/deepdigs/ - Deep Diggs

>>121

in the aids and covid pandemics, a hoax virus is used to coerce large segments of the population into taking harmful pharmaceuticals.

>post 1 of 2 - QRD on covid as a bioweapon

Dr. McCullough embed is from May.

>this whole [covid] pandemic from the beginning was about the vaccine, so all roads lead to the vaccine and what it means

>there are already places in Asia and SE Europe laying the groundwork for compulsory vaccination, that means someone pins you down to the ground and puts a needle in you

>that's how bad stakeholders want vaxx

>it's not a cost you dont have to pay for it there are stakeholders who do want "a needle in every arm" incl, covid recovered and 12 year old kids , North Carolina just passed that

>people know they can die of the vaccinem, why are we pushing this in a way that people's livelihoods and education depend on a potentially fatal treatment?

>the tension you can cut it w a knife parents want their kid in school or college but dont want the vaxx, they know what's going on

>I have yet to lose a patient to the vaxx but I've had my patients lose their family memebrs, lots of them

>I've fillled out a VAERS safety report on a patient who had a bloodclot after one of the pfizer moderna vaccines

>and I'm telling you, it took half an hour to do it, there are many pages and each page said warnign, federal offense punishable by severe fines and penalties if I falsify the report

>all those thousands of Americans that have died with th evaccine and the hospitalizations in the database I think are REAL, and they are far beyond anything we've ever seen and as a doc and public citizen I'm concerned about the vaxx

>the vaccine center here is empty, it's right next to my work I drive by it every day. Americans know that vaccine's not safe, they're talking to each other and now the effort is the stakeholder's want kids taking it without parental guidance

>based on the safety data I can no longer recomend the vaccine. It's passed all the thresholds for being a safe product. None of the vaccines are safe.

>now there are papers written buy prominent scientists calling for worldwide halt in the program

>if we vaxx people and create an incomplete library of immunity

>vaccines all targeted to the Wuhan spike protein which is long gone. This is somethign that doesn't even exist anymore, we're hoping the immunity covers the other variants [he's since said more than once that the vaxx doesnt cover the delta variant)

>narrow immunity is a setup, there are warning saying don tdo this dont vaxx the entire world, we're gona set ourselves up for a superbug which is going to really wipe out populations.

>so for many reasons, indiscriminate vacination is a horrendous idea, it's a horrendous bioweapon that's been thrust onto the public and it's oging to cause great harm which it already has, thousands of people have lost their lives

>Americans and people worldwide should be extraordinarily alarmed

>>151

a month later

https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/27/dr-peter-mccullough-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans includes vid with 10 min interview of him

>Dr. Peter McCullough said these deaths have been facilitated by a false narrative bent on pushing an all-new, unproven vaccine for a disease that was highly treatable.

>He said COVID was a bioweapon and the vaccines represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

>“The first wave of the bioterrorism is a respiratory virus that spread across the world, and affected relatively few people—about one percent of many populations—but generated great fear.”

>“As this, in a sense, bioterrorism phase one was rolled out, it was really all about keeping the population in fear and in isolation and preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation"

>“Both the respiratory virus and the vaccine delivered to the human body the spike protein, the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research.”

>“Now I can’t come out and say all this on national TV today or at any time,” he continued. “But, what we had learned over time is that we could no longer communicate with government agencies. We actually couldn’t even communicate with our propagandized colleagues in major medical centers, all of which appear to be under a spell, almost as if they are hypnotized right now.”

>He did not hold back in his criticism of his colleagues in the medical community.

>“And doctors, good doctors, are doing unthinkable things, like injecting biologically active messenger RNA that produces this pathological spike protein into pregnant women. I think when the doctors wake up from their trance they’re going to be shocked to think what they’ve done to people.”

>“We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC. We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.”

>>156

>>155

>>95816

Part 3:

All the species of trypanosoma are given different names based on the host they are found in. But every species is cross contagious with every other host. IE, if you take the chicken version and put it in a human, it will follow the same life cycle as if it came from a shellfish or cow. The indestructible eggs (oocysts) are identical in every species, along with the larval form., epimastigotes. The adult form changes slightly depending on the host, like the alien face hugger changing slightly depending on it's host. They call the disease Nagana in cows, Dourine in horses. In reality, it's all the same species, structurally and morphologically identical. It's a multi-trillion dollar cover-up that allows Big AG to breed “resistant” cattle that won't die to their infection instead of doing constant & expensive deworming treatments- THEY KNOW: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-9034-3_36

Part 4:

Pretending all our problems are caused by secondary infections of viruses and bacteria instead of parasites allows Big Pharma to generate trillions by treating the second symptoms of infection that arise with immuno-compromise. Most people will live with it for 50+ years and never get rid of it. It doesn't kill you. It just weakens you & when you get old and weak it causes secondary infections that kill you. 90% of tests will yield false negatives, so it's VERY difficult to detect. Most cases are identified post mortum by autoopsy. Or by biopsy of lymph nodes, which only shows positive if you are in stage 3 of infeciton. This problem is compounded by the fact that doctors are trained to believe that it's exceedingly rare, and they'll try to steer you away from parasites if you bring it up, owing to their demonic Rockefeller indoctrination combined with their narcissistic personality profiles, which are a prereq for acceptance into the medical programs. The boards all know, as do the people who write the textbooks. All the books have been written for the express purpose of covering this up, along with the role that other parasites play, causing 60-80% of human health problems. Why would every government agency deny it's sexual transmissivity? Why haven't they done tests on US cattle to determine the prevalence on farms? Why do they continue to gaslight us and pretend that a beetle is the only vectors, a beetle which probably accounts for less than 1% of the spread?

