>>1890
I'm aware of that social taboo, but it still doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever. From my perspective, if you're watching someone have sex on film, you've already went past the point of no return, so censoring the genitals is a wasted effort on their part. How does a pixel-aided crotch preserve someone's "purity" or "innocence" (for the record, I don't subscribe to the "sex before marriage/masturbation makes you impure/corrupts you/destroys your innocence" mindset) when they are performing graphic sex acts that one would consider crude or in some cases fetishistic?
I have seen bits and pieces of the recent stuff Hitomi did for Score (the milking scene is my favorite because it caters to one of my fetishes), but they didn't really show her vagina and those dicks in the bukkake video where fake. Though I guess it's a sign that she might be willing to do more stuff in the future on the state side of things.
If you want to you could type up that huge post you were about to post before you found that link of yours anon.