/v/ - Video Games

Nah, fuk ur lolishit pedo

>>16928198

You deserved your rape, impotent faggot.

>>16928198

The lolifags you hate so much are leaving, which is exactly what you want. We have the same goal, friend.

>>16928198

Then stay faggot. You clearly belong here now with the Qlarps.

>>16928209

>>16928205

>>16928206

nah, fuck your pedo shit

>>16928210

Wow, genius. Can’t even fucking read a couple sentences.

>>16928189

good. we'd much prefer it if you pedos and useless faggots weren't here

>>16928216

nofukurpedoshit :^)

>>16928214

But both of them allow loli. Hell, julay has both a /delicious/ and a /loli/ board.

>>16928219

If loli is pedo then video games cause violence.

>>16928224

no u

>>16928225

lel butthurt over new rule

>>16928224

False equivalence. Consuming loli shit won't necessarily lead to child rape but it signifies an attraction to children. Pedophilia doesn't mean rape or sexual contact with children, only attraction towards them. If I consume yaoi shit, am I not a faggot?

>>16928225

Were people even knocking up on Jim's doorstep about loliposting prior to this? I seriously doubt that happened. It's not like cuckchan is going through legal problems right now even though a lawyer could tell Hiro the same shit a lawyer told Ron. It's like they purposely wanted this outcome.

>>16928229

>but it signifies an attraction to children.

except for the most part lolis look nothing like real children nor do most act like real children most pedos don't like loli for that reason show me a real child with child birthing hips real pedos don't like secondary sexual traits at all

>>16928235

Bishonen also look and act nothing like actual men, but I won't see you arguing it's not gay to like yaoi. They may be cartoony or exagerated, but they still represent the real thing. Also not all loli art is the same. Some is more realistic and takes into account actual child physical proportions and psychology.

>>16928229

I'm neither for, nor against the loli-ban.

I see it as a legal necessity, but one made out of fear, not actual requirement.

But this?

> it signifies an attraction to children

This is plain ignorance. Actually talk to lolifags and pedo's aswell. You won't find overlap between both.

Pedo's don't like the anime look or unrealistic personalities of traditional lolis.

And loli enthusiasts frequently HATE real kids. At best, they're indiferent to them.

You WOULD have a point if you were talking about the Babyfur comunity. Those guys got a well earned bad-rep for the sick shit they pull.

As it stands though, every anon caught with CP in the past? Not a loli fan. They usualyl just really fucking like CP. Because they're sick in the head, need help (not prison) but that's a discussion for another thread.

What Ron did, was out of fear. They got enough people pissed at them, explictly allowing loli is something those people could exploit, since to normalfags, loli is just pedofilia (and you are a perfect exemple of that, you mong).

However, I'm sad to see Loli go. If anything, it atleast kept the normalfags at bay. Now that they're gone, this place will go the way of cuckchan fast.

>>16928250

archive links in the images would be great in case shit's deleted

>>16928250

Wtf I love ponyfags now.

>>16928250

I never thought I'd see the day where me and a ponyfag are on the same boat.

>>16928253

So if I am into 2d women/hentai, it means I can't also be into real women and viceversa? I can't be into both at the same time? How are you so sure all pedos hate or dislike 2d lolis? Have you talked to every single pedo in existence? And I'm still not convinced lolifags aren't simply in denial about their attractions, since it's much safer (both socially and legally) and easier to watch and like 2d lolis than the real thing.

>>16928268

How are you so sure all lolifags are attracted to children? Have you talked to every single lolifag in existence?

>>16928273

As if the chickenshits were going to admit it.

penis music

Gamergate on suicide watch.

>>16928235

I'd give most 2d a slide but a week ago on here people were getting mad for suggesting that if you jerk off to realistic porn of Ellie from TLOU you're a pedo. Not to mention how much this board likes its uneralterbach or however you spell that kraut faggot shit

>>16928293

You also got rid of everyone who plays video games, making this board pointless.

>>16928252

>Pedos hate loli and lolicons hate CP

>Therefore there must be something different between the two that makes one palatable and one not

<But GAY THINGS ARE GAY!

Great line of reasoning there.

>>16928268

In the few cases where there has been an overlap between lolicon and pedophilia, typically the lolicon was attracted to pedophilia because it was a taboo, not because it was child pornography.

>>16928293

this

>>16928297

>video games

nah, only the lolifags.

>>16928324

Ah yes, because video game discussion is thriving on the board right now. That’s why this thread is still up and on the front page.

>>16928293

The only winners are Qfags. Everyone else is a loser, including Jim and Ron

>>16928329

I bet Jim is making bank from those folks, though. He's a real Machiavellian businessman.

>>16928297

no one talks about video games anyways

>>16928268

I'm not exactly an in depth researcher of criminal cases but I have never heard of any pedophile or CP hoarder being arrested with loli art. If there were a connection, more pedos who are caught would have it. From a practical standpoint, loli is much more common and less risky to get than real photos of children, so why would they not have at least a few?

Personally I am worried about the slippery slope aspect. Look at Australia banning all porn featuring women with flat chests, or someone like Schreier calling the artist behind Dragon's Crown a pedophile despite there being no loli art in the game. It will be used as a cudgel by the group of autists on the internet who seem to want to annihilate any and all anime girls. Plus, I like short stack art, but have zero attraction to anything without shapely hips. I doubt most retards will be able to tell the difference between a big titty goblin and a loli. The collateral damage will be real.

>>16928333

check my sick trips you pedophile queers

>>16928350

There are documented cases like Mad Thadd, but typically those sorts did something else and the loli stuff was just thrown on to slap any charge they could at him.

>>16928350

The issue is the jury composition and the fact the "throwing the book bullshit" that comes with said slope. Also, 3D which is "indistinguishble" from a real life minor is also considered to be CP. Let me remind you that that definition is based on a jury of people who were too stupid or didn't give a shit to get out of jury duty.

