180341 No.16132859
https://archive.fo/j98mi
>“Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as ‘any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes’. The qualification ‘by whatever means’ reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline. It includes, inter alia: visual material such as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments.1
>“The Committee urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse material in any form. The Committee notes that such material is increasingly circulating online, and strongly recommends States parties to ensure that relevant provisions of their Criminal Codes cover all forms of material, including when the acts listed in article 3.1(c) are committed online and including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.”
Remember that they tried this 3 years ago with Japan, AND IT FAILED:
>FEMALE JAPANESE REPRESENTATIVE REFUTES UN SUGGESTION TO BAN MEDIA DEPICTING SEXUAL VIOLENCE
https://archive.fo/NVLAJ
91fb9e No.16132868
I hope Japan rejects this shit again, but the Olympics next year have me worried.
9c80ef No.16132874
can we ban the UN instead?
2a6af1 No.16132885
>>16132874
Absolutely not.
The UN is of great importance.
Just think of all the great things It has done over the decades.
Who can imagine what kind of miserable state the world would be in without them?
a4f921 No.16132898
>It's another "UN focuses on cartoons instead of real pedophiles and pedophilic content" episode
940bd4 No.16132900
Bring it the fuck on, then.
If they wanna try this shit again, they can go ahead. They'll fail, though.
7d35f1 No.16132901
So when are we going to go out into the streets and hang UN representatives? I'm still waiting for the day of the dakimakura to come.
b5aa7c No.16132907
>>16132859
>realistic representations of non-existing children
The fact that they can acknowledge they're trying to protect characters that don't actually exist and still push this is mind numbing.
>>16132894
That's tame compared to what happens when a white school girl wanders too close to a no-go zone.
43a69c No.16132912
Does it honestly even matter? With what army are the UN going to enforce this? No one takes the organization seriously, not once have they successfully stopped a genocide since they became an organization, it's a joke.
c2ce1b No.16132915
Reminder that the same thing has been in effect since 2001 and nothing really happened.
The new shit is pretty much the same regarding to loli/shota to a previous one, the UN always had this loli hating ideology.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/opsccrc.aspx
(c) Child pornography means any representation, by whatever means, of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes.
23a96d No.16132917
>UN
Does any counter even give a flying fuck about the UN? They have zero fucking control and are just globalist puppets.
43a69c No.16132923
>>16132917
They do when there is one non-puppet out in the world they want under (((their))) tentacles.
af01fa No.16132924
>>16132907
>That's tame compared to what happens when a white school girl wanders too close to a no-go zone.
You're right and that's the real problem but, ya know, not gonna tempt fate and google "muslim rape gang".
>>16132912
>With what army are the UN going to enforce this?
None. Just constant oy veying until nips get so fed up they'll yield. Has worked on smaller scales.
f3cb11 No.16132928
if this passes I'm gonna shoot up the un with all the forks and spoons I got at home
43a69c No.16132933
>>16132924
I hope to God some day, one of these countries just withdraws from this sham of an organization, but it's not going to happen as long as they're a ZOG.
c7821e No.16132937
This is a coordinated attack, South Korea too is folding over a new radical feminist government. Remember the mad president who was actually controlled by a cult of feminists? The one who replaced her is even worse.
1. All men are jailed immediately after being MeToo'd.
2. Women testimony is more important than contrary evidence in court: if you have proof you didn't do it, that doesn't matter.
3. All crime against women is now considered graver than against men, who are second class citizens.
56f256 No.16132942
Reminder that Denmark legalized loli after a research that showed it had no positive correlation with child abuse (positive as in "more loli = more abuse").
23a96d No.16132946
>>16132943
>nothing to do with vidya
Nigger have you seen what sony is doing?
deba22 No.16132949
>>16132943
>Bans on fictional things won't affect vidya
940bd4 No.16132951
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16132943
Being a lolicon doesn't make you a pedophile.
56f256 No.16132952
>>16132943
>>inb4 faggots ITT desperately try and justify that they're aren't pedos
Pedo mean you like pre-pubescent children, the second the character is presented as post-pubescent, it stops being pedophilia.
Loli has nothing do to with age, it's just a body type, so it's not necessarily pedophilia, though it can be.
>not vidya
>implying banning loli won't have any effect on vidya at all
I bet you're the kind of fag that'd screech at SOPA threads for not being vidya.
7d35f1 No.16132953
I just want this cyberpunkish nightmare to fucking end already. I want an 8chan country. I know we would be able to do that, we have everything in place for it too, we're basically like a nationality when you think about it.
