/nightowlnews/ - The Night Owl News

23200683 Lee Zeldin: Ramping up domestic energy production is better for our economy, environment, and national security

Lee Zeldin is identified in the sources as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator under the Trump administration.

Key information about Lee Zeldin from the provided sources includes:

•

Repeal of Biden-era Environmental Regulations: As EPA Administrator, Zeldin announced a proposal to repeal the "unconstitutional 2015 Obama 'Clean Power Plan'," "Biden's 'Clean Power Plan 2.0'," and the "2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards". These proposed repeals aim to revert to the "effective 2012 standards".

•

Rationale for Repeals: Zeldin stated that the previous rules imposed "massive costs on power plants, raised the cost of living, and endangered the reliability of our electric grid". He views these actions as "ending their war on our domestic energy supply and saving Americans billions of dollars". He also characterized the rules as based on a "false binary choice" between protecting the environment and growing the economy.

•

Economic and National Security Benefits: Zeldin asserts that the proposed rules, if finalized, would "deliver savings to American families on electricity bills" and ensure they "have the electricity that they need today". He also stated that "ramping up domestic energy production is better for our economy, our environment, and our national security," and that President Trump’s "One, Big, Beautiful Bill will help make this happen".

•

Policy Philosophy: Zeldin believes the EPA is "reclaiming sanity and sound policy, illustrating that we can both protect the environment and grow the economy". This aligns with a broader push towards "energy dominance" and crushing the "renewable" scam, which is seen as leading to "third world style living in western nations".

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23200695 CBP's 0 released in May down from 62,000 under Biden

The statement "CBP's 0 released in May down from 62,000 under Biden" highlights a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy and border control as described in the sources.

Here's a breakdown of the context and details surrounding this claim:

The Claim and Its Source:

This specific statistic, indicating "0 releases in May" by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) compared to "62,000 under Biden," is attributed to Donald J. Trump, who quotes Chief of U.S. Border Patrol Michael Banks. Trump presents this as evidence that "We are breaking record numbers in the right direction now" regarding border security.

Trump Administration's Approach to Immigration:

Mass Deportation Program: President Trump has campaigned on and is implementing a "Historic Mandate for, the largest Mass Deportation Program in American History". Polling reportedly shows "overwhelming Public Support" for removing undocumented immigrants.

Focus on Cities: Trump has stated that he wants ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to "focus on the cities," particularly "All blue cities. All Democrat-run cities," where he claims most of the 21 million people allowed in by Biden reside. He believes Democrats intend to use these immigrants to vote, but asserts "It's not gonna happen".

"CBP Home" App for Self-Deportation: A program encouraging voluntary departure, renamed "CBP Home" from the Biden administration's "CBP One" app, allows undocumented immigrants to "notify the U.S. Government of their intent to depart". This initiative offers financial incentives, such as a $1,000 stipend and free flights, as a more cost-effective alternative to physical deportation (which costs taxpayers an average of $17,100 per person).

Results of Self-Deportation: Reports suggest that "Nearly 1 million illegal immigrants have ‘self-deported’ under Trump". This trend is linked to higher wages for American workers, with a "decline in the immigrant population of 773,000 in the first four months of Trump II" and "a million foreign-born workers" having exited the workforce since March, leading to accelerating average hourly wages.

Reduced Inflows and Restricted Travel: The Trump administration has sealed off the U.S.-Mexico border, ended refugee admissions, revoked protections and work authorizations for over half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and imposed entry bans on foreigners from a dozen countries. These policies are expected to result in the "lowest immigration levels in decades" and potentially negative net migration for the first time in 50 years. Trump has also expanded travel restrictions to citizens from 36 additional countries, including 25 African nations.

Enforcement Actions: ICE agents have been instructed to continue conducting immigration raids at agricultural businesses, hotels, and restaurants. In one instance, after ICE raided a Nebraska meat plant, American citizens reportedly "lined up to fill the vacant spots".

Alleged Contradictory Stance: Some sources, however, present a contrasting view, alleging that Trump, despite his public statements, "officially told ICE not to deport" undocumented workers in hotels, restaurants, and agriculture because his "billionaire hotel friends and family" complained about having to "make the beds" themselves.

Criticism of Biden Administration's Policies:

The Biden administration is accused of letting "21 Million Unvetted, Illegal Aliens flood into the Country from some of the most dangerous and dysfunctional Nations on Earth — Many of them Rapists, Murderers, and Terrorists".

This influx is blamed for destroying "Americans' Public Schools, Hospitals, Parks, Community Resources, and Living Conditions," stealing American jobs, consuming "BILLIONS OF DOLLARS in Free Welfare," and turning communities into "Third World Nightmares".

The "Biden-Harris administration’s mass catch-and-release policies" are specifically cited as having incentivized millions of "inadmissible aliens" to cross the border. It is claimed that during Biden's administration, "62,000" were released by CBP in May and that "half a million illegals" were admitted in one month.

The total increase in the illegal alien population under Biden is estimated at "50% over the four tumultuous years," reaching "about 15.4 million" by one conservative watchdog group, while other sources claim the number is "way higher than disclosed," possibly 20+ million, or even 40+ million in total.

In summary, the sources present the "0 releases" figure as a key indicator of the Trump administration's effective implementation of its strict immigration policies, contrasting sharply with the "mass catch-and-release" policies attributed to the preceding Biden administration. This shift is framed as a restoration of law and order and an economic benefit for American citizens.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23200698 Trump says Tucker called him to apologize

The statement "Trump says Tucker called him to apologize" is directly supported by the sources. This claim highlights a dynamic and at times contentious relationship between former President Donald Trump and journalist Tucker Carlson, as depicted in the provided excerpts.

Here's a summary of the information regarding this statement and their broader interactions:

Trump's Claim of Apology:

* Donald Trump explicitly stated that "Tucker called him to apologize". This claim was made via a post on Truth Social.

