No.3874 [Last50 Posts]
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3876
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3877
I wonder how long it'll be until they revert it?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3952
>>3877
it's still there lmao
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3954
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3958
It's survived an edit when someone added a legit entry. Perhaps this will raise awareness to Brendan's FUCKED SHIT?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4013
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4041
Hold the fucking phone.
Why is some Britfag from late 2012 trying to fuck Brendan's shit up JUST before he petitioned for less alimony where his wife accused him in court of hiding assets?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brendan_Fraser#Homosexuality
IP: 144.124.24.57
Host: adm27.pip.aber.ac.uk
Country : United Kingdom
http://www.aber.ac.uk/en/
Is adm27 an individual user or building? Adam? Administration?
Have I just stumbled upon the Flight 4U of this board?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4042
>>4041
There are rumours that this fellow is currently in a homosexual relationship with a cameraman he met while filming The Mummy. Whether or not they are true, they are significant enough to warrant a small note in the article. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
No they're not - not by a long way. Rumours have no place in Wikipedia, unless you can reference them from reliable sources - at which point they cease to become rumours. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/44839#.UGmuF5jA-IA Is an example of the rumour being discussed. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC) http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message846432/pg1 Another example. http://www.chacha.com/question/is-brendan-fraser,-the-actor,-a-homosexual With all this mounting up, I am going to suggest that we allow these to given a mention in the article, with a cautionary tag that they may not be true fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.124.24.57 (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
A forum that contains posts such as "he always has this duuuuuh look on his face" falls slightly short of being a reliable source. Inclusion of such comments would be instant grounds for removal. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
More evidence; http://www.fmforums.co.uk/ and relevant pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.124.24.57 (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC) http://www.blinditemsexposed.com/2008/02/gay-but-broke-lainey-22008.html 144.124.24.57 (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
I had thought that this was a community effort. If so then why am I being prevented from adding legitimate information? Furthermore, what gives you the right to overrule me? Seems this wholly inaccurate website infamous for its own lack of substance needs to take a step back to realise its role on the internet. --144.124.24.57 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC) I am going to propose that we cover the rumours about his sexuality in the article, seeing as they are widely held to be correct, regardless of their status in fact. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
You have already proposed it in your very first post, and you still have not provided any reliable sources. Please do not add anything until you can reliably source it - otherwise you run the risk of reversion, followed by warnings, followed by blocks - BLP violations - of which these currently fall into - are taken very seriously on Wikipedia.
If you wish to get a second opinion, or don't believe me - either is fine - please check over at the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. I haven't brought it up there yet myself, but it looks as though you may be (unintentionally) forcing my hand. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
" Whether or not they are true, they are significant enough to warrant a small note in the article." this sums up your complete misunderstanding of WP:BLP. For a claim like this, we need to ensure it is true using quality reliable sources, not blogs, not forums, not rumours. Until then, it should _not_ be mentioned. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Well if you think it will help, by all means bring it up on the board. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, what board? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Biographies of living persons/noticeboard that Chaheel mentioned above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.124.24.57 (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to bring up your opinion there. Right now, I'm exercising the right to remove the rumour being added incorrectly with dubious sources in a non-encyclopedic fashion. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
I haven't added it yet because I thought we would need to discuss it here first. You are the ones who thought you should bring it up there. If you disbelieve me that much then voice your opinion. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
As evidence http://simpleandgayforward.wordpress.com/tag/brendan-fraser/ 144.124.24.57 (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
No, we don't add rumours. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Agreed. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 15:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4043
>>4042
But rather than JUST finally back off about it, he tries to double down saying somehow Wikipedia has to publish reports of rumors if there's a vote to do so:
In light of all the evidence I have produced, I believe we should take a vote on this matter. I vote that we include a section covering these rumours, with a cautionary statement that we warn the reader than they may not be true. 144.124.24.57 (talk) 10:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
think he is gay yeah i vote he is 144.124.4.81 (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Vote to put in in the article as well. makes three of us Rastadon1987 (talk) 11:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Right, that's it. I've presumed good faith and competency up until this point, but the above post just screams out stupidity. Quite obviously none of you have any idea how Wikpedia operates, especially regarding biographies, and voting.
Any edits that are made to this page will be reverted, not just by me, not just by The Rambling Man, but by any editor who sees the article edits. If you're that insistent that it should be inserted, ask at the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and see how quickly you're shot down there as well. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Can you not go calling people stupid please? This sort of behaviour will not be tolerated by the website. Is this the level of maturity you are showing? That you immediately dismiss things out of hand because you disagree with them? --144.124.24.57 (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Could all the sockpuppeteers please stop editing from different accounts and different IP addresses. Thanks. Oh, and IPs, please read WP:BLP. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm not using the term "stupid" as an insult, simply as an accurate description of behaviour - behaviour that has shown no inclination to change despite being advised to do so, and the means and methods to do being made readily available to those who need it.