Part 5:

How do I know COVID is modified Trpanosoma Cruzi? Covid strips iron off hemoglobin, much like the parasite malaria. This is a very complex task that requires the production of enzymes to digest the alpha chains, enzymes are larger and more complex than a virus. The virus is analagous to a knife. The enzyme is analogous to a bomb. A parasite is analogous to a factory. A virus would have no reason or ability to do this. Parasites like Chagas, on the other hand, are known to strip iron to use iron to hyper accelerate their growth. Both Covid and Chagas cause macorphage confusion, CD4 dysfunction, and the results Is endocarditis as the macrophages target the ACE2 receptors of epithelial cells that have S1 spike protein stuck in them (a problem made much worse with the vaccine). Coronavirus and HIV are the ONLY pathogens that contain s1 spike protein, a 4 letter gene sequence patented by Pfizer (which has 70 CCP members on the board) in 1998. It's not a coincidence. They're the same base thing, though COVID has been gain of functioned SIGNIFICANTLY. Covid long-haul syndrome is extremely similar to the AIDS progression. It's uncanny. The reason ADE reactions occur is that the anti-viral antibodies that you body produces post vaccine don't stick to parasites, so they end up circulating and causing acidic damage to every organ instead. The CV19 version seems able to survive on dry surfaces for days instead of minutes, a major change, but otherwise it's pretty much the same progression.

Part 6:

So after I figured this all out, the biggest cove-up of all time; that parasites are the main plague we face, I went searching on the chans to see if anyone else had realized it, and I found the mother of all red pills, the thing that Q has been prepping us to accept. The final lesson. You aren't ready for this unless you've already accepted that 1) The media is a coordinated lying campaign 2) The 3 letter agencies are evil gatekeepers 3) The western medical establishment cares nothing for human life 4) There is a systemic attempt to destroy society & freedom on a global scale by collectivist ideologies 5) The elites are blood drinking child raping monsters pushing degeneracy on the population for a sinister purpose. Behold, the answer the all the riddles: THE PARASITE PILL

>>152

Dr. Peter Duesberg who is a vocal critic of Fauci and Robert Gallo, who pushed the aids theory in the 80s, explains why HIV cannot cause AIDS in the embed.

He's says the theory is purely correlational and lists inconsistencies. He's working in the germ theory model but if you figure out parasites and you believe that, you could use it as a key.

What he's saying is good science whether diseases are caused by germs or parasites.

>>158

By Duesberg's theory not only does HIVnotcause AIDS, but the AIDS label is applied to multiple different diseases.

>AIDS in Africa hits different demographics (50/50 male/female wih 90% male in the US, 90% microbial vs 62% in the US, distributed across the population evenly vs confined to original risk groups in the US for at least the first 12 years) therefor it cannot be the same disease.

>even within the US, infected IV users have different symptoms (tubercolusis, and wasting syndrome) than infected gays (kaposis's sarcoma and cytomegalovirus) indicating that even within the US, there are separate illnesses being lumped together as AIDS

TLDR

>HIV is harmless, has been around forever and doesn't cause AIDS

>AIDS as currently defined doesn't exist at all.

>>158

>>163

>>162

>>161

>>160

>>159

In summary:

>HIV as a new virus and the cause of AIDS was a hoax – the virus is older than America, and harmless

>it cannot possibly lead to to aids in the way we've been told, no virus works like that

>meaning there is no such thing as a slow developing virus, retroviruses cannot kill T-Cells outside of controlled lab conditions, and cannot cause any disease after immmunity, which is what HIV tests test for, and even ig HIV did kill T-Cells, it does not infect them even close to fast enough to cause immune deficiency, infecting .1% of a patient's T-Cells while the body regenerates it's T-Cells at 5% a day

Different profiles suggest different diseases

>the profile in different populations is completely different

Africa vs US

>in the US hiv remained in original risk group, whereas in Africa it spreads evenly across the population

>in US it's 90% male, in Africa 50/50

AIDS likewise has inconsistent profiles in different continents, and even within the US in different risk groups

>in US 63% of aids cases are microbial

>in Africa 90% of AIDS cases are microbial

>Americans with HIV get AIDSat least14x faster than Africans, despite malnutrition and other poor health conditions in Africa which suggest the reverse would be more logical

>American IV users who develop AIDS have a completely different set of symptoms than American gays

Conclusion:

>there are multiple viruses being falsely grouped together as AIDS, when they are obviously different things

I suspect that in Africa they're either running up false positives using the PCR test, or everyone there legitimately has this harmless virus HIV, but it doesn't progress to AIDS there because they don't take the "medicine" /AZT which could actually be poison.

My running theory is that people in risk groups in the US are either given HIV maliciously in the hospital, or they genuinely have it and are deceived into taking AZT (still widely used) or other harmful drugs.

So the IV users and gays have already weakened their immune systems (in different ways for each group: IV users inject, gays have anal sex and use inhalants) before being diagnosed and taking AZT, and that this is why AZT leads to one set of illnesses in IV users and another in gays.

The hospitals deceive patients who already have weak immune systems into taking AZT, which kills them.

>>167

this got me thinking about the Dallas Buyers Club movie

>guy who wants to help sick people gets around the FDA to give them the drugs they need

Sounds like he was killing them with AZT?

NO, it turns out they saw AZT as an expensive poison and were delivering peptide T and other actual cures

https://theskepticalchemist.com/dallas-buyers-club-azt-peptide-t/

only AZT was approved, and like remdesivir it had a bad safety record, then like the covid shots was rushed onto the market in under 2 years

parallels could be drawn between

>AZT and Remdesivir and/or the rna jabs

>HIV and Covid-19, in that neither is much to worry about but it used to scare people into taking harmful meds

I'm taking my time with this. Anyone who finds this, feel free to research and post.

relevant books:

"The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr.

>amazon dot com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804

Deadly Deception the Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS

>amazon dot com/Deadly-Deception-Proof-Absolutely-Cause/dp/0964231611

>>168

another parallel is peptide-T and Ivermectin/hcq

>>168

>Deadly Deception the Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS

Dr. Willner's book costs $2000, wow.

Someone uploaded it to archive dot org. You can read the pdf's in their viewer with a sign on, you check them out for an hour at a time and renew as needed.

archive dot org/details/deadly-deception-the-proof-that-sex-and-hiv-absolutely-do-not-cause-aids-robert-willner

>This highly controversial, out-of-print book is nearly impossible to find. Only a few used copies show up periodically on Amazon or Ebay and run hundreds of dollars to over a thousand per copy. A good Samaritan located a copy, meticulously scanned and formatted each page; and then created a word-searchable ebook to share far and wide.

