/v/ - Video Games

If this shit somehow passes I'll take back half of the stuff I said about the JewSA government.

>>16633944

Shouldn't this be in the GG thread?

>>16633963

I thought this was some kind of gore, but it was really just a seashell next to a dog. God damn it.

>>16633944

That post is so fucking weird, the topic doesn't break anything other than the second rule which is super subjective and total gray area tier.

I thought itch.io was fucking based with their free and open source client, but now I'm more skeptical on what values they hold but then again other storefronts are also scatterbrained on what's right or wrong

>>16633977

the admin on that site are hard leftists who will explicitly delete anything that would "cause arguments" or is "nazi"

Could you give a bit more context? I'm not sure I understand.

>>16634004

TLDR: videogame hosting website with a hard-left mod team, doesn't want you talking about a law change where left-wing bias could get them sued

>>16633951

I fervently pray the law passes. Nothing would be more delicious than watching leftists cry salty, impotent, bitch tears as we drop redpills everywhere.

>>16634004

A law was proposed that would make it illegal for social media and websites to censor people.

>>16634013

THIS IS THE FUCKING GUY THAT TRIED TO HIDE THE THREAD.

>>16634013

Pretty based

>>16633944

>>16633977

>>16634013

No one knew about this before? The administration was always hard left since they're located in North California. They're keeping quiet about their stances so that they can gradually expand their platform over time, they'll also fold to the press if your game is controversial..

I'd suggest Gamejolt, but nearly every site is compromised. If you want complete control, then it's better to make a site that hosts the content yourself. If you want to incentivize people into using your platform, then you need to offer them discounts

>>16634013

They're also massive hypocrites, there's a jams about assaulting "fascists" and stuff and they never get deleted even if you report them for literally violating their content rules.

>itch.io getting their 230 revoked

Heh

Sucks for the people that don't scratch either side of the issue though.

>>16634076

Centrists deserve the bullet even more than leftists.

>>16634103

i got in.

i got asked "can i ask where you got this link" to which i replied "no.".

then i said honkler did nothing wrong, and that the honkocaust was a lie, and was instantly kicked out.

10/10 would honk again

>>16634130

Mate, this isn't a political issue I'm referring to.

>>16634076

They won't get their 230 revoked as they're small. It only affects large platforms that have a monopoly.

>>16634132

They already know which user dropped the link invite, they just wanted to know where.

>>16634176

Yeah I suppose that's true, could always try to keep the fire on their ass about trust shit

>>16634156

>They won't get their 230 revoked as they're small

If this gets passed it could very easily snowball and take a big, fat shit on all leftist cesspits. If you can argue that Facebook is limiting your freedom of speech then it's only logical you can also argue that smaller platforms are doing the same.

Goddamn that's HUGE

>Tech companies get a golden goose until very lenient conditions

>Abuse said trust

>DONT TAKE OUR RIGHTS AWAY YOU DESERVE TO BE CENSORED BY US REEEEE

>>16634218

Well you have to also bear in mind, a lot of people who have rules like that inherently believe their political ideology is the pinnacle of normality.

>>16634218

let me answer that for you

https://rexmundane.itch.io/lets-punch-a-nazi-the-twine-adventure

https://lara-falcon.itch.io/lets-punch-some-nazis

https://aquma.itch.io/grunkle-stan-vs-white-supremacy

https://oakreef.itch.io/super-fash-bash

(this one even won a "games VS nazi" gamejam)

none of these apparently violate the rules

>>16634230

>>16634218

Also a lot of "community" sites tend to be leftist as fuck now

>>16634230

yes that's why I'm asking if they allow topics talking about Elizabeth Warren or Hillary for example or even tech pieces that push the Russiagate shit

>>16634275

>"malicious, derogatory, discriminatory, bullying, harassing" and "demeaning"

Is "Demeaning" some new shit? When i heard it being used against japanese girl on bethesda conference it made me angry.

>>16634297

It means voicing any opinion that is right of Mao.

>>16634013

This is the purest form of a Homo Soy-pien.

I honestly hope this law passes, whoever proposed it deserves a medal.

>>16634338

i once left a comment hating on communists for being lazy vandals, and it got -2 downvotes. that's itch.io

itch.io should become a publisher. Game stores may as well be legally required to be treated like publishers if they continue to act like them.

>>16634338

>that pic

The absolute state of NPCs.

>>16634384

Envy is the driving motivation for everything leftists do.

>>16634393

None of those pictures were even sexualizing her, just simply fanart portraying her being happy. They must hate people who are happy.

no shit, cause this is the first step in making the internet a public utility managed by DARPA.

which considering that the ISPs are all owned by the (((masters))) of the old media that's probably a good change.

>>16634273

we did, and they can try and end up like the old guard we're currently replacing.

you think this guy isn't one of us?

>>16634399

They hate her because she's getting attention being feminine and cute, while they wallow in their pedophile shithole and make each other miserable.

>>16634393

Most of them are nothing but Narcissists and Contrarians who do these things so they can feel superior and special to other people.

That's how Veganism works as well.

They just have a need to preach how Not-Racist they are when they overlap that statement like the hypocrites they are by discriminating against people they don't like and cancelling good TV shows and erasing characters out of existence because they get off to making everything boring and tasteless.

The whole point of being a liberal is having prejudice tolerance, meaning even if you hate something or someone, it's none of your problem because it's just words, let them have their little rant and go about your business.

As Trevor Noah once said:

"Racism is better in South Africa because they're honest about it, meaning I can engage in talking to them to see why and how they came to be this way so I can help them realise the error of it. If we could engage in conversations more instead of shouting at each other for attention, the world might just be a little bit different."

>>16634415

>The whole point of being a liberal is having prejudice tolerance

That was never the point of liberalism, and they never adhered to this principle. It's more of the "rules for thee but not for me" they use to shut down opposition. You're not allowed to keep them out because it's "morally wrong", but when liberals are in power they'll happily censor, ban and unperson anyone and everyone they disagree with, because it's now "morally wrong" to be racist/sexist/conservative/etc.

>so I can help them realise the error of it

Oh yeah, those post-Apartheid crime and murder rates sure proved how right the liberals were to crush South Africa into subservience. Who cares they're now the rape capital of the globe, at least they're not racists, and in the end that's all that matters.

Fuck liberals, they should all be rounded up and shot.

I'm curious to see how this law will affect online games in general. Especially communities ruled by hugbox CoCs.

>>16634458

They'll need to increase their pill prescriptions once the nigger/faggot/cunt barrage commences.

>>16634458

Why do people keep forgetting about the mute button?

>>16634472

Because just muting people doesn't satisfy megalomania.

>>16633944

What exactly would that do to them? Would that mean games with character who looks below 18 that are porn would be banned because that could get them jailed if it was deemed obscene? Or is it about something else?

>>16634472

because it's not that they don't want to hear you, it's because to control the narrative they must silence dissent.

>>16634472

Because they need to prove toxicity exists and threaten a smear campaign against the admins to control the environment. It's always about control.

>>16634469

Nah, change the prescription to cyanide.

Probability of this law actually getting passed?

>>16634508

If it can get made into a partisan issue it probably could be passed.

>>16634521

You can bet your ass Google, Facebook and the rest will pour millions into lobbying against. The fact Google/Alphabet hasn't been slapped with an antitrust violation speaks volumes about how compromised the US government is.

>>16634533

actually, now that you mention it…

https://www.businessinsider.com/justice-department-google-antitrust-case-2019-5

https://www.businessinsider.com/ftc-oversight-potential-facebook-antitrust-probe-2019-6

>>16634536

It's a "maybe" on whether they go through with it. On the other hand, Google is getting sued for discrimination against conservatives and white/East Asian men.

>>16634508

Not good, to say the least. Social media was what cost the left the 2016 election. 2018 made it painfully clear that they were going to do everything they could to make sure that didn't happen again by deplatforming the right. Big tech is going to throw billions at lawmakers to make this go away or at the very least stall it in the hopes of getting a democrat elected in 2020.

>>16634508

0%. Absolutely 0%, there's no possible way for this to pass as long as Google and Facebook and the like exist on this earth.

>>16634558

Depends. Maybe the Democrats want to punish them a little for failing them during the elections.

>>16634009

>I fervently pray

No, ACT. Help bring about a better world with your 2 hands!

Haha hopefully this law takes down Facebook and Twitter when Nazi autists shit up their platforms like they do here and drive everyone away lol.

>>16634508

We must do what this site does best. AMPLIFY a message.

>>16634508

Lobbying alone would prevent it.

>>16634338

Will she download skyrim now that there are mods that let you lewd a character of her?

>>16634596

But I'm not a burger.

Publishers getting their asses handed to them is great, but what is itch.io? I don't really focus on forum/site drama and this is the first time I hear about them.

>>16634656

videogame marketplace thing. their payment processor banned alex jones as well

https://pollmill.com/f/what-is-the-size-of-miyu-komatsu-s-nipple-s26jvev

>>16634661

Who the fuck buys games on itch.io? Do they sell Steam keys or something?

>>16634665

>Who the fuck buys games on itch.io? Do they sell Steam keys or something?

you'd be shocked at the amount of devs there that literally do that

>>16634665

Why the fuck would you want a key to a DRM platform instead of a direct download of the game?

>>16634670

Because GOG is a thing? I mean, if you're going to buy DRM-free games at least pick a platform that is likely to last more than the next few years.

>>16634673

It is when you're the roastie not getting male attention.

>>16634653

>all of those chubby middle-aged white women talking about beauty

lmao

>>16634060

Oh shit. What an awesome list. I've been looking for something like this for a while. Real shame about GOG. Cyberpunk 2077 could make them a real competitor to (((Steam)))

>>16634704

I imagine it's not GOGs fault, but developers/publishers that can't be arsed to update their games. There's plenty of games on Steam that don't work right while the GOG version does. As an example, the Steam version of Freedom Force has a mouse bug that can only be fixed if you use the .exe of the GOG version.

