[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/deepdigs/ - Deep Diggs

Attention Span > 7 seconds please

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: a07227e69343b0b⋯.png (1.1 MB,1024x1024,1:1,1622158113409.png)

c9302d No.121

There was no internet in the 80s and people still believed what they say on TV. HIV as the cause of AIDS and AIDS-related deaths has since been entrenched in our mythology and whoever is behind that used fear to do it.

Fauci played a similar role in the AIDS pandemic as he has during sars/"covid". In the beginning he made the same kind of hysteric warnings he does today that in hindsight we can see are factual wrong but don't, because we're driven by selective media coverage to forget about them. For example, he said you could get aids from touching the same household surfaces that a carrier of the virus did. Remember hearing the same thing about covid?

Society suffers from a collective amnesia in which everything the media stops covering gets memory holed.

Keeping this in mind, the AIDS mythology today is driven by people who weren't adults or weren't even born trusting the memory of boomers who believed what they saw on TV 40 years ago.

A number of scientists and other critical thinkers have questioned the AIDS mythology. Discuss them and their arguments ITT.

There are two theories I'm familiar with

>AIDS, initially known as GRIDS (gay Related Immune Disorder), is nothing more than a destroyed immune system brought on by the gay lifestyle and recreational drugs

>AIDS and the health problems that come with it are caused HIV medications, and HIV is a harmless retrovirus that has been around a lot longer than the AIDS industry claims.

There are people who believe the entire concept of germ theory is a fraud, but I don't think that's a good starting point.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

334df6 No.151

Bitchute embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>121

in the aids and covid pandemics, a hoax virus is used to coerce large segments of the population into taking harmful pharmaceuticals.

>post 1 of 2 - QRD on covid as a bioweapon

Dr. McCullough embed is from May.

>this whole [covid] pandemic from the beginning was about the vaccine, so all roads lead to the vaccine and what it means

>there are already places in Asia and SE Europe laying the groundwork for compulsory vaccination, that means someone pins you down to the ground and puts a needle in you

>that's how bad stakeholders want vaxx

>it's not a cost you dont have to pay for it there are stakeholders who do want "a needle in every arm" incl, covid recovered and 12 year old kids , North Carolina just passed that

>people know they can die of the vaccinem, why are we pushing this in a way that people's livelihoods and education depend on a potentially fatal treatment?

>the tension you can cut it w a knife parents want their kid in school or college but dont want the vaxx, they know what's going on

>I have yet to lose a patient to the vaxx but I've had my patients lose their family memebrs, lots of them

>I've fillled out a VAERS safety report on a patient who had a bloodclot after one of the pfizer moderna vaccines

>and I'm telling you, it took half an hour to do it, there are many pages and each page said warnign, federal offense punishable by severe fines and penalties if I falsify the report

>all those thousands of Americans that have died with th evaccine and the hospitalizations in the database I think are REAL, and they are far beyond anything we've ever seen and as a doc and public citizen I'm concerned about the vaxx

>the vaccine center here is empty, it's right next to my work I drive by it every day. Americans know that vaccine's not safe, they're talking to each other and now the effort is the stakeholder's want kids taking it without parental guidance

>based on the safety data I can no longer recomend the vaccine. It's passed all the thresholds for being a safe product. None of the vaccines are safe.

>now there are papers written buy prominent scientists calling for worldwide halt in the program

>if we vaxx people and create an incomplete library of immunity

>vaccines all targeted to the Wuhan spike protein which is long gone. This is somethign that doesn't even exist anymore, we're hoping the immunity covers the other variants [he's since said more than once that the vaxx doesnt cover the delta variant)

>narrow immunity is a setup, there are warning saying don tdo this dont vaxx the entire world, we're gona set ourselves up for a superbug which is going to really wipe out populations.

>so for many reasons, indiscriminate vacination is a horrendous idea, it's a horrendous bioweapon that's been thrust onto the public and it's oging to cause great harm which it already has, thousands of people have lost their lives

>Americans and people worldwide should be extraordinarily alarmed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

334df6 No.152

>>151

a month later

https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/27/dr-peter-mccullough-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans includes vid with 10 min interview of him

>Dr. Peter McCullough said these deaths have been facilitated by a false narrative bent on pushing an all-new, unproven vaccine for a disease that was highly treatable.

>He said COVID was a bioweapon and the vaccines represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

>“The first wave of the bioterrorism is a respiratory virus that spread across the world, and affected relatively few people—about one percent of many populations—but generated great fear.”

>“As this, in a sense, bioterrorism phase one was rolled out, it was really all about keeping the population in fear and in isolation and preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation"

>“Both the respiratory virus and the vaccine delivered to the human body the spike protein, the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research.”

>“Now I can’t come out and say all this on national TV today or at any time,” he continued. “But, what we had learned over time is that we could no longer communicate with government agencies. We actually couldn’t even communicate with our propagandized colleagues in major medical centers, all of which appear to be under a spell, almost as if they are hypnotized right now.”

>He did not hold back in his criticism of his colleagues in the medical community.

>“And doctors, good doctors, are doing unthinkable things, like injecting biologically active messenger RNA that produces this pathological spike protein into pregnant women. I think when the doctors wake up from their trance they’re going to be shocked to think what they’ve done to people.”

>“We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC. We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07cb91 No.154

File: 455572b79c6f9b7⋯.gif (296.43 KB,1074x2282,537:1141,pt_intro_1632257734051.gif)

germ theory wasn't going be my starting point but I want to post these while they're up and I'll reply afterward to >>152 to continue. with a Peter Duesberg video I'll post notes on.

>lists 10 reasons why hiv could not have caused the phenomena we know as AIDS

Halfway through, what I think Dr. Duesberg is driving at is "AIDS" was caused by the drug. What I'll quote next post argues it's caused by the Chagas parasite.

for background, parasite vs. Germ theory is summarized in https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf . An amazing read with many links to similar files.

TLDR parasites, not germs, are what make us sick, as with all other mammals (who all are dewormed if they're around humans)

further discussion:

>>>/qrb/48592

>https://archive.ph/aohUh

on cancer being from a parasite (this too is discussed in pdf):

https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-07/cancers-are-newly-evolved-parasitic-species-biologist-argues/

more political:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/340098219

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/340126362

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/340887945

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07cb91 No.155

File: 71ad5abe1d1a9dc⋯.png (39.4 KB,1545x365,309:73,1_1.png)

File: cd1f49f76b170b7⋯.png (48.38 KB,1542x425,1542:425,1_2.png)

File: da8c884fa55b701⋯.png (207.16 KB,1559x862,1559:862,1_3.png)

File: a0ba5db86ef53d1⋯.png (85.89 KB,601x387,601:387,1_4.png)

>>>/qrb/95800

I have a degree in microbiology.

AIDS is casued by the CHAGAS parasite. HIV was a theoretical construct they used to hide the truth, never isolated based on computer modeling, with Anthony Fauci running cover-up while people like Nobel prize-winning Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, spent their career trying to expose Fauci's lies and blow the whistle on the AIDS scam only to be mysteriously murdered just before the launch of COVID (convenient). The particles they look at and call “viruses” are stress proteins created by a body that's either infected with parasites or exposed to toxins. They are exosomes, not viruses. It's merely the correlation fallacy. They are not causative.

Chagas aka Trypanosoma Cruzi causes AIDS in every other animal. Of course they don't call it that. They call it immune dysfunction, immunopathology, immuno-compromise,

macrophage derangement -https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9464791/

T. Cruzi causes autoimmune disease that causes heart disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25521296/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21734249/ Chagas and auto-immunity

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22951533/ Chagas causes auto-immunity in chickens

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16323421/ Chagas causes immune dysfunction by mimicking other toxins/pathogens (& carrying heavy metals on it's surface) to fool your immune system

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823355/ All parasites are STDs.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29211102/ Sexual transmission of Chagas is an ordinary eventually

https://www.longdom.org/open-access/trypanosoma-cruzi-and-domestic-animals-2327-5073-1000e142.pdf

100 million people are exposed yearly in Latin America, alone, making it the most prevalent STD in the world by a lot.

It's EVERYWHERE. In all the animals, every mammal, every bird, every shellfish. It was found in 80% of randomly tested guinea pigs https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657135/ , 80% of north American raccoons, 77% of Argentina goats https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32371222/, 30-60% of wild deet, 40% of wild pigs, 44% of Italian bats, 80% of chickens. It's the #1 cause of heart failure, as I found in this NIH-deleted article that I had to use the WayBack Machine to locate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326591340_Prevention_and_Control_of_Chagas_Disease_-_An_Overview

Mosquitos, triatome beetles, ticks, fleas, biting flies, are all vectors, but by my estimation account for less than 10% of the spread. Most outbreaks are linked to contaminated food https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-medicina-clinica-english-edition–462-articulo-orally-transmitted-chagas-disease-S2387020617300992 and contaminated beverages https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32781335/ & then sexual transmission is right up there.

This is the most versatile pathogen every to exist, yet the official dogmatic narrative is that it's rare, non sexually transmitted, (despite being found in the semen of every animal tested) and only spread by a single beetle. Nothing to see here. The plot thickens.