>We have our own culture
>We create our own art
>We have at least partialy, our own language
>We have our own jokes
>We have our own symbols
>We have our own philosophy
>We feel attached to each other and think that we're similar people, while being different from others normalfags
I want a country in which wouldn't be run by a bunch of nofun faggots that will censor everything they don't like.
c2d361 No.16132958
>>16132859
>UN being tards again
Who even fucking benefits from banning this?
f3cb11 No.16132960
>>16132953
you are a poor, uneducated, undarage, retarded larper and I feel sorry for you
91fe51 No.16132964
>>16132859
>Recognizing "UN authority"
Literally just a bunch of nobodies in a room waiting to be bombed, they can't do shit.
a419d3 No.16132968
>>16132958
The UN could possibly look good for "helping children" as a cover while they continue to rape kids and do contribute nothing of value to anyone.
e47c7a No.16132972
>>16132953
>I want an 8chan country
>I want a country in which wouldn't be run by a bunch of nofun faggots that will censor everything they don't like.
b608ec No.16132973
>>16132951
>posting uses Zizek to defend loli and perpetuates the "only governments can censor you" meme.
The only good thing about that video is that it does technically defend loli shit, but the arguments used to get to that point invalidate the entire argument.
b608ec No.16132975
>>16132973
>*posting a video that
23a96d No.16132977
>>16132972
>nuwojak
go back
04ebc6 No.16132979
>>16132968
>contribute nothing of value to anyone
That's a lie. They do help the Jews.
bd4132 No.16132982
and I propose the UN just remain a meeting ground for whatever the defense council (the only ones with any real say) want to discus and immediately drop the moment they go home, but I guess we can't always get what we want.
5c182c No.16132984
>>16132859
>uch as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online;
WRITTEN MATERIALS
What the actual fuck? It doesn't even need to be drawn, it can just be fucking WRITTEN to get b&?
2a6af1 No.16132987
>>16132937
This all could have been avoided if Hideyoshi's invasions had worked out.
af01fa No.16132991
>>16132958
It's a power play. The conceding party opens the precedent of being a bitch and I wager the endgoal is making sure only ZOG-approved content is consumed (drop those problematic manga and nip games and get a subscription at blacked.com, goy).
04ebc6 No.16132992
>>16132987
It could also have been avoided if Roosevelt didn't fuck them over in his quest to ensure communist global domination. Imagine a world where Korea is rightful Japanese clay and chinks had been wiped out to ensure Japanese lebensraum.
940bd4 No.16133002
>>16132973
While Rikafag is still right in that video, he does get on a fucking high horse a lot because nobody can find any contradictions with his arguments. But the only reason nobody can form a good counter-argument against him is because most of his audience is dumber than him, which is because his audience is either from the faggoty "anitwitter" community, from YouTube comment sections, or from the dumbest parts of 4um and this place.
23a96d No.16133006
>>16133001
Wouldn't it just make them louder
bd4132 No.16133008
>>16132992
Hell imagine a non pozzed America. Had our ancestors fought for the right side we would have control over the entire American continent by now. Japan can have East Asia, Germany can have Europe, and Itally can have Africa (or more honestly it's resources). Instead they got Jewed and chose a new dark age.
856d44 No.16133009
>>16132894
>Be Czech
>Don't have to deal with this bullshit because majority of the population are linguistic nationalists and are xenophobic to boot
Man, this country has a lot of issues, but safety and being cuckolds to shitskins is not one of them.
c7e28e No.16133011
REMINDER THIS'LL EFFECT SHOTA TOO
c2d361 No.16133013
>>16132991
That's what I don't get, why is this flavor of porn the one not zog approved? Why does the jew fear the samurai?
23a96d No.16133014
04ebc6 No.16133019
>>16133009
While we in slavland don't have yet to deal with this shit, it's coming our way eventually, of that you can be sure. Once Western Europe is filled to the brim with niggers and shitskins they'll try to offload the rest on us, and since most of our politicians are corrupt cucks they'll name the price and do the deed.
940bd4 No.16133020
>>16133011
While the gays rightly deserve to not have access to this, this will also affect /ss/, and that cannot be forgiven.
23a96d No.16133023
>>16133012
It's US Law, not UN law. The UN does not control any countries laws.
eaf96a No.16133026
Which loli is good at domination?
514b36 No.16133029
>>16132937
>Japan takes over Korea
>Brings with them technology and industry
>Turns them from a bunch of assbackwards dirt farmers into civilized decent people
>Japan gets kicked out, Korea massively butthurt at Japan despite them doing nothing wrong, lifting them all out of abject poverty and being the sole reason why Korea is a technological powerhouse today instead of being the Africa of the East
>Korea makes up a bunch of bullshit about comfort women and such, basically their equivalent of "MUH HOLOCAUST"
>Japan goes "Fine" and decides to use their wealth to poz the ever living shit out of ungrateful koreans and control their courts from the shadows
Don't bite the hand that feeds you. Japan did nothing wrong.
23a96d No.16133030
>>16133024
I don't know, probably so we can all accuse each other of bait in an endless cycle until the thread dies.
2c784a No.16133036
>>16133011
I like shotas too, albeit of the trap variety.
23a96d No.16133038
>>16133035
Jews aren't white
c7e28e No.16133039
>>16133031
I don't speak gook!
