>>838343
Power dictates culture. Those evangelicals that are least resistant to leftist pressure will find themselves most supported by the wealthy and politically powerful, and those evangelicals that are most resistant will find themselves labelled "religious" and cut off from power.
As an example of this, I have chosen Horace Rowan Gaither's 1949 Report for the Ford Foundation. Conducted after great consultation with government actors and academic experts, the report presents an outline of the intellectual and cultural state of affairs at the very top of the democratic "church." It is also a justification for the evangelical exporting of American liberalism using the wealth of Ford - far greater than the contemporary budget of the UN.
"He [the citizen] must choose between two opposed course. One is democratic, dedicated to the freedom and dignity of the individual, as an end in himself. The other, the antithesis of democracy, is authoritarianism, wherein freedom and justice do not exist, and human rights and truth are wholly subordinated to the state." (p47)
Man being an "end-in-himself" is as anarcho-capitalist as is possible.
"Democracy accepts the fact of conflicting interests and even encourages the positive expressions of divergent views, aims, and values. Democracy theory assumes, however, that conflicts can be resolved or accommodated by nonviolent means, and that discrimination and hostility between various groups on the basis of race, national origin, or religion can be kept below the point where basic well-being of society is threatened." (p46)
The implicit insistence that individuals are anterior to society and that their "views, aims and values" are external expressions of internal developments. This is the grounding of anarcho-capitalism; and this state of affairs is created by the power.
"Economic democracy is realized through a fluid and mobile social structure which permits maximum individual freedom of choice and action. This requires practical equality of opportunity for all individuals to pursue the vocation of profession of their choice, to change jobs, to move from place to place, and to advance in their chosen career according to their capabilities." (p37)
Progressives like Gaither are under no illusion that anarcho-capitalism must be enforced by the state.
With this in mind, the funding received by libertarians from the likes of the Rockefeller foundation, the tolerance for anarchist groups protesting outside the annual World Economic Forum conference at Davos-Klosters, and the leniency given to the cries of "Anarchotopia now! Death to statism!" is rendered intelligible. All these groups share the same set of assumptions, which are best expressed by the definition of human welfare found in Gaither's report:
"Basic to human welfare is the idea of the dignity of man - the conviction that man must be regarded as an end in himself, not as a mere cog in the mechanisms of society." (p17)
"The committee's conception of human welfare is stated in chapter one, as will be seen, it is largely synonymous with a declaration of democratic ideals." (p12)
The evangelicals will "awaken" because the state necessarily engages in cultivating virtue; and the Satanic state cultivates the Satanic "virtues" of negation and inversion.