>Just a short time after the release of his book and a powerful, informative lecture (youtube dot com/watch?v= 9WFhw5HHHbQ), Dr. Willer ended up dead; allegedly from a heart attack.

The lecture was on Dec. 7 1994 so that would've been in 95 that he died or was killed.

Lecture embedded. He sticks himself with HIV around halfway through. The Q and A afterward is just as good as the presentation.

takeaways

>goes over some of duesberg's conclusions

>much more direct and aggressive when he talks about what happened, might have something to do with his death

>he goes around sticking himself with HIV needles to show it's nothing

>HIV can be transmitted but it's extremely difficult, nothing like how the media characterizes it

>after repeatedly sticking himself on stage and even more times while practicing medicine

>says AZT a chemotherapeutic drug and that is what causes the deaths, and malnutrition it causes with the loss of appetite

>he argues that drug use in gays, not anal sex, is what kills their immune system: "poppers" amyl nitrate inhalants are very widely used by gays

>very, very hard to transfer by blood or through sex, needs a lot of blood or a lot of sex for many years

>however, constantly getting VD's and going through antibiotic cycles can kill the immune system too.

>it can be hard to tell when he means getting hiv vs getting aids. But progressing from hiv to aids doesn't happen.

>AIDS was not only a hoax it was premeditated mass murder and he calls fauci and gallo killers, names others, says they should be locked up

pasting my notes on Dr Wilner after this.

Dr Duesberg's book, which is also very expensive, is available for free as an audiobook if you join audible

amazon dot com/Inventing-the-AIDS-Virus/dp/ B00DBAXVMU

>>170

>after repeatedly sticking himself

*he still tests neg at a major NYC clinic*

Dr. W worked as a doctor for 40 years in one of the largest hospitals in Florida.

NOTES

what causes aids? what causes any virus:

1 malnutrition

2 drugs -and not just street drugs

number 1 cause is 2 medical drugs

azt, wich was discovered in the 60s for cancer and shelved bc too toxic to treat cancer

3. radiation

4. chemotherapy

azt a chemotherapeutic drug

concord study completed the year before in 93 showed azt did _

look at the insert it's a dna terminator

there are no side effects in medicine they're direct affects

lymphoma and cancer direct affects of azt

pancytopemia = loss of all your cells

= the definition of aids

they cut the dosage way down because it was killing them too fast

$100k to anyone who produces a scientific document that HIV causes any serious disease

what do Duesberg or Charles H Thomas or Kary Mullis have to gain?

why would Wullsberg inject himself with a deadly virus if he knew it was deadly?

independent lab found AZT to be 1000x more toxic than the lab at the NIH

10% error or 20 ok. But a 100,000% error? That's fraud.

CDC let blacks go untreated w syphilus just to see what would happen

they admitted they cant give in on the aids thing now cus no one would ever be able to trust the gov

"isn't it strange that the same day or the day after robert gallo filed for a test for hiv after it was announced? Premeditation.

You mean he just happened to have this test available? So the same day or the following day he files for a patent?

30k russian came down with it by gallo's test

confirmation test showed only 6 of them had it–not 6,000; six.

hiv test 99.997% inaccurate

dr W got tested in one of the biggest nyc clinics after sticking himself

in greenwitch village. Doc told him shhh stop talking about it my patients will hear

tests gives you the answer Pos/neg in 15m

What does this prove? These are 99.997% inaccurate readings

You would treat somebody with a deadly drug on the basis of a test that's inaccurate?

Doc asked why I'm taking the test I told him I'm a doctor so I'm in a risk group

he laughed and said aren't we all

bc EVERYBODY KNOWS

Research group in FLA in 94 found not only is the test inaccurate, it's totally nonspecific

you could test pos if you had the measles, the flu, the flu shot, any one of a hundred diseases

I told fauci I tested neg after sticking myself repeatedly

fauci said you need to stick yourself 300x to xmit the virus

300x to transmit a virus? You cannot have an epidemic under those circumstances

if you cant xmit it by blood you certainoly cant transmit it sexually

it's unbelievable what they're getting away with. How does the press let this go?

us gov says 12k people died each year from 1985 - 92

12k a year for 7 years in a row? that's not epidemic, by definition it's endemic

and you would expect in 7 years considering it's srpead sexually that we'd have probably 15-20 million

in russia 105 deaths from aids since 1987 (talking in Dec. 94)

in Philippines, 80 deaths since 1984 .. epidemics? It's no epidemic.

But who had to gain from this? Not Dr. Duesberg.

If there are 2 politicians and one of them keeps insulting the other, and won't answer his questions in a scietific way, who's the liar?

Fauci and Gallo instead of answering the scientific conflicts that Duesberg pointed out so brilliantly, they called him a homophobe.

I've been called a homophobe too

all blacks and hispanics and marginalized groups getting diagnosed

if you're in one of those groups you have AIDS

if you're not you have TB or lymphoma, leukemia, phemonia, 30+ diseases

where is the press, how do they buy a story that a virus knows what country it's in?

3 symptoms in Africa but 30 diseases in the US and europe.

How do they buy the story that a virus has prejudices?

prefers men to women 9:1 in us/europe but w/m equaly in Africa

it knows if you're single black or white immigration status everything

Liars and killers like Fauci and Gallo and Hazeltine and Essex and flosic unstal, margaret fishel

these people are getting by with the lie and getting paid immense sums of money for it and getting praised by the rest of the world while they murder

>>171

The Study at U. of Miami was completely fraudulent

You see I believed that the virus caused aids from 1984 to 1988 and I treated aids patients, AS ONE OF THE FEW DOCTORS WILLING TO.

dOCTORS ARE SCARED FOR THEIR LIVES

to even treat the patient

btw sticking my finger nothing new:

I did it LOTS of times treating my aids patients

and it's amazing that in spite of our great exposure, the incidence of the disease among medicao personel of all types is less than the general pop:

This would be a first in the history of science.

Think about that, how is it possible? Maybe the virus has nothing to do with it.

