/v/ - Video Games

>>16915713

Where did you come from?

>>16915715

Given the obsession with Mark, probably Julay

He is not.

But don't worry. A vol will claim the board and some months down the line he will mysteriously resign and a guy named Mork will be your new BO.

OP raises a good point, anons that don't come here frequently or are busy aren't aware of the current situation.

>>16915740

Didn’t he fuck off to Fatchan while he tries to bring back vch or something?

I am gay and I just love cock

BIG and very FAT cock

>>16915713

At least we can post pro-white content here now.

>>16915746

>>16915745

We know, mark

>>16915743

Raged out and deleted the /v/ he made there.

>>16915771

Yeah that much I know. That's why I'm wondering where he's at now.

>>16915770

Hand over the fucking cake and nobody's dick gets sucked

Can someone give me a quick rundown? I was busy playing Bannerlord the past few days.

>>16915713

Don't worry Anon, I'll hand the board back to Mark when I get the claim.

Already got an email back from Ron about it.

>>16915777 (checked)

Yup., Try going to the fatchan /v/ url and you'll get

a message from the admin tell you Mark deleted the board. Apparently he had a bit of a meltdown while enduring a mixture of raids from julay fags and uncomfortable but genuine questions from his users, went on a ban spree and nuked the board because he decided to take a week off to clear his head.

>>16915780

Mark posted an open letter to admins complaining about the loss of features 8chan used to have as well as anons inability to create their own boards

he focused his complains on the lack of dedicated loli boards and that codemonkey cucked out phase 2 of board migration

i really don't get what he was sperging about, i see loli posters all the time and the don't get banned

Actually, fatchan's /v/ just got restored and has a mod that isn't mark up.

https://fatchan.org/v/index.html

>>16915794

Mark's gained immunity to gas from hotboxing his own room for 26 years.

>>16915774

I'm on break. I hope to come back in a week or so.

>>16915784

>>16915737

Shit, what if Mark actually does claim the board?

>>16915785

>>16915787

So no one knows for sure?

>>16915804

No, I'm pretty certain Mark is not the board owner anymore. The situation is not completely over yet though, somebody will have to claim the board when it becomes available, or a replacement is manually assigned.

>>16915809

If >>16915799 really is the cake kike then Mark will return here as the BO.

>>16915812

>>16915803

I mean to the image board scene, I'm done with 8kun. It's no longer the 8chan we helped create back in 2014. I pointed this out back in my open letter. Right now 8kun only exists to make money from journalists or to help create narratives for alternative news outlets. There's a reason Ron and Jim were never transparent on the site itself. Regardless where you want to go is your choice. I just don't recommend staying on here or 4chan.

>>16915809

Likely one of the vols will claim it and then mark will just shadow mod it.

>>16915812

Every time Mark is mentioned in a thread, there are always at least 2 people who pretend to be Mark until the real one actually shows up.

>>16915822

Let me fix that for you.

>Jim was paying Mark $2000 a month to be a reporter in his shitty clickbait news board no one cares about, managing board claims and some other things

>Jim berates Mark in a private chat for criticizing the direction of where the site is going and questioning the supposed idea that local news papers will support 8kun

>Jim says "fuck v, delete v, i dont pay you for v, post on newsplus" in chat

>Mark gets extremely concerned about the way things are going on 8kun

>Mark reaches out to people he knows to set up a backup site in case things go wrong

>Mark creates this thread >>16909565

>Ron hears about Mark setting up a backup and thinking of leaving so he removes Mark as BO even though he broke no rules

>Mark leaks chat with Jim that reveals he worked for Jim didn't give a shit about the website or what it stood for and that he thinks that both /v/ and the QAnon people are expendable and that they're irrelevant

>Mark hastily sets up a bunker

>people raid the bunker and constantly spam it

>Mark is now taking a break from it all for a week, but decided to delete the bunker and focus on creating a new site focused on preserving 8chan's legacy

>Ron does damage control sayingnthat loli is not banned and that /delicious/ will be restored in 2 weeks contradicting Jim

>Jim says loli is banned during his stream

>Ron says he will put the board up for claim, with /v/ volunteers having priority

>>16915827

>>16915822

>Ron does damage control sayingnthat loli is not banned and that /delicious/ will be restored in 2 weeks contradicting Jim

This isn't up-to-date. Ron is now paying 2 lawyers to look into the matter and determine whether or not loli will be allowed on the site.

Here are his posts on the matter

>>16914963

>>16915018

So the fate of loli on 8chan is going to be determined by two kike lawyers.

>>16915827

>giving a single iota of a fuck about the Q-LARPers

Dude, kill yourself. This entire website only exists to grift them. 8chan was killed by the owner himself solely because he hates whites and wants us all dead. This zero effort shitpost excuse for a website only exists for the sake of grubbing shekels from the Q-LARPers. Once Trump leaves office, it’s likely we’ll be deleted entirely since their mass suicide will “look bad” just like all pro-white actions and statements “look bad” to the senile faggot who runs this place. OBVIOUSLY Jim doesn’t give a shit about 8xxxx’s real purpose.

>>16915817

You are a jew. You only destroy. It is impossible for you to create anything. Creation is anathema to your entire race. We can now post pro-white content on /v/ without being instantly banned, having ALL OF OUR POSTS WIPED, NO MATTER THEIR CONTENT, and being banned FOR AN ENTIRE FUCKING MONTH because one post said something that contradicted the jewish narrative. You are gone forever. You are the imkikey of /v/ and it’s fucking glorious that you will never have power again.

>>16915837

It WAS spam, you were constantly making a big fuss and spreading lies about what the past and stretching context of the logs.

Good. I hope that nigger offs himself. He banned me and so many of my boys for no good reason. Fuck that fat faggot.