>>16133036
That's why we must fight to protect them.
856d44 No.16133040
>>16133019
I doubt it. Politicians are held in power through votes, and the public votes. The public is heavily against shitskin immigration, so the moment one would utter such a phrase? He is fucked.
Hell, just look at how people react to any and all leniency towards these cockroaches in slavland. The reaction is quick and negative.
2c784a No.16133041
>>16133031
It's all written in gook. I go to >>>/trapshota/
eaf96a No.16133046
>>16133039
Got any shota feet?
dd0bce No.16133048
>U.N. proposal
Who is going to enforce it, their nigger army who are too busy conducting war crimes in Africa?
fbcfb0 No.16133052
so how come japan didnt sucessfully ethnically cleanse korea and china and the reast of asia? what stopped them?
993320 No.16133055
And so the fags are here to shit the thread up to make people stop caring.
c7e28e No.16133057
>>16133046
Closest I have.
ebc540 No.16133063
I guess the anons that said (((they're))) trying to ban lolicon so that way they can push for actual pedophilia to be legalized was right all along.
2c784a No.16133068
File: 1adcf5388800f41⋯.jpeg (Spoiler Image, 776.07 KB, 2150x3035, 430:607, 1adcf5388800f41e211b59cbb….jpeg)
File: d7cb665907a68d1⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 461.95 KB, 1000x1411, 1000:1411, d7cb665907a68d195fe4f0f71a….jpg)
File: 437ac1a0ec75ea7⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 467.59 KB, 700x756, 25:27, 437ac1a0ec75ea7c521b031aa9….png)
File: bd719fcf1233f6d⋯.jpeg (Spoiler Image, 305.34 KB, 1450x1020, 145:102, bd719fcf1233f6d875968be02….jpeg)
3dfc3d No.16133073
>>16133057
>fapping shotas
99a0db No.16133074
>>16132859
>giving rights to fictional children
May as well ban artistic freedom and art as a whole. There is little difference.
fbcfb0 No.16133078
>>16133066
>being this much of a cuck
Nationalism is for me and only me other countries must fall so that I will prosper, are you REALLY saying the jews also deserve nationalism as well as the chinese and the entire continent of africa? what about those metizos both in north and south america?
2a6af1 No.16133079
>>16133061
This.
Literally so much this.
If the Japs were worth a damn, Germany would have sided with them in WW2.
2c784a No.16133083
>>16133073
Sei Iori would look cute in a schoolgirl uniform.
059fe4 No.16133084
>don't want to fap to lolis
>eventually give in after years of lewds and propaganda pushing
Why did you guys do this to me? I've never tried to hurt any of you.
4939a1 No.16133088
>Deem every anime girl as a child.
>Then make it so exploiting these "children" is something to be arrested over.
Is this their way of banning loli and twitter accounts that use anime avatars?
99a0db No.16133092
>>16133045
They are white when it is convenient for them to be white (making declarations on behalf of whites). And they are not white when it is inconvenient for them to be white (accepting criticism for being white). Kikes excel at this kind of subterfuge.
fbcfb0 No.16133094
>>16133082
1989年天安门广场大屠杀
1989年天安門廣場大屠殺
dd0bce No.16133095
>>16133074
But (((artistic freedom))) serves a purpose, unlike those horrible 2d drawings of lolis.
af01fa No.16133097
>>16133009
>>16133019
Yeah, the problem really is the political class. It's similar over here - average person is either mildly racist (not openly hateful but ultimately favors segregation) or just has enoguh common sense to know that flooding the country with third-world refuse has no benefit. However, our politicians are ballless lapdogs and will eagerly do anything the EU tells them to. You Eastern Europe folks still have a chance but you gotta keep your political class honest, i.e., make them know that if they try to pull that shit, their gravy train is dead as >>16133040 says.
>>16133013
Can't rightfully say. Might be shekels or maybe non-ZOG porn doesn't corrupt the brain just as they want it to. JAV has its share of issues - the scenarios or either a promiscuous woman or a turbo slut single woman and I'll be damned if that's not deliberate to condition the viewer's perception but how does that differ from ZOG porn is beyond me. It's as exploitative (a lot of the actresses are debt slaves), probably even heavier on humiliation and while interracial bestiality is not as prevalent, it's still there.
940bd4 No.16133098
>>16133072
Most of the people who advocate for that are FBI shills trying to see how many people genuinely agree with that.
I like to believe this board isn't so stupid that they actually believe that's the best solution. I know /pol/ isn't. They like to pretend they are, but they aren't.
>>16133084
Give into temptation~
>>16133092
Their greatest advantage is the fact that their skin color is white. It's their ultimate trick.
99a0db No.16133099
>>16133088
It's just another tool to persecute anyone who uses wrongthink.