* Trump reiterated this, saying, "Tucker Carlson apologized to me".

* The apology came after Carlson's public criticisms of Trump regarding the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump implies that Tucker was "not on POTUS' side".

* Trump mentioned that he asked Tucker, "are you ok with nuclear weapons in the hands of iran," and when Tucker "wasn't really ok with that," Trump told him "then you have to fight… the entire world will blow up, im not gonna let that happen". This suggests the apology might have been related to a difference in opinion on the Iran situation or Carlson's public stance on it.

* Trump also stated that his "supporters are for me, my supporters are about Make America Great Again… if they think that its ok that Iran have a nuclear weapon, then they should oppose me".

Background of Disagreements and Criticisms:

* Iran-Israel Conflict: Tucker Carlson has been a vocal critic of Trump's stance on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. He accused Trump of being "complicit in the act of war" by supporting Israel's assault on Iran. Carlson argued that "Washington knew these attacks would happen. They aided Israel in carrying them out" and that Trump's bragging about U.S.-supplied weapons placed the U.S. at the center of the events.

* "Warmongers" vs. "Peacemakers": Carlson has frequently drawn a distinction between "warmongers" and "peacemakers," placing individuals like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter, and Miriam Adelson on the "warmonger" list, suggesting they were pressuring Trump to escalate the conflict. He publicly questioned why the U.S. should be "mad at Iran".

* "America First" Principles: Carlson and others have questioned if Trump has "abandoned 'America First' principles" by seemingly prioritizing Israel. Carlson asserted that if Trump is still under the illusion of stopping "endless wars," it's time to "take off the MAGA blinders".

* Carlson's Warnings: Carlson wrote a newsletter titled "This Could Be the Final Newsletter Before All-Out War," warning that entanglement in the Middle East could "effectively end Trump's presidency".

* Trump's Response to Carlson's Criticism: Trump publicly dismissed Carlson's views, stating, "Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'". Trump also sarcastically suggested Carlson "go get a television network and say it so that people listen".

Other Mentions of Apologies/Regrets:

* Separately, Elon Musk expressed "regret" for "some of his posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week," acknowledging they "went too far". This occurred after private discussions with Vice President JD Vance and the White House chief of staff.

The sources present Trump's claim of Tucker Carlson's apology as a direct response to Carlson's public criticisms, particularly concerning the Israel-Iran conflict and the "America First" foreign policy stance. However, the tone and context of other sources suggest ongoing tension and differing interpretations of events between the two figures.The statement "Trump says Tucker called him to apologize" is directly supported by the sources. This claim emerged within the context of a public and at times contentious relationship between former President Donald Trump and journalist Tucker Carlson.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23198944 LIVE: Pete Hegseth Testifies at a Department of Defense Budget Hearing

Based on the provided sources, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testified at a Department of Defense Budget Hearing, which was a significant event covered in multiple instances.

Here are the details from the sources regarding his testimony:

* Date and Time: The hearing took place on June 18, 2025. Specific times mentioned include 9:00 AM EDT and 9:30 AM EDT.

* Location/Committees: Hegseth provided testimony before both the Senate Armed Services Committee and the House Appropriations Committee.

* Purpose of Hearing: The testimony focused on the posture of the United States Central Command in review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2026 and the Future Years Defense Program.

* Key Participants: General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified alongside Secretary Hegseth.

* Main Topics and Statements:

* Iran-Israel Conflict: Hegseth stated that protecting U.S. forces is a top priority, and deployments are intended to enhance defensive posture in the Middle East due to the escalating conflict. He confirmed the deployment of additional "defensive capabilities" to the Middle East, including a large number of U.S. military refueling aircraft and the movement of an aircraft carrier. He also previously authorized the "voluntary departure" of all military dependents in the region in anticipation of potential threats. During questioning, he said officials are providing various options regarding Iran to President Trump.

* Iran's Nuclear Program: Hegseth mentioned that there have been "plenty of indications" that Iran has been "moving their way toward something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".

* Ukraine Aid: He had previously stated that a cut in U.S. military aid to Ukraine was almost certain, citing the Trump administration's "very different view" of Russia's war compared to the previous administration. He confirmed the diversion of anti-drone weapons originally intended for Ukraine to American forces in the Middle East. When pressed by Senator Mitch McConnell, Hegseth stated that the Trump administration sought an end to the killing without taking sides in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and that winning and prevailing proponents had not presented a plan to push the Russian army out of territories. He emphasized that peace is in U.S. best interests and that Ukraine is not in the U.S. and not in NATO.

* Defense Budget Process: The House Appropriations Committee approved an $831.5 billion defense spending bill for fiscal year 2026, but the process faced bipartisan criticism due to the Trump administration's delay in releasing detailed budget materials. Hegseth defended the delay by stating the administration needed more time to align the budget with President Trump's priorities, promising a detailed proposal "soon".

* Military Parade: Hegseth discussed the military parade celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th birthday and the United States' defensive posture in the Middle East.

* Additional Deployments: Hegseth also deployed an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles under a Title 10 status to protect federal property, bringing the total in Task Force 51 (Los Angeles) to approximately 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. This was in response to anti-ICE riots in the city.

* Other Related Information: Senator Lindsey Graham pressed Hegseth on whether Russian President Vladimir Putin would stop at Ukraine. Hegseth confirmed that the U.S. would be obligated to act under NATO’s Article 5 if Russia were to invade NATO. There was also a question about whether Elon Musk was invited to the Pentagon to discuss war plans with China.

The sources indicate that Hegseth's testimony was part of ongoing discussions about U.S. military posture, budget allocations, and foreign policy, particularly concerning the Middle East and the conflict in Ukraine.Based on the provided sources, Pete Hegseth, identified as the Defense Secretary and Pentagon chief, testified at multiple Department of Defense Budget Hearings around June 2025.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23198967 Canadian state media explains absence of G7 Ukraine statement

Canadian state media has explained the absence of a joint G7 statement on the Ukraine conflict following the recent summit in Canada.