>>16915848

>doesn't even deny it

Mark shitting his pants once again and going an overemotional ban spree then deleting the entire goddamn fatchan /v/ finally 100.0% convinced me to never want anything to do with him again. You can shove your "he's not malicious he's inept/he really cares about the community/he was just stressed" up your ass.

>>16915844

I'm lazy and also don't want to deal with Ron and Jim's cucking out and faggot ass bureaucratic approach to fucking to a fucking hobbyist website.

If I had to run a board I'd run it on prolikewoah.

>>16915855

I said I was gonna take a break and anons told me to delete the bunker

>>16915845

Of course somebody would spam something when it gets repeatedly deleted. Its almost like their want it to stay up.

>>16915859

He got removed for being a lazy cunt that didnt do his work.

>>16915859

More like why didn't they blast these faggots sooner since literally all of the BO removals a good decision.

>>16915857

>Taking a break

>Still here

Well you sure lied about that. Just fuck off if you really intend to take a break. Whether you are Mark or not

>>16915855

First of all Mark is not "shitting his pants" or going on any ban sprees. Stop spreading lies. There are way more things to shit on Mark about, like how he briefly considered monetizing gondola.

>>16915859

>>16915860

Ron is full of shit. Why would Mark beg for a raise while not even doing his job?? It makes no sense at all.

>>16915858

That's called spam. You idiot.

>>16915859

Pretty much. /v/ was not part of my job, and I'm allowed to have a secondary site if I so choose. It's in the FAQ. However Ron and Jim saw me as a threat and decided to play damage control by removing me from both my paid and voluntary position, despite going against what the rules themselves state.

>>16915863

>>16915859

Jim and Ron are cockroaches, Mark is a kike. This whole place is fucked.

>>16915877

Pretty much the only sensible conclusion to take from all this. The issue is finding a replacement.

>>16915872

>Mark is not "shitting his pants" or going on any ban sprees

I guess you didnt visit the fatchan thread in which he went on a ban spree.

>>16915872

>Ron is full of shit. Why would Mark beg for a raise while not even doing his job?? It makes no sense at all.

Because he wanted money. He did practically nothing to get money so he thought he could get some more. Ron shared Marks logs of being a lazy cunt.

>>16915884

>Ron shared Marks logs of being a lazy cunt.

Link?

>>16915888

Because he was paid to do it.

>>16915892

He was not paid to be the /v/ board owner. That is explicitly stated during his conversation with Jim. I believe his words were "I do not pay you for v". It's in the .pdf

>>16915899

Thats not what i said. Its quite clear i was talking about /newsplus/. Not doing your job has consequences.

>>16915869

>Well you sure lied about that.

“The jew is not a liar: he is the lie itself. From this vantage point, we can say that the jew is not a man. He lives the pseudo-life of a ghoul whose fortunes are linked to Yahweh-Moloch. He employs deception as the weapon with which he will exterminate mankind. The jew is the very incarnation of the unearthly power of destruction.” ~ Ludwig Klages, Rhythmen und Runen; 1944

>>16915872

>or going on banning sprees

The log is right there, you fucking yid. He banned anyone who posted anything against the jewish narrative, even if it was directly and exclusively related to video games.

>>16915899

lol conflict of interests

>>16915897

Claims emails barely came in, and my username on newsplus was MYen.

>>16915902

Also KentBrockman.

In fact look how many articles were made by KentBrockman and decide for yourself

>>16915897

>I don’t think it’s necessary to bring /pol/ back

Finally HARD proof that /pnd/ is run directly by him, and that he bans any content that allows whites to have their own board. The ruleset was “purely coincidentally” IDENTICAL to post-kikey 8/pol/, and the BO never addressed this at any point. Great screenshot, anon.

>>16915822

>board no one cares about

Still afraid, impotent leftist?

>>16915900

Those consequences shouldn't have anything to do with /v/'s ownership i do welcome the change though

>>16915888

I'm hoping to bring it back either this weekend or next week. Although we'll also try to bring on board creation. My main concern right now is storage space.

>>16915827

>>Mark is now taking a break from it all for a week, but decided to delete the bunker and focus on creating a new site focused on preserving 8chan's legacy

Meaning open board creation for all?

>>16915919

Ah ok >>16915918

>>16915859

mark was actively planning an exodus from 8kunt trying to get other BOs with him at least days before he was removed.

>>16915919

Yes. That's the plan. I wanna run things like vch/2015 8chan where administration wouldn't touch anything unless required by law.

>>16915923

Banning actual spam is not a banning spree unless you're a retard who thinks rules shouldn't be enforced.

>>16915926

How are you supposed to get the money to run that?

>>16915923

yeah, during a raid.

>>16915908

Wait, are you actually claiming that newsplus is right-wing in any capacity? Or pro-white? Or that it matters at all? What does leftism have to do with anything, other than describing the contents of the board? Look at the catalog right now, anon. It’s literally all (((neoconservative))) headlines from totally not controlled opposition websites, and pushing nothing outside the narrative of egalitarianism, feminism, overt communism, etc. And where’s the discussion? Literally nowhere. The thread with the most replies has FOUR. Why would anyone discuss anything? It’s all carefully, meticulously curated by someone with a singular narrative in mind.

>>16915930

He’s a jew. He’ll figure something out.

>>16915923

post what was actually removed or shut the fuck up about it

>>16915930

I get more money from the cares act then I ever did from Jim.

>>16915929

But i was in that thread and he was not deleting or banning spam.

>>16915939

Yes he was.

>>16915939

It was meta spam that wasn't a meta thread.

>>16915926

> I wanna run things like vch

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

Everyone hates you for a reason mark

>>16915923

No you don't understand they were all Julay spammers. I He did nothing wrong.