059fe4 No.16133108
>>16133091
There have been anons who called you cuckchan for not fapping to lolis.
d04c29 No.16133109
Reminder that Japan doesn't actually like people who post Loli porn you degenerates
99a0db No.16133113
>>16133095
You have a poor understanding of personal freedom and liberty if you think its okay to ban any kind of art.
191d1b No.16133114
>>16133108
That's just identifying your proclivity.
d04c29 No.16133115
Also Totalitarianism is not the logical endpoint of any government and that shit only applies to euros because they're submissive
04c8e9 No.16133120
aeb7a3 No.16133129
I can't wait until all the good stuff is banned and people start shooting up government institutions to pass time.
514b36 No.16133130
>>16133121
desert people will never be white
cbc195 No.16133131
>>16133031
d@i is NOT a gook
fbcfb0 No.16133133
>>16133106
GTFO Zhang, dont you have some wageslaving to do?
000000 No.16133135
>>16133126
bruh /pol/ memes is all you hear when you play a /v/ gamenight
it sucks tbh
23a96d No.16133136
01ccd0 No.16133138
Why is this thread now anchored?
000000 No.16133140
nice, I got the thread bumplocked
aeb7a3 No.16133145
>>16133135
>niggerspeak
>butthurt over /pol/ memes
I wonder why.
fbcfb0 No.16133149
>>16133140
Thanks TORnigger
059fe4 No.16133160
>>16133114
Fuck you man. I didn't think about this shit and never would have if I wasn't forced to see it almost every day. I'd probably even recover if it was out of my life forever from here on. You can't convince me that it wasn't forced onto me.
deba22 No.16133166
>Cake kike himself bumplocked it
Of course he did. I'm sure he'll use the loli posts as an excuse despite the issue being about censorship and the UN still being supported by anybody.
23a96d No.16133168
>thread bumplocked
>all thread velocity disappears into thin air
really makes you think
8cd43a No.16133169
>>16132894
Do I have to convert to kebabism to get a loli, or is it free for all?
4b49cd No.16133175
>>16132868
True as this is, it’s not a Japan-only “problem”.
dd0bce No.16133180
Mark is still loyal to israel I see.
99a0db No.16133184
>>16132868
I expect that they will. There is a huge lolicon industry in Japan.
de0b06 No.16133187
This thread being bumplocked only proves that Mark would ban loli if he could get away with it.
eaf96a No.16133192
>>16133187
Mod team has been banning porn in other threads even if on topic
56f256 No.16133195
>>16133169
>3D
>loli
Also, probably not. Muds take breaks from killing themselves to kill non-muds whenever one is present. "Converted" don't count.
deba22 No.16133196
>>16133192
I've seen both bans and just deletions. What a mess.
deba22 No.16133206
>>16133197
>Banning loli
>Doing something right
Reminder that shortly after the last time they pulled this they were found circulating actual CP in their offices.
d0c92f No.16133207
>>16132999
But Italy stands at the top of the average iq chart in europe.
https://brainstats.com/average-iq-by-country.html
a4f921 No.16133208
>>16133187
I get the feeling they just delete/bumplock anything that gets reported. Some guy got banned and his post deleted because he was trying to derail the thread, when he posted a single post that was on topic while also posting a pic of some cuck. The moderation here is getting abysmal.
dd0bce No.16133211
>>16133197
>right
>Doesn't attack actual child abuse/rape
>Just wants to group 2d with 3d and pretend it did something
56f256 No.16133212
>>16133208
>is getting
Mark is literally autistic and cobalt has always been braindead.
af01fa No.16133213
>>16133192
Even if properly spoilered?
99a0db No.16133214
>>16133206
They just want full control of the market. Can't have free porn out there. That's bad for profits.
4db6f1 No.16133226
>>16132859
>are committed online and including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.”
>Non-existing
>As in, is not real, not a being of flesh and blood, nor related in any direct way to one.
>crime
We should put literally every GTA Online player in a FEMA camp then.
Every shooter player gets death penalty for multiple counts of murder.
I guess RTS players go straight to War Crime tribunals.
>>16132937
That gook should've killed himself.
Japan should've just eradicated korea from existence in the early XX century instead of annexing them and building them basically the entire country.
>>16133029
The smiling gook with a teacup is a then famous actress, enjoying a tea in the newly built Chosen hotel, the first hotel in Korea, built by their benevolent benefactors.
a4f921 No.16133228
>>16133212
I mean shit like this >>16133218 They must think there's a raid going on because they're deleting posts and banning people for no reason.
deba22 No.16133236
>>16133213
I made a singular spoilered kemono post in another thread recently (one of the previous GG threads I think) and they just outright deleted it. It's funny since I've posted far worse before toddlercon as the starting benis post in those threads before without issue.
99d874 No.16133237
>>16133228
Threads like these always make certain people pop out of the woodworks though, just look at the shitposts with nuwojack, the obvious baiting etc. Im surprised the USA/EU D&C bullshit hasnt started yet
99a0db No.16133239
>>16133230
>Pornography (especially the one with fictional children) is the greatest expression of freedom.
