hub for allied submarine operations, sustainment and undersea warfare capabilities in the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62816

>>62818

There's this from a maritime site

==AUKUS Ministers Commit to 2027 Sub Base

gCaptain May 30, 2026

AUKUS defense chiefs set a hard date on Saturday for the pact’s most tangible promise. The year is 2027, and the milestone is standing up Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-West) at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia. It’s the rotational nuclear-submarine presence that will test whether the trilateral deal delivers steel in the water or stays a partnership on paper.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and U.K. Defence Secretary John Healey met in Singapore and announced they had finalized the AUKUS arrangements. Authorized U.S. Navy support elements will begin rotating the first American sailors to HMAS Stirling later this year. The U.K. reaffirmed it will join the rotation, and pointed to the maintenance period its Astute-class boat HMS Anson completed in Australia earlier this year as proof the concept already works.

For the maritime and naval-industrial world, the payoff is concrete. SRF-West expands maintenance options and sustainment infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific, and it’s meant to compress the timeline for Australia to own, operate and maintain nuclear-powered submarine force. The maintenance and crewing muscle built at Stirling now is what makes a sovereign capability credible later.

The money behind the milestone

The ministers acknowledged the scale of Australia’s spending is the real story. Canberra plans to invest up to AUD 8 billion at SRF-West for infrastructure and logistics support at HMAS Stirling. That sits on top of an initial AUD 3.9 billion down payment for the new Submarine Construction Yard in South Australia and AUD 12 billion for the Henderson Defense Precinct in Western Australia. Part of the Henderson money goes to contingency docking and depot-level maintenance, the kind of heavy-industrial dry-dock capacity the region has lacked.

The bet is straightforward. Australia is paying for the shipyards, dry docks, and logistics tail before the submarines arrive, on the theory that infrastructure is the long-lead item you can’t surge. The United States will be able to repair forward deployed submarines without having to sail back to the states. Whether Henderson and the South Australia yard can be built and crewed on schedule is the variable that will decide if 2027 holds.

Buying Virginia-class boats off the line, not off the drawing board

The ministers also announced a change to how Australia acquires its Virginia-class submarines (VCS). Rather than a mix of newly built and in-service variants, the new approach would have Australia acquire three in-service Virginia-class boats, simplifying supply-chain management, operations, and maintenance while squeezing out cost.

This is the pragmatic move but the unspoken constraint hasn’t changed: the U.S. submarine industrial base has struggled to build Virginia-class boats on time and on budget, and every hull transferred to Australia is one the U.S. Navy doesn’t keep. Streamlining Australia’s order doesn’t fix the throughput problem at Groton and Newport News. It just makes Australia’s slice of it cleaner.

On the longer horizon, the ministers reported “significant progress” on the design and delivery of SSN-AUKUS, the next-generation boat the U.K. and Australia will operate. The work is underwritten in part by the GBP 6 billion the U.K. committed in 2025.

Pillar II: the first project is underwater drones

On the advanced-capabilities side of AUKUS, known as Pillar II, the ministers named their first “Signature Project.” It will develop cutting-edge payloads and enabling systems for the partners’ uncrewed undersea vehicles (UUVs), with delivery starting in 2027.

This may be the more forward-looking announcement. Top of the Pillar II list is protecting critical national seabed infrastructure, the cables and pipelines whose vulnerability has been on display in the Baltic and elsewhere. The rest covers surveillance, reconnaissance, and strike, plus logistics, anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare, mine countermeasures, electronic warfare, and contested littoral maneuver. Crewed Virginia-class boats are the headline, but autonomous undersea systems are where the partnership can move at a tempo that doesn’t depend on a decade of shipyard buildout.

Tearing down the trade wall

Finally, the ministers backed widening the AUKUS license-free environment by narrowing the list of excluded technologies. Those carve-outs are what kept the export-control wall standing despite the headline reforms. The ministers also reaffirmed the Advanced Capabilities Industry Forum as the channel for deeper trilateral industrial collaboration.

The bottom line

The constraints that have dogged AUKUS from the start haven’t gone away, namely U.S. submarine production rates, Australian shipyard and dry-dock construction at Henderson and Osborne, and the workforce to crew and sustain nuclear boats. But the program has moved from promising to scheduling. Two years out, the question is no longer whether AUKUS is real. It’s whether the industrial base on three continents can keep the calendar it just signed.

https://gcaptain.com/aukus-ministers-commit-to-2027-sub-base/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62824

File: db4ec15f7fda645⋯.jpg (337.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 317a51be14ee94e⋯.jpg (431.33 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665937 (010947ZJUN26) Notable: The nuclear substitutes: pressure mounts with AUKUS subs deadline - Australia’s revised AUKUS submarine plan has increased scrutiny of the project after confirmation that all three Virginia-class submarines acquired from the United States will be second-hand vessels rather than a mix of used and new boats. Supporters say operating three submarines of the same configuration will simplify training, maintenance and sustainment while reducing costs. However, defence analysts warn the older boats will have shorter remaining service lives, placing greater pressure on Australia to deliver its first domestically built SSN-AUKUS submarines on schedule in the mid-2040s. The change comes amid ongoing concerns about US submarine production rates and capacity constraints in British shipbuilding, leaving little room for delays in the broader AUKUS timetable.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62816

>>62823

The nuclear substitutes: pressure mounts with AUKUS subs deadline

BEN PACKHAM - 31 May 2026

1/2

Australia’s AUKUS timeline has been placed under fresh pressure amid revelations the navy will get three second-hand Virginia-class boats from the US, leaving little room for delay in the nation’s domestic submarine construction plan.

In the first major change to the pact at the heart of the nation’s military strategy, it has been ­revealed that Australia’s third ­nuclear boat would no longer be an advanced model straight off the US production line.

The submarine, scheduled for delivery in 2038, will instead be an in-service boat like those expected to arrive in 2032 and 2035, which will have about 20 years’ service life remaining of their original 33 years.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said operating three of the same Virginia-class variants would make the AUKUS plan simpler and cheaper for Australia, and there had been a “live conversation” over the move for the past three years.

“This is a complicated endeavour. In the context of that, simplicity comes at a premium,” he said. “I cannot overstate the significance of that, both in terms of the submariners who are operating them, but also the people who are working on them to sustain those submarines.”

The change of plan will come under scrutiny in Senate estimates this week, with opposition defence spokesman James Paterson demanding a “proper explanation from the government” for its deviation from the AUKUS “optimal pathway”.

At the Shangri-La Dialogue on Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth lavished praise on Australia, declaring the Albanese government was “stepping up” to contribute to collective defence and making “great progress” on the AUKUS plan. But he revealed in a later statement with Mr Marles and British Defence Secretary John Healey that there would be a new approach to “streamline” Australia’s acquisition of ­Virginia-class submarines.

“This approach would enable Australia to acquire three in-­service VCS in lieu of a mixture of new and in-service VCS variants,” they said, arguing it would simplify maintenance and maximise cost efficiencies.

The move follows long-running problems in the US submarine industry, which is producing just 1.3 Virginia-class boats a year – well under the 2.33 the US Navy says are needed to provide subs to Australia.

Australia has transferred $2.8bn to the Trump administration of a promised $4.5bn to help revive US submarine construction. The UK’s submarine industry, which Australia is relying on to design the new SSN AUKUS, is also under immense strain, and is getting another $4.5bn from Australian taxpayers.

Former navy warfare officer and Adjunct Professor at the University of Western Australia, Jennifer Parker, said the change of course would leave no margin for error in the AUKUS-class build in Adelaide, which is scheduled to deliver the first Australian-made nuclear-powered submarine in the mid-2040s.

“Acquiring three boats of the same class makes sense for training and sustainment,” she said.

“But the trade off is that the boats will have less operational life in the RAN. This does put pressure on the SSN AUKUS build.

“The UK have been averaging over a decade per boat for their Astute SSNs. Australia will not be able to afford delays in the build start date (for SSN AUKUS) or a lengthy production time.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62825

File: 3f484d6aad141b1⋯.jpg (416.78 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665951 (010955ZJUN26) Notable: COMMENTARY: PM must be honest about depth of US defence alliance - "The submarine announcements made in Singapore show that Australia and the US are preparing to fight together should deterrence fail in the Indo-Pacific. This is the strategic logic of AUKUS. It is also a tale of two technologies - old submarines and new unmanned vessels. We are putting more money and priority on old subs, but the new technology is potentially the war winner ... The decision to receive second-hand Virginia boats may well be the right strategy for Australia. We can at least be assured that the design is good and the boats are fit for purpose. An even more significant announcement from the AUKUS ministers in Singapore was that of the “first AUKUS Pillar II Signature Project: developing cutting-edge payloads” for uncrewed undersea vehicles. The joint statement said these payloads would “protect critical national seabed infrastructure; deploy cutting-edge surveillance, reconnaissance and strike capabilities; conduct logistics operations, and; bolster superiority in anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare, mine countermeasures, electronic warfare, and contested littoral manoeuvre” ... Speaking at the Shangri La dialogue, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth spoke in positive terms about America’s Asian allies “stepping up” to do more on defence. Hegseth’s surprisingly benign comment on Australia was: “Together, we are expanding the rotational presence of US forces and collaborating to ensure our defence-industrial base build and sustain weapons required for a high-end fight. We appreciate Australia’s investment in real combat power and the commitment to integrate more deeply with the US joint force.” Hegseth’s speech put a powerful case for closer alliances in the guise of “America First” language. Note the phrases “high-end fight” and “integrate more deeply”. Marles understands this, but he and Anthony Albanese are not coming clean with the Australian public about what this really means ... Since the announcement of the US Marine Corps deployments to northern Australia in 2011, the alliance co-operation story has been about building a shared defence-industrial base and establishing the foundations for closer American and Australian military integration. Australia’s US alliance is not just an add-on to our defence planning, it is absolutely central to how we think about defending the country. But this is coming at a time when Australian trust of the US alliance is at its lowest, seemingly because of a dislike of President Trump. We need to set aside the emotional reactions to Trump and focus instead on a clear-eyed assessment of our security needs. Australia has no exit strategy from its own region and no credible defence plan beyond the US alliance. It is increasingly critical for the government to explain this reality to the Australian people." - Peter Jennings, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38906 (pb)

>>62804

>>62816

>>62819

>>62818

COMMENTARY: PM must be honest about depth of US defence alliance

PETER JENNINGS - 1 June 2026

1/2

The submarine announcements made in Singapore show that Australia and the US are preparing to fight together should deterrence fail in the Indo-Pacific.

This is the strategic logic of AUKUS. It is also a tale of two technologies – old submarines and new unmanned vessels. We are putting more money and priority on old subs, but the new technology is potentially the war winner.

In public comments before meeting his US and British counterparts, Defence Minister Richard Marles claimed “the biggest leap in Australia’s military capability in more than a century” will be realised, if and when in the 2040s nuclear-powered submarines will be built in Adelaide.

The Defence Minister did not mention a big concession Australia has made to the US, which is that we will not, in the interim, receive newly built Virginia-class submarines in the 2030s.

One had to read deep into the AUKUS joint statement to discover that, in an effort to simplify “supply chain management, operational and maintenance requirements, and maximising cost efficiencies”, Australia will take three in-service Virginia-class subs “in lieu of a mixture of new and in-service VCS variants”.

Virginia-class submarines are designed around life-of-ship nuclear reactor cores intended to operate for roughly 33 years without refuelling.

The current plan is that Australia will receive the first Virginia submarine in 2032, the second in 2035 and third in 2038. They are meant to be so-called block IV boats, the first of which is the USS Vermont, commissioned in 2020 with an expected life to 2053. If the Vermont were to transition to the Royal Australian Navy in 2032, we could plan for at best 21 years of remaining service life.

The block IV Virginias are designed to have three major overhauls in their service lives, during which time they’ll be out of the water for an extended period. Will our boats arrive needing an extended refit or will the US have done the scheduled major overhaul before delivery? The answer to that question involves tens of billions of dollars in cost and time.

The decision to receive second-hand Virginia boats may well be the right strategy for Australia. We can at least be assured that the design is good and the boats are fit for purpose.

An even more significant announcement from the AUKUS ministers in Singapore was that of the “first AUKUS Pillar II Signature Project: developing cutting-edge payloads” for uncrewed undersea vehicles.

The joint statement said these payloads would “protect critical national seabed infrastructure; deploy cutting-edge surveillance, reconnaissance and strike capabilities; conduct logistics operations, and; bolster superiority in anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare, mine countermeasures, electronic warfare, and contested littoral manoeuvre”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62826

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665967 (011005ZJUN26) Notable: ‘ISIS bride’ accused of trying to indoctrinate children into terrorism before return to Australia - (Video) An Australian woman charged with terrorism offences has been accused of promoting Islamic State ideology, attempting to indoctrinate her children with extremist views and encouraging other Australians to travel to Syria. Rayann El Houli, 34, is charged with entering or remaining in a declared area and being a member of a terrorist organisation after returning to Australia from Syria in 2025. Police allege she supported violent jihad, endorsed the killing of non-believers and maintained radical views while living under Islamic State. Her lawyer told the court she has since renounced ISIS and violent extremism and wishes to rebuild her life in Australia. Prosecutors opposed bail, arguing the allegations remain serious and that questions remain about her activities, associations and departure from Syria.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62721

>>62766

>>62786

>>62787

‘ISIS bride’ accused of trying to indoctrinate children into terrorism before return to Australia

Erin Pearson - June 1, 2026

1/2

A so-called ISIS bride tried to indoctrinate her own children into radical views and encouraged other Australians to travel to Syria but has since renounced violent jihad, a court has heard.

However, Rayann El Houli, 34, has not completed any anti-terror programs in the eight months she has been back in Australia, because it was “a bit much” for her, Melbourne Magistrates’ Court was told.

El Houli, of Broadmeadows in Melbourne’s north, appeared in court on Monday charged with terrorism offences.

She is accused of travelling to Syria and entering or remaining in declared areas, and being a member of a terrorist organisation. Police oppose her bid for bail.

Defence barrister Peter Morrissey, SC, said his client returned to Australia knowing she might be charged, but she has renounced ISIS and violent jihad, and wants nothing to do with them directly or indirectly for herself or those she loves.

Morrissey said El Houli preferred to dress in traditional Muslim attire but came to court on Monday without it on as an “act of good faith” to allow the magistrate to see her “face to face”.

“She’s prepared to submit to the court in that way. To be seen, to be recognised,” Morrissey said.

El Houli had appeared in court for a filing hearing on Thursday wearing a niqab, a full-face covering with only her eyes visible.

The court heard the allegations in the police summary included that the 34-year-old intentionally travelled to Syria to join Islamic State and accept the benefits of being a member.

Police allege that while she was there, she married a number of members and expressed radicalised views and support for terrorist acts including martyrdom.

Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan said El Houli was also accused of expressing support for the killing of non-believers, sought to indoctrinate her children in radical views, and tried to get other Australians to go to Syria to follow ISIS.

El Houli later left Raqqa, in Syria, when the caliphate was defeated, “not as a result of changing views”, the court heard.

Hannan questioned why El Houli had not participated in anti-terrorism programs since returning to Australia, highlighting there was a “void” of evidence regarding what happened while the accused was in a camp abroad.

Hannan also said there was no evidence about how El Houli escaped the camp and was smuggled out of Syria, or who helped and paid for this.

“There would need to be … some evidence in that regard because based on what I’ve read from the summary, the views expressed in the charges are extremely concerning,” the chief magistrate said.

“Terrorism is much harder to address, monitor and assess than, for example, someone addicted to drugs. These are very serious charges. The risk is serious indeed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62827

File: 2034ca2ccc50086⋯.jpg (492.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24665978 (011013ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Bike boy’ saga: Ryan Meuleman fronts court from custody, charged with carjacking - Ryan Meuleman, known publicly for his involvement in the 2013 collision with a vehicle carrying then opposition leader Daniel Andrews and his wife Catherine, has appeared in court from custody on unrelated criminal charges. Meuleman faces allegations including carjacking, vehicle theft and breaching bail conditions. The matter was briefly mentioned in Dandenong Magistrates’ Court and adjourned to later this month after his lawyer sought additional time to prepare the case. Separately, Meuleman is pursuing defamation proceedings in the Federal Court against Daniel and Catherine Andrews over a 2024 media statement, while the couple are contesting the claim. The criminal charges are unrelated to the long-running dispute arising from the 2013 collision, which was investigated by police and did not result in charges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62773

‘Bike boy’ saga: Ryan Meuleman fronts court from custody, charged with carjacking

LILY MCCAFFREY - 1 June 2026

“Bike boy” Ryan Meuleman, who is suing former premier Daniel Andrews for defamation, has faced court from custody on an unrelated matter, charged with carjacking and breaching bail.

Mr Meuleman was seriously injured as a teenager in a 2013 collision with a Ford Territory driven by Mr Andrews’ wife, Catherine. Mr Andrews, who was opposition leader at the time, was also in the car.

Mr Meuleman – who became known as “bike boy” – is in the midst of suing the couple in the Federal Court, alleging they defamed him in a 2024 media statement.

Mr Meuleman appeared via video link from custody in Dandenong Magistrates’ Court for the unrelated criminal matter against him on Monday.

Mr Meuleman has been charged with offences relating to carjacking with a child in the car, vehicle theft and breach of bail.

In a brief appearance before Magistrate Frances Medina, lawyer Savannah Westwood from Tony Hargreaves and Partners, successfully applied for an adjournment.

Ms Westwood told the court she had only received funds in trust on Friday so hadn’t yet had the opportunity to properly case conference the matter.

Mr Meuleman, who wore a white T-shirt with his hair cut short, did not speak during the short hearing. Ms Medina adjourned his case for a further mention on June 19.

Mr Meuleman began defamation proceedings against Mr and Ms Andrews in the Federal Court late last year, nearly 13 years on from the collision. He alleged that a media statement issued by the couple in 2024 defamed him.

Mr and Ms Andrews are fighting the claim, and in their defence filed with the court have alleged Mr Meuleman was suing them for publicity and to advance other people’s personal and political agendas. Mr and Ms Andrews have always denied any wrongdoing in relation to the 2013 collision.

Victoria Police investigated the incident and never laid charges.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bike-boy-saga-ryan-meuleman-fronts-court-from-custody-charged-with-carjacking/news-story/d82c2dd7ebd3b6e4c02239dde5ab7113

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62828

File: 96de0bab37507ec⋯.jpg (1.1 MB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24667281 (011820ZJUN26) Notable: ‘We’re not spies’, Chinese diplomat insists as he calls for closer ties with Australia - China’s consul general in Melbourne, Fang Xinwen, has urged Australia to deepen economic and cultural ties with Beijing, arguing Chinese businesses, investors and scientists should not be viewed through a national security lens. In his first Australian media interview, Fang criticised restrictions on Chinese investment and technology, warning against overstating security threats and calling for a more welcoming business environment. He encouraged greater trade, tourism and sporting exchanges, including a possible return of AFL matches to China, and promoted Chinese advances in robotics and technology. Fang also called for closer co-operation between Australia and China on international issues, including the conflict involving Iran and the security of global trade routes. His comments come amid ongoing Australian concerns about espionage, foreign interference and strategic competition with Beijing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38804 (pb)

‘We’re not spies’, Chinese diplomat insists as he calls for closer ties with Australia

In his first Australian interview, Consul General Fang Xinwen has said casting Beijing as a threat to Australia will “backfire”, and warned against missing opportunities in trade and robotics.

Carly Douglas and Stephen Drill - May 30, 2026

Chinese businesspeople and scientists working in Australia are “not spies”, one of the nation’s most senior diplomats says, warning that casting Beijing as a threat to this country will “backfire”.

In his first Australian interview, consul general Fang Xinwen also revealed that China was keen to host more AFL games.

And Mr Fang is promoting the widespread take-up of Chinese-built humanoid robots in Australian households.

Amid Donald Trump’s unending war on Iran, he warned that the world must not return to the “laws of the jungle”.

Mr Fang urged Anthony Albanese to “stay in the same boat” as China, regardless of whether that could undermine our longstanding alliance with the US.

While Australia’s intelligence experts have repeatedly flagged concerns over espionage operations, identifying Chinese businesses and scientists as potential threats, Mr Fang said: “They are not spies, they are here to do business.”

In a face-to-face interview he added that Chinese professionals working in Australia or trying to do business deals often faced too many restrictions.

Mr Fang, the consul general of the People’s Republic of China in Melbourne, said: “We are partners, not rivals. We are friends, not foes.

“There should be a better business environment here.

“I think more and more Chinese businesspeople and investors could be here.”

Mike Burgess, head of Australia’s spy agency ASIO, warned last year that Chinese-backed hackers were trying to sabotage Australia’s water, electricity, internet and mobile phone networks.

In February last year, the Australian government also banned staff from downloading Chinese-owned AI platform DeepSeek.

But Mr Fang insisted there was no need to be “scared” of Chinese investment, claiming China “fully protects the intellectual property rights”.

“We should never go too far or maximise the so-called threat,” he said.

“That kind of a threat will – just like a boomerang – it will go back to hit yourself, or backfire.”

PING-PONG DIPLOMACY

Mr Fang said China wanted to become closer to Australia, suggesting that AFL games could return to Chinese cities such as Shanghai for the first time in five years.

“There are some unique beauty of this game and we can give full support to any training or exhibition or friendship match of the Australian football teams to China,” he said.

“They did the matches some years ago, and we should continue this training. Should there be any club in Victoria who would like to go to China … we will do our best.”

Three AFL clubs – Port Adelaide, Gold Coast Suns and St Kilda – played regular-season premiership matches in China before the Covid pandemic at Jiangwan Stadium in Shanghai.

Mr Fang suggested games could also be played in mid-sized cities, saying if more people understood and watched the game it could really take off in China.

An AFL spokesman said it had no short-term plans to return to China.

With a seeming nod to the 1970s “ping-pong diplomacy” phenomenon that helped open diplomatic relations between Australia and China under the Whitlam government, Mr Fang suggested that more table tennis should also be arranged between Chinese and Australian teams.

He’s so keen on the sport he’s even installed a mini table tennis table in his Melbourne consulate office.

Mr Fang said he would like to see Australia assert its influence with the US and Donald Trump regarding the Iran War. China bought 1.4 million barrels of oil from Tehran each day before the Strait of Hormuz was blockaded.

Amid global fears over the reliability of fuel supplies due to the US-Iran conflict, Mr Fang urged Australia to get more involved in the global effort to persuade the two nations to establish a long-term agreement.

“China and Australia should shoulder the common responsibility or share the tasks to maintain regional and world peace,” Mr Fang said.

“As long as we are in difficult times we should work together and stay in the same boat to combat the storms, and then we can sail smoothly after the difficult time.

“If not, if we just become the onlookers or undoers of this crisis, the impacts will come, definitely.”

His ambitions for a closer relationship with Australia come despite lingering tension over China’s claims to Taiwan, which could result in conflict with the US as soon as next year.

China’s President Xi Jinping told Mr Trump on his visit to Beijing this month that mishandling the question on Taiwan’s independence could lead to a “highly perilous situation”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62829

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669409 (020722ZJUN26) Notable: Nurses from ‘kill threat’ video sought out Israelis online, a court has heard - (Video) A court has heard that two former Sydney nurses accused of making threats against Israeli patients allegedly sought out Israeli users on an online chat platform before a video of the exchange was recorded and shared globally. The prosecution case centres on a conversation between Sarah Abu Lebdeh, Ahmad Rashad Nadir and Israeli influencer Max Ilinksi, in which the pair allegedly made hostile comments about Israeli patients. Defence lawyers are seeking to have the video excluded from evidence, arguing it was recorded without consent during what they describe as a private conversation and was therefore obtained unlawfully. Ilinksi told the court he published the footage to warn Jewish communities about antisemitism and denied targeting the accused. The matter will proceed ahead of a scheduled trial later this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Nurses from ‘kill threat’ video sought out Israelis online, a court has heard

BIMINI PLESSER - 2 June 2026

1/2

An Israeli influencer claims he was targeted by two former Sydney nurses in an online chatroom before he recorded them allegedly threatening to “kill” Israeli patients in a video their lawyers are now seeking to have thrown out of court.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 27, and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 28, made global headlines last year when they were recorded allegedly threatening violence against Israeli patients at Bankstown Hospital in Sydney’s west.

In the two-and-a-half minute video, recorded by Israeli influencer Max Ilinksi – known online as Max Veifer – the former nurses allegedly made a series of violent threats.

Mr Nadir allegedly said, “You (Mr Ilinksi) have no idea how many (Israeli people) come to this hospital … I send to Jahannam”, the Arabic word for “hell”.

Ms Abu Lebdeh told Mr Ilinski he was going to “die the most disgusting death” and, when asked what would happen if an Israeli patient came into the hospital, she said: “I won’t treat them, I will kill them.”

The pair, who are out on bail and have both pleaded not guilty, attended Sydney’s Downing Centre District Court for a pre-trial hearing before Judge Michael McHugh on Monday.

Mr Nadir’s barrister, Greg James KC, argued in court that Mr Ilinksi had used his online platform and expertise to “hunt down, expose and publicise those who laboured under what he considered reminisce conceptions” about Israel, Hamas and the war in Gaza.

By “exposing” these people online, Mr James said Mr Ilinski was “in effect, a propaganda warrior” determined to see people with anti-Israel or antisemitic beliefs lose their jobs or face criminal charges.

Speaking to the court via video link, Mr Ilinski denied targeting specific people on the online chatroom, instead claiming the two accused had targeted him by requesting to be matched with Israeli users.

Mr Ilinski said he only posted the video online “to bring awareness … and warn Jewish communities around the world from things that want to hurt them”.

The content creator said he had worked with authorities in several countries, including Canada and the Netherlands, to see antisemites charged with criminal offences, but his main priority online was “protecting” and “warning” the international Jewish community.

Outside court, Mr Nadir’s solicitor Zemarai Khatiz told reporters his team would move to have the video excluded from evidence on the basis it was recorded without consent.

“It was a private conversation, it was recorded secretly without my client’s consent,” Mr Khatiz said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62830

File: 72154e84258dd26⋯.jpg (118.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8223a0b87db7cd6⋯.jpg (61.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669411 (020728ZJUN26) Notable: Malaysia enforces ban on social media for children - Malaysia has begun enforcing new rules that prohibit children under 16 from creating social media accounts, requiring major platforms to introduce age-verification systems and block underage users. The measures apply to large platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, with companies facing significant financial penalties for non-compliance. The government says the policy is designed to protect children from harmful content, cyberbullying and platform features that encourage excessive use. The move places Malaysia among a growing number of countries pursuing stricter online protections for minors, including Australia. While supporters argue the rules strengthen online safety and parental confidence, critics question how effective the restrictions will be in practice, warning that children may still bypass safeguards and that enforcement challenges could limit the law’s impact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38735 (pb)

>>38833 (pb)

Malaysia enforces ban on social media for children

Eileen Ng - June 1 2026

Malaysia has begun enforcing rules barring millions of children younger than 16 from social media, joining a global effort to tighten online safety protections for young users.

The rules require social media platforms to implement age-verification systems and block users under 16 from creating accounts. They apply to platforms with at least eight million users, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube.

Companies that fail to comply could face penalties of up to 10 million ringgit ($A3.5 million).

But parents whose children manage to bypass the law will not be penalised.

The government said the measures are aimed at protecting children from harmful content, cyberbullying and platform features designed to encourage excessive use.

Other countries including Australia, Brazil and Indonesia have introduced or announced age-based restrictions or requirements for children’s access to social media.

Countries including Britain, France, Spain, Denmark, Thailand and South Korea are also studying or developing similar approaches.

Malaysia’s Communications and Multimedia Commission said the rules aren’t intended to prevent children from accessing the internet or digital technology.

Instead it set expectations for service providers to address online harms and ensure age-appropriate safeguards are in place.

“These measures help strengthen the protection of children in the online environment, while providing added reassurance to parents in navigating increasingly complex digital risks,” the regulator said in a statement last month.

Platforms will be required to introduce safety-by-design features, including protections against manipulative design that encourages compulsive use, and take action against underage accounts and harmful content.

Technology companies have yet to detail how they will comply with the requirements.

The regulator said a grace period will be given for platforms to complete implementation of age-verification systems.

Clara Koh, Meta’s director of public policy for Southeast Asia, had cautioned in April that Malaysia’s blanket under-16 ban could backfire by driving teenagers away from protected apps and into unregulated corners of the internet.

She said Meta has launched “teen accounts” for those under 18 that limits contact, screen time and exposure to inappropriate content.

Benjamin Loh, social science lecturer at Monash University in Malaysia said experiences elsewhere suggest age-based restrictions have yet to prove consistently effective.

Without parent penalties, he said families can easily bypass the law by creating accounts for their children.

“This is a major gap that unless regulators are willing to fix, will result in the law having little effect in stopping children from using social media,” he added.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9270197/malaysia-enforces-ban-on-social-media-for-children/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62831

File: f4f424210b02ae3⋯.jpg (374.51 KB,1170x1560,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 10c8ec3dd483ac1⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669413 (020736ZJUN26) Notable: NRL distances itself from Broncos’ decision to invite Ben Roberts-Smith into dressing sheds - The NRL has distanced itself from the Brisbane Broncos’ decision to allow Ben Roberts-Smith into the team’s dressing sheds following the club’s loss to St George Illawarra, stressing it was a matter for the club rather than the league. Roberts-Smith, who has denied multiple war crimes charges relating to his service in Afghanistan, attended the match with his daughters and later entered the dressing room through personal connections rather than as an official club guest. Reports indicate most Broncos players were unaware of his presence. The incident has attracted attention given the seriousness of the allegations he faces and the upcoming court proceedings. While Roberts-Smith is not expected to be barred from future games, sources indicated the dressing-room visit was an impromptu occurrence rather than a formal invitation arranged by the club.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

NRL distances itself from Broncos’ decision to invite Ben Roberts-Smith into dressing sheds

Christian Nicolussi - June 1, 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith’s surprise appearance in the Brisbane Broncos dressing sheds on Sunday afternoon is expected to be a one-off.

The NRL on Monday distanced itself from the Broncos’ decision to allow Roberts-Smith into their inner sanctum following the loss to St George Illawarra.

The former soldier has been charged with multiple war crimes over the alleged murders of unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners.

He faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment for each charge. The former SAS corporal has rejected the charges, saying, “I categorically deny all of these allegations”.

Sources with knowledge of the situation not authorised to speak publicly confirmed Roberts-Smith had accompanied his daughters to the Broncos’ game against St George Illawarra after they were invited to attend by the spouse of a club staff member who knows the girls through school connections.

Roberts-Smith, the same sources confirmed, is friends with Broncos welfare officer Adam Walsh, a former SAS soldier with whom he served overseas.

The Broncos refused to comment on the matter, but the sources confirmed Roberts-Smith had not been a guest of the club, did not visit the club’s chairman’s lounge during the game, and that most of the players had no idea he was in their inner sanctum.

The sources added that Roberts-Smith would not be banned from attending future games, but stressed Sunday’s was an impromptu visit and that he had not been invited by the club.

Senior figures at the NRL were unaware Roberts-Smith had been invited into the Broncos’ sheds, but later said it was a matter for the club who they wanted to invite to their dressing room.

When spotted by The Courier Mail in the sheds, Roberts-Smith said on Sunday: “The Broncos invited my daughters today because of all the things they have been through, and we were very grateful.”

Roberts-Smith has been accused of kicking an Afghan civilian off a cliff, and directing a subordinate to execute a man in September 2012. He is also alleged to have executed a prisoner with a prosthetic leg during an Easter Sunday mission in Afghanistan in 2009.

Roberts-Smith’s case has been set down for a brief status mention, an administrative court hearing, on Thursday.

On the field, the Broncos were stunned by the Dragons, who had not won in 295 days. Returning prop Payne Haas was clearly upset by the effort, and told ABC Sport after the game: “We’re all talk at the moment. We keep saying we’re going to do all these important things on the field, but to be honest, we’re BS-ing each other.”

Meanwhile, the Broncos’ hopes of defending their title have been dealt a blow with representative forward Pat Carrigan facing up to a month on the sidelines with a syndesmosis injury that will keep him out of Origin II.

Fellow Maroon Gehamat Shibasaki is out for up to six weeks because of a grade-two MCL injury.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl-distances-itself-from-broncos-decision-to-invite-ben-roberts-smith-into-dressing-sheds-20260601-p602o5.html

https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/ben-robertssmiths-bizarre-sighting-inside-brisbane-broncos-dressing-room/news-story/b6d2cca990213ebe476e9f69f11a9886

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62832

File: 9bd6ef28b14ce64⋯.jpg (3.37 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3557f1c7d7918df⋯.jpg (726.48 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669417 (020749ZJUN26) Notable: Antisemitism royal commission rejects federal government's bid to keep cabinet documents confidential - The Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has rejected a federal government attempt to keep cabinet documents relating to counterterrorism funding confidential, ruling the material is necessary to properly examine whether intelligence and law enforcement agencies were adequately resourced before the Bondi terror attack. Commissioner Virginia Bell found the public interest favoured access to the documents, noting they would remain confidential and would not be publicly released. The commission is examining whether counterterrorism efforts received sufficient priority and funding in the years leading up to the attack, including comparisons before and after the national terror threat level was raised to “probable” in 2024. The government had argued cabinet confidentiality was essential to ensure frank discussions between ministers, while maintaining national security agencies had received increased funding.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

>>62796

>>62797

Antisemitism royal commission rejects federal government's bid to keep cabinet documents confidential

Holly Tregenza - 1 June 2026

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has rejected the federal government's bid to keep cabinet documents about counterterrorism funding secret.

The federal government had made a public interest immunity claim over the documents, which Attorney-General Michelle Rowland defended as standard procedure for matters related to cabinet.

But royal commissioner Virginia Bell found it was in the public interest for the inquiry to access the documents, so it could make a full assessment of whether intelligence and law enforcement agencies did their job in the lead-up to the Bondi terror attack.

The prime minister's department secretary, Steven Kennedy, had argued the cabinet documents should be protected because ministers relied on the assumption their meetings would be confidential.

He said releasing them could result in a lack of "candour" going forward.

But while Ms Bell acknowledged Mr Kennedy's concerns, she said there were "no issue of disclosure to the public or to another party" because only she and those who read her confidential report would ever read the contents.

In her finding, Ms Bell said she had weighed the public interest in disclosure of the documents against the public interest in maintaining confidentiality.

The ruling found the documents were critical to allow the commission to conduct a "thorough examination of the issues raised" in relation to counterterrorism funding.

Ms Bell also said access to the documents would provide a comparison of the resourcing given to counterterrorism before and after August 2024, when the terror threat level was raised to "probable".

"In the context of the antisemitic Bondi terrorist attack on 14 December 2025, the question of whether intelligence and law enforcement agencies performed to maximum effectiveness requires consideration of the priority given to, and the resourcing of, counter-terrorism by each agency," she wrote.

What is in the documents?

The royal commission had sought access to nine documents that included files from the Finance Department and Australian Federal Police, as well as seven cabinet memoranda.

At the heart of these documents is a question of whether the counterterrorism budget declined between 2020 and 2025.

The government had repeatedly insisted that Australia's national security agencies, including ASIO, have had funding increases since Labor came to office in 2022.

In a written submission to the royal commission, spy boss Mike Burgess made clear that ASIO was not asked by the government to shift resources away from counterterrorism.

"ASIO was not directed by any minister between January 1, 2023 and November 2025 to reduce [counterterror] efforts to service other priorities," he said.

"I am not aware of any such decision or direction by any minister to any [intelligence] agency."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-01/antisemitism-royal-counterterrorism-bondi-terror-attack/106743974

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62833

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669493 (020907ZJUN26) Notable: Friendly fire: Labor figures question AUKUS commitment - (Video) Debate over AUKUS has intensified within Labor after backbencher Ed Husic publicly questioned whether Australia will receive the nuclear-powered submarines promised under the agreement. His comments followed confirmation that Australia will acquire three second-hand Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of new and used vessels. Husic raised concerns about workforce shortages, industrial capacity and supply-chain challenges affecting the program. The criticism coincided with the launch of a public inquiry into AUKUS led by former Labor minister Peter Garrett, which will examine the pact’s strategic, financial and national security implications. Former chief of the defence force Chris Barrie also expressed concern that the scale of investment required for AUKUS could divert resources from other defence priorities. Senior government figures reiterated Labor’s support for the agreement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

Friendly fire: Labor figures question AUKUS commitment

Zac de Silva - June 2 2026

1/2

A Labor MP has broken ranks to call for a rethink of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal as a former party minister launches a "people's inquiry" into the agreement.

After asking whether Labor's original commitment to the deal still stood during a private caucus meeting in Canberra on Tuesday, Labor backbencher Ed Husic went public with his reservations about the military pact after it was announced Australia would only get second-hand submarines from the US.

"You do wonder whether or not we will get the deal, even the reconfigured one that we have got," Mr Husic told reporters at Parliament House.

Originally, Australia was set to get a mix of new and used Virginia-Class vessels before eventually building its own in Adelaide, but now the defence force will only get used submarines.

Defence Minister Richard Marles defended the move, saying it would make AUKUS simpler and cheaper to deliver, but Mr Husic appeared skeptical of that reasoning.

"In the circumstances he's been placed, he would have to say that," Mr Husic said.

The Labor MP, who was science and industry minister before being ousted from cabinet in 2025 in a factional power play, said Australia needed to be open about the workforce shortages, supply chain challenges and quality issues confronting the AUKUS pact.

Mr Husic has previously broken with his colleagues on the recognition of a Palestinian state, the war in Gaza and taxation of gas.

Husic's comments came as former Labor minister and Midnight Oil frontman Peter Garrett on Tuesday announced plans to lead a "people's inquiry" into AUKUS, investigating the implications of the pact for the nation's security.

The crowdfunded probe, run separately from the government, will look into whether the vessels will make Australia more secure, the storage of nuclear waste and potential long-term strategic consequences, the former environment minister said.

"This is not a royal commission, this is a people's inquiry," Mr Garrett told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62834

File: 31e021e49405d72⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,5287x3525,5287:3525,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 97461d19a46bb8a⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,5760x3840,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669503 (020912ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Where’s the plan B?’: Ed Husic goes nuclear on AUKUS - Labor MP Ed Husic has publicly questioned the future of AUKUS after confirmation that Australia will receive three second-hand Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of new and used vessels under the original plan. Husic raised concerns about whether the United States will be able to deliver the submarines at all, citing production delays and asking what contingency plans exist if the agreement falters. His intervention comes amid broader criticism of AUKUS from within sections of Labor and coincides with the launch of a public inquiry led by former minister Peter Garrett and former defence force chief Chris Barrie. Critics argue the project’s cost, complexity and strategic implications require greater scrutiny, while supporters maintain AUKUS remains central to Australia’s long-term defence strategy despite ongoing challenges and revisions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

‘Where’s the plan B?’: Ed Husic goes nuclear on AUKUS

Matthew Knott - June 2, 2026

Former Labor cabinet minister Ed Husic has broken ranks to call for a rethink of the AUKUS pact after the revelation the United States only plans to sell Australia second-hand nuclear-powered submarines.

Husic’s intervention in a caucus meeting on Tuesday came as former Labor minister Peter Garrett and former defence force chief Chris Barrie announced they would lead a crowd-funded inquiry into AUKUS, labelling the $368 billion project as “controversial and secretive”.

Husic, who served as industry minister until he was demoted to the backbench in a reshuffle last May, joined calls for the government to develop a “Plan B” in case the promised submarines do not arrive as promised.

The Coalition said the comments revealed division within Labor about AUKUS and called for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to enforce discipline within his caucus.

“You do wonder whether or not we will get the deal, even the reconfigured one that we have got,” Husic told reporters at Parliament House.

Earlier, during Labor’s caucus meeting, he questioned whether the original caucus vote on AUKUS was valid given the changes to the scheme.

“That deal versus what we’ve got now are different,” Husic said.

“I think that it now gives us a moment to think about whether or not the deal should be reconfigured, or what are the contingencies.”

Asking “what’s the plan B?” Husic said he was concerned sluggish American submarine production rates meant the US would not have any to spare for Australia.

“You’ve seen within the broader [Labor] movement a general disquiet about the nature of the deal itself,” Husic said.

“But putting all that aside, there’s an issue about reality confronting us about whether or not we will even get the new deal that has been put to us.”

The AUKUS defence ministers announced over the weekend that Australia would now acquire three second-hand submarines from the US rather than two used and one new submarine as originally planned.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the shift would reduce complexity and save money for taxpayers.

“I’d imagine that in the circumstances he’s been placed, he would have to say that,” Husic replied.

He said he was also concerned about what US President Donald Trump could ask in return from Australia for backing AUKUS.

Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said Albanese was facing a “full-on Labor revolt” when it comes to Australia’s signature defence policy, accusing Husic of launching “a direct challenge to the authority of the Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles”.

“It’s a result of Labor’s mismanagement of the delivery of AUKUS and Richard Marles’ failure, along with the prime minister, to make the case for AUKUS,” Paterson said.

Senior Labor sources have privately insisted the government originally preferred to acquire three submarines of the same type, even if the ultimate impetus for the change was a review last year by senior Pentagon official and AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby.

Former Labor defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the change to all second-hand submarines reinforced that AUKUS was a “big, expensive, challenging project”.

“There are going to be bumps along the way and we have to expect that,” he said.

Garrett, a long-time anti-nuclear campaigner who has previously blasted the AUKUS pact, said a public inquiry was needed because it is “the most momentous and expensive decision ever made by any Australian government in the modern era”.

The inquiry, funded by donations from the public, will hold public hearings and receive submissions.

Barrie, who led the defence force from 1998 to 2002, said he had previously supported Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines, but he now had “serious concerns” about AUKUS, including that it could draw Australia into a war with China.

Independent MP Monique Ryan joined fellow crossbenchers to demand more scrutiny of the AUKUS pact.

“It’s a national embarrassment that a former Labor minister is crowdfunding for an independent inquiry into AUKUS,” Ryan said.

Perth MP Josh Wilson was previously the only Labor MP to speak out against AUKUS, arguing in the lead-up to the last election that he believed acquiring nuclear-powered submarines was “not in the national interest”.

“We have embarked on an excruciatingly long, complex, fraught and costly endeavour that, in my view, remains substantially unexplained and unjustified,” he wrote for the Foreign Affairs journal in 2024.

He has since been promoted to the front bench, limiting his ability to speak out.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/where-s-the-plan-b-ed-husic-goes-nuclear-on-aukus-20260602-p6036f.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62835

File: 078d1faf6532ee4⋯.jpg (170.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 746c24fb73a400c⋯.jpg (596.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669511 (020922ZJUN26) Notable: Joe Courtney says AUKUS changes will still serve Australia well - Senior US congressman Joe Courtney has defended recent changes to the AUKUS submarine plan, arguing Australia will still receive a credible and long-lasting nuclear-powered submarine capability despite now being expected to acquire three in-service Virginia-class submarines. Courtney said discussions with US Navy leaders indicated Australia would likely receive newer Block IV submarines with substantial service life remaining, rather than older vessels nearing retirement. He rejected suggestions the change represented a major downgrade, arguing it could simplify training, maintenance and operations while supporting the transition to Australia’s future SSN-AUKUS fleet. Courtney also backed the new AUKUS Pillar II project to develop uncrewed undersea vehicles from 2027, while acknowledging frustration over the lack of clear leadership and coordination within the advanced technology component of the partnership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Joe Courtney says AUKUS changes will still serve Australia well

JOE KELLY - 2 June 2026

1/2

Joe Courtney, co-chair of the Friends of Australia caucus in the US congress, says the fundamentals of the trilateral security partnership remain “very strong” despite proposed changes to the expected mix of Virginia-class submarines to be sold to Australia.

The leading congressional champion for the AUKUS partnership said it was his “expectation” that Australia would now receive three in-service Block IV Virginia-class submarines under the AUKUS arrangements.

His discussions with US Navy leadership led him to conclude that Virginia-class submarines from earlier blocks would not be sold because they were too far into their service lives and America was committed to providing Canberra with a long-lasting capability.

Mr Courtney also welcomed the AUKUS Defence Ministers’ announcement on May 30, which unveiled the first AUKUS Pillar II signature project: the development of uncrewed undersea vehicles, with delivery starting in 2027.

He argued the uncrewed vessels would free up crewed submarines for higher-priority missions. However, on Pillar II, Mr Courtney warned there had been “a ton of frustration about the fact that nobody knows who is in charge”.

He personally felt it should still have a “much stronger centre of gravity” and stressed it was important “to really get Pillar II much more institutionalised so that people actually know who to contact in terms of trying to get the benefits of that part of AUKUS.”

The Pentagon also told The Australian it remained fully committed to delivering Virginia-class submarines to Australia under the AUKUS security partnership, arguing the proposal to provide three in-service Virginia-class submarines was “intended to simplify Australian operation and sustainment”. This would have benefits across a range of areas including “workforce training, main­tenance, supply chain manage­ment, and operational activities”.

The Pentagon said it would also create “cost efficiencies”, while “putting the program on the strongest possible footing.”

“The United States remains committed to delivering AUKUS and supporting Australia’s acquisition of a conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability,” the spokesperson said.

“As reflected in the May 30 AUKUS Defence Ministers’ Meeting Joint Statement, the proposed approach would streamline Australia’s acquisition of Virginia-class submarines by enabling the acquisition of three in-service submarines in lieu of a mix of new and in-service variants.”

Mr Courtney said it was now his expectation that Australia would receive three in-service Block IV Virginia-class submarines, rather than a package that included a future Block VII boat.

But Mr Courtney, the ranking Democrat on the House Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, stressed this would not necessarily result in a significantly shorter service life for Australia’s proposed nuclear submarine fleet.

“It’s important to begin with the basics,” he said. “Which is that a Virginia sub has a 33-year lifespan. There’s just no question that if you are careful in terms of (the) operation of a submarine, the service life can be longer than 33 years,” he said. “That’s important to begin the conversation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62836

File: d14ec3e9087041d⋯.jpg (177.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 48673096b1642cc⋯.jpg (297.93 KB,1233x1644,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a556fe7d4baab35⋯.jpg (323.53 KB,1229x1639,1229:1639,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669518 (020928ZJUN26) Notable: Jewish leader warns ‘blue collar’ activist group is a sinister ‘neo-Nazi front’ - A prominent Jewish community leader has warned that the National Workers Alliance, a Melbourne-based nationalist group conducting a recruitment drive, may be using working-class themes and community messaging to conceal an extremist agenda. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich argued the organisation’s language, imagery and recruitment methods resemble tactics historically associated with white supremacist movements, raising concerns about radicalisation and antisemitism. The National Workers Alliance rejects those claims, describing itself as an Australian nationalist organisation focused on European cultural identity, community, fitness and opposition to immigration. The group denies any connection to neo-Nazi organisations and says it advocates lawful political views. Victoria Police confirmed officers recently responded to reports involving the group but said no offences were detected, while noting authorities continue to monitor a range of far-right organisations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

>>62709

>>62716

Jewish leader warns ‘blue collar’ activist group is a sinister ‘neo-Nazi front’

DAMON JOHNSTON - June 01, 2026

A Jewish community leader has raised concerns that a Melbourne group dedicated to “blue-collar activism” is a front organisation for white-supremacy supporters.

Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich fears the National Workers Alliance, which has recently launched a recruiting drive, has an antisemitic agenda. Dr Abramovich said NWA activists were distributing recruiting pamphlets calling on people to “join our active club” if they are “from the working class, a producer not a parasite (and) family orientated”.

“The National Workers ­Alliance pamphlet is one of the most sophisticated and sinister examples white-supremacy rebranding and disguise I have seen,” he told The Australian.

“This group has studied precisely how previous neo-Nazi ­organisations in Australia were exposed and designated as a terrorist organisation and has built a sophisticated layer of plausible deniability designed to survive that scrutiny.

“The playbook is simple and it is chilling. Take the raw ugliness of hate, wrap it in the language of the working man, add a fitness culture, a sense of brotherhood, a glossy logo, and a list of policy ­positions that sound almost reasonable on the surface.

“Then let the pipeline do its work by drawing people in through the legitimate-sounding front door and walking them, step by step, toward the ideology that was always waiting at the end of the corridor.”

The NWA was formed several years ago, has organised rallies and declares that “nationalism is rising” in its promotional material and social media accounts.

It has rejected any links or ­association to the neo-Nazi movement. “We are a standalone movement and are not associated with neo-Nazi organisations,” an NWA spokesman said. “I have never been a member of any neo-Nazi organisations.”

The spokesman described the group as “an organisation that is from the working class and believes that it is healthy for young men to have a sense of brotherhood and to become involved in a fitness culture”. He challenged “anyone to find anything hateful” about the group. The NWA said “white ­supremacy” was a term that “plays on emotion and implies evil”. “We are not rebranding or … in disguise, we are simply an ­organisation that advocates for people of European descent,” the he said.

The NWA’s pamphlet says the group holds “vetting” nights every Tuesday and its website asks would-be members to submit an application via email before they’re provided with details of the location of the meeting.

“The National Workers ­Alliance is an Australian nationalist organisation with the following aims: Preserve European culture and identity, stop immigration (and) withdraw from the UN,” the group’s pamphlet states.

The group’s website, which uses imagery of Australian soldiers from World War I, reinforces its “mission” is to “preserve Western culture and identity”. NWA has more than 7000 followers on Facebook.

“Western countries have been demoralised for decades and taught to believe that their culture, identity and history are not a source of pride. People of Euro­pean ancestry built the most ­successful and desired societies in history,” its website declares.

The NWA website calls for an end to immigration and links it to a range of issues including crime, housing shortages, cost of living, and loss of national identity. It states that it has caused “less social cohesion, more division, less civic engagement” and declares that “diversity is not a strength”.

Victoria Police confirmed it had deployed officers to East Melbourne on May 23 after reports of men with banners and flags gathering. Police said the men had left the area, at the corner of Vale and Berry streets, when officers arrived. “There have been no further reports, and no offences have been detected,” a police spokesperson said.

Police have analysed the NWA pamphlet and said it had been determined it did not constitute a criminal offence. But police confirmed they keep a close eye on a range of far-right groups.

Dr Abramovich said the ­National Workers Alliance’s name echoed the Nazis’ National Socialist German Workers’ Party. “That is not an accident,” he said, adding: “The pamphlet uses the phrase ‘a producer not a parasite’, wording drawn directly from the documented language of Nazi propaganda. Their ‘vetting nights’ and ‘fitness requirements’ are the recruitment tools of a paramilitary organisation, not a community group.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jewish-leader-warns-blue-collar-activist-group-is-a-sinister-neonazi-front/news-story/b5621ed0fd286c9faef6e719b8214e48

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62837

File: 56cef8a288fe30b⋯.jpg (116.21 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669535 (020950ZJUN26) Notable: Boy, 13, accused of plotting school massacre is first charged under new Queensland law - A 13-year-old Queensland boy has become the first person charged under new state laws targeting the planning or preparation of serious acts of violence, after police alleged he had developed plans to attack children at a school. Detectives claim the boy, from Maryborough, consumed violent extremist material online, including footage of mass killings and content linked to Russian school shooters, and had taken steps consistent with preparing for an attack. Police allege he intended to target younger children and had obtained clothing resembling that worn by perpetrators seen in online videos. The teenager was initially investigated following an incident at a service station before counter-terrorism officers examined electronic devices seized from his home. Authorities say no terrorism motive has yet been established, but the investigation remains ongoing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62681

>>62798

Boy, 13, accused of plotting school massacre is first charged under new Queensland law

MACKENZIE SCOTT and JON MENDELSOHN - 2 June 2026

A 13-year-old boy inspired by online videos of Russian school shooters and stabbing videos had “imminent plans” to kill young children at a Queensland school, and had purchased clothing from webstore Temu to dress like them, police allege.

The boy, from Maryborough on Queensland’s Fraser Coast, was arrested on Thursday after allegedly entering a petrol station with a balaclava around 9am with a large knife and threatening an employee.

He was released following a police interview, with detectives executing a warrant at the boy’s home on Saturday after the detectives from the counter-terrorism unit reviewed the service station CCTV footage.

During the search, police allegedly uncovered electronic devices that had a recorded video from the livestream of the New Zealand mosque massacre.

The Courier-Mail reported that a Maryborough court heard the boy had allegedly planned to target children “who he deemed to be small and easy targets”.

He was later arrested by detectives from the Counter Terrorism Investigation Group and charged with one count each of preparation or planning to cause death or grievous bodily harm and possessing or controlling violent ­extremist material obtained or ­accessed using a carriage of ­service.

Queensland Police Acting Detective Superintendent Jason Hindmarsh on Monday said the boy’s actions “did involve a threat to a local school”.

“We’re in a very early process of reviewing these devices, but we do have evidence that there was planning towards death and GBH (grievous bodily harm),” Superintendent Hindmarsh said.

“We’ve got evidence to satisfy our evidentiary standards that he had planned to undertake acts of violence at a school.

“I can’t give any specific details, but there was a threat to the school, and particularly young people at that school.”

The 13-year-old boy was not known to police, and early indications suggest there were no ideological underpinnings to the plan.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service defence solicitor Clem van der Weegen tried unsuccessfully to have both charges dismissed, with The Courier-Mail reporting he told the court that the boy was a “child of trauma” who was at the service station “looking for kids to play with”.

Superintendent Hindmarsh said police were not alleging he planned to undertake a terrorist attack, adding counter-terrorism experts were engaged because of new laws passed by the Crisafulli Liberal National Party government in response to the Bondi massacre in December.

The legislation amended several existing laws to deliver tougher penalties for hate speech, terrorism-related activities and firearm offences. Among the amendments was the introduction of a new offence under the Criminal Code that prohibits acts done in preparation for, or planning, an offence likely to cause the death or grievous bodily harm of another.

“This is the first prosecution in Queensland for this new offence,” Superintendent Hindmarsh confirmed. “If we do identify a terrorism aspect to it, we will investigate that.”

The teenager has been remanded in custody and is expected to reappear in the Hervey Bay Children’s Court on June 5.

Counter-terrorism investi­gators will continue their investigation in Maryborough on Tuesday. There is no ongoing threat to the community.

“We just want to reassure the community that we will work with our partners to ensure the safety of all Queenslanders,” Superintendent Hindmarsh said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teenager-accused-of-plotting-attack-on-children-at-queensland-school/news-story/6310940021a74edcb09efb61528cc8b6

https://mypolice.qld.gov.au/news/2026/06/01/violent-extremist-material-charges-maryborough/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62838

File: 0140c0b7d42244e⋯.jpg (284.27 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 854755b236bc61e⋯.jpg (233.18 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669538 (020956ZJUN26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith faces three-month delay in seeing war crimes allegations - Ben Roberts-Smith’s war crimes case has been delayed after national security provisions were invoked, postponing the release of the prosecution brief until September. Prosecutors allege the former SAS corporal committed five war crime murders involving unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012, allegations he denies. Commonwealth lawyers told the court that orders under the National Security Information Act must be resolved before evidence can be disclosed, citing concerns that certain material could prejudice Australia’s national security. The case is expected to rely heavily on testimony from former soldiers granted immunity in exchange for evidence, with their identities protected by court orders. Roberts-Smith remains on strict bail conditions while the matter proceeds, and a trial is not expected to begin before 2029.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

Ben Roberts-Smith faces three-month delay in seeing war crimes allegations

BIMINI PLESSER - 2 June 2026

Alleged war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith will have to wait three months before seeing the full suite of allegations levelled against him due to national security concerns.

Mr Roberts-Smith was arrested and charged with five counts of war crime murder in April, crimes he allegedly committed between 2009 and 2012 against unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS.

The full brief of evidence against him was scheduled to be served on Tuesday, but national security concerns have stalled proceedings.

The National Security Information Act has been invoked in Mr Roberts-Smith’s case, meaning the commonwealth has flagged that the disclosure of certain evidence or information could prejudice Australia’s national security.

Commonwealth lawyers on Tuesday told the Downing Centre Local Court orders had to be made under the NSI Act before the brief of evidence could be served, and asked to schedule a hearing for that matter later in the year.

Mr Roberts-Smith was not present in court but his legal team, headed by solicitor Karen Espiner, said they expected to consent to the commonwealth’s proposed orders.

A hearing to make orders under the NSI Act was set for September 1. The brief of evidence against Mr Roberts-Smith will be served one week later, on September 8. The former soldier, who is currently out on bail, will not attend either hearing.

Mr Roberts-Smith is subject to strict conditions while on bail, including a $250,000 surety and the surrender of his passport. He must report to police three times a week, cannot leave Australia, and cannot leave Queensland except to travel to Sydney or Perth for the case.

He is not permitted to approach anyone he served with in Afghanistan or access firearms.

Mr Roberts-Smith was also barred from using any encrypted messaging or video platforms, but Judge Allen on Monday amended the bail conditions, granting him access to video call services such as FaceTime and Zoom.

The procedural delays in his case mean Mr Roberts-Smith will not be able to access the full list of allegations made against him for another three months.

He has denied any wrongdoing, and previous findings against him in a defamation case have only been made to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities.

It is unclear what exactly will be included in the brief of evidence against him, but it is understood that the indemnified testimony of Australian soldiers who served alongside Mr Roberts-Smith will play a significant role in the commonwealth’s case.

Shortly after his arrest, prosecutors revealed that four soldiers who admitted complicity in Mr Roberts-Smith’s alleged war crimes had been granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for their evidence against him.

These witnesses’ identities are protected by non-publication orders.

Last month, Judge Michael Allen condemned attempts by the public to identify and “hunt down” the four “crucial” witnesses.

Judge Allen said all witnesses must be able to deliver their evidence “without fear of repercussions or … pressure from the public which may impact their health and wellbeing”.

“(Mr Roberts-Smith) is absolutely entitled to have a fair trial, and the crown … is entitled to present its case without public threats, harassment and menace to its crucial witnesses,” he said.

If the key witnesses were publicly identified, Judge Allen believed there was a “real risk” one or more of them would become “unwilling and unable” to give evidence.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s war crimes trial is unlikely to reach the NSW Supreme Court until at least 2029.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/ben-robertssmith-faces-threemonth-delay-in-seeing-war-crimes-allegations/news-story/49d4baa1c963c3db6850e39d37436484

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62839

File: 9ddc84e2bf228ea⋯.jpg (399.2 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24669543 (021005ZJUN26) Notable: Anthony Albanese on a Solomons mission to catch new PM Matthew Wale as China circles - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rolled out a high-level diplomatic welcome for newly elected Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale as Australia seeks to strengthen ties with Honiara amid ongoing concerns about China’s growing influence in the Pacific. Wale’s first official overseas visit includes meetings with Albanese, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles, alongside talks involving several senior Solomon Islands ministers. Australian officials are expected to discuss regional security, policing cooperation and the implications of Solomon Islands’ security relationship with Beijing, while stopping short of demanding policy changes. Wale has previously criticised aspects of the China security pact signed in 2022 but has not committed to reversing it. Canberra hopes the visit signals a renewed emphasis on Australia as Solomon Islands’ principal strategic and security partner.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62776

Anthony Albanese on a Solomons mission to catch new PM Matthew Wale as China circles

BEN PACKHAM and SARAH ISON - 1 June 2026

1/2

The Albanese government is pulling out all stops for Solomon ­Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale’s first official visit to Canberra, with China’s growing influence in the Pacific set to dominate days of “frank” and “sensitive” talks with Anthony Albanese and his senior ministers.

Mr Wale has a packed schedule following his arrival in Canberra late on Monday, including meetings with Mr Albanese, lunches with Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles, and briefings with senior Department of Foreign Affairs officials.

He will also receive a full ceremonial welcome at Parliament House on Wednesday and address the media with Mr Albanese before dining with the Prime Minister at The Lodge.

Mr Wale is travelling with six of his top ministers, including ­Finance Minister Gordon Lilio, Foreign Minister Rick Houenipwela, National Planning Minister Peter Kenilorea, and Infrastructure Minister Ricky Fuo’o, who will sit in on key meetings.

The diplomatic charm offensive underscores hopes in Can­berra that Mr Wale will shift his country’s foreign policy to prioritise ties with Australia over those with Beijing. Solomon Islands has been one of the Pacific’s most pro-China countries since it ditched diplomatic ties with Taiwan in 2019, signing a controversial ­security pact with Beijing in 2022 under former prime minister Manesseh Sogavare.

Senator Wong said after Mr Wale was elected last month that Australia was interested in upgrading security ties with Honiara and declared Australia’s “job will never be done” in countering Chinese influence in the Pacific.

Former Australian high commissioner to Solomon Islands James Batley said the government would be “pretty frank” with Mr Wale over the security implications of China’s activities in the Pacific.

“Australian officials would be talking to him about our perception of the broader regional picture and our assessment of what China means certainly for our national security and, by extension, for Solomon Islands as well,” he said. “I think that would be part of the conversation and obviously that involves some pretty serious or sensitive discussions.

“(The government is) not going to be saying, ‘You have to do this, you have to do that’. But I think we would want to be having a pretty frank discussion to say, ‘This is where we come from. And this is why and we’re very keen for you to understand that’.”

While the Solomon Islands would always have a relationship with China, a significant economic and aid partner, Mr Batley said Mr Wale would be briefed on the risks around collaborating with Beijing on security.

He said it was an “open question” whether the new Solomons’ Prime Minister would limit security co-operation with China or roll it back.

“Wale is under no obligation to have Chinese police trainers in the country, but … those are political judgments that he would have to make,” the former diplomat said.

He said it was striking that Mr Wale, who was elected by MPs after his predecessor Jeremiah Manele was ousted in a no-confidence vote, was visiting Australia so soon after being elected.

“I think clearly (he is) sending a signal to the Australian government on the importance of the ­relationship,” Mr Batley said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62840

File: 8b98ff0c16bfdb0⋯.jpg (332.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9580b532bfebfc2⋯.jpg (292.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4e88883b7296c8f⋯.jpg (255.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24672912 (030418ZJUN26) Notable: Prosecutors drop one charge against ex-shock jock Alan Jones - One charge has been withdrawn against former broadcaster Alan Jones ahead of his trial on multiple indecent assault and sexual touching allegations. Prosecutors discontinued a single indecent assault charge relating to an alleged incident at a Tamworth event in 2013, reducing the total number of charges from 27 to 26. Jones, 84, continues to plead not guilty to all remaining allegations, which now relate to eight complainants and span the period from 2009 to 2020. The allegations involve claims of indecent assault and sexual touching at various locations across New South Wales. No reason was given in court for the withdrawal of the charge. Jones has consistently denied any wrongdoing and says he intends to contest every remaining allegation at trial later this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Prosecutors drop one charge against ex-shock jock Alan Jones

STEVE ZEMEK - June 02, 2026

Prosecutors have withdrawn one charge against Alan Jones as he prepares to battle indecent assault and sexual touching allegations in a blockbuster trial later this year.

Mr Jones, 84, had previously pleaded not guilty to 27 charges - 25 counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching - relating to nine alleged victims between 2009 and 2020.

However the number of charges he will face at trial was whittled down in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday as prosecutors withdrew a count of indecent assault relating to one complainant.

“There are proceedings being discontinued, this happened overnight,” Mr Jones’ solicitor Bryan Wrench told the court on Tuesday.

The charge withdrawn on Tuesday related to an allegation that Mr Jones touched and grabbed the person, who can be known only as “Complainant K”, on the bottom at an event in Tamworth in 2013.

No reason was given in court as to why it was being withdrawn.

It means Mr Jones will only face charges relating to eight alleged victims when he faces a Local Court hearing, which is scheduled to begin in August and is anticipated to run for four months.

According to court documents, the alleged offences occurred in Sydney, Fitzroy Falls, Kiama, Mittagong and at his work premises and home.

Following his first court appearance in December 2024, Mr Jones strongly denied the allegations.

“I have never indecently assaulted these people,” he said at the time.

“The law assumes I am not guilty, and I am not guilty.

“I am emphatic that I’ll be defending every charge before a jury in due course.”

Mr Jones’ matter will return to court next week.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/prosecutors-drop-one-charge-against-exshock-jock-alan-jones/news-story/4be10eb842250537d3034de37a9c296e

https://qresear.ch/?q=Alan+Jones

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62841

File: 816d151a74f1b0b⋯.jpg (212.37 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc1cfca1ccbb7c9⋯.jpg (157.8 KB,862x862,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c9e659a5fbd8a00⋯.jpg (365.55 KB,1874x1054,937:527,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e74cfed3121109b⋯.jpg (276.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 86500d06ad85311⋯.jpg (404.63 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24672948 (030447ZJUN26) Notable: Grace Tame podcast sparks fury as Jewish leaders condemn ABC decision - (Video) The ABC has come under criticism after confirming Grace Tame will host a four-part podcast series despite controversy surrounding her comments about the Israel-Hamas conflict. Jewish community leaders, opposition figures and ABC presenter Charlie Pickering questioned the broadcaster’s decision, citing Tame’s participation in pro-Palestinian activism and remarks disputing reports of sexual violence committed during the October 7 attacks. Critics argued proceeding with the podcast risked undermining public confidence in the national broadcaster at a time of heightened concern about antisemitism. The ABC said it rejects Tame’s views regarding October 7 but noted work on the podcast began in late 2025, before the controversy. The series will focus on the experiences of autistic women and gender-diverse people in Australia and is scheduled to proceed as planned.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38771 (pb)

Grace Tame podcast sparks fury as Jewish leaders condemn ABC decision

JON MENDELSOHN and JAMES MADDEN - June 02, 2026

1/2

The ABC is facing criticism from Jewish leaders, politicians and even one of its own high-profile presenters over its decision to proceed with a podcast hosted by Grace Tame, just weeks after she dismissed the rape of Israeli women by Hamas terrorists as “propaganda”.

On Tuesday the ABC announced the controversial activist would host a four-part podcast, Autistic AF with Grace Tame, which will explore what life is like for autistic women and gender-­diverse people in Australia.

It was first announced in November that Tame had been commissioned to work on the ABC’s podcast platform in 2026, but that was before she made a series of inflammatory remarks about the conflict in the Middle East.

In February, Tame led a chant of “From Gadigal to Gaza, globalise the intifada” at a pro-Palestine rally in Sydney, opposing a visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog, whom she labelled a “war criminal”.

The following month, Tame told ABC Radio host Hamish Macdonald that reports of Israeli women being raped by Hamas terrorists on October 7 had been “debunked”.

Jewish leaders expressed outraged over the ABC’s decision to proceed with the Tame podcast, accusing the public broadcaster of a “profound lack of judgment”.

Australian Jewish Association chief Robert Gregory said he thought at first the ABC announcement was a joke.

“I simply could not believe Australia’s public broadcaster could be so tone deaf,” he said.

“This decision demonstrates a profound lack of judgment and disregard for the concerns of many Australians, particularly within the Jewish community. It reinforces the growing perception that ABC management is increasingly out of touch with the communities it is supposed to serve.”

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin told The Australian that the ABC’s decision to proceed with Ms Tame’s podcast, even after her widely-panned anti-­Israel public statements, sent a message that such conduct carried no consequences and even brought financial rewards.

“It seems the ABC has determined that Grace Tame is fit for employment at public expense after screaming chants widely interpreted as calling for global attacks on Jews, and a radio interview in which she doubled down on her comments questioning the widespread pack rape and sexual torture committed by Hamas, which the terrorists themselves never denied,” he said.

“Everyone deserves a second chance but Tame has shown no remorse or regret whatsoever.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62842

File: 15faad9a775df9e⋯.jpg (349.98 KB,960x1280,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3520afdf15d1a57⋯.jpg (198.53 KB,1759x2345,1759:2345,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24672960 (030456ZJUN26) Notable: Calls grow for notorious childcare pedophile Ashley Paul Griffith to face justice in NSW - Pressure is mounting for convicted child sex offender Ashley Paul Griffith to be extradited to New South Wales to face more than 180 additional charges involving 23 children after his Queensland appeal is resolved. Griffith, who is serving a life sentence after pleading guilty to more than 300 child sexual offences against 65 victims, is accused of further offences allegedly committed while working in Sydney childcare centres. Families of alleged NSW victims, legal representatives and the Australian Childcare Alliance have called for a trial to proceed so survivors can receive recognition through the justice system. The NSW government says arrangements are already in place with Queensland and Commonwealth authorities to seek Griffith’s transfer once legal proceedings in Queensland conclude. Griffith is currently appealing the 27-year non-parole period attached to his life sentence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24653832

>>62792

Calls grow for notorious childcare pedophile to face justice in NSW

Pressure is building to extradite one of Australia’s most notorious daycare pedophiles to NSW to face alleged offences.

Will Paige and Suzan Giuliani - June 1, 2026

One of Australia’s worst pedophiles should face justice for alleged crimes against 23 children in NSW, according to survivors’ families and a major early learning services body, which want the former childcare worker extradited to stand trial.

Former childcare centre worker Ashley Paul Griffith was handed a life sentence in 2024 after pleading guilty to more than 300 child sexual offences against dozens of victims across Queensland and Italy over a period of almost two decades.

However Griffith has never stood trial in NSW, where he faces a further 180 charges against more than 20 children in Sydney’s inner west.

The family of an alleged victim in NSW told The Daily Telegraph that Griffith exploited his role in the state’s childcare system to prey on children, unimpeded for years.

“Seeing this monster finally brought back to face charges in our state will never undo the damage he has caused but we take some comfort in knowing he is locked away and unable to harm any more children,” the parent said.

The convicted pedophile is currently appealing his 27-year sentence for raping and abusing scores of children in Brisbane, arguing it is “excessive”.

NSW can seek to have prisoners transferred from another state on legal grounds to face charges but this cannot occur until Griffith’s appeal in Queensland is dealt with.

“We are just one of the families trying to pick up the pieces after the utter devastation caused by his heinous actions,” the parent said.

“We applaud the investigative teams at the Australian Federal Police and NSW Police for the very difficult but necessary work they did to stop him.”

As long ago as 2014, daycare predator Griffith allegedly abused young girls at a Sydney daycare centre but more than a decade later he has still not faced justice in NSW.

He is accused of horrific crimes in the state including 68 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under ten.

NSW Attorney General Michael Daley has sought and received agreement from the Queensland and Commonwealth attorney generals to extradite Griffith to NSW to face charges after his appeal in Queensland has concluded.

“The NSW Government is determined to do everything possible to ensure Griffiths faces trial in NSW as soon as possible,” a spokesman for Attorney General Michael Daley told the Telegraph.

Some of Griffith’s charges relate to Federal laws, meaning agreement is needed from both the Queensland and Federal governments to extradite him to NSW.

Marea Hickie, special counsel at Shine Lawyers, is acting for some of Griffith’s alleged victims and said the predator’s offending involved an extraordinary number of victims.

“It is essential that Griffith is prosecuted for the alleged crimes in NSW so that every survivor has some recognition of their ongoing suffering,” Ms Hickie told the Telegraph.

“Justice must be comprehensive and we hope it is swift to provide our clients with some minimal comfort and recognition of the ongoing impact on their everyday lives.”

Ms Hickie added: “Despite repeated recommendations and inquiries into childcare regulation, both Australia and NSW have continued in their failure to implement urgent measures to protect the lives of innocent children and their families.”

In an email seen by the Telegraph and sent to Attorney General Michael Daley, the Australian Childcare Alliance (ACA) NSW Chief Executive Chiang Lim also called for Griffith’s urgent extradition, labelling him “Australia’s worst pedophile”.

“We anxiously await the NSW Government’s announcement of this anticipated extradition as well as the beginning of the legal trial for his crimes,” he said in a letter.

The ACA, which represents over 1,600 privately owned early childhood care services, added that as part of NSW court proceedings, it expected “structural and systemic failures” that precipitated Griffith’s crimes to be identified.

“Moreover, we continue our expectations of culpable others (including those early childhood education and care services as well as their related approved providers) who have still not been criminally charged for negligence or being an accessory.”

On Thursday in Brisbane, the Court of Appeal reserved its decision in the appeal of Griffith, with a ruling to be made at a later, unspecified date.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/education/regions/new-south-wales/calls-grow-for-notorious-childcare-pedophile-to-face-justice-in-nsw/news-story/7ffe13f0869d7cfe53ebe1ba3d2ed349

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62843

File: d70d9c17bbb56de⋯.jpg (254.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 200b49602247b3f⋯.jpg (164.59 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 65ed9e9efd62ee9⋯.jpg (241.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 61530975f454836⋯.jpg (626.66 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673243 (030941ZJUN26) Notable: Australian Defence Force trainers for Ukraine to move from Britain to Poland - Australia will relocate its military training mission for Ukrainian forces from Britain to Poland, bringing Australian Defence Force personnel closer to Ukraine as part of an effort to better support Kyiv’s requirements. Under the revised arrangement, Australian trainers will join the Norwegian-led Operation Legio from mid-2026, continuing instruction in infantry skills, leadership and military tactics. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the move reflected Australia’s commitment to keeping assistance practical and aligned with Ukraine’s evolving needs. Ukrainian officials welcomed the change, arguing it would reduce logistical challenges and improve efficiency. The shift comes as Russia intensifies missile and drone attacks across Ukraine and as Kyiv seeks to formalise long-term security cooperation with Australia through a bilateral agreement. Australia has provided approximately $1.7 billion in support since the war began.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian Defence Force trainers for Ukraine to move from Britain to Poland

BEN PACKHAM - 3 June 2026

Australian military personnel will be deployed to Poland to train Ukrainian forces in coming weeks, shifting the Australian Defence Force’s Operation Kudu mission from the UK, ­Defence Minister Richard Marles has revealed.

From the middle of this year, Australian Army trainers will partner with the multinational, Norwegian-led Operation Legio, bringing them closer to the Ukrainian border to better meet Kyiv’s requirements.

Mr Marles revealed the commitment at The Australian’s ­Defending Australia summit, describing it as an evolution of the training mission. “Australia is continuing to adapt our contributions to Ukraine to ensure our support remains practical, relevant, and aligned with their most urgent needs,” he said.

The commitment comes as Ukraine faces some of the most intensive Russian strikes of the war, with thousands of missiles and drones raining down on the country in recent weeks.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said the location change would make the mission “easier and cheaper”, cutting down on travel costs and logistics.

“Poland is just across the border. You drive them there and they can provide the training. So it just makes sense,” he said.

“We still rely on our partners for that basic infantry training ­because we are continuously ­recruiting people. We’re extremely grateful for the support provided by Australia, and we hope that Australia can continue providing that support, because it’s continuing to save lives.”

Mr Myroshnychenko said Australia stood to gain from its support for Ukraine, given Russia had partnered with two other Pacific countries – China and North Korea – providing them with valuable combat lessons and a ready-made testing environment for new weapons.

In the UK, through Operation Kudu, the ADF trained more than 3650 Ukraineian personnel in basic infantry tactics, leadership and military skills.

The Australian trainers also learned lessons from their Ukrainian trainees, including “what it’s like to fight a war of national existence”, the ADF’s Chief of Joint Operations, Justin Jones, told The Australian last year.

Some Australian personnel were previously based in Poland during the conflict, supporting the deployment of a E-7A Wedgetail early-warning aircraft that provided defensive support detecting incoming missiles and drones.

Mr Myroshnychenko has previously offered Ukrainian support to teach the ADF “how to do modern warfare”, and provide Australia with new military technology.

“We’re now the most powerful army in Europe … and we learned how to fight,” he said in February.

Kyiv is hoping Anthony Albanese and Ukraine’s President ­Volodymyr Zelensky will sign a new bilateral security agreement in coming months to formalise ongoing Australian support for the country’s war against Russia, which invaded Ukraine more than four years ago.

Australia has so far provided $1.7bn worth of support to Ukraine, including $1.5bn of military aid. But support has dwindled over the years, with last year’s commitment of about $95m dwarfed by average commitments of about $500m in each of the first three years of the conflict.

Australia’s military aid to Ukraine has included 120 Bushmaster protected mobility vehicles, 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks, 56 M113 armoured personnel carriers, 28 Rheinmetall medium trucks, six howitzers and 14 inflatable boats, as well as artillery shells, large numbers of drones, air defence missiles, and other ­munitions.

Kyiv was battered by strikes early on Tuesday local time, killing at least 10 people and wounding more than 100. The attack followed massive air strikes on Kyiv on May 24. More than 600 drones and 90 missiles, including ­advanced hypersonic models, struck the capital, killing two people and injuring 77.

Mr Zelensky has reportedly ­ordered preparations for another two to three years of fighting amid Russia’s demands for territorial control and recognition of occupied regions of Ukraine, and for Kyiv to formally renounce its NATO membership aspirations.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was still prepared to play a mediating role in Ukraine, but acknowledged peace talks had stalled.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/australian-defence-force-trainers-for-ukraine-to-move-from-britain-to-poland/news-story/188a244aa3360562db954b73d59f9417

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62844

File: e9ae8bc38a10e6b⋯.jpg (954.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c03b09273482d6a⋯.jpg (175.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 063f7ad41cad3b9⋯.jpg (386.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673254 (030952ZJUN26) Notable: Anthony Albanese faces growing revolt over AUKUS submarine deal - Debate over AUKUS has intensified within Labor after MP Ed Husic questioned whether the revised submarine agreement can deliver as promised. Concerns have grown following confirmation Australia will receive three second-hand Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of new and used vessels. Union leaders, former ministers, independents and long-time critics have called for greater scrutiny of the pact, with some demanding contingency plans if US submarine production delays affect deliveries. Former minister Peter Garrett and former defence force chief Chris Barrie are leading a public inquiry into the agreement’s costs and strategic implications. The government has rejected calls for a rethink, with Richard Marles insisting AUKUS remains firmly in the national interest and central to Australia’s future defence strategy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Anthony Albanese faces growing revolt over AUKUS submarine deal

GREG BROWN and BEN PACKHAM - 2 June 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese faces a ­revolt over AUKUS with rebel Labor MPs, former ministers, teal independents and unionists demanding the Prime Minister reconsider his backing of the agreement while claiming there is growing uncertainty over its rollout under the Trump administration.

After Labor MP and former cabinet minister Ed Husic used a caucus meeting on Tuesday to question the future of the $368bn deal, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles offered a passionate defence of the AUKUS pact and declared the government was “unambiguously” behind the nuclear submarine agreement.

Speaking at The Australian’s Defending Australia conference at the War Memorial in Canberra, Mr Marles said the Labor movement had already debated AUKUS and called on agitators within the party and the unions to “take a deep breath”.

“Overwhelmingly, AUKUS was endorsed and we continue to move down that path … it was not close in terms of that fight,” he said.

“Everyone needs to just take a deep breath … it’s the right thing in terms of what our country needs and it’s a massive endeavour.”

Mr Marles also suggested that anti-immigration policies – such as those being pushed by Angus Taylor and One Nation leader Pauline Hanson – were a risk to the nation’s security and Asian countries’ view of Australia.

“For those who are tempted to walk down a path of xenophobia, it not only undermines our social ­cohesion, it fundamentally makes us less safe,” Mr Marles said.

“Our diverse, multicultural, ­socially cohesive society is fundamental to our national security and maintaining it is fundamental to defending Australia.”

Mr Marles’ AUKUS defence came hours after one of Australia’s most prominent Left-faction unionists urged the government to hold a ­review into the trilateral ­defence partnership with the US and Britain.

United Workers Union national secretary Tim Kennedy – whose union is a key support base of the Prime Minister’s leadership – said the government should “have a good hard look” at AUKUS.

“These things are enormous and I wouldn’t think it would be ­intelligent if we didn’t revisit the parameters of it as the world is changing quickly and we have got to make smart decisions,” Mr Kennedy told The Australian.

“Just going along with it as things change – we have gone from a new sub to a couple of ­second-hand subs – we need to look at these things.”

Mr Albanese on Tuesday rejected Mr Husic’s call for a fresh caucus vote on AUKUS, after the former industry minister argued the terms of the deal had changed given the weekend announcement that Australia would be ­receiving three second-hand ­Virginia-class submarines from the US rather than the third of the boats being new. On Tuesday night in Senate ­estimates, new ­Defence Department secretary Meghan Quinn claimed the ­government had ­always preferred acquiring three second-hand ­Virginia-class submarines rather than a combination of one new and two used vessels.

While Labor MPs expect Mr Albanese’s supporters to shut down any AUKUS debate at the ALP national conference in July, Mr Kennedy and Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Victoria assistant secretary Tony Piccolo cautioned against this.

Former Labor government ministers Peter Garrett and Carmen Lawrence are among a group launching a crowdfunded inquiry into the AUKUS deal to heap pressure on Mr Albanese to change course on the issue. The community has raised $50,000 for public hearings around Australia and is also backed by former Australian Defence Force chief Chris Barrie.

Amid the growing push against AUKUS, Mr Marles said the nation’s biggest threat was coercion rather than outright invasion.

“Our most consequential strategic risk is not so much that the continent is invaded, but it is that we would be coerced by any potential adversary in the future,” he said. “You only need to look at the closure of … the Strait of Hormuz to understand what it might look like if we had coercion there.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62845

File: 90898d9559de04b⋯.jpg (2.36 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3690802497ba66e⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,4140x2760,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673262 (030958ZJUN26) Notable: Scott Morrison backs new AUKUS plan, urges Australia not to ‘surrender’ to doubt - Former prime minister Scott Morrison has backed the decision for Australia to acquire three in-service Virginia-class submarines rather than a mix of new and used vessels, arguing the change will simplify operations without reducing capability. Morrison said the Virginia-class boats were always intended as an interim capability before the arrival of Australian-built SSN-AUKUS submarines and urged the government to better explain AUKUS as a strategic deterrent rather than an industry policy. Defence officials and Navy chief Vice Admiral Mark Hammond also defended the revised approach, citing training, maintenance and supply-chain advantages from operating a single submarine configuration. The changes remain contested, with Labor critics, the Coalition and the Greens disputing the government's claim that acquiring three second-hand submarines had always been Australia’s preferred outcome.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Scott Morrison backs new AUKUS plan, urges Australia not to ‘surrender’ to doubt

Matthew Knott - June 3, 2026

Former prime minister Scott Morrison has backed the move to buy only second-hand submarines from the United States, rather than a mix of new and old vessels as originally planned, as he called for Anthony Albanese to do more to sell the benefits of AUKUS to the public.

The Defence Department boss, navy chief and senior Albanese government ministers said it was always Australia’s preference to acquire three in-service Virginia-class submarines from the US, a claim lampooned by the Coalition and the Greens.

Morrison – who created the AUKUS pact with his American and British counterparts in 2021 – said he was relaxed about the decision to no longer acquire a new and upgraded Virginia-class submarine from 2038, as was announced in late 2023.

“I can see the case for simplifying things by sticking with the same platform, I understand that,” Morrison told this masthead.

“There will be no real diminution of the ultimate capability.”

He said it was important to remember the Virginia-class boats were intended to be a bridging capability until the arrival of the new SSN-AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines Australia is designing with the UK and plans to build in Adelaide.

“AUKUS is not the Virginias. It is an important part of AUKUS but not AUKUS itself,” he said.

Morrison reiterated his calls for Albanese to do more to explain the strategic rationale for AUKUS as a counterweight to China’s growing military might in Asia, rather than its benefits to the local manufacturing sector, to ensure the public does not lose support for the project.

“The purpose of AUKUS is to provide a strategic deterrent in the Indo-Pacific,” he said.

“It’s not a jobs program, it’s a strategic program to deter a potential adversary and opponent. When you can’t explain that it becomes hard to sell.”

He said he understood the debate about AUKUS’s merits, but was worried about a sense of defeatism among some AUKUS critics.

“Let’s not surrender because we think we’re not up to it. We have to be careful not to talk down Australia,” he said.

Navy chief Mark Hammond told Senate estimates hearings on Tuesday night: “From a sustainment perspective, it is much more efficient to maintain three platforms of the same configuration baseline.

“It means you only need one training system, one supply chain. It’s much more efficient.”

He added: “From a capability manager’s perspective, simplification is my friend. So three of the same platform is a better outcome than a mix of platforms.”

Newly appointed Defence Department secretary Meghan Quinn said: “Australia’s position is that we would always have a preference for three in-service [submarines].”

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy told Sky News: “We’ve made it very clear that that was our preferred position when we were negotiating this arrangement in ’22 and ’23.”

“[The US has] arrived at new data, they’ve improved their maintenance performance of their in-service Virginias, which meant that they felt comfortable releasing a third in-service submarine,” he said.

“So this is the Trump Administration confirming support for AUKUS, saying, ‘Yes, your preferred approach is now our preferred approach’. This is a win for Australia and it’s a win for AUKUS.”

Conroy said former cabinet minister Ed Husic “got his facts wrong” by claiming the agreement Labor MPs signed up to in 2021 had changed because there was no detail about acquiring Virginia-class submarines at the time.

Coalition defence spokesman James Paterson said Labor could not “have it both ways” by claiming the new plan was better after describing the previous plan as the “optimal pathway” for AUKUS.

Greens defence spokesman David Shoebridge said: “I don’t think anyone should believe any of the spin coming out of the Albanese government ... Not only are we seeing this sort of destruction of political trust by Labor spinning and revisiting past history, but we’re actually seeing the fundamentals of AUKUS fraying in real time.”

He said AUKUS risked making Australia “a bit player in a US-China war” because of their ability to travel far from Australia’s shores.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/scott-morrison-backs-new-aukus-plan-urges-australia-not-to-surrender-to-doubt-20260603-p603jk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62846

File: c16f2c5d2be15df⋯.jpg (271.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d215e08f46460ee⋯.jpg (288.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0a26ed3fb6ee513⋯.jpg (223.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673267 (031005ZJUN26) Notable: Anthony Albanese secures new Solomons Islands police deal with new PM Matthew Wale - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale have agreed to expand policing co-operation and begin negotiating a broader strategic treaty, strengthening ties between the two countries. The agreement will deepen collaboration between the Australian Federal Police and the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force and builds on the Pacific Policing Initiative. Australia also pledged about $35 million for cyclone recovery and development support. The announcement comes after years of concern over Beijing’s growing security role in Solomon Islands following the 2022 China-Solomons security pact. Analysts said the deal suggests a shift towards Australia as a preferred security partner, while both leaders stressed the resilience of the bilateral relationship despite recent tensions and differing foreign policy approaches.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62776

>>62839

Anthony Albanese secures new Solomons Islands police deal with new PM Matthew Wale

SARAH ISON - 3 June 2026

Anthony Albanese has secured long-stalled agreements with Solomon Islands on joint policing initiatives and elevating the relationship between the two nations to “a comprehensive strategic one”, in a boon for Australia and its efforts countering China’s ­influence in the Pacific.

The announcement follows a series of high-level meetings held during Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale’s visit to Australia, which he embarked on less than a month after winning office, and was accompanied by a $35m commitment by the Albanese government for cyclone recovery in the Solomon Islands.

“We have said very clearly we want Australia to be the security partner of choice in our region and we want the Pacific family to look after our security in this region,” Mr Albanese said in Canberra.

“The Prime Minister’s decision to choose Australia for his first overseas visit reflects the closeness of our relationship and I congratulate him on the energy and vision he has brought to his first days in office.”

Mr Albanese added that, along with providing $SBD200m (about $35m), for recovery from Tropical Cyclone Maila and other “energy issues”, his government would be “looking ahead to the future of how we can support education and skills development” in the ­Pacific nation.

Following years of resistance from Solomon Islands to join a ­regional policing initiative spearheaded by the Australian Federal Police, Mr Albanese on Wednesday confirmed Mr Wale had formally signed up, while agreeing to progress work with the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force.

“We’ve … agreed to move to the next phase of the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force, Australian Federal Police Policing Partnership Program, building capability and strengthening policing co-­operation,” Mr Albanese said.

“This builds on the Pacific Policing Initiative that we launched at the Pacific Islands Forum just a couple of years ago. And we welcome Solomon Islands’ signature of this agreement of understanding, reinforcing our shared commitment to regional security.”

The Albanese government committed in 2023 to financially support the development of a sovereign police force in Solomon Islands, but the two countries have made little progress on the initiative since then.

It was announced after Solomon Islands struck a ­security pact with Beijing in 2022, which allowed for Chinese police officers to be stationed locally and undertake activities such as collecting biometric data from citizens.

Mr Wale recognised Solomon Islands’ relationship with Australia had experienced “issues” in recent years, following the former government signing the controversial deal with China.

“We have had some issues and all relationships go through issues, bumps here and there,” he said. “But the resilience of our relationship, I think, is self-evident. It’s not easy to break that kind of depth and strength of such a relationship. So we’re very happy – we’re pleased it didn’t.”

Former Australian diplomat James Batley, who served in senior roles across the Pacific, said the agreements announced on Wednesday signalled Solomon Islands was recalibrating its security relationships.

“It does seem to indicate something of a shift towards Australia and potentially away from China as a security provider,” he said.

“The new government in Solomon Islands has also made some changes at the top of the public service, in the foreign affairs ministry and the police and national security. I think that kind of underlines a desire to shift away from the previous (government line).”

A new comprehensive treaty will be negotiated between Australia and Solomon Islands in coming months, with Mr Batley expecting both countries to seek a deal as quickly as possible.

“I obviously think the Australian government wouldn’t take advantage of this new opening. There are elections due in two years in Solomon Islands, so it’s not as if that either government can afford to wait around,” he said.

“I think Prime Minister Wale is keen to give a sense of that he’s delivering change. So he’s got an incentive, I think, just as much as the Australian government does to conclude this.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-secures-new-solomons-islands-police-deal-with-new-pm-matthew-wale/news-story/d79798128d5718c507b0a78076e2b041

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62847

File: ecf820a4cb2d0b1⋯.jpg (238.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1d6c2c72780673d⋯.jpg (249.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 77d44f3c0bdf28b⋯.jpg (273.72 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673274 (031012ZJUN26) Notable: Hash Tayeh cleared of charges over ‘Zionists are terrorists’ chant - Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh has been acquitted on four offensive-language charges after a Melbourne magistrate found prosecutors failed to prove he intended to insult people when leading chants of “all Zionists are terrorists” at a 2024 rally. Magistrate Malcolm Thomas ruled the slogan was offensive and a “demonstrably false assertion” that could provoke anger and outrage, but said there was reasonable doubt about Tayeh’s intent because the comments were made in the context of political advocacy. A fifth charge relating to the same chant at a 2025 protest remains unresolved, with the court to consider arguments about the implied freedom of political communication. The case is being closely watched as a test of Victoria’s offensive-language laws amid tensions surrounding pro-Palestinian protests and antisemitism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62690

Hash Tayeh cleared of charges over ‘Zionists are terrorists’ chant

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 2 June 2026

A Melbourne court has handed down a landmark freedom-of-speech ruling, acquitting Palestinian activist Hash Tayeh of four charges over the chant “all Zionists are terrorists”.

In a major blow to Victoria Police and the state’s anti-­vilification laws, magistrate Malcolm Thomas found the chant was offensive on all five occasions it was used across two years but ruled that prosecutors hadn’t proven beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Tayeh intended to insult during the first four instances at a 2024 rally.

He was acquitted in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on four charges under section 17(1)(c) of the Summary Offences Act over the controversial chants.

A fifth, single charge relating to a repeat of the chant in 2025 remains unresolved and has been deferred to allow both parties to make submissions for a “constitutional argument” over the implied freedom of political communication.

As previously revealed by The Australian, the case focused solely on whether the phrase “all Zionists are terrorists” constituted “insulting words”, and whether Mr Tayeh intended the words to be insulting. Police prosecutors did not assert the chant was antisemitic and an affront to the majority of Jewish Australians, despite a police summary claiming that was the case.

In his judgment, Mr Thomas ruled that making a blanket statement across an entire group – regardless of age or an individual’s commitment to non-violence – was a “demonstrably false assertion” that serves to “dehumanise individuals” and would provoke anger, disgust and outrage in any reasonable person.

Despite finding the language offensive on all five occasions, Mr Thomas said he could not be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr Tayeh held a general criminal “intent” to be offensive during his first four uses of the chant at the “Our Babies Matter” rally on May 27, 2024.

Because Mr Tayeh was speaking at a highly charged political rally aimed at “influencing government policy”, the court ruled it was a reasonable possibility he fixed upon the words simply to reinforce a political argument, resulting in the four not guilty verdicts.

However, Mr Thomas indicated the final charge, which took place at a “Protest Until Ceasefire” demonstration on March 30, 2025, was “more problematic”.

By this time, Mr Tayeh had already been formally charged over the 2024 utterances, placing him squarely on notice that the phrase was legally problematic.

The court heard Mr Tayeh openly referenced his legal troubles to the 2025 crowd, stating, “Here in Australia, leaders such as myself have been charged for calling a political ideology that supports terrorism, terrorists … My court case will determine whether the rest of you will be charged.”

While Mr Thomas noted that repeating the chant after being charged constituted a deliberate, calculated “act of defiance” that established an intent to use offensive words, a final verdict on this single 2025 count cannot yet be recorded.

Mr Tayeh’s lawyer, Sarala Fitzgerald, said there would be a “constitutional argument” over the final charge, with both parties needing to make submissions on July 28. That charge will then be contested.

Mr Tayeh’s legal team also indicated they would be applying for court costs; Mr Thomas said he was anticipating such an ­ application.

During the trial, prosecutor Daniel Gurvich argued that while criticism of Israel was entirely legitimate, the deliberate use of the word “all” transformed a political slogan into a “sweeping” criminal insult designed to achieve “maximum attention”.

Ms Fitzgerald countered that Australian community standards allowed for “robust, emotionally charged” discussions during global conflicts, noting that none of the 26 police officers present at the time felt the peace had been disturbed.

Mr Tayeh is the former owner of the Burgertory fast-food chain. The case against him was closely watched as a major test of Victoria’s offensive language laws amid escalating tensions surrounding pro-Palestinian demonstrations and rising antisemitism.

His co-accused, Melbourne kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu ­Alsendyan, also faces charges but his matter has been adjourned until Mr Tayeh’s fifth charge is dealt with.

Separately, in February this year, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal ruled Mr Tayeh breached the state’s racial and religious vilification laws by leading the chant at a CBD rally.

The tribunal found encouraging thousands of protesters to chant an “absolute statement” attaching “a heinous label (terrorist) to an undifferentiated group of people (all Zionists)” amounted to conduct likely to incite hatred against Jewish people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hash-tayeh-cleared-of-charges-over-zionists-are-terrorists-chant/news-story/5ba917af97d1faf3d7eba8b825c8ec73

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62848

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24673287 (031019ZJUN26) Notable: Anzac Day booer unapologetic for disturbing ceremony - (Video) A man convicted of disrupting Sydney’s Anzac Day dawn service has refused to fully apologise for booing during a Welcome to Country, telling a court he still believed such ceremonies were inappropriate at Anzac commemorations. Eli Joseph Toby pleaded guilty to committing a nuisance at a war memorial after interrupting the service attended by thousands in Martin Place. Judge Greg Grogin criticised Toby for disrupting a solemn national occasion and noted his reluctance to express remorse, saying there were more appropriate ways to voice political views. Toby was convicted and fined $880. The incident drew widespread condemnation from veterans, political leaders and defence figures, who argued the behaviour disrespected both the ceremony and the service of Indigenous Australians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38980 (pb)

>>38981 (pb)

Anzac Day booer unapologetic for disturbing ceremony

Tom Wark - 3 June 2026

A man who booed during a Welcome to Country at an Anzac Day dawn service has refused to apologise while being sentenced in court.

Eli Joseph Toby pleaded guilty in Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday to one count of committing a nuisance at a war memorial for booing loudly while Uncle Ray Minniecon was delivering the Welcome.

When asked by Judge Greg Grogin whether he was sorry for what he had done, Toby said he had "mixed feelings".

"I'm sorry it has caused such an uproar and I'm sorry to my family," he said.

Toby said he was expressing his belief Welcome to Country ceremonies were overdone and should not be performed at Anzac Day commemorations.

"My behaviour was not designed to be offensive to Aboriginal or Indigenous people," he said.

"My booing of the Welcome to Country was my vocal expression ... of a feeling that is shared by (many)."

Judge Grogin repeatedly pressed Toby on whether he was apologetic for disrupting the ceremony.

"Are you sorry? Obviously not," the judge said when Toby would not answer.

The judge told Toby there were many more appropriate ways he could have expressed his dissatisfaction and he disturbed a deeply solemn ceremony for thousands of people.

"You broke a tradition, you broke a deeply sensitive moment to express your thoughts when nobody asked for them," Judge Grogin said.

"Your actions, especially that you're unable to say you're sorry for what you did, show an ignorance ... as to what Anzac Day really means."

Toby was convicted and fined $880.

He was arrested on Anzac Day and several others were moved on from the 11,000-strong crowd at Martin Place, Sydney.

After the acknowledgement - punctuated by booing - finished, a chorus of applause resounded for an extended period in support of Uncle Ray.

"We do have laws to try and deter people from this but it seems like these people still want to be lawless," the pastor and veteran said after the ceremony.

"They just need to realise their place in this country ... and show their deepest respect."

The booing attracted condemnation from around the country, with RSL Australia National President Peter Tinley labelling it "loutish behaviour" that was "grossly disrespectful" to First Nations people.

NSW Premier Chris Minns expressed his disappointment with the few in the crowd who chose to mar the sombre occasion with ugly scenes.

"This is a day to honour sacrifice," he said at the time.

Boos and heckling were also heard at Anzac Day ceremonies in Perth and in Melbourne.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said it was "deeply disappointing" behaviour at a time when the country should be acknowledging the contributions Indigenous Australians have made to the nation's defence.

"What we have seen with this booing is a disgrace, and it is deeply disrespectful to everyone actually who is participating in Anzac Day and particularly to that history," he told the ABC.

The view was echoed by opposition defence spokesman James Paterson, who said the heckling was completely inappropriate considering the service of Indigenous Australians who fought in uniform.

"Whatever your views about Welcome to Country, it is never appropriate to boo in an Anzac Day ceremony, which is our most sacred moment as a nation," he said at the time.

Lifeline 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

Open Arms 1800 011 046

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://au.news.yahoo.com/anzac-day-booer-unapologetic-disturbing-062412813.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfSgfBuJE7A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62849

File: 8401c133e800939⋯.jpg (2.02 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aca217019c05eda⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,5000x3349,5000:3349,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 132b156e96b1ea0⋯.jpg (4.28 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e490861e743af6c⋯.jpg (924.54 KB,3500x2333,3500:2333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24674334 (031810ZJUN26) Notable: Australia faces proposed 12.5pc US tariff over forced labour crackdown - Australia could face a new 12.5 per cent US tariff under a Trump administration proposal targeting countries accused of failing to adequately prevent imports linked to forced labour. The measure, announced by the US Trade Representative, forms part of an investigation into 60 trading partners and would place Australia alongside countries including China, Japan, India and South Korea. Canberra rejected the proposal as unjustified, arguing Australia already has strong modern slavery and forced labour laws and that any tariffs would be inconsistent with the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement. The proposed duties are subject to a public consultation process and would not take effect immediately. The dispute centres on supply-chain enforcement rather than allegations of forced labour within Australia itself.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia faces proposed 12.5pc US tariff over forced labour crackdown

Audrey Courty - 3 June 2026

Australia could be hit with a new 12.5 per cent US tariff after the Trump administration accused dozens of countries of failing to crack down on goods made with forced labour.

The proposed tariff was announced by the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday, as part of an investigation into what Washington says are unfair trade practices by 60 countries.

Australia is among 45 countries facing the higher 12.5 per cent rate, alongside China, Japan, India, South Korea, Brazil and Switzerland.

Another group, including Canada, Britain, the European Union and Mexico, would face a lower 10 per cent duty.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the US would "no longer tolerate" countries that failed to address forced labour in their supply chains.

"The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labor is unacceptable," Mr Greer said in a statement.

"This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field."

The USTR also proposed a textile mechanism that would allow for a certain volume of clothing and textile imports to enter the US at a reduced tariff rate, although details have not yet been released.

A spokesperson for the Trade Minister said Australia maintained that any tariffs on Australian exports to the US were "unjustified" and inconsistent with the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement.

The spokesperson said Australia had "robust, comprehensive and world-leading legislation" addressing forced labour and modern slavery, and would continue to advocate that US tariffs imposed on Australia were "unwarranted".

The proposed tariffs would not take effect immediately. The proposal will undergo a public consultation process, with hearings due to begin on July 7.

China says forced labour claims an 'excuse'

The US proposal came ahead of the July 24 expiry of a temporary 10 per cent tariff imposed by the Trump administration after the US Supreme Court struck down a separate set of tariffs introduced under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The court ruled US President Donald Trump had exceeded his authority by using the law to impose sweeping tariffs on US trading partners.

The administration has since said it would appeal a ruling that would make companies eligible for refunds on those duties.

The USTR investigation was conducted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and found all 60 countries examined — including Australia — had failed to adequately enforce bans on imports made with forced labour.

In its nearly 100-page report, the USTR defined forced labour as "work or service exacted from a person under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily".

It cited estimates from the UN's International Labour Organisation that 27.6 million people were engaged in forced labour worldwide in 2021.

Products identified as being at risk of involving forced labour included rice from Myanmar, tobacco from Malawi, beef from Brazil, and cotton and polysilicon from China.

The USTR said that even where countries banned forced labour domestically, importing goods produced using forced labour undermined fair trade rules.

The US has long argued that goods linked to China's far-western Xinjiang region are at risk of involving forced labour. Beijing rejects those allegations.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning denied the latest claims and called for economic disputes to be resolved through dialogue.

"There is no such thing as forced labour in China, and we oppose using it as an excuse to engage in political manipulation," she said in Beijing.

Earlier this week, the US administration separately proposed 25 per cent tariffs on imports from Brazil, alleging the country's trade practices were "unreasonable'' and burdened US commerce.

In the forced labour findings, the USTR said it would exempt from the tariffs a number of products, including energy, rare earths and certain other metals, beef, coffee, certain fruits and vegetables, and pharmaceuticals.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-03/australia-faces-proposed-us-tariff-over-forced-labour-crackdown/106756686

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/unwarranted-trump-proposes-new-12-5-per-cent-tariff-on-australia-20260603-p603nl.html

https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/june/ustr-makes-findings-and-proposes-action-60-section-301-investigations-relating-failures-take-action

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62850

File: 32f18dae3d3af13⋯.jpg (2.43 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6f44ff7fc1de8e⋯.jpg (905.62 KB,2642x1761,2642:1761,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ef3adef37cdddde⋯.jpg (3.57 MB,5000x2814,2500:1407,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676849 (040955ZJUN26) Notable: PM says Australia has 'ideological disagreement' with Trump administration after US reveals anti-slavery tariff - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia has an “ideological disagreement” with the Trump administration after the US proposed a 12.5 per cent tariff on Australian exports as part of a broader forced-labour crackdown. Albanese argued the measure was unjustified, inconsistent with the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement, and reflected Washington’s growing reliance on tariffs despite Australia’s modern slavery laws and the US trade surplus with Australia. Trade Minister Don Farrell raised objections directly with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while Opposition Leader Angus Taylor also opposed the move. Former ambassador Joe Hockey said Donald Trump remained firmly committed to tariffs despite their economic costs. Australia’s Anti-Slavery Commissioner Chris Evans criticised the proposal, arguing forced labour concerns were being used as part of a wider trade dispute.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62849

PM says Australia has 'ideological disagreement' with Trump administration after US reveals anti-slavery tariff

Nicholas McElroy - 4 June 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared Australia has an "ideological disagreement" with the United States, after the US revealed a plan to impose a 12.5 per cent tariff on exported goods from the junior ally.

The US plans to slap the new tariff on dozens of countries for allegedly failing to "address the importation of goods made with forced labour".

It is the latest attempt by the Trump administration to hit nations with import taxes since the US Supreme Court struck down 10 per cent tariffs that impacted Australian imports in February.

Mr Albanese said any tariff on Australian exports to the US was "unjustified and inconsistent" with the free trade agreements between the two allies.

"There is an ideological disagreement where the United States administration has broken with what was a decades-long understanding that tariffs are not positive for the country that is imposing them," Mr Albanese said.

"They increase the cost of goods and services in the country that is applying them to its consumers, and … free trade is in the interests of the global economy."

US trade representative Jamieson Greer said the alleged failure to ban products produced with forced labour created a "dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field".

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell met with Mr Greer on the sidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) meeting in Paris overnight, where Mr Farrell told him the tariffs were "unjustified".

The tariffs apply to more than 50 countries and replace, and slightly increase, the US global 10 per cent temporary import surcharge which expires in July.

Mr Albanese said Australia had world-leading legislation addressing forced labour and modern slavery that passed through parliament with unanimous support.

'World's on its head'

Mr Albanese also highlighted the point, which US President Donald Trump has also raised, that United States has a trade surplus with Australia, which means Australia buys more from the US than it sells.

He said the tariffs were a penalty on US consumers and harmed international trade.

"We actually think not only is it not in the interest of the United States, importantly, it undermines the global trading system," Mr Albanese said.

"It's one of which no notice was given. One of the things that we ask for in terms of international engagement is certainty. Australia and the United States are important allies.

"It is unfortunate that there have been a rolling series of decisions, some of which change from time to time, but all of which do have a common theme, which is that the United States is a supporter of tariffs."

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said the tariffs were "rotten" and should not be imposed on Australia.

"They are a great friend and they shouldn't do it," Mr Taylor said.

"It's not what we want to see and we'll fight against rotten tariffs."

Former federal treasurer and former Australian ambassador to the US Joe Hockey said he was not surprised by the move by Trump administration.

"The president of the United States is absolutely convinced that tariffs are great," Mr Hockey said.

"I've argued personally with him on the issue, and he's just not for moving."

Mr Hockey said Mr Trump could not see the inflationary and negative impact that tariffs had on American consumers.

"And it just goes to show how the world's on its head when a left-wing Labor prime minister is trying to convince a right-wing Republican president that free trade is actually the right way to go," Mr Hockey said.

Australia's Anti-Slavery Commissioner Chris Evans accused Trump of using the issue of slave labour as a "play thing" in his ongoing trade war.

"I don't want to be seen in any way to be supporting the moves by the American president because they're not motivated by the right reasons," he said.

"It's a shame that what is a really important human rights issue is being treated as a bit of a play thing in the tariff war."

Mr Evans says Australia could toughen up its Modern Slavery Act which asks businesses to ensure there is no forced labour in their supply chains.

Currently, Australian businesses have to report if they find evidence of slavery but aren't forced to take any action.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-04/us-plans-to-impose-anti-slavery-tariff-on-australian-products/106757472

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62851

File: 2293894f653e037⋯.jpg (357.62 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 705d48219d234c9⋯.jpg (759.13 KB,3484x2323,3484:2323,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676860 (041004ZJUN26) Notable: Defence officials say talks with US on AUKUS changes began 18 months ago - Australian defence officials have revealed discussions with the United States about changing the AUKUS submarine acquisition plan began in early 2025, around 18 months before last weekend’s announcement that Australia would acquire three in-service Virginia-class submarines instead of a mix of two used and one new vessel. Australian Submarine Agency chief Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead said the original 2023 agreement reflected the best option available at the time, but ongoing talks explored whether improving US submarine production and maintenance capacity could allow a shift to three in-service boats. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the revised arrangement would simplify operations and reduce costs, although it would not significantly alter the overall cost of the AUKUS program. Officials said the submarines are expected to transfer to Australia about six years into their service lives.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Defence officials say talks with US on AUKUS changes began 18 months ago

Tom Lowrey - 4 June 2026

Australian officials began talking with their US counterparts about changing the AUKUS pact around a year and a half ago, a Senate estimates hearing has heard.

Discussions began early last year, culminating in an announcement last weekend that Australia would buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines in the 2030s, rather than two second-hand and one new.

The change is the most significant shift to the AUKUS "optimal pathway" since it was announced in 2023.

The government has this week argued that buying three "in-service" submarines has always been the preferred option, given the simplicity of operating three near-identical submarines.

Officials from the Australian Submarine Agency, which is tasked with overseeing Australia's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines, were questioned at Senate estimates on details of the changes.

Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead was asked when "intense discussions" with the United States about the prospect of changing the plans began.

"Really, the beginning of last year," he said.

He said Australia had agreed to the best deal available in 2023, but there had been ongoing conversations about shifting to three "in-service" submarines.

Vice-Admiral Mead said there were constraints on the US in 2023 that meant they could not agree to selling three in-service submarines, but that had changed over time.

"What was available to us then was the optimal pathway," he said.

"We have been working with the US now for about the last 12 months or more on seeing if there was scope — as their industrial base matured … as they began to climb their production rates — was there scope to turn production into an 'in-service'.

"That has been an ongoing conversation with the US, which we saw was agreed to."

Marles says second-hand subs cheaper, but will not alter AUKUS cost

The government has also argued the change will see budget savings, as it is cheaper to both buy and maintain an in-service submarine than a brand new one.