>>16915943

Administration wise. Read nigger read.

>>16915938

It is only a one time payment of $1,200 dollars. I suppose you probably get $600 dollar unemployment checks each month, but is still is only $1,800 for a single month.

>>16915949

It's actually 600 a week

>>16915951

>visible IDs

>samefag

You are so fucking stupid I swear

>>16915877

Indeed

>>16915954

It's impossible to browse on the desktop and phone at the same time after all.

>>16915835

>still worshiping a false flagger

nu/pol/ never fails to disappoint in its idiocy and naivety

short term thinkers that praise the pawns of the global elites

for anyone who missed what happened.

http://archive.is/dZMkZ

Marks /cow/ thread.

>>16915771

Then fatchan admins brought it back and gave the board to an Italian.

>>16915966

Somewhat whiter than Mark, so there's an improvement right there.

>>16915822

>THQ Nordic buys developer after developer

>even Mark is on their payroll

Austrians back at it again with the attempted world control.

>>16915970

https://fatchan.org/v/catalog.html

Admin of the site banned Mark from having a board there again.

>>16915975

Not even the first time Mark got kicked off from board owning either within the webring.

It's amazing how he kept 8kun's /v/ for so long.

Anyway, I hope fatchan /v/ enjoys the Italian BO.

>>16915961

The cares act gives me 600 a week you dumbass. Jim only gave me a straight 2k

Mark, when are you going to realize no one fucking liked you? God you must be so heated you can't delete shit right now.

>>16915982

>I made 500 a week

>this wasn't enough

Why are aspies so bad with money?

>>16915977

>>16915974

>>16915975

Where does it say that? I just checked their /v/ and meta boards, nothing there.

I don't get all the hate for Mark, sure he's legitimately autistic and spergs out sometimes but he's normally very fair and can be reasoned with, unlike a lot of other board operators.

Try defending yourself from a bullshit ban on halfchan /v/, for instance. Your argument will reach nobody and your ban will probably be extended if anyone actually checks your appeal.

>>16915982

Go back to playing Utopia Dance on your Playstation.

>>16915984

Well he does live in Jew York.

>>16915974

Mark's unending cascade of failure never ceases to amuse me.

>>16915988

I think he's wrong, iirc the admin said he just wasn't giving /v/ back to Mark and that's it, granted now that there's a /v/ even if Mark did get another video game board going, nobody would go there and it'd be filled with spam.

>>16915988

https://fatchan.org/t/thread/1371.html

>>16915990

>he's normally very fair and can be reasoned with, unlike a lot of other board operators.

Compare him to Loleron, /animu/'s BO and now the new current owner of /a/.

>>16915990

Mark is fucking awful. Literally the only good thing he did was keep the CP away. He pretends to be "neutral" yet every time two retards shit up a thread, he only deletes the posts from the side he disagrees with. Fuck him.

>On break

>Still spergs out on any thread that's about him

You deserved everything that happened to you.

>>16915989

I said the same thing.

>>16915990

I don't get it either. In all my years hear I had very few negative interactions with Mark (I did have them though) and the worst ban I got was 30 minutes or an hour, something very light.

In comparison to halfchan /v/ where I'd get 3 day global bans for simply calling a dumb nigger a dumb nigger, he was a fine BO.

>>16915991

Is Utopia Dance available on Switch?

>>16916005

>TL;DR Mark and Jim are both huge faggots

Riveting stuff.

>>16916012

Its true though.

>>16916014

Mark is a wannabe e-celeb.

>>16915989

Because pedo's aren't satisfied until they shove their bullshit everywhere you are, much like furries, in a justification-by-volume approach. God forbid you don't want their bullshit on your imageboard, then it's whining and crying worse than the fucking furries. Literal cancer over something they can find a zillion other places.

>>16916005

>a faggot from /a/ has an opinion

Wonderful. Also I wish anons would quit pretending Julay are just trying to ignore us when they bitch and moan about Mark every fucking time someone mentions PPH.

>>16916004

The stretchgoal was sadly not reached.

>>16916029

Well, now fatchan /v/ is Mark free and under an Italian so the board might hold promise now.

Keep tabs open for both this site and fatchan.

>>16916035

And Julay's /v/

>>16916027

Then let them be banned for spam, as they should be. I don't like those obnoxious faggots either who insist on spamming porn for no reason, but the problem with banning "loli" is it is an extremely broad term that can be subverted extremely easily. If "banning loli" becomes mainstream, I can see shit going downhill for all manga-style artists extremely fast in the West. Manga-style art lends itself to age ambiguity due to the relative simplicity of the facial designs, which is why you frequently have a mom and daughter who look the exact same in an anime for example. The only factor you have to determine age in much of the art is the shape of the body, which frequently doesn't even make sense – see "oppai loli." It has virtually no correlation to attraction to children from my experience because "loli art" looks sufficiently different from real children. Usually people who are "real" pedophiles can't settle for anything less than the real thing, or something with more realistic art. Take a look at zankuro's art, for example. He draws moeblob girls that are of a childish height, but they have well-developed breasts and hips, yet usually his work is labelled as "loli" for whatever reason, despite the fact that virtually no child exists which looks like that.

>>16916041

It's best to keep checking everything at least periodically, especially when you know that the board you're in has problems.

>>16916029

Well, now fatchan /v/ is Mark free and under an Italian so the board might hold promise now.

Keep tabs open for both this site and fatchan.>>16916049

>Manga-style art lends itself to age ambiguity due to the relative simplicity of the facial designs, which is why you frequently have a mom and daughter who look the exact same in an anime for example

Reminder that Patreon's loli ban ended up being extended to anime artsyles being banned entirely.

>>16916060

Quick reply has a bug on my end.