All the species are given different names based on the host they are found in. But every species is cross contagious with every other host. IE, if you take the chicken version and put it in a human, it will follow the same life cycle as if it came from a shellfish or cow. The indestructible eggs (oocysts) are identical in every species, along with the larval form., epimastigotes. The adult form changes slightly depending on the host, like the alien face hugger changing slightly depending on it's host. They call the disease Nagana in cows, Dourine in horses. In reality, it's all the same species, structurally and morphologically identical. It's a multi-trillion dollar cover-up that allows Big AG to breed “resistant” cattle that won't die to their infection instead of doing constant & expensive deworming treatments- THEY KNOW: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-9034-3_36

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07cb91 No.156

File: f5f6d0e95bc2b32⋯.png (1.44 MB,2112x1626,352:271,2_1.png)

>>155

btw. found this on 4chins

https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf

AIDS is casued by the CHAGAS parasite, trypanosoma Cruzi. HIV was a theoretical construct they used to hide the truth, never isolated based on computer modeling, with Anthony Fauci running cover-up while people like Nobel prize-winning Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, spent their career trying to expose Fauci's lies and blow the whistle on the AIDS scam only to be mysteriously murdered just before the launch of COVID, which is modified T. Cruzi. The particles they look at & call “viruses” are stress proteins created by a body that's either infected with parasites or exposed to toxins. They are exosomes, not viruses. It's merely the correlation fallacy. They're not causative.

T. Cruzi causes AIDS in EVERY animal. Of course they call it immune dysfunction, immunopathology, etc…

Chagas causes macrophage derangement -https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9464791/

T. Cruzi causes autoimmune disease that causes heart disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25521296/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21734249/ Chagas and auto-immunity

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22951533/ Chagas causes auto-immunity in chickens

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16323421/ Chagas causes immune dysfunction by mimicking other toxins/pathogens (& carrying heavy metals on it's surface) to fool your immune system

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823355/ All parasites are STDs.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29211102/ Sexual transmission of Chagas is an ordinary event

https://www.longdom.org/open-access/trypanosoma-cruzi-and-domestic-animals-2327-5073-1000e142.pdf

100 million people are exposed yearly in Latin America, alone, making it the MOSt prevalent STD in the world.

Part 2:

T. Cruzi is EVERYWHERE, in all mammals, birds, & shellfish, found in 80% of randomly tested guinea pigs https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657135/ , 80% raccoons, 77% of Argentina goats https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32371222/, 30-60% of wild deer, 40% of wild pigs, 44% of Italian bats, 80% of chickens. It's the #1 cause of heart failure- I found in this NIH-deleted article that I had to use the WayBack Machine to locate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326591340_Prevention_and_Control_of_Chagas_Disease_-_An_Overview

Mosquitos, triatome beetles, ticks, fleas, biting flies, are all vectors, but by my estimation account for less than 10% of the spread. Most outbreaks are linked to contaminated food https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-medicina-clinica-english-edition--462-articulo-orally-transmitted-chagas-disease-S2387020617300992 and contaminated beverages https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32781335/ & then sexual transmission is right up there.

This is the most versatile pathogen every to exist, yet the official dogmatic narrative is that it's rare, non sexually transmitted, (despite being found in the semen of every animal tested) and only spread by a single beetle. Nothing to see here. The plot thickens.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07cb91 No.157

>>156

>>155

>>95816

Part 3:

All the species of trypanosoma are given different names based on the host they are found in. But every species is cross contagious with every other host. IE, if you take the chicken version and put it in a human, it will follow the same life cycle as if it came from a shellfish or cow. The indestructible eggs (oocysts) are identical in every species, along with the larval form., epimastigotes. The adult form changes slightly depending on the host, like the alien face hugger changing slightly depending on it's host. They call the disease Nagana in cows, Dourine in horses. In reality, it's all the same species, structurally and morphologically identical. It's a multi-trillion dollar cover-up that allows Big AG to breed “resistant” cattle that won't die to their infection instead of doing constant & expensive deworming treatments- THEY KNOW: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-9034-3_36

Part 4:

Pretending all our problems are caused by secondary infections of viruses and bacteria instead of parasites allows Big Pharma to generate trillions by treating the second symptoms of infection that arise with immuno-compromise. Most people will live with it for 50+ years and never get rid of it. It doesn't kill you. It just weakens you & when you get old and weak it causes secondary infections that kill you. 90% of tests will yield false negatives, so it's VERY difficult to detect. Most cases are identified post mortum by autoopsy. Or by biopsy of lymph nodes, which only shows positive if you are in stage 3 of infeciton. This problem is compounded by the fact that doctors are trained to believe that it's exceedingly rare, and they'll try to steer you away from parasites if you bring it up, owing to their demonic Rockefeller indoctrination combined with their narcissistic personality profiles, which are a prereq for acceptance into the medical programs. The boards all know, as do the people who write the textbooks. All the books have been written for the express purpose of covering this up, along with the role that other parasites play, causing 60-80% of human health problems. Why would every government agency deny it's sexual transmissivity? Why haven't they done tests on US cattle to determine the prevalence on farms? Why do they continue to gaslight us and pretend that a beetle is the only vectors, a beetle which probably accounts for less than 1% of the spread?

Part 5:

How do I know COVID is modified Trpanosoma Cruzi? Covid strips iron off hemoglobin, much like the parasite malaria. This is a very complex task that requires the production of enzymes to digest the alpha chains, enzymes are larger and more complex than a virus. The virus is analagous to a knife. The enzyme is analogous to a bomb. A parasite is analogous to a factory. A virus would have no reason or ability to do this. Parasites like Chagas, on the other hand, are known to strip iron to use iron to hyper accelerate their growth. Both Covid and Chagas cause macorphage confusion, CD4 dysfunction, and the results Is endocarditis as the macrophages target the ACE2 receptors of epithelial cells that have S1 spike protein stuck in them (a problem made much worse with the vaccine). Coronavirus and HIV are the ONLY pathogens that contain s1 spike protein, a 4 letter gene sequence patented by Pfizer (which has 70 CCP members on the board) in 1998. It's not a coincidence. They're the same base thing, though COVID has been gain of functioned SIGNIFICANTLY. Covid long-haul syndrome is extremely similar to the AIDS progression. It's uncanny. The reason ADE reactions occur is that the anti-viral antibodies that you body produces post vaccine don't stick to parasites, so they end up circulating and causing acidic damage to every organ instead. The CV19 version seems able to survive on dry surfaces for days instead of minutes, a major change, but otherwise it's pretty much the same progression.

Part 6:

So after I figured this all out, the biggest cove-up of all time; that parasites are the main plague we face, I went searching on the chans to see if anyone else had realized it, and I found the mother of all red pills, the thing that Q has been prepping us to accept. The final lesson. You aren't ready for this unless you've already accepted that 1) The media is a coordinated lying campaign 2) The 3 letter agencies are evil gatekeepers 3) The western medical establishment cares nothing for human life 4) There is a systemic attempt to destroy society & freedom on a global scale by collectivist ideologies 5) The elites are blood drinking child raping monsters pushing degeneracy on the population for a sinister purpose. Behold, the answer the all the riddles: THE PARASITE PILL

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

efc274 No.158

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>152

Dr. Peter Duesberg who is a vocal critic of Fauci and Robert Gallo, who pushed the aids theory in the 80s, explains why HIV cannot cause AIDS in the embed.

He's says the theory is purely correlational and lists inconsistencies. He's working in the germ theory model but if you figure out parasites and you believe that, you could use it as a key.

What he's saying is good science whether diseases are caused by germs or parasites.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

efc274 No.159

File: a2241a55dd7d2a1⋯.png (375.85 KB,876x557,876:557,cdc_aids_definition.png)

File: 3708fe2d310c435⋯.png (314.74 KB,791x517,791:517,80s_flu_vs_hiv_spread_.png)

File: 15d9c350072e92c⋯.png (395.78 KB,705x478,705:478,95_pct_of_people_with_hiv_….png)

File: 69c4c6823f68e00⋯.png (693.88 KB,988x703,52:37,caused_by_something_noninf….png)

10 scientific reasons why hiv does not cause aids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB8g0b-FkW0

-why hiv fails as the cause of aids and what the redal causes coudl be

-why aids is not being caused by conventional sex

-why clean needles and "safe sex" will do little to stop it

1.

hiv like all other viruses is harmless after antibody immunity

its a retro virus

= reproduces itself thru a process called reverse transription

receptacle attaches to the coating of the tcell

penetrates the cell and encodes its rna genes inside the cells dna

as the cell multiplies, the new viruses break free and reproduce themselves in other cells

like all other retorviruses it reproduces quickly right after entering body

gets killed by antobodies

hiv blood test does not test for the virus but the antibody

when a person tests positive they have produced their own antobody vax which means theyre immune to the virus

infecitous diseases must win the race with the antibodies if they are to kill the host

no known disease has ever reemerged to czuse the illness after antibody presence

they cause their diseases BEFORE THE ANTIBODIES

once you have antibodies you're safe, that;s the whole basis for vaxx

not one precedent where a microbe only causes disease after immunity

some come back but none ever cause a disease only after antibodies appear

which is how aids is described

2.

hiv does not kill the tcells it infects

aids patients osing tcells and since these are the cells hiv infects, it was assumed hiv was killing them.