In 88 I was invited to a dinner where inaudible was going to push AZT as a drug for treating AIDS

We were told we could ask questions during the dinner because Margaret Fishel was going to be speaking.

And when she mentioned that the drug AZT had 56 side effects I raised my hand

and I said, Dr. Fishel, how did you do a double blind study on a drug with 56 side effects?

You've got to know that you're on the drug?

She said to me, Well, the placebo had 31!

And I raised my hand again, How could a PLACEBO have 31 side effects?

I didn't know what was wrong then but I knew there was something wrong, I knew there was something dreadfully wrong and I didn't know how dreadfully wrong and how deadly wrong it was .

But the answer came years later

the FDA as you probably know, released AZT after 4 months of a proposed 6 month study

They cut it short out of compassion bc one group in this double blind study was doing better than another group: AZT doing better

then it came out that it wasn't double blind, participants knew who had it and didnt

real meds being shared with placebo group

Q:

Dr. W, You said that this is an endemic not an epidemic

circumstanced by a variety of factors including malnutrition and drug use

how then do you explain the years of potential life loss in the 250k + people who've died of aids according to cdc definition where drug use has been going on for centuries and suddenly we're losing people in their 20s and 30s?

A:

that's an excellent Q and you're using your head.

THAT'S the kind of question that should've been asked of Gallo in the very beginning.

Most of these peopel are in their 20s and 30s. Isn't it strange you've got a disease that affects our healthiest?

But what happened in the 60s, the drug culture began.

What happened in the 70s? It heated up.

At the end of the 70s the gays came out of the closet and became an identifiable group

Now I'll ask you, in a sense it's a redundant question but I think it'll get the point across:

I'm gonna name 5 of 30 diseases: TB, Lymphoma, Leukemia, pneumasistic pnemonia, and Caposi's Sarcoma.

Are these new diseases? No.

These diseases and the other 25 have always been around.

It's easy to create an epidemic:

You take a variety of diseases and group them under one heading and claim a virus is responsible for it, well that's nonsense.

First of all let me offer the proof: the reason it appeared, which I think is the essence of your question, as though it were some new epidemic coming on,

is because it appeared in a select population, the gay population.

It ONLY is occuring in gays who are on drugs, and remember alcohol is a drug.

And let's remember these individuals are extremely promiscuous, getting one venereal disease after another and they'll be taking antibiotics all year long

And it's a matter of medical fact that antibiotics ARE immune suppressive.

Now let me offer one bit of investigative reporting for you:

it was reported in the newspapers a couple years ago that this HIV was found in blood that had been preserved in labs in the 1940s.

They found hiv in these bodies, which btw HIV had been around for thousands of years. But let's use this one example

If we had hiv in the population in the 1940s and we had homos in the 40s and btw according to Kinsey, 10-15% of the hetero population preferred anal intercourse

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS YOUR EPIDEMIC?

It wasn't suitable for a scoundrel like Robert Gallo in the 1940s, he wasn't old enough or maybe he wasn't born, to pull of a scam of theis magnitude.

ANd now they're caught up in a maelstrom: now if the truth gets out, it will deal a blow to the credibility of the NIH and the CDC AND the FDA AND the AMA

and by God, it is sorely needed!

>>172

Q:

Is it true that all lifetime drug users eventually come down with a syndrome that could be attributed to aids

A:

Absolutely.

Remember it's dose related, so it depends upon how many drugs you're using and how much of them and for how long a period of time.

Now if you overdose you never get to that point.

Q:

aren't bathhouses being dark wet places an excellent place for microbes around the world, do you think that men who've had sex thousands of times per year in these bathhouses does that have incredible amount of immune suppression that is not matched by the rest of the population?

with mdma , poppers and all the things gonig on (could the gay sex in the bathhouses be a contributing factor)?

A:

I agree that these drugs are causing immune suppression

Now, I don't beleive that sex itself will cause immune suppression

But I do believe that recurring venereal disease [and antiobiotic cycles as he said earlier] will cause immune suppression

But the simple fact is that the virus has nothing to do with it! And that's the important thing.

I am for a healthy lifestyle, yes. But let's not get into the idea that AIDS is contagious.

You cannot get AIDS from anyone, and you cannot give AIDS to anyone.

Q:

Do you consider the intense chronic psychological terrorisms around hiv and aids to be [a major story/ a major cause of immune deficincy? inaudible]

A:

22 years ago I urinated pure blood without pain

I knew immediately what thediagnosis was it was bladder cancer

I cannot fully desribe what I felt at that moment

describes a crash

when you start to get yourself together and use your intelligence, you can get over it

But yes, what you're syaing is true for most people

it's a sentence of death for most people and immediately after getting the diagnosis their system starts going into negative phases:

everything becomes destructive.

This is modern medical voodoo.

You're system is going to die because you've been told so.

Q:

R.Gallo who is a proven fraud, the AMA itself, biologists and hematologists have said this is a faulty test

the criticisms are just basic medical facts, how is it that this has gotten by the entire population and the media is pushing this lie

Arthur Ash for example was on 30 pills a day before he succumbed including AZT, how is that not iatrogenic (caused by the medicine/procedure)?

How is it that the medical profesion can murder a million people a year, according to their own study the Yale Newhave study that came out this year 1994, they admit to it, why aren't they on trial?

A:

TY for the compliments I'd like a copy of that study after the presentation.

We're worried about the so called AIDS epidemic but 12k a year is not an epidemic [even if it were caused by the hiv aids virus]

500k from cancer and 800k from heart disease

60k die from car accidents 120k die each year from iatrogenic disease (caused by complications from medical treatments)

I've been saying that iatrogenic diseases are the nbr 3 cause of death?

that's 120k deaths that they Admit to

I've been going around saying iatrogenic is the number 3 cause of death, that's the official number

but I believe in my heart it's the number one cause of death: iatrogenic disease.

but if we took the figure that 120k are killed by doctors each year

not malpractice but as the normal course of doing medicine,

then doctors are 10x more dangerous than HIV

now you're telling me it's 100x

Q:

can you give some insight into how this mechanism works with pediatrics?