>>16915982

Stop eating my tax money you fat piece of shit. You are finally removed from my favorite board after years of blood sucking just for you to turn around and latch onto my wallet. Fuck you Mark.

>>16916049

I know… I know… They're the canary in the free speech coal mine. They're a fracture point for SJWs to fuck with anime/manga. A picture doesn't have rights. Etc etc… I've heard it all, but have run out of fucks for their bullshit fetish and endless whinge. I'm more concerned that allowing it acts as a vector for attack against imageboards, which has been proven as a pretty damn effective way to fuck with them. Nordic got hammered just for giving us the time of day because this was the

"pedo website." Just can't have nice things sharing room with their fap obsession.

>>16916005

>An anon gave his two cents on the whole thing.

>>16916072

>I know… I know… They're the canary in the free speech coal mine. They're a fracture point for SJWs to fuck with anime/manga. A picture doesn't have rights. Etc etc…

And yet you're still a dumb fuck rallying for it to be banned. Shut the fuck up goon.

>>16916094

>fag that defends mark also flings around goon and is in desperate defense of loli

i guess kikes have a kike's backs

Why do all BOs look the same? Even across sites and not even chans.

>>16916094

>goon

You wish I was one of those bullshit bad actors instead of an oldfag totally sick of your shit. The assblasted hissyfits you sad cunts make when you can't have your safespace EVERYWHERE has sown more division on imageboards than you are remotely fucking worth. Go take your trash fetish somewhere else, like a furnace.

>>16916108

All jewish agents.

>>16915992

>Made 500 a week working from home.

>Couldn't move somewhere far less expensive and still work from home.

Sounds like he's still bad with money, anon.

>>16916109

>i'm an oldfag

Funniest shit you've said yet goon. Any oldfag would understand that loli is an integral part of imageboard culture.

>i'm not a bad actor!

You listed every legitimate reason there is to allow loli on imageboard and then handwaved it away with "but fuck pedos lol" and are insisting that anyone in favor of keeping loli is a pedo. You did all this and still think you can pretend to not be a "bad actor"?

Goons are this fucking dumb

I've seen windows that weren't as transparent as you, dipshit. Take your $10 and cocksucking friend >>16916102 back where you came.

I like ASMR.

>>16916095

I don't think he's a false flag, but I am annoyed by fags like >>16915835

>>16916126

Eh, Mark is a faggot regardless of what you may think of that incident. Why? Because he goes all

>Boohoo the poor people died

The correct course of action was to simply not address it, and if addressing it, doing it like another anon. That just helped to solidify Mark as an spineless faggot because

>I-it was supposed to be a joke!

>>16916121

>still think you can pretend to not be a bad actor

You want to talk about bad actors? You want everyone else to suffer, get punted off of google's search terms, let the dud fuck with our hosting, etc etc etc ALL for the sake of some stupid fucking porn… THAT's a bad actor: a worthless cunt unwilling to make a single compromise over one thing in order to save the whole fucking thing. You'd rather burn this place down than just go to one of the hundreds of outlets for your idiocy. KYS

>>16916072

>Nordic got hammered just for giving us the time of day because this was the "pedo website."

That was 8chan specifically because it had actual pedo boards in the past where real pedophiles posted pictures of 9 year old girls in swimsuits. But of course you are completely ignoring that and insisting loli is the problem, despite the fact that somehow, magically, those same pedos who posted swimsuit kids are somehow not satisfied with loli or they wouldn't have been doing it in the first fucking place. Nice mental gymnastics fuckwad.

>>16916160

You really want to go down that slippery slope dont you faggot?

>>16915791

I hope he gets blessed by corona chan

>>16916160

>I want 8chan to be first on Google search results

Yeah. You're definitely the bad actor here.

>>16916165

>muh slippery slope

Same tired fucking whinge. Never changes. Go ahead and burn it down, then move to the next imageboard that doesn't cater to your fetish and repeat, like you've always done.

>>16916167

>implying

NO U

>>16916172

So who's going to enforce the no loli policy? You? Why don't you start by defining what "loli" is? This should be good, because even the most autistic of loli consumers doesn't seem to give a straight answer in my experience. It sounds more like you're just an anti-weeb memer looking to ban all manga styled art through an abusably vague term.

>>16916172

>implying im wrong

Then they will ban offensive slurs and whatever the hell they feel like, you faggot, how can you be so blind?

>>16916190

If i were completely fine with censorship I would have never left cuckchan in the first place.

>>16916160

>get punted off of google's search terms

MUH GOOGLE

>>16916190

loli should be banned because loliniggers are colossal spergs that you either have to tip-toe around or face the thread going down the shitter fucking fast

any kind of enabling of this faggots should be discouraged

>>16916172

You don't seem to be getting it friend, its not about the content, its about the message it sends. If you say that you're going to ban something with incredibly ambiguous definitions, you're asking for anything to be construed to fall within those ambiguous definitions.

>>16916198

Or maybe you should just hide post/threads you don't like instead of sperging about it and shitting up the thread.

>>16916198

>vols don't exist

>anti-spam rules don't exist

>off-topic rules don't exist

Yeah, clearly we need to make more rules because there aren't enough to ban obnoxious faggots that derail threads with loli porn. Thank you, friendly statist.

>>16916183

This anon has a fair point, those faggots will just make up bullshit arguments in trying to take down this site with whatever angle they can think off of from.

>>16916204

or maybe lolifags shouldn't nuke a thread when somebody calls out their shit fetish

>>16916210

>vols don't exist

>anti-spam rules don't exist

>off-topic rules don't exist

They don't because they never seem to apply to loli kikes.

>>16916212

It's not even a fair point, it's just common fucking sense. You don't "appease" your enemy. You give them an inch, and they take a mile. What they think is irrelevant.

