>>42105
From what I've read in the global rules and "dost", only
>Depictions of real children
>3d depictions of children, real or fictional
>Realistic sex dolls of children, real or fictional
>Links suspected of containing any of the above
aren't allowed
Therefore, depictions of 2d fictional children seem to be fully allowed. Considering this ss thread has been up for ~5 years without getting deleted I think you're either wrong or bullshitting/baiting me.
You mentioned an update to the rules, could you specify what exactly was added or changed, and/or link to that?