>>16634060

What would you guys have to say about

dlsite and gamersgate?

>>16634677

>Because GOG is a thing

That doesn't answer the question. A steam key was asked for, not a GoG download.

>>16633944

Sorry buddy but free speech just means the government can't silence you for your opinions. When private businesses like Google do it they're just showing you the door.

>>16634734

explain a christian bakery denying faggots being bad then

>>16634734

Except that's not the law. Not every single 'business' is classified the same way when it comes to whether the government is able to force it to comply with free-speech rules. Stop posting until you learn to not talk out of your ass.

>>16634736

It wasn't leftists doing it.

>>16634717

I thought gamersgate shut down after people mistook them for gamergate and sent them death threats

>>16634734

>Sorry buddy but free speech just means the government can't silence you for your opinions.

It really doesn't. Free speech is a cultural institution. You might as well say just tolerance means the government wont beat you up for being a faggot.

>>16634740

I got a number of games after that. I haven't checked recently.

>>16634653

>her mouth is crooked

and her knees are too sharp

>>16634116

<As long as he doesn't fuck around with the deep state

Fuck off with the fearmongering you fucking kikenigger

>>16634072

And fuck you for trying to jinx this news dumbnigger

>>16634734

Companies don't get to decide when they want to allow free speech to be exercised by free peoples.

>>16634116

"Big tech" means way more than just videogames. Hell, most lefty forums where kikes and their puppets openly dictate what to think will not be affected, and this includes many online games. In particular, I'm pretty sure Resetera will not be affected at all. On the other hand, this law concerns jewgle, twatter, faceberg and other mass indoctrination platforms, and they will readily pour millions into trying to shut it down before it passes.

>>16634736

Private businesses are not allowed to discriminate against anyone for race\religion\ethnicity\sexual orientation\etc.

The idea is that, if you're part of a community (like those gays in that town) you should be treated equally as any other member of said community in the same circumstances since you too contribute to that community like everyone else.

It also helps to avoid polarization and radicalization, something that can easily happen once someone is ostracized and treated as a second class citizen in the community he is inserted. Check with your local incel community to understand why this is a good idea and why feminists are brewing some serious problems that will bite them in the future.

The "gay cake" is unique however since it also has the religious angle to it. In truth, it's easy to dismiss it since it's just a cake and it has nothing to do with religion at all especially since the wedding is also a civil and not a religious one.

However, forcing secularism on an individual is indeed against his own religious freedom and they should have focused on that. This isn't a bakery refusing to bake a cake for a couple of gays (that's discrimination based on sexual orientation) but rather a bakery that doesn't want to produce something that goes against their moral values and therefore perfectly okay.

Still stupid, pecunia non olet and all that.

>>16634769

>you must tolerate niggers

This is your mind on /leftypol/.

>>16634000

>joos

The consistency with which only retards use the word "joo" is incredible

>>16634773

What a retarded uber-simplification, as expected of /pol/.

At no point in that post can you infer that I agree with that, I'm only stating what the law and it's principles are.

You're also the kind of moron that doesn't even understand the words you use. There's a very big difference between "tolerate" and "accept".

You can "tolerate" someone or something existing near you, much like you tolerate a pebble in your shoes or a bad ache on a knee, and that's the reasonable response when you don't have the power\right to do something about it or when it's not much of of a problem and taking care of it is more trouble than it's worth.

"Accepting" something however, that's when you accept that this is normal, that that's how things are supposed to be from now on, either because you give up or because it's something you consider good.

I can "tolerate" faggots and niggers since I don't think I have the power to patrol their bedrooms and make sure no sodomy occurs nor do I think that rattling on a ghetto instead of letting them rot there will have a good outcome.

But that doesn't mean I "accept" either of them. I still think that homosexuality is a genetic defect and it makes as much sense to "accept" it as it would anyone with Downs, however I'll tolerate it for the same reason as well, because they did not chose it.

I also think niggers are a ridiculously retarded culture that's case number 1 for the Prime Directive and won't ever accept them to be on equal footing as anyone else on a civilized world, but I will tolerate them as long as they stick to their places since nothing good comes from interacting with them.

>>16634778

The likelihood that someone who gets offended by anyone mocking their scapegoat being also a retard is what's incredible. Can't even string sentences together or do anything else but repeat buzzwords and cliches.

>>16634218

You do realize that every single company, publisher, corporation etc. ToS is completely powerless and irrelevant when you use your country's laws against it, right? Your country's laws will completely rape every ToS on planet earth if it doesn't follow their own rules. ToS and other agreements boil down to "dude please trust me", you aren't legally obligated to follow them, they can't do anything if you break them.

>>16634017

I fucking hope you die, this image actually revived my depression. Fuck you.

>It is going to be a good day when this law is passed

We can only hope it's soon.

>>16634033

Steam appears to be the only platform with at least a quarter of a brain. They're kikes sure but at least they allow most shit. it's obvious lolicon wouldn't be allowed on steam and don't use that as an argument

>>16634786

>I'm only stating what the law and it's principles are.

The law is shit and the principles leftist drivel.

>There's a very big difference between "tolerate" and "accept".

Neither is acceptable.

>I can "tolerate" faggots and niggers

It's your traitorous, fence shitting tolerance that led to the current state of affairs. The slippery slope is real. What one generation tolerates, the next learns to accept. Your services are much appreciated, cattle, shalom.

>But that doesn't mean I "accept" either of them

What does it matter what you "accept"? Nobody is asking you, you're nothing, just a useful tool drunk on your own moral "superiority", a foolish leftists that thinks he isn't one.

If it wasn't clear enough, my dear fence shitting traitor, you're the reason we are in this mess. Understand this and maybe you'll be able to feel shame for once in your life.

>>16634786

>There's a very big difference between "tolerate" and "accept".

I don't think he's trying to conflate the two. Unless I missed something, he hasn't even mentioned accepting anyone and is merely critical to having to tolerate that shit in the first place.

>>16634746

We live in a CAPITALISTIC society, if you think companies shouldn't be allowed to do whatever they want with their hard earned money you can go back to communist Russia.

>>16634794

Anon, you're free to start your shariahetero militia and break into people's houses in the middle of the night to make sure they aren't buttfucking each other.

I'm sure you won't break any laws doing that or face any resistance or suffer any backlash enforcing it.

You're also free to start lynching niggers in public and I'm sure you'll have rivers of people praising you for your services. Honestly, what's your excuse for shitposting online instead of reloading your guns?

>>16634795

That's because to these imbeciles, both terms mean the same shit. It's the partizan mindset, you're either 100% for something or it's enemy action and it must be stopped.

There's a lot of shit that needs to be tolerated because the world ain't no utopia. This is part of growing up, understanding just how little you actually control and how important it is that you instead focus your strength on what you can actually do. You tolerate what you can't change so you can focus instead on what you can accept.

Frankly, all this tough talk about opposing this or that group reeks of underage LARPing and never leads to anything good. It's just faggots that can't do anything right taking the simple, short path to change in the hopes that they can contribute anything because being destructive is just that easy.

Try raising your own family, teach your kids and local community about why the nuclear family is so important or how to contribute towards your economy in a positive manner. Now that shit's hard and takes a lot of work. Much easier to shitpost again about "muh joos!" instead and complain that you can't do neither of that because you're under attack instead.

>>16634716

>monkey see

>monkey do

>or monkey gets beaten to death with a stick by other monkeys

That pretty much sums up the NPC lifestyle.

>>16634813

Why is that every time a centrist gets challenged on his love for niggers, Jews and other degenerates he immediately beings trying to goad people into violence?

Why would such a vastly superior intellect need to strawman his opponents for calling him a nigger-loving kike?

>you're either 100% for something or it's enemy action and it must be stopped

>letting faggots roam free and fuck each other isn't supporting them

You're either against faggotry, and thus agree that it should be outlawed based on moral and medical grounds, or you're for it. So which is it?

>It's just faggots that can't do anything right taking the simple, short path to change in the hopes that they can contribute anything because being destructive is just that easy

Or we could be centrist cucks and let niggers keep killing innocent humans and faggots rape children. Because we'd be bad goys for trying to put a stop to it. Can't have that.

>Try raising your own family, teach your kids and local community about why the nuclear family is so important or how to contribute towards your economy in a positive manner

Yes, let's all bury our heads in the sand and pretend whites won't be a minority in their own countries within our lifetimes. Gotta raise your daughter right so Jamal and Ahmed can gangrape her and throw acid in her face, or be forced to let little Timmy go to public school (it's the law after all!) and be brainwashed into becoming a tranny.

Remember fellow goyim, don't resist, do nothing, keep repeating the same shit centrist have been doing for the past 100 years, soon we'll get our civilization back. Trust us, true centrism has never been tried before!

>>16634811

>We live in a CAPITALISTIC society

You most certainly do not, the Free Market is a joke with how easily it is manipulated these days.

>if you think companies shouldn't be allowed to do whatever they want with their hard earned money you can go back to communist Russia

You're either underage or actually retarded.

There's a reason for laws regarding monopolies, anti-trust, anti-discrimination, safety and hygiene regulations as well as worker conditions.

Left unchecked, companies will take the shortest route possible towards profit, which means horrible working conditions, underhanded tactics, elitist attitudes and terrible products with innovation being extremely rare since it will hardly be worth it.

Worse still, with enough money they can create a monopoly and control the market or even an entire currency, ruining the whole idea behind it at that point.

You cannot allow anyone to work inside a system in ways that fundamentally undermine it and render it useless.

Case in point: Mussolini being "elected" and then making sure he wouldn't lose any more elections or pretty much any of Mexico, Cuba and nearby countries "democracy". You need rules to prevent auto-destruction of a system.