>>16916203

Mark kicked the bucket, goys. RIP

>>16916216

Thats some grade A bullshit.

/hebe/ was created by some anti-GG faggot to frame the site

The rest is also bullshit because pedophilia is being pushed by fags and slowly being accepted anyway. Pedo threads being an outlet to deal with their pedophilia is also bullshit and is only to enable their mental illness further plus that it isnt actually used for that and its for their fetish indulgence.

>>16916230

Guess "Wanting to talk about video games" is something unacceptable here.

>>16916214

>They don't because they never seem to apply to loli kikes.

That's a whole lotta anecdotal bullshit I'm detecting coming from you anon.

>>16916216

>Boards like /hebe/ died back in 2015-2016, which is already bad. And pedo threads in /b/ also died.

It doesn't fucking matter because those who don't like the people on this board will use screenshots from 2015 and 2016 again and again and again, because nobody unfamiliar will visit this site due to the stigma of being "the secret pedo hangout." The damage has already been done which is even more of a reason to not restrict loli posting. I remember I once suggested 8chan's /tg/ as a place to discuss RPG shit, because it was (at the time, haven't visited in ages) a slow-ass board due to the departure of questfags that still had genuine discussion. My post was immediately deleted because "CP," despite CP or loli never being posted on that board as far as I could remember. Even in the thinly-veiled porn threads where users would post elf and orc porn. It's like saying "nigger" on live television. No one will ask any questions at any point in the future and you are forever branded as "that guy who said nigger." Doesn't matter who you are or what you did before or afterward. THQ Nordic was always going to be harrassed for hanging out with "the pedos" regardless of the presence of loli on 8chan.

>And I know you are advocating for loli, anon, but one thing has nothing to do with the other. Pedos barely cared about lolis, and even if they did, you are falling for the stupidest fallacy there.

You must have not finished your reading comprehension remedial class because that's exactly what I said. Pedos don't care about loli which is why those boards existed in the first fucking place, they needed it to get off unlike loli which was already all over the place.

>>16916248

Also, ignore the ID change, I switched devices.

>>16916252

I'm guessing his counterpoint will be "other people won't stop talking about/the people who post loli will act persecuted when called out" to which the point of "just ignore it like an adult or with the myriad of self-censorship tools" will be ignored.

>>16916252

How about not smearing shit on my screen whiles I try to have a conversation? You need to realize you are no better than faggot furries.

>>16916248

>That's a whole lotta anecdotal bullshit I'm detecting coming from you anon.

Sure thing nigger. I wasn't here when call a lolifaggot the faggot that he is would result in everyone who shared said opinion to be banned, the entire thread being reduced to rubble and lolifaggot creaming a meta thread bitching that somebody disrupted their safespace.

8chan /v/ was great.

>>16916231

as long as he keeps a site running with good technology and actually communicates with anons I couldn't give less of a shit

>>16916256

>"just ignore it like an adult or with the myriad of self-censorship tools" will be ignored.

<How about not smearing shit on my screen whiles I try to have a conversation?

>>16916256

Damn son you must be a fucking prophet.

>>16916260

Just don't click on the spoiler you absolute fucking mongoloid. Just Block by ID.

>>16916265

Yeah, I was about to say, anon nailed it.

>>16916260

>I wasn't here when call a lolifaggot the faggot that he is would result in everyone who shared said opinion to be banned, the entire thread being reduced to rubble and lolifaggot creaming a meta thread bitching that somebody disrupted their safespace.

So you admit that you and people like you go into thread that you don't like just to get mad and shit it up. Gotcha.

>>16915903

>articles

>made

You fucking leech couldn't even write a decent article if your life depended on it.

All you did was copy/pasting some shit from other sites like some retard, and even then were too stupid to do your job right.

It's appalling that you got paid for copy/pasting shit from other sites in the first place.

Now get fucked in the real word, faggot.

Have fun flipping burgers, because this is the only job you might be qualified to do… just don't eat them, lest you lose another job!

>>16916273

No, you are just desperate at this point to paint me as wrong. When I see a loli thread i just instantly hide it. Its when you faggot start posting that shit in unrelated threads that people start calling you about because not everyone has as shit taste as you.

>>16916275

view >>16916214

>>16916260

Maybe if you're one of the only people complaining about it, you're the problem? Ever consider that? Most of the time it just makes me laugh. It really just doesn't bother me as much as it seems to bother you, anon. Usually when I realize that's happening I just shrug and adapt, or fuck off if it bothers me that much. Clearly you want to continue being here because you're mad, so why does it bother you?

>>16916275

He's just going to repeat his theory that loli posters get some kind of preferential treatment.

Typical cuckchan atitude of getting trigered by loli,it's a good filter,also delete this thread it's too off-topic.

>>16916305

To be fair anon, some fights are worth fighting, like fighting against NTR/cuckolding just to shame cucks and run them out of whatever shit hole they feel comfortable in like the cockroaches they are. Anon is just a retard and don't know how to pick a fight, though, you can just go around yelling at the top of your lungs

LOLI POSTERS GET AN SPECIAL THREATMENT!

Without proof, or at least a logical conclusion or reasoning.

>>16916285

I've seen a lot of unspoilered lewds/borderline lewds of lolis, where they are in gstrings or near naked. In OPs, even. Sometimes mod spoiler the lewds, but it's not consistently enforced, or the pic remains unspoilered for a long time.

>>16916323

I mean don't get me wrong, I think loli is disgusting and that people who consume the media are subhuman trash who deserve extermination for their perversions, but then again, I'm sure literally everyone here could say the same about me if they knew the kind of shit I whacked it to. Most people here are into something weird or gross, its just the nature of introversion; any amount of resisting it is pointless. You can simply filter these people and move on, sure, maybe you had to see something for a second or two, but its not hard to think about something else, unless

of course, you're autistic.