But, only in rare lab conditions do retroviruses kill their host cells

In face, hiv researchers used tcells to grow the virus bc tcells live compatibly with hiv

Peter Dunesberg reacts to Gallo's AIDS hypothesis that HIV kills T Cells and their death produces aids

retroviruses do not kill cells; theyre diff from all other viruses we know in theat they do not kill the cell they infect. ever.

3.

hiv does not infect enough tcells to cause aids, even if it did kill them

hiv infects 1 out of 1,000 t-cells

t-cells regenerate at the rate of 5% a day

dunesberg: aids patients characterized by the defficiency of deplesion of t-cells, they lack t-cells thats why theyre aids patients

in order to die from depletion of tcells you'd need a virus that kills more than half of them

like saying a 25 year old killed himself with a shaving cut

4.

hiv has no aids causing gene

all retroviruses have only 3 major genes:

GAG, ENV, POL

and 6 minor genes

and bc the genes in genetic sequences ar so limited they need all the genes to replicate

hiv is almost identical to all other retroviruses

there are 50-100 of these in every healthy human body

all have teh same 3 genes

all kept in ctl by antibodies after infection

HIV behaves no differently than the others in the way it mutates becomes dormant and reactivates

SO – if none of these other retroviruses cause diseases, why should hiv?

and if hiv causes aids, why don't all the rest?

no genetic reason to explain why hiv causes aids

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

efc274 No.160

File: cff0752ad8d7fc6⋯.png (469.81 KB,759x565,759:565,us_aids_cases_1980_95.png)

5.

there is no such thing as a slow virus

HIV they say takes 10-12 years after infection to cause aids

slow virus ideas designed by scientists like Gajdusek and Gallo to buy time when their disease causing agent failed to perform

slow virus hypoth. based on epstein barr, which was supposed to cause cancer 10 years after infection

herpes viruses that smolder and hide in persons with supressed immune systems, then reemerge

BUT these differ greatly from hiv bc in both cases large amonuts of ACTIVE virus can be found causing SPECIFIC symptoms

HIV in contrast is inactive, then said to cause 30 diff diseases 10 years later, none of which are specific to hiv itself

Duesberg: "theres no such thing as a slow virus only slow virologists"

a virus incl a retrov causes a disease within days weeks or a month after infection and that isnt a mysterious number, its a function of the generation time of the virus, the time it needs to infect a cell and generate new virus particles

and that takes with all known viruses incl. hiv and retrov's , 1 or 2 or 3 weeks

so w/e a virus could possibly do must hapen in that time period or its not caused by that virus

aids started with a minimal latent period of 1 year in 1984 to a minimal latent period of 10 years in 96

in other words buying lots iof time for something else to cause a disease that is blamed on the virus

after all the money and time spent there isnt a single ray of light on why it takes 10 years. It's impossible.

6.

hiv is not a new virus, so it could not cause a new epidemic

assumption: aids cases were new in the 80s to 90s and rose to hal a million, so hiv must have been too

this is bypassing another essential logical question: how old IS hiv?? and where did it come from?

green monkey bites and traveling gay flight attendants running in the headlines but no one in the entire gov funded research program bothered to verify the age of hiv

duesberg says it's very old, using the fundamental ideas found for dating viruses in farr's law

farr said when a new virus coming into a population it "explodes" into that population, see pic 80s seasonal flu epidemics vs aids

but if a microbe and disease is now established then it's old

when you look at hiv in america, ever since it was first detected you find 1 million Americans are positive

it's true every year

always 1M, every year for 10 years.

that means hiv is an old virus

25m americans tested once a year, this is harder data than anything

this virus in america is older than america

older than the constitution

7. hiv fails koch's postulates

Robert Koch the father of bacteriology, discoverer of TB

designed the universal test to determine if a disease is truly being caused by an infection

Koch's Postulates:

The organism must:

1. Be foudn in all Cases of the Disease

(actively growing in large amounts)

-hiv fails p# 1 bc

10-20% aids patients have no hiv at all

when it can be foudn, only a tiny amount of the dormant virus is found

2. must be isolated from the infected host and grown in pure culture

huge amounts of cell tissue needed to find hiv

hiv needs a chemically induced process to reactivate

-hiv passes post.2 only on a technicality:

can be isolated but takes huge amounts of cell tissue to find it

difficult chemically induced process neeed to reactivate it

by contrast, large amounts of active virus can easily be found with other diseases

3. cause the same disease when injected into a new and healthy host

hiv fails p.3 "hands down"

-does not cause aids when injected into chimps

-more importantly, human health care workers accidently infected rarely get aids unless they use recreatinoal drugs and AZT

4. must be found growing again in the newly-diseased host

Gallo responded that Koch's Postulates are outdated and don't apply to modern medicine

but they have stood the test of time:

scurvy, beri-beri, pelegra, smon (japan), virus-cancer

–all failed koch's postulates and failed to be infectious

It's obvious that hiv fails to cause aids in the microscopic lens and on the drawing board, but it doesnt fly int he population studies either

using telescopic lens to obseve the population at large, hiv becomes linked to real names and faces

the pop studies prove beyond a doubt that hiv does not cause aids

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

efc274 No.161

File: db069edb015fea6⋯.png (559.38 KB,847x560,121:80,Screenshot_2021_09_27_0653….png)

>>160

8.

hiv has remained in it's original risk groups for 12 years

when an infectious epidemic strikes it begins in small clusters then quickly spreads throughout the entire population

if a disease does not spread it is not contagious and must be caused by smth non-infectious

cdc confirmed in 92 aids is not spreading into the population at large and was still locked in its og risk groups

in 1992 (12 years later) aids was still 97% in risk groups:

62% in gays

32% in iv drug users

1% in hemophiliacs

2% in transfusion patients

the 3% outside those risk groups have immunodeficiency at random and just happen to have hiv

If AIDS was caused by a virus, AIDS patients not in a risk group should be growing above 3%

1984 army study foudn hiv infection even spread between males and females 50-50

and its remained that way since then;

yet 9/10 people who develop aids are males

(of the 10% who are women, 60% of them are iv drug users)

hiv evenly spread but aids 90% males

9.

the intl profile of aids patients is inconsistent

18:38

a germ related disease would affect different populations the same around the world

i.e. a cholera outbreak in india would be similar to one in honduras

but aids stats in africa vs us and the west are totally different

in US aids patients 90% male

in Africa they're 50/50 male /female

in US AIDS resides 97% in risk groups

in Africa it's dsitributed at random around the pop

in US 62% aids cases are microbial

in Africa 90% are microbial

aids in africa should develop faster bc of malnutrition and other health conditions conduscive to aids

aids stats should be at least 14x higher in Africa than US

instead, people with hiv in the us get aids 10-20x faster

So the question is:

Why would the aids epidemic behave so differently in the industrialized world?

one explanation is that aids is caused not by hiv but by drugs

Duesberg questions if what's called aids in africa is the same epidemic

"I think it's a completely different epidemic, it affects men and women alike"

"clinically and epidemiologically the 2 pandemics are very different " citing the m-f and microbial stats

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

efc274 No.162

File: 88eef77d34f298a⋯.png (372.72 KB,887x602,887:602,aids_rates_by_sex_us_afric….png)

File: 8a08049f9bbb402⋯.png (425.85 KB,942x624,157:104,microbial_aids_rate_us_afr….png)

File: 67d4797d1c93101⋯.png (459.55 KB,847x612,847:612,Screenshot_2021_09_27_0821….png)

File: e8e8f96d943c0d4⋯.png (353.58 KB,811x616,811:616,from_the_mid_nineties.png)

>>161

(~21:10)

London Sunday Times questioned whether aids in africa is a myth –

"if tens of thousands are dying of aids in africa, where are their graves?"

-dr. felix knonotey/Ahulu

Phillippe Krennen, a French humanitarian, went to Tanzania, thought to be the aids outbreak epicenter,

he and his wife went to deal with orphans with aids

they find there is no aids and there are no orphans

"there is no aids, there is something that's been invented"

orphans were being cared for by grandparents whiel their parents worked at the salon until dry season

the aids diseases were the same old diseases africans have always been suffering from

only difference is if they call it an aids disease, the WHO sends money (just like covid at the hospitals!)

Reason 10.

aids occurs without hiv infection and most people w hiv never develop aids

the evidence for causation is solely the correlation

IF hiv is a harmless passenger virus, we should see:

-people with aids not infected with hiv

-people with hiv who are healthy and do not get aids

and that is exactly what's happened

**

risk group specific aid diseases

iv drug users get TB and wasting syndrome

gays get kaposi's sarcoma and cytomegalovirus

do people in thee risk groups who dont have aids get these?