>>16634825

"but muh private company"

the nazi were called national SOCIALIST for a reason

>>16634838

That image was proven fake a while back, look it up. Could be wrong but I'm certain I'm not.

>>16634823

>Why is that every time a centrist gets challenged on his love for niggers, Jews and other degenerates he immediately beings trying to goad people into violence?

Don't pussyfoot and stop being obtuse. We've had this dance many times before, we all know how it all ends, "kill niggers\kikes\faggots" yadda yadda, nothing new under the sun.

Why the heck are you pretending otherwise? Do you only care about PR when it suits your argumentation?

>You're either against faggotry, and thus agree that it should be outlawed based on moral and medical grounds, or you're for it. So which is it?

Neither because there's more positions to take in this regard.

Following your logic, eugenics is perfectly justified and we should be killing anyone born with any genetic defect as well as euthanize anyone with a congenital condition based on moral (prevents him from spreading it to a newer generation, saving much suffering) and medical grounds (saves a lot of expenses when you don't have to treat them).

That's problem number 1. Number 2 is that, even if you outlaw it, it's a victimless "crime". When someone is robbed, he will report it to the cops. When someone is buggered, who's gonna report on it? Are you going to break privacy to make sure that no one is bum fucking no one else?

This isn't comparable with other crimes, it's a fucking nightmare to enforce and you'd have more success with your "war on drugs".

Problem number 3 is that you'd still be trying to outlaw something that's not a personal choice, unless we have already proven it otherwise 100%. Again, this would make as much sense as outlawing being born with low IQ. Retards and morons are a detriment to society, but they did not chose to be born like that. Should we jail them for that as well? Is that even moral?

>letting faggots roam free and fuck each other isn't supporting them

Supporting requires doing anything at all that benefits someone for doing a particular action. Letting them be faggots isn't supporting them. Giving them free healthcare to handle their AIDS, giving them family benefits as if they were straights, giving them media attention etc all that would be supporting them, but I'm not in favor of any of that so this is a moot point invoked by your partizan mindset.

>Or we could be centrist cucks and let niggers keep killing innocent humans and faggots rape children. Because we'd be bad goys for trying to put a stop to it. Can't have that.

Or we could be right-wing cucks and let all of that shit happen while we shitpost about it online. Because that makes us brave and strong natsocs and helps to stop any of that.

>Yes, let's all bury our heads in the sand and pretend whites won't be a minority in their own countries within our lifetimes.

Yes, let's all shitpost online and become socially inept, then act surprised that we never got married, never made any kids, never helped the white race and somehow it's someone else's faults. Game was rigged from the start, no point in trying! Stay online shitposting! By the way, you're a goy if you disagree with my blackpill, don't even try it!

I kept telling you to stop shitposting and go out in the world, actually making something.

You just don't like it because it would actually take work and responsibility to do any of that. Much easier to shitpost instead.

And despite you being the one that exaggerates shit to complain about how pointless it is to even try getting married and having kids, you're also going to say "Remember fellow goyim, don't resist, do nothing".

Cognitive dissonance is the roof of a partisan mind.

>>16634841

>That image was proven fake a while back

Sources: dude trust me

>>16634813

>Anon, you're free to start your shariahetero militia and lynch niggers.

For someone upset about absolutist LARPers, you seem to have something in common with them.

>There's a lot of shit that needs to be tolerated because the world ain't no utopia. This is part of growing up, understanding just how little you actually control and how important it is that you instead focus your strength on what you can actually do

None of that excludes resentment nor necessitates tolerance. Being unable to act on perceived injustices or whatever without putting whatever you have left in life at immediate risk is not the same as tolerating it. I'd say it's more about having to grit it, but I suppose this might merely be an instance of arguing semantics for us right now.

>There's a lot of shit that needs to be tolerated because the world ain't no utopia. This is part of growing up, understanding just how little you actually control and how important it is that you instead focus your strength on what you can actually do.

This is sort of what the other guy meant by what you tolerate today, your kids will accept tomorrow. I agree that it's a defeatist sentiment.

> It's just faggots that can't do anything right taking the simple, short path to change in the hopes that they can contribute anything because being destructive is just that easy.

I don't see how being angry about jewish influence or nigger crime online is destructive. And I'd like to hear what you have in mind when you say "contribute anything".

>Try raising your own family, teach your kids and local community about why the nuclear family is so important.

My wife turned 30 last month and we had our third kid the weeks before that. I think we're doing just fine and I still feel no need to mellow out aforementioned resentment.

>Now that shit's hard and takes a lot of work.

You get used to having two hours of free time (tops) after a while. It's a lot better than having too much time with nothing to do.

>Much easier to shitpost again about "muh joos!" instead and complain that you can't do neither of that because you're under attack instead.

Why not both? And are you implying there are no political forces at play right now that we might consider antagonistic towards the nuclear family, local community and our idea of a strong economy?

In short, it all sounds to me like you're in the wrong place.

>>16634845

Pretty much, all I'm saying is I definitely remember that image being called a fake and then one of my friends explaining how.

>your friend is a kike

no he's so far into /pol/ ass that it's actually annoying

>>16634852

Nice sources

>>16634854

All I'm saying is that that is what I remember so you should go ahead and double check your shit images so you don't make a fool of yourself one day.

>>16634836

Dunno what you're trying to say with this, sorry.

I do know Nazis actually invented the 8 hours work policy to prevent exploitation of workers and that they also nationalized a lot of industries near the end of the war (namely, steel and railroads for war supplies).

>>16634838

NatSocs should use this image more often. That quote is something every engineer and scientist can get behind, as is anyone that values their freedom and personal achivements but won't try to leverage them to control those around them. As in, it's the kind of quote that appeals to Torba (Gab) instead of Jack (Twitter) and makes the guy seem a lot smarter and more sympathetic.

Of course, this would also mean taking responsability for your own shortcomings and work on them, and we can't have any of that in the NEETSoc movement. :^)

All hail the group that is great regardless of us and makes us great regardless of how much we contribute! Just show your white skin and you're automatically a 180 IQ ubermench!

>>16634841

Why don't YOU look it up, tripleniggerfaggot.

https://carolynyeager.net/why-we-are-antisemites-text-adolf-hitlers-1920-speech-hofbr%C3%A4uhaus

For all sides in question, how hard is it to look this shit up? The people who have been inspired by /pol/ have not carried out their own due diligence and are no less e-tribal meme-reposting no-think redditors than the rest of them.

>>16634860

>that image was proved fake

<well…actually, I just heard it was fake… fucking shit natzee text images!!!

Kill yourself

>>16634861

>NEETSoc

I'm a Golden Dawn member and help the locals. What have you done for your country, faggot?

>>16634842

>kill niggers\kikes\faggots

You're the only guy arguing for that here.

>Why the heck are you pretending otherwise? Do you only care about PR when it suits your argumentation?

Next you'll tell me the Holocaust actually happened.

>Neither because there's more positions to take in this regard.

It's not. Either you agree homosexuality is an unhealthy mental illness that needs treating or you don't.

>ugenics is perfectly justified and we should be killing anyone born with any genetic defect as well as euthanize anyone with a congenital condition based on moral (prevents him from spreading it to a newer generation, saving much suffering) and medical grounds (saves a lot of expenses when you don't have to treat them)

Well, yeah. Why is that such a controversial issue? Do you want the taxpayers to foot the bill because Downey's mother was an irresponsible whore that decided to get pregnant in her 40s?

>When someone is buggered, who's gonna report on it?

The child that got raped by the homosexual and now has HIV? Is that your definition of a victimless crime? Oh, wait, you're so deluded you actually believe all faggots aren't pedophiles.

>Are you going to break privacy to make sure that no one is bum fucking no one else?

Just set up honeypots and catch all the faggots. That's how police was doing it before society went to shit.

>Problem number 3 is that you'd still be trying to outlaw something that's not a personal choice

Being a serial killer or a pedophile isn't personal choice either. What's your point?

>but they did not chose to be born like that

Yes, and? Need I feel sorry they drew the short stick with the genetic lottery?

>Letting them be faggots isn't supporting them

It actually is you clown. It's hilarious how much of a leftist you are, right down to redefining words to suit your own purposes. You allow them to congregate and engage in their degeneracy and molest minors to grow up just like them.

>Or we could be right-wing cucks and let all of that shit happen while we shitpost about it online

Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, if you'll excuse my meme. You've been free to engage in your idiocy for close to 100 years, and look where we are now.

>Yes, let's all shitpost online and become socially inept, then act surprised that we never got married, never made any kids, never helped the white race and somehow it's someone else's faults.

Projecting much? Remember, clean your room.

>the one that exaggerates shit to complain about how pointless it is to even try getting married and having kids

All I said was that raising"children right" in a fucked up world is merely making them sacrificial lambs. I bet you'd be the kind of cucked dad that never warned his daughter about niggers and then wonders why she's found dead in a ditch with 20 individual samples of semen in her orifices, all belonging to the local youf.

>>16634868

This is not how you have a productive argument. See the forest for the trees, anon.

Let me know when itch.io lets their politics actually impact their behavior toward customers. Until then they're one of the few doujin overseas releasers outside the Steam DRM hegemony that doesn't have asinine game standards like GOG. I don't waste my time on a retailer's internet forum because I'm not a dumbass.

>>16634013

a   fucking   leaf

>>16634875

>See the forest for the trees, anon.

There is nothing productive with centrist. They'll keep calling you stupid while offering no concrete answers, always telling you we need to keep doing what has been done for the past century, to tolerate degenerates, Jews, niggers and the rest because tolerance is a core Western value (it's not).

When you point out that tolerance leads to acceptance and show the current state of Western society he starts calling you a coward you're not gunning up and shotting a gay parade or a mosque.

Centrists are traitors, same as leftists, and they both have the same goal in mind.

>>16634851

>For someone upset about absolutist LARPers, you seem to have something in common with them.