>>16916325

>but it's not consistently enforced, or the pic remains unspoilered for a long time.

But that's true of all lewds that fail to get spoilered.

>borderline lewds of lolis, where they are in gstrings or near naked.

Borderline isn't the same as full lewd. Ther's a lot of official art and assets of non porn games that could be considered borderline depending on you specific point of view. It's all up to BO/vol discretion anyway and anons can still block post individually or by ID themselves.

>>16916325

It's far more reasonable to assume that the vols are simply being lazy, though, because they're vols on a niche-ass imageboard.

>>16916336

To your point, how exactly would you approach a thread about Senran Kagura? There is a loli character, and plenty of lewd in the game, but it is also a game franchise with differing gameplay across entries that isn't just a VN. Hell, I've jerked it to official Senran art easily enough before

>>16915926

>I wanna run things like vch/2015 8chan

So, delete any post/thread that you don't like? Fuck you you fat jew, you can't create anything of value.

I guess the moral is, you live long enough, you see yourself become a jannie that does it for free

>>16916339

They are clothed enough, so long as they are not nude, Senran Kagura can just barely pass being SFW. Though needing the board to be SFW is interesting when the board itself isn't one you would want your boss to find out about.

>>16916358

Just being on 8kun at all isn't something that you'd want you boss to find out about.

>>16916358

>They are clothed enough, so long as they are not nude,

There's parts in the games where the girls remove each others' tops and they're wearing nothing, no bra, except a couple of band-aids covering the nipples. What about screenshots like that? It's official art, but it's lewd as fuck. You can also do shit in the in-game dressing room like set up a POV camera with simulated paizuri using a sushi roll and aforementioned bandaid tits. But on the other hand, it's also a beat-em-up game about ninjas. Senran Kagura is firmly in the realm of "lewd shit which is borderline acceptable in Japan but looked upon with distaste in most Western nations." Your boss would definitely wonder what the fuck is going on if he saw that on your computer screen. Really, none of this site is "safe for work" in the literal sense.

>>16916336

>Borderline isn't the same as full lewd

It gets close. It may not be as explicit, but it can be very suggestive, and they're never posted for innocent reasons.

>anons can still block post individually or by ID themselves

Still, I don't know why anyone would dump enough lewds for that to be necessary, and even if the pics are spoilered, it's still annoying when multiple anons in a thread do it.(unless the thread was created for that purpose, but I'm not sure those are allowed)

>>16915737

>He is not.

Does this mean I can ask why this fat tub of jewish lard thought it would be a good idea to take pictures of his naked asshole without my posts getting deleted?

test

>>16916381

If any genitalia are uncovered, including nipples, anus, vagina, penis etc, it is NSFW and needs to be spoilered. If a picture has no exposed genitalia at all it does not. Of course there are exceptions to both sides but this is the rough overall idea.

Just come to fatchan/v/ already

>>16915713

With any luck Mark and Hotwheels both die from corona this year.

>>16915817

>Right now 8kun only exists to make money from journalists

Really? How so?

>or to help create narratives for alternative news outlets

You mean them making stories about shootings associated with 8kun?

> It's no longer the 8chan we helped create back in 2014

I don't notice any functional difference between the two. Maybe the changes over time were to gradual to notice. I'd need you to point them out.

This is all one big clusterfuck.

Good thing I lurk on the bunkers.

>>16915838

I don't know man, is being a jim cocksucker any better? That picture about loving 8kun is ironic since mark doesn't

>>16915822

Has anyone ever cared about /newsplus/ when a political board has already existed? And he wants to turn this site into a video game store?

>>16916328

>loli is disgusting and that people who consume the media are subhuman trash who deserve extermination for their perversions

This, the sooner we rid imageboards of lolifags the better.

>>16915966

Putting a Mario hat on Mark doesn't make him Italian.

>>16916408

Nah mate, you can fuck right off, if you don't want loli, just go to the myriad of other imageboards that don't allow it already, there's enough places that cater to censorious faggots like you.

>>16916414

There's this one schizophrenic meth addict that loves the place. Other than that no.

>>16916262

k, but he still a bitck.

>>16916328

>but then again, I'm sure literally everyone here could say the same about me if they knew the kind of shit I whacked it to

That would be an ad hominem that wouldn't change your point, you subhuman sack of shit

>Most people here are into something weird or gross

Most people here are probably into rape and/or corruption fetishes. Those might be weird and gross, but not exactly uncommon on the internet. And also not as bad as loli or whatever you presumably fap to.

>>16916413

Or you could go to the other imageboards that do allow it. They might not be a "myriad" but there's more of them than you give credit for

>>16916430

stop posting in italics for no reason like a fag

>>16916442

This, lolifags start packing and fuck off to the imageboards that will tolerate your shit.

>>16916172

<muh slippery slope

You mean that "fallacy" that is objectivly true and consistently happens in real life?

You sound like a leftwinger

>>16916442

>Most people here are probably into rape and/or corruption fetishes.

That's a nice broad brush you just stroked with, faggot. Non-consensual and corruption are actually turn-offs for me, and I've discussed this topic enough to know many anons feel the same way. I'm into impregnating a woman that I have no relation to or friendship with who becomes my soulmate afterward

>It's not as bad

Well, you can't really prove that loli is tied to a real-world obsession with children because much of loli art is not realistic, but being obsessed with rape is definitely dangerous and could translate into real-world actions. But of course you'll say that's not true despite the fact that we're both completely spitballing.

>>16916450

This isn't Reddit, stop replying to posts with "this" in lieu of an upvote. You look like a tool.