Questioned on how much money will be saved through the change, Defence Minister Richard Marles told the 7.30 program it was meaningful.

But he said in the overall scale of AUKUS, the changes would not represent a transformative change.

"It will be significantly cheaper, that will help," he said.

"It's a useful contribution to saving money in terms of the overall program, but across the life of the program this doesn't fundamentally change the cost of what we are seeking to do here."

Australian Submarine Agency officials have also given new details on the Virginia-class submarines Australia is set to buy from 2032.

Officials told the estimates hearing that the submarines would be transferred to Australia roughly six years into their life, after undergoing a significant maintenance procedure in the US.

The submarines have an expected life of between 30 and 33 years, and so will have more than 20 years in Australian hands.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-04/defence-aukus-us-changes-18-months-talks/106757056

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62852

File: 25f37acd80b1986⋯.jpg (210.83 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676867 (041007ZJUN26) Notable: Inquiry launched into AUKUS deal including its impact on China-Australia ties; more Australians question sacrificing relations with Beijing for US interests: Chinese expert - "Former Australian environment minister Peter Garrett will head up a crowd-funded review of the multi-billion-dollar AUKUS submarine deal, Australia's biggest ever defense project, with one of its questions including an examination of how the deal affects Australia's relations with China, BBC News reported. A Chinese expert said this reflects a growing number of voices within Australia questioning whether it is worthwhile to sacrifice relations with China in order to accommodate US interests ... Launched by a group of Labor veterans and public figures concerned that proper scrutiny was not applied to the deal, the inquiry will hold public hearings and take written submissions before delivering a final report by October 30 ... The inquiry specifically calls for an assessment of AUKUS's impact on China-Australia relations, indicating that some figures within Australia are rethinking whether sacrificing ties with China to align with US geopolitical objectives truly serves Australia's national interests, Chen Hong, director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times ... A growing number of Australians clearly see that the US prioritizes its own interests, not those of its allies, and the consensus is also deepening that relying on the Chinese market while proactively defining China as a potential adversary is a strategic contradiction, Chen added." - Li Yawei, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Inquiry launched into AUKUS deal including its impact on China-Australia ties; more Australians question sacrificing relations with Beijing for US interests: Chinese expert

Li Yawei - Jun 03, 2026

Former Australian environment minister Peter Garrett will head up a crowd-funded review of the multi-billion-dollar AUKUS submarine deal, Australia's biggest ever defense project, with one of its questions including an examination of how the deal affects Australia's relations with China, BBC News reported. A Chinese expert said this reflects a growing number of voices within Australia questioning whether it is worthwhile to sacrifice relations with China in order to accommodate US interests.

Launched by a group of Labor veterans and public figures concerned that proper scrutiny was not applied to the deal, the inquiry will hold public hearings and take written submissions before delivering a final report by October 30, the Guardian reported.

Garrett, who served as environment minister between 2007 and 2010, said the independent inquiry into the A$368 billion ($239 billion) deal - where Australia will buy second-hand US submarines to replace its ageing fleet - was "long overdue," the BBC reported.

He also said the inquiry would consider if the submarines can be delivered on time and on budget, how nuclear waste will be managed and if Australia's defense and strategic interests are well served by the deal, the Guardian reported.

This inquiry has dealt a blow to the AUKUS pact, while also reflecting concerns among some Australian Labor Party figures over the prospects of the AUKUS nuclear submarine program, its staggering costs, distrust of the US government, and the program's implications for Australia's sovereignty, Ning Tuanhui, an associate research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

After Garrett's inquiry, Labor backbencher Ed Husic urged a new vote on the future of the AUKUS submarine pact, warning the deal as it stood could impact sovereignty, news outlet The Australian reported.

Ning said these developments have left the Anthony Albanese administration caught between internal rifts within its own party and relentless opposition censure, placing the government under mounting pressure from two flanks.

"This will likewise cast tangible headwinds over the administration's future efforts to advance the pact," he added.

The BBC reported that the inquiry will ask how the deal will affect Australia's relationship with China, its largest trading partner.

The inquiry specifically calls for an assessment of AUKUS's impact on China-Australia relations, indicating that some figures within Australia are rethinking whether sacrificing ties with China to align with US geopolitical objectives truly serves Australia's national interests, Chen Hong, director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times.

The AUKUS deal was announced in September 2021, and while it is not explicitly stated, it is believed to be about countering China's growing presence in the so-called Indo-Pacific region, and about the South China Sea issue, according to a BBC report.

A growing number of Australians clearly see that the US prioritizes its own interests, not those of its allies, and the consensus is also deepening that relying on the Chinese market while proactively defining China as a potential adversary is a strategic contradiction, Chen added.

Concerns are growing within Australia over the US role in and commitment to the AUKUS pact. Husic warned that Australia needs a backup plan for the AUKUS submarine agreement, arguing that sluggish US production and the "transactional nature" of the current US administration have put the multibillion-dollar defense deal at risk, per BBC News.

Arthur Rorris, the secretary of the South Coast Labour Council, which opposes the establishment of a nuclear submarine base at Port Kembla, said the proposed base was never intended for Australian submarines but "would be ceded to the US navy as a staging post for their 7th fleet," the Guardian reported.

Australia's case underscores that tying one's strategic and economic fortunes to the US at steep costs may yield heightened troubles and lingering uncertainties, serving as a sobering wake-up call for Washington's other allies, Ning said.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202606/1362697.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62853

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676901 (041030ZJUN26) Notable: Excluding video of Bankstown nurses’ alleged threat could undermine prosecution’s case - (Video) A NSW court has heard that excluding the video recording of two former Bankstown Hospital nurses allegedly threatening Israeli patients would significantly weaken the prosecution case. Lawyers for Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir argue the conversation was a private exchange unlawfully recorded by Israeli influencer Max Ilinksi and should be ruled inadmissible. Prosecutors contend the recording was lawful because Ilinksi and his devices were outside NSW when it was made. The court heard the video provides a direct record of the alleged comments, while its exclusion would leave prosecutors relying largely on Ilinksi’s testimony. Judge Michael McHugh has reserved his decision on admissibility until June 23. The pair have pleaded not guilty and are due to stand trial from August 31.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

Excluding video of Bankstown nurses’ alleged threat could undermine prosecution’s case

BIMINI PLESSER - 4 June 2026

1/2

Lawyers for two former nurses who allegedly threatened to “kill” Israeli patients say it would be a “devastating blow” for the prosecution if a recording of the exchange is deemed inadmissible in court.

Prosecutors on Thursday indicated they planned to have Israeli influencer Max Ilinksi (known online as Max Veifer), who recorded the conversation, fly to Sydney to give evidence at trial, amid a legal battle over whether the video was recorded illegally and should be excluded from evidence.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir made global headlines last year when they were recorded allegedly threatening violence against Israeli patients at Bankstown Hospital, in Sydney’s west, in an online chatroom.

The pair, who are out on bail, attended the NSW District Court on Thursday, where their lawyers continued their bid to have the video thrown out of evidence.

Mr Nadir’s barrister, Greg James KC, called Mr Ilinski a “vigilante” whose intention was to get the two nurses fired by publishing their alleged threats and rallying his followers to share the video.

Mr James said that because his client’s alleged statements were made in NSW the video was recorded, at least in part, in the state and should be subject to local law.

“It doesn’t matter where you use the device, provided that it is recording a private conversation which took place in NSW,” he said.

Mr Ilinski on Monday, attending court via video link, said he only posted the video “to bring awareness … and warn Jewish communities around the world from things that want to hurt them”.

“My intention was to get it to the authorities so they could review it,” he said.

Mr Ilinski said he was “not a lawyer” and unaware of the precise rules regarding recording conversations outside of Israel. But he added that he didn’t consider the chatroom secure or “full private” in the way encrypted apps like WhatsApp are.

Mr James on Thursday rejected the notion that Mr Ilinski had recorded the conversation for his safety, saying he was “an active party” who had an agenda going into the chatroom.

“He is an activist. He is seeking ... to draw out opinions and having succeeded in drawing them out, he’s not protecting himself from them, he’s capitalising on them,” he said.

“He hit the jackpot with them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62854

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676920 (041039ZJUN26) Notable: Neo-Nazi hecklers found guilty over Anzac Day booing during Welcome to Country - (Video) Four men who disrupted Melbourne’s 2025 Anzac Day dawn service by booing during a Welcome to Country have been found guilty of offensive behaviour and fined. Jacob Hersant and Michael Nelson were convicted and fined $1,900 each, while Nathan Bull and Ian Lomax were fined $1,000 and $800 without conviction. The court heard the group disrupted the solemn ceremony attended by thousands at the Shrine of Remembrance. Magistrate James FitzGerald ruled that, regardless of differing views on Welcome to Country ceremonies, booing during an Anzac Day service was offensive because it interrupted a solemn national commemoration. The magistrate found the conduct likely to provoke anger and outrage among reasonable attendees. Shrine officials welcomed the ruling, describing the disruption as disrespectful and damaging to the significance of the service.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38961 (pb)

>>39008 (pb)

>>39009 (pb)

>>62701

>>62848

Neo-Nazi hecklers found guilty over Anzac Day booing during Welcome to Country

Kristian Silva - 4 June 2026

Neo-Nazis who loudly booed during an Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne have been found guilty of offensive behaviour and ordered to pay fines.

The group disrupted proceedings at the Shrine of Remembrance in 2025 when Indigenous elder Mark Brown took to the stage to conduct a Welcome to Country.

Magistrate James FitzGerald today found Jacob Hersant, Nathan Bull, Michael Nelson guilty of behaving in an offensive manner in public.

A fourth man, Ian Lomax, was also found guilty.

Hersant, a white supremacist once jailed for performing a public Nazi salute, was convicted and fined $1,900.

Nelson received the same punishment.

Bull and Lomax were fined $1,000 and $800 respectively, and avoided conviction.

After the hearing, three of the four accused became involved in a heated argument with a protester outside the court and were separated by Protective Service Officers.

Shrine leadership says verdict reflects seriousness of 'disgraceful' behaviour

Prosecutors alleged that booing and racist slogans were yelled during parts of the service.

The loud heckling was heard by thousands who had gathered at the shrine to honour fallen soldiers.

Magistrate FitzGerald said he accepted there were differing views in the community about Welcome to Country ceremonies.

But he said it was beyond reasonable doubt that booing at an Anzac Day ceremony was offensive behaviour, given the event’s "hushed" and "reverential" nature.

"The dawn service at the Shrine of Remembrance is not a time and place for noisy argument, heated debate, or the indignant expression of political views," Magistrate FitzGerald said.

"The behaviour engaged in in this case ruined this moment of national commemoration for those attending.

"It was transgressive behaviour that would be likely to arouse significant anger, significant resentment, outrage, disgust, or hatred in the mind of a reasonable person."

The magistrate found the booing breached Victoria's Summary Offences Act.

He dismissed two alternative charges brought by prosecutors under the Shrine of Remembrance Act.

Responding to the verdict, Shrine of Remembrance acting chair Colonel Catherine Carrigan said it reflected "the seriousness with which the community and the justice system regard any conduct that compromises the sanctity of the dawn service".

"We condemn the disgraceful and disrespectful behaviour of the small number of individuals who disrupted the service," she said.

The magistrate said each accused's level of offending was different.

Lomax only participated in booing at the start of the event before he was kicked out with Nelson.

Nelson, however, "goaded" the crowd by stating he had done more for Australia than the Anzacs.

The magistrate described Hersant's criminal history as "deeply troubling" but decided not to jail him, despite prosecutors saying it was an option available to the court.

Witness 'upset and disgusted'

When the booing occurred at the shrine, some in the crowd tried to counter the insults by cheering and clapping.

Hersant was later escorted from the area by police, while Nelson was also dragged away by an ex-serviceman.

During a hearing last month, a woman standing near Nelson and Lomax testified she was "upset and disgusted".

"So many people were asking to show respect at this really important ceremony for so many Australians," she said.

Hersant, Bull and Nelson are well-known white supremacists, while Lomax, a Ballarat dentist, was suspended from practising due to allegations connecting him to neo-Nazi rallies.

During the hearing, Hersant, Bull and Nelson admitted causing the disruptions but argued it was an act of political speech against Welcome to Country ceremonies.

"We weren't booing Anzac Day," Hersant said.

Defence lawyer Sam Norton, acting for Mr Lomax, argued evidence before the court did not show his client booing.

Hersant was the first Victorian to be convicted of performing a Nazi salute in public, and recently spent a month in jail after losing an appeal.

He also has a conviction for violent disorder after participating in a group attack on hikers in Victoria's Cathedral Ranges.

Hersant was a senior figure in the National Socialist Network (NSN) before the group disbanded earlier this year.

The NSN, a neo-Nazi organisation, was listed as a prohibited hate group by the federal government under laws introduced after the Bondi terror attack.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-04/anzac-day-welcome-to-country-booing-neo-nazis-found-guilty/106757584

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz66A7UJ4eI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62855

File: 8b7ba4252fdaba2⋯.jpg (993.14 KB,4304x2869,4304:2869,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9ffb3a6c63fe87e⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,3893x2595,3893:2595,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53e756b7f616164⋯.jpg (335.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4f6eab463407e32⋯.jpg (191.13 KB,1817x1022,1817:1022,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676940 (041053ZJUN26) Notable: Neo-Nazi group White Australia loses High Court bid to halt hate law designation - Neo-Nazi organisation White Australia has failed in a High Court bid to temporarily prevent its designation as a prohibited hate group while challenging the legality of new federal hate speech laws. Chief Justice Stephen Gageler rejected the injunction, finding no compelling reason to suspend the listing before the constitutional challenge is heard. The group, formerly known as the National Socialist Network, argues the laws infringe the implied freedom of political communication. The legislation, introduced after the Bondi terror attack, makes supporting, recruiting for, funding or directing a listed hate group punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment. The government maintains the group effectively continued operating under a new name despite formally disbanding. A full High Court hearing on the constitutional challenge is scheduled for September.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

>>62709

>>62716

Neo-Nazi group White Australia loses bid to halt hate law designation

JACK QUAIL - 4 June 2026

Neo-Nazi group White Australia has failed in its bid to temporarily shield itself from new hate speech laws, ahead of its broader constitutional challenge to the legislation due to be heard by the High Court later this year.

The organisation, formerly known as the National Socialist Network and now seeking registration as a political party, applied for an injunction in the High Court to prevent its designation as a prohibited hate group after it was formally listed in May.

On Thursday, Chief Justice Stephen Gageler dismissed the bid to temporarily halt its listing, finding no “compelling grounds” to interfere with the laws and suspend the group’s designation ahead of the outcome of its constitutional challenge.

That case centres on the validity of hate speech laws legislated by the Albanese government following the antisemitic terror attack at Bondi Beach, which made supporting, funding, training, recruiting for, joining or directing a listed hate group a criminal offence punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment.

Anticipating its designation as a hate group, members of the NSN moved to disband the organisation in January, but Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke proceeded to list them anyway. He said the organisation had ­effectively “phoenix-ed” by adopting a new name while retaining the same leadership and membership.

The NSN’s affiliated groups White Australia and European Australian Movement were also listed.

Appearing for the group, barrister Peter King said the hate speech laws infringed the Constitution’s implied freedom of political communication and would hamper White Australia’s ability to challenge the legislation’s validity.

The injunction application sought to quash the listing and prevent authorities from investigating or prosecuting the organisation for its “membership, political association, political communication, party registration, campaign activities or distribution of electoral matters” until the constitutional challenge was resolved.

Government lawyers argued that dismissing the injunction would not cause “injury” to the group, while granting it would impede the operation of criminal law, given the organisation’s rhetoric encouraged violence.

The High Court has scheduled a two-day hearing on the constitutionality of the laws in September.

The NSN was the second organisation to be designated as a hate group under the new laws. Earlier this year, the government designated Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/neonazi-group-white-australia-loses-bid-to-halt-hate-law-designation/news-story/674a0eb1e900f2cfa242389137ba57e7

https://www.theage.com.au/national/neo-nazis-lose-fight-to-shield-themselves-from-ban-but-their-high-court-fight-isn-t-over-20260521-p5zzc3.html

https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/single-justice-judgments

https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/single-justice-judgments/white-australia-party-inc-anor-v-commonwealth-australia-anor

https://www.hcourt.gov.au/sites/default/files/eresources/2026-06-04/HCA/White%20Australia%20Party%20v%20Cth%20%5B2026%5D%20HCASJ%2017.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62856

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676956 (041103ZJUN26) Notable: Accused slave owner Zeinab Ahmad’s chilling slavery allegations revealed - (Video) A Melbourne court has heard allegations that Zeinab Ahmad, 31, played a role in the enslavement of a Yazidi teenager while living under Islamic State rule in Syria. Ahmad faces charges of enslavement and using a slave, offences carrying maximum penalties of 25 years each. Police allege the girl, captured by ISIS in Iraq at age 15, was purchased by Ahmad’s father and held by the family for 16 months, during which she was confined, forced to perform domestic work and subjected to abuse. Prosecutors also presented evidence alleging Ahmad remained active within ISIS after her husband’s death, working for an ISIS department and posting messages supporting the group online. Ahmad’s bail application continues, with the allegations yet to be tested in court.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39044 (pb)

>>39047 (pb)

>>39064 (pb)

>>62746

Accused slave owner Zeinab Ahmad’s chilling slavery allegations revealed

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 4 June 2026

Accused slave owner Zeinab Ahmad didn’t just follow her former Jihadi husband into the heart of the Islamic State, she celebrated atrocities, advocated for brutal ­violence against the US and its ­allies, and ultimately embedded herself onto the payroll of a terrorist regime, a court has heard.

The 31-year-old former ISIS bride appeared before Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday for a high-stakes bail application, where federal police detailed Australia’s first prosecution for crimes against humanity.

Ms Ahmad faces charges of enslavement and using a slave, which carry maximum penalties of 25 years imprisonment per offence.

A police summary delivered by Detective Senior Constable Marc Clendenning detailed the direct testimony of the Yazidi victim who the accused allegedly helped keep in their Syrian home after her ­father purchased her from a slave market.

Mr Clendenning told the court the AFP had been investigating the Ahmad family since 2017 after they left Australia for Syria in 2014.

The court heard that in 2014, the alleged victim, then a 15-year-old Yazidi girl, was captured by the Islamic State in Sinjar, Iraq. Her father and brother were killed, and she was sold into sexual slavery, passing through 17 different owners over five years.

Police allege that during Ramadan in May 2017, the slave was brought to a residence in Mayadin, Syria, where she was inspected by the accused’s father, Muhammad Ahmad, and her co-accused mother, Kawsar Abbas, 54.

Mr Ahmad allegedly ordered the teenager to remove her outer garments to inspect her body, stating he was purchasing her for “sexual relations and domestic housework”. Ms Abbas allegedly consented to the arrange­ment, and Mr Ahmad purchased the slave for $US10,000 cash at a local market.

“I want you for the purpose of raping and serving the home,” he allegedly told the girl. The alleged victim was held in the Ahmad family household for 16 months as they moved through Mayadin, Raqqa, and Hajin.

According to police evidence, the girl was locked inside the house, denied a phone, forbidden from leaving unaccompanied, and forced to perform all cleaning duties. She told AFP investigators that Mr Ahmad routinely assaulted her, on one occasion dragging her down two flights of concrete stairs, causing back injuries and severe bruising.

The court heard that two days after the purchase, Mr Ahmad began sexually assaulting the alleged victim. She stated that she fought back, screamed, and pushed him away repeatedly over the course of a month. She told police that both accused slave owners before the courts and their relatives were present in the house and within earshot during these assaults but did not intervene.

Police allege Ms Abbas had enforced the enslavement by forcing the alleged victim to read the Koran, threatening to have her beaten or resold if she disobeyed, and stating she must learn to use firearms because they had to follow the ISIS police. The young Yazidi girl reported seeing both Ms Abbas and Ms Ahmad in possession of Glock pistols and AK-47 assault rifles, as well as large quantities of ISIS paper currency.

The AFP presented extensive digital evidence to counter claims that Ms Ahmad was a submissive, trapped dependent. Her former husband Dawood Elmir, with whom she travelled to Syria in late 2014, was killed in a coalition drone strike in May 2016. Following his death, she did not attempt to return to Australia. Instead, she obtained employment with the official ISIS Women’s and Orphans Department in Raqqa, operating under the Bureau of Al-Rikaz, the court heard.

Several of her social media posts that supported ISIS were read out in court. “I ask Allah to accept this sacrifice of ours,” she wrote in one post. “May Allah destroy the United States and its allies,” another post read.

The accused was seen wiping tears as evidence from her social media accounts were aired.

The bail application continues on Friday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accused-slave-owner-zeinab-ahmads-chilling-slavery-allegations-revealed/news-story/7137e9628a0aa44470d662dcd3bdad4b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGG5wBTlwFw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62857

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24676967 (041112ZJUN26) Notable: Paedophile ex-magistrate Peter Liddy released from prison after serving 25-year sentence - (Video) Former South Australian magistrate Peter Liddy has been released from prison after serving a 25-year sentence for sexually abusing four children during the 1980s while volunteering at a surf lifesaving club. The 82-year-old has been placed under a strict interim supervision order, including home detention, restrictions on internet access, and a ban on contact with children, while the state government seeks to have him indefinitely detained or subjected to extended supervision. Victims’ advocates said the release was distressing for survivors, many of whom believed he should never return to the community. Liddy’s sentence was among the longest imposed on a paedophile in Australia at the time. A court hearing on the government’s applications is scheduled for November.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62707

>>62741

Paedophile ex-magistrate Peter Liddy released from prison after serving 25-year sentence

Jordanna Schriever and Eva Blandis - 4 June 2026

1/2

Notorious paedophile and former magistrate Peter Liddy has taken his first steps of freedom after serving a 25-year prison term for sexually abusing four children.

Liddy was jailed in 2001 for sexual offending against four children between 1983 and 1986 while he was volunteering at the Brighton Surf Life Saving Club.

He has been placed on an interim supervision order with strict conditions, including home detention, while the South Australian government pursues an application to have him indefinitely detained.

The 82-year-old's release comes after the Supreme Court refused Liddy's bid to shelve those proceedings.

Despite questions from the media as he left the Adelaide Remand Centre his only words were "excuse me".

The conditions of the interim supervision order include restricted internet access and a ban on contact with children, including a prohibition on going within 50 metres of any school, kindergarten of public playground.

Last month, the Supreme Court heard the premises where Liddy would live were "currently being assessed", but that there were "complexities" which could not be articulated in open court.

Advocate for abuse survivors, lawyer Andrew Carpenter, said he felt for the victim-survivors "who thought this day should never come".

"They were shocked, they never thought that he would ever be the kind of person that would be released," he said.

"It's not a happy day for the victim-survivors and it's definitely a very dark day in South Australia."

He said the victim-survivors were also "quite disheartened" that the government had not moved to keep Liddy indefinitely detained sooner.

"[The victim-survivors] have been dealing with the trauma — for not just the 25-years he's been in prison — but ever since they were children, when he first abused them," he said.

"It's a bit of a kick in the guts for them, especially the fact that he's shown no remorse and still denies his offending.

"That monster they've been avoiding all these years is now back on the loose."

Former Commissioner for Victims' Rights Michael O'Connell said that while it was impossible to know how all the victims and their families were feeling today, it was possible Liddy's release would re-traumatise them.

"It's important that their voices are heard and it's important that they're not forgotten and that we never lose sight of the harm that this man caused," he told 891 ABC Adelaide.

"For some of these people, they would have most probably had some sense that justice was being done on the day that Liddy was sentenced, but suddenly having to confront his release can cause a great deal of turmoil that can remind them that their ordeal is not over.

"When a person has done their time in prison they are entitled to be released based on the legal concept of justice, but that doesn't always match the victim's perception of what genuine justice is for them."

He said it was also important to remember that Liddy had faced further alleged offences that never made it to trial.

Yesterday, Attorney-General Kyam Maher said there was "a special corner of hell reserved for people who have committed these sorts of crimes, especially when you consider the position [Liddy] held — a serving magistrate".

He said the government was pursuing its applications to have Liddy indefinitely detained, or placed on an extended supervision order with "exceptionally" strict conditions.

"As a government we are doing everything in our legal power to have Peter Liddy returned to jail," he said.

"In the alternative, if that's not granted by the court, we have made an application — and we will be pursuing it — to have those strict conditions continue to apply."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62858

File: 3aa52a3eb8a4306⋯.jpg (386.73 KB,750x979,750:979,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 960b74b5e73deb1⋯.mp4 (15.11 MB,624x480,13:10,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24677000 (041142ZJUN26) Notable: Terence Shen Tweet - 8:03 AM · Jun 4, 2026 - (Video) - 37 years ago today, the Chinese government brutally crushed peaceful protesters in and around Tiananmen Square who were demanding an end to corruption, freedom of speech, and democratic reform. The massacre revealed a truth the world should never forget: the Chinese Communist Party will do whatever it takes to preserve its grip on power. If it did not value the lives of its own citizens, why would it value the lives of others?''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Terence Shen Tweet

8:03 AM · Jun 4, 2026

37 years ago today, the Chinese government brutally crushed peaceful protesters in and around Tiananmen Square who were demanding an end to corruption, freedom of speech, and democratic reform. The massacre revealed a truth the world should never forget: the Chinese Communist Party will do whatever it takes to preserve its grip on power. If it did not value the lives of its own citizens, why would it value the lives of others?

https://x.com/Terenceshen/status/2062294152503599150

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62859

File: e01593348b89a2a⋯.jpg (166.89 KB,750x362,375:181,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24680986 (051252ZJUN26) Notable: Secretary Marco Rubio Tweet - On June 4, the world marks 37 years since the Chinese Communist Party ordered its troops to attack thousands of peaceful demonstrators in and around Tiananmen Square. Those who sacrificed to uphold their unalienable rights of free expression and peaceful assembly will be vindicated someday.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

Secretary Marco Rubio Tweet

On June 4, the world marks 37 years since the Chinese Communist Party ordered its troops to attack thousands of peaceful demonstrators in and around Tiananmen Square. Those who sacrificed to uphold their unalienable rights of free expression and peaceful assembly will be vindicated someday.

https://x.com/SecRubio/status/2062561517652852753

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62860

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681006 (051257ZJUN26) Notable: PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Peace-Loving Army. - (Video) PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China. Peace-Loving Army, for the Chinese people and people of the world. - SpokespersonCHN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Peace-Loving Army.

SpokespersonCHN发言人办公室

Sep 3, 2022

PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China. Peace-Loving Army, for the Chinese people and people of the world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnyuaf3n9Fs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62861

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681027 (051301ZJUN26) Notable: Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square - (Video) First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks. Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene. - BBC News

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square

BBC News

Jun 5, 2014

First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks.

Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMKvxJ-Js3A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62862

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681038 (051303ZJUN26) Notable: How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989 - (Video) Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage. - NBC News

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989

NBC News

Jun 5, 2019

Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXJ6gHFME0w

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62863

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681051 (051306ZJUN26) Notable: Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians - (Video) "World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing. - ABC News

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians

ABC News

Jun 5, 2012

"World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9AvUuEPgvA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62864

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681061 (051308ZJUN26) Notable: Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown - (Video) It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians. - Sky News

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown

Sky News

Jun 4, 2014

It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE7EkTRS96M

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62865

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681078 (051312ZJUN26) Notable: 1989: Tiananmen Square protests - (Video) Student protests in Tiananmen Square ended when Chinese troops fired on crowds, killing hundreds and wounding thousands. - CNN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

1989: Tiananmen Square protests

CNN

Oct 7, 2010

Student protests in Tiananmen Square ended when Chinese troops fired on crowds, killing hundreds and wounding thousands.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNEW1Uh0lz0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62866

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24681103 (051320ZJUN26) Notable: Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989) - (Video) A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square. The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo. - CNN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989)

CNN

Jun 4, 2013

A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square.

The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo.

At first, Jeff Widener was annoyed by the man entering his shot.

Widener, a photographer with the Associated Press, was focusing his camera on a line of tanks in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square when out of the blue came this man in a white shirt and dark trousers, carrying what appeared to be shopping bags.

Widener thought the man was going to mess up the composition of his frame.

Little did he know that he was about to make one of the most iconic photos in history.

It was June 5, 1989, a day after Chinese troops began violently cracking down on pro-democracy demonstrators who had been in the square for over a month.

Widener had been in Beijing for a week to cover the protests, and he was hurt when the deadly crackdown began.

“I was hit in the head by a protester rock the early morning of June 4, and I was also suffering from the flu,” Widener said. “So I was quite ill and injured when I photographed ‘Tank Man’ from the sixth-floor balcony of the Beijing Hotel.”

The hotel had the best vantage point of the square, which was now under military control. An American exchange student, Kirk Martsen, helped sneak him in.

From the hotel balcony, Widener watched as the man confronted the lead tank, standing directly in front of it. The tank stopped and tried to go around the man. The man moved with the tank, blocking its path once again.

At one point during the standoff, the man climbed aboard the lead tank and appeared to speak to whoever was inside.

“I was about a half mile away from the row of tanks and so I could not really hear much,” Widener said.

The man was eventually pulled away by onlookers. To this day, we don’t know who he is and what happened to him. But he remains a powerful symbol of defiance.

By this point, the Chinese government was trying desperately to control the message going out to the world. Several days before the crackdown began, China had made efforts to stop all American news outlets, including CNN, from broadcasting live in Beijing.

“There was always a huge risk of being arrested and having film confiscated,” Widener said.

Martsen, the student who helped Widener get into the Beijing Hotel, put the “Tank Man” film in his underwear and smuggled it out of the hotel. The pictures were soon transmitted over telephone lines to the rest of the world.

Several media outlets took a photo of “Tank Man,” but Widener’s shot was the most used. It appeared on the front pages of newspapers all around the world, and it was nominated that year for a Pulitzer Prize.

“Though I knew the picture was highly acclaimed, it wasn't until years later when I saw an AOL post where my image was named one of the top 10 most memorable photos of all time. That was the first time that I realized I had accomplished something extraordinary,” Widener said.

The protests in Beijing started after the death of former communist leader Hu Yaobang on April 18, 1989. Hu had worked to move China toward a more open political system, and he had become a symbol of democratic reform. Mourning students marched to Tiananmen Square to call for a more democratic government.

Thousands of people joined the students over the next few weeks to protest China’s communist rulers.

A rally on May 19 drew an estimated 1.2 million people. A 33-foot-tall statue, the Goddess of Democracy, was built in four days and placed in the square.

“There was a carnival atmosphere and a lightness in the air,” Widener recalled. “I think most of the media was swept up in the whole affair, and I personally found it amazing that there was a statue of democracy across the Chang’an Boulevard which faced off against the giant Mao portrait symbolizing communism.”

Chinese troops began firing on demonstrators at about 1 a.m. on June 4. There has never been an official death toll released. Estimates range from several hundred to thousands.

It has also been estimated that as many as 10,000 people were arrested during and after the protests. Several dozen were executed.

Widener spent a week in Beijing after the crackdown began, then he got out.

“I was sick with the flu, suffering from a head injury and scared to death when I left for the airport,” he said.

To this day, his photos — and anything referring to the massacre — are banned in China.

https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2019/05/world/tiananmen-square-tank-man-cnnphotos/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeFzeNAHEhU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62867

File: fe75cf92ec953ff⋯.jpg (541.46 KB,3800x2532,950:633,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24687886 (070423ZJUN26) Notable: Every year I get new pictures’: the fight to preserve the memory of Tiananmen - Efforts to preserve the history of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and military crackdown are intensifying outside China as censorship under President Xi Jinping continues to restrict discussion of the event. Historians, activists and archivists are collecting photographs, diaries, documents and eyewitness accounts to ensure records of both the pro-democracy demonstrations and the subsequent violence remain accessible. Projects such as China Unofficial Archives host material ranging from protest photographs capturing the optimism of the movement to testimonies from participants, soldiers and former officials. A California court recently ruled that the diaries of former Communist Party official Li Rui, which contain observations of the crackdown, can remain in the United States. Former student protest leader Zhou Fengsuo, now a human rights advocate, said new evidence continues to surface decades later, remarking: “Every year, I get new pictures, new documents.” Researchers say such discoveries are helping preserve the historical record and challenge attempts to erase it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62858

>>62859

>>62860

‘Every year I get new pictures’: the fight to preserve the memory of Tiananmen

Amid growing censorship at home under the rule of Xi Jinping, efforts to document the massacre of 4 June, 1989, are intensifying abroad

Amy Hawkins - 4 Jun 2026

1/2

Discussions about the bloody crackdown on peaceful protesters that took place around Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on 4 June, 1989 – and in cities across China – often dwell on the risk of forgetting the massacre.

The passage of time, with the world’s eyes soon drawn elsewhere, and suppression by authorities at home mean that the pivotal moment in Chinese history is at risk of fading into grey.

“Even when it was happening, people felt like the memory of it was going to be fragile,” says Jeffrey Wasserstrom, chancellor’s professor of history at UC Irvine, who has studied student protest in China.

One aspect particular at risk is a detail less commonly associated with the massacre: the hope that blossomed in the days leading up to the killing of hundreds, possibly thousands, of unarmed protesters by the Chinese army as they demanded democratic reforms.

One collection encapsulating that sense is a set of photographs taken by Austrian sinologist Helmut Opletal who was posted to Beijing as a journalist in May 1989. His photographs show crowds of protesters holding up banners calling for freedom and democracy, many with smiles on their faces and thrusting peace signs into the air.

“One of the things that gets forgotten was that at the early phase of [the protests], there was this incredible kind of joyousness and sense of possibility,” says Wasserstrom.

But in recent years, censorship controls inside China have grown tighter, with state-sponsored amnesia intensifying under the rule of leader Xi Jinping, sparking renewed efforts abroad to document what happened on that night, when Beijing’s streets flowed with blood.

The Opletal photographs are among the hundreds of items hosted by China Unofficial Archives (CUA), a grassroots project launched in 2023 as a US-registered non-profit that aims to protect “censored and suppressed Chinese history”.

Sharon, one of CUA’s Chinese editors, who uses a pseudonym to protect her identity because of threats from the Chinese government, says that “history cannot only be written by officials”.

“If you don’t have real information, it’s difficult for you to have independent thought,” she says.

The Tiananmen Square massacre remains one of the most sensitive topics in China. Virtually all mention of it scrubbed from physical and digital spaces within China’s borders. Those who participated in the protests or have tried to memorialise it have been harassed or imprisoned, sometimes for years at a time.

Just last week, a Chinese activist called Dong Guangping, who has previously attempted to commemorate the event, risked his life to sail more than 300km to South Korea in an attempt to flee China, where he has been imprisoned several times. He remains in custody in South Korea.

CUA hosts a range of material about the Tiananmen Square protests, from the diary of a soldier who protested against the massacre to a subversive documentary made by state-employed filmmakers.

“We don’t advocate,” says Ian Johnson, the founder of CUA. “We’re just trying to provide a resource in a neutral way.”

CUA is supported by grant funding and donations from readers. The website is blocked in China and can be visited only with the use VPN, a type of software that allows users to mask their IP address and jump over the censorship firewall. That makes it hard to track how many readers come from inside China, but Johnson says that around 80% of visitors navigate to the Chinese-language version of the website.

Any material that counters the Chinese Communist party’s (CCP) official historical narrative is likely to be a target for transnational repression. CUA’s website has received several hacking attempts and its Chinese staff have been harassed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62868

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24687915 (070428ZJUN26) Notable: Chinese spies using LinkedIn to steal secrets from recruits, Five Eyes warns - (Video) Australia and its Five Eyes intelligence partners have issued a rare joint warning that Chinese intelligence services are using LinkedIn and other online job platforms to recruit people with access to sensitive government, military and economic information. The agencies said operatives pose as recruiters, consultants or think-tank staff, targeting current and former officials, defence personnel, academics, journalists and others with valuable knowledge. Recruits are allegedly drawn into a staged hiring process involving interviews, research reports and paid assignments before being asked for increasingly sensitive information through encrypted communication platforms. The warning stated that even unclassified information can be combined to build valuable intelligence. Experts said former officials seeking new careers can be particularly vulnerable. Beijing has rejected the allegations, describing previous espionage claims as fabrication.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62828

Chinese spies using LinkedIn to steal secrets from recruits, Five Eyes warns

Annika Burgess - 4 June 2026

1/2

Australia and its partners in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance have issued a rare joint notice warning about Chinese spies aggressively using LinkedIn and other job platforms to "lure" recruits with access to sensitive information.

"China's military intelligence services are using an increasingly wide array of professional networking sites and online job platforms to target Five Eyes government and military personnel, and anyone with access to classified or privileged information," the domestic security agencies from the US, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand said.

The "Safeguarding Our Secrets" bulletin said the Chinese operatives were posting fake online job ads, posing as "employees of private consultancies, think tanks or human resources firms".

Their primary targets are government or military personnel, or anyone with access to classified information.

Also at risk are academics, journalists, think tank employees, and professionals with links to defence and economic sectors who may have indirect access to government data.

"Chinese military intelligence services ultimately seek to acquire privileged military, political and economic intelligence that can provide China with a strategic and tactical advantage over the Five Eyes," according to the notice.

A full recruitment process

The FBI posted about the threat, warning: "Applicants beware!"

"The threat is real," the US law enforcement agency said.

According to the Five Eyes notice, spies were carrying out an "aggressive" recruitment strategy, attempting to form long-term relationships that would result in the exchange of classified or privileged information.

The tactics included a full recruitment process:

First contact. Recruiters post job ads on professional networking platforms and hiring websites, then reach out to candidates whose resumes showed a likelihood of access to sensitive information.

Interview. Interviews are held virtually, with the recruiters concealing their identity. Applicants may be probed about their access to government contacts, or military members asked about their roles.

Initial testing. Candidates are asked to write a trial report on topics such as China's bilateral relations, the Indo-Pacific region and related defence or trade issues.

More requests and platform shift. Recruits are informed that clients require more privileged information for additional reports. At some point in the recruitment process, intelligence officers typically transition the conversation to a more "secure" platform, such as encrypted messaging applications.

Payment. Recruits receive anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per report, and may be offered more money for increasingly sensitive information. Payment methods include third-party payment platforms, such as PayPal and Wise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62869

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688025 (070449ZJUN26) Notable: Four New Zealand MPs banned from China, Hong Kong and Macau after Taiwan trip - (Video) China has imposed a one-year travel ban on four New Zealand MPs after they visited Taiwan as part of a cross-party parliamentary delegation, prompting protests from both New Zealand and Australia. The MPs – Maureen Pugh, Duncan Webb, David Wilson and Laura McClure – were informed they would be denied entry to China, Hong Kong and Macau, with reports suggesting the restriction could be lifted if they apologised. New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters expressed concern, noting MPs had visited Taiwan for decades under New Zealand’s longstanding One China policy. Australia also criticised the move, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong stating parliamentarians should be free to make their own travel decisions. Taiwan condemned the ban, while Beijing said the visit sent a “wrong signal” on Taiwan. Analysts described the move as an escalation aimed at deterring future parliamentary visits.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62828

Four New Zealand MPs banned from China, Hong Kong and Macau after Taiwan trip

Stephen Dziedzic and Kai Feng - 4 June 2026

1/2

Australia and New Zealand will both lodge protests with China after Beijing slapped an unprecedented travel ban on four MPs from New Zealand who visited Taiwan last month.

The National Party's Maureen Pugh, Labour's Duncan Webb, NZ First's David Wilson and ACT's Laura McClure all visited the democratically ruled island in May as part of a cross-parliamentary group which makes regular trips to Taiwan.

China's embassy in Wellington did not initially condemn the trip but late yesterday news broke that it had lodged complaints with New Zealand's parliament.

The clerk of New Zealand's parliament said Chinese diplomats told them the four MPs would now be denied entry to China, Hong Kong and Macau for a year.

They reportedly said the travel ban could be reduced or dropped if the MPs issued an apology.

New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters said he was "surprised" by the move, with one politician accusing Beijing of intimidation.

A spokesperson for Mr Peters said New Zealand MPs had visited Taiwan for "decades" with the visits consistent with the country's One China policy.

Under the policy New Zealand acknowledges Beijing's view as the sole government of China but maintains unofficial trade and cultural ties with Taipei.

Taiwan ranks as New Zealand's eighth biggest export market while China is its largest trading partner.

"In the context of that long history the minister was surprised to learn that China has taken a decision to, for the first time, impose travel bans on New Zealand MPs as a result of travel to Taiwan," the spokesperson said.

"He has instructed MFAT officials in Beijing and Wellington to discuss this matter with the Chinese system in order to express concern at this departure from past practice and to better understand it."

Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australian officials would also make representations to China on the apparent ban and said Australia was "concerned" by the move.

"Australian officials will also make representations on this, both in Beijing and Canberra, including our view that placing pressure on parliamentarians is not appropriate," Senator Wong said.

"We agree with the principle expressed by New Zealand that members of parliament, including the Australian parliament, are free to make their own decisions about travel."

One of the affected MPs, Laura McClure, told New Zealand media the ban was "concerning" and "unsettling", noting that Taiwan was an important trading partner of New Zealand.

"I think it is an intimidation tactic, or a deterrent, to try and put off other or future members of parliament from travelling to Taiwan," Ms McClure said.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade also said the visits were part of a "longstanding practice of New Zealand members of parliament".

"In the New Zealand constitutional system, members of parliament do not represent the government," it said.

"They are independent and responsible to their constituents.

"It is up to MPs to make individual decisions about how they respond to invitations to travel in their capacity as MPs."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62870

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688062 (070501ZJUN26) Notable: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says New Zealand friendship is important to endure volatile world - (Video) Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon used annual bilateral talks in Noosa to emphasise closer co-operation amid global instability, economic uncertainty and growing strategic challenges. Both leaders highlighted the importance of collaboration on trade, business and defence as traditional assumptions underpinning global trade and security continue to shift. While neither directly named China, concerns about regional influence and broader geopolitical tensions formed part of the backdrop to discussions, alongside the impact of US trade policies. Luxon said Australia and New Zealand must focus on strengthening their own resilience and economic security, noting bilateral trade is worth about $38bn annually. He also thanked Australia for supporting New Zealand’s protest against China’s one-year travel ban on four MPs who visited Taiwan, describing the restrictions as inappropriate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62828

>>62869

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says New Zealand friendship is important to endure volatile world

Stephanie Borys - 6 June 2026

Global volatility and economic turbulence have dominated annual talks between the leaders of Australia and New Zealand.

Handshakes, back slaps and rugby banter were part of the annual catch up between prime ministers Anthony Albanese and Christopher Luxon at Noosa, in Queensland.

Aside from taking cheeky jabs at each other, the leaders acknowledged the most pressing issue for both countries was the "volatile and changing world".

Mr Albanese noted the friendship between Australia and New Zealand could help the countries face those growing challenges.

"I think there's a new element, which is that we're living in a world which is really volatile, where there is a great deal of turbulence and some of the old certainties that commanded global trade and global activity has disappeared," Mr Albanese said.

Neither leader named China in the press conference, but there are ongoing concerns about the country's expanding influence in the region.

Australia and New Zealand have also been impacted by the trade war instigated by the United States President Donald Trump.

Mr Albanese spoke to the important of collaboration and cooperation across business, trade and defence.

"At a time like this, Australia and New Zealand working together is more important than ever and there are also more opportunities than ever," he said.

There were no new announcements made in Saturday's press conference, but Mr Luxon attempted to provide a positive message about the path forward.

"We are going to control what we can control in Australia and New Zealand, and that is to build kick-arse countries," he said.

"We are moving definitely from a world from rules to power, from economics to security, and increasingly from efficiency into resilience."

About $38 billion of goods and services move between Australia and New Zealand each year.

Mr Luxon said there was room for further growth in that space.

"That alignment in our economies just continues to play a really big strength as we think about how we build more financial security as part of our broader national securities in the context of that volatile and changing world," he said.

Support acknowledged

During the press conference, Mr Luxon also thanked Australia for raising concerns about a travel ban imposed on some politicians.

"We appreciate the support," he said.

Last month, four MPS from New Zealand travelled to Taiwan as part of a cross-parliamentary group.

They were later told by Chinese diplomats they would be denied entry to China, Hong Kong and Macau for a year.

Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Australian government voiced its concerns about the decision.

Mr Luxon said he did not agree with Beijing's ban and New Zealand has also raised concerns.

"We think it's inappropriate that bans are put on these four MPs from New Zealand that have gone," he said.

"They've simply just exercised their right to travel and they're free to see who they want to see."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-06/pm-anthony-albanese-christoper-luxon-australia-new-zealand-talks/106767688

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPz67C1RQrc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62871

File: 6d52c6e9719c89e⋯.jpg (349.61 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e046e13cb6bca64⋯.mp4 (4.41 MB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 83ec6075646a7db⋯.jpg (316.64 KB,1524x897,508:299,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a98f5c938a74a80⋯.jpg (485.88 KB,1487x886,1487:886,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688255 (070552ZJUN26) Notable: Rich mates, secret mansions: Australia’s millionaire Nazi-backers revealed - (Video) An investigation by The Age has identified a network of wealthy associates and supporters linked to neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell and the outlawed National Socialist Network (NSN), as the group pursues a High Court challenge against Australia’s hate speech laws. Sewell is reported to be living at a secluded Victorian estate allegedly acquired through a company connected to trucking heir Martin Featherstone, who publicly describes himself as a white nationalist and is alleged to have supported NSN activities. The report also identifies property heir Hugo Lennon, race-car driver and aviation businessman Yassin Albarri, aviation entrepreneur David Roberts, stockbroker Mitchell Hobbs and influencer Nigel “Stirling Cooper” Clifford as figures associated with the group or its events. Authorities have previously designated the NSN a prohibited hate group. Experts cited in the report warned that wealthy benefactors, property holdings, fundraising networks and overseas extremist connections could strengthen the movement’s capacity to organise, recruit and pursue political ambitions despite increased legal scrutiny.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

>>62709

>>62716

>>62855

Rich mates, secret mansions: Australia’s millionaire Nazi-backers revealed

Wealthy backers are helping Australia’s neo-Nazis plot their next move into politics from a secret multimillion-dollar compound. We tracked it down - along with Thomas Sewell’s rich mates.

Sherryn Groch - JUNE 3, 2026

1/5

You can’t see the mansion – or its pool – from the road. But locals in this leafy corner of Melbourne’s north-east have seen the man who lives here in town.

Some will yell at him; a few want to shake his hand. The face of the bald, mustachioed leader of Australia’s largest neo-Nazi group is known not just here but around the world, after all.

What locals don’t know is that, since being released on bail last year on assault charges, neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell has been secretly living among them at this sprawling $2.5 million estate.

Sewell’s name doesn’t appear on the official paperwork – it was bought using a shell company by the heir of a Melbourne trucking empire.

It’s just one in a web of assets this masthead has discovered held by rich associates and less prominent members of Sewell’s now-outlawed neo-Nazi group the National Socialist Network (NSN).

For the first time, an investigation by this masthead can unmask the wealthy backers behind Australia’s neo-Nazis as they mount a costly High Court challenge to new hate speech laws – and plot their next move into politics.

Among Sewell’s rich associates are a race-car driver turned failed political candidate who owns a fleet of planes; the son of a gun dealer and inventor in regional Victoria; a jet-setting “manfluencer” friend of Andrew Tate who sells penis supplements to teenagers; a property development heir turned provocateur, and a stockbroker mixing with MAGA influencers overseas.

Sewell has recently bragged to followers on livestreams of his plans to build a function centre on the property he said “an investor” had “gifted” his group last year – which this masthead has now tracked down through open-source intelligence and property records.

International extremism expert Matt Kriner, who recently assessed the NSN for the Albanese government, says the assets and connections uncovered by this masthead suggest Australia’s neo-Nazis have entered a dangerous new phase. “Historically, when fascist movements start to sequester themselves in compounds, particularly those that have already shown a fascination with violence, terrorists and weapons like the NSN, that makes them very dangerous,” Kriner said.

He and other far-right researchers say authorities should now target the group the same way they had organised crime syndicates: “By following the money.”

Sewell’s new home – described by one gushing realtor as a mountain chalet – boasts more than 10 bedrooms, as well as a gym and pool on a 19-acre block. Up a long snaking drive, the main house is screened from the road by thick bush and security fences, but enjoys soaring hilltop views of Melbourne.

The NSN has long been trying to acquire land to build “white homestead” compounds from which to grow a racist ethno-state. Two sources close to the group, speaking anonymously for safety reasons, said other neo-Nazis were living at the estate with Sewell and his family. This masthead separately connected several men associated with the NSN to the address.

While on bail, Sewell is barred from associating with about a dozen neo-Nazis charged over a violent attack that Sewell allegedly led on an Indigenous camp last year. But his living arrangements with others in the group do not appear to have drawn scrutiny from authorities.

In outlawing the NSN as a hate group on May 15, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke noted that they had continued to operate in the shadows, “phoenixing” under new names and forms rather than disbanding as they claimed.

Documents recently filed in the High Court by Sewell in his fight to overturn the new laws confirm that the NSN never dissolved its political party wing, “White Australia”, of which Sewell remains president. And records filed by White Australia list the mansion – Sewell’s home – as their new headquarters.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62872

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688289 (070610ZJUN26) Notable: Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell covertly broadcasting hate on Instagram from Melbourne acreage - (Video) An ABC News Verify investigation has reported that neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell continued posting antisemitic and homophobic content on Instagram weeks after the National Socialist Network (NSN) was designated a prohibited hate group. Investigators linked a masked Instagram account, which featured a figure wearing an Anglo-Saxon Sutton Hoo-style helmet and delivering extremist commentary, to Sewell through background details matching previous online broadcasts. Meta later removed the account for breaching community standards. The report also identified a Hurstbridge property where Sewell was living and recording videos, which is listed as the registered address of the White Australia Party association. Property records linked the site to a company directed by Martin Featherstone and his mother, Christina Macgregor. Featherstone confirmed Sewell was renting the property, while Macgregor disputed media characterisations of him.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62702

>>62709

>>62716

>>62855

Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell covertly broadcasting hate on Instagram from Melbourne acreage

Matt Martino - 3 June 2026

1/2

Neo-Nazi leader and convicted criminal Thomas Sewell is covertly broadcasting hateful views on Instagram weeks after his organisation the National Socialist Network (NSN) was formally listed as a hate group by the government.

ABC NEWS Verify can reveal that Sewell has posted antisemitic and homophobic diatribes to the platform from behind a sparkling Anglo-Saxon Sutton Hoo mask which the NSN has used previously in propaganda material.

Though his face is obscured, the position of a light switch, bookshelf and items on the bookshelf on Instagram match the background of another video Sewell appeared in unmasked on video streaming site Rumble in January.

Sewell established the new Instagram account in May, and to date has posted seven videos to the platform, the first on May 24.

He has launched a challenge in the High Court to overturn the government's ban on his organisation so that he can register a White Australia party with the Australian Electoral Commission.

In response to questions from ABC NEWS Verify about the Instagram videos and whether they constitute hate speech under the federal government's new laws, a spokesperson for the Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said "Our agencies are constantly monitoring for any potential breaches of our hate speech laws, the strongest such laws in Australian history".

The Australian Federal Police were also contacted for comment.

Alex Ryvchin, the co-chief executive officer of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry said social media platforms were enabling extremists to recruit and target people.

"Any Jewish user could attest to the volume of accounts pumping out everything from highly curated propaganda to direct death threats," he said.

"We've never seen it at such levels and its danger and effectiveness comes from the scale and consistency of the message.

"We know that violence is the endpoint of indoctrination and scapegoating which makes this phenomenon especially dangerous."

ABC NEWS Verify also contacted Instagram parent company Meta to ask if Sewell's videos violated its policy on hateful conduct.

Meta later removed the account for violating the company's community guidelines.

ABC NEWS Verify also sent questions to Sewell.

He did not respond directly, but posted a long video to Telegram abusing ABC NEWS Verify with what appeared to be the same mask in the background.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62873

File: 0da5a7403c27fdf⋯.jpg (425.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2a4f527cb6e208c⋯.jpg (307.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 675607f968aba2b⋯.jpg (773.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688614 (070842ZJUN26) Notable: ‘I have a plan’: Book reveals how Christchurch terrorist flagged attack on 4chan - A new book, He Told Us, argues Australian-born terrorist Brenton Tarrant, who murdered 51 people in the 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks, left numerous warning signs online that were missed by authorities. Researchers from the University of Auckland identified more than 400 previously unknown 4chan posts they attribute to Tarrant, tracing his progression from racist commentary to explicit advocacy of violence and discussion of plans targeting New Zealand mosques. The authors challenge findings of New Zealand’s Royal Commission, which concluded Tarrant largely radicalised in isolation and was difficult to detect. They argue his online activity, links to Australian far-right figures and groups, firearms purchases, extremist usernames and public behaviour presented multiple red flags. The book contends authorities underestimated the significance of his online footprint and warns that extremist digital spaces continue to radicalise individuals today, offering lessons for Australia’s ongoing examination of violent extremism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘I have a plan’: Book reveals how Christchurch terrorist flagged attack on 4chan

PAUL GARVEY - June 05, 2026

1/3

The Australian terrorist responsible for the Christchurch massacre twice posted publicly about his plan to attack mosques on New Zealand’s South Island, a forensic analysis of far-right internet ­forums has found.

The extraordinary revelations – detailed in the new book ‘He Told Us: How an Australian committed far-right terrorism in Christchurch, New Zealand’ – sharply contradict key findings from New Zealand’s Royal Commission into the terror attack, which concluded that it would have been almost impossible for authorities to detect the terrorist, Brenton Tarrant, and that he had been radicalised in isolation.

Instead, the findings by University of Auckland associate professor Dr Chris Wilson and researcher Michal Dziwulski show that the Grafton, NSW-born shooter’s descent into radicalisation occurred while he was interacting with Australian far-right groups and figures such as Thomas Sewell.

As Australia conducts its own royal commission into the Bondi massacre, the authors say the nation should take lessons from what they describe as the shortcomings of New Zealand’s own investigation into its deadliest ­terrorist attack.

Out of the shadows

The pair’s work challenges the narrative put forward by the royal commission of the shooter as a stealthy operative who worked in the shadows without any trace.

Instead, Wilson and Dziwulski show Tarrant to be a ­pathetic, lonely and sadistic steroid-using loser who – while impotent at forming meaningful relationships in the real world – was desperate to try to impress strangers online.

Controversially, they also break the taboo that has prevailed in New Zealand since then-prime minister Jacinda Ardern said she would never say the terrorist’s name. While Wilson and Dziwulski predominantly refer to him as “the terrorist”, they do not shy away from mentioning him by name where necessary and are not afraid of exploring his background in detail.

The pair, along with two other researchers from the University of Auckland, identified more than 400 previously unknown messages written by him on 4chan, an internet forum favoured by many on the far right. They were moved to act after New Zealand’s royal commission handed down what Wilson described as its “incredibly incomplete” findings, which included scant details about the terrorist’s online interactions.

Believing the terrorist’s digital footprint had to extend beyond the Facebook posts identified in the immediate aftermath, Wilson and Dziwulski began searching for signs of him on 4chan.

Users of the site post anonymously, but the researchers were able to identify him courtesy of one small feature of the site. Each post is accompanied by a national flag denoting the country the posts were made from.

The terrorist was a prolific traveller – he visited dozens of countries funded by an inheritance his father had left for him – and the royal commission published a detailed itinerary of his travels. Aware that he had briefly visited Kyrgyzstan in 2015, the researchers scoured 4chan for posts from that time featuring the rarely seen Kyrgyz flag.

The matching posts they found included dozens by a person celebrating Dylann Roof’s race-inspired shooting of an African-American church. When the person described himself as “an Aussie tourist in kyrgz”, they knew they had their man. That belief was further reinforced by a distinctive typographical quirk in the posts – the lack of a space after full stops and commas – which was a feature of his writings.

That methodology ultimately helped them identify hundreds of messages they firmly believed were written by the terrorist. Combined with the other social media posts already known, Wilson and Dziwulski were able to paint a much clearer picture of the terrorist’s path from racism to extremism, to the glorification of violence by others, and ultimately on to the imagining and then planning of his own violence.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62874

File: 108b4ab2cf83f79⋯.mp4 (962.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 3e203f39a070b4f⋯.jpg (173.28 KB,1902x1426,951:713,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688712 (070945ZJUN26) Notable: Inside the evil mind of the mosques mass murderer - This is an edited extract from He Told Us: How an Australian committed far-right terrorism in Christchurch, New Zealand by Dr Chris Wilson (Associate Professor at the University of Auckland) and researcher Michal Dziwulski, published by Allen & Unwin on June 9.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62873

Inside the evil mind of the mosques mass murderer

CHRIS WILSON AND MICHAL DZIWULSKI - June 06, 2026

1/5

Around midday on March 15, 2019, a lone man drove into the southern outskirts of the city of Christchurch in New Zealand. He had driven there from Dunedin, five hours to the south. Lying across the seats of his Subaru were six firearms, including semi-automatic rifles. Names and slogans were painted in white across every surface of the weapons. A helmet mounted with a GoPro camera sat on the passenger seat. In the back of the car were rudimentary incendiary devices: containers filled with petrol with cigarette lighters fixed on top.

It was a Friday, and two mosques on either side of the central city were full. The first, Masjid Al Noor or Al Noor Mosque, in the suburb of Riccarton, sits across the road from the large green expanse of Hagley Park. The second, to the east of that park, was Linwood ­Islamic Centre, which had opened only a year before to cater to the community on that side of the city. That day, hundreds from the city’s small Muslim community had gathered in the two locations, as they always did at midday on a Friday, to pray and see their friends before returning to their offices, homes, businesses and schools.

Within an hour, the man would brutally trap and massacre 51 of them in and around the two buildings. He injured and traumatised many more. While the man used firearms to kill, leaving his victims dead or dying on the floor of the mosques, he used several other devices to ensure the damage from his atrocity continues until the present day. Using his smartphone, he livestreamed footage of his attack captured by the GoPro camera on his helmet straight to his Facebook page. By the time it ended, this livestream transformed into a recording of his massacre. It sat on his Facebook account for an hour and was downloaded and shared innumerable times.

The prime minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, quickly designated the attack as terrorism: violence carried out for a larger political, social or ideological purpose. The slogans and symbols on the attacker’s weapons and clothing indicated that he saw himself as a white nationalist, someone engaged in armed struggle on behalf of the “white race”, an imagined community of people of European heritage located all around the world, from New Zealand and Australia to the United States and Russia. A manifesto he had emailed to media and government offices minutes before his ­attack confirmed his ideological motivations, depicting immigration as threatening the culture and very existence of the white race.

The man is Australian Brenton Tarrant, who had arrived in New Zealand 19 months earlier. He was the first white nationalist terrorist to travel overseas to carry out an attack. The man had spent much of the past five years travelling the world alone, becoming radicalised to violence through interaction on anonymous online forums.

White nationalist extremism is transnational, and borders between countries are now largely ­irrelevant for the movement. But his politics were also explicitly Australian, his ideas having evolved through engagement with highly Islamophobic far-right groups in his home country in the years leading up to his attack in New Zealand.

Prelude to a massacre

In 2024, as we were researching this book, a semi-detached house in South Dunedin was listed for sale. The online advertisement featured photographs of a sparsely furnished home, with an image each of the bedrooms, lounge, kitchen and the weatherboard house from the street. The interior images showed a bed, a washing basket full of clothes, and a desk with a desktop computer and monitor. Since late 2017, the terrorist had been renting the house. Several weeks before he drove to Christchurch to commit his atrocity, he had informed the rental agency that he was moving out, and an agent arrived and took the photographs. The same images were still being used online five years later. Without knowing it, anyone who looked at the advertisement was seeing the terrorist’s house and belongings as they were in the weeks before his attack.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62875

File: 5f631498d772167⋯.jpg (160.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a64e0c8b052eecb⋯.jpg (347.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fd2e338767bbe43⋯.jpg (916.71 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d502c405d095a63⋯.jpg (530.09 KB,1914x2552,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688752 (071010ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Child of trauma’ teen accused of planning school terror attack after years as recluse - A 13-year-old Queensland boy accused of planning a violent attack on younger children at a local school had reportedly lived as a recluse and not attended school for two years before his arrest. Police allege he entered a Maryborough service station armed with a knife and balaclava, later telling officers he had considered carrying out an attack inspired by videos of Russian school stabbings but decided against it. A subsequent search of his home allegedly uncovered violent extremist material, leading to charges under new Queensland laws targeting preparations for serious acts of violence. Education authorities have launched a review into how the boy, described in court as a “child of trauma”, was not enrolled in school and whether earlier intervention opportunities were missed. He remains in youth detention awaiting further court proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62798

>>62873

>>62837

‘Child of trauma’ teen accused of planning school terror attack after years as recluse

MACKENZIE SCOTT - June 05, 2026

The teen boy accused of planning a schoolyard stabbing spree was a recluse who had not left his home for two years before being arrested with a knife at a Queensland petrol station.

A high-level investigation has been ordered by the Department of Education to work out how the 13-year-old facing two ­terror-related charges slipped through the cracks after not being enrolled at school.

Described in court as a “child of trauma”, the teenager was born from an incestuous relationship. It is understood his ­father is also his grandfather.

He was also bullied in and out of the classroom, leading him to refuse to attend school.

Queensland police initially gave the boy a caution after he allegedly walked into the BP service station at Maryborough, southwest of Hervey Bay, last Thursday morning armed and with a balaclava.

After allegedly making threats to the attendant and locking himself into the on-site bathroom, he is said to have told police he had homicidal thoughts after watching videos of Russian school stabbings and had planned to enact a similar attack against younger children at a local state school. But, he allegedly told police, upon walking into the business he had realised he “couldn’t do it”.

The Department of Education was unable to confirm whether other formal schooling arrangements were in place or whether he was regularly followed up.

“The department is deeply concerned about this matter and has commenced a thorough review into all relevant systems and processes to understand if and when earlier interventions could have been put in place,” a department spokesman said.

“Any findings or recommendations from the review will be carefully considered and ­actioned swiftly.”

The family was not known to the Department of Child Safety.

The lack of school attendance raises serious questions about the teenager’s mental capacity and whether he had the capability to plan an attack to the criminal standard required by the courts.

On Saturday, two days after the initial interaction with police, detectives from the Counter Terrorism Investigation Group arrested the boy in his home, finding a video of the NZ mosque massacre on an electronic ­device.

The teenager is the first person to be charged under the new Queensland offence of preparing or planning to cause death or grievous bodily harm, and the commonwealth offence of possessing or controlling violent extremist material obtained or accessed using a carriage service.

The boy is currently on remand at Brisbane Youth Detention Centre at Wacol and will appear via video link before Hervey Bay Magistrates Court on Friday.

The Australian understands his alleged plans had no ideological underpinnings and no formal plans or a manifesto have been found.

On Monday, Queensland Police Service Acting Detective Superintendent Jason Hindmarsh clarified that the charges did not mean he intended to undertake a terror attack. “We’ve got evidence to satisfy our evidentiary standards that he had planned to undertake acts of violence at a school,” he said.

The boy is the first Queenslander to be charged under the Liberal National Party government’s crime crackdown in response to the Bondi shooting.

The amendment to the criminal code made it an offence to undertake acts in the preparation or planning for an incident that was likely to cause the death or grievous bodily harm of another person, even if the incident does not occur.

Following Counter Terrorism’s announcement, the member of parliament for Mary­borough, John Barounis, posed a Dorothy Dixer to Police Minister Dan Purdie about community safety during question time on Tuesday.

“As a government, we need to be agile, we need to respond to changing threat levels and methodologies of criminals, and we need to give the police the resources they need to keep people safe,” Mr Purdie said.

“We identified this was an emerging issue – lone actors conducting acts preparatory to a casualty event – and there was no offence in Queensland law for police to decisively and pre-emptively take action, and I want to commend the police for doing that.”

The LNP won government in October 2024 on a law-and-order platform, pledging to reduce victim numbers and hold youth criminals to the same sentences as adults for more than 30 offences.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/child-of-trauma-teen-accused-of-planning-school-terror-attack-after-years-as-recluse/news-story/709333b358a44bf2650f8be473a26793

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62876

File: c5281d934ef23c1⋯.jpg (517.31 KB,2560x1707,2560:1707,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688782 (071030ZJUN26) Notable: Analysis: Australia races to defend vital undersea cables from growing Chinese and Russian threats - "Australia is critically dependent on infrastructure lying on the ­seabed. More than 95 per cent of our international data traffic travels through subsea cables, alongside the pipelines and energy infrastructure that underpin the economy. As the maritime domain becomes increasingly contested, the battle beneath the oceans is intensifying. Chinese naval deployments around Australia are reminders that control of our ­surrounding seas can no longer be assumed, and we should apply the same assumption to the underwater domain. Undersea cables, seabed infrastructure and the systems used to monitor and protect them are now part of strategic competition. That growing vulnerability helps explain Australia’s increasing investment in undersea warfare capabilities, including systems such as Ghost Shark and Speartooth. While significant gaps remain in areas such as hydrography and mine warfare, investments in capabilities including AUKUS... and uncrewed underwater vehicles should provide Australia with the greatest underwater situational awareness capability it has ever possessed ... The government has announced a $1.7bn investment in the Ghost Shark extra-large autonomous underwater vehicle, and an undisclosed investment in the smaller, much more affordable Speartooth large uncrewed underwater vehicle (LUUV) which is optimised for seabed warfare and agile undersea operations, reaching areas Ghost Shark cannot. Manufacturers C2 Robotics last month also delivered the first of a batch of Speartooth LUUVs to the US Navy ... The full capabilities of Ghost Shark and Speartooth remain unclear publicly, but Defence has promoted their potential roles in intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, logistics and strike. Taken together, these capabilities should significantly strengthen Australia’s broader undersea warfare posture." - Jennifer Parker, Adjunct Professor with the University of Western Australia Defence and Security Institute. She served for more than 20 years as a warfare officer in the Royal Australian Navy - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38906 (pb)

>>62704

>>62804

>>62818

Analysis: Australia races to defend vital undersea cables from growing Chinese and Russian threats

JENNIFER PARKER - June 02, 2026

1/2

Australia is critically dependent on infrastructure lying on the ­seabed. More than 95 per cent of our international data traffic travels through subsea cables, alongside the pipelines and energy infrastructure that underpin the economy.

As the maritime domain becomes increasingly contested, the battle beneath the oceans is intensifying. Chinese naval deployments around Australia are reminders that control of our ­surrounding seas can no longer be assumed, and we should apply the same assumption to the underwater domain.

Undersea cables, seabed infrastructure and the systems used to monitor and protect them are now part of strategic competition. That growing vulnerability helps explain Australia’s increasing investment in undersea warfare capabilities, including systems such as Ghost Shark and Speartooth. While significant gaps remain in areas such as hydrography and mine warfare, investments in capabilities including AUKUS, the Hunter-class frigate’s towed array sonar, the Bluebottle uncrewed surface vessels with towed array sonars, and uncrewed underwater vehicles should provide Australia with the greatest underwater situational awareness capability it has ever possessed.

What happens in the underwater domain, and our ability to respond to developments there, is understandably shrouded in secrecy. But in April, British Defence Secretary John Healey provided a rare public glimpse into this contest when he de­classified a Russian operation inside the United Kingdom’s Exclusive Economic Zone.

The operation involved a Russian Akula nuclear-powered submarine and two specialist vessels from Moscow’s Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research, which Healey said are designed to survey underwater infrastructure in peacetime and sabotage it in conflict. The UK has every reason to be concerned following a series of attacks on undersea cables and pipelines in the Baltic Sea.

But the capability to interfere with subsea cables, pipelines and broader seabed infrastructure is rapidly expanding. China is investing heavily in undersea capabilities, from sensors and uncrewed underwater vehicles to increasingly sophisticated submarines. In 2025, considerable attention was given to reports that Chinese researchers had developed a deep-sea cable cutter capable of severing cables at depths of up to 4000m. Chinese-flagged vessels, and vessels crewed by Chinese nationals, have been suspected of interfering with several subsea cables servicing Taiwan.

The growing accessibility of uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUV) also means state and non-state actors increasingly have the ability to surveil and interfere with critical underwater infrastructure.

Key to underwater domain awareness is understanding where your vulnerabilities lie and maintaining strong maritime domain awareness above the surface. Many recent incidents involving undersea infrastructure have not involved submarines at all, but ­surface vessels dragging anchors across cables and pipelines.

Monitoring one of the world’s largest maritime domains is an immense challenge, made harder by Australia’s fragmented maritime security architecture spread across multiple agencies and without a dedicated coastguard.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62877

File: 418e0e7a74e7e9e⋯.jpg (394.3 KB,1426x951,1426:951,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b84d2b1ab62f317⋯.jpg (361.9 KB,1282x855,1282:855,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688804 (071042ZJUN26) Notable: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor photographed with large bruise on his face - Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was photographed near the Sandringham estate with a large bruise-like discolouration around his right cheek and eye during a rare public appearance. The cause of the mark was not disclosed, although it was reportedly believed to be linked to a non-serious medical condition. The sighting comes amid continuing scrutiny of the former royal, who was stripped of his titles last year and relocated from Royal Lodge in Windsor to a cottage on the Sandringham estate. Police are examining a historical allegation relating to a woman who worked at Royal Ascot as part of a broader investigation. Andrew was arrested and questioned earlier this year on suspicion of misconduct in public office, has denied wrongdoing, and remains under investigation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62749

>>62811

>>62820

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor photographed with large bruise on his face

KATE MANSEY - June 05, 2026

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was seen driving near the Sandringham estate on Thursday with what appeared to be a large purple bruise on the right side of his face.

Seen in public for the first time in several days, the King’s brother was behind the wheel with another man and a dog in the car.

First Public Appearance in Days

He was seen to have a large patch of discolouration across his cheek and eye.

While it is not known how he received the mark, it is thought to be the result of a non-serious medical condition.

Andrew, who is rarely seen in public following a security scare near his new home in Norfolk, had been out dog walking.

It comes after a turbulent few months for Andrew who was stripped of all his royal titles late last year.

Fresh Legal Scrutiny Underway

Last week the Sunday Times reported that police were investigating claims that Andrew had allegedly behaved inappropriately towards a woman who was working as a waitress at Royal Ascot.

The claim, which dates back nearly 25 years, is now being examined by police as part of a wider investigation into Andrew.

Andrew was arrested on his 66th birthday in February and questioned on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He was released under investigation and has denied any wrongdoing.

The Royal Lodge Eviction

Following public outrage over his friendship with the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the King stripped him of his titles as prince and Duke of York.

He has since been ordered to move out of Royal Lodge, his former home in Windsor, and into Marsh Farm, a more modest cottage on Sandringham, the King’s private estate in Norfolk. When Charles returned to Sandringham last month, Palace sources said that the monarch did not visit his brother.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/andrew-mountbattenwindsor-photographed-with-large-bruise-on-his-face/news-story/7c925e989983744b094fab88d674ce0d

https://nypost.com/2026/06/04/world-news/ex-prince-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-seen-with-bruise-on-face/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62878

File: 00d6e535c9d856a⋯.jpg (240.13 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cd63a14b1481b15⋯.jpg (461.19 KB,2000x1331,2000:1331,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688818 (071053ZJUN26) Notable: Australia gets access to AI model ‘too dangerous to release’ - Australian government agencies, critical infrastructure operators and other selected organisations will gain access to Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview artificial intelligence model through its Project Glasswing program. Anthropic has restricted the model from general release because of concerns its advanced ability to identify and exploit software vulnerabilities could be misused for cyber attacks against governments, financial institutions and critical infrastructure. The company said participating organisations have already uncovered more than 10,000 high- and critical-severity software flaws. The program, initially limited to major technology and financial firms, is being expanded across Five Eyes countries, NATO partners and other trusted organisations. Anthropic argues controlled access allows defenders to find and fix weaknesses before similarly capable AI systems become widely available and potentially accessible to malicious actors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia gets access to AI model ‘too dangerous to release’

David Swan - June 3, 2026

Australian organisations will get access to the artificial intelligence model that Anthropic has deemed “too dangerous” for public release, as part of a staggered global rollout aimed at hardening critical systems against hackers.

On Wednesday morning, the San Francisco company said it had extended access to its Claude Mythos Preview model to about 150 new organisations across more than 15 countries, expanding a program known as Project Glasswing. The Financial Times reported access had been granted across the Five Eyes alliance – which includes Australia – along with NATO and the European Union’s cybersecurity agency.

Mythos has proven extraordinarily adept at finding software flaws that, in the wrong hands, could trigger catastrophic breaches. Anthropic has withheld it from general release, warning its cyber capabilities are dual-use and could enable attacks on financial systems and infrastructure.

A spokeswoman confirmed Australian organisations would gain access but declined to name them. Anthropic has previously briefed Treasury, the Reserve Bank and stewards of critical infrastructure.

The move came a day after Anthropic confidentially filed for a $US1 trillion-plus ($1.4 trillion) initial public offering, and as competitors race to build similarly powerful models within roughly a year.

What is Project Glasswing?

Anthropic launched the program on April 7, initially giving about 50 Wall Street and technology firms access to Mythos to scan their own code for flaws before a broader release could put critical services at risk. The idea is that organisations can use the model to find and fix weaknesses in their systems before attackers do.

The early results were striking. Members surfaced more than 10,000 high- or critical-severity software vulnerabilities since the program launched. The latest cohort opens access to sectors not previously represented, including power, water, healthcare and communications.

“Following several weeks of close collaboration with our Project Glasswing partners, the security industry, open-source software maintainers, and the US government, we’re extending the partnership to approximately 150 new organisations,” Anthropic said in a statement on its website. Many of the new partners are vendors whose codebases are relied upon by governments worldwide.

Which organisations get access?

Anthropic has declined to name the new partners, and such organisations are typically identified only when they choose to disclose it themselves. The original cohort surfaced largely that way, and included Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks, along with Google, Amazon and JPMorganChase. Cloud data firm Rubrik said it was among the new batch of companies.

In Australia, the most likely candidates are systemically important institutions: the major banks, critical-infrastructure operators in energy and telecommunications, and national security and government agencies such as the Australian Signals Directorate and Home Affairs. Financial infrastructure is squarely in scope – JPMorgan was named in the initial US group – making the big four banks a logical fit. Government agencies rarely confirm specific security tooling, so the public may never get a definitive Australian roster.

Why is Claude Mythos Preview considered dangerous?

Anthropic’s most powerful model has proven extraordinarily adept at finding software flaws, and at working out how to exploit them. “What each partner has in common is that a successful attack on their codebase could be catastrophic,” the company said, estimating a major attack could affect more than 100 million people.

The company’s president, Daniela Amodei, said the model was being withheld because its cyber capabilities cut both ways. “Cyber is a dual-use technology … it’s also very good at cyber warfare,” she told Forbes Australia. “We decided that we can’t put this into general availability right now because we believe it’s going to cause a lot of problems in the world if we do.”

The worry, she said, was that a rogue actor could use such a model “for cyber warfare against a state, against a financial institution to hack credit card information, or to try to bring down critical infrastructure”.

Anthropic expects competitors to build similarly powerful models within roughly a year, raising the stakes for defenders to get ahead first.

https://www.theage.com.au/technology/australia-gets-access-to-ai-model-too-dangerous-to-release-20260603-p603ds.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62879

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688835 (071106ZJUN26) Notable: Bondi massacre hero Ahmed Al Ahmed charged with assaulting his father - (Video) Ahmed Al Ahmed, widely recognised for disarming gunman Sajid Akram during the Bondi terrorist attack, has been charged with common assault and stalking with intent to cause physical harm following an alleged incident involving his father at the family home in Sydney’s southwest. Mr Ahmed strongly denied the allegations in a radio interview, describing himself as “honest” and “innocent” and claiming he was the victim of extortion and false accusations by family members. He is due to appear before Bankstown Local Court in July and intends to contest the charges. The case follows separate criminal proceedings against two of his brothers, who have pleaded not guilty to allegations they threatened and pressured him for money from the millions of dollars donated after his actions during the Bondi attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38822 (pb)

>>62687

>>62759

Bondi massacre hero Ahmed Al-Ahmed charged with assaulting his father

PAIGE FRYER and BIMINI PLESSER - June 04, 2026

Bondi hero Ahmed Al Ahmed has vehemently denied the allegations he attacked his father in an emotional radio interview.

Speaking to Ben Fordham on Friday morning, Mr Ahmed alleged he was the victim of “extortion” at the hands of his father and brothers.

“Honestly, I’m disappointed. The situation causes me stress … I am very upset about what has happened,” Mr Ahmed told the 2GB host, breaking down in tears and suggesting people around him were “lying”.

“I’ve never been violent, I am not a violent guy,” he told Fordham. “I’m an honest, innocent, honourable guy.’’

“I don’t deserve to be treated like this.. since the situation in Bondi, I’ve been given a second chance in life. I’m married, I have two little daughter, 3 years and 6 years… I’m honest, innocent and a normal guy and it’s good for people to know I’ve never been a violent guy.

“It’s extortion one hundred per cent.”

Fordham cast doubt on the allegations against Mr Ahmed, asking how he was “supposed to put someone in a headlock when (he) struggles to hold a microphone” due to the bullet fragments which still remain in parts of his arm and shoulder.

I don’t believe them. I don’t believe your brothers, I don’t believe your dad, I don’t believe any of them,” Fordham said.

Mr Ahmed, 44, is ­alleged to have assaulted his father in the family home in the city’s southwest in March.

Police revealed on Thursday that Mr Ahmed had been served with a court attendance notice on Wednesday for common assault and stalking with intent to cause physical harm. He is set to appear before Bankstown Local Court on July 29.

The charges mark a major shift for the Muslim Australian-Syrian father of two, who emerged as a national hero in Bondi’s darkest hour.

During the December 14 terrorist attack at Archer Park, Mr Ahmed sprang from behind a parked car and tackled gunman Sajid Akram, seizing a high-powered firearm from his grasp and pointing it back at him.

Fifteen people were killed and about 40 others were injured during the attack.

Mr Ahmed was lauded for his bravery, earning global praise, more than $2.5m in online donations and receiving keys to the city in both Canterbury-Bankstown and Waverley.

The Australian understands Mr Ahmed will defend the charges and alleges the dispute stems from an earlier conflict with his two brothers.

He will be represented, at least in part, by his lawyer Sam Issa.

Mr Ahmed registered a company called Bondi Hero Pty Ltd with ASIC in February this year. Registered in the ACT, Bondi Hero Pty Ltd has just one shareholder: Mr Ahmed. He is also the director and secretary of the company.

The company was registered around the time Mr Ahmed’s relationship with his two brothers was breaking down.

Police charged Sameh and Hozifa Ahmed last month, accusing them of bullying their hero brother to coerce him into sharing his millions in donations.

Each pleaded not guilty to one count of using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend over the alleged threats soon after.

According to police, Hozifa Ahmed called Mr Ahmed on May 7, telling him: “If you’re a man, you would come here. I will put your head under my boot, break your other arm and smash your face. We will only leave if you give us $100,000 each”.

After Mr Ahmed hung up on Hozifa, Sameh Ahmed allegedly called him and issued similar threats and demands, saying “If you want peace of mind and to be safe, you will give us $100,000 each.”

They are on bail under strict conditions, including that they cannot contact Mr Ahmed or anyone he has a domestic relationship with.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bondi-massacre-hero-ahmed-alahmed-charged-with-assaulting-his-father/news-story/ee1a15f2011387b4fea12fb640a91c2a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyceLLmFX40

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62880

File: 4b7f115aea3392c⋯.jpg (641.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24688842 (071115ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Bike boy’ accused of stealing $50k car with child; carjacking while on bail - Ryan Meuleman, known as “bike boy” following a 2013 collision involving former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews’ family, has been charged with multiple offences unrelated to his ongoing Federal Court defamation case against Daniel and Catherine Andrews. Police allege Mr Meuleman stole a $50,000 Kia Sportage in Pakenham on May 3 while a child under 10 was inside the vehicle, and later provided a false name and address when questioned. He is also accused of committing a carjacking the following day while on bail. Mr Meuleman appeared via video link from custody in Dandenong Magistrates’ Court, with the matter adjourned until June 19. Separately, his defamation proceedings against the Andrewses continue, with the couple denying wrongdoing and contesting the claim.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62773

>>62827

‘Bike boy’ accused of stealing $50k car with child; carjacking while on bail

LILY MCCAFFREY - June 04, 2026

Ryan Meuleman, who is suing former premier Daniel Andrews for defamation in relation to the “bike boy” saga, allegedly stole a $50,000 car with a child inside and gave a fake name and address to police when questioned about it.

The next day, Mr Meuleman allegedly committed carjacking while he was on bail, according to police charge sheets released by the Magistrates’ Court on Thursday.

Mr Meuleman became known as “bike boy” after he was seriously injured as a teenager in a 2013 collision with a Ford Territory driven by Mr Andrews’ wife, Catherine. Mr Andrews, who was opposition leader at the time, was also in the car.

Some 13 years later, the fallout from the incident continues, with Mr Meuleman in the midst of suing the couple in the Federal Court, alleging they defamed him in a 2024 media statement.

At the same time, Mr Meuleman is in custody where he is charged with five criminal offences on the unrelated matter.

Police allege a child under the age of 10 was in the car when Mr Meuleman stole it on May 3 this year in Pakenham in Melbourne’s south east. The white Kia Sportage was worth $50,000, police allege.

That same day, Mr Meuleman allegedly gave a police officer who questioned him about the theft of the car a false address and a fake name.

On May 4, Mr Meuleman committed carjacking while on bail, according to the charge sheets.

Mr Meuleman appeared via video link from custody in Dandenong Magistrates’ Court in relation to the criminal matter on Monday, where it was adjourned to June 19.

Mr and Ms Andrews are fighting the Federal Court defamation claim, and in their defence filed with the court alleged Mr Meuleman was suing them for publicity and to advance other people’s personal and political agendas. Mr and Ms Andrews have always denied any wrongdoing in relation to the 2013 collision. Victoria Police investigated the incident and never laid charges.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bike-boy-accused-of-stealing-50k-car-with-child-carjacking-while-on-bail/news-story/6ad08ca5ae78c6876ea22ce8515f2aa4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62881

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24692356 (080926ZJUN26) Notable: Hanson hosts barbecue for Ben Roberts-Smith supporters, questions his superiors - Pauline Hanson has backed Ben Roberts-Smith, using a Brisbane supporters’ gathering to question whether military superiors involved in operations during his Afghanistan service would also face scrutiny. Roberts-Smith, who faces five war crime murder charges relating to alleged offences between 2009 and 2012, did not attend and continues to deny the allegations. Hanson said she had spoken with Roberts-Smith and his family, criticised the circumstances of his arrest, and argued he deserved public support while the case proceeds. The gathering highlighted continuing divisions over the prosecution, which follows earlier civil court findings made on the balance of probabilities. Hanson also linked rising support for One Nation to voter dissatisfaction with the major parties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39019 (pb)

>>39032 (pb)

>>62722

>>62736

>>62788

Hanson hosts barbecue for Ben Roberts-Smith supporters, questions his superiors

Cloe Read - June 7, 2026

1/2

Pauline Hanson has questioned whether authorities ranked above accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith will face trial as she addressed a “Justice for Ben” community barbecue in Brisbane’s south-west on Sunday.

The One Nation leader arrived to cheers and claps at the event in Seventeen Mile Rocks, before being surrounded by her own supporters. Nearby was a “Ben for PM” sign.

Hanson threw her support behind the former soldier at the event, held in a park in the Oxley electorate where the populist leader first entered parliament as an independent MP after initially running for the Liberal Party.

“None of us can judge Ben. But what I can judge is the man has now been charged with a crime 17 years after the fact,” she told the crowd at the community barbecue.

“That’s wrong. I also question about the authorities above Ben. He was corporal at the time.

“What has happened to those people? Are they actually going to be on trial as well?”

Roberts-Smith, who was charged earlier this year over allegations he murdered unarmed Afghan civilians and prisoners during his service with the Australian SAS in Afghanistan, did not appear for the event.

He was charged with five counts of war crime murder related to his deployment in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. He faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment for each charge.

Roberts-Smith has previously rejected the charges, saying “I categorically deny all of these allegations”.

Several of the alleged crimes were canvassed in the defamation case that Roberts-Smith unsuccessfully brought against this masthead.

In that case, a judge found in favour of the media and that most of the allegations against Roberts-Smith happened, in the civil test of the balance of probabilities. Prosecutors will need to prove beyond reasonable doubt, a higher standard of proof, in the looming criminal case.

Hanson assured the crowd of about 100 people that she would let Roberts-Smith know of the support at the event.

“I’ve spoken to Ben, and I’ve also spoken to his parents. They’re devastated, but when I spoke to Ben, I said, ‘Ben, don’t give up, you have so many Australians that are behind you, supporting you, encouraging you, respect you’.

“He said, ‘Pauline, I know’.”

Hanson said Roberts-Smith’s public arrest in front of the media was put out there for a show.

“I know, because I’ve had it done to me as well when I was charged – out in the middle of nowhere, and I had the media in tow to take those initial photographs.

“So I understand what he went through, and it should never have happened.”

AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett has since said anyone who leaked details of the arrest to the media in advance should face consequences.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62882

File: 91586b7176f524c⋯.jpg (624.12 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24692372 (080944ZJUN26) Notable: Andrew Hastie slams Hanson’s ‘MAGA first’ mindset as One Nation leader backs Trump - Liberal MP Andrew Hastie has accused Pauline Hanson of putting “MAGA” politics ahead of Australian interests after she defended aspects of Donald Trump’s handling of the Middle East conflict and suggested the outcome could still be judged a success if global oil supplies remain secure. Hastie argued Australia’s interests should take precedence over foreign political movements and said allies should be criticised when necessary. The exchange comes as One Nation continues polling strongly, with the Coalition struggling to counter the party’s growing support. Hanson declined to criticise Trump’s broader approach during an interview, instead highlighting policies she supported, including immigration restrictions and measures relating to women’s spaces. The dispute reflects increasing political competition between One Nation and the Coalition ahead of the next election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38780 (pb)

>>38871 (pb)

>>38982 (pb)

>>62722

>>62752

>>62881

Andrew Hastie slams Hanson’s ‘MAGA first’ mindset as One Nation leader backs Trump

Paul Sakkal - June 8, 2026

1/2

Liberal Andrew Hastie has labelled Pauline Hanson “MAGA first” after the One Nation leader said US President Donald Trump’s war in the Middle East could still be a success, in one of the most direct critiques of Hanson from an opposition MP as the Coalition scrambles to fend off the populist party.

Asked on the Inside Politics podcast if the United States’ war effort could be classed as a win, Hanson did not criticise any element of Trump’s strategy; she said the conflict was ongoing; and she suggested the war could be determined a success “if we can get the Strait of Hormuz open, and we get the oil supply”.

“I think it would be more detrimental to the world if they were allowed to have [nuclear] weaponry,” she said in an interview with this masthead last week.

Hastie, the right-wing leadership hopeful being targeted by One Nation over the war crimes allegations against Ben Roberts-Smith, said it was “not controversial” to say Trump’s war had not gone to plan.

“Pauline Hanson’s problem is that she is MAGA [make America great again] first, even when the Australian people suffer the economic consequences,” Hastie told this masthead.

“Our first loyalty must be to the Australian people. Not to international institutions, not to ideology like MAGA, but to the Australian people, first and foremost. The US is a close ally, but we should always be frank with our friends, and speak up for the national interest.”

As her party jumps ahead of Labor in numerous polls and threatens to wipe out the Coalition, Opposition Leader Angus Taylor’s MPs are under instruction to avoid comments that may offend Hanson’s voters. On Sunday night, Newspoll was the third poll in a week with One Nation ahead of Labor on primary votes, the first choice of 31 per cent of respondent, just ahead of Labor at 30 per cent while the Coalition trailed well behind at 18 per cent.

Hanson travelled to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in November to speak at a conservative conference. Coalition strategists believe that linking her to Trump is one of the best ways to diminish her standing among voters, as Labor did with former Liberal leader Peter Dutton at the last election.

A Resolve Political Monitor survey conducted in April found that 62 per cent of Australians viewed Trump negatively. Fewer than one in five viewed him positively, making him far more unpopular than China’s Xi Jinping, though not as unpopular as Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62883

File: 2f34e4def92d14a⋯.jpg (465.77 KB,1891x1064,1891:1064,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 72e5ad770328a9c⋯.jpg (265.81 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24692381 (080950ZJUN26) Notable: Governments silent on crucial gun buyback details as industry frustration grows - Anthony Albanese’s proposed national gun buyback, announced after the Bondi terror attack as the largest since Port Arthur, is facing increasing uncertainty as several states and territories withdraw support and key details remain unresolved. Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory have rejected participation, while other jurisdictions have signalled reluctance or adopted alternative approaches, leaving NSW as the likely sole participant. Concerns within Labor over rising support for One Nation in regional areas have reportedly contributed to the lack of momentum. Industry groups, the Australian Federal Police Association and the opposition criticised the absence of information about compensation, valuation methods and implementation. Advocates for stronger gun laws continue to support the scheme, while governments say discussions are ongoing and further details will be released later.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62799

Governments silent on crucial gun buyback details as industry frustration grows

LACHLAN LEEMING - 8 June 2026

Anthony Albanese’s pledge to hold the biggest gun buyback since the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre is in tatters, with the central reform announced just days after the Bondi mass shooting stricken by opposition from states and territories, as well as growing angst from Labor MPs fearing a One Nation fight in the future.

Progress on the key plank of reform has stagnated as jurisdictions follow one another in pulling out of the scheme, headlined by Victoria’s Labor government confirming they wouldn’t be involved last month.

The Australian understands the buyback has also barely been mentioned in federal Labor’s caucus in recent months, with the rise of One Nation over the first half of 2026 triggering concerns within the party that a buyback could hurt Labor MPs in regional seats across the nation.

The federal government also won’t start a fight by pressuring reluctant states and territories to partake in the scheme, The Australian understands, making it increasingly likely that NSW will be the only state participating.

Key details on how the buyback will work remain unexplained almost six months after the scheme was announced, with the commonwealth and NSW government refusing to reveal basic information including how the value of surrendered weapons will be determined and whether ammunition will also be purchased.

The opposition, shooters’ groups and even the Australian Federal Police’s union criticised the lack of progress on the scheme.

Australian Federal Police Association president Alex Caruana said the slow rollout “was a contributing factor” to states and territories pulling out. “But the bigger factor is the legislation was put together as a knee-jerk reaction to a tragic event,” he said.

“With the clarity of hindsight, some states are thinking, ‘does limiting the number of firearms mirror up to the statistics, arrests and interactions we’re having with firearm licence holders?’”

If the buyback does go ahead, he said every weapon should be test-fired and ballistics gathered, with data gathered to be cross-­referenced across unsolved crime cases.

Senior Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie added that six months on from the Bondi attack “the government cannot provide even simple details about what may or may not be included”.

Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia chief executive James Walsh said peak bodies representing the sector were growing frustrated with a lack of detail over the buyback.

“As a result of the policy changes, there’s been a significant economic impact on industry – particularly NSW,” he said.

“We are pushing the government for information on when it’ll happen and when compensation for industry will come, and they can’t tell us anything. No one knows what’s going on – it’s just a merry-go-round of bureaucrats at the moment.”

Sporting Shooters’ Association of Australia’s Tom Kenyon said the longer the buyback stalls “the further it goes backwards”.

“The royal commission is proving that gun laws weren’t the problem – it was a terrorism problem and a failure of intelligence collection and sharing.”

Alannah & Madeline Foundation CEO Sarah Davies said the buyback still had to be pursued, and urged all leaders to come back together on it.

Ms Davies – whose foundation was set up by Walter Mikac after his wife Nanette and their daughters Alannah and Madeline were killed at Port Arthur – said a buyback was “the logical way” to cut “gun-related injury or death”.

“Australians need their leaders to work together again,” she said.

A federal government spokeswoman, asked for specifics on the buyback’s progress, said: “We continue to work constructively with the states and territories”.

NSW Police and counter-terrorism Minister Yasmin Catley likewise said the state was “working closely” with the commonwealth and other jurisdictions “to finalise the details of a firearms buyback scheme”.

“Further information about the buyback, including funding and parameters, will be released in due course,” she said.

Despite state and territory leaders initially agreeing to a raft of stronger gun laws in the wake of the Bondi shooting, Victoria now joins Queensland and the Northern Territory in rejecting the ­national buyback.

South Australia has signalled reluctance to change its own gun laws, Western Australia has already completed its own buyback, and Tasmania is set to reject a proposed gun cap in favour of a smaller scheme targeting specific types of firearms.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/governments-silent-on-crucial-gun-buyback-details-as-industry-frustration-grows/news-story/fb9909e44eab134e7923d3cc5a2be22a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62884

File: 08cd0048959591b⋯.jpg (237.17 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3cd1322fcb74d71⋯.jpg (344.16 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 91625681c5fe6e6⋯.jpg (2.37 MB,3000x2250,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0df1fdbe626efe6⋯.jpg (1.57 MB,3000x2121,1000:707,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24692396 (080957ZJUN26) Notable: Bondi gunman dropped to bottom tier of terror watchlist before alleged attack - Alleged Bondi terrorist Naveed Akram had been known to counter-terrorism authorities since 2019 but was downgraded to the lowest tier of the National Known Entity Management List after assessments found no signs of radicalisation. Akram and his father, Sajid Akram, are accused of carrying out the December 2025 Bondi attack that killed 15 people at a Chanukah celebration. Authorities reportedly viewed Akram as a peripheral figure linked to an Islamic State-associated circle in Bankstown, but he remained among thousands of lower-priority subjects on the watchlist. Investigators believe the pair were influenced by extremist material, including the teachings of al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, while Akram is reportedly preparing a defence that he was manipulated by his father. He remains in custody awaiting trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

>>62763

Bondi gunman dropped to bottom tier of terror watchlist before alleged attack

Perry Duffin - June 7, 2026

Naveed Akram was one of more than 5000 names on the radar of counter-terrorism authorities before he allegedly opened fire on Jewish families at Bondi Beach, a number that exposes both the scale of Australia’s threats and the near-impossible task of policing them.

This masthead can also reveal new details of Akram’s legal strategy, and that guards often find him in tears in his isolation cell, as well as an al-Qaeda cleric’s hold on him and his slain father.

Akram, 24, and his father, Sajid, allegedly shot dead 15 people at Chanukah by the Sea in December using legally acquired shotguns and rifles.

Sajid, 50, was killed by NSW Detective Senior Constable Cesar Barraza with his police-issued Glock pistol. The younger Akram was badly injured but survived. Explosives and Islamic State flags were found in their car.

This month, the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion aired scant details about how Naveed Akram allegedly managed to stay off the radar in the years before the attack, despite being interviewed by counter-terrorism squads in 2019.

A Joint Counter-Terrorism Team, which included spy agency ASIO, Australian Federal Police and NSW Police, was aware that Akram was on the periphery of an IS cell clustering in Bankstown.

Authorities placed Akram on a National Known Entity Management List around that time. The NKEM has four tiers, with one being reserved for individuals under active counter-terrorism investigation.

This masthead can reveal that Akram was initially designated a tier three following the IS probe in 2019, then dropped to tier four. That choice was made after interviews and “engagements” with numerous agencies revealed no signs of radicalisation, sources close to the investigation say.

Tiers three and four are reserved for people who are known to counter-terrorism authorities, and have about 5000 people listed.

The large number means police must prioritise active surveillance to the top tiers and limit the time spent monitoring those in tiers three and four.

Akram, meanwhile, has spoken to police four times, sources told this masthead. He is being held in isolation in Goulburn Supermax, and has been recently discovered crying in his cell on various occasions.

“Get used to it,” one officer said, noting that Akram is facing a lengthy wait until trial.

Akram has yet to signal a plea to the dozens of counts of murder, attempted murder, wounding and terrorism, and more charges on the way, sources with knowledge of the case said.

Other sources said Akram is laying the groundwork to claim he was the “lackey” to his father, who had either coerced or brainwashed him into allegedly carrying out Australia’s worst modern terror attack.

Akram had links to a street preaching group in Bankstown in 2019 that had hosted other IS sympathisers. But Sajid’s path to extremism has been harder to trace.

What is known is that the war in Gaza was behind Sajid’s decision to attack Jewish Australians, a police source said. They said this was clear from the “confronting” video manifesto allegedly showing the Akrams in front of IS flags, discussing their plans.

In 2020, Sajid renewed a decade-long quest to acquire a gun licence, which was granted in 2023 despite his son’s prior associations. In October that same year, terrorist group Hamas attacked Israel, triggering retaliation in Gaza.

This masthead previously reported that IS organisers have capitalised on the Gaza war, and it probably formed much of the motive for Sajid Akram to carry out the attack on Jewish Australians.

Sources aware of the Akrams’ history say they were consuming a “mixture” of extremist elements both in Australia and from abroad.

Among them were the preachings of al-Qaeda cleric and organiser Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-Yemeni killed in 2011 in a drone strike ordered by then US president Barack Obama.

Al-Awlaki has played an outsized role in influencing English-speaking jihadists, with experts saying 88 extremists have been motivated by his preaching in Europe and the United States.

Those attacks have included the Fort Hood shooting in Texas, where 13 people were shot dead by a US Army major and psychiatrist, and the attempted downing of a plane by a bomber with plastic explosives in his underwear, both in 2009. The 2013 Boston Marathon bombers, the 2015 San Bernardino shooters and the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooter were also acolytes.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/bondi-gunman-dropped-to-bottom-tier-of-terror-watchlist-before-alleged-attack-20260604-p603yp.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62885

File: ea4a192c38d638f⋯.jpg (290.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4295b4a77f84b4b⋯.jpg (153 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24695961 (090955ZJUN26) Notable: Royal commission to investigate journalism, media companies in future hearings - The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion is preparing to examine media organisations, journalism and social media as part of upcoming hearings focused on antisemitism in public discourse. The ABC and SBS have both made submissions after being directed to retain relevant internal documents and communications. The commission is seeking evidence from journalists and is expected to complete public hearings by the end of August before delivering its final report in December. Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion argued media coverage of Israel and antisemitism should be scrutinised, while a submission from former ABC editor Elahn Zetlin raised concerns about the treatment of Jewish staff and communities. Future hearings will also examine universities, online antisemitism, security arrangements, deradicalisation programs and related government policies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38991 (pb)

>>62759

Royal commission to investigate journalism, media companies in future hearings

JAMES DOWLING - 9 June 2026

1/2

The Bondi royal commission will soon investigate traditional media companies, with both public broadcasters making submissions ahead of its next hearing block which will focus on antisemitism in news and social media.

The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission has begun sourcing submissions from reporters, The Australian understands, and it expects to conclude public sessions by the end of ­August, before giving its final report on December 14.

Both SBS and the ABC said they had made submissions to the federal inquiry after they were ­ordered by the National Archives of Australia to retain all internal documents and communications related to the royal commission’s focus areas. “SBS is engaging with the royal commission process, including with a written submission,” a spokesperson said. The ABC said it had made a submission and “will continue to engage constructively”.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel ­Aghion said royal commissioner Virginia Bell would give both commercial media and public broadcasters a look-in.

“There’s a real question of responsible journalism, and how the lack of it feeds into heated tensions in Australia,” he said. “There are news outlets that take their responsibility very seriously. There are those who claim to do so, but will still publish ­material about the Middle East or Israel that is one-sided, and which agitates or causes agitation here in Australia; and then there are those – and this is more in the area of social media – that are completely unregulated and irresponsible.”

Mr Aghion said news editors, particularly the current and former executives of the ABC, must be compelled to give evidence.

“It would be very useful for the ABC to be examined because they claim an absolute independence, but then the language and ­approach they use regarding Israel can lead to local agitation,” he said. “One very recent example of that bias is both the ABC and the SBS refusing to adopt the (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) definition of antisemitism in circumstances where the government has adopted it, the royal commission is adopting it and, furthermore, the commissioner has said that the definition itself is not problematic in any way.

“One has to ask why would the two public broadcasters funded by the government take a different political position from the government, in respect of antisemitism of all things.”

Former ABC video editor Elahn Zetlin’s submission to the royal commission, shared with The Australian, points to alleged inconsistencies in the recognition of Jewish Australians compared to other groups – both inside the national broadcaster and within its editorial output.

“The question for the commission is whether an institution’s stated values of accuracy, impartiality and contextualisation are applied consistently to all communities, including the Jewish community,” he wrote.

“Whether an Australian institution – a national public broadcaster funded by all Australians – applied its stated values consistently to its Jewish staff and to the Jewish community it was obligated to serve. The documented record suggests it did not.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62886

File: 0a0bc93f6143d46⋯.jpg (370.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 57c5a91fb336929⋯.jpg (70.93 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24695969 (091001ZJUN26) Notable: Bail decision pushed back in ISIS bride slavery case - A decision on whether former ISIS bride Zeinab Ahmad will be granted bail has been delayed until next week. Ahmad, 31, is charged with slavery offences and, alongside her mother Kawsar Abbas, faces Australia's first prosecution for crimes against humanity. Police allege a Yazidi teenager was purchased by Ahmad’s father in Syria in 2017 and held as a slave. The court heard Ahmad did not physically assault the girl but allegedly treated her badly while she remained in the family’s household. Ahmad’s uncle has offered a $75,000 surety in support of her release, while her legal team indicated she would not oppose a control order requiring electronic monitoring. The outcome of Ahmad’s application is expected to influence a separate bail bid by Abbas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62856

Bail decision pushed back in ISIS bride slavery case

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 9 June 2026

A decision to free one of the ­former ISIS brides accused of ­enslaving a Yazidi teenager in Syria is expected to be handed down next week.

Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan is expected to make a decision on Monday on whether Zeinab Ahmad will be granted bail with strict conditions.

The 31-year-old is seeking bail after she was charged with slavery offences after crossing into Syria with her family to support Islamic State in 2015.

She and her mother, Kawsar Abbas, are being tried for crimes against humanity, the first of their kind in Australian history.

Last week the court heard shocking allegations of how the young Yazidi girl was purchased by Ms Ahmad’s father, Mohammad Ahmad, for $US10,000 and allegedly used as a sex slave.

While the court heard he sexually and physically assaulted the girl multiple times, Detective Senior Constable Marc Clendenning said Ms Ahmad, then aged 22, did not “physically hurt” the teenager, but did treat her “badly”. The girl, who told The Australian in May that she ­wanted Ms Ahmad and her mother to “be punished” after learning of their arrests, was passed on to 17 different families.

Last week the court heard from Ms Ahmad’s uncle, Abraham Abbas, who offered the court a $75,000 financial surety if his niece was granted bail.

Mr Abbas swore as he aired his views on the terror organisation, telling the court he “hates those bastards”.

Members of the Joint Counter Terrorism Team told the court on Friday that Ms Ahmad could not be forced to wear an ankle monitoring bracelet as part of any bail conditions.

But defence lawyer Grace Morgan said her client would not contest any application for a control order, which can force a person to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet.

The bail application is being watched by lawyers for Ms Abbas, who will also apply for bail next Wednesday.

It is expected at least two bail hearings will be heard for Ms Abbas, who the court heard played a role in the purchase of the Yazidi slave. The decision on whether to grant Ms Ahmad bail was delayed until next week for the availability of witnesses, who will give evidence during the third and possibly final hearing on the bail application.

Police allege that during Ramadan in May 2017, the slave was taken to a residence in Mayadin, Syria, where she was inspected by the accused’s father and her mother. Mr Ahmad allegedly ordered the teenager to remove her outer garments to inspect her body, stating he was purchasing her for “sexual relations and domestic housework”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bail-decision-due-in-isis-bride-slavery-case/news-story/0e0e5929f3fb9cb30de1876e4cf152e8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62887

File: 734d5a0e8fe32e6⋯.jpg (254.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24695978 (091005ZJUN26) Notable: Tony Abbott launches nationwide tour to make Angus Taylor prime minister - Liberal Party president Tony Abbott has announced plans for a nationwide tour aimed at rebuilding support for the Coalition and promoting Opposition Leader Angus Taylor as a future prime minister. In a letter to supporters, Abbott acknowledged voter scepticism towards the Liberal Party and the growing challenge posed by One Nation, but argued the party remained the best alternative government. He pledged the federal executive would back Taylor’s leadership and support a more assertive political approach. Abbott also signalled openness to working constructively with parties seeking a change of government, endorsing preference arrangements with One Nation where appropriate. The move comes as Coalition polling remains weak and Taylor seeks to regain voter support by attacking Labor’s economic record and tax policies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62800

Tony Abbott launches nationwide tour to make Angus Taylor prime minister

ROSIE LEWIS - 9 June 2026

New Liberal president Tony Abbott is preparing to embark on a nationwide tour to try and drum up support for an ailing opposition in the face of a resurgent One Nation, conceding it’ll “take some time to persuade sceptical voters” to elect Angus Taylor.

In a letter emailed to supporters on Tuesday, the former prime minister and Liberal veteran said the new federal executive would support the Opposition Leader and his team – who are at record lows in the polls – “to continue to be bold and resolute”.

Mr Abbott also left open the possibility of working with One Nation and those who wanted to change the government, as he endorses preference deals with Pauline Hanson’s party as a strategy that “makes sense”.

“Like you, I can read the polls. While the majority of Australians now would like a change of government, there’s an unprecedented split on what’s the best alternative,” Mr Abbott writes, in reference to One Nation.

“While it’s the parliamentary party’s job to set and to implement policy, and to provide strong political leadership, you can be confident that the new federal executive will support Angus and his team to continue to be bold and resolute. We certainly won’t win the next election as slaves to focus groups and being a little bit less ‘woke’ than Labor.

“As well, you can be confident about our collective determination to work constructively with others who also want a change of government.”

Mr Abbott’s letter acknowledges Liberal members and supporters are “sceptical about the extent of the party’s change of heart or its willingness to do much about it in government”, as he lays out his plan to convince them otherwise.

“For my part, I’m keen to arrange a series of meetings around the country to give Liberal members and supporters the chance to gather, to learn from each other, and to recommit to giving our country the better government a great people deserve. I hope you might consider coming to one of these and perhaps bringing along any friends and family members equally keen to see Australia develop its full potential,” Mr Abbott writes.

“It might take some time to persuade sceptical voters of what I know to be true – namely that the Liberal Party remains the best hope of better government in our country – but I’m confident that, together, we can make Angus Taylor our 32nd prime minister for Australia’s sake.”

Mr Taylor, who is also open to preference deals with One Nation, is attempting to blame Labor’s “bad” budget for the Coalition’s declining primary vote, saying voters are angry because Anthony Albanese lied about his tax agenda.

Core support for the Coalition has dropped back to 18 per cent, where it was when Mr Taylor ousted Sussan Ley as Liberal leader in February as part of a “change or die” moment.

“(Australians) have had a gutful, they’re swinging the bat and I don’t blame them,” the Opposition Leader said.

“I’m angry, because this is a government that is letting Australians down … We have to do better as a party, and I’ve said this many times, to rebuild trust with Australians, and we have to lay out our plans every day.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/tony-abbott-launches-nationwide-tour-to-make-angus-taylor-prime-minister/news-story/443a5f015a8df449a11ae08236dce3a7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62888

File: 034576abd74f820⋯.jpg (212.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 09cf20b14583c53⋯.jpg (256.93 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24695984 (091009ZJUN26) Notable: ABC boss brushes off backlash over Tame podcast, blames disagreements for news boss exit - ABC managing director Hugh Marks has defended the broadcaster’s decision to proceed with a podcast hosted by Grace Tame despite criticism over her comments about the Israel-Hamas conflict and chants to “globalise the intifada” at a pro-Palestinian rally. Marks said the podcast itself was a worthwhile project focused on the experiences of autistic women and gender-diverse Australians, and noted Tame had been engaged before the controversy arose. He also said Tame opposed violence and encouraged audiences to judge the program on its merits. Separately, Marks confirmed that disagreements over the future direction of ABC News contributed to the departure of news director Justin Stevens. He said the differences could not be reconciled, making Stevens’ resignation inevitable.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62782

>>62789

>>62841

ABC boss brushes off backlash over Tame podcast, blames disagreements for news boss exit

THOMAS HENRY - 9 June 2026

ABC managing director Hugh Marks has blamed disagreements over the national broadcaster’s future for the departure of news boss Justin Stevens, but defended its decision to platform a podcast hosted by former Australian of the Year Grace Tame.

Speaking to Radio National on Tuesday morning, Mr Marks brushed off criticism over the broadcaster’s decision to run the activists’ four-part podcast after she dismissed the rape of Israeli women as “propaganda” and led chants to “globalise the intifada” earlier this year.

