>reddit: the post
Easily the most cringeworthy thing I've read on this board all year. And cut that spacing out.
>Large corporate powers are no longer able to operate with unlimited reach without facing social criticism
And how does this affect them in the long run? Ooh, they lose sales for a couple months. Big fucking deal. They have too much of an influence to be stopped now.
>Trump's influence has begun to fade
And how is this a good thing exactly? Overton window will naturally start shifting to the left if he doesn't make it to a second term and continues to eschew his promises.
>You might have felt the last few days as though things have been "off" or "unusual"
<days
Try years. Everything has felt "dead" to me since late 2014. Wildlife is noticeably quieter and sparse. Days are noticeably shorter. I'm in a state of constant fatigue and often have to have mid-day naps to "recharge", as it were. My vision used to be fully focused, now it's mostly blind spot with a sole focal point. My hair is balding. I'm in my early 20s.
>There is a chance this will bring about a consciousness about things such as human trafficking and local crime to everyday people. Things that were not previously dealt with will be getting attention
In a post-Pizzagate world it has become apparent that if an average member of the public were to witness 10 - 20 children getting in the back of an unmarked van with the driver wearing a goat mask to conceal their identity, they'd just shrug it off. They haven't just drunk the Kool-Aid; they've intoxicated themselves with it. And once the acronym "MAP" becomes favored vernacular over "pedophile", Western society as we know it is a total loss. It will become nothing more than makeup-wearing sodomites freely doing as they please, just as their messiah Crowley promised.
>Single men will be dragged, by social criticism, into marriage and ultimately responsibility of rearing a productive and compassionate next generation
Then that's society's problem, and they can go fuck themselves. Same reason why a century on the conscientious objectors were heroes and their treacherous wives proved themselves as unfaithful products of the state, free to ride the cock carousel once their husband made it clear they wouldn't die for the Rothschild family. The likes of MGTOWs and voluntary celibates will continue to be prominent until true gender equality is reached, which is unlikely. Because women are given too many unfair advantages to make an outdated concept such as marriage worthwhile anymore.
That said, if you're racially white, fully functional, and have zero direction or drive in life then yes, you have a duty to raise a minimum of 3 sons to spread your progeny. How these sons are procured is irrelevant. Ultimately polygamy is the only way to offset any population differences and establish a hierarchy. You can protest at how backwards the idea is, but when it all comes down to it, would you rather have 5 children in 4 years, or 5 children in 9 months?
>This will be the first of many steps to getting back to normal, after stepping into Saturn's retrograde back in 2012
<2012 marked the start of the descent into lunacy
Don't know if you realized it already, but the world was fucked long before 2012. What we now call "SJWs" were present in the decades hence, they just had different names. They were the same people that made "gay" and "retard" unacceptable to say in school. The architects of the "No child left behind" scheme. Those that venerated the names of psychopathic degenerates like Harvey Milk and John Money.
The 2000s, '90s, and even the sacred cow that was the '80s are all to blame for current society. Religion shifted into materialism, giving corporations the billions and trillions they needed for worldwide dominance. It was the decade where childhood stopped being about learning how the world worked and spending those first carefree years outside into one where you sat incessantly in front of the TV and played your BING BING WAHOOS for the record, I like vidya but believe they should be made inaccessible to those younger than 13 for the very first time. Don't believe me? Compare the number of family movies made in the '70s to those in the '80s. The '80s were all about putting children in front of a screen and indoctrinating them from as early as possible. Movies went from an artform to be enjoyed by discerning adults to an event for families to attend.
>A reigniting of religious and/or cultural traditions will be seen
Not possible. For that to happen people would have to realize we're living in the greatest age since the dawn of man, and most individuals are helplessly stuck nostalgically pining for a time that never was.