/liberty/ - Liberty

I don't know. Unless we somehow undo the government overreach form post 9/11 abuses I don't see it going away.

>>98166

How depressing. Another area where life and progress stagnates.

>>98182

It's sad. My dad works in the airline industry and he told me when I was younger how security was different before 9/11. Hell I can barely remember some of the security before 9/11 despite being born before it.

>>98202

It really is sad, I remember pre-TSA travel, and it really was simple. The lives of the next generation will be worse than mine.

>>98155

> Is there any agorist way around this agency?

I mean, I'm moderately familiar with stealth technology if you want to create a series of illegalist airports with unliscenced pilots, but that opens up a whole lot of other stresses and issues.

>>98214

That just wouldn't be profitable, I'd reckon. Too high profile to be unnoticed and most of your customers would be high risk (middle to low tier criminals) because normalfags wouldn't want to use it.

>>98288

It's actually fairly inexpensive compared to the plane itself, and a bush-pilot shadow airport system is pretty much "any meadow that's remote enough."

The big issue comes when you start flying stealth aircraft across borders, which I'm pretty sure ends up a series of pound-me-in-the-ass felonies which makes the average renditioned terrorist look like a pot charge in a decrim state. Also, collision detection without radar presence kind of sucks.

I assume that about all this could ever be worthwhile for is huge-shipment drug cargo. A few subs, some stealth aircraft…. otherwise, you're probably better off doing the "liscensed bush pilot in the meadow" thing and keeping it, well, gray. Because when a few hundred aircraft that don't show up on radar DO get detected crossing a border, we can assume the response is likely going to be, erm, "inappropriately excessive."

Government elitism does not like civilian tech.