According to reports from Canadian state broadcaster CBC and other media outlets:

The G7 leaders did not issue a joint statement on the Ukraine conflict because the United States refused to sign off on it unless it was "watered down".

An anonymous official from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office admitted that plans for a group statement on Ukraine were dropped.

The Americans reportedly opposed wording that referenced Russia, due to concerns that it could jeopardize U.S.-brokered diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict between Moscow and Kiev.

The Canadian PM's office spokesperson, Emily Williams, later rejected these specific reports, insisting that "no proposed joint statement regarding Ukraine was distributed" and that Canada's intention was always for the important language to be part of the G7 Chairs' Summary Statement, which it was.

The G7 Chairs' Summary statement did state that "G7 leaders expressed support for President Trump’s efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine" and backed Kiev’s call for "an unconditional ceasefire". However, Russia has dismissed Ukraine's demand for an unconditional ceasefire as a ploy for their forces to regroup and resupply.

The sources also indicate that U.S. President Donald Trump left the G7 gathering early and did not meet with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky, who was also in attendance. This was seen as a "snub" to Zelensky, who had been scheduled to meet with Trump and was widely perceived to be seeking more U.S. weapons shipments and increased sanctions against Russia. Zelensky had appealed for $40 billion annually in budgetary support for Ukraine. Trump's early departure was cited by the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt as being due to "what's going on in the Middle East".

The situation also reflects President Trump's broader stance, as he publicly advocated for Russia’s return to the G8 format during the summit, arguing that excluding Moscow was a mistake that could have helped prevent the Ukraine conflict. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called the G7 a "dead club" and praised Trump's conduct at the summit.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23202694 USAID Gave Known Con Man $800M Contract To Do Kamala’s Work On ‘Root Causes Of Migration’

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) awarded an $800 million contract to a business, despite knowing that its key manager had secured previous USAID contracts through bribery. This contract was specifically for addressing the "root causes of irregular migration from Central America to the United States," work that was assigned to Vice President Kamala Harris, but which she reportedly never appeared to address.

Details of the Bribery Scheme and Contracts:

Individuals Involved: The scheme involved Roderick Watson, a USAID contracting officer, and three corporate executives: Walter Barnes III, founder of Vistant (formerly PM Consulting Group), Darryl Britt, president of Apprio, and Paul Young, president of another subcontractor.

How the Scheme Worked:

Watson agreed to accept bribes from Britt in exchange for influencing the award of USAID contracts to Apprio.

Apprio, a certified small business under the SBA 8(a) contracting program, could access lucrative federal contracting opportunities through set-asides and sole-source contracts without a competitive bid process.

When Apprio was no longer eligible for the 8(a) program, the scheme shifted: Vistant became the prime contractor, with Apprio as the subcontractor, still benefiting from Watson's influence.

Bribes to Watson included cash, laptops, NBA game tickets, a country club wedding, down payments on two residential mortgages, cellular phones, and jobs for relatives. These payments were often concealed by passing them through Young or through electronic bank transfers falsely listing Watson on payroll and incorporated shell companies. Watson allegedly received over $1 million in bribes.

Contract Values: The contracts associated with this bribery scheme totaled $544 million between 2013 and 2022, starting with a $4.8 million "staffing contract" in 2013 and escalating to a $95 million "technical support" contract in 2022. An additional three potential contracts totaling $287 million were not ultimately awarded.

Government Awareness and Continuation of Contracts:

USAID inspector general investigators were aware of the corruption by 2023.

On November 9, 2023, the government formally barred Vistant and Barnes from contracting due to "evidence of conduct indicating a lack of business honesty or integrity".

However, on the same day, a joint venture involving Barnes' company (PMCG CollaborateUp JV LLC) was chosen for the "root causes of migration" contract, valued at up to $800 million.

A USAID contracting official initially considered this contract "legally questionable" and tried to rescind it, noting that the joint venture primarily acted as a middleman for Vistant, whose "driving force" (Barnes) was banned.

Despite this, USAID formally awarded the $800 million "indefinite quantity" contract on August 22, 2024, making an initial payment of $10,000.

One week later, prosecutors offered a plea deal to a co-conspirator, detailing the long-running investigation's findings.

The contract was eventually terminated in February 2025, not because of Barnes' corruption, but because the Trump administration was "shuttering USAID over suspicion that graft and insider deals were common".

The Biden administration's General Services Administration (GSA) also awarded PMCG CollaborateUp JV LLC two five-year indefinite delivery contracts, one with a cap listed as $999,999,999,999.00, even after the government knew Barnes had secured contracts through bribery.

Purpose of the "Root Causes of Migration" Contract:

The contract was aimed at addressing issues causing irregular migration from Central America to the U.S..

CollaborateUp, the joint venture partner, stated it would address migration by focusing on "climate change," and also touted its work in "advancing DEIA" (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility) and combating "misinformation".

Mark A. Green, former Republican congressman and Trump's appointee to lead USAID, was added to CollaborateUp's payroll as a "senior advisor".

CollaborateUp also claims to have "co-developed" USAID's "procurement reform" policies "alongside former Administrator Mark Green," meaning the company put in charge of contracting reform benefited from the corrupted process.

Legal Outcomes and Broader Implications:

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23203166 Border Patrol agents shut down massive drug smuggling tunnel between Tijuana and San Diego

U.S. Border Patrol agents successfully discovered and disabled a significant drug smuggling tunnel located beneath the U.S.-Mexico border, connecting Tijuana and San Diego.

Key details about the operation and the tunnel:

•

Discovery: Agents found the tunnel in early April.