>>16928374

>Let me remind you that that definition is based on a jury of people who were too stupid or didn't give a shit to get out of jury duty.

Oh no, anon. It's much worse. You know that whole thing about it being a jury of your peers and how the jury isn't required to rule on the law but on how they think the law should be interpreted and whether or not the law should apply to that peer? Mention to any judge that you believe in jury nullification when you get jury duty and your ass will be out on the street in minutes. The prosecution explicitly picks out the jury to find you guilty which is why you need 3-5 times as many people interviewed as you have actually standing on the jury.

>>16928377

Voir dire selection is quite bs at times. Sadly most people assume that if you are in case your basically done something wrong and are automatically guilty. The jury system is in it's deathgasps because the fact that the "racial equality" and BS requirements on the jury have retarded its influence. The US criminal court is more focused on procedure than obtaining honest results, procedure is important, but it is no more important than the result itself. The two are like wheels, both must be well functioning to achieve desired results.

True liberals died long ago, or are hidden away preparing for the inevitable death of ideals that founded the states. We are left with either religious zealots or muh patriarchy leftists. God I miss the days where you could do your own shit (so long as you did not harm anyone else) and not be murdered by idiots.

From when /v/ was about loli?

>>16928392

Never really.

The fact that you disagree with said speech should not be a reason for you to censor it.

except commies, free helo rides

Just letting you guys know that FEMA literally has a secret global volunteer account on here and has since the Tarrant shooting happened. This site a honeypot.

If Ron doesn't remove the loli ban I'm going to post proof of it.

>>16928395

Do it.

>>16928395

Pretty sure the FEMA global vol account has been here since before the Tarrant shooting

>>16928405

Okay, so I've been gone for a good while before the tarrant shooting, what the fuck is the webring?

>>16928350

I mean is it really that hard to imagine that at least some pedos would also consume and enjoy fictional media of what they're sexually attracted to? Considering also that alot of loli art is near photorealistic, to say nothing of 3d stuff. Why would pedos be any different? Every other group is able to enjoy 2d and real porn simultaneously, but somehow this particular group would not only not consume 2d media, but actively hate it for whatever reason. This is always said with absolute certainity but backed up by nothing.

You also know that some loli art is actually traced from real cp, right? So there goes the idea that there isn't any overlap between the two groups.

>>16928408

>some loli is photorealistic

Lol. Most of the stuff isn't, maybe some is but that's made primarily by Western artists who can barely pull of their art style in a fashion where anyone see's it as looking good.

>tracing of real cp

Yeah I've seen this before. Too bad that all previous bo's of loli boards banned this content too out of their own jurisdiction and not Ron's.

>>16928395

The idea that FEMA of all agencies has an account is downright stupid. If you said FBI, DHS, NSA or maybe even TSA, CIA or perhaps even the NPS (because of investigating fires or whatever) I could maybe suspect you weren't full of shit. But FEMA deals with hurricanes and other natural disasters. Any other branch of the DHS would have made more sense than FEMA.

I'm not surprised that a lolikike has that low of an IQ.

>>16928405

What next, are you going to claim that picture proves Chris Hansen, in the flesh, is a glovol? kek

>>16928412

I said near photorealistic. As in animu face but realistic shading and lighting, body proportions etc. Also made by jap artists. Usually have high scores on booru sites. But lolifags would never be into the real thing of course. Inconceivable.

>>16928276

lolifags are pedos in denial and no different from furfags who claim they're not animal rapists to save face but the horror stories about the people who have rescued their poor pets abound

>>16928417

Correct

>>16928395

>>16928405

>account is called FEMA

Unless you have someway to actually tie that account to somebody at FEMA this is a big nothingburger.

>>16928395

A honeypot is a site that encourages you to post illegal shit so that they can van you.

>>16928406

You know how the whole plot of the Warcraft series is that the Orcs' home planet was destroyed by demons and they had to invade Azeroth? I like to think of the webring as the little shards of the planet left behind where everything is slowly degrading and dying.

>>16928405

Why would they work under such conspicious name, though? It doesn't make any sense. So you are propably overreacting

>all these nasty loli skanks

Lolis are fucking disgusting, all women are gross, and useless unless you pretend to either impregnate them, bust a desesperate nut or have some fun torturing them.

There's a reason why Nature made them inferior and gave them Penis Envy.

Shotas and twinks is where the fun is at, two men, two friends, becoming closer to one another, teaching one another new things and experience.

Shotas fucking lolis is ok, but cucked stuff like straight shotas are abominations, pure mental illness.

Why do most marriages end up as a failure? Because a man will never be able to reach a deep level of connection with a woman.

This world is so sick, I blame kikes and Christcucks.

>>16928232

why do you care so much about hgg? its janitor is a tryhard retard and that board is rulecucked beyond belief thanks to him

>>16928497

Post some cute shota boypussies dude. I’m down. Of course, they’re banned now too since they are drawn depictions of minors.

>>16928406

The webring is a set of imageboards that all link to and show activity on each other so you can look at a single list on any of them and go from board to board. Like how you could look at the 8chan board list, but they're not hosted on a single site so they're isn't a single point of failure. 8kun/v/ has now migrated to the webring, specifically Fatchan (contrary to the OP nobody seems to be going to julay). To see a list of webring sites you can for example go to a julay.world page and click the webring button at the top:

https://julay.world/v/

Or go to smuglo.li and do the same, with a different display:

https://smuglo.li/a/

Or go the the board list on Fatchan and scroll down to the webring boards:

https://fatchan.org/boards.html

>>16928232

>Unless BO has responded by then

Seems like it's just vols acting on their own due to an inactive BO. If the BO reappears then things are still up in the air.

>> 16928284

Theres litterally no difference between these two things a part from "canon" ages at the end of the day its just a bunch of pixels.

If they make you so upset why dont you go to the police instead of screeching at people who could not give to shits about your opinion

>>16928284

Theres litterally no difference between these two things a part from "canon" ages at the end of the day its just a bunch of pixels.