I sure as hell wouldn't call it the greatest expression of freedom. That is the freedom to criticize the government without fear of punishment. But porn is an expression of freedom, nonetheless.
fbcfb0 No.16133242
>>16133230
this, taking away my access to pornography is no different than taking the air right out of my lungs!
a4f921 No.16133247
>>16133237
What does that have to with it? It doesn't matter what thread we're in, they're still doing stupid shit.
dbea54 No.16133250
>>16133052
America controlled by kikes.
af01fa No.16133253
>>16133236
I sometimes post some tangentially related smut properly spoilered and always make it a point of saging if I'm not adding to the discussion but I guess that might not be enough these days.
deba22 No.16133257
>>16133253
Nothing is enough when the mods act as they please.
4939a1 No.16133260
>>16133187
It's not a vidya thread so it doesn't even belong here despite it being an important manner. Still, how will they even enforce this? I just see it as a silencing tool because a lot of people who appose them use anime avatars. Therefor, they are "exploiting children" even if the characters in their avatar are "lolicon fantasy" tier.
>>16133236
That's bizarre considering I post kemono in the Share Threads and it never gets deleted.
eaf96a No.16133263
>>16133253
This.
I've done all sorts of proper things, only to get banned for "Rule 8" and appeal denied as soon as I try to appeal. Kike didn't reply to my email. So we basically have rogue vols that ban whatever they want
c005f8 No.16133265
>>16132915
Because it's not about restricting your access to illegal material, but their increasing legal rights for using censorship to take out dissidents who could expose their crimes. This crimes then are being used to steal away your freedom, but don't be afraid you will be able to jerk off to illegal shit until the day the sharia law enforcers knock down your door.
0172da No.16133266
>defending censorship
>but it's something I don't like!
You have it coming, don't complain when the entire world lives on a turbo ching chong dystopia
In any case, I have enough backups for a lifetime and I'm always expanding, so I'm good
>>16133263
>rogue
That's the law here
99d874 No.16133271
>>16133260
Oh yea totally not vidya, it's not like this very topic is being censored in vidya already by certain companies.
eaf96a No.16133272
>>16133266
I'd be shitposting porn all day long if I had a dynamic IP
ce6439 No.16133279
Told /loli/ and /delicious/ about it.
/a/ has a post about it in their meta thread and /aiumu/ has a thread. Gonna check /monster/ too.
a4f921 No.16133288
>>16133260
Every mod moderates the board the way they want. Mark bans and deletes posts depending on how he feels that day, Pewter and cobalt do absolutely nothing but delete posts that hurt their feelings, Tangerine is sort of okay.
af01fa No.16133321
>>16133263
For fairness' sake, I have to state I haven't been banned for the transgressions being discussed and was given lenience a couple of times - accidentally posted unspoilered NSFW content (thumbnail was tricky) and it got spoilered before I got to delete it.
But I guess I should stop with the drive-by shitposts.
de0b06 No.16133324
>>16133289
Which is more likely, an authoritarian government banning more things because it could get away with banning some things already, or a perfectly normal adult man raping a child because the cartoons told him its ok to do so?
deba22 No.16133325
>>16133279
>Told /loli/ about it
Not seeing your post there at least from the mod page.
ce6439 No.16133349
>>16133325
Oops
>You must fill out the Subject field to create a thread on this board.
>>16133302
Two threads on two very similar boards that both have a very high interest in the topic.
Sure, that's spam.
4939a1 No.16133355
>>16133271
This has nothing to do with any particular game being censored or pointing out the ones behind it. It's only on the same theme of mass censorship in the media but this case in particular doesn't have anything to do with video games. If anything, this thread was anchored because people can't ignore obvious bait.
>>16133288
It would be nice if it was actually consistent. But what people will let slide is personal bias I guess. Still some of the posts deleted break no rules or aren't even shitposting.
0172da No.16133366
>>16133289
Given the extremes, pick your poison: Increasingly tighter security, restrictions and control until we reach China's "get good boy points for reporting your neighbor", or the freedom to de/volve into whatever we make of our culture
>>16133272
I'm not posting anymore because that's pretty much all the completely sfw I have and I'm probably already banned anyways
fbcfb0 No.16133370
>drive-by shitposts.
what is this, resetera?
dd0bce No.16133372
>>16133355
>If anything, this thread was anchored because people can't ignore obvious bait.
So mods can't just delete the bait posts but have to anchor the entire thread? Anyhow it seems the mods have to anchor the entire board giving how many threads have constant shitposting and derailing.
99d874 No.16133373
>>16133355
Because this time it's not a particular game but fucking everything. Cant discuss anything except specific vidya now? How the fuck is discussing a potential censoring of the entire medium not related
de0b06 No.16133375
>>16133367
None of that happens with good parenting.
People who put youtube up on a tablet and leave it on autoplay next to a child and think they are doing their job as parents create these problems, not media itself.