And need I point out the irony of you commenting "This sort of behaviour will not be tolerated by the website"? Probably, yes. Have you read the BLP page yet? You also may want to peruse the page on sockpuppets. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, and read WP:NOTAVOTE while you're at it. Standards in Welsh education are really low these days. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Well, general consensus does mean that you go with what the majority think. I don't care what any of you have to say for yourselves. It is a group work so I am putting my foot down to say that the material is being added to the article. You say you don't vote as if it is a proud thing. If you want to run under the current dictatorship which seemingly is the cause of Wikipedia's authoritarianism, you are perfectly free to. Just don't force it on people who respect democracy. I am actually going to make a complain about how I have been treated. What makes you think you can get away with calling Welsh education poor? Obviously more than one of you were not raised correctly so you lack the basic manners to have a discussion without resorting to personal insults. --144.124.24.57 (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't care what "foot" you're putting down, we're not contravening WP:BLP so best you find something else to do this afternoon in sunny Wales. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Complain about our behaviour here, on the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - a page which you should be familiar with, but I suspect not. Meanwhile I have requested semi-protection of the page to prevent intentional breaches of BLP. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I am putting in a formal complaint, but I don't suppose your fly-by-night website has a feature where you can raise issues. I am changing this article whether you like it or not. --144.124.24.57 (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Looking forward to the complaint. If you change the article in contravention of BLP, I'll revert it, protect it and block you. Cheers boyo. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
When your block expires, here are a couple of places you can raise your concerns about our behaviour:
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
Wikipedia:Help desk
Pob lwc! Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Wow, I just want to add that hearsay and rumor is definitely NOT suitable for a Wikipedia article. I suggest you take that elsewhere. I add my name to the list of people who will revert the page in case of vandalism. Browncoat101 (talk) 04:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4044
>>4043
Then later, start of December, there's this brief thing where someone puts in an unrelated link about a report of his death which isn't even in the link, by a new account.
According to TMZ he has passed away. [2] Phecht7 (talk) 03:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
What are you talking about? That isn't even a TMZ link, or mentions any death. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Later this same account contributes to his own sandbox version of someone's page several times and has edits to a list of floods in the US, a credit union, and two edits to the page of a Colorado politician four days ago. Not much activity overall.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Phecht7
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4045
>>4042
>>4043
>>4044
Great investigation, anon. Could this be our first hard evidence of someone actively fucking up Brendan's shit?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4046
>>4045
His shit has been HURT so badly.
I JUST want it to be unfucked.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4063
>>4045
>>4046
What do the Welsh have against our punished hero?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4065
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4070
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4384
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4395
>Brendan Fraser will be forever remembered in the annals of history
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4473
>>4042
>>4043
>>4041
This guy is fucking hilarious, he just completely ignores the rules and pretends everyone will go along with him.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4522
>>4473
>guy
>Afton
What do you know that we don't anon, is it accualy Jew tranny?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4523
Holy fuck it's been over a month and it's still there.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4552
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4714
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_known_as_the_Just
Brenden's Fraiser's part just got changed to "Brendan Fraser (1968-living), American-Canadian actor." after someone did a legit edit to the article. Are the Wiki Mods actually letting this stay lmao.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4718
>>4714
Yes. It is further legitimized. Each edit that isn't removing it further sets it in stone.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4928
Well, it got removed.
Godspeed, Brendan.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4937
>>4928
It's back lmao
WE HAVE A /JUST/ ADMIN ON WIKIPEDIA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4947
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4996
>>4714
JUST CITE MY SOURCES UP
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5159
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5207
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5210
Friendly reminder to never trust Wikikedia.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5211
Some sperg who's dedicated his life to cleaning up vandalism finally is watching the page. We had a good run.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5212
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5214
>>5212
>this nigger's fucking Wiki page
I forgot Wikipedians are turboautists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RickinBaltimore
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5215
Ah some fucker finally got it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5216
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5236
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5237
>>5236
>literally an anime janitor
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5238
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5251
>>5236
>Counter-Vandal
Serious business man strikes again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5271
It's back. But someone added "Toby Fox" to it too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5276
>>5271
Why is Toby Fox in the list? Did he get his shit fucked?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5284
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>5276
This guy does look fucked up.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5286
>>5276
He fucked his own shit up, fam. He pandered to a really autistic type of fanbase and GameTheory convinced his fanbase that some skeleton is Ness from Earthbound.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5400
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5401
>>5400
>we got an article locked
We managed to piss somebody off so much that an admin actually came along and manually locked the page. He could have done something productive, like fix one of the countless articles with false information, negationism and bias. But instead he reviews an extremely insignificant article that only a handful of people would ever notice exists.
That little padlock button is a mark of absolute and pure asspain. Look at it as a badge of honour.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5564
The protection template has been removed…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5568
>>5564
Removed by… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DumbBOT#About_unprotection
Look at Q2. The page isn't protected; it's just a template, fam.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.9691
This was great, I'm not letting the garbage new threads bump this gold off the board.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13365
>Article is unlocked 6 days from now.
You know what must be done.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13366
>>13365
I expect Brendan to be on there when I check back a week from now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13430
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13431
Reminder that this unlocks in t-minus 23 hours.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13582
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13595
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13597
>>13595
Fixed.
Can't wait to see the wiki autists sperging over our persistence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13608
>I'm almost certain the people doing this come from a smaller website that has a forum decided to Brendan Fraser.
Looks like we've got a detective here.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13658
>autist comes along and reverts it
Good thing we have a 24/7 JUST patrol.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13659
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13664
>it got protected again
There is no JUSTice for Brendan.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13665
It wouldn't surprise me if it's the same cuck mod that had a meltdown over the edit last year.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.13683
>>5401
Someone should create a wikipedia page about it :^`)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17326
Bump so that he can assume his rightful title and be forever known as the master of alimony and duke of debt.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.