If they make you so upset why dont you go to the police instead of screeching at people who could not give to shits about your opinio

>>16928189

Who's the artist for the second image in the third screen cap?

The board agreed on is clearly fatchan's.

>>16928566

Kind of a shame, post quality has tanked on Fatchan since

>>16928408

The burden of proof is on you minute, you can't legislate a law banning something or throw someone in jail because of your imagination.

>>16928586

>minute

Wow, that's what I get for phone posting. I meant numbnuts.

>>16928497

You're literally gay anon.

>>16928582

>ponytard

Banning loli is one thing but to invoke U.S. legal paragraphs equating loli pictures with actual cp and then not calling the police on each and every infraction is hypocritical as fuck.

I'd enjoy fatchan more if anons did anything other than post in the meta general

>>16928602

Maybe stop crossposting and remake actual /v/ threads over there.

>>16928603

I've made at least even you shit

>>16928605

*seven

wew

>>16928602

But there are other threads. The reason why the meta general is active because of this recent happening.

It was the same during the exodus to 8chan, the meta threads were the most active and then died down when the dust settled.

>>16928604

I urge everyone to go there, type out anything and hit "New Reply".

Just check that motherfucking speed, HOLY SHIT.

You press the button and BOOM, post is in.

I'm gonna cum buckets in the next few hours.

>>16928604

The catalog is the ugliest piece of shit I've ever seen in my life.

>>16928666

>You say that, but atleast I can read a decent chunk of the OP before opening a thread.

At the cost of not seeing fancy thumbnails and thus not having an aesthetic catalog to please my autisme? Pure faggot talk.

The new 8chan will be at 8chan.moe.

>>16928686

Mark we've already gone to fatchan

>>16928694

Is Mark anything in Julay or Fatchan? I just want a /v/ without Mark.

>>16928722

No. Mark briefly owned fat/v/ 10 days ago but he deleted it and the site owner gave the name to someone else. The fat/v/ owner seems reasonable.

>>16928265

>drawing=CP law is actually planned, funded, made by real life pedophile predators include worldwide masonic pedophile ring members, to disrupt police investigation and ultimately making police and law enforcement forces halt any investigation on real life pedophiles

This is exactly what I assumed, and would explain all of these (((anti-lolifags))) cropping up on this board lately.

>>16928686

Will there be any issues with pigman since its using the name '8chan'?

>>16928666

>halfchan is creeping in on this place at an alarming rate

I was wondering why there was a sudden influx of wojaks and low effort posts.

>>16928754

>influx of wojaks and low effort posts

You could argue that it started back in 2016, for reasons everyone is aware of.

But it picked up the pace in the last week, and no matter how pretty the catalog is, if it's filled with shit threads, it's a still a shitty catalog.

>>16928744

Of course. Unless it's one of his many sockpuppet sites

>>16928189

Who owns fedchan?

>>16928198

>>16928210

>>16928218

>impotent leftist being impotent leftist

All leftists are child rapists and it is ok to kill you on sight.

Loli drawings will keep being made. There is nothing that you can do about it, child rapist.

>>16928210

ok baby raper, i bet you love it when women scrape their kids out of their scarred vaginas.

Anyways you deserved being raped.

>>16928854

You know I won't even care if loli and shota shit were illegal as long as it were consistent.

If zoo porn, guro and rape was also illegal then it would at least make sense. You can't just enforce laws on one genre of drawn porn but not others.

>>16928883

god I wish that were me

>>16928422

Projecting much?

Would not surprise me if you turned out to be a child rapist

How come that cuckchan has lolis but not this place?

I feel like i'm going insane.

>>16928917

/pnd/ is just next in line to get fucked over to please the qoomers, just wait and see.

>>16928198

>>16928210

>>16928218

>>16928422

Based chad Aryan energy. Imagine being attracted to cartoons.

>>16928937

Imagine being attracted to 3D

I was waiting for an opportunity to exodus just from the technical issues and incompetent boomer management anyways. Seems like the iron is hot now.

Loli is a smokescreen concealing the real master plan. It's a decisive topic that can easily be written off by the administration as illegal and a portion of the user base as gross and deserving a ban, but to focus on that alone would be to miss the Forrest for the trees. This proves Marks hypothesis on the situation, as pained as that makes me to say. Jim gives no fucks about anything that won't make him profit and this is a first step into a long fall that has so far seen removal after removal of BO and vol alike.

Tell me this, when the last thread remains, and your webeite is finally dead, will you finally be happy? Will you finally be free?

I hope the answer is yes Ron, I hope you agree Jim.

>>16928937

nofukurpedoshit :^)

>>16928830

no u leftmans

>>16928957

this

>>16928969

good schizo post Forrest

>>16928957

>coomer

Back to 4chan faggot.

>>16928998

Go back to anontalk pedo coomer.

bump

>>16928957

not a lolifag, but I'm tired of the administartion cucking. Over the past few months the administration has proved that they don't have what it takes to moderate an infamous imageboard.

The reason that this community constantly gets splintered is analagous to white flight. You never fucking stand your ground. You could've planted your roots in 4chan and told all the invaders to fuck off, but you didn't. Now look at you. You have no home. You've literally become the jews, just like they wanted all along.

Look goyim, now you're the ones with no roots.

>but moot cucked!

Oh, but now look at you. Fucking retards.

>>16929162

Well, moot cucked for a different reason. He did it because advertisers, and he never made a secret about that. Back in the day(pre 2010) the chances of getting deplatformed over loli because someone in charge thought it too risky was almost zero.

>>16929165

I'm talking about the 'divide' between 8 and 4. There really should be none, since it was your home at one point. Imagine getting run out of your own home by jews, and then adapting a hatred for it. It's positively schizophrenic. And that's what I find here constantly. I'll readily admit I discovered imageboards around 2014, and this is just my observation.