Not being able to grasp sarcasm is a sign of autism. Or that you're getting upset and taking jokes way too seriously.

In the future, I'll provide some help by labeling sarcasm with the mandatory :^). Wouldn't want to disparage the mentally challenged, after all.

>None of that excludes resentment nor necessitates tolerance.

It should not exclude resentment but it does necessitate tolerance. You can and should resent the cause of strife, but if you can't tolerate it, it will consume you and prevent you from moving on to something more productive.

I resent every normalfag for what they do to any medium, how they ruin everything by being easily-pandered and profitable faggots that eat shit and ask for seconds.

But I tolerate it because I can't change the market by ranting about normalfags, only by supporting the things I like.

I tolerate Stellaris and Paradox in general, despite resenting them heavily, so I can focus instead in supporting Endless Space and Amplitude Studios, for instance.

>This is sort of what the other guy meant by what you tolerate today, your kids will accept tomorrow. I agree that it's a defeatist sentiment.

I don't think this is automatically true, it happens but not for everything so it should follow that it's not a set rule and there's more to this.

Sometimes, this is how things are supposed to be. The newspapers and the printing press were "tolerated" first, for instance.

Other times it has nothing to do with tolerance but rather that it turned out to be such a small problem it was ridiculous to worry about it. I mean, the gay population is such a minority sometimes it makes me wonder what the fuss is all about. Maybe it's not accepted because it's seen as something "stunning and brave" but rather because "Yeah, I don't give a fuck, whatever".

>I don't see how being angry about jewish influence or nigger crime online is destructive.

Besides the obvious examples (Tarrant), it's destructive to yourself. Focusing too much on opposing these things when you're likely not actually doing anything about it will prevent you from moving on with your life and actually improve yourself.

It's like when you start to worry about a series of tasks you have to complete or you start imagining what you'll do with the reward of a task. You'll spend so much time and effort thinking about these things that, when it comes the time to work on them, you'll feel like you already did a lot, even though you haven't even started!

>I'd like to hear what you have in mind when you say "contribute anything".

I meant it in a pejorative way. Infographs are all well and good but in the end, most of this is just preaching to the choir and doesn't change much. They also tend to brigade comments online, enforce mindsets across other boards (/v/ is natsoc everyone!) and nothing of this actually helps to solve IRL problems. It just paints any alternative to the current paradigm in a negative light while making themselves look as obnoxious as furries.

>My wife turned 30 last month and we had our third kid the weeks before that.

Congrats for that, Anon. Although I doubt you're being honest here, I'm still happy just in case you're telling the truth.

>You get used to having two hours of free time (tops) after a while.

I miss my NEETlife a lot but that's probably because my time is filled with work while yours is filled with your family.

>Why not both?

Why bother with that at all? It literally does nothing. You could just as well argue "why not take placebos with your regular medication?"

Of course there's plenty of forces working against all those things, even if I think most of them aren't as far-reaching as /pol/ would believe them to be (most journalists aren't jewish golems, they're just 40's single men\women that are incredibly lonely and spiteful of anyone genuinely happy, most SJWs are just coddled kids, etc)

But I think most of these problems are self-correcting in nature. Take gays for instance. Why would someone bother lynching them when they are perfectly happy to infect each other with a mortal disease? Take most commie shitholes like San Francisco. Why bother doing anything about them when they are becoming actual shitholes on their own?

I wouldn't even care at this point, I'd just raise my kids to be super confident athletes and watch them destroy the pathetic competition other parents put out, I'd just invest into real-estate for the coming craze that will come once everyone starts migrating away from the big cities too.

Most of these problems aren't solved with shitposting, infographs or making sure everyone thinks the same way in a videogame board. They are solved by investing in yourself and your family while everything else that's terrible rots away.

>>16634865

>I'm a Golden Dawn member and help the locals.

Beating untermench on the streets can hardly be considered helping. You might as well say you're part of a biker gang and you help your country by buying gas and beer.

I work in a factory as engineer that exports machines to other countries, directly contributing to the economy of mine. I also help to modernize our technology and local factories with better machines that make them more productive. I'm part of the reason several countries are starting to invest heavily in mind because no where else do they get specialized technicians that actually can take care of the equipment they work with.

>>16633969

>shouldn't this important news be berried in a containment thread where nobody will read it?

stop being gay you gay gamer.

>>16634888

>The newspapers and the printing press were "tolerated" first, for instance.

False equivalence you disingenuous cuckold. Why not mention miscegenation, homosexuality, transcendentalism, pedophilia, bestiality, fat acceptance, anti-colonialism, racism against whites, affirmative action and all the other filth leftists have pushed onto us? And before you reply, keep in mind that newspapers and journalists were at the center of lefties movements.

>mean, the gay population is such a minority sometimes it makes me wonder what the fuss is all about. Maybe it's not accepted because it's seen as something "stunning and brave" but rather because "Yeah, I don't give a fuck, whatever".

This is a centrist cuck. Look at this and finally understand why they are disgusting traitors.

>Focusing too much on opposing these things when you're likely not actually doing anything about it will prevent you from moving on with your life and actually improve yourself.

Yeah, because I can move on with my life with the knowledge minorities will steal all the jobs, destroy the infrastructure, rape our women, kill our children and turn Western countries into the same kinds of shitholes they fled from. Genius!

>and nothing of this actually helps to solve IRL problems

And tolerating faggots does?

>Why bother with that at all?

Yes, goyim, why bother? Just ignore it, faggots are a minority, niggers are a minority, spics are a minor… oops, they're not anymore, but just ignore it, trust me, they'll not slaughter the men and rape the women first chance they get. They're just like us, except browner, more violent and with a lower IQ. But just like us in all the other ways that matter!

>a mortal disease

AIDS hasn't been mortal for years now. Even infected they can live well into their 50s or 60s.

>Why would someone bother lynching them

>Why bother doing anything

>Why bother…

Indeed fellow anons, why bother?

>>16634868

You're mentally retarded and you can't make this brief, so I'll try to help you. G-D forbid anyone says I don't care about those in need.

>Either you agree homosexuality is an unhealthy mental illness that needs treating or you don't.

I don't. It has not yet been proven it's not a strictly mental problem, that there isn't a genetic or physical component to this. Personnally I believe it's the conditions the fetus develops while still inside the mother that dictate this. If it can affect the gender of the baby, it's likely it could affect it's sexual orientation as well.

>The child that got raped by the homosexual and now has HIV?

That's rape and that's already a crime. Nice argument you though you had there.

>Just set up honeypots

<actually being in favor of honeypots

<just sell drugs and arrest the clients, dude! nothing wrong with that!

>Being a serial killer or a pedophile isn't personal choice either.

<being a serial killer isn't a personal choice

Also, pedophiles aren't arrested for being pedophiles. They are arrested for possession of CP or because they molested kids. Again, the crime isn't their sexual orientation. Nice argument you though you had there.

>Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, if you'll excuse my meme.

<he says, as he shitposts even more

>All I said was that raising"children right" in a fucked up world is merely making them sacrificial lambs.

All you said is "give up, it's hopeless" while complaining that someone else is apparently telling you to "give up, it's hopeless."

Apparently, it's hopeless to try and have kids, but it's not hopeless to shitpost online. Who's the goy here? :^)

>itch.io Community » Tabletop Gaming » General » Discussion

>Tabletop Gaming

Could be the actual reason the topic was treated like that, perhaps if it was actually posted in the real general discussion board it would've been fine on it's own. Theres a topic on how it was handled within the actual General side, so it remains to be seen on how they'll treat it now. Perhaps they'll explain why with the reason I mentioned, or maybe they'll be shifty and act more harshly. Either way, I'm not going to accuse them of anything until further action proves one way or the other.

>>16634898

>False equivalence

I was giving examples of GOOD things that had to be "tolerated" first as an example of why this isn't a bad thing all the time, which is why I did not post any of the shit you listed. You're literally reading what you want from my posts, not what is meant in them.

>traitors

To whom? To heteros? To your country? To your religion? Who do I own allegiance to? Why can't you argue outside of your partisan mindset?

>because I can move on with my life

No, you cannot. And that's the problem that you refuse to understand, again, because it's easier to fight against shadows than to face yourself.

>>16634900

>It has not yet been proven it's not a strictly mental problem, that there isn't a genetic or physical component to this

Again, what does it matter what the source is? If it's curable why shouldn't they be cured of it? If it's not, why should they be tolerated?

Apply the same logic with pedophiles or serial killers. If you can't cure it why tolerate it?

>That's rape and that's already a crime. Nice argument you though you had there.

Nice strawman. Over-representation in rape/pedophilia statistics isn't the only incriminating fact that can easily be directed at homosexuals.

<just sell drugs and arrest the clients, dude! nothing wrong with that!

What's wrong with that? If you're buying drugs you're already committing a crime, doesn't matter if the police catch you while doing it or they themselves set up bait to get you. Next you'll tell me that police officers pretending to be children to bait pedophiles into revealing themselves IRL are doing something bad.

<being a serial killer isn't a personal choice

>being mentally ill is a choice

Centrists are genuinely the most retarded people, ever. Not even /leftypol/ is this fucking retarded, and they all believe they're women in men's bodies.

>Again, the crime isn't their sexual orientation.

>defending pedophiles

How leftist of you.

>All you said is "give up, it's hopeless" while complaining that someone else is apparently telling you to "give up, it's hopeless."

You're the guy telling us we shouldn't bother and just raise our children to play niggerball.

>>16634888

>Not being able to grasp sarcasm is a sign of autism.

As the other guy already said, the knee-jerk reaction to perceived intolerance has often been "WELL WHY DON'T YOU JUST KILL ALL THE KIKES, WHITEY?". There's nothing about what you've shared so far that would imply that you'd say it sarcastically instead of sincerely so far.

>Or that you're getting upset and taking jokes way too seriously.

