[–]▶ 83e325 (2) No.130922>>130928 >>130973 >>131144 >>133794 >>133799 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
I found this study that's a response to another study and it apparently shows black people are discriminated against in police shootings even when taking crime rate into account. The problem is I can't read it. Can any of you explain to me if that's bullshit or not?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550620916071
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ bbee66 (1) No.130926>>131244
It’s a hoax. Every study ever done shows that cops shoot whites more and explicitly hold off on shooting niggers, because they know their careers are over if they do.
https://archive.is/1Ve9C
https://archive.is/d4S19
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 11673c (1) No.130928>>130972
>>130922 (OP)
All you need to know is:
-White cucks are kneeling.
-White cucks are scared of being called out and fired from their jobs.
-Police heavily avoid shooting niggers to avoid being fired too.
-Monkeys are destroying statues, although nobody gives a fuck.
-Any smart person would avoid every social media website or board other than 8chan (4chan is on a shill raid, avoid it until the election happens).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ f99dc1 (1) No.130972
>>130928
>White cucks are scared of being called out and fired from their jobs.
Because they know other whites will gleefully throw them under the bus. HTF are you going to have a family with 9 kids if you can't even afford those kids?
inb4 "just rent a closet like the beaners do lol"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 7f27e8 (1) No.130973
>>130922 (OP)
Use sci-hub you retard
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ a8a4c2 (1) No.131144>>131244 >>131246
>>130922 (OP)
these statistics are fake, they use p-hacking to make the study seem legit and delibertely ignore confounding variables. This is the same way they "proved scientifically" that there are 6 gorillion genders.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 83e325 (2) No.131244
>>130926
I am familiar with the reverse racism study. But you can't say this study is a hoax when you probably don't even understand it. Who cares if cops are more likely to shoot whites in a simulation if apparently according to this study they shoot blacks more in real life?
>>131144
Can you go into specifics please?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ a31a8d (1) No.131246>>131259 >>131275 >>131285 >>131551
>>131144
If leftists can fake statistics, then how can we be sure that conservatives don't fake statistics as well?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 70dbd4 (1) No.131259
>>131246
Because they're the ones burning buildings, looting, censoring everything, destroying monuments and being completely insane in general.
Also concordance.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ adcbbb (1) No.131275>>131294
>>131246
Because /pol/ said so and surely /pol/ would never lie, right?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ b176f0 (1) No.131285
>>131246
Very simple actually, ask if the study was ever replicated and here is the kicker no one was able to recreate this experiment following the same procedures and get the same results. Seriously, its a huge issue in a lot (((social science))) courses, even wikipedia doesn't deny it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ a61544 (1) No.131294
>>131275
Everything in your life is a lie, tranny. Even your gender.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ c3067c (1) No.131423
Basically this says that there are disparities (such as black less likely to be armed). They are not disputing the fundametal point that relative to encounters whites are more likely to be killed.
I'm guessing that if you reach for the officer's belt you don't count as "armed".
They also make a deal about whether they were engaged in criminal activity or not, which I again assume that they don't count resisting arrest as "criminal behaviour" even though it is.
If you want a normie-friendly redpill on the stats use Sam Harris's BLM podcast. It gets all the stats right on black crime and normies like him.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 170787 (1) No.131551
>>131246
Because one has been standard for generations, even with a nigger in the White House. The other was produced as sensationalist bait within the last week. If you think the original statistics are bullshit drive through Chicago back streets around midnight in a Rolls Royce, or if you don't wanna get butt fucked to death just watch the local news.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ d6289e (1) No.133794
>>130922 (OP)
Halfway through they say that they still dont have wnough data to say anything concrete. Also they dont factor in population size.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ c8d84f (1) No.133799
>>130922 (OP)
> However, if we assume that those individuals who were armed when killed by police come from the criminal subpopulation and those individuals who were unarmed come from the noncriminal subpopulation, then we can derive unbiased measures by using crime rate data as a benchmark.
This appears to be where they are juking the stats. It's labeled "Bias Corrections" which may as well be titled "How we're lying." Nearly every white I know owns a gun, none of them are criminals and a significant percentage are CCW. I'm sure a number of niggers who have a felony conviction are smart enough to know not to carry around their illegal gun at all times.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