“I think if you look at the program itself, it’s a great podcast, she’s done a great job on a topic that I’m sure will be of real interest and real importance to many Australians who suffer from those conditions,” he said.

“There’s a balance in all these things, for the ABC to be ensuring that we bring great content to air and also acknowledging that, you know, with some people that we work with, sometimes there will be controversy.”

Mr Marks claimed he had spoken to Ms Tame and she ­“really abhors violence of any kind, particularly against women and children”, before encouraging listeners to tune in to her podcast, which will explore life for autistic women and gender-diverse Australians.

In February at a pro-Palestine rally in Sydney opposing Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s visit to Australia, Ms Tame led a chant to “globalise the intifada” from Gadigal to Gaza. The following month she told ABC Radio host Hamish Macdonald that reports of Israeli women raped by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, had been “debunked”.

Mr Marks said he understood the backlash to the program given the activists’ controversial comments but claimed the broadcaster had engaged her for the project before Ms Tame had made those statements.

The decision to run Ms Tame’s podcast also drew heat from within the ABC, with presenter Charlie Pickering declaring her appointment was “prob­lematic” before later walking back those comments.

Mr Marks on Tuesday said the ABC was comfortable that Pickering’s comments did not breach the broadcaster’s public comment guidelines.

The ABC boss also shed light on the circumstances around the departure of veteran news boss Justin Stevens late last month, confirming the pair could not reconcile differences over the ­future of the ABC news division.

“Justin and I were having discussions about what we both felt the future of news for the ABC was, and maybe we felt there were different directions to pursue,” he said on Tuesday.

“A lot of people, particularly in the live news area of the ABC, I think feel stretched and pressured, and that’s because we’ve added services to what we do. And more work obviously leads to more pressure. Sometimes that leads to having to spread our resources more thinly. And that’s a problem I know I’ve got to solve.”

Mr Marks confirmed the formal selection process to replace Stevens was under way before his resignation from the ABC without his knowledge, saying the latter’s exit was “inevitable”.

“We knew if we couldn’t get agreement on the way forward, that his resignation was inevitable,” he said.

“I’d been – in a formal way but also in an informal way – just meeting people as I should as the head of the ABC, making sure we’ve got the very best executive team to lead the organisation forward.”

The broadcaster last month announced Stevens would be replaced by former Reuters executive editor Simon Robinson, marking the first time in decades that the ABC tapped an external journalist for the role.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/abc-boss-brushes-off-backlash-over-tame-podcast-blames-disagreements-for-news-boss-exit/news-story/199703d1c15ccf7fda12644c62e49de4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62889

File: a2402455c2109da⋯.jpg (755.14 KB,1890x1260,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4ae65fb33ea8e26⋯.jpg (361.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c7c4aff2938908f⋯.jpg (364.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 787e8877ad64b3c⋯.jpg (519.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24695992 (091017ZJUN26) Notable: Germany, US interested in $2.4bn Ghost Bat drone - The Albanese government is increasingly confident Australia’s Ghost Bat combat drone could secure its first export customer, with Germany emerging as a leading prospect and recent testing also taking place in the United States. Defence Minister Richard Marles is expected to promote the Boeing Australia-designed aircraft during talks in Berlin, where it is being showcased at a major airshow. Developed with $2.4 billion in government funding, the autonomous drone is designed to operate alongside crewed combat aircraft and is being considered for future service with the RAAF. Germany, Japan and the US are among potential customers, while Boeing is highlighting the aircraft’s stealth capabilities and weapons integration. The government views both domestic deployment and export sales as key goals for the program.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38906 (pb)

Germany, US interested in $2.4bn Ghost Bat drone

BEN PACKHAM - June 07, 2026

The Albanese government is becoming more confident it could soon have its first international buyer for Australia’s “world-­leading” Ghost Bat combat drone, amid signs of strong interest by Germany and recent test flights in the US.

Defence Minister Richard Marles will sharpen the government’s pitch to German counterpart Boris Pistorius during talks this week in Berlin, where the Boeing Australia-designed autonomous aircraft will be on show at the city’s biennial airshow.

The meeting follows a visit to Boeing’s Melbourne headquarters last week by members of Germany’s Bundestag budget committee, which oversees all of the country’s large-scale arms purchases.

In a separate development, Boeing revealed late last month that the Ghost Bat had made its first flight outside Australia, undergoing testing at US Naval Base Ventura County, in California.

The company also released new data last week to prove to potential customers that the aircraft’s stealth technologies gave it a “decisive edge” in combat.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the Ghost Bat, developed with $2.4bn in taxpayer funding, was “years ahead of other platforms”.

“When it comes to collaborative combat aircraft, we’re not just in the game – we are ahead of the game,” he told The Australian. “This is world-leading technology, and so it’s not surprising that other nations would be interested in it.”

Mr Conroy said the government was moving towards bringing the aircraft, also known as the MQ-28, into service with the RAAF before the decade’s end.

“Our vision is for a ratio of a minimum of at least three uncrewed aerial platforms to every one crewed combat aircraft.

“But we have always also had an eye on its export potential. The fact we are investing in Ghost Bat and bringing it into service also sends a strong signal to other nations that we have confidence in our own kit. That’s important if you want to convince others that you believe in it as a capability.”

The aircraft test-fired an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile last year; a new version has since gone into production with a wider wingspan and internal weapons bay that can carry a range of ­munitions.

“We’ve demonstrated it can fire AMRAAMs, so that means it’s attractive for countries that use those as part of the US family of weapons,” Mr Conroy said.

“What we’re looking at now is expanding the type of payloads it can carry, including the European family of weapons.

“That will make it export-ready for multiple nations.”

Mr Marles will travel to Germany with Foreign Minister Penny Wong for “2+2” talks with Mr Pistorius and the country’s Foreign Minister, Johann ­Wadephul.

They will also visit Britain this week for annual AUKMIN talks with Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, where the AUKUS pact will be top of the agenda.

The trip follows the signing of a $72m contract with German defence giant Rheinmetall and Australia’s NIOA Group to produce 155mm artillery shells for the army in Queensland.

Rheinmetall has partnered with Boeing Australia to sell the Ghost Bat in Germany, making the aircraft its centrepiece exhibit at ILA Berlin 2026 – one of ­Europe’s biggest airshows.

Australia’s Chief of Air Force Stephen Chappell will be in Berlin for the event and meetings with German counterparts.

Germany has embarked on a massive rearmament amid fears over Russian aggression and concerns at US reliability as a NATO ally, with Mr Pistorius saying during a visit to Australia in March that the Ghost Bat was “under consideration” for the Luftwaffe.

The Ghost Bat’s advanced stage of development is a key selling point, but it will face stiff competition from European vendors.

Airbus has teamed up with US company Kratos to offer its XQ-58A Valkyrie, and German defence technology company Helsing is pitching the CA-1 ­Europa, which looks very similar to the Ghost Bat.

Japan is another potential customer, and will participate in flight testing of the aircraft in Australia under a bilateral agreement struck in April.

Boeing missed out on joining the first stage of the US Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft program, but did not propose the Ghost Bat as its entrant in that competition. It was one of four companies selected to take part in a US Navy CCA program, but that process is not far advanced.

A Boeing spokeswoman told The Australian: “The US remains a key market for our CCA capability. We expect there will be a range of opportunities over the next few years across all allied nations and we will focus on those where MQ-28 can add the most value. It is one of the most advanced CCA and it has been designed to be interoperable with allied aircraft.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/germany-us-interested-in-24bn-ghost-bat-drone/news-story/79f95f06ee5abf9566047284de8a28df

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62890

File: 334e64449276751⋯.jpg (5.3 MB,7197x4798,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b46a85450a3a392⋯.jpg (963.4 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24696024 (091026ZJUN26) Notable: U.S. Navy Establishes NSA Stirling in Australia - The United States Navy has formally established Naval Support Activity (NSA) Stirling in Western Australia as part of the AUKUS partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Based at HMAS Stirling near Perth, the new organisation will support Submarine Rotational Force–West, under which US and British nuclear-powered attack submarines will maintain a rotational presence in Australia. NSA Stirling will provide housing, healthcare, childcare, recreation and other services for US military personnel, civilian staff, contractors and their families assigned to the program. US Navy officials said the move would strengthen submarine readiness and support long-term AUKUS objectives. The facility was established with Australian government approval and follows confirmation by the three partners that key milestones for the submarine rotation program continue to be met.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62805

>>62816

>>62823

U.S. Navy Establishes NSA Stirling in Australia

CNFJ/CNRJ Public Affairs - 08 June 2026

PERTH, Australia – As of May 30, the U.S. Navy has established a new naval support activity in Perth, Western Australia as part of AUKUS, the enhanced trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This move follows the trilateral Joint Statement on May 30 confirming that key milestones continue to be met for Submarine Rotational Force – West (SRF-West).

Naval Support Activity (NSA) Stirling will provide support services and programs for U.S. service members, civilian personnel, contractors, and their families assigned to SRF-West, which will support the rotational presence of U.S. and U.K. nuclear-powered fast attack submarines at Australia’s HMAS Stirling base in Western Australia.

“Establishment of NSA Stirling with our AUKUS partners demonstrates our command mission to support the Fleet, warfighter, and family,” said Vice Adm. Scott Gray, Commander, Navy Installations Command. “By providing essential services to U.S. personnel and their families, NSA Stirling will enhance rotational submarine force readiness.”

Navy Region Japan was tasked in October 2024 to stand up NSA Stirling. SRF-West is established with the approval of and at the invitation of the Australian Government.

“We are currently in the early stages of establishing NSA Stirling,” said Rear Adm. Ian Johnson, commander of Navy Region Japan. “While there is still much work ahead, we are confident in our ability to accomplish this task through strong collaboration with our AUKUS partners.”

NSA Stirling will provide robust support for U.S. service members, civilians, and their families, connecting U.S. personnel to quality housing, healthcare, childcare, and recreation to ensure their well-being during their assignment.

The Department of War’s Joint Statement, AUKUS Defense Ministers' Meeting can be found here:

https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4504769/joint-statement-aukus-defense-ministers-meeting/

https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4510955/us-navy-establishes-nsa-stirling-in-australia/

https://x.com/USNavy/status/2063992049028776353

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62891

File: d0f3fa1d0bde677⋯.jpg (874.65 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24696029 (091032ZJUN26) Notable: US Navy sets up support hub at HMAS Stirling for AUKUS personnel - The United States Navy has established Naval Support Activity (NSA) Stirling at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia to support the AUKUS submarine program. The new hub will provide housing, healthcare, childcare, recreation and other services for US military personnel, civilian staff, contractors and their families involved in Submarine Rotational Force–West (SRF-West). Under the arrangement, US and British nuclear-powered submarines will begin regular deployments to HMAS Stirling from 2027, with American personnel expected to start arriving this year. The facility will also support maintenance activities and submarine operations linked to the rotational force. US officials said the hub would strengthen readiness and support the long-term implementation of AUKUS in partnership with Australia and the United Kingdom.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62805

>>62816

>>62823

>>62890

US Navy sets up support hub at HMAS Stirling for AUKUS personnel

A new US military hub has begun operations at Western Australia’s HMAS Stirling naval base ahead of the arrival of hundreds of American personnel for the start of AUKUS submarine rotations.

Andrew Greene - 9 June 2026

A new US military hub has begun operations at Western Australia’s HMAS Stirling naval base ahead of the arrival of hundreds of American personnel for the start of AUKUS submarine rotations next year.

The Naval Support Activity (NSA) Stirling was quietly established by the US Navy late last month, as part of the AUKUS security partnership with Australia and the United Kingdom.

From next year, US and British nuclear-powered submarines are scheduled to begin regular deployments to HMAS Stirling under Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-West), before Australia acquires its own Virginia-class boats in the 2030s.

“Establishment of NSA Stirling with our AUKUS partners demonstrates our command mission to support the Fleet, warfighter, and family,” US Vice Admiral Scott Gray, Commander, Navy Installations Command, said in a statement.

“By providing essential services to U.S. personnel and their families, NSA Stirling will enhance rotational submarine force readiness.”

Earlier this month Pentagon boss Pete Hegseth confirmed US Navy sailors would begin arriving at HMAS Stirling this year as part of SRF-West, which is on track to formally begin in 2027.

“Just this month I authorised the establishment of naval support activity Stirling, submarine squadron 3 and the lead maintenance activity to support SRF-West,” the US Secretary of War said.

Maintenance work will be done at HMAS Stirling, with American and UK crews — and their family members — staying at Garden Island and in the Rockingham area.

In October 2024 the US military’s Navy Region Japan was tasked with establishing NSA Stirling as part of SRF-West preparations approved by the Australian Government.

“We are currently in the early stages of establishing NSA Stirling,” said US Rear Admiral Ian Johnson, commander of Navy Region Japan.

“While there is still much work ahead, we are confident in our ability to accomplish this task through strong collaboration with our AUKUS partners.”

NSA Stirling is expected to provide “robust support” for US service members, civilians, and their families, connecting personnel with housing, healthcare, childcare, and recreation services.

https://thenightly.com.au/australia/us-navy-sets-up-support-hub-at-hmas-stirling-for-aukus-personnel-c-22404560

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62892

File: 6fab41574b4d769⋯.mp4 (11.83 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24696059 (091045ZJUN26) Notable: Quakers Hill man charged after childlike sex doll seized - (Video) A 31-year-old Quakers Hill man has been charged following a joint Australian Federal Police and Australian Border Force investigation into the alleged importation and possession of a childlike sex doll. Authorities began investigating after border officials intercepted an air cargo shipment addressed to the man in late May. A subsequent search of his western Sydney home allegedly uncovered a childlike sex doll, children’s clothing and multiple digital devices. He was charged with possessing the childlike sex doll and importing prohibited goods, and was granted bail ahead of a court appearance in Penrith Local Court on July 17. Police and border officials said the case involved material prohibited under Australian law and warned such offences carry substantial penalties. Authorities said the investigation reflected their ongoing focus on preventing child exploitation-related offences and protecting children from harm.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Quakers Hill man charged after childlike sex doll seized

A man faces a maximum of 15 years in jail if convicted after the AFP intercepted a childlike sex doll addressed to his western Sydney home, where they also seized a doll.

Joanne Vella - June 8, 2026

A western Sydney man has been arrested after a Australian Federal Police and Australian Border Force investigation uncovered alleged sex doll offences.

An investigation began in late May after ABF officers intercepted an air cargo consignment addressed to the man, which was allegedly found to contain a childlike sex doll.

On June 4, the ABF and AFP searched the 31-year-old man’s property at Quakers Hill where they seized a childlike sex doll, children’s clothing and multiple digital devices.

He was charged with possessing a childlike sex doll and importing tier 2 goods.

The man was granted bail and is due to face Penrith Local Court on July 17.

Importing childlike sex dolls is an offence under the Customs Act 1901. The maximum penalty if convicted is up to 10 years’ imprisonment and/or fines of up to $825,000.

Under the Criminal Code 1995, the possession of a childlike sex doll attracts a maximum penalty of 15 years in jail.

AFP Detective Acting Superintendent Emmanuel Tsardoulias said individuals who allegedly used childlike sex dolls were desensitised to the severity of their actions.

“Child-like sex dolls desensitise users from the physical, emotional and psychological harm inflicted on real children who are exploited, and they do not dissuade people from offending in reality,” he said.

“The AFP will pursue any form of child exploitation or activity that encourages or reinforces the sexual abuse of children, which includes using items such as these dolls, which are legally classified as child exploitation material.”

ABF Superintendent Shaun Baker said the charges demonstrated the seriousness with which the ABF treated activity that threatened children’s safety.

“The use of childlike sex dolls abhorrently normalises child exploitation and is far from a victimless crime,” he said.

“People with information about those who may be importing childlike sex dolls or other child abuse material should contact Border Watch.’’

https://www.abf.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/borderwatch

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/blacktown-advocate/quakers-hill-man-charged-after-childlike-sex-doll-seized/news-story/6f5c082ad27f941a0ac6e33b4c5983ca

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/sydney-man-charged-alleged-child-sex-doll-offences

https://qresear.ch/?q=childlike+sex+doll

https://qresear.ch/?q=sex+doll

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62893

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700152 (100953ZJUN26) Notable: Bondi gunman Naveed Akram charged with 19 additional offences - (Video) Naveed Akram, accused of carrying out the December 2025 Bondi Hanukkah festival attack, has been charged with 19 additional offences, bringing the case against him beyond the 59 charges he was already facing. The new allegations include 10 counts of shooting with intent to murder, six counts of discharging a firearm with intent to resist arrest, and three counts of causing wounding or grievous bodily harm with intent to murder. Prosecutors told a Sydney court the investigation remains extensive, involving about 230,000 CCTV images, numerous electronic devices and translated material. Akram has not yet entered a plea, with his lawyer saying the case remains in its early stages. The attack allegedly killed 15 people, while his father and co-accused gunman, Sajid Akram, was shot dead by police.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62689

>>62763

>>62884

Bondi gunman Naveed Akram charged with 19 additional offences

Jamie McKinnell - 10 June 2026

Bondi gunman Naveed Akram has been charged with 19 additional offences.

Akram was facing 59 charges after the shooting at a Jewish festival celebrating Hanukkah at Bondi Beach last December, in which 15 people were killed.

The initial charges included 15 counts of murder, 40 counts of attempted murder, and one count of committing a terrorist act.

On Wednesday, the Commonwealth prosecutor told the Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney that paperwork for 19 additional charges had been filed.

According to court records, those new charges include 10 counts of "shoot at with intent to murder", six counts of discharging a firearm with intent to resist arrest, and three counts of causing wounding or grievous bodily harm with intent to murder.

The Commonwealth prosecutor told the court there were 230,000 CCTV images in the brief of evidence and "numerous devices" from other people reportedly linked to the defendant, with material requiring translation.

She said investigators from the Joint Counter Terrorism Team (JCTT) were updating the alleged police facts.

The JCTT was progressing well through the preparation of the case, Deputy Chief Judge Michael Antrum was told.

Addressing media outside of court, Akram's defence lawyer, Leonie Gittani said Akram was aware he could face additional charges.

"He was sort of aware of it on the last occasion, but [in] a matter of this magnitude, it's not unusual for additional charges to be laid," she said.

"It's a process now that we've got to follow."

When asked about the context of the images in the evidence brief, Ms Gittani said the matter was under strict suppression orders.

"It's an unprecedented matter and so ... there's a lot to come. We've got a job to do, and that's what we intend to do," she said.

Gunman yet to enter plea

Ms Gittani said Akram was yet to enter a plea as the matter was "still in its infancy".

"There's still a fair way to go, there's still a brief to be served, there's still a lot more brief to be served," she said.

"Until that time comes, I'm not in a position to enter any pleas."

The 24-year-old's father and fellow gunman, Sajid Akram, was shot dead by police before Naveed Akram was arrested.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has been sitting in secret this month to examine the circumstances that led up to and surrounding the shooting.

The royal commission is due to report by the first anniversary of the attack.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-10/nsw-bondi-gunman-naveed-akram-new-charges/106779628

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvUr-RqN8_g

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62894

File: e17d2291f6ef6fd⋯.jpg (266.85 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700170 (101004ZJUN26) Notable: Cartoon in The Age and SMH encoded antisemitic trope, Press Council rules - The Australian Press Council has ruled that a cartoon by award-winning illustrator Cathy Wilcox, published by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, conveyed an antisemitic trope by depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “beating the drum to which the political figures march”. The council found the imagery “encodes the antisemitic trope that Jewish people secretly control or manipulate global events, governments, financial systems, or the media” and was likely to cause substantial offence and prejudice. While acknowledging cartoons often use exaggeration and absurdity, the council said “latitude is not unlimited” where racial, ethnic or religious stereotypes are reinforced. Nine Entertainment previously apologised, saying the cartoon was intended to examine the politicisation of calls for a royal commission into antisemitism. Jewish community representatives welcomed the ruling.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62687

>>62779

Cartoon in The Age and SMH ‘encoded antisemitic trope’, Press Council rules

JAMES MADDEN - 10 June 2026

1/2

A cartoon published by both The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age just three weeks after the Bondi massacre conveyed an “antisemitic trope that Jewish people secretly control or manipulate global events, governments, financial systems, or the media”, according to the Australian Press Council.

The cartoon, by award-winning illustrator Cathy Wilcox, suggested those pushing for a royal commission into rising antisemitism following the December 14 terrorist attack were indoctrinated by ­Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, News Corp chairman emeritus Rupert Murdoch, senior members of the legal profession, and various Coalition figures, the APC ruling found.

“The council notes the depiction of political figures carrying the purported grassroots movement above their heads, while Netanyahu, who is both Jewish and the Israeli Prime Minister, stands apart, beating the drum to which the political figures march,” the ruling states.

The cartoon was published on January 7, and attracted widespread criticism, with accusations that it trivialised mass murder and encouraged “Jew-hatred”.

Nine Entertainment, which owns the SMH and The Age, refused to comment on the ensuing uproar for four days following the publication of the cartoon, before both mastheads eventually ran an editorial headlined: “Wilcox cartoon was divisive – and we apologise for the hurt it has caused.”

On Wednesday, the SMH and The Age published the Press Council’s ruling on the cartoon.

“The council considers this imagery encodes the antisemitic trope that Jewish people secretly control or manipulate global events, governments, financial systems, or the media. The council considers this imagery was likely to cause or contribute to substantial offence, distress and prejudice particularly to those who are Jewish.”

The Press Council acknowledged that cartoons are “expressions of opinion that often use exaggeration and absurdity to make a point on serious issues”.

However, it found the Wilcox cartoon’s attempt to draw attention to the political motivation of some of those calling for the royal commission had fallen short of acceptable commentary, and failed to meet the Press Council’s standards of practice.

“Latitude is not unlimited, particularly where a cartoon can reinforce racial, ethnic or religious stereotypes,” the Press Council found.

One of the main complaints about the cartoon was that it implies those personally affected by the Bondi shootings, as well as the broader community, were in favour of a royal commission not out of concern with the murders, “but a willingness to be manipulated by ‘Zionists’, marching to Netanyahu’s drum”.

Notwithstanding the apology on January 11, the Nine mastheads submitted to the Press Council that the cartoon should be considered in the context of the significant public debate following the terrorist attack.

“The publications said the cartoon’s intention was to scrutinise the almost immediate politicisation of the genuine calls for a royal commission, which became a political attack against Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and to illustrate the phenomenon of ‘astroturfing’ where privately funded or politically motivated campaigns are designed to resemble organic grassroots movements,” the Press Council said in its ruling.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62895

File: c3ac85037f56a99⋯.jpg (112.62 KB,1992x1121,1992:1121,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 193a12ab3a0ff6d⋯.jpg (88.12 KB,1080x809,1080:809,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700187 (101011ZJUN26) Notable: Israeli influencer who exposed Sydney nurses may refuse to testify in person - Israeli influencer Max Ilinski, known online as Max Veifer, has indicated he may be unwilling to travel to Australia to give evidence at the trial of former Bankstown Hospital nurses Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, saying he does not know “what will happen to me there”. In a statement to Israel’s National Cyber Crime Investigation Unit, Mr Ilinski said it would be “no problem” to testify via video-link. Prosecutors have applied for that option but still plan to seek his appearance in Sydney. Ms Abu Lebdeh and Mr Nadir have pleaded not guilty to charges relating to alleged threats made during an online video conversation with Mr Ilinski. A court ruling on the admissibility of the recording is expected later this month before the August trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

>>62853

Israeli influencer who exposed Sydney nurses may refuse to testify in person

BIMINI PLESSER - 10 June 2026

The Israeli influencer who recorded two Sydney nurses allegedly threatening to “kill” Israeli patients may refuse to travel to Australia to give evidence in their upcoming trial because he’s not sure “what will happen” to him when he arrives.

Max Ilinski – known online as Max Veifer – went viral after he recorded Bankstown Hospital nurses Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir allegedly making violent threats towards Israeli patients last year.

Now that criminal charges have been laid against Ms Abu Lebdeh and Mr Nadir, prosecutors want Mr Ilinski to fly to Sydney and give evidence in person at their trial. But in a police statement seen by The Australian, the Israeli appears hesitant to travel to Australia.

Mr Ilinski was interviewed by Israel’s National Cyber Crime Investigation Unit – which operates under Lahav 433, often referred to as the “Israeli FBI” – on February 19, 2025, about a week before Ms Abu Lebdeh was arrested.

A senior officer asked him: “If you have to, would you agree to come and testify in a court in Australia?”

“Right now, I don’t know,” Mr Ilinski said.

“I don’t know what will happen to me there.”

Mr Ilinski was not completely unwilling to give evidence in the nurses’ trial. He said it would be “no problem” to testify via video-link.

At a hearing in the case last week, prosecutor Justin Hannebery KC told the court the commonwealth’s “plan” for the trial included having Mr Ilinski travel to Sydney to testify.

Mr Hannebery did, however, remind Judge Michael McHugh that the commonwealth had an active application for Mr Ilinski to be allowed to give evidence via video-link. He said that while the plan was to have the Israeli appear in court in Sydney, he would not be withdrawing that application.

The matter of Mr Ilinski’s trial attendance was shelved for the time being.

Mr Nadir and Ms Abu Lebdeh – who are out on bail – have both pleaded not guilty to using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend, while Ms Abu Lebdeh pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of threatening violence to a group.

They have been stood down from their jobs by NSW Health and issued a two-year ban from working with NDIS participants.

Their next court appearance is scheduled for June 23, when Judge McHugh will decide whether the video of their alleged threats will be allowed to be included in evidence.

In the 2½-minute video, Mr Nadir allegedly said, “You (Mr Ilinksi) have no idea how many (Israeli people) come to this hospital … I send to Jahannam”, the Arabic word for “hell”.

Ms Abu Lebdeh allegedly told Mr Ilinski he was going to “die the most disgusting death” and, when asked what would happen if an Israeli patient came into the hospital, she said: “I won’t treat them, I will kill them.”

Their trial, set to begin on August 31, is expected to run five days.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/israeli-influencer-who-exposed-sydney-nurses-may-refuse-to-testify-in-person/news-story/3432be011da879b20e283defe87366e9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62896

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700198 (101018ZJUN26) Notable: Hanson’s fundraising blitz raises over $600,000 in eight hours - (Video) One Nation says it raised more than $600,000 within eight hours of launching its “Fire the Liar” fundraising campaign, moving rapidly towards a $1 million target. Senator Pauline Hanson said supporters were responding because they wanted Labor removed from government and wanted the party to build a stronger campaign “war chest”. The fundraising drive coincides with a series of events featuring Senator Hanson, One Nation Senator Tyron Whitten, WA leader Rod Caddies and WA MP Phil Scott, as well as a Victorian fundraiser with former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed the campaign, saying he would leave Senator Hanson to “engage in negative activity”. The party’s growing support has also prompted renewed scrutiny of its fundraising methods and political alliances.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62881

>>62882

Hanson’s fundraising blitz raises over $600,000 in eight hours

James Massola - June 10, 2026

Pauline Hanson has boasted about the rapid success of a fundraising blitz, with One Nation claiming to have raised more than $600,000 in donations just eight hours after launching a “Fire the Liar” website and fundraising drive.

The veteran politician, who spent close to 30 years on the fringes of Australian politics before forcing herself into the political mainstream this year, is also criss-crossing the country to attend intimate fundraisers. Some of them are facilitated or hosted by Australia’s richest person, mining billionaire Gina Rinehart.

Those fundraisers include a sold-out event in Perth on Wednesday evening with Hanson as well as One Nation senator Tyron Whitten; the party’s WA state leader, Rod Caddies; and state MP Phil Scott “for a special Sundowner”.

“This is your chance to meet like-minded patriots, hear Senator Hanson address the Western Australian crowd, and connect with your One Nation representatives,” a blurb for the event says.

On Friday, Hanson and Barnaby Joyce will be the star attractions at “an evening for Victoria”, a cocktail party and fundraiser at the Moonee Ponds venue Casa Giorgio that promises to “bring together business leaders, community figures and supporters seeking a stronger direction for Victoria”.

The Fire the Liar website was launched by One Nation at 6.04am on Wednesday with a target of raising $1 million. By 2.30pm, the party claimed to have raised $610,528.

The website accuses the prime minister of lying to Australians about immigration, the changes made to the stage 3 tax cuts last term, the Voice to parliament, changes to negative gearing, capital gains tax and more.

In an interview on Perth radio station 6PR on Wednesday, Hanson said she was amazed by the huge response and avalanche of donations to the party after the Fire the Liar website was launched.

Since the start of the year, One Nation’s primary vote has surged past the Coalition in published opinion polls, including the Resolve Political Monitor, which reported on May 17 that support for Labor was at 29 per cent while One Nation was at 24 per cent and the LNP had a primary vote of 23 per cent.

“I think we’re all absolutely blown away by the support that’s coming in for One Nation,” Hanson said.

“It clearly tells you people aren’t against One Nation … they want the Labor Party gone ... and that’s why people are donating to the party, to give us a war chest to actually fight the Labor Party.”

Hanson promised that the money would be used wisely and would not be wasted.

In Melbourne, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was asked about One Nation’s new fundraising website.

“I’ll let Pauline Hanson engage in negative activity. What I’m doing here is actually doing something real for people, and that’s the difference. Promoting division takes the country nowhere,” he said.

Hanson’s dramatic success in recent fundraising and her party’s growing support have prompted fresh scrutiny of how the party raises funds and what it uses the money for.

Hanson’s close relationship with Rinehart appears to be at odds with her reputation as a politician who stands up for ordinary Australians who are struggling with the cost of living.

A story in The Guardian last week revealed that Hanson and Joyce had billed taxpayers more than $3000 to attend several fundraisers on board the luxury cruise ship The World, hosted by Rinehart.

In March, declarations published in the Parliamentary Expenses Authority revealed that Hanson charged taxpayers almost $9000 for a chartered flight last October to the opening of a building at a private agricultural college funded by the mining billionaire.

Rinehart was a long-time donor to the Coalition parties but has switched her financial support to One Nation.

Both Opposition Leader Angus Taylor and the Liberal Party’s newly installed president, Tony Abbott, have backed the idea of the Coalition swapping preferences at the next election in order to force Labor out of office.

At a book launch in Washington this week, Abbott said “a lack of conviction and a lack of political competence brought [the Liberals] undone”, followed by a “dreadful year” in which the Coalition broke up twice.

“In a democracy, if the people you vote for consistently let you down, you’ll end up voting for someone else. It’s a political marketplace,” Abbott said.

“If you, historically, bought Fords, but your Fords keep breaking down, sooner or later you won’t buy Fords any more. And if you’ve never liked General Motors, well, you might start buying Honda or Toyota or something, maybe even BYD – although thankfully Americans don’t let them in.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/hanson-s-fundraising-blitz-raises-half-a-million-in-eight-hours-20260610-p605ia.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d2ZgXPTzYQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62897

File: b9d8c5811963c2b⋯.jpg (2.99 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700214 (101025ZJUN26) Notable: Hanson says planned protest shows One Nation gaining support in WA - One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson says a planned protest outside a sold-out Perth fundraiser demonstrates the party is gaining support in Western Australia. Speaking ahead of the Midland event, Senator Hanson said opponents were reacting because One Nation was making “inroads” and attracting growing public backing. The protest, partly organised by the Greens, drew criticism from Senator Hanson, while WA Greens MLC Sophie McNeill described her party as a “peaceful and inclusive movement” opposing Hanson’s politics. WA Premier Roger Cook downplayed One Nation’s electoral prospects, while Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas said recent polling showing increased support for the party could not be ignored. Senator Hanson also highlighted a new candidate vetting process and said more than 1,500 people had expressed interest in standing for the party.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62881

>>62882

>>62896

Hanson says planned protest shows One Nation gaining support in WA

Michael Philipps - June 10, 2026

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson believes planned protests ahead of a sundowner to be held in Perth’s east on Wednesday evening show the party is gaining traction in Western Australia.

Hanson is due to speak at a sold-out event at the Crooked Spire in Midland, with an open agenda likely to touch on the federal budget, negative gearing, as well as migration and climate change.

The $70-per-head sundowner is already drawing controversy, with a protest planned in Midland this afternoon ahead of Hanson’s arrival. The protest is organised in part by the WA Greens.

Hanson told 6PR’s Simon Beaumont that people had a right to have their say on politics, but believed protests targeted at One Nation were often “full of aggression”.

“They’re not peaceful protesters, they’re usually full of aggression, and that’s the type that out there pushing their own agenda in Australia, and I think it’s wrong,” she said.

“But it means that One Nation is making inroads, doesn’t it? Really means that we’re hurting those ones that like the status quo and still driving the country into the ground.

“I think we’re all absolutely blown away by this support that’s coming in for One Nation.

“It clearly tells you people aren’t against One Nation, they really want One Nation, they want the Labor Party gone. That’s why people are donating to the party to give us a war chest to actually fight the Labor Party.”

WA Greens MLC Sophie McNeill said the party was a “peaceful and inclusive movement”, while Hanson had spent three decades “spewing her hate-filled, divisive brand of politics, which we are proud to oppose tonight in Midland”.

“Pauline Hanson is being funded by billionaire Gina Rinehart who wants us to turn on each other instead of asking why [Rinehart] is worth $36 billion while the rest of us are struggling to pay our rent or mortgage,” she said.

Speaking at a press conference this morning, WA Premier Roger Cook said he had no concerns about the One Nation event quickly selling out of tickets, but played down their chances at the polls.

“We welcome Pauline Hanson to Western Australia, but One Nation, they talk up a big game,” he said.

“But they’ve got nothing to offer the people of Western Australia.”

It comes after WA Opposition leader Basil Zempilas flagged earlier this week that he would be open to working with One Nation in a bid to oust the Labor government ahead of the next election.

Speaking as the guest of honour at Monday’s Leadership Matters breakfast at Crown Perth, Zempilas acknowledged One Nation’s upward surge following recent poll results showing the party had overtaken the federal government in popularity.

The opposition leader said the recent polls showed there was a level of frustration with the current state of politics within Australia.

“What you cannot deny and what you cannot ignore is that currently 30 per cent of the Australian – and likely West Australian – population are suggesting they could or would vote for One Nation,” he said.

“In our position, you have to consider everything that is in front of you, and there’s a very significant movement towards One Nation in this state and around Australia.”

However, this morning Cook said any alliance between the state Liberal Party and One Nation was purely hypothetical.

“All [One Nation is] about is combining with the Liberals to sow division and hatred in our community, and to cut services and privatise public services,” he said.

“They’re not here to bring prosperity, they’re not here to bring policies, they’re simply here to sow division and resentment, and as a result of that, division in the community.”

Speaking on 6PR, Hanson said the party had installed a strong vetting process to make sure the party had the best possible candidates for WA.

“We’ve actually got a new vetting process now, it’s extremely hardcore vetting of candidates that we’ve got standing for us now,” she said.

“So far, for the next federal election, we’ve had 1500 people who want to be candidates.

“Our next Senate candidate for WA, you’ll be highly impressed with him as well, who I will be putting up as a Senate candidate.

“I’m not just going after those academics, I want those tradies, want people out there who have a passion and want to represent their country.”

https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/hanson-says-planned-protest-shows-one-nation-gaining-support-in-wa-20260610-p605li.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62898

File: 691945abb9fcca2⋯.jpg (378.87 KB,1377x918,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700229 (101042ZJUN26) Notable: Victim-survivors tear up agreement with Catholic church, claiming hypocrisy - A Ballarat survivor group has ended agreements with the local Catholic diocese over planned permanent memorials for victims of clergy abuse, accusing the church of acting without “good faith” and continuing to fight survivors through the courts. Loud Fence and the Ballarat and District Survivors Memorial Committee said negotiations had collapsed amid concerns about the church’s response to abuse compensation claims following a 2024 High Court ruling on institutional liability. The dispute intensified after ribbons tied to St Patrick’s Cathedral gates in support of survivors were removed, with the diocese saying ribbons outside an agreed area had been “respectfully removed”. Ballarat Catholic Diocese priest Father Marcello Colasante said trust had been eroded and acknowledged the church would need to work “twice as hard” to rebuild confidence with survivors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62715

>>62725

Victim-survivors tear up agreement with Catholic church, claiming hypocrisy

Eden Hynninen - 10 June 2026

An organisation representing survivor-victims of clergy abuse has torn up agreements reached with the Catholic Diocese of Ballarat and has accused the church of hypocrisy.

Loud Fence and The Ballarat and District Survivors Memorial Committee said they had been working with the diocese towards two permanent memorials at St Patrick's Cathedral and St Alipius Old Boys School in Ballarat for victims of clergy abuse.

Victim-survivor Gary Sculley said those negotiations and agreements were now null and void.

"We've sat down and negotiated and told them with good faith, transparency, and honesty to come to a resolution on how we build permanent memorials on these sites," Mr Sculley said.

"But they [have] in turn treated us with no transparency, no good faith, and have been fighting survivors and the system through the courts, spending millions of dollars to try and defend the indefensible."

'No good faith'

Mr Sculley said concerns were heightened following the High Court decision in 2024 concerning vicarious liability, where the court determined that an institution cannot be held responsible for abuse or wrongdoing by non-employees.

Victoria and the ACT have already reversed this decision, meaning a priest, Christian brother, or a volunteer can be defined as "akin" or similar to an employee.

Both governments have approved this legislation retrospectively, allowing historical victim-survivors to set aside previous settlements and bring forward new claims.

But Mr Sculley said, despite the reversal, victims-survivors were still struggling.

"They [the church] are still persecuting victim-survivors, sitting them in the witness box for three, four days and just drilling them until they collapse and the case gets thrown out," he said.

"That's the tactics they were using.

"So we cannot, we will not, negotiate with a system that is treating survivors that way until they come to terms with what they've done wrong and accept accountability."

On Sunday, Loud Fence members gathered at Ballarat's St Patrick's Cathedral to tie ribbons on the gates to support survivors of abuse, after hundreds were taken down last week by the church.

'Living memorial for victim-survivors'

Father Marcello Colasante from the Ballarat Catholic Diocese said ribbons outside of the approved placement area were "respectfully removed".

"The understanding reached between ourselves and Loud Fence was to designate one panel of the Cathedral fence for ribbons to be tied to, should anyone wish to do so," Fr Colasante said.

"By doing this, with a focus on a single panel, the panel then becomes a living memorial for victim-survivors of sexual abuse.

"It highlights the ongoing commitment we all have to keeping all people safe, particularly the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults."

But Mr Sculley said these areas were only ever meant to be an interim solution.

Victim-survivor Livio Turkevic said each ribbon represented a victim.

"The parishioners just see them as ribbons," Mr Turkovic said.

"This system does not care about what we say, what we're going through."

"It's just attack, attack, attack, until you break."

'Trust has been eroded'

Fr Colasante said he believed conversations were continuing in relation to the erection of two permanent memorials in Ballarat.

"My understanding is with the arrival of our new bishop, Bishop Freeman, he has clearly stated at his ordination … 'to victim-survivors, your families and the communities deeply affected by the experience'," Fr Colasante said.

"[Bishop Freeman said] 'I pledge my readiness to listen, to learn and to support everything that enables healing and deep peace in your lives.'"

Fr Colasante said he empathised and sympathised with victim-survivors after the High Court decision in 2024.

"Because of that action, they have felt that trust has been eroded, so we as a church community have to work twice as hard now to regain their trust and work together towards what we need to do," he said.

"But we also need to acknowledge that this is going to take some time."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-10/loud-fence-ballarat-agreement-catholic-church-torn-up/106769814

https://qresear.ch/?q=Loud+Fence

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62899

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700236 (101052ZJUN26) Notable: Encrypted apps used by criminals to lure vulnerable teens into crime - (Video) Organised crime networks are recruiting vulnerable teenagers through encrypted messaging platforms and online gaming communities, according to child and adolescent forensic psychiatrist Dr Adam Deacon. He said youths with intellectual disabilities, low IQs and limited social connections were being “exploited”, “deceived” and “conned” into carrying out serious offences including firebombings, home invasions and kidnappings across Melbourne. The issue has been linked to incidents including the 2024 death of 19-year-old Joseph Romano during an alleged home invasion organised through the Signal app. Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police are also investigating a user known as “Iceman”, who allegedly directed teenagers to conduct arson attacks. AFP Commander Rob Nelson warned young people often did not understand “what they’re getting themselves into” when dealing with organised crime figures online.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Encrypted apps including Signal and Discord used by criminals to lure teens with intellectual disabilities into crime

Alysia Thomas-Sam and Melissa Polimeni - 10 June 2026

1/2

Organised crime syndicates are using encrypted digital platforms to recruit vulnerable teenagers with intellectual disabilities, low IQ and no criminal history, "conning" them to commit serious crimes, according to a child and adolescent forensic psychiatrist.

Those crimes include fire-bombings, home invasions and kidnappings that have been occurring across Melbourne.

Dr Adam Deacon told 7.30 that criminals are preying on minors who might be isolated or struggling with neurodevelopmental challenges, convincing them to carry out high-risk crimes for money, via encrypted platforms.

"They're exploiting them, they're deceiving them, they're conning them," Dr Deacon said.

"They're luring them into behaviour that they otherwise would not even have considered, if not for the attraction of money, some sort of level of notoriety and this sort of false sense of respect and regard.

"I think at a level they [teenagers] know what they're doing, why they're doing it. [But] I don't think they really have a level of sophistication."

Dr Deacon, who meets with over a dozen youth offenders a week, said criminal syndicates are finding and enlisting teens online.

"The children seem to be recruited through social media and applications," he said.

"Encrypted apps [such as] Telegram and Discord and Signal and the like, but also through gaming, kids playing Fortnite and Roblox and the like. There's different means," he said.

"They seem to be able to locate these kids."

He said many of the targeted teenagers had low IQs and learning disabilities, and may not consider the consequences of their actions.

"Primarily it'll be in response to their need to again have that social connection, some sense of being, belonging somewhere, and including the financial gain which is obviously an incentive for them to participate," Dr Deacon said.

'Going to end up dead'

A perpetrator who paid the ultimate price was Joseph Romano.

He was 19 when he was shot and killed after he carried out a home invasion in 2024.

His father, Francis Romano, discovered his son's criminal activity too late and offered a warning to other parents.

"Find out what your kids are up to. Don't let them do what my son was doing," he told 7.30.

Police say Joseph was armed and given instructions on Signal to break into a house in Donnybrook, in Melbourne's north, with two other men.

Inside the home was a pregnant woman and a man who police say had links to organised crime.

He fatally shot Joseph in the chest.

Prosecutors dropped charges against the man who shot Joseph on the grounds he had a good case to argue self-defence.

"I get a phone call [at] four o'clock in the morning, 'he's been shot dead'. It's the saddest news I've ever heard in my life," Mr Romano recalled.

"I don't want to see parents go through the same thing I did."

Mr Romano also has a warning to teenagers who join criminal syndicates.

"I'll tell you now, some of you young blokes, you're going to end up either dead or your friends are going to end up dead," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62900

File: 46814f121b2aedb⋯.jpg (3.76 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c275d267ce2509⋯.jpg (2.4 MB,3000x1688,375:211,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5cc9935e280339b⋯.jpg (648.81 KB,2142x3000,357:500,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f50b4bceaf90951⋯.jpg (962.64 KB,3000x2143,3000:2143,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24700245 (101107ZJUN26) Notable: Apple revamps child safety features inspired by Australia’s under-16s social media ban - Apple has announced new child safety controls for its devices, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese saying chief executive Tim Cook told him the changes were partly inspired by Australia’s under-16s social media ban. The new features will allow parents to manage the apps, websites and contacts their children can access, while messaging services will blur graphic images by default and expand existing safety protections. Apple said the tools were designed to help parents manage content, communications and screen access more easily. RMIT University information sciences professor Lisa Given welcomed the changes as a positive step but argued they placed a significant burden on parents to understand and activate the safeguards. She said Australia had helped drive global discussion about online safety and age restrictions for children.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38735 (pb)

>>38833 (pb)

>>38889 (pb)

>>38938 (pb)

Apple revamps child safety features 'inspired' by Australia's under-16s social media ban

Lewis Wiseman - 9 June 2026

Apple has announced new child safety controls that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says are inspired by Australia's under-16s social media ban.

The new controls will allow parents to manage the apps, websites and contacts their children can access on their Apple devices.

The prime minister said Apple chief executive Tim Cook called him to give him the heads up about the changes being made to the products.

"Mr Cook told me these changes are in part inspired by Australia's world-leading social media age ban, as well as the continued research Apple is undertaking into the impact of social media on kids," Mr Albanese said.

"I welcome this announcement, and I am proud of the world-leading work Australia is doing to fight for a safer online world for our children."

Lisa Given, a distinguished professor of information sciences at RMIT University, said that while the changes from Apple were a step in the right direction it was another example of tech companies passing the buck on to parents.

"I think one of the challenges with this is that type of a shift puts a lot of control into parents' hands, but that means the onus is on the parents," she said.

"Apple is saying it's on the parents to really understand different features and the apps or websites that kids would be asking to use."

She said that "Australia has definitely got the world talking about this issue" and acknowledged that the Apple changes were likely driven by the social media ban.

But she said there had been a lot of pushback from tech companies that believed a social media ban "shouldn't be met at the platform or app level, it should be managed at the device level".

Australia's social media ban, which began on December 10, stops children under 16 from creating and using accounts on several social media platforms.

In June 2024, Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the Joint Select Committee on Social Media and Australian Society had looked into options for policing phone manufacturers when it came to an under-age ban.

Ms Inman Grant has been contacted for comment on the new Apple features.

What are the changes?

The revamp to Apple's child safety offering was unveiled at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference in Cupertino, California, on Monday, local time.

It launched three main changes to its child safety features including a new child account that gives parents control over Ask to Browse, time allowances, and screen time settings.

There is also a new dedicated website for parents that adds to the existing child safety features of screen time pass-code notifications and user reporting tools.

Messaging apps will also blur graphic images by default and alert parents, expanding earlier safeguards focused on nudity.

Apple said the changes provided "a new suite of powerful, intuitive, and easy-to-use features designed to allow parents to more easily manage the content their children can see, who they can communicate with, and when they have access to apps."

"At Apple, our mission has always been to create technology that empowers people and enriches their lives, while helping keep them safe," said Sumbul Desai, Apple's vice-president of health and fitness.

"Our approach to helping families create safer digital experiences is grounded in the belief that every child is unique."

Ms Desai said the new tools would let parents "tailor their kids' digital journey" on Apple products.

Professor Given said that while the changes would let parents dictate what their children did on Apple products, it could be a lot of work.

"Apple is basically saying parents can have control as long as they've set up those child accounts," she said.

"If they don't, this could again end up giving parents a bit of a false sense of security because this is something they actually have to actively enable.

"The onus on parents here is absolutely massive and this presumption that parents are going to have the time and even the expertise to kind of go through all of these different requests ... is a lot to put on people's shoulders."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-09/apple-child-safety-features-revamped/106777228

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62901

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704096 (110959ZJUN26) Notable: Pauline Hanson draws huge Perth crowd amid fears of Liberal voter exodus - (Video) One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson attracted a large crowd to a sold-out event in Perth, with supporters filling a function venue to hear her speak on government spending, immigration and climate policy. The gathering reflected the party’s growing confidence following recent polling gains and a strong fundraising campaign. Attendees included former Liberal supporters and figures with past links to the Liberal Party, reinforcing concerns about voter movement between the parties. Senator Hanson received strong support for pledges to reduce immigration, cut spending and abolish the Department of Climate Change. She also told the audience that One Nation’s “Fire the Liar” fundraising campaign had raised almost $1.8 million within 24 hours. The event highlighted increasing pressure on the Liberals as One Nation seeks to expand its support base.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

Pauline Hanson draws huge Perth crowd amid fears of Liberal voter exodus

PAUL GARVEY - 11 June 2026

The rockstar welcome for Pauline Hanson in Perth on Wednesday night was a dream come true for One Nation and a nightmare for the Liberals.

Hundreds of people crammed into the function room at Midland’s Crooked Spire cafe in Midland, in Perth’s east, to hear from the One Nation leader and chase her for a selfie.

The mood inside the venue was more akin to what you would find at an election night victory party, and a world away from what one would typically expect at a political party function on a chilly Wednesday night years away from the next election campaign.

Particularly striking was the demographic mix: inside was a vast array of ages, ethnicities, genders and professions. This wasn’t the usual blend of idealistic student volunteers and grey-haired retirees with nothing better to do that generally constitute the crowd at a political event.

The unifying link between the wide array of backgrounds in the room was their support for the key themes being pushed by Senator Hanson.

There were roars of approval as Senator Hanson denounced Labor’s recent budget as “the worst ever” and vowed to rein in government spending and immigration. By far the biggest roar of the night was that which followed her pledge to disband the Department of Climate Change.

While Senator Hanson insisted that the party was out to defeat Labor, singling out Chris Bowen, Tony Burke, Andrew Giles, Clare O’Neil and WA ministers Madeleine King and Anne Aly as targets, it is the Liberals who arguably have more to worry about from One Nation’s rise.

Polls have shown the Liberals are bleeding support to One Nation and the crowd inside the Crooked Spire backed that up.

Bec, a young nurse at the event, told The Australian she was a disaffected Liberal supporter who had seen at least half a dozen other former Liberal members among the audience.

Lance French – a former police officer sacked for not getting the Covid vaccine who ran for the Liberals for the seat of Central Wheatbelt at last year’s WA state election – was there wearing a tie in One Nation orange and is likely to be among the more than 1500 people who Senator Hanson said had put in expressions of interest to be candidate for the party.

Michael Huston – a former chief of staff to ex WA Liberal leader David Honey, a one-time Liberal candidate for WA’s upper house and the brother of current WA Liberal MP Jonathan Huston – was also in attendance.

Even the venue itself is owned by the Liberals’ candidate for the seat of Midland, the mulleted Mike Matich, although he insisted the hosting of the event was purely a commercial transaction.

Not only do the Liberals appear to be losing members to One Nation, they are getting beaten on the fundraising front too.

Senator Hanson delightedly updated the audience on the success of the party’s latest call for donations.

After launching on Wednesday, One Nation had raised almost $1.8m within 24 hours after calling on members to support their “Fire the Liar” campaign targeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

It’s the sort of spontaneous grassroots funding injection that the WA Liberals could only dream of.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pauline-hanson-draws-huge-perth-crowd-amid-fears-of-liberal-voter-exodus/news-story/90030c7c1735c21d88f0b1b18ab9c86d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcGdjwfuSWE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62902

File: 88fddd73ea4f57a⋯.jpg (182.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e1177a75ad131a8⋯.jpg (380.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704117 (111006ZJUN26) Notable: Pauline Hanson in tears as she blames Tony Abbott for her 2003 jailing - One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson became emotional during a Perth event as she reflected on her 2003 imprisonment for electoral fraud, a conviction later overturned on appeal. Senator Hanson said the prosecution was a “political witch hunt” and blamed former prime minister Tony Abbott and former Queensland premier Peter Beattie for events that led to her jailing. She also spoke about the impact the case had on her children and revealed she had experienced domestic violence during her second marriage. Looking ahead, Senator Hanson said her daughter Lee Hanson would run for the Senate at the next election and was already working within the party. The senator said she intended to remain in politics until she was confident the “right people” were in place to continue One Nation’s future direction.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

>>62901

>>62887

Pauline Hanson in tears as she blames Tony Abbott for her 2003 jailing

PAUL GARVEY - 11 June 2026

An emotional Pauline Hanson has made it clear she has not forgotten the role she believes new Liberal Party president Tony Abbott played in sending her to jail.

Speaking at a small Swan Chamber of Commerce function in Perth’s eastern suburbs on Thursday, Senator Hanson shed tears as she spoke about the impact that her 11 weeks in jail in 2003 had on her children and revealed she had experienced domestic violence during her second marriage.

And the senator also declared that her daughter would again run for the senate at the next election as she vowed not leave politics until she had the “right people” in place to continue her legacy.

Talking about her imprisonment for electoral fraud – which was later overturned on appeal – Senator Hanson pinned responsibility at the feet of Mr Abbott and former Queensland premier Peter Beatie.

“It was a political witch hunt, because prior to my trial Peter Beattie changed the laws in Queensland from a six month jail term or a fine to seven years retrospective. That’s why the judge could (sentence) me to three years on each charge,” she said.

“That was structurally set up by Tony Abbott, who set up a slush fund to take me through the process of that legal challenge. And he got ten prominent Australians to put in $10,000 each.

“And one of them was from here in Western Australia that I’m aware of. So I don’t know who they all are, I knew who three were, and one was from here, Western Australia. A prominent businessman.”

Mr Abbott, who was recently named the Liberal Party president, this week publicly backed a preference deal with One Nation, which has leapt past the Liberals in multiple opinion polls.

Senator Hanson, who is 72, became teary when talking about the impact of her imprisonment on her children.

“It was a very hard time for my children,” Senator Hanson said.

“The kids didn’t have their fathers at that time. I was the only one that they had and so I was their whole life. And through politics, they’ve had to wear so much. But you know what they said to me the other day? They said mum, it hasn’t been easy, but you’ve taught us resilience to be independent, to stand on our own two feet, and for that we thank you.”

Senator Hanson endorsed her daughter Lee, who ran unsuccessfully as a One Nation candidate at the last Federal election, as a future One Nation senator.

“She actually is now working for the party, working for a senator, and she will stand for the Senate at the next election and I’m so proud of her. I don’t believe in jobs for the boys, and either you can cut it or you can’t. Because what I’m trying to do, what I’m trying to achieve, you need the right people around you to drive it. And that’s why I think she’s going to be a great asset,” she said.

“I wouldn’t have my sons anywhere near it, but my daughter, she’s different.”

The 72-year-old senator said she was determined to put in place the right people to continue One Nation beyond her career.

“Where’s my life going to take me? It’s building a strong team around me. It’s giving hope back to the Australian people that we can have that change, we can get our country back, fight for our rights, the right to have an opinion, the right to have a say, the right to have a decent standard of living and way of life. And that’s what my job is,” she said.

“I don’t know how long it’s going to be, but I’m not going anywhere till I know that I’m comfortable to hand on to the next one to carry on my legacy, what I’ve started, and I’m not going to give up on it.”

On Wednesday night, Ms Hanson received a rock star welcome in Perth, with hundreds of people cramming into a function room at Midland’s Crooked Spire cafe in Midland to hear from the One Nation leader.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pauline-hanson-in-tears-as-she-blames-tony-abbott-for-her-2003-jailing/news-story/e8c5879624a4cbd6cd05929efaafc144

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62903

File: 2e71cc43fa93f15⋯.jpg (158.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 796dba6a904df0a⋯.jpg (281.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2afb004eaae7744⋯.jpg (211.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704143 (111022ZJUN26) Notable: Jim Chalmers slams Angus Taylor’s privilege and Pauline Hanson’s links to Gina Rinehart - Treasurer Jim Chalmers has intensified Labor’s criticism of both the Coalition and One Nation, accusing Opposition Leader Angus Taylor of benefiting from privilege and alleging Senator Pauline Hanson takes direction from mining billionaire Gina Rinehart. In a speech to Labor members, Dr Chalmers argued economic opportunity should not be limited to those already advantaged and said Labor was focused on improving living standards. The remarks came amid debate over how the Coalition should respond to One Nation’s growing support, with Liberal MP Tony Pasin urging greater cooperation between the parties. Mr Taylor rejected suggestions the Liberals would stand aside in selected seats, saying there were “no plans to carve up seats”. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese questioned One Nation’s fundraising campaign, prompting Senator Hanson to release audit details defending its legitimacy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62887

Jim Chalmers slams Angus Taylor’s ‘privilege’ and Pauline Hanson’s links to Gina Rinehart

GREG BROWN - 11 June 2026

Labor is increasingly resorting to class-war rhetoric in its attacks on One Nation and the Coalition, as Angus Taylor rules out striking a deal with Pauline Hanson that would see the Liberals agree to go without a candidate in some seats.

Anthony Albanese has also suggested One Nation’s fundraising drive to “fire the liar” was fake, after it raised more than $2m in two days.

Senator Hanson responded by releasing an audit that “proves the site and money is ridgy didge”, declaring the Prime Minister was “lying again”.

Mr Albanese took aim at Senator Hanson for using a plane “given to her by Australia’s richest person”, arguing it showed One Nation was not interested in representing battlers. “They vote against battlers each and every time,” Mr Albanese said.

In a speech to Labor members on Thursday, Jim Chalmers also used class-war language by accusing the Opposition Leader of being “born already at the top of the ladder”, while claiming Senator Hanson took instructions from billionaire Gina Rinehart.

The Treasurer used a speech to the ALP’s national policy forum to argue prominent opponents of his budget were motivated by protecting their privilege.

Dr Chalmers said aspiration and opportunity should be the birthright of every Australian, “not the exclusive preserve of people already doing well”.

“Our opponents who say we’re pulling up the ladder don’t understand there’s not much point in a ladder with the first few rungs missing,” Dr Chalmers said, according to a copy of his speech seen by The Australian.

“Not everybody is born already at the top of the ladder like Angus Taylor was, not everybody fails upwards like he has. And unlike One Nation, we vote the way workers need us to, not the way Gina Rinehart tells us to. They irony of their position is they want to change the government in order to leave everything as it is – a truly absurd proposition.”

Dr Chalmers said the story of the contentious budget – which included broken promises on clamping down on tax concessions for investors – was too often told by the “biggest beneficiaries of these current arrangements” and accused critics of being motivated by political or commercial interests.

In The Australian on Thursday, Liberal frontbencher and confidant of Mr Taylor, Tony Pasin, called for the party to sit down with Senator Hanson to identify the seats that Liberal and One Nation candidates should run in so they are not competing with each other.

“We should work hand-in-glove to defeat Labor. We should work together to identify which seats are more appropriately targeted by a One Nation candidate or a Liberal candidate,” he said.

While Mr Taylor this week left the door open to striking a preference deal with One Nation, he rejected Mr Pasin’s push for collaboration on the running of candidates. “There’s no plan to carve up seats. We won’t be doing that,” Mr Taylor said.

Powerbroker and Liberal senator James Paterson said any talk of preference deals with One Nation was premature, despite one being floated earlier in the week by Mr Taylor and new Liberal federal president Tony ­Abbott.

“You cannot make a final decision about which candidates you’ll preference in each seat until you know who each of those candidates are,” Senator Paterson said.

“Some political parties, like One Nation, have demonstrated great difficulty in choosing appropriate candidates for public office.”

Mr Albanese said that Mr Pasin’s “extraordinary” push showed “the once mainstream Liberal Party has become just a fringe party”.

“Almost giving up two years before an election is held,” he said.

In his speech on Thursday, Dr Chalmers reflected on the rise of One Nation by declaring our “politics right now makes two ­essential and related distinctions”.

“The first is between three right-wing parties who see economic and social division and divisive politics around the world and want to replicate that here, and a Labor government determined to reject it,” he said.

“The second is between three right-wing parties who seek to whip up and benefit from all this division and dislocation, and a Labor government determined to actually address it.”

Dr Chalmers said much of the democratic world was vulnerable “because governments aren’t ­always meeting the aspirations of working people”.

“We have a responsibility here to rebuild confidence in politics and economic institutions by lifting living standards for workers in particular, and an obligation to future generations to deliver a better standard of living,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jim-chalmers-slams-angus-taylors-privilege-and-pauline-hansons-links-to-gina-rinehart/news-story/1f3fcbeec3d7f67798e3f8038e62af47

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62904

File: a49e59bcf66262d⋯.jpg (414.36 KB,3800x3042,1900:1521,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704160 (111031ZJUN26) Notable: AUKUS among Australia’s worst foreign policy decisions, Gareth Evans says - Former foreign affairs minister Gareth Evans has told an independent inquiry that AUKUS could become one of Australia’s worst defence and foreign policy decisions, arguing the planned transfer of US and UK nuclear-powered submarines faces major strategic, industrial and financial uncertainties. Mr Evans said it was a “ludicrous delusion” to believe the United States would sacrifice its own cities to defend Australia and warned the submarines would effectively operate as an extension of US military capability. Associate Professor Tilman Ruff also criticised the pact, arguing it could increase regional tensions and raise concerns about nuclear waste and weapons-grade uranium. Foreign Minister Penny Wong defended AUKUS, acknowledging the project’s challenges but saying the capability was essential to protecting Australian sovereignty and national interests in a more contested world.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Aukus is among Australia’s worst foreign policy decisions and requires ‘heroic’ optimism, Gareth Evans says

Former Labor foreign affairs minister says belief US would defend Australia in event of an existential attack is a ‘ludicrous delusion’

Tom McIlroy and Ben Doherty - 11 Jun 2026

1/2

Aukus will prove to be one of the worst defence and foreign policy decisions ever made by an Australian government and is only being permitted by Donald Trump in order to destroy Chinese nuclear threats to the US mainland, former foreign affairs minister Gareth Evans has said.

In evidence to an independent public inquiry into the $368bn nuclear agreement with the US and UK on Thursday, Evans, a cabinet minister in the Hawke and Keating governments, warned the transfer and construction of submarines to Australia from the early 2030s was effectively only an extension of the American military fleet.

He said a future US administration would not come to Australia’s aid in the event of an “existential attack” and would only assist in a military conflict if its own assets on Australian soil were threatened.

“The notion that extended nuclear deterrence justifies our prostration – that the US really would be prepared to sacrifice San Francisco for Sydney, let alone Miami for Melbourne – is, and always has been, a ludicrous delusion,” Evans told the inquiry.

Foreign affairs minister from 1988 to 1996, Evans told the committee hearing in Melbourne the delivery of three Virginia-class submarines from the US starting in 2032 was unlikely, because of construction delays and existing shortages in the US fleet. And he argued the complexity and timeline of the second phase of Aukus – the UK-designed, Australian-built Aukus class submarines - required even more “heroic levels of optimism” than was needed for the American vessels.

“Every report coming out of the UK indicates that its defence-industrial base is presently under extraordinary stress, with submarine building schedules tightening and costs increasing, and with every prospect of further deterioration, notwithstanding Australia’s commitment to spending $4.5bn over 10 years to help boost production rates.”

Evans said the government’s expected price tag for the deal was “wholly speculative” and argued the US would view the submarines primarily as supplementary assets, effectively embedded into US military command, for the task of finding, tracking, attacking and destroying Chinese submarines seen as posing a risk to the US mainland.

Associate Professor Tilman Ruff, co-founder of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, told the inquiry Aukus would exacerbate regional tensions, and, in the event of conflict, make Australia “a higher priority target, including for nuclear attack”.

He said the use of “weapons-grade, highly-enriched uranium” to power the Aukus submarines undermined global non-proliferation efforts, and said Australia had no solution for how it would deal with hundreds of kilograms of high level radioactive waste.

“It’s a very significant issue, because no country has resolved this huge problem, of how to manage this material. And there’s no guarantee, given the timeframes involved, and the hazards of the material over geological time, that any arrangement we come up could absolutely reliably isolate that material over hundreds of thousands or millions of years.

“The additional complication here is that it needs a really high level of security because in 10,000 years somebody could go and dig that stuff up and build nuclear weapons with it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62905

File: aee1cf647d0db93⋯.jpg (2.5 MB,5941x3961,5941:3961,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 22c292f77b20244⋯.jpg (566.43 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704185 (111039ZJUN26) Notable: AUKUS no ‘academic exercise’ despite new UK submarine setbacks - Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles have defended AUKUS amid renewed concerns about delays and capability problems within Britain’s submarine fleet. The criticism follows reports that none of the Royal Navy’s five Astute-class attack submarines is currently deployed at sea and ongoing delays in Britain’s submarine construction program. Senator Wong said AUKUS was “not an academic exercise” but a capability essential to protecting Australian sovereignty in a more contested strategic environment. Mr Marles argued the project remained on track, citing progress in infrastructure, workforce training and industrial development in Australia and the United States. UK Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed construction of the first AUKUS-class submarine would begin next year, while acknowledging significant challenges inherited within Britain’s defence sector.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62833

AUKUS no ‘academic exercise’ despite new UK submarine setbacks

Andrew Tillett - Jun 11, 2026

London | Senior ministers strongly pushed back on growing concerns Britain will struggle to keep up its end of the AUKUS bargain, brushing off embarrassing revelations that the Royal Navy is unable to send any of its five nuclear-powered attack submarines to sea.

Meeting their British counterparts in London on Wednesday (Thursday AEST), Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles expressed some exasperation over the ongoing criticism and debate over AUKUS, saying the $366 billion acquisition was not an “academic exercise”.

And in the latest move to reduce reliance on China’s stockpile of critical minerals, the Australian and British militaries have struck a deal to work together to secure supplies of rare earths and other raw materials crucial for building modern weapons.

The annual AUKMIN dialogue between foreign and defence ministers was held against the backdrop of fresh global turmoil, with the ceasefire between the US and Iran nearing collapse, the war between Russia and Ukraine dragging on, uncertainty over ties with a Donald Trump-led US, demands for higher defence spending and China’s growing military assertiveness around Taiwan and the South China Sea.

But much of the focus on AUKMIN centred on the AUKUS trilateral agreement, which also includes the United States. The pact aims to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines from the early 2030s.

While the US will sell Australia second-hand submarines as an interim step, Britain’s major contribution to AUKUS is designing the boat that will be used long term by both the Australian Navy and Britain’s Royal Navy from the 2040s. Australia’s submarines will use a UK-built nuclear reactor, which will be welded into hulls built locally in Adelaide.

However, Britain’s existing submarines under construction are running years behind and billions over budget.

In a further blow to the country’s credibility as a partner, on the weekend Britain’s Daily Mail revealed that none of the UK’s five existing Astute-class submarines is at sea as they undergo maintenance and repairs.

The AUKUS plan calls for Britain to deploy one of its Astute-class submarines to Perth’s HMAS Stirling naval base to help train Australian crews and technicians to operate and maintain a nuclear-powered submarine.

Opposition to AUKUS is ratcheting up, with former prime ministers Malcolm Turnbull and Paul Keating, a suite of former military officers, think-tanks and non-government politicians among the most vocal critics.

The deal is also unpopular with Labor’s rank-and-file, with backbench MP Ed Husic last week seizing on the revelation that Australia will not get new submarines from the US, breaking ranks to call for a rethink because of the “transactional” nature of the Trump administration.

A crowdfunded “inquiry”, headed by Wong’s and Marles’ former ministerial colleague and Midnight Oil singer Peter Garrett, is set to provide a high-profile platform for attacks on the deal.

Tackling the criticism head-on, Wong said at the joint press conference that while AUKUS was ambitious and challenging, it was also “critical for ensuring our sovereignty”.

“So this is not an academic exercise or theoretical procurement exercise,” Wong said. “It is the response to a central question, which is how do we secure capability in Australia that is critical to ensuring our sovereignty.”

Despite the woes afflicting Britain’s submarine program, Marles said he remained confident AUKUS would be delivered because key milestones had already been met.

These included the construction of facilities at Perth’s navy base and Adelaide’s shipyard to support nuclear submarine operations, and the deployment of 200 submariners on American submarines and 200 workers in Pearl Harbour learning how to maintain submarines. He said 1000 people in Australia were now working on AUKUS

“It’s actually our track record that we establish on the ground which is going to answer that question in history, and we’re answering it,” Marles said.

UK Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed the first steel for Britain’s first AUKUS-class submarine would be cut next year, another milestone. He said the Labour government had inherited a defence force that was hollowed out and unfunded, but had tried to arrest that with a £6 billion injection into submarine construction.

“With submarines, it is a personal priority for me,” Healey said.

https://www.afr.com/world/europe/aukus-no-academic-exercise-despite-new-uk-submarine-setbacks-20260610-p605oo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62906

File: a4b86c9a889efbb⋯.jpg (394.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf6f07daf190c7f⋯.jpg (334.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704200 (111045ZJUN26) Notable: First steel for AUKUS subs to be cut in UK next year - Britain will begin cutting steel next year for the first AUKUS-class submarine, with UK Defence Secretary John Healey describing the project as a personal priority and a central element of defence cooperation between Britain and Australia. The announcement came during AUKMIN talks in London, where Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained “very confident” Australia would receive Virginia-class submarines from the United States in the 2030s and that supporting facilities in Western Australia were being built “at pace”. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said AUKUS was “not an academic exercise” but a capability critical to Australian sovereignty. The ministers also announced deeper cooperation on critical minerals, maritime security and advanced radar technology, while expressing concern about security and human rights issues involving China, Russia and Hong Kong.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62833

>>62905

First steel for AUKUS subs to be cut in UK next year

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 8 June 2026

The first steel for the AUKUS submarine design being built in Barrow-in-Furness in England will be cut next year, British Defence Secretary John Healey has revealed, as Australian and British ministers launched a robust defence of the multibillion-dollar AUKUS program in London on Wednesday.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said he was “very confident” the US Virginia-class submarines would be transferred to Australia in the 2030s as planned and that facilities in Stirling, Western Australia were being built “at pace” as part of the triumvirate AUKUS pact between the US, UK and Australia. He stressed that the AUKUS planning was being put into action and that more than 1000 employees were working on the program.

Mr Healey said the AUKUS submarines “was a personal priority for me, as well as for the new First Sea Lord’’ to raise levels of infrastructure and development and to improve maintenance as part of a “speeded up” productivity drive in relation to AUKUS. He confirmed the steel for the first AUKUS submarine would begin to be cut next year in Sheffield.

“You will see the first steel cut for SSN AUKUS that will become the joint submarine force, nothing is more profound, nothing is more important between us as ministers, than that as a conversation,’’ Mr Healey said.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said while AUKUS was “ambitious and challenging … it’s not an academic exercise or a theoretical plan”, stressing it was critical for the country’s sovereignty.

The AUKMIN meeting – the gathering of the two countries’ defence and foreign secretaries – also saw the two countries collaborate on critical minerals for each country’s military and Australia successfully negotiating opportunities of Canberra company CEA Technologies to provide advanced radar technologies to Britain.

The Active Electronically Scanned Array radar is capable of detecting aircraft and missile threats at greater ranges and with increased accuracy, allowing for greater warning, decision and response time.

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said Britain was committed to an Indo-Pacific region “that is open, stable and free from coercion”. She said the two countries discussed how the straightforwardness of the chokehold on the global economy is affecting the UK and Australian economies and the Arctic side of the world.

Senator Wong said Britain has agreed to mobilise investment into Southeast Asia.

“The region is on track to be the fourth-largest economy by 2040,’’ she said.

“We’re bolstering economic resilience by working together more closely on critical minerals, and we welcome the United Kingdom’s support for common resilience in the Pacific. We are both committed to new funding to strengthen maritime security across Southeast Asia.”

In a joint statement released after the press conference, the ministers noted the increasing scale and severity of hostile activity by states, their proxies and non-state actors.

“This includes cyber activities undertaken by China-based information security companies, and recent attempts by Russia to interfere in democratic elections through its proxy organisations, the Social Design Agency and ANO Dialog,’’ the statement said, detailing deepening co-operation to counter the spectrum of hybrid threats.

Ministers reiterated strong opposition to activities that raise tensions and risk miscalculation and escalation in the South China Sea, and have agreed to continue co-operating to uphold navigational rights and freedoms in the region, including through participation in joint activities.

Another serious concern was the human rights violations in China, including the persecution and arbitrary detention of Uighurs and Tibetans and the erosion of religious, cultural, education and linguistic rights and freedoms.

Ministers shared grave concerns about the ongoing systemic erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy and democratic processes, and the rights and freedoms of individuals, such as the prosecution of British national Jimmy Lai and Australian citizen Gordon Ng.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/first-steel-for-aukus-subs-to-be-cut-in-uk-next-year/news-story/71a9d3f1215f516cc13923fc38a1d1da

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62907

File: d431b6739ada4af⋯.jpg (589.09 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 87a0aecb5d54314⋯.jpg (799.22 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704209 (111052ZJUN26) Notable: Modi wants Australia’s uranium to power India’s data centre boom - Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to use a visit to Australia next month to seek expanded uranium imports and stronger defence cooperation as India accelerates plans to expand nuclear power generation. The push is being driven in part by growing electricity demand from artificial intelligence and data centres. India and Australia agreed to uranium exports in 2014, but shipments have remained limited. Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar recently said New Delhi was looking to expand uranium supplies as its nuclear sector grows. Discussions are also expected to focus on defence ties, trade and Indo-Pacific cooperation. Minerals Council of Australia chief executive Tania Constable said Australia’s large uranium reserves positioned it to support India’s expanding nuclear energy program, while some analysts expect progress on defence access and logistics arrangements.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62760

>>62774

Modi wants Australia’s uranium to power India’s data centre boom

Matthew Knott - June 10, 2026

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is hoping to use a visit to Melbourne and Sydney next month to unlock a flood of uranium imports and boost defence ties with Australia in a move that will be closely watched by China.

Australia and India struck a historic deal to allow uranium exports in 2014, but there have been only negligible shipments in the following 12 years.

India is planning a major expansion of nuclear power driven by the surging demand for new data centres used for artificial intelligence.

Modi, one of the world’s most important political leaders, is expected to visit Australia in the second week of July, including meetings with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Sydney and a stadium rally for members of the Indian diaspora in Melbourne.

He will also visit Indonesia and New Zealand during the trip.

Albanese hailed Modi as “the boss” during a packed rally of 20,000 people at Sydney Olympic Park during his most recent visit in 2023, sparking debate about whether Albanese was ignoring human rights violations occurring under Modi’s watch.

On Albanese’s trip to India in March 2023, he was ferried around a stadium in Ahmedabad in a chariot decorated with golden cricket bats.

Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said during a meeting with Foreign Minister Penny Wong last month: “On the energy side, we have energy trade, we are looking to expand that as well into the uranium supplies.

“Our own nuclear sector has undergone reform, which will grow nuclear energy.”

The Organiser, an Indian publication with close ties to Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist government, reported this week that “expectations are high for progress on uranium supplies for India’s civilian nuclear energy program under safeguards” during the visit.

Australia’s high commissioner to India, Philip Green, told Indian outlet World is One News last week that the countries were also “shooting towards a new and higher level joint declaration” on defence, noting the countries had not signed a defence agreement since 2009.

India, Australia, Japan and the United States are members of the Quad grouping, a partnership of democracies that works to provide a counterpoint to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Labor changed its policy platform in 2011 to allow uranium exports to India, removing a longstanding ban that had been in place because India is not part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Australia made its first shipment of uranium to India in 2017, but the trade has not taken off since that small and largely symbolic delivery.

The state-owned Nuclear Power Corporation Of India recently said the country planned to add 18 more nuclear reactors to its energy mix by 2032, almost tripling the nation’s nuclear power capacity.

India is the world’s most populous nation, with 1.47 billion people. Major tech companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon are pumping billions of dollars into the Indian data centre market.

Minerals Council of Australia chief executive Tania Constable said bans on uranium mining in NSW, Queensland and Western Australia would hold back export opportunities to nations such as India.

“Australia has the world’s largest uranium resources yet ranks only fourth in global production, and the opportunity to supply a potentially immense Indian nuclear generation program with Australian uranium exported under strict safeguards will add further impetus to overturn outdated and ideologically driven bans on uranium mining,” Constable said.

“Australia should be given every opportunity to cement our already strong minerals trade with India in coal and gold by backing our uranium miners to help deliver reliable zero emissions energy.”

Ian Hall, an expert on Indian politics at Griffith University, said expanded access to each other’s airbases and naval ports would be the best practical way to drive forward the defence relationship.

“A little bit of energy has come out of the bilateral relationship recently because both nations have been distracted by other things,” Hall said.

Albanese and Modi will also seek to make progress on a free trade agreement, but it is famously difficult for overseas farmers to gain access to India’s market given the power of its agricultural sector.

Human Rights Watch’s latest report on India said the country’s “slide to authoritarianism under the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government continued [in 2025], with increased vilification of Muslims and government critics”.

Modi’s BJP lost 63 seats in India’s 2024 elections, forcing him into minority government.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/modi-wants-australia-s-uranium-to-power-india-s-data-centre-boom-20260610-p605iw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62908

File: b2c8c468e980e8f⋯.jpg (120.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5b2ce4719e40b97⋯.jpg (123.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44142c04688e35f⋯.jpg (120.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 88b2730e05718c4⋯.jpg (112.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704223 (111059ZJUN26) Notable: ‘A bit messy’: jury still out on child social media ban - Six months after Australia’s under-16 social media ban took effect, there is little evidence yet of a decline in cyberbullying or image-based abuse reports among young people. Youth support organisations say the impact has been mixed, with some teenagers losing access to social media accounts while others appear largely unaffected. Kids Helpline virtual services manager Tony FitzGerald said the experience had been “a bit messy” and noted that many young people had shifted to messaging platforms not covered by the ban, where online harm can still occur. While some parents support the restrictions, others remain sceptical about their effectiveness. Advocates are calling for a broader approach that includes education, stronger regulation and greater responsibility from technology companies, alongside age-based access restrictions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62900

‘A bit messy’: jury still out on child social media ban

Allanah Sciberras - June 10 2026

There is little sign of a dip in cyberbullying or image-based abuse in the six months since teenagers under 16 have been banned from social media.

But, even without a clear fall in reports of online harm, the early results are not necessarily discouraging, experts say, as the nation remains at the front of efforts to restrict under-16 access to social media.

The world-first ban, which stipulates users must be 16 or older to create or hold social media accounts, made international headlines in December.

Call patterns remained largely unchanged since the ban was introduced, a helplines operator said.

Non-profit yourtown operates Kids Helpline and virtual services manager Tony FitzGerald told AAP it was too early to gauge any real difference.

“From speaking to young people, particularly in that 13-16 age group the experience for them has been very inconsistent,” he said.

“Some of them have had social media cut-off, whereas (some) have not had any impact in terms of their access to those platforms.

“It’s been a bit messy for that group.”

Despite this, young people are moving to other platforms such as WhatsApp to interact, which aren’t subject to the social media ban.

“We’ve seen young people come to us who would say they’re being cyberbullied on messaging apps,” Mr FitzGerald said.

“There’s a whole range of other platforms that are out there that are not subject to the social media minimum age restrictions that young people still are interacting on and they’re still experiencing harm.”

There had been no discernible drop in reports of online harm such as cyberbullying and image-based abuse from under-16s, according to the latest report from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant in March.

Nevertheless, mother of teenage children Bianca Quetti supports the ban.

“My kids were 16 already when it came in … I’m not sure what other parents are thinking, but I would presume most would like it,” she said.

“I mean, there’s probably a way around it, I’m sure they’ve all got a way around it.

“I think it’s not a bad thing.”

Her 16-year-old daughter Taylah narrowly avoided the ban and said there was a lot on the internet she didn’t think young people should be seeing.

But she said not much had changed with the social media accounts of people at her school who should have been impacted by the ban.

“I don’t know if it’s really working that much … most of their accounts didn’t even get banned, so they’re still allowed on there,” she told AAP.

Ellie Johnston, who has a teenage grandson, was sceptical of the ban.

“We just want our kids to be safe, right? And when they go online, they’re not safe because of predators.

“They’re throwing money into something that’s not going to work”.

She said parents had a key role to play.

“Parents are always on their phone … if you want to be a role model, put your phone away properly. Because it’s monkey see, monkey do.”

Advocates are calling for more education for young people on how to navigate the online environment so that, by age 16, they are better prepared and less exposed to harm.

Mr FitzGerald believes there must be a multi-pronged approach that includes tech companies taking responsibility and stronger regulation of their activity in this space.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said one of the key reasons for the social media ban was due to the harm it placed on the health of young people.

“Today is six months since the social media ban came into effect … and it was having a deleterious impact on their mental health and on a range of issues,” he told ABC Radio Melbourne on Wednesday.

Lifeline 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)

https://kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9289993/a-bit-messy-jury-still-out-on-child-social-media-ban/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62909

File: ce1178e65556fb1⋯.jpg (245.14 KB,1440x960,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8be389adb8710bf⋯.jpg (212.54 KB,1440x915,96:61,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0853595184d1ad6⋯.jpg (190.22 KB,1440x960,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d59c8ae82da150⋯.jpg (299.36 KB,1440x960,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f5c81df8670d281⋯.jpg (196.93 KB,1440x930,48:31,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704243 (111108ZJUN26) Notable: Canada seeks to ban social media accounts for children under 16, joining growing global effort - Canada has introduced legislation that could prevent children under 16 from holding social media accounts unless companies can demonstrate their platforms are safe for young users. The proposal would require platforms to meet safety standards or obtain exemptions from a new Digital Safety Commission of Canada, which would oversee compliance and age-verification measures. The legislation targets several categories of harmful content, including material promoting self-harm, violence, hatred and non-consensual intimate images. It would also impose new responsibilities on developers of artificial intelligence chatbots. Canadian officials said they would examine lessons from Australia’s under-16 social media ban, under which authorities say about 4.7 million accounts belonging to children have been removed. The proposal forms part of a broader international push to strengthen online protections for minors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62830

>>62900

>>62908

Canada seeks to ban social media accounts for children under 16, joining growing global effort

ROB GILLIES - June 11, 2026

TORONTO (AP) - Canada introduced legislation on Wednesday that could bar children younger than 16 from having social media accounts unless the companies show they can make their platforms safe.

Canada is joining a growing global effort to tighten safety protections. Canadian government officials said social media platforms can obtain an exemption if they have put in place sufficient safeguards.

“We are failing our children. Enough is enough,” Marc Miller, Canada’s culture minister, said. “We need basic protection in place.”

The legislation covers seven types of harmful content including content that induces children to harm themselves, content that incites violence and foments hatred and non-consensual intimate images.

A new regulator, the Digital Safety Commission of Canada, will be created. Criteria for what exemptions would look like will be announced at a later date. Miller said setting up the regulator could take up to 18 months.

Miller said platforms will need to prove they are safe. Age verification will also be established.

Countries including Australia, Brazil and Indonesia have introduced or announced age-based restrictions or requirements for children’s access to social media. Others including Britain, France, Spain, Denmark, Thailand and South Korea are studying or developing similar approaches.

Platforms in Canada that offer adult content would not be able to obtain an exemption.

The legislation would also regulate the companies behind artificial intelligence chatbots by imposing on them a duty to act responsibly through measures such as crisis intervention protocols.

In Australia, social media companies have revoked access to about 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to children since the country banned use of the platforms by those under 16, officials said. The law provoked intense debate in Australia about technology use, privacy, child safety and mental health and has prompted other countries to consider similar measures.

A Canadian government official, in a briefing with journalists, said authorities will try to learn lessons from Australia.

Lianna McDonald, Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, applauded the move, noting sextortion on social media is up dramatically.

https://apnews.com/article/canada-social-media-ban-16-kids-292444c9dd8773aeb4119aaa9eae5990

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62910

File: e4a62e69f7fff77⋯.jpg (83.87 KB,1590x894,265:149,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6b8c30fba0ec2b6⋯.jpg (159.38 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0c38b89b24563df⋯.jpg (353.03 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704260 (111122ZJUN26) Notable: Court to decide fate of mystery parties fighting to block IBAC corruption report - Victoria’s Court of Appeal is set to decide whether two unidentified parties challenging the release of an anti-corruption report can continue to conceal their identities. Known only as XY and Z, the applicants are seeking to block publication of IBAC’s Operation Richmond report, which examines the 2016 dispute involving the Country Fire Authority, the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union. Their lawyers argued revealing their identities would unfairly encourage speculation that they were the subject of adverse findings, causing reputational harm before the legal challenge is resolved. Media organisations argued there was a strong public interest in knowing who was attempting to prevent release of the report. The report’s publication remains suspended while the broader legal proceedings continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

>>62739

>>62747

Court to decide fate of mystery parties fighting to block IBAC corruption report

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and DAMON JOHNSTON - 11 June 2026

A decision on revealing the identities of two mystery parties who are desperately trying to block the publication of a Victorian corruption probe will be handed down on Friday.

The two unidentified applicants, known only as XY and Z, are attempting to block the publication of IBAC’s Operation Richmond report, which concerns the 2016 conflict involving the Country Fire Authority, the Andrews government and the United Firefighters Union.

The Court of Appeal on Thursday heard arguments as to whether the applicants should continue to be shielded by pseudonym orders while they pursue their challenge against the report’s release.

Chief Justice Richard Niall said most of the proceedings could be conducted in open court, despite submissions from the applicants that aspects of the case would require closed hearings because they involved confidential material contained in the yet-to-be-released report.

Barrister Paul Holdenson KC, appearing for the applicants, argued identifying his clients would unfairly fuel speculation they were the subject of adverse findings in the report and cause irreparable reputational damage.

“There has been speculation about who might have commenced these proceedings,” he told the court. “The applicant(s) has to wear the speculation that they commenced the proceeding because they wanted to prevent the public from knowing adverse findings.”

He argued naming the applicants would encourage public inference that they were seeking to suppress damaging findings, creating prejudice that could not be undone, or put back in the “genie bottle” even if they ultimately ­succeeded in their challenge.

Media lawyer Justin Quill, acting on behalf of The Australian, told the court the public had a strong interest in knowing who was attempting to prevent parliament from receiving the watchdog’s findings. “The public interest is as high as it can be,” he said.

“The public should know the identity of parties seeking to stop IBAC from releasing these documents. If it is the case that there is no finding of wrongdoing, there’s nothing stopping Mr Holdenson’s client saying the court found this report was unlawful.”

Chief Justice Niall said the matter was urgent and had significant public interest, before ­reserving judgment until Friday morning.

The interim pseudonym orders protecting XY and Z will remain in place until the court hands down its decision.

The report into Operation Richmond had been due to be ­tabled in parliament, but its release was halted by a late legal challenge in May. The findings will remain confidential until the Supreme Court resolves proceedings between IBAC and the two applicants seeking to block publication, a process that could stretch on for months or even years.

The court last month refused the application for permanent pseudonym orders. However, after the applicants indicated they would appeal, they were granted interim anonymity and are now known as XY and Z.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/court-to-decide-fate-of-mystery-parties-fighting-to-block-ibac-corruption-report/news-story/1a46361b3b9b171be248888746c9c25e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62911

File: 4cd7ad4950ec124⋯.jpg (2.73 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 87ae35a05f4ebae⋯.jpg (330.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704291 (111133ZJUN26) Notable: Brittany Higgins makes return to Australian politics in advocacy role - Brittany Higgins is returning to public advocacy as chief executive of the Vida Fund, a progressive fundraising organisation that supports gender equity initiatives and helped back teal independent candidates at the 2025 federal election. Ms Higgins said the group would campaign against what she described as rising misogyny and extremism, including the growing support for One Nation and the “new right”. The organisation plans to support future federal and state election campaigns focused on women’s representation and equality. The appointment is Ms Higgins’ first major public role since leaving politics after alleging she was raped by former colleague Bruce Lehrmann in Parliament House. The allegation became the subject of extensive legal proceedings and public debate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

Brittany Higgins makes return to Australian politics in advocacy role

THOMAS HENRY - 11 June 2026

Brittany Higgins is set to make her return to Australian politics as the boss of a progressive advocacy group looking to take on Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.

The former Liberal staffer is set to head up the Vida Fund, a fundraising body which bankrolled teal independent candidates at the last election and was established to promote gender equity reforms.

Ms Higgins’ appointment marks the first major role since she left politics and rose to national prominence after alleging she was raped by her then-colleague Bruce Lehrmann in Parliament House in 2021.

The fund’s campaign against surging support for the ”new right” aims to take on what Ms Higgins deems to be a wave of misogyny and extremism in Australia.

“One Nation and the new right are trying to mainstream misogyny on a scale Australians have never seen before,” Ms Higgins told The Sydney Morning Herald.

“With Barnaby Joyce championing this US-style war on reproductive rights, it has never been more important to get organised and take action.”

The Vida Fund at the 2025 election bankrolled a number of federal teal independent candidates and is looking to run another campaign ahead of the 2028 federal election, as well as a number of key state campaigns.

“Vida Fund was created to ensure progress for women is not treated as temporary, symbolic or optional — because women’s safety, representation and equality are fundamental democratic issues,” the group’s website reads.

Despite an exclusive Newspoll for the Australian showing support for One Nation surging ahead of Labor for the first time in the poll’s history, Ms Higgins claimed the party had a weakness on women’s issues.

“We recently saw One Nation panic when the Sean Black scandal hit the headlines. That tells us they know their atrocious track record on gendered violence is a liability,” she said.

Senator Hanson’s party faced significant scrutiny over its handling of the dismissal of former staffer Sean Black, who was convicted for rape in 2018.

In a defamation case brought by Mr Lehrmann against the Ten Network and Lisa Wilkinson, Federal Court judge Michael Lee found that, on the balance of probabilities, Ms Higgins was raped by Mr Lehrmann.

In the same case Justice Lee rejected claims that former minister Linda Reynolds and chief of staff Fiona Brown had participated in a cover-up, which led to a successful defamation suit brought by Ms Reynolds over the claims of a cover-up.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/higgins-makes-return-to-australian-politics-in-advocacy-role/news-story/e2fc5a09e4517cafa857952402abde95

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/brittany-higgins-returns-to-frontline-politics-to-fight-rising-tide-of-misogyny-20260610-p605jj.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Brittany+Higgins

https://qresear.ch/?q=Bruce+Lehrmann

https://qresear.ch/?q=Linda+Reynolds

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62912

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704374 (111204ZJUN26) Notable: Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026: Partner nations rehearse for war - (Video) More than 3,000 military personnel from Australia, the United States, Japan, Papua New Guinea and South Korea are participating in Exercise Southern Jackaroo in North Queensland, the Australian Army’s largest domestic multinational exercise of 2026. Running from late May to early July, the exercise is designed to test readiness, interoperability and combined military capability in realistic conditions. Commander 1st Division Major General Ash Collingburn described the activity as “a rehearsal for war” and a test of readiness, resilience and trust between partner forces. Participating commanders highlighted the benefits of training in Australia’s expansive environment, including live-fire exercises and uncrewed aerial vehicle operations. The exercise also focuses on strengthening cooperation and communication between partner nations ahead of potential future crises or conflicts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

Exercise Southern Jackaroo 2026: Partner nations rehearse for war

defence.gov.au - 11 JUNE 2026

More than 3000 personnel are participating in the Australian Army’s largest domestic multinational exercise this year.

The 3rd Brigade is in Townsville with personnel from the United States, Japan, Papua New Guinea and South Korea for Exercise Southern Jackaroo from May 29 to July 3.

Commander 1st (Australian) Division Major General Ash Collingburn said the high-tempo training exercise tested the readiness and integration of participating forces in a demanding and realistic environment.

“This is not routine training. It is a rehearsal for war. A deliberate test of readiness, resilience and trust,” Major General Collingburn said.

The exercise will push soldiers physically and mentally to strengthen combined capability and collective readiness.

“We must be ready to deploy anywhere, operate in austere conditions and fight on arrival. That is a shared challenge across all our forces, and this exercise is where we build that readiness together,” Major General Collingburn said.

Commander of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force contingent, Colonel Soichi Yamazaki, said the Townsville Field Training Area offered training opportunities unlike those available in Japan.

“Our training field in Japan is very limited, very narrow. On the other hand the training environment in Australia is incredible,” Colonel Yamazaki said.

“So we can conduct a fire exercise at maximum range and we can use UAVs [uncrewed aerial vehicles] without any limitation.”

Commander of the United States Marine Corps contingent (Marine Rotation Force – Darwin), Major Trevor Kerchner, said North Queensland provided a markedly different training environment, from unfamiliar terrain to communication hurdles, highlighting challenges and benefits for partner nations.

“Specific to language barriers, we use things like terrain models or we use pictures in the dirt to create an environment similar to the map,” Major Kerchner said.

“Even though we might not have the same terminology or language, we can visualise what we are trying to do on the map together and create a mutual understanding.”

Major General Collingburn said trust between partner nations was central to multinational training.

“Most importantly, this is where we build trust. Trust in procedures, trust in capability, but above all, trust in each other – as one team,” Major General Collingburn said.

“That trust, built here in training, is what carries forward into crisis and conflict.”

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2026-06-11/partner-nations-rehearse-war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plBMYy1mx9E

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62913

File: c27decb2443613d⋯.jpg (537.26 KB,3000x2068,750:517,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 318ac309d988efc⋯.jpg (642.3 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c27f947191511b8⋯.jpg (385.81 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c10767600adc77⋯.jpg (224.17 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24704389 (111207ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Profound injustice’: 16 experts demand inquest for Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre - Sixteen Australian domestic violence researchers and practitioners have called for a public coronial inquest into the death of Virginia Giuffre, arguing it could examine broader issues of family violence, coercive control and possible systemic failures. In a letter to Western Australian Coroner Ros Fogliani, the experts supported requests from Giuffre’s family for a formal investigation into events leading up to her death in April 2025. The group said the misidentification of victim-survivors as perpetrators was a “well-documented and dangerous failure” that could increase the risk of serious harm. They argued it would be a “profound injustice” if questions about whether systems failed Giuffre were not examined. The Coroner’s Court said the matter remains under active investigation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39062 (pb)

>>62682

‘Profound injustice’: 16 experts demand inquest for Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre

Carla Hildebrandt and Melissa Fyfe - June 11, 2026

1/2

Some of Australia’s most prominent domestic violence experts have thrown their weight behind Virginia Giuffre’s family’s plea for a public coronial inquest, warning that the circumstances surrounding her death raise broader questions about family violence, coercive control and expose systemic failures.

In a rare intervention, 16 researchers and practitioners from some of the nation’s most influential universities and domestic violence organisations have written a letter to West Australian Coroner Ros Fogliani.

The signatories include WA Centre for Women’s Safety and Wellbeing chief executive officer Alison Evans, University of Melbourne professors Heather Douglas and Cathy Humphreys, Monash University professor Kate Fitz-Gibbon, University of Western Australia professor Melanie O’Brien, Curtin University professor Donna Chung and University of Technology Sydney associate professor Jane Wangmann, who is also on the state’s domestic violence death review committee.

It comes after this masthead revealed Giuffre’s US-based brothers, Sky Roberts and Danny Wilson formally requested a coronial inquest in May.

Giuffre died by suicide on April 25, 2025, at her property in Neergabby, an hour’s drive north of Perth, in WA’s Wheatbelt region.

The family does not dispute their sister took her own life. But they believe police failed in their responsibility to thoroughly investigate domestic violence reports, to provide adequate support and to properly investigate an alleged assault on January 9 and early morning on January 10, 2025.

In their letter to the coroner, Giuffre’s family claimed she repeatedly sought assistance from police.

Giuffre was involved in divorce proceedings with her husband Robert Giuffre, who she shared three children with.

He was granted a family violence restraining order (FVRO) on January 14 against Giuffre in Perth Magistrates Court, shortly after a 72-hour police order against him was lifted.

The FVRO order included two of her children, who were younger than 18.

The experts’ letter says misidentification of victim-survivors as perpetrators is a “well-documented and dangerous failure. One that can result in loss of access to children, exclusion from the family home, criminalisation, and significantly elevated suicide risk”.

WA CWSW chief executive officer Alison Evans said a victim’s distress and suicidal thoughts should not be treated as individual disorders.

“(Suicidality) must be understood as responses to ongoing violence, coercive control and entrapment and systemic failures,” she said.

“When the impacts of abuse are routinely misclassified as a mental health issue, the danger posed by violent partners or family members disappears from view.”

Evans said victims being mistakenly identified as the predominant aggressor can contribute to suicidality.

“In some cases, women’s defensive actions, such as fighting back, are misinterpreted as aggressive behaviour, leading to their identification as the predominant aggressor rather than the person most in need of protection,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62914

File: 2afd5f7745be63c⋯.jpg (772.2 KB,3360x2240,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 83459dcabc9634f⋯.jpg (532.99 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 93e2f1d07983f55⋯.jpg (133.79 KB,748x1024,187:256,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a390981003758b⋯.jpg (113.5 KB,770x1024,385:512,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710736 (130135ZJUN26) Notable: UK defence minister John Healey quits hours before AUKUS meeting with Richard Marles - Britain’s Defence Secretary John Healey has resigned after a dispute over defence spending, warning that the government had failed to provide the resources required at a time of “rising threats”. In his resignation letter, Mr Healey said he had “no other option” but to quit and warned that current plans could leave him making decisions that would “reduce the readiness of our forces and increase the risk to personnel on operations”. The resignation disrupted an Australian diplomatic mission led by Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles, who was due to meet Mr Healey to discuss AUKUS and defence cooperation. The development has intensified scrutiny of the submarine pact, although analysts said AUKUS funding remains protected within Britain’s defence plans.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62905

UK defence minister John Healey quits hours before AUKUS meeting with Richard Marles

David Crowe - June 12, 2026

1/2

Belfast: Britain’s defence minister has quit in frustration over cuts to spending on national security in an extraordinary move that has thrown the government into crisis and added to pressure for a leadership challenge to replace Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Defence Secretary John Healey announced his resignation hours before he was due to meet Australian counterpart Richard Marles in Portsmouth to outline their ambitions for the crucial AUKUS alliance on nuclear-powered submarines.

In a widening crisis over national security and Starmer’s authority, Armed Forces Minister Al Carns followed Healey by quitting the government, and they were joined by fellow Labour MP Pamela Nash, who resigned as the parliamentary private secretary in the defence portfolio.

The decisions confirmed a cabinet split over whether to increase defence spending and find savings in welfare programs to pay for the changes, while coming days before likely leadership challenger Andy Burnham hopes to win a seat in parliament and launch a formal bid for the top job.

Seen as one of the government’s steadiest cabinet ministers, Healey declared he had “no other option” than resigning after discovering on Monday that new spending on defence would not meet the standards he believed were necessary for the nation’s safety.

The decision stunned the government after Healey released a letter he sent to Starmer to complain about what he saw as dangerously weak spending in the Defence Investment Plan being negotiated among cabinet ministers.

“You have been unable, and the Treasury has been unwilling, to commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats,” Healey wrote to Starmer.

“As I’ve outlined to you, there are credible ways of meeting the mid-term funding challenges, working multi-nationally and as other European nations are doing, to allow us to protect our ability to deliver the missions of our Labour government.

“You know what defence needs. Without a DIP that meets the moment in this way, I am being forced to make decisions that would reduce the readiness of our forces and increase the risk to personnel on operations, and could make the country less safe.”

The resignation comes one month after former health secretary Wes Streeting quit the cabinet and moved to the backbench over his frustrations with Starmer and the direction of the government, while declaring he was willing to stand for the leadership in a ballot among Labour Party members.

Burnham, the Greater Manchester Mayor, will have his fate decided by voters next week in a by-election for the seat of Makerfield, which he hopes to win so he can return to parliament in Westminster and begin a formal challenge to replace Starmer.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62915

File: 08602b0e41c0fe2⋯.jpg (244.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9846117089235de⋯.jpg (246.1 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 984e954667fdbc3⋯.jpg (225.97 KB,1244x1771,1244:1771,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ec52da1e33ccabe⋯.jpg (236.82 KB,1241x1773,1241:1773,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710804 (130152ZJUN26) Notable: British Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces minister Al Carns quit over Labour government’s lack of spending - British Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces Minister Al Carns have resigned amid a dispute with the Labour government over defence spending, creating uncertainty during high-level Australia–UK defence talks. In his resignation letter, Mr Healey said the government had been “unwilling to commit the resources the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats” and warned proposed funding levels “fall well short of what is required”. Mr Carns also resigned, saying “the change I had pushed for is not going to come”. The departures disrupted Defence Minister Richard Marles’ visit to Britain and prompted fresh scrutiny of AUKUS, although no changes to the submarine program were announced. Former security minister Dan Jarvis was appointed as Mr Healey’s replacement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62905

>>62914

British Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces minister Al Carns quit over Labour government’s lack of spending

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - June 12, 2026

1/2

British Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces Minister Al Carns have resigned in dramatic fashion in the midst of the Australian-UK ministerial meetings over the Starmer government’s penny pinching on defence.

Mr Healey’s dramatic intervention came as he was to accompany Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles at the Portsmouth Naval Base in England on Thursday to see various defence capabilities.

Late on Thursday Dan Jarvis, a former paratrooper and security minister, was appointed as Mr Healey’s replacement but Mr Marles was clearly rattled by the shock announcement, cancelling a media conference and dis-inviting the press pack who had travelled the three hours from London to the naval base expecting to observe a defence operation.

The carefully co-ordinated advocacy by the top ministers of Australia and Britain in regards to the AUKUS submarine arrangement of just a day earlier has been thrown into disarray. Meanwhile Mr Marles refused to present himself and answer questions whether AUKUS was still rock solid.

Some five hours after Mr Healey’s announcement, Mr Marles finally issued a statement saying he deeply valued the close and collaborative working relationship “with my good friend John Healey as Secretary of Defence, as I have with his predecessors on the Australia-UK defence relationship”.

He added: “I have worked closely with all of them particularly in respect of AUKUS. Our defence relationship is enduring, with deep connections, values and shared interests.

“Acknowledging that ultimately this has been a decision for John, I wish him all the best for the future.”

Just a day ago Mr Healey, 66, was staunchly defending the AUKUS program, saying the pact and deliver of the ambitious nuclear-powered submarine program was his “personal priority”, but in his resignation letter he said the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves were “unwilling to commit the resources the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats”.

Britain is currently finalising a much-delayed defence industry procurement plan with behind-the-scenes debates about the country’s priorities and where the defence money will come from after two years of constant tax rises to boost a booming welfare bill. The talks were continuing right up to this Friday’s deadline previously announced by Sir Keir.

Mr Healey revealed that the work on the defence investment plan had been completed last January, but in the five months since, the government had been unwilling to commit resources needed to defend the country at a time of rising threats.

He said: “Demands have increased since then as have the UK commitments you have rightly made to allies.”

Mr Carns told Sir Keir in his letter: “It has become clear to me that the change I had pushed for is not going to come.”

Mr Carns, who could be a candidate for any future leadership challenge told Times Radio earlier the defence investment plan is not fit for purpose, calling on Sir Keir to “sort it out”.

Mr Jarvis, 53, takes up the role having already been heavily briefed on defence policy, given he had been the security minister in the Home Office in charge of counter terrorism issues.

A former mayor of South Yorkshire, Mr Jarvis will have to draw upon his military discipline, having served with NATO in Kosovo and then in Afghanistan, Iraq and Northern Ireland in dealing with the paltry defence industry plan being signed off by the Starmer government.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62916

File: b2eac1b4cbeacf0⋯.jpg (249.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 89d2113bc3a60c0⋯.jpg (323.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710832 (130201ZJUN26) Notable: Analysis: Even before Healey quit, Marles and Wong looked glum - "When Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles walked into the jaw-droppingly gilded music room of Lancaster House on Tuesday, an air of tension appeared to hang over them. After a meeting with UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper the ministers emerged through the Corinthian columns with set expressions: Senator Wong looking annoyed but determined; Mr Marles clenching his upper lip. Here they were in one of the most spectacular buildings in all of London, in the very room that Frederic Chopin had performed for Queen Victoria, Prince Albert and the Duke of Wellington 178 years ago. And they just looked … glum. What had they just been told in discussions with their British counterparts to prompt such serious faces? Did they know that Mr Healey was meeting his Waterloo? It now appears Mr Healey’s frustration over defence funding with the British Prime Minister to whom he has shown intense loyalty culminated in his resignation at lunch time some 20 hours later. But it would not be out of the question to assume he had tipped off the Australians about upcoming difficulties with the budget for British defence industry. To put this in context, the British government had been finalising a much-delayed defence industry procurement plan with behind-the-scenes debates about the country’s priorities and where the defence money would come from. Mr Healey found out on Monday afternoon that nearly six months of wrangling about the monies was not going his way and that the increase on the hollowed out defence budget - a rise of just 0.08 per cent - would be derisory and ineffective. His resignation means the much vaunted Defence Investment Plan is now dead in the water. Mr Marles ... cancelled all media engagements. It was clear he didn’t want to be questioned about the immediate and long term future of AUKUS and what the dire British budgetary position means for the tripartite alliance." - Jacquelin Magnay, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62905

>>62914

>>62915

Analysis: Even before Healey quit, Marles and Wong looked glum

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - June 12, 2026

When Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles walked into the jaw-droppingly gilded music room of Lancaster House on Tuesday, an air of tension appeared to hang over them.

After a meeting with UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper the ministers emerged through the Corinthian columns with set expressions: Senator Wong looking annoyed but determined; Mr Marles clenching his upper lip.

Here they were in one of the most spectacular buildings in all of London, in the very room that Frederic Chopin had performed for Queen Victoria, Prince Albert and the Duke of Wellington 178 years ago. And they just looked … glum.

What had they just been told in discussions with their British counterparts to prompt such serious faces? Did they know that Mr Healey was meeting his Waterloo?

It now appears Mr Healey’s frustration over defence funding with the British Prime Minister to whom he has shown intense loyalty culminated in his resignation at lunch time some 20 hours later. But it would not be out of the question to assume he had tipped off the Australians about upcoming difficulties with the budget for British defence industry.

To put this in context, the British government had been finalising a much-delayed defence industry procurement plan with behind-the-scenes debates about the country’s priorities and where the defence money would come from.

Mr Healey found out on Monday afternoon that nearly six months of wrangling about the monies was not going his way and that the increase on the hollowed out defence budget – a rise of just 0.08 per cent – would be derisory and ineffective.

At the Lancaster House press conference after meeting Mr Healey and Ms Cooper, the four ministers appeared determined to talk up the future of AUKUS. Mr Marles was even indignant

when it was put to him that AUKUS might be floundering. He stressed he was “very confident” about the transfer of US Virginia class submarines to Australia in the early 2030s “as planned”.

Mr Healey then insisted that AUKUS was “a personal priority” – a hugely ironic moment in retrospect – and detailed the schedule to cut the first steel for AUKUS submarines next year in Sheffield. Then Senator Wong piped up, reinforcing the government stance that trilateral pact was in Australia’s national security interests.

“AUKUS is ambitious and AUKUS is challenging, but it is also critical to ensuring our sovereignty,’’ she said, adding: “This is not an academic exercise or a theoretical procurement exercise. It is the response to the central question, which is, how do we secure capability for Australia that is critical to assuring our sovereignty and ensuring peace in a much more contested region?”

Come Thursday, and Mr Healey and Mr Marles went jogging together in Hyde Park before what was planned to be a catch-up, catch up later at the naval base in Portsmouth, with the media looking at some defensive capabilities.

But just before noon Mr Healey suddenly resigned his ministerial post in a scathing letter to Sir Keir Starmer revealing his deep hurt at the government priorities in not adequately funding defence industry procurement. The debate about the monies had been going on for months, yet until Thursday it was still a “live issue” inside Downing Street, with Ed Miliband, the energy secretary refusing to scale down his net zero projects for defence purposes. Sir Keir, considered the weakest prime minister in living memory, couldn’t broker any deal and Mr Healey left the job in disgust.

His resignation means the much vaunted Defence Investment Plan is now dead in the water.

Mr Marles would still go to Portsmouth, taken around the base by the life peer Vernon Coaker, but he cancelled all media engagements.

It was clear he didn’t want to be questioned about the immediate and long term future of AUKUS and what the dire British budgetary position means for the tripartite alliance.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/even-before-healey-quit-marles-and-wong-looked-glum/news-story/f9333898c625c542f737cfa11500db05

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62917

File: 187a9154ce5c83e⋯.jpg (227.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1c3833bfd28d208⋯.jpg (303.7 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a08640152bad593⋯.jpg (282.72 KB,2000x1500,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710845 (130206ZJUN26) Notable: British defence secretary’s resignation will have “no effect” on AUKUS: Ayres - Innovation Minister Tim Ayres has sought to reassure supporters of AUKUS following the resignation of UK Defence Secretary John Healey, saying the change would have “no effect” on the trilateral defence partnership between Australia, Britain and the United States. Mr Ayres described AUKUS as a long-term agreement with broad institutional and political support across all three countries, arguing it would endure beyond individual ministers and governments. Mr Healey resigned over a dispute with the British government about defence spending levels, despite having described AUKUS as a “personal priority” only a day earlier. Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said he had valued his close working relationship with Mr Healey and emphasised that the Australia–UK defence relationship remained enduring and strategically important.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62751

>>62816

>>62905

>>62914

>>62915

British defence secretary’s resignation will have “no effect” on AUKUS: Ayres

RIA PANDEY - June 12, 2026

UK Defence Secretary John Healey’s abrupt resignation will have “no effect” on the trilateral AUKUS defence pact, a senior Albanese government minister says.

Mr Healey’s resignation came hours before he was due to appear alongside his Australian counterpart Richard Marles to spruik the $368bn AUKUS deal at the Portsmouth naval base south of London.

Mr Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong are in the UK to take part in this year’s AUKMIN talks, a foreign policy and defence dialogue between Australian and British ministerial officials.