U MAD was about 15 years ago. And you could just as easily argue that most of the calls for violence against non-whites is cathartic humor. In which case, your winded posts about why one should not shitpost at all for productive reasons lose a lot of their merit.

>if you can't tolerate it, it will consume you and prevent you from moving on to something more productive.

I used to think the same, but in my case it was more about exposure than tolerance. In short, I'd get worn out if I spent too much time reading up on child abuse and your typical nigger malice, but merely not immersing myself in that information so often was enough to gain a much more balanced and productive mindset. That, and being too busy to spend that much time fucking around on imageboards.

>Sometimes, this is how things are supposed to be. The newspapers and the printing press were "tolerated" first, for instance.

>I mean, the gay population is such a minority sometimes it makes me wonder what the fuss is all about

I don't know about you, but those two combined with corporate virtue signalling has made gay agenda shit ubiquitous in all facets of my every day life.

>Focusing too much on opposing these things.

You're assuming they are spending all day ranting about niggers. I don't see why that would be the case.

>You'll spend so much time and effort thinking about these things that, when it comes the time to work on them, you'll feel like you already did a lot, even though you haven't even started!

Again, an assumption. The idea that resent or hate disables you sounds like a progressive litany. I consider it releasing to be honest about the negative as much as the positive.

>I meant it in a pejorative way. Infographs are all well and good but in the end, most of this is just preaching to the choir and doesn't change much. They also tend to brigade comments online, enforce mindsets across other boards (/v/ is natsoc everyone!) and nothing of this actually helps to solve IRL problems

That's just the nature of a (culture) war, especially one that's online. I haven't seen fair neutral ground online since the mid 2000s, and I suspect that had more to do with the hottest issues back then being Bush invading Iraq whether or not games create killers.

>Congrats for that, Anon. Although I doubt you're being honest here, I'm still happy just in case you're telling the truth.

Believe what you will, but you need to consider that I'm in my 30s, so it's not an outlandish claim.

>Why bother with that at all?

Because I want to. Same reason I suspect you're wasting time having this conversation going in the first place.

>It literally does nothing

I unironically think ensuring there are places left in the world where you can say nigger and maintain anonymity is important. And being part of such communities, if you can call them that, is one way of doing it.

>But I think most of these problems are self-correcting in nature

It's not that we care about them hurting themselves, it's that they cause a lot of collateral damage. We have no way of removing them from us or us from them, that's where the frustration comes from.

>I wouldn't even care at this point, I'd just raise my kids

If you aren't already what you want your kids to be, it's very unlikely to happen. Trust me.

>Most of these problems aren't solved with shitposting, infographs or making sure everyone thinks the same way in a videogame board.

It's fun and I can't do this anywhere else.

>They are solved by investing in yourself and your family while everything else that's terrible rots away.

Again, you can do both. You talk a lot about being too focused on things, I think you should take your own advice.

Arguing on an imageboard with a few thousand people is low effort. All you'll do is vent and won't have any energy left to channel into actual change. I must have read hundreds of arguments online. They NEVER see the other person's side. There's NEVER understanding just shouting at your own understanding of someone's statement.

>>16634995

You're operating on false premises. Democracy was never meant to function with two diametrically opposite sides trying to find common ground. Only fools believe such compromises actually happen, or are even possible. All you get in reality is a crippled elected government that can do nothing of substance because subversive elements in society given voice and power will always hold it back.

Democracy was always meant to bring together factions that agree on a common goal but disagree on how to achieve it. Centrists are just idiots that fail to grasp the simple fact that most issues are black and white.

>>16634818

Ah right, I forgot about that experiment. How chilling.

>>16635035

Fuck Trumpstein.

>>16634734

>>16634811

>muh private company

>muh my money my rules

That will end soon. The will of the people is above any company's needs or rights. If companies became leftist politically, they must be destroyed. New laws must (and will) be made explicitly for that purpose.

>>16635069

And, what happens when the other side comes into power and then uses those laws against the people? Like how ever single Leftist law put into place for the past century is now "unconstitutional" because the Right came into power and is using the law exactly the way it was designed (Specifically when the victims just happen to be baizuo).

>>16634950

Please don't defend the underage LARPers. You know very well how this argumentation goes, what they chant in these moments and there's no shortage of "kill kikes\niggers\faggots" to corroborate it. If that's what they want to be known for, fine. But I won't accept complaints that that's how I see them afterwards. There's also nothing funny about yet another "kill all niggers, amirite fellow whites?". It's just spamming the same shit again and again and again.

>it was more about exposure than tolerance

Oh sure. Tolerance only becomes necessary when you can't avoid exposure. Always try that first. If you're living near a ghetto, you're gonna have to tolerate hip hop, but the best course is to not live there in the first place.

>those two combined with corporate virtue signalling has made gay agenda shit ubiquitous in all facets of my every day life.

Surely you're exagerating. I see it as nothing but PR moves and marketing for the sake of profit and understand it as such (which is why you won't see much of that crap in more conservative countries) but even then, there's plenty of alternatives for pretty much anything that you don't have to deal with it as much as you'd think.

>You're assuming they are spending all day ranting about niggers. I don't see why that would be the case.

They don't call them NEETSocs for nothing, Anon.

>The idea that resent or hate disables you sounds like a progressive litany.

It's not resent or hate, it's ranting and shitposting about it that makes you feel like you did something. Again, slacktivism is a thing.

>Believe what you will, but you need to consider that I'm in my 30s, so it's not an outlandish claim.

Stating your age to corroborate your story doesn't really help, it's just more "trust me dude". In fact, it's more harmfull since you stop trying to use anedotal evidence that you can't even prove anonymously when you grow up. Unless you're a boomer, I suppose :^)

>I unironically think ensuring there are places left in the world where you can say nigger and maintain anonymity is important.

Going to those places and saying nigger isn't what keeps them open nor does it open more. Like I keep saying, it's important and even feels good to do it, but it does not help or change anything.

>We have no way of removing them from us or us from them, that's where the frustration comes from.

That's bullshit and if you're in your 30s you should know this.

You can move to another city or state that's not so bad. Your kids can go to any STEM degree instead of liberal arts. Gated communities exist. You don't need cable TV when you have internet and there's plenty of alternatives for anything too. You can remove "them" from you, it just takes work but has amazing results. I mean, you're on 8ch instead of Reddit for a reason.

>I think you should take your own advice.

And I do. I've got a lot more going on IRL and if I bother to come here it's to have fun arguing every now and then. I dislike the partisan mindset taking over the site more because it stifles that discussion than because of any ideology. Now there's always some retard that shitposts about Trump in every thread to try and be funny or several threads made about how horrible everything is instead of focusing on good shit because that's what doomfags like to talk about.

I already have shit to keep me down IRL, I really don't need any of that on /v/.

>>16634995

A smarter person would realize this is just a modern iteration of "circus", indeed. But why bother actually doing something instead of having fun and shitposting instead? It's not like you lack bread after all.

>>16635004

Ridiculously wrong. The point of democracy is precisely to bring together factions that do not have a common goal at all but instead of fighting to have their way, they'll talk, compromise and make deals to get what they want, avoiding conflict in the process.

Everyone elected represents a goal that it's voters want to see completed, the more voters the more important that goal is to society at large and the greater weight is placed on it on the parliament giving it far more leverage when dealing with lesser parties that do not have so much support.

How Democracy is handled today has little to do with what it was supposed to be, especially the freak show that is the USA.

Instead of debating ideas, finding common ground and compromising for the sake of who elected you, it's all a partisan popularity contest, polarizing as many people as possible to make sure you garantee votes and get elected.

Democracy WAS made for the centrists to reach an agreement. You fuckwits are the ones that ruined the entire concept, made it into a government American Idol and now bitch about how you can't find common ground with the other side when that's mandatory to have things your way.

>>16634060

J-List has absolutely jewish prices though and they advertise on cuckchan, so take that as you will.

>>16635069

>The will of the people is above any company's needs or rights.

Not exactly right and barely matters, sadly.

In the instances where this is true, all it means is that you have to change the will of the people to suit the company's needs and rights and that isn't even that hard to be honest.

But most of the time, the people end up needing the company itself so their will ends up being "I want that company to continue in business" anyway.

Take for instance India and China fucking up the entire ecosystem with ridiculous levels of pollution. Isn't it the will of the people that we take care of our atmosphere and oceans so we don't end up poisoning ourselves? Then trade sanctions to curb their industry would make perfect sense. But does anyone want to pay 10000 for a cellphone? Didn't think so. So Apple and other companies will keep doing what they want regardless of anyone else because everyone else would rather have cheap phones then actually care about the environment.

>If companies became leftist politically

They don't. They just think the cool PR stunts they make will net them more sales (and in several cases, it does as Nike proved). You could check other countries where they sell the same products with none of the "progressive" advertisement on it because they know it's not gonna be well accepted there. If Americans ever wanted companies to stop pandering one way or another, all they'd have to do is prove it's not profitable to do so.

>New laws must (and will) be made explicitly for that purpose.

<MOAR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION WILL HELP

<TIMMY HAS THE GOMMUDISM!!::::DDDDD

>>16634059

Can you imagine being such a child that you don't understand ethics aren't universal? The winners decide what was right and what was wrong. If you don't win it doesn't matter what rules you played by. Leftists are completely right in the way they approach these situations and there is zero hypocrisy in it.

>If it's good for me then it's good

>If it's good for my race then it's good

>If it achieves my goals it is good

Mean while the right

>I sure would hope I wasn't unfair to those niggers, it would be a real shame if someone thought I was a bad person. I will spend 2 days debating the ethics of this situation so I can repent for my sins and do better in the future

One of these mind set wins. The other loses and feels good about it.

>>16635099

Companies don't make money off of spending it on gay pride parades. There's not enough of them to gain money and you lose markets like the Christian family market. Places like Walmart used to refuse to stock degenerate material and since that's the biggest store in the world it's a big loss.