5ab3b2 No.16133382
>PIDF at it again
He does it for free!
>>16133349
Then why is there a thread on /v/ beside garbage like VNs which already isnt video games?
>>16133366
The devolution is precisely because of the decensorship of the harmful ideas that we are seeing spread like the cancer they are for which they were censored in the first place.
>>16133375
Yes, thats why we should allow even further risk?
804fde No.16133387
>>16132885
Lets see… raping children in disaster-hit zones because the Clintons needed more CP?
de0b06 No.16133389
>>16133382
You will never ban enough bad things because the goalposts will always be moved forward.
Fix shitty parenting if you want to fix shitty generations.
b0b98b No.16133393
>Anchored
Because surely this isn't going to affect Japanese games and VN's, even if the characters in them aren't lolis. Because surely everyone in the UN knows exactly what classifies as a loli in the first place and won't go banning anime high school girls like Reddit, Gab, Discord, and Steam have.
5ab3b2 No.16133394
>>16133389
Good luck with that when every school in the world has mandatory tranny classes and you get your child taken away from you over not having them participate.
Its already happening.
4b49cd No.16133405
Law student here, I dont see this going anywhere. The term any person appearing to be a child is very broad; there are female adults that are short height and have small breasts so they really can’t define what a child drawing looks like.
4939a1 No.16133410
>>16133373
>Because this time it's not a particular game but fucking everything.
I know. But it would be more fitting on another board. Not that I agree that it should be anchored but I can understand why it would be.
>>16133372
>Delete bait posts
>People constantly ask why said posts were deleted
>IP hoppers simply come back to start the conversation again
>Thread derailed again and again just like this one
I'm not defending their decision but people here act like they're new to shitposting. If people would just ignore the bait then everything would go by more smoothly. However, even if you ignore it, someone else will respond. And anchoring the thread only satisfies the shitposters because they now feel accomplished for derailing and getting a thread anchored.
The best move was to simply report and ignore. But people can't seem to do that.
>>16133382
>VNs which already isnt video games?
>He doesn't know what a VN is.
dca717 No.16133415
>>16133405
The UN is also the ineffectual and has no way of making anyone follow through on this. I don't think anything will come of it either, but it's worth keeping an eye on.
906847 No.16133421
>>16132859
>some anons unironically use zog
>not calling them kikes
Faggots.
ce6439 No.16133425
>>16133405
Pretty sure this happened already (Australia?) and if you're an adult and look too young, you can't do porn because it'd be child porn
56f256 No.16133426
>>16133405
>is very broad
That's the point, it allows them to ban whatever the fuck they like what already happens in Australia.
dca717 No.16133427
>>16133425
>if you're an adult and look too young, you can't do porn because it'd be child porn
f3e188 No.16133428
>>16133415
>The UN is also the ineffectual and has no way of making anyone follow through on this.
>he doesn't know
The enemy always has a way of securing victory, no matter what we do. Name a single time we ever came out on top.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) 408913 No.16133431
>>16133394
The only way to fix this is to end all jews
de0b06 No.16133435
354dc5 No.16133437
>>16133431
So which government building gotta be bombed first, CIA-kun?
23a96d No.16133438
>>16133428
Oh no he's back
dca717 No.16133441
>>16133428
SOPA and PIPA got fucked in the asshole by the internet at large so there's that
9d5f73 No.16133444
>>16133410
>>He doesn't know what a VN is.
Nigger just because you have an inventory and can choose which girl to fuck doesnt meant its a game. Its far worse than the movie simulators that Sony shits out but gets a pass because of the same tards that are so in love with lolishit that insist it belongs on /v/.
9d5f73 No.16133445
d5adca No.16133449
>>16133405
Remember Ausfailia:
With their dumb wording, a perfectly adult woman with the misfortune or blessing, I'd say of being flat is basically a criminal if she takes a perfectly legal photo of her body.
But yeah, 'appearing to be a child' is extremely vague. Chilindrina from El Chavo would be 'appearing to be a child'?
0cc053 No.16133450
>>16133052
Are you historically illiterate? in WW2 specifically? You should already know the answer.
23a96d No.16133457
>>16133444
>Its far worse than the movie simulators that Sony shits out but
At least in a VN I don't have to walk beside an (((enriched individual))) who goes two thirds my speed, forcing me to walk for 10 seconds and stop for 5 just so they can catch up because the developers want to pretend I'm interacting with an environment.
91fb9e No.16133459
>>16133435
>Who is "we
He posted the exact same comment in the /animu/ thread about this issue, it's the asses and elbows dude.
>>>/animu/87857
0172da No.16133460
>>16133382
I just don't see the angle here, yours or the UN's. The UN is trying to give rights to cartoons, which is just fucking retarded. You (and everyone else here with the same point of view) call it moral degeneration. What's this supposed to mean, lolicon creates pedophiles just by existing? Lolicon leads to cp, and child rape? Why doesn't normal porn lead to rape of women then?