But Innovation Minister Tim Ayres downplayed the impact of Mr Healey’s exit from Keir Starmer’s Labour government, pointing out the deal would endure as an intergenerational partnership.

“It will have no effect on the AUKUS partnership with the United Kingdom and the United States,” Mr Ayres told ABC Radio National on Friday.

“This is a partnership that has deep support across all three countries’ political systems, within the public service and the defence agencies in all three countries, and indeed with the defence industry, because it’s in the interests of all three countries.

“Over the 30-year life of the agreement to provide nuclear-powered conventionally armed submarines, there will be many ministers for defence for all three countries, many secretaries for war in the United States case, who are there charged with delivering this program.”

Mr Healey announced his resignation on social media and said he had “no other option” but to quit.

He attributed this decision to the UK government’s proposed defence spending falling “well short of what is required for defence and the country at this dangerous time”.

About five hours after the British official’s announcement, Mr Marles released a statement saying he valued his collaborative relationship with Mr Healey and described him as a “good friend”.

“I have deeply valued the close and collaborative working relationship with my good friend John Healey as Secretary of Defence, as I have with his predecessors on the Australia-UK defence relationship,” Mr Marles said.

“I have worked closely with all of them particularly in respect of AUKUS.

“Our defence relationship is enduring, with deep connections, values and shared interests.

“Acknowledging that ultimately this has been a decision for John, I wish him all the best for the future.”

Mr Healey’s announcement came less than a day after he declared the AUKUS plan to deliver Australia nuclear-powered submarines was a “personal priority” during a press conference with Mr Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/british-defence-secretary-resigns-hours-before-aukus-media-event-with-defence-minister-richard-marles/news-story/28f300c3acdd4174cc516e5b6c288a04

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62918

File: f2b804f825e95a3⋯.jpg (2.4 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: daed8bab67cb76f⋯.jpg (3.27 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710880 (130216ZJUN26) Notable: Pauline Hanson opens up on domestic violence, prison and racism claims - One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson used a Perth speaking event to reflect on personal experiences that have shaped her political career, including domestic violence, her imprisonment in 2003 and longstanding accusations of racism. Senator Hanson said she had experienced domestic violence earlier in life and described her time in prison after being convicted of electoral fraud, a conviction that was later overturned on appeal. She recalled being “absolutely devastated” by the verdict and said one of the hardest aspects of imprisonment was knowing she was not guilty. Addressing criticism of her political views, Senator Hanson rejected claims that she was racist, saying she had “an open heart and mind” while remaining proud of Australia. She said adversity had strengthened her resolve and shaped her leadership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

>>62901

>>62902

Pauline Hanson opens up on domestic violence, prison and racism claims

Michael Philipps - June 11, 2026

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has revealed personal details of her life during her Perth visit, telling of her time behind bars and experiences with domestic violence.

Hanson was at a Swan Chamber of Commerce event in the city’s east to gather support for her party and gave a speech offering intimate details of her life before and during her political career.

While detailing her life running a small business prior to politics, Hanson revealed she had experienced domestic violence in her life but refrained from going into detail.

“I won’t go into detail, but I had domestic violence as well,” she told the audience.

“So again, that’s a little bit of knowledge and history of knowing what happens running small business, being involved in domestic violence.

“But anyway, since then we split up, I’ve actually been a single woman.

“I think my whole life and career has just been involved in politics, and of course, how I got into politics.”

Hanson also detailed her rise in politics and the establishment of the party in Queensland in the late 90s.

“I formed the political party in 1997,” she said.

“The first election in 1998 in Queensland, we won 11 seats in parliament, six Labor, five Coalition.

“That put the fear into the major political parties, especially the Howard government, which was going to have an election in October that year.

“They changed voting systems to full preferential voting.

“They all glued together to put One Nation last in that election.

“That’s why it never translated into seats for us, because they preferenced us last to keep the nation out. We won one senate seat in 1998 in Queensland.”

Hanson also addressed one of the major criticisms of One Nation - whether she considered herself or the party as racist.

“Am I a racist? No, I’m not a racist,” she said.

“Do I care if people want to call me that? No way in the wide world, because you know what, they don’t know who I am.

“I have an open heart and mind to a lot of people that come to this country, but at the end of the day, I am Australian, and I’m so proud of my country, and I respect the men and women that have died and fought for our country to give us what we have today.”

The event MC also opened the floor up to questions from the audience, with Hanson asked about her experience in prison after she was found guilty of electoral fraud in 2003, charges that were eventually overturned.

“The day they brought down the guilty (verdict), I was absolutely devastated,” she said.

“I could have just fallen into a heap. I was handcuffed in that room. I was taken downstairs, and I was strip searched.

“I was taken to the watch house that night, that’s an experience in itself.

“The support from the guards and everyone was tremendous.”

Hanson said one of the most difficult parts of serving a prison sentence was the knowledge that she was not guilty.

“I’d been given a sentence and the people didn’t believe me, that I had to be dishonest about registering a political party when I knew that we had thousands of members,” she said.

She also opened up about her first few nights behind bars, claiming she almost gave up, not just on her political career, but on life itself.

“That night I just, I actually gave up, I stopped eating … I just gave up” she said.

“They put me into the hospital ward at the prison when I was taken there the next day after the night in the watch house, and then I was processed and having that picture taken.

Hanson said her past experiences were what had made her into the woman and political leader she has now become.

“Don’t keep living in the past that’s gone, acknowledge what’s happened, and move on with your life,” she told the audience.

“And I think that’s what I’ve done also with my life, stuck with my principles, what I believe in, what I want to accomplish.

“And I think we’ve all had our ups and downs in our lives, we really have, if you look at it, but you stand up tall and straight, and as I just say to everyone, put yourself up on a pedestal.

“The only one that can pull you down is yourself - only you.

“It’s your friends and your loved ones, the people that really care about you. Listen to their advice, listen to them, and the rest of them - put them to the sideline.

“Just do what makes you happy. Don’t let it get into your head worrying about what other people might say and do about you.”

Asked if she had a piece of advice that she would tell herself as a 10-year-old, Hanson had a simple response.

“Don’t get married at 16,” she said.

https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/hanson-opens-up-on-domestic-violence-prison-and-racism-claims-20260611-p6063h.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62919

File: c7f24a58a76ecb8⋯.jpg (281.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 42f017d4131c86b⋯.jpg (225.91 KB,1431x1076,1431:1076,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3f6e6fb9ef2d9bf⋯.jpg (276.18 KB,1888x1416,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24710983 (130252ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Simply wrong’: former Queensland premier says Hanson was not jailed in a ‘witch hunt’ - Former Queensland premier Peter Beattie has rejected Senator Pauline Hanson’s claim that electoral law changes introduced by his government were designed to target her, describing the allegation as “simply wrong”. Mr Beattie said the reforms were implemented in response to the Shepherdson Inquiry into electoral fraud and branch-stacking within the Queensland Labor Party and had “nothing to do with Pauline Hanson”. The dispute follows comments by Senator Hanson in Perth, where she described her 2003 conviction for electoral fraud, later overturned on appeal, as a “political witch hunt” involving Mr Beattie and former prime minister Tony Abbott. Mr Beattie acknowledged he had been a strong political opponent of One Nation but said the legislative changes were intended to strengthen electoral integrity rather than target individual political figures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

>>62901

>>62902

>>62918

‘Simply wrong’: former Queensland premier says Hanson was not jailed in a ‘witch hunt’

Rob Harris - June 11, 2026

Former Queensland premier Peter Beattie has rejected Pauline Hanson’s claim that changes to his state’s electoral laws two decades ago were designed to target her, insisting the reforms were designed to combat electoral fraud within the Labor Party following a major corruption scandal.

Hanson on Thursday accused Beattie and newly elected Liberal Party president Tony Abbott of orchestrating a “political witch hunt” that led to her 11-week imprisonment for electoral fraud in 2003, a conviction later quashed on appeal.

Speaking at a business function in Perth, the One Nation founder alleged Beattie had changed Queensland laws before her trial, increasing the maximum penalty from six months’ jail or a fine to seven years’ imprisonment.

“It was a political witch hunt, because prior to my trial, Peter Beattie changed the laws in Queensland from a six-month jail term or a fine to seven years retrospective,” Hanson said, fighting back tears at times.

She said Abbott had set up a controversial $100,000 slush fund to underwrite a legal bid to deregister One Nation in the lead-up to the 1998 federal election.

“It was a very hard time for my children,” Hanson said. “The kids didn’t have their fathers at that time. I was the only one that they had and so I was their whole life. And through politics, they’ve had to wear so much. But you know what they said to me the other day? They said ‘Mum, it hasn’t been easy, but you’ve taught us resilience, to be independent, to stand on our own two feet, and for that we thank you.’ ”

In separate remarks in Perth, Hanson revealed she was abused by a former partner.

“I won’t go into detail, but I had domestic violence as well,” she said of a relationship in her past. “I’ve had a couple of relationships but I’ve never married again.”

But Beattie said Hanson’s account was “simply wrong”, arguing the reforms were driven by recommendations from the Shepherdson Inquiry into electoral fraud and branch-stacking within the Queensland ALP.

“The law change had nothing to do with Pauline Hanson,” Beattie said. “The irony of her claim is that the ALP rorters hated me for the rest of my time in office and no doubt still do.”

Beattie his government had been re-elected on a platform of cleaning up electoral fraud and the law changes delivered on an election commitment.

“The reforms were a response to the independent Shepherdson Inquiry and my desire to stamp out electoral fraud in the ALP. They were electoral integrity measures and nothing to do with Pauline Hanson.”

The Shepherdson Inquiry exposed widespread branch-stacking and electoral enrolment fraud within Labor ranks, triggering a major political crisis for the Beattie government.

Several MPs were found guilty of electoral rorts, while deputy premier Jim Elder resigned to fight charges, and a number of party members were expelled from the ALP as a result.

Among the allegations a state MP had told “war stories” about having nine people enrolled at his unit in the 1980s, and claimed that a federal Labor Party figure – whose name was suppressed – had a dozen people enrolled at his house in the 1970s.

“I don’t deny that I was a fierce critic of Pauline Hanson’s policies at the time and strongly opposed her politically,” Beattie said. “I actively worked against One Nation, as I did against ALP rorters … [but] the law changes were to deal with ALP electoral fraud and nothing to do with Pauline Hanson or Tony Abbott.”

Abbott has since said he was sorry that Hanson went to jail, but has stood by his efforts to expose the “shenanigans” within One Nation.

“Between Pauline and myself there has been a lot of dirty water under the bridge, but her willingness to let the past be the past is a sign of decency which is all too rare these days in our public life,” Abbott said in 2018 when launching her book Pauline, In Her Own Words.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/simply-wrong-former-queensland-premier-says-hanson-was-not-jailed-in-a-witch-hunt-20260611-p6062o.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62920

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711140 (130335ZJUN26) Notable: Hanson pledges to work with Coalition in Victoria as protesters target moved fundraiser - (Video) One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson has pledged to work with a future Coalition government in Victoria if her party wins enough seats at the next state election, using a Melbourne fundraising event to promote One Nation as an alternative to the major parties. The event was relocated shortly before it began after the original venue cancelled the booking, while anti-racism protesters gathered outside both locations. Senator Hanson said voters had “had a gutful” and were looking for political change, while criticising the Victorian Labor government over crime, governance and public spending. Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce also attended the fundraiser. The event capped a week of One Nation fundraising activities and highlighted the party’s efforts to expand its support base ahead of future elections.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62897

>>62901

Hanson pledges to work with Coalition in Victoria as protesters target moved fundraiser

Sherryn Groch - June 12, 2026

1/2

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has promised to work with a future Coalition government in Victoria at a glitzy fundraising event in Melbourne’s south, swapping venues at the eleventh hour as anti-racism protesters chased the party across town to rally outside.

Some demonstrators who had planned to rally outside the far-right party’s original venue in Melbourne’s north were thrown off by the last-minute venue change, but others poured into cars to head south as news started to filter out about the new location.

Victoria Police confirmed that Giorgio Casa, the Italian restaurant in Moonee Ponds that was to host the cocktail party on Friday night, cancelled the event just hours before doors were due to open, though police said they were not aware of any threats made against the venue.

Outside the event, as an early protester chanted “Nazi scum off our streets”, Hanson took aim at Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, whose leadership has been threatened by recent anonymous rumours of a potential challenge.

“Look, the people will have their say at the next election,” Hanson said. “She’ll be judged on her performance as premier for the state. But ... She’s going to struggle to even keep her seat, hold her seat, and I’ve heard rumours that they will oust her before the election.”

Hanson denied protesters had prompted the change of venue. “We had too many bookings, people wanting to come,” she told reporters outside.

“So that’s why we had to change location. Do you think I’d be deterred by the protesters?”

But at her side, One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce decried the protests and need for such a strong police presence. “I mean, I thought we’ve arrived at Melbourne, not Pyongyang,” he said. “This is political debate. People are allowed to have it. We’re a free nation, and, you know.”

While Hanson and Joyce were quickly whisked inside, a line of men in suits and women in their cocktail finest were forced to wait outside the venue as more anti-racism protesters poured in from Moonee Ponds. Fundraiser tickets cost between $200 and $500, and $2000 for a meet and greet with Hanson and Joyce.

Protesters outside held anti-Hanson banners and chanted: “No racists, no fear, Hanson is not welcome here.”

“I wonder when they’ll open the bar,” laughed one guest. Cheers erupted from attendees waiting outside as a “Fire the Liar” bus taking aim at the Labor Party rolled by, tooting its horn.

Spotted inside the glitzy event were some of One Nation’s staunchest supporters, including Lee Hanson, Pauline’s daughter, Adam Giles, the CEO of Hancock Agriculture and former chief minister of the Northern Territory, and Mark Nicholson, the creator of the Please Explain cartoons.

Other guests included comedian Elliot Loney, Hanson’s chief of staff James Ashby, prolific buyer of houses on The Block Danny Wallis, Hancock Prospecting media advisor James Radford, and Rikki-Lee Tyrrell, One Nation’s sole seat holder in the Victorian parliament.

Adoring fans queued for selfies with Hanson, who received a rock star welcome from those who had paid hundreds – and in some cases thousands of dollars – to see her.

She told the crowd she would work with the Coalition, if One Nation secures enough seats in the upcoming Victorian state election.

“I’m going to give you the opportunity to vote for someone other than the two major parties,” she said. “But I will work with a Coalition government because who needs to go is the toxic Labor government.

“There’s this underground movement that’s happening. People say, ‘We have enough. We’ve had a gutful’,” Hanson said. “We want change. And people constantly come up and say to me, ‘Pauline, you are our last hope. Pauline, we want you to try and give us that future that we’re crying out for.’

“And if it’s in my power, and I will give you my honest truth of what I will do for you, I want grassroots Australians to represent you. I want you to be able to trust your representatives.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62921

File: f370587e532f095⋯.mp4 (4.81 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 3ba961d1465f1c4⋯.jpg (825.67 KB,1683x2244,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 686174076c5d183⋯.jpg (261.78 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7481ba39fdc3a34⋯.jpg (1.02 MB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711211 (130403ZJUN26) Notable: ‘We’re no Nazis’: Hanson, Joyce met by protesters, police at One Nation event - (Video) One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson and former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce were met by protesters and a heavy police presence at a Melbourne fundraising event that was relocated after the original venue cancelled the booking over safety concerns. Demonstrators gathered outside the new venue, while prominent neo-Nazi Michael Nelson was removed from the area by police after attempting to associate himself with Senator Hanson and One Nation. Inside the event, Senator Hanson rejected comparisons between One Nation and Nazism, while Mr Joyce dismissed such characterisations as “crap”. Senator Hanson also pledged to work with a future Victorian Coalition government to remove what she described as a “toxic” Labor administration. The fundraiser concluded a successful week of donations for One Nation’s “Fire the Liar” campaign targeting the Albanese government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39009 (pb)

>>62854

>>62855

>>62677

>>62901

>>62920

‘We’re no Nazis’: Hanson, Joyce met by protesters, police at One Nation event

Pauline Hanson has declared she will work with the Victorian Coalition to remove “toxic” Labor as chaos erupted outside her $2000-a-head Melbourne fundraiser with a prominent neo-Nazi pinned down by police

Ryan Bourke - June 13, 2026

Chaos broke out at a One Nation Melbourne fundraiser on Friday night as a prominent neo-Nazi was pinned to the ground by police.

“Hail Pauline Hanson,” Michael Nelson yelled as officers cuffed his hands behind his back outside the South Melbourne venue.

He added: “The great white hope.”

Nelson accused police of arresting him for supporting Hanson.

But police on Saturday confirmed no-one was “arrested” during the chaotic scenes.

“A 22-year-old man was given a direction to move on,” a police spokeswoman said.

Police had a highly visible presence at Canvas House, where scores of people holding banners and playing drums lined the street to protest against the One Nation leader.

Protesters cried chants of “shame” as Ms Hanson and former Nationals leader turned One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce made their way inside.

One protester yelled “Die, Pauline” while another labelled her a “Nazi”.

With protesters refusing to disperse, Ms Hanson was forced to make a backdoor exit alongside Mr Joyce just before 10pm, leaving the venue through an alleyway.

Despite attempts to track her departure with a drone, Ms Hanson and her family were able to escape.

It came after a last minute venue change for the $2000-a-head meet and greet with the One Nation leader.

The fundraiser was originally slated to kick off at Casa Giorgio in Moonee Ponds at 6.30pm but was moved because of safety concerns.

“Due to the safety of our community, the event at Casa Giorgio has been cancelled,” a notice on the venue read.

“We appreciate your understanding, the venue will reopen on Sunday, 14th June.”

The fundraiser was moved to Canvas House, where Ms Hanson arrived to a mixed reception, with supporters treating her like a rock star inside but with angry protesters outside.

The new venue was adorned with orange balloons, with dozens of police officers creating a human barrier between Ms Hanson and her supporters.

Ms Hanson told her supporters she was willing to work with the Victorian Coalition if needed, just to oust “toxic” Labor.

“People have had enough,” she said. “And we’re here to help them.”

Speaking on stage Ms Hanson said she was ready to work with the Victorian Liberal Party if she couldn’t form government in her own right.

“I will work with the Coalition government because it’s Labor who needs to go,” she said. “It’s toxic”.

Ms Hanson and Mr Joyce condemned those who had triggered the event’s switch.

“We’re no Nazis, that’s just crap,” Mr Joyce said.

Ms Hanson, who was wearing a dark blue velvet pant suit, added that she worried about the safety of supporters who would encounter the demonstrators on the way in.

“This has happened for many years and it’s a shame,” she said.

Mr Joyce told the Herald Sun that Victoria was “the next battleground”.

Asked what she made of Premier Jacinta Allan, Ms Hanson said: “I think the people will have their say at the next election.”

She added: “The momentum has changed and they want to see a new government. I think their (Labor’s) time is up”.

It’s understood Melbourne billionaire Adrian Portelli and senior Liberal Colleen Harkin were invited to the event.

The soiree capped off the most successful week of fundraising in the party’s history, with $5m raised by Friday night through its “fire the liar” campaign, targeting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Labor.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/protest-threats-force-melbourne-venue-to-cancel-one-nation-fundraiser/news-story/9166f3868b3980e43e1365202403f0f4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62922

File: b60c3ede1bd202a⋯.jpg (269.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 188ace496eec651⋯.jpg (420.82 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1088b483fc222a4⋯.jpg (148.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1b3605fe38dbbd8⋯.jpg (194.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711544 (130619ZJUN26) Notable: Jewish leaders demand action over ‘anti-zio’ bans in sharehouse ads - Jewish community leaders have called for action after a number of Melbourne sharehouse advertisements in the Fairy Floss Real Estate Facebook group included phrases such as “no zios” or “anti-zio” among their requirements for prospective housemates. The advertisements prompted complaints from Jewish Australians who said the language was exclusionary and discriminatory. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich argued the term was being used as a coded way to exclude Jewish people and called for investigations by relevant authorities as well as action by Meta. A Jewish man who encountered the advertisements while searching for accommodation said the posts made him feel excluded because of his identity. The group is operated by rental platform Snug, which said the language breached its policies, pledged stronger moderation and said offending content would be removed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62836

>>62847

Jewish leaders demand action over ‘anti-zio’ bans in sharehouse ads

PHOEBE GRIFFITHS - June 11, 2026

Sharehouse advertisements on a Melbourne flatmates Facebook group have adopted the words “no zios” or “anti-zio”, short for anti-Zionist, as part of a list of household requirements – right next to “looking for someone … friendly, clean and socially warm”.

Many of them included “no zios etc” in the same way other users added “no couples” or “no pets” at the bottom of the listing.

“Absolutely staunchly no Zionists, or recovering Zionists,” one of the posts said in the Fairy Floss Real Estate Facebook group.

“Acab, queer friendly, zio free etc pls,” said another.

“Interests: tea, rice, beans … clean kitchen benches … music, poetry. Dislikes: Zio scum, fascists, Vic Pol, Islamophobes, Zio apologists, gas industry lobbyists.

“No swerfs/terfs/Zionists/cops etc thanks very much.”

The emergence of the “no zio” posts represents a new front in Australia’s post-October 7 antisemitism crisis, which has exploded into hostile attacks on members of the Jewish community.

It also comes after the establishment of the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission and Social Cohesion in response to the Bondi terrorist attack in December.

A final report by Commissioner Virginia Bell is due by the end of the year.

Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich said Jewish people looking for a sharehouse are being turned away by three letters – “zio”.

“The same exile, the same smiling cruelty, the same little word doing the work the old slurs used to do. Strip off the disguise and the message is naked: No Jews. Not here. Not ever,” Dr Abramovich said.

“Let no one pretend ‘zio’ is politics. It is a slur, popularised by Klan leader David Duke, a code word for ‘Jew’ dressed up for a younger crowd.

“And here is the obscenity of it: the people writing these ads call themselves anti-racist in the very same breath. Their compassion comes with a blacklist, and every name on that list is a Jew.”

Fairy Floss Real Estate is a popular Facebook group with almost 500,000 members.

It was created by online platform Snug and allows users to list available rooms in a sharehouse, advertise lease transfers or help people find a housemate before applying for rentals.

A Jewish man in his 20s, who did not wish to be named, came across the Facebook posts when he was looking for a room in Melbourne.

“I was shocked by how openly and shamelessly I was being excluded because of who I am. Being Jewish and Israeli is not a choice, it is part of who I am,” he said.

“Yet the alias ‘zio’ is increasingly being used to dehumanise and exclude people like me. It is an isolating and painful experience. It sends the message that discrimination against Jews and Israelis is considered acceptable in circumstances where similar prejudice directed at other communities would rightly be condemned.”

Dr Abramovich said history has “seen placards like this before”.

“The decade was the 1930s. The only difference now is the love-hearts and the emojis,” he said.

Another Jewish person, who also did not want to be named, said while they do not consider themself a Zionist, they found the posts offensive to all Jewish people.

The Australian reached out to a number of Facebook users who included “no zio” in their posts, but did not receive a reply.

A spokesperson from Snug thanked The Australian for bringing the matter to their attention and said the remarks “directly violate our established core policies”.

“Fairy Floss Real Estate is committed to providing a safe, inclusive and welcoming community for people seeking residential accommodation,” the spokesperson said. “We have a zero-tolerance policy for discrimination, harassment, and offensive or abusive language of any kind.

“The FFRE group generates over a thousand listings and comments every week. Moderators are volunteers, and where moderators are notified of an issue, we endeavour to take immediate and decisive action to address it including … immediate content audit and removal, members’ account actions and enhanced supervision and moderation.

“Because FFRE relies heavily on voluntary moderation and activity moves quickly – often outside daytime hours – we recognise the challenges of monitoring every post. We are immediately reinforcing our FFRE Community Moderation Policy with our volunteer and internal moderation teams to actively monitor for this language.”

Dr Abramovich said he is calling on the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission to investigate, and on Consumer Affairs Victoria to act, as well as urging Meta to take down the ads.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victoria/jewish-leaders-demand-action-over-antizio-bans-in-sharehouse-ads/news-story/b723ed6b9991f00402b897382cd9b078

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62923

File: 7765d7872211ba1⋯.jpg (158.84 KB,1440x810,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4f6eab463407e32⋯.jpg (191.13 KB,1817x1022,1817:1022,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711613 (130705ZJUN26) Notable: Man charged with threatening royal commission witness, possessing illegal weapons - A New South Wales man has been charged with allegedly sending threatening emails to a witness appearing before the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, as well as possessing prohibited weapons and other offences. Gavin Begbie, a Woodburn gym owner and former member of the now-banned National Socialist Network, was arrested after Australian Federal Police searched his property and allegedly seized electronic devices, extremist material, instructions for making explosives, and prohibited weapons. Police charged him with offences including intimidating a witness, using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend, weapons offences and refusing to provide access to electronic devices. AFP Assistant Commissioner Peter Crozier said intimidation of royal commission witnesses was “wholly intolerable”. Mr Begbie remains in custody and is due to reappear in court in August.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62701

>>62759

>>62779

>>62780

Man charged with threatening royal commission witness, possessing illegal weapons

JAMES DOWLING and BIMINI PLESSER - June 12, 2026

1/2

A Northern Rivers neo-Nazi who protested against the “Jewish lobby” outside NSW parliament as a member of the National Socialist Network has been arrested for allegedly sending a series of threatening emails to a witness in the antisemitism royal commission.

Woodburn gym owner and former NSN member Gavin Begbie was hit with eight criminal charges on Thursday after he allegedly sent a series of threatening emails to a witness in the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.

The NSN was earlier this year disbanded under federal hate laws.

The Australian can reveal Mr Begbie, 59, attended an infamous neo-Nazi rally in November where senior NSN members Jack Eltis and Joel Davis led dozens of men clad in black in chants of “blood and honour” in front of a banner reading “abolish the Jewish lobby”.

The Australian last month reported that Mr Begbie shared news of the NSN’s proscription as a designated hate group in a chat group on an encrypted messaging service, before quickly deleting the post.

Mr Begbie allegedly sent three offensive emails to the witness, which were reported to Australian Federal Police’s National Security Investigations team last month.

Police executed a search warrant at a property in Woodburn, on the NSW far north coast, on Thursday, allegedly seizing right-wing literature, instructions on how to make explosives, electronic devices and two prohibited weapons — a knife and a whip.

Photos from the AFP raid showed Mr Begbie allegedly had copies of an infamous neo-Nazi flyer calling for “the building of a physical and politicised white Australian community”.

Far-right groups across Australia have used the flyer in recruitment campaigns for years. In 2022, copies were found plastered across Melbourne suburbs and in community libraries, sparking concern in the local Jewish community.

Mr Begbie was later charged with four counts of using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend, one count of intimidating a witness, two counts of possessing a prohibited weapon in breach of a weapons prohibition order, and one count of refusing to grant police access to his devices.

He faces up to 10 years imprisonment over the weapons and access refusal charges.

Mr Begbie did not apply for bail on Friday and will remain behind bars until his next appearance at Lismore Local Court on August 12.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62924

File: 20ea8b46788fbed⋯.jpg (339.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711684 (130913ZJUN26) Notable: IBAC welcomes court ruling that unmasks UFU chief Peter Marshall as ‘Operation Richmond blocker’ - Victoria’s anti-corruption watchdog has welcomed a Court of Appeal ruling that identified United Firefighters Union secretary Peter Marshall and the union as the parties seeking to block publication of IBAC’s long-running Operation Richmond report. The investigation, which began in 2018, examined the 2016 dispute involving the Andrews government, the CFA and the UFU. The court rejected an appeal that would have allowed Mr Marshall and the union to continue pursuing legal action anonymously, ending temporary pseudonym orders. IBAC said the decision supported the “transparency Victorians deserve” and reaffirmed its commitment to releasing the report once court proceedings conclude. Mr Marshall said the legal challenge alleges Operation Richmond was unlawful and argued he and the union remain restricted from discussing the contents of the confidential report.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

>>62739

>>62747

>>62910

IBAC welcomes court ruling that unmasks UFU chief Peter Marshall as ‘Operation Richmond blocker’

DAMON JOHNSTON - June 12, 2026

1/2

Victoria’s anti-corruption agency has hailed a court ruling unmasking Peter Marshall and the United Firefighters Union as the mystery parties trying to block the release of an eight-year investigation as a win for “transparency”.

In a strongly-worded statement after Victoria’s Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by Mr Marshall and the UFU to hide behind pseudonyms while they launch last-ditch legal action, IBAC said it remained committed to releasing the special report into Operation Richmond.

Operation Richmond, which started in 2018 and became a full blown anti-corruption inquiry in 2019, has dragged on for longer than World War II.

The investigation has been running under tight secrecy and while no public hearings were called, scores of witnesses – including then premier Daniel Andrews – were grilled in private by IBAC.

The investigation, sparked by a complaint from a Labor insider, has been digging into the 2016 pay-and-conditions negotiations between the Andrews government and the UFU and Mr Marshall.

“IBAC can now advise that the parties who commenced court proceedings against IBAC in relation to the publication of the Operation Richmond special report are the United Firefighters Union and its Secretary, Mr Peter Marshall,” an agency spokesperson said.

“The court’s decision (Friday) to uphold the refusal of a pseudonym order is in the public interest and supports the transparency Victorians deserve. We remain committed to the release of the special report, pending the resolution of court proceedings.”

Mr Marshall and the UFU were unmasked by Victoria’s highest court as the applicants taking legal action to block the release of Operation Richmond, a major anti-corruption investigation that has been running since 2018.

Chief Justice Richard Niall, in dismissing the appeal on Friday, said; “It is the decision of this court no error has been found. Indeed, her honour’s decision was correct.”

Justice Niall dismissed Mr Marshall’s appeal against a decision by Supreme Court Justice Claire Harris, who last month refused to grant permanent pseudonym orders to the two parties challenging the publication of IBAC’s Operation Richmond report.

Mr Marshall and the UFU are attempting to prevent the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission from tabling its Operation Richmond special report in parliament.

The ruling means the applicants can no longer rely on the anonymity orders that had temporarily shielded them while they pursued their appeal.

Mr Marshall declined to comment when contacted by The Australian after the Court of Appeal ruling. But in a written statement, the veteran union chief — a key witness in Operation Richmond — said he and the UFU had commenced legal action in the Supreme Court alleging that the “so-called Operation Richmond” was “unlawful for various reasons”.

“Pseudonyms have often been given in the past to persons challenging the legality of IBAC’s conduct,” Mr Marshall stated.

“However, the Supreme Court held that a differentiating factor in the present case is that ‘there is a significant amount of information in the public domain about Operation Richmond’.”

Mr Marshall said he and the union had been “restricted at law from commenting on Operation Richmond” as the “examinations were in private” and “confidentiality notices were issued”. “The law still prohibits us from commenting on what is in the report and what it may say about us or anyone else,” he stated.

“Yet, while we have not been able to talk about these things, there has been a consistent and sustained flow of information to the media. We will make a further statement, when we can.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62925

File: 9b5e6783743e95d⋯.jpg (334.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0cada9b0a8d4947⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,3928x2842,1964:1421,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 257e307b51882b4⋯.jpg (260.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711715 (130936ZJUN26) Notable: COMMENT: 168 days to polls; Victorians deserve to see Operation Richmond before they vote - There are 168 days until the Victorian election. In a fixed four-year political cycle, that’s not very long. But hopefully it’s long enough for Victorians to have the opportunity to read the findings of the most consequential anti-corruption investigation launched by IBAC before they vote. Two elections - 2018 and 2022 – have come and gone since the events at the centre of IBAC’s Operation Richmond unfolded a decade ago.''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

>>62739

>>62747

>>62910

>>62924

COMMENT: 168 days to polls; Victorians deserve to see Operation Richmond before they vote

DAMON JOHNSTON - June 12, 2026

There are 168 days until the Victorian election.

In a fixed four-year political cycle, that’s not very long.

But hopefully it’s long enough for Victorians to have the opportunity to read the findings of the most consequential anti-corruption investigation launched by IBAC before they vote.

Two elections – 2018 and 2022 – have come and gone since the events at the centre of IBAC’s Operation Richmond unfolded a decade ago.

A quick recap:

In 2016, the Andrews government and the Peter Marshall-led United Firefighters Union were locked in a toxic pay-and-conditions dispute, and the UFU was also pushing to grab effective operational control of the volunteer Country Fire Authority.

Labor’s emergency services minister Jane Garrett thought it was a bad deal that was going to cost the Victorian budget hundreds of millions of dollars and smash the CFA.

Garrett opposed the deal. Premier Daniel Andrews sidelined her. Met with Marshall and handed over pretty much everything the UFU wanted. Garrett resigned.

A Labor figure was so disturbed with what went on they lodged a complaint with IBAC in 2018. By the middle of the following year, a full-blown anti-corruption investigation was launched and raids started. Secret hearings followed. Marshall and Andrews were among witnesses grilled in private by IBAC.

On Friday, in a rare and welcome win for transparency in this state, Victoria’s highest court, the Court of Appeal, dismissed Marshall’s attempt to hide behind a pseudonym in a last ditch legal bid he and his union have launched to block the release of Operation Richmond.

The Victorian Supreme Court will this month hear Marshall’s substantive case to have the IBAC investigation declared unlawful. Even if he loses, Marshall will almost certainly appeal this decision, further delaying the report’s tabling in parliament.

And if he loses in the Court of Appeal? There’s always the High Court. An earlier UFU legal scuffle over Richmond ended up there.

Waging lawfare is expensive. But it’s cheap if a union is paying for the lawyers. The hardworking firefighters of this state should be asking the leaders of their union if, in fact, it is in the interests of the rank-and-file for this to continue.

Despite Friday’s win, all of this points to a very real risk that Operation Richmond – which has already dragged on for longer World War II – won’t be released until after the November 28 election.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/168-days-to-polls-victorians-deserve-to-see-operation-richmond-before-they-vote/news-story/337ea0f1afef0272bf2523fc2679b043

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62926

File: 1031ae660883e39⋯.jpg (149.55 KB,1280x966,640:483,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 982f26c70126949⋯.jpg (145.39 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711773 (131032ZJUN26) Notable: ‘No escape’: Mum of son abused by childcare worker David William James speaks of ‘horror and fear’ - The mother of a child abused by former childcare worker David William James has described the lasting trauma, guilt and anxiety she continues to experience in a victim impact statement presented to a Sydney court. James, 26, has pleaded guilty to multiple child abuse offences committed at out-of-school-hours care centres across Sydney between 2021 and 2024, including producing and possessing child abuse material. The woman said she lived with constant reminders of the abuse and would “forever wonder” whether her son had tried to tell her something she failed to recognise at the time. She described learning details of the offending through an Australian Federal Police investigation as a moment of “horror and fear”, and said concerns about her son’s future now affect everyday activities, including school events and childcare arrangements. James is due to be sentenced on July 2.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘No escape’: Mum of son abused by childcare worked David William James speaks of ‘horror and fear’

CLAREESE PACKER - June 12, 2026

WARNING: Distressing content

The mother of a child who was sexually abused by a childcare worker says she will “forever wonder” if her son was “trying to tell me something”.

In a harrowing victim impact statement read on her behalf in the NSW District Court on Friday, the woman detailed the “horror and fear” she felt when she discovered her son was a victim.

David William James admitted to a raft of child abuse offences against children aged as young as five at out-of-school hours (OOSH) care centres across Sydney between 2021 and 2024.

The 26-year-old pleaded guilty to 11 charges last December, including using a child under 14 to make child abuse material, filming a sexual act with a child under the age of 16 for abuse material, and possessing and producing child abuse material.

The mother of one of James’ victims told the court that every day was now filled with triggers and reminders that she “can’t escape from”, with the woman wanting to scream “children are not safe” when she sees OOSH staff now.

“There is no escape or way to move forward,” her victim impact statement, read to the court on her behalf, stated.

“I wonder if my son will recall something someday and what this will do to him.

“My son was innocent, he was a little boy who deserved to feel safe.

“(I will) forever wonder if he was trying to tell me something more at the time and I misread the signs.”

She and her husband now finish work early every day to pick their son up and take time off on school holidays to care for him.

The woman also spoke of how school camps and swimming lessons were now “weighted with what could happen”, and of how she feels responsible for James’ actions.

“What is worse than knowing what this man has done is feeling responsible for his actions,” she said.

“The guilt you feel in leaving (your children) to go to work is only eased by assuring yourself that they are safe … Mr James’s actions has stolen this from me.”

She wrote of the “surreal” moment the Australian Federal Police had asked her to identify articles of clothing in a photograph that belonged to her son and how the police were unable to give her any further information about the abuse until a non-publication order had been lifted.

“(There was a) mix of horror and fear when we were finally informed of what Mr James had done,” the woman said.

She said she woke up most nights wondering if the abuse identified by the police was “really all that happened”.

James, who was beamed into the courtroom via an audiovisual link from custody, did not react as the statement was read out.

Parents of his victims also dialled in online for the hearing.

The court was told James was a probationary constable in the NSW Police Force at the time of some of his offending.

He had written a letter of apology, was remorseful for his actions, and open to treatment, the court was told.

James will be sentenced on July 2.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/no-escape-mum-of-son-abused-by-childcare-worked-david-william-james-speaks-of-horror-and-fear/news-story/ff822a4b9df3d2c95032b1829d54e6b2

Revealed: Former Knox student allegedly made videos at childcare centres - August 01, 2025

https://archive.vn/vHdei#23419003

Childcare worker, former Knox student David William James charged with producing child abuse material - 4 December 2025

https://archive.vn/4OWXq

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62927

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711783 (131044ZJUN26) Notable: Court denies child sex offender Ashley Paul Griffith’s bid to cut jail time - (Video) Queensland’s Court of Appeal has rejected child sex offender Ashley Paul Griffith’s attempt to reduce the 27-year non-parole period attached to his life sentence, clearing the way for possible extradition to New South Wales to face more than 100 additional charges. Griffith pleaded guilty to more than 300 offences, including rape, indecent treatment of children and child exploitation offences, involving 69 girls in Queensland and overseas while working in childcare settings. The court found the sentence properly reflected the scale and seriousness of the offending. Justice John Bond said Griffith had created “a widening gyre of grave hurt and trauma”, betraying the trust of children, parents and colleagues and causing lasting harm to confidence in childcare institutions. Victims’ families welcomed the ruling and expressed hope that legal proceedings in New South Wales could now begin.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24653832

>>62792

>>62842

Court denies child sex offender Ashley Paul Griffith’s bid to cut jail time

The Court of Appeal has thrown out childcare monster Ashley Paul Griffith’s bid to reduce his 27-year non-parole period, paving the way for his possible interstate extradition.

Patrick Billings - June 12, 2026

1/2

Childcare monster Ashley Paul Griffith has had his appeal thrown out, paving the way for his possible extradition interstate to face justice there.

The prolific child sex offender, who molested 69 girls in childcare centres in Queensland and overseas, was denied by the Court of Appeal on Friday.

Griffith, who pleaded guilty to more than 300 charges involving rape, indecent treatment of children under 12 by carer and making child exploitation material, was sentenced to life in jail with a non-parole period of 27 years.

Griffith applied for leave to appeal his sentence in a bid to reduce the non-parole period but leave the life sentence undisturbed.

The application, which argued the non-parole period was manifestly excessive, was heard before Justices John Bond, Sean Cooper and Robert Gotterson last month.

Top barrister Ruth O’Gorman KC, for the DPP, argued Griffith’s sentence was not manifestly excessive and captured the horror of the 600 sexual acts that the monster had perpetrated on scores of the most vulnerable.

“There is a difficulty in a case of this kind … in truly giving expression to the seriousness of the offending itself and to the reality of harm that was caused to the girls, their parents, and the community,” she told the Court of Appeal where a number of victims and their families sat.

Defence barrister Sarah Cartledge argued the non-parole eligibility period of 27 years handed down to her client did not recognise the significant co-operation Griffith provided to authorities.

Justice John Bond said it was possible but not certain that some judges may have given Griffith a “little more benefit” for his co-operation than sentence judge Justice Paul Smith, who was later promoted to the Supreme Court.

“But there is no single correct sentence. I am not persuaded that the sentencing judge permitted the factors of denunciation, punishment and deterrence to overwhelm the proper exercise of his sentencing discretion,” Justice Bond said.

“In my view the exercise of the sentencing discretion to require the applicant to serve a minimum period of 27 years’ imprisonment was within the bounds of a proper exercise of the sentencing discretion.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62928

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711793 (131056ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Very happy’: Victim’s joy over paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith’s appeal fail - (Video) The family of one of Ashley Paul Griffith’s victims has welcomed the failure of the convicted child sex offender’s appeal, saying they were “very happy” with the outcome and believed he did not deserve any reduction in sentence. Queensland’s Court of Appeal dismissed Griffith’s bid to reduce the 27-year non-parole period attached to his life sentence for 307 offences against 69 children over almost two decades. The judges found the scale and severity of the offending, and the harm inflicted on victims, families and the wider community, outweighed the value of Griffith’s cooperation with police after his arrest. The court said it was difficult to overstate the damage caused by his crimes and upheld findings that he had shown limited remorse. The ruling clears the way for Griffith’s possible extradition to New South Wales, where he faces almost 200 additional child sex offence charges involving more than 20 children.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24653832

>>62792

>>62842

>>62927

‘Very happy’: Victim’s joy over paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith’s appeal fail

Rex Martinich - June 12, 2026

The family of a girl assaulted by one of Australia’s worst paedophiles hopes interstate victims receive justice soon after an appeal by the notorious predator failed.

Ashley Paul Griffith, 48, may be extradited to NSW to face almost 200 child sexual offences after his bid to reduce a life sentence for years of childcare centre assaults was dismissed.

Griffith’s lawyers had argued the 27-year non-parole period he was handed for 307 offences committed on 69 young children over almost 20 years was “manifestly excessive”.

One of his victims bravely attended Brisbane’s Court of Appeal on Friday to see Justice David Boddice hand down the decision to dismiss the appeal during a brief sitting.

“We are very happy with today’s outcome,” the victim’s mother said outside court.

“We don’t think he deserved any reduction in sentence after everything he has done to all those victims.”

The appeal’s conclusion clears the path for Griffith to face court proceedings in NSW, where he is accused of committing 180 sex offences against more than 20 children.

The mother said her “heart goes out” to all the alleged interstate victims in NSW.

“We hope that he is moved to NSW as quickly as possible so he can face them,” she said.

Comment has been sought from NSW Police.

The victim and her family, who can’t be identified for legal reasons, sat in the Court of Appeal as the judgment was handed down and a scathing written decision was issued.

The three appeal justices said the violent depravity and life-long effects on children and parents from Griffith’s offending overwhelmed any assistance he gave to police after being arrested.

They said his offending had caused a widening ring of grave hurt and trauma and called for a sentence with “very significant deterrent effect”.

In refusing the appeal, the justices said the original District Court sentencing judge’s finding that Griffith was not actively remorseful was correct.

“[Griffith] does not identify any specific errors in that sentence,” they stated.

“The true position is that it is difficult to overstate the extent of the harm wrought by [Griffith] over the 20 years of his disgraceful offending.”

Griffith had pleaded guilty to 307 child sex offences against 65 victims aged between one and nine.

It included 28 counts of rape against girls mainly aged three to five at Queensland childcare centres between 2007 and 2022.

The justices said Griffith had corroded trust in childcare and the people who worked alongside him.

The appeal was focused on the parole eligibility date, with the defence arguing that while a life sentence was open, the minimum term effectively imposed a harsher punishment than in similar cases of extreme child sex offending.

Defence barrister Sarah Cartledge told the panel of three judges during a hearing in May Griffith’s crimes were “truly awful” and he had preyed upon “the most vulnerable” while in a position of trust.

However, she said Griffith had co-operated fully and openly since his arrest, giving about 18 hours of interviews.

“His extensive co-operation and guilty plea saved an enormous amount of court time and spared child complainants from giving evidence,” she said previously.

The victim’s mother said outside court she understood Cartledge was doing her job but it was hard to hear the claimed grounds for appeal.

“It cuts very deep to hear someone argue that a rape isn’t violent,” the mother said.

“All rapes are violent.”

Throughout two decades of preying on children, Griffith filmed all but one of his victims, building a vast cache of abuse he shared online.

When detectives raided his Gold Coast home in 2022, they seized more than 4000 child abuse images and videos documenting much of his offending.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/decision-on-notorious-paedophile-s-appeal-bid-revealed-20260612-p6068j.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib8To-KTAa4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62929

File: 2ac1c0714f075c9⋯.mp4 (15.1 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 33db89928dd46d7⋯.jpg (420.59 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24711827 (131112ZJUN26) Notable: Experts demand inquest for ex-prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre - (Video) More than a dozen women’s safety advocates have called for a coronial inquest into the death of Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide at her Western Australia home aged 41. In a letter to the WA coroner, advocate Alison Evans and 15 other women’s safety campaigners argued that “it would be a profound injustice” if questions about whether systems failed Giuffre in her final months were not thoroughly examined. Evans said a coronial review was “a critical opportunity” to identify any systemic failures or gaps in support. The advocates said an inquest could help provide answers for Giuffre’s family and assess the adequacy of existing support systems. WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch said any decision on an inquest remained “at the coroner’s discretion”. The Coroner’s Court will consider the matter after police investigations and consultation with Giuffre’s next of kin.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39062 (pb)

>>62682

>>62913

Experts demand inquest for ex-prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre

9News Staff - June 11, 2026

More than a dozen women’s safety advocates have written to the West Australian coroner calling for an inquest into the death of Virginia Giuffre.

They claim the 41-year-old accuser of paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein and former prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor deserves an inquiry into what led to her taking her life.

Giuffre’s family says her death by suicide at her rural WA home leaves questions that need to be answered.

Experts say those answers will only come from an inquest.

Advocate Alison Evans joined 15 other women’s safety champions from around Australia in writing to the coroner today, calling for a public hearing.

“It would be a profound injustice if the question of whether systems failed her in her final months were not examined with equivalent rigour,” they wrote.

The letter referred to Giuffre’s courageous pursuit of accountability as a victim of Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.

“A coronial review is such a critical opportunity to better understand where there may have been any systems failures or gaps,” Evans told 9News.

WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch said it was up to the coroner.

“It’s at the coroner’s discretion to always call a coronial inquest if they see fit and police always support a coroner in those,” he said.

The WA Coroner’s Court says a decision on an inquest will be made once the police investigation is complete and following consultation with Virginia Giuffre’s next of kin.

https://www.nine.com.au/australia-news/wa/virginia-giuffre-womens-safety-advocates-call-for-inquest-into-former-prince-andrew-accuser-death-20260611-p6064p.html

https://cevaw.org/open-letter-inquest-into-the-death-of-virginia-giuffre/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62930

File: 23590a934c9aeee⋯.jpg (161.42 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c1afa034e2c580a⋯.jpg (104.65 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719096 (150953ZJUN26) Notable: Last Australian ISIS bride and her disabled child vanish in Syrian prison - Australia’s last remaining Islamic State-linked detainee in Syria, Hodan Abby, and her disabled nine-year-old daughter have disappeared into Syria’s detention system after the Albanese government blocked her return under a temporary exclusion order issued by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke. Abby was denied boarding a repatriation flight in May and transferred to Idlib, a small city in Syria’s northwest, where she told family she was “OK” and heading to a detention centre. That was the last contact relatives received. Family members and legal representatives say they have “lost total contact” with her and do not know where she is being held. Concerns have grown because her daughter requires urgent treatment for shrapnel injuries, while human rights groups have documented abuse, torture and poor medical care in detention facilities in the region.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62755

>>62766

Last Australian ISIS bride and her disabled child vanish in Syrian prison

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 14, 2026

1/2

Australia’s last remaining Islamic State bride in the war zone and her disabled young child have disappeared into a Syrian prison system notorious for torture and abuse after the Albanese government stopped the mother from boarding a flight home.

When Hodan Abby was denied boarding a flight in Damascus with the last group of six woman in May because of a temporary exclusion order issued by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, she was not returned to the Roj internment camp in northeast Syria. She was sent to Idlib by Syrian officials.

The mother of a disabled daughter who desperately needs medical attention is now “lost in the system” and could be holed up in one of several notorious prisons in the west of the country with no means of communication with her family.

Idlib, a small city in Syria’s northwest, was where Syria’s new ruler, Ahmed al-Sharaa, wielded power through the militant group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

The Australian can reveal that in one of her last messages with her family after being blocked from travelling to Australia, Abby told them she was “OK” and that she would be going to a detention centre in Idlib. That was understood to be the last time they heard from their daughter in more than three weeks.

The family did not wish to speak when approached by The Australian, but multiple sources confirmed she was in an unknown prison with no means of communication.

Abby, 29, escaped from her home in western Sydney in 2015 with a friend when she was 18 and was trapped in Kurdish-run camps for years with her daughter, who suffers from shrapnel wounds in her head, hip and back.

The Australian previously revealed her relatives had engaged Birchgrove Legal principal solicitor Moustafa Kheir, hoping to challenge the federal government-issued TEO, which is due to expire in February 2028. It’s understood the legal challenge has not been initiated; Mr Kheir did not respond to The Australian when approached for comment.

Although there are limited grounds to appeal a TEO, and such an order has not been tested before, an opportunity to apply for re-entry with control orders had been floating as a possible point of argument.

“The family has lost total contact with their daughter,” one source said. “They are worried about her safety and that is their only driving factor at the moment. It’s the only thing on their minds.

“The lawyer (Mr Kheir) is in the same boat. There’s no information coming from Hodan so they can’t seek instructions, they can’t progress anything at the moment.”

Another source said: “Hodan’s last message to her family was she was OK and … going to Idlib. She’s now in a detention centre but no one knows where.

“She’s messaged (her family) to say that’s where she is and that she was OK, but then nothing’s happened since.”

Despite having a choice to allow her child to travel to Australia last month, Abby chose not to be separated from her.

Her child, 9, has a series of debilitating medical conditions caused by shrapnel that has been in her body for most of her life. If the shrapnel is not removed soon, medical records show she could suffer permanent paralysis.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62931

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719108 (151006ZJUN26) Notable: ISIS bride rejects extremism, decries Syrian 'hell' - (Video) Accused “ISIS bride” Zeinab Ahmad has rejected Islamic State ideology and described her 11 years in Syria as “11 years of hell”, according to submissions made by her lawyer during a Melbourne bail hearing. Ahmad, 31, faces slavery-related charges linked to allegations that a teenage girl purchased by her father in Syria in 2017 was subjected to abuse. Ahmad denies the allegations and is not accused of physically assaulting the girl. Her lawyer argued she no longer holds extremist views, is grateful to be back in Australia, and wants her daughter to attend a public school. The defence also noted the case could take years to reach trial because of its complexity. Prosecutors oppose bail, with the hearing continuing before Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62856

>>62886

ISIS bride rejects extremism, decries Syrian 'hell'

Tara Cosoleto - June 15 2026

An accused "ISIS bride" rejects Islamic extremism and considers her time in Syria to have been 11 years of hell.

Zeinab Ahmad's lawyer made the assertions on her behalf on Monday as her application for bail entered its third day.

"My client does not support Islamic State," barrister Grace Morgan told Melbourne Magistrates Court.

"She rejects Islamic State. She has a deep anger towards it and to those men who enforced its ideals upon her."

Ahmad, 31, was charged with slavery offences in May after returning to Australia with other so-called "ISIS brides" and their children.

It's alleged Ahmad moved to Syria with her first husband Dawod in January 2015 and he became a member of Islamic State before he was killed in a drone strike in May 2016.

Federal police allege it was while she was living with her family in 2017 that Ahmad's father Mohammad bought a teenage girl as a slave for $US10,000.

It's alleged the girl was repeatedly raped and beaten by Mohammad, with the claimed attacks including an incident where she was hit and dragged down two flights of stairs by the hair.

The girl reported screaming loudly during the incidents so Ahmad and the other family members would have known what was happening, the court was told.

It is not alleged Ahmad assaulted the girl but the teen claims she was "treated very badly" by her.

Ms Morgan told the court the slavery allegations were denied but it could be years before the case reached trial.

She noted it was the first time the charge of crime against humanity for enslavement would be tried in Australia.

As a result, it was expected there would be pre-trial issues and public interest immunity claims made by Australian and international agencies, which could lead to lengthy delays, Ms Morgan said.

That meant Ahmad's time on remand could exceed any possible sentence, the barrister said.

The separation from her daughter was also a significant hardship for the young girl who already suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, the lawyer said.

When it came to being a potential risk to the community, Ms Morgan maintained her client did not hold extremist Islamic views.

The barrister earlier pointed to comments Ahmad made to a psychologist, in which she described her time in Syria as being "11 years of hell" that she would not wish on anyone.

Ahmad now refused to cover her face and wanted her daughter to attend a public school, where she could interact with multicultural students, Ms Morgan said.

After the lunch break and following questions from the magistrate, the barrister was even stronger in her assertions that Ahmad rejected Islamic State.

"She is happy to be back in Australia," Ms Morgan said.

"She is grateful for the freedoms that she and her daughter and her wider family, particularly her sisters, can enjoy."

Ms Morgan maintained any risk Ahmad posed could be reduced through strict bail conditions, including a curfew and a ban on using social media.

The prosecution, who oppose bail, will make submissions before Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan when the bail application continues on Tuesday.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9292706/isis-bride-rejects-extremism-decries-syrian-hell/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYqMYka9F58

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62932

File: b75321e905064c8⋯.jpg (2.45 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719118 (151019ZJUN26) Notable: Liberal Party senator for Tasmania Jonno Duniam to retire before next election - Opposition home affairs spokesman Senator Jonno Duniam has announced he will retire before the next federal election, saying family considerations and the Liberal Party’s February leadership change convinced him it was time to leave politics. The Tasmanian senator, first elected in 2016, said the leadership coup was the moment he realised he had “had enough”, although he stressed the Coalition’s poor polling and electoral challenges did not influence his decision. Duniam said his children had struggled with his long absences and recalled his youngest son responding to news of the resignation by saying, “I thought this day would never come”. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor praised Duniam’s service, while Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke described him as one of the Liberal Party’s “best and brightest”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62800

Liberal Party senator for Tasmania Jonno Duniam to retire before next election

Brittany Busch - June 14, 2026

1/2

Liberal senator Jonno Duniam says the party’s leadership coup in February was the tipping point for his decision to quit politics, the latest blow to a beleaguered Coalition after more than a year of turmoil.

The opposition home affairs spokesman announced on Sunday he would not recontest his Tasmanian Senate seat at the next election, saying he had pondered his political future for years because of the toll the job had taken on his family.

“In terms of moments that crystallised it for me, I have to say I think the leadership change earlier this year was the point in time where I thought, ‘I’ve had enough, I think there are things that I need to tend to that are more important than this’,” Duniam said at a press conference in Hobart.

The 43-year-old’s departure is a significant hit to the party for which he was elected in 2016.

The conservative factional heavyweight had been viewed as a rising star within the Coalition, taking on the prominent home affairs portfolio under former leader Sussan Ley. Those responsibilities grew to include direct control over immigration policy under Angus Taylor, a priority for the opposition leader in trying to fend off the rise of One Nation.

Revelations that Duniam, a key member of Ley’s leadership team, was involved in plotting leadership change built momentum for Taylor to challenge the leadership, and his resignation from Ley’s frontbench helped force the spill.

Duniam insisted the Coalition’s electoral prospects did not factor into his decision, and that the time had come for him to reprioritise his family – as he had contemplated since his re-election in 2022. His resignation will force a shadow ministry reshuffle after Taylor overhauled the frontbench when he took on the leadership in February.

“Where we’re at in the polls is irrelevant,” he said. “If I’m talking about family versus work, then I can tell you now, it wouldn’t matter whether we were on the precipice of a landslide win or the doldrums of electoral defeat, I would be making the same decision.”

Duniam said his children had struggled with his absence during his career in politics.

“When I brought home the Sunday Tasmanian [reporting the resignation] and sat it on the table, my youngest son when he saw it... said, ‘I thought this day would never come’,” he said.

The senator acknowledged he was leaving at a “difficult time” for the party, and said he was staying on for a short time at Taylor’s request to finalise the party’s immigration policies.

Duniam said he was confident in Taylor’s leadership, but warned his colleagues that they needed to act as if the party could form government in its own right, after a week of MPs sending out conflicting messages about potential deals with One Nation.

“If we’re just going to wave the white flag and say that it’s over now, we’ve just got to do deals ... to get across the line, then we’re not doing our job properly,” he said.

“I’ve never met … a member of the Labor Party who says: ‘It’s all right, you vote Green first, and we’ll do a deal with the Greens after the fact.’ ”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62933

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719126 (151028ZJUN26) Notable: ‘No’: Ben Carroll’s blunt response when asked if he’s going to topple Jacinta Allan on Tuesday - (Video) Victorian Deputy Premier Ben Carroll has publicly ruled out challenging Premier Jacinta Allan, seeking to quell speculation about a possible leadership spill as Labor MPs continue debating the party’s future. Appearing alongside Allan at a press conference, Carroll repeatedly stated he had “the job I want” and rejected suggestions he would move against her at a caucus meeting. Asked directly whether he planned to challenge the Premier, he answered: “No.” When prompted to look Allan in the eye and rule out a challenge, Carroll replied: “I can look you in the eye and say that, Premier.” Allan said she remained focused on governing and expected no challenge, despite internal concerns about polling and the rise of One Nation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62920

‘No’: Ben Carroll’s blunt response when asked if he’s going to topple Jacinta Allan on Tuesday

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 15 June 2026

Victorian Labor MPs believe Deputy Premier Ben Carroll’s eye-to-eye vow to not challenge Jacinta Allan has decreased the chances of a leadership spill this week.

While agitators are still pushing for a change to happen this week, state Labor MPs conceded that Mr Carroll’s comments on Monday decreased the chances of a challenge occurring in the coming days.

As Labor MPs continued to plot against the Premier, Ms Allan’s office arranged for her and and Mr Carroll to appear at a press conference alongside each other on Monday morning in an attempted show of unity.

The Deputy Premier was asked at least six times whether he wanted to be Premier, answering repeatedly that he “has the job I want”.

“We have a Premier and she is working harder than anyone every day,” Mr Carroll said.

“I’ve got a young daughter at home and I couldn’t be more proud to make sure she grows up knowing that I supported Jacinta Allan to be a world-class premier and get re-elected in her own right.”

Asked whether he was going to challenge Ms Allan at a caucus meeting on Tuesday morning, he said “No.”

He also ruled out asking her to step aside.

Mr Carroll was then asked by a journalist to look Ms Allan in the eye and rule out a challenge, and he turned to the Premier and said: “I can look you in the eye and say that, Premier.”

Ms Allan declared she was not standing down because she was “focused every day on fighting for Victorians and this task is becoming more and more important, as we are seeing a One Nation outfit and a Liberal Party that cannot govern without One Nation”.

While conceding that polls showed the rise of One Nation was “causing some challenges for the Labor Party”, she said it was “causing a complete crisis for the Liberal and National parties”.

She said she was not expecting a challenge at Tuesday morning’s caucus meeting and that she had not spoken with Mr Carroll about a potential challenge. Asked whether she would stand down if caucus approached her and declared her leadership was over, Ms Allan said: “That’s a hypothetical and I won’t be answering hypotheticals.”

Many of the Labor MPs who wanted a change believed this week was the best time to strike considering that state parliament is rising for six weeks from Thursday evening. However, some insist a challenge could still be made in late July or early August if polls continued to worsen.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/no-ben-carrolls-blunt-response-when-asked-if-hes-going-to-topple-jacinta-allan-on-tuesday/news-story/538790dce9878e68a54049ce8ed59406

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1jt5vxNwkQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62934

File: 286eef7b2dd090b⋯.jpg (424.18 KB,1280x1641,1280:1641,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719141 (151046ZJUN26) Notable: Gina Rinehart secures one billion dollar stake in Elon Musk’s SpaceX - Hancock Prospecting, the company owned by Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart, has acquired a stake in SpaceX reportedly worth $US1 billion, marking its largest investment outside the mining sector. The investment follows SpaceX’s public listing, which valued the company at about $US2.1 trillion. Rinehart praised founder Elon Musk as “a truly exceptional person” whose companies have helped shape the future of technology, space and communications. She highlighted SpaceX’s achievements in reusable rockets, satellite broadband and artificial intelligence. Hancock Prospecting chief executive Garry Korte said the investment could create future opportunities between SpaceX and the company’s critical minerals projects. The move expands Hancock’s growing portfolio of technology, media and US-based investments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62896

>>62903

Gina Rinehart secures one billion dollar stake in Elon Musk’s SpaceX

JOHN STENSHOLT - 15 June 2026

Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart has emerged with a $US1bn stake in SpaceX, the hottest new stock founded by the world’s wealthiest individual Elon Musk, and signalled she wants to work with the trillionaire.

Mrs Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting is fast emerging as one of Australia’s biggest privately held equities investors, and has made its largest ever investment outside mining in SpaceX, which last week pulled off the world’s largest initial public offering.

SpaceX was founded by Mr Musk in 2002 and ended its first day of trading on Friday with a market value of $US2.1 trillion.

Among the shareholders cashing in was Hancock Prospecting, which has bought up a string of mining, including rare earths, stocks in the past two years, as well as technology and media holdings.

Mrs Rinehart said in a statement: “We see SpaceX as a rare business: led by a truly exceptional person, technically exceptional and operating in sectors that are crucial, and with long-term potential. Hancock favours investing in industries led by sensible, hard working, patriotic and exceptional people. Elon excels in every regard.”

The Australian mining magnate has met Mr Musk several times, including at US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago private members resort in Florida, where she is a member.

“Elon has done what very few people in history have done – he has not just imagined the future, he has built companies capable of delivering it, and helped to keep American technology at the forefront,” Mrs Rinehart said.

“SpaceX’s record speaks for itself. It was the first private company to launch a liquid-fuel rocket to orbit in 2008, the first to dock a private spacecraft with the International Space Station in 2012, and other firsts, and, very critically, through Starlink, the first to begin deploying large-scale LEO broadband satellite constellations in 2019, which network is critical for communications.

“SpaceX stands apart as the only company globally building integrated hardware and software across its core segments of space, connectivity and AI. It has changed what many thought was possible – from reusable rockets to advanced connectivity – and its work will continue to shape industries, economies and opportunities for decades to come.”

Hancock Prospecting chief executive Garry Korte said Hancock receiving an allocation of SpaceX shares was a “pleasing result” and reflected the international regard for Mrs Rinehart and her company.

“In the future, we also see the possibility of mutually beneficial arrangements between SpaceX and Hancock Prospecting’s significant critical minerals investments, as demand grows for the materials and infrastructure needed to support advanced technology,” Mr Korte said.

He noted SpaceX had “in a short space of time … built a leading AI platform, Grok, which we use. They continue to innovate with the design and manufacture of their own chips as well as putting AI compute into orbit”.

The Wall Street Journal reported Hancock Prospecting held a SpaceX stake worth about $US1bn ($1.42bn). SpaceX shares rose about 19 per cent on the Nasdaq on Friday.

Mrs Rinehart said SpaceX “is yet another clear example of why the world needs more enterprise, more builders and much less bureaucracy. It has delivered lower costs and greater capability by moving with the urgency and discipline that bureaucracy too often delays or prevents.

“As Elon Musk says: ‘The larger government gets, the less individual freedom you have. Your freedoms have just been eroded year after year with more and more government, laws and regulations and regulatory authorities’.”

Before its SpaceX investment, Hancock Prospecting had a $5bn share portfolio, comprising mostly mining stocks but also with some media investments.

There is an almost $100m holding in Fox Corp, the owner of the Fox News cable network and Fox Sports networks in the US, and Hancock Prospecting also owns shares in the ­Nasdaq-listed Trump Media & Technology Group.

Hancock Prospecting, which is majority owned and run by Mrs Rinehart, has also been buying US defence and weapons-making stocks this year.

Other holdings include Tesla, Nvidia, Microsoft, ­Netflix, Meta, Alphabet and Amazon.

She has lent former Seven Network commercial director Bruce McWilliam about $26m to buy shares in Southern Cross Media. Previously, Mrs Rinehart has been a major shareholder in Fairfax Media – sources say she once considered forming a consortium to buy The Age newspaper – and Network Ten in Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/gina-rinehart-takes-14bn-stake-in-elon-musks-newly-public-spacex/news-story/d8841865ca66a4c684cde242ae3c4c4e

https://www.hancockprospecting.com.au/hancock-prospecting-backs-spacex/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62935

File: 9e5bad8127d2057⋯.jpg (173.37 KB,1600x935,320:187,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 52deddd58b49498⋯.jpg (315.44 KB,1600x1000,8:5,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0c41c5fff034ea5⋯.jpg (118.59 KB,1600x1000,8:5,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a659d5ea8f95a64⋯.jpg (278.74 KB,1600x899,1600:899,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719146 (151052ZJUN26) Notable: Boeing unveils bigger, badder MQ-28 Ghost Bat at Berlin airshow - Boeing has unveiled an upgraded version of the Australian-designed MQ-28 Ghost Bat uncrewed combat aircraft at the Berlin Air Show, showcasing what is believed to be the Block 3 model intended for future operational service with the Royal Australian Air Force. The new design features a 25 per cent larger wing area, allowing an extra 1000 kilograms of fuel or weapons, and includes internal weapons bays capable of carrying air-to-air missiles or precision-guided bombs. Additional upgrades include beyond-line-of-sight communications, enhanced mission payload options and improved autonomous capabilities. Boeing said the changes were developed with the Royal Australian Air Force and reflected lessons learned from testing. The Ghost Bat program received a further $1.4 billion in federal funding in 2025 to support its transition into operational service.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62889

Boeing unveils bigger, badder MQ-28 Ghost Bat at Berlin airshow

Andrew McLaughlin - 11 June 2026

Boeing has used the ILA Berlin Air Show in Germany to unveil a growth version of its MQ-28 Ghost Bat uncrewed collaborative combat aircraft (CCA).

Details of the latest iteration of the Australian-designed and developed concept were likely revealed at Berlin because the Ghost Bat is being pitched for German and other possible European CCA requirements in collaboration with Rheinmetall.

Although Boeing hasn’t given the larger version a different designation in its public disclosures, it is believed the aircraft unveiled at Berlin is the Block 3 iteration which will be the same or similar to the Royal Australian Air Force’s first planned operational version of the aircraft.

To date, about eight MQ-28 Block 1 and nine Block 2 versions have been built or are under construction for the RAAF for concept and operational development, with at least one company-owned aircraft sent to the US for evaluation by the Pentagon.

The Block 3 features 25 per cent greater wing area over the Block 2, allowing it to carry 1000 kg of additional fuel and external stores stations. It also has internal weapons bays on the fuselage flanks capable of carrying two AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles or four GBU-53/B StormBreaker precision glide bombs.

Boeing’s MQ-28 global program director Glen Ferguson said, “That additional capacity gives operators freedom to balance payload and endurance to configure for the mission at hand, whether that means carrying extra fuel for longer-range operations, increasing weapons carriage, or any combination of both.

“These features, developed in partnership with the Royal Australian Air Force, will be progressively released to the fleet through a spiral upgrade program, and are available to interested allied countries.”

Other improvements have been made to the aircraft’s communications suite giving it a beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) capability for command and control, an upgraded modular nose section able to carry enhanced mission payloads, and open architecture software allowing for tailored weapons, payloads, command and control, and mission autonomy.

The aircraft can fly a pre-programmed mission without operator input, or can be controlled from a ground-based or airborne operator.

“Inclusion of features such as BLOS capability are a direct result of our learnings to date along with feedback from air forces as they understand more about the role and integration of CCAs into joint force operations,” Ferguson said.

Vice president and managing director of Boeing Defence Australia, Amy List added, “The advanced maturity of the MQ-28 systems is what allows us to continually adapt to the changing operational environment and minimise the risk as we transition to operations.

“Combined with the MQ-28’s confirmed low observability characteristics and survivability upgrades, these capability enhancements support more flexible mission concepts and further allow Defence customers to distribute operational risk.”

The Ghost Bat was designed by Boeing Defence Australia’s Phantom Works team, and jointly funded by Boeing and the Federal Government. In December 2025 the government announced it would contribute an additional $1.4 billion to transition the Ghost Bat from a developmental program into an operational capability.

That announcement followed a successful 2025 test in which a Ghost Bat teamed with an E-7A Wedgetail airborne command and control aircraft and an F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter to successfully fire an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile and shoot down a fighter-representative target drone in flight at Woomera in remote South Australia, and a successful operational evaluation of the MQ-28 at RAAF Tindal in the Northern Territory.

Since then, the Ghost Bat’s low radar ‘stealth’ signature has been verified in a series of tests in an anechoic chamber, and the MQ-28 that was sent to the US has completed a test series for the US Navy at NAS Ventura County and a nearby test range north of Los Angeles.

https://psnews.com.au/boeing-unveils-bigger-badder-mq-28-ghost-bat-at-berlin-airshow/180124/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62936

File: 2cbd3499a67da15⋯.mp4 (9.41 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719161 (151110ZJUN26) Notable: Australian referee accused of ‘white power’ gesture during World Cup broadcast - (Video) Australian referee Shaun Evans has come under scrutiny after television footage from the FIFA World Cup showed him making an upside-down “OK” hand sign while in a video assistant referee booth before Germany’s 7-1 win over Curacao. Images of the gesture circulated online, with some social media users alleging it was a “white power” symbol, while others argued it was part of a common game in which participants try to make others look at the hand sign. FIFA said it was aware of the incident but declined further comment. Evans has not publicly responded to the allegations. The experienced official has been an A-League referee since 2012 and a FIFA-listed referee since 2017, and is officiating at his second World Cup after also serving at the 2022 tournament.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62873

Australian referee accused of ‘white power’ gesture during World Cup broadcast

Frances Howe - June 15, 2026

Australian referee Shaun Evans has been accused of making a “white power” gesture during the World Cup broadcast before Germany’s 7-1 win over Curacao on Monday (AEST).

The broadcast cut to Evans alongside two colleagues in a video assistant referees booth, where he could be seen making an upside-down “OK” sign against his thigh.

The gesture has traditionally been used to signify approval, but has been adopted by sections of the far right in recent years.

The Boston Globe first reported the use of the symbol as a white supremacist gesture in 2018, when it appeared on the website 4chan. It was also used by the Australian gunman responsible for the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings when he appeared in court.

An official who made a similar gesture during the live broadcast of the Paris 2024 Olympics skateboarding final had his accreditation revoked as a result.

Screen captures of Evans performing the sign are circulating on social media, with some users claiming he was making the white power gesture. Others say the hand signal was part of a game in which a person loses if they look at the circle.

A FIFA spokesperson told The Athletic the organisation was aware of the incident but declined to comment further.

Evans has not yet commented publicly on the allegations.

Evans has been a full-time referee in the A-League since 2012 and a FIFA-listed referee since 2017. This is his second World Cup. He was also a part of the VAR team in the 2022 Qatar World Cup.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/soccer/australian-referee-accused-of-white-power-gesture-during-world-cup-broadcast-20260615-p606xh.html

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7361130/2026/06/14/shaun-evans-white-power-fifa-world-cup/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62937

File: ec6b0ac277378e0⋯.jpg (174.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0b547d7e5fb6520⋯.jpg (447.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24719173 (151121ZJUN26) Notable: Giggle app founder Sall Grover launches High Court appeal after discrimination ruling - Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover has applied to the High Court for special leave to appeal a Federal Court ruling that found she discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by removing her from the women-only social media app. The appeal follows a May decision that increased damages awarded to Tickle to $20,000, in addition to legal costs. Grover said the case raises “fundamental questions” about the legal meaning of sex, women’s single-sex spaces and the interpretation of the Sex Discrimination Act. She argued the dispute concerns whether women retain the right to female-only spaces based on biological sex. Australian Human Rights Commission Sex Discrimination Commissioner Dr Anna Cody welcomed the ruling, stating legal protections “extend to all women, including transgender women”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62692

>>62696

>>62700

>>62771

>>62822

Giggle app founder Sall Grover launches High Court appeal after discrimination ruling

RHIANNON LEWIN and KATE STEPHENSON - 15 June 2026

Female-only app founder Sall Grover is taking her legal fight to Australia’s highest court, after the federal court found she directly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle twice when she chose to remove her from the app.

Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd and founder Ms Grover confirmed on Monday they had filed a special leave application with the High Court seeking to appeal a federal-court decision handed down on May 15.

Ms Grover and the Giggle App were ordered to pay a higher total of $20,000 in damages to Ms Tickle, alongside court costs for the appeal and Ms Tickle’s cross appeal up to $50,000.

The damages were ordered to be paid within 60 days.

It followed an August 2024 decision where Ms Grover was ordered to pay $10,000 in damages after the Federal Court found she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle when she removed Ms Tickle from the app Giggles for Girls, designed to be a “safe, online space exclusively for women”.

Ms Tickle was originally given access to the app after an AI software test designed to filter out male users cleared her.

However, Ms Grover personally removed her after seeing her profile in 2021.

Despite her attempts to be readmitted to the app, Ms Tickle was denied by Ms Grover.

In a statement on Monday, Ms Grover said the “Giggle v Tickle” case raises “fundamental questions” under Australian law, including the legal meaning of “sex”, the right of women to create and maintain female-only spaces, and the “proper interpretation” of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).

“This case is not just about one app or one individual. It is about whether women in Australia still have the right to single-sex spaces based on biological sex,” Sall Grover said.

“These issues are of profound national importance. Reality and women’s rights must be properly upheld in law.”

Ms Grover said Giggle remains “fully committed to its mission of serving women”, and expresses “deep gratitude to the many thousands of supporters in Australia and around the world who continue to back this important fight”.

However, the Australian Human Rights Commission welcomed the court’s decision.

Sex Discrimination Commissioner Dr Anna Cody, who assisted in the appeal on an amicus basis, said the case had “prompted significant discussion about how our discrimination laws apply in practice”.

“The Sex Discrimination Act is intended to ensure all people are treated equally and can participate fully in public life. These protections extend to all women, including transgender women,” Dr Cody said

Shortly after the May decision was handed down One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said she was “disgusted” by the court’s finding.

“I will back Sall Grover in parliament,” she wrote.

The result was disappointing for many “fighting for biological rights of women”, opposition spokesperson for women Melissa McIntosh said.

“The issue is the Sex Discrimination Act,” she said on X.

“It is time for a review of the Sex Discrimination Act. Our laws should be working for Australian women, not against them.”

Both Senator Hanson and Ms McIntosh were quick to claim their parties had attempted to amend the Act.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/giggle-app-founder-sall-grover-launches-high-court-appeal-after-discrimination-ruling/news-story/e0cc69aa844f646de23a3f17164bb1e2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62938

File: d3500bfc58f8556⋯.mp4 (14.68 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24724911 (170122ZJUN26) Notable: Pauline Hanson uses Bondi grief footage in new ad attacking Albanese - (Video) One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has released a two-minute political advertisement combining footage of Australians facing hardship with images from the aftermath of the Bondi massacre, arguing that Australians are increasingly concerned about safety and living standards. The video, distributed across her social media platforms, features scenes of grieving families, homelessness and economic struggle alongside criticism of the Albanese government’s policies on migration and free speech. Hanson claims Australians “don’t feel they’re safe” and that “people are screaming out for change”. The advertisement concludes with a call for voters to decide “who will be the next government” and encourages donations to One Nation’s campaign. The video forms part of the party’s broader efforts to expand support ahead of the next federal election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

Pauline Hanson uses Bondi grief footage in new ad attacking Albanese

SARAH ISON - 17 June 2026

Pauline Hanson has released an evocative political advert across her social media platforms, with a high production video picturing Australians grieving at Bondi and living on the street as the One Nation leader declares “people are screaming out for change”.

The American single “I won’t back down”, produced for the latest Fast and the Furious movie, plays under the two-minute video published on Tuesday across social media platforms followed by 1.5 million Australians with the caption “you alone will decide the next government”.

Starting on a man in a dark room with his head in his hands, the video cuts to a child in bed with empty painkiller tablet sheets on his side table before capturing a mother holding a crying baby.

Senator Hanson speaks over stock footage of Australians gathered at Bondi following the massacre, declaring Australians now “don’t know where to turn” and “don’t feel they’re safe” accompanied by lyrics “I’m falling to my knees … but I won’t back down”.

The first shot of Senator Hanson is from the late 1990s surrounded by news cameras in Australian suburbs, before a speedy montage of shots since then including clips from her popular cartoon series “please explain”.

Following her message on Australians feeling unsafe, Senator Hanson warns mass migration is creating shortages and causing people to live “destitute” on the streets as the video captures homeless Australians living in tents or on the streets.

“Seven million Australians can only afford one meal a day, in a country as prosperous as what we used to be? People are screaming out for change” she says, going onto declare citizens rights had been “stripped” from them as a series of photos of Anthony Albanese appear on screen.

“Our freedom of speech is being taken from us.”

The video captures pro-Australian flag protests and Senator Hanson in parliament draped in the Australian flag.

As Senator Hanson’s final message plays telling viewers “it is your choice, you alone decide who will be the next government”, shots capture actors of various ages and backgrounds playing with their children and struggling to spread butter over toast.

The One Nation leader is seen embracing voters before being captured in parliament turning and smiling at the camera as the video fades to black with white text reading “stand up fire the liar”.

An unflattering photo of the Prime Minister is used to end the video, which calls viewers to donate and add to the $4m One Nation claims to have already raised.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pauline-hanson-uses-bondi-grief-footage-in-new-ad-attacking-albanese/news-story/e3186fbd3da59e46ba3b2599ca4f11f0

https://x.com/PaulineHansonOz/status/2066665852414619960

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62939

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24724964 (170134ZJUN26) Notable: Pauline Hanson distances herself from neo-Nazi who crashed Melbourne event - (Video) One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has rejected support from neo-Nazi Michael Nelson after he appeared outside a Melbourne political fundraiser and claimed he was being targeted for backing her. Hanson said Nelson and people with similar views were “with the wrong party” and stressed she had “never advocated for a white Australia policy”. Nelson, who was issued a move-on direction by police outside the event, was among a group gathered near anti-racism protesters. The incident prompted criticism from political opponents, with Liberal MP Andre Wallace urging people to “take a cold shower” amid heightened rhetoric. Hanson addressed supporters at the fundraiser as One Nation continues preparations to contest every seat at the next federal election and the upcoming Victorian state election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62921

Pauline Hanson distances herself from neo-Nazi who crashed Melbourne event

Sarah Swain - June 13, 2026

Pauline Hanson is distancing herself from a neo-Nazi who crashed her political fundraiser in Melbourne.

A handcuffed Michael Nelson declared he was there in support of the One Nation leader, but the Senator says she’s never advocated for a ‘White Australia’.

Footage shows Nelson saying: “I’m being arrested right now for supporting Pauline Hanson” but Hanson said, “they’re with the wrong party”.

“I’ve never advocated for a white Australia policy at all,” Hanson added.

Shadow treasurer Tim Wilson claims Hanson “has attracted extremists into her ranks”.

Nelson was not arrested, instead issued a move on direction, in front of thirty anti-racism protesters outside the Melbourne fundraiser.

Hundreds of supporters spent thousands of dollars to hear from Hanson.

“I want to take our country back,” she told them.

But those on other sides of politics cast doubts over the One Nation leader’s ability to do the top job.

“One Nation has anger, not answer, slogans not solutions,” Energy Minister Chris Bowen said.

While Liberal MP Andre Wallace said people need to simmer down.

“I would just encourage everyone to take a cold shower,” he quipped.

Nelson booed during Anzac Day proceedings and the 22-year-old was among those charged for an attack on a First Nations camp last year.

As a growing number of disaffected Australians gravitate towards One Nation driven by various grievances, endorsements from Nelson and people like him would likely damage the party’s longer-term prospects.

This would give those voters tempted by her politics as well as the parties looking to work with her pause for thought.

Hanson’s promising to run candidates in every seat at the next federal poll and the looming Victoria state election.

https://www.nine.com.au/australia-news/pauline-hanson-distances-herself-from-neo-nazi-who-crashed-melbourne-event-20260613-p606jd.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jalDCBlwAb0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62940

File: 0cb341bd144c73f⋯.jpg (570.54 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: df2d3dd875c0ade⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725143 (170232ZJUN26) Notable: Jewish group links One Nation to neo-Nazis and antisemitism - A submission to the antisemitism royal commission by the Jewish Council of Australia has argued that far-right extremism is a major driver of antisemitism in Australia and alleged that One Nation has cultivated links with networks that include individuals holding antisemitic views. The submission cited survey data suggesting One Nation supporters were the most likely of major voter groups to express negative views about Jews and pointed to past controversies involving party candidates and members. Associate Professor Josh Roose of Deakin University said growing electoral support would bring greater scrutiny of One Nation’s candidates and supporters. The group’s intervention comes amid ongoing debate within Australia’s Jewish community, with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry previously describing the Jewish Council of Australia as a “fringe group” that does not represent most Australian Jews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62921

>>62939

Jewish group links One Nation to neo-Nazis and antisemitism

Alexandra Smith - June 16, 2026

1/2

A progressive Jewish organisation has warned that the rise of far right neo-Nazi groups is a significant driver of antisemitism in Australia and singled out One Nation supporters as the most likely group of voters to be anti-Jewish.

The Jewish Council of Australia’s submission to the royal commission says Pauline Hanson’s One Nation, which now leads both Labor and the Coalition on primary vote, has “cultivated relationships with far-right networks” that hold antisemitic views.

These far-right groups, the submission says, include the now outlawed Australian neo-Nazi group the National Socialist Network (NSN), which protested outside NSW Parliament late last year and unfurled banners calling for the “Jewish lobby” to be banned.

ASIO boss Mike Burgess has consistently warned that right-wing extremism, particularly neo-Nazism and white supremacy, is a persistent and volatile national security threat in Australia. He has also highlighted antisemitism as a “threat to life” and the spy agency’s top priority.

In its submission, the Jewish Council says the “commission must recognise that far-right extremism, in both its street-activist and mainstream-political forms, is one of the primary drivers of antisemitism in Australia today.”

The council’s submission says there is a “long history of One Nation members endorsing and promulgating antisemitic views”. One example, it says, was the ABC’s revelations that Tyler Green, the One Nation candidate for the South Australian seat of Mawson, had published more than a dozen extremist posts on social media, including comments about “Jewish bankster wars”.

The submission also points to findings of the Crossroads25 survey, conducted by pollster YouGov and commissioned by The Jewish Independent, which tracked Australian attitudes to Jews, Israel and antisemitism in August 2025.

According to that survey, One Nation supporters were the most negative of all voters about Jews (17.3 per cent) but were second lowest on the anti-Israel scale (12 per cent).

One Nation has been contacted for comment. In a recent interview with this masthead, Hanson admitted One Nation had shut down party branches she said were “infiltrated by extremists”.

Dr Josh Roose, an associate professor of politics at Deakin University, said it was important to distinguish between “neo-Nazis who want a race war in Australia and forceable mass deportation, and a white populist party who may well be anti-migration but have not yet advocated for the extermination of minority groups”.

“Historically, because One Nation has been a fringe political party with very low levels of electoral success, there has been an intersection between some of their members and potentially some of their candidates and the extreme right,” Roose said.

“One Nation is like any other political party. Their platform may not align with the views of their extreme members. However, as the party emerges, as far as polling indicates, as a major political force they will face a significant reckoning as they can no longer hide behind ignorance about their candidates’ views.”

Roose said One Nation can no longer avoid accountability if they want to be a major player.

“It is incumbent on One Nation, a right-wing populist party, to distance itself openly and publicly from right-wing extremists who appear to be gaining some inspiration from the party’s rise,” Roose said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62941

File: 6d805f987dcad08⋯.mp4 (8.17 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725275 (170312ZJUN26) Notable: Hanson headache as rogue One Nation senator calls US world’s worst terrorist organisation - (Video) One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts is facing scrutiny after comments from a 2024 podcast resurfaced in which he described the United States government as “the world’s greatest terrorist organisation” and referred to “globalist parasites” controlling its military power. The remarks have re-emerged as One Nation leader Pauline Hanson seeks to present the party as a credible governing force amid strong polling and a major national advertising campaign. Roberts did not provide comment when approached, while Hanson’s office also declined to comment. Political opponents argued the comments raised questions about One Nation’s foreign policy credentials should the party gain greater influence. The controversy follows other instances in which Hanson has publicly distanced herself from statements made by Roberts, one of the party’s most senior parliamentary figures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62921

>>62938

>>62939

>>62940

Hanson headache as rogue One Nation senator calls US world’s worst terrorist organisation

James Massola - June 17, 2026

1/2

One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts labelled the United States “the world’s greatest terrorist organisation” in a 2024 interview, in comments that will challenge Pauline Hanson to bring her controversial colleague to heel and raise questions about the party’s fitness to govern.

Roberts described the US as “globalist parasites since 1913” in an interview with Israeli podcaster Efrat Fenigson in September 2024, when Joe Biden was still president, but his remarks have resurfaced just as One Nation leader Hanson prepares to front the National Press Club in Canberra for the first time on Wednesday.

The address to the Press Club – more than 30 years after Hanson was first elected – is seen within the party as a test of her ability to face tough questions as One Nation surges in all the polls to become a mainstream political force.

Its primary vote has reached 29 percentage points in the latest Resolve Political Monitor, ahead of Labor on 28 points and the Coalition on 20 points.

At the same time, Hanson now leads as preferred prime minister too, with 33 per cent of voters nominating her, 29 per cent nominating Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and just 16 per cent of voters naming Angus Taylor as their preferred PM.

One Nation will spend some of the $4.3 million raised so far in its “Fire the Liar” campaign on a new anti-Albanese television ad during Wednesday’s State of Origin game – one of the most expensive time slots of the year – and on Tuesday launched a second advertisement set to US country anthem Won’t Back Down by Bailey Zimmerman, featuring Hanson comforting despairing Australians.

In the podcast interview, Roberts tells Fenigson – who bills herself as an independent journalist, podcaster, public speaker and marketing expert whose “path to sovereignty unfolded with the outbreak of COVID” – that he had lived in the US for five years, married an American woman and had two children who were dual Australian-American citizens.

The senator, who entered parliament as a One Nation MP in 2016, would be in the box seat to hold a senior ministerial or shadow ministerial portfolio such as Defence or Foreign Affairs if the party can translate its surge in support into more seats and a formal conservative coalition role at the next election, due in 2028.

“That country that I had so much respect for is just the world’s greatest terrorist organisation now. American people are fantastic; they are lovely people. So caring, so frank, so easy to engage, so wonderful. But their government has been hijacked by these globalist parasites since 1913 and probably before, and it’s now controlling the world’s largest military force ever,” he said.

“They don’t even need a fraction of what they’ve got. They can walk into any country on Earth. They can bring Australia along with us just like little patsies following. Britain’s going in after them.”

Roberts then said he agreed with former US Republican congressman Ron Paul that “every major war since 1913 is directly attributable to the Federal Reserve Bank”.

Roberts was contacted for comment. Despite his office promising a response, it did not provide one. Hanson’s office declined to comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62942

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725413 (170350ZJUN26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith denied bail variation to attend mate’s son’s military parade - Ben Roberts-Smith has been refused a variation to his bail conditions that would have allowed him to attend the march-out parade and subsequent celebrations for Henry Diddams, the son of his late friend Sergeant Blaine Diddams, who was killed in Afghanistan in 2012. Judge Susan Horan ruled there was too great a risk Roberts-Smith could come into contact with potential witnesses in his war crimes case, including former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz, who faces separate war crimes charges. The judge said there was “no bail condition” that could adequately mitigate the risk at the social function. However, Roberts-Smith was granted permission to attend the official opening of Anzac Hall at the Australian War Memorial under strict conditions. Roberts-Smith denies five war crimes charges and remains on bail.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62785

>>62838

Ben Roberts-Smith denied bail variation to attend mate’s son’s military parade

STEPHEN RICE - 16 June 2026

Ben Roberts-Smith has been refused permission to vary his bail conditions to attend the march out parade of Henry Diddams, the son of his mate Sergeant Blaine Diddams, who was killed in Afghanistan, due to the risk he might come into contact with potential witnesses in his war crimes trial.

Mr Roberts-Smith sat in the front row of the court at the Downing Centre in Sydney on Tuesday as Judge Susan Horan heard submissions from his barrister Slade Howell.

Mr Roberts-Smith has been a long-time friend of the Diddams family, organising for Sergeant Diddams’ daughter Elle-Lou Diddams to travel with him to London on her 18th birthday, for Roberts-Smith to meet the Queen.

Sergeant Diddams was killed on July 2, 2012, on a mission against a high-ranking Taliban commander in Uruzgan’s Chora Valley.

Mr Roberts-Smith had asked the court to allow him to attend both the march out parade next Friday at Lone Pine Barracks in Singleton and a social function for graduates in Newcastle afterwards, but Judge Horan ruled there was too high a risk he might come into contact with Oliver Schulz, another former SAS soldier charged with war crimes.

Simon Buchen SC, for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, had objected to Mr Roberts-Smith attending the celebration but not the march out parade, where he would have watched on with Mr Diddams’ family and friends.

However, Judge Horan referenced an affidavit from Office of Special Prosecutor senior investigating officer Stephen McIntyre, who raised concerns about Mr Schulz being at both events.

If the bail variation was allowed it was likely Mr Roberts-Smith would come into contact with Mr Schulz, Judge Horan ruled.

“There is no bail condition that can mitigate the risk,” she said.

The “uncontrolled social function” would involve between 100 and 200 people, would be held in private and would likely involve the consumption of alcohol, and meant there was still an opportunity for Mr Roberts-Smith to interact with Mr Schulz, the judge said.

The march-out parade was to be live-streamed, so Mr Roberts-Smith would be able to watch that, she said.

However Judge Horan granted Mr Roberts-Smith permission to attend the official opening ceremony of Anzac Hall at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra next Tuesday, after the prosecution conceded it was “highly unlikely” that a certain potential Crown witness would be present.

Mr Roberts-Smith has been invited to the event along with all other living Victoria Cross recipients.

Permission was granted on the condition that he not communicate with other witnesses, or any SAS personnel from certain rotations in Afghanistan.

Any inadvertent contact would not be deemed a breach of his bail conditions.

He must also not discuss his case or the Oliver Schulz case with any person present.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62943

File: 44f9e44bd6ef894⋯.jpg (268.07 KB,2000x1290,200:129,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725704 (170723ZJUN26) Notable: Opinion: Gareth Evans is wrong. AUKUS isn’t about China, but nation’s survival - "The AUKUS “independent” inquiry opened last week with a familiar list of concerns from long-time critics of the program. Witnesses pointed to risks ranging from the industrial base to the prospect that reactor fuel disposed of in 2060 could be recovered for use in nuclear weapons 10,000 years in the future. While every major defence acquisition carries risk, and AUKUS is more complicated than most, one issue raised during the hearings warrants far more attention than the rest: the role of Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarines and what their acquisition means for the nation’s strategy towards China. While an inquiry led by commissioners who have long opposed Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines can hardly be described as independent, it nevertheless highlights an important lesson for government. Despite substantial progress under AUKUS, the government has sometimes struggled to communicate its benefits effectively. Former foreign minister Gareth Evans told the inquiry that it was an “inescapable conclusion” that Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarines would have only one role: “finding, tracking, attacking and destroying [nuclear-armed] Chinese submarines” as they operate in the western Pacific. As a maritime strategist who spent two decades specialising in anti-submarine warfare, I found that a remarkable claim. Is it possible? Certainly. Is it the most likely employment of Australia’s future submarines? Almost certainly not ... Ninety-nine per cent of Australia’s imports and exports move by sea, including essentials that underpin both prosperity and national security. Protecting these interests requires the ability to project power through the maritime domain, not merely defend the country’s northern approaches. While missile and drone attacks are plausible, the greater risk is maritime coercion: interference with the sea lines of communication on which our economy and security depend. Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines is first and foremost about protecting a vital national interest: maritime trade. While China’s military build-up is a major factor shaping Australia’s strategic environment, the capability is ultimately about protecting Australian interests rather than targeting any one country. Few events illustrated this more clearly than the Chinese naval task group’s circumnavigation of Australia in February and March 2025, and the return of a second task group in November 2025 ... In an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific, where for the first time since 1942 a regional military power possesses the ability to threaten Australia’s maritime supply lines and trade at scale, the ability to protect those interests is not optional. It is the foundation of a credible defence and an insurance policy that underpins Australia’s security." - Jennifer Parker, Adjunct Professor with the University of Western Australia Defence and Security Institute. She served for more than 20 years as a warfare officer in the Royal Australian Navy - The Australian Financial Review

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

>>62852

>>62904

Opinion: Gareth Evans is wrong. AUKUS isn’t about China, but nation’s survival

Nuclear-powered submarines are not being acquired because Australia is seeking conflict but because it is a maritime trading country.

Jennifer Parker, Defence expert - Jun 16, 2026

The AUKUS “independent” inquiry opened last week with a familiar list of concerns from long-time critics of the program. Witnesses pointed to risks ranging from the industrial base to the prospect that reactor fuel disposed of in 2060 could be recovered for use in nuclear weapons 10,000 years in the future.

While every major defence acquisition carries risk, and AUKUS is more complicated than most, one issue raised during the hearings warrants far more attention than the rest: the role of Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarines and what their acquisition means for the nation’s strategy towards China.

While an inquiry led by commissioners who have long opposed Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines can hardly be described as independent, it nevertheless highlights an important lesson for government. Despite substantial progress under AUKUS, the government has sometimes struggled to communicate its benefits effectively.

Former foreign minister Gareth Evans told the inquiry that it was an “inescapable conclusion” that Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarines would have only one role: “finding, tracking, attacking and destroying [nuclear-armed] Chinese submarines” as they operate in the western Pacific.

As a maritime strategist who spent two decades specialising in anti-submarine warfare, I found that a remarkable claim.

Is it possible? Certainly. Is it the most likely employment of Australia’s future submarines? Almost certainly not.

China’s nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, a key component of its second-strike nuclear capability, operate from Hainan Island and are widely assessed to patrol primarily within the South China Sea. They do not generally leave that area because it increases their risk of detection. Locating and tracking them is, of course, a key task for the United States, but it is unlikely to be the primary mission of Australia’s future submarines.

Their ability to operate undetected is what makes submarines so versatile. For Australia, that versatility is most valuable in protecting national interests across vast maritime distances. This is no small task. Australia possesses the world’s third-largest maritime domain, and operating across it is challenging. The speed and endurance provided by nuclear-powered submarines are therefore critical. A conventional submarine takes about nine days to travel from Sydney to Perth – a nuclear-powered submarine can do so in roughly half that time and is much less likely to be detected.

The Chinese naval task group’s circumnavigation of Australia last year illustrated the challenge. A conventional submarine lacks the speed to intercept such a deployment unless it is positioned well in advance. When operating across the world’s third-largest maritime domain with only a small number of submarines, transit speed matters.

Australia’s limited submarine force is more likely to be employed locating, tracking and, in conflict, destroying adversary naval task groups and submarines that threaten the nation’s maritime trade, while conducting intelligence collection and supporting special forces operations across the Indian and Pacific Oceans.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62944

File: 8318b9efb029558⋯.mp4 (14.52 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725737 (170752ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Vile piece of work’: notorious childcare abuser Ashley Paul Griffith to be extradited to NSW - (Video) Convicted childcare worker Ashley Paul Griffith will be extradited to New South Wales to face further child abuse charges after Queensland authorities completed legal processes following his unsuccessful sentence appeal. Griffith, 48, is serving a life sentence with a 27-year non-parole period after being convicted of 307 child sex offences against 69 children at childcare centres across Queensland. He is also due to face almost 200 additional charges in NSW. Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said Griffith had “operated in plain sight” and described him as a “vile piece of work”. A review into his offending identified multiple missed opportunities to stop him and has prompted a $250 million overhaul of Queensland’s child protection system, including the creation of a new child safeguarding commission and intelligence-sharing hub.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/24653832

>>62792

>>62842

>>62927

>>62928

'Vile piece of work': notorious childcare abuser Ashley Paul Griffith to be extradited to NSW

Robyn Wuth - June 16 2026

Australia's worst pedophile will be extradited to face further abuse allegations after his heinous crimes prompted the creation of a powerful child protection watchdog.

Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington has confirmed Ashley Paul Griffith, 48, will be sent to NSW after his failed bid to reduce a life sentence for years of childcare centre assaults.

"Griffith is a vile piece of work," she told the Queensland Media Club in Brisbane.

A scathing review into his offending spanning almost 20 years has sparked an unprecedented $250 million child safety overhaul, which was unveiled by Ms Frecklington on Tuesday.

A Queensland Protection Commission will be set up as a dedicated child safeguarding body with responsibility for the reportable conduct scheme, child safe standards and working-with-children checks.

It will be backed by a permanent intelligence hub drawing on experts and data from health, education and law enforcement authorities to share information, spot patterns of risk earlier and force faster responses when concerns are raised.

Griffith, a qualified early childhood educator, received a 27 year non-parole sentence in November 2024 for 307 child sex offences against 69 children – most under five – at 22 early education and care services.

He is also set to face almost 200 child sexual charges in NSW after the Queensland Court of Appeal recently dismissed his argument that his sentence was excessive.

Ms Frecklington said Griffith's Queensland appeal was now finalised, paving the way for him to be transferred interstate.

NSW and federal attorneys-general had signed off on the extradition.

A final decision on timing rested with the court but the transfer was expected soon.

The 10-month review into Griffith's conduct found there were more than 18 separate points where his offending could have been detected or disrupted earlier, including five clear missed opportunities to stop or expose him.

Instead, repeated failures to introduce a promised reportable conduct scheme left dangerous gaps in the system, allowing him to keep abusing toddlers and preschoolers while parents believed their children were safe.

"Can there be a more brutal betrayal than child sexual abuse? I sincerely doubt it," Ms Frecklington said.

"If we are to rebuild a child safety system that absolutely acts in the best interests of the child, truth and transparency cannot be a casualty."

Griffith did not lurk on the margins, Ms Frecklington said, but "operated in plain sight" as an educator trusted by thousands of families who handed over their children daily.

The review uncovered what she called a "litany of failure" – siloed information, fragmented responsibilities, insufficient thresholds for action against offenders, poor record-keeping and "enormous sector and inter-agency gaps".

It concluded the introduction of a reportable conduct scheme, recommended by a 2017 royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse, could have led to Griffith being stopped on up to five separate occasions.

"The complacency was a broken promise to Queenslanders and a devastating misstep for the growing toll of Griffith's innocent victims who continued to be abused," the attorney-general said.

The state government would allocate $250 million over four years to set up the Queensland Protection Commission and kickstart the intelligence hub.

The existing Queensland Family and Child Commission will be absorbed by the overhauled system.

More funding might be provided after the new commission and hub were established, Ms Frecklington said.

"Every harmed child and every impacted family is our collective pain," she said.

"This is about protecting vulnerable children who cannot protect themselves."

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

https://1800respect.org.au/

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service (1800 211 028)

https://fullstop.org.au/get-help/our-services/redresssupport

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9293344/vile-piece-of-work-notorious-abuser-to-be-extradited/

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZo8rFJCWaR/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62945

File: d651c44a8a99d6a⋯.jpg (64.03 KB,687x484,687:484,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 43fb52d1c15c66b⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ee5450a5d40f8c4⋯.jpg (2.2 MB,2500x1663,2500:1663,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d96a6649ccfb12⋯.jpg (69.26 KB,788x509,788:509,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725748 (170804ZJUN26) Notable: Australian World Cup referee Shaun Evans responds to accusations he used a hate symbol at World Cup - Australian referee Shaun Evans has denied intentionally making a hand gesture associated with white supremacist movements after footage from the FIFA World Cup sparked controversy online. Evans said the movement was an “involuntary, subconscious twitch” and that he was unaware he had made it, adding that later images showed him repeating the same motion while holding a pen. He stated that the coverage did not reflect who he is and said he did not knowingly or deliberately make the symbol. Anti-discrimination monitoring group Fare called for Evans to be removed from the tournament, arguing the gesture resembled a symbol used in far-right circles. However, FIFA’s independent disciplinary committee said it found no evidence of a breach of its disciplinary code and noted Evans’ explanation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62873

>>62936

Australian World Cup referee Shaun Evans responds to accusations he used a hate symbol at World Cup

abc.net.au - 16 June 2026

The Australian referee at the centre of the World Cup hand gesture controversy has responded after calls to have him sacked from the tournament.

Shaun Evans, who was filmed in the review box before Germany's opening game against Curaçao on Monday morning, was accused of making a "white power" symbol after appearing to make a circle with his fingers.

In 2019, the gesture, with the thumb and forefinger touching in a circle and the other fingers outstretched, was designated a hate symbol by the New York-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

"I would like to clarify that I did not intentionally make a hand gesture or symbol to communicate a message, affiliation, game or belief of any kind," Evans said in a statement.

"The only explanation I can offer is that the movement was an involuntary, subconscious twitch, and I was unaware I had done it at the time. Images taken later during the match showed that I repeated this movement many times while holding a pen between my fingers.

"The coverage following this incident simply does not reflect who I am. Of course, I understand how the gesture has been interpreted, and I regret this. However, I want to be very clear and categorically say that I did not knowingly or deliberately make the hand symbol suggested.

"Officiating at the World Cup is the biggest honour of my career and I look forward to supporting my colleagues for the rest of the tournament."

FIFA's discrimination monitor at the World Cup called for Evans to be removed from the tournament.

"Advice from our experts is that the gesture used clearly resembles an upside down 'OK' hand symbol used as a 'white power' symbol in global far-right circles," said the Fare network, a long-time partner of FIFA and European soccer body UEFA to monitor racist and discriminatory chants, flags and symbols at international games.

"Clearly this official should have no further role to play in this World Cup," Fare said in its statement, describing the gesture as "neo-Nazi".

FIFA's independent disciplinary committee said it looked into the matter and "found no evidence of breaches of the FIFA disciplinary code".

"The disciplinary committee has also taken note of Mr Evans's statement," it said.

At the time it was thought that Evans, working at his second-straight World Cup and his first game at this edition, was either making a political gesture or playing a children's game prank.

The "gotcha" or "circle game" is where someone flashes an upside-down OK sign below their waist and punches in the shoulder anyone who looks at it. It became popular after being used in an episode of comedy TV show Malcolm in the Middle in 2000.

It was appropriated a decade ago as a signal for white supremacy that started as a hoax on the far-right online message board 4chan.

The sign received global attention in March 2019 in New Zealand, after it was made during the first court appearance by the white supremacist shooter who killed 51 Muslim worshippers at two mosques in Christchurch.

Later in 2019, when the sign was designated as a hate symbol, Oren Segal, director of the ADL's Center on Extremism, said context was key to interpreting whether an "OK" symbol was hateful or harmless.

At the time, he said: "There is enough of a volume of use for hateful purposes that we felt it was important to add."

Evans is among 30 video review analysts selected by FIFA to work at the World Cup being played in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

"Why is a VAR supervisor using this symbol at a global football event at the very moment he knows the cameras are on him?" Fare said.

"We note that in the two subsequent games it appears TV directors have stopped introducing the VAR panel to the TV audience."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-16/fifa-world-cup-discrimination-body-calls-for-evans-to-be-sacked/106801784

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62946

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725931 (170954ZJUN26) Notable: Police probe GetUp stunt targeting Pauline Hanson during National Press Club address - (Video) ACT Policing has launched an investigation after a banner targeting Pauline Hanson was unfurled above the stage during the One Nation leader’s National Press Club address. The banner criticised Hanson’s parliamentary pay increase and her party’s opposition to a range of wage-related measures, before being quickly removed by staff. National Press Club chief executive Maurice Reilly apologised to Hanson and said CCTV footage appeared to show individuals entering the venue the previous day to install the device used to deploy the banner. Reilly said GetUp campaigns and media director David Sharaz was observed filming the incident and later left the venue shortly after the banner descended. GetUp claimed responsibility for the action, saying it was intended to highlight Hanson’s parliamentary record. Police are investigating allegations of unauthorised access and interference with equipment, while the Press Club is considering legal action and seeking to recover costs associated with the incident.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62911

>>62938

Police probe GetUp stunt targeting Pauline Hanson during National Press Club address

JACK QUAIL - 17 June 2026

1/2

Police have launched an investigation into efforts by GetUp to disrupt Pauline Hanson’s first Press Club address, after the group displayed a banner during the One Nation leader’s speech mocking a six-figure hike in her salary.

GetUp’s recent recruit David Sharaz, the progressive political outfit’s campaigns and media lead, was sitting in the audience on Wednesday when a bright yellow banner attacking Senator Hanson’s opposition to wage increases was unfurled above the stage about 17 minutes into the address.

“I opposed a pay rise for workers … while I took a $100,000 pay rise for myself,” the banner read, alongside an image of Senator Hanson wearing sunglasses and surrounded by winged bundles of cash.

In a statement released late on Wednesday afternoon, ACT Policing confirmed an investigation had been launched into the incident, and urged people to contact Crime Stoppers regarding the matter.

“ACT Policing has received a complaint regarding the alleged unauthorised access and interference with equipment in a building in Barton,” a spokesman said.

“Investigations into this matter are underway including examination by AFP Forensics officers.”

NPC chief executive Maurice Reilly issued an apology to Senator Hanson following the incident and confirmed it had been undertaken by “third parties”.

“No club personnel or club contractors had any involvement in this matter,” he said, adding that the Club had “referred the relevant footage and other evidence to the AFP for further investigation.”

Having reviewed the Club’s CCTV footage, Mr Reilly said it appeared to show two people entering the premises on Tuesday afternoon and installing a separate drop-screen above the stage, which was activated by another individual during Wednesday’s address.

Mr Reilly said Mr Sharaz was seen filming the incident on his phone and, after the banner had lowered, left the venue abruptly.

“We understand that this is likely to form part of the AFP investigation,” he said. “When the investigation has concluded, the Club will consider its legal options against the perpetrators including recovering costs for the significant damage to the media wall (and) light box.”

The Australian has contacted Mr Sharaz, who joined GetUp in February, for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62947

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725947 (171003ZJUN26) Notable: GetUp! takes credit for failed stunt after hijacking Pauline Hanson's National Press Club address in major security breach - (Video) Activist group GetUp! has claimed responsibility for a banner protest that interrupted Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club address in Canberra, prompting questions about security at the venue. The banner, which criticised Hanson’s parliamentary pay increase and voting record on wage-related measures, descended behind the One Nation leader about 20 minutes into her speech before being removed by National Press Club staff. GetUp chief executive Paul Ferris said the action was intended to highlight what the organisation described as contradictions between Hanson’s public image and parliamentary record. Hanson continued her address with little visible reaction, using the occasion to outline policies on immigration, energy, culture and government spending. The incident followed a small protest outside the venue and has prompted scrutiny over how the banner was installed inside the building.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62896

>>62911

>>62938

>>62946

GetUp! takes credit for failed stunt after hijacking Pauline Hanson's National Press Club address in major security breach

Left-wing activist group GetUp! has taken credit for a failed stunt at Pauline Hanson's National Press Club address in a major breach of security.

Laurence Karacsony - June 17, 2026

The activist group GetUp! has taken credit for the banner protest during Pauline Hanson's National Press Club address.

The Banksy-style banner was slowly unfurled about 20 minutes into Senator Hanson's address, raising major security concerns.

Despite clearly intending to disrupt Ms Hanson, the One Nation leader continued with her address.

It is unclear how or when the banner, which read “I opposed pay rises for workers while I took a $100,000 pay rise for myself", was installed.

But shortly after the conclusion of the One Nation leader's historic address, the left-wing activist outfit took credit.

"It was us," it said in a statement.

GetUp chief executive Paul Ferris said: "Pauline Hanson has built her entire brand on being for the battlers. But her record tells a different story."

"One Nation has consistently opposed wage rises, affordable childcare, increases to the aged pension, and housing affordability measures," he said.

"We thought the occasion deserved some honesty. So we provided it."

National Press Club CEO Maurice Reilly quickly had the sign ripped down while Ms Hanson continued speaking.

“We are not doing stunts, we are at the Press Club,” Mr Reilly said.

Ms Hanson barely reacted and said “thank you very much”, before continuing with her speech.

On Facebook, GetUp! posted a video of the banner lowering behind Ms Hanson, writing: "Pauline Hanson says she tells it like it is. But her record says otherwise."

"She’s opposed wage rises, affordable childcare, higher pensions and affordable housing measures – every time working Australians needed someone to fight for them.

"We thought someone should say it plainly. So we did."

Despite the interruption, Ms Hanson used her speech to outline her policy platform, amid claims from the Albanese government and the media that she doesn’t have any policies.

The One Nation leader identified immigration, energy, cultural issues and government spending as key concerns.

“Don’t expect a divisive Welcome to Country from me. This beautiful country belongs to all Australians born here and those who have joined us,” she opened her speech.