The meme that it's profitable gets disproven time and time again. companies use marketing companies who are full of poz, all in the same little poz bubble. They argue that more diversity will earn more money but then you see Star wars pissing off China (big movie market) because it's full of niggers. If you're pissing off your number 1/2 market and losing money on it then there is a serious issue there which profit cannot explain.

>>16635106

Here's the (You) you wanted.

>>16635085

>The point of democracy is precisely to bring together factions that do not have a common goal at all but instead of fighting to have their way

If that's true then democracy is an even more ridiculously flawed system than I already thought.

>Instead of debating ideas, finding common ground and compromising for the sake of who elected you

Tow or more sides can be so diametrically opposed to each other that compromise is fundamentally impossible. For example traditionalists and progressive liberals have no common ground at all. The only "compromise" that they can ever make is simply "let's not kill each other right now. Lets put it off till later."

>when that's mandatory to have things your way.

When the other side wants to turn little boys into catamite whores and my side doesn't then you're Goddamned right that it's mandatory to have things my way.

>>16635198

Being banned from a single board is one thing, on sites like reddit you get banned from the whole site.

>>16635151

When someone explains something to you being a retard in response just means it wasn't for you. You weren't smart enough to understand.

>>16635175

Democracy is simply the weak banding together as a tyranny against the strong. That's what all the fag stuff comes down to.

>>16635225

>Democracy is simply the weak banding together

Bullshit. Democracy is merely a mask for the rule of the oligarchy. There's no such thing as "rule of the people" here.

>>16635273

You don't understand the post, fuck off back to /leftypol/ where you belong.

>>16634734

The funny thing about this is what guys like you don't think about is the consequence of not having your rights as a citizen respected once corporations rule the nation. Like they already do. T

>>16635144

>If the idea is that they prevent imageboards from being more open and inclusive

They make an imageboard more stale. The same jokes, the same ideas, the same things repeated ad nauseam. Even going to another board won't help if the same mentality is enforced across the entire site.

>I'm not. I'm in Northern Europe and it's Pride Month. MONTH.

My sincere condolences. I'm in the southern region of Europe, where machismo is still alive and well (if a bit annoying at times since it easily devolves into knuckle dragging nonsense) and we barely see any of that shit.

>I don't think that profits excuse poz.

Matters to them, that's what counts.

>I'm sure plenty of marketing and HR employees are true believers.

Irrelevant. They don't run the company, and when they do you get Vox and Buzzfeed where they only survive with venture capital.

>I wouldn't bother talking to you if I thought you were an irredeemable idiot.

Likewise. Even if I disagree with you, it's good to see that honest debate ain't dead. However I have no problem with NatSocs, even if I disagree with them. I literally give no fucks about the ideology war since I don't believe it leads anywhere. All I want is /v/ to be about videogames and any parttisan that tries to frame any dissenting opinion as a political stance by the Left should be shamed back to /pol/.

>Pic related

Hey, congrats on the little tyke, I guess you were telling the truth then, even if this whole bit wasn't really necessary. Anecdotal evidence is still anecdotal, even if it's something good as a wholesome family.

>why would try to stop them?

I'm not. But I expect the same courtesy when I point out how pointless this slacktivism is and I expect these rants to be contained in the boards made specifically for them. I don't want shit like this out of /v/ because it's offensive, I want it gone because it's not vydia and /pol/ or /b/ exists. If they didn't, I'd be the first to welcome these guys but at this point, their justification for overstaying their welcome here isn't that different from economic migrants.

>You can't possibly argue that white-flight is an answer

Why not? Some place becomes a shit hole because of someone else, why would you stick around and try to fix it? The sooner you leave the better conditions you can find elsewhere, before everyone else does the same and the more opportunities you have to entrench your culture and prevent it from being taken over when the liberals come along. You even get a good bonus of a case study as to why you don't things in a certain way.

I mean, would you seriously tell someone living in Baltimore, Detroit or Seatle "You have to stay there and fix that place"? Or would it make more sense that someone there would move to a better place and contribute there instead?

>The normal distribution practically insists on it being implausible.

Alright, you got me there. I'm biased since I'm an engineer too and my job is taking jobs away from other people. .^)

Still, it's not really demographic friction, it's social darwinism. If the left keeps giving out participation trophies all around, all you can do is strive to earn actual trophies and out-do them. If you can't beat them, you're not much better either.

>But, Anon. That's not very productive of you :^)

Caught me. I'm a severe procrastinator. As long as I keep posting I don't have to finish this work. :^)

>considering your productive reasoning, I don't think it's meaningful to "fight" it

Bad habit of mine that I keep trying to shake off. Always starts with a silly argument but devolves into serious discussion before I notice it. It's a personal flaw that I have to work on.

nicely derailed thread.

i read the archive anyway, should post this around and get more eyes on it.

>>16635294

>I want video games to be apolitical

Said the chump who will see games used as political propaganda against him or agrees with using it against others.

Do you think politics willl leave one of the largest industries in the world alone when its got the youth by the balls and can feed them moral guidance through in game rewards? You agreed with the liberal you get a power boost and a nice jingle. Keep chasing that reward until your brain instinctively links rewards with our ideology.

Fleeing only works until you run out of space and you will run out of space, Many European countries already are.

>>16635143

Anon, I'm going to let you in on a big secret: Companies are administered by humans. Big shock, I know, but keep in mind that this means they can fuck up too, especially since they get information from bottom up and the higher the hierarchy, the slower this is.

I recall an Anon explaining just why the fuck does Marvel keep pandering to libshits when that's not profitable and it was basically this: All the people in the middle of the company that are supposed to report on how their sales are going tell their bosses that they can't sell shit for several other things besides their virtue signaling and keep making excuses for it. "Kids like videogames, comics aren't as popular. People care more about the movies than the comics. Anime is taking a toll on us", etc, etc.

The guys at the top only have those reports to work on and they make decisions based on that, they don't actually talk with their clients or read their shit, which is why they don't fire all the idiots working there.

Vox, Buzzfeed and other sites are another story. That mentality goes all the way to the top, they don't need to make any excuses and if they stood around for so long, it's because the government invested heavily into them, something that's quickly running out.

And then you have examples like Nike. You say they don't make money of it, but that's not accurate. Nike saw a drop followed by a massive surge after that nigger protest. Faggots might alienate the christian family market (that has questionable value these days anyway) but niggers don't. Racism would likely bother them more than that actually.

>>16635175

>>16635225

Jesus Christ, don't you fags learn any history besides your own in school? For fuck's sake.

Democracy is attributed to the Greeks, but it didn't saw any use in Europe until way past the Industrial Revolution and then the French Revolution. France was about the first place that idea came up to be shaped into proper Democracy (which I admit isn't a good outlook on it :^) and at the time it had only 3 parties in it: the proletariat, the aristocrats and the clergy. The proletariat was essentially all the common rabble that worked like dogs and wanted better living conditions and they sat at the LEFT of the french parliament while the aristocrats that owned all the jobs and were tired of literally losing their heads to peasant revolts sat on the RIGHT to defend their rights as employers.

The entire purpose of them starting to use Democracy was to stop all the goddamn civil wars they were under so workers could be heard and their needs met while the employers could still remain competitive with England without ruining themselves. The clergy would eventually drop out as secularism took over but they were there mostly as mediators.

The entire point of it was to find common ground between mortal enemies to reduce the level of violence in the country, and you guys are seriously suggesting that Democracy only works in the situations where you don't even need it anymore! Might as well go feudal at that point.

>>16635315

>Said the chump who will see games used as political propaganda against him or agrees with using it against others.

Said the guy that can't quote a single post of mine that proves I think this happens. Nice assumptions, but political pandering one way or another always harms the quality of a videogame. It's only when it presents all sides and lets you come up with your own ideas that it works out (Deus Ex), not when it browbeats you with an obvious answer it wants you to accept, regardless if it's right or left.

>Do you think politics will leave one of the largest industries in the world alone

If they're smart, they will. Hegelians will make sure that anyone touching it will make sure the opposition gets more support. Soccer moms and Jack Thompson swang things to the left, SJWs are swinging it to the right. Anyone that cares more about videogames than politics will always support the group that messes the least with them in order to stop the others.

>Fleeing only works until you run out of space and you will run out of space

And at that point I will fight against whoever is chasing me. Now, are you going to keep chasing me to join your camp?

>>16634841

>>16634838

>>16634845

>>16634852

>>16634854

>>16634860

>>16634865

Because nobody else fucking bothered to look it up, it's in here: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler

And originally cited back to here: https://books.google.com/books?id=PxZoAAAAMAAJ&q=Our+adopted+term+%27Socialist%27+has+nothing+to+do+with+Marxian+Socialism.+Marxism+is+anti-property;+true+Socialism+is+not.&dq=Our+adopted+term+%27Socialist%27+has+nothing+to+do+with+Marxian+Socialism.+Marxism+is+anti-property;+true+Socialism+is+not.&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjP_pa_xcLYAhVPRN8KHRk2CKsQ6AEIPjAE

It's a real quote.

>>16635326

>Might as well go feudal at that point.

Sounds like a plan to me.

>>16635326

Do you think the people in charge don't notice when the comic side of thing bleeds red ink and has to be kept afloat by movies?

Nikes primary market is niggers, same with all sports shoe makers. They're not the only industry no matter how you cherry pick it.

>>16635341

No game will ever treat every side as equal and the same. Personal bias will always leak in. Even the concept of a single hero vs a party of heroes is a huge cultural difference. It's like Japan considers people to be gears in the family machine while the west considers people to be single members of a family unit. It's a fundamental different ideology that you're blind to and assume your own defaults.

>If they're smart they will ignore gaming so their enemy can take the ground

This level of stupidity is amazing. It's something even Gamergays figured out. Refusal to fight over a space means you lose that space to any one willing to fight. You can't win a defensive battle like this you have to be offensive and drive your enemies out.