A:

first of all I challenge anybody, except from genetics or for children born under cirtcumstances that we don't have all the facts,

but I would say 99% or better of the inidividuals born with AIDS, if they actually have aids their mother is a crack mother,

it's from drugs there's no doubt about it

Q:

the story of the pregnant woman who received HIV from the transfusion and passed it on to her child then she died

A:

there's a gap there. How much time between when she tested pos and died?

what did they do in that time?

I cant answer to that case not knowing the specifics but I can tell you:

these kids who are diagnosed HIV, if you give them AZT the kid will die of AIDS, absolutely.

But most of those kids will not die, just like most of the kids I've treated did not die.

>>173

Q:

what about the T-cells?

A:

They're our body's way of fighting infection

Now when somebody cam einto my office with a belly ache I would do a white count, which includes the T-cells

if the white count was 5,6,7k, I didn't think anything of it.

but if it was 20k I alerted a surgeon.

You see the body creates the T-cells when it needs it

If you don't need it you don't got it.

Why would you walk around with a lot of T-cells when you've got nothing to fight

Here's one thing we've always known:

There is no correlation between severity of disease in AIDS-so to speak- and the T-cell count

It doesn't match and I'll tell you why:

you will not have a high white count unless you have a severe infection

which means that if you don't have a high white count it's not bad

if everything else is normal why do you want a high white count?

if you got a bad cold then yes, an elevation in your white count.

It's a documented fact we've had individuals with aids die with elevated t cells

and invidiuals who are healthy they have no t cells

you can use it to some degree as a barometer depending on the situation but basically you can't and I'll tell you why:

because you can change the t cell count if you worry somebody

bc their whole life is focussed on those t cell counts and they keep counting it

every low count instead of seeing that as a good sign like I would they literally worry themselves to death

They have absoultely no correlation to disease:

they can be low bc you've wiped out your immune system, or they can be low bc you don't need them.

That's the important thing to understand = it is not a barometer for anything.

The same CDC that left syphalitics untreated has admitted that 40-60% of the listed AIDS cases were never even tested for HIV

and not that it makes any difference because the test is meaningless

Q:

so can it happen that I take AZT it's seen as a foreign invader and my T-cells go way up?

A:

yes and that's exactly what happens

no get an initial rise but then the AZT does it's dirty work suppresses your entire reproduction of your t-cells and eventually it goes thru the floor.

Q:

You say that hiv itself is a harmless retrovirus

Can HIV, not AIDS but HIV, be sexually transmitted?

A:

HIV a harmless virus CAN be sexually transmitted with incredible difficulty to the point where it becomes meaningless.

And that hasn't been definitely proven

they presented a case in 25 males with hiv, there were able to demonstrate only in 2 out of 25 with the virus

and in those 2 they only found one in a million cells

the lie is so compounded and so idiotic and so unbelievable that you have to fight your way out of the maze of these lies

They are all unadulterated lies and the men responsible for them belong in jail.

[to someone who reports at a mag for gays with aids]:

Gov says it takes an average of 1000 acts of intercourse over 10 years in the US

and 10k acts over 10 years in Africa to transmit the aids virus

that's twice a week in the US, for 10 years on average to tarnsmit the virus

in Africa that's 20x a week on average

and if you know what the bell curve is there's gotta be soe inidvidual out in africa that's doing it 200x a week

I wanna meet that individual!

>>174

Now let me give you a set of figures that you must produce for your readers please:

the WHO says the annual conversion rate in the US for HIV is 1-1.5 percent a year

now according to the figures given us by the CDC, there are constantly for ten years now 1 Million Americans pos for HIV

that defies all definitions of an epidemic.

how does it stay steady at 1 million if this is an epidemic that's gonna kill everybody

and btw they're predictions from 10 years ago were 91% wrong as far as deaths

1-1.5% per year would average out to 67.5 years for everyone who's hiv pos in the US today to develop aids

but in Haiti it's 1/10th that

I advise your readers if they're hiv pos to go to Haiti LOL

because there it'll take 1000 years for everybody who is hiv pos today to develop full blown aids

and these are the WHO figures

but in Zaire, according to their numbers,

you have 150x better chance of survival if you're in Zaire with aids than if you live in the US

in other words, there in Azire it'll take 25000 years for everybody who's hiv pos today to become full blown aids

so I think you should urge all your readers with full blown compassion in your heart to take the plane to zaire

Those are gov figures they are not mine!

the ridiculousness of it demands that you print those figures and give them to your readers

Q:

isn't is interesting that Africa and Haiti have similar situations than N. America and Europe

you would think that the infected would spread closer to the center of

A:

simple

malnutrition and starvation can lead to death but aids due to drugs is a much shorter period of time

Q:

[azt destroys your liver and your dead]

A:

Let me throw out an overall principle from the point of view of disease and death

this applies to aids as it would apply to any disease in humanity and with this I'm going to end:

the bubonic plague killled half th epop of Europe

The question you must ask and answer if you're going to be a rational thinking human being is,

why didn't it kill the other half?

In the US in 1919

18m people died of the flu

my question is why didn't the other 92m people die?

the answer to that is very simple:

the bugs do not cause the disease unless there's a suitable terrain

so the answer is to live at ease with the other organisms on the planet

>>158

>>167

LA Times did a surprisingly even-handed writeup of Dr. Duesberg's fight with the AIDS industry.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-05-21-vw-2451-story.html

https://archive.md/84N4d

The bias is there but it isn't obnoxious like it is in every article today. The reporter summarizes Duesberg's arguments. But they don't summarize the counterarguments.

All they can say is

>researchers and science writers have rebutted Duesberg’s arguments almost point by point–without moving Duesberg an inch. The counter-arguments center on the voluminous evidence linking HIV with AIDS and point to subtleties of viral behavior that Duesberg is thought to have overlooked or ignored.

abstracts on all his articles here

>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Duesberg+PH&cauthor_id=19619953

but the last one was withdrawn.

The editor was fired, he wrote about it

https://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com/2010/05/medical-hypotheses-affair-times-higher.html

He basically says that the journal was established specifically to publish controversial works. Publisher told him to change the publishing process after the Duesberg article and he said no and was canned.