The hijacked speech came after a handful of Canberra Socialists rallied outside the National Press Club ahead of Ms Hanson's address.

The activists chanted “migrants are welcome, racists are not”, “Pauline Hanson, Gina Rinehart go to hell”.

The rabble also called for One Nation to be “obliterated from the scene of mainstream politics in Australia”.

“We will fight and we will win, put the racists in the bin,” the socialists chanted.

“One two three and a bit, Hanson is a racist sh*t.

“Pauline Hanson go to hell, take your racists there as well.

“Racists, sexists, anti-queer, One Nation is not welcome here.”

The National Press Club has hosted Australia’s leading political figures since the 1960s, including every prime minister and opposition leader over the past four decades.

Ahead of the event, National Press Club President and Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell said Senator Hanson had remained one of the country’s most influential political figures.

“Pauline Hanson has captured the attention of the nation,” he said.

“The National Press Club is where politicians come to flesh out their policies and ideas, and for journalists to examine their bona fides.”

One Nation captured 28 per cent of the primary vote in the latest Sky News Pulse / YouGov survey.

In promoting the event, the National Press Club highlighted Senator Hanson’s decades-long influence on Australian politics.

“For more than a generation, Pauline Hanson has been one of Australia’s most recognisable political leaders,” the National Press Club said in its event description.

“Pauline’s entry into federal politics was a controversial one which saw her and One Nation become targets for Australia’s political establishment.

“Through all of this, Pauline never lost sight of her goal: to be a strong voice for the Australian people in the halls of power, to stand up for the interests of Australia first."

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/pauline-hansons-national-press-club-address-hijacked-by-preinstalled-protest-banner/news-story/aaf0dcb8143856ce737765daa9f26436

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTww3cWVCVw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62948

File: 028235b0342e3ca⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 84d4e993f2198b6⋯.jpg (281.32 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9713f88fad432ba⋯.jpg (363.82 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24725990 (171026ZJUN26) Notable: GetUp stunt at Hanson speech referred to police as One Nation says leader safety compromised - One Nation has raised security concerns after activist group GetUp claimed responsibility for unfurling a banner behind Pauline Hanson during her National Press Club address in Canberra. Hanson’s chief of staff, James Ashby, said the incident compromised the party leader’s safety and called for GetUp and those involved to be permanently banned from the venue. The National Press Club apologised to Hanson, denied any involvement by staff or contractors, and referred footage of the incident to the Australian Federal Police. Club officials said CCTV appeared to show two people entering the building the day before to install the banner mechanism, which was later activated remotely during the speech. GetUp accepted responsibility for the protest, while club officials said David Sharaz was seen filming the incident and left shortly afterwards. Police investigations are continuing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62911

>>62946

>>62947

GetUp stunt at Hanson speech referred to police as One Nation says leader safety compromised

James Massola - June 17, 2026

One Nation says leader Pauline Hanson’s safety was compromised when activist group GetUp was able to unfurl a stunt banner behind her as she delivered her first-ever speech at the National Press Club in Canberra.

Hanson pushed on to outline plans to clamp down on Muslim migration, end multiculturalism and axe the climate change department.

Speaking after Wednesday’s event, Hanson’s chief of staff, James Ashby, said, “there are safety concerns around Pauline’s security”. He demanded the club impose a lifetime ban on the activist group, including the organisation’s media and campaigns lead, David Sharaz.

The club issued an apology to Hanson and said neither its staff nor its contractors had any involvement in the incident and that it was the work of third parties. Footage has been handed to the Australian Federal Police.

After the speech, GetUp claimed responsibility for the stunt, which involved remotely unfurling a banner that said, “I opposed a pay rise for workers while I took a $100,000 pay rise for myself”. The banner was unfurled shortly after Hanson started speaking.

Hanson was momentarily distracted by the banner’s appearance but pushed on with her speech.

Ashby later said he had been assured on Tuesday and Wednesday “by members of the Press Club and the AFP that she had the same level of security as was provided to Israeli dignitaries who were recently here, which is one step above the security provided to the PM”.

“What signal does this send to dignitaries if vigilante groups and protesters like GetUp are allowed to do that? I think the National Press Club should be looking very closely at their constitution for a way in which to impose a lifetime ban on GetUp and its members who were there, and I am pointing my finger specifically at David Sharaz.”

Sharaz came to prominence working with his partner, Brittany Higgins, when she went public with her claims she had been raped by fellow political staffer Bruce Lehrmann.

Sharaz was at the National Press Club for the event but has not responded to a request for comment.

The club said in a comment released at 5.20pm: “At time of writing, we understand he [Sharaz] is yet to be interviewed by the AFP. It appears that two persons entered the club building yesterday afternoon without permission and installed a separate drop-down screen in front of our media wall/light box.

“It is evident that a further person present during the address activated a remote device to trigger the unfurling of the coiled banner. David Sharaz was seen filming the incident on his phone and, after the banner had lowered, left abruptly. We understand that this is likely to form part of the AFP investigation.

“When the investigation has concluded, the club will consider its legal options against the perpetrators including recovering costs for the significant damage to the media wall/light box.”

The club’s president, Sky News presenter Tom Connell, told his employer that preliminary vision suggested someone had set the stunt up much earlier.

“It appears from vision we’ve looked at so far that people were able to get access to the building yesterday, not today, and somebody who bought a ticket pressed a button during the address,” he told Sky News.

Hanson’s colleagues, including Barnaby Joyce and senators Malcolm Roberts, Sean Bell and Tyron Whitten, were also in the room for the speech, which ran about 15 minutes over time, and One Nation staff and supporters were also present, many of whom repeatedly cheered the party leader.

Hanson also attacked Guardian Australia journalist Sarah Martin for asking why her daughter, Lee Hanson, was working for NSW senator Bell while the younger Hanson lived and worked in Tasmania – where she is the party’s Senate candidate at the next election – and whether Pauline Hanson had had any role in her daughter being hired.

“Honestly, you never give up,” Hanson said. “I’ve never seen a person that’s such a trashy journalist, you know, and what you put out all the time, you’ve got this obsession with constantly trying to pull down myself, my party, or Mrs [Gina] Rinehart,” she said.

Rinehart is a major donor to One Nation, including recently giving the party leader a small plane.

SBS journalist Anna Henderson also received a blast after asking about Hanson’s plan to shut down the network, with the One Nation leader saying: “You’re going to be without a job, certainly.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/getup-stunt-at-hanson-speech-referred-to-police-as-one-nation-says-leader-safety-compromised-20260617-p607j8.html

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/pauline-hanson-faces-media-grilling-at-national-press-club/news-story/40452acfe15b98ff5cd169fb7c7ce21e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62949

File: 0d3762a784dada6⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 79afbba550277bc⋯.jpg (322.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24726009 (171038ZJUN26) Notable: Accused Islamic State bride denied bail over ‘unacceptable risk’ to community - Former Islamic State bride Zeinab Ahmad has been denied bail after Victoria’s Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan found she posed an “unacceptable risk” to the community. Ahmad, 31, is charged with two crimes against humanity offences relating to the alleged enslavement of a Yazidi girl while living under Islamic State rule in Syria. She denies the allegations. The court rejected defence arguments that expected delays in the complex prosecution and the impact of imprisonment on Ahmad’s young daughter amounted to exceptional circumstances justifying release. Magistrate Hannan found prosecutors had established an unacceptable risk linked to Ahmad’s alleged adherence to extremist ideology and concluded that no bail conditions could adequately manage that risk. Ahmad remains in custody awaiting further proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62746

>>62856

>>62886

>>62931

Accused Islamic State bride denied bail over ‘unacceptable risk’ to community

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and PHOEBE GRIFFITHS - 17 June 2026

1/2

The former Islamic State bride accused of enslaving a young Yazidi girl in Syria has been denied bail after a Victorian court found her alleged loyalty to extremist ideology posed an “unacceptable risk” to the community that could not be managed through control orders.

Victoria’s chief magistrate Lisa Hannan on Wednesday refused to release Zeinab Ahmad, ruling the 31-year-old had failed to establish the “exceptional circumstances” required for bail and remained a risk to public safety while awaiting trial in Australia’s first crimes against humanity prosecution.

Ms Ahmad, a former bride of three ISIS fighters, is charged with two crimes against humanity offences relating to the alleged enslavement of a Yazidi girl while living under Islamic State rule in Syria. The charges carry maximum penalties of 25 years’ imprisonment.

In the highly anticipated ruling following a week of evidence in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court, Ms Hannan rejected defence arguments that likely delays in the landmark prosecution and the impact of Ms Ahmad’s imprisonment on her young daughter justified her release.

While accepting there was a risk the “complex” prosecution could face substantial delays, Ms Hannan said it was too early to determine the likely duration of any delay.

“I think there is at least a risk of substantial delay, but the duration of any delay will be better assessed once the case against the applicant and timelines are clearer,” Ms Hannan said.

“In this regard this application might be seen as premature as relevant information is not yet available.”

The defence had argued the unprecedented prosecution, involving overseas witnesses, intelligence from government agencies, and material gathered from multiple jurisdictions, could take years to reach trial.

Ms Hannan accepted delay need not be fully realised before being considered in a bail application but found it did not amount to exceptional circumstances in the current case.

She also accepted expert evidence about the impact of Ms Ahmad’s imprisonment on her daughter, who spent much of her life in Syrian detention camps before being repatriated to Australia earlier this year with the help of her uncle, Abraham Abbas and Robert Van Aalst.

“There is no doubt that her child has had a traumatic history,” Ms Hannan said.

However, she found the hardship flowing from the separation of a child from an imprisoned parent was not, by itself, exceptional.

“It is a sad fact that a parent’s ongoing custody affects a child negatively, however that of itself is not exceptional,” she said.

Ms Hannan concluded that neither the factors relied upon by the defence, nor their cumulative effect, were sufficient to satisfy the exceptional circumstances test.

“Combining all matters relied upon by the defence in seeking to establish exceptional circumstances, I am not satisfied that either individually or in combination that the applicant has discharged the burden of establishing exceptional circumstances,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62950

File: ca12751e261af6f⋯.jpg (194.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 52b8feab7db6fb2⋯.jpg (291.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a3e49d5bb72c40a⋯.jpg (187.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24726029 (171051ZJUN26) Notable: Antisemitism royal commission overrules government bid to hide ASIO evidence - Antisemitism royal commissioner Virginia Bell has rejected a third attempt by the federal government to withhold evidence relating to counter-terrorism funding and decision-making, ruling that the public interest outweighed claims of cabinet confidentiality. The decision allows Bell to examine sections of evidence provided by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess concerning the allocation of Commonwealth resources to counter-terrorism, although the material will not be made public. Critics, including opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam and Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion, argued the commission should have full access to relevant documents. The government said its immunity claims were made to protect cabinet confidentiality and sensitive security information. Bell’s interim report previously found the proportion of security funding devoted to counter-terrorism had declined over five years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62761

>>62796

>>62797

>>62832

Antisemitism royal commission overrules government bid to hide ASIO evidence

JAMES DOWLING - 17 June 2026

1/2

Labor has been accused of breaking its promise to give complete assistance to the antisemitism royal commission after Virginia Bell overruled its third application to hide evidence related to federal counter-terrorism operations.

Documents quietly released by the royal commissioner on Thursday showed she last week determined that the “public interest” in evidence given by ASIO chief Mike Burgess overruled cabinet confidence, rejecting a request from the Albanese government to keep the evidence secret.

The Australian understands that the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet pledged unimpeded cabinet access to former ASIO chief Dennis Richardson’s internal inquiry, and many documents had already been provided.

However, the department then flagged its public interest immunity claim after the Richardson review was folded into the royal commission.

Opposition home affairs spokesperson Jonno Duniam said it was “atrocious that Labor is continuously trying to shield critical evidence from scrutiny”.

“Virginia Bell’s decision is another serious rebuke of a government that appears far more interested in protecting itself than being upfront with the Australian people,” he said.

“Australians deserve to know exactly what the government was doing – and deciding – prior to the Bondi massacre and why the share of counter-terrorism funding was allowed to decline during a period of heightened threat.”

Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion demanded Ms Bell receive the “fullest access to government documents” to properly interrogate antisemitism in Australia. “When the government says that it will fully co-operate with the royal commission, I would expect it to provide the commissioner with all of the documents that she needs to do her work and not to resist her requests,” he told The Australian.

“The commission needs to understand the threat environment so as to protect against the risk of another terrorist attack. We do not want another Bondi. The commissioner should be given every opportunity to investigate the funding requirements and constraints of our security services to ensure that we are protected.”

A government source said privilege claims were more about precedent and principle than withholding specific information, arguing the Coalition would have been equally furious if Labor released cabinet documents from the prior government without any claim for immunity.

The federal government previously tried and failed to suppress cabinet documents that show what it knew and when about a sinking proportion of security and intelligence funding allocated to counter-terrorism from 2020 to 2025.

Ms Bell’s June 9 decision covered three relevant sections in one of Mr Burgess’s affidavits, which she will now consider but not make public. “The topic to which the redacted paragraphs are directed is the question of allocation of commonwealth resources to counter-terrorism as considered in cabinet,” the decision reads.

“I am satisfied public interest in that limited scope of disclosure of the following information outweighs the public interest in maintenance of its strict confidentiality as cabinet information.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62951

File: c56b13c51f0d910⋯.jpg (509.7 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24729209 (180950ZJUN26) Notable: National Press Club rejects David Sharaz’s membership after GetUp’s stunt during Pauline Hanson address - The National Press Club has rejected a membership application from GetUp campaigns and media director David Sharaz and banned all GetUp staff from future events following a protest during Pauline Hanson’s address in Canberra. The decision came after GetUp claimed responsibility for a banner that descended behind Hanson while she was speaking. The club has referred the incident to the Australian Federal Police and launched an internal security review. Club officials said security footage showing Sharaz filming the stunt had been provided to investigators. ACT Policing confirmed it is investigating allegations of unauthorised access and interference with equipment. The incident has also reignited debate about security at political events and media access, with the Federal Parliamentary Press Gallery criticising Hanson’s subsequent threat to ban certain journalists from future interviews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62911

>>62946

>>62947

>>62948

National Press Club rejects David Sharaz’s membership after GetUp’s stunt during Pauline Hanson address

Andrew Greene - 18 June 2026

Political activist David Sharaz has had his membership application to the National Press Club rejected after the organisation he works for disrupted Pauline Hanson’s address to journalists in Canberra on Wednesday.

Left-wing campaign group GetUp immediately claimed responsibility for the stunt that involved a “drop-down screen” being lowered onto the stage as Senator Hanson was speaking to the NPC.

The NPC has referred the matter to Federal Police for investigation and in a statement on Wednesday said: “David Sharaz was seen filming the incident on his phone and, after the banner had lowered, left abruptly.”

The Nightly can reveal that GetUp’s director of campaigns and media had recently applied for NPC membership and had separately purchased a ticket to attend Senator Hanson’s first speech to the club.

During a scheduled and lengthy board meeting on Thursday morning, the NPC resolved to formally reject Mr Sharaz’s membership application, and to ban all GetUp staff from attending future events.

Sources have confirmed that NPC security video showing Mr Sharaz filming the GetUp stunt as it occurred has also been handed to police for their investigation, and the club has now launched its own internal security review.

ACT Policing has confirmed an investigation had been launched into the incident and urged anyone with information to contact Crimestoppers.

“ACT Policing has received a complaint regarding the alleged unauthorised access and interference with equipment in a building in Barton,” a spokesperson said.

“Investigations into this matter are underway including examination by AFP Forensics officers.”

GetUp has not responded to questions from The Nightly about the incident or David Sharaz’s involvement.

Asked what steps needed to be taken following the GetUp stunt the Prime Minister told reporters: “I think in general sometimes actions can be counterproductive, and I think that was as well”.

One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce said the incident highlighted security fears for his party’s leader and appeared to be an “inside job”.

“Imagine if that had been a bomb. If that had been Pauline or the Prime Minister, the room would’ve been packed… blown the place sky high’’ Mr Joyce told Radio 2GB in Sydney.

Meanwhile the Federal Parliament Press Gallery committee, which represents political journalists based in Canberra, has condemned Pauline Hanson’s threats to ban certain reporters from future events.

During her National Press Club address, Senator Hanson called journalist Sarah Martin “trashy” for questions about her daughter Lee Hanson’s employment and said The Guardian reporter would be banned from future events.

“Honestly, you never give up. I have never seen a person that is such a trashy journalist, and what you put out all the time, you’ve got this obsession with constantly trying to pull down myself, my party or Mrs [Gina] Rinehart,” Senator Hanson said on Monday.

“You will be banned from my answering. I’ll answer you this question today, but I am telling you now, don’t come near me for an interview in the future.”

In a statement the Federal Parliament Press Gallery criticised Senator Hanson’s comments declaring: “the ability to scrutinise and question politicians is one of the fundamental functions of our work as journalists”.

“Against this backdrop, the Gallery Committee strongly objects to threats made by One Nation – or by any political party - to ban certain journalists and organisations from doing their jobs as important observers and interpreters of federal politics.”

https://thenightly.com.au/politics/national-press-club-rejects-david-sharazs-membership-after-getups-stunt-during-pauline-hanson-address-c-22449651

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62952

File: 45c733c12c7fdbb⋯.jpg (127.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24729213 (180956ZJUN26) Notable: ‘I want to hear them cry’: Boy, 13, refused bail over school massacre plot - A 13-year-old Queensland boy has been refused bail after being charged with preparing or planning to cause death or grievous bodily harm and possessing violent extremist material. Police allege the Maryborough teenager wrote a manifesto expressing hatred towards children and detailing plans for a mass attack, while also making racist and antisemitic statements. Prosecutors argued the material demonstrated extremist views and intentions to commit mass violence. The defence described the document as the “ranting of a teenager” rather than evidence of a genuine plan. Magistrate John Milburn refused bail, finding there were no exceptional circumstances to justify release. The case is believed to be the first brought under a Queensland offence introduced earlier this year as part of reforms enacted following the Bondi massacre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62798

>>62873

>>62837

>>62875

‘I want to hear them cry’: Boy, 13, refused bail over school massacre plot

MACKENZIE SCOTT - June 17, 2026

The reclusive teenager who allegedly planned to enact a primary school killing spree detailed his deep hatred of Jews and black people in his alleged murderous manifesto in which he said he wanted children to “see his wrath”.

The digital document, written by the Indigenous teenager who can not be named, labelled black people as “disgusting filth of the world and labelled children as ”pathetic pieces of shit”. A police prosecutor also said the 13-year-old had a hatred for Jewish people and had “expressed plans for mass murders”.

The teenager called himself “a God”.

“Nothing bad happened in my life,” the document read.

“Just, I have this feeling to commit a big attack on kids. I want to hear them cry and beg me for their life.

“I’ll probably kill the teachers … they are just worthless creatures, pathetic piece of shit. I hate them. My hatred for little children is f*cking unyielding.

“I might be 13 at this time, but when I’m 18, they will see my wrath.

“I wouldn’t say I’m crazy, I’m a normal person. I just don’t feel any empathy, fear. I only feel disgust and angry, and f*cking hate children.

“I am a God.

“If this is posted online, it’s because I followed through on my act and killed a lot of people, and the cops found my notes... damn pigs.”

The court heard the child had previously threatened to smother his sister, with his mother having to sleep between the siblings in the lounge room for protection. The teenager is also alleged to have threatened to harm his mother.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service barrister Clem Van Der Weegen said the document was nothing more than the “ranting of a teenager”.

“There is no context to it, there is no indication that this was an intention of his other than threatening,” Mr Van Der Weegen said.

“The irony is he is talking about children when he himself is a child.”

The 13-year-old boy from the regional Queensland town of Maryborough, on the Fraser Coast, was refused bail on Wednesday. He faces one charge of the Queensland offence of preparing or planning to cause death or grievous bodily harm and one commonwealth offence of possessing or controlling violent ­extremist material obtained or ­accessed using a carriage of ­service related to a copy of the Christchurch Massacre found on his device.

He appeared via video link wearing a prison-issued green tracksuit from Wacol Youth Remand Centre in Brisbane, where he has been held since his arrest.

Magistrate John Milburn said the bail hearing was “unusual” because of the child’s age and his lack of prior criminal history.

“I can't be satisfied there are exceptional circumstances to justify bail,” he said.

The boy and his mother, who were in the court, cried upon hearing the decision. She did not answer questions from reporters outside of court.

The boy first came to the attention of police on May 28 after entering a BP service station in Maryborough wearing a face covering over his mouth. He was armed with a knife he had taken from the kitchen sink at home, tucked into one of his black gloves.

He locked himself in the business’s toilet and threatened to stab a worker who later banged on the door, telling him to leave. Police were called, and after being interviewed, the teen was released with a caution.

Detectives from the Counter Terrorism Investigation Group executed a search warrant two days later, during which three devices were seized.

Federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland will be required to sign off on the commonwealth charge before it can proceed, given the child’s age.

It is the first time the Queensland offence had been laid since it was legislated in March as part of the Liberal National Party government’s response to the Bondi massacre.

The matter will next be heard on September 15 at Maryborough Children’s Court.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/i-want-to-hear-them-cry-boy-13-refused-bail-over-school-massacre-plot/news-story/d8e4b6d0a01c15f6b29eb1633df840cc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62953

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24729231 (181009ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Nothing to hide’: target of Dezi Freeman police raid slams police - (Video) Kay Reid, the mother of former AFL players Ben and Sam Reid, has criticised police after her Victorian property was searched as part of the investigation into who may have assisted fugitive Dezi Freeman following the fatal shooting of two police officers in 2025. Reid said police seized phones and electronic devices but insisted her family had “nothing to hide”, describing the search as an invasion of privacy. The raid was one of seven conducted across Victoria and New South Wales as Taskforce Summit investigates Freeman’s movements between the Porepunkah shootings and his death near the Victorian-NSW border. Police said the operation is focused on identifying anyone who may have helped Freeman evade authorities and supporting ongoing coronial investigations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62758

>>62769

>>62783

‘Nothing to hide’: target of Dezi Freeman police raid slams police

JOHN FERGUSON - June 16, 2026

1/2

The mother of two former AFL stars has slammed police after they raided her regional home as part of the investigation into Dezi Freeman’s life on the run.

In an online post, Kay Reid – the mother of AFL premiership players Ben and Sam Reid – said she and her husband had “nothing to hide” and accused police of wasting their day by raiding the property at Buckland on Tuesday.

“They came in, then they took our phones ... we still don’t know why,” she told a podcast.

“We knew him (Freeman). We had a stack of old phones, they took all of those.

“They just looked in things, I don’t really know what they were there for.”

The Reid property was one of seven raided in Victoria and NSW by Taskforce Summit detectives on Tuesday as they widened the investigation into who helped Freeman escape after he shot dead two police offices at Porepunkah last year.

Ms Reid, the wife of former Footscray and Carlton player Bruce, published a series of photos showing nine police officers inside the couple’s family home.

“I don’t know what they think. There’s a whole big community here of people who knew him (Freeman),” she said.

“I feel like our privacy has been invaded. They walked around our home, they took photos, live video.

“They can look (at) what they like in my phone, they might learn something.

“We’ve got nothing to hide ... that wasted our whole f..king day. I was meant to go to yoga.”

Police executed seven search warrants and arrested two people across NSW and Victoria as the hunt for the double police killer’s collaborators turned national.

Police raided houses in four locations in regional NSW on Tuesday in the first major push into the state after Freeman was found at Thologolong on the Victorian-NSW border on March 30.

The raids suggest Freeman, 56, may have fled north of the Victorian border after killing two officers on August 26 last year and attempting to murder two more, or received outside help to evade detection.

NSW raids were conducted at Greenwich Park near Goulburn, at nearby Tarlo, Wombeyan Caves near Bowral and Umina Beach on the central coast.

On Tuesday morning, Victoria Police executed warrants at three rural properties in Buckland, near Bright in northeastern Victoria, nearby Stanley and at Lucyvale, south of where Freeman was killed by special operations police.

The areas in Victoria are at the heart of a large community supportive of Freeman’s pandemic-era antics.

A 64-year-old Lucyvale man was arrested in Wodonga and interviewed by police, but was released pending further investigation.

A 47-year-old Wombeyan Caves man was arrested in Greenwich Park on unrelated outstanding warrants. No charges have been laid.

A Victoria Police spokesman said searches of the seven properties were extensive and “a range of electronic devices from the addresses” were seized.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62954

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24729248 (181026ZJUN26) Notable: Women accused of Anzac Day graffiti win fight to keep faces secret - (Video) Two women accused of spray-painting anti-Anzac slogans on Melbourne RSL buildings have secured a suppression order preventing publication of images identifying them while their case proceeds. Edith Pope, 22, and Charlie Tidmarsh, 20, argued they faced serious threats to their safety from potential vigilantes following widespread public attention. Magistrate Michael Wighton accepted that the threats were significant and granted the order, which will remain in force until after the conclusion of proceedings and any appeal period. The decision drew criticism from figures including former Victorian premier Jeff Kennett, Vietnam veteran Rod Coote and opposition politicians, who argued the women should not receive special protection. The pair face charges including criminal damage, offensive public conduct and graffiti-related offences over alleged Anzac Day vandalism at two Melbourne RSLs.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38955 (pb)

>>38961 (pb)

Women accused of Anzac Day graffiti win fight to keep faces secret

A former Victorian Premier and a Vietnam veteran have joined those voicing their anger at an “absurd” suppression order granted to protect two women who allegedly spray-painted “f*ck the Anzacs” and “kill the troops” on Melbourne RSLs.

Laura Placella - June 18, 2026

1/2

A magistrate’s decision to protect two women accused of spray-painting “f*ck the Anzacs” and “kill the troops” on Melbourne RSLs has sparked outrage and been slammed as “disgusting” and “absurd”.

Edith Pope, 22, and Charlie Tidmarsh, 20, on Wednesday won their fight to keep their faces secret, claiming they were at risk from vigilantes seeking to harm them.

The pair were granted a suppression order in the Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court that prevents the media – and members of the public – from publishing photos of them or images of their “likeness”.

After Magistrate Michael Wighton handed down his decision, two supporters of Ms Pope and Ms Tidmarsh – who hid behind masks – unfurled a banner on the court’s front steps, doubling down on the vile “f*ck the Anzacs” taunt.

Vietnam veteran Rod Coote, who was the same age as Ms Pope when he went to war and lost five mates in battle, said he was “disgusted” the women’s identities would be protected.

“I’d like to speak to the (magistrate). How could you make a decision like that?” he said. “Their faces should be up in lights.”

Mr Coote, who is also the president of the Prahran RSL, was almost brought to tears by the “f*ck the Anzacs” insult outside court.

Former premier Jeff Kennett – himself a veteran – slammed the decision to suppress images of the alleged vandals as “the height of absurdity”.

“There is something terribly, terribly wrong in the courts of Victoria,” Mr Kennett said.

“The best way that we can crack down on this behaviour is exposing those who will (allegedly) go around in the middle of the night with spray paint and vandalise.”

Mr Kennett said the decision showed there was “no real penalty” for crime in the state.

“I’m a veteran, and I’m appalled. I cannot accept the way that those who offend get the benefits of a legal system that is totally inappropriate and inconsistent with public opinion and standards,” he said.

Ms Pope, from Northcote, and Ms Tidmarsh, from Reservoir, have faced public scrutiny in recent weeks after allegedly vandalising the Heidelberg and Reservoir RSLs in the early morning of Anzac Day.

Defence barrister Lauren Bull said her clients had been subjected to a large number of online threats, which she described as threats to their “safety, lives and homes”.

She argued that there was a “fine line” between “reasonable public responses” to criminal charges and “real threats to physical safety”.

She also raised the case of convicted rapist Tom Silvagni to argue that courts regularly made suppression orders that bind not only the media but members of the public.

The Herald Sun and other media outlets opposed the suppression order, arguing that the women had failed to prove it was necessary.

Media lawyer Joanna Bocewicz from top-tier law firm Thomsons said to say the women were at risk from vigilantes was merely “speculative”.

She said there was no basis to treat these women differently than other accused charged in high-profile cases.

But in the end, Mr Wighton sided with the alleged vandals.

He told the court he considered the threats to be “large in number” and “serious in nature”.

He said, in these circumstances, a limited suppression order would offer the women a “greater level of protection”.

“I am satisfied that the order sought has the necessary utility,” he added.

The order will expire a year after the conclusion of the proceedings or any appeal period.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62955

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24729270 (181050ZJUN26) Notable: Secret plan to sneak Ben Roberts-Smith out back exit of Sydney prison - (Video) Internal Corrective Services documents reveal NSW prison officials considered using a rear exit and special escort arrangements when Ben Roberts-Smith was released on bail from Sydney’s Silverwater prison in April. Authorities classified him as a high-profile inmate requiring enhanced security because of intense media interest surrounding his war crimes case. An internal review examined the release after correctional staff attempted to manage media access as Roberts-Smith left the facility. The review found officers were acting to maintain safety and security but did not fully comply with procedures, including failing to activate body-worn cameras during the operation. Corrective Services NSW said there was no evidence of misconduct and denied Roberts-Smith received preferential treatment while in custody.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62838

Secret plan to sneak Ben Roberts-Smith out back exit of Sydney prison

Riley Walter and Eryk Bagshaw - June 17, 2026

1/2

NSW prison officers hatched a plan to sneak Ben Roberts-Smith out a rear exit, provided priority access for his partner and ensured he had regular exercise in a series of interventions for the disgraced former soldier that have thrown the spotlight back on the treatment of Australia’s highest-profile accused war criminal.

A cache of documents obtained by this masthead has also revealed the first photos of Roberts-Smith behind bars and how the attempt to smuggle the 47-year-old out of prison could have ended in “a very dangerous situation,” according to an email sent by a security manager after the incident.

NSW Corrective Services staff considered the alleged war criminal the highest-profile inmate they had ever encountered, defining Roberts-Smith as a “national security interest inmate” who triggered extreme “high-risk security escort protocols” in an attempt to ensure his safe exit on bail.

Instead, Roberts-Smith’s prison exit in April sparked chaotic scenes as prison officers tried to block media outlets from photographing him.

Silverwater jail governor Patrick Aboud led the convoy of vehicles used to escort Roberts-Smith and his partner, Sarah Matulin, from the correctional complex. Aboud’s vehicle was used to block the road as the pair left the facility. Several other vehicles escorted Roberts-Smith in an attempt to stop the media from photographing him as he was released.

The incident was the second time law enforcement has been hit with controversy over the handling of Roberts-Smith’s case, after the father of two was publicly arrested at Sydney Airport in April and charged with five counts of war crime – murder over the alleged killing of unarmed Afghan detainees.

The documents show prison officers had initially planned to escort Roberts-Smith and Matulin to the rear gate of the facility, before Aboud directed them to travel in convoy with him along a public road.

In advice sent to deputy commissioner Adam Wilkinson four days after Roberts-Smith was bailed on April 17, Aboud said senior staff had undertaken a “dynamic operational risk assessment” on the day to determine the “safest and most appropriate method of release”.

But internal department communications reveal Aboud, who personally escorted Roberts-Smith into his cell after he was remanded in custody shortly after his arrest, approved a plan allowing the decorated former soldier to leave via a back exit more than 24 hours before he was granted bail.

“It’s no issue if he is filmed/photographed as he exits – our only concern is getting him off complex safely and without creating any other security concerns,” a senior member of Corrective Services NSW’s media unit wrote in an email to Aboud on April 16.

“Media obviously won’t be told that he’s leaving via the back entrance.”

Two female Security Operations Group officers “temporarily exited their vehicles to impede media access and prevent interaction with the release inmate”, a review into the officers’ actions found.

The officer’s supervisor wrote he believed the officers were “concerned about the media blocking the car containing Roberts Smith in and an unidentified person jumping from the rear vehicle and running towards the vehicle containing Roberts Smith,” he said. “A very dangerous situation.”

Corrective Services were acutely aware of the heightened interest in Roberts-Smith, noting his case had garnered media scrutiny and political attention from One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, Liberal leader Angus Taylor and “billionaire’s media mogul Kerry Stokes and mining magnate Gina Rinehart”.

“Countless numbers of public sympathisers for Roberts-Smith have voiced their outrage of his arrest on various social media platforms,” a corrective services briefing stated.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62956

File: b07c4ee7b7a669d⋯.jpg (204.73 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e4931fe23c15fe7⋯.jpg (1.5 MB,4000x3000,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c00e3400efbc99e⋯.jpg (88.09 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24736954 (201245ZJUN26) Notable: ISIS flag video key evidence in slavery case against Melbourne grandmother Kawsar Abbas - A Melbourne court has heard allegations that Kawsar Abbas, 54, participated in the purchase and exploitation of a Yazidi girl while living in Islamic State-controlled Syria, as she seeks bail ahead of an Australian-first crimes against humanity prosecution. Prosecutors relied on social media posts, intercepted communications and video evidence, including footage allegedly showing an ISIS flag displayed in the family’s Syrian home, to argue Abbas maintained support for the terrorist group. The court heard allegations that the Yazidi teenager was bought for $US10,000 in 2017 and subjected to sexual slavery, domestic servitude and religious indoctrination while living with the family. Abbas faces four slavery-related charges, which she denies. The case forms part of a broader investigation into family members who returned to Australia from Syria and now face serious criminal proceedings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39044 (pb)

>>39047 (pb)

>>39064 (pb)

>>62856

ISIS flag video key evidence in slavery case against Melbourne grandmother Kawsar Abbas

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 19, 2026

A black ISIS flag draped across the wall of a Syrian living room is at the centre of explosive evidence against a Melbourne grandmother accused of enslaving a Yazidi girl during the Islamic State’s reign of terror.

Lawyers for ISIS bride Kawsar Abbas on Friday mounted a strong defence for her case to be freed into the community while awaiting her landmark crimes against humanity prosecution.

It comes after the 54-year-old’s daughter, Zeinab Ahmad, was denied bail this week at the Melbourne Magistrate’ Court because she posed an unacceptable risk to the community.

Ms Abbas is facing four counts of slavery charges that include enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave, and engaging in slave trading. Each count has a maximum penalty of 25 years’ imprisonment and is considered a crime against humanity in the context of the persecution of Yazidi people during the caliphate.

Before Chief magistrate Lisa Hannan, the court heard Ms Abbas had engaged in the purchase and trade of a young Yazidi girl with her husband at the height of the caliphate.

Allegations of abuse and harrowing evidence of sexual slavery were aired to the court, with police relying on social media posts, intercepted calls and images recovered from devices that they say demonstrate Ms Abbas’s enduring support for Islamic State.

The Australian-first federal prosecution follows a complex investigation into the Melbourne-based family, who allegedly used a local charity named Global ­Humanitarian Aid to fund their journey to the conflict zone.

It’s suspected that Ms Abbas and her husband, Mohammed Ahmad, used public donations intended for Syrian refugees to instead facilitate their family’s flights and illegal entry into Islamic State territory.

Although Ms Abbas claimed on an outgoing passenger card in August 2014 that she was embarking on a two-month trip to Turkey, the AFP claims she and her family crossed into Syria by January 2015 to embed themselves within ISIS.

Shocking allegations of the treatment of the Yazidi girl allegedly purchased by the family to be used as a sex slave, who was captured by ISIS in 2014 at the age of 15, were aired in court on Friday.

According to a summary of facts tendered to the court and provided to media, the girl was brought to the family’s residence in Mayadin around Ramadan in 2017, where Ms Abbas allegedly participated in the inspection of the teenager and approved her purchase for $US10,000. The court heard that Ms Abbas stood by when her husband told the girl he bought her for the purpose of raping and serving the home. It was also alleged Ms Abbas had told her husband to beat the girl when she did not do house chores.

In her evidence, the girl told AFP officers she was subjected to regular domestic servitude and forced to study Islam under Ms Abbas’s watch. She also said Ms Abbas allegedly forced her into military indoctrination, telling her: “I want you to be taught how to use weapons, according to the Daesh (ISIS) beliefs, we should be the same, whatever they do, we have to do the same.”

Senior constable Marc Clendenning told the court Ms Abbas had endorsed an online post by her daughter Zeinab that prayed for the destruction of Western nations and celebrated the expansion of the Islamic State.

She also disclosed her movements during the military battle for Aleppo in late 2016, confirming on a Facebook post: “No alhamdulillah we managed to leave a few months ago.”

The prosecution’s case is further bolstered by a 2016 home video recovered from an encrypted device, which shows Ms Abbas reacting in a panicked manner as a camera panned across her Syrian living room during a phone call with her mother.

Ms Abbas could be heard demanding: “Can I have a look at the video please? Look at the room.” Images from the video show an ISIS flag hanging on the wall.

Inside her bedroom, the court heard she kept her Australian passport side-by-side with an official ISIS ID card, an assault rifle, a Glock pistol, and cash.

Ms Abbas and her daughter were arrested at Melbourne Airport on May 7 after arranging their own travel back to Australia with the help of her brother, Abraham Abbas and Robert Van Aalst.

The bail hearing continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/isis-flag-video-key-evidence-in-slavery-case-against-melbourne-grandmother/news-story/5246c6aa6460db0ff459219603fffd4b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62957

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24736995 (201255ZJUN26) Notable: Third man charged over firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue - (Video) A third man has been charged over the December 2024 firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, which forced worshippers to flee during early-morning prayers. Victoria Police and the AFP charged a 20-year-old Airport West man with arson, conduct endangering life and motor vehicle theft. Two other men previously charged over the attack are contesting the allegations, while a fourth man has been charged over the theft of a vehicle allegedly used in the operation. Police said investigations remain ongoing, including inquiries into alleged overseas connections. AFP Assistant Commissioner Peter Crozier described the case as highly complex and said authorities believe the attack was politically motivated. The synagogue community has been informed of the latest arrest as plans continue to rebuild the damaged place of worship.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23939113 (pb)

>>62687

Third man charged over firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 19, 2026

A third man has been charged directly over the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, as police continue investigating the terror attack linked to the Iranian regime.

The blaze ripped through the Ripponlea synagogue in Melbourne’s southeast shortly after 4am on December 6, 2024, forcing worshippers attending early-morning prayers to flee the building.

Victoria Police and the AFP on Friday charged a 20-year-old Airport West man with arson, conduct endangering life and theft of a motor vehicle.

The latest arrest follows charges laid last year against Younes Ali Younes, a 20-year-old Meadow Heights man, and Giovanni Laulu, a 21-year-old Werribee man, who were both accused of the same offences.

Both of them are fighting their charges before the courts.

A fourth man, a 20-year-old from Melton South, was previously charged with stealing a communal crime car used to transport those involved in the attack to the synagogue.

Police said the Airport West man was charged while already in custody on unrelated matters and is expected to face court on Tuesday.

AFP Assistant Commissioner Peter Crozier described the inquiry as a “highly complex” investigation and said detectives were continuing to pursue further lines of inquiry into the alleged offshore links.

In August, ASIO ­revealed that Iran was behind the synagogue blaze and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen two months earlier.

ASIO is also reportedly investigating whether Iran was behind the attack in January of the former Sydney home of Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, in which two cars were firebombed and graffiti was sprayed on the property.

Mr Crozier alleged some members of the community had intentionally misled investigators and urged anyone with information to come forward.

“You will not obstruct justice. Now is the time for you to come forward and to do the right thing,” he said.

Mr Crozier said police believed the attack was politically motivated and linked to individuals overseas.

“You would be aware that this investigation does have international connections and we will continue to work collaboratively with our international partners to assist, and also draw information from them,” he said.

He thanked the Jewish community for its patience and support throughout the investigation.

“There is no understating the fear and genuine sense of unease this crime has created across our society,” he said.

More than 200 AFP and Victoria Police personnel have been involved in the investigation, he said.

Victoria Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Paul O’Halloran said members of the synagogue community had been informed of the latest arrest.

“Our heart goes out to them. Again, this brings back this terrible incident but we certainly have engaged with people appropriately,” he said.

“I’m sure it brings a sense of comfort that Victoria Police, the AFP and security agencies are doing all they can.”

The Albanese government responded to ASIO’s assessment that Iran was behind the attacks by putting the relationship with the Islamic republic on ice, expelling Iran’s ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, and three other officials and suspending operations at Australia’s embassy in Tehran.

Rebuilding the Melbourne ultra-Orthodox synagogue to its former glory is now estimated to cost between $25m and $40m, with the building requiring state-of-the-art security systems, including cameras, bollards and guards, to prevent future attacks.

The community hope to expand the synagogue in the future to include a multifunctional centre with a playground, a woman’s mental health facility and a library.

So far, more than $2 million have been raised to help fund the reconstruction of the place of worship.

You can donate to the synagogue via:

https://www.charidy.com/rebuildadass

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/third-man-charged-over-firebombing-of-melbournes-adass-israel-synagogue/news-story/bc71757a0fd699e58297b795d4db9785

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xrScV8aR_Y

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62958

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24737036 (201306ZJUN26) Notable: Australian Federal Police says Five Eyes targets technology giants over online predators - (Video) Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett says the Five Eyes law enforcement partnership will seek greater cooperation from major technology and social media companies to combat online exploitation, extremism and other transnational threats. Speaking ahead of a Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group meeting in London, Barrett said authorities wanted to work with technology firms to better use artificial intelligence and platform features to identify, disrupt and deter online predators. She highlighted growing concerns about sadistic online networks targeting vulnerable young people, particularly teenage girls, through blackmail and coercion. Barrett also pointed to rising cases involving violent extremist material and online radicalisation. The AFP said recent cooperation between Five Eyes agencies has helped identify offenders and support prosecutions in both Australia and the United States.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62798

>>62868

Australian Federal Police says Five Eyes targets technology giants over online predators

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - June 16, 2026

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett says big technology companies will be brought to the table in a Five Eyes intelligence operation to protect young and vulnerable people across Australia and allied nations.

Commissioner Barrett said before a high-powered Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG) meeting in London this week she expected the social media companies to co-operate in new transnational measures.

The Five Eyes group encompasses Australia, New Zealand, the US, Britain and Canada with the FBI, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations and Drug Enforcement Administration, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Britain’s National Crime Agency and Counter Terrorism Police and the New Zealand Police working with the AFP and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission.

“I’m quite confident that there is absolutely a recognition there (by social media companies) that they have a social responsibility, they have a critical role to play and that they understand that they need to come to the table and work with law enforcement to keep our communities safe,’’ Commissioner Barrett said.

Commissioner Barrett said there would be “deep conversations” around the threats and formulating the practical operation work to use the features of social media technology.

“How do we use the features of their technology, how do we use AI and other emerging tech to frustrate, to disrupt, to deter, to detract those people that we know are online that are, you know, they’re predators, they’re looking to exploit the vulnerable.’’

She said what happens overseas “is reverberating quicker and quicker in Australia”.

Of particular concern is the increase in the number of reports around sadistic online exploitation. “These are decentralised networks sadistically targeting victims online,’’ she said.

“We are seeing that the general theme is that these are young men in their teenage years that are targeting predominantly young females in a sadistic fashion. So manipulating, blackmailing them to carry out particular acts of violence or self-harm. And indeed sometimes actually blackmailing the victims to become perpetrators themselves as part of the whole sadistic (operation).’’

Commissioner Barrett also said there has been an increase in the use of particularly vulnerable and young, potentially unaware individuals who are being exploited to carry out significant acts of violence or criminality.

In addition, the counterterrorism caseload has showed an increase in possession of violent extremist material and the desensitisation of vulnerable people who are continually viewing violent extremist material.

Joint operations within the FELEG group have already produced convictions. One case before the Australian courts is a young person whose material found on their mobile phone and computer allegedly showed an affiliation with an international extortion network which promised sadism.

It is alleged the person had authored two manifestos, created an attack plan including target reconnaissance and research into acquisition of weapons and had online chats about intent.

In another case the AFP provided material to the FBI which identified a US dental assistant who had sexually assaulted multiple patients while they were sedated, and who had shared videos of the abuse on the dark web.

The US man was recently sentenced to 55 years jail after pleading guilty to abuse of 16 patients, some children, at the Oklahoma clinic in 2021. The AFP had found the video on a Western Australian man’s phone, seized in 2024, during a child exploitation investigation and identified clothing that suggested it had been filmed in the US.

The AFP said the speed with which the information was passed on and action taken highlights the close relationship between FELEG agencies and a shared commitment to protect vulnerable people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-federal-police-says-five-eyes-targets-technology-giants-over-online-predators/news-story/4b34cbd4950c3d6d7403be737cc90a3b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsomFRE_QbY

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/five-eyes-law-enforcement-group-target-serious-online-harms

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/five-eyes-law-enforcement-leaders-united-call-better-protect-children-and

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62959

File: 7b032de17a43416⋯.jpg (717.47 KB,1000x1333,1000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c280f4510f03a45⋯.jpg (347.76 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e37ecc11cbe77dd⋯.jpg (271.6 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d9eac95c4cc810e⋯.jpg (427.08 KB,1000x750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 40833bfbf99f10a⋯.jpg (415.77 KB,1000x714,500:357,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24737173 (201341ZJUN26) Notable: Barunga Festival 2026: Marines gain cultural experience in the outback of the Northern Territory - About 30 United States Marines and sailors stationed in northern Australia volunteered to help prepare, run and dismantle the 2026 Barunga Festival in the Northern Territory, an annual celebration of Aboriginal culture that attracts thousands of visitors. The personnel assisted with festival infrastructure, sporting events and other logistical tasks while taking part in cultural activities including spear throwing, didgeridoo making, traditional dancing and community gatherings. The visit highlighted the growing relationship between Indigenous communities and the Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, strengthened after Tiwi Islanders formally adopted the force as family following the 2023 Osprey crash that killed three Marines. During the festival, senior traditional owner Esther Bulumbara exchanged ceremonial gifts with Marine commanders. Organisers said the experience deepened cultural understanding, strengthened community ties and reflected mutual respect between Indigenous Australians and visiting US personnel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

Barunga Festival 2026: Marines gain cultural experience in the outback of the Northern Territory

1st Lt. Chase Fortier - 06.15.2026

1/2

DARWIN, Australia – Three vehicles pulled up to an empty plot of grass at the end of a short row of houses, and a group of men and women disembarked. Their clothing, their accents, their mannerisms—all an immediate tell that they were not from here. This was the first indication to the small community of Barunga, which typically consists of about 350 people, that their town was about to be flooded by thousands of people. And the Marines had just arrived to help them welcome the crowds.

Approximately 30 Marines and Sailors with Marine Rotational Force – Darwin 26 volunteered six days to be a part of the working party that would help set up, facilitate, and take down the Aboriginal culture festival known as Barunga Festival, in Barunga, Northern Territory, Australia, June 2026. Marines who volunteered for this opportunity did so to offer their hard physical labor for the once-in-a-lifetime chance to interact with a culture and people that they may otherwise have never been able to meet.

After the four-and-a-half-hour journey into the outback, and once the tents were set up and properly covered and aligned as overseen by their staff noncommissioned officer in charge, Gunnery Sgt. Elkan Meyervolinek, the acting first sergeant of Headquarters Company, 5th Marine Regiment, MRF-D 26, the Marines were taken on a walking tour of the community. Barunga locals greeted and waved at the newly arrived Marines, asking to take pictures and telling the Marines how excited they were for the upcoming weekend festivities. At the end of the tour, the Marines were invited to a barbecue at the Barunga School by community organizers and leaders. Malcolm Hales, the principal of the Barunga School, introduced the Marines to Aussie-rules football (or “footie”), the most popular sport in the Northern Territory and one of the main events of the Barunga Festival. The Marines took turns learning how to kick the football as one does in footie, which is quite different from how it is done in American grid-iron football. Over dinner, the Marines engaged with community organizers about the local community and culture and the work that was to be done to prepare this small town for the weekend.

Hard work followed, as the Marines spent the next day and a half carrying concrete blocks, fence panels, tables, and tents to prepare the community for the festival. What motivated these Marines to give their time and energy to this community was a sense of gratitude and desire to reciprocate the kinship that the Indigenous people of Australia had given to them. Not only does MRF-D train on the land of the Indigenous people—they are also considered family.

In 2023, an MV-22B Osprey tiltrotor aircraft crashed on Tiwi Island, and three Marines tragically passed away in an incident that reminds all Marines of the dangerous nature of their job. The Indigenous people of Tiwi Island, particularly the Mantiyupwi—who are the traditional custodians of the land on which the incident occurred—wanted to support the Marines in honoring the life of their brothers and sister in arms, especially since the Marines of MRF-D are so far from their families while on deployment. After the traditional mourning period of 1 year and 1 month—known to the Indigenous people as “sorry business”—the Mantiyupwi officially adopted MRF-D as family and invited them to the final farewell ceremony for the Marines who passed away. Those Marines are referred to by the Mantiyupwi as “big brother,” “big sister,” and “little brother.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62960

File: 31a2992a96e464c⋯.jpg (300.28 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 10ddbb2955d1596⋯.jpg (315.14 KB,1240x1548,310:387,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24737270 (201410ZJUN26) Notable: Amy Wallace is still fighting for Virginia Giuffre - Journalist and ghostwriter Amy Wallace has reflected on her close friendship and four-year collaboration with Virginia Giuffre on the memoir Nobody’s Girl, published after Giuffre’s death in April 2025. Wallace said the book was designed to document both the abuse Giuffre alleged she suffered at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and others, and the lasting physical and psychological effects that followed. Rejecting conspiracy theories surrounding Giuffre’s death, Wallace noted that the memoir openly discussed her mental health struggles and previous suicide attempts. The pair spent four years recording Giuffre’s account and verifying details through flight logs, deposition files, photographs and interviews with other sources. Wallace said Giuffre wanted the book published regardless of what happened to her, believing it could help other survivors. She argued Giuffre’s determination to speak publicly helped drive accountability and inspired others to come forward.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62913

>>62929

Amy Wallace is still fighting for Virginia Giuffre

“Never underestimate the power of your individual outrage”

Zing Tsjeng - 19 June 2026

1/2

“The reason it’s called a ghostwriter is you’re supposed to be invisible,” Amy Wallace says from her home office in northern California, where the wall behind her is sprinkled with meticulously colour-coded Post-its. The veteran magazine journalist is used to disappearing into her stories, not being in the spotlight herself, especially when it comes to her side gig co-authoring memoirs.

But Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice is a very different type of book. It tells the story of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, the survivor and advocate best known for helping to expose Jeffrey Epstein’s global sex-trafficking ring. Giuffre was one of the first to come forward with allegations of sexual abuse at the hands of the American financier, his crony Ghislaine Maxwell and their elite circle of friends and hangers-on. It is 17-year-old Giuffre apparently pictured with the then Prince Andrew’s hand around her waist in the infamous 2001 photo at Maxwell’s house in Belgravia, London. It is Giuffre who, for years, led calls to prosecute Epstein and his accomplices.

The reason Wallace is stepping forward to speak about Nobody’s Girl – which was published last autumn, sold a million copies in its first two months alone and won Book of the Year at the British Book Awards in May – is because Giuffre is no longer able to. In April 2025, six months before publication, she died by suicide at her farm in Neergabby, Western Australia. She was only 41 years old. “I was shocked, because she’d always been so resilient,” Wallace says plainly. “But of course, I also knew what she was struggling with every day.” She trails off, looking tired – she’s only just recovered from jetlag after a trip to Australia to promote the book – and melancholy. “We were very close. We talked a huge amount.”

Despite the conspiracy theories surrounding Giuffre’s death, Wallace, 63, firmly rejects the idea of foul play. Nobody’s Girl also documents Giuffre’s ongoing struggles with her physical and mental health, including two earlier suicide attempts. Wallace says that Giuffre was adamant about unflinchingly detailing the legacy of her abuse, worried that if she gave the impression of being fully healed, she would “create shame in other survivors”. A few weeks before she died, Giuffre sent an email to Wallace and her publicist, making it clear that Nobody’s Girl should be published even “in the event of my passing…I believe it has the potential to impact many lives and foster necessary discussions about these grave injustices.”

In the four years over which they crafted the manuscript, Giuffre and Wallace excavated some of the most painful moments of Giuffre’s life, including the alleged grooming and abuse she was subjected to by Epstein, who died in jail in 2019, and Maxwell, who was convicted of sex trafficking two years later. Their time together produced hundreds of hours of recordings. The tapes contain the names of more alleged abusers; many are powerful men who have “access to violence”, in Wallace’s words. “I have not been physically confronted,” she says carefully, but she has kept the tapes locked away in a secure location nonetheless. Before the book was announced, she even received a phishing email claiming to be from her editor, inquiring, “Hey, can you shoot me the latest copy of the manuscript?”

Wallace enlisted a fact-checker to corroborate Giuffre’s account of the abuse with flight logs, deposition files, wire images and interviews with other sources. “I drove by the now empty lot where Epstein’s mansion was,” she recalls. “I went to Australia twice, lived with the [Giuffre] family in the guest room.”

This was not a typical assignment for Wallace. In her previous work, she’s grabbed commissary burgers with Hollywood auteurs and tracked down luxury watch thieves. For Nobody’s Girl, she had to learn about trauma reporting and how to avoid inflicting further harm on Giuffre during the writing process. At their first meeting, Giuffre launched straight into a well-worn account of her abuse. Wallace interrupted on pure instinct: “We have to get to know each other,” she said. “We have to get to trust each other. You don’t have to serve that up to me on a call without even knowing me.” Today, she wonders if that moment was why Giuffre chose to partner with her.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62961

File: 6ec5e64f552a018⋯.jpg (2.08 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 38c4591cc7fca3d⋯.jpg (1.93 MB,4552x2561,4552:2561,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24740254 (210928ZJUN26) Notable: Former ACT attorney-general Gordon Ramsay facing new charges after arrest for child grooming - Former ACT attorney-general Gordon Ramsay is facing seven additional charges, including two counts of committing an act of indecency on a person under special care and multiple offences involving the use of a carriage service for child abuse material and to menace, harass or offend. The new charges relate to the same alleged victim and extend the alleged offending period to between 2022 and 2025, including after the complainant turned 16. Prosecutors told the court the brief of evidence now exceeds 7,000 pages, delaying the case’s progression. Police allege Ramsay groomed the young person through gifts, alcohol and frequent contact before requesting increasingly sexualised images, with investigators alleging he later suggested they “needed to delete the images” after learning the boy’s parents had discussed contacting police. Ramsay denies the allegations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Former ACT attorney-general Gordon Ramsay facing new charges after arrest for child grooming

Elizabeth Byrne - 16 June 2026

The ACT's former attorney-general Gordon Ramsay is facing a raft of new charges after he was arrested last year for grooming a young person.

The arrest sent shock waves through Canberra when Mr Ramsay, the former Labor politician, was initially charged in October.

He was to have been committed to trial in the ACT Supreme Court today, but instead his lawyers turned up to court to ask for more time to prepare the case.

That's because he is now facing seven more charges which include two counts of committing an act of indecency on a person under special care, and several counts of using a carriage service for child abuse material and to menace, harass or offend.

The offences all relate to the same alleged victim.

Magistrate Jane Campbell also pointed out the new charges relate to events that occurred after the boy turned 16.

Brief of evidence thousands of pages long

All of the alleged offences are now said to have occurred between 2022 and 2025.

A redacted statement of facts, released before the new charges were laid, alleged Mr Ramsay groomed the boy with dinners and alcohol, telling him he was special, before requesting increasingly sexualised images.

It's alleged the pair began communicating on Instagram, with weekend catch ups and phone calls.

Among the allegations are claims Mr Ramsay continually pushed the boundaries, first asking for photos with the boy clothed, and later asking him to take pictures of himself in his underwear.

Police allege that when the boy's parents mentioned going to the police, Mr Ramsay messaged the boy suggesting they needed to delete the images.

Prosecutors told the court today it had taken a while to lay the new charges because the brief was 7,000 pages long.

Gordon Ramsay was the ACT attorney-general between 2016 and 2020, when he lost his seat in an election.

He then became chief executive officer of the Cultural Facilities Corporation, which oversees the Canberra Theatre Centre, Canberra Museum and Gallery, and ACT historic places.

Mr Ramsay was suspended without pay from the position when he was charged with the current offences.

Before his stint in politics, he had been a minister in the Uniting Church in Sydney and from 1997 at Kippax Uniting Church in Canberra.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-16/former-act-attorney-general-gordon-ramsay-faces-new-charges/106802188

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62962

File: c0a2ec7298ba700⋯.jpg (414.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 485cc5c1409af40⋯.jpg (395.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24740258 (210935ZJUN26) Notable: Anglican Church to deliver second apology to survivor after decades-long battle for justice - Anglican Bishop of Bathurst Mark Calder will deliver a personal apology to sexual abuse survivor Beth Heinrich during a church service in Forbes, New South Wales, marking the second formal apology she has received this year after decades seeking accountability. Heinrich, now 86, was groomed and sexually abused as a teenager in the 1950s by Anglican priest Donald Shearman, who was later defrocked for misconduct in 2004. The apology follows one delivered in March by Archbishop Jeremy Greaves, who acknowledged the church’s failure to support Heinrich after former governor-general Peter Hollingworth wrongly suggested she had initiated the relationship. Heinrich said the public apology would demonstrate to other survivors that “they should not give up” because “you will get somewhere if you keep at it”. Bishop Calder described her treatment by the church as “appalling” and said it “should never have occurred”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38759 (pb)

>>38806 (pb)

>>38807 (pb)

>>62728

Anglican Church to deliver second apology to survivor after decades-long battle for justice

JAMIE WALKER - June 19, 2026

A senior Anglican Church figure will issue the second personal apology in three months to sexual abuse survivor Beth Heinrich, capping her decades-long fight for justice.

Bishop of Bathurst Mark Calder will apologise during a Sunday service at St John’s Church in Forbes, NSW – adjoining the former Anglican hostel where Ms Heinrich as a teenager was groomed and exploited by a predatory priest.

This follows the heartfelt apology delivered in March by Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane Jeremy Greaves. He acknowledged that his predecessor, the late Peter Hollingworth, had failed Ms Heinrich when he suggested, while governor-general, that she had instigated a sexual relationship with her abuser.

The 86-year-old told The Australian the move by Bishop Calder sent an important message to other sexual abuse survivors that they should never stop demanding accountability and redress.

“It’s not for myself. I’m doing it … to demonstrate that if people have been abused out there they should not give up, they need to keep going to be heard and to get something done,” she said.

“I think my experience shows that you will get somewhere if you keep at it.”

Bishop Calder said: “I’m very sad that Beth was harmed by the church and the apology expresses that.”

Ms Heinrich’s interaction with her abuser, future bishop Donald Shearman, began in the mid-1950s after she was sent to board at the hostel in Forbes attached to St John’s, her family’s farm being too far away for her to commute to high school.

She was 14 when she entered the married priest’s orbit. Within a year, Shearman, the boarding master, was regularly having sex with her; he promised to leave his wife and that they would marry.

Instead, he contrived to have her expelled, falsely claiming that she had been promiscuous with boys. This destroyed her relationship with her parents and her hope of becoming a teacher.

But it didn’t end there. The man who targeted her as a child continued to use her as a vulnerable adult. She fled a troubled marriage into his arms and they lived together briefly in 1984 before, at the urging of another bishop, Shearman returned to his wife.

Eventually, Ms Heinrich complained to the church. But it would take nearly two decades for anything to come of it.

Hollingworth, as governor-general, fanned the flames in 2002, after Ms Heinrich went public with her story, claiming there was “no suggestion of rape or anything like that”.

Ignoring that Ms Heinrich was underage when Shearman took her to bed, Hollingworth notoriously said: “Quite the contrary. My information is that it was rather the other way around.”

Shearman was found guilty of misconduct by a church tribunal and became the first Anglican bishop in Australia to be defrocked in 2004, by which time Hollingworth had been forced to quit his vice-regal role.

Shearman died in 2019. Hollingworth apologised on a number of occasions to Ms Heinrich before his death last month, aged 91.

While she also received written apologies from both the Anglican dioceses of Brisbane and Bathurst, which covers Forbes in central west NSW, Ms Heinrich said hearing directly from the bishops was important.

She will be on hand when Bishop Calder addresses the congregation on Sunday

“That’s a physical demonstration that they did something wrong and they’re sorry for it,” Ms Heinrich said.

Describing her past treatment by the church as “shameful”, Bishop Calder told The Australian: “I will be saying that what happened to her was appalling and should never have occurred.”

In apologising to Ms Heinrich in Brisbane’s St John’s Anglican Cathedral on March 22, Archbishop Greaves said she had been ignored by the church when she found the courage to speak out about her abuse.

“Most grievously, those in positions of senior leadership in the Brisbane diocese, including archbishop Peter Hollingworth, failed Beth,” he said.

“Rather than expressing compassion, justice and accountability … the victim-survivor was blamed, while the person responsible was defended or excused.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anglican-church-to-deliver-second-apology-to-survivor-after-decadeslong-battle-for-justice/news-story/69ae4f47e281d29a62061f8d1b7c2cce

https://qresear.ch/?q=Beth+Heinrich

https://qresear.ch/?q=Peter+Hollingworth

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62963

File: e25a4733a20ae46⋯.jpg (219.87 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0c00b59162e4ed1⋯.jpg (387.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24743361 (220928ZJUN26) Notable: Royal commission probes if police mistrust hampered detection of Bondi gunmen - The antisemitism royal commission is examining whether longstanding tensions between the Australian Federal Police and NSW Police hindered information-sharing that may have affected efforts to detect the radicalisation of Bondi gunmen Sajid and Naveed Akram before the December 2025 terrorist attack. The inquiry has focused on the fallout from the Dural caravan investigation, where disagreements over the handling of a fabricated terrorism plot reportedly deepened mistrust within the NSW Joint Counter-Terrorism Team. Evidence before the commission includes concerns about non-disclosure agreements, differing interpretations of information-sharing protocols and strained relations between senior police leaders. The commission’s interim report recommends an independent confidential review of the NSW Joint Counter-Terrorism Team’s information-sharing arrangements to improve cooperation between federal and state agencies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62756

>>62759

Royal commission probes if police mistrust hampered detection of Bondi gunmen

JAMES DOWLING - 21 June 2026

1/2

The antisemitism royal commission questioned whether communication breakdowns from the Dural caravan investigation hampered the ability to detect radicalisation of Bondi gunmen Sajid and Naveed Akram, following decades of mistrust between police services.

As part of early inquiries into factors leading up to the worst terror attack in Australia’s history, the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission investigated how a phony bomb threat on Sydney’s outskirts drove a wedge between state and federal police, and interviewed former Australian Federal Police commissioner Reece Kershaw before releasing its interim report in April.

The Australian previously reported that NSW Police sent a senior officer to Canberra after the Dural plot was exposed in January last year to negotiate with AFP commanders about the future and function of the NSW Joint Counter-Terrorism Team – the state’s main terror investigators, comprising NSW Police, AFP, ASIO and State Crime Command officers.

A government source has now revealed the royal commission heard there were threats made during these discussions about future participation in the NSW JCTT, though the substance of these threats was unclear.

Problems identified in the cross-jurisdiction relationship stretched back 25 years to the inception of the JCTT, the source said, but the investigation into the Dural incident – when an explosives-laden caravan was found with a series of notes listing Jewish sites and buildings, including the Great Synagogue – was the nadir.

The Australian understands Mr Kershaw, who was commissioner at the time, was interviewed during the short-lived internal inquiry led by senior public servant Dennis Richardson, which was later folded into the royal commission.

While peripheral to the wider investigation into the Akrams, inquiries into the Dural incident were intended to gauge how it affected the relationship between federal and state police, and whether that impacted their co-operation monitoring persons of interest and rooting out terror plots before December 14.

The Australian in January found that despite AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett “almost immediately” knowing the caravan was a “fabricated terrorism plot – essentially a criminal con job”, her officers maintained a top priority for the investigation as a terrorist threat and ordered state police officers to sign non­disclosure agreements and not pass information up the chain of command.

It caused ructions and NSW Police pushed publicly and privately for an independent inquiry into the NSW JCTT and counter-terrorism protocols to clear the “bad blood” between senior police in Canberra and Sydney. However, there was no subsequent change to the counter­terrorism protocols and no independent inquiry was held.

The Dural caravan was also examined by a NSW parliamentary inquiry where both NSW Police counter-terror commander David Hudson and former NSW Police commissioner Karen Webb spoke about their early certainty there was no real threat, but said they could not rule it out until the AFP discredited a source behind the terror tip-off.

“Contrary information from the AFP could not be ignored at the level it was being provided,” Mr Hudson said

“Until … the source had been discredited we needed to continue treating it as a threat.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62964

File: bd253fcdfeff978⋯.jpg (78 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 910fe0d6eab2654⋯.jpg (142.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 009989bb47bc940⋯.jpg (238.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 066a77199c2d8e7⋯.jpg (587.1 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24743365 (220935ZJUN26) Notable: Accused ISIS bride seeks divorce from alleged fighter as bail hearing continues - Lawyers for Kawsar Abbas told the Melbourne Magistrates Court the 54-year-old wants to divorce her husband, alleged Islamic State fighter Mohammed Ahmad, as they argue she has renounced ISIS and should be granted bail. Abbas faces four crimes against humanity charges alleging she participated in the enslavement of a Yazidi teenager in Syria. Her defence said she wanted to live peacefully in Australia, accepted any bail conditions and was “fair dinkum” about rebuilding her life. Her brother, Abraham Abbas, offered his home as a $75,000 surety and said he would personally contact police if she breached bail. Forensic psychologist Michael Davis testified he found no evidence Abbas remained committed to extremist ideology or was likely to re-radicalise. The prosecution opposed bail, with the hearing continuing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62856

>>62956

Accused ISIS bride seeks divorce from alleged fighter as bail hearing continues

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 22 June 2026

An accused ISIS bride wants to divorce the husband she allegedly joined in buying a slave, as her lawyers argue she is now “fair dinkum” and wants to live peacefully in Australia.

Lawyers for Kawsar Abbas told the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday that the 54-year-old had provided written instructions to begin divorce proceedings against her husband, alleged Islamic State fighter Mohammed Ahmad, who is believed to be imprisoned in Iraq.

Ms Abbas is seeking bail in the Melbourne Magistrates Court while being tried in an Australian-first crimes against humanity prosecution over allegations of enslaving a Yazidi teenager during the Islamic State caliphate in Syria.

In the third bail application hearing before Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan, defence barrister Peter Morrissey SC told the court his client wanted to live a peaceful life in Australia and wanted to show that she was “fair dinkum”.

Mr Morrissey also said the grandmother had renounced the Islamic State entirely.

“She is not a supporter of ISIS. She does not have anything to do with ISIS. She hates them regardless. She wants to have nothing to do with them,” Mr Morrissey said.

“She wants her children and grandchildren to have nothing to do with them.”

In his submission, Mr Morris­sey said his client, who had an ISIS flag draped on the wall of her Syrian home, would accept “anything” to show that “she is being good”.

“The court instructions and the boundaries are a help to her in their demonstration to the community, that she wants to live in peace … that she’s fair dinkum and that she wants to behave,” he said.

“She is game for any restrictions to be placed and would like to show that she’s worthy of trust.”

Giving evidence in court, Ms Abbas’s younger brother, Abraham Abbas, provided a $75,000 bail surety that also included his five-bedroom house.

Mr Abbas told the court he had visited his sister up to 12 times in prison and, if released, she would be residing with his 73-year-old mother. Asked if he understood what would happen if the accused did not comply with any bail conditions, Mr Abbas said he would personally call the police.

“I would lose my house and virtually everything that I ever worked for, so, yeah,” he said. “That’s everything I’ve worked for.” Asked about his views on the Islamic State, Mr Abbas said neither he nor his family had ever expressed support for it.

“I denounced the Islamic State. I never supported this thing. Our family doesn’t support Islamic State. Not now, not ever.”

Forensic clinical psychologist Michael Davis told the court there was “nothing blatant whatsoever” to suggest Ms Abbas remained committed to extremist ideology and said he had found no evidence that she was likely to engage in terrorism-related offending if released. Mr Davis said he was struck by Ms Abbas’s discussion of her favourite Koranic passages, telling the court it showed that she held beliefs different from those espoused by the Islamic State.

Mr Davis said he spent more than five hours interviewing Ms Abbas and found no sign that she continued to support the terrorist organisation.

“I was certainly looking for them,” he said. “The fact that she lost a brother and two sons whilst over there has probably contributed to her current very negative view of Islamic State.”

Asked by Ms Hannan whether the accused’s “dependent personality” could make her vulnerable to re-radicalisation, Mr Davis rejected the suggestion.

“I can’t see her being re-radicalised,” he said. “With the depth of her anger and hatred towards the Islamic State … re-radicalisation, if it happens at all, is extraordinarily rare.”

Mr Davis described the accused as suffering from depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and panic disorder, and said separation from her children and grandchildren was causing her distress.

“The only positive aspect that she has in her life is her children and her grandchildren,” he told the court.

Ms Abbas is facing four slavery offences, including enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave and engaging in slave trading, over allegations she and her husband purchased a Yazidi teenager while living under Islamic State rule in Syria.

The bail application continues before Ms Hannan.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accused-isis-bride-seeks-divorce-from-alleged-fighter-as-bail-hearing-continues/news-story/9f45bf69a14a1412ffe9d0c94ef38b8c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62965

File: 55f78965d826223⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,3600x2400,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 08b8ccf728325a5⋯.jpg (150.07 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 02895c7a10ea295⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24743375 (220944ZJUN26) Notable: Australia and Canada ink $2.5 billion over-the-horizon radar deal - Australia and Canada have signed the first stage of a $2.5 billion agreement for Australia to supply its over-the-horizon radar technology, marking the nation’s largest-ever defence export. The system will be modelled on Australia’s Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN), which provides surveillance coverage of up to 3,000 kilometres, and will strengthen Canada’s ability to monitor the Arctic. The project will be delivered by BAE Systems, with Canada allocating up to $6.5 billion for the broader program. Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia would benefit from ongoing collaboration to further develop the technology and remained open to exports to trusted allies. Canadian defence procurement secretary Stephen Fuhr also confirmed Canada was assessing Australia’s MQ-28 Ghost Bat uncrewed aircraft.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62889

>>62935

Australia and Canada ink $2.5 billion over-the-horizon radar deal

Tom Lowrey - 22 June 2026

A $2.5 billion deal to sell Australia's highly advanced over-the-horizon radar system to Canada has been signed, making it Australia's most valuable defence export ever.

Canada is buying the powerful radar system to monitor the Arctic, modelling the system on Australia's Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN).

The JORN radar has been operating for 40 years, allowing up to 3,000 kilometres of surveillance coverage of Australia's northern approaches.

Canada's prime minister, Mark Carney, announced in March that his country would spend billions on the system, the first time Australia has sold the technology.

Now the first stage of that deal has been signed, allowing it to go ahead with the prospect of more to come.

The deal was noted at the time as a sign that Canada was keen to broaden its defence partnerships beyond a heavy reliance on the United States.

Canada's secretary for defence procurement, Stephen Fuhr, said the deal marked a significant shift in the Australia-Canada relationship.

"As the world adjusts to its new strategic and economic realities, I can't think of a stronger partner to work with than Australia," he said.

The Canadian project will be built through defence manufacturer BAE Systems, which also maintains Australia's JORN radar.

Canada has provisioned $6.5 billion in total for the project and will look at expanding the network in the years ahead.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the deal comes with benefits to Australia beyond the billions in export revenue, as Australia will benefit from future shared expertise in developing the radar system further.

He said Australia would be open to selling the radar to other countries, like the US, but noted the sensitivity of the technology.

"This is an exquisite technology with a really impressive IP, and something that we would only do with the closest of friends," he said.

"That said, under our government, we have looked to be more ambitious in terms of finding more opportunities to engage in defence industry exports."

Canada looks at Ghost Bat aerial drone

Mr Fuhr said he would also be taking the chance to inspect a Ghost Bat uncrewed aircraft while in Australia.

The Ghost Bat is a highly capable drone designed to operate alongside fighter aircraft like the F-35.

It was primarily designed for intelligence and reconnaissance missions, with a range of about 3,700km, but can also carry weapons.

Germany is taking a strong interest in acquiring the Ghost Bat, and Mr Fuhr said Canada is also keen to take a look.

"I'm quite interested; collaborative combat aircraft are a thing, and it seems like Australia has a bit of a lead there," he said.

"So I'm curious to see where that's at, and I'll see it this afternoon."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-22/australia-canada-sign-billion-dollar-over-horizon-radar-deal/106827724

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62966

File: ec19bf89a299070⋯.jpg (754.31 KB,4799x3199,4799:3199,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24743390 (220955ZJUN26) Notable: China’s policing plans should be sidelined, says top Solomons minister - Solomon Islands Planning Minister Peter Kenilorea Jr has urged a greater focus on economic development rather than security cooperation with China, signalling support for closer ties with Australia under the new government of Prime Minister Matthew Wale. Kenilorea said the security sphere was already “too crowded” for a small nation and argued China’s involvement should concentrate on development projects. He has previously criticised Chinese policing activities, including community registration and fingerprinting programs, as an invasion of privacy. The comments come as Australia and the Solomon Islands negotiate a comprehensive new treaty expected to deepen security cooperation, expand labour mobility and reinforce bilateral ties as Canberra seeks to counter Beijing’s influence in the Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62760

>>62776

>>62839

>>62846

China’s policing plans should be sidelined, says top Solomons minister

Matthew Knott - June 22, 2026

1/2

One of Solomon Islands’ most senior ministers has called for security and policing co-operation with China to be sidelined in a boost for Australia’s efforts to counter Beijing’s influence in the Pacific.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will conduct a Pacific diplomacy blitz in July, including a visit to the Solomons to drive forward negotiations on a new comprehensive treaty while finalising pacts with Fiji and Vanuatu.

Recently elected Solomons Prime Minister Matthew Wale vowed to review a controversial security agreement struck with China during a visit to Canberra this month and promised a “reset” in the relationship with Australia after years of tension and distrust.

Peter Kenilorea Junior, the minister of national planning and development coordination, said the new government was seeking a “a rebalancing of relations” with its development partners after the nation moved closer to China under previous governments.

Asked if he wanted to see a winding back of China’s role in policing and security in the Solomons, Kenilorea told this masthead that “we would like to focus more on economic development”.

He continued: “The security space, in my own personal opinion, is a little bit too crowded for a small country like the Solomons. So I would definitely emphasise the development aspect of China’s involvement.”

Chinese police have been fingerprinting Solomon Islanders and getting them to fill out household registration cards under a community policing model based on a Mao Zedong-era system requiring citizens to keep tabs on each other.

Kenilorea said last year he was concerned about the practice, describing it as an invasion of privacy.

Chinese police have also been offering martial arts and self-defence training to Solomon Islanders.

A report released in May by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime found the Solomons had “emerged as China’s most prominent policing partner in the Pacific”.

“The relationship includes training, equipment, advisory presence and high-level political signalling,” the report found.

The Albanese government has insisted that Pacific nations’ security and policing co-operation should be limited to other island nations including Australia.

The 2022 security pact between China and the Solomons caused alarm in Canberra, reviving fears Beijing could seek to establish a military base in the Pacific near Australia’s coastline.

Australian officials have said that Australia is facing a “diplomatic knife fight” with China in the Pacific, including fending off alleged efforts by Beijing to pay bribes to corrupt politicians.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62967

File: c27decb2443613d⋯.jpg (537.26 KB,3000x2068,750:517,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24743412 (221014ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Concerns’ raised over trust withdrawals in Virginia Giuffre’s estate battle - A Supreme Court of Western Australia case management hearing has heard concerns about money being withdrawn from a family trust linked to the estate of Virginia Giuffre, as a legal dispute over her multimillion-dollar estate continues. Lawyer McLane Edinger, representing Giuffre’s former solicitor Karrie Louden and former carer Cheryl Myers, raised concerns about withdrawals from the Witty River Family Trust, which had been jointly controlled by Giuffre and her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre. Giuffre’s sons, Christian and Noah, are seeking to administer the estate, arguing she died without a valid will, while Louden and Myers contend an informal will expressed her wish that her estranged husband not benefit. The court granted a short extension for the interim administrator to provide further evidence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23904324 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23921130 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23951100 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23951125 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/24253522 (pb)

>>62682

‘Concerns’ raised over trust withdrawals in Virginia Giuffre’s estate battle

Carla Hildebrandt and Melissa Fyfe - June 22, 2026

Virginia Giuffre’s former lawyer and her carer, who are locked in a battle with her sons over her multimillion-dollar estate, are concerned about money being withdrawn from a family trust controlled by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre.

The issue was aired during a case management conference before registrar Danielle Davies in the Supreme Court of Western Australia on Monday, where administrative matters were discussed before an expected mediation later this year or next year.

Child sex-trafficking survivor Giuffre died aged 41 in April last year at her farm in Neergabby, about an hour’s drive north of Perth. Her estate is believed to include substantial compensation payments received from Britain’s Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Giuffre had separated from her husband and was involved in divorce proceedings at the time of her death. The couple share three children.

Last year, her adult sons, Christian, 20, and Noah, 18, brought proceedings seeking to be appointed administrators of the estate. They argue their mother died without a valid will and lacked “testamentary capacity” when an informal will was created, according to court filings.

Giuffre’s lawyer Karrie Louden and carer Cheryl Myers filed a counterclaim alleging Giuffre expressed in an “informal will” that her estranged husband should not benefit from her estate.

Robert Giuffre and the couple’s daughter have since been joined to the proceedings, with the public trustee appointed to represent the teenager.

Perth lawyer Ian Torrington Blatchford remains the interim administrator currently managing the estate.

During Monday’s hearing, Louden and Myers’ lawyer McLane Edinger told the court he had “concerns relating to the use of funds” from the Witty River Family Trust, in which Robert and Virginia Giuffre held 50 shares each.

McLane told the court he had been speaking with Blatchford “extensively” and asked for an extension for him to give evidence on the state of affairs of the estate.

“I do not speak for him … there is quite a bit that has occurred … complex issues have arisen,” McLane told the court.

“There are issues in the Family Court … and issues with the use of funds from the family trust.”

George St Chambers barrister Jon Patty, representing Christian and Noah Giuffre, who appeared via audio link from Queensland, told the court Blatchford had already received extensions and opposed the order.

But registrar Davies approved the order, telling the court it was a “very short extension” and it “made sense” to grant it.

Patty told the court his clients were seeking to access a range of medical and financial documents from third parties, including a “small medical centre” and an accounting firm.

Davies told the plaintiffs to file a further amended application within 14 days.

Since the last court appearance, Louden and Myers have changed legal representation from Craig Hollett to Edinger, who is part of national firm Hall and Wilcox.

He previously managed Heath Ledger’s estate for eight years.

The next hearing would be set once registrar Davies was provided availability from the parties.

Lifeline 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/concerns-raised-over-trust-withdrawals-in-virginia-giuffre-s-estate-battle-20260622-p608wz.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62968

File: 45682035a1f2813⋯.jpg (367.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9f43154a567071c⋯.jpg (99.66 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748075 (230839ZJUN26) Notable: Andrew Hastie receives security upgrades after being targeted by pro-Ben Roberts-Smith online campaign - Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie is set to receive security upgrades at his home and electorate office after an online campaign by supporters of Ben Roberts-Smith allegedly targeted him over his involvement in the former soldier’s legal proceedings. According to reports, Hastie told Coalition colleagues he had been informed of the measures by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke and believed they were prompted by hostility from One Nation supporters. Hastie became a focus of criticism after giving evidence in Roberts-Smith’s unsuccessful defamation case against Nine newspapers and has since vowed he would “never surrender to One Nation”. Pauline Hanson has continued to support Roberts-Smith, while rejecting speculation he would contest Hastie’s seat of Canning as a One Nation candidate at the next federal election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38871 (pb)

>>62722

>>62752

>>62881

>>62882

Andrew Hastie receives security upgrades after being targeted by pro-Ben Roberts-Smith online campaign

THOMAS HENRY - 23 June 2026

Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie is set to receive security upgrades at his home and electorate office, believed to be linked to an online campaign by One Nation supporters targeting the MP over his involvement in the Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes scandal.

According to Nine reports Mr Hastie told his Coalition colleagues he had been informed of the security upgrades by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke and believed the move was driven by One Nation’s base over his role in the BRS affair.

“I would rather get taken out in a box than bend the knee to One Nation,” Hastie reportedly told the meeting.

“I will never surrender to One Nation, and we will do them, and do them slowly.”

The minor party’s leader Pauline Hanson has been one of Mr Roberts-Smith’s most strident supporters since he was arrested on suspicion of war crimes at Sydney airport earlier this year, and One Nation’s supporters have rallied against those who have testified against him.

Mr Hastie became a target for Mr Roberts-Smith’s supporters after he gave evidence during defamation proceedings launched against Nine newspapers by Mr Roberts-Smith over a series of articles alleging he was involved in four murders in Afghanistan.

The Victoria Cross recipient has been charged with five counts of the war crime of murder over the alleged killing of unarmed Afghan detainees.

Senator Hanson earlier this month again threw her support behind Mr Roberts-Smith at an event in Brisbane, but rejected rumours the party would run him against Mr Hastie in his seat of Canning at the next election.

“I’ve been in Ben Roberts-Smith’s shoes, as far as facing a criminal trial. I’ve been there, and it’s a distressing time, especially when you know you’re innocent, and I think Ben needs to know that people are supportive of him,” she said at a barbecue organised by BRS supporters.

“I don’t think it would be fair to Ben to put that pressure on him (to run). He’s going through a hell of a thing at the moment.”

The furore surrounding the case against Mr Roberts-Smith formed a key part of the party’s campaign in the Farrer by-election, erecting placards expressing support for him at pre-polling booths across the electorate.

Despite Senator Hanson’s chief of staff James Ashby promising to run a strong candidate in the seat of Canning at the next election, Mr Hastie claimed he backed himself to hang onto the key West Australian seat.

“Pauline Hanson and James Ashby have declared war on me – they said they’re coming for Canning. I don’t negotiate, mate. If they want war, I’m going to give them war,” he told 2GB last week.

“I back myself as a campaigner, I back myself for delivering for my local community, so I welcome the fight.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/andrew-hastie-receives-security-upgrades-after-online-campaign-in-defence-of-ben-robert-smith/news-story/7c16efd8206b7fc094bf26938b925c34

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62969

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748100 (230853ZJUN26) Notable: Influencer’s video of nurses threatening to ‘kill’ Israeli patients thrown out of evidence ahead of trial - (Video) A NSW judge has ruled that video footage recorded by Israeli influencer Max Ilinski, known online as Max Veifer, allegedly showing Sydney nurses Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir threatening Israeli patients cannot be used as evidence at their upcoming trial. Judge Michael McHugh found the recording was made unlawfully because it captured a private conversation, making it inadmissible despite describing the alleged remarks as “likely highly disturbing”. The prosecution will instead rely on Ilinski’s testimony when the trial begins on August 31 and is seeking permission for him to give evidence by video link if necessary. Abu Lebdeh and Nadir have pleaded not guilty to Commonwealth offences, with Abu Lebdeh also denying an additional charge of threatening violence against a group.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

>>62853

>>62895

Influencer’s video of nurses threatening to ‘kill’ Israeli patients thrown out of evidence ahead of trial

BIMINI PLESSER - 23 June 2026

1/2

A judge has sensationally ruled an Israeli influencer’s video of two Sydney nurses allegedly threatening to “kill” Israeli patients cannot be used as evidence in their upcoming trial, stating it was unlawful to record and share the private conversation.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir made global headlines last year after they were recorded allegedly threatening violence against Israeli patients at Bankstown Hospital, in Sydney’s west, in an online chatroom.

On Tuesday, Judge Michael McHugh determined that Israeli influencer Max Ilinski (known online as Max Veifer) recorded the video unlawfully and ruled the footage inadmissible in court.

“Ultimately, I have come to the firm view that the video evidence must be excluded from each of the trials of the applicants,” he said.

Mr Nadir and Ms Abu Lebdeh, who are out on bail, attended court via video link. Their lawyers, appearing alongside them, could be seen smiling as Judge McHugh delivered his decision.

Judge McHugh said “the alleged utterances of the applicants during the chat room interactions are… likely highly disturbing to right-minded people everywhere” but whether they met the “high criminal standard is an entirely different set of questions” that must be put to a jury.

“It is in that context that the publishing of the outcome of these pre-trial applications must be made with care and an understanding of sub judice contempt,” he said.

Judge McHugh made clear his judgment was not meant to “express any views on what Mr Ilinski referred to as ‘the war’ or ‘antisemitism’ generally”.

His decision followed a months-long bid by the defence to have the video thrown out.

Earlier this month, Mr Nadir’s barrister, Greg James KC, told a Sydney court the video should be subject to local law because it was recorded, at least in part, in NSW.

“It doesn’t matter where you use the device, provided that it is recording a private conversation which took place in NSW,” he said.

Mr James said allowing the video to be used in the trial would be “an invitation to people all over the world” with certain political beliefs or motivations to “breach the laws of NSW” by recording and publishing online conversations.

Attending court via video link, Mr Ilinski said at the time he only posted the video “to bring awareness … and warn Jewish communities around the world from things that want to hurt them”.

Mr James rejected the notion that Mr Ilinski had recorded the conversation for his safety, calling him a “vigilante” whose intention was to get the two nurses fired.

“He is an activist. He is seeking…to draw out opinions and, having succeeded in drawing them out, he’s not protecting himself from them, he’s capitalising on them,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62970

File: 6db224c08c1b2e0⋯.jpg (971.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f23eb48d0a476e1⋯.jpg (231.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748117 (230912ZJUN26) Notable: Dennis Richardson’s Bondi report abandoned as Virginia Bell reinterviews ex-spy chief’s subjects - The antisemitism royal commission has effectively set aside the work of former ASIO chief Dennis Richardson’s independent review into security agencies ahead of the Bondi terrorist attack, instead conducting its own interviews with many of the same witnesses. Richardson was appointed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to rapidly examine police and intelligence preparedness before his inquiry was absorbed into the royal commission in January. He later resigned, saying he had become “surplus to requirements”. The commission has instead relied on fresh evidence, including interviews with former AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw, while examining tensions between the AFP and NSW Police following the Dural caravan investigation. Its interim report recommended an independent review of information-sharing within the NSW Joint Counter-Terrorism Team.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38751 (pb)

>>38752 (pb)

>>38753 (pb)

>>62759

>>62963

Dennis Richardson’s Bondi report abandoned as Virginia Bell reinterviews ex-spy chief’s subjects

DENNIS SHANAHAN - 22 June 2026

1/2

The antisemitism royal commission has effectively shelved the ­interviews and findings of the three-week independent inquiry of former spy boss Dennis Richardson into the police and security agencies ahead of the Bondi Beach massacre.

Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell’s inquiry did not consider the Richardson probe – which was launched immediately after the terror attack and included interviews with security and police heads – as “evidence” the commission could use in its findings.

Instead, it took the work of the former ASIO chief and leading diplomat as a guide and conducted its own interviews with the same people Mr Richardson interviewed, including former ­Australian Federal Police comm­issioner Reece Kershaw.

The interim security report in April did not rely on material Mr Richardson gathered as “evidence” in its findings and recommendations, which included a review of counter-terrorism operations between federal and state police.

The decision not to use evidence from Mr Richardson has nullified much of his work and increased the chances of a harsher finding about security preparedness before the Bondi massacre.

Anthony Albanese last December appointed Mr Richardson a week after the Bondi shootings to hold an immediate inquiry into the security and police handling leading up to the December 14 shooting of 15 innocent people during a celebration of the Hanukkah holiday as he fended off calls for a royal commission.

On December 21 last year, the Prime Minister said the former secretary of the Department of Defence and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade would work with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to review the security agencies to keep “Australians safe in the wake of the horrific antisemitic Bondi Beach terrorist attack”.

“The ISIS-inspired atrocity reinforces the rapidly changing security environment in our nation. Our security agencies must be in the best position to respond,” Mr Albanese said.

He described Mr Richardson as the best person to conduct a ­review, saying he was someone “who can look quickly, sharply”, and was an “actual expert” who could determine any further actions required to improve security with a report due in April.

Mr Richardson immediately started interviewing security chiefs, including on Christmas Day, as he worked to deliver an April report on the preparedness of the police and intelligence organisations before the massacre.

But on January 8 this year his inquiry was folded into the royal commission after the Prime Minister caved in to public pressure for a royal commission and appointed former High Court judge, Virginia Bell as commissioner.

Mr Richardson’s powers and the standing of the inquiries he had already made were not clear despite Mr Albanese’s assurances and claims he was “an actual expert” reviewing the security agencies and would report in April.

At the beginning of March, Mr Richardson raised concerns about the legalistic limits of the commission’s inquiries preventing a swift report on security by April, and on March 11 he formally resigned from the inquiry stating that he had become “surplus to requirements”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62971

File: 0e0025067f2c66e⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748126 (230921ZJUN26) Notable: Jewish leader says government delayed antisemitism envoy to find candidate for Islamophobia role - Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion has told the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission that the Albanese government delayed appointing an antisemitism envoy because it wanted to announce an equivalent Islamophobia envoy at the same time. In his submission, Aghion said the delay left Australia without dedicated leadership as antisemitic incidents escalated during 2024, despite repeated warnings from Jewish community leaders. He argued the Islamophobia envoy role was created “for political reasons to demonstrate even-handedness”, a claim rejected by Islamophobia envoy Aftab Malik, who said anti-Muslim hatred deserved attention in its own right. Aghion also criticised delays in responding to Jillian Segal’s recommendations, arguing the government only acted decisively after the Bondi terrorist attack.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Jewish leader says government delayed antisemitism envoy to find candidate for Islamophobia role

JAMES DOWLING - 22 June 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese delayed appointing an antisemitism envoy because he could not fill an equivalent Islamophobia role, according to one of the Prime Minister’s most influential Jewish allies.

In a submission to the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, Executive Council of Australia Jewry president Daniel Aghion claimed that Islamophobia envoy position was “created for political reasons to demonstrate even-handedness” as a counterweight to Jillian Segal’s position.

This drew a sharp response from Islamophobia envoy Aftab Malik, who warned that Muslim perspectives were cheapened when treated merely as “a political balancing exercise,” insisting his role must be genuinely valued by the government.

Mr Albanese was first lobbied by Ms Segal, ECAJ co-chief Peter Wertheim and Mr Aghion to appoint an antisemitism envoy in December 2023, according to the submission.

“In January 2024, the federal government responded to me to the effect that they would agree to our proposal, if an Islamophobia envoy were also appointed,” Mr Aghion wrote.

“I advised the government that this was acceptable, provided that the appointments were not the same person. By Easter 2024 however, there had been no appointment. I was told by several government representatives that the delay was due to the government taking longer than it had anticipated in identifying a suitable candidate for the Islamophobia envoy position.”

In the months from when the prospect was first raised and Ms Segal’s appointment in July 2024, a group chat of Jewish creatives was doxxed, the electoral offices of Jewish Labor MPs Josh Burns and Mark Dreyfus were vandalised, and the Jewish-run Mount Scopus Memorial College was defaced with antisemitic slurs.

As the royal commission heads into its third hearing block next week, Mr Aghion’s submission is set to intensify pressure on Mr ­Albanese. The Prime Minister has frequently championed Ms Segal’s appointment as crucial to tackling antisemitism, but Mr Aghion’s submission raises sharp questions about the urgency of his government’s response to the unfolding crisis.

The Australian understands Ms Segal was the clear frontrunner for the position as early as March 2024. The Albanese government had hoped, however, to announce the antisemitism and Islamophobia envoys side by side.

“The delay in appointing the antisemitism envoy was extremely frustrating,” Mr Aghion wrote. “The ECAJ knew that ­Australia was facing a rising tide of antisemitism; we knew that the best response to antisemitism is strong, decisive and early leadership; and we had conveyed this repeatedly to the federal government.

“But the appointment of an antisemitism envoy was being held up because of the government’s inability to fill an unrelated position, which we considered the government had created for ­political reasons to demonstrate even-handedness.”

By July, a global conference of appointed Jewish advocates in Argentina was approaching and ECAJ pressured the government to send a delegate, saying it would “be embarrassing if Australia did not have a representative”.

Ms Segal was appointed a week before it.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62972

File: 3c40499cf029f25⋯.jpg (429.64 KB,2047x1151,2047:1151,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7fa17466f47c130⋯.jpg (269.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748137 (230928ZJUN26) Notable: Teacher union demands guidance on Holocaust lessons - The Australian Education Union has called for national guidance to help teachers navigate Holocaust education amid heightened tensions over the Middle East conflict, while reaffirming that antisemitism has no place in schools. Federal president Correna Haythorpe said teachers remained committed to delivering the Australian curriculum but were balancing curriculum requirements, duty of care and increasingly diverse classroom experiences. The debate follows research by NSW history teacher Greg Keith, whose PhD found some teachers had avoided or reduced Holocaust lessons because of concerns about student reactions after the October 7 attacks. Education Minister Jason Clare reaffirmed the Holocaust’s place in the curriculum, while other education leaders stressed it should remain a central part of history education and called for stronger teacher training and professional development.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Teacher union demands guidance on Holocaust lessons

NATASHA BITA - 23 June 2026

The Australian Education Union claims it is harder to teach about the Holocaust during war in the Middle East, despite outrage over some teachers refusing to teach Muslim students about the mass murder of six million Jews in World War II.

Asked if she supported teachers who fail to teach about the Holocaust to avoid upsetting Muslim students, AEU federal president Correna Haythorpe said teachers needed “more guidance’’ from education ministers because of the “diverse lived experience’’ of students.

“Antisemitism, like all forms of racism, discrimination and hate, has no place in our education system,’’ she said. “Teachers understand their responsibilities to teach a broad, rich syllabus, based on the Australian curriculum.

“However, teachers are navigating complex and emotionally charged environments while balancing curriculum requirements, duty of care obligations and the diverse lived experiences of their students. In the absence of consistent guidance, this work has been made more difficult.

“That is why in June last year, the AEU called on all Australian education ministers for clear, consistent national guidance for teachers on how to discuss global conflicts in the classroom, particularly the ongoing situation in the Middle East.”

The failure to teach mandatory Holocaust lessons was exposed in a PhD thesis by NSW high school history teacher Greg Keith last year, who found some Sydney teachers worried about “heightened tensions’’ following the Oct­ober 7, 2023, terrorist attack on Israel.

Federal Education Minister Jason Clare on Monday said “there is no place for the poison of antisemitism anywhere in our ­society’’.

“The Holocaust is already part of the curriculum but there is more we can do to make sure students are learning about it and the evils of antisemitism,’’ he said.

“There’s a lot we as a country need to do to tackle antisemitism and what we do in education is an important part of that.

“That’s why we established the Antisemitism Education Taskforce chaired by David Gonski.’’

Mr Gonski, a prominent Jewish business leader, refused to comment on the controversy.

NSW Teachers Federation senior vice-president Michael De Wall said the Holocaust, which is taught in year 10 history, should “remain central to the curriculum … the Holocaust is one of the most distressing, significant episodes in human history. The lessons of antisemitism, minority persecution and the danger of hate should never be lost upon us,’’ he said. “That is why teaching of the Holocaust is, and should always remain, central to the NSW ­curriculum.”

Queensland Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek said he expected students to study the Holocaust in high school. “Queensland has a zero-tolerance approach to discrimination, ­racism, and antisemitism in our schools, and that’s why it’s important this part of the curriculum is followed,’’ his spokesman said.

Federal opposition education spokesman Julian Leeser, who is Jewish, said antisemitism education “should move away from Holocaust education and towards the contribution of Jews to our society. It is not enough to describe the way Jews are murdered.”

Dr Keith’s thesis cites one teacher who told him “the nature of his student cohort, which included a significant Arabic-speaking population … meant he was not prepared to try to have conversations about antisemitism as they might not be productive’’.

Another teacher said “many of our students are of Middle Eastern background and I have decided not to teach The Diary of Anne Frank this term to my year 9 history elective class because of their views on Jewish people in the ­Israeli-Palestine conflict.’’

A third teacher told him “she could not teach about the Holocaust in her school … because the (October 7) conflict had created such a volatile situation’’.

“The reality in Australia today is that it is impossible to know when and where the Holocaust is being taught, in how much depth it is being taught, and the effectiveness of teaching program,’’ Dr Keith wrote in his thesis. “Any claim Holocaust education in any Australian state is compulsory is founded purely on hope rather than reality. The Holocaust must become a substantial focus of teacher training and professional development.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/education/teacher-union-demands-guidance-on-holocaust-lessons/news-story/ae923991cd918ec4d766fcaf73bb23e8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62973

File: cc585b2eb3b5e4a⋯.jpg (857.97 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cf41e8dd803008a⋯.jpg (299.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748151 (230936ZJUN26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Islamophobia mirage led Labor and Albanese away from antisemitism reality - "An Islamophobia distraction driven by Labor politics clouded the judgment of Anthony Albanese and his ministers, and ultimately weakened the govern­ment’s response to a two-year explosion in antisemitism ahead of the Bondi Beach terror attack. It should not have taken Australia’s worst terrorist attack and the massacre of 15 Jewish-­Australians and bystanders at a Hanukkah family holiday event on a Sunday afternoon to stop the Left’s false equivocation between antisemitism and Islamophobia. Following the October 7 Hamas terror attacks against Israel in 2023 and the subsequent wave of homegrown antisemitic incidents targeting synagogues, Jewish-owned businesses and homes, ministers would not mention Israel without referencing Palestine or address antisemitism without invoking Islamophobia. That mixed, conditional leadership fuelled fundamental weaknesses in how our institutions, including universities and schools, responded to antisemitism across society, workplaces and in Australian classrooms ... From the disgraceful chants at the Sydney Opera House protest shortly after Hamas terrorists murdered innocent Jews to the disgusting Sydney Harbour Bridge protest where Labor MPs and elders marched alongside activists holding up photos of the now slain Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Albanese government was flat-footed for too long in its response to antisemitism. Just a month after the Sydney Harbour Bridge protest, the Prime Minister in September last year flew to New York to announce his government formally recognised Palestinian statehood. On December 14, father-and-son Islamic radical extremists Sajid and Naveed Akram shook the nation to its core after conducting Australia’s most terrifying terrorist attack. Albanese’s immediate response to the massacre was unsteady and headlined by a weeks-long delay in ordering the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion ... As the royal commission continues investigations and public hearings ahead of its December 14 reporting deadline, new submissions are shining a light on what happened behind closed doors ... For the sake of the nation, the royal commission must not whitewash the government’s ­security failures and weak response to vile antisemitism." - Geoff Chambers, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>62766

>>62971

>>62972

COMMENTARY: Islamophobia mirage led Labor and Albanese away from antisemitism reality

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 22 June 2026

1/2

An Islamophobia distraction driven by Labor politics clouded the judgment of Anthony Albanese and his ministers, and ultimately weakened the govern­ment’s response to a two-year explosion in antisemitism ahead of the Bondi Beach terror attack.

It should not have taken Australia’s worst terrorist attack and the massacre of 15 Jewish-­Australians and bystanders at a Hanukkah family holiday event on a Sunday afternoon to stop the Left’s false equivocation between antisemitism and Islamophobia.

Following the October 7 Hamas terror attacks against Israel in 2023 and the subsequent wave of homegrown antisemitic incidents targeting synagogues, Jewish-owned businesses and homes, ministers would not mention Israel without referencing Palestine or address antisemitism without invoking Islamophobia.

That mixed, conditional leadership fuelled fundamental weaknesses in how our institutions, including universities and schools, responded to antisemitism across society, workplaces and in Australian classrooms.

Revelations that a western Sydney teacher decided to not teach The Diary of Anne Frank to their year 9 history class because of the views of students of Middle Eastern background on Jewish people in the Israeli-Palestine conflict is frankly beyond ­comprehension.

The tragic and heroic story of Anne has been a bedrock for millions of Australians to understand the Holocaust.

Education Minister Jason Clare, whose western Sydney seat of Blaxland is home to 60,000 Muslims, and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, whose Sydney electorate of Watson is home to the Lakemba mosque and almost 46,000 Muslims, have authority over ensuring the Holocaust is taught in schools, that university staff and students feel safe from antisemitism and that Australians are safe from violent Islamic extremism and terrorism.

From the disgraceful chants at the Sydney Opera House protest shortly after Hamas terrorists murdered innocent Jews to the disgusting Sydney Harbour Bridge protest where Labor MPs and elders marched alongside activists holding up photos of the now slain Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Albanese government was flat-footed for too long in its response to antisemitism.

Just a month after the Sydney Harbour Bridge protest, the Prime Minister in September last year flew to New York to announce his government formally recognised Palestinian statehood.

On December 14, father-and-son Islamic radical extremists Sajid and Naveed Akram shook the nation to its core after conducting Australia’s most terrifying terrorist attack.

Albanese’s immediate response to the massacre was unsteady and headlined by a weeks-long delay in ordering the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion.

The terror attack triggered deep concern in the electorate over public safety, Islamic extremism and whether the government’s national security architecture was fit-for-purpose.

The Bondi terror massacre, combined with ISIS brides returning to Australia, marked a turning point in the political fortunes of Labor and the Coalition, as voters shifted to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.

As the royal commission continues investigations and public hearings ahead of its December 14 reporting deadline, new submissions are shining a light on what happened behind closed doors.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62974

File: a1c374a8731e2ff⋯.jpg (210.74 KB,800x480,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748168 (230943ZJUN26) Notable: Australian media's renewed hype over Solomons minister's remark on China 'policing plans' exposes exclusionary mindset, says Chinese expert - "A reported remark by a senior Solomon Islands official to "sideline" so-called China's policing plans in the Pacific island country has become the latest trigger for Australian media to hype claims about Beijing's security cooperation with the South Pacific country. According to Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) report on local time Monday, Peter Kenilorea Junior, the minister of national planning and development coordination of Solomon Islands, claimed the new government was seeking a "a rebalancing of relations" with its development partners after the nation moved closer to China under previous governments. Asked by the SMH if he wanted to see a winding back of China's role in policing and security in the Solomons, Kenilorea told this masthead that "we would like to focus more on economic development." The minister also claimed that "the security space, in my own personal opinion, is a little bit too crowded for a small country like the Solomons. So I would definitely emphasize the development aspect of China's involvement." Yet behind the latest round of hype lies a broader question: is Australia willing to respect Pacific island countries' right to make independent diplomatic choices, or is it trying to turn the region into a closed security circle under Canberra's approval ... The renewed hype says less about the actual content of China-Solomon Islands policing cooperation than about Australia's persistent attempt to draw an exclusionary security boundary around the South Pacific ... Chinese observers pointed out that as a sovereign country, Solomon Islands has the right to assess its foreign partnerships according to its own domestic political priorities and development needs. The real problem, they said, is that some Australian voices have used the review to revive an old narrative that smears China's role in the South Pacific. Notably, the SMH Monday report wrote that the Albanese government has insisted that Pacific nations' security and policing cooperation should be limited to other island nations including Australia ... The idea of "moving closer to Australia on security while continuing to work with China on trade and development" is understandable, but carries clear risks, Chinese observers warned. If Solomon Islands believes concessions on security issues will be enough to secure Australia's acceptance of its economic cooperation with China, that may be overly optimistic, observers said. What Australia seeks is not merely security cooperation, but greater influence over the direction of island countries' external partnerships." - Deng Xiaoci, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62846

>>62966

Australian media's renewed hype over Solomons minister's remark on China 'policing plans' exposes exclusionary mindset, says Chinese expert

Deng Xiaoci - Jun 23, 2026

1/2

A reported remark by a senior Solomon Islands official to "sideline" so-called China's policing plans in the Pacific island country has become the latest trigger for Australian media to hype claims about Beijing's security cooperation with the South Pacific country.

According to Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) report on local time Monday, Peter Kenilorea Junior, the minister of national planning and development coordination of Solomon Islands, claimed the new government was seeking a "a rebalancing of relations" with its development partners after the nation moved closer to China under previous governments.

Asked by the SMH if he wanted to see a winding back of China's role in policing and security in the Solomons, Kenilorea told this masthead that "we would like to focus more on economic development." The minister also claimed that "the security space, in my own personal opinion, is a little bit too crowded for a small country like the Solomons. So I would definitely emphasize the development aspect of China's involvement."

Yet behind the latest round of hype lies a broader question: is Australia willing to respect Pacific island countries' right to make independent diplomatic choices, or is it trying to turn the region into a closed security circle under Canberra's approval, a Chinese observer asked on Tuesday. The renewed hype says less about the actual content of China-Solomon Islands policing cooperation than about Australia's persistent attempt to draw an exclusionary security boundary around the South Pacific.

The issue has been put under media spotlight again after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale visited Canberra and said his government would review the 2022 security agreement signed with China, while also agreeing to begin negotiations on a comprehensive strategic treaty with Australia. Reuters reported on June 3 that Wale said he had only recently seen the full China agreement and that his government would review it alongside other security arrangements. The same report said Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged to elevate bilateral ties while offering to move forward on a policing partnership.

Chinese observers pointed out that as a sovereign country, Solomon Islands has the right to assess its foreign partnerships according to its own domestic political priorities and development needs. The real problem, they said, is that some Australian voices have used the review to revive an old narrative that smears China's role in the South Pacific.

Notably, the SMH Monday report wrote that the Albanese government has insisted that Pacific nations' security and policing cooperation should be limited to other island nations including Australia.

"This shows that Australia is promoting a security arrangement that sets limits in the name of regionalism, while in effect placing itself at the center," Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

This round of media hype by Australian media is not an isolated incident, but a psychological projection of Australia's changing role in the region, Chen noted.

For a long time, Australia has been accustomed to viewing the South Pacific as its strategic backyard, and to holding a dominant position in security, aid, infrastructure and diplomatic agendas. After China developed normal relations with Solomon Islands and other island countries, Australian public opinion quickly interpreted this change as a "challenge" and "infiltration," turning cooperation issues that should belong to the island countries' own development agenda into an arena of China-Australia competition, the expert explained.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62975

File: 99fbcd0337bfd24⋯.jpg (234.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: afc4b275a9ee292⋯.jpg (286.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 943714b0587414b⋯.jpg (300.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24748200 (231001ZJUN26) Notable: One Nation leader Pauline Hanson backs Ben Roberts-Smith invite to War Memorial opening - Pauline Hanson has defended the decision to invite Ben Roberts-Smith to the official opening of the Australian War Memorial’s new Anzac Hall, arguing he remains entitled to the presumption of innocence while facing five war crime murder charges, which he denies. Defence Minister Richard Marles also said the invitation was appropriate because Roberts-Smith is a living Victoria Cross recipient, while Greens leader Larissa Waters boycotted the event in protest. Although a court had varied Roberts-Smith’s bail conditions to allow him to attend, his lawyers later said illness prevented him travelling to Canberra. The ceremony marked the opening of Anzac Hall as part of the memorial’s controversial redevelopment, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese praising the expansion as a tribute to Australia’s service personnel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62838

>>62881

>>62942

>>>/qresearch/24748188

Ben Roberts-Smith decides not to attend War Memorial event unveiling $55m renovation despite Hanson support

BEN PACKHAM - 23 June 2026

Victoria Cross recipient and accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith will no longer attend the opening of the Australian War Memorial’s new $550m renovation on Tuesday night.

Mr Roberts-Smith was invited to the event along with the nation’s three other living VC recipients, and had his bail conditions varied last week so he could be there.

But The Australian has confirmed he has pulled out of the event, citing illness.

The former SAS corporal, who is charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, was granted permission to attend the AWM opening after prosecutors conceded it was “highly unlikely” that a certain potential Crown witness would be present.

Earlier, Defence Minister Richard Marles defended the invitation to Mr Roberts-Smith, saying the AWM was “the most sacred building in our country” and it was “absolutely appropriate” that the country’s war heroes attended.

“There is a presumption of innocence in this country and Ben Roberts-Smith is a recipient of the Victoria Cross, and the Victoria Cross recipients have been invited to this, which is appropriate and so I am comfortable about that,” Mr Marles said.

Mr Roberts-Smith has consistently denied all wrongdoing in regard to the allegations against him.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson – one of the former SAS corporal’s most vocal backers – also supported his right to attend.

“Why shouldn’t he?” she said. “I’ll be going, and I am hoping to actually catch up with him, say hello to him, give him my support.”

The extension to the AWM, delivering an 80 per cent increase to its exhibition space, was controversial when it was first announced by former prime minister Scott Morrison due to its high cost.

But the Prime Minister said the new sections of the building were “sublime and powerful” additions to the national shrine.

“It amounts to an act of profound respect from the nation to all who have served in our name, and all who serve now – the fighters for peace, the keepers of peace,” he said.

“It honours all who went and all who fell. It honours those who came home, including the many whose hearts never knew peace again.”

The new AWM’s new Anzac Hall features a soaring roofline which takes inspiration from the iconic Rising Sun badge worn by the Australian Army.