>>16929167

>wasn't on 4chan during glory days

that explains why you feel the way you do

>>16929169

You could explain your reasoning instead of being a smug bandwagoning redditor.

>>16929160

We have no home because 8chan died. This isn't 8chan. It's retarded to compare this to a real life phenomenon because:

1. Nations and territory don't vanish from existence, unlike websites.

2. Websites have administration/moderation with limitless power and can't be impeached or overthrown, it'd be like countries having Olympian gods ruling them.

>discovered imageboards in 2014

>calling anyone a redditor

>>16929167

>place goes to shit with the owner actively hating you

>large portion of you leave

>retards who never cared or belonged there stay

>for some reason you shouldn't hate those retards

Yeah no, kill yourself.

>>16928830

>n-no u leftist pedo child rapist!

kys paedophile

>>16928235

>except for the most part anime looks nothing like children

Literally every single anime character looks like a 6 year old girl

>>16928189

I'll continue browsing all 100 and so boards on the webring in addition this this one, thank you

>>16929195

And furthermore: 8chan, gamergate, whatever you want to call the userbase. It's dead. Fragmented into oblivion.

It's not coming back to life just because you posted links to two websites.

Don't get me wrong, I'll keep on this autistic shitshow, for a little while longer at least. But I'm not going to pretend it's not a shitshow

>>16929181

Fatchan /v/ is home.

>>16929205

>still using avatar flag

>>16928235

Laura B, the girl that Laura Belanova from Unteralterbach is a parody of.

>>16928559

>Theres litterally no difference between these two things a part from "canon" ages at the end of the day its just a bunch of pixels.

Yes, there is. One is clearly more realistically styled to look like a real person. Just like SFM porn of the The Last of Us and Life is Strange. There are 3D modelers on Pixiv approaching photorealism. At what level of realistic style does one begin to say it's an indication of actual pedophilia? I don't know. But anime style is a far cry from pedoshit, at least in the facial category.

>>16928253

>You won't find overlap between both.

There's quite a lot of it on Pixiv, ATF, and places like Baraag. On Pixiv and Baraag, quite a lot of artists, eastern and western, tag their shit 'pedo' or 'loli' and 'pedo'. They also tag their shit 'child', of course.

>>16928312

> typically the lolicon was attracted to pedophilia because it was a taboo, not because it was child pornography.

You could make the same argument that a non-loli affiliated pedo "isn't actually a pedo, he just liked the taboo."

>>16929242

Then don't go to Julay /delicious/. I posted pic related and it was deleted. The BO then asked "everyone to please stop discussing pedophilia". He also threatened to ban UAB entirely should anons not be able to keep themselves from discussing real people. So any discussion of UAB regarding it's parody of German politicians or it's messages about pedophilia, Remember Bernd's sister? are verboten. Hell, isn't the word pedo used in the game? A screenshot of text in the game could be an offense there.

Shame. See you niggers on julay I guess.

>>16928350

>Look at Australia banning all porn featuring women with flat chests

They actually didn't do that. They tried and failed some years ago.

>From a practical standpoint, loli is much more common and less risky to get than real photos of children, so why would they not have at least a few?

Every once in a while a pedo is charged with 1466A, the law that "makes loli illegal". However, it is not a requirement of 1466A that the obscene depiction of a minor be fictional. Rather, most cases involving 1466A are real CP and nothing else, and the prosecution is essentially charging the pedo for the CP twice under two different laws. One of for child pornography, and one for obscenity. This is unfair to pedos, but who gives a shit about being fair to pedos with CP?

>I doubt most retards will be able to tell the difference between a big titty goblin and a loli. The collateral damage will be real.

Anon, it's not merely an issue of misinterpreting things as loli. This new rule based on 1466A bans all obscene depictions of minors real or fictional. In the case of fictional characters, all that is needed is the ability to argue a charcter appears 17 or younger. Bam, 99% of hentai has to go.

>>16928412

>Too bad that all previous bo's of loli boards banned this content too out of their own jurisdiction and not Ron's.

Nigger, traces are illegal under actual CP law.

>>16928189

Nice. Piss off. If I want pedos, I go to Discord. And if I want lolis, I definately don't go to a board for videogames.

Can you pedos neck yourself instead of shitting up every board in the webring with your cancer?

Nobody wants you around, you're worse than ponyfags.

>>16929254

>Still for the time being there is no place to be comfy

Come to the webring, dude.

>>16928883

fat is down, rip

Doesn't the site administration declaring lolis equal to CP mean that they are admitting all this time, when 8ch was being called a pedo den full of CP by various media sites, they were actually correct? How fucking retarted is jim to ask a lawyer if he's been committing a crime for years instead of pretending like nothings wrong. It's not even a crime anyways so what's the point inventing crimes and punishing yourself.

Either way this was done to please the qboomer crowd, the canary is dead. No reason to stay here when webring is better.

>>16929302

good

>>16929297

no fuku.

>>16929305

> the canary is dead.

ur mother is a canary.

>No reason

no u.

>>16929307

No one wants to hang out with a retard like you.

>>16929302

Works for me, but there's two people on Fatchan commenting with Tor who had the same problem. One of them was able to use the fatpeople.lol domain. Is anyone else having a problem?

>>16929312

That domain doesn't work for me either. Site is kill

f

>>16929312

They better fix it soon.

>>16929302

it is erect for me

There's also fatpeople.lol to get there if something's fucky with DNS or whatever.

>>16929313

>>16929314

You might be able to access it from Tor (not a hidden service, just the normal URL in Tor). Setting fatchan.org to 198.251.86.191 manually in your hosts file should also work, though I haven't tried it.

>>16929305

>the canary is dead

is there a warrant canary or are you referring to the loli question as a canary?

>>16929318

Too lazy to install TOR on this pc but I was able to browse, not post, from a proxy. I will give the admins time to fix their shit but if this becomes a habit then that's not good for refugees.

