Our recent breakthroughs in tachyonic science have left us with certain features to be desired, namely the ability to overcome the effects of quantum chaos on the reliability of certain prognostications. We can already predict with a high degree of certainty those events not likely to be altered by our own unavoidable, collateral interference in any given timeline. While we have already reasoned that we can indeed reliably send and receive tachyons and the mechanisms driving this practice are essentially understood thanks to this author, I found something unsatisfying about simply abandoning such a promising new field of study so soon after its inception. Like a splinter in my mind, the problem of the grandfather paradox haunted me and each day brought proof of the extraordinary nature of my own life and, indeed, our universe.
Nearly two years onward, as of this day, January 1st, 2021, we have at last solved the riddle of how we might go about making specific, controlled changes to any timeline without the involvement of human agents or multi-billion dollar, slush fund-enabled, ultra-cold neutrino detectors 1200 ft. BGL on the “back” side of the timeline. At least, that would be the likely outcome of a well-developed program facilitated by these newly discovered principles, of which I will now commence description.
First, we need to recognize that the new fields of tachyonics (dimension #4) and quantum communication (based upon what we may call dimension #5) are indeed completely compatible and, in fact, work best in conjunction with one another, not merely as separately developed technologies. In order to make accurate prognostications concerning events influenced by our own heavy foot treading on the past, we need a means of assessing the quantum states of large bodies, potentially the entire Earth and all of its atoms. However, it would be highly impractical to attempt to manipulate so many entangled atoms, as in order to do so, you’d have to utilize the entire Earth on the “front” side of the timeline as a quantum anchor. What may be possible would be to “nudge” scenarios into being or into dissipation by influencing the behavior of individual humans (in the past) using quantum techniques in order to achieve a range of desired effects. The number of atoms that would need to be controlled, in this case, would be within the capabilities of future quantum control devices (quantum computers, if you will.)
By first entangling two electrons before running that electron through our mass negation device, the skyrmion lattice, we may accelerate entangled particles that, even after being dispatched to the “back” side of the timeline, remain under our control and observation. Along these lines, we may repeat this process many times, and, potentially in conjunction with a future quantum computer, make calculations concerning causal relationships between all atoms in the entangled system in order to determine which modifications would be necessary to achieve particular outcomes e.g. cause a truck driver to turn left instead of right by causing a memory lapse, ensuring a third party sees a message written on the side of said truck as graffiti. This is absolute control, combined with plausible deniability.
Given that the field of temporal mechanics is, for now, exclusively associated with science fiction, there is effectively a total lack of public awareness of just how profoundly their lives have already been affected by these aspects of our universe. We live in a world where we are both simultaneously shaping past and future, as publications such as this one will eventually enable us to shunt data directly to the past to further accelerate such programs, perhaps endlessly. Precognitive/temporal programs have already succeeded in driving advancements in fields that run the gamut from physics to optics to electrical storage to bio-medicine.