AWM director Matt Anderson said the memorial’s mission was unlike that of any other cultural institution.

“We have a unique and enduring purpose and are three things at once — a shrine, an archive, and a museum,” he said.

“This allows us to explore more deeply each of the stories entrusted to us. These are not static, they evolve, while paying tribute to the facts of the past. That is how we help our visitors to understand the causes, conduct and consequences of conflict.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/ben-robertssmith-decies-not-to-attend-war-memorial-event-unveiling-55m-renovation-despite-hanson-support/news-story/fa50b6cf6cd9195bfb3e63530bdd0c98

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62976

File: 802597fb01d8333⋯.jpg (124.12 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752637 (240935ZJUN26) Notable: Angus Taylor refuses to commit to a multicultural Australia under repeated questioning - Opposition Leader Angus Taylor repeatedly declined to state whether the Coalition still supported multiculturalism after being questioned about Pauline Hanson’s call to end the policy and replace it with a “monoculture”. Instead, Taylor said migrants of all backgrounds were welcome provided they embraced “core Australian values”, challenging reporters to define multiculturalism. Hanson argued multiculturalism had failed and advocated a society united by shared values rather than cultural differences. Outgoing shadow home affairs minister Jonno Duniam defended multiculturalism, while Liberal MP Aaron Violi later confirmed the Coalition continued to support it. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese criticised Taylor’s refusal to give a direct answer, accusing him of failing to stand up to One Nation on the issue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38800 (pb)

>>62677

>>62948

Angus Taylor refuses to commit to a multicultural Australia under repeated questioning

Jake Evans - 23 June 2026

1/2

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has refused to say whether or not the Coalition still supports multiculturalism, while also avoiding an endorsement of One Nation's demand for Australia to become a "monoculture".

Mr Taylor was challenged multiple times on whether the Coalition still supported multiculturalism or whether it would follow One Nation's push to end multiculturalism.

The opposition leader would not give a position, instead saying the culture he wanted to see was people supporting "Australian values".

"You explain to me what you mean by that. There is all these vague words running around. I'll tell you what, the one thing I want all of us to share is those core Australian values," Mr Taylor said.

Pauline Hanson demanded an end to multiculturalism at her National Press Club address, suggesting the decades-long stance held by Labor and Coalition governments had failed.

"How can you generate social cohesion if people can't speak the language?" she said.

"Under the failed policy of multiculturalism, all cultures are allowed equivalence to ours. Surely opposing that is not racist; it's common sense."

Senator Hanson told Channel 7 this morning that "nothing will really change" under her proposal, pointing to Japan as an example of the "monoculture" that she envisioned for Australia.

Japan's government endorses a policy of "tabunka-kyosei" or "multicultural coexistence", which expects immigrants to learn the Japanese language, adhere to local customs, and maintains a strict immigration policy, while still formally respecting cultural differences.

"I believe in Australians all working together towards the same goal under the same flag, regardless of skin colour, ethnicity or background," Senator Hanson said on social media.

"That's what monoculturalism is — a country united by what we share rather than divided on our differences."

One Nation MP David Farley told ABC Afternoon Briefing that people from other nations were welcome, but they should be "Australian first".

"We don't mind if you're Australian British, Australian Canadian, or Australian Chinese, but you've come to this country and been adopted by this country from the generous gift we're giving to become an Australian. So, you're an Australian first. So, blend in," he said.

Outgoing Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jono Duniam told the ABC yesterday he did not know what Senator Hanson was proposing by calling for a monoculture.

"I don't even really know what it means, that we all must dress the same, believe the same religion, it's a bizarre concept," he said.

"Frankly, at the end of the day, the success of multiculturalism has depended on our capacity for people to accept their differences, and park them, and look at what unites them.

"That is what makes Australia a good country.

"Do we want people to respect our rule of law? Yes. Do we want people to respect democracy and its institutions, definitely; do we want people to understand that individuals have equality before the law, yes — but that's not what I think she means by monoculture."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62977

File: 412e4609e0b910a⋯.jpg (396.88 KB,2750x1534,1375:767,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752650 (240942ZJUN26) Notable: Karl Stefanovic’s controversial podcast with far-right extremist Tommy Robinson pulled from YouTube - Karl Stefanovic has sparked controversy after interviewing British far-right activist Tommy Robinson on his independently run podcast, which was removed from YouTube less than 12 hours after publication for reasons that remain unclear. During the hour-long discussion, Stefanovic praised Robinson’s “tenacity” and “courage” while the pair discussed immigration, Islam, free speech and Australian politics. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, praised Pauline Hanson for supporting him over many years, saying she “hasn’t backed down” despite sustained criticism. The interview has attracted scrutiny because of Robinson’s criminal convictions, history of anti-Islam rhetoric and association with the English Defence League, an anti-Islam street protest movement that organised demonstrations across Britain. Nine declined to comment, noting Stefanovic’s podcast operates independently of the broadcaster.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Karl Stefanovic’s controversial podcast with far-right extremist Tommy Robinson pulled from YouTube

Rob Harris - June 24, 2026

1/2

Television presenter Karl Stefanovic has sparked fresh controversy by hosting British far-right anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson in a lengthy podcast interview, during which the pair discuss immigration, Islam and Australian politics, including One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

The Nine Network star, who has increasingly cast himself as a culture warrior, told Robinson he admired his “tenacity” and “courage” in “trying to stand up for what you believe is right” in an interview lasting almost an hour on Stefanovic’s self-titled YouTube program.

On Wednesday morning, less than 12 hours after it debuted, the episode was unavailable on YouTube. It is not yet known why it was removed or who decided to take it down.

The conversation, released on Tuesday afternoon, marked the highest-profile Australian media appearance for Robinson (whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon), a divisive figure who has built a large online following campaigning against Islam and immigration while repeatedly attracting condemnation for inflammatory rhetoric and a long history of legal troubles.

Stefanovic, who is currently in the UK, described Robinson as “one of Britain’s most controversial public figures” who had been at the centre of debates around immigration, grooming gangs, free speech and national identity.

A former member of the fascist British National Party, Robinson co-founded the English Defence League, an anti-Islam movement that organised street demonstrations across Britain.

He has convictions for assault, mortgage fraud, using a false passport and contempt of court, when he was jailed in October 2024 after he ignored a court order not to repeat lies about a Syrian refugee, who had successfully sued him for libel.

Robinson has again attracted attention in recent weeks following unrest in Northern Ireland, where he shared graphic footage online after a stabbing attack in Belfast allegedly carried out by a Sudanese-born suspect and subsequently promoted demonstrations that later descended into violence, including attacks on migrants and the burning of homes.

He has been condemned by several UK prime ministers, including Conservative Boris Johnson, who labelled him a “far-right thug” who did “not represent the values of this country”.

Right-wing populist leader Nigel Farage has repeatedly said Robinson was not welcome in his Reform UK party and publicly clashed with trillionaire owner of X, Elon Musk, over the activist.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62978

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752676 (240955ZJUN26) Notable: Karl Stefanovic Tommy Robinson Podcast: Pauline Hanson re-uploads deleted podcast interview - (Video) Pauline Hanson has republished Karl Stefanovic’s deleted interview with British far-right activist Tommy Robinson after it was removed from YouTube, Spotify and Apple Podcasts within hours of release. Hanson accused Nine of trying to sack Stefanovic over the interview, while Nine stressed the podcast is independently produced but said it was taking the matter seriously. During the interview, Stefanovic praised Robinson’s “tenacity” and “courage”, and Robinson described Hanson as a leader who “hasn’t backed down”. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, co-founded the English Defence League, an anti-Islam street protest movement in Britain, and used the interview to promote anti-immigration and anti-Islam views largely without challenge. The episode also drew criticism after Stefanovic called former British prime minister Keir Starmer a “wanker” in a promotional clip.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62977

Karl Stefanovic Tommy Robinson Podcast: Pauline Hanson re-uploads deleted podcast interview

Ella McIlveen and Rohan Smith - June 24, 2026

1/2

Channel Nine has issued an ominous warning just hours after Karl Stefanovic’s interview with anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson was scrubbed online.

In a statement to news.com.au, the network appeared to distance itself from Stefanovic’s controversial new venture, but claimed they were taking the matter seriously.

“The Karl Stefanovic Show is a completely independent production. Nine has no involvement, including in the guest selection and other editorial processes.

“However, Nine is taking this matter seriously,” a spokesperson said.

It comes amid reports that Nine does not intend to extend Stefanovic’s $2 million annual contract upon its expiration in December.

According to The Australian, Stefanovic himself is keen to leave Nine as soon as possible to focus on his new side hustle.

The Australian also noted that well-placed insiders at Nine had told the outlet that they believe Stefanovic’s provocative podcast content was a deliberate strategy to alienate his bosses at the TV network in the hope they might agree to pay out the remaining six months of his contract – the equivalent of about $1 million.

The bombshell statement comes just hours after One Nation leader Pauline Hanson took a pointed jab at the Nine network, branding them “weak” and a “flop.”

On Wednesday morning, Hanson re-released the controversial podcast interview to her YouTube account with the title: ‘CANCELLED: The Full Karl Stefanovic and Tommy Robinson Interview.’

“It looks like they’re trying to sack my good friend Karl Stefanovic for this video with Tommy Robinson,” the caption alleged.

“Deb Knight was a huge flop for Channel 9 and while she was busy grilling me over One Nation’s polling Channel 9’s ratings were in the toilet.

“In 2019 on live TV with her, I called on Channel 9 to bring back Karl. Now with 6 months to go on his contract the weak management of Channel 9 want to sack Karl over this interview.

“Tommy Robinson has a lesson for Australians. If we don’t learn from the UK’s mistakes on immigration and radical Islam, we are going to face the same destruction.

“This is exactly what Karl was trying to bring to Australia’s attention.”

During the interview, Robinson declared he “loves” Hanson and promised that an uprising is underway in Australia.

Stefanovic heaped praise on the far-right commentator during Tuesday’s episode of his podcast, The Karl Stefanovic Show, in which Robinson also declared he was in the process of causing a “f*cking earthquake” in the UK.

The guest proved divisive for Stefanovic’s Australian audience because Robinson was, among other things, a member of the neo-Nazi-adjacent British National Party (BNP) in the early 2000s and has a lengthy criminal record.

Just hours after its release, the posts were scrubbed from Stefanovic’s Instagram account, and by Wednesday morning, the podcast episode had been completely removed from Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and the Karl Stefanovic Show YouTube channel.

Instead, the latest interview available for viewers is Stefanovic’s interview with former SAS Star Ant Middleton, published on Monday.

There was no mention of the decision to remove the episode on the podcast’s social media channel.

Stefanovic had early touted the interview on his personal X account on Tuesday night.

“What happens when speaking your mind comes at a cost? Now live on the show, Tommy Robinson shares his story, chatting all about free speech, censorship, immigration and the direction he believes Britain should be heading in,” Stefanovic wrote alongside a short 39-second clip of the interview.

News.com.au has sought more information from Stefanovic’s team.

‘A f*cking earthquake’

During the 55-minute episode, before it was removed, in which Robinson was not asked difficult questions or pressed on his controversial previous comments, the founder of the English Defence League was allowed to spruik his ultra right-wing nationalist agenda unchallenged.

“We all believe in free speech, we’re against mass migration, we’re against Islam, we’re a Christian nation and we’re against LGBTQ indoctrination of children,” Robinson said.

Stefanovic did not question the priorities, but instead asked “how is the right going to take power over in the next three years” and “how do you convert those five values into representation?”

Robinson said he wants to “reach the 50 per cent of non voters and register them to vote”.

“I want to go into the roughest areas of Britain, the working class communities … captivate them, re-energise them and make them believe they matter and that will cause a f*cking earthquake,” he said.

Stefanovic’s response was: “Well, why not. This is a great country and it’s just so lost.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62979

File: 96cf4cf773e70d3⋯.jpg (645.36 KB,3840x2160,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: feac2e96a1ff022⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5109x3406,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752723 (241011ZJUN26) Notable: Activist group ‘Mad F*cking Witches’ targets Stefanovic over pulled interview with far-right figure - Karl Stefanovic is facing a campaign by activist group Mad F*cking Witches after his interview with British far-right activist Tommy Robinson was removed from YouTube, Spotify and other platforms within hours of publication. The group said it would pressure advertisers associated with Stefanovic in a campaign modelled on its previous efforts against radio host Kyle Sandilands. Nine and radio network ARN both distanced themselves from the independently produced podcast, while Pauline Hanson defended Stefanovic and republished the deleted interview online. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, co-founded the English Defence League, an anti-Islam street protest movement in Britain, and has multiple criminal convictions. Stefanovic later released a new podcast featuring Barnaby Joyce without addressing the controversy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62977

>>62978

Activist group ‘Mad F*cking Witches’ targets Stefanovic over pulled interview with far-right figure

Kishor Napier-Raman and Rob Harris - June 24, 2026

1/2

Nine presenter Karl Stefanovic’s job is being targeted by online activists after he interviewed British far-right anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson on a now-deleted episode of his podcast, prompting the network to distance itself from one of its biggest stars.

The episode, which was removed from sites including YouTube and Spotify less than 12 hours after it debuted, drew an angry backlash from the activist group Mad F*cking Witches, who vowed to target Stefanovic in the same way it did advertisers on shock jock Kyle Sandilands’ former show.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson backed Stefanovic and posted the entire deleted podcast on her YouTube channel while accusing Nine of trying to sack the presenter over the interview.

“It looks like they’re trying to sack my good friend Karl Stefanovic for this video with Tommy Robinson!” she wrote on Instagram.

Stefanovic, co-host of Nine’s Today show, has increasingly cast himself as a culture warrior. He told Robinson he admired his “tenacity” and “courage” in “trying to stand up for what you believe is right”, in an interview lasting almost an hour on Stefanovic’s self-titled YouTube program. The pair discussed immigration, Islam and Australian politics.

In a statement, a spokesman for Nine, which owns this masthead, emphasised that Stefanovic’s show was produced independently of the network.

“Nine has no involvement, including in the guest selection and other editorial processes,” the spokesman said, but he added: “However, Nine is taking this matter seriously.”

Sources familiar with the matter said the podcast episode was not removed by the tech platforms from which it disappeared, including YouTube and Apple Podcasts. Posts with short clips of the Robinson interview remain on Stefanovic’s X account.

Stefanovic, who is in on leave from Today in the United Kingdom, was contacted for comment. Keshnee Kemp, who describes herself as a founding partner of the podcast and serves as its producer, was also contacted for comment.

Presenter Tom Steinfort is filling in for Stefanovic while he is overseas.

Meanwhile, media company ARN, which has contracted Stefanovic for a weekly show on its Gold radio network with Eddie McGuire, distanced itself from the podcast.

“Karl’s association with ARN is limited to specific radio engagements. His external media activities, including his podcast, are undertaken in a personal capacity and are entirely separate from the network, which we have no control over,” a company spokesperson said.

“They do not represent ARN’s views, editorial standards or programming.”

The activist group Mad F*cking Witches, which ran a pressure campaign against ARN by complaining to advertisers on Kyle Sandilands’ radio show about his sexualised remarks, announced on Wednesday that it would run a similar campaign against Nine, despite the removal of Stefanovic’s Robinson episode.

“In fact, it makes us even angrier they seem to think we’re so easily fooled and silenced,” the group posted.

“The truth is we’re now even MORE determined to run such a campaign on Stefanovic (tentatively titled #KancelKarl), and we badly need your help if you want us to do so.”

This masthead contacted or attempted to contact several advertisers that have featured on Stefanovic’s podcast, including two supplements companies, an outdoor advertising firm and a workplace software maker.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62980

File: 71d25b79212c98f⋯.jpg (165.05 KB,1024x724,256:181,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d5fe56fa1254c0a⋯.jpg (136.1 KB,1600x862,800:431,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 10c15536a41a12b⋯.jpg (244.54 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bbaedc781493e51⋯.jpg (259.63 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752773 (241028ZJUN26) Notable: Nine axes Karl Stefanovic from Today show after Tommy Robinson podcast - Nine has reportedly decided to end Karl Stefanovic’s tenure as host of the Today show following controversy over his independent podcast interview with British far-right activist Tommy Robinson. According to The Australian, network executives met after the interview prompted internal concerns about editorial independence, reputational damage and the prospect of advertiser pressure. The interview, which Stefanovic later removed from his podcast platforms, was republished by One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, who claimed Nine was trying to sack him. Nine said the podcast was independently produced and outside the network’s editorial control but confirmed it was taking the matter seriously. If finalised, Stefanovic’s departure would end more than two decades with the network, with six months remaining on his current contract.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62977

>>62978

>>62979

Nine axes Karl Stefanovic from Today show after Tommy Robinson podcast

STEVE JACKSON - 24 June 2026

1/2

Karl Stefanovic has “almost certainly” appeared on the small screen for Nine – and hosted its Today show – for the last time with the network’s executives deciding to cut ties with its long-standing breakfast show presenter on Wednesday.

The 11th hour call comes after the broadcaster’s top bosses spent the day locked in closed-door meetings at the company’s North Sydney bunker after the increasingly outspoken presenter actively promoted ultra right-wing activist Tommy Robinson on his independent podcast this week.

It is understood the network’s executives intended to discuss the decision with Stefanovic, who is in London on two weeks of leave, overnight on Wednesday, due to the time difference.

Both sides are expected to call in their respective lawyers in the coming days to officially draw up a legal deed confirming the terms of Stefanovic’s departure from the network after more than two decades given he still has six months and more than $1m to run on his current 12-month contract.

While Nine has been at lengths to distance itself from the content that appears on Stefanovic’s digital podcast since its launch in January, there have been growing concerns his increasingly outspoken views and controversial roster of guests could begin to impact the network – and its bottom line – amid talk of an potential advertiser boycott and complaints from shareholders.

Those concerns were only heightened after Stefanovic promoted his almost hour-long chat with Robinson on Tuesday by posting a chummy clip showing them walking through the streets of London as the Today show host praised the anti-immigration provocateur and labelled recently resigned British Labour prime minister Keir Starmer “a wanker”.

The ensuing interview, when it landed, only made matters worse by virtue of the fact it was barely an interview at all, with Stefanovic failing to challenge Robinson on any of his contentious anti-immigration views, and instead congratulating him on his courage and bravery in speaking out.

It is understood Stefanovic later made the decision to delete the interview from his social media channels himself after the network’s bosses raised concerns about the chat and he began to comprehend the sensitivity of the situation, but that Nine never specifically asked him to remove the vision.

Rather than ease any misgivings, though, the move only amplified the drama surrounding Robinson’s appearance, with the podcasts’ followers – and rival media outlets – soon noticing the interview had been scrubbed from Stefanovic’s YouTube, Spotify, Instagram and Apple Podcast channels within 12 hours of it going live.

Not that it helped kill off any controversy, with the interview soon gaining a second life on One Nation leader, and The Karl Stefanovic Show regular, Pauline Hanson’s channels under the header “CANCELLED: The Full Karl Stefanovic and Tommy Robinson Interview”, alongside the senator’s claims Nine was “trying to sack my good friend Karl Stefanovic for this video with Tommy Robinson”.

Republishing the missing interview a little after 8am, Senator Hanson went on to sledge the Stefanovic’s colleague Deborah Knight as well as Nine’s decision to parachute her in to replace her “good friend” on the Today show, alongside former newsreader Georgie Gardner, in its failed breakfast show reboot in 2019.

“Deb Knight was a huge flop for Channel 9 and while she was busy grilling me over One Nation’s polling Channel 9’s ratings were in the toilet,” a statement on Hanson’s YouTube account said.

“In 2019 on live TV with her, I called on Channel 9 to bring back Karl.

“Now with six months to go on his contract the weak management of Channel 9 want to sack Karl over this interview. Tommy Robinson has a lesson for Australians.

“If we don’t learn from the UK’s mistakes on immigration and radical Islam, we are going to face the same destruction. This is exactly what Karl was trying to bring to Australia’s attention.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62981

File: 7dba4be222c8055⋯.jpg (1.65 MB,3559x2373,3559:2373,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a97e22a3acb9a26⋯.jpg (623.95 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752843 (241102ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Animated by nostalgia’: Labor senator slams luminaries over AUKUS - Labor senator Raff Ciccone has strongly defended the AUKUS submarine program, criticising prominent former Labor figures backing a crowd-funded inquiry into the pact as being “animated by nostalgia” and relying on outdated strategic assumptions. The chair of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security argued Australia must respond to current security realities rather than revisit years of debate, saying “now is the time for concrete action” and that “vague questions and concerns are not constructive”. He also accused the Greens of allowing “ideological hostility toward the United States” to shape their opposition. Ciccone defended the decision to acquire three second-hand US Virginia-class submarines, rejecting concerns about their capability and lifespan, and quoted former defence secretary Dennis Richardson, who described criticism of the plan as “one of the greatest beat-ups I’ve ever seen in my life”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62904

‘Animated by nostalgia’: Labor senator slams luminaries over AUKUS

Rob Harris - June 24, 2026

Labor senator Raff Ciccone has launched a blistering attack on critics of the AUKUS submarine pact, dismissing a crowd-funded inquiry backed by former Labor ministers as backward-looking and unconstructive.

In a speech to the Senate on Tuesday night, the Victorian argued that opposition to Australia’s planned acquisition of US Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines was driven more by politics and nostalgia than genuine concerns about national security.

Ciccone, the chair of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, took aim at a recently established inquiry into AUKUS, chaired by former Labor minister and anti-nuclear campaigner Peter Garrett and other party luminaries, which is calling for a fresh examination of the program’s strategic assumptions, costs and risks.

“Distinguished voices, now animated by nostalgia, are basing dramatic claims about the very purpose of AUKUS on the strategic needs of the past,” Ciccone told the Senate on Tuesday night. “Australia must respond to the world as it exists today, not as it existed in the past.”

The intervention from the chair of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security marks one of the strongest public defences yet of the defence program, as scrutiny intensifies over the cost, timing and viability of Australia’s plan to acquire second-hand submarines from the United States before building a future fleet of AUKUS-class boats.

Without naming anyone, Ciccone suggested critics were viewing Australia’s strategic circumstances through the lens of a bygone era.

The comments represent a direct challenge to a growing group of former ministers, diplomats, defence officials and strategic experts who have questioned whether AUKUS remains the best option for Australia’s long-term defence needs.

Gareth Evans, who served as foreign minister from 1988 to 1996, used the first day of hearings at the inquiry to savage the nuclear-powered submarine plan as “misconceived from the outset”, and argued it has made Australia a “compliant cash cow” to the United States. Former prime minister Paul Keating and retired Labor frontbenchers Kim Carr, Doug Cameron and Bob Carr have also criticised the pact.

Ciccone argued that after almost five years of debate since the alliance was announced, the time for further reviews had passed.

“Now is the time for concrete action,” he said. “Vague questions and concerns are not constructive.”

Ciccone reserved his sharpest criticism for the Greens, and accused the party of allowing its hostility towards the US to override Australia’s strategic interests.

“Their position deserves to be called out for what it is,” he told the Senate. “It is not principled opposition. It is not strategic caution. It is ideological hostility toward the United States.”

The senator also used the speech to attack the Coalition’s handling of previous submarine programs, blaming the former Morrison government for abandoning the Japanese submarine option before pursuing a French-designed conventional submarine fleet that was later scrapped when Australia joined AUKUS.

“After years of indecision, false starts and wasted money, this government’s plan is forging ahead despite the mess they made,” Ciccone said.

Last month, Defence Minister Richard Marles announced that taxpayers would save money by ditching a plan to acquire a new and upgraded nuclear-powered submarine from the US, and instead buy three second-hand submarines. Experts have warned that Australia would receive a less capable vessel with a shorter lifespan under the shift.

But Ciccone rejected those concerns, arguing each submarine would have more than 20 years of operational life remaining and describing criticism of the arrangement as overblown.

Quoting former defence secretary Dennis Richardson, Ciccone said the debate surrounding the submarines was “one of the greatest beat-ups I’ve ever seen in my life”.

He argued that purchasing three in-service Virginia-class submarines would reduce costs, simplify maintenance and improve Australia’s submarine capability long before the first AUKUS-class submarine enters service.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/animated-by-nostalgia-labor-senator-slams-luminaries-over-aukus-20260623-p609e0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62982

File: f2e798c3aa3c19a⋯.jpg (370.57 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752869 (241113ZJUN26) Notable: Vanuatu set to sign long-awaited security deal - Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat is expected to visit Canberra next week to sign the long-delayed Nakamal Agreement with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, marking a significant step in Australia’s Pacific security strategy. The pact follows years of negotiations and is not expected to include the veto over Chinese-funded infrastructure projects that Australia had previously sought. The agreement comes as Vanuatu negotiates a separate economic co-operation pact with China and after Australia excluded Vanuatu from the 2026–27 Pacific Engagement Visa program, a move some viewed as diplomatic pressure. Former diplomat James Batley said the deal reflected Australia’s “strategic persistence”, while questions remained over its practical significance. Security agreements with Fiji and the Solomon Islands are also expected to follow.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

Vanuatu set to sign long-awaited security deal

BEN PACKHAM - 24 June 2026

1/2

Vanuatu’s Prime Minister Jotham Napat will visit Canberra next week to sign a new bilateral security pact with Anthony Albanese after years of negotiations and multiple false starts.

The Nakamal agreement is unlikely to include a veto that Australia had sought over Chinese-funded projects in Vanuatu, which Port Vila argued was a threat to its sovereignty.

The deal follows the Albanese government’s move in recent weeks to drop Vanuatu from its Pacific Engagement Visa quota for 2026-27, in what some viewed as a “shot across the bows” to remind Port Vila of the benefits its relationship with Australia.

The visa offers citizens of Pacific countries permanent residence in Australia, with 2900 places available this coming financial year for nationals from 11 island nations but not Vanuatu.

Mr Napat will arrive in Canberra on Sunday and visit Parliament House on Monday for the signing ceremony and bilateral talks with Mr Albanese.

The looming deal comes as Vanuatu negotiates a new pact with Beijing which the Napat government insists is a “comprehensive economic co-operation agreement”, rather than a security deal.

The signing of the Nakamal agreement, named after a traditional ni-Vanuatu meeting place, will kick off a new wave of security deals between Australia and the Pacific, amid what’s been described as a diplomatic “knife fight” with Beijing.

A new agreement with Fiji is expected to be signed in coming weeks, and another is under negotiation with Solomon Islands following the election of former China critic Matthew Wale as the country’s Prime Minister.

Former diplomat James Batley, who served in Port Vila during a long career in the Pacific, said the finalisation of the Nakamal Agreement underscored the government’s “strategic persistence”.

He said it was unclear yet whether “the value of this agreement purely symbolic”, and whether Vanuatu would follow up quickly by finalising its China agreement.

“Are they going to go and then sign one with China a few days later which would diminish the significance of this one?” Mr Batley said.

The imminent Vanuatu deal comes amid opposition criticism of the government’s diplomacy, with Coalition foreign affairs spokesman Ted O’Brien calling for more ambition from Labor in the international arena.

“I fear Australia’s influence and ambition has diminished. Our nation seems to have lost its mojo – as if our quiet confidence has given way to nervous timidity,” Mr O’Brien told the National Press Club on Wednesday.

He said the Coalition would pursue a region-wide security agreement with Pacific Island Forum countries if it was elected.

At the same time, he said Australia could not afford the “strategic weakness” of an “uncosted 2050 net zero policy” – highlighting the Coalition’s more conservative climate change stance which alienated Pacific nations under the Morrison government.

Mr O’Brien said Pacific nations were “no fools” and were more interested in bringing down emissions than “virtue signalling” on targets.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62983

File: 90eb8b66a525eb5⋯.jpg (3.52 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e899fa2d7e78e8⋯.jpg (5.19 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 955c78192fb7e5e⋯.jpg (3.93 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752895 (241122ZJUN26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith did not show up at the Australian War Memorial, but he almost overshadowed it - Ben Roberts-Smith’s planned attendance at the opening of the Australian War Memorial’s new Anzac Hall threatened to dominate the event before the Victoria Cross recipient withdrew after reportedly falling ill with a stomach flu. Roberts-Smith had successfully varied his bail conditions to attend the ceremony, prompting debate over his presence while facing five war crime murder charges, which he denies. Defence Minister Richard Marles said inviting Victoria Cross recipients was “absolutely appropriate”, while Greens leader Larissa Waters boycotted the event. One Nation leader Pauline Hanson expressed disappointment at his absence and said he deserved to attend. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese instead focused on the memorial’s new galleries, describing the extension as “a profound respect” for Australians who have served.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62942

>>>/qresearch/24748188

>>62975

Ben Roberts-Smith did not show up at the Australian War Memorial, but he almost overshadowed it

Matthew Knott - June 23, 2026

The circus didn’t move on; in the end, it never arrived.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese suspended parliamentary businesses early on Tuesday to allow federal MPs to attend the opening of the Australian War Memorial’s new Anzac Hall. It should have been a unifying moment, with the focus on the veterans who fought and died for their nation in conflicts overseas.

Instead, a planned appearance by decorated soldier turned accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith threatened to turn the event into a media frenzy and another front in the culture wars. Roberts-Smith successfully varied two of his bail conditions last week so he could attend the ceremony.

Greens leader Larissa Waters said she would skip the opening given Roberts-Smith is facing five counts of the war crime of murder for his time with the Special Air Service Regiment in Afghanistan. He denies the charges.

Defence Minister Richard Marles defended the Victoria Cross winner’s decision to attend the opening, saying it was “absolutely appropriate” for him to be included.

“There is a presumption of innocence in this country and Ben Roberts-Smith is a recipient of the Victoria Cross, and the Victoria Cross recipients have been invited to this, which is appropriate and so I am comfortable about that,” Marles said.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson was more than comfortable, she was enthused.

“I’ll be going, and I am hoping to actually catch up with him, say hello to him, give him my support,” said Hanson, a passionate Roberts-Smith defender.

As dignitaries began arriving in Canberra for the lavish event, however, Roberts-Smith’s lawyers announced he would be a no-show.

Roberts-Smith’s barrister Slade Howell told the Downing Centre local court in Sydney that his client would no longer be attending after he “fell ill” with a bad stomach flu.

“As a result has not travelled to Canberra to attend the official opening at the war memorial,” Howell told the court.

This absence meant he did not come face-to-face with Liberal frontbencher and former special forces soldier Andrew Hastie, who has become a hate figure in parts of the conservative movement for appearing as a witness in Roberts-Smith’s unsuccessful defamation trial against The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

The nation’s top military leaders, including outgoing defence force chief David Johnston, attended the event, as did Albanese.

“What a sublime and powerful addition it is. A bold vision turned into a reality that enhances the institution of which it is now part,” the prime minister said of the new hall, which includes three major new galleries on Australian defence personnel’s service in Afghanistan, peacekeeping operations and the Middle East.

“It amounts to an act of profound respect from the nation to all who have served in our name, and all who serve now.”

War Memorial director Matt Anderson described the new gallery as the country’s “most comprehensive exhibition ever created on Australia’s involvement in Afghanistan, Australia’s longest war”.

“It is so contemporary the galleries were formed in real time. The fall of Kabul was happening as our curators were collecting the unfolding stories,” he said.

As she arrived at event, Hanson expressed disappointment that Roberts-Smith could not attend, saying he deserved to be there.

Not everyone felt so glum about Roberts-Smith’s conspicuous non-attendance. As much as they may have defended his right to appear at the event, you could almost hear the sighs of relief emanating from the event’s organisers.

The prospect of an ugly, or at the very least tense, spectacle had been averted.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/ben-roberts-smith-did-not-show-up-at-the-australian-war-memorial-but-he-almost-overshadowed-it-20260623-p609c7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62984

File: 9debbac3714e6fa⋯.jpg (122.07 KB,1080x1212,90:101,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 85f8d872813c336⋯.jpg (126.67 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752915 (241131ZJUN26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith supporter makes crude gesture at witness exhibit in War Memorial - Former commando Scott Jones, a vocal supporter of Ben Roberts-Smith, has sparked criticism after posting a photograph of himself raising his middle finger beside an Australian War Memorial display honouring the spouse of a protected witness who gave evidence against Roberts-Smith in his defamation trial. The image, shared on Jones’ Instagram account, was taken in the memorial’s new Afghanistan gallery before its official opening. Decorated former SAS commander Peter Winnall condemned the gesture as inappropriate, saying the War Memorial should be “a place of remembrance, grief and honour”. Referring to the soldiers who testified against Roberts-Smith, Winnall said they “did it at real cost to themselves, and it took courage”, adding that respecting the rights of the accused, the witnesses and their families was essential. Roberts-Smith, who denies five war crime murder charges, ultimately did not attend the opening after reportedly falling ill.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62942

>>>/qresearch/24748188

>>62975

>>62983

Ben Roberts-Smith supporter makes crude gesture at witness exhibit in War Memorial

BEN PACKHAM - 24 June 2026

1/2

One of accused war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith’s supporters has shared a picture of himself in the Australian War Memorial making a crude gesture while standing next to an exhibit for the spouse of a witness who testified against the former SAS corporal.

Scott Jones, a former 2 Commando Regiment signaller, raised his middle figure in the AWM’s new Afghanistan gallery while standing alongside the display, posing for a picture which was posted to his Instagram account.

The image was taken this week ahead of the official opening on Tuesday night of the AWM’s new $550m renovation, which Mr Roberts-Smith – one of Australia’s four living Victoria Cross recipients – pulled out of at late notice citing illness.

The witness and his partner cannot be identified for legal reasons.

Anthony Albanese and Governor-General Sam Mostyn headed a VIP guest list at the AWM opening that included Chief of the Defence Force David Johnston, his incoming successor, Vice-Admiral Mark Hammond, and VC recipient Daniel Keighran.

They were joined by Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, a host of ministers and federal MPs, Defence service chiefs, AWM chairman Kim Beazley and his predecessor, Seven West Media chairman Kerry Stokes – a longtime supporter of Mr Roberts-Smith.

Mr Jones, a vocal backer of Mr Roberts-Smith on social media, was at the AWM a day earlier to attend a function in memory of Victoria Cross recipient Cameron Baird, who died in action in Afghanistan.

Decorated former SAS commander Peter Winnall said his gesture in the gallery was inappropriate.

“The Australian War Memorial should be a place of remembrance, grief and honour,” he said.

“The accused, the witnesses and their families deserve to have their rights respected. The soldiers who raised concerns are tough professional soldiers. They did it at real cost to themselves, and it took courage.”

Mr Winnall has previously written in The Australian that Mr Roberts-Smith is entitled to the presumption of innocence, while the allegations against him should be properly tested.

“Pursuing these matters properly is not a betrayal of the Anzac spirit. It is a defence of it,” he said.

“It tells the next generation of Australian soldiers there is honour in the way we fight, not only in the fact that we fight.”

The Australian tried to contact Mr Jones via his Instagram account but received no response.

Mr Roberts-Smith, who has been charged with five counts of the war crime of murder, had his bail conditions varied last week so he could attend the AWM opening.

A source close to him told News Corp he felt “terrible” about missing it.

“If there is any way he could have got there, he would. He didn’t want to risk travelling and infecting anyone else,” the source said.

Mr Roberts-Smith has consistently denied all wrongdoing in regard to the allegations against him.

The criminal charges against him follow his civil defamation case against Nine Entertainment, in which a judge found allegations he was involved in war crimes were substantially true on the balance of probabilities. The full bench of the Federal Court last year dismissed his appeal against the judgment, upholding the original ruling.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62985

File: b433d12ec18671d⋯.jpg (121.51 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eae5cd7486cf66f⋯.jpg (91.82 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 416f6851e91f6d0⋯.jpg (109.05 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ccc7dcea77659e⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,4180x2858,2090:1429,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24752947 (241147ZJUN26) Notable: WA Police to launch internal investigation into way officers interacted with Virginia Giuffre before death - WA Police will conduct an internal investigation into officers’ interactions with Virginia Giuffre in the months before her death after receiving correspondence from her family. Police Commissioner Col Blanch said the review would begin with the family violence investigation team and examine whether officers had “done our job properly”, noting police attended more than 100,000 family violence incidents annually and that body-worn camera footage would assist the inquiry. The review follows calls from more than a dozen domestic violence experts, led by WA Centre for Women’s Safety and Wellbeing chief executive Dr Alison Evans, for a coronial inquest into Giuffre’s death. Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, said the family wanted “a thorough investigation into the systematic failures” affecting sexual abuse and domestic violence victims, asking: “How many more is it going to take until we take this seriously?”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39062 (pb)

>>62682

>>62929

>>62960

WA Police to launch internal investigation into way officers interacted with Virginia Giuffre before death

Jessica Evensen - 24 June 2026

WA Police will launch an internal investigation into the way officers interacted with Virginia Giuffre in the months before her death, Police Commissioner Col Blanch has confirmed.

Ms Giuffre died by suicide at her farm property in Neergabby, about 80km north of Perth, in April last year.

The 41-year-old was a prominent survivor of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who also alleged she was sex-trafficked to former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor as teenager.

At the time of her death, Ms Giuffre was involved in divorce proceedings with her husband, Robert Giuffre, whom she had separated from and shared three children with.

Court records show Ms Giuffre was charged with breaching a family violence restraining order at an Ocean Reef property on February 2.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Mr Blanch confirmed WA Police would be launching an internal review after receiving correspondence from Ms Giuffre’s family.

“It will start with our family violence investigation team, who will look at the circumstances and review the circumstances of all the attendees,” he said.

“I understand the family has written further ... to perhaps the ombudsman and the coroner, as well as WA Police.

“Certainly, a grieving family will be seeking answers, and we understand that, and I would hope to give them the answers of the ones that I can manage and control through our police force.”

Mr Blanch said he wanted to ensure his officers had done their jobs correctly.

“We attend (and) call to over 100,000 cases of family violence every year, I want to make sure we’ve done our job properly,” he said.

“We invest a lot in training our police officers, we have body worn videos so our reviews can be quite clear enough to make sure that we did our job properly.”

It comes just days after a group of more than a dozen domestic violence experts — including WA Centre for Women’s Safety and Wellbeing chief executive Dr Alison Evans — wrote a letter to WA Coroner Ros Fogliani demanding a coronial inquest into Ms Giuffre’s death.

“(Ms) Giuffre spent much of her adult life in courageous pursuits of accountability for the abuse she suffered, taking significant personal risk to expose a network of exploitation and in doing so helping to protect other women,” the letter reads.

“It would be a profound injustice if the question of whether systems failed her in her final months were not examined with equivalent rigour.”

In a recent interview with ABC Radio, Ms Giuffre’s brother and sister-in-law, Sky and Amanda Roberts, said they had “too many” unanswered questions.

“Virginia is a very public figure, and the only thing that’s unusual about this is the fact that there’s documentation leading up to her death that we can utilise, so that hundreds and thousands of other women and children can be saved moving forward,” Mr Roberts said.

“What Virginia would want is a thorough investigation into the systematic failures in Australia, here in the United States, across the UK, the systematic failures that have happened to sexual abuse victims time and time again, and domestic violence victims time and time again.

“How many more is it going to take until we take this seriously?”

In 2021, Ms Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit against Prince Andrew, alleging he sexually assaulted her when she was 17-years-old.

Andrew agreed to an out-of-court settlement but has repeatedly denied the allegations.

An infamous photograph of Ms Giuffre as a teenager standing with Andrew and Epstein’s fixer, convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell, has been central to a host of court proceedings.

Her death came less than a month after she posted to social media that she had just “four days to live” after a crash with a school bus near her home, which police later dismissed as a minor incident.

“It is with utterly broken hearts that we announce that Virginia passed away last night at her farm in Western Australia,” her family said in a statement in April last year.

“She lost her life to suicide, after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking. Virginia was a fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking.

“She was the light that lifted so many survivors. Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure.”

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

https://1800respect.org.au/

Lifeline (13 11 14)

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://thewest.com.au/news/police/wa-police-to-launch-internal-investigation-into-way-officers-interacted-with-virginia-giuffre-before-death-c-22479056

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62986

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24756939 (251110ZJUN26) Notable: David Shoebridge slams ASIO’s warning about media spies, says it will have ‘chilling effect’ on whistleblowers - (Video) Greens senator David Shoebridge has criticised ASIO's warning that government officials should tightly control contact with journalists because foreign intelligence services may exploit media organisations for espionage and foreign interference. Shoebridge argued the advice would have a "chilling effect" on whistleblowers and press freedom, saying Australia's secrecy laws pose a greater threat because they expose whistleblowers and journalists to prosecution for disclosing information in the public interest. He also argued concerns about foreign influence should extend to media ownership and social media platforms. The report notes ASIO's assessment that state-affiliated media can be used as intelligence cover. It also references a 2020 incident in which a journalist from China's Xinhua News Agency was reported for filming other journalists inside Parliament House, prompting tighter security measures for foreign journalists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Iran proxies want to spread fear and terror in Australia, ASIO boss warns in major threat assessment

GEOFF CHAMBERS - June 24, 2026

1/3

Spy chief Mike Burgess is “gravely concerned” about the temperature and trajectory of terrorism threats following the Bondi Beach massacre and has warned that an Iran-aligned group waging terror in Europe could co-ordinate assassinations, arson and vandalism in Australia.

In his first threat assessment speech since father-and-son Islamic extremists allegedly murdered 15 Jewish-Australians and bystanders in the nation’s worst terrorist attack, the ASIO director-general cautioned that the terror threat level of “probable” does “not tell the full story”.

Mr Burgess, who described his address as “not exactly upbeat, bedtime reading”, revealed ASIO had resolved 14 significant terror-related cases since Bondi and that in addition to the re-emergence of global terror groups including ­Islamic State and al-Qa’ida, an ­Iranian-backed group was orchestrating attacks as part of the Islamic regime’s antisemitic agenda.

The security chief also revealed that nation-state hackers had mapped the network of a critical infrastructure provider “so they could cripple it at the time of their choosing”. In recent years, China has been associated with the majority of cyber attacks targeting Australian energy, defence, communications, water and health critical infrastructure.

ASIO has also called out for the first time an Australian resident now in custody in Iraq who allegedly helped to orchestrate the ­Israel Adass synagogue firebombing in Melbourne. While Mr Burgess did not name the individual, The Australian previously revealed this man was illicit tobacco crime boss Kazem “Kaz” Hamad.

Following the explosion in antisemitic incidents across Australia in the wake of the October 7, 2023, slaughter of innocent Israelis by Hamas terrorists and the broader Middle East conflict, Mr Burgess said “sadly, and illogically, hatred of Jews is one thing virtually all the violent extremist cohorts have in common”.

Amid a broader post-Bondi ­debate over restoring Australian values and tightening migration flows, Mr Burgess strayed from his security brief to amplify that people travelling to Australia should respect the country’s core principle of “a fair go for all”.

On the rise of antisemitism, Mr Burgess said Islamic extremists, neo-Nazis, issue-motivated extremists, nation states, anarchists and revolutionary groups could all “be antisemitic”.

“All these groups have very different ideologies,” he said. “They do not associate with each other – indeed, for the most part, they ­despise each other. The way they operate, their tactics and techniques are all different. And yet they are united by a common hatred. My point is that violent antisemitism is not a single, or simple, intelligence problem.”

Speaking at ASIO headquarters in Canberra on Wednesday night, Mr Burgess, revealed ASIO and its security partners had foiled 31 major terrorism plots since 2014.

He said social media was “amplifying and accelerating grievance narratives, eroding trust in institutions, promoting discord and inflammatory rhetoric, exacerbating polarisation and creating a permissive environment for violence”.

“Whether online or in the real world, when intolerance is ­tolerated, when violent language and violent acts are left unchecked, they become normalised, reinforcing the impression they are acceptable and compounding the likelihood of further violence,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62987

File: a8bceca5cea1dca⋯.jpg (169.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de4a6043f325c13⋯.jpg (606.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3ba77039709bca4⋯.jpg (286.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 96edcf08e7361d6⋯.jpg (230.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24756973 (251130ZJUN26) Notable: David Shoebridge slams ASIO’s warning about media spies, says it will have ‘chilling effect’ on whistleblowers - (Video) Greens senator David Shoebridge has criticised ASIO's warning that government officials should tightly control contact with journalists because foreign intelligence services may exploit media organisations for espionage and foreign interference. Shoebridge argued the advice would have a "chilling effect" on whistleblowers and press freedom, saying Australia's secrecy laws pose a greater threat because they expose whistleblowers and journalists to prosecution for disclosing information in the public interest. He also argued concerns about foreign influence should extend to media ownership and social media platforms. The report notes ASIO's assessment that state-affiliated media can be used as intelligence cover. It also references a 2020 incident in which a journalist from China's Xinhua News Agency was reported for filming other journalists inside Parliament House, prompting tighter security measures for foreign journalists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62759

>>62986

ASIO chief reveals agency foiled foreign spy plot to steal AUKUS submarine secrets

RICHARD FERGUSON - June 24, 2026

ASIO foiled a foreign plot to ­weasel into Australia’s AUKUS nuclear submarine program and directly confronted the spy, as ­security chief Mike Burgess warns overseas actors are using networking sites such as LinkedIn to compromise the nation’s signature defence strategy.

As China continues its attempts to undermine AUKUS, Mr Burgess highlighted the espionage threats to the pact in a national threat assessment on Wednesday that was otherwise completely dominated by the ASIO boss’s concerns about antisemitism and terrorism.

The revelations of a foiled plot follow Mr Burgess’s previous warnings that foreign countries will ramp up their attempts to undermine the US-Britain-Australia defence pact in the next five years, and espionage is costing the country $125bn a year.

Speaking in Canberra, Mr Burgess said a spy attempting to crack into AUKUS operations approached a national security pass holder pretending to be a consultant and offered money for reports on Australia’s Pacific policy and the submarine program.

“The spy paid the official to write two reports on Australia’s relationship with our Pacific neighbours, and then, thinking he’d been hooked, offered money for inside information on AUKUS,” Mr Burgess said in ­Canberra.

“The foreign intelligence service wanted insights on the progress of Pillar 1, the technologies of Pillar 2, the amount of money being invested, Australia’s geo-strategic ambitions, relations between the three AUKUS governments, and the likely trajectory of Australian public opinion.

“I’m pleased to report the clearance holder became suspicious and reported the contact,” he said.

After thoroughly interviewing the official – who handed over the money he was given by the spy – ASIO agents then called up the AUKUS saboteur directly and confronted them.

“We demonstrated we knew exactly who she was, demanded she cease targeting Australian citizens, stated we have zero tolerance for spying on AUKUS, provided a quick overview of Australia’s espionage laws and pointed out the director-general always reserves the right to speak publicly about these matters.” Mr Burgess said.

“At that point the spy hung up. Message received.”

While Mr Burgess did not reveal the name of the country behind the plot mentioned in the speech, China has been the most virulent critic of AUKUS.

Beijing’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has tried to undermine public confidence in AUKUS by calling it a “unnecessary consumption of the hardworking Australian taxpayers’ money” and an “Anglo-Saxon bloc” that perpetuates a Cold War mentality.

The Chinese government last year lodged a protest with the Albanese government over Mr Burgess’s accusations that China organised state-based hackers to target Australian critical infrastructure. On Wednesday, Mr Burgess said foreign spies were using professional networking sites to recruit moles and that the attacks on AUKUS would expand as the program matured.

“Using professional networking sites to recruit Australians is a low-cost and low-risk vector for foreign intelligence services,” Mr Burgess said.

“They are also using less scaled but more sophisticated techniques to target AUKUS and its associated capabilities, and we expect it will only increase.

“Defending Defence and its capabilities from espionage and foreign interference will always be a priority for ASIO,” he said.

“Australia’s war fighters rely on it. Our strategic advantage depends on it. Our partners’ expectations require it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/asio-chief-reveals-agency-foiled-foreign-spy-plot-to-steal-aukus-submarine-secrets/news-story/8cd384cbb3dc70246ae5d8403a4ecef8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62988

File: af57f0dfe2f5dce⋯.jpg (486.51 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24756996 (251146ZJUN26) Notable: UK AUKUS envoy Stephen Lovegrove tells Australia ‘don’t worry about us’ - United Kingdom AUKUS envoy Stephen Lovegrove has reassured Australia that political upheaval in Britain will not derail the AUKUS submarine partnership despite the expected replacement of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and recent defence spending tensions. Lovegrove said the investments underpinning AUKUS were so substantial they were effectively "unturnoffable" and that the pact remained one of the three partners' most important strategic projects. He said he hoped to continue serving as envoy under the next prime minister. Defence Minister Richard Marles reaffirmed that "AUKUS is happening", while the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's Justin Bassi proposed Australia appoint its own AUKUS envoy. Lovegrove also expressed confidence Britain remained committed to funding its nuclear submarine fleet despite wider defence spending pressures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62751

>>62914

UK AUKUS envoy Stephen Lovegrove tells Australia ‘don’t worry about us’

The submarine pact struck in 2021 is safe under a new Prime Minister, the UK’S envoy says.

Latika M Bourke - 25 June 2026

1/2

Keir Starmer’s AUKUS envoy says he wants to serve the UK Prime Minister’s successor and told The Nightly that Australia does not need to worry about the political upheaval over defence spending affecting the submarine production pact.

Sir Keir could be replaced by Andy Burnham as soon as next month, after bowing to pressure from his Labour colleagues to resign.

He had been under pressure since almost the beginning of his short premiership over a series of unforced errors, poor relations with MPs and no clear political strategy or plan to deliver the change he promised at the election two years ago, when he won in a landslide.

The eventual trigger for his downfall was a row over defence spending, with his then Defence Secretary John Healey quitting, saying his boss was not willing to fund national security as required and was leaving the country unsafe.

Mr Healey quit just hours before he was due to tour a naval base with Defence Minister Richard Marles to promote AUKUS, effectively standing up his Australian counterpart.

But Sir Stephen Lovegrove, who has also served as National Security Advisor in the UK and at the highest levels in the civil service, said the turmoil in the UK should not worry Australians about the long-term plan to build submarines together.

“I wouldn’t worry too much about the state of AUKUS in the UK. The investments are so large, which are going into Barrow and to Rolls-Royce in Derby, that they’re sort of unturnoffables really,” he said, during an appearance at the Westminster think tank Policy Exchange.

“Likewise, in the States, there’s a lot of talk about that as well, that ship has sailed, as it were. AUKUS is part of all three countries’ most important projects. It’s going to continue.”

Under the AUKUS submarine pact struck in 2021, Australia will buy three Virginia-class boats from the US Navy’s current fleet from early next decade.

Then Australia and the UK plan to build a brand new attack boat based on the UK’s existing Astute-class of boats that will be called SSN-AUKUS.

Shortly before quitting, Mr Healey said that steel would be cut on the first SSN-AUKUS, which will be for the UK’s fleet, next year.

The Australian government has repeatedly insisted that the UK will deliver on its end of the bargain, despite serious concerns about the UK’s poor production rates and degraded ability to field its current fleet.

“AUKUS is happening,” Mr Marles told the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s conference in Canberra on Thursday.

Justin Bassi from ASPI said that Mr Marles could boost the program by appointing an Australian AUKUS envoy.

“Stephen’s role as AUKUS envoy has been beneficial as communication is the flip side of the same strategic capability coin,” he said.

“Ideally all three nations would have AUKUS tsars or envoys whose dedicated mission is to help keep the public informed and build the social license necessary for such a multi-generation security endeavour.”

The House of Commons Defence Select Committee chair Tan Dhesi has warned that the program is “plodding along” and needs a serious reboot from the three AUKUS leaders, as well as demanded his governing party deliver more defence spending sooner.

But Sir Stephen, who chairs Rolls-Royce SMR, the company that wants to build small modular nuclear reactors, said that while he could not speak about the broader UK defence investment plans, he did not fear for submarine funding.

“I don’t have any real concerns about the commitment to our nuclear submarine fleet, either the bombers or the attack boats,” he said.

“So I would encourage Australian and indeed American colleagues not to read alarming things into basically, shorter-term political perturbation in the UK.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62989

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24757022 (251201ZJUN26) Notable: Banned ISIS bride Hodan Abby to return to Australia, Tony Burke says - (Video) Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has confirmed Sydney-born Islamic State affiliate Hodan Abby will be allowed to return to Australia after the government revoked the temporary exclusion order that prevented her re-entry. Burke said legal advice meant the order could no longer remain in force and authorities were ready for her return. Abby, who travelled to Syria in 2015, was previously stranded after being denied boarding on a flight carrying the final group of Australian women and children out of the war-torn country. She later disappeared into Syria's detention system before contact was re-established. Burke said she would face "a very high level of surveillance", including strict reporting obligations and advance notification of telecommunications use and travel. Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Director-General Mike Burgess said ASIO had been involved in planning her return and would use the agency's "full capability and powers" to manage any security risks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62755

>>62766

>>62930

>>62986

Banned ISIS bride Hodan Abby to return to Australia, Tony Burke says

THOMAS HENRY and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 25 June 2026

Australia’s last remaining Islamic State bride, Hodan Abby, is now free to return home after the Albanese government issued her with a return permit, ending the temporary exclusion order that had prevented her from re-entering the country.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revealed on Thursday that the Sydney-born woman, who was barred from boarding a flight from Syria in May, was granted a return permit overnight after the government received advice that the exclusion order could no longer remain in force.

“We received the final advice yesterday that we can no longer have an exclusion condition any longer for her. We’ve checked with our agencies, they are ready,” Mr Burke told ABC Radio’s AM program.

Contact lost with Hodan Abby

The Australian revealed this month that Abby, 29, had disappeared into Syria’s notorious prison system after being denied boarding on a flight carrying the final group of Australian women and children out of the war-torn country.

At the time, Abby was separated from other Australian ISIS-linked women and transferred to Idlib, where her family later lost contact with her.

It was revealed that her last message to her family was that she was “OK” and would be travelling to a detention centre in Idlib.

The Australian was told that the UN Commission of Inquiry got involved after the revelations were revealed by The Australian, and further pressure had mounted on the government from Syrian authorities to facilitate her return.

Abby fled western Sydney in 2015 when she was 18 and travelled to Syria, where she later became trapped in Kurdish-run detention camps following the collapse of the Islamic State caliphate.

She remained in Syria with her nine-year-old daughter, who suffers from severe shrapnel injuries and requires urgent medical treatment.

The temporary exclusion order imposed on Abby made her the only Australian woman affiliated with Islamic State to be barred from returning under the scheme.

The decision sparked concern among family members, who feared Abby had become lost within Syria’s prison network after authorities transferred her from Al Roj to Idlib.

Details of repatriation not revealed

The government has not publicly disclosed when Abby and her daughter are expected to arrive in Australia.

“The temporary exclusion order applies until a permit is issued. And when a permit is requested, a permit lawfully has to be issued.”

Mr Burke says the last remaining woman in the Al Roj camp in Syria will be subject to stringent monitoring measures upon her return to Australia.

“She will have to report and we will have to know where she lives, where she works, where she studies, if she books a ticket to anywhere. For telecommunications, you cannot use any telecommunications device without 24 hours notice being given,” he said.

“Even if you want to use a public phone, it’s 24 hours notice. Any social media, 24 hours notice on everything has to be given so that there will be a very high level of scrutiny and surveillance. And we have gone absolutely to the legal limit that we’re able to.”

ASIO consulted over return

ASIO boss Mike Burgess confirmed his agency had been involved in planning around the woman’s return to Australia, assuring Australians that the nation’s intelligence agency would use all of its “capability and powers” to monitor the ISIS-affiliated individual.

“Of course we were involved, and yes, I’m satisfied that my organisation is ready for the return,” he told ABC RN.

“ASIO is not all-seeing and all-knowing and we don’t want to be, but I can assure your listeners that actually the full use of my organisation’s capability and powers will be used when this individual returns to this country.

“When there are Australians who have been overseas in places like Syria and Iraq who represent security concerns, we assess them. We know the level of the risk and anyone who’s considered a high or medium risk gets my agency’s full attention.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/last-remaining-isis-bride-to-return-to-australia-tony-burke-says/news-story/649dd5d7fdad74156a7f7f404cec2375

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymIfje3zXf0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62990

File: 91af8a442ff9b11⋯.jpg (167.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e7859bb861c111⋯.jpg (289.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763396 (270235ZJUN26) Notable: Nurse’s lawyer says prosecution appeal over video ruling ‘doomed to fail’ - The lawyer for former Sydney nurse Ahmad Rashad Nadir has argued any prosecution appeal against a court ruling excluding a viral video allegedly showing two nurses threatening Israeli patients is "doomed to fail". Solicitor Zemarai Khatiz said the District Court's decision was "firmly supported by both the law and the evidence" and warned an appeal would only prolong proceedings and waste public resources. Judge Michael McHugh ruled the video was inadmissible because it had allegedly been recorded and shared unlawfully, leaving prosecutors to rely primarily on influencer Max Ilinski's testimony at trial. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has not indicated whether it will appeal. The two former nurses have pleaded not guilty to the charges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

>>62853

>>62895

>>62969

Nurse’s lawyer says prosecution appeal over video ruling ‘doomed to fail’

BIMINI PLESSER - June 24, 2026

The lawyer who successfully argued a video of two Sydney nurses allegedly threatening to kill Israeli patients should be thrown out of evidence has warned prosecutors that any bid to have the evidence reintroduced would be “doomed to fail”.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir made global headlines last year after Israeli influencer Max Ilinski recorded their conversation in an online chatroom, in which Mr Nadir suggested he had sent Israeli patients to “hell” while Ms Abu Lebdeh allegedly told Mr Ilinski he was going to “die the most disgusting death”.

In an extraordinary ruling, NSW District Court judge Michael McHugh on Tuesday declared the viral video was inadmissible and could not form part of the evidence against the former nurses, as it was unlawful for Mr Ilinski to have recorded and shared the private conversation.

Without the video, the prosecution’s case must rely on Mr Ilinski’s testimony when the trial begins on August 31. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions declined to answer questions on whether an appeal would be lodged.

Mr Nadir’s solicitor Zemarai Khatiz told The Australian on Wednesday he had not yet been informed of any proposed appeal by the prosecution, but he believed Judge McHugh’s decision would be final.

“The District Court delivered a thorough and carefully reasoned judgment that is firmly supported by both the law and the evidence,” he said.

Mr Khatiz said any bid by the CDPP to overturn Judge McHugh’s decision would “face significant legal challenges”.

“Whilst the prosecution is entitled to consider its appeal options, in my view, I am confident that any appeal would be doomed to fail and prolong the inevitable,” he said.

“Pursuing an appeal under these circumstances would further delay the proceedings that have already been ongoing for approximately 15 months and further result in unnecessary expenditure of court resources and taxpayers’ money.”

Most of Judge McHugh’s judgment was suppressed and only limited reasons were released publicly. The reason for the suppression was not aired in open court.

Judge McHugh found evidence ­obtained illegally should only be allowed into court if “the desirability of admission outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence that has been obtained in such a way or ways”.

Judge McHugh said “the ­alleged utterances of the applicants during the chatroom interactions are … likely highly disturbing to right-minded people everywhere” but whether they met the “high criminal standard is an entirely different set of questions” that must be put to a jury.

“It is in that context that the publishing of the outcome of these pre-trial applications must be made with care and an understanding of sub judice contempt,” he said.

He made clear his judgment was not meant to “express any views on what Mr Ilinski referred to as ‘the war’ or ‘antisemitism’ generally”.

The Samuel Griffith Society executive director Mia Schlicht said even if the chatroom conversation was found to have been recorded unlawfully, Judge McHugh could have used his judicial discretion – under section 138 of the Commonwealth Evidence Act – to allow it to be used at trial anyway.

“That evidence still could have been admitted if the judge decided that the video was so important that it outweighed the problem in which it was obtained,” she said.

Ms Schlicht said keeping so much of the judgement hidden from the public under a non-publication order was symptomatic of the “erosion of open justice” in Australia.

“Ultimately, the judge has decided that the way the video was recorded falls under New South Wales privacy regulations. But what’s really interesting is that I actually can’t explain to you the exact reasoning the judge used in that case because those reasons haven’t been published,” she said.

“Open justice is important because justice needs to be seen to be done, and in cases like this where we don’t see how justice was administered, it’s very difficult for the public to come to the conclusion that justice has been done.”

The nurses have both pleaded not guilty to using a carriage ­service to menace, harass or offend, and Ms Abu Lebdeh has pleaded not guilty to an ­additional charge of threatening violence to a group.

They have been stood down from their jobs by NSW Health and issued a two-year ban from working with NDIS participants.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nurses-lawyer-says-prosecution-appeal-over-video-ruling-doomed-to-fail/news-story/6e9145d8981afd24edb4dff3b77e788e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62991

File: 17fc6cb80fc2a64⋯.jpg (2.14 MB,7149x4768,7149:4768,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0a51a19d800cc18⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,3508x2481,3508:2481,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763450 (270301ZJUN26) Notable: Teals reveal name, logo and founding principles of new party - but there’s no leader - Independent MPs Zali Steggall and Allegra Spender have launched a new political party, Community Strong Australia, aiming to expand the community independent movement and secure greater influence in the Senate. The party will have no single leader, with parliamentary members to lead collectively, and will allow MPs to vote freely except on confidence and supply. Steggall described it as "a centrist party, not a centre-right replacement", while Spender said many Australians felt "politically homeless". The party's creation follows changes to political donation laws that they argue disadvantage independents. Climate 200 is not involved in the new party, although future funding has not been ruled out. Several other teal independents have declined to join.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

Teals reveal name, logo and founding principles of new party – but there’s no leader

Jacqueline Maley - June 25, 2026

1/2

Teal independents Zali Steggall and Allegra Spender will form a new political party, Community Strong Australia, in a much-anticipated move set to further destabilise the two-party system, and an attempt to grab disaffected One Nation voters.

Community Strong will seek to exploit Australia’s political upheaval, as well as circumvent new donations laws that disadvantage independents, to establish a new stronghold in the Senate.

But the leaderless party, which is not currently taking funding from Climate 200, is a high-risk strategy, as all other teal MPs have declined to join.

“This is a centrist party, not a centre-right replacement,” Steggall told this masthead. “It is not a life raft for the Liberal Party. They have done their own damage to their own movement.”

Spender said she had consulted her community and donor base before joining the party.

“A lot of people feel politically homeless right now and very frustrated with the major parties’ ability to listen and deliver,” she said.

“People have come up to me in the street and said, ‘We hope you guys do build something together.’ I’ve had emails from all around the country.”

Papers to register Community Strong Australia as a party were filed on Wednesday with the Australian Electoral Commission, along with the party’s constitution, which allows its parliamentarians to vote as they choose on all matters except providing supply and confidence to a government.

However, there is a requirement to advocate for the party’s “policy pillars” – sensible economic management, climate action, equality and integrity.

The party will have no leader; instead, “parliamentary leaders will collectively lead”.

If the application is accepted by the AEC, party registration usually takes about three months.

“I strongly believe it is out there, an appetite for a different model,” Steggall said. “I don’t disagree that it’s a risk. That’s why I only have one colleague standing with me.”

Pollster Kos Samaras, who has consulted community independents about the appetite for a new party, said that “a number of people who are currently voting for One Nation – not an insignificant number of them – will switch to an alternative if it’s a serious one”.

“They are sitting on One Nation in lieu of something else. At the moment, there is only one product on the market,” Samaras said.

“If there is a second one, it will hit the vote of One Nation just as much as it will hit any other established political party, including the Greens.”

How much support Community Strong Australia can garner is untested.

Steggall was enormously successful as the first “teal” candidate, winning the prize Liberal seat of Warringah on Sydney’s north shore from former prime minister Tony Abbott at the 2019 election.

Spender took Sydney’s blue-ribbon electorate of Wentworth from Liberal Dave Sharma in 2022 and increased her margin at the 2025 election.

But Community Strong has no candidates lined up yet and has not settled its policies. It would need five parliamentary members to qualify for “minority party” status.

Steggall and Spender hope other independent MPs may join Community Strong after discussing the proposal with their communities.

Bradfield independent Nicolette Boele and Mackellar independent Sophie Scamps have been consulting supporters and voters in their electorates on the idea.

The remaining two lower house teals – Victoria’s Kooyong MP, Monique Ryan, and WA’s Curtin MP, Kate Chaney – have ruled out joining the party.

Climate 200, the controversial big-money donor to many teal campaigns, is not involved in Community Strong, although Steggall did not rule out taking future donations from the political funding vehicle, headed by Simon Holmes à Court.

“Climate 200 is not part of this. They are informed of Allegra’s and my decision. There is no agreement over future funding,” Steggall said. “It’s partly because too many in the media will jump to assume control or influence from them.”

Steggall said the measure of the new party’s success would be on election night 2028.

“It will look like an increased presence in the parliament,” she said. “It might cost me politically. It might mean that’s it [for me]. But I think the moment in Australian politics is worth the risk.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62992

File: e5f27eb8affaffe⋯.mp4 (10.31 MB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 992b84e1d468042⋯.jpg (349.67 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 326c2bb846340f8⋯.jpg (438.77 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763714 (270510ZJUN26) Notable: A dinner, a camera and an assault claim: The CCTV footage that has rocked the Victorian Liberal Party - (Video) Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has alleged former Victorian Liberal leader Matthew Guy assaulted her by placing her in a violent headlock during a community function in Melbourne's west, prompting a Victoria Police investigation. CCTV footage from the event reportedly shows the pair leaning towards each other in conversation, with Guy placing an arm across Deeming's shoulder, a sequence that has cast doubt on her account. Deeming nevertheless maintains Guy's conduct was "rough, unwelcome and degrading", while Guy has denied any wrongdoing. Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson said the matter was now before police and that those involved deserved "due process" and the presumption of innocence while the investigation continues.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

A dinner, a camera and an assault claim: The CCTV footage that has rocked the Victorian Liberal Party

Chip Le Grand - June 25, 2026

1/2

Liberal MP Moira Deeming has accused a former leader of her party, Matthew Guy, of assaulting her by putting her in a violent headlock at a public function.

CCTV footage of the episode has undermined the veracity of Deeming’s claim, with the footage instead showing a seemingly innocuous interaction between two colleagues leaning in to talk to one another in a noisy room.

Deeming’s allegation, which Victoria Police is investigating, has dismayed and angered Liberal MPs. It has also created a fresh headache for Opposition Leader Jess Wilson, who is sympathetic to Guy but determined to treat Deeming’s grievance with respect.

Deeming and Guy declined to comment to this masthead. Wilson has refused to take questions on the matter.

The interaction between Deeming and Guy at the centre of her complaint to police took place at a Macedonian community function on May 23 inside the Sheldon Reception ballroom in Sunshine West.

It happened about 10 minutes after Guy posted photos on social media of him and Deeming smiling together with community members.

CCTV footage from the venue taken from multiple angles shows Deeming and Guy sitting at the same table, separated by a young staff member who works for Deeming. As they lean in to talk to one another, Guy puts his right arm across Deeming’s shoulder.

Guy then repeats the gesture in a separate interaction with Deeming’s staffer.

Deeming has confirmed to Wilson’s office that this is the physical contact she now alleges was assault.

In text messages sent by Deeming to colleagues and published by The Australian, she described the episode in graphic terms. “Suddenly, I felt like someone smashed me in the base of my skull with a wine bottle – but it was Matthew Guy grabbing me violently in some kind of headlock.

“He wouldn’t let me go. He held on the side of my face and had his whole arm round my head and was pulling. I thought I was going to be ripped off my chair, and have my face smashed into [her staffer’s] lap or the table.”

Guy has not been interviewed by police but has vehemently denied to colleagues that anything untoward took place. He has told colleagues Deeming did not raise any concerns at the dinner.

This masthead has been told by two sources with knowledge of the sequence of events that Guy became aware of the allegations against him on 11 June, after Deeming complained about his conduct to Wilson’s office.

Deeming made the same allegation against Guy to a senior party member during a chance encounter in Collins Street this month. That conversation was also relayed to Guy.

Wilson’s office sought advice and provided Deeming with three options, according to a source familiar with the discussions who was not permitted to speak publicly.

Wilson’s office stressed that if it was a criminal matter, Deeming should go to police.

The office suggested that if it was a workplace complaint, Deeming could either take it to the Parliamentary Workplace Standards Commission or seek to have it resolved through internal party processes.

Deeming in her dealings with Wilson’s office rejected all three options. She subsequently made a formal complaint to police on June 16.

A Victoria Police spokesperson confirmed on Wednesday that police were investigating reports of an alleged assault in Sunshine West on May 23 and that the incident involved two people known to each other.

“The women left the area following the incident and did not require medical attention,” the spokesperson said.

The CCTV footage has been provided to police.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62993

File: 2b3421d3b3dd389⋯.mp4 (15.98 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763762 (270552ZJUN26) Notable: Matthew Guy demands apology after police dismiss Moira Deeming’s assault claim - (Video) Former Victorian Liberal leader Matthew Guy has demanded a public apology from Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming after Victoria Police concluded there was "no offence detected" following her allegation that he assaulted her at a community function. Police reviewed CCTV footage before deciding Guy had no case to answer. Guy said "there was no ambiguity" and that he did not do what had been alleged, while leaving open the possibility of legal action. Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson said Guy "does deserve an apology" and would discuss the matter with Deeming on her return from overseas. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said investigators based their decision on the available evidence, particularly the CCTV footage.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

Matthew Guy demands apology after police dismiss Moira Deeming’s assault claim

Chip Le Grand - June 26, 2026

Former Liberal leader Matthew Guy has demanded a public apology from his party room colleague Moira Deeming for making an unfounded assault allegation against him.

It came after Victoria Police reviewed CCTV footage of an innocuous interaction between Guy and Deeming at a community function last month, and concluded on Thursday he had no case to answer.

He said he was also owed an apology from Premier Jacinta Allan and Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny who on Thursday sought to exploit the turmoil caused by Deeming’s claims for political gain.

“They can come to me the honourable and easy way or a harder way,” said Guy, who was flanked by his lawyer as he read a short statement addressing for the first time the allegations levelled against him.

“My family name, my reputation, is not a political toy – no one’s is,” he said.

“There was no ambiguity. I did not do what was alleged.”

Opposition Leader Jess Wilson backed Guy and said she would discuss the matter with Deeming when she returns to Melbourne from London, where she is attending a conservative political conference.

“Matthew does deserve an apology,” she said. “I think that it is entirely reasonable that he has asked for that. I’m devastated for Matthew.”

Guy has left open the possibility of legal action against Deeming. His solicitor, Candice Almeida from Queenie Thompson Lawyers, said Guy had “endured immense personal and professional harm” since Deeming first accused him of assault.

“False allegations have devastating consequences,” she said. “They can damage a person’s reputation, career, mental health and their family life, even when those allegations are ultimately found to be unsubstantiated.”

Guy and Wilson’s comments will add to momentum within both the parliamentary and administrative ranks of the Victorian Liberal Party to hold Deeming to account for making spurious claims about a colleague and potentially bringing the party into disrepute.

Deeming accused Guy of assaulting her by putting her in a violent headlock while the pair were seated at a Macedonian community dinner on May 23.

She made a formal complaint to police on June 16. Victoria Police announced on Thursday they had concluded their investigation and “no offence had been detected”.

Guy was not questioned by police as part of the investigation. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush on Friday told 3AW that video footage taken from inside the venue was the decisive evidence.

“Often it is a matter of perception but we deal with reality and we deal with evidence and that is what we have made our decision based on,” he said. “It is mainly based on the video that is in the public domain.

“I think everybody has come to a similar conclusion.”

Guy told this masthead on Thursday night that Deeming’s claims were ridiculous and unsubstantiated.

Deeming, in text messages to colleagues, claimed Guy grabbed her roughly on the back of the neck and likened the force involved to being smashed in the base of her skull with a wine bottle.

CCTV footage from inside the venue instead shows Guy briefly resting his right hand on Deeming’s shoulder as the pair lean in to have a conversation in a crowded, noisy room.

“Police have concluded an investigation following reports of an assault at a function venue on Sommerville Road in Sunshine West on 23 May,” Victoria Police said in a statement.

“It was reported a woman was assaulted by a man at the event.

“Following a thorough investigation, it has been determined there was no offence detected.”

Deeming was contacted for a response.

She has not publicly explained the discrepancy between her version of events and the video footage.

One Liberal MP said there was “white-hot anger” among colleagues about what Deeming had done, and they expected the party to take action.

“Doing nothing is not an option,” he said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Even MPs who supported Deeming throughout her previous dispute with the party and former leader John Pesutto have now distanced themselves from the upper house MP, who was recently pre-selected to stand again as a Liberal candidate in the Western Metropolitan Region.

Under the Liberal Party’s constitution, any MP found to have brought the party into disrepute would face expulsion from the party.

http://archive.today/bPEgb

https://www.nine.com.au/australia-news/vic/former-victorian-liberal-leader-demands-apologies-after-assault-allegation-quashed-by-police-20260626-p60ahj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62994

File: de7880c9bbc3846⋯.mp4 (10.36 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 7ed5457ad7ae4a8⋯.jpg (145.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 628d5ab7447bfa1⋯.jpg (190.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: da18bb745dd931f⋯.jpg (155.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763789 (270619ZJUN26) Notable: Matthew Guy demands Moira Deeming apologise for assault claim after police found ‘no offence’ - (Video) Former Victorian Liberal leader Matthew Guy has demanded public apologies from Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming, Premier Jacinta Allan and Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny after Victoria Police concluded its investigation into Deeming's assault allegation and found "no offence detected". Guy said the CCTV footage proved "there was no ambiguity" and warned those involved could apologise "the honourable and easy way, or a harder way", leaving open the prospect of legal action. Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson backed his call for an apology, saying Guy "does deserve an apology" and describing the impact on him and his family as "devastating". Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said investigators based their decision on the available evidence, particularly the CCTV footage, explaining that police "deal with reality" and evidence rather than perception when assessing allegations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

>>62993

Matthew Guy demands Moira Deeming apologise for assault claim after police found ‘no offence’

RACHEL BAXENDALE - June 26, 2026

1/4

Matthew Guy has demanded a public apology from his Liberal colleague Moira Deeming, the Premier and the Attorney-General, after police confirmed overnight they had concluded their investigation into Ms Deeming’s allegation that the former opposition leader had physically assaulted her, finding “no offence detected”.

Opposition Leader Jess Wilson has backed her frontbench colleague’s demand, saying she is “devastated” for him, and refusing to speculate on Ms Deeming’s future in the Liberal Party, other than to say that she has requested to meet with the MP when she returns from overseas.

In a veiled threat of possible legal action, Mr Guy said on Friday morning that Ms Deeming, Jacinta Allan and Sonya Kilkenny could either “come to me the honourable and easy way, or a harder way.”

With the backing of the Premier standing next to her, Ms Kilkenny on Thursday declared that Ms Wilson had questions to answer about whether Mr Guy should remain in shadow cabinet, or indeed the Liberal partyroom, in light of the allegations.

“My wife, my sons, my parents, my brother, my cousins, my family who share my name deserve those apologies as well. My family name, my reputation is not a political toy. No one’s is, and so I want, and my family deserve those apologies, particularly from Moira Deeming,” Mr Guy said in a statement to journalists, after which he refused to take questions.

“There was no ambiguity. I did not do what was alleged. The CCTV proves this. It did from the start, and Victoria Police agree.”

The Liberal spokesman for public transport, ports and freight said Australian men seem to be universally “blamed, scapegoated, not believed, and now thrown under the bus, even by our own government.”

“The Premier and the Attorney-General yesterday told every Victorian male over 40, they don’t have your back. They never believe you. In (their) eyes, you’re guilty before proven innocent” he said.

“To Aussie males who are sick of this treatment, who are sick of not being believed, some of us in parliament still have your back. I have your back. Your word matters as much as anyone else’s. You shouldn’t have to prove your innocence.”

Mr Guy said that with the obvious exception of Ms Deeming, his Coalition colleagues had been a “strong support” to him and his family since the allegations surfaced.

“I am deeply appreciative of the support many have given and have offered. I’m deeply appreciative of my Liberal and National colleagues. They are good people. They’d be a good government,” he said.

“I’m appreciative of the immense support from my mates, my staff, those who have helped me through this time. My whole family has been deeply hurt by these allegations. I am owed the apologies I seek. Any reasonable and decent person would agree.”

A response has been sought from Ms Deeming.

Mr Guy’s lawyer, Candice Almeida, said her client had consistently maintained his innocence.

“Following a thorough police investigation, including a review of the available CCTV footage, the investigation has now been closed, and there have been no charges laid,” Ms Almeida said.

“That outcome speaks for itself. False allegations have devastating consequences. They can damage a person’s reputation, career, mental health, and their family life, even where those allegations are ultimately found to be unsubstantiated.

“My client has endured immense personal and professional harm as a consequence of those allegations.

“He hopes that the outcome serves as a reminder that allegations of this nature should be carefully investigated before conclusions are reached, and that every person is entitled to the presumption of innocence.

“Women should always be believed, but so should men. Their voices should be no less than anyone else, no less than any woman, and I hope that today onwards, that everyone remembers that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62995

File: eaf4f84b1366695⋯.jpg (356.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763796 (270634ZJUN26) Notable: Union chief’s court move to block Operation Richmond unfolds in secret - United Firefighters Union state secretary Peter Marshall has launched a Supreme Court challenge seeking to block the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission's Operation Richmond investigation into a 2016 pay and conditions agreement between the union and the Andrews government. Justice Claire Harris closed the two-day hearing to the public as Marshall and the union argued the inquiry was "unlawful for various reasons". Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal rejected applications by Marshall and the union to conceal their identities during the proceedings. IBAC said it remained committed to releasing its report once the litigation concludes and described the appeal ruling rejecting pseudonym orders as supporting the "transparency Victorians deserve". The investigation has been conducted largely in private since 2018.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62711

>>62739

>>62747

>>62910

>>62924

>>62925

Union chief’s court move to block Operation Richmond unfolds in secret

DAMON JOHNSTON - June 24, 2026

Peter Marshall’s last-ditch legal bid to block an eight-year anti-corruption investigation is unfolding in a secret hearing in the Victorian Supreme Court.

Justice Claire Harris on Wednesday closed the court for the two-day proceeding launched by the United Firefighters Union and its state secretary as they challenge the legality of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission’s inquiry into a 2016 pay and conditions deal between the UFU and the Andrews government.

Mr Marshall and the UFU were earlier this month unmasked as the mystery parties trying to block IBAC’s Operation Richmond when the Court of Appeal rejected their applications for pseudonyms.

IBAC is contesting Mr Marshall’s legal challenge to Operation Richmond — triggered by a complaint from a Labor figure in 2018 — and remains committed to releasing the report.

The agency welcomed this month’s Court of Appeal’s decision rejecting Mr Marshall’s bid to remain anonymous as a win for “transparency”.

“The court’s decision to uphold the refusal of a pseudonym order is in the public interest and supports the transparency Victorians deserve,” an agency spokesperson said.

“We remain committed to the release of the special report, pending the resolution of court proceedings.”

The investigation has been running under tight secrecy since 2018 and while no public hearings were called, scores of witnesses – including then premier Daniel Andrews and Mr marshall – were grilled in private by IBAC.

The investigation has been digging into the 2016 pay-and-conditions negotiations between the Andrews government and the UFU and Mr Marshall.

After losing his bid to keep his identity under wraps, Mr Marshall said he and the UFU had commenced legal action in the Supreme Court alleging that the “so-called Operation Richmond” was “unlawful for various reasons”.

“Pseudonyms have often been given in the past to persons challenging the legality of IBAC’s conduct,” Mr Marshall stated.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/union-chiefs-court-move-to-block-operation-richmond-unfolds-in-secret/news-story/e4dfd0066c32dab6d6004e0df7c45983

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62996

File: eafeaa5b74f4b3c⋯.jpg (490.13 KB,2028x1141,2028:1141,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5264fd6e28ca345⋯.jpg (121.66 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e8c86b93c8b9894⋯.jpg (126.51 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763817 (270705ZJUN26) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith case triggers Coalition rift as MP parades Andrew Hastie critic - A disagreement linked to the Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes case has exposed tensions within the Coalition after Opposition defence personnel spokesman Phillip Thompson hosted Afghanistan veteran Scott Jones at Parliament House. Jones, a supporter of Roberts-Smith, has publicly criticised Liberal leadership contender Andrew Hastie for giving evidence in Roberts-Smith's defamation trial and recently made a crude gesture at the Australian War Memorial beside an exhibit connected to the spouse of a prosecution witness. Thompson rejected suggestions the visit reflected internal divisions, saying MPs regularly met people with differing views and insisting he and Hastie continued to work together. Hastie recently told Coalition colleagues he had received additional security following threats and intimidation linked to supporters of Roberts-Smith.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62752

>>62968

>>62975

>>62983

>>62984

Ben Roberts-Smith case triggers Coalition rift as MP parades Andrew Hastie critic

BEN PACKHAM - June 24, 2026

1/2

The Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes allegations have triggered a rupture on the Coalition frontbench, after defence personnel spokesman Phillip Thompson ­paraded a prominent critic of ­Liberal leadership contender Andrew Hastie around Parliament House in Canberra.

Mr Thompson signed Afghanistan veteran Scott Jones into the parliament on Tuesday and gave him a tour of the building in what colleagues said was a “declaration of war” against Mr Hastie.

Mr Jones, a former 2nd Commando Regiment signaller, earlier attended a function at the Australian War Memorial where he made a crude gesture while standing next to an exhibit for the spouse of a witness who testified against Mr Roberts-Smith in his defamation case against Nine Newspapers.

Mr Jones is a key supporter of the former SAS corporal and has publicly criticised Mr Hastie over his decision to give evidence against the accused war criminal, who the Liberal frontbencher served with when he was an SAS captain in Afghanistan.

Mr Hastie revealed in the Coalition partyroom this week that he had been granted additional security at his home and electorate office amid an orchestrated campaign against him fuelled by Mr Roberts-Smith’s supporters and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.

Given the personal attacks against Mr Hastie, a colleague said Mr Thompson’s decision to sign Mr Jones into the parliament was an “exceptionally provocative” move.

Mr Hastie declined to comment, while Mr Thompson played down the rift.

“People from all walks of life visit parliament every week. The fact that someone may have expressed a view about a politician in the past does not turn every interaction into a factional drama,” Mr Thompson, a fellow Afghanistan veteran, told The Australian.

“Australians expect their representatives to engage broadly, ­listen widely and be confident enough to hear perspectives they may not always agree with.

“Andrew Hastie and I have worked together on matters of substance and will continue to do so. We’re focused on the challenges facing the country, not on concocting stories about who spoke to whom in the corridors of Parliament House.”

He added: “Ben Roberts-Smith deserves the presumption of innocence and is innocent until proven guilty.”

Mr Thompson’s electorate of Herbert is based around the garrison town of Townsville, where 36 per cent of his constituents are ADF members, veterans or their families.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62997

File: 68c0e7d2ebf31fa⋯.jpg (356.11 KB,2560x1440,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2947471eb57ee8d⋯.jpg (492.48 KB,2560x1708,640:427,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c3946ba454d717a⋯.jpg (680.62 KB,2560x1708,640:427,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6841a8e1c559ca2⋯.jpg (395.64 KB,2560x1440,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ecd3bc4b5166b0b⋯.jpg (660.79 KB,2560x1440,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763844 (270732ZJUN26) Notable: Gina Rinehart honours Ben Roberts-Smith with new housing for homeless veterans - Mining executive Gina Rinehart has funded a new accommodation complex for homeless veterans in Perth and named it the "Ben Roberts-Smith Beach Houses" after Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith, who is facing five war crimes charges, including murder. Mrs Rinehart’s company, Hancock Prospecting, published a statement saying the facility provides more than 20 beds for short and long-term accommodation as part of its support for former Australian Defence Force personnel. Rinehart is also an honorary guardian of Soldier On, a charity that assists current and former defence personnel who have been physically or psychologically injured during military service. She said she hoped the housing would bring "some comfort" to struggling veterans, adding they were "owed a great debt by this nation". Roberts-Smith has denied the allegations against him.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62903

>>62934

>>62722

>>62838

Gina Rinehart honours Ben Roberts-Smith with new housing for homeless veterans

PAIGE TAYLOR - June 25, 2026

Mining billionaire Gina Rinehart has purchased accommodation for homeless veterans and named it after Ben Roberts-Smith, the Victoria Cross recipient charged with five war crimes, including murder.

Mrs Rinehart has funded housing for veterans in the past but it did not grab attention in the same way; this time, the words “Ben Roberts-Smith Beach Houses” are painted large on the exterior of the homeless complex. Passers by on Perth’s busy Scarborough Beach Road were intrigued.

On Wednesday, Mrs Rinehart’s company Hancock Prospecting published a statement confirming the beach houses are her latest contribution to reducing homelessness among former Australian Defence Force personnel.

The complex can accommodate more than 20 beds and will provide short and long term accommodation for veterans, according to the media statement.

Mrs Rinehart is an honorary guardian of Soldier On, the not-for-profit organisation established in 2012 to support defence personnel injured physically or psychologically in the line of duty. Governor-General Sam Mostyn is the patron-in-chief of Soldier On.

Mrs Rinehart has made public statements in support of Mr Roberts-Smith before and since his arrest in April.

A statement published by the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Special Investigator says it is alleged that, while deployed to Afghanistan as a member of the Australian Defence Force, Mr Roberts-Smith “intentionally caused the deaths of five Afghan nationals who were not taking an active part in the hostilities, between 2009 and 2012”.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s parents, Len and Sue Roberts-Smith, officially opened the new complex for homeless veterans named after him.

In written comments published on the website of Hancock Prospecting, Mrs Rinehart said in part: “I hope this accommodation, even more desperately needed as we move into the winter months, will bring some comfort to our struggling veterans, who after sacrificing so much for us are owed a great debt by this nation”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/gina-rinehart-honours-ben-robertssmith-with-new-housing-for-homeless-veterans/news-story/8d749d107ed5f3558ea370177d66a7a5

https://www.hancockprospecting.com.au/homeless-veterans-move-into-first-homes-delivered-under-hancock-prospectings-200-million-commitment/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62998

File: 931535a16c7e574⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,2049x3072,683:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a888eb1383bfa16⋯.jpg (382.64 KB,2550x3300,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf69620c51401f4⋯.pdf (335.59 KB,Clipboard.pdf)

File: ec4d9ccf0b9faa1⋯.jpg (320.47 KB,2550x3300,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 94b6962088a9737⋯.pdf (1.01 MB,Clipboard.pdf)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24763875 (270817ZJUN26) Notable: After release of Epstein files, Ghislaine Maxwell again challenges her conviction - Ghislaine Maxwell has asked a US federal court to overturn her 2021 sex-trafficking conviction, arguing that documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act contain new evidence that makes her conviction "invalid, unsafe and infirm". Representing herself, Maxwell claims the disclosures support allegations that prosecutors withheld evidence, witnesses gave false testimony and constitutional violations affected her trial. Federal prosecutors have rejected the claims as "baseless", arguing the newly released material would not have changed the jury's verdict and does not justify an evidentiary hearing. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence, has exhausted her direct appeals and says she will seek further review if her latest petition is unsuccessful.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62960

After release of Epstein files, Ghislaine Maxwell again challenges her conviction

Maxwell claims material in the files invalidates her sex-trafficking conviction.

James Hill - June 25, 2026

1/2

Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell argues in a newly unsealed petition in federal court that documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act have exposed alleged constitutional and legal violations that render her 2021 sex-trafficking conviction "invalid, unsafe and infirm," according to court documents made public on Wednesday.

Maxwell - who is serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison camp in Texas for aiding and participating in Epstein's trafficking of underage girls - contends that among the millions of files disclosed by the Justice Department since the law passed in November are records that have "expanded the evidentiary landscape" of her case beyond what was considered by the trial judge and the appellate courts.

"No reasonable juror would have convicted her had these documents been placed before the jury or had the material [been] made available for cross examination and impeachment purposes," Maxwell wrote in her filing, which had been sealed since its submission in April.

Maxwell, 64, is representing herself in an effort to have her conviction vacated or her sentence reduced. She argues that the cumulative effect of the newly disclosed records demonstrates the need for an evidentiary hearing and contends that "further factual development is necessary."

She cites DOJ documents from the Epstein files that she alleges offer new support to her arguments that the government withheld relevant evidence, that witnesses testified falsely, and that attorneys for Epstein's victims acted as de facto prosecutors in her criminal case.

Federal prosecutors in New York, in a sweeping rebuttal spanning nearly 100 pages, called her claims speculative, factually erroneous and procedurally barred, according to a May 19 filing that was also unsealed Wednesday.

"The defendant seeks to sweep away the judgment of conviction representing the solemn verdict of a jury," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, the only member of the government's trial team still working in the prosecutor's office in the Southern District of New York.

"[Maxwell's] lengthy papers make repeated baseless claims of government misconduct, unmoored from law, logic or the record," Pomerantz wrote in urging the court to swiftly reject Maxwell's petition and her request for an evidentiary hearing.

"Her victims deserve finality," Pomerantz wrote. "The supposedly new evidence the defendant cites ... affords her no relief."

The government conceded in its filing that, in some instances, documents that are now public were not in possession of Maxwell's attorneys before her trial - but argued that none of those occurrences amounted to legal or constitutional violations or would have impacted the verdict.

Maxwell - in a reply to the government filed earlier this month - argued that the government's approach to her petition attempts to "minimize each category" of evidence individually, rather than evaluating the Epstein files and other post-trial developments as "components of a larger evidentiary picture."

"The issues presented here are not routine. The petition involves a substantial body of post-trial evidence disclosed years after conviction through a statutory transparency process that did not exist during the underlying proceedings," Maxwell wrote in her reply. "The Court's task therefore is not to evaluate each disclosure in isolation, but to consider the cumulative force of a record that is substantially different from the record available during trial, direct appeal, and prior collateral review."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.62999

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24767246 (280949ZJUN26) Notable: Islamic State bride accused of keeping a slave released on bail - (Video) Kawsar Ahmad, an alleged Islamic State affiliate charged with crimes against humanity involving the alleged enslavement of a Yazidi teenager, has been granted bail after a court found any risk to the community could be managed through strict conditions. Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan ruled there was no evidence Ahmad currently supported or advocated terrorist acts, despite accepting she had previously supported Islamic State. Ahmad must live with her mother, observe a nightly curfew, report regularly to police, avoid mosques and social media, and provide a $75,000 surety. Prosecutors allege Ahmad and her husband purchased a 15-year-old Yazidi girl in Syria in 2017 and subjected her to slavery. Ahmad denies the allegations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62856

>>62956

>>62964

Islamic State bride accused of keeping a slave released on bail

Erin Pearson - June 26, 2026

A so-called ISIS bride accused of keeping a slave has been released on bail after a magistrate found her risk to the community could be managed with strict conditions, including that she does not possess firearms.

Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan found that while Kawsar Ahmad, 54, supported Islamic State at one time, she had not made statements supporting or advocating for terrorist acts that would make her an unacceptable risk if released.

Ahmad will have to live with her mother in community housing and must abide by a nightly curfew, report to police, not attend mosques or use social media and provide a $75,000 surety as part of her bail conditions.

Victoria Police dispatched more than a dozen officers to the court precinct to help escort Ahmad from inside the building to an awaiting car. Officers were also in place to stop traffic when she was released.

The prosecution allege she was a long-time supporter of Islamic State and travelled to the Middle East with her family in August 2014, where she later worked as a religious leader, engaged in slavery and held an IS identification card.

The court heard that by January 2016, the Ahmad family were living in Syria. Videos of their home at the time show an IS flag on a wall and an AK-47 lying on the floor of their living room.

Police allege a 15-year-old Yazidi girl was forcibly taken from her village in 2014 and sold as a sex slave, traded among 17 IS soldiers.

In 2017, she was allegedly purchased by Kawsar Ahmad’s husband for $US10,000 and taken to the family home to be inspected by him and his wife.

He allegedly told the teen: “I bought you for the purpose of raping and at the same time, serving the home.”

Police allege Ahmad treated the complainant poorly, and asked her husband to beat the teen.

Ahmad was arrested, alongside her daughter Zeinab, at Melbourne Airport on their arrival in Australia on May 7.

She is charged with crimes against humanity: enslavement, possessing and using a slave, and engaging in slave trading.

Her defence argued Ahmad returned to live a quiet life in Australia and had filed divorce proceedings against her husband.

She told a psychologist: “I’ve never agreed with their beliefs like kill, kill, kill. I’m not a supporter of Islamic State. My son was brainwashed. I hate them regardless. My husband was pulled in because of my son.”

The court heard that while in Syria, the doctor believes Ahmad identified with and was fixated by IS but that this was no longer the case.

“It’s very unlikely her views will resurface. She’s not concealing an ongoing devotion or attraction to IS,” the expert said.

Re-radicalisation, the court heard, was “vanishingly rare”.

In arguing for bail, the accused woman’s lawyers had submitted that Ahmad lived with significant mental health disorders including PTSD and required the advice of her daughters to make decisions.

Ahmad smiled at her family seated in the courtroom, including a daughter and brother, as the bail decision was delivered.

Zeinab Ahmad was denied bail earlier this month when Hannan found there was no clear and compelling evidence that she had renounced her extremist views, and that there were no bail conditions that could make the risk of her release acceptable.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/islamic-state-bride-accused-of-keeping-a-slave-released-on-bail-20260618-p607z0.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YfLYKFS01k

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63000

File: 4219a25ea7da21f⋯.mp4 (5.23 MB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.mp4)

File: a8a1a83620a8bc4⋯.jpg (571.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1b8dc352cbfbb1⋯.jpg (335.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2cb1abf01c839d⋯.jpg (105.23 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fb786dd11c934f9⋯.jpg (114.73 KB,1144x858,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24767254 (280959ZJUN26) Notable: Accused ISIS bride granted bail in Australian-first prosecution - A Victorian court has granted bail to Kawsar Abbas, who is charged with four crimes against humanity offences over the alleged enslavement of a Yazidi teenager while living under Islamic State rule in Syria. Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan found strict bail conditions could adequately manage any risk, relying heavily on evidence from forensic clinical psychologist Dr Michael Davis that Abbas had renounced Islamic State and that re-radicalisation was "vanishingly rare". Abbas must live with her mother, report regularly to police, observe a nightly curfew, surrender her travel documents and comply with strict communication restrictions. Hannan found the prosecution case "cannot be described as weak" but was not satisfied Abbas posed an unacceptable risk. Her daughter, Zeinab Ahmad, remains in custody after being refused bail.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62856

>>62956

>>62964

>>62999

Accused ISIS bride granted bail in Australian-first prosecution

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 26, 2026

1/2

A Victorian court has granted bail to an accused “ISIS bride” facing allegations of enslaving a Yazidi teenager, one week after the same magistrate deemed her daughter too dangerous to release.

On Friday Chief Magistrate Lisa Hannan affirmed the release of Kawsar Abbas after finding strict bail conditions were sufficient to manage the risk posed by the 54-year-old as she awaited an Australian-first crime against humanity prosecution.

Ms Abbas walked free at 7.30pm, when members of her family swiftly scurried her into a waiting Land Rover outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court. Ten police formed a line for them to escort her out.

Ms Abbas will reside with her mother in a suburban Melbourne home, with her brother, Abraham Abbas, guaranteeing a $75,000 surety. She must report to police three times a week, comply with a nightly curfew and surrender all passports and travel documents.

Ms Abbas also is required to provide the Australian Federal Police with her mobile phone number and PIN, is restricted to possessing a single mobile phone and is prohibited from making or answering calls to anyone outside Australia. She also is barred from attending mosques or engaging in any paid or unpaid work involving religious studies.

Ms Abbas’s family members sighed with relief when the ruling was handed down.

She walked free at 7.30pm, and members of her family swiftly hurried her into a waiting Land Rover outside the Melbourne Magistrates Court, where 10 police officers formed a line for them to escort her out.

Ms Hannan’s judgment depended heavily on the evidence of forensic clinical psychologist Michael Davis, who found there was “simply nothing” to suggest she remained committed to extremist ideology.

“The applicant told Dr Davis and made a statement through her counsel, that she renounces both IS and all violent extremism,” Ms Hannan wrote in her judgment.

Dr Davis, who assessed Ms Abbas after more than five hours of interviews, described re-radicalisation as “vanishingly rare” and said she had told him: “I never agreed with their views like ‘kill, kill, kill’.” According to the judgment, Ms Abbas also told Dr Davis she had not seen her husband, Mohammed Ahmad, since 2019 and had started divorce proceedings against him.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63001

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24767260 (281008ZJUN26) Notable: Bondi hero Ahmed al Ahmed fronts court over alleged assault of father - (Video) Ahmed al Ahmed, who was hailed as a hero after disarming one of the attackers during the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, has appeared in court charged with allegedly assaulting and intimidating his father during an incident at a Bankstown home in March. The 44-year-old has pleaded not guilty to one count of common assault and one count of stalking or intimidation. Outside court, his lawyer, Mohamad Sakr, said Ahmed's "honesty and dignity should be maintained" and that his presumption of innocence must be respected. Ahmed has denied wrongdoing, saying, "I never hurt anyone and I never been violent." His brothers, Hozifa al Ahmed and Sameh al Ahmed, have separately pleaded not guilty to allegedly making verbal threats against him and are subject to interim domestic violence orders preventing them from coming within 100 metres of Ahmed or any place where he lives or works.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62879

Bondi hero Ahmed al Ahmed fronts court over alleged assault of father

Perry Duffin - June 24, 2026

Bondi Beach hero Ahmed al Ahmed has fronted court accused of assaulting his father, six months after he was celebrated for disarming a gunman during Australia’s worst terror attack.

The 44-year-old from Sydney’s south was charged earlier this month with assaulting his father and putting him in a headlock at a home in Bankstown.

He is facing one count of common assault and a second of stalking/intimidation over the alleged incident in March.

His lawyer Mohamad Sakr entered not guilty pleas to both charges and spoke for Ahmed outside court on Wednesday.

“He is a heroic man, and his honesty and dignity should be maintained until these matters are ultimately determined,” Sakr said.

“My client maintains his plea. These charges will be determined before a court of law.”

Sakr said Ahmed’s presumption of innocence must be upheld.

Ahmed tackled and disarmed Sajid Akram, 50, who was firing on crowds of Jewish families at a Hanukkah festival in mid-December.

Akram and his son Naveed allegedly murdered 15 and injured dozens more in the attack, including Ahmed.

Shocking footage from the scene showed Ahmed pulling a weapon from Sajid.

Sajid was shot dead by NSW Police while Naveed was gravely wounded and is now standing trial on dozens of counts of murder, terrorism, attempted murder and wounding.

A GoFundMe page established to support Ahmed, who was hospitalised with gunshot wounds, raised more than $2.6 million in donations from almost 50,000 people, including American billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, Hollywood comedian Amy Schumer, and Charlton Howard, the given name of Australian musician The Kid Laroi.

Ahmed has denied wrongdoing.

“I never hurt anyone and I never been violent,” he told 2GB after being charged.

“When I disarmed the terrorist and take his gun, I throw it away. I didn’t hurt him, I’m not violent.”

His brothers Hozifa al Ahmed, 35, and Sameh al Ahmed, 33, appeared at the same court in May, charged with verbally threatening al Ahmed.

Hozifa and Sameh both entered pleas of not guilty. An interim domestic violence protection order was placed on the pair, prohibiting them from going within 100 metres of their brother or any place he lives or works.

Ahmed’s case is listed for hearing in December.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/bondi-hero-ahmed-al-ahmed-fronts-court-over-alleged-assault-of-father-20260624-p609md.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0wKkvfQsuU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63002

File: a00ce1679e31412⋯.jpg (282.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24767268 (281012ZJUN26) Notable: Virginia Giuffre left ‘significantly larger’ fortune than known, court hears - A Supreme Court hearing in Western Australia has been told that the estate of Virginia Giuffre, who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of trafficking her as a teenager, is worth "rather larger" than previously understood. Lawyer McLane Edinger said the interim administrator required more time because of "complex issues" involving Family Court proceedings and a family trust. The estate has previously been estimated at more than $20 million, including an undisclosed settlement paid by Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in 2022 after Giuffre discontinued her civil sexual assault claim against him. The court also heard hospitals, a health centre and an international accounting firm had been asked to provide documents relevant to the estate dispute.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62682

>>62967

Virginia Giuffre left ‘significantly larger’ fortune than known, court hears

PAIGE TAYLOR - June 22, 2026

Virginia Giuffre – who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein as a teenager and received an undisclosed settlement from Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor – died with a “rather larger” net worth than has been confirmed so far in the legal dispute over her estate, the West Australian Supreme Court has been told.

At a case management hearing on Monday in the battle over Giuffre’s estate, lawyer McLane Edinger said the interim administrator of that estate, Perth lawyer Ian Blatchford, needed more time to do his work because he had been dealing with “complex issues”.

“There is quite a bit that has occurred as to why he needs more time that pertains to issues in the Family Court and family trust,” Mr Edinger told the court during the brief case management hearing at the David Malcolm Justice Centre in Perth’s CBD.

“The size of the estate is rather larger than what has been espoused in pleadings.”

Outside court, Giuffre’s estate has previously been estimated to be worth more than $20m, partly because of an undisclosed sum Mr Mountbatten-Windsor paid her in 2022, before his brother, King Charles, stripped him of his royal titles. Giuffre had claimed Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, trafficked her to Mr Mountbatten-Windsor on three occasions when she was 17. Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing. Giuffre dropped her civil sex assault case against him after the confidential settlement.

It is unclear how much money may have flowed to Giuffre’s estate since her death as a result of her memoir, Nobody’s Girl, published after she was found deceased at her hobby farm north of Perth in April 2025.

In the Perth court case over Giuffre’s estate, Mr Edinger represents Giuffre’s former lawyer, Karrie Louden, and Giuffre’s housekeeper, Cheryl Myers, who has also been described as Giuffre’s carer.

So far, the Supreme Court case over Giuffre’s estate has been provided with documents outlining fundamental disagreement over Giuffre’s intentions and an unsigned will, according to media reports about the earliest hearings.

The Perth court was told on Monday that Giuffre’s estranged husband, Robert, was represented by a lawyer in the dispute over her estate but that lawyer did not take part in the case management hearing on Monday.

Virginia and Robert Giuffre had three children together and the family of five moved to Perth in 2020 after a stint in Queensland. The couple reportedly separated in late 2023. Neither the date of their separation or details about their children were discussed in the hearing on Monday.

The court was told that hospitals, a suburban health centre and an international accounting firm had been asked to provide documents that could be relevant to the case.

Giuffre had been hospitalised several times in the year before her death, according to her contemporaneous social media posts and statements by her publicist.

She was 41 when she was found deceased at her farm north of Perth on April 25, 2025. A family statement issued by her New York-based publicist, Dini von Mueffling, the following day said in part: “She lost her life to suicide after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking.”

Epstein died in New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Centre in 2019 while charged with sex trafficking offences. Maxwell has been in a US prison since June 2022 for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors as young as 14.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/virginia-giuffre-left-significantly-larger-fortune-than-known-court-hears/news-story/336c2e1c988359ecf722bff418dbb354

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63003

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24767277 (281023ZJUN26) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s family call for a coronial Inquest into her death - (Video) Virginia Giuffre's family has called for a coronial inquest into her death, arguing systemic failures should be examined after she died by suicide in Western Australia in April 2025. Her brother, Sky Roberts, and sister-in-law, Amanda Roberts, have asked State Coroner Rosalinda Fogliani to investigate the circumstances leading to her death, including her experiences of domestic violence and the systems that supported her. Roberts said Giuffre wanted people to understand "abuse cannot be fit inside a box" and hoped any investigation would help prevent similar tragedies. The request is supported by domestic violence researchers and advocates. A Coroner's Court spokesperson confirmed the matter remains under active investigation and no public information would be released while inquiries continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>39062 (pb)

>>62682

>>62913

>>62929

>>62960

>>62985

Virginia Giuffre’s family call for a coronial Inquest into her death

The family of Virginia Giuffre, a victim of notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, has demanded answers over her death, saying the system let her down.

Emma Kirk - June 24, 2026

1/2

Virginia Giuffre’s family are calling for a coronial inquest into her death, which occurred while she was fighting domestic violence accusations in court.

Ms Giuffre took her own life aged 41 at a farm she owned north of Perth in April 2025 after years of fighting for justice to see US sex trafficker Jeffrey Esptein prosecuted.

She alleged Epstein trafficked her to have sex with former prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and other prominent figures across the globe when she was a teenager.

Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied the claims and has never been charged with any criminal offences but was sued by Ms Giuffre for sexual abuse in 2021.

He reached an out-of-court settlement with her.

Ms Giuffre died six months before her powerful memoir Nobody’s Girl was released, documenting years of horrific abuse she suffered at the hands of her father before she was recruited by Epstein conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

Despite being a powerful advocate for sexual abuse victims for many years, Ms Giuffre was accused of breaching a domestic violence-related order before her death.

Her family argue systematic failures let her down.

Her brother and sister-in-law Sky and Amanda Roberts wrote to West Australian Coroner Rosalinda Fogliani requesting a coronial inquest into her death.

Ms Roberts said Ms Giuffre was a global figure, but her brothers lost a piece of themselves when she died and would never recover.

“That emotional toll of losing a sibling itself is already a layer that changes your life, you can never look at life the same losing someone that close to you,” she told ABC Perth. “Then the layer of her legacy and her impact, and what her voice means to the world, taking on that mantle.

“It’s been a very difficult year just trying to navigate how we can do the best for her, for her children and for the legacy that she’s left behind and making sure that it stays intact.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63004

File: 2e2fc55de33121a⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 367b475af41d994⋯.jpg (105.63 KB,510x680,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12ea88261dbac66⋯.jpg (444.5 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24769926 (291002ZJUN26) Notable: Bondi terror attack survivor Arsen Ostrovsky tells antisemitism royal commission he received 'influx of hate' - Bondi Beach terrorist attack survivor Arsen Ostrovsky has told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion he was subjected to an "influx of hate" online within hours of the attack, including manipulated images, conspiracy theories and antisemitic abuse while he was awaiting surgery. Ostrovsky said he was falsely labelled a "crisis actor", "trauma tourist" and "intelligence asset", with the abuse becoming "overwhelming" and "dehumanising". Businessman Steven Lowy also described extensive online abuse targeting his family, including violent threats against his father, Holocaust survivor Frank Lowy, saying security staff had documented more than 15,000 incidents in the past year. Other witnesses described antisemitic bullying of children and difficulties having abusive online content removed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

Bondi terror attack survivor tells antisemitism royal commission he received 'influx of hate'

Phoebe Pin - 29 June 2026

1/2

Deepfake and altered images depicting a Bondi Beach terror attack survivor holding an Academy Award while covered in blood spread "like wildfire" online just hours after the shooting, a royal commission has heard.

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has entered its third hearing block, which will focus on the spread of hate speech online and in traditional media sources.

Warning: This story contains graphic images of a person with bloody physical injuries.

The inquiry was called earlier this year after 15 people died during the terror attack in Sydney's east on December 14, 2025.

Witnesses to be called on Monday have all experienced antisemitic hate speech, including Bondi Beach terror attack survivor Arsen Ostrovsky.

Mr Ostrovsky told the royal commission an image of his injuries shared on X about two hours after the shooting prompted offensive comments and manipulated images.

"There were messages of solidarity, but there was almost immediately an influx of hate, of abuse, of vilification, of AI manipulation," he said.

"It was surreal to be in the state that I was in hospital and seeing this material at the same time."

He said social media comments labelled him a "trauma tourist" and an actor in a "false flag attack", while some claimed the blood depicted in his photo was instead ketchup or paint.

Examples of manipulated pictures posted online that were shown to the royal commission include one of a bandage having been removed from his head, a photo of his bloodied face after the attack with tomato sauce bottle references and another with an Academy Award added to the image.

The commission was also shown an AI-generated image which depicted Mr Ostrovsky sitting on the ground laughing while someone painted his face red.

"This was happening as I was literally being prepped to go into surgery," he said.

'Impossible' to block out

Mr Ostrovsky said some of the content was still online, including a YouTube video in which he was accused of being a "crisis actor" and "intelligence asset".

The video, seen by the ABC, was live as of Monday and had about 150 views.

Mr Ostrovsky, who has hundreds of thousands of followers across a number of social media platforms, said the cumulative nature of the online harassment was "overwhelming" and "dehumanising".

"I try my best to block it out … but it's impossible," he said.

"It tries to completely erase my experience and my trauma."

He said the abuse was "relentless" and "vicious".

"It is a cesspool of Jew hatred that I cannot keep up with," he said.

'Constant focus on personal protection'

Prominent businessman and philanthropist Steven Lowy said his family had been subject to extensive antisemitism, with a security detail tasked with monitoring all online hate directed at the Lowy family.