•

Location: It linked Tijuana and San Diego, running under a portion of the Otay Mesa Port of Entry.

•

Target: The tunnel's projected exit point was near or inside a commercial warehouse space in San Diego.

•

Characteristics: The passageway was described as "highly sophisticated" and nearly 3,000 feet long.

•

Obstacles: Upon entry, authorities encountered barricades, which appeared to have been placed to prevent law enforcement from locating the tunnel's entrance.

•

Outcome: The Border Patrol agents successfully shut down this massive drug smuggling tunnel.

This operation is part of broader efforts to combat illicit activities at the border. Other sources also discuss drug trafficking and money laundering operations in the Los Angeles Fashion District, which were targeted by federal agents including ICE, DEA, FBI, and IRS, leading to the seizure of millions in undeclared imports and unpaid tariffs, and arrests of undocumented immigrants. There have also been reports of other drug busts, such as the recovery of 900 pounds of meth in Burnsville, Minnesota, tied to human trafficking and money laundering, with the Twin Cities identified as a prime spot for cartel distribution due to its location on I-35 and international airport access.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23202706 How Chinese Intel Infiltrated LA Mayor Karen Bass’ Camp

According to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation cited in the sources, Chinese intelligence allegedly infiltrated Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass's camp through an official in her administration, Adam Ma.

Key details from the investigation include:

Adam Ma's Role: Adam Ma, an official in Mayor Bass's administration, serves as both the city's liaison for Asian-Americans and the director of commission appointments.

Father's Influence and CCP Ties: Ma's father, described as a Chinatown powerbroker and Democratic donor, reportedly raised tens of thousands of dollars for Bass's mayoral campaign. He has praised the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for creating a "strong China" and is listed as an official by multiple branches of the United Front Work Department (UFWD), which is described as a Chinese government influence and intelligence service.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23202698 Senate passes landmark crypto bill in historic bipartisan vote

The Senate has passed a landmark cryptocurrency bill in a historic bipartisan vote12. The legislation, known as the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act), aims to boost the cryptocurrency industry's growth by creating the first-ever U.S. regulatory framework for digital tokens called stablecoins2…. Stablecoins are digital assets that an issuer must redeem for a fixed value6.

Key details of the bill and its passage:

•

Vote Count: The Senate passed the legislation with a vote of 68-3025.

•

Bipartisan Support: 18 Democrats sided with most Republicans to ensure the bill cleared the 60-vote threshold required for passage2…. Senator Mark Warner (D-Virginia) was one of four Democrats who helped lead negotiations on the bill8.

•

Purpose: The bill aims to modernize the American payment system and integrate digital assets into the U.S. economy responsibly4. President Trump expressed strong support, stating that the bill would make America the "UNDISPUTED Leader in Digital Assets," bringing "MASSIVE Investment, and Big Innovation"39.

•

Permitted Issuers: Under the bill, only "permitted issuers" may issue a payment stablecoin for U.S. persons. These issuers must be a subsidiary of an insured depository institution, a federal-qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer, or a state-qualified payment stablecoin issuer, and they must be regulated by the appropriate federal or state regulator6. State regulation is limited to those with a stablecoin issuance of $10 billion or less6.

•

Negotiations: The bill's passage followed months of negotiations between its Republican sponsors and crypto-friendly Senate Democrats. Bipartisan talks initially stalled when pro-crypto Democrats objected to a revamped text and concerns grew over the Trump family's business involvement in the digital assets industry78.

•

Industry Support: Crypto firms have heavily lobbied for stablecoin legislation, investing hundreds of millions of dollars in influence efforts, hoping it will legitimize crypto and accelerate its adoption10. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming), a key ally of the crypto industry, stated that it is a "first step toward modernizing the American payment system"4.

Opposition and Concerns:

•

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), a leader on the Senate Banking panel, has opposed the bill, arguing it needs changes to protect national defense and consumers and to mitigate risks of stablecoins "blowing up our economy"10. She also claimed the legislation would "accelerate" President Trump's "corruption" and called for stronger conflict-of-interest language10.

Future of the Bill:

•

The stablecoin bill now faces an uncertain future in the House of Representatives, where Republicans are considering how much to amend the Senate legislation and whether to combine it with a broader market structure bill11. The broader measure is a bigger priority for most crypto firms but is expected to be more complex to advance in the Senate4.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23206116 We will never forget, in September 2016 the Obama administration admitted paying $1.7 billion to Iran

In September 2016, the Obama administration acknowledged paying $1.7 billion to Iran. This payment involved $400 million delivered in cash, stacked on pallets of euros, Swiss francs, and other foreign currency, which was flown to Tehran on January 17, 2016. A few days later, an additional $1.3 billion was paid as interest, completing the $1.7 billion settlement. Some sources also specify payments occurring on January 22 and February 5.

The stated purpose of this payment was to resolve a decades-old arbitration claim arising from a failed U.S. arms deal with Iran that predated the 1979 Iranian revolution. Iran had paid $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered, and the U.S. agreed to the $1.7 billion settlement to avoid larger arbitration losses after freezing Iranian funds. Officials maintained that the release of hostages was coincidental to this payment.

However, the payment drew significant controversy and criticism within the sources:

•

Opponents, including then-President Donald Trump, claimed the cash was "likely" funding terrorism. It was suggested that Democrats funneled money through USAID to George Soros, and that "the people running the US are funding both sides".

•

Q posts referred to these as "Hussein pallets of cash" and alleged that the Iran deal was orchestrated solely to lift sanctions for the "enrichment" of foreign businesses, with nuclear weapons being a "cover". It was described as a "SCAM!!!".

•

Despite the significant amount, sources note that no one in Congress, the FBI, or the Department of Justice called for an investigation into the Obama administration's transfer of $1.7 billion in cash to Iran.