Absolutely Yes

common denominator: the use of nitrite inhalants as aphrodisiacs that are known to be immunodeppressive

common denominator: thousands of hiv-neg american drug users get the same tuberculosis , wasting syndrome and pheumonias, even lose CD4-T-Cells like hiv infected

Dr. Duesberg says there were 4,621 documented aids cases w/o hiv in 93

and this number is much lower than it may actually be

but it's not going as fast as it should, bc if a person is reported with a clinical aids diagnosis, he or she will not appear in the natl aids statistics

they'll call it something else like pneumonia and say it cant be aids bc he's not hiv pos

so these cases mostly date from the early 80s when people were still asking, is hiv actually found in all aids cases?

more have accumulated since but not as many because people know now what to say in order to survive in this competitive world

The official definition of AIDS is designed to eliminate ever case of aids that provides an embarassing non-correlation

Dr D.: The offical definiteion of aids is with 30 previously known diseases, check diseases and the presence of the antibody against hiv–

if you have kaposi's Sarcoma with HIV antibodies, it's HIV. If you have it w/o HIV antibodies, it's kaposi's

etc with the other illnesses

"there is no hiv-specific disease anywhere

unlike any other microbe that causes a specific disease just like an instrument makes a certain sound

HIV doesn't make a specific sound

it's said to cause 30 previously known diseases when it's there and when it's not there, the original causes of these diseases are responsible for them (laughs)"

that is the official definition of aids, not my joke

using this official definition , hiv proponents arrive at a near 100% correlation between the virus and aids

and remember, the hiv hypothesis is based solely on correlational evidence

"and you can find the correlation, there's no question about it, if you ignore all the cases where there isn't a correlation, you have the correlation, but that is very bad science, and it's very bad epidemiology as well" (dont know who that is)

the correlation is not Objective, nor scientific, say critics, and is deceptively self-fulfilling

"science is designed to get around self fulfilling prophesies but in this case, it's proceeding on the basis of one"

finally the most compelling argument:

the millions of people worldwide who have the disease and are nto becoming sick

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4ebc6d No.163

>>158

By Duesberg's theory not only does HIVnotcause AIDS, but the AIDS label is applied to multiple different diseases.

>AIDS in Africa hits different demographics (50/50 male/female wih 90% male in the US, 90% microbial vs 62% in the US, distributed across the population evenly vs confined to original risk groups in the US for at least the first 12 years) therefor it cannot be the same disease.

>even within the US, infected IV users have different symptoms (tubercolusis, and wasting syndrome) than infected gays (kaposis's sarcoma and cytomegalovirus) indicating that even within the US, there are separate illnesses being lumped together as AIDS

TLDR

>HIV is harmless, has been around forever and doesn't cause AIDS

>AIDS as currently defined doesn't exist at all.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6e3562 No.167

>>158

>>163

>>162

>>161

>>160

>>159

In summary:

>HIV as a new virus and the cause of AIDS was a hoax – the virus is older than America, and harmless

>it cannot possibly lead to to aids in the way we've been told, no virus works like that

>meaning there is no such thing as a slow developing virus, retroviruses cannot kill T-Cells outside of controlled lab conditions, and cannot cause any disease after immmunity, which is what HIV tests test for, and even ig HIV did kill T-Cells, it does not infect them even close to fast enough to cause immune deficiency, infecting .1% of a patient's T-Cells while the body regenerates it's T-Cells at 5% a day

Different profiles suggest different diseases

>the profile in different populations is completely different

Africa vs US

>in the US hiv remained in original risk group, whereas in Africa it spreads evenly across the population

>in US it's 90% male, in Africa 50/50

AIDS likewise has inconsistent profiles in different continents, and even within the US in different risk groups

>in US 63% of aids cases are microbial

>in Africa 90% of AIDS cases are microbial

>Americans with HIV get AIDSat least14x faster than Africans, despite malnutrition and other poor health conditions in Africa which suggest the reverse would be more logical

>American IV users who develop AIDS have a completely different set of symptoms than American gays

Conclusion:

>there are multiple viruses being falsely grouped together as AIDS, when they are obviously different things

I suspect that in Africa they're either running up false positives using the PCR test, or everyone there legitimately has this harmless virus HIV, but it doesn't progress to AIDS there because they don't take the "medicine" /AZT which could actually be poison.

My running theory is that people in risk groups in the US are either given HIV maliciously in the hospital, or they genuinely have it and are deceived into taking AZT (still widely used) or other harmful drugs.

So the IV users and gays have already weakened their immune systems (in different ways for each group: IV users inject, gays have anal sex and use inhalants) before being diagnosed and taking AZT, and that this is why AZT leads to one set of illnesses in IV users and another in gays.

The hospitals deceive patients who already have weak immune systems into taking AZT, which kills them.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6e3562 No.168

>>167

this got me thinking about the Dallas Buyers Club movie

>guy who wants to help sick people gets around the FDA to give them the drugs they need

Sounds like he was killing them with AZT?

NO, it turns out they saw AZT as an expensive poison and were delivering peptide T and other actual cures

https://theskepticalchemist.com/dallas-buyers-club-azt-peptide-t/

only AZT was approved, and like remdesivir it had a bad safety record, then like the covid shots was rushed onto the market in under 2 years

parallels could be drawn between

>AZT and Remdesivir and/or the rna jabs

>HIV and Covid-19, in that neither is much to worry about but it used to scare people into taking harmful meds

I'm taking my time with this. Anyone who finds this, feel free to research and post.

relevant books:

"The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr.

>amazon dot com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804

Deadly Deception the Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS

>amazon dot com/Deadly-Deception-Proof-Absolutely-Cause/dp/0964231611

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6e3562 No.169

>>168

another parallel is peptide-T and Ivermectin/hcq

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.170

Bitchute embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>168

>Deadly Deception the Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS

Dr. Willner's book costs $2000, wow.

Someone uploaded it to archive dot org. You can read the pdf's in their viewer with a sign on, you check them out for an hour at a time and renew as needed.

archive dot org/details/deadly-deception-the-proof-that-sex-and-hiv-absolutely-do-not-cause-aids-robert-willner

>This highly controversial, out-of-print book is nearly impossible to find. Only a few used copies show up periodically on Amazon or Ebay and run hundreds of dollars to over a thousand per copy. A good Samaritan located a copy, meticulously scanned and formatted each page; and then created a word-searchable ebook to share far and wide.

>Just a short time after the release of his book and a powerful, informative lecture (youtube dot com/watch?v= 9WFhw5HHHbQ), Dr. Willer ended up dead; allegedly from a heart attack.

The lecture was on Dec. 7 1994 so that would've been in 95 that he died or was killed.

Lecture embedded. He sticks himself with HIV around halfway through. The Q and A afterward is just as good as the presentation.

takeaways

>goes over some of duesberg's conclusions

>much more direct and aggressive when he talks about what happened, might have something to do with his death

>he goes around sticking himself with HIV needles to show it's nothing

>HIV can be transmitted but it's extremely difficult, nothing like how the media characterizes it

>after repeatedly sticking himself on stage and even more times while practicing medicine

>says AZT a chemotherapeutic drug and that is what causes the deaths, and malnutrition it causes with the loss of appetite

>he argues that drug use in gays, not anal sex, is what kills their immune system: "poppers" amyl nitrate inhalants are very widely used by gays

>very, very hard to transfer by blood or through sex, needs a lot of blood or a lot of sex for many years

>however, constantly getting VD's and going through antibiotic cycles can kill the immune system too.

>it can be hard to tell when he means getting hiv vs getting aids. But progressing from hiv to aids doesn't happen.

>AIDS was not only a hoax it was premeditated mass murder and he calls fauci and gallo killers, names others, says they should be locked up

pasting my notes on Dr Wilner after this.

Dr Duesberg's book, which is also very expensive, is available for free as an audiobook if you join audible

amazon dot com/Inventing-the-AIDS-Virus/dp/ B00DBAXVMU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.171

>>170

>after repeatedly sticking himself

*he still tests neg at a major NYC clinic*

Dr. W worked as a doctor for 40 years in one of the largest hospitals in Florida.

NOTES

what causes aids? what causes any virus:

1 malnutrition

2 drugs -and not just street drugs

number 1 cause is 2 medical drugs

azt, wich was discovered in the 60s for cancer and shelved bc too toxic to treat cancer

3. radiation

4. chemotherapy

azt a chemotherapeutic drug

concord study completed the year before in 93 showed azt did _

look at the insert it's a dna terminator

there are no side effects in medicine they're direct affects

lymphoma and cancer direct affects of azt

pancytopemia = loss of all your cells

= the definition of aids

they cut the dosage way down because it was killing them too fast

$100k to anyone who produces a scientific document that HIV causes any serious disease

what do Duesberg or Charles H Thomas or Kary Mullis have to gain?

why would Wullsberg inject himself with a deadly virus if he knew it was deadly?

independent lab found AZT to be 1000x more toxic than the lab at the NIH

10% error or 20 ok. But a 100,000% error? That's fraud.

CDC let blacks go untreated w syphilus just to see what would happen

they admitted they cant give in on the aids thing now cus no one would ever be able to trust the gov

"isn't it strange that the same day or the day after robert gallo filed for a test for hiv after it was announced? Premeditation.

You mean he just happened to have this test available? So the same day or the following day he files for a patent?