>>16929320

Weirdly downforeveryoneorjustme.com tells me fatchan.org is up but fatpeople.lol is down. I'll tell them.

>>16929323

Seems like the issue is probably different for different people. Some are unaffected and some are only affected on some domains. I can’t access either though without going through Tor which is really frustrating.

>>16929305

The webring is for fucking pedophiles!

>>16929326

Fucking good, hopefully those pedos get taken out and all the poor anons who left come back once they realize the pedoniggers are gone for good.

>>16929326

Anyone still having problems accessing Fatchan? If you are it might help to flush your computer's DNS cache (normally lasts 24 hours), but I'm not sure if that's necessary because they just emptied the DNS record instead of hijacking it. If that doesn't work the cache of your DNS provider probably hasn't updated yet, usually that takes a few hours at most. If necessary you can access it over Tor (just using the normal url not a hidden service), or manually set fatchan.org to 198.251.86.191 in your hosts file (might cause problems in the future if you forget to undo it and they change IPs).

>>16929328

Wrong. Try harder, shill.

>>16929254

You lolifags don't really seem to get it. Regardless if whether or not loli is dangerous, it's degenerate. That alone is more than enough reason to ban it.

You can't understand because you've programmed your brain to believe "anything's fine as long as it doesn't hurt anything!"

Funnily enough, that would include pedophila, as merely being attracted to children doesn't hurt anyone as long as you don't actually molest anyone. And yet when people correctly point out that being aroused by drawings of children makes you a pedophile, you recoil. You suddenly shrink back.

You're fine with being called a racist, sexist, nazi, bigot. But you can't stand being called pedophile because deep down, you know it's degenerate. You know you're a subhuman for being one. And no amount of mental gymnastics will change that.

>>16928215

>/cunny/ invades /v/ and spams constant slide threads

>bitches about moderators moving /cunny/ back to /cunny/ and not /v/

>somehow this is censorship

>>16929351

this image is clearly fine as it just a young woman appreciating a sketch of the female form, it is not pornographic or obscene in any way

>>16929357

rent free, nigger :^)

>>16929356

>loli is banned globally

>somehow this isn’t censorship

>>16929365

It's not the hill to die on. :^)

>>16929366

Nor has 8kunt become one either, given how jimbo would rather use kneejerk reactionary bullshit to operate upon.

>>16929365

>implying it's censorship

>>16929365

>OH NO I'M BEING CENSORED oh wait it's just a dime-a-dozen drawing

>>16929358

that, it's just a kid holding a playboy joke

>>16929366

Despite the obvious bait, what IS the hill to die on? Shooting random muslims in a second world shithole?

>>16929371

The ability to question:

>The intrinsic goodness of the Jews

>The innocence of black people

>Infinite amounts of nonwhite immigrants flooding into your country

>Your entire neighborhood being replaced with aliens

>Men who masturbate into each other’s anuses

>The precise number of Jews that died during World War II

>The moral superiority of women

>The superior job performance of women

>A woman’s fundamental right to murder her own children

>Children being injected with sex hormones

>Boys having their penises surgically removed

>>16929365

>>somehow this isn’t censorship

Was /pol/ getting axed not censorship? Why did you cake kike subjects stay here when that happened?

You pedos can't keep your fetish in check and must spam it everywhere. Now that people are putting their foot down, you scream persecution.

>>16929372

Hills to die on:

>political shit I care about

NOT Hills to die on:

>political shit you care about

Great argument. Considering the "legality" of loli is what caused it to get removed, what makes you think the legality of the Jewish question won't get your discussions banned as well? It's already questionable in terms of legality and it will certainly be especially in a few years when more antisemitism laws get passed.

>>16929373

4u

>>16929371

Probably anything that is a partisan issue. Pedophilia is one of the few ideas that gets everyone united under one banner, regardless of whether they're left, right, authoritarian or liberal. Basically only the extreme liberal spear tip doesn't care, but are of course always hopelessly outnumbered.

That's just my bait answer, but its one that is based on empirical evidence. It's where the venn diagram of left and right overlap. They don't that on anything else to this degree. Terrorist threats? More likely to be defended by the left(muh multiculturalism). Racism? The right is more tolerant. And so on.

I guess the only other example I can think of that comes close being attacked by both sides equally is gamers. One side claims it's a slippery slope towards violence, the other claims its hinders social progress.

Mhh, I guess pedos and gamers do have something in common. Now I get why ni/gg/ers were so adamant about loli. Yeah, that makes total sense.

>>16929376

Guess what pedo

Idiots like you aren't going to lift a finger to fight against unfair laws, after all your motto is just let you masturbate to your child porn while you infest the site like a parasite. Your ilk isn't going to do a single thing when the feds start knocking to take the site down but you'll pester and spam your cancer on every single image board until either the site collapses or you get the boot.

>>16929374

>You pedos can't keep your fetish in check and must spam it everywhere.

It was never spammed, your revisionist fuck.

>>16929376

Jewish Question is 100% legal. Loli for the sake of pornographic titillation is not. Come back when you are marching on the streets to defend your right to masturbate to cartoon girls.

>>16929388

You're not going to do anything about it yourself so stop pretending like you give a shit about anything but masturbating to your child porn.

8goon rebrand when?

>>16929393

Right now, why else do you think jimbo is doing this shit?

>>16929395

Do you suppose these fags will cry when their blacked porn gets the boot as well?

>>16929392

>It's not needed, the law isn't unfair, it's just fucking idiots who can't comprehend it

>but also banning it goes against the first amendment

>Ron and his father are just retards

Absolute state of pedos, go ahead sue this site for infringing on your first amendment rights. You won't even need to hire a lawyer with your obviously superior legal understanding

>That was me.

What a surprise, a literal pedo is also retarded.

>site doesn't want his ilk around

>but he keeps coming back to spread his degeneracy

Literally no one wants you here, jump ship like you've been claiming for the past week already.