•

The payment is also linked to broader claims of "Obama fuckery" and money laundering. One source states that the same method used to fund illegal immigrants via the EPA was used by Obama to send billions to Iran.

•

Additionally, the Iranian regime reportedly threatened in May 2018 to release the names of Western officials who took bribes to pass the nuclear deal if the Trump administration did not put pressure on them.

The broader context of these discussions includes claims that Iran is a "clown controlled" or "CIA run country", and that the conflict between Israel and Iran is a staged event maintained for the trouble it causes the U.S., or that Iran is controlled by British oil interests.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/23206042.html

23206192 A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump Admin from cutting funds to cities that don't cooperate with ICE

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from cutting funds to cities that do not cooperate with ICE. This ruling came from U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell, an Obama appointee.

According to the source, Judge McConnell stated that Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy lacked the authority to issue such a directive and that the directive itself was vague and unconstitutional. This action is part of a broader context where the Trump administration has been attempting to reduce funding to various agencies and entities, leading to multiple judicial challenges.

The Trump administration's efforts to cut funds to "sanctuary cities" are aimed at pressuring them to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. These cities, including Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago, have "sanctuary" policies that restrict their cooperation with federal immigration agents. Trump has consistently opposed these policies, arguing that such cities shelter "illegal criminals" who threaten public safety, drain taxpayers, lower wages, and steal American jobs.

The issue of federal control over executive branch funding and staffing has been a recurring point of contention. Other judges, such as California District Judge Susan Illston, have also issued injunctions preventing the Trump administration from reorganizing or reducing staff and funding at various federal agencies. These judges argue that the executive power to reduce funding or fire taxpayer-funded bureaucrats should not be vested solely in the President. For example, Judge Illston has previously blocked attempts to dismantle the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI) unit, formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC), which was accused of censorship. She also ordered the restoration of scientific research grants tied to race and gender identity that the Trump administration had terminated, deeming the cuts illegal and discriminatory.

In summary, the temporary block on cutting funds to non-cooperative cities is a reflection of ongoing legal battles between the Trump administration and a judiciary that includes judges appointed by previous Democratic administrations, who are challenging the scope of presidential authority in controlling federal agencies and their funding.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23205765 Hackers reportedly wipe out $90 million from largest Iranian cryptocurrency exchange

Hackers have reportedly wiped out over $90 million from Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange. This incident occurred on June 18, 2025.

Key details about the hack:

•

Target Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange.

•

Amount Affected More than $90 million in cryptocurrencies was reportedly drained from Nobitex's wallets.

•

Responsible Group A pro-Israel hacking group known as Gonjeshke Darande, which translates to "Predatory Sparrow," claimed responsibility for the attack.

•

Motivation The hacking group described it as a politically motivated cyberattack targeting Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). They accused Nobitex of helping the Iranian government evade Western sanctions and funding terrorism, including proxy forces, missile programs, and military nuclear projects, using Iranian people's accounts.

•

Method of Funds Handling The stolen funds, which included Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, Ripple, Solana, Tron, and Ton, were reportedly sent to cryptographic addresses with anti-government messages. Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic suggested that the attack was likely not financially motivated, as the hackers effectively "burned the funds" to send a political message rather than profiting from them.

•

Impact Nobitex confirmed unauthorized access to its hot wallets, and the exchange's app and website went offline. This breach is considered "particularly significant" given the relatively modest size of Iran's cryptocurrency market.

•

Context This hack followed another cyberattack by the same group on Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah earlier the same week. Bank Sepah served as a financial arm for bypassing international sanctions and funding terrorism. Customers of Bank Sepah reported widespread outages at ATMs and card readers, with many bank offices closed, leading to panic as people feared losing their savings. Some believed IRGC leaders had already withdrawn their assets and fled the country, leaving empty accounts.

The incident involving Nobitex and Bank Sepah is part of a broader narrative in the sources that suggests cyberattacks are being used as a strategic tool in the conflict between Israel and Iran, with goals beyond just financial gain, such as disrupting services and inciting public unrest.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

23204850 Louisiana Gov. Landry signs bill to allow law enforcement to neutralize threatening drones

Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry has signed a bill into law, known as the "We Will Act" Act, which permits state and local law enforcement to neutralize threatening drones12.

Key details of the new law include:

•

Purpose The law aims to allow law enforcement to actively intercept and disable drones that pose credible threats to public safety2. Governor Landry stated that the law puts Louisiana "on the front lines of drone defense," taking "bold steps now to protect our people and our skies before tragedy strikes"3.

•

Methods of Neutralization Specially trained officers are authorized to use both non-kinetic and kinetic technologies against unmanned aerial systems (UAS) that are violating the law2.

•

Scope The law applies to drones operating illegally in various areas, including public events, schools, and critical infrastructure3.

•

Penalties for Violations Individuals who violate this law could face fines, jail time, and the confiscation of their drone. Specifically, offenders may face up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $5,0003.

•

Effective Date The "We Will Act" Act is scheduled to go into effect on August 14.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23207687, >>23207750, >>23207821 ICYMI: @realDonaldTrump BIG WIN in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the President’s core power to call in the National Guard! The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared

President Donald Trump achieved a "BIG WIN" in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning his authority to deploy the National Guard. The appeals court's decision temporarily halted a lower court's ruling that had deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles illegal.

The dispute arose after President Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to the greater Los Angeles area. California Governor Gavin Newsom, referred to as "Gavin Newscum" in some sources, opposed this action, describing it as a "step toward authoritarianism" and an "unprovoked attack on our state’s sovereignty". Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta had filed an emergency motion to block the federal deployment, arguing that it ordered soldiers to engage in "unlawful civilian law enforcement activities" beyond merely guarding federal buildings.

Initially, a U.S. district judge, identified as Clinton-appointed U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, ruled against Trump, ordering him to return control of the National Guard to Governor Newsom and California. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction against this ruling.