30k russian came down with it by gallo's test

confirmation test showed only 6 of them had it–not 6,000; six.

hiv test 99.997% inaccurate

dr W got tested in one of the biggest nyc clinics after sticking himself

in greenwitch village. Doc told him shhh stop talking about it my patients will hear

tests gives you the answer Pos/neg in 15m

What does this prove? These are 99.997% inaccurate readings

You would treat somebody with a deadly drug on the basis of a test that's inaccurate?

Doc asked why I'm taking the test I told him I'm a doctor so I'm in a risk group

he laughed and said aren't we all

bc EVERYBODY KNOWS

Research group in FLA in 94 found not only is the test inaccurate, it's totally nonspecific

you could test pos if you had the measles, the flu, the flu shot, any one of a hundred diseases

I told fauci I tested neg after sticking myself repeatedly

fauci said you need to stick yourself 300x to xmit the virus

300x to transmit a virus? You cannot have an epidemic under those circumstances

if you cant xmit it by blood you certainoly cant transmit it sexually

it's unbelievable what they're getting away with. How does the press let this go?

us gov says 12k people died each year from 1985 - 92

12k a year for 7 years in a row? that's not epidemic, by definition it's endemic

and you would expect in 7 years considering it's srpead sexually that we'd have probably 15-20 million

in russia 105 deaths from aids since 1987 (talking in Dec. 94)

in Philippines, 80 deaths since 1984 .. epidemics? It's no epidemic.

But who had to gain from this? Not Dr. Duesberg.

If there are 2 politicians and one of them keeps insulting the other, and won't answer his questions in a scietific way, who's the liar?

Fauci and Gallo instead of answering the scientific conflicts that Duesberg pointed out so brilliantly, they called him a homophobe.

I've been called a homophobe too

all blacks and hispanics and marginalized groups getting diagnosed

if you're in one of those groups you have AIDS

if you're not you have TB or lymphoma, leukemia, phemonia, 30+ diseases

where is the press, how do they buy a story that a virus knows what country it's in?

3 symptoms in Africa but 30 diseases in the US and europe.

How do they buy the story that a virus has prejudices?

prefers men to women 9:1 in us/europe but w/m equaly in Africa

it knows if you're single black or white immigration status everything

Liars and killers like Fauci and Gallo and Hazeltine and Essex and flosic unstal, margaret fishel

these people are getting by with the lie and getting paid immense sums of money for it and getting praised by the rest of the world while they murder

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.172

>>171

The Study at U. of Miami was completely fraudulent

You see I believed that the virus caused aids from 1984 to 1988 and I treated aids patients, AS ONE OF THE FEW DOCTORS WILLING TO.

dOCTORS ARE SCARED FOR THEIR LIVES

to even treat the patient

btw sticking my finger nothing new:

I did it LOTS of times treating my aids patients

and it's amazing that in spite of our great exposure, the incidence of the disease among medicao personel of all types is less than the general pop:

This would be a first in the history of science.

Think about that, how is it possible? Maybe the virus has nothing to do with it.

In 88 I was invited to a dinner where inaudible was going to push AZT as a drug for treating AIDS

We were told we could ask questions during the dinner because Margaret Fishel was going to be speaking.

And when she mentioned that the drug AZT had 56 side effects I raised my hand

and I said, Dr. Fishel, how did you do a double blind study on a drug with 56 side effects?

You've got to know that you're on the drug?

She said to me, Well, the placebo had 31!

And I raised my hand again, How could a PLACEBO have 31 side effects?

I didn't know what was wrong then but I knew there was something wrong, I knew there was something dreadfully wrong and I didn't know how dreadfully wrong and how deadly wrong it was .

But the answer came years later

the FDA as you probably know, released AZT after 4 months of a proposed 6 month study

They cut it short out of compassion bc one group in this double blind study was doing better than another group: AZT doing better

then it came out that it wasn't double blind, participants knew who had it and didnt

real meds being shared with placebo group

Q:

Dr. W, You said that this is an endemic not an epidemic

circumstanced by a variety of factors including malnutrition and drug use

how then do you explain the years of potential life loss in the 250k + people who've died of aids according to cdc definition where drug use has been going on for centuries and suddenly we're losing people in their 20s and 30s?

A:

that's an excellent Q and you're using your head.

THAT'S the kind of question that should've been asked of Gallo in the very beginning.

Most of these peopel are in their 20s and 30s. Isn't it strange you've got a disease that affects our healthiest?

But what happened in the 60s, the drug culture began.

What happened in the 70s? It heated up.

At the end of the 70s the gays came out of the closet and became an identifiable group

Now I'll ask you, in a sense it's a redundant question but I think it'll get the point across:

I'm gonna name 5 of 30 diseases: TB, Lymphoma, Leukemia, pneumasistic pnemonia, and Caposi's Sarcoma.

Are these new diseases? No.

These diseases and the other 25 have always been around.

It's easy to create an epidemic:

You take a variety of diseases and group them under one heading and claim a virus is responsible for it, well that's nonsense.

First of all let me offer the proof: the reason it appeared, which I think is the essence of your question, as though it were some new epidemic coming on,

is because it appeared in a select population, the gay population.

It ONLY is occuring in gays who are on drugs, and remember alcohol is a drug.

And let's remember these individuals are extremely promiscuous, getting one venereal disease after another and they'll be taking antibiotics all year long

And it's a matter of medical fact that antibiotics ARE immune suppressive.

Now let me offer one bit of investigative reporting for you:

it was reported in the newspapers a couple years ago that this HIV was found in blood that had been preserved in labs in the 1940s.

They found hiv in these bodies, which btw HIV had been around for thousands of years. But let's use this one example

If we had hiv in the population in the 1940s and we had homos in the 40s and btw according to Kinsey, 10-15% of the hetero population preferred anal intercourse

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS YOUR EPIDEMIC?

It wasn't suitable for a scoundrel like Robert Gallo in the 1940s, he wasn't old enough or maybe he wasn't born, to pull of a scam of theis magnitude.

ANd now they're caught up in a maelstrom: now if the truth gets out, it will deal a blow to the credibility of the NIH and the CDC AND the FDA AND the AMA

and by God, it is sorely needed!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.173

>>172

Q:

Is it true that all lifetime drug users eventually come down with a syndrome that could be attributed to aids

A:

Absolutely.

Remember it's dose related, so it depends upon how many drugs you're using and how much of them and for how long a period of time.

Now if you overdose you never get to that point.

Q:

aren't bathhouses being dark wet places an excellent place for microbes around the world, do you think that men who've had sex thousands of times per year in these bathhouses does that have incredible amount of immune suppression that is not matched by the rest of the population?

with mdma , poppers and all the things gonig on (could the gay sex in the bathhouses be a contributing factor)?

A:

I agree that these drugs are causing immune suppression

Now, I don't beleive that sex itself will cause immune suppression

But I do believe that recurring venereal disease [and antiobiotic cycles as he said earlier] will cause immune suppression

But the simple fact is that the virus has nothing to do with it! And that's the important thing.

I am for a healthy lifestyle, yes. But let's not get into the idea that AIDS is contagious.

You cannot get AIDS from anyone, and you cannot give AIDS to anyone.

Q:

Do you consider the intense chronic psychological terrorisms around hiv and aids to be [a major story/ a major cause of immune deficincy? inaudible]

A:

22 years ago I urinated pure blood without pain

I knew immediately what thediagnosis was it was bladder cancer

I cannot fully desribe what I felt at that moment

describes a crash

when you start to get yourself together and use your intelligence, you can get over it

But yes, what you're syaing is true for most people

it's a sentence of death for most people and immediately after getting the diagnosis their system starts going into negative phases:

everything becomes destructive.

This is modern medical voodoo.

You're system is going to die because you've been told so.

Q:

R.Gallo who is a proven fraud, the AMA itself, biologists and hematologists have said this is a faulty test

the criticisms are just basic medical facts, how is it that this has gotten by the entire population and the media is pushing this lie

Arthur Ash for example was on 30 pills a day before he succumbed including AZT, how is that not iatrogenic (caused by the medicine/procedure)?

How is it that the medical profesion can murder a million people a year, according to their own study the Yale Newhave study that came out this year 1994, they admit to it, why aren't they on trial?

A:

TY for the compliments I'd like a copy of that study after the presentation.

We're worried about the so called AIDS epidemic but 12k a year is not an epidemic [even if it were caused by the hiv aids virus]

500k from cancer and 800k from heart disease

60k die from car accidents 120k die each year from iatrogenic disease (caused by complications from medical treatments)

I've been saying that iatrogenic diseases are the nbr 3 cause of death?

that's 120k deaths that they Admit to

I've been going around saying iatrogenic is the number 3 cause of death, that's the official number

but I believe in my heart it's the number one cause of death: iatrogenic disease.

but if we took the figure that 120k are killed by doctors each year

not malpractice but as the normal course of doing medicine,

then doctors are 10x more dangerous than HIV

now you're telling me it's 100x

Q:

can you give some insight into how this mechanism works with pediatrics?