>>16916442

I'm not sure what point you're arguing for? There is no such thing as "as bad as loli"; loli has no objective bad other than its taboo status. Its no more taboo than liking rape, or any other sensitive subject where someone is harmed in a way that can transfer into the real world. These things exist and will continue to exist until they are forcefully removed from being comprehended, which is a complete Orwellian nightmare that I hope you seriously don't advocate for.

>>16916282

Nah. He isn't the only one. Loli is pretty gay and garbage shit taste too.

>>16916508

I think lots of things are garbage and shit taste, and yet I somehow find the will to simply ignore them and scroll down the thread rather than post about it here and pretend that other people will stop posting forever simply because I complain about it. I mean, everyone hates scat and golden showers, right? Right, guys? But I find it a waste of breath to complain every time someone posts something shocking, usually to deter a faggot OP. Something tells me that you clowns wouldn't have survived on 4chan /v/ in its heyday because it was a turbo-scrolling stream of garbage posts.

>>16916452

>Well, you can't really prove that loli is tied to a real-world obsession with children

I never said it was. Did you really think I was saying people with rape and corruption fetishes are obessed with real-world versions of both of those things, you dense nigger?

> or any other sensitive subject where someone is harmed in a way that can transfer into the real world

You are aware that the premise of "harmful things bad" can be "debunked" simply by continuesly asking why until the person supporting that position can no longer give an answer? If you aren't will to accept that somethings are self-evidently immoral then nothing can be "bad".

>>16916521

>I never said it was. Did you really think I was saying people with rape and corruption fetishes are obessed with real-world versions of both of those things, you dense nigger?

No, but you seem to be implying that people with loli fetishes are. Otherwise what makes loli fetish "worse" than any other fetish if you don't believe it correlates to any real-world action or moral stance? As you said:

>And also not as bad as loli or whatever you presumably fap to.

Do you just arbitrarily assume that everyone who likes loli posts it constantly on unrelated boards and threads?

Really, I'm having a hard time empathizing with this antagonism. Is there a day of the week where I'm not on and everyone just floods the board with lolis, then pushes those threads off the front page before I notice? Because I'm really not seeing this "lolis are everywhere" bullshit and it's starting to feel like a psy-op.

>>16916536

There is a small but dedicated contingent of concern-trolling goons who are here simply to stir things up. I'd recommend you just filter them.

>>16916536

> Otherwise what makes loli fetish "worse" than any other fetish

Being sexually aroused by something in the shape of a prepubescent

>Do you just arbitrarily assume that everyone who likes loli posts it constantly on unrelated boards and threads?

Not sure who's magic asshole you pulled that out of, I don't think I even said the word "post" much less make any mention of how frequently it is posted. I suppose someone else did and you collerated their statement with mine.

>>16916546

<y-you're just goons

cope harder faggot

>>16916649

>cope

That's how I know that your opinion is worthless and that you aren't from around here.

>>16916649

Call him a goon and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: 'I've been found out.'"

>>16915713

this faggot can go to hell

he was such a bitch that he would ban you for anything negative against the Switch

the kike needs to be gassed permanently and never given any position of authority again

>>16916699

I just hope either the new moderation is better or the new moderation at whatever place is left after this one collapses is better.

>>16916699

Now we're under the rule of a delusional, out of touch boomer who is only interested in turning 8kun into a media-friendly neocon news website and advertising platform. I'm not any happier.

>>16916649

>cope

Nice job outing yourself tourist. Go back.

>>16915786

>uncomfortable but genuine questions from his users

You mean that they were jeering at him.

The raids weren't anything legitimate and were focused on percieved past faults without posting actual evidence of supposed faults.

It's a something awful style goon raid tactic and now someone's going to try to wrest control of /v/ and wreck the shit out of it now by replacing Mark, who was an idiot, but not actively malicious.

Always be wary when people are making attacks on mods. They're trying to replace them.

>>16916747

Not to mention he started handing out bans like candy.

>>16916747

Remind me what the fat fuck gets paid for if he can't even be bothered to look at what he deletes?

>>16916741

It wasn't even just deleting something a poster said that upset him. If someone were in a thread and said something dumb (albeit not a shitpost, just had a wrong opinion) and that person got a bunch of (you)'s Mark would delete that post like a retard and you'd see the thread full of a bunch of replies to a deleted post which looks fucking ridiculous. It was Mark's retarded way of thinking "see I deleted something YOU guys hated, did I do a good job?". When /v/ gets a new BO and keeps GG threads while not repeating the shit Mark did, then no one has any excuse to follow the kike to wherever dead site he's going to.

>>16916272

Everyone one of your obnoxious, shit eating posts can be summed up as "wahhh i don't like loli! if you defend the right to like loli its cause you're a pedo lolishit! CATER ME TO ME!"

Here's the final response to your whining bullshit; Shut the fuck up, no one cares.

No dipshit, I am not into loli. But as I am not a mouth-breathing sperg like yourself I'm able to ignore the things I'm indifferent to instead of bitching incessantly.

You are not going to get loli banned. Eat a cock you whining faggot.

>>16916790

It's not 5 people either, it's basically one or two guys with an IP changer posting 2-3 times and then switching, always using the same talking points and insults. The board's gone to shit only because it's been undergoing a raid since last month.

>>16916717

>he was such a bitch that he would ban you for anything negative against the Switch

It was almost the same if you said anything negative against Steam's business practices and anticonsumer behavior. Never saw a ban over this but lots of deleted posts (not shitposts, but well thought out posts he just happened to disagree with), and threads bumplocked or shoah'd over criticism of Steam's consumer practices and censorship.

>>16916759

>Remind me what the fat fuck gets paid for if he can't even be bothered to look at what he deletes?

The job Mark was being paid for had nothing to do with /v/ , though looks like he was just as incompetent and inept at it as he was moderating /v/, based on the log Mark himself posted of his chat with Jim, and if we believe Ron's claims.