>it turns people into porn addicts and useless members of society and the human race
Nigger next you'll ban any kind of food that's anywhere dangerous for your health just because land whales can't stop eating. I have a job, behave like a normal person, and whip it to whatever I want to, don't blame me because some retard dropped out of high school to stay in his room his entire life fapping to cp
The way I see it, this is the same discussion as violent videogames: GTA doesn't make children grab guns and cars and do an Elliot. People don't just turn pedophiles for looking at lolicon, it doesn't attract people merely by being at some website, it has nothing to do with real cp, my guess is they are just testing how far they can twist society for control
>>16133428
Blackpill nigger is here, we officially have a shitposting thread now
4939a1 No.16133461
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16133419
So you don't know what they are either. They're their own story telling medium like manga or light novels. Because of this, you can have VNs with no gameplay (Umineko or Grisaea Phantom Trigger) and some with tons of gameplay (Kamidori Alchemy Meister, Sengoku Rance, Utawarerumono, etc). They've been with vidya going all the way back to the PC-engines and some are just the Japanese take on Adventure games.
12a219 No.16133470
>>16132859
Right but who listens to the UN? Any country that would act on this is fucked anyhow.
23a96d No.16133477
>>16133471
Do you have 4 brain cells, or do you not understand what you read
0fbda4 No.16133478
>>16133428
>Thread has no business being anchored
>It gets babysat for wrongthink
>AND THEN THEY HAVE THE GALL TO COME IN AND BAN SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY SAID SOMETHING STUPID, AS IF THEY WERE DOING A GOOD JOB ALL ALONG
b4efdd No.16133490
>>16133478
>not knowing blackpill spam when you see it
0fbda4 No.16133493
>>16133490
I know it's blackpill spam. My point is that the vols basically killed the thread on sight, then proceeded to babysit the thread. If it's worth handing out bans inside, then the thread shouldn't be anchored. There's a problem with their process
f3dd70 No.16133500
>>16132868
If the Olympics actually influenced long-term change, China would be a democracy by now and there would be no talks of separatism in Tibet, Hong Kong or anywhere else. There'll be 1 month of sports, maybe a poor attempt at clean up but the entrenched interest will ensure it'll come back. The only negative impact I can imagine is if the Olympics prove to be too expensive for Tokyo and this causes more long term economic issues hence leading to lower pay for everyone including manga writers.
586bf8 No.16133514
>>16133023
UN controls ICANN.
238721 No.16133533
Remember, folks. Many countries signed the UN's International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), which is a UN document in which all signatories Must adopt mandatory "hate speech" laws. Like the EU, the UN is pretty persistent and constantly tries to pressure lesser countries to get what it wants. It hounded Japan for decades to adopt "hate speech" laws and finally got its desired results in 2016, sadly. Japan might have had the balls to tell them to fuck off when they wanted to ban loli hentai 3 years ago, but Japan's free speech also took a hit that year when they finally outlawed hate speech.
This is where the US comes in. It's literally the only country sovereign and powerful enough to not let the UN control its free speech jurisdiction. Mainly because the US is currently still the world's greatest superpower, the US funds a lot of the UN's budget, and the UN is a child project that the US primarily helped create. The child isn't going to try to bully the father anytime soon. This is why when the US signed the (ICERD), it boldly stated "we won't adopt hate speech laws because they're unconsitutional under our First Amendment". Effectively killing any chance of US having similar draconian "hate speech" laws like its western cousins do. Making it literally the only country in the world without "hate speech" laws, and the only country bold enough to reject the UN's attempts at limiting free speech.
The US has signed the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) (which wants countries to ban racial/ethnic "hate speech", as well as "hate speech" in general), the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) (which wants countries to ban All sexist speech towards women), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (which wants countries to ban All child pornography, whether real or fictional like lolis). The US has signed all of these, but our free speech is still as free as ever. The US constantly reminds the UN that if they propose something that is unconstitutional to our laws (especially our free speech), we won't adopt it. That is why Americans are still free to express hate speech, sexist speech, and post loli hentai if we want.
In regards to loli hentai, the First Amendment allows it so long as it, by our legal definition of the word, isn't "obscene". We have something called the three-step Miller Test to determine if something is obscene or not.
> 1: Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
> 2: Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[3] specifically defined by applicable state law,
These two are to stop degenerates from being obscene In Public without a damn good reason. You can't casually walk into Burger King in a gimp suit and covered in cum. Believe it or not, we still live in a society alongside little kids, who shouldn't be exposed to adult/obscene content. You can still wear your cum gimp suit in the privacy of your own bedroom, but going out in public might get you arrested immediately.
> 3: Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
This is what protects loli/shota hentai. It has "artistic value" because it's drawn / computer generated, and maybe has "literary value" too if you take into account loli doujinshi/manga stories. As long as the loli hentai is purely fictional characters/situations and doesn't violate the DOST test whatsoever (basically, ensuring that no real children were abused in the creation of the loli hentai), it's constitutional under US law. This is why American artists can freely draw lolis and not get arrested like some Canadian cuck.