A:

first of all I challenge anybody, except from genetics or for children born under cirtcumstances that we don't have all the facts,

but I would say 99% or better of the inidividuals born with AIDS, if they actually have aids their mother is a crack mother,

it's from drugs there's no doubt about it

Q:

the story of the pregnant woman who received HIV from the transfusion and passed it on to her child then she died

A:

there's a gap there. How much time between when she tested pos and died?

what did they do in that time?

I cant answer to that case not knowing the specifics but I can tell you:

these kids who are diagnosed HIV, if you give them AZT the kid will die of AIDS, absolutely.

But most of those kids will not die, just like most of the kids I've treated did not die.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.174

>>173

Q:

what about the T-cells?

A:

They're our body's way of fighting infection

Now when somebody cam einto my office with a belly ache I would do a white count, which includes the T-cells

if the white count was 5,6,7k, I didn't think anything of it.

but if it was 20k I alerted a surgeon.

You see the body creates the T-cells when it needs it

If you don't need it you don't got it.

Why would you walk around with a lot of T-cells when you've got nothing to fight

Here's one thing we've always known:

There is no correlation between severity of disease in AIDS-so to speak- and the T-cell count

It doesn't match and I'll tell you why:

you will not have a high white count unless you have a severe infection

which means that if you don't have a high white count it's not bad

if everything else is normal why do you want a high white count?

if you got a bad cold then yes, an elevation in your white count.

It's a documented fact we've had individuals with aids die with elevated t cells

and invidiuals who are healthy they have no t cells

you can use it to some degree as a barometer depending on the situation but basically you can't and I'll tell you why:

because you can change the t cell count if you worry somebody

bc their whole life is focussed on those t cell counts and they keep counting it

every low count instead of seeing that as a good sign like I would they literally worry themselves to death

They have absoultely no correlation to disease:

they can be low bc you've wiped out your immune system, or they can be low bc you don't need them.

That's the important thing to understand = it is not a barometer for anything.

The same CDC that left syphalitics untreated has admitted that 40-60% of the listed AIDS cases were never even tested for HIV

and not that it makes any difference because the test is meaningless

Q:

so can it happen that I take AZT it's seen as a foreign invader and my T-cells go way up?

A:

yes and that's exactly what happens

no get an initial rise but then the AZT does it's dirty work suppresses your entire reproduction of your t-cells and eventually it goes thru the floor.

Q:

You say that hiv itself is a harmless retrovirus

Can HIV, not AIDS but HIV, be sexually transmitted?

A:

HIV a harmless virus CAN be sexually transmitted with incredible difficulty to the point where it becomes meaningless.

And that hasn't been definitely proven

they presented a case in 25 males with hiv, there were able to demonstrate only in 2 out of 25 with the virus

and in those 2 they only found one in a million cells

the lie is so compounded and so idiotic and so unbelievable that you have to fight your way out of the maze of these lies

They are all unadulterated lies and the men responsible for them belong in jail.

[to someone who reports at a mag for gays with aids]:

Gov says it takes an average of 1000 acts of intercourse over 10 years in the US

and 10k acts over 10 years in Africa to transmit the aids virus

that's twice a week in the US, for 10 years on average to tarnsmit the virus

in Africa that's 20x a week on average

and if you know what the bell curve is there's gotta be soe inidvidual out in africa that's doing it 200x a week

I wanna meet that individual!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd854f No.175

>>174

Now let me give you a set of figures that you must produce for your readers please:

the WHO says the annual conversion rate in the US for HIV is 1-1.5 percent a year

now according to the figures given us by the CDC, there are constantly for ten years now 1 Million Americans pos for HIV

that defies all definitions of an epidemic.

how does it stay steady at 1 million if this is an epidemic that's gonna kill everybody

and btw they're predictions from 10 years ago were 91% wrong as far as deaths

1-1.5% per year would average out to 67.5 years for everyone who's hiv pos in the US today to develop aids

but in Haiti it's 1/10th that

I advise your readers if they're hiv pos to go to Haiti LOL

because there it'll take 1000 years for everybody who is hiv pos today to develop full blown aids

and these are the WHO figures

but in Zaire, according to their numbers,

you have 150x better chance of survival if you're in Zaire with aids than if you live in the US

in other words, there in Azire it'll take 25000 years for everybody who's hiv pos today to become full blown aids

so I think you should urge all your readers with full blown compassion in your heart to take the plane to zaire

Those are gov figures they are not mine!

the ridiculousness of it demands that you print those figures and give them to your readers

Q:

isn't is interesting that Africa and Haiti have similar situations than N. America and Europe

you would think that the infected would spread closer to the center of

A:

simple

malnutrition and starvation can lead to death but aids due to drugs is a much shorter period of time

Q:

[azt destroys your liver and your dead]

A:

Let me throw out an overall principle from the point of view of disease and death

this applies to aids as it would apply to any disease in humanity and with this I'm going to end:

the bubonic plague killled half th epop of Europe

The question you must ask and answer if you're going to be a rational thinking human being is,

why didn't it kill the other half?

In the US in 1919

18m people died of the flu

my question is why didn't the other 92m people die?

the answer to that is very simple:

the bugs do not cause the disease unless there's a suitable terrain

so the answer is to live at ease with the other organisms on the planet

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

302bc7 No.178

>>158

>>167

LA Times did a surprisingly even-handed writeup of Dr. Duesberg's fight with the AIDS industry.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-05-21-vw-2451-story.html

https://archive.md/84N4d

The bias is there but it isn't obnoxious like it is in every article today. The reporter summarizes Duesberg's arguments. But they don't summarize the counterarguments.

All they can say is

>researchers and science writers have rebutted Duesberg’s arguments almost point by point–without moving Duesberg an inch. The counter-arguments center on the voluminous evidence linking HIV with AIDS and point to subtleties of viral behavior that Duesberg is thought to have overlooked or ignored.

abstracts on all his articles here

>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Duesberg+PH&cauthor_id=19619953

but the last one was withdrawn.

The editor was fired, he wrote about it

https://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com/2010/05/medical-hypotheses-affair-times-higher.html

He basically says that the journal was established specifically to publish controversial works. Publisher told him to change the publishing process after the Duesberg article and he said no and was canned.

The funny thing you'll see a lot of the critics say Duesberg was involved with a vitamin salesman or something and he hid it, and they work for companies that profited from the AIDS meds which they don't announce in every article either.

Cal Berkley started an investigation into Duesberg for scientific misconduct because of the article.

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/berkeley-scholar-in-dock-over-hiv-aids-article/411352.article

Like he says it's strange that they'd start in investigation into an argument he'd been making for 23 years.

Chicago Tribune article reviews the Robert Gallo controversy

>https://archive.md/84N4d

who had a dispute with Montagnier over who discovered HIV that he ultimately lost. But if HIV is a nothing virus among many others then it doesn't matter who discovered it.

Gallo was found guilty of misconduct and forced out at HHS, federal prosecutors wanted to charge him but it seems someone protected him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6e8175 No.179

File: 7983c7678c1d99c⋯.pdf (267.97 KB,Duesberg_censored_article_….pdf)

>>178

Dr Duesberg's withdrawn Article attached, 5 pages long with a 1-paragraph summary. found on https://www.immunity.org.uk/articles/peter-duesberg/

>re: study showing 330k South African AIDS deaths a year could hav ebeen prevented with HIV meds: what evidence is that that these deaths were caused by HIV, and that the meds would've prevented them?

>It's unconfirmed, and the SA gov with US Census reported a large population increase over that same time, which doesn't make sense if 25-30% of the pop had HIV and HIV was spreading and killing

>similarly, the total subsaharan African population has doubled from 1980 to 2007 during the so-called AIDS epidemic.

"We conclude that the claims that HIV has caused huge losses of African lives are unconfirmed and that HIV is not sufficient or even necessary to cause the previously known diseases, now called AIDS in the presence of antibody against HIV. Further we call into question the claim that HIV antibody-positives would benefit from anti-HIV drugs, because those drugs are inevitably toxic and because there is as yet no proof that HIV causes AIDS."

>Chicago Tribune article reviews the Robert Gallo controversy

I pasted the wrong address it's

https://archive.ph/YKUhO

<Flashback: Scientists battled over bragging rights as AIDS raged. A 50,000-word Tribune report laid it all bare.

>Crewdson spent 20 months reconstructing the discovery of the virus “in an effort to distinguish scientific truth from gossip, rumor and professional jealousy,” the Tribune explained in an editor’s note. He interviewed 150 scientists and amassed 5,000 pages of government documents. (Gallo’s lab at the National Cancer Institute was part of the federally funded National Institutes of Health.)

>The Tribune noted that Gallo rebuffed requests for an in-person interview and impeded Freedom of Information requests for public records.

>“He claimed that the subject was too complicated for lay people to deal with,” the Tribune Editorial Board wrote in a subsequent editorial.

>Gallo answered some questions by phone, but the lack of in-person interview prevented Crewdson from extensively going over government documents with the researcher.

>Based on his comprehensive review, Crewdson concluded that Gallo’s research was tainted by “misstated data and secret experiments, phantom viruses and disappearing genes, unreproducible results and muddled lab notes, mislabeled cultures and misleading photographs.”

He also argued the Gallo contaminated his virus and stole Montagnier's, which he requested and was mailed to him.