He said in the past year more than 15,000 examples of "very unpleasant" online abuse had been collected by security, with 200 individuals identified as being responsible for the material.

Mr Lowy said between 30 and 40 of those individuals had been reported to authorities.

"The volume of this is enormous and we are just one family," he said.

The inquiry was shown a number of offensive and threatening comments directed at his father Frank Lowy, who survived the Holocaust and whose business ventures include founding Australian think tank the Lowy Institute.

One comment called for the "public execution" of Frank Lowy and others.

Steven Lowy said the threats of violence were "disturbing" and resulted in a "constant focus on personal protection".

"Online threats lead to or inspire others to do … violent physical activity," he said.

He said he felt a "deep responsibility" to front the commission, which he lobbied for, despite concerns his appearance would trigger a spike in online abuse.

Israeli-Australian author Lee Kofman gave evidence about her involvement with a group of creatives who were subject to a doxxing event in January 2024.

Dr Kofman said the fact those involved in the doxxing had not been held to account created a "real wound" in the Jewish creative community.

She told the commission she had little success in having online harassment directed at her scrubbed, with platforms like Instagram responding that the content did not meet relevant criteria for removal.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63005

File: 937066808e4bb8b⋯.jpg (189.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6b22e270c8fddfb⋯.jpg (448.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 242fc67e94231b0⋯.jpg (907.73 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24769952 (291015ZJUN26) Notable: Businessman Steven Lowy urges new police unit to protect Jewish Australians - Businessman Steven Lowy has urged the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion to recommend dedicated police units to protect Jewish Australians, warning antisemitism has become increasingly organised, widespread and dangerous. Lowy said his family's security team monitored about 1,500 threatening or hostile online posts each month and described decades of antisemitic abuse, including threats against his father, Holocaust survivor Frank Lowy. He proposed permanent police units for Jewish community protection, specialist intelligence cells, government funding for community security, a national curriculum on antisemitism, mandatory removal of antisemitic social media content and a national service program to strengthen social cohesion. Lowy warned Jewish Australians could question their future in Australia if meaningful reforms were not implemented.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62759

>>63004

Businessman Steven Lowy urges new police unit to protect Jewish Australians

BEN PACKHAM - 29 June 2026

1/2

Prominent business leader Steven Lowy has called for dedicated police to protect Jewish Australians and national service for young people to counter an unrelenting torrent of antisemitism, in searing testimony to the Bondi massacre royal commission.

The far-reaching recommendations – covering security, education and social media – came as the former Westfield co-chief executive and Jewish community figure revealed his family faced 1500 antisemitic threats a month.

Mr Lowy told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that Jewish Australians had long been marginalised but the “targeted hatred” towards them had become “more dangerous” and widespread.

In deeply personal evidence, he said antisemitism had shadowed his family over decades from schoolyard slurs, to the 1982 bombing of Westfield’s Sydney headquarters, calls for his father to be “executed” and the “hostile reconnaissance” of his home by an Iranian national.

“The threats against my father, against me, against my brothers, my wife and family have never stopped,” Mr Lowy said.

“In a single recent month, my family’s security team reviewed more than 1500 items of hostile or threatening online content directed at our family and our institutions.”

Mr Lowy, who appeared before royal commissioner Virginia Bell on Monday, warned that organised antisemitism was no longer the preserve of the far-right, and had been amplified by social media and the “weaponisation of anti-Zionism”.

He added in an interview that hatred of Jews was “the only thing that the far right and the far left agree on”, and despite making up only half a per cent of Australians “we are targeted probably more than any other community in the country”.

Mr Lowy – the son of Westfield founder and Holocaust survivor Frank Lowy – told The Australian that if the royal commission’s recommendations fell short or were not properly implemented, Jewish Australians would reconsider whether “Australia is going to be the place for them and their children”.

He said he often wondered whether the royal commission would have been called if the Bondi massacre had occurred at a synagogue, instead of Bondi beach, “a national icon and beacon of Australian society and culture”.

“Would Australians understand that antisemitism and radical Islamism is not just a Jewish problem, but also an Australian and Western civilisational problem?” he said.

The leading philanthropist said in his submission to the inquiry that law enforcement agencies had “not fully grasped the risks and fears” faced by the Jewish community.

“The problem has been less one of bad faith than of inadequate resourcing, inconsistent prioritisation and – at times – a failure to understand the specific character of antisemitic violence and the community context in which it occurs,” Mr Lowy said.

He also revealed that he nearly walked away from his charitable work at the Victor Chang Foundation over St Vincent’s Hospital cardiologist Peter Macdonald’s antisemitic claims that Mossad was behind attacks on Australian Jews.

“These were not the musings of a fringe figure,” Mr Lowy said in his submission. “Professor Macdonald is a world-renowned cardiologist/researcher and a person of the highest professional standing and public prominence, and it is precisely that standing that makes such statements so damaging.

“I served for 19 years as a director of Victor Chang, eight years as its chair. I am a life governor and patron today. This type of behaviour by one of its senior faculty made me seriously question my future involvement with Victor Chang.”

In a wide-ranging suite of recommendations, he called for:

• A new policing capability to be set up in every state and territory “for the protection of Jewish Australians and Jewish communal life”, staffed by permanently assigned officers;

• New intelligence cells within state, territory and federal police commands to deal with antisemitic threats, with formal information sharing links with the Australian Federal Police and ASIO;

• New protective units inside each of the nation’s police forces “providing a permanent visible presence at Jewish schools, synagogues, community centres, sporting and cultural facilities, and major communal events”;

• Specialist training for police on Jewish community life, the history of antisemitism and current threats;

• Funding to cover the costs of Jewish community security, which is estimated to cost about $100m a year and has largely been borne by the community itself;

• A program of national service – civil or military – to create “the conditions in which young people from different backgrounds encounter one another as fellow citizens”;

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63006

File: 82bd88303c43bc3⋯.jpg (167.58 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f420a7b78e4af6d⋯.jpg (1.65 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24769985 (291032ZJUN26) Notable: Vanuatu critical infrastructure to remain 'free from militarisation' under Nakamal pact - Australia and Vanuatu have signed the Nakamal Agreement after months of negotiations, committing to closer security and development cooperation while affirming Vanuatu's sovereignty. The revised pact requires Vanuatu to consult Australia over proposed third-party involvement in critical infrastructure, which both countries agreed should remain "free from militarisation, any form of foreign interference or unauthorised access". Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the agreement as balanced, while Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat said it strengthened the partnership between the two nations. The agreement also recognises Australia as Vanuatu's primary policing partner and gives priority to Australia, New Zealand and France for disaster assistance. Key provisions were softened from an earlier draft, and discussions on easier travel arrangements for ni-Vanuatu will continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62982

Vanuatu critical infrastructure to remain 'free from militarisation' under Nakamal pact

Stephen Dziedzic and Lillyrose WelWel - 29 June 2026

1/2

Australia and Vanuatu have signed a landmark strategic pact after months of prolonged and sometimes acrimonious negotiations.

Vanuatu's Prime Minister Jotham Napat and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese finally put pen to paper on the Nakamal Agreement this afternoon in Canberra, almost 10 months after Mr Napat pulled out of a planned signing ceremony in Port Vila, citing concerns around sovereignty.

The pact signed today has been watered down from the original agreement, which was given initial approval in a spectacular ceremony at a spiritually charged location atop Vanuatu's Mount Yasur last year.

Last month, Vanuatu's cabinet finally gave a green light to the compromise pact, which was eventually ticked off by the Albanese government earlier this month.

Both countries have agreed to water down key clauses clearly aimed at limiting Chinese investment in Vanuatu's ports, airports and telecommunications by blocking "third party involvement" in critical infrastructure which could affect either country or "the region's security interests".

Instead the new agreement says that Vanuatu will "consult Australia on proposed third party engagement in Vanuatu's critical infrastructure", which must remain "free from militarisation, any form of foreign interference or unauthorised access".

Anthony Albanese said that the new agreement was a "balanced one" that would "protect our collective and individual security and our sovereignty" while Mr Napat said it was a "shared commitment to continuing to strengthen the comprehensive partnership between our two countries".

But Mr Napat played down the significance of Vanuatu's new commitments on critical infrastructure, saying his country had already passed legislation making clear it would "not allow any militarisation to actually be used for our critical infrastructure".

"We give very strict attention to all our critical infrastructure," he said.

The Nakamal Agreement doesn't prevent Vanuatu maintaining policing ties with China but recognises Australia as the Pacific nation's "longstanding primary policing partner" and says Vanuatu will "prioritise" Pacific Island Forum members when it makes policing requests.

It also makes it clear that Vanuatu will come to Australia, New Zealand and France first if it needs help responding to a humanitarian disaster, before reaching out to other countries.

Mr Albanese said the pact was "a recognition of sovereignty" but also "recognises Australia's historic role as well, which is reinforced by this agreement, that Australia is the security partner of choice in the Pacific".

Australia and China struggle for Pacific influence

The negotiations over Nakamal have also been complicated by the fierce struggle for influence in the Pacific island nation between Australia and China, which has been intent on securing its own strategic pact with Vanuatu called the Namele Agreement.

The Australian government has privately accused Beijing of trying to block the Nakamal Agreement, and Mr Napat responded angrily when an Australian official told Vanuatu's major newspaper that the deal could be endangered if the Pacific nation signed a security pact with China.

The prime minister showed a flash of frustration with both Canberra and Beijing in parliament last month, saying Vanuatu's "development partners" were "using their interests to try to undermine us".

The ABC has also been told that Mr Napat characterised both the Nakamal Agreement and the Namele Agreement as "externally driven" pacts in a recent meeting with senior US officials.

Mr Napat told journalists in Canberra the Namele agreement was "not yet signed" but didn't indicate when it might be, saying he was "waiting for clearance from Beijing".

He also promised he would make the pact public.

"We will share the agreement. There's nothing to hide. Our government is transparent," he said.

Today's signing ceremony caps a long and sometimes torturous series of negotiations which have tested the patience of officials and politicians in both countries.

Some politicians in Vanuatu have accused Australia of withholding funding for key development projects as Nakamal negotiations dragged on, and insisted they were blindsided when Australia excluded Vanuatu from this year's ballot for the Pacific Engagement Visa, the primary permanent migration pathway to Australia for the region.

That decision triggered an explosion of criticism on social media, with many ni-Vanuatu accusing Australia of trying to use the visa as leverage in its negotiations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63007

File: 59ad96a20a02989⋯.jpg (243.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8d33aed3c6b41c7⋯.jpg (421.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7818d1b70866c2b⋯.jpg (368.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24769996 (291038ZJUN26) Notable: Chris Minns says multiculturalism does not equal ‘insane’ sharia as he takes on Pauline Hanson - New South Wales Premier Chris Minns has rejected Pauline Hanson's argument that support for multiculturalism is incompatible with Australian values, saying it does not mean endorsing "sharia law or any of these insane ideologies". Minns said Labor needed to "get into the arm wrestle" with One Nation as polling showed growing support for the party, but argued many of its voters were motivated by concerns about immigration and infrastructure rather than opposition to multiculturalism itself. Treasurer Jim Chalmers also addressed the rise of populist parties, saying Labor's response was to deliver practical reforms, arguing "the best antidote to anger is action" rather than allowing political grievances to deepen.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62948

>>62976

Chris Minns says multiculturalism does not equal ‘insane’ sharia as he takes on Pauline Hanson

NOAH YIM - June 28, 2026

NSW Labor Premier Chris Minns has declared his party must “get into the arm wrestle” with Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and reject the idea that backing multiculturalism equals supporting “insane” sharia law.

As both federal and state polls show a surge in support for Senator Hanson’s populist party that puts it into genuine contention for major party status, Mr Minns said he was taking the One Nation threat seriously ahead of his re-election bid in March next year.

On Senator Hanson’s call for monoculturalism instead of multiculturalism, Mr Minns said that Senator Hanson was conflating too many ideas and that he would not support “sharia law or any of these insane ideologies” in Australia.

“One of my biggest gripes with what Hanson has been saying … she seems to be saying, if you support multiculturalism, then you’re also for sharia law, for multiple marriages, or multiple wives for men, and gangs with machetes,” he told Sky News.

“If you’re a supporter of multiculturalism, you must be for sharia law.

“That’s utter garbage. That’s not the view or the lived experience of people that live in Sydney, who grew up in Sydney, and I’m one of them. I’ve lived here my whole life and I’m raising my family here. I don’t support any of those things.

“I wouldn’t support sharia law or any of these insane ideologies in a place like Australia.”

The NSW premier said that it would be “hard to get back” voters to whom Senator Hanson’s monoculture message appealed but that he thought it did not enjoy broad support.

“My sense is, having talked to friends in my local community, that are voting for One Nation to send a message,” he said.

“And they’ve got no problem with multiculturalism. They don’t want a monoculture, but they’ve got a concern about infrastructure or immigration.”

Labor is also looking closely at the British Labour Party’s struggle to deal with a Hanson-like populist movement in the form of Brexit leader Nigel Farage’s Reform.

After British Prime Minister Keir Starmer resigned to make way for Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham – who trounced Reform in the heavily pro-Brexit seat of Makerfield last fortnight – Australian Jim Chalmers said on Sunday that Australian Labor will not go the same way as its UK sister party because the “best antidote to anger is action”/

The Treasurer attributed the situation in the UK to the rise of right-wing party Reform.

“I think what we’re seeing in the UK is a bit like what we’re seeing right around the world now – the pace of change is accelerating, the global and generational pressures are intensifying, and people have got legitimate concerns about where they fit in,” he told the ABC’s Insiders program.

“And then we’ve got the anger industry and parties of the populist right trying to make that worse rather than trying to make that better and so it is a difficult time around the world to be an incumbent government.

“From our point of view we are using the power of incumbency to take real action to deliver cost of living help, to deliver real change.

“The best antidote to anger is action and that’s the approach that we are taking in delivering this real change whether it be in the housing market, or in the tax system, or otherwise, and so what we’re seeing in the UK I think reflects a broader global trend around incumbency and around the legitimate concerns that people have.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/chris-minns-says-multiculturalism-does-not-equal-insane-sharia-as-he-takes-on-pauline-hanson/news-story/6bc5cc3bd0b4099dc31367b58494ba5b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63008

File: 859e90b642618b1⋯.jpg (152.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24770005 (291043ZJUN26) Notable: Moira Deeming refuses to apologise after assault allegations dismissed; ‘misunderstood technical meaning of term headlock’ - Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has refused to apologise to former Victorian Liberal leader Matthew Guy after Victoria Police found "no offence detected" following her assault complaint. Through her lawyer, Tim Houweling, Deeming said she made the complaint "honestly, in good faith" after being advised by senior Liberal Party officials to report the matter to police when internal processes failed to resolve the issue. She said she had "misunderstood the technical meaning of the term 'headlock'" but maintained the physical contact was unexpected, unwelcome and painful from her perspective. Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson said she expected Deeming to apologise to Guy, while Deeming has agreed to meet senior party figures on her return to Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

>>62993

>>62994

Moira Deeming refuses to apologise after assault allegations dismissed; ‘misunderstood technical meaning of term headlock’

LILY MCCAFFREY - 29 June 2026

Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has defied her leader by ­refusing to apologise for making unsubstantiated allegations of ­assault against fellow MP ­Matthew Guy, arguing senior party officials advised her to make the complaint.

In a lengthy statement after her claims threw the party into chaos, Ms Deeming’s lawyer, Tim Houweling, rejected suggestions she had made a “false complaint” to police.

“She will not apologise for something she had not done,” Mr Houweling said.

“Our client instructs us to make clear that she categorically rejects any suggestion that her complaint was falsely made and considers any such allegation to be entirely without foundation and highly defamatory.”

Mr Guy demanded a public apology from Ms Deeming after Victoria Police found there was “no offence detected”. Ms Deeming had accused him of putting her in a “headlock” and physically assaulting her at a community event in Sunshine West on May 23.

Liberal leader Jess Wilson said on Monday morning: “I’ve reached out to Moira to express the fact that I expect her to deliver an apology to Matthew, but nothing further to add at this stage.”

Mr Houweling said Ms Deeming’s complaint was “made ­honestly, in good faith and only as a matter of last resort”.

“Following unsuccessful attempts to resolve the incident confidentially and through the Liberal Party’s internal processes, Ms Deeming was advised by ­senior Liberal Party officials to report the matter to Victoria Police,” he said.

“She followed that advice to ensure the matter was independently assessed through the ­proper legal channels. Throughout the process, her intention was to deal with the matter confidentially, appropriately and in the appropriate way, rather than through the media or public commentary.”

Mr Houweling said Ms Deeming – who is overseas – had instructed him that the complaint was made “based upon her own recollection of what had occurred and in accordance with her understanding of the events at the time”.

“After the CCTV footage was released to media, our client was able to view the footage for the first time,” he said. “She accepts that she misunderstood the technical meaning of the term ‘headlock’, but maintains that she used it in good faith to describe what happened.

“The publicly available footage shows Mr Guy pulling her ­towards him while maintaining a grip around her neck and upper shoulder area as she attempted to pull away, preventing her from freely moving her head for several seconds.

“Without attributing motive to the other party, our client maintains that from her perspective this physical contact by a senior male colleague in the workplace was unexpected, unwelcome, physically painful and caused her to feel fear and confusion.”

Mr Houweling said the incident was “exacerbated by Ms Deeming’s prior history of being a victim of rape and sexual abuse, and having PTSD both from that and from what has occurred over the last more than three years”.

“She considers it deeply regrettable that this matter was not able to remain within the party’s confidential processes and that it has instead become the subject of public commentary, causing unnecessary distress to all those involved,” he said.

“Upon her return to Australia, Ms Deeming has accepted the offer to meet with senior Liberals to continue working towards an internal resolution.”

Ms Deeming’s future with the party remains unclear, with Ms Wilson last week repeatedly avoiding giving a direct answer when asked.

“I’ve reached out to Moira, and I have requested when she returns to Melbourne that we speak … but right now I’m focused on supporting Matthew and ensuring that he receives the support that he needs,” she said.

“I’m devastated for Matthew. Matthew is someone I call a friend. He is a colleague, he is part of my team, and he (is) someone who has given his life to the Liberal Party, and what he has gone through over the past few days will be absolutely devastating for him, his beautiful wife, his young boys, and his family. And I do think it’s entirely reasonable that he has asked for an apology.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/deeming-refuses-to-apologise-after-assault-allegations-dismissed-misunderstood-technical-meaning-of-term-headlock/news-story/135370795bb9d204d443832dee656edf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63009

File: 68512e38aa5fe12⋯.jpg (676.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4b723d1d4a0e1be⋯.jpg (452.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 66a2852870ae8b6⋯.jpg (461.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3884899f6cedff6⋯.jpg (637.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bd2541735c01414⋯.jpg (841.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24770028 (291056ZJUN26) Notable: Forces unleash firepower during Exercise Southern Jackaroo training event - Soldiers from the Australian Army's 4th Field Regiment and the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force have conducted integrated live-fire artillery training during Exercise Southern Jackaroo, alongside United States Marines at the Townsville Field Training Area. The exercise, involving about 3,000 personnel from Australia, Japan, the United States, the Republic of Korea and Papua New Guinea, included coordinated firing of M777A2 howitzers at targets 9 kilometres away. Commanding Officer Lieutenant Colonel Simon Frewin said the training was designed to build trust and interoperability so partner forces could respond together to future regional crises. The exercise will culminate in a multinational live-fire event featuring participating nations' weapons systems on 2 July.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62790

Forces unleash firepower during Exercise Southern Jackaroo training event

Soldiers from 107th Battery, 4th Field Regiment in conjunction with Japanese Self Defence Force soldiers conducted a live fire exercise as part of Exercise Southern Jackaroo

Evan Morgan - June 29, 2026

Soldiers from Townsville-based 4th Field Regiment have been conducting multi-nation live fire shoots alongside counterparts from the Japanese Self Defence Force at the Townsville Field Training Area as part of Exercise Southern Jackaroo.

The training is the closing stages of the largest iteration of the multilateral military training exercise with 3000 soldiers from the Australian Defence Force and personnel and partner nations, including the United States, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Papua New Guinea.

On Sunday the soldiers were using Australian and Japanese M777A2 howitzers firing explosive shells 9km observed by soldiers from both nations and also US Marines to direct the fire onto the targets.

Commanding Officer 4th Field Regiment Lieutenant Colonel Simon Frewin said the key component of the training was integration.

“Over the last four and a half weeks we’ve all been working together as part of Exercise Southern Jackaroo. In the past ten days we have been integrating our live fire weaponry, working side-by-side and learning from each other and each other’s drills to ensure that we have the trust in each other if we needed to go and respond to any crisis or conflict in our region,” the Lieutenant Colonel said.

“This integration is important because as our friends, partners in our region, you never know when we might get called on to work alongside each other – tomorrow, next year, the year after.

“The trust that is formed after the weeks of being in field is the key component.

“Soldiers each do their part in the mission, but knowing and watching other countries achieve their mission in the different ways in which they do that provides you great understanding in your own drills and confidence in your own system.

“But also looking at other nations and how they do things and the respect that grows between the different countries as we work together to achieve the same output in different ways, that’s the strength and that’s where the learning is.”

He said the use of artillery was the heavy firepower of the brigade and of any army.

“Bringing it to bear safely and accurately at the right time and the right place alongside our partners is an incredible feat and something that goes to building the trust that this exercise is designed to maximise.”

Exercise Southern Jackaroo culminates in a multinational live fire event on Thursday.

“We’re building towards a multinational life fire activity on July 2. That’ll be an incredible feat where we’re almost a life fire demonstration of each country bringing its weaponry, its ammunition to bear on a target to show the decisive effects that we can have when we work together,” the Lieutenant Colonel said.

US Marine First Lieutenant Lucas Schatz was stationed at Duffy’s Opp, the observation post watching the live fire working with Australian and Japanese soldiers to ensure the impacting rounds landed on target.

He is part of the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D) and his unit is based in Southern California at Camp Pendelton.

“We are in and the observation post are the eyes for artillery being in this instance is about 5km away,” he said.

“They don’t have the ability to see the target area. So we as the observers are responsible for identifying what the target is and then we pull the information of that target and send it to artillery.

“It’s been a great opportunity and we and my team are super grateful for it to share practices with one another, to bounce ideas off each other and we’ve all definitely become better for it,” he said.

https://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/news/forces-unleash-firepower-during-exercise-southern-jackaroo-training-event/news-story/4f987f4b97815d0c43c81566929288b2

https://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/news/forces-unleash-firepower-during-exercise-southern-jackaroo-training-event/news-story/478e2eddbba063592bfc7cb82e77ef35

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63010

File: 966a8d8f2716f19⋯.jpg (3.24 MB,5926x4000,2963:2000,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44b752bc7e93774⋯.jpg (861.64 KB,1399x1879,1399:1879,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773524 (301028ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Biggest arena of antisemitism’: Jewish MP Josh Burns slams social media companies - Labor MP Josh Burns has told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion he has "no faith" social media companies will effectively respond to antisemitic abuse, describing online platforms as the "biggest arena of antisemitism". Burns said he had reported 44 posts to Meta platforms since 2021, with only three removed, and criticised companies for allowing complaints to disappear into "a black hole". He also detailed abuse directed at himself, his partner, Victorian MP Georgie Purcell, and their family, along with an arson attack on his electorate office in 2024. Dor Foundation chief executive Tahli Blicblau told the commission witnesses had continued to face extensive online abuse, including calls for violence, after giving evidence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

‘Biggest arena of antisemitism’: Jewish MP Josh Burns slams social media companies

Alexandra Smith - June 30, 2026

1/2

Federal Labor MP Josh Burns says he has no faith in social media platforms taking action to stop hate against Jews as he detailed antisemitic attacks levelled at him, his staff and his partner, Victorian MP Georgie Purcell.

As the first MP from the Albanese government to appear before the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, Burns, who is Jewish, said he had largely given up on reporting online examples of antisemitism to social media companies because complaints are ignored.

Appearing on Tuesday, Burns said Purcell, who is not Jewish, had also been subjected to “ferocious” abuse and receives the same attribution of blame for the actions of Israel as he does, but there is an added “layer of misogyny and violent sexualisation”.

In one X post, shared in his submission to the commission, Burns was called a “Nazi/terrorist supporter” and Purcell was compared to “Eva Braun” – the partner of Adolf Hitler. Another example shown at the commission included a post about the birth of the couple’s daughter, labelling Purcell a “Nazi c*nt” because she had been “knocked up by a Zionist”.

“It’s weird knowing they have to take abuse because they’re in a relationship with you – it’s an awful feeling ... Georgie is not Jewish, obviously her partner is, her daughter is ... it’s something she’s had to walk into and confront and she should never have had to do that,” Burns said told the commission.

“I feel extremely guilty that she has to face this.”

Burns told the commission he had reported 44 posts on Instagram and Facebook since November 2021, with just three removed, nine receiving an acknowledgement of receipt, and the vast majority “not responded to at all”.

“You lose faith in the reporting processes – I certainly don’t report everything I would otherwise, because I don’t think anything is going to be done about it,” Burns said.

Burns told the commission that Instagram “knows when I was looking for a new high chair for my six-month-old”, so it should be able to “do a better job of making it a bit safer online”.

He said he had reported accounts to the eSafety Commissioner, but its powers only allow intervention if the poster is vilifying an individual, not to deal with attacks on Jews as a group of people.

Burns said content moderation was “a heavy thing to wear”.

“My staff are kind and caring people and don’t want to see this all day ... the social media companies rarely return a call or report an outcome … [a complaint] just disappears into a black hole. It’s exceptionally frustrating [and] I’d be lying if I said I had great faith in the social media companies to manage this – I don’t.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63011

File: 63c3555ec09a92b⋯.jpg (56.13 KB,1369x770,1369:770,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0127f8f1c80253e⋯.jpg (983.54 KB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773533 (301033ZJUN26) Notable: Steven Lowy says lives would have been saved in Bondi Beach attack if armed Jewish security present - Businessman Steven Lowy has argued New South Wales' private Jewish security organisation should be permitted to carry firearms in public, telling the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion the change would improve community safety and assist police. Lowy said he believed "the tragedy would have been far smaller" if armed Community Security Group NSW volunteers had been present during the Bondi Beach terrorist attack. He acknowledged there were "vastly different views" on the issue but said properly trained and tightly regulated armed volunteers would make Australia safer. Last month, NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told the commission police had "considerable reservation" about arming the group, warning it could create divisions by giving one community additional powers unavailable to others.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

>>63005

Steven Lowy says lives would have been saved in Bondi Beach attack if armed Jewish security present

Phoebe Pin - 30 June 2026

New South Wales's private Jewish security organisation should be permitted to be armed in public spaces, prominent businessman and philanthropist Steven Lowy says.

Community Security Group NSW (CSG NSW) provides volunteer support and security services at Jewish events and institutions across the state, and had an unarmed presence at the Hanukkah event targeted in the deadly Bondi Beach terror attack last December.

Shortly after the shooting, NSW Premier Chris Minns flagged that arming CSG NSW would be considered.

The premier addressed the issue again in late April, saying discussions were ongoing.

Mr Lowy, who is Jewish, on Tuesday said arming the CSG would bolster the security and confidence of the Jewish community.

"My view is that would be one measure that would enhance the safety and security ... when Jews congregate in public spaces," he told the ABC's AM program.

"So yes, I do believe that would be one of the recommendations that should be taken up because it would also be, it would be an assistance to the police.

"And if that would have been the case at Bondi, I think the tragedy would have been far smaller."

Senior police officer says arming groups 'problematic'

NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson last month told the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that police would have "considerable reservation" about granting additional powers and privileges to CSG.

"Isolating a particular group for additional powers within our community is problematic," he said.

"It creates a disconnect between groups.

"It can cause friction between groups if one particular element of society is afforded privileges that others aren't."

Mr Lowy said he recognised there were "vastly different views" on the "complex" issue of arming the private group.

"I hope that it gets serious consideration because under very controlled, in a very controlled environment with high-quality and disciplined education and training for these matters, I think we would be living in a safer country if that was the case," he said.

Mr Lowy on Monday fronted the royal commission, which is now examining the prevalence of hate speech online and in the media.

He told the inquiry how his family's security detail was tasked with identifying offensive and threatening material on social media, with the team collecting more than 15,000 posts, comments and images in the past year.

Some of the threats were made against his father and holocaust survivor Frank Lowy, who founded Australian think tank the Lowy Institute and was the former long-time chairman of Westfield Corporation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-30/bondi-royal-commission-steven-lowy-jewish-security-csg-nsw/106859780

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63012

File: b86478c4161841a⋯.jpg (461.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f0ce16e898c8592⋯.jpg (236.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773554 (301043ZJUN26) Notable: CEO of The Dor Foundation Tahli Blicblau says royal commission witnesses have been targeted - Dor Foundation chief executive Tahli Blicblau has told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that at least 26 witnesses who gave evidence during its first hearing block were subsequently targeted in 275 abusive online posts across seven platforms. She said the posts included Holocaust glorification, dehumanising language, calls for violence, accusations that witnesses were "crisis actors", and demands for the expulsion of Jews from Australia. Blicblau said only five of 150 reported Facebook posts had been removed by mid-June, describing the response from social media companies as "grossly inadequate". Labor MP Josh Burns also criticised online platforms, describing them as "arenas of hate" and saying reports of antisemitic abuse too often disappeared into "a black hole".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62779

>>63004

CEO of The Dor Foundation Tahli Blicblau says royal commission witnesses have been targeted

RHIANNON LEWIN and AMY JACKSON - 30 June 2026

1/2

Witnesses who have given evidence into a hate inquiry sparked by the Bondi terror attack have since borne the brunt of hundreds of abusive online posts, which are largely still online.

Some of the hateful posts have included calls for the reinstation of Holocaust gas chambers.

CEO of The Dor Foundation Tahli Blicblau revealed on Tuesday at the Royal Commission on anti-Semitism and Social Cohesion that data collected by the not-for-profit organisation suggested a minimum of 26 witnesses in the first hearing block had been attacked online in 275 posts across seven platforms.

Ms Blicblau also revealed preliminary findings suggested there had been 70 further examples of online hatred toward the five witnesses who presented at the commission on Monday.

The CEO said the comments sought to “delegitimise” the witness testimonies by comparing them to “cockroaches, vermin and parasites”, sharing “Holocaust glorification” and asserting that the individuals “were crisis actors”.

“There’s a whole body of examples in the Annexure that relate specifically to the Bondi terrorist attack being … fake, staged or self-inflicted.”

The online hatred involved sexually degrading abuse, accusations of pedophilia and calls for Australia to be “the 110th country to expel their Jewish population”.

A report by the Dor Foundation found many code words or deliberate misspelling techniques to avoid posts or comments being reported.

As of the middle of June, Ms Blicblau said only five out of the 150 posts reported to Facebook had been removed, with two others pending amid investigation.

Ms Blicblau said the horrific abuse witnesses have been subjected to online included calls for violence and direct harm as well as calls for the “extermination and expulsion of Jews”.

“It is dehumanising, it is degrading,” she told reporters outside the commission on Tuesday.

“The response from the platforms has been grossly inadequate and in most cases non-existent.

“The vast majority of documented examples of anti-Semitism online remain there today.

“They include direct calls for violence and harms and despite multiple reports to platforms they have not been removed.”

‘Arenas of hate’

Meanwhile, Victorian MP Joshua Burns has described social media platforms as the “arenas of hate” and says more needs to be done to stamp out horrific instances of anti-Semitism online, an inquiry has been told.

Mr Burns told the commission on Tuesday that he could count “on one hand” the instances of Jewish hate he experienced prior to the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel.

However, “something dramatic shifted” in October 2023, he conceded.

“But never did I grow up thinking being Jewish would be something I would have to hide or something that would prohibit me from reaching any part of Australian society or reaching any of the goals that I would have for my life or for my family,” he said.

Mr Burns told reporters outside the commission that he wanted people to be able to express themselves online, criticise government policy and have a robust democracy and debate.

“But unfortunately, where that descends and disintegrates into abuse and vilification is when people leave the discussion around policy and start making attributes to particular individuals based on their race, religion, gender and ethnicity,” he said.

“Right now, social media platforms are the arenas of hate … and they are the platforms in which people can spread messages of dehumanisation, racism and vilification.”

Social media platforms needed to “prove” they were not “amplifying” hate, Mr Burns added.

“But they are using the conflict and the vilification that is occurring from one group to another in order to attract people and put people online,” he said.

“Because to me that’s what it seems like they’re doing. That they are designing their algorithms in a way that is sending content that is only being reacted by the most inflammatory and awful responses in order to keep people on their platforms and I think they have a lot of air to breathe.”

Shocking anti-Semitism targets schoolgirls

Mr Burns said on one occasion while in Canberra he had a group of year 9 girls from a Jewish school visiting.

“And I said to them … put up your hand if you’ve experienced anti-Semitism. And they all put up a hand,” he said.

“I said, all right … well, let’s dissect that, put up your hand if you’ve had someone shout at you, and barely a hand went down.

“These are year 9 girls who are distinctly dressed in … school uniforms that have a modest and religious design to them …. being screamed at because they’re Jewish.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63013

File: 141cd52375a1273⋯.jpg (216.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d0d645b63c47eb4⋯.jpg (192.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: deb811ccc123910⋯.jpg (193.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773574 (301054ZJUN26) Notable: NSW Premier Chris Minns faces Labor Party revolt over protest laws, slogan bans - NSW Premier Chris Minns is facing internal opposition ahead of the state Labor conference over his government's protest laws and proposal to ban slogans such as "globalise the intifada". Branches have submitted motions criticising post-Bondi protest restrictions, opposing proposed slogan bans on free speech grounds, and urging stronger criticism of Israel, with several calling for Australia to end defence ties. The Labor Israel Action Committee has instead called for disciplinary action against members engaging in antisemitic conduct. Former federal Labor MP Mike Kelly backed Minns' approach, praising his leadership in responding to antisemitism while urging respectful debate and warning some party members remained vulnerable to anti-Israel "propaganda". Minns is expected to address the divisions at this weekend's conference.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38902 (pb)

>>62690

>>62847

>>62765

>>63012

NSW Premier Chris Minns faces Labor Party revolt over protest laws, slogan bans

LACHLAN LEEMING - June 29, 2026

NSW Premier Chris Minns is facing a revolt from party members over protest laws and a plan to ban pro-Palestine chants, as deep schisms over his attempts to protect the Jewish community threaten to erupt at this weekend’s state Labor conference.

A policy book for the first conference since the Bondi Beach terror attack shows dozens of motions submitted by branches calling on the federal government to sever defence ties with Israel; multiple branches also condemned protest laws introduced by the Minns government.

Various branches criticised military action by Israel, claiming aggression by the country had curtailed any chance of a two-state solution. Another branch accused Israel and the US of “an illegal act of unprovoked aggression” in the war against Iran.

While most motions regarding foreign conflicts have been referred to Labor’s national conference to be held in Adelaide in July, Mr Minns is facing a showdown with party members over actions taken by his government.

One motion, submitted by the Liverpool branch, calls on NSW ministers who supported protest laws strengthened post-Bondi to “consider alternate career ­choices”, saying “while genocide is a crime, protest is not”.

The Minns government introduced laws banning mobile protests in specific areas for up to three months in the wake of the Bondi Beach attacks, with the Premier saying at the time the restrictions were aimed at securing a “summer of calm”.

The laws were struck down by the NSW Court of Appeal this year, but are criticised in multiple motions tabled for conference.

The Liverpool branch said NSW Labor’s stance on protest was “atrocious” throughout their first term, while claiming “outrageous violence” was used by police at a rally against Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s Sydney visit in February.

The Kiama Labor branch urged a rethink on Mr Minns’s pledge to outlaw phrases like “globalise the intifada”, which has been put on ice pending a court case in Queensland against similar laws.

“Banning phrases that can mean different things in different contexts risks eroding our democratic right to free speech,” read the motion, which was recommended to be rejected by Labor’s managing committee.

Mr Minns will be tasked with traversing the split within his party in an address at the conference, where it is expected he will reveal major policies that Labor will campaign on in the lead-up to next year’s state election.

The raft of anti-Israel motions clash with submissions put forward by the Labor Israel Action Committee, which called for executive officials of Labor “at every level to take decisive disciplinary action against members of the party who engage in antisemitic or discriminatory activities or speech of any kind”.

Former federal Labor MP Mike Kelly, who co-wrote a letter late last year warning Mr Minns and Anthony Albanese of the need to crack down on inflammatory anti-Israel and antisemitic rhetoric within the party, raised the potential of the conference to turn into a political powder keg.

Mr Kelly, an associate member of the LIAC who will also sit on a panel during the conference discussing antisemitism within Australia, said he was heartened by progress within Labor’s NSW ­division to tackle the scourge, but added that many party members were still at risk of succumbing to anti-Israel “propaganda”.

“As LIAC, we very much support free speech and open debate – but we would encourage it to be respectful and civil,” he said, adding the NSW Premier had “demonstrated true leadership in our Australian context and has been a shining light as to what leaders should be doing”.

“We’ve seen people continue to engage in this process in elements of the party (which is) really dis­appointing … We would encourage respectful and informed discussion.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nsw-premier-chris-minns-faces-labor-party-revolt-over-protest-laws-slogan-bans/news-story/715f67814a8c24b04ac910e1bc5ae97b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63014

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773584 (301100ZJUN26) Notable: Former Bankstown nurse Ahmad Rashad Nadir has morphine possession charge dismissed - (Video) Former Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital nurse Ahmad Rashad Nadir has had a charge of possessing morphine dismissed after a court ruled evidence obtained during a search of his workplace locker was inadmissible. Represented by solicitor Zemarai Khatiz and barrister Greg James KC, Nadir successfully argued the evidence should be excluded, leading Judge Glenn Walsh to dismiss the charge. Outside court, Nadir said he was "very happy with today's judgment" and thanked his legal team and family. Nadir and former colleague Sarah Abu Lebdeh still face a District Court jury trial over allegations they made threatening anti-Israeli comments during a recorded online video chat with Israeli content creator Max Veifer. Last week, the recording of that conversation was ruled inadmissible as evidence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

>>62969

>>62990

Former Bankstown nurse Ahmad Rashad Nadir has morphine possession charge dismissed

The former nurse charged after allegedly launching an anti-semitic tirade on video has had a drug possession charge dropped, claiming he was ‘very happy with the result’ outside of court.

Hannah Farrow - June 30, 2026

One of the former Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital nurses, who made global headlines after allegedly threatening Israeli patients on video, has had his drug possession charge thrown out of court.

Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 28, appeared at Bankstown Local Court on Tuesday, represented by lawyer Mr Zemarai Khatiz and high-profile barrister Greg James KC charged with possessing an illicit drug after a 10ml vial of morphine sulfate was allegedly found in his locker at work.

He succcessfully had that charge dismissed after Judge Glenn Walsh ruled evidence relating to the search of his locker was inadmissable.

In a statement outside of Bankstown Local Court Mr Khatiz said: “We successfully argued for the evidence to be excluded, the judge agreed and the charges were dismissed.

“My client is very happy with the result and he is pleased with the outcome.”

Nadir spoke outside court saying: “I’d like to make a comment, I’m very happy with today’s judgment.”

“I’d like to thank my family, my brother and my mum, and I’d like to make a special thanks to my lawyer, Mr Zemarai Khatiz and my barrister James Greg KC.”

Nadir and his co-accused, Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 27, will now face an upcoming District Court jury trial regarding the interaction that occurred over the video chat platform.

The pair were working at Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital in 2025 when they connected to Israeli content creator and social media personality Max Veifer on the video chat app ChatRoulette, designed to bring strangers together to spark conversation.

Mr Veifer recorded the conversation where the pair allegedly made menacing anti-semitic comments, and saying they would refuse to treat Israeli patients.

The video was recorded and uploaded to TikTok sparking outrage. Last week, that video was struck out as evidence.

When asked whether he was confident he can put the drug charge behind him or whether he would apologise for the comments he allegedly made on this video, Nadir refused to comment.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/competitions/former-bankstown-nurse-ahmad-rashad-nadir-has-morphine-possession-charge-dismissed/news-story/e78d3a08c361c5fe921ba00df56b7409

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptiJ1jn2rWQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63015

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773601 (301106ZJUN26) Notable: China hits back at Australia-Vanuatu treaty - China has criticised the newly signed Australia-Vanuatu Nakamal Agreement, warning that bilateral cooperation "should not target any third party" or become a vehicle for geopolitical competition. The treaty commits Vanuatu not to host foreign military bases, recognises Australia as its primary policing partner and requires consultation with Australia over third-party involvement in critical infrastructure, while preserving Vanuatu's sovereignty over investment decisions. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun defended Beijing's engagement with Pacific nations and declined to confirm whether China would publish its proposed Namele agreement with Vanuatu after it is signed. The Nakamal Agreement forms part of Australia's broader strategy to strengthen security partnerships across the Pacific amid growing Chinese influence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62982

>>63006

China hits back at Australia-Vanuatu treaty

Michael Read - Jun 30, 2026

China hit back at Australia’s new security treaty with Vanuatu, warning that bilateral agreements should not target third countries, as Beijing pursued its own pact with Port Vila and declined to say whether it would release the text once it was signed.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Vanuatu’s leader Jotham Napat signed the long-awaited Nakamal agreement in Canberra on Monday, almost a year after a planned signing ceremony in Port Vila collapsed over concerns Vanuatu would surrender too much sovereignty to Australia, particularly over foreign investment decisions.

Under the finalised Nakamal deal, Vanuatu has committed not to permit its territory to be used for any foreign military base and has recognised Australia as its primary policing partner, pushing back on China’s efforts to bolster its influence across the Pacific by training local police forces.

While Vanuatu will still be free to pursue Chinese investment in its critical infrastructure network, it has committed to consulting Australia, which will provide Port Vila with technical support to ensure safety and security on any future projects.

Asked about the Nakamal agreement on Monday, China’s foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said, “the co-operation should not target any third party, still less be used as an excuse for geopolitical contest”.

“We hope that the co-operation between relevant countries and Pacific nations will be truly conducive to the development and stability of the Pacific Islands region,” Guo said.

China is now in discussions with the Vanuatu government to sign its own agreement – the Namele agreement – though Napat has forcefully denied to local media that it would amount to a security deal. Vanuatu has a foreign policy of non-alignment.

Napat on Monday committed to sharing a copy of the Namele agreement once it had been signed with Beijing.

But Guo would not commit China to releasing the deal text, instead saying that “China always handles the documents on bilateral co-operation with Pacific island nations on the basis of friendly consultation”.

“China’s co-operation with Pacific island nations is fair and square. Our co-operation is not imposed on anyone, nor targets any third party, and has been sincerely received by the people in the region,” Guo said.

The Albanese government has tried to strengthen Australia’s ties with the Pacific after the Solomon Islands stunned the region in 2022 by striking a secretive defence pact with Beijing.

Solomon Islands’ new leader Matthew Wale said this month that he could not release details of the country’s security pact with China because of a non-disclosure clause in the agreement, even as he committed to negotiating a new strategic partnership with Australia.

To counter China’s influence, Canberra has signed far-reaching security agreements with Tuvalu and Nauru, giving it a final say over any other security deals the two nations might want to strike with other countries.

It has also inked a military alliance with Papua New Guinea and is finalising a security pact with Fiji, which Albanese is expected to sign in Suva next week.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/china-hits-back-at-australia-vanuatu-treaty-20260630-p60b8a

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202606/t20260629_11954304.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-iMTC94RCo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63016

File: ff365e4ebdf37a2⋯.mp4 (15.8 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773638 (301124ZJUN26) Notable: ‘Twisted steel, shattered structures’: AUKUS inquiry warned of nuclear disaster risk - (Video) A public inquiry examining the AUKUS submarine program has heard claims that Australia is inadequately prepared for a potential nuclear accident involving future nuclear-powered submarines at HMAS Stirling. Former public health official Colin Hughes presented a hypothetical scenario in which a structural failure escalates into a radiation emergency, arguing existing emergency planning is insufficient for such an event. The Australian Submarine Agency said it is developing a comprehensive nuclear safety management system with United States and United Kingdom expertise, citing Australia's long record of operating nuclear facilities safely. The inquiry, chaired by former Labor minister Peter Garrett, has also heard criticism from opponents of AUKUS, while supporters argue Australia must strengthen its strategic posture in response to a changing regional security environment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

‘Twisted steel, shattered structures’: AUKUS inquiry warned of nuclear disaster risk

Rob Harris - June 29, 2026

1/2

A crowd-funded probe into the contentious AUKUS pact will be warned that Australia is not prepared for any potential nuclear accident at naval base HMAS Stirling, arguing a worst-case failure could trigger explosions, mass evacuation and long-term environmental contamination.

As scrutiny intensifies over the $368 billion defence program, former public health official Colin Hughes will set out a hypothetical chain of events at a public hearing in Perth on Monday, in which structural failure at a submarine support facility escalates from industrial fire to radiation emergency, overwhelming hospitals and forcing exclusion zones to expand across surrounding suburbs and waterways.

Hughes, a former head of Public Health East Perth and a member of activist group the Medical Association for the Prevention of War, argues Australia lacks a comprehensive nuclear emergency framework beyond limited spill-response planning, warning that even a non-weapons nuclear incident could have “multi-decade consequences” for communities and the environment.

In an emotive and descriptive submission, Hughes describes emergency crews initially treating a conventional disaster at the Perth base before radiation alarms begin sounding, prompting withdrawal, containment operations and large-scale decontamination as contamination spreads on prevailing winds.

“Twisted steel hangs from shattered structures,” his evidence says. “Fires burn in dozens of locations. Radiation alarms on emergency vehicles begin sounding. Some responders stare at the readings, unsure whether the instruments are malfunctioning. Commanders quickly realise this is not a normal fire.”

It further describes hospitals rapidly becoming overwhelmed, evacuation zones expanding across suburbs, and mass disruption as residents attempt to flee while emergency authorities order others to shelter indoors.

Critics of the nuclear submarine plan have claimed that the deal would eventually oblige Australia to take high-level radioactive waste from the US and Britain. Defence Minister Richard Marles has said that would not happen.

The federal government’s Australian Submarine Agency is developing a “comprehensive safety management system” for nuclear-powered submarines, drawing on US and UK expertise and Australia’s 70-year “unblemished track record” of operating nuclear facilities and conducting nuclear science activities.

Operational waste will initially be stored on Defence sites, with further technical work under way to identify potential interim and permanent disposal pathways, including within the Defence estate for intermediate and high-level waste.

It says while “defuelling” was not expected for decades, planning had begun for transport, storage and disposal systems requiring specialised facilities, trained personnel and community “social licence”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63017

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773655 (301131ZJUN26) Notable: Victorian Liberal Party to take action on defiant Deeming - (Video) The Victorian Liberal Party is preparing to take action against Moira Deeming after she refused Opposition Leader Jess Wilson's request to apologise to former leader Matthew Guy over assault allegations that Victoria Police concluded disclosed "no offence detected". Wilson cancelled a planned meeting with Deeming after her lawyer confirmed she would not apologise, maintaining she had acted in good faith and had misunderstood the technical meaning of the term "headlock". Opposition legal affairs spokesman James Newbury said "any good person would have apologised" and indicated the party would act "urgently". Party sources indicated Deeming's preselection could be revoked, potentially preventing her from contesting the next state election as a Liberal candidate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

>>62993

>>62994

>>63008

Victorian Liberal Party to take action on defiant Deeming

LILY MCCAFFREY - 30 June 2026

1/2

The Victorian Liberals are set to take action against Moira Deeming after Opposition Leader Jess Wilson cancelled their scheduled meeting and a senior frontbencher publicly declared that “any good person” would apologise for making unverified claims of assault against a colleague.

Opposition legal affairs spokesman James Newbury on Tuesday said the Victorian party would soon act, paving the way for Ms Deeming to potentially lose endorsement to stand for the Liberals at the forthcoming election.

This comes after the Liberal MP defied her leader’s request to apologise to Matthew Guy for making allegations that he had put her in a “headlock”, which were dismissed by police.

Ms Wilson previously said she had requested to meet with Ms Deeming, who has been overseas, upon her return to Melbourne, and had told Ms Deeming she expected her to apologise to Mr Guy, a former party leader.

Mr Newbury on Tuesday morning confirmed that a new course of action would take place after Ms Deeming issued a statement saying she would not apologise.

“Jess Wilson and Matthew Guy asked for an unqualified apology. Moira Deeming released a statement saying that she was not willing to apologise. Therefore, there will not be a meeting between Jess Wilson and Moira Deeming,” Mr Newbury said.

“The party is now working on the next action it will take.”

Party sources have signalled that the party’s organisational wing will seek to remove Ms Deeming’s preselection, which would prevent her from standing for the Liberals at the upcoming election.

Ms Deeming had accused Mr Guy of putting her in a “headlock” and physically assaulting her at a community event in Sunshine West on May 23. Mr Guy demanded a public apology from Ms Deeming after Victoria Police found there was “no offence detected”.

Mr Newbury on Tuesday said “any good person would have apologised”.

“I think yesterday a confirmation was given that the allegations used words that were not true. I’m not in any way applying motive behind that, other than to say that an admission was made that those words were used which were untrue,” he said.

“The right thing would have been for an apology.

“Moira has said that she’s unwilling to apologise so I think it’s incumbent upon the party to act.”

Mr Newbury refused to be drawn on what specific action the party should take but said he expected it to be done “urgently”.

“I’m not going to reflect on what the party administration does, other than to say I expect, and I think the team expects, action to be taken. I think action will occur, and I’ll leave the party to make an announcement on that,” he said. “I think that you will see action shortly.”

A Liberal Party spokesperson on Tuesday said: “The Liberal Party does not discuss internal party processes.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63018

File: 110164679b1a814⋯.mp4 (14.72 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773705 (301155ZJUN26) Notable: Magistrate blasts white supremacist Thomas Sewell for emulating ‘Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin’ during demonstration - White supremacist Thomas Sewell has been convicted of offensive behaviour over his role in a 2024 neo-Nazi demonstration outside the Chinese consulate in Melbourne, where protesters displayed a racist banner and chanted anti-Chinese slogans. Magistrate Patrick Southey said Sewell had resorted to "appalling racist slurs" and was "emulating the Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin", adding he had "yet to learn what it is to be Australian". Sewell, the former leader of the National Socialist Network, was sentenced to an 18-month community corrections order, including 200 hours of community work. The magistrate rejected Sewell's constitutional free speech defence, finding the offensive behaviour laws served a legitimate purpose consistent with Australia's system of government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62716

>>62855

>>62871

>>62872

Magistrate blasts white supremacist Thomas Sewell for emulating ‘Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin’ during demonstration

A magistrate has told notorious white supremacist Thomas Sewell he has “yet to learn what it is to be an Australian”, as he is convicted over his role in a neo-Nazi demonstration.

Laura Placella - June 30, 2026

1/2

A magistrate has blasted notorious white supremacist Thomas Sewell for hurling “repugnant” racist slurs and “emulating the Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin” during a demonstration outside the Chinese consulate in Toorak.

Sewell, 33, copped a serve in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday after he was found guilty of offensive behaviour over his role in the neo-Nazi protest in October 2024.

“With respect, I know you’ve lived in this country a long time, but some might say you’ve yet to learn what it is to be Australian,” Magistrate Patrick Southey said.

He told Sewell, who was born in New Zealand, that Australia was an “easy-going, tolerant and diverse society” made up of people from all different backgrounds.

“Welcoming to immigrants like you,” he remarked.

“But you don’t see it like that.”

Mr Southey convicted the former leader of the National Socialist Network and slapped him with an 18-month community corrections order.

“Mr Sewell’s supporters may hide their faces, but he cannot hide behind the pretence of exercising his right to free speech,” he declared.

“He could have made any of the points he wished to make without resorting to appalling racist slurs and emulating the Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin.”

Sewell was charged after he led the protest outside the Chinese consulate on Toorak Rd on October 26, 2024, alongside 30 masked men.

“Yellow grubs hand over the baby mutilator,” their banner read.

It referred to a Chinese national who allegedly poured hot coffee on a nine-month-old baby in Brisbane two months earlier, causing the child serious burns that required multiple surgeries.

The offender fled to China, where he is protected from extradition.

The court heard Sewell, the only unmasked member of the demonstration, declared during the protest that he would personally hang the offender “from the tallest building in this country”.

Mr Southey described the footage as “chilling” and the utterances “repugnant”.

“Any reasonable person passing would have been appalled,” he said.

“They would have been entitled to ask themselves: ‘What is this country coming to?’”

He added: “You didn’t have to resort to crude, racist slurs.

“It’s the manner in which you go about it. It’s clumsy, hateful, repugnant.

“What’s even more frustrating that here in the court, you conduct yourself impeccably.

“You let yourself down when … out on the streets with your mates.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63019

File: a418e9a37355013⋯.jpg (205.48 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24773725 (301206ZJUN26) Notable: Sydney daycare worker who allegedly abused 120 children launches secrecy bid - A Sydney childcare worker facing 192 charges involving the alleged abuse of 122 children has sought to extend a court order suppressing his identity and the names of childcare centres where he worked. Australian Federal Police argued the suppression order should now be lifted so the public can identify additional potential victims after investigators contacted families linked to children already identified. The accused's lawyers argued publication would endanger his physical and mental safety, expose his family to reprisals, and increase the risk of self-harm while in custody. His wife, who is expected to be an AFP witness, also supported continuing the order. The court extended the suppression order pending a further hearing in the coming weeks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38920 (pb)

Sydney daycare worker who allegedly abused 120 children launches secrecy bid

Perry Duffin - June 30, 2026

One of Australia’s worst alleged paedophiles, a Sydney childcare worker with 120 suspected victims, has launched a secrecy bid to prevent the public from learning where he worked, stopping police from alerting further potential victims.

The man, who cannot be named under a court order, has warned his and his family’s safety could be put at risk if his name is released.

The Australian Federal Police arrested the childcare worker in July 2025 after he allegedly synced a child abuse file to a cloud server, triggering automatic detection, in the latest alleged abuse case to rock the country’s childcare sector.

Investigators ultimately seized more than 2 million files from his electronic devices and began poring over them. An unknown number were deemed to be original recordings of the man filming young undressed children in centres across Sydney.

After his arrest, a court ruled the man’s name and the childcare centres that employed him should not be published, to give police a chance to reach out to victims first.

The non-publication order was made to protect the police investigation from parents, understandably horrified by the accusations, who might question their children and contaminate their evidence.

The man had worked in the industry for more than a decade and the alleged offending, which now includes 192 charges involving 122 children, took place over six years.

The vast bulk of the charges are producing child abuse material, and a handful of sexual touching allegations centre around the childcare worker’s alleged undressing and posing of children.

The scale of the alleged offending means that if found guilty, the man will have abused more children than any other childcare worker in Australia’s history. Some of the new charges carry a sentence of 20 years in prison.

AFP investigators have now contacted the parents of the children they have been able to identify and want to print the names of each centre that employed the alleged abuser.

“The next steps need public outreach,” AFP’s solicitor Ellen Trevanion told a local court on Tuesday.

“[The AFP] intends to publish the locations where [the] accused worked, to allow the public to submit information and allow additional victims to be identified.”

But plans to release the list this week were derailed by the alleged abuser’s legal team in the urgent local court hearing.

His lawyers argued the prohibition on publishing his name and workplaces must be extended to “protect both the physical and mental safety” of the man, his parents, and his family.

The alleged abuser’s parents, the lawyers submitted, share his name, and work in the same community where the alleged crimes took place.

His lawyers argued he was at risk of self-harm and reprisals while in prison, where he has remained since his arrest last July.

This masthead, through its lawyers, opposed the attempts for a two-week temporary gag order, saying delay could hamper the AFP’s work and deny parents the right to know the truth.

“Other families have a right to know, and right now, they don’t,” Nine’s executive counsel Larina Alick told the court.

“They should know about the allegations at their childcare centres and that these matters have been on foot for a year.”

The childcare worker’s wife also joined in his attempts to have his name indefinitely kept from the public. The woman requested the gag order because she shares her husband’s last name, as do their children, and it would cause “undue stress and embarrassment”.

The court heard she would act as witness for the AFP, against her husband.

The childcare worker has been interviewed extensively by police, and the court heard it’s not clear whether he will choose to defend the charges at trial or plead guilty.

Ultimately, the court extended the non-publication order until a full hearing could take place in a matter of weeks.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/sydney-daycare-worker-who-allegedly-abused-120-children-launches-secrecy-bid-20260630-p60bb1.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63020

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24777212 (011100ZJUL26) Notable: Trillionaire Elon Musk partly to blame for anti-Jewish hatred on X, royal commission hears - (Video) The Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has heard evidence that changes to X under owner Elon Musk contributed to a rise in antisemitic content on the platform. Online Hate Prevention Institute chief executive Dr Andre Oboler said X became more difficult to engage with after Musk's 2022 takeover, citing major reductions in trust and safety staff and the reinstatement of previously banned accounts. He told the commission Musk had amplified material that promoted antisemitism and criticised the platform's approach to content moderation. The inquiry also heard evidence comparing the removal rates of reported hateful content across major platforms and was told that fringe online forums, such as the bulletin board 4chan, remain a significant source of extremist and antisemitic material.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38791 (pb)

>>62740

>>62873

>>62934

>>63004

Trillionaire Elon Musk partly to blame for anti-Jewish hatred on X, royal commission hears

Phoebe Pin - 1 July 2026

1/2

An online hate prevention charity which monitors and reports antisemitic content says trillionaire Elon Musk is partly to blame for anti-Jewish hatred on social media platform X.

Formerly called Twitter, the platform has not responded to repeated requests for engagement by the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.

The third round of hearings has been examining the prevalence of antisemitic content and other forms of hate speech on social media, with witnesses telling the commission of the barriers they have encountered in attempting to get offensive and threatening posts removed.

The Online Hate Prevention Institute's Andre Oboler said the organisation has had success in getting antisemitic and extremist content removed from some platforms, while others were less cooperative.

An analysis by the institute showed that in a sample of more than 400 videos reported to TikTok, 64 per cent were removed, while just 17 per cent of more than 1,000 Reddit posts were taken down by the platform.

Meta had removed 54 per cent of the 950 Facebook posts reported as offensive, and X scrubbed 24 per cent of the 1,700 posts that were flagged.

Dr Oboler told the inquiry on Wednesday X Corp was "generally difficult to work with, particularly from Australia".

"It's been quite a few years since we were able to have contact with them," he said.

"I believe the current eSafety commissioner [Julie Inman Grant] was the last Australian-based staff member at Twitter that I was able to engage with [when she worked there].

"We have had engagement with them back to head office since then, but that was coincidence that one of their senior legal people happened to be someone I studied with here in Australia."

Content bypassing moderation

Dr Oboler said the institute witnessed a "five-fold" increase in antisemitic content online in the wake of Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 and Israel's subsequent attack on Gaza.

He said the conflict in the Middle East with Iran led to a further spike and a "re-energisation" of antisemitic content across social media.

Speaking to the media outside the inquiry, Dr Oboler said a sample of the content was "printed off in two giant folders of hate" and presented to the commission as part of his expert evidence.

"It's all sorts of content, some of it quite violent," he said.

Dr Oboler said the antisemitic content was being expressed in ways that were not being picked up by the platforms' moderation and filtering systems.

He said LinkedIn was one platform that was able to identify traditional forms of antisemitism, such as those using decades-old offensive tropes, but not examples with political flavour.

"The minute there's any political discussion around it they seem to give it a free pass, so we have content there that is extremely antisemitic using Zionist as a code word, but just isn't being dealt with," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63021

File: 836c42a62786543⋯.jpg (225.8 KB,1857x1045,1857:1045,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7a34d4ab82d5ef7⋯.jpg (452.7 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24777229 (011109ZJUL26) Notable: Ex-minister Mike Kelly urges AUKUS to fight antisemitic propaganda war - Former Labor minister and retired army colonel Mike Kelly has urged Australia to make countering antisemitic information warfare a central objective of AUKUS Pillar II, arguing collaboration with the United States and Britain should focus on combating online propaganda, deepfakes and foreign influence campaigns. In a submission to the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, Kelly said hostile states, including Russia, were exploiting social media to spread antisemitic narratives and undermine Western democracies. He proposed closer collaboration with the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and supported calls for a national service scheme and dedicated police units to protect Jewish Australians. Kelly argued information warfare posed one of the greatest threats to Australia's democratic institutions and social cohesion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62818

>>63004

>>63005

Ex-minister Mike Kelly urges AUKUS to fight antisemitic propaganda war

ELIZABETH PIKE - 30 June 2026

1/2

Former Labor minister and retired army colonel Mike Kelly has called for information warfare collaboration to combat antisemitism to be made a “central feature” of the AUKUS pact with the US and Britain.

In his submission to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, Dr Kelly said Australia must prioritise research to fight “insidious and poisonous” narratives in co-operation with the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency in the wake of the Bondi terror attack.

In separate comments to The Australian, the former defence materiel minister also supported businessman Steven Lowy’s recommendations to the royal commission for a national service to build social cohesion, and dedicated police squads to protect Jewish Australians.

Jewish leaders have backed Mr Lowy’s proposal, which Dr Kelly added to in his submission arguing Russia and other malicious state actors were using antisemitism to “create social discord” in the West through information warfare.

Dr Kelly said the nation’s adversaries had weaponised social media to spread propaganda and radicalise users, contributing to “distorted views” about antisemitism among young Australians.

He said DARPA’s “significant progress” developing tools to combat deepfakes and “adversarial influence campaigns” must be a focus of Australia’s post-Bondi response under AUKUS’s technology-sharing pillar.

“Given the urgency and threat to our social cohesion and democracy, Australia should be seeking to make collaboration on this research a central feature of AUKUS Pillar II, and indeed broader collaboration across the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ given the uncertainty associated with the current US administration,” Dr Kelly wrote.

In 2023, the Albanese government established the Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator to bring Australia in line with its AUKUS partners.

ASCA was created to work with the US defence research agency but Dr Kelly said research on information warfare should extend to the “coalition of the willing” formed by 34 countries to support Ukraine against Russian aggression following the 2022 invasion.

Donald Trump’s unpredictable administration had not hampered DARPA’s work to date, Dr Kelly said, but the US President’s links to Russian involve­ment in his election campaigns presented a potential conflict and necessitated a wider safety net.

“(Combating information warfare) is critically important and it’s why we are losing the battle against antisemitism,” Dr Kelly told The Australian.

“There’s nothing more threatening to our Liberal democracies than this effort.”

The efforts included DARPA’s SemaFor deepfake detection program, developed in 2024, to detect AI-generated images, text and videos, alongside the Influence Campaign Awareness and Sensemaking program that tracked geopolitical disinformation campaigns across the globe.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63022

File: f8b79a14645154f⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,5071x3381,5071:3381,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de5205efb46e5c0⋯.jpg (255.08 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6b1d69418842999⋯.jpg (526.2 KB,1242x1755,46:65,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 28d8a828a366419⋯.jpg (550.67 KB,1242x1755,46:65,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 134bdcfcf564426⋯.jpg (126.22 KB,1242x1755,46:65,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24777262 (011137ZJUL26) Notable: David Shoebridge slams ASIO’s warning about media spies, says it will have ‘chilling effect’ on whistleblowers - (Video) Greens senator David Shoebridge has criticised ASIO's warning that government officials should tightly control contact with journalists because foreign intelligence services may exploit media organisations for espionage and foreign interference. Shoebridge argued the advice would have a "chilling effect" on whistleblowers and press freedom, saying Australia's secrecy laws pose a greater threat because they expose whistleblowers and journalists to prosecution for disclosing information in the public interest. He also argued concerns about foreign influence should extend to media ownership and social media platforms. The report notes ASIO's assessment that state-affiliated media can be used as intelligence cover. It also references a 2020 incident in which a journalist from China's Xinhua News Agency was reported for filming other journalists inside Parliament House, prompting tighter security measures for foreign journalists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>38804 (pb)

>>62986

>>62987

China ambassador attacks ASIO, rejects foreign interference accusations

Matthew Knott - July 1, 2026

1/2

China’s top diplomat in Australia has launched a remarkable attack on ASIO and other Western intelligence agencies, accusing them of fabricating spying claims against his nation as he issued a sweeping denial that Beijing engages in foreign interference.

The combative intervention has sparked calls for ambassador Xiao Qian to be summoned for an official rebuke and drawn pushback from ASIO, injecting new friction into the Australia-China relationship after years of steady improvement.

Xiao, who has represented China in Canberra since 2022, accused ASIO of smearing China in a video aired before director-general Mike Burgess’ annual threat assessment last week, suggesting it could undermine ongoing legal proceedings.

“China itself has long suffered from foreign interference and has no intention of, nor has it ever engaged in, so-called interference in Australia,” Xiao writes in an opinion piece submitted to this masthead.

In an attempt to tamp down criticism of Beijing’s activities, Xiao argues that “certain Australian organisations and media outlets have repeatedly fabricated and hyped falsehoods and fallacies regarding the security threat posed by China”.

“Although these allegations have never been substantiated, and not a single perpetrator has been held accountable, they have deeply wounded the feelings of the people of both China and Australia, and undermined the atmosphere of friendly co-operation between the two sides,” he writes.

Xiao, who sat in the second row for Burgess’ speech at ASIO headquarters last week, writes that the video aired for an audience of journalists, diplomats and national security professionals included “charges of foreign interference against specific individuals to cast aspersions on China”.

“Whilst relevant cases are still pending and facts have yet to be established, what harm will the broadcasting of such an official video cause to the individuals concerned?” Xiao asks.

“What message will this one-sided information convey to the Australian public? And what impact will it have on China-Australia relations?”

The video included television footage of Chinese nationals who appeared in the ACT Magistrates Court in February after being accused of covertly gathering information on a Canberra Buddhist group to send back to China.

The 25-year-old man and a 31-year-old woman have been charged with reckless foreign interference. Both have entered not guilty pleas and the trial is ongoing.

The professionally edited ASIO video, which has not been publicly released, also included footage of the case of Australian businessman Alexander Csergo, who was found guilty of reckless foreign interference in March after a jury found he compiled reports for two suspected Chinese spies while overseas.

An ASIO spokeswoman said: “Noting the ambassador advocates the application of the rule of law, we point you to: the conviction of a Melbourne man for attempting to interfere in Australia’s political system to advance the interests of the Chinese Communist Party [and] the conviction of a Sydney man who gave Chinese spies information on Australia’s economic, defence and political priorities.”

Melbourne man Di Sanh “Sunny” Duong was sentenced to two years and nine months in prison in 2024 after a jury found him guilty of trying to secretly influence former federal minister Alan Tudge to advance the aims of the Chinese Communist Party.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63023

File: b350618db1c37a6⋯.jpg (166.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 21771c4a7effea4⋯.jpg (224.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784541 (031424ZJUL26) Notable: Moira Deeming launches urgent court bid to stop Liberals ending her career - Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has launched an urgent Supreme Court bid to prevent the Victorian Liberal Party from disendorsing her before the November state election. The application seeks to stop a state executive meeting expected to consider her endorsement after she accused former opposition leader Matthew Guy of assault, allegations Victoria Police found did not disclose any offence. Deeming has refused Opposition Leader Jess Wilson’s request to apologise, although her lawyer said she accepted she had misunderstood the technical meaning of "headlock" while maintaining her complaint was made honestly and in good faith. One Nation leader Pauline Hanson ruled out Deeming joining her party, citing the refusal to apologise, while Liberal figures expect the state executive to consider removing Deeming’s endorsement as a Liberal candidate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

>>62993

>>63008

>>63017

Moira Deeming launches urgent court bid to stop Liberals ending her career

RACHEL BAXENDALE and LILY MCCAFFREY - 3 July 2026

1/2

Moira Deeming is taking Victorian Liberal president Brian Loughnane to court, in an extraordinary last-ditch bid to prevent the party disendorsing her at a meeting which had been planned to go ahead on Friday evening.

The Victorian Supreme Court has listed the urgent application to be heard at 9.30am on Friday, as the MP attempts to terminate a meeting of the Liberal state executive planned for 6.30pm.

Liberals across the party’s factions had widely expected Ms Deeming to be disendorsed as a candidate for the November state election by the state executive, after she made assault allegations against former opposition leader Matthew Guy that were unable to be substantiated by police, and defied current leader Jess Wilson’s request to apologise.

On Friday she is expected to seek an injunction, preventing the party from disendorsing her, ahead of defamation action she is expected to take.

The case is set to be heard by former Director of Public Prosecutions and KC Kerri Judd.

It will be the third time Ms Deeming has been involved in legal action against fellow Liberals, after she successfully sued then opposition leader John Pesutto for defaming her over her attendance at a Let Women Speak rally which was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis.

She remains an independently represented defendant in the case being brought by five current and former members of the Liberal state executive, against the party, over the decision to loan Mr Pesutto $1.55m to enable him to pay his legal debts.

Friday’s action is being brought against Mr Loughnane in his capacity as state Liberal president — a role he has only held since May.

Mr Loughnane is married to Sky News commentator and former Tony Abbott chief of staff, Peta Credlin, who until recently had been a staunch public supporter of Ms Deeming, with Abbott and Credlin both penning references in March, urging colleagues to preselect the MP.

However, The Australian understands Ms Deeming has lost the support of both Ms Credlin and the former prime minister over the allegations.

The latest legal action comes after One Nation leader Pauline Hanson declared Ms Deeming was not welcome in her party, hours after the Liberal MP received a public scolding from opposition leader, Jess Wilson.

“No, don’t want her,” Senator Hanson responded in an interview with 3AW when asked whether she would welcome the MP to her party.

“And I’ll tell you why. I know she had a lot of support … but I think based on her allegations against a Liberal Party colleague that were proven to be … no charges were laid, (and she) refused to make an apology, and you don’t do that to your fellow colleagues,” the One Nation leader said on Thursday afternoon.

“And it tells me a person who is not prepared to admit that they got it wrong …

“I want a person with integrity and honesty, and I don’t see that, and that’s why I would not offer her a position with One Nation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63024

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784554 (031429ZJUL26) Notable: Moira Deeming wins eleventh-hour court reprieve to delay Liberal Party showdown by two weeks - (Video) Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has secured a two-week reprieve after the Victorian Supreme Court delayed any move by the Liberal Party to disendorse her as a state election candidate until a one-day trial on July 17. The party gave an undertaking not to take any steps against Deeming before the hearing, prompting cancellation of a state executive meeting expected to consider her endorsement. The dispute follows Deeming's assault allegations against former opposition leader Matthew Guy, which Victoria Police found disclosed no offence, and her subsequent refusal to apologise despite requests from Opposition Leader Jess Wilson. The court set deadlines for further evidence and submissions before determining whether the Liberal Party can proceed with disendorsing Deeming as its state election candidate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62992

>>62993

>>63008

>>63017

>>63023

Moira Deeming wins eleventh-hour court reprieve to delay Liberal Party showdown by two weeks

RACHEL BAXENDALE - 3 July 2026

The Victorian Liberals will have to wait at least two weeks if they wish to disendorse Moira Deeming as a state election candidate, after a court adjourned an eleventh-hour legal bid brought by the controversial MP for trial later this month.

Barrister Marcus Clarke KC, representing the party, gave an undertaking to the Victorian Supreme Court on Friday afternoon not to “take any step” to disendorse Ms Deeming until after a one-day trial on July 17.

Following a farcical series of events which earlier saw the case adjourned and resumed three times, Justice Kerri Judd ordered that any further affidavit material be filed by 4pm on July 10, with written submissions due by 10am on July 14. She reserved costs.

The court action was lodged by Ms Deeming after she made assault allegations against former opposition leader Matthew Guy that were unable to be substantiated by police, and then defied current leader Jess Wilson’s request to apologise.

Victorian Liberals privately expected Ms Deeming would be disendorsed as a state election candidate over the saga, at a meeting of the state executive which had been scheduled for 6.30pm on Friday. But the meeting was cancelled after Friday’s court action.

In a statement, the Liberal Party said: “The Liberal Party of Victoria today requested an expedited hearing of the matter brought by Moira Deeming.”

“This has been granted by the court, and at the request of the court, the State Executive meeting will be adjourned until the matter can be determined,” the party said.

Ms Deeming has publicly rejected suggestions she made a “false complaint” to police.

The matter was due to be heard before Justice Judd at 9.30am on Friday, but after a brief mention it was delayed until 1pm. When Ms Deeming’s lawyers failed to appear at 1pm, Justice Judd stood the matter down again.

Ms Deeming’s lawyers entered the courtroom 20 minutes late, with a further, even longer adjournment then required to allow the Liberal Party’s lawyers to seek instructions from their clients.

During the morning’s mention, Justice Judd warned Mr Clarke that his clients should “consider their position” in relation to whether or not they wanted to proceed with the meeting to disendorse Ms Deeming.

“Because if the court ultimately did make a decision about that meeting after the meeting occurred, then that might also have consequences for your client.”

Justice Judd also earlier noted to Ms Deeming’s barrister Ganesh Jegatheesan that she was “not here to review the decision of Victoria Police to not charge Mr Guy”.

Opposition Leader Jess Wilson avoided holding a press conference on Friday and has only addressed the media once this week, with the saga distracting from the second week of her 36-day campaign tour of every Victorian electorate.

The undertaking not to disendorse Ms Deeming for another fortnight means the distraction is likely to continue for the remainder of the electorate blitz.

Friday’s action is the third time Ms Deeming has been involved in legal action against fellow Liberals, after she successfully sued then opposition leader John Pesutto for defaming her over her attendance at a Let Women Speak rally that was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis.

She remains an independently represented defendant in the case being brought by five current and former members of the Liberal state executive, against the party, over the decision to loan Mr Pesutto $1.55m to enable him to pay his legal debts.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/moira-deemings-court-bid-to-block-liberal-party-disendorsement-delayed/news-story/2190e8c30c9686aa004d4ce955c05300

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8JkMDWn7Ko

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63025

File: 082ac72b7b71d28⋯.jpg (3.13 MB,7165x4779,7165:4779,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784594 (031442ZJUL26) Notable: Angus Taylor’s rural campaign-style blitz to fight One Nation in battleground seats - Opposition Leader Angus Taylor will spend Parliament’s five-week winter recess visiting battleground electorates across Australia in a campaign-style effort to rebuild support following poor polling and internal concerns over the Coalition’s performance. The tour comes amid renewed pressure over his leadership and criticism relating to his association with Dallas McInerney, who is the subject of a NSW corruption inquiry. Meanwhile, Liberal MP Andrew Hastie confirmed he will contest the next election, rejected suggestions he may leave the party, and pledged to confront One Nation directly as it targets Liberal seats. Hastie said the Coalition must defeat Labor while also resisting challenges from the political right, declaring he remained fully supportive of Taylor’s leadership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62677

>>62887

>>62976

>>62882

>>62968

Angus Taylor’s rural campaign-style blitz to fight One Nation in battleground seats

Brittany Busch and Natassia Chrysanthos - July 2, 2026

1/2

Opposition leader Angus Taylor will attempt to resurrect his political fortunes over parliament’s winter break by crisscrossing the country to visit battleground seats while Liberal MP Andrew Hastie sharpens his own strategy for tackling One Nation.

After the Coalition spent the week grappling with dismal polling that showed its vote continuing decline, Taylor was dealt a fresh blow on Thursday night when the former state Liberal police minister David Elliott called on him to resign over his associations with Dallas McInerney, who is being probed in a NSW corruption inquiry.

A spokesperson for Taylor said: “Any suggestion that the leader is connected to these matters is entirely without foundation and should not be inferred.”

But it will be another unwelcome distraction for the Liberals, many of whom were this week already frustrated that colleagues were drawing attention to the party’s struggles rather than those of voters.

Several MPs were privately concerned about Taylor’s leadership last week after he gave a bungled answer on multiculturalism in a culture war debate started by Pauline Hanson. However, the prevailing view was that the party could not afford to entertain leadership speculation while its standing with voters remains so precarious.

Taylor was among those cautioning MPs to be disciplined during a joint party room meeting on Tuesday, and encouraged them to go home over the winter break focused on selling the party’s message.

The opposition leader will seek to regain ground with a campaign-style blitz of every state and territory throughout the five-week winter recess, visiting small businesses and holding community forums in battleground seats.

Liberal Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price defended Taylor’s leadership in an interview with Sky News on Thursday.

“I think he’s doing a great job, he’s a very bloody intelligent bloke, and when people do get to meet him face to face, I think they will understand the fact that he is about this country’s future,” she said.

“He needs to get out and see Australians … so they realise that for themselves.”

Twin polls published on Sunday showed the Coalition had failed to capitalise on the backlash to Labor’s budget and a stall in One Nation’s momentum for the first time since the minor party’s surge.

Hastie, who has emerged as one of the Coalition’s strongest critics of Hanson’s party, on Thursday vowed to contest the next election amid competing views within the opposition about how best to tackle the surge of One Nation.

Hastie denied suggestions he was reconsidering his future, after this masthead reported he could leave the party if he felt abandoned in his fight with Hanson.

He said on Thursday morning that was “not at all” on the cards. “I intend to contest the next election as a Liberal,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63026

File: 648300e9c6c315c⋯.jpg (208.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784600 (031448ZJUL26) Notable: ‘Ongoing investigation’: Police interview key figures familiar with stunt at Pauline Hanson’s NPC address - ACT Police have interviewed key figures and obtained CCTV footage as part of an ongoing investigation into a protest during Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club address. National Press Club chief executive Maurice Reilly confirmed staff had been interviewed and relevant CCTV footage provided, while AFP forensic officers have also assisted the investigation. The inquiry relates to a banner unfurled during Hanson’s speech accusing her of selling out Australian workers. GetUp! later published footage of the protest, prompting scrutiny of individuals present at the event, including the organisation’s media head, David Sharaz, who declined to comment. ACT Police confirmed the investigation remains ongoing, with no outcome or charges announced.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62911

>>62946

>>62947

>>62948

>>62951

‘Ongoing investigation’: Police interview key figures familiar with stunt at Pauline Hanson’s NPC address

WILL GLASGOW - July 02, 2026

It’s just over a fortnight since the ACT police announced they were launching an investigation into the GetUp!-linked stunt at Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club address.

At the time, some wondered if there would be any follow through.

Well, Margin Call can reveal that Canberra’s police force weren’t bluffing.

Based on information overheard at the NPC bar, we hear that police have interviewed some of the key figures involved in recent days. AFP Forensics officers have also been involved.

“They have interviewed several of our staff and we have provided them relevant CTV footage,” NPC chief executive Maurice Reilly confirmed on Thursday afternoon.

Two weeks is a long time in federal politics right now, so a quick refresher. A banner was unfurled during the One Nation leader’s press club speech, which accused the senator of selling out Australian workers.

A video of that unfurling was then published by GetUp! The footage in that clip seemed to be perfectly aligned with the seat occupied by the left-wing activist group’s media head David Sharaz.

As Margin Call reported back then, Sharaz’s table mates noted he was suspiciously energised by the stunt. He also left the building before Hanson’s Q&A session began.

A statement released by the NPC at the time noted that two other people were seen on the club’s CCTV footage, apparently interfering with the club’s equipment in the exact spot the mechanised banner was installed.

Sharaz declined to comment when we contacted him on Thursday. Fair enough too.

Meanwhile, a spokeswoman for the ACT Police told us “the investigation is ongoing.”

Stay tuned. We sure will.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/margin-call/ongoing-investigation-police-interview-key-figures-familiar-with-stunt-at-pauline-hansons-npc-address/news-story/f0b402c5591e226c8ad83c24e3b4882a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63027

File: e799663f3eef8e6⋯.jpg (224.88 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b728e464c1c5d7⋯.jpg (471.61 KB,1996x1123,1996:1123,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784624 (031459ZJUL26) Notable: eSafety Commissioner says Elon Musk’s X fought to platform Bondi massacre video - eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant told the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that X resisted efforts to remove graphic footage of the Bondi terror attack, arguing the material was comparable to content in horror films. She said eSafety successfully persuaded the platform to retain the video's refused-classification status but criticised social media companies for seeking to distribute and monetise traumatic content. Inman Grant also warned online hate had reached unprecedented levels, describing the current environment as the most toxic she had encountered, and said her agency needed greater resources to regulate major technology companies. She also criticised weakened content moderation policies and increasing resistance by digital platforms to regulatory oversight.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

>>62740

>>62934

>>63020

eSafety Commissioner says Elon Musk’s X fought to platform Bondi massacre video

JAMES DOWLING - July 02, 2026

1/2

Elon Musk’s X fought to keep footage of the Bondi massacre on its platform, according to Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, who believes there has “never been a more toxic or caustic environment” for online hate speech.

Digital watchdog Julie Inman Grant appeared before the Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission on Thursday, saying the federal government had underfunded her agency and X had suggested “post-mortem” video from the December 14 attack was no worse than a “gore movie”.

“We fought hard against X in terms of not allowing that post-mortem Bondi content,” Ms Inman Grant said.

“They said it’s not any worse than you would see in a gore movie, and I said ‘I can’t think of anything more horrific for the family members and the Australian Jewish community’.

“We fought really hard, and we were able to get them to agree to keep that refused classification, but these are mainstream platforms fighting for the right and ability to distribute and monetise this content.”

She questioned how platforms could argue the “societal benefit” of such material, beyond lining their own pockets.

“I can’t imagine any other reason they would want to put it up there,” she said. “The Bondi tragedy has been one of, if not the worst, most traumatic event any of us in Australia have experienced on our soil, and I think it would do nothing more but exacerbate and cause more pain.”

Asked by counsel assisting, Richard Lancaster, if she believed eSafety needed more resourcing, Ms Inman Grant said the answer was “clearly yes”.

“If I were to do everything that I think we need to do, and wanted to, clearly the answer is yes, but I also accept this past budget was pretty austere for everyone, and sometimes that means we need to set priorities,” she said. “We are really, really small for what we do.

“As a regulator in a middle power country that’s relatively small, making sure we’ve got the tools and resources that we need to take on these powerful companies is ever more important.

“We’ve been an organisation that has made the most of what resources we have, have cut the cloth to fit.”

She said tech platforms had become aggressively anti-regulation, noting X Corp had launched six of eight ongoing cases it has against eSafety.

“It’s never been a more toxic or caustic environment,” Ms Inman Grant said.

“There’s just constant sand being thrown in our gears to trip us up in so many different ways. We’ve got the most powerful technology in the world owned by the richest, wealthiest technologists in the world, but we’ve never had looser guard rails, and that to me is a recipe for disaster.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63028

File: 250b45035262550⋯.jpg (282.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3b3c9c0124afeed⋯.jpg (379.77 KB,1232x1642,616:821,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 795030bdfdb936a⋯.jpg (132.56 KB,862x1148,431:574,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b6e45f2e6b99ce⋯.jpg (409.13 KB,1551x2067,517:689,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 770199afdf49bea⋯.jpg (210.01 KB,1061x796,1061:796,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784635 (031508ZJUL26) Notable: Veterans launch push for Senate inquiry into retrospective war crimes law - Retired Air Commodore Terry van Haren has called for a Senate inquiry into Labor's 2024 retrospective amendment to Australia's war crimes legislation, arguing it lowered the threshold for proving an alleged victim was hors de combat (no longer taking part in hostilities) ahead of the criminal trials of Ben Roberts-Smith and Oliver Schulz. He said the change created uncertainty for Australian Defence Force personnel by retrospectively altering the legal framework under which they served and warned it could expose troops to "lawfare" in future conflicts. The government maintains the amendment merely corrected a longstanding drafting error to align Australian law with international obligations, while Coalition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said the broader effect of the amendment now warranted closer parliamentary scrutiny.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62768

Veterans launch push for Senate inquiry into retrospective war crimes law

ELIZABETH PIKE and BEN PACKHAM - July 01, 2026

A former RAAF commander has launched a veterans’ push for a Senate inquiry into Labor’s retrospective legal change that lowered the threshold to prove a war crime ahead of the upcoming trials of alleged war criminals Ben Roberts-Smith and Oliver Schulz.

The move by retired Air Commodore Terry van Haren comes amid a groundswell of concern in the veterans’ community over the 2024 amendment, and a Coalition call for the matter to be revisited.

In a letter to key non-government senators, he warned the retrospective legal change to the definition of “hors de combat” – when an enemy is “out of the fight” – appeared to simplify the law for the “convenience of upcoming prosecutions”.

The government said the change was made to correct a “longstanding drafting error”.

Since the law was introduced in 2002, the prosecution had to satisfy three conditions to prove a victim was “hors de combat”: that a victim was under the power of an “adverse party”, expressed an intention to surrender, or could not defend themselves and did not act in hostility and attempt to escape.

The modified definition requires prosecutors to satisfy just two conditions: that a victim was under the power of captors, expressed an intention to surrender or had been incapacitated; and they abstained from hostile acts and did not try to escape.

The amendment passed parliament while the prosecution of Mr Schulz was on foot and captures “any conduct engaged in or after” September 26, 2002, ensuring the threshold will apply in the Schulz and Roberts-Smith prosecutions.

Mr van Haren said the change carried significant ramifications for all ADF personnel and questions about legal fairness were “larger than any individual prosecution”.

“It concerns every Australian who has served since 2002, and every young Australian who may one day be asked to fight on behalf of the nation,” he said.

“Military personnel should never wonder whether the legal framework under which they trained and fought will later be interpreted differently because parliament altered the legislation years after the events in question.”

As threats evolve, Mr van Haren said, the new definition would be “untenable” for the ADF and adversaries could exploit it on the battlefield as a form of “lawfare”.

A spokesman for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland maintained the definition was changed to align with other international jurisdictions while restoring the law to parliament’s “original intent”.

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said the legal change should be revisited.

“At the time the Coalition supported the amendment because the government gave assurances that it was simply correcting a drafting error to align the Criminal Code with Australia’s international obligations, and that it would not change the substance of the law,” Senator Cash said.

“It is now apparent the amendment has had a broader substantive effect than Labor represented, which is a serious matter and one that warrants close scrutiny.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/veterans-launch-push-for-senate-inquiry-into-retrospective-war-crimes-law/news-story/f4ae4f8351358abc2f797965e7ccfe30

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63029

File: 02debc248f42d7e⋯.jpg (292.73 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4fa62bc21b638c7⋯.jpg (2.15 MB,3378x1901,3378:1901,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784692 (031530ZJUL26) Notable: Espionage charges upgraded against alleged Russian spies - Russian-born Australian citizens Kira Korolev, a former Australian Army private, and her husband Igor Korolev have had espionage charges upgraded to conspiracy to commit espionage, replacing earlier charges of preparing for an espionage offence. The upgraded charge, introduced under Australia's 2018 foreign interference laws, carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and is the first prosecution under the offence. Police allege the couple conspired to obtain sensitive Australian Defence Force material and transmit it to Russian authorities by accessing Kira Korolev's official ADF account while she was in Russia. The Australian Federal Police said the upgraded charges more accurately reflected the seriousness of the allegations, with Operation Burgazada and the broader investigation continuing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62986

Espionage charges upgraded against alleged Russian spies

Robert Dougherty - 02 JULY 2026

The Australian Federal Police has upgraded the charges against Russian-born Australian citizens alleged to have conspired to commit espionage and transmit Australian Defence Force material to Russian authorities.

The married pair was originally charged on 11 July 2024, with one count each of preparing for an espionage offence and have since been upgraded to conspiracy to commit espionage, under Operation Burgazada.

The charges against former Australian Army Private Kira Korolev and labourer Igor Korolev were upgraded at Brisbane Magistrates Court on 29 June, according to reports from the ABC.

The 42-year-old woman and 64-year-old man are each facing one count of conspiracy to commit espionage, contrary to section 91.1(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), by virtue of section 11.5(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

It’s the first time this offence has been laid in Australia since new laws were introduced by the Commonwealth in 2018.

Assistant commissioner cyber and special investigations Sandra Booth said the upgraded charges were a better representation of the serious allegations.

“Espionage remains one of the most significant national security threats to Australia, impacting government, businesses and the university sector,” assistant commissioner Booth said.

“The AFP – as a member of the Counter Foreign Interference Taskforce – is committed to working with its partners within Australia and across the globe to defend and protect Australia and Australia’s future from security threats.”

The Counter Foreign Interference Taskforce, which includes the AFP, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and other Commonwealth partners, has dedicated significant resources and capabilities to Operation Burgazada, which remains ongoing.

The two Russian-born Australian citizens were originally arrested in 2024 on accusations of obtaining Australian Defence Force material to share with Russian authorities.

At that time, the AFP alleged that the pair was working together to obtain sensitive information and while on long-term leave from the ADF since 2023, the woman undertook non-declared travel to Russia with and without the man.

The AFP alleged that while the man remained in Australia, the woman instructed him on how to log into her official work account and guided him to access specific information to send directly to her private email account while she was in Russia.

The AFP further alleged that the woman’s ADF account credentials were used on a number of occasions to access sensitive ADF information, with the intent to provide it to Russian authorities.

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/land/18465-espionage-charges-upgraded-against-alleged-russian-spies

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/two-australian-citizens-charged-espionage-related-offence

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/charges-against-australian-couple-upgraded-conspiracy-commit-espionage

https://qresear.ch/?q=Kira+Korolev

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63030

File: a7bf2543d9f808f⋯.jpg (309.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 27ec719e1918517⋯.jpg (557.58 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784717 (031538ZJUL26) Notable: Anthony Albanese quells anti-AUKUS Labor Party backlash - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has moved to neutralise internal Labor opposition to AUKUS ahead of the ALP national conference, with senior party figures expecting no significant challenge to the $368 billion nuclear-powered submarine program. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy is set to argue AUKUS embodies Labor's vision of "progressive patriotism", linking the pact to Australian industry, defence self-reliance and national sovereignty. While some unions and party members remain opposed, key critics have indicated they will not prioritise motions against AUKUS at the conference. The government will also highlight broader defence reforms, including the establishment of the Defence Delivery Agency, while presenting Labor as the party with the strongest record on national security and defence investment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62704

>>62816

>>62833

Anthony Albanese quells anti-AUKUS Labor Party backlash

BEN PACKHAM and GREG BROWN - July 01, 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese and his factional lieutenants have headed off an anti-AUKUS backlash at the upcoming ALP national conference amid a push to entrench party support for the $368bn submarine program under the banner of “progressive patriotism”.

Senior Labor sources said the government appeared to have averted any significant challenge to AUKUS at the July 23-25 conference in Adelaide, despite sections of the party having mis­givings over the pact.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy will issue a rallying cry for AUKUS in a speech to the Nat­ional Press Club on Thursday, saying Labor is Australia’s party of defence and national security.

Reprising his slapdown of AUKUS critics at the 2023 ALP national conference, he will position the nuclear-powered submarine enterprise as “an integral part of the Labor approach to progressive patriotism”.

“Progressive patriotism means backing Australian workers and Australian industry to make and sustain our critical Defence capabilities,” Mr Conroy will say, according to a preview of his speech.

“Progressive patriotism means growing our self-reliance and strengthening our sovereignty.”

The push follows rebel Labor MP Ed Husic’s demand last month for a fresh caucus vote on AUKUS, and attacks on the program by senior party figures including Paul Keating, Bob Carr, Doug Cameron and Kim Carr.

The government is also facing an “independent inquiry” into AUKUS led by former Labor minister Peter Garrett, which is providing a platform for critics of the program.

Electrical Trades Union secretary Michael Wright, who moved an anti-AUKUS motion at the last national conference, told The Australian he would not be doing so this year.

He said the ETU’s focus at the triennial gathering would be on gaining support for a ­commonwealth-owned renewable power operator and securing more funding for skills development. “Our position (on AUKUS) hasn’t changed, it’s just that those two things are our priority,” he said.

Another senior left-faction figure said it was doubtful any major union would move a motion at the conference calling for the government to dump AUKUS. “I think we’ve lost the debate within the party; I don’t think we have a strong enough argument as to why it should be abandoned at this stage. I think it is too late,” the source said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63031

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24784774 (031557ZJUL26) Notable: ‘Dual life’: Sydney daycare worker David James jailed for abuse in multiple centres - (Video) Former childcare worker David James has been sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment, with a seven-year non-parole period, after pleading guilty to child abuse material offences involving nine children across multiple Sydney childcare centres. The court heard James secretly filmed and sexually abused children while exploiting his position of trust, with the judge describing him as living a "dual life" while harbouring paedophilic interests. A victim's mother said the offending had left her family with lasting trauma, destroyed their trust in childcare services, and forced them to abandon after-school and holiday care for their children. James also completed NSW Police training during the offending and later refused multiple police requests to provide passwords to his electronic devices. He will remain on the NSW Child Protection Register for 15 years and be eligible for parole in October 2031.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62926

‘Dual life’: Sydney daycare worker David James jailed for abuse in multiple centres

Clare Sibthorpe - July 2, 2026

1/2

A Sydney childcare worker led a “dual life” while he secretly filmed the abuse of nine children at several centres, a judge has said, as one victim’s mother shared her agonising pain, sleepless nights and ongoing mistrust in people.

Facing Sydney’s Downing Centre District Court via audiovisual link from custody on Thursday, David James sat emotionless as he was sentenced to 12 years’ prison with a seven-year non-parole period for four counts of using a child under 14 years to make child abuse material, three counts of doing and filming a sexual act with a child to create abuse material, four counts of producing or possessing child abuse material, and failing to provide device passwords to police.

The 27-year-old, through his escalating offending, egregiously abused a position of trust and authority for the purpose of sexual gratification, Judge Guy Newton said.

“James has led a dual life, one in private and one in public,” he said.

“In the community [he] was a pro-social young man who had actively pursued a career in policing, was well-engaged with others and was self-confident. However, in private [he] harboured deviant sexual interests … consistent with paedophilia.”

A compulsive pornography viewer, James was active on the dark web.

Newton said that while there was no evidence the children knew crimes had been committed, they may become aware later in life.

He pointed to remarks from a similar judgment on the “critical importance” of childcare centres, which support children to develop socially and emotionally as well as grow up in economic stability.

“It is vital that parents and other caregivers can have trust in childcare institutions,” Newton said.

“It is also difficult for children … to speak out because of their relative powerlessness to their adult carers. As a result, this form of offending can be very difficult to detect.”

The judge outlined a victim impact statement by one child’s mother, whose family’s life was “irreversibly changed”.

She said her children no longer attend after-school or holiday care, while she and her husband alternate leaving work early for school pick-up.

“As a consequence of this man, I no longer consider any person or place safe,” she wrote.

“I struggle to reconcile the idea that my children are safe anywhere other than with me or my husband.”

The woman said she lies awake worrying if her sons will be safe at school camp, tainting what should be fun and exciting.

She described feeling guilt “as a result of the whole experience” and hoped James would pay for his crimes to offer “some small reprieve”.

The identity of the former NSW Police probationary constable and Knox graduate, as well as the 58 centres he worked at casually, was suppressed for almost a year until the Herald successfully challenged a court order.

He pleaded guilty to child abuse charges between April 2021 and May 2024 at Pyrmont OSHC – City of Sydney; OSHClub – Barker College; Willoughby Kids House; Helping Hands – St Ives Park Public School; St Ives OSHC Centre – Kidzone; and Helping Hands – Lane Cove West. The children were aged between five and nine while James was between 22 and 26 years old. (There is a list of all the centres at which he worked at the bottom of this story.)

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63032

File: 6c903d35bffc77c⋯.jpg (190.47 KB,1440x810,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788688 (041515ZJUL26) Notable: Anthony Albanese’s Pacific blitz to shore up ties in the region - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will undertake a Pacific diplomatic tour aimed at strengthening regional security partnerships and countering Chinese influence, including signing a new "Vuvale Union" treaty with Fiji and advancing negotiations on a security agreement with Solomon Islands. He will also meet the leaders of Papua New Guinea, Tonga and Samoa before hosting them in Brisbane. The tour follows Australia's recent strategic agreement with Vanuatu, which prevents foreign military bases on its territory. Albanese will then meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Melbourne, where the leaders are expected to finalise agreements on uranium exports for India's civilian nuclear energy sector and expand defence cooperation after resolving longstanding technical issues.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62748

>>62982

>>63006

>>63015

>>62907

Anthony Albanese’s Pacific blitz to shore up ties in the region

BEN PACKHAM - 4 July 2026

Anthony Albanese will seal a new security treaty with Fiji to keep China at bay and clear the way to export billions of dollars worth of uranium to India in a diplomatic blitz next week bolstering six critical international relationships.

The Prime Minister will fly to Suva to sign a new “Vuvale Union” with Fijian counterpart Sitiveni Rabuka on Monday; head to Solomon Islands for talks with counterpart Matthew Wale on Tuesday; and return to Aus­tralia to meet his Papua New Guinean, Tongan and Samoan counterparts in Brisbane and host them at the State of Origin decider on Wednesday.

He will then travel to Melbourne the following day to meet with the leader of the world’s most populous nation, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, green-lighting high-level uranium and defence agreements.

The Fiji deal is being billed as a gold-standard agreement that could come close to the level of Australia’s PukPuk mutual defence treaty with Port Moresby, which will come into effect next week with an exchange of letters between Mr Albanese and PNG counterpart James Marape.

Mr Rabuka said in a speech earlier this year that the Vuvale Union would recognise the nations’ interests were intertwined, ensuring “we will co-operate to find solutions and act together as is necessary to face common challenges”.

The statement came close to the PukPuk treaty’s commitment that Australia and PNG will “act to meet the common danger” if either comes under attack, but it’s unclear whether the Fiji deal will bind the nations in a new alliance like that with Port Moresby.

In Solomon Islands, Mr Albanese will celebrate the country’s 48th anniversary of independence with Mr Wale, and continue talks on a new security treaty with Honiara which began last month in Canberra.

The progress on the new security deals follows the sealing of a long-awaited agreement with Vanuatu, in which Port Vila ruled out the use of its territory for ­foreign military bases.

Mr Modi will reprise his 2023 Sydney visit when he arrives in Melbourne, with a major event at Marvel Stadium that is expected to attract some 30,000 Indian Australians.

He and Mr Albanese will finalise a new agreement during the trip to supply Australian uranium to India, after a past agreement faltered due to concerns over non-proliferation safeguards.

Multiple sources have told The Australian that “technical issues” preventing Australian uranium exports to India have now been resolved, opening the way to a multi-billion dollar trade to feed India’s energy needs.

“It has to be only for civil nuclear energy purposes,” a source told The Australian.

Australia-India Institute chief executive Lisa Singh said: “India’s energy needs are on a scale that we cannot fathom. It has an economy that is developing at a rapid speed, and has a population of 1.4 billion people. So, if we can assist in that delivery of clean energy, then we should be definitely playing a role. It’s a win-win for both of our countries.”

James Batley, a former Australian high commissioner to both Fiji and Solomon Islands, said the Fiji treaty would continue Australia’s push to deny China a strategic foothold in the region.

“They said in their foreign policy white paper a couple of years ago that ‘we want to be friends with everybody, but when it comes to security, we lean towards our traditional partners’,” Mr Batley said. “So that’s already in black and white. The question is how far (the treaty) might go?”

He said believed Mr Rabuka “may be inclined” to enter into a mutual defence arrangement like the PukPuk treaty, “but whether it goes as far as the PNG one is a different question”.

Mr Batley said the upcoming Vuvale Union and the government’s recent Nakamal Agreement with Vanuatu highlighted its success in Pacific diplomacy.

“We might even speculate that there’s a FOMO factor at play, as country after country signs up to a deeper strategic relationship.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albaneses-pacific-blitz-to-shore-up-ties-in-the-region/news-story/2af262260eb593269d6d67fb4e2d6805

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63033

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788707 (041520ZJUL26) Notable: Bondi terror attack miracle survivor Arsen Ostrovsky warns UN more to be done on anti-Semitism - (Video) Bondi terror attack survivor Arsen Ostrovsky has urged the United Nations to encourage stronger action against antisemitism in Australia, warning that hatred left unchecked inevitably leads to violence. Speaking in Geneva after giving evidence to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, Ostrovsky said the December 2025 attack followed years of escalating antisemitic incidents, including synagogue firebombings, harassment of Jewish children and hostility towards Holocaust education. He said he endured a wave of online abuse after the attack, including deepfake images and conspiracy theories while recovering in hospital. Ostrovsky acknowledged Australia's recent initiatives, including the royal commission, but said substantially more action was needed to combat antisemitism, including when expressed as anti-Zionism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

Bondi terror attack miracle survivor Arsen Ostrovsky warns UN more to be done on anti-Semitism

A miracle survivor of Bondi’s December 14 terrorist massacre has told the UN anti-Semitism left unchecked will result in violence and Australia has “much more” to do to tackle it.

Ryan Keen - July 4, 2026

Days after a Bondi terror gunshot survivor told Sydney’s Royal Commission he faced a “relentless tsunami of Jew hatred” in the aftermath, he warned the UN “much more must still be done” to address anti-Semitism in Australia.

Arsen Ostrovsky’s blood-covered selfie went viral after a bullet tore through the top of his skull during December 14’s massacre targeting Hanukkah celebrations on Bondi beach.

Mr Ostrovsky, described by doctors as a miracle man who was a millimetre from death when shot, told the Royal Commission on Monday his wound was being treated in hospital as conspiracy theories and deep fake images of him with an Academy Award flourished online.

“There were images of me holding what looked like an Academy Award trophy, and many of these images, videos and material are still online today.”

After testifying, he immediately flew to Geneva at the invite of UN Watch.

The father of two told the UN he was speaking not just as Sydney’s head of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, but as a “survivor of anti-Semitic terror” in Bondi - which claimed 15 lives.

“I speak before you today though not seeking sympathy, but sounding a warning,” he told the UN.

“That hatred directed at Jews, when ignored, excused or mainstreamed, inevitably leads to violence. Bondi did not occur in a vacuum.

“It was built chant-by-chant and march-by-march. For two years, repeated warnings from the Jewish community went largely unheeded,” he said, adding it followed synagogue firebombings, harassment of Jewish children and people fearing to wear the Star of David.

“Even teachers now reluctant to teach about the Holocaust for fear of causing offence. This should indeed concern us all.”

He said Australia had taken “important steps”, including its Royal Commission on Social Cohesion and Anti-Semitism.

“But more – much more – must still be done. I urge the international community to encourage Australia to confront anti-Semitism in all its forms, including when it masquerades as anti-Zionism, so that every citizen can live openly and safely.

“Because history teaches while Jews may be the first target when antisemitism flourishes, we are seldom the last.”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/bondi-terror-attack-miracle-survivor-arsen-ostrovsky-warns-un-more-to-be-done-on-antisemitism/news-story/3c7edcb240177a88c505ac1377348b98

https://unwatch.org/i-was-shot-in-the-head-terror-survivor-arsen-ostrovsky-stuns-un-with-powerful-warning/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZnO90mltzA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63034

File: 6536cc5dba31b30⋯.mp4 (15.61 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788753 (041538ZJUL26) Notable: ‘We need to be courageous’: Albanese plans to go harder on teen social media ban - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has flagged tougher online safety laws, signalling the government will strengthen Australia's under-16 social media ban and impose greater obligations on technology companies to reduce harmful content. He cited concerns over AI-powered "nudify" apps, pornography and violent material, arguing such content was contributing to harmful attitudes and behaviour among young people. Albanese said further measures, including a digital duty of care requiring platforms to identify and mitigate risks, were under active consideration. Despite the existing ban, most under-16 users reportedly continue accessing major platforms, while the eSafety Commissioner is investigating Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube for potential breaches. The government is expected to announce further reforms in the coming days.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62830

>>62900

>>62908

>>62909

‘We need to be courageous’: Albanese plans to go harder on teen social media ban

Rob Harris - June 25, 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese has flagged a fresh tightening of the country’s world-first social media restrictions, saying the federal government would go further to curb harmful online content amid growing concern about the impact on young Australians exposed to pornography, “nudify” apps and violent material.

The prime minister said the government was planning a further strengthening of the under-16 social media ban and broader online safety laws, as evidence mounts that many children continue to access major platforms more than six months after the landmark restrictions came into force.

Speaking in parliament on Thursday, Albanese said Australia could not allow technology companies to operate without greater accountability as concerns intensified about the influence of online content on children and young men.

Albanese singled out the emergence of artificial intelligence-powered “nudify” applications, which can generate sexually explicit images, and said the government was actively considering tougher measures.

“We’re seeing increased presentations in our hospitals of young women who have been choked, strangled,” he told the House of Representatives. “We see anal tearing growing at an extraordinary, horrific rate because what too many young men are seeing online is normalising behaviour that is anything but normal.”

“We need to be conscious as a parliament about this. We need to be courageous about this.”

He said while the law now allowed for fines of $49.5 million for breaches of the social media ban aimed at young people, he said it was clear “we are going to need to do more”. He cited an already foreshadowed digital duty of care that would place broader obligations on technology companies to identify and mitigate harms across their services.

A government source confirmed a “significant” announcement was expected within days.

Albanese said Australia had led the world with its under-16 social media ban, claiming another 16 countries were now pursuing similar approaches. The United Kingdom this month announced plans to introduce restrictions on social media access for children under 16 by next year.

But the flagship policy’s effectiveness has been questioned as under-age teens find their way back on platforms.

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, recently described the laws as a “very blunt force approach” and said the legislation had been developed “very quickly” with only “very thin scaffolding”.

She told this masthead she did not “have potent powers” and a “regulator is only as good as the tools and the resources that they’re given”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63035

File: 7db496ce42ef508⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ce56efcd91c2495⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788783 (041547ZJUL26) Notable: Christian Brothers says it is paying $1.7m a week to abuse victims and running out of funds - The Christian Brothers told the NSW Supreme Court it is paying about $1.7 million a week in abuse compensation and expects to exhaust its remaining $23 million in cash by mid-September. The order has applied for a moratorium on all civil claims, arguing litigation costs would reduce funds available for survivors and allow remaining assets to be distributed more equitably. Lawyers representing more than 200 alleged abuse victims opposed the application, saying many clients were psychologically vulnerable and required more time to obtain instructions from clients and assess the consequences of a stay on their claims. The court heard 32 civil trials are scheduled over the next three months and 540 National Redress Scheme applications remain in progress. The hearing was adjourned until the following week to allow survivors' lawyers additional time to prepare.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Christian Brothers says it is paying $1.7m a week to abuse victims and running out of funds

Isobel Roe - 24 June 2026

The Christian Brothers religious order is spending $1.7 million a week paying victims of abuse and will run out of cash by September, a Sydney court has heard.

An application from the Catholic body to place a stay on all civil claims against it has been adjourned to next week, with lawyers representing more than 200 abuse survivors arguing they need more time to consider the consequences.

Christian Brothers brought an application for a moratorium in the Supreme Court of NSW, warning that any more time spent in court would whittle away money that should be reserved for victim payouts.

It comes days after The Congregation of Christian Brothers Oceania Province released a statement, revealing it was seeking to sell off its 36 properties to pay abuse victims, who would be treated as creditors.

The properties were estimated to be worth $216 million, but the statement admitted even after their sale, there was not enough money to pay what victims were entitled to.

'Limited resources left'

About a dozen barristers and lawyers representing alleged victim survivors of abuse at Christian Brothers' facilities argued against the moratorium on Wednesday, telling the court their clients, many of whom are "very psychiatrically damaged people", would not handle news that their cases were being stayed.

In arguing for a moratorium, barrister for Christian Brothers, Stewart Maiden KC, said the religious order had $23 million in cash, and had lost an average of $1.7 million a week since October to victim payouts.

He said the current estimation was that Christian Brothers would run out of cash by September 13, and a moratorium would allow money to be reserved for all claimants.

"There is very limited resources left," Mr Maiden said.

"If those resources are expended fighting court proceedings that will be to the detriment of all those not party to those proceedings."

Abuse victims' lawyers given more time

The court heard there were 32 matters of alleged abuse by Christian Brothers listed for trial in the next three months alone, and there were 540 applications in process with the National Redress Scheme for abuse survivors.

Lawyers for victims told the court they wanted the matter dealt with in August, when the court was set to hear the Christian Brothers' plans for its asset sale scheme.

Barrister Andrew Harding SC argued lawyers would not be able to contact clients in time.

"A week is not long enough to obtain proper instructions from 85 plaintiffs who are psychologically injured and vulnerable people," he said.

Judge Peter Brereton said he believed the fairest outcome was to adjourn the matter until Thursday next week, to give abuse victims' lawyers more time.

Lawyers for Christian Brothers also called for an immediate moratorium on civil cases until the full hearing next week, arguing publicity of the arrangement would cause victim survivors to "race for the court door" to claim their money.