The three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was unanimous in its decision. They concluded that it was "likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority" to deploy the troops, even though he did not consult Governor Newsom. The panel consisted of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointed by former President Joe Biden. While acknowledging that the President's decision was not entirely immune from judicial review, the court stated that it must be "highly deferential" to it. This marked the first instance since 1965 that a president deployed a state's National Guard without the governor's permission.

Following the appeals court's decision, Trump asserted that if he "didn’t put the National Guard into Los Angeles, the place would be burned down to the ground right now" and expressed gratitude for the ruling. He views this as a validation of his "core power" to protect cities and citizens when state and local authorities are unable to manage situations. The sources also suggest that "The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared". This outcome is widely characterized as a "MASSIVE L" for Governor Newsom.

In a related context, U.S. Attorney Essayli previously stated that the deployment of the Guard allowed law enforcement to "continue our mission, undeterred, to enforce the law, and to keep our people and our building safe" amidst "overwhelming" resistance from "organized agitators". Trump has also indicated a broader strategy of focusing ICE operations on Democratic strongholds like Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago for mass deportations, stating that anti-ICE rioters will be "HELD ACCOUNTABLE".

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23212351 ICYMI: Kari Lake MASS TERMINATES 85% of positions at the U.S. Agency for Global Media - 1,400 total.

According to the sources, Kari Lake mass terminated 85% of positions, totaling 1,400 jobs, at the U.S. Agency for Global Media.

Kari Lake stated that "American taxpayers have been forced to bankroll an agency that’s been riddled with dysfunction, bias, and waste. That ends now". This action is described as part of an effort to "shrink the Out-of-Control Federal Bureaucracy". One user in the discussion suggested that "DEI was in control?" when referring to these terminations.

The Trump administration also issued layoff notices to over 600 Voice of America (VOA) staff, reducing the outlet's staff to fewer than 200, described as the biggest rollback of the federally funded broadcaster in decades. VOA, launched in 1942 to counter wartime propaganda, had been a central pillar of U.S. public diplomacy. The cuts to VOA were welcomed by Russian propagandists.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/23212309.html

23212492 No. 23-1021 Supreme Court of the United States KARI LAKE, ET AL.,v. ADRIAN FONTES, ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE,

The provided sources indicate that there is a case before the U.S. Supreme Court titled "KARI LAKE, ET AL.,v. ADRIAN FONTES, ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE," with case number No. 23-1021. One of the sources includes a link to a PDF document from the Supreme Court website, which is identified as an "amicus brief" for this case.

In a broader context, Kari Lake is also mentioned in connection with mass terminations at the U.S. Agency for Global Media, where 85% of positions, totaling 1,400 jobs, were terminated. This action was described as an effort to "shrink the Out-of-Control Federal Bureaucracy". A user in the discussion suggested that "DEI was in control?" in relation to these terminations. Additionally, there's a reference to an MSNBC video discussing "How MAGA-Darling Kari Lake Turned From Obama Donor To A Trump Acolyte".

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23212363 Who Is Feras Hamdan? Doctor Who Allegedly Drove Congressman Off Road/Representative Max Miller

Feras Hamdan is identified as a 36-year-old doctor from Ohio who was arrested and charged after allegedly driving Republican Representative Max Miller off the road in a road rage incident on June 15.

According to the police report and Miller's 911 call, Hamdan allegedly tailgated Miller's vehicle, swerved erratically, and forced the congressman's car off the road to avoid a collision. Miller's wife and 2-year-old son were also in the car at the time. During the incident, Hamdan reportedly honked his horn, shouted threats, and made aggressive gestures, including displaying a Palestinian flag. Miller, who is Jewish, stated that Hamdan threatened, "I'm going to cut your throat and your daughter's," and called him a "dirty Jew". Miller also mentioned on the 911 call that he had a weapon but was glad he did not use it. Law enforcement indicated that Hamdan's actions appeared intentional and targeted.

Hamdan was arrested without incident and charged with aggravated menacing, a first-degree misdemeanor. During his arraignment, he pleaded not guilty and requested a trial by jury, with his bond set at $500,000. He also agreed to a criminal protective order preventing contact with Miller and his family.

His attorney, Issa Elkhatib, stated that the allegations are "baseless and outrageous" and defamatory, asserting that Hamdan is a respected physician, devoted husband, loving father, and an upstanding community member with no prior criminal history. Elkhatib accused Congressman Miller of exploiting Hamdan's name as a "political pawn".

Congressman Miller stated, "We know who this person is and he will face justice. As a Marine, a proud Jewish American and a staunch defender of Israel, I will not hide in the face of this blatant antisemitic violence". House Speaker Mike Johnson condemned the attack as an example of "unhinged rhetoric inspiring unstable people to threaten and attack elected officials," urging a reduction in national tensions. House Democratic leaders also issued a statement condemning the attack and expressing gratitude that Miller and his family were safe.

The investigation involves multiple agencies, including the U.S. Capitol Police, Ohio State Highway Patrol, the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Ohio. Hamdan is a family doctor who was previously linked to the Cleveland Clinic and HealthExpress Urgent Care.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23212521 Patricia Broderick, former D.C. Superior Court judge, dies at 75

Patricia Broderick, a former D.C. Superior Court judge, died on June 17 at a care facility in the District at the age of 75.

She was paralyzed from the chest down in an automobile accident in 1970, shortly before her senior year at what is now Trinity Washington University. Despite her disability, she pursued a legal career. Broderick served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the District, prosecuting murder, sexual assault, and other felony cases. In 1989, she moved to the Justice Department's money laundering section. She was serving as a special counsel to the Department's office on violence against women when President Bill Clinton nominated her to the D.C. Superior Court. She assumed her seat in 1998 and remained on the bench until taking senior status in 2020, presiding over criminal, civil, and family court cases.