Crewdson's Nov 19 1989 article looks like it was wiped from the freenet. This is probably it

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1989-11-19-8903130823-story.html

https://archive.ph/G5kJk

with a different title and 46,000 words missing.

Idk how a paper can publish one article with that many words but they say they did. To access their old papers you need a chicago library card.

Apparently he made it into a book:

Science Fictions: A Scientific Mystery, a Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark Legacy of Robert Gallo

https://www.sciencefictions.net/

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/606592.Science_Fictions

interesting reply to a critic

https://www.sciencefictions.net/reply_to_science.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c7e3c7 No.180

>>158

Cary Mullis' wrote the intro to Duesberg's book "Inventing the AIDS Virus", it is posted here

https://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/kintro.html

similar to this interview

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GcCyNHmI7S0/

he says he was writing about hiv causing aids and couldn't find a reference for that fromanybodynot even top scientists, and he couldn't understand that until he heard Duesberg on the radio explain that the reason why was there IS no relationship between hiv/aids/

apparently he disagrees with Duesberg and Willner that drugs cause the immune failure FWTW

Dr. Duesberg answered AIDS FAQ's here

https://www.duesberg.com/faq.html

>the aids cocktails weren't effective meds at all, despite media claims

>says it takes ~1,000 acts of sex to transmit HIV, same number WIllner quoted, cites 1989 article in New England Journal of Medicine

>means 20x a week to xmit the virus in one year

>sex twice a week would take 10 years

>says condoms are effective in preventing AIDS if you have sex 100x with someone HIV+, but only because they prevent the prescription of anti-HIV "medication"

"(1) Since AIDS is caused by drugs, not by HIV, condoms do not prevent AIDS. (2) However, since many doctors prescribe DNA chain terminators such as AZT as anti-HIV drugs to healthy HIV-positives, and since DNA chain terminators cause AIDS - condoms are useful after all. They protect people who have an average of 1,000 sexual contacts with HIV-positives from infection, and thus from AIDS caused by anti-HIV medication."

"Q8: You state that any microbe that kills all his hosts would end up by committing suicide. So what? Do you believe in a 'survival finalism' in nature, in a sort of intelligence of the virus?

"A8: Life is comparable to the law: it is based on logic and precedent. There >>>>is neither a precedent for a virus that consistently kills it's host, as is claimed for HIV, nor would it be logical for a virus to kill the host it needs for its survival.

The 'intelligence of a virus' killing consistently its host, would be the same as that of a car that consistently kills its drivers because it does not have brakes."

"Q10: The new tests (Pcr) can detect the virus not only its antibodies. How is it that many people die of Aids with no trace of Hiv in their blood? Is it hidden or non existent?

A10: Contrary to your assertion, the new PCR test does not detect "the virus". Instead it detects a piece of the viral RNA or DNA genome, but not even the complete genome. Typically any virus, whose RNA or DNA must be detected by this method, is neutralized by antibody and is thus latent, and not infectious. It is for this reason that this very expensive method was introduced to detect "the virus" in AIDS patients. It would be much cheaper, and biologically much more relevant if infectious HIV could be detected. The difficulty in detecting infectious virus was reason for the fraud charges of the Pasteur Institute against leading AIDS researchers in the US (Gallo) and the UK (Weiss).

The PCR method was invented by Kary Mullis, who wrote the foreword for IAV, to detect a needle in a haystack. But a needle in a haystack does not cause a fatal disease. This is in fact one of the fatal flaws of the HIV-AIDS hypothesis.

The reason why "many people die of AIDS with no trace of HIV" is simple. Since AIDS is caused by drugs, HIV must not be present in AIDS patients - this is the hallmark of a passenger virus."

also says why he hasn't injected himself with the virus (ignoring that Willner already did this repeatedly and tested neg after)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2e7b3 No.181

>>180

from the Viewpoints tab

https://duesberg.com/viewpoints/index.html

Bruce Nussbaum

Good Intentions:

How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS

Good Intentions is a tale of vaulting ambition, greed, and hubris set against the tragic backdrop of AIDS.

Bruce Nussbaum takes us behind the scenes to reveal how America's top scientists are at the center of a triangle of power. He shows how the National Institute of Health allied with the drug company Burroughs Wellcome, secretly helped by the FDA, to steamroll a thirty-year-old drug, AZT, into becoming the only approved treatment for AIDS.

An old-boy network of powerful medical researchers dominates in every disease field, from AIDS to Alzheimer's, Nussbaum reports. They control the major committees, they run the most important trials. They are accountable to no one. Despite the billions of taxpayers' dollars that go to them every year, there is no public oversight. Medical scientists have convinced society that only they can police themselves.

Business Week senior writer Bruce Nussbaum follows the money trial from the billions appropriated by Congress through a network of government laboratories and into the profit statements of Burroughs Wellcome. This is an inside look at how politics, science, and big business are bungling the fight against AIDS.

(The Atlantic Monthly Press, New York, 1990)

This is a recent discovery of an ageless 1995 article, that has become more, rather than less timely with age:

Michael Tracey, Colorado University

Mere smoke of opinion: Aids and the Making of the Public Mind

(Inaugural lecture of the Chair of International Communication,

University of Salford, England UK, 1995)

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry

Introduction for the book "Inventing the AIDS Virus"

by Peter Duesberg ( Regnery Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC, 1996)

Serge Lang, Yale University

The Case of HIV and AIDS

The Gallo Case

The two preceding references are from the book

"Challenges" by Serge Lang

(Springer-Verlag, 1998) ISBN 0-387-94861-9

The Case of HIV: We Have Been Misled

from Yale Scientific, Spring 1999

links to this piece by Professor Michael Tracey

>an internationally recognized researcher and scholar, …

https://duesberg.com/viewpoints/mere-smoke.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2e7b3 No.182

>>181

>Bruce Nussbaum

>Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS

lengthy review from the gay community on the book's amazon page:

> Technocrat Joe

>5.0 out of 5 stars COVID-19 EVERY AMERICA. MUST READ THIS BOOK DR FAUCI POISON AZT KILLED OFF THE GAY POPULATION

>Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2020

>Dr FAUCI criminal corruption poisoned and murdered gay men in the 80s by blocking hundreds of HIV drugs and promoting his toxic poison drug AZT with shoddy data. The only data exposed was his millions of dollars and interests owned in his poison trafficted and by his big pharma partners at Burroughs Wellcome. He knowingly urged Drs to administer this poison killing many of my dear friends in the late 80s. If HIV doctors questioned the horrible symtoms they were witnessing from their patients they Dr Fauci, NIH , FDA became angry and shamed them. Why is this not being brought to the public attention at every daily press conference with Trump?

>Every gay man in America must read this book to understand that Dr Fauci murdered your brothers. This is not fake news. This was a scandal and caused outrage that Dr Fauci was never prosecuted. That’s becuase the FDA and big pharma protected him. This scandal was exposed across major media outlets in the late 80s and this book uncovers this shameful corruption led by Dr Fauci. I had to go find this book in my old library in storage and re read every word this past week under Covid-19 lockdown having to feel more sick watching Dr Evil on TV everyday promoting a Gdamn Vaccine that must be made to end this current pandemic.

>The gay population in America in the 80s were marginalized without any political voice or power. What gay men were to Dr Fauci were lab rats poisoned with his Dr Evil AZT and he knew this toxicity, killed lives so he could bank his millions of dollars with drug company Burroughs Wellcome. I ask all American reporters why are you silencing this scandal and why are you not talking about the Nobel prize winning scientist who discovered HIV claiming that Covid-19 had to be lab made becuase it contains the HIV virus. He claims Dr Fauci funded lab including American Tax paying dollars funding Wuhan lab spliced the Covid-19 with the Hiv vector. This is impossible to be there by a natural cause. See link to his statement below.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2e7b3 No.183

>>182

>Wake up America! The media knows all about Dr Fauci corruption killing American Gay population in the 80s, in fact many Journalists won awards uncovering his scandel and questioned why he was not put in jail.

>I followed this scandal closely because all my friends who took AZT died. The ones that did not are still living. There was a huge cover story in Time and Spin Music magazine that i saved and caused the AZT drug to be shelved but it was too late. To quote ending paragraphs of that article published in 1989

>SPIN/TIME MAGAZINE 1989-

>August 17, 1989: The government has announced that 1.4 million healthy, HIV antibody-positive Americans could “benefit” from taking AZT, even though they show no symptoms of disease. New studies have “proven” that AZT is effective in stopping the progression of AIDS in asymptomatic and early ARC cases. Dr. Fauci, the head of NIH, proudly announced that a trial has been going on for “two years” had “clearly shown” that early intervention will keep AIDS at bay. Anyone who has antibodies to HIV and less than 500 T-4 cells should start taking AZT at once, he said. That is approximately 650,000 people. 1.4 million Americans are assumed HIV antibody-positive, and eventually all of them may need to take AZT so they don’t get sick, Fauci contended.

>The leading newspapers didn’t seem to think it unusual that there was no existing copy of the study, but rather a breezy two-page press release from the NIH. When SPIN called the NIH asking for a copy of the study, we were told that it was “still being written.”