>>16929396

I don't think that would happen. You need to cater to your jewish overlords, after all.

>>16929390

For one, the legality of loli is disputed. Even the lawyer basically said "if it meets five arbitrary criteria, it may be illegal in some states" and Ron figured "good enough to ban". So in essence, there's little to fight for. The crackdown was much more worrisome in Japan before the olympics and has all but stopped with them being cancelled now, but funnily enough, people in the #GG threads WERE actually doing something. Unlike you, who has never done anything for your cause aside for post Tarrant photoshops.

And unlike you, I don't pretend to hold some high moral ground. I don't claim to be some fucking moral warrior, fighting for the future of my entire race or whatever. You do. Your entire identity revolves around Jews destroying the white race. So you can't retort to "you won't do anything" with "no you". I have nothing to do. You, on the other hand, have a battle to fight. 16 European countries downright outlaw questioning the holocaust. and America not only has several laws disallowing you from advocating for boycotts of Israel and their products, but also several laws regarding Anti-semetic speech. Those laws already exist and a jewish enough lawyer could twist anything into fitting that mold. But YOU will never do anything about that, despite thinking that that's literally the biggest thing standing in the way of the ethnostate. What's stopping you, faggot?

>>16929396

More likely that non-blacked porn would get banned

>>16929396

You''l get 4f18ea screeching how its a good thing and how it was spammed on every board.

>>16929397

You're pretty much posting alone as is, but you clearly didn't belong here on /v/ so I wonder if you from the quck board instead.

>>16929409

>You're pretty much posting alone as is

Then why are you pedos still here? Leave for your haven already.

>but you clearly didn't belong here on /v/ so I wonder if you from the quck board instead

Pick up some English lessons too while you're at it so that you don't stick out like an ESL chimp.

>>16929428

>Then why are you pedos still here?

Because I want to make your life as miserable as possible for bending over willingly so jim can slide his dick up your ass.

>Pick up some English lessons

God forbid a man make a mistake. You might have to make an argument, you projecting sack of dogshit.

>>16929437

>Because I want to make your life as miserable as possible for bending over willingly so jim can slide his dick up your ass.

all is as foretold, just as I said in >>16929405 they are so petty that they would rather destroy the board than fight for their rights somewhere that it actually matters

>>16929390

It’s not like you’re doing anything about “saving the white race.” How about you stop pretending you give a shit about anything other than larping as a nazi on the internet.

>>16929442

Meanwhile you'd spit in my face at any given chance. Talk about petty.

>>16929445

I'm not spitting in your face, I'm laughing at you for being so utterly predictable.

>>16929449

So yes, being petty. Enjoy fiddling while Rome burns.

>>16929437

>impotent pedo going on a powertrip

Go ahead, spam your CP to your heart's content. Maybe one day you'll manage to groom a child.

>>16929444

>It’s not like you’re doing anything about “saving the white race.”

<unlike me who is going to save the world and free speech by masturbating to loli and spamming cp everywhere

Shouldn't have tolerated pedos in the first place, just like how Mark should've been removed within the first week.

>>16929458

>loli is totally pedo guys i swear im not retarded!

Fucking kill yourself, Ron. Loli is not pedo and should have never been banned.

>>16929462

>>The only reason I keep coming back is out of inertia, honestly.

That and jewgle captcha really.

>>16929462

>Loli is not pedo

>we just happen to enable pedophiles and spread pedophile apologia

>we just spam CP when we don't get our way

>we must insert our fetish on every topic no matter what

whatever pedo

They banned the lolis and killed 8kun, just look at the home.

>>16929458

Unlike your sorry ass I don’t give a shit about “saving the world” or whatever delusions you entertain. It’s a fucking imageboard. It’s about entertainment and shitposting, not changing the world.

>>16929468

Oh no it is. In fact, loli does exactly as much harm as cp. The only difference is that loli can be created safely without endangering kids.

As for the apologia and enabling, that's the same kind of myth boomers used in the 80s and 90s to paint video games as gateway drugs. Video games don't make people violent, violent people, among many others, gravitate towards playing video games.

Porn consumption does make the average person less aggressive, reduces their sex drive and their levels of productiveness. Cp, fictional or not, does the same. The only lie you have been fed and probably want to believe if is that pedos, loli exclusive ones or not, are ticking timebombs one naked drawing of a kid away from driving a van to the playground. There's no way to prove they arent at this point since politicians have long since successfully stigmatized the entire subject to the point where research without high risk of persecution is impossible.

I could tell you to ask yourself why politics did that, but I don't think you want to know the answer. Or rather, you already know it.

>>16929472

>Unlike your sorry ass I don’t give a shit about “saving the world”

<nooo you can't ban my lolis muh free speech

<never mind I never cared about free speech I just want to masturbate to cp

You pedos are so fucking predictable its almost as pathetic as your fetish.

>>16929475

>As for the apologia and enabling, that's the same kind of myth boomers used in the 80s and 90s to paint video games as gateway drugs

>he says as literal pedo apologia littered GG threads with the pedos who post it being proud of it in this very thread

Open your eyes and read the thread on your cum stained monitor you mongoloid.

>>16929479

>advocating for free speech on a tiny website = wanting to “save the world”

You’re a fucking braindead retard.

>>16929475

>loli does exactly as much harm as cp

Go on.

>>16929305

>How fucking retarted is jim to ask a lawyer

Ron was asking a lawyer. Jim is ignorant of the site outside of /newsplus/ and Q and thinks loli was banned the whole time.

>>16929372

>>16929428

none of this is relevant to /v/. Images on an imageboard, even the pornographic ones, are more relevant then everything you've listed.

>ESL

back to cuckchan you go

>>16929649

Yeah but masturbating to pictures isn't a free speech issue is it, whereas all those things are free speech issues, protesting 8kun not letting you post pictures to masturbate to is like protesting the local coffee shop refusing to let you have sex with a prostitute anymore.