According to her executor, Elizabeth Francis, her death was due to respiratory infections complicated by pulmonary weakness stemming from her paralysis.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23212615 DHS reveals shocking 500% increase in assaults against ICE officers during operations

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported a "shocking 500% increase" in assaults against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers during their operations. These statistics were released by DHS, with Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin noting an incident where an ICE officer was dragged 50 yards by a car while arresting an illegal alien sex offender. This escalation in violence also extends to Border Patrol operations.

DHS highlighted an incident in Bell and Maywood, California, where Patrol vehicles were "violently targeted during lawful operations," leading to a vehicle being rammed, its tires slashed, and another civilian totaling a federal vehicle, resulting in an arrest for alleged vehicular assault as a mob formed.

This increase in assaults is occurring amid intensified immigration enforcement efforts, including mass deportation operations. President Trump has ordered ICE agents to focus on large Democratic-led cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York for these deportations, arguing that these cities use illegal aliens to "expand their Voter Base, cheat in Elections, and grow the Welfare State". Although Trump initially directed ICE to halt raids in agriculture, hotel, and restaurant industries to focus on "criminals," this guidance was later reversed, allowing workplace raids to continue in these sectors.

The sources indicate that Los Angeles has experienced significant "anti-ICE riots" in response to these federal immigration enforcement operations. During these riots, protesters have reportedly attacked federal agents, thrown bricks and fireworks at officers, torched vehicles, and defaced public buildings. The initial raids that sparked the Los Angeles unrest were described as targeting a multi-national illegal money laundering scheme linked to Mexican and Colombian cartels in the city's garment district. The protests have led to the deployment of National Guard troops and U.S. Marines in Los Angeles to manage the civil unrest and protect federal property.

Officials like Vice President Vance have criticized local governments, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom, for allegedly "siccing violent mobs" on federal law enforcement and for creating an "open season on federal law enforcement" by maintaining sanctuary city policies. The House Oversight Committee has also launched an investigation into Newsom and Bass, accusing them of inaction and obstructing federal efforts to manage the riots. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested for allegedly assaulting a federal officer while attempting to aid illegal immigrants at a courthouse, an act condemned by New York Attorney General Letitia James as a "shocking abuse of power". Governor Kathy Hochul of New York has also pledged $50 million in taxpayer funds to cover legal services for migrants arrested by federal immigration authorities.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23211601 ICE to convert shuttered California prison into state’s largest migrant detention center

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is reportedly converting a shuttered California prison into what is expected to become the state's largest migrant detention center.

This facility, a sprawling 2,560-bed site in California City (Kern County), previously operated as a state prison until March 2024, when California ended its lease as part of an initiative to eliminate the use of private prisons. ICE has entered into a six-month contract with CoreCivic, a private prison contractor, for this conversion, with an initial funding of $10 million. This move is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to expand ICE detention capacity nationwide from 41,500 to 100,000 beds.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government Laying Off Staff Following Trump Funding Cuts

Yes, the sources confirm that Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government is laying off staff following Trump Administration funding cuts. This action is presented as a direct consequence of President Trump's policies targeting elite academic institutions.

Key details from the sources include:

Direct Confirmation: An article titled "WHAT A SHAME: Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government Laying Off Staff Following Trump Funding Cuts" is cited. This indicates a direct link between the layoffs and the funding cuts.

Broader Crackdown on Universities: This event is part of a "broader crackdown by the Trump administration against America's most elite universities". The administration deems these institutions "too left-wing" and has accused them of failing to combat antisemitism.

Specific Funding Freezes: Harvard University, in particular, had $2.65 billion (£1.96 billion) in federal grants frozen.

Student Visa Restrictions: The Trump administration also "tried to revoke Harvard's ability to enrol international students," although this move was temporarily blocked by a federal judge while litigation is ongoing. The proclamation stated that the Chinese Communist Party and other U.S. adversaries were allegedly "exploiting the student visa program for improper purposes and by using visiting students to collect information at elite universities in the United States".

Justification for Cuts: The Trump administration's stance is to "defend the rule of law, protect American interests and ensure that every student in this country — regardless of race, faith or background — can pursue an education in peace and safety". Secretary Kristi Noem challenged Harvard to decide whether it wished to be a "partner to the United States, or an adversary to American values".

Criticism of "Wokeism" and DEI: The broader context of these cuts is framed against an "era of toxic wokeism and DEI propaganda" that the Trump administration believes is "collapsing under its own weight".

"Academic Refuge" in France: In response to these cuts, Aix-Marseille University in France has stated its readiness to "welcome American scientists, whose work has become untenable following the Trump administration's cuts in certain academic sectors". Approximately 40 researchers from top U.S. universities have reportedly answered this call, with some comments framing this as "climate change swindlers" being forced to "pack up and move their hustle elsewhere".

This situation aligns with previous discussions in our conversation history regarding the Trump administration's efforts to "drain the swamp" and dismantle institutions perceived as part of a "Deep State" or as promoting ideologies contrary to their agenda. The funding cuts and resulting layoffs at Harvard are presented as a tangible outcome of these broader policy shifts.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

The new facility is expected to hold 1,000 illegal immigrants within 30-60 days of construction.

The new facility you are asking about, often referred to as "Alligator Alcatraz," is a proposed immigration detention center in Florida, expected to hold 1,000 illegal immigrants within 30-60 days of construction, with mentions of opening as early as the first week of July 2025.

Here are the key details from the sources:

Location and Design

The facility is being built on an airstrip in the Everglades, Florida, and is envisioned as a "cost-effective and innovative" way to manage immigration enforcement.

It is specifically stated to be surrounded by alligators, snakes, and pythons, though not located within the Everglades National Park itself.

The construction involves "light infrastructure" with a focus on "heavy duty tent facilities and trailer facilities" rather than permanent brick-and-mortar buildings.

The site is currently used primarily as a pilot training facility.