>“It’s a momentous decision to say to people, ‘If you’re HIV-positive and your T-4 cells are below 500, start taking AZT,'” says the AIDS doctor who wished to remain anonymous. “I know dozens of people that I’ve seen personally every few months for several years now who have been in that state for more than five years, and have not progressed to any disease.”

>“I’m ashamed of my colleagues,” Sonnabend laments. “I’m embarrassed. This is such shoddy science it’s hard to believe nobody is protesting. Damned cowards. The name of the game is to protect your grant, don’t open your mouth. It’s all about money… it’s grounds for just following the party line and not being critical, when there are obviously financial and political forces driving this.”

>When Duesberg heard the latest announcement, he was partially stunned over the reaction of Gay Men’s Health Crisis President Richard Dunne, who said that GMHC now urged “everybody to get tested,” and of course those who test positive to go on to AZT. “These people are running into the gas chambers,” says Duesberg. “Himmler would have been so happy if only the Jews were this cooperative.”

>Nobel prize Scientist finding HIV states Covid19 contains HIV http://thejewishvoice.com/2020/04/2008-nobel-prize-for-medicine-winning-dr-luc-montagnier-says-covid-19-was-manipulated-for-hiv-research/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2e7b3 No.184

>>180

excerpts from 2 1990 publisher reviews

>From Publishers Weekly

>Business Week writer Nussbaum blames the failure to find a drug effective against AIDS on an unholy alliance forged among the National Institutes of Health, the FDA, elite biomedical centers and the big drug companies. AZT, the toxic, immunosuppressive anti-AIDS drug developed by Burroughs Wellcome, probably offers only short-term, transitory benefits to some patients, he charges. A hard-hitting, shocking look at profit-oriented AIDS research, this brisk journalistic account also tours a medical underground in which grass-roots organizations offer various unapproved drugs to people with AIDS. In this informal network, claims Nussbaum ( The World After Oil ), a model for quick testing of drugs is emerging that, if widely implemented, could revolutionize the treatment of other diseases. Photos.

>Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

>From Library Journal

>Journalist Nussbaum's readable, gossipy book raises some important and hotly debated issues, but it also reduces thorny problems in medical research and ethics to a simplistic theory of conspiracy among medical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and government agencies to keep promising AIDS drugs off the market and away from desperate patients. His narrative barely acknowledges the enormous difficulty of developing effective antivirals, the self-criticisms by government agencies and researchers charged with handling AIDS, or the ethical dilemmas encountered in distributing unapproved drugs. He also seems unaware or dismissive of the role that human frailty plays in the politics of science and business. Not on a par with such titles as Randy Shilts's And the Band Played On ( LJ 11/15/87), this is an optional purchase.

> -Mary Chitty, Massachusetts Coll. of Pharmacy & Allied Health Svces. Lib., Boston

>Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

>>183

certainly the gay community and drug users were targeted during the AIDS hoax, as technocratjoe notes. Were they a trail run before trying something similar on everyone else?

"Good intentions" was very generous of Naussbaum to write. I don't know anything about him but suspect he had to dress it up that way to be published.

>Bruce Nussbaum takes us behind the scenes to reveal how America's top scientists are at the center of a triangle of power. He shows how the National Institute of Health allied with the drug company Burroughs Wellcome, secretly helped by the FDA, to steamroll a thirty-year-old drug, AZT, into becoming the only approved treatment for AIDS.

>An old-boy network of powerful medical researchers dominates in every disease field, from AIDS to Alzheimer's, Nussbaum reports. They control the major committees, they run the most important trials. They are accountable to no one. Despite the billions of taxpayers' dollars that go to them every year, there is no public oversight. Medical scientists have convinced society that only they can police themselves.

probably the same model for producing the c10 jabs and getting remdesivir approved, and zinc ionophores and nutrition supplements blacklisted

>>179

linked on Crewdson's site, which I can only access on the wayback machine now, these 2 articles a good summary of Gallo/Montagnier's HIV "discovery"

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-2002-02-18-0202180157-story.html

https://archive.ph/vQWAR

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-2002-02-17-0202160295-story.html

https://archive.ph/gRqmW

>Gallo lied about isolating HIV, asked for and was mailed a sample of Montagnier's culture, claimed it as his own to back up his claim to be the discoverer, later they analyzed it was from Montagnier's patient

>Gallo was discredited for this and other serious misconduct, forced out at the National Cancer Institute and the feds wanted to press charges but he was protected

Gallo was a fraud and the AIDS/T-Cell depletion theory was his. Duesberg disproves it here

>>158

So we should look at the "power triangle" if we want to see how he did this.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1094ba No.188

Is this where we hanging to get away from that fucking psycho OSS?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d88b2a No.17953

relevant background -

Daily Wire Special - China The Enemy Within

https://www.dailywire.com/show/china-the-enemy-within

Episode 1Fauci

https://www.dailywire.com/episode/1-fauci

>America's ruling class no longer on the side of Americans

>rather they're compromised by china's rise

>and so it's our elites and not China that are the greatest threat to our national security

>and so for the first time the success of America's elite class weakens America

>the story of how America's ruling class attached themselves to a foreign power China

>and how they enrich themselves at the expense of the United States

opens with fauci saying covid came from wuhan wet market and how it was described as a force of nature out of our control so you cant hold anyone accountable for it

people started to point out the absurdity of that

when some scientists, journos and others pointed out there's a lab right there, they were ridiculed

incl. President Trump

Why did the media push this wet market so hard?

Why do American elites continue to cover for the CCP?

Well as it turns out, they're not just covering for Beijing, they're also covering for themselves.

How in the world did this come to be, when the elites in our country are mroe concerned with the progress of China than the progress of America?

[Patrick Byrne addressed this in Deep Rig, that the elites have been preparing to short the American economy into the shitter and leapfrog to China with our money, and China would replace post-WWII America is the world power]

China fell to the CCP in 1949

Nixon reopened trade with China in 72

Nixon and Kissinger thought it would be in the US interest to divide the Soviet Union and CCP

in 1989 the Berlin Wall fell and in 91 the USSR

but 1989 was also an important year for China and US policy in China

Tieneman Square the Chinese sent the message that their internal affairs are none of our business and they'll won't be shaped by Western pressure

China had asserted its will

In 1994 Bill Clinton delinked human rights from trade with China

In 2000 he gave China most favored nation status

>meaning they can match any price we give to any other country for anything = they get the best price

When people talk about the global economy what they really mean is cheap labor and free trade

The globalist leaders in the West understood that the Communist Party in China would be the centerpiece of a global economic system

Why? large pool of cheap labor under authoritarian control

a place for the American establishment to build wealth and power without anyone looking over their shoulder

people were going to get rich

but not only was China known for it's human rights abuses,it held a shockingly cavalier attitude toward risky scientific and medical experimentation

biotourism industry selling organs harvested from their political opponents including Falun Gong leaders

forced people to sell their organs

cut them out while still alive

discusses Gain of Function research

Obama put 2-14 moratorium on it

this didn't stop it, just moved it to China

state dept findings show there was a dual use program at the Wuhan Institute of Vrology: had both a civilian and military use

>military use meaning bioweapons

15m mark

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cb0aaa No.18089

Bitchute embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>17953

https://www.dailywire.com/episode/1-fauci

>Why did American elites attack anyone who pursued the lab leak theory?

>it turns out they're not just covering for Beijing, they're covering for themselves.

>China as the centerpiece for a new global order

>cheap labor, "free trade" (= trade imbalances), totalitarian rule

The US has been the centerpiece of the global order since WW2 and it appears China was the choice to replace us, and that this plan has been developing for a long time.

This plan to replace America with China and progressivism/deception with an iron fist is how I understand the Great Reset.

The COVID lockdowns seem to be an important instrument to achieve it.

GoF research is basically bioweapon development, under the justification that we need to stay ahead of any disease that nature may throw at us.

GoF funding cancelled in the US under Obama apparently to move the factories to China, this challenges the notion that Covid is a Chinese Virus.

@14m

Over the years EcohealthAlliance was given close to $4M in funding through the NIH

Dual use program at Wuhan Inst. means civilian and military/bioweapon

Uniformed CCP military seen at the W. lab monitoring and using the lab "and trained the scientists with the understanding that they would continue to monitor and utilize the lab"

China kicked the French out of the lab, HRC (then SoS) asked them in 2009 how they'd make sure Chinese didn't leak biowarfare info

in 2018 the State Dept wired a warning to Trump admin about the Wuhan lab and that it could cause a pandemic

Now there's a paper trail tying Fauci to the research done at the Wuhan Institute

Why won't the media hold them responsible? Bc powerful people would lose a lot if their role in the Wuhan lab was revealed

>goes over Sen Paul questioning Fauci

analysis embed of Fauci body language

>"and as we shall see, at the head of the pro china faction of the american establishment is Joe Biden"

embed on Fauci body language with Sen. Paul

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7ad803 No.20727

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/04/dirty-vampire-facials-behind-first-hiv-outbreak-linked-to-spa-treatments/

these people aren't dying from a disease, they're being killed by the government

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

10a2fa No.20785

>>18082

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]