The funny thing you'll see a lot of the critics say Duesberg was involved with a vitamin salesman or something and he hid it, and they work for companies that profited from the AIDS meds which they don't announce in every article either.

Cal Berkley started an investigation into Duesberg for scientific misconduct because of the article.

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/berkeley-scholar-in-dock-over-hiv-aids-article/411352.article

Like he says it's strange that they'd start in investigation into an argument he'd been making for 23 years.

Chicago Tribune article reviews the Robert Gallo controversy

>https://archive.md/84N4d

who had a dispute with Montagnier over who discovered HIV that he ultimately lost. But if HIV is a nothing virus among many others then it doesn't matter who discovered it.

Gallo was found guilty of misconduct and forced out at HHS, federal prosecutors wanted to charge him but it seems someone protected him.

>>158

Cary Mullis' wrote the intro to Duesberg's book "Inventing the AIDS Virus", it is posted here

https://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/kintro.html

similar to this interview

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GcCyNHmI7S0/

he says he was writing about hiv causing aids and couldn't find a reference for that fromanybodynot even top scientists, and he couldn't understand that until he heard Duesberg on the radio explain that the reason why was there IS no relationship between hiv/aids/

apparently he disagrees with Duesberg and Willner that drugs cause the immune failure FWTW

Dr. Duesberg answered AIDS FAQ's here

https://www.duesberg.com/faq.html

>the aids cocktails weren't effective meds at all, despite media claims

>says it takes ~1,000 acts of sex to transmit HIV, same number WIllner quoted, cites 1989 article in New England Journal of Medicine

>means 20x a week to xmit the virus in one year

>sex twice a week would take 10 years

>says condoms are effective in preventing AIDS if you have sex 100x with someone HIV+, but only because they prevent the prescription of anti-HIV "medication"

"(1) Since AIDS is caused by drugs, not by HIV, condoms do not prevent AIDS. (2) However, since many doctors prescribe DNA chain terminators such as AZT as anti-HIV drugs to healthy HIV-positives, and since DNA chain terminators cause AIDS - condoms are useful after all. They protect people who have an average of 1,000 sexual contacts with HIV-positives from infection, and thus from AIDS caused by anti-HIV medication."

"Q8: You state that any microbe that kills all his hosts would end up by committing suicide. So what? Do you believe in a 'survival finalism' in nature, in a sort of intelligence of the virus?

"A8: Life is comparable to the law: it is based on logic and precedent. There >>>>is neither a precedent for a virus that consistently kills it's host, as is claimed for HIV, nor would it be logical for a virus to kill the host it needs for its survival.

The 'intelligence of a virus' killing consistently its host, would be the same as that of a car that consistently kills its drivers because it does not have brakes."

"Q10: The new tests (Pcr) can detect the virus not only its antibodies. How is it that many people die of Aids with no trace of Hiv in their blood? Is it hidden or non existent?

A10: Contrary to your assertion, the new PCR test does not detect "the virus". Instead it detects a piece of the viral RNA or DNA genome, but not even the complete genome. Typically any virus, whose RNA or DNA must be detected by this method, is neutralized by antibody and is thus latent, and not infectious. It is for this reason that this very expensive method was introduced to detect "the virus" in AIDS patients. It would be much cheaper, and biologically much more relevant if infectious HIV could be detected. The difficulty in detecting infectious virus was reason for the fraud charges of the Pasteur Institute against leading AIDS researchers in the US (Gallo) and the UK (Weiss).

The PCR method was invented by Kary Mullis, who wrote the foreword for IAV, to detect a needle in a haystack. But a needle in a haystack does not cause a fatal disease. This is in fact one of the fatal flaws of the HIV-AIDS hypothesis.

The reason why "many people die of AIDS with no trace of HIV" is simple. Since AIDS is caused by drugs, HIV must not be present in AIDS patients - this is the hallmark of a passenger virus."

also says why he hasn't injected himself with the virus (ignoring that Willner already did this repeatedly and tested neg after)

>>180

from the Viewpoints tab

https://duesberg.com/viewpoints/index.html

Bruce Nussbaum

Good Intentions:

How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS

Good Intentions is a tale of vaulting ambition, greed, and hubris set against the tragic backdrop of AIDS.

Bruce Nussbaum takes us behind the scenes to reveal how America's top scientists are at the center of a triangle of power. He shows how the National Institute of Health allied with the drug company Burroughs Wellcome, secretly helped by the FDA, to steamroll a thirty-year-old drug, AZT, into becoming the only approved treatment for AIDS.

An old-boy network of powerful medical researchers dominates in every disease field, from AIDS to Alzheimer's, Nussbaum reports. They control the major committees, they run the most important trials. They are accountable to no one. Despite the billions of taxpayers' dollars that go to them every year, there is no public oversight. Medical scientists have convinced society that only they can police themselves.

Business Week senior writer Bruce Nussbaum follows the money trial from the billions appropriated by Congress through a network of government laboratories and into the profit statements of Burroughs Wellcome. This is an inside look at how politics, science, and big business are bungling the fight against AIDS.

(The Atlantic Monthly Press, New York, 1990)

This is a recent discovery of an ageless 1995 article, that has become more, rather than less timely with age:

Michael Tracey, Colorado University

Mere smoke of opinion: Aids and the Making of the Public Mind

(Inaugural lecture of the Chair of International Communication,

University of Salford, England UK, 1995)

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry

Introduction for the book "Inventing the AIDS Virus"

by Peter Duesberg ( Regnery Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC, 1996)

Serge Lang, Yale University

The Case of HIV and AIDS

The Gallo Case

The two preceding references are from the book

"Challenges" by Serge Lang

(Springer-Verlag, 1998) ISBN 0-387-94861-9

The Case of HIV: We Have Been Misled

from Yale Scientific, Spring 1999

links to this piece by Professor Michael Tracey

>an internationally recognized researcher and scholar, …

https://duesberg.com/viewpoints/mere-smoke.html

>>181

>Bruce Nussbaum

>Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS

lengthy review from the gay community on the book's amazon page:

> Technocrat Joe

>5.0 out of 5 stars COVID-19 EVERY AMERICA. MUST READ THIS BOOK DR FAUCI POISON AZT KILLED OFF THE GAY POPULATION

>Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2020

>Dr FAUCI criminal corruption poisoned and murdered gay men in the 80s by blocking hundreds of HIV drugs and promoting his toxic poison drug AZT with shoddy data. The only data exposed was his millions of dollars and interests owned in his poison trafficted and by his big pharma partners at Burroughs Wellcome. He knowingly urged Drs to administer this poison killing many of my dear friends in the late 80s. If HIV doctors questioned the horrible symtoms they were witnessing from their patients they Dr Fauci, NIH , FDA became angry and shamed them. Why is this not being brought to the public attention at every daily press conference with Trump?