>The people who care about games will support

any one who continues to give them bing bing wahoos while not going against the cultural norms. And as proven already you live in an extremely liberal industry which means left wing ideas reign supreme in all media except the very fringes.

I forgot just how incredibly stupid /v/ is. But what can you expect when you spend your life chasing high scores in fictional entertainment?

You're a liberal happy with liberalism. You deserve a bullet in the back of the head just as much as the pedos do. Enabling the destruction if the civilization you depend upon to live makes you a traitor. They won't accept you, we won't accept you so all you have is your bing bing wahoos and your anime masturbation until yew find those taken away.

>>16635198

>muh horseshoe

Who cares if 8chan globally banned every leftyfaggot? It's really not a loss at all, but even if you have some idiotic sense of "fairness" towards dys-civilizational retards, then they still have reddit and basically every other site on the internet to be a faggot on. If you want to see left vs. right shit-flinging there's Breitbart or the RT comments section.

If you want meaningful interchange between the ideologies of left vs. right, sorry but it's not going to happen. In general the modern left has become so enamored with insane ethnic replacement schemes and trying to normalize degenerate freaks and baby killing that they've more or less abandoned the nuggets of truth and effective policy leftism used to have. It's 100% cancer now.

>>16635326

In your own example democracy failed miserably until it was revitalized by a dictator for life in Napoleon. But anyway, western democracies have only survived because of 1) Populations with more or less compatible interests (i.e. before mass immigration, the interests of worker and big business of a given nation are fundamentally compatible and can be effectively litigated. Now they, along with the interests of foreign invaders, are fundamentally incompatible).

2) The transition from an implicitly national state with self-evident priorities (the betterment of the nationals' lives) to liberal democracy (whose priority is perpetuation of the power of the state's elites and makes no recognition of the nation it was founded upon) has made "democracy" thoroughly un-democratic. The decisions that have fundamentally transformed society were all made by deeply intrenched business, media, and government elites. Things like sodomite "marriages", mass immigration, birthright citizenship, mass enfranchisement of foreigners, and mandatory state secularism were all done against the will of the populace, and since most of them were done via declaration by a judge they are basically unchangeable within the current political framework.

Multiracial/ethnic democracies have an abyssmal track record of collapse (the ME and balkans), general dysfunction (Brazil and "Latin" America, majority Black municipalities even in the U.S.) and corruption (same).

>>16635385

>Do you think the people in charge don't notice when the comic side of thing bleeds red ink and has to be kept afloat by movies?

If they did, we wouldn't have Squirrel Girl.

>It's a fundamental different ideology

That is not political in nature, no matter how much you want it to be.

Deus Ex also manages to treat all sides equally, showing the upsides and downsides of every possible choice in it's final scene. It's sequel does the same and even the shitty endings of Human Revolution do it.

You also have Sid Meye's Alpha Centauri with several leaders having their own political ideas being represented equally so… Argument invalidated?

>Refusal to fight over a space means you lose that space to any one willing to fight. You can't win a defensive battle like this you have to be offensive and drive your enemies out.

My enemy is whoever is trying to mess with my hobby and here on /v/, it's not the Left that's trying to make every topic a political stance.

>You're a liberal happy with liberalism. You deserve a bullet in the back of the head

Funny, you know who saw this too? Also my enemies.

>>16635423

>In your own example democracy failed miserably

Dunno what you mean by this. The workers did got better conditions and living standards while the nobles got to keep their heads on top of their shoulders. That's pretty much a win.

If you're talking on a macroeconomical level, they were bound to "lose" since England had the Industrial Revolution drastically changing global economy. That was even why the protests started in France, they had to exploit their workers to remain competitive against England in the first place.

Napoleon is more a solution to their outdated industry and economy than to their democracy.

You're also again ridiculously wrong and seeing everything upside down. I just told you that the first instance of Democracy in Europe was basically Labor vs Aristocrats, the first wanting more rights and the second wanting the "perpetuation of the power of the state's elites". If Democracy lasted so long in the west, it's because it proved itself to be a good method to solve conflict without resorting to violence. Sure is good to change leaders without needing a regicide or revolution.

>mandatory state secularism were all done against the will of the populace

You fucking what, mate? Secularism was the WILL of the populace that wanted the church to have less control over their lives! Just how ignorant are you on this topic?

>>16634894

>Beating untermench on the streets can hardly be considered helping

Cleaning up the streets of third world trash is helping.

>>16635471

>nobles

>workers

Gas yourself commie.

>>16635423

>muh horseshoe

its this kind of anti-intellectual rhetoric that is so insufferable. It's just a smoke screen to allow for Fed posting and LARPers to degrade the quality of the discourse into buzzwords. Forcing everyone to chose a side in false dialectic is how (((They))) manipulate public discourse. More importantly, it's just rhetoric encouraged by FED's and Leftist to encourage people on the right to attack the sympathetic moderates who (often have better Optics) allowing the Left and to impose even more draconian censorship on the illusion they are fighting a right wing extremist bogyman that doesn't really exist outside of hony-pots on (((discord))) and gab.

>>16635949

lol, with the recent way Alphabet has been acting. You might have a hell of a harder time playing video games in the future.

>>16634665

They do sell Steam keys, but they also allow for direct downloads. I bought Copy Kitty recently, and the game files and OST were all available through links they emailed me afterwards.

>>16634861

They didn't touch Herr Krupp's steel empire. They let him do as he pleased.

>>16634472

because it's about propaganda and shutting down your enemy a.k.a. competitive spirited gamers, not whether or not they actually care about what you're saying

>>16636098

>They let him do as he pleased.

Incorrect. Mr. Krupp was allowed to remain in control of the company because he led the company according to the dictates of the government. Any business that went against it, or in other ways acted against the common good, was nationalized. Nice try, kike.

you can't organize information without favoritism

>>16634670

>DRM platform

Steam has DRM free titles that work without the client. DRM's an optional thing per publisher.

>>16634004

My understanding of it is currently websites have the protection of a "platform" while acting as a "publisher."

>platform: just place for people to put things, but not legally responsible

>publisher: curated content, legally responsible for things posted

Currently websites are mixing the two, curating content like a publisher while absolving themselves of being responsible by saying they are just a platform. This law will force them to pick one of the two, which if they decide to become a publisher it means they will be legally responsible for anything posted.

OP here.

thread number 2 locked. they have doubled down

https://itch.io/t/492071/itchio-admins-dont-want-you-revealing-law-may-no-longer-be-protecting-their-business-practices

http://archive.fo/rwGhc

>>16637005

https://itch.io/t/492676/leafo-is-suppressing-legal-information-he-doesnt-want-you-knowing-about

here's thread number 3. watch this to see if it goes down too.

>>16634508

Can we contact our rep and senator to support it? That sounds like an actionable thing to do than just post on the internet.

>>16634841

>fake

It's just colorized.

>>16634013

>"toxic" people should not be "allowed" to exist

>btw we decide who is toxic

These are probably people who wanted to throw the Covington kids into a woodchipper for the unforgivable crime of wearing a hat and smiling.

>>16637655

basically their argument is "you're being a meanie poopy head thats why we're removing your posts" while baiting you into acting belligerently by removing your posts so they can go "see? What a shitlord. We're better off without him or his posts :^)" Its leftist pathos "reasoning" applied in a roundabout way.

>"Provide proof that no discriminatory censorship exists"

>Provide proof that nothing was deleted.

All this is going to do is give tech companies a wrongthink quota they need to fill in and submit.

It won't even need to be one of their customers they send in as proof either.

>>16637753

>anorexia > obesity

Yes, but consider the simple fact that you should FUCKING EAT, NIGGER, AND NOT STARVE YOURSELF LIKE AN EMO TEEN OR GROW FAT LIKE AN AMERICUNT IN ANY CASE. Fuck you and your faggotry.

>>16637770

>>16637753

If you don't want to get fat stop eating starch, it gets stored as fat since the human body lacks the proper enzymes to digest cellulose completely. Sugar+starch tells your body to store starch as fat.

>>16634275

Screencapping this shit to post it next time some cuckchan faggot goes "but we're just as bad as them amirite xDDdDdDdD!1!!"

>>16637796

Harder to digest starches like bread also make you fatter, especially processed soy shit.

>>16637802

Makes sense

>>16637802

Then let them die for being dumb niggers who can't do what every other animal with a basic learning ability can do.

>>16637808

Lack of impulse control is a very modern thing anon. With access to immediate stimulus, synthetically nutrient enriched food, and more, the issue is no longer an individual's nature that predisposes them to impulsive behaviour, but the individual's nurture. Think of it like this: in Christian times they used to take the impulsive and put them in monasteries, in order to teach them temperance, humility and modesty. These people would have been those born impulsives: the monastery was incredibly effective at quashing this entirely genetic behaviour. The answer to uncontrollable decadence is asceticism.

>>16637821

didn't in the case of people like the Buddha , it required self refinement through stuff like denying your self food within asceticism when he was a guru ?

>>16637811

Nigger everything bad is caused by jews one way or another, if you don't like talking about kikes behind things you're objectively not going to fit in here and should find some place less dedicated to the truth.

>>16635059

Oh fuck of you child.

>B-uh he kissed a wall

I've said this before, I'll say it again.

The economy is booming in my state minimum wage went from to 7 to 9.50.

My town even burger flippers make $11 an hour. With benefits.

Housing market is booming which is good because my mom is selling her house and needs the income for retirement.

You don't sound like someone who lives and operates as an adult, so either you're a child or a leach off your parents.

>>16637884

>implying every kike isn't guilty of being a kike and therefore deserving of death

>>16637855

also that is more concise yes

>>16637876

Boomer tier logic that got us into this mess to begin with (especially the selling house part.) If the economy is so great why don't you support her so she doesn't have to sell her house? Why does she have to sell it in the first place?

