>>29535
>chemical control
>hormones
WEW LAD.
Hormone replacement therapies are different as they are absorbed into the system, but hormones in food are broken down before they reach the gut.
I know this as I have performed blood work on myself before and after I ingested a 5mg pill of estrogen (Menopause tablets) just to see.
>>30449
If the Earth is flat, how come you can leave Westward from American and end up in India?
Do compasses suddenly meme us at a certain point? Don't talk shit about Antarctica, talk about going left to right on a traditional globe.
>>30472
I'd like to know this, too. GPS uses 3 satellites. If we were flat, we'd only need one or two. Even if the 3 was some kind of plot to hide the truth, someone would of been able to jury-rig a GPS that uses 2 satellites and gets the correct location.
>>30509
Astronauts train underwater as there's a better range of movement which is more comparable to zero-gravity. You can move on all 3-axis easily.
Algea could of been from a leaked experiment from one of their farming tanks.
It's called a space ship because it is. I don't know this one, maybe it has something to do with my next point.
>astro-naut
This one is easy. Same for nautical miles.
Naval explorers were called Aquanauts. Not all of them, mostly used for underwater explorers. The "aqua" meant water, the "naut" meant explorer. That's why kosmonaut/astronauts have their name; they're astrological/cosmos explorers. Nautical miles are because Aquanauts used them.
Your theory about globes just sounds like you're a, in your own words, "quack".
I like the part where you tell people not to experiment the experiment that would prove you right.
If you were to let gas outside in space, say an oxygen tank, the gas would float around and eventually get caught in a gravitational field. Gravity does hold gases down to an object. Lighter gases like helium rise to the top of the atmosphere as they're lighter, ergo gravity ha less effect on them than other gases and solids. Even asteroids have their own observable atmosphere that we've witnessed siphoning to larger masses.
The sky is blue due to light refraction which is, surprise surprise, easily observable with basic equipment. The sky also turns red, green and yellow based on location and time of day. Don't act stupid because you think there's an evil cabal manufacturing fucking glass triangular prisms to trick you.
NASA only releases composite images of the whole Earth as they don't have the ability for a satellite to take a photo of the whole Earth. They use lots of satellites and piece together the pictures. Use Google Earth (Which isn't very scientific but that doesn't matter for this) and notice how, when using the satellite view, some images are very bright and some are darker. That's because different satellites with different cameras are used. NASA do release single images, you just don't go looking for them and they don't give them out in big bold text as they're not as useful as a composite.
Rockets are shot at an angle or else by the time they reach the outer atmosphere, the Earth has rotated (remember how fast the "fake" scientists "brainwash" you into thinking the Earth "spins") and they are off their target.
As for being spun off, you clearly are unable to understand basic physics regarding gravity. We are so close to the gravitational pull of the Earth that we stick to it, and we are constantly in motion at whatever the speed of rotation are, both on the axis and around the sun. As we are under the same force of speed as the planet, we don't notice the movement.
You've proven you're an idiot by thinking that centrifugal force is the same in this instance. Also, you're a further idiot by calling it centrifugal force then describing centripetal force. Centripetal force is what keeps us on the Earth, more so than gravity. If you want to experiment with this (and I recommend you try my experiments, unlike yourself), get a ball and tie it to a pole in the ground like one of those stationary tennis games. When you hit the ball, it rotates around the pole, and centripetal force forces it inwards towards the pole. That inwards force is what makes the ball keep rotating instead of going straight to the pole. It's fairly basic motion physics. Read up on vertical circular motion. Horizontal circular motion further explains it, but the premise you need to understand is covered by vertical.
I preferred when /x/ was fun and spooky, not literal retards making up shitty theories because they stop taking the pills that stop their episodes. I'm fairly certain flat earthers are just mememasters, but now it's co-opted by idiots who will cling to any theory and disregard empirical evidence.
Bonus Question:
Which am I, a government plant or a reptilian trying to cover my people's tracks? Or am I some kind of alien that doesn't want humans to figure it all out and ascend?