>>16929652

*refusing to let you have sex with a prostitute in their restroom anymore

man I liked that analogy and managed to fuck it up anyways

>>16929652

the /hebe/ section of this coffee shop got more activity when it was around than /v/ does now, just saying.

>>16928198

fuck off back to your shithole mongoloid

>>16929485

no u, she is a ticc hoe

Acidchan is online now as well. I think I'm going to keep using fatchan though.

>>16929719

You mistook this thread for the goober containment.

Hey Ron and Jim how does it feel to know that your incompetence killed your stupid website?

>>16929485

>Deleting Vivian

So this is what nu/v/ have become. Did goobergate also left this place?

>>16929365

>removing off topic faggotry is censorship

if you want to fap to porn go to porn board #132498931

>>16929743

why is your gay ass opinion required on a video game board?

>>16929750

why is your gay opinion on my gay opinion required on a video game board?

>>16929472

Imagine being so subhumanly retarded that this is how you actually think and behave.

>>16929751

its not so jim should make /vplus/ and hire some third worlders for next to nothing to make game articles like they do the news and that will just be what this site is.

>>16929754

Does that mean mark was a third worlder?

>>16929757

Yes. Didn't you know he's from New York?

>>16929755

>LOLIS REPRESENT THE FREEDOM OF THE BOARD

Nah, most of them were fags that posted shit that wasn't related to the board in the first place

>>16929733

>not deleting loli Vivian

it was real loli anon, he didn't post hot vivain ass but instead posted a shit aged down version.

>8 pph, less than 500 active ISPs

RIP 8chan. At least the anti-loli goons and qboomers will have each other.

>>16929781

Note Fatchan UIDs are based on the past 24 hours and 8kun UIDs are based on past 72 hours, so they aren't directly comparable. That 312 probably represents roughly the same number of people as the 800 8kun/v/ had.

>>16929777

>forgetting goons worked with lolifags

>>16929781

>implying

Yes

>>16929783

>implying

Also Yes as well.

>>16929783

>overwatch mousepad

>>16929791

have a bump :^)

>>16929772

You mean like the entirety of /pol/?

>>16929755

Freedom to jerk of to kiddy drawings

>>16929755

nah this isn't gamergate 2.0 as much you want it to be, nobody's speech is being censored, only meaningless porn

>>16929839

what did he mean by any of this

did he somehow miss two weeks of discussion

>>16929841

What, did he leave or something I left for like two months

see you 8kun/v/ keyboard warriors never

>>16929889

>Guro loli

>nazi animu pic to show i'm not a degenerate pedo

>freedom of speech

No

>>16929828

And /v/ with /b/ sometimes

>>16929889

>>16928189

>>16928198

>>16928225

>>16928250

>>16928253

Honestly, it's kind of funny that nazis, right-leaning, and pizzagate types are leaving en masse because of how 2D CP is being banned. It was not the mass shootings, trolling, nor doxing that caused them to draw the line, it was them being denied the access to see EROTIC depictions of UNDERAGE characters.

It shows that none of you LARPers had serious conviction in your beliefs, you were just using it as an excuse to hurt those around you.

You will NEVER make a difference because you are no different from whom you've criticized. That's why you have failed constantly in accomplishing your political goals.

>>16929898

>mass shootings, trolling, nor doxing

>>16929901

You are a sadistic self-unaware hypocrite and will always be one for the rest of your life.

>>16929898

no u LARPers

>>16929508

It's fine when (best) girls do it.

>>16929898

>guilt by association fallacy

>ACTUALLY

>FUCKING

>THINKS

>ANYONE

>WILL

>FALL

>FOR

>THIS

This is a paid jewish shill, almost certainly a poster of loli and actual CP himself, and a political leftist of subhuman intelligence.

>>16929911

And you're a tranny, which is far worse. It's funny that trannies like yourself are FAR more likely to molest kids than lolicons are, but are so eager to protect the "rights" of drawings.

>>16929945

>high horse

Yes, everyone and I are indeed better than hypocritical nazi pedophiles who are objectively wrong about everything.

>>16929950

Imagine being so pathetic that you throw away everything that the site worked hard for because you were told not to post child porn. What's preventing you from doing the same with everything else? It indicates a complete lack of willpower and self-agency.

>>16929955

>tranny

>self agency

You aren't fooling anyone.

>>16928189

Infinitychan is up and running after finally being launched by josh.

https://9chan.tw/videogames

On the one hand, I love seeing pedo scum squirm and cry crocodile tears. On the other, they make up a sizeable portion of the posters and do contribute (when they're not spamming their fap threads or even derailing threads with lolishit). They also kick up a stink and leave in large numbers which hurts the site they are leaving. They're almost a necessary evil.

>>16929874

Well his /v/ is still the most active /v/ compared to other ones on webring. Actually, it is just the biggest board period.

>>16929898

Most people had already left. And to begin with this /v/, not any other board.

>>16930010

>Well his /v/ is still the most active /v/ compared to other ones on webring. Actually, it is just the biggest board period.

No, his /v/ has like 3 pph, everyone is still using fat/v/ instead of acids and marks site.

>>16930019

Wait, wasn't fat/v/ Marks? I guess I am that badly following things.

And the person he is working with is Acids? That Acid faggot from the gamergate drama?