Most of the economy is going to nonwhites.

>>16637884

>they made the term to shelter themselves

Correct. I disagree with where you decide to go from here though.

Because they hide among the whole and cooperate to shelter each other THEY ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE. All of them. Down to the last 1/128th jewish infant.

>>16637884

Wrong. The jewish race itself is evil, and deserves extermination. Trying to just say

>well it's only a individuals, there's no racial aspect

gives countless kikes the excuse to say

>teehee I'm not like the other kikes!

only to screw us again years later after we showed them mercy.

Gas them all.

>>16637898

>Boomer tier logic that got us into this mess to begin with (especially the selling house part.) If the economy is so great why don't you support her so she doesn't have to sell her house? Why does she have to sell it in the first place?

No its called living in the real world, you would rather have support someone who would never get elected in the first place and ignore real responsibilities.

Why don't I support her? Because its a 1.2 million aging house that has a semi-annual tax rate of 16k. Which would mean I would need to make 160k+ a year before tax to be able to afford 32k tax on top repairs as its an aging house.

What I can't pay to help get fixed I do myself you cocksucker.

She has to sell it because she blew all her money because she's a pychotic bipolar whos'e pills aren't working as well because she's belt up immunity over the years.

She also has health problems because she was hit by a semi when she was a teen.

Reality is not shitposting with other underaged kids larping about your made up adult lives,

>>16637953

That image has nothing to do with my post. The image is related to the type of posts that say

>go and shoot some kikes right now

and other such phrases which are actionable, immediate threats, the makers of which are usually feds as the Michael Rod case testifies to. However, saying that kikes deserve to be gassed, and that there are no good kikes, is nothing like that. Fuck off, nigger.

>>16637973

Nothing I said was untrue, and it was also not illegal. If retards like you were around during the time of Hitler, guaranteed you'd have called him a shill or a fed because how dare anyone speak out against the 'chosen'.

>>16634013

>hurr durr why isn't everyone worried about toxic masculinity like I am

jesus this guy should kill himself

I may just be old but what’s wrong with gog? Isn’t it the drm free paradise /v/ always said they wanted? I’m just surprised to see so many people still buy shit on steam

>>16638071

>competent leader of industry makes a request that isn't in conflict with the policy of the government

>government acquiesces

<REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HE DID WHU' HE WANTED

Spare me.

Isn't there a new law being signed into effect or at least being petitioned that makes it so the 1st ammendment also applies to companies?

>>16634653

Sorta gotta agree though. She's a cute asian girl, but not a whole lot more.

Also none of the commenters are saying they are more attractive women themselves, so what the fuck are you guys on about? If any of you ever commented on the attractiveness of a girl without being an attractive girl yourself, I mean, just go ahead and kill yourselves.

I guess you could say they are doing the "crabs in a bucket" thing, but they aren't denying she is cute, either, so yeah. Furthermore, no proof any of these aren't wives nor mothers. What an appalling display of confirmation bias.

>>16638290

t. old hag

>>16638290

>but not a whole lot more.

She's also an athlete, but keep on being jealous.

>>16638615

>We closed your topic because you accused us of trying to hide things

Fascinating strategy, I wonder how it plays out.

You guys really think this is going to pass under Democrat controlled House? lol

>>16638943

Who is that spic?

Throw him back to Mexico.

>>16639378

Thats Yanderedev.

>>16639459

Not only genetic trash but also fucking retarded to boot. I dont know if you've ever seen his code but fuck, i've only taken 1 basic coding class and read half of a c++ book and i could optimize his code better than he can.

>>16637783

>I was locked in chastity, I had to go

This nigger is grade-A pure, uncut, retarded.

Chastity cages are usually plastic, meaning he could just break that shit off. But let's assume it's metal.

One, they use fucking airport locks on those fuckers, and the most secure one on the market is still easy to shim, or just pick with a fucking paperclip. I'm a goddamn moron but I was doing this shit for years.

Let's assume he's even more stupid than I. He can get a pair of bolt cutters and cut the lock. Hell, with those tiny locks, you can use a pair of pliers.

Let's assume he's stupid and too soy addled to break it.

Why didn't he just ice up or grease his dick outta it? I used to jam my dick into all sorts of shit for jokes when I was a young man, the dick and balls are nightmarishly elastic. Seeing as he's a faggot, he should know this.

Goddamn, is he a true npc? Do they not have these problem solving skills? I think about how to solve problems I don't even have.

>>16639611

>if statements stacked 10 deep

>no switches or enums

>string comparisons for boolean statements

>90% of those if statements don't even matter because "Insanity" is the overriding condition in every instance

And most of all

>no comments fucking anywhere

>>16639608

As a nodev, what's wrong with this code?

>>16639666

IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF

>>16639666

ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE ELSE

>>16639666

>>16639631 sums it up, I don't have anything else to add.

>>16639692

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branch_table

Some languages also have interoperability between enumerators and switch statements.

>>16639378

thats one of us, a fellow channer, the one and only Yanderedev, our boy

>>16639687

A switch statement is only compiled the same as an if statement in the absolute worst case. For long chains of ifs (which is his ENTIRE CODE BASE), switch statements will always win out with a decent compiler.

Second, even if we accept your false statement that ifs and switch statements are the exact same in everything but visuals, his if statements are STILL fucking awful. From a readability standpoint, he could lower his amount of code substantially by using substring searches instead of equality comparisons. Simply changing it to 'this.Witnessed.contains("Insanity")' would cut the amount of code in half, be far more readable, AND it would be faster. He should ALSO, if he wants to continue along this path, be using final string constants, not manually putting in the string for comparison each time.

You could write an entire book on how NOT to code just with that first picture.

>>16638290

If you're autistic, you have to read in between the lines of what they do. They're also nitpicking at small details, looking for the smallest yet unimportant flaw to criticise regarding her appearance.

We don't have the full context of what the photo was published for, but inference says its a publication regarding sports and the asian girl's participation. If that's the case, then much of the commentary regarding appearance is besides the point, and what they've independently brought up as a forefront of their concerns (appearance, attractiveness).

>>16639689

He's right though. The majority of bitching about yanderedev's code is that it looks ugly. You can't seriously be suggesting that switch statements and enums would fix his performance issues.

The thing is, I'm sure he really is a terrible programmer. But I have yet to see anyone dig into his code and find out what is really making the game run like shit. It's always 'look at this n3wb's elseifs, am I right fellow l33t h4ck3rz?'

>>16639757

Didn't read >>16639715 ?

>>16638162

They steal pirate cracks and sell them on their on as well as effectively being steam with their gay ass client locking you out of online features of some games.

>>16639840

>They steal pirate cracks

No theft occurred, they just made a copy.

>>16639783

The post that was mostly complaining about readability? Yeah, I saw it.

While shitcode 1.png contains obvious inefficiencies, I am not convinced that snippets like that and snitcode 3.png are causing the performance issues. These two examples get brought up every time because they're ugly and easy to laugh at, not because they're critical flaws.

>>16639874

He also talks about switches being faster than ifs with any decent compiler, substring searches and final string constants. Visuals don't make up anywhere near "most" of the post. And there's other posts earlier in the thread talking about how shit like this is getting run every frame, which obviously is going to add up. Failing all that, go through the code yourself and figure out whether there's something else even stupider in there. It's open source last I checked.

>>16639840

>They steal pirate cracks and sell them on their on

That does sound a little iffy morally and meritorically, but legally they're in the clear since GOG are the ones with distribution rights.

On the other hand, it's a very stupid idea to pursue litigation as a cracker group, and GOG doesn't have the source code for the cracks in any capacity anyways.

But it's pretty dumb in terms of the overall software, to have both DRM and something that breaks said DRM. Generally, customers have no real way of assessing software design quality with proprietary software to begin with, and really it's not a metric anyone thinks about when buying a game.

>>16634863

>For all sides in question, how hard is it to look this shit up? The people who have been inspired by /pol/ have not carried out their own due diligence and are no less e-tribal meme-reposting no-think redditors than the rest of them.

If you look anything up these days related to Hitler, without search engine personalization, the average person is going to get at its most modest, mundane bullshit regarding Hitler and Nazis. E.g online magazine articles on how Hitler's underpants were found in a hotel or whatever. Or tranny blogger's social media spergout on "nazis" in terms of the gay anarchists' buzzwords.

I can entirely imagine people being uninvested to sort through the garbage. Much less dig deeper and find accurate translations of Hitler's words.

>>16634060

Not sure how much this applies, but Mangagamer just recently released a patch to their Higurashi vns(Chapter 6) that took away the original music with rerecorded sounds and new music from 07th

Expansion which caused a lot controversy. The only other possible issue I see is the curation, but I don't see any problems there.

>>16639748

It's pretty fucking obvious the article was something along the lines of

>you won't believe how beautiful this athlete is

or some bullshit to generate clicks. Of course most of the comments are people who took the bait and were disappointed.

>>16636040

She's the one who designed Bayonetta in the first two games, which would also explain Bayonetta's redesign in 2.

>>16643958

Wrong, Bayonetta's designer was Mari Shimazaki

>>16639986

Its even worst if you want information on trump, there are thousands upon thousands of new articles on fucking nothing or misinformation of trump shitting up any real info on him and the election. Its fucking insane, I wouldn't be surprised if internet archive delete hitler speeches and shit just like they did for the christ church shooter "to prevent violence" even though they have hundreds of thousands of vids much worst for other ideologies. Its goddamn insane, if its not censorship its info overload, and if you haven't been archiving stuff since at least 2015 you are fucked.

>>16633944

Just wanna say hello, recognize you and you're doing good work.

Interpret this emoticon however you want. :)

>>16636040

r34 mate

no exceptions.

>>16654945

she has already been lewded anyway, it was posted right in the e3 thread as it was ongoing