Mark was only removed as BO from /v/ because he pissed Jim off, so when he was fired Jim also removed his BO status out of spite just because he could. His removal was unfair but /v/ doesn't care because most of the userbase wanted him gone for a long time.

>>16916815

>>16916810

panicky one and done poster posting copypasta, every day, every week, every month of every second of every hour of every day.

You're decentralizing the boards, so you're not actually going to have power over shit. You made it harder to target us. Congrats.

>>16916716

Call him a pedophile and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out.'"

>>16916809

>Only last month

/vg/ was an 8chan board that everyone was jumping ship to that never came back with 8kun. It was literally made just to escape the shitpost plague. It's not just a raid that's been going on within the last month.

Mark is a cake eating kike faggot lol.

>>16916821

Hey retard, here's a genuine question that you'll no doubt reply to with low-level snark; how do you reconcile your utter stupidity? With your belief that loli = pedophilia, you open a host of other contradictions. Does drawn bestiaity constitute animal abuse? Do drawn depictions of rape constitute actual sexual assault?

Where you do you draw the line with your retarded bullshit? Genuinely curious, retard.

>>16916825

>It's ok to draw cartoon pedophilia

>It's ok to draw cartoon bestiality

>It's ok to draw cartoon rape

This is why the Wiemar republic failed and the Hitler burned all their books.

>>16916828

>hurdur hitler wouldnt have liked it!

Great, thanks. Next time I want a retard's opinion I'll ask for you by name.

>>16916818

Wat

Did you mean to reply a different post by any chance, bud?

>>16916833

>hurdur hitler wouldn't like it you shouldn't either

Like I said, retard.

>>16916499

>Mark can still post like a normal user, but that's all he can do.

This reminds me, it sounds so ironic and hypocritical that Mark has still been around parroting everywhere he shows up that he fucking "loves the community", and that's why bringing up a different /v/ is still in his plans.

No Mark, you don't love the community. If that was all there was to it, being able to post as anonymous should be enough. Heck, if you felt a genuine altruistic urge to contribute somehow, then being an anonymous BO without a face or an anonymous vol should have been enough.

No, what he loves is not the community. What Mark loves is being king of /v/, and the attention and powertrip it brings.

>>16916838

You are extremely assmad, why do you have this obsession?

>>16916833

It's almost as pathetic as a larping faggot who calls for censoring drawings and acts surprised when his dissident views get censored in turn by the same argument of obscenity. If you don't want free speech then go to Voat or Gab, being serious right now.

>>16915955

So how the hell did someone find a picture of Mark's asshole in the first place? All I remember is it being spammed all over /v/ suddenly one day.

>>16916859

It's not his ass, someone just impersonated him and Mark rolled with it because bending over is how you lose respect. If someone's convinced everyone around you that you made a mistake that isn't yours, if you own it, it becomes your legend and your shamelessness. Shamlessness is a barrier online as well, because no one can really call you out on it either if you yourself don't care.

>>16916871

You should take your own advice, since you literally log on every evening to flood the board in your shit because one of your forum friends told you to. Do you think you're fighting for some cause, or do you really want to touch children that much? You goons are all the same.

>>16916893

Supreme salt from a dead eyed fish.

>>16916889

>reddit tier formating and salty about anime tiddies

>Calls others goons

I havent chuckled this much in days, thanks.

>>16915737

>a guy named Mork will be your new BO

Wasn't he called Gork?

>>16916821

>>16916828

>>16916833

Drawings aren't people, goon.

Anyone can draw a children being raped, tortured and killed, and it is never a crime nor it is anything wrong with it, goon.

But being a goon equals being a real life child rapist, making it ok to kill, goons.

You will never get rid of lolis.

We will always throw you in jail to be raped or put bullets to your heads.

>>16916828

>m u h hitler :(

Hitler was also a vegetarian who hated capitalism, but I guarantee if I quoted some of his anti-capitalism or animal rights sentiments verbatim you'd call me a communist cuck.

Stormfags don't actually believe any of the economic or political Hitler believed in, they're just retards who blame the Jews for everything. If anything they're closer to libertarians economically.

>>16916986

>economic or political theory*

>>16915861

>went

You realize that writer browses this site, right? It's more reasonable to assume he saw the drama unfold and decided to make a thread about it. Wouldn't be the first time.

>>16917057

>Implying we give a shit about the opinions of Discord subhumans

Anyone who drops his anonymity in favour of having a faggy online persona is a subhuman and doesn't belong here.

Every single person in those screenshots should unironically commit suicide. Imageboards must be used and owned by anonymous people.

>>16916072

you're missing the big picture when you throw loli under the bus for… for what exactly? an imageboard for conspiracy theorists?

will Ron have to run to lawyers everytime whenever something controversial comes up to ask whether the content is going to be liablity or not? have we learned literally nothing at all from 4chan and gamergate? fuck

>>16916216

>I fully understand the stigma of allowing pedos to vent here, but there was nothing illegal ever, as far as I'm aware, except with /hebe/, but ironically enough the people posting CP on /hebe/ were the ones trying to run them away, and they succeed because faggot can't see beyond their fucking noses.

they succeded because /hebe/ admins refused to answer admins call for stronger moderation and fucked away to create splinter boards off 8chan where they could post more risque content which eventually became full fledged cp boards

>>16917069

>Anyone who drops his anonymity in favour of having a faggy online persona is a subhuman and doesn't belong here.

Well Mark did that and he's the reason /v/ as it is now exists. 8ch isn't the secret club you think it is anymore.

>>16917057

>/v/ users are loyal to me

>his community

Holy fuck, Mark. Goobers may be the ones sucking your dick, but that is no excuse to be this dumb.