>Every gay man in America must read this book to understand that Dr Fauci murdered your brothers. This is not fake news. This was a scandal and caused outrage that Dr Fauci was never prosecuted. That’s becuase the FDA and big pharma protected him. This scandal was exposed across major media outlets in the late 80s and this book uncovers this shameful corruption led by Dr Fauci. I had to go find this book in my old library in storage and re read every word this past week under Covid-19 lockdown having to feel more sick watching Dr Evil on TV everyday promoting a Gdamn Vaccine that must be made to end this current pandemic.

>The gay population in America in the 80s were marginalized without any political voice or power. What gay men were to Dr Fauci were lab rats poisoned with his Dr Evil AZT and he knew this toxicity, killed lives so he could bank his millions of dollars with drug company Burroughs Wellcome. I ask all American reporters why are you silencing this scandal and why are you not talking about the Nobel prize winning scientist who discovered HIV claiming that Covid-19 had to be lab made becuase it contains the HIV virus. He claims Dr Fauci funded lab including American Tax paying dollars funding Wuhan lab spliced the Covid-19 with the Hiv vector. This is impossible to be there by a natural cause. See link to his statement below.

>>182

>Wake up America! The media knows all about Dr Fauci corruption killing American Gay population in the 80s, in fact many Journalists won awards uncovering his scandel and questioned why he was not put in jail.

>I followed this scandal closely because all my friends who took AZT died. The ones that did not are still living. There was a huge cover story in Time and Spin Music magazine that i saved and caused the AZT drug to be shelved but it was too late. To quote ending paragraphs of that article published in 1989

>SPIN/TIME MAGAZINE 1989-

>August 17, 1989: The government has announced that 1.4 million healthy, HIV antibody-positive Americans could “benefit” from taking AZT, even though they show no symptoms of disease. New studies have “proven” that AZT is effective in stopping the progression of AIDS in asymptomatic and early ARC cases. Dr. Fauci, the head of NIH, proudly announced that a trial has been going on for “two years” had “clearly shown” that early intervention will keep AIDS at bay. Anyone who has antibodies to HIV and less than 500 T-4 cells should start taking AZT at once, he said. That is approximately 650,000 people. 1.4 million Americans are assumed HIV antibody-positive, and eventually all of them may need to take AZT so they don’t get sick, Fauci contended.

>The leading newspapers didn’t seem to think it unusual that there was no existing copy of the study, but rather a breezy two-page press release from the NIH. When SPIN called the NIH asking for a copy of the study, we were told that it was “still being written.”

>“It’s a momentous decision to say to people, ‘If you’re HIV-positive and your T-4 cells are below 500, start taking AZT,'” says the AIDS doctor who wished to remain anonymous. “I know dozens of people that I’ve seen personally every few months for several years now who have been in that state for more than five years, and have not progressed to any disease.”

>“I’m ashamed of my colleagues,” Sonnabend laments. “I’m embarrassed. This is such shoddy science it’s hard to believe nobody is protesting. Damned cowards. The name of the game is to protect your grant, don’t open your mouth. It’s all about money… it’s grounds for just following the party line and not being critical, when there are obviously financial and political forces driving this.”

>When Duesberg heard the latest announcement, he was partially stunned over the reaction of Gay Men’s Health Crisis President Richard Dunne, who said that GMHC now urged “everybody to get tested,” and of course those who test positive to go on to AZT. “These people are running into the gas chambers,” says Duesberg. “Himmler would have been so happy if only the Jews were this cooperative.”

>Nobel prize Scientist finding HIV states Covid19 contains HIV http://thejewishvoice.com/2020/04/2008-nobel-prize-for-medicine-winning-dr-luc-montagnier-says-covid-19-was-manipulated-for-hiv-research/

>>180

excerpts from 2 1990 publisher reviews

>From Publishers Weekly

>Business Week writer Nussbaum blames the failure to find a drug effective against AIDS on an unholy alliance forged among the National Institutes of Health, the FDA, elite biomedical centers and the big drug companies. AZT, the toxic, immunosuppressive anti-AIDS drug developed by Burroughs Wellcome, probably offers only short-term, transitory benefits to some patients, he charges. A hard-hitting, shocking look at profit-oriented AIDS research, this brisk journalistic account also tours a medical underground in which grass-roots organizations offer various unapproved drugs to people with AIDS. In this informal network, claims Nussbaum ( The World After Oil ), a model for quick testing of drugs is emerging that, if widely implemented, could revolutionize the treatment of other diseases. Photos.

>Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

>From Library Journal

>Journalist Nussbaum's readable, gossipy book raises some important and hotly debated issues, but it also reduces thorny problems in medical research and ethics to a simplistic theory of conspiracy among medical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and government agencies to keep promising AIDS drugs off the market and away from desperate patients. His narrative barely acknowledges the enormous difficulty of developing effective antivirals, the self-criticisms by government agencies and researchers charged with handling AIDS, or the ethical dilemmas encountered in distributing unapproved drugs. He also seems unaware or dismissive of the role that human frailty plays in the politics of science and business. Not on a par with such titles as Randy Shilts's And the Band Played On ( LJ 11/15/87), this is an optional purchase.

> -Mary Chitty, Massachusetts Coll. of Pharmacy & Allied Health Svces. Lib., Boston

>Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

>>183

certainly the gay community and drug users were targeted during the AIDS hoax, as technocratjoe notes. Were they a trail run before trying something similar on everyone else?