But Judge Brereton dismissed that request.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-24/nsw-christian-brothers-order-abuse-victims-payouts/106837142

https://qresear.ch/?q=Christian+Brothers

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63036

File: 3d9237a0d8b85fa⋯.jpg (760.14 KB,3000x2250,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eabe0b0d835b92a⋯.jpg (39.01 KB,351x472,351:472,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d4e0c06f5ed6b4f⋯.jpg (563.25 KB,2387x1593,2387:1593,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3e1865fd63123cd⋯.jpg (86.42 KB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788799 (041552ZJUL26) Notable: Victim-survivor unsurprised and 'exhausted' by Christian Brothers' restitution shortfall - Abuse survivor Peter Buchanan says victims are "disappointed but unsurprised" by the Christian Brothers' disclosure that proceeds from selling its remaining assets will be insufficient to meet all compensation claims. The religious order, which says it has paid more than $480 million in compensation and costs since 1980, is seeking a stay on current and future civil proceedings while it sells assets valued at about $216 million. Buchanan said many survivors, after years pursuing legal action, now faced further delays and uncertainty, describing the move as "unconscionable" and arguing the broader Catholic Church should cover any funding shortfall. Lawyer Judy Courtin said at least 150 survivors represented by three law firms would be affected, with legal teams scrutinising the asset valuation and exploring whether related entities, including Edmund Rice Education Australia, could also face legal claims.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63035

Victim-survivor unsurprised and 'exhausted' by Christian Brothers' restitution shortfall

Laura Mayers - 24 June 2026

A Victorian survivor of clergy abuse says he is disappointed but unsurprised by allegations the Christian Brothers appear to be attempting to "squib" on compensation payments.

The Congregation of Christian Brothers Oceania Province yesterday revealed it would seek to sell off its remaining assets to pay abuse victims.

It said its assets were valued at about $216 million and comprised about 36 properties around Australia, which it admitted would not be enough to pay full restitution owed to those who suffered abuse at its institutions.

Peter Buchanan, a regional Victorian victim-survivor, said he was "disappointed but unsurprised".

"Whenever these roadblocks get put up in front of survivors, those of us who have been through those situations know what they are feeling right now," Mr Buchanan said.

Mr Buchanan is the secretary of LOUD Fence. His own fight for compensation following abuse at the hands of the Marist Church concluded after a years-long legal battle in 2024.

Christian Brothers on Monday said it would seek a "stay" on current and future civil proceedings against it by abuse victims.

It said it had paid in excess of $480 million in compensation and costs to claimants since 1980.

Exhausted, disappointed, unsurprised

Mr Buchanan said victim-survivors were likely "exhausted" by this latest hurdle to getting restitution.

"People who had fought for probably six years to get to the point of having their case heard are now having everything ripped out from under them," he said.

He said the move was "unconscionable" and accused Christian Brothers of shirking its responsibility. He said the Catholic Church should step up and cover any shortfall.

"I think the Catholic Church is ultimately liable for the sins of its operators," Mr Buchanan said.

"To claim this is a subsidiary, and that the Marist Brothers are a subsidiary, various other diocese are all subsidiaries of an organisation with massive global wealth, is a cynical attempt to reduce financial liability and actual, true, accountability."

Lawyers vow to keep up fight

Judy Courtin, lawyer and long-time advocate for survivors of institutional abuse, said she knew of "at least 150" victim-survivors being represented by three law firms who would be impacted by the Christian Brothers' move to pause payments.

"This is truly horrific," she said.

Dr Courtin said "a lot" of survivors of abuse by Christian Brothers were impacted by a since-overruled "shocking" High Court decision that stated churches could not be sued for the actions of their priests.

"We've now got those people back on board … and now there is a second huge delay," she said.

Dr Courtin said legal agencies were looking very closely at the valuation of Christian Brothers' assets.

"Who says they're worth $200 million? They could be worth more. We simply don't know that," she said.

"We are getting expert advice on this, but the Oceania Province does not include all the Christian Brothers schools, nor does it include Edmund Rice Education Australia.

"It is involved, and connected with, all the [schools].

"We are still working on whether it would be possible to commence new claims against other entities."

Dr Courtin said: "We are not just rolling over here."

"We are going to fight this institution as hard as we can," she said.

In a statement released on the Edmund Rice Education Australia website, the Trustees of the Christian Brothers said they were balancing their debts to the best of their ability.

"We have been very clear that our highest priority during this process is to ensure that the interests of victims and survivors, as well as our other creditors, are addressed and that the modest future living needs of remaining brothers are also addressed," the statement read.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-24/victim-survivor-devastated-by-christian-brothers-compensation/106831658

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63037

File: 3f1dd105d77bea5⋯.jpg (5.05 MB,5555x3703,5555:3703,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e5a781ea2dbef41⋯.jpg (85.13 KB,900x316,225:79,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788842 (041607ZJUL26) Notable: Christian Brothers granted pause on child abuse victim payouts due to financial strain - The NSW Supreme Court has granted the Christian Brothers a moratorium on all civil child abuse claims after the religious order argued it was running out of money to compensate victims. The order told the court it had about $23 million in cash remaining and was paying approximately $1.7 million a week in settlements, with more than 240 claimants and prospective claimants involved. The stay pauses current and settled-but-unpaid claims while the court considers a proposed creditors' scheme intended to distribute remaining assets equitably among survivors and other creditors. The Commonwealth raised concerns over historical asset transfers to Edmund Rice Education Australia, questioning whether they were appropriate. Justice Scott Nixon said the moratorium would preserve the opportunity for survivors to participate in the proposed scheme. A two-day hearing on the scheme is scheduled to begin on September 21.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63035

>>63036

Christian Brothers cry poor to abuse survivors after transferring elite schools for $1

Cameron Houston and Caroline Schelle - June 29, 2026

1/3

The Christian Brothers in Australia transferred some of its most valuable colleges to a separate trust for just $1 each but now claims it will be broke by September and unable to compensate hundreds of survivors of shocking clerical abuse.

At least three prominent schools in NSW, including Waverley College in Sydney’s eastern suburbs, were passed by the Catholic order in 2018 to the Trustees of Edmund Rice Education Australia.

Documents obtained by this masthead reveal other NSW schools including St Patrick’s College in Strathfield and St Pius X College in Chatswood were also transferred that year for the nominal consideration of $1 each.

The move came just months before state governments across Australia removed the controversial Ellis Defence, which had limited civil claims against churches since 2007.

In Victoria, the transfers of prestigious St Kevin’s College in Toorak, Geelong’s St Joseph’s College and Parade College in Bundoora, were all made in June 2015 – just three months before the Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse first recommended the Ellis Defence be dismantled.

It is unclear if any symbolic payment was made during the restructure in Victoria, with the Christian Brothers and Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA) both refusing to answer questions about the transfers.

However, the Christian Brothers said that under a scheme of arrangement or liquidation, the property transfers would be scrutinised.

Last week, the Oceania Province of the Christian Brothers announced it was on the brink of financial collapse, conceding the value of its remaining assets would not cover monthly compensation payments of nearly $6 million a month to survivors.

However, the Trustees of Edmund Rice Education Australia appears in robust financial health, with more than $345 million in cash and property valued at $2.28 billion, according to its latest financial report.

The schools charge fees of between $8000 and $23,000 a year. St Kevin’s has since broken away from Edmund Rice.

The transfer of schools between the two entities has fuelled claims by abuse survivors and their lawyers that the Christian Brothers engaged in a deliberate strategy to shield its assets from civil claims.

Lawyer Grace Wilson from Rightside Legal is representing a former student at another Edmund Rice school, St Patrick’s College in Ballarat, who was repeatedly abused by prolific paedophile Brother Edward “Ted” Dowlan in 1974.

His case was due to proceed to trial this month but has been thrown into limbo after lawyers for the Christian Brothers requested more than 200 cases across Australia be adjourned while it pursues a “creditors’ scheme of arrangement” to disperse its remaining assets.

The delay has exacerbated her client’s trauma, according to Wilson, who said the Catholic order had a moral obligation to make reparations to those abused by its clerics.

“The Christian Brothers have been using every trick in the book to minimise what they have to pay to survivors for generations. No wonder their victims are responding to their claims to be broke with suspicion,” Wilson said.

“When abuse survivors sue church institutions, it’s the responsibility of the institution to direct the survivor to the part of the institution with assets. Edmund Rice has assets.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63038

File: 164e2adb5b80347⋯.jpg (234.29 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 15f30aa82126df7⋯.jpg (563.52 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788910 (041634ZJUL26) Notable: Secret ASIO report warns of journalist spies operating in Australia, infiltrating media - A confidential ASIO intelligence assessment warns foreign intelligence services are using journalists and media organisations to conduct espionage and foreign interference against Australia. It says intelligence agencies may embed officers in media organisations or recruit legitimate journalists to gather sensitive information, cultivate sources and influence public narratives. The report warns state-affiliated media can provide effective cover because they may be compelled to support intelligence objectives. Government agencies are advised to tightly control contact with journalists, as even authorised engagement carries security risks. The assessment cites a Czech case involving a journalist linked to a Chinese Communist Party newspaper and follows recent Five Eyes warnings about Chinese intelligence recruitment. ASIO says it has disrupted such operations for decades but has not identified the countries currently targeting Australian media.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62986

>>62987

>>63022

Secret ASIO report warns of journalist spies operating in Australia, infiltrating media

Andrew Greene - 23 JUN 2026

1/2

A confidential ASIO report warns international spies are posing as journalists and targeting members of the media here to help steal classified information and conduct foreign interference against Australia.

The recent ASIO Intelligence Assessment marked “OFFICIAL: Sensitive”, and seen by The Nightly, urges Australian government agencies to closely manage all “engagement” with news reporters to “defend against espionage”.

“Journalists undertake a range of activities that are similar to the activities of foreign intelligence officers, including collecting information and cultivating relationships with sources,” the ASIO document states.

“Their access and activities can be exploited by foreign intelligence services to conduct or facilitate espionage and foreign interference, as well as to provide cover for intelligence officers and their operations.”

“In order to defend against espionage involving journalists, it is important to understand the threat, identify the risks and manage the risks,” the four-page document advises Australian government agencies.

It details how journalism “provides effective cover” for foreign adversaries to seek “privileged insider insights” into Australia’s politics, foreign partnerships, public and private sector projects, science and technology, and economic and defence topics.

“Some work conducted by journalists can be difficult to distinguish from intelligence activity, increasing the challenge for security services in identifying foreign intelligence service activity,” the assessment dated June 18 also notes.

According to ASIO foreign spies use two primary methods to conduct operations: by placing intelligence officers in positions within media organisations or by recruiting or using genuine journalists to fulfill tasking on behalf of the overseas intelligence service.

Pointedly, the ASIO Intelligence Assessment also notes that “Foreign intelligence services can exploit state media to embed officers under journalistic cover in Australia and internationally.”

“State-affiliated media organisations are uniquely effective for this purpose, as they can be directly compelled by their home governments to facilitate intelligence objectives,” the assessment warns.

“Established journalists are seen by foreign intelligence services as valuable recruitments – they often have subject matter expertise, extensive networks that include government, private industry and media, as well as access to information and places of intelligence value.”

“Recruited journalists’ accesses can be exploited to conduct or facilitate intelligence activity that includes access to otherwise inaccessible locations, actively collecting or using their media organisation’s database to gather information on targets, and assist in the cultivation of targets, including other journalists.”

Commonwealth agencies and officials are also advised by ASIO that “unapproved or unauthorised contact with journalists and the media carries risks for the security of government information.”

Noting that media content “informs the public about current events and ultimately influences readers”, ASIO warns that foreign spies also target and use journalists to “influence narratives on issues that matter to them – this constitutes foreign interference”.

It advises that all “engagement with journalists” must be officially authorised in strict accordance with Australian Government, departmental or agency-specific policies.

“Even where contact is authorised, determining whether a journalist or media organisation is legitimate, versus working for a foreign intelligence service, adds an additional layer of risk and complexity.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63039

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24788951 (041647ZJUL26) Notable: David Shoebridge slams ASIO’s warning about media spies, says it will have ‘chilling effect’ on whistleblowers - (Video) Greens senator David Shoebridge has criticised ASIO's warning that government officials should tightly control contact with journalists because foreign intelligence services may exploit media organisations for espionage and foreign interference. Shoebridge argued the advice would have a "chilling effect" on whistleblowers and press freedom, saying Australia's secrecy laws pose a greater threat because they expose whistleblowers and journalists to prosecution for disclosing information in the public interest. He also argued concerns about foreign influence should extend to media ownership and social media platforms. The report notes ASIO's assessment that state-affiliated media can be used as intelligence cover. It also references a 2020 incident in which a journalist from China's Xinhua News Agency was reported for filming other journalists inside Parliament House, prompting tighter security measures for foreign journalists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62986

>>62987

>>63022

>>63038

David Shoebridge slams ASIO’s warning about media spies, says it will have ‘chilling effect’ on whistleblowers

Andrew Greene - 24 JUN 2026

ASIO is being accused of attacking Australia’s press freedom after the intelligence agency urged government officials to limit and tightly control any interactions with journalists and media organisations.

This week The Nightly revealed a newly produced ASIO Intelligence Assessment that warns international spies were posing as reporters to steal classified information and conduct foreign interference.

The ASIO document marked “sensitive” also advises Commonwealth agencies and officials that “unapproved or unauthorised contact with journalists and the media carries risks for the security of government information.”

Greens Senator and frequent ASIO critic David Shoebridge condemned the warnings as a “politicised intervention” that increases the “chilling effect” on whistleblowers.

“ASIO telling Australians that contact with journalists carries security risks should worry everyone who values a free press,” Senator Shoebridge, the Greens Justice spokesperson, told The Nightly.

“A healthy democracy depends on people being able to talk to journalists without a security agency hovering over their shoulder.”

“The real threat to press freedom in this country is not people talking to reporters, it is the stack of secrecy laws that leave whistleblowers and journalists facing prosecution for telling the public the truth.

“ASIO knows that warning people off contact with the media deepens that chilling effect, and it pushes accountability further into the dark.”

In its four-page intelligence assessment, ASIO details how foreign spies also target and use journalists to “influence narratives on issues that matter to them – this constitutes foreign interference”.

Senator Shoebridge has also hit out at the assessment, suggesting that Rupert Murdoch’s media empire NewsCorp Australia is also engaged in foreign interference in this country.

“If we are serious about foreign actors shaping Australia’s political narratives, the obvious place to start is the US citizen who controls the bulk of our newspapers and social media platforms, not the working journalists doing their jobs.”

“Somehow Rupert Murdoch’s and Elon Musk’s daily influence over our politics never makes it into a foreign interference briefing, that tells you this framing is only about the journalism the establishment finds inconvenient, not about protecting the country.”

At the National Press Club on Wednesday, Shadow Foreign Minister Ted O’Brien was asked about what policies the Coalition wants to put in place to counter foreign interference, following ASIO’s recent warnings about foreign spies targeting journalists.

“You can take it from my speech that we are prioritising the importance of foreign interference,” Mr O’Brien said in response.

“I think the Government wants to hide from having hard conversations about foreign interference. They need to speak plainly about that, and they need to speak directly also with different diaspora communities, which are being targeted”.

The Nightly has also approached Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke for comment about the latest ASIO Intelligence Assessment but has not received a response.

According to the ASIO document “foreign intelligence services can exploit state media to embed officers under journalistic cover in Australia and internationally,” and cites an example of a Chinese reporter charged in the Czech Republic.

“State-affiliated media organisations are uniquely effective for this purpose, as they can be directly compelled by their home governments to facilitate intelligence objectives,” the assessment warned.

The Nightly has confirmed that journalists working for Chinese Communist Party controlled news organisations are no longer accredited to inside Canberra’s Parliamentary Press Gallery.

Back in 2020 a representative of China’s Xinhua News Agency was reported for filming other journalists in Parliament House, which caused alarm for some occupants of the building.

At the time Liberal Senator James Paterson called for rule changes that would prevent state media from one-party, totalitarian countries having “unfettered access” to the Parliament for themselves and their guests.

The Department of Parliamentary Services is believed to have recently increased security checks on all foreigners who hold passes for the building, including journalists working for foreign news organisations.

https://thenightly.com.au/australia/asios-warning-about-media-spies-and-the-chilling-effect-it-will-have-on-whistleblowers-c-22478818

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM2HOAB_L8U

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63040

File: 287eaeb5710b30f⋯.mp4 (15.94 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24789042 (041718ZJUL26) Notable: WA Police Child Exploitation Squad catch more than 200 predators in one year revealing shocking online horror - (Video) WA Police arrested more than 200 alleged online child predators and identified 67 previously unknown child victims over the past year. Detective Senior Sergeant Steve Britton of the WA Child Exploitation Squad said the figures represent only a fraction of the state's online child exploitation problem, warning that offenders increasingly use gaming platforms, chatrooms and encrypted messaging apps to groom children before shifting conversations to anonymous messaging services that are harder to trace. Officers conduct covert operations by posing as children as young as 13, with many suspects continuing explicit conversations despite knowing the child's stated age. Police said those arrested came from diverse backgrounds, including teachers, lawyers and accountants. Cyber safety experts urged parents to monitor children's online activity, particularly games with chat functions, while police warned young teenagers should avoid communicating with anonymous users online.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WA Police Child Exploitation Squad catch more than 200 predators in one year revealing shocking online horror

Jerrie Demasi - 21 June 2026

1/2

Shocking police figures have exposed the scale of our State’s online child exploitation crisis, with more than 200 predators apprehended and 67 previously unknown child victims uncovered in just one year.

But detectives warn those confronting numbers barely scratch the surface, as offenders increasingly use games, chatrooms and encrypted apps to target children.

The new statistics, revealed to 7NEWS during rare access inside the WA Police Child Exploitation Squad, represent just a fraction of the real scale of child abuse material and online grooming in the State, according to investigators.

Detective Senior Sergeant Steve Britton said most child victims in WA remained unidentified, despite the squad’s extensive work in trying to track offenders online.

“Those victims there, are definitely a small percentage of what’s out there,” he said.

“Absolutely.”

The way these highly skilled officers catch online predators is covert and quite confronting.

Inside an unsuspecting Perth office building, specialist detectives spend their shifts in online chatrooms, monitoring digital platforms and identifying adults allegedly trying to groom or exploit minors.

To do this, the officers use fake profiles, posing as children aged as young as 13.

Detective Senior Sergeant Britton said the stated age of the child often did nothing to deter alleged predators.

“It’s made very clear the age of the person,” he said.

“Time and time again we will explain that we are a 13, 14, 15-year-old.

“The majority of people we deal with, unfortunately, will continue the conversation knowing they’re dealing with a child.”

In an unprecedented all-access report airing on 7NEWS Monday, detectives demonstrate how quickly a seemingly casual online exchange can escalate.

Investigators say groomers often begin by flattering a child, mirroring their interests or using friendly conversation to build trust — before manipulating the interaction into explicit territory.

In many cases, police say offenders then attempt to lure children from chatrooms or gaming platforms onto encrypted messaging services, where they are harder to trace.

“They’re anonymous, so sometimes there’ll be no phone linked to it, there’ll be no email linked to it,” Det. Sen. Sgt Britton said.

“And then we have the battle of identifying who that person is.”

The squad uses specialist technology and covert online methods to identify suspects before search warrants and arrests are carried out.

Body-worn camera vision obtained by 7NEWS shows WA Police arresting suspects accused of offences including possessing, producing and distributing child exploitation material.

It includes a horrific case in Geraldton, where detectives allege a man induced a child to engage in prostitution.

Another offender posted chilling online advertisements soliciting access to children.

“Obviously that sparked significant concern because we learned there are people actually out there actively doing this,” Det. Sen. Sgt Britton said.

“They wanted to develop a network of people with access to children who are willing to share them and come up with plans and ideas to discuss how they would do this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63041

File: fedb47c6f550ab8⋯.jpg (252.48 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e658d2d9deb2855⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,5413x3609,5413:3609,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f618baad1d56b0d⋯.jpg (259.01 KB,3600x2400,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24792252 (051138ZJUL26) Notable: OPINION: As a priest, I wonder what Jesus would say about the Christian Brothers crying poor - "What would the Pope make of recent reporting that reveals the Christian Brothers in Australia is set to declare itself bankrupt after shifting at least $500 million in assets into a separate legal entity, making it inaccessible to church child abuse victims seeking compensation? Pope Leo XIV last month denounced the “scourge” of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy before he met privately with abuse victims in Spain. The Pope said some of his most painful encounters had been with those who have been wounded by those who were supposed to care for them, including members of the clergy ... As a Catholic priest of nearly 60 years, I’m ashamed that those poor kids were damaged and burdened for life by people they were told they must both obey and trust. Yet rather than responding in good faith, the Christian Brothers in Australia have reportedly spent years transferring the assets - mainly land and school buildings potentially worth billions – to the Trustees of Edmund Rice Education Australia. On Thursday, all sex abuse claims against the Christian Brothers in Australia were suspended after the Supreme Court of NSW granted the Christian Brothers a moratorium, noting the organisation could run out of money if it weren’t granted. In 2018, the order transferred schools in NSW - Waverley College in Sydney’s eastern suburbs, St Patrick’s College in Strathfield, and St Pius X College in Chatswood – to the Edmund Rice trustees for the nominal consideration of $1 each ... Does the shifting of assets (albeit legally) to limit compensation claims satisfy Pope Leo’s requirement of “reparation and a culture of care”? Even more fundamentally, does it pass the standard of Jesus Himself, to “treat others as you would like to be treated yourself”? Surely not. To its great credit, over many years that same Catholic order has educated untold thousands of young people and, in doing so, helped form them as responsible and upright citizens as well as imparting academic knowledge. How tragic to undo all that good by marshalling wily and reprehensible legal strategies and using them against those who have already been irreparably damaged. In response to the sex abuse crisis within the Catholic and other churches over the past 50 years, heart-felt apologies have been issued, public ceremonies of “lamentation and sorrow” have been held, assurances have been given that “we have learnt from our mistakes”, and payments of compensation - both adequate and inadequate, court-imposed and negotiated – have been made to victims. But by and large, the church has failed to live up to its basic Christian obligations. Had it done so, perhaps the many empty pews in our churches might still be occupied by people who treasure their faith. The offences, the subsequent cover-ups and the indefensible legal strategies used to avoid fundamental obligations largely explain why so many, in the Western world especially, no longer associate with the church in any meaningful way ... I have spent the vast majority of my life serving as an ordained Catholic priest. I still say Mass every day and assist regularly in parish ministry. But I find it impossible to comprehend how hair-splitting legal strategies can be justified when the lives of so many former pupils, parishioners and their families continue to lie in ruins." - Father Kevin Dillon, a Catholic priest who works with survivors of church-related sexual abuse via his establishment of the Lifeboat Geelong Foundation, The Age - https://www.lifeboatgeelong.com.au

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63035

>>63036

>>63037

>>>/qresearch/24788881

OPINION: As a priest, I wonder what Jesus would say about the Christian Brothers crying poor

Father Kevin Dillon - July 5, 2026

1/2

What would the Pope make of recent reporting that reveals the Christian Brothers in Australia is set to declare itself bankrupt after shifting at least $500 million in assets into a separate legal entity, making it inaccessible to church child abuse victims seeking compensation?

Pope Leo XIV last month denounced the “scourge” of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy before he met privately with abuse victims in Spain. The Pope said some of his most painful encounters had been with those who have been wounded by those who were supposed to care for them, including members of the clergy.

“The Church community must respond with listening, truth, justice, reparation and an even more determined commitment to prevention and a culture of care,” the US-born Pope told Spanish bishops.

As a Catholic priest of nearly 60 years, I’m ashamed that those poor kids were damaged and burdened for life by people they were told they must both obey and trust.

Yet rather than responding in good faith, the Christian Brothers in Australia have reportedly spent years transferring the assets – mainly land and school buildings potentially worth billions – to the Trustees of Edmund Rice Education Australia.

On Thursday, all sex abuse claims against the Christian Brothers in Australia were suspended after the Supreme Court of NSW granted the Christian Brothers a moratorium, noting the organisation could run out of money if it weren’t granted.

In 2018, the order transferred schools in NSW – Waverley College in Sydney’s eastern suburbs, St Patrick’s College in Strathfield, and St Pius X College in Chatswood – to the Edmund Rice trustees for the nominal consideration of $1 each.

Three years earlier, the order had transferred three of its top Victorian schools – St Kevin’s College in Toorak, Geelong’s St Joseph’s College and Parade College in Bundoora – to Edmund Rice Australia. Doing so limits survivors’ claims for just and appropriate compensation.

The timing of this asset transfer occurred just months before state governments across Australia removed the controversial Ellis Defence, which had prevented abuse survivors from suing unincorporated organisations including churches and other institutions and had limited civil claims against churches since 2007.

Technical interpretations and nuances occasionally carry the day in some legal disputes, but for church personnel dealing with the extreme and life-long harm to children in their care, the words of Pope Leo must be paramount. Victims should not be palmed off as a merely “helpful background” to policies and decisions. Their stories must stand as a clear and decisive cornerstone in providing genuine reparation.

Does the shifting of assets (albeit legally) to limit compensation claims satisfy Pope Leo’s requirement of “reparation and a culture of care”? Even more fundamentally, does it pass the standard of Jesus Himself, to “treat others as you would like to be treated yourself”?

Surely not.

To its great credit, over many years that same Catholic order has educated untold thousands of young people and, in doing so, helped form them as responsible and upright citizens as well as imparting academic knowledge. How tragic to undo all that good by marshalling wily and reprehensible legal strategies and using them against those who have already been irreparably damaged.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63042

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795424 (060940ZJUL26) Notable: Australia, Fiji sign new defence alliance in rebuff to China - Australia and Fiji have signed the Ocean of Peace Alliance (Veitacini Treaty), a mutual defence pact committing both countries to consult on security threats and act to meet the common danger if either is attacked in the Pacific, in accordance with domestic processes. The agreement makes Fiji Australia's fourth mutual defence partner after the United States, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea, and allows other Pacific nations to join in future. The leaders also signed a Vuvale economic and security agreement expanding cooperation, including greater visa access for Fijians. Former Australian high commissioner James Batley described the treaties as a major strategic success that strengthens regional security cooperation and reinforces Australia's leadership while limiting China's efforts to expand its military influence in the Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

Australia, Fiji sign new defence alliance in rebuff to China

BEN PACKHAM - 6 July 2026

Anthony Albanese and his Fijian counterpart Sitiveni Rabuka have signed a new mutual defence treaty stating each would “act to meet the common danger” of either is attacked.

The new Ocean of Peace Alliance, also known as the Veitacini Treaty, makes Fiji Australia’s fourth alliance partner after the US, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.

It has a provision allowing Fiji and Australia to “invite any other Pacific state” to join the alliance – opening the prospect that it could be expanded in the future.

It represents a major diplomatic win by Australia against China, which wants to secure a military foothold on the region.

It had the following key elements:

“Article 5: Consultation – In the event of a security-related development that threatens the sovereignty, peace or stability of a Party, the Parties shall consult at the request of any Party and consider whether any measures should be taken in relation to the threat.

“Article 6: Mutual defence — Each Party recognises that an armed attack on any of the Parties within the Pacific would be dangerous to each other’s peace and security as well as the security of the Pacific, and declares that it would act to meet the common danger, in accordance with its domestic processes.”

The leaders also signed a new Vuvale economic and security agreement, which includes a provision to expand visa access to Australia by Fijians.

Former Australian high commissioner to Fiji James Batley said the agreements underscored Australia’s leadership role in the region in “a serious rebuff to Chinese ambitions“.

“The two treaties are groundbreaking. They cement the notion of a genuine regional security community,” Mr Batley said.

“Taken together with recent developments with Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and others, they achieve the holy grail of Australian policy in the Pacific – exercising both partnership and leadership simultaneously.”

He said the Veitacini Treaty had the potential to “evolve into a fully regional security pact – a Pacific NATO if you like – although we should not necessarily expect other Pacific Islands countries to rush to sign up”.

The treaties were consistent with Canberra’s vision of regional security integration first set out in Australia’s 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Mr Batley said.

“The agreements emphasise the primacy of the Pacific Islands Forum at multiple points, and entrench the evolving doctrine of ‘Pacific-first’ approaches, which implicitly sidelines China,” he said.

Mr Albanese was welcomed to Fiji on Monday with a traditional kava ceremony in Suva presided over by the country’s chiefs and Mr Rabuka.

Mr Rabuka has been one of Australia’s biggest supporters in the region and has warned China should not be allowed to establish a base in the South Pacific.

“Who would welcome them? Not Fiji,” he told the National Press Club in Canberra in July last year.

He said at the time that Fiji, which has more than 1500 of its citizens serving in the British Army, could eliminate Australia’s defence personnel shortage.

“I would like to see it happen,” Mr Rabuka said.

At the welcome ceremony, Mr Albanese downed half a coconut shell of the narcotic kava liquid in one go. He was also presented with a whole dead pig, necklaces and traditional mats.

Mr Albanese brought Yolngu elder, Djapirri Mununggirritj, and Australia’s First Nations Ambassador, Justin Mohamed, with him to Fiji for the occasion.

“Bula,” Mr Albanese said, using the Fijian greeting.

“Thank you for warmly welcoming me to Fiji, and for honouring the country that I’m proud to represent with such a meaningful ceremony. Our countries share such strong cultural and people to people links demonstrated here today with representatives joining me from the Yolngu Nation in northern Australia. Our partnership is strong, from my Vuvale (family) to yours, Vinaka (thank you).”

Mr Albanese was also made a Companion of the Order of Fiji, one of the country’s highest honours, by its President Naiqama Lalabalavu.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/australia-fiji-to-sign-new-defence-alliance/news-story/8955661077f771a021a7cebc5ecbc341

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wqj7Qwm6b8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63043

File: fc70d90f5cf14d3⋯.jpg (275.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ad983c9e57bdb52⋯.jpg (498.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795432 (060944ZJUL26) Notable: China launches sea-based missile in South Pacific after Anthony Albanese signs pact with Fiji - China has confirmed it test-fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile carrying a simulated warhead into the South Pacific, describing the launch as a routine military exercise conducted in accordance with international law and with prior notification to regional governments. The test occurred within hours of Australia and Fiji signing the Veitacini Treaty, a new mutual defence alliance, alongside the Vuvale Union economic and security partnership, prompting Australia to describe the launch as destabilising. Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles said China notified Australia only on the day of the launch, while Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Canberra had formally conveyed its concerns to Beijing. Analysts, including the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's Malcolm Davis, argued the timing appeared intended as strategic coercive messaging and said same-day notification fell short of accepted international practice. Japanese analyst Tetsuo Kotani said the missile was likely the JL-3, an intercontinental submarine-launched ballistic missile designed to strengthen China's sea-based nuclear deterrent and future continuous at-sea patrol capability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

China launches sea-based missile in South Pacific after Anthony Albanese signs pact with Fiji

BEN PACKHAM and YONI BASHAN - 6 July 2026

China has confirmed it fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile fitted with a simulated warhead into the South Pacific Ocean on Monday, describing the test as a routine component of its annual military training and stating that regional governments had been notified in advance.

Few experts were persuaded and the timing was not lost on anyone.

The missile was launched at 12.01pm local time by the People’s Liberation Army Navy from what Chinese state media described as a “strategic nuclear submarine”, and reportedly struck its designated target in the “relevant high seas of the Pacific Ocean”. Beijing maintained the exercise was conducted in accordance with international law and was “not directed against any specific country or target”.

The launch occurred within hours of Australia and Fiji signing the landmark Veitacini Treaty – also known as the Ocean of Peace Alliance – in Suva. The mutual defence agreement, which commits both nations to come to each other’s aid in times of crises, marks Fiji’s first-ever defence alliance and Australia’s fourth, alongside its existing pacts with the United States, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.

The treaty was signed alongside the Vuvale Union, a sweeping economic partnership that will see Australia invest over $1bn into Fiji over the next decade, and is open to other Pacific nations – including New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Tonga – to join in the future.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who had travelled with Anthony Albanese for the signing ceremony, said Australia had made clear to Beijing that the test was “destabilising to the region”.

Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles confirmed that China had informed Australia of its intention to conduct a long-range missile test on the day of the launch itself – the same day the treaty was signed. “We are very concerned about any actions which undermine the stability, the peace, and security of the Pacific,” Mr Marles said.

Beijing’s claim of advance notice was swiftly challenged by analysts who noted a same-day advisory falls short of the standard required under international law.

“It is notification in name only,” said Dr Malcolm Davis, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. “The timing of the launch — on the day of the signing of the Veitacini Treaty — simply cannot be seen to be coincidental. China uses military power for coercive messaging.”

Dr Davis also highlighted the deeper strategic significance of conducting the test from a submarine platform, saying it reinforced China’s development of a “second-strike capability based on ballistic missile submarines” – vessels designed to survive an initial nuclear exchange and retaliate.

Chinese state media did not confirm the type of warhead used. Tetsuo Kotani, a senior fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs, a think tank in Tokyo, said China was most likely to have test-fired the JL-3, its newest submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missile.

“Because its range exceeds 10,000 kilometers, the missile could not be tested by firing westward into the desert as has traditionally been done, so it was likely fired toward the Pacific instead,” Mr Kotani said.

He added that China is advancing development of the quieter Type 096 strategic nuclear-powered submarine, which would likely be armed with the JL-3 for continuous at-sea deployment, a move that would significantly enhance Beijing’s capacity for sustained nuclear deterrence.

Monday’s launch follows an September 2024 intercontinental ballistic missile test carrying a dummy warhead, which similarly alarmed Canberra, in part due to a lack of advance notice.

That missile flew across the Pacific Ocean and landed in waters near French Polynesia, marking China’s first such announced test over international waters in more than four decades.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-to-test-nuclear-missile-in-south-pacific-after-anthony-albanese-signs-pact-with-fiji/news-story/5c7504085d0c5221a9dd4bc8881d1dfc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63044

File: 5cfd101404bbff4⋯.jpg (2.9 MB,4374x2916,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ea7eb7d45ebc7c9⋯.jpg (127.91 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c01ce6c30126f95⋯.jpg (248.85 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795443 (060954ZJUL26) Notable: ‘Destabilising’: Australia blasts China for launching nuclear-capable weapon in Pacific - Australia and New Zealand have condemned China after it launched a nuclear-capable submarine-launched ballistic missile with a dummy warhead into the South Pacific, describing the test as destabilising and concerning. The launch occurred hours after Australia and Fiji signed the Ocean of Peace defence alliance, with China providing only limited advance notice. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the test was inconsistent with Pacific leaders' vision of the region as an "Ocean of Peace", while New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters warned such launches should not become normalised within the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone. Maritime intelligence firm Starboard reported Chinese tracking ships were positioned in the region during the test. China maintained the launch was a routine military exercise conducted in accordance with international law and not directed at any particular country.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

‘Destabilising’: Australia blasts China for launching nuclear-capable weapon in Pacific

Matthew Knott and Lisa Visentin - July 6, 2026

1/2

The launch of a nuclear-capable long-range missile from a Chinese submarine in the South Pacific with just hours of notice has angered Australia and New Zealand, who labelled the test destabilising and concerning.

The firing of the ballistic missile, fitted with a dummy warhead, came just hours after Australia and Fiji struck a new defence alliance that commits them to come to each other’s aid if they come under attack.

A Chinese tracking ship was stationed alongside Fiji at the time of the missile firing, with a leading maritime surveillance company saying its presence was unlikely to have been coincidental.

Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng, a spokesman for China’s People’s Liberation Army navy, said that a Chinese strategic nuclear submarine successfully launched a strategic missile carrying a training dummy warhead toward “relevant high seas areas of the Pacific Ocean” at 12.01pm on Monday.

Wang said the missile “accurately landed within the predetermined sea area”.

“This missile test launch is a routine arrangement of the Chinese side’s annual military training, and relevant countries have been notified in advance,” he said.

“It complies with international law and international practices and is not targeted at any specific country or target.”

Chinese officials had briefed various regional governments, including Australia and New Zealand, about an intercontinental ballistic missile test in the Pacific earlier on Monday.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “Australia has been clear with China that we regard this as destabilising to the region” before adding that Pacific leaders had made clear they wanted the Pacific to be “an Ocean of Peace. We believe this test is inconsistent with that objective.”

Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said China hoped “relevant countries will not overinterpret the matter”. She described the launch as “a routine military training exercise, not targeted at any specific country or target, and relevant countries have been notified in advance, which is in line with international law and international practice”.

New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters said he was “deeply concerned” by the testing, complaining that it was carried out only hours after notice was given to Pacific nations.

“New Zealand considers this an unwelcome and concerning development,” Peters said.

“We, like our neighbours in other Pacific countries, have no interest in China using the South Pacific as a testing site for missile capability.”

Peters said the missile was fired into the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone established by the Treaty of Rarotonga as he flagged further discussions with Pacific nations in response to the test.

“We as a region should not sit by and allow such tests to become normalised or routine,” he said.

The Japanese government said it had urged China to reconsider the missile launch after receiving notification. “We expressed our grave concern over the Chinese military’s increased activity,” a government spokesperson said.

Maritime intelligence company Starboard said it had identified two Chinese satellite tracking ships, the Yuan Wang 3 and Yuan Wang 6, operating in international waters near the Federated States of Micronesia’s exclusive economic zone at the time of the test. The vessels left China around June 25.

A third tracking ship, the Yuan Wang 5, is currently alongside in Suva after operating in the eastern Pacific and arriving in Fiji on July 3.

Mark Douglas, a senior Starboard employee, said Yuan Wang 5’s “presence in the region is unlikely to be coincidental. The significance of that vessel being berthed in Fiji’s capital in the same week Fiji signed its first defence alliance with Australia won’t be lost on anyone.”

The ship was used to support China’s test-firing of an intercontinental ballistic missile into the Pacific Ocean in September 2024 – its first such test since 1980.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said he did not believe the test was designed as retaliation for the defence treaty struck between Australia and Fiji.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Ted O’Brien criticised the Chinese missile launch, saying: “This is irresponsible, and it is not welcomed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63045

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795460 (061003ZJUL26) Notable: Meta tells royal commission its platforms allow ‘dehumanising’ hate speech - Meta's Global Content Policy Director, Ben Good, appeared before the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion to defend the company's content moderation policies, arguing its platforms distinguish between offensive expression and content likely to cause offline harm. Internal company documents revealed examples such as "immigrants are scum" and "white people are all Nazis" may remain online under Meta's rules. The commission heard Meta significantly reduced proactive hate speech removals after changing its moderation approach, despite having AI capable of screening posts before publication. Senior Counsel Assisting the Royal Commission, Richard Lancaster, also highlighted cases where antisemitic material, including Holocaust denial content and abuse targeting royal commission witnesses, remained online until reviewed following direct intervention by the commission. Good acknowledged shortcomings and said Meta would learn from the cases to improve its moderation systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

Meta tells royal commission its platforms allow ‘dehumanising’ hate speech

JAMES DOWLING - 6 July 2026

1/2

Internal Meta talking points revealed by the antisemitism royal commission say its platforms Facebook, Instagram and Threads allow the phrases “immigrants are scum”, “white people are all Nazis” and “gay people are sinners” without consequence.

The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission on Monday heard that a Melbourne-based tech giant had acted on fewer than 1 per cent of alleged discrimination material reported, while Meta significantly cut the number of posts it blocked from going online for suspected hate speech – and in one case allowed a meme denying the Holocaust to stay online for three years.

Senior counsel assisting, Richard Lancaster, presented Meta’s global content policy director Ben Good with an FAQ prepared last year, when the company shifted away from proactive moderation.

The talking points argue: “We’ll proactively catch less bad stuff, but we’ll also reduce the number of innocent people’s posts and accounts that we accidentally take down in the process.”

“Why is saying things like ‘immigrants are scum’, ‘dirt’ or ‘shit’ not considered dehumanising under the new policy? Many would agree that it’s clearly hateful,” the document reads.

“It is important to distinguish between speech that is offensive and content that could lead to offline harm. Such speech may be offensive to many but it is not Meta’s role to police offensiveness.

“This also applies to things like ‘trans people don’t exist’ or ‘gay people are sinners’.

“We also allow statements addressing general morality – for example ‘immigrants are criminals’ – or comparisons to known hate groups or criminal organisations, like ‘White people are all Nazis’.

“However, we distinguish between claims of general activity and charges of specific criminal behaviour. ‘Black people are more violent than whites’ is allowed under our policy but ‘Black people are all drug dealers’ is not.”

Data released by Meta showed the number of suspected hate speech posts it proactively removed or took action against declined by 79 per cent and 73 per cent in less than a year on Facebook and Instagram after the policy change.

“The gold standard, of course, would be to remove every single piece of violating content before anyone sees it, but I’ll add that that would include never over-­enforcing against content,” Mr Good said.

“It carries risks when we remove content proactively.”

He said Meta has been able “for some time” to use AI large language models to screen every post on its platforms for hate speech as it was published, but held off on doing so because it risked over-enforcement.

Mr Lancaster showed Mr Good a cache of antisemitic posts targeting prior witnesses in the royal commission that Facebook had refused to remove from its platform until it was flagged with lawyers for Meta by the commission itself.

“In each case, Facebook has revisited that consideration after receiving correspondence from the royal commission,” he said.

“It does not instil confidence in the system. You’ve recognised Meta, Facebook and Instagram already have the AI and large language model tools to be able to prevent antisemitic content of this character being posted or shared at all.”

Mr Good said he had personally reviewed the posts and would “commit to learning from them”.

“That is an ever improving system, but one that is at times imperfect,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63046

File: 8f043c1c2dfdb4e⋯.jpg (212.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3737545da855aee⋯.jpg (440.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e0e07493d67b77⋯.jpg (291.25 KB,1999x1124,1999:1124,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4846968ba624627⋯.jpg (221.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795501 (061016ZJUL26) Notable: Aussie top cop Krissy Barrett’s warning to UN: time to get leaner and meaner as China grows - Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett will urge the United Nations to modernise its peacekeeping model by making police training leaner, faster and more affordable, while promoting greater Pacific leadership in international policing. Addressing the United Nations Chiefs of Police Summit (UNCOPS) in New York, Barrett will advocate training officers closer to their home countries and establishing the proposed PACPOL bloc to give Pacific police forces a stronger collective voice in global security matters. The initiative is intended to strengthen regional policing cooperation as China expands its security presence and police training across the Pacific, particularly in Solomon Islands. During the visit, Barrett will also meet FBI Director Kash Patel, New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, Canadian and US law enforcement leaders, and sign agreements to strengthen cooperation against terrorism, transnational crime and financial crime.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62713

>>62714

>>62737

>>62748

>>62846

Aussie top cop Krissy Barrett’s warning to UN: time to get leaner and meaner as China grows

RICHARD FERGUSON and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 5 July 2026

Australia’s top cop will warn the UN it needs to become a leaner and more agile peacekeeping corps as she takes her calls for a Pacific law enforcement bloc countering Chinese influence to her fellow security chiefs in New York.

Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett is set to meet FBI director Kash Patel and NYPC chief Jessica Tisch this week to discuss co-operation on terrorism post-Bondi, as she hosts the UNCOPS summit and works to elevate Australia’s role in inter­national policing.

First revealed by The Australian last year, the commissioner’s focus will be on countering the growing influence of Chinese police and security forces in the Pacific region, and giving island nations access to UN peacekeeping deployments.

Amid fears China is seeking to dominate peacekeeping operations worldwide, given it now provides the most troops and police of any Security Council member, the AFP boss will tell the UN that it needs to streamline the corps and train more officers closer to their home countries. “When UN member states adopted the Pact for the Future in 2024, they agreed peacekeeping must become more agile and better tailored to today’s challenges,” she will say.

“Australia took that call seriously. With our Pacific partners, we built a leaner, more sustainable police training model, without lowering the bar.

“When we say leaner, we mean a program delivered in five weeks instead of many months. When we say more affordable, we mean a model member states can actually sustain year on year, not one that strains a peacekeeping budget already under pressure. And when we say more agile, we mean police who can be trained closer to home and deployed where they’re needed, faster.”

Commissioner Barrett will be joined by three other Pacific ­nation police chiefs at the UNCOPS event as she seeks a global rebalance of law enforcement.

Beijing’s aggressive push to embed security personnel and exert influence over Pacific police forces was headlined by a 2023 deal struck between China and Solomon Islands, which included an implementation plan on policing scheduled to run until the end of 2025. A broader security deal was signed by the countries in April 2022.

While the AFP boasts a longstanding relationship with Pacific police chiefs and played a central role in the Australian-led ­Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon ­Islands, Beijing has expanded its security presence in Honiara and provided equipment and training for Solomon Islands police officers.

The AFP chief will tell her global colleagues that the Pacific policing bloc – PACPOL – will give island nation police a “greater say at global forums about security and safety matters”.

“A decision will be made by Pacific chiefs of police in Oct­ober on whether they agree to a new bloc, PACPOL. This will allow them to collectively establish priorities, with one voice at global and regional forums,” she will say.

After years of concerns about waste and corruption in peacekeeping missions, Ms Barrett will also call for financial belt-tightening at the UN and new models that will benefit smaller countries that cannot afford more bureaucratic and expensive police training methods. “Cost matters because sustainability matters. Member states have been candid about the financial pressure on UN peacekeeping,” she will say.

“A leaner training model means more countries can contribute capable, UN-ready officers without the price tag that has held them back. That’s how you protect police peacekeeping for the long term.”

Amid the UN event, Ms Barrett will sign a new memorandum of understanding with Donald Trump’s FBI chief, Mr Patel, on combating trans­national crime and terrorism.

She will meet with Ms Tisch, the powerful head of the New York police who has retained her power even under new socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani.

Ms Barrett will also meet with the US’s top drugs cops and the head of the Canadian Mounties, as well as sign a deal with digital payments giant PayPal on sharing information.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/aussie-top-cop-krissy-barretts-warning-to-un-time-to-get-leaner-and-meaner-as-china-grows/news-story/ff9b8c2f4c157449930a97c83145e516

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/afp-commissioner-address-united-nations-chiefs-police-summit-her-vision

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63047

File: 91586b7176f524c⋯.jpg (624.12 KB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 658df5e30020272⋯.jpg (362.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795523 (061024ZJUL26) Notable: One Nation eyes Andrew Hastie’s federal stronghold in Secret Harbour by-election test - One Nation will use the forthcoming Western Australian by-election in Secret Harbour as a test of support ahead of targeting Andrew Hastie’s federal seat of Canning at the next election. The by-election follows the resignation of state minister Paul Papalia, whose electorate largely overlaps with Canning. Premier Roger Cook said Labor expected a difficult contest despite previously holding the seat. WA One Nation leader Rod Caddies said the party had been preparing for months, with cost-of-living pressures expected to dominate the campaign. The party believes Secret Harbour will provide an indication of its prospects against Hastie, who retained Canning with an increased margin at the 2025 federal election despite the Coalition’s broader losses in Western Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62752

>>62881

>>62882

>>62897

>>62968

One Nation eyes Andrew Hastie’s federal stronghold in Secret Harbour by-election test

PAIGE TAYLOR - 6 July 2026

One Nation will use an imminent by-election for the West Australian lower house seat of Secret Harbour as a practice run for Andrew Hastie’s federal seat south of Perth.

The resignation on Monday of Cook Labor government minister Paul Papalia is expected to test One Nation’s popularity with voters in the sprawling seat of Canning held by Mr Hastie since 2015. Mr Papalia’s state seat of Secret Harbour, about 60km south of Perth, is mostly within the boundaries of Mr Hastie’s federal seat.

WA Labor retained Secret Harbour last year when it won a third term. While the Cook Labor government’s victory was a landslide overall, there was a 19.8 per cent swing against Labor in Mr Papalia’s seat. One Nation polled 8.3 per cent of the primary vote in Secret Harbour last year, a 6.3 per cent improvement on its 2021 vote.

Mr Papalia, 64, cited the illness of a close family member as the reason for his decision to leave parliament 22 months out from the next state election.

WA Premier Roger Cook told reporters on Monday that he expected a “really tough” campaign.

“It’s going to be very hard. We are not taking anything for granted,” he said.

“And we know that during a by-election there is heightened debate, there’s increased focus, and we are going to have to fight for our lives on this one.”

One Nation on Monday already had campaign T-shirts and a short list of candidates for the Secret Harbour by-election, according to the party’s WA leader, Rod Caddies, a member of the state upper house. Mr Caddies said One Nation began planning months ago amid rumours that Mr Papalia would quit before the next state election.

Mr Caddies predicted cost of living would be an important issue in the by-election. He said that while federal MPs had been a big asset for major parties in past state election campaigns, he did not think Mr Hastie was as popular with locals as he had been.

The Liberals were wiped out across Perth at the 2025 federal election but Mr Hastie was re-elected with a 5.4 per cent swing towards him in the federal seat of Canning. He relied on a strong local campaign that emphasised his work in the electorate, with little mention of the Coalition.

One Nation is known to consider Mr Hastie’s seat a big prize, and party leader Pauline Hanson has been in a war of words with him. Mr Hastie in June told a podcast hosted by Nine: “Pauline Hanson’s problem is that she is MAGA first, even when the Australian people suffer the economic consequences.”

Senator Hanson responded by saying she wanted to make Australia great again, and “clearly, his party is not being accepted by the Australian people”.

Senator Hanson is a vocal supporter of Ben Roberts-Smith – the Victoria Cross recipient who is facing war crimes murder charges – as is the party’s highest-profile backer, billionaire Gina Rinehart.

Mr Hastie, a former SAS captain who served alongside Mr Roberts-Smith in Afghanistan, has been targeted online for his evidence at the defamation trial that Mr Roberts-Smith initiated and lost against media outlet Nine. Mr Hastie was among more than 20 former and serving soldiers who were summonsed to appear as witnesses at that trial.

He has since said Mr Roberts-Smith is entitled to the presumption of innocence in the criminal proceedings.

In a statement to his constituents in June, Mr Hastie accused One Nation of “a relentless campaign of personal attacks against me online. It’s become serious enough that security at my home and electorate office needs to be upgraded”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/west-australian/one-nation-eyes-andrew-hasties-federal-stronghold-in-secret-harbour-byelection-test/news-story/3e9a4919da43c78957b33b257b2d0066

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63048

File: a2c9f7ce094e4b1⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,4489x2993,4489:2993,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24795552 (061041ZJUL26) Notable: Neo-Nazi complains he’s ‘unemployable’ after salute during Holocaust movie - Self-proclaimed neo-Nazi Nathan Bull, 24, has been sentenced to a six-month community corrections order with 125 hours of unpaid work after being found guilty of performing a prohibited Nazi salute during a screening of The Zone of Interest in Melbourne. Bull and others disrupted the March 2024 screening by performing Nazi salutes, mocking Holocaust victims and making Holocaust denial statements. Representing himself, Bull told the court his political views had made him unemployable, claiming employers rejected him because they could identify him online. Magistrate Stella Stuthridge sentenced him without recording a conviction, finding his notoriety and ongoing legal matters had already significantly affected his employment prospects, but rejected any suggestion that the seriousness of the offending did not warrant punishment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62854

Neo-Nazi complains he’s ‘unemployable’ after salute during Holocaust movie

Melissa Meehan - July 6, 2026

A white supremacist found guilty of performing a Nazi salute during a film about the Holocaust says his political beliefs make him unemployable.

Self-proclaimed neo-Nazi Nathan Bull was found guilty on Monday of performing a prohibited salute at Cinema Nova in Carlton, in Melbourne’s inner-north.

Bull was charged after he and others disrupted a screening of The Zone of Interest on March 9, 2024, by making Nazi salutes and mocking Holocaust atrocities.

The Zone of Interest follows the horrifying daily life of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss and his family, who build an idyllic domestic life in a house directly adjacent to Auschwitz concentration camp.

Six witnesses testified about Bull’s conduct, including cinema patrons and staff, in a two-day contested hearing in May.

Bull, representing himself on Monday, was asked by magistrate Stella Stuthridge whether he thought he should be sentenced with or without conviction.

The 24-year-old said his job prospects had already been badly affected because of his far-right political beliefs.

Bull told the court he relied on Centrelink payments to support his family. His partner is due to have their second child in coming days.

“It is quite difficult to get a job, obviously, because of who I am,” he told the court.

“They can just Google me and they don’t want the issues that it comes with being pulled up by communists, saying they have a Nazi working for them or the police showing up.”

Bull did not apologise for his actions during the court proceedings.

Police prosecutor Jessica McCartney said a conviction was warranted given the gravity of the offending.

Stuthridge ruled Bull’s ongoing court cases and political views had a “dramatic impact on his employability”, and decided to sentence him without a conviction.

“I think a conviction could only add to those difficulties,” she said.

Bull was sentenced to a six-month community corrections order including 125 hours of unpaid work.

Previously, witness Daphne Mohajer va Pesaran told Melbourne Magistrates’ Court the film focused on a concentration camp manager’s mundane life, set against the horror occurring nearby.

She said she noticed a rowdy group of five when they first entered the small cinema and witnessed them “laugh and snicker” during a scene that depicted human loss.

“It felt like they were excited to be there, they were egging each other on and announced to the cinema that we’d been lied to, that the Holocaust didn’t happen,” Mohajer va Pesaran said.

She said the group, seated in the front row, stood up and announced to the audience that “Hitler was a great guy” and “he didn’t do anything wrong”.

Another witness, Richard Schultz, said he saw two members of the group perform a Nazi salute in the cinema.

Bull wore a black Helly Hansen polo shirt in court, a clothing brand far-right extremists have appropriated because the prominent “HH” logo is interpreted as an abbreviation for “Heil Hitler”.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/neo-nazi-complains-he-s-unemployable-after-salute-during-holocaust-movie-20260706-p60cz5.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63049

File: fe49e1bc618cb21⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,5000x3331,5000:3331,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f81c99618689ecb⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9428333d570026f⋯.jpg (437.83 KB,2343x1687,2343:1687,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798559 (071046ZJUL26) Notable: China warns Australia over military alliance with Fiji that promises to 'act to meet the common danger' - China has warned Australia not to undermine its interests in the Pacific following the signing of the Ocean of Peace Alliance, a new mutual defence treaty between Australia and Fiji. The agreement commits both countries to "act to meet the common danger" if either faces armed attack and makes Fiji Australia's fourth formal defence ally. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning urged Australia to respect the independence of Pacific island nations and avoid targeting third countries. Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said he did not expect a severe Chinese backlash and suggested other Pacific nations could eventually join the pact. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to discuss regional security and a proposed bilateral treaty with Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale during talks in Honiara.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

China warns Australia over military alliance with Fiji that promises to 'act to meet the common danger'

Stephen Dziedzic - 6 July 2026

China has warned Australia not to harm its interests in the Pacific after Anthony Albanese struck a landmark military alliance with Fiji that could reshape the region's security architecture and draw in multiple other Pacific nations.

The prime minister and his Fiji counterpart Sitiveni Rabuka unveiled the Ocean of Peace Alliance on Monday morning, along with the Vuvale Union treaty, after months of secretive negotiations.

Fiji will become Australia's fourth official ally under the pact, with both countries promising to "act to meet the common danger, in accordance with its domestic processes" if the other faces a military attack.

Mr Rabuka also suggested he would be happy for many other countries in the region to join the pact, although Australia has signalled it is initially focused only on countries with standing militaries.

The new alliance forms part of the web of agreements Australia is pulling together as it tries to entrench Australia's strategic position and stop China establishing a military foothold in the region.

Mr Rabuka played down the prospect of any backlash from China, telling journalists in Fiji's capital Suva that he did not expect "severe pushback" and that he believed Beijing would "welcome" the understanding reached by both countries.

But China's foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning issued a frosty response on Monday evening.

"We do not engage in geopolitical rivalry or seek selfish political games," she said.

"It is hoped that the country of concern will truly respect the independence of Pacific island nations, focus on their sustainability, such as economic development, and avoid targeting any third party or harming the interest of any third party."

One Fiji government source also told the ABC they expected China to be "unhappy" about the agreement, but insisted the Pacific nation was determined to press ahead with the pact.

New Zealand has already welcomed the announcement, although it has not yet started any formal discussions about joining the alliance.

"As agreed by Pacific leaders, Pacific security should be led by the Pacific. The alliance reinforces this," a foreign affairs ministry spokesperson said.

Mr Albanese is likely to discuss the new alliance with Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale as he makes a lightning-quick stop-off in the capital Honiara as the nation celebrates Independence Day.

Mr Wale has been pushing his own idea of a regional security pact for Pacific nations, although it is unclear how this vision fits with the agreement unveiled by Mr Rabuka and Mr Albanese on Monday.

Australia and Solomon Islands agreed last month to kickstart negotiations on a new bilateral treaty, with Mr Wale telling the ABC he would like to conclude the deal before the end of the year.

Both leaders are also certain to field questions about China's ballistic missile test in the Pacific on Monday, which occurred just hours after the new Fiji-Australia agreement was signed.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-06/china-warns-australia-over-alliance-with-fiji/106886394

https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202607/t20260706_11976109.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63050

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798571 (071106ZJUL26) Notable: Albanese seeks Pacific pact after condemning ‘provocative’ China missile launch - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned China's submarine-launched ballistic missile test over the Pacific as a "provocative" act that destabilises the region, after joining Pacific leaders in criticising the launch. Speaking alongside Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale, Albanese said Australia had formally protested to Beijing, while Wale declared: "Be our friend, but don't threaten us." Albanese will host the leaders of Papua New Guinea, Tonga and Samoa in Brisbane as Australia pursues closer regional security cooperation, including a proposed treaty with Tonga and encouraging further participation in the new Ocean of Peace Alliance with Fiji. The United States, Philippines and Papua New Guinea also criticised the missile test, while Australia rejected China's claim that its limited advance notice met accepted international practice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

Albanese seeks Pacific pact after condemning ‘provocative’ China missile launch

Matthew Knott - July 7, 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese will seek to drive forward another Pacific treaty after he and key Asia-Pacific leaders united to condemn China’s intercontinental ballistic missile launch, labelling it a provocative, threatening and unfriendly act undertaken without sufficient notice.

Albanese will host three Pacific leaders – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape, Tongan Prime Minister Lord Fakafanua and Samoan Prime Minister La'auli Leuatea Schmidt – in Brisbane on Wednesday, where they will attend the State of Origin decider after a series of bilateral meetings.

Australia and Fiji have said they would welcome more nations joining the Ocean of Peace military alliance they struck this week, which commits the parties to come to each other’s aid if under attack. Tonga would be a logical partner to join the alliance given it is one of the few Pacific nations with a defence force.

Australia and Tonga are also seeking to finalise a comprehensive treaty known as the Kaume’a Ofi (close friendship) agreement, which the nations last year said would be “transformational” and “write the next chapter of regional integration”.

“Joining together is not expedient, short-term or transactional. It is our duty,” the nations said in a statement of intent last year.

In his first public comments since China announced it had fired a long-range ballistic missile from a submarine over the Pacific Ocean on Monday, Albanese told reporters in Solomon Islands capital Honiara: “We have made clear our concerns to China in both Beijing and in Canberra, and I’m making our concerns clear here as well.”

Albanese said there was “no doubt that this is a provocative act by China, which does destabilise the region, and therefore we will put forward our strong view”.

“This is one of those occasions where we must disagree with this action, and in particular, we point out that it is standard procedure for tests such as this, for there to be given 48 hours’ notice,” Albanese said. Defence Minister Richard Marles earlier said Australia was warned just two hours before the launch.

Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale, who was elected in May, said at the same press conference: “China is a good friend of Solomon Islands, but this is not something a friend does. This is not good in our region.”

Wale added: “Be our friend, but don’t threaten us.”

Wale, the current chair of the Pacific Islands Forum, said he had registered a “strong protest” with China’s ambassador in Honiara.

Noting that the United States also conducts missile testing in the Pacific, Wale said his “bottom line” was that he didn’t want to see any long-range missile launches in the region.

Wale said the missile test would not deter his efforts to create a Pacific-wide security pact, and that it only added to the need for a regional platform.

Solomon Islands and China signed a security pact in 2022, alarming officials in Canberra. Albanese and Wale are hoping to strike a comprehensive security treaty by the end of the year.

The Philippines issued an angry response to the missile launch, which passed over the northern tip of the country on Monday afternoon, calling it “a reckless display of military power that shows little regard for smaller countries and the fragile ecological systems that sustain their people.”

“This launch serves no peaceful purpose and is a calculated act of taunting and provocation against those who reject China’s illegal expansionism and coercive conduct,” Philippines Department of National Defence Spokesman Arsenio Andolong said.

Marape, the PNG leader, issued a statement in which he “respectfully” urged China to make this its last missile test in the region, extending the message to other nations such as the US, Japan and France.

The Fijian government issued a muted response, acknowledging China had provided notice of the test and saying Fiji was assured it was not targeted at any particular country.

Senior Labor and Coalition figures united to condemn the missile launch, while saying they did not believe it was a direct response to the defence alliance Australia signed with Fiji just hours earlier.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63051

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798579 (071116ZJUL26) Notable: Anthony Albanese gives China his strongest ever rebuke since taking office over nuclear missile test - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered his strongest criticism of China since taking office, describing Beijing's submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missile test over the Pacific as a "provocative" act that undermined regional peace and stability. Speaking in Solomon Islands, Albanese criticised China's limited notice before the launch and warned the world needed "less nuclear weapons, not more". Prime Minister Matthew Wale condemned the test, telling Beijing: "Be our friend, but don't threaten us," while arguing it strengthened the case for a Pacific-wide security pact. The United States, Philippines, New Zealand, Japan and Taiwan also criticised the launch. Analysts said the test highlighted China's expanding nuclear deterrent and growing submarine capability, while former Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo questioned whether the timing alongside Australia's new defence pact with Fiji was coincidental.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

>>63050

Anthony Albanese gives China his strongest ever rebuke since taking office over nuclear missile test

BEN PACKHAM - 7 July 2026

1/2

Anthony Albanese has blasted China’s “provocative” launch of a nuclear-capable missile in the ­Pacific and backed Trump administration warnings over its “rapid and opaque” weapons build-up in his strongest rebuke of Beijing’s actions since taking office.

The Prime Minister said the missile test undermined regional peace, as his Solomon Islands counterpart Matthew Wale warned Beijing not to “threaten us” and declared a region-wide ­security pact with Australia was now more urgent than ever.

The condemnation came less than 24 hours after China launched the intercontinental ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine, sending shockwaves through the Pacific and beyond.

Chinese state media outlet The Global Times claimed the test was “both necessary and restrained”, warning countries in the region to “accept and get used to” China’s nuclear program.

Speaking in Honiara, Mr Albanese criticised China’s scant notice before the test and said he feared the launch would accelerate the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

“There is no doubt that this is a provocative act by China which does destabilise the region,” the Prime Minister said.

“We don’t want to see any action that is destabilising or which undermines the peace, security and stability of the Pacific.

“And in particular, we point out that it is standard procedure for tests such as this … to be given 48 hours notice. This was not done on this occasion.”

The missile with a dummy warhead was fired from the South China Sea, flying more than 7000km before landing somewhere between Tuvalu and Nauru, according to a map of its trajectory published by Taiwan. The strike zone was estimated to be about 1000km north-northeast of Solomon Islands.

Mr Wale said no country should launch an ICBM into the Pacific, calling on China to “be our friend” but adding the warning “Don’t threaten us”.

“China is a good friend of Solomon Islands, but this is not something a friend does. This is not good in our region,” he said.

“And as chair of Pacific Islands Forum, I’ve also … registered my strong protest yesterday with the (Chinese) ambassador.”

Mr Wale, who replaced his pro-China predecessor in May, has led calls for a Pacific-wide security agreement with Australia, in addition to a comprehensive bilateral pact which is set to be fast-tracked for signing by the end of the year.

“In many ways the missile test is further evidence for the need for a regional platform so that the region can speak as one,” he said.

The proposed agreement would “allow for much greater sharing of intelligence and information so we can be advocating better for Pacific-wide issues”, Mr Wale added.

Mr Albanese stopped in Honiara on Tuesday to celebrate Solomon Islands’ Independence Day, pledging about $10m to buy books for every primary school student in the country.

Solomon Islands signed a controversial security agreement with Beijing in 2022, but Mr Wale has sought to prioritise diplomatic and security ties with Australia.

The stop followed Mr Albanese’s signing a day earlier of a so-called Ocean of Peace military alliance with Fiji in Suva that will compel both countries to “act to meet the common danger” if ­either is attacked.

The Chinese missile test came just hours later, in what many analysts said was a warning to Pacific nations to avoid further security agreements with Australia.

It was just its third such Chinese test in the region, following one in 2024, and another in 1980.

Mr Albanese said the world needed “less nuclear weapons … not more”, highlighting the missile’s long range and ability to “cause considerable damage”.

Amid rising regional anger, The Philippines said the test was “a reckless display of military power that shows little regard for smaller countries and the fragile ecological systems that sustain their people”.

“This launch serves no peaceful purpose and is a calculated act of taunting and provocation against those who reject China’s illegal expansionism and coercive conduct,” the country’s Defence Department spokesman, Arsenio Andolong, said, calling on China “to act responsibly and stop turning shared seas into arenas of intimidation and imperial ambition”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63052

File: 615bf346ea21b4b⋯.jpg (265.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 56f9537d60f6e7b⋯.jpg (83.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e82ea41a05285e1⋯.jpg (256.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aecc71e20d5d7e1⋯.jpg (317.05 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798598 (071130ZJUL26) Notable: COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese throws his China caution to the wind after ‘provocative’ nuclear missile test - "Anthony Albanese has taken extreme care to avoid inflaming tensions with China since he was elected. On Tuesday, that caution was thrown out the window. China’s nuclear-capable missile launch into the Pacific was a “provocative act”, he said, destabilising the region and undermining peace. The comment was calibrated to be heard in Beijing and by Pacific Island leaders, who are equally angry at and bewildered by the missile test. Solomon Islands’ leader Matthew Wale, the current chair of the Pacific Islands Forum, spoke for the entire region when he warned “Don’t threaten us”. Beijing wants to win over regional leaders as part of its quest to secure a base in the Pacific. But it is its own worst enemy. The South Pacific has a long memory of US, British and French nuclear tests. The entire region signed the Treaty of Rarotonga in 1985, banning the use, testing and possession of nuclear weapons. China’s missile test was an affront to that diplomatic pact. Beijing’s reaction to the uproar was typically abrasive. State-run mouthpiece The Global Times attacked “voices with ulterior motives, or even those with guilty consciences”. If anything, this incident will drive Pacific leaders even closer to Australia, as the Albanese government looks to counter China’s strategic ambitions at every turn. It comes ahead of talks on a proposed but long-elusive region-wide security agreement between Pacific Island countries and Australia. Wale, a longtime China critic who is championing the idea, is expected to lead discussions on it at the PIF leaders’ meeting in late August and early September. He now has an even more powerful argument - that the region needs the platform to share intelligence and “speak as one”. Meanwhile, Australia has been amassing bilateral security agreements, including two new mutual defence alliances in the space of less than 12 months. The first, with Papua New Guinea, will enter into force on Wednesday with an exchange of letters between Albanese and PNG Prime Minister James Marape. Albanese signed the second, with Fiji, on Tuesday. That treaty has an added provision allowing other Pacific nations to join with the approval of the original signatories. This will have set off the klaxons inside the Chinese Communist Party, which is seeing its prospects for gaining a military foothold in the region slipping away." - Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

>>63050

COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese throws his China caution to the wind after ‘provocative’ nuclear missile test

BEN PACKHAM - 7 July 2026

Anthony Albanese has taken extreme care to avoid inflaming tensions with China since he was elected. On Tuesday, that caution was thrown out the window.

China’s nuclear-capable missile launch into the Pacific was a “provocative act”, he said, destabilising the region and undermining peace.

The comment was calibrated to be heard in Beijing and by Pacific Island leaders, who are equally angry at and bewildered by the missile test.

Solomon Islands’ leader Matthew Wale, the current chair of the Pacific Islands Forum, spoke for the entire region when he warned “Don’t threaten us”.

Beijing wants to win over regional leaders as part of its quest to secure a base in the Pacific. But it is its own worst enemy.

The South Pacific has a long memory of US, British and French nuclear tests.

The entire region signed the Treaty of Rarotonga in 1985, banning the use, testing and possession of nuclear weapons. China’s missile test was an affront to that diplomatic pact.

Beijing’s reaction to the uproar was typically abrasive. State-run mouthpiece The Global Times attacked “voices with ulterior motives, or even those with guilty consciences”.

If anything, this incident will drive Pacific leaders even closer to Australia, as the Albanese government looks to counter China’s strategic ambitions at every turn.

It comes ahead of talks on a proposed but long-elusive region-wide security agreement between Pacific Island countries and Australia.

Wale, a longtime China critic who is championing the idea, is expected to lead discussions on it at the PIF leaders’ meeting in late August and early September.

He now has an even more powerful argument – that the region needs the platform to share intelligence and “speak as one”.

Meanwhile, Australia has been amassing bilateral security agreements, including two new mutual defence alliances in the space of less than 12 months.

The first, with Papua New Guinea, will enter into force on Wednesday with an exchange of letters between Albanese and PNG Prime Minister James Marape.

Albanese signed the second, with Fiji, on Tuesday. That treaty has an added provision allowing other Pacific nations to join with the approval of the original signatories.

This will have set off the klaxons inside the Chinese Communist Party, which is seeing its prospects for gaining a military foothold in the region slipping away.

In reality, New Zealand and Tonga are the only other South Pacific nations with standing armies that could credibly seek to join the pact.

Yet even the prospect of the treaty’s expansion represents a further blow to Beijing’s strategic ambitions and institutional prestige.

Albanese will, perhaps uncoincidentally, get together with Tonga’s Prime Minister, Lord Fakafanua, in Brisbane on Wednesday, before hosting him and Marape at the NRL’s State of Origin decider.

Samoa’s Prime Minister, La’auli Leuatea Schmidt, may also attend, despite recently undergoing surgery in New Zealand.

This is the sort of bridge-building China is incapable of pulling off. Its diplomatic engagements are intended to inspire awe, even fear. Albanese, on the other hand, can set his counterparts at ease over a beer and meat pie at the footy.

The PM’s week of good international vibes is set to continue on Thursday when he hosts Indian counterpart Narendra Modi in Melbourne.

Modi remains a formidable global figure despite a drop in support for his governing BJP at the last election and concerns over human rights in India.

Albanese will bask in his reflected star power. He knows diplomacy is all about relationships – something China struggles to grasp.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-throws-his-china-caution-to-the-wind-after-provocative-nuclear-missile-test/news-story/97a59f7f44e3e26ef70574a09c181c5f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63053

File: e2f8135582c97f5⋯.jpg (226.31 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798619 (071142ZJUL26) Notable: Australia instrumentalizes 'sports diplomacy' and defense pact to counter China; expert sees anxiety behind bid to shore up fading dominance - "Three Pacific island leaders are scheduled to attend security talks in Australia while also attending a rugby league final, as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reportedly mounts a sports-diplomacy push to curb China's influence. Separately, Albanese inked a defense deal with Fiji on Monday, viewed as a "rebuff to China." An observer said that Canberra is packaging sports outreach, security agreements and other tools into a full-fledged mechanism to counter China's influence, driven by Canberra's anxiety over the unraveling of its long-standing position across the Pacific. AFP reported that Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape and Tonga's Prime Minister Lord Fakafanua will travel to Australia on Wednesday, with at least one other Pacific leader also expected for bilateral security talks on the day. According to AFP, the Australian Prime Minister will host these leaders at the final State of Origin rugby league match between Queensland and New South Wales states ... Officials have privately said rugby league and rugby union, where Australian and Pacific players have significant success, offer a soft-power edge over China, which does not have a history of playing the codes, per the report. When sport, which promotes exchanges, ties and regional identity, is packaged with elements of soft-power competition and embedded into security negotiations, it turns from a bridge for communication into a strategic bargaining chip, reflecting the instrumentalization of sports diplomacy, Chen Hong, Director of Asia Pacific Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday ... Chen said with new partners including China offering Pacific island nations a broader range of cooperation options, Australia clearly realizes it can no longer take the Pacific island countries' political alignment and security dependence for granted. It is therefore attempting to re-entrench its central position in the region by tapping into carriers brimming with cultural connotations, Chen added ... Judging from Australia's multiple moves targeting China, the country has been attempting to continuously package issues such as sports and security agreements into a broader mechanism to counterbalance China, the expert pointed out. These attempts also reveal that Australia's anxiety does not stem from any single cooperative initiative, but rather from the unraveling of its long-standing dominance across the Pacific, Chen said. In the long run, Australia's logic of competition for dominance in the region will not only marginalize issues that truly affect people's livelihoods, such as climate, health, and development, but also squeeze the space for Pacific island nations to pursue their own independent and balanced diplomacy, Chen added." - Li Yawei, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

>>63050

Australia instrumentalizes 'sports diplomacy' and defense pact to counter China; expert sees anxiety behind bid to shore up fading dominance

Li Yawei - Jul 06, 2026

1/2

Three Pacific island leaders are scheduled to attend security talks in Australia while also attending a rugby league final, as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reportedly mounts a sports-diplomacy push to curb China's influence. Separately, Albanese inked a defense deal with Fiji on Monday, viewed as a "rebuff to China." An observer said that Canberra is packaging sports outreach, security agreements and other tools into a full-fledged mechanism to counter China's influence, driven by Canberra's anxiety over the unraveling of its long-standing position across the Pacific.

AFP reported that Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape and Tonga's Prime Minister Lord Fakafanua will travel to Australia on Wednesday, with at least one other Pacific leader also expected for bilateral security talks on the day.

According to AFP, the Australian Prime Minister will host these leaders at the final State of Origin rugby league match between Queensland and New South Wales states.

"Through one of Australia's favorite sporting codes, we are bringing our Pacific family closer together," Albanese said in a statement on Sunday.

Officials have privately said rugby league and rugby union, where Australian and Pacific players have significant success, offer a soft-power edge over China, which does not have a history of playing the codes, per the report.

When sport, which promotes exchanges, ties and regional identity, is packaged with elements of soft-power competition and embedded into security negotiations, it turns from a bridge for communication into a strategic bargaining chip, reflecting the instrumentalization of sports diplomacy, Chen Hong, Director of Asia Pacific Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.

The AFP report also said that Prime Minister Albanese "mounts a sports diplomacy push to curb China's influence."

Chen said with new partners including China offering Pacific island nations a broader range of cooperation options, Australia clearly realizes it can no longer take the Pacific island countries' political alignment and security dependence for granted. It is therefore attempting to re-entrench its central position in the region by tapping into carriers brimming with cultural connotations, Chen added.

Concurrently, Albanese signed an agreement, named the Ocean of Peace Alliance, alongside Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka in Suva, on a one-day trip to the Pacific island on Monday, The Australian reported.

Under the mutual defense provision, the agreement states: "Each party recognizes that an armed attack on any of the parties within the Pacific would be dangerous to each other's peace and security as well as the security of the Pacific, and declares that it would act to meet the common danger, in accordance with its domestic processes," The Australian reported.

When asked to comment on Australia and Fiji signing a mutual defense treaty and a new agreement to develop ties, which is part of Canberra's campaign to shore up its influence in the South Pacific and to limit China's influence, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Monday that China always upholds the principles of mutual respect, equality, mutual benefit, openness and inclusiveness in carrying out cooperation with Pacific island nations, adding that "we do not engage in geopolitical rivalry or seek selfish political gains."

"It is hoped that the country concerned will truly respect the independence of Pacific island nations, focus on their sustainable socioeconomic development, and avoid targeting any third party or harming the interests of any third party," Mao said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63054

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24798677 (071158ZJUL26) Notable: YouTube says video calling Bondi Beach terror attack a 'false flag' does not violate hate speech policies - (Video) YouTube told the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion that a video claiming Bondi terror survivor Arsen Ostrovsky faked his injuries and describing the attack as a "false flag" did not breach its hate speech policies and would remain online. Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster SC challenged the decision, arguing the video clearly incited hatred against Ostrovsky as a Jewish Australian, but YouTube policy manager Rachel Lord said repeated reviews, including at a senior level, had found it non-violative. By contrast, TikTok said antisemitism was explicitly prohibited under its policies and that 98 per cent of harmful content in Australia was removed proactively before being reported. The platform acknowledged occasional moderation errors but said they were corrected through further review.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63004

>>63033

YouTube says video calling Bondi Beach terror attack a 'false flag' does not violate hate speech policies

Phoebe Pin - 7 July 2026

1/2

YouTube has doubled down on its finding that a video in which creators suggested a victim of the Bondi Beach terror attack had lied about his injuries did not violate its hate speech policies, with the content remaining online.

The popular video platform has fronted the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, which is examining the prevalence of online hate.

The commission was taken through the various hate speech policies that YouTube creators and users must abide by.

The policies did not provide explicit examples of antisemitic content that was prohibited on the platform.

Under the policies, content which dehumanised individuals or groups was prohibited, as was content that denied or minimise well-documented, major violent events.

The commission has previously heard Bondi Beach shooting victim Arsen Ostrovsky reported to YouTube a video in which he was described as an "intelligence asset" who had a "degree in theatre".

The video referenced a selfie Mr Ostrovsky posted of his injuries showing his head covered in blood, with one of those featured in the video claiming Mr Ostrovsky was wearing makeup.

"We know that Zionists do this sort of shit all the time. Like it's false flag, after false flag, after false flag," one man in the video said.

Despite the video being reported multiple times, it remains on the platform.

Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster SC put to Australia-based YouTube policy manager Rachel Lord that the video was a "very clear breach" of community guidelines.

"What I have been told from the teams that have reviewed the video it is non violative and it remains on the platform," Ms Lord said in response.

"My understanding … that [violent events component] part of the policy is looking at denial of the event itself or denial of victimhood, not questioning motivations and actions around it."

Mr Lancaster put to Ms Lord that the video's criticism of Mr Ostrovsky as a Zionist and intelligence actor "surely incites violence against him based on his characteristic as a Jewish Australian".

Ms Lord said she did not have an understanding "in any detail" about the reasons behind the decision.

"The teams have reviewed this thoroughly as a result of this being referenced at this commission," she said.

She said a subsequent review was conducted at a high level.

"That may make matters worse, Ms Lord rather than better," Mr Lancaster said in reply.

"I suggest to you it shows a really serious deficiency in YouTube's guidelines that this video, after review at the highest level remains accessible to the public."

Ms Lord said she would direct the commission's feedback internally at YouTube.

Nicholas Bender SC, who represents various Jewish community groups, asked Ms Lord what further options were available for Mr Ostrovsky and others requesting the removal of the video.

"That video has been reviewed and it remains on the platform so were it flagged, it wouldn't be removed," Ms Lord said.

"We abide by the laws in the jurisdictions where we operate so were it determined that where platforms are drawing the line is not meeting community expectations then governments are free to regulate and we would abide by that legislation."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63055

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802276 (080944ZJUL26) Notable: Bizarre ‘time travel’ bug blamed for catastrophic Telstra outage - (Video) A faulty firmware update affecting Telstra's network timing systems is believed to have caused the nationwide mobile outage after some servers reset their clocks by 1024 weeks, making parts of the network believe the date was November 2006 instead of July 2026. The error disrupted device authentication, causing widespread call and data failures and preventing some Triple Zero calls from connecting. Telstra chief financial officer Michael Ackland said there was no evidence of malicious activity and confirmed about 300 welfare checks were conducted, with six people later reporting they had required assistance. The outage also disrupted regional rail services and affected mobile providers using Telstra's wholesale network. The cause remains under investigation, while critics renewed calls for stronger telecommunications reliability standards.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bizarre ‘time travel’ bug blamed for catastrophic Telstra outage

David Swan - July 8, 2026

1/2

A 20-year “time travel” glitch triggered by a botched firmware upgrade is the likely culprit behind Telstra’s catastrophic nationwide mobile network outage, internal sources have revealed.

Two internal Telstra sources said the outage was caused by a software bug linked to the network’s timekeeping systems.

According to the sources, a faulty firmware update caused some of Telstra’s timing servers to incorrectly reset their clocks by 1024 weeks, or almost 20 years, making them believe the date was November 2006 instead of July 2026.

Modern mobile networks rely on highly accurate timing to authenticate devices and maintain connections. The incorrect date caused parts of the network to reject customers’ phones, leading to intermittent call and data outages across the country.

“There was an update... and it did impact what’s known as the GPS node, which caused the time to re-sync,” Telstra’s chief financial officer Michael Ackland confirmed on Wednesday afternoon. “We’re working through the details of that now.“

He admitted that there were more Triple Zero calls that failed to get through than the company initially expected.

“The volume of these welfare checks was higher than we expected,” Ackland said. About 300 welfare checks were conducted via text, calls and in person by police. He says that there were six people who told the company that they needed help after the company checked. Details of those cases have not been released.

At about 4.30am AEST, Telstra noticed that two “nodes” that keep time synchronised across the mobile network – which is crucial for computers to work together – had stopped working as they should, causing intermittent call and data failures across the country.

The telco’s chief financial officer, Michael Ackland, said the affected nodes were housed in Telstra data centres in Melbourne and Sydney, and there was nothing to indicate malicious activity, despite suggestions from One Nation that a foreign power could be involved.

Ackland said the issues had been fully resolved by 4pm.

Wibowo Hardjawana, a senior lecturer in electrical engineering at the University of Sydney, said a node was made up of software functions that had to keep to the same clock for the network to work. “These functions must be synchronised in time and work together to enable customers to establish communication with each other,” he said.

The Communication Workers Union national secretary, Shane Murphy, called the outage “utterly shameful” and claimed it was a direct result of the company cutting staff.

“This is what happens when you prioritise the bottom line over critical services; you get an unreliable network that lets Australians down time and time again,” Murphy said. He did not present evidence to support his claim that the job cuts were tied to the outage.

Telstra has been cutting jobs and shifting work offshore under its “Connected Future 30” strategy. In February, it proposed cutting up to 400 enterprise and consumer roles, many to be outsourced to the Indian technology firm Infosys, on top of about 209 jobs going from an artificial-intelligence joint venture with Accenture and 550 roles cut in July last year.

Telstra has not linked the outage to staffing levels, and Ackland said the cause remained under investigation. The company was contacted for further comment.

Ackland claimed about 90 per cent of calls and data services were working again by late morning, but could not say what had caused the fault, when full service would return, how many customers were affected and whether everyone whose calls to Triple Zero had failed were safe. Ackland would not commit to compensating customers who had been affected.

“Our focus at the moment is absolutely on getting things up and running and we will deal with our customers post the event, as we will work with government and regulators on any other action,” Ackland said. He fronted the media for a short press conference on Wednesday in place of chief executive Vicki Brady, who was on holidays overseas but is now returning to Australia.

The outage also brought down Victoria’s entire regional passenger rail network, while in New South Wales some regional and intercity trains were also delayed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63056

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802298 (080954ZJUL26) Notable: Australian government commits $250m to landmark five-country Pacific rugby league deal - Australia has committed $250 million to a landmark Pacific Rugby League Partnership linking Australia, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Fiji and Samoa to expand rugby league participation and strengthen regional ties. Witnessed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the leaders of PNG, Samoa and Tonga, the agreement will fund grassroots development, school programs, coaching, competitions and player pathways for boys and girls across the Pacific. The investment forms part of Australia's broader $600 million commitment associated with PNG's entry into the NRL. ARL Commission chairman Peter V'landys said the partnership would embed rugby league throughout the region, provide resources and personnel on the ground, and help develop the next generation of players. Albanese described the initiative as a significant investment in regional unity, saying rugby league builds identity, strengthens communities and brings Pacific nations together as "one Pacific family".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>63032

>>63042

>>63043

>>63044

>>63050

>>63053

Australian government commits $250m to landmark five-country Pacific rugby league deal

The statement of partnership between Pacific countries Australia, PNG, Tonga, Fiji and Samoa was ratified in Brisbane and will help encourage rugby league throughout the Pacific.

Dean Ritchie and Peter Badel - July 8, 2026

1/2

In a remarkable day for international rugby league, four Prime Ministers witnessed the ARL Commission sign an historic agreement with Pacific rugby league federations on Wednesday.

The statement of partnership between Pacific countries Australia, PNG, Tonga, Fiji and Samoa was ratified in Brisbane and will help encourage rugby league throughout the Pacific.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, PNG Prime Minister James Marape, Samoan PM La’auli Leuatea Schmidt and Tongan PM Lord Fakafanua united at the Sofitel Hotel to witness the landmark moment, which will be supported by a $250 million investment by the Australian Government.

The Pacific Rugby League Partnership is a historic initiative between the ARLC, the Australian Government, Pacific Governments and the rugby league federations of Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Samoa and Tonga.

Supported by a $250 million investment from the Australian Government - a key part of the broader $600 million commitment to PNG - the partnership will grow rugby league across the Pacific, using the game as a catalyst for social change.

There will be a strong focus on introducing young boys and girls to rugby league early in life and building participation in the sport, including through schools.

Albanese spoke passionately about the game and the initiative.

“This has been years in the making and required hard work and diligence,” said Albanese.

“It is a partnership built on the Pacific’s deep shared passion for rugby league.

“Rugby league is about identity, it’s about who you are. It’s about who your parents supported and you connections with your local community. It’s something that can inspire and drive a community to achieve better.

“This Pacific partnership will inspire the people of these fantastic nations and together we are all one Pacific family.

“It will lift up all of us over the coming years and I have no doubt that for however long I have the privilege of occupying the position that I do, this will be right up there as one of the most significant changes that we could possibly make to improve lives. Rugby league is a game that brings people together.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63057

File: 84df175664c9c52⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802360 (081011ZJUL26) Notable: ISIS-linked Australian woman Hodan Abby accused of beating enslaved Yazidi girl - The last known Australian woman linked to Islamic State, Hodan Abby, is expected to return to Australia under strict conditions amid allegations she abused a young Yazidi girl enslaved in her Syrian home a decade ago. The alleged victim, identified as Sara, told the ABC she was repeatedly beaten, deprived of food and knew Abby as "Umm Osama", the wife of an IS fighter known as "Abu Osama", who allegedly repeatedly raped her while she was held captive. Another Yazidi witness said she observed the abuse, while a former UN human rights specialist said multiple survivor accounts led investigators to believe Umm Osama was Abby. Abby, who left Australia in 2014 and was previously prevented from returning under a Temporary Exclusion Order, was later granted permission to return. The Australian Federal Police declined to comment on potential charges but said returning Australians who allegedly breached Australian law may be investigated.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62755

>>62766

>>62930

>>62989

ISIS-linked Australian woman Hodan Abby accused of beating enslaved Yazidi girl

Stephanie March - 8 July 2026

1/3

Warning: this article includes graphic descriptions of violence that some readers may find distressing.

The last of the known Islamic State-linked Australian women in Syria is expected to return home amid allegations a Yazidi girl was enslaved, beaten and raped in the woman's home in Syria a decade ago, the ABC can reveal.

Sydney woman Hodan Abby spent more than a decade in the self-declared Islamic State (IS) caliphate and Kurdish detention camps after leaving Australia in 2014.

When she left her home in Western Sydney it was with a friend who reportedly declared her desire to marry a jihadi fighter and become a martyr alongside him.

Ms Abby, who is of Somali descent, had been prevented from coming back to Australia under a Temporary Exclusion Order designed to delay the return of a person deemed a terrorism or security threat.

Last month, she was granted permission to return under strict conditions.

The ABC has spoken to Yazidi woman Sara, whose name has been changed, who was held as a slave in the home of a woman believed to be Hodan Abby, known to her by the nom de guerre "Umm Osama".

The Yazidis are a minority group that were targeted for extermination, mass execution and slavery by IS in 2014 in what the UN recognises as a genocide.

Having been abducted by IS members along with thousands of other Yazidi women and children in northern Iraq in 2014, Sara was just nine or 10 years old when she was sold into the home of a foreign IS fighter she knew as "Abu Osama" in neighbouring Syria in 2016.

His wife, Umm Osama, was pregnant with their daughter.

According to Sara, she spent the first three days in their home locked in a room without food.

When she was finally introduced to Umm Osama, her captor tried to convince his wife he'd bought the slave to help around the house, Sara said.

"After three days he told Umm Osama that he had brought me for her because she was about to give birth," Sara told the ABC.

"But his main purpose of taking me there was rape," Sara alleged.

She claimed Umm Osama initially did not realise Sara was being raped, but when she found out, she was furious.

"After she knew that, she started beating me and all my body was having bruises because of her beatings," Sara alleged.

"She beat me and also told me I wanted Osama to sleep with me."

Sara said Abu Osama then started taking her to the nearby house of his friend — another foreign IS fighter known as Abu Yahya — where Sara said Abu Osama would rape her in secret.

Sara said she was sold eight times to different ISIS households during her years in captivity, but she said the worst treatment she received from a woman was from Umm Osama.

"I was like her younger sister and she knew I was getting raped and she was not preventing that from happening," Sara told the ABC exclusively from her home abroad.

Sara discovers Australian link

While Sara never knew Umm Osama's real name, she describes her as English-speaking and having dark skin.

It was only after Sara was freed from IS captivity that she learned the woman she knew as Umm Osama was believed to be Australian.

Sara said the revelation came when she was working with investigators in Germany on a case against Abu Osama's friend, the IS fighter known as Abu Yahya.

"During the investigation I was asked about [Umm Osama] and [the investigators] said she was Australian," Sara said.

While the identification of Hodan Abby as Sara's abuser is not definitive, a former UN human rights specialist who has spent years working on IS cases said he believed this Umm Osama was Hodan Abby, based on what he had been told by multiple Yazidi survivors who gave statements about their time in captivity.

"When we conducted interviews we met with those who were there while Abu Osama was in Syria," the former UN specialist, who wants to remain anonymous to protect ongoing investigations, told the ABC.

"That is how our assessment was that this lady was Australian … it's according to the witnesses."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63058

File: 7785e236748963f⋯.jpg (595.33 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802395 (081017ZJUL26) Notable: Australian uranium to supercharge Indian nuclear power surge in breakthrough deal - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are expected to sign a long-awaited commercial agreement to enable significant Australian uranium exports to India, overcoming regulatory barriers that have limited trade since the countries signed a nuclear co-operation pact in 2014. The deal is expected to accompany new agreements on critical minerals and defence cooperation during Modi's Melbourne visit. India is rapidly expanding its nuclear energy sector, targeting 100GW of nuclear capacity by 2047 and planning to add 18 reactors by 2032 to meet growing electricity demand driven by economic growth and artificial intelligence data centres. Australian uranium producers are expected to benefit from the agreement, while Albanese and Modi are also expected to deepen defence and strategic cooperation despite continuing criticism from human rights advocates over India's domestic record.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62907

Australian uranium to supercharge Indian nuclear power surge in breakthrough deal

Matthew Knott - July 8, 2026

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Indian counterpart Narendra Modi are set to strike a breakthrough deal to unleash a surge of Australian uranium exports to India, ending more than a decade of delays since the nations signed a historic nuclear co-operation pact.

Modi, one of the world’s most powerful leaders, was scheduled to arrive in Melbourne on Wednesday night for meetings with Albanese on Thursday and what is set to be a raucous rally at Marvel Stadium where Modi will be cheered by 30,000 members of the Indian-Australian community.

Sources familiar with the planning of the visit said the leaders were expected to sign a long-awaited commercial uranium supply agreement, as flagged by this masthead in June, alongside pacts on critical minerals and defence co-operation.

Albanese told reporters on Wednesday he would have more to say about uranium exports to India in the coming days, as he flagged that he and Modi would make “a range of announcements” during the visit.

Australia and India signed a nuclear co-operation pact in 2014 which was controversial at the time, including within the Labor Party, because India has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

There have been only negligible uranium shipments over the past 12 years due to technical and regulatory barriers in India.

Changes to Indian safeguards have now paved the way for significant quantities of uranium to be exported for peaceful purposes.

India is planning a massive increase in nuclear power capacity to help reduce its reliance on fossil fuels and power the boom in data centres linked to artificial intelligence.

Major tech companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon are pumping billions of dollars into data centres in India, the world’s most populous nation with 1.47 billion people.

India has set an ambitious target to have 100GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047, 10 times greater than current levels.

The state-owned Nuclear Power Corporation Of India has said the country planned to add 18 more nuclear reactors to its energy mix by 2032.

Sources in the resources sector, who were not authorised to speak publicly, said Australian uranium companies were eager to seize opportunities to export to India and were willing to expand their operations if necessary.

Australia has the world’s largest uranium reserves – almost a third of the global total – according to the World Nuclear Association, but is only the world’s fourth-largest producer.

Uranium mining is banned in NSW, Queensland and Western Australia.

Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said during a meeting with Foreign Minister Penny Wong in May: “On the energy side, we have energy trade, we are looking to expand that as well into the uranium supplies.

“Our own nuclear sector has undergone reform, which will grow nuclear energy.”

Albanese described Modi as “the boss” during a stadium rally in Sydney during his last visit in 2023, prompting concerns from human rights advocates that he had not spoken out about discrimination towards minorities and democratic backsliding in India under Modi’s watch.

Pranav Aggarwal, from the Australia-India Foundation, said members of the Indian diaspora were travelling from Perth, Darwin, Auckland and Tasmania to attend the stadium rally in Melbourne.

Albanese will also speak at the event.

“We are super excited to welcome Prime Minister Modi and showcase the vibrancy of India,” Aggarwal said.

Shruti Pandalai, the Lowy Institute’s India Chair, said Modi was seeking to diversify India’s energy sources, raising the importance of securing uranium supplies from Australia.

She said she expected Australia and India to expand defence co-operation, especially on maritime security and the production of weapons and other military equipment.

Human Rights Watch Australia executive director Daniela Gavshon has called for Albanese to raise human rights concerns with Modi during the visit.

Human Rights Watch’s most recent report on India said that over the past year, the “slide to authoritarianism under the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party-led government continued, with increased vilification of Muslims and government critics”.

Modi, who was first elected prime minister in 2014, is travelling to Australia from Indonesia, where he visited the country’s largest Hindu temple and signed a series of defence deals with counterpart Prabowo Subianto.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-and-modi-to-strike-breakthrough-uranium-deal-20260708-p60djm.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63059

File: c827c45af9fe578⋯.jpg (197.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f960b9c19cda088⋯.jpg (236.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 360221c33bc9e07⋯.jpg (430.54 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802414 (081022ZJUL26) Notable: Jacinta Allan’s central role in Modi’s visit: Airport greeting, private meeting and centre stage at Marvel - Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan will play a prominent role during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Melbourne visit, welcoming him at the airport, holding a private meeting and joining him and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on stage before up to 30,000 people at Marvel Stadium. The visit comes as Labor seeks to strengthen support among Victoria’s 370,000-strong Indian-Australian community, now regarded as a key part of the party’s electoral base. Political analyst Kosmos Samaras said Labor enjoys strong support in electorates with large Indian-Australian populations, while arguing federal Liberal policies on immigration have complicated the Coalition’s efforts to rebuild support. Human rights organisations have meanwhile urged Albanese to raise concerns about the treatment of religious minorities and civil liberties during his talks with Modi.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62907

>>63058

Jacinta Allan’s central role in Modi’s visit: Airport greeting, private meeting and centre stage at Marvel

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 8 July 2026

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan will welcome Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Melbourne on Wednesday night before holding a one-on-one meeting with him and joining the Indian leader on stage at Marvel Stadium in front of up to 30,000 people.

Ms Allan’s high-profile role in Mr Modi’s three-day visit comes as Labor seeks to reinforce its standing among Victoria’s large Indian-Australian community.

With more than 370,000 residents of Indian ancestry, Victoria is home to Australia’s largest Indian diaspora.

Ms Allan and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil will greet Mr Modi on arrival in Melbourne, before the Premier will appear alongside him and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the “Melbourne Meets Modi” event at Marvel Stadium.

It is understood Ms Allan has also secured a private meeting with the Indian leader on Friday. Federal Opposition Leader Angus Taylor and Victorian Opposition Leader Jess Wilson are expected to attend the stadium event but will remain in the audience rather than appear on stage. They will also meet Mr Modi on Friday.

The visit will be Mr Modi’s first to Australia in three years, following a similar community event in Sydney in 2023 where Mr Albanese and NSW Premier Chris Minns shared the stage with him. Former Labor strategist and RedBridge director Kosmos Samaras said Mr Modi’s brand in Australia was now “strongly aligned with Labor”.

Mr Samaras said the Indian-Australian community, once regarded as a genuine electoral battleground, had increasingly become part of Labor’s base, and now forms a coalition of voters Ms Allan could not afford to lose.

“In electorates where there are high numbers of people who speak a language other than English at home, Labor’s primary vote is in excess of 40 per cent,” he said. “That extends into the Indian community. The two-party-preferred vote is well above 60 per cent, and against One Nation it’s more than 70 per cent.”

Ms Wilson has sought to rebuild the Coalition’s standing with migrant communities since becoming Victorian Liberal leader last November, including among Chinese and Indian-Australian voters.

However, Mr Samaras said Mr Taylor’s stance on immigration, including his pledge to block non-citizens from accessing welfare payments, had complicated those efforts.

“Angus Taylor has been very unhelpful. If you think about the intricate network that is the Indian community in Victoria … for a portion to be targeted like they have been by the Liberal Party at a federal level, it’s made Jess Wilson’s job a lot harder,” he said.

“I would say it’s pretty much sealed it, it’s very hard to see how the Liberal Party can rebuild those relationships while Angus Taylor is there. That is the brand.

“The rebuilding of those relationships will take some time, but that doesn’t mean it’s irreparable. These are socially conservative, aspirational, wealth-accumulating Aussies. They should be voting Liberal.”

Mr Modi has strident critics among the Indian community, with Muslim and Sikh Australians typically having more negative views on his Bharatiya Janata party’s form of Hindu ethno-nationalism.

The Australian Federal Police this week issued a warning to an individual who is alleged to have made a threat to Mr Modi ahead of the visit, while human rights advocates have urged Mr Albanese to raise India’s human rights record in his talks with Mr Modi.

Amnesty International Australia said Mr Modi’s treatment of marginalised communities – particularly Muslims, Christians and other religious minorities – should be raised by the Australian government.

This includes a citizenship bill which discriminates against refugees from Muslim countries and the demolition of Muslim homes, businesses and places of worship.

“Australia has consistently affirmed its commitment to universal human rights,” Amnesty International said.

“As a close partner of India, Australia has an opportunity to engage through principled and constructive dialogue and to ensure that human rights remain a central component of bilateral relations.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jacinta-allans-central-role-in-modis-visit-airport-greeting-private-meeting-and-centre-stage-at-marvel/news-story/ff10781be5f3e27f2c385b90583cca1a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63060

File: c01b6394aa665b6⋯.jpg (349.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ce34a6c0afec2c3⋯.jpg (326.69 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802461 (081033ZJUL26) Notable: Probe into former anti-corruption chief Paul Brereton dropped over cost and disruption fears - The Inspector of the National Anti-Corruption Commission has discontinued two misconduct investigations into former commissioner Paul Brereton, concluding that completing them would impose unjustified costs and unnecessarily disrupt the agency following his resignation in May. Inspector Gail Furness said substantial public funds had already been spent, the key conflict-of-interest issues had been addressed through reforms to the NACC's declaration and reporting processes, and there was little public interest in pursuing the investigations further. A second complaint was also abandoned because it related to a single incident, raised no systemic issues and public disclosure could pose safety risks to those involved. The Coalition criticised the decision, with Michaelia Cash calling on the Albanese government to ensure the investigations are completed to maintain public confidence in the NACC.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62722

>>62767

Probe into former anti-corruption chief Paul Brereton dropped over cost and disruption fears

ELIZABETH PIKE - 8 July 2026

1/2

The Inspector of the National Anti-Corruption Commission has dropped its investigations against the agency’s besieged former boss Paul Brereton, finding the probes would “unnecessarily” hamper the office’s work less than two months after the matters forced his resignation.

Inspector of the NACC, Gail Furness, announced she had discontinued both investigations into Mr Brereton’s alleged misconduct as she could not “justify” the costs now the commissioner had resigned and “systemic issues” had been “addressed,” according to a statement penned last Friday.

The NACC welcomed the decision in its response on Wednesday but the Coalition called for the Albanese government to “step in” and ensure the investigations are completed.

It comes after Ms Furness said “significant” taxpayer money had been spent on the cases and the NACC’s efforts to detect, investigate and deter corruption would be “unnecessarily hampered by continued scrutiny” of the former commissioner.

Mr Brereton announced in late May that he would step down from the role, just three years into the five-year position, following months of scrutiny about his alleged conflicts of interest and handling of corruption complaints.

It was revealed in February that Mr Brereton was being investigated by the Inspector following reports that he had performed undisclosed work with the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force.

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland reprimanded Mr Brereton for failing to adequately address his ties to the Defence Force, which had sparked concerns about the potential for conflicts of interest in corruption complaints levelled against the ADF.

Mr Brereton, a former army reservist, had acknowledged the investigations into his conduct were “drawing attention away” from the NACC’s work when he announced his resignation.

The NACC also spent at least $204,000 on lawyers to help respond to the Inspector’s draft report into his alleged misconduct.

Ms Furness said “significant public money” had gone towards the investigations and “further considerable funds” would be needed to complete them, which she could not justify.

The chief watchdog for the NACC said many of the details about Mr Brereton’s conduct were already known and when it came to the complaint about his Defence ties, there was “little, (if any)” merit or public interest in seeing through the case now that he had resigned.

Ms Furness said the resignation also meant she no longer had to “resolve” the key issue at the heart of the case, which questioned whether Mr Brereton had met the legal requirements for declaring conflicts of interest.

“Third, the actions that have been the subject of this investigation were Commissioner Brereton’s alone … The other statutory officer holders did not know of his ongoing role and were not party to his decision to make the Declarations of Interest in the terms he did,” Ms Furness said.

“The question then became whether there were any systemic issues which could be identified from Commissioner Brereton’s actions and which needed to be addressed.”

Changes made to the NACC’s guide for declaring conflicts of interests, as well as reforms to internal reporting procedures, had satisfied her concerns.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63061

File: 07b8c7b9279e4ed⋯.jpg (151.7 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 23a1874dc642148⋯.jpg (296.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802486 (081038ZJUL26) Notable: Prosecutors fight to use video of Bankstown nurses in court - Commonwealth prosecutors have appealed a ruling excluding from evidence the viral video of former Bankstown Hospital nurses Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, who allegedly made threats against Israeli patients during an online conversation with Israeli influencer Max Ilinski. NSW District Court Judge Michael McHugh SC ruled the recording was inadmissible because it had been unlawfully recorded and shared, leaving the prosecution to rely primarily on Ilinski's testimony at the trial beginning on August 31. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has appealed to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal in an effort to have the video admitted. Defence solicitor Zemarai Khatiz argued the appeal was unlikely to succeed and would unnecessarily delay proceedings and increase public expense.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>62829

>>62853

>>62895

>>62969

>>62990

Prosecutors fight to use video of Bankstown nurses in court

BIMINI PLESSER - 8 July 2026

Commonwealth prosecutors have appealed the decision to exclude from evidence a video of two Sydney nurses allegedly threatening to kill Israeli patients, after a judge ruled it inadmissible ahead of their criminal trial.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir made global headlines last year after Israeli influencer Max Ilinski recorded their conversation in an online chatroom, in which Mr Nadir allegedly suggested he had sent Israeli patients to “hell”, and Ms Abu Lebdeh allegedly claimed she would “kill” Israelis rather than treat them.

In an extraordinary ruling, NSW District Court judge Michael McHugh SC declared last month the viral video was inadmissible and could not form part of the evidence against the nurses as it was unlawful for Mr Ilinski to have recorded and shared the private conversation.

Without the video, the prosecution’s case must rely on Mr Ilisnki’s testimony when the trial begins on August 31.

But two weeks after the controversial decision was handed down, the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions has lodged an appeal with the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal to overturn it. The CDPP declined to answer questions about the appeal.

The CDPP’s attempt to reintroduce the video into evidence follows warnings from the defence that any such appeals would likely fail.

Mr Nadir’s solicitor, Zemarai Khatiz, told The Australian he believed the prosecution’s bid was a “long shot” that would face “significant legal challenges and obstacles”.

“I am of the view that His Honour Judge McHugh SC delivered an incredibly thorough and meticulous judgment ... (that) is consistent with how the law should be applied, considering the evidence of this case,” he said.

“Whilst the prosecution is entitled to appeal, in my view, I am confident that any appeal would not have any reasonable prospects of success and prolong the inevitable.

“Pursuing this appeal under these circumstances would further delay the proceedings that have already been ongoing for approximately 15 months and further result in unnecessary expenditure of court resources and taxpayers’ money.”

The CDPP’s appeal will appear before the NSW Supreme Court for the first time on July 16.

Mr Khatiz said the defence was preparing to argue that Judge McHugh “reached the correct decision and made no error”.

Most of Judge McHugh’s judgment was suppressed and only limited reasons for his decision were released publicly last month. The reason for the suppression was not aired in open court.

Judge McHugh found evidence ­obtained illegally should only be allowed into court if “the desirability of admission outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence that has been obtained in such a way or ways”.

The former Bankstown Hospital nurses have both pleaded not guilty to using a carriage ­service to menace, harass or offend, and Ms Abu Lebdeh has pleaded not guilty to an ­additional charge of threatening violence to a group.

They have been stood down from their jobs by NSW Health and issued a two-year ban from working with NDIS participants.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/prosecutors-fight-to-use-video-of-bankstown-nurses-in-court/news-story/969960a5d088fcd6cb4bc5b14d5500e6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

70b232 No.63062

File: 20eb6b6723d0bc4⋯.jpg (32.66 KB,263x352,263:352,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9c7228364f27979⋯.jpg (111.63 KB,814x250,407:125,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/24802527 (081051ZJUL26) Notable: Australian woman arrested in US after allegedly voting illegally in federal elections - Australian citizen Denise Nataly Migliore, 51, has been arrested in Louisiana after being accused of illegally voting in the 2022 and 2024 US federal elections. Prosecutors allege she falsely claimed to be a US citizen when registering to vote before casting ballots despite being ineligible as a non-citizen. Ms Migliore, originally from Sydney, was arrested in New Orleans following an investigation by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. She told a local media outlet she believed permanent residents could vote and considered herself a citizen after living in the US for almost 30 years while her citizenship application was pending. President Donald Trump highlighted the case on Truth Social, reposting a news report about the arrest. If convicted, Ms Migliore faces up to five years' imprisonment, a substantial fine and possible deportation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian woman arrested in US after allegedly voting illegally in federal elections

Lucia Stein - 8 July 2026

An Australian woman has been arrested in the United States after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigation found she had allegedly voted illegally in multiple federal elections.

Denise Nataly Migliore, 51, was indicted on four counts on June 11 for illegal voting in an election and making false statements in order to register to vote, according to the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Prosecutors allege that in October 2022 and October 2024, Ms Migliore knowingly made false claims about her US citizenship to register to vote in a federal election.

Then on November 8, 2022 and November 5, 2024 she cast ballots that were ineligible because she was not a US citizen, prosecutors said.

The Australian was arrested at a federal courthouse in New Orleans on July 1.

"Her arrest and charges are the result of the hard work of the men and women of ICE law enforcement and our federal partners," Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said.

"Our message to aliens who vote in American elections is clear: we will find you, arrest you, and you will face the consequences, including criminal charges and deportation. Only Americans should be electing American leaders."

US President Donald Trump also weighed in on the case on Truth social on Tuesday, local time, posting a link to a news article about the investigation.

"Australian alien arrested after investigation finds she illegally voted in two federal elections," he wrote.

Mr Trump has previously alleged that immigrants have improperly influenced federal elections, but this has been debunked by comprehensive studies and state voting data, which indicates such instances are incredibly rare.

The full circumstances around Ms Migliore's arrest are not known.

Local news outlet NOLA has reported that Ms Migliore said she thought legal permanent residents could vote, and she did not know it was illegal for non-citizens to vote.

"I have been here almost three decades, I had a pending application for citizenship, and I just considered myself a citizen," she told the outlet earlier this month.

"I just didn't realise that it was such a big deal."

Ms Migliore is currently a resident of Franklinton, Louisiana but is originally from Sydney.

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said it was providing consular assistance to an Australian facing legal action in the United States.

There are approximately 2.9 million registered voters in Louisiana but since last year, state election officials have started verifying their citizenship status with the federal Department of Homeland Security.

It runs the information through a database called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program.

Both Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation were involved in the investigation that led to Ms Migliore's arrest.

If convicted, Ms Migliore faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. She could also be fined up to $US250,000 ($360,000).

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-08/australian-accused-of-illegally-voting-in-us-elections/106893092

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/07/07/ice-investigation-leads-arrest-australian-alien-who-illegally-voted-multiple

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116882008915975445

https://justthenews.com/government/security/australian-alien-arrested-after-investigation-finds-she-illegally-voted-two

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / aiproto / biz / comfy / cute / lumidor / random / socpl / tingles ]