Purpose and Rationale

This facility is a central part of the Trump administration's intensified immigration agenda, aiming to "ramp up arrests and deportations across the country".

It is intended to house individuals caught in these deportation sweeps, including "dangerous criminals".

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has been a key proponent, giving the facility its "Alligator Alcatraz" nickname.

The initiative is supported by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, who touts it as an efficient method to secure the homeland and deliver on President Trump's mandate.

Funding and Costs

Florida will operate the facility at an estimated cost of $450 million per year, with the ability to seek reimbursement from the federal government.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Shelter and Services Program has allocated $625 million to support Florida’s efforts. This funding mechanism is notable because the Trump administration claims the program was previously misused by the Biden administration to house "illegal aliens".

Florida is using emergency powers to commandeer the Miami-Dade County-owned land for the facility. While Florida offered $20 million for the property, county appraisals value the land at $195 million.

Controversy and Reactions

The facility has drawn criticism, with Alex Howard, a former Biden administration DHS spokesperson, labeling it "Desantis’ Little Guantánamo in the swamp".

The move is part of Florida's broader strategy to be the "most aggressive in the nation when it comes to illegal immigration".

The swift implementation of such policies aligns with the broader "Trump’s deportation machine is running on apps, ads, and fear" narrative discussed in our conversation history, indicating a direct and forceful approach to immigration enforcement. The aggressive nature of these enforcement actions, including ICE raids and efforts to track immigrants via apps, is a recurring theme.

In essence, the "Alligator Alcatraz" facility is presented as a concrete (or tent-based) manifestation of the Trump administration's hardline stance on illegal immigration, leveraging state and federal resources to rapidly expand detention capabilities and enforce deportations.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

Linda Sun is accused of steering lucrative state contracts to businesses linked to her family in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Yes, according to the sources, Linda Sun is accused of steering lucrative state contracts to businesses linked to her family in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. This has led to her being indicted on a host of federal charges.

Here are the key details from the sources regarding Linda Sun:

Positions Held: Linda Sun was the former Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Director for New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and later became the Deputy Chief of Staff to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, both Democrats.

Allegations and Charges:

She is accused of steering lucrative state contracts to businesses linked to her family during the COVID-19 pandemic.

She has been indicted on charges including bribery, kickbacks, fraud, and for acting as an unregistered agent for China.

Specifically, the indictment accuses Sun and her husband, Chris Hu, of reaping millions in kickbacks by exploiting her role on a Cuomo administration team responsible for procuring personal protective equipment (PPE) in the spring of 2020.

Sun allegedly forged documents to falsely claim that Chinese contacts had recommended two additional companies for contracts; one was run by her second cousin, and the other by a business associate of her husband's.

These contracts, which New York State signed with both companies in March 2020, amounted to over $44 million. Her cousin reportedly funneled about $2.3 million back to her husband, Chris Hu.

Charges include honest services wire fraud, honest services wire fraud conspiracy, bribery, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and tax evasion.

Ties to China: Sun, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in China, reportedly used her "homeland ties" to help New York obtain PPE from China. She connected the state with vendors recommended by the Chinese government. The sources also explicitly state she was charged with "acting as an agent for China" and that "Kathy Hochul's ties to the Chinese Communist Party just keep getting deeper and tighter".

Broader Context of Corruption: The sources frame Linda Sun's case as an example of a broader issue, stating that "Show me a Democrat run state, and you can easily find leftists in the state government who take advantage of their position to gain financial wealth through bribery and fraud". This is connected to the idea that "all of the COVID-19 emergency funds, the Green New Deal funds, the Inflation Reduction Act funds, all of them… and the end of the system there are hundreds of individuals and organizations profiting personally from these corrupt endeavors". It's suggested that "leadership in these same state systems are just as corrupt as the supportive bureaucrats who extract their own part of the process" and that "trillions at stake".

Legal Status: Linda Sun lost her motion to dismiss her criminal charges last month, and now faces new charges. It is also noted that she has "been singing like a bird".

This situation is presented as part of the ongoing effort to expose corruption within government, particularly linked to the "Deep State" and foreign influence, a recurring theme in our conversation history.

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/

>>23248013 Supreme Court has 6 cases left to decide this term

The sources indicate that as of June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court had six cases left to decide this term. These cases were listed as:

* Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (argued January 15)

* Louisiana v. Callais (argued March 24)

* Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research (argued March 27)

* Kennedy v. Braidwood Management (argued April 21)

* Mahmoud v. Taylor (argued April 22)

* Trump v. CASA (argued May 15)

Based on the provided sources, several of these cases appear to have been decided or discussed in rulings around June 2025:

* Trump v. CASA, Inc.

* The Supreme Court handed President Trump a "GIANT WIN" by limiting federal district judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions.

* The decision was a 6-3 vote, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion, stating that universal injunctions "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts".

* This ruling significantly restricts the judiciary's ability to halt federal policies across the country based on individual lawsuits.

* President Trump celebrated this ruling, noting it "indirectly, hit hard" the "Birthright Citizenship Hoax" which he believes "had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process". He explicitly stated that the Supreme Court is "agreeing with the Trump Administration that these judges are well past their authority".

* Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed it as an end to "rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation".

* The Court did not rule on the underlying constitutionality of Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship itself. Attorney General Pam Bondi mentioned that the birthright citizenship issue will be decided in October, in the next session, unless it comes down sooner.

* The three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented. Justice Jackson wrote that the decision was an "existential threat to the rule of law" and that the court was "rewarding lawlessness". She reportedly asked Clarence Thomas "What is a Constitution" during oral arguments, suggesting a lack of understanding.

* Democrats criticized the ruling, warning it "paves the way for 'a vile betrayal of our Constitution'" and would infringe Americans' rights by ceding "even more power to the executive branch".

source: https://8kun.top/qresearch/