"Good intentions" was very generous of Naussbaum to write. I don't know anything about him but suspect he had to dress it up that way to be published.

>Bruce Nussbaum takes us behind the scenes to reveal how America's top scientists are at the center of a triangle of power. He shows how the National Institute of Health allied with the drug company Burroughs Wellcome, secretly helped by the FDA, to steamroll a thirty-year-old drug, AZT, into becoming the only approved treatment for AIDS.

>An old-boy network of powerful medical researchers dominates in every disease field, from AIDS to Alzheimer's, Nussbaum reports. They control the major committees, they run the most important trials. They are accountable to no one. Despite the billions of taxpayers' dollars that go to them every year, there is no public oversight. Medical scientists have convinced society that only they can police themselves.

probably the same model for producing the c10 jabs and getting remdesivir approved, and zinc ionophores and nutrition supplements blacklisted

>>179

linked on Crewdson's site, which I can only access on the wayback machine now, these 2 articles a good summary of Gallo/Montagnier's HIV "discovery"

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-2002-02-18-0202180157-story.html

https://archive.ph/vQWAR

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-2002-02-17-0202160295-story.html

https://archive.ph/gRqmW

>Gallo lied about isolating HIV, asked for and was mailed a sample of Montagnier's culture, claimed it as his own to back up his claim to be the discoverer, later they analyzed it was from Montagnier's patient

>Gallo was discredited for this and other serious misconduct, forced out at the National Cancer Institute and the feds wanted to press charges but he was protected

Gallo was a fraud and the AIDS/T-Cell depletion theory was his. Duesberg disproves it here

>>158

So we should look at the "power triangle" if we want to see how he did this.

Is this where we hanging to get away from that fucking psycho OSS?

relevant background -

Daily Wire Special - China The Enemy Within

https://www.dailywire.com/show/china-the-enemy-within

Episode 1Fauci

https://www.dailywire.com/episode/1-fauci

>America's ruling class no longer on the side of Americans

>rather they're compromised by china's rise

>and so it's our elites and not China that are the greatest threat to our national security

>and so for the first time the success of America's elite class weakens America

>the story of how America's ruling class attached themselves to a foreign power China

>and how they enrich themselves at the expense of the United States

opens with fauci saying covid came from wuhan wet market and how it was described as a force of nature out of our control so you cant hold anyone accountable for it

people started to point out the absurdity of that

when some scientists, journos and others pointed out there's a lab right there, they were ridiculed

incl. President Trump

Why did the media push this wet market so hard?

Why do American elites continue to cover for the CCP?

Well as it turns out, they're not just covering for Beijing, they're also covering for themselves.

How in the world did this come to be, when the elites in our country are mroe concerned with the progress of China than the progress of America?

[Patrick Byrne addressed this in Deep Rig, that the elites have been preparing to short the American economy into the shitter and leapfrog to China with our money, and China would replace post-WWII America is the world power]

China fell to the CCP in 1949

Nixon reopened trade with China in 72

Nixon and Kissinger thought it would be in the US interest to divide the Soviet Union and CCP

in 1989 the Berlin Wall fell and in 91 the USSR

but 1989 was also an important year for China and US policy in China

Tieneman Square the Chinese sent the message that their internal affairs are none of our business and they'll won't be shaped by Western pressure

China had asserted its will

In 1994 Bill Clinton delinked human rights from trade with China

In 2000 he gave China most favored nation status

>meaning they can match any price we give to any other country for anything = they get the best price

When people talk about the global economy what they really mean is cheap labor and free trade

The globalist leaders in the West understood that the Communist Party in China would be the centerpiece of a global economic system

Why? large pool of cheap labor under authoritarian control

a place for the American establishment to build wealth and power without anyone looking over their shoulder

people were going to get rich

but not only was China known for it's human rights abuses,it held a shockingly cavalier attitude toward risky scientific and medical experimentation

biotourism industry selling organs harvested from their political opponents including Falun Gong leaders

forced people to sell their organs

cut them out while still alive

discusses Gain of Function research

Obama put 2-14 moratorium on it

this didn't stop it, just moved it to China

state dept findings show there was a dual use program at the Wuhan Institute of Vrology: had both a civilian and military use

>military use meaning bioweapons

15m mark

>>17953

https://www.dailywire.com/episode/1-fauci

>Why did American elites attack anyone who pursued the lab leak theory?

>it turns out they're not just covering for Beijing, they're covering for themselves.

>China as the centerpiece for a new global order

>cheap labor, "free trade" (= trade imbalances), totalitarian rule

The US has been the centerpiece of the global order since WW2 and it appears China was the choice to replace us, and that this plan has been developing for a long time.

This plan to replace America with China and progressivism/deception with an iron fist is how I understand the Great Reset.

The COVID lockdowns seem to be an important instrument to achieve it.

GoF research is basically bioweapon development, under the justification that we need to stay ahead of any disease that nature may throw at us.

GoF funding cancelled in the US under Obama apparently to move the factories to China, this challenges the notion that Covid is a Chinese Virus.

@14m

Over the years EcohealthAlliance was given close to $4M in funding through the NIH

Dual use program at Wuhan Inst. means civilian and military/bioweapon

Uniformed CCP military seen at the W. lab monitoring and using the lab "and trained the scientists with the understanding that they would continue to monitor and utilize the lab"

China kicked the French out of the lab, HRC (then SoS) asked them in 2009 how they'd make sure Chinese didn't leak biowarfare info

in 2018 the State Dept wired a warning to Trump admin about the Wuhan lab and that it could cause a pandemic

Now there's a paper trail tying Fauci to the research done at the Wuhan Institute

Why won't the media hold them responsible? Bc powerful people would lose a lot if their role in the Wuhan lab was revealed

>goes over Sen Paul questioning Fauci

analysis embed of Fauci body language

>"and as we shall see, at the head of the pro china faction of the american establishment is Joe Biden"

embed on Fauci body language with Sen. Paul

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/04/dirty-vampire-facials-behind-first-hiv-outbreak-linked-to-spa-treatments/

these people aren't dying from a disease, they're being killed by the government