>>16929898

So I need to leave a site everytime some fucks go nuts and shoot something up? Tarrant posted on fb or instagram before doing the shooting (it got reposted here by some anon) - yet those sites are up. And you're concerned about trolling and doxing and you use a chan site? The most pitiful thing is being bothered by trolling - fucking grow a pair. Goddamn I hate you - imagine someone posts something on your site and you take it down and report it to authorities within 5 MINUTES of it being posted yet that isn't fast enough response time. Why must our site go down because some nut lost it on a different site? Why is any social media site that has had the same thing happen still up then? If you paid attention you'd know most of the pizzagate types already left, and the /pnd/ board is the only reason any right-leaning and nazi people are left on this site. You're such a fucking narrow minded, tunnel vision asshat that words really struggle to do your severe case of fucking retardation justice. Keep this shitty fucking site - celebrate finding one more thing to ban, because apparently not enough people have left the site yet. No one but autists care about a cartoon. If you're willing to declare war on LINES OF PAPER then what aren't you willing to remove? You know a cartoon isn't a child, you know a cartoon isn't real, yet fake child cartoon porn is where you're upset, rather then the fact that the pizzagate types who wanted to protect real children long ago left? It doesn't bother you that so many of the podestas and epsteins of the world are molesting actual children, but the lines on paper do. You don't care about the children, you care about feeling right. You are a worthless self-deluded hypocrite, and right now there's a billionaire rich fuck raping a four year old to death in their cellar and they're protected thanks to stupid people like you. Neck yourself faggot - the world will be far batter off.

>>16930021

Yeah Acidman.

Mark indeed had fat/v/ for a short while but then sperged out and deleted it. It has a new owner now that seems to be pretty ok.

>>16930023

I see. I was feeling reluctant towards fatchan, because fuck Mark, but if it is somebody else, maybe there is a bit of hope. Though whoever he is, he seems to be reusing some of the moderation tactics from fullchan. Are we sure it is not just Mark 4D chessing pretending that he left fatchan, but still being in charge?

>>16930022

*fucking

*better

I'm so angry I can't even type worth a damn.

>>16930024

Pretty sure it's not Mark.

>>16930024

It is someone else. Mark is on acidman's shitty 8chan copy.

>>16930087

>/s

You can tell how well this is going.

>>16929898

It's about free speech and principles, I don't find loli content interesting or arousing, but when it's banned I know that it's a wedge for further speech control.

Don't even start with "slippery slope fallacy", if there's something these past decades have shown is that it's real.

If you find that loli content can be compared to mass shootings, trolling or doxing, then please show me how a drawing of a fictional character can hurt real people.

>>16930095

>If you find that loli content can be compared to mass shootings, trolling or doxing, then please show me how a drawing of a fictional character can hurt real people.

Anyone that disagrees with this is a retard that doesn't belong on /v/.

The exact same discussion repeats every year regarding "violent videogames", with herds of morons scapegoating their failings at raising the next generation on a hobby they know next to nothing about.

Every time this discussion happens, everyone here unanimously agrees that "virtual violence does not lead to real violence and may even reduce it by giving you a venting mechanism".

Anyone that turns around and uses the boomer logic when it comes to lolis instead of violent videogames either agrees with them in the former problem or has double standards and sees nothing wrong with that. In other words, he's a moron that doesn't belong on /v/ and can't kick his oxygen addiction soon enough,

Here you go Ron, have a free post just so you can claim it ain't just the Qoomers posting in this site.

>>16930245

if you want to make money being a filthy smut artist then do furry shit you fucking whore work those hands harder bitch

>>16930245

it's weird, purge may be coming for other sites or it might be confined to this one, it (somewhat) hit e621 last month, and people are speculating other boorus like Sankaku Complex are next

>>16930081

>>16930024

I personally think Mark isn't in control of Fatchan, but that he will certainly be happier if people leave 8kun, it will sort of reaffirm his weird complex about him being the only person to control /v/ since what was once mainly just 8kun /v/ will be fractured across 5 or so different boards: julay, fatchan, 8kun, markchan, 9chan, etc. That's the main reason I'm not leaving, fuck Mark, if I want to masturbate I can use a site other than 8kun.

To hell with lolifags, goons, and qboomers alike. Burn it all.

>Exodus 1: Left due to the banning of gamergate discussion

>Exodus 2: Left due to the banning of mongoliod sketches of children

The absolute state of gamergate

>>16930095

> how a drawing of a fictional character can hurt real people

Keep proping up that strawman

>slippery slope fallacy

Like how banning loli will slip into the abolishment of all freedom?

>>16930257

No need to be so binary about it. Some of us are larping as monarchists and hate free speech and the DNC alike.

>>16930257

And if you kill your enemies they win huh?

<y-you're a leftist if you don't support my right to fap to drawings of children

Yes anon, nazis are the real leftists

<I'm posting moonman!, I'm calling people leftist kikes and saying they should get the rope! I'm using nazi speech! This will get /pol/ on my sidefor sure

You lolifags have been continously calling anyone who disagrees with you as psyop agents, and then you do this

>>16930252

>Keep proping up that strawman

Cool, what was your argument again?

>Like how banning loli will slip into the abolishment of all freedom?

Maybe I wasn't clear, I was trying to say that the slippery slope fallacy isn't a fallacy, that it actually happens as we've seen time and time again.

Of course it won't abolish all freedom, but it will make this site prone to censoring and banning anything due to popular pressure, like every other site on the internet, such as 4chan. In this case it's not even by popular pressure, it's purely out of fear of legal repercussions that might not even exist.

So next time some buttblasted journo or discord tranny sees an opportunity to fuck this site up, the administration will capitulate.

I find it strange how you talk about gamergate, which was a very similar situation, except that Ron is being upfront about it, and you seem to think that all of this doesn't matter, although you might be just baiting.

>>16930264

>which was a very similar situation

>>Exodus 1: Left due to the banning of gamergate discussion

>Exodus 2: Left due to the banning of mongoliod sketches of children

Yeah

>>16930264

Also, I thought you were talking about the slippery slope that loli leads to irl child molestation.

Seems like lolifags are fine saying the slippery slope is a fallacy when it suits them

>>16929930

>you’re a tranny because you exposed my jewish spam

Commit suicide immediately.

>>16930265

also keep in mind exodus 2 actually began with M*rk's concern trolling and departure, there are people pathetic enough to follow Mark wherever he goes

>>16930266

>brown

sure thing you nigger lover

>>16930266