4939a1 No.16133555
>>16133460
Even if you actually thought loli lead to child molestation. It's well known that access to pornography reduces domestic violence and sex related crimes in every country it's not outlawed in (when it previously was). If that's the case, then why wouldn't you allow loli content? Would you rather ban "degenerate filth" so more kids could potentially be exploited or simply let them have their filth and actually reduce the crimes? One of these things actually benefits everyone. So if they actually were dumb enough think loli is the same as CP, then it shows they care more about banning things they don't like than keeping predators off the street. Or they simply care more about punishing the guilty instead of protecting the innocent. In which case, they should stop pretending about giving a shit about children.
>>16133471
>A game that tells its story through character CGs talking to each other with text boxes for long periods of time is suddenly not that because you added some combat between it.
How is this hard to understand? It's simply the way a story is portrayed to the player. Therefor, you can have a VN with no gameplay and some with tons. Kamidori has a lot of text but it's heavily expanded by the post game which is all gameplay. Utawarerumono can have you ingesting plot for hours before you get to the next mission.
d0c92f No.16133565
>>16133514
Nuke Canada and the UN.
f3dd70 No.16133585
Meanwhile, cuckchan has literally the same amount of fearmongering as the other threads reporting this 3 years back. History really does repeat itself.
16d443 No.16133586
0d9849 No.16133599
>>16132859
Enjoy your ban pedophile.
f3cb11 No.16133600
>>16133586
>expecting reasonable moderation from a literal jew
it is you who is at fault, anon
4939a1 No.16133605
>>16133580
Now you're just going full retard at this point. How does adding gameplay remove the story telling elements?
2c784a No.16133610
>>16133419
VNs fall under /jp/ more than /v/ to be honest.
23905a No.16133651
>>16133533
>Remember, folks. Many countries signed the UN's International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), which is a UN document in which all signatories Must adopt mandatory "hate speech" laws. Like the EU, the UN is pretty persistent and constantly tries to pressure lesser countries to get what it wants. It hounded Japan for decades to adopt "hate speech" laws and finally got its desired results in 2016, sadly. Japan might have had the balls to tell them to fuck off when they wanted to ban loli hentai 3 years ago, but Japan's free speech also took a hit that year when they finally outlawed hate speech.
So no matter what happens, Japan is officially done for. They are the next EU.
Nowhere is safe anymore. Kikes have control of everywhere in the world. It's over.
d0c92f No.16133657
>>16133651
Niggerpill fags BTFO
ddf5bd No.16133665
>>16133657
More like weebs BTFO. Japan is literally UK 2.0. Better get used to calling it Japanistan from now on, especially after the olympiad.
f3dd70 No.16133671
>>16133651
>>16133665
As far as we know, they still hate the Chinese and Koreans in spite of said laws. It hasn't stopped them from protesting in public.
91fb9e No.16133676
bd4132 No.16133684
>>16133671
A lot of idiots forget that Japan's "hate speech" laws carry no legal weight. Nothing more than a "止めるください” that the police would only enforce if the target was actually Japanese.
a419d3 No.16133710
>>16133684
>止めるください
止めてください
bd4132 No.16133719
>>16133710
My bad, I guess it would be please stop what you are doing.
586bf8 No.16133728
>>/v/16133651
Asses and elbows you gonna start shipping free cyanide pills to every anon here to join your huehuehue blackpill monkey cult? You really are just an annoying whiney little shit too weak to end it yourself. So you try to convince others to kill themselves for you as the messenger. You are the worst profit leading by lies and not example. This is why you get banned every day niggerpill.
We don't care what you have to say because it's the same things offer and over again in different context. You tell us to kill ourselves now.
After you.
0fbda4 No.16133746
>More deleted posts
Seeing if I'm banned
0b8ed2 No.16133851
>>16133471
You're so stupid. VN is it's own genre that's independent of being a video game. A VN can be a game or not.
0b8ed2 No.16133855
e86efe No.16133898
>>16132859
Don't forget their failed shaming attempt with the BBC by Stacy Dooley. Anyone have any of the "is this child pornography?" images?
0b8ed2 No.16133933
>>16133907
VN simply describes the storytelling. It says nothing else about the non-story elements. The presence of gameplay does not affect the storytelling mechanism. It does not exclude it from being a VN. VN is a definition that only covers how the story is conveyed and not the entire product/program.
e86efe No.16133938
>>16132915
This one is acutally explicit in forbidding cartoons specifically though.
ac9292 No.16133940
>>16133460
>my guess is they are just testing how far they can twist society for control
Actually they're copying South Korea, where you'll get over a decade of prison time and put on a sex offender list. As a 6 year old. Police resources will be spread so thin that they won't even be able to bust real pedo rings anymore, they'll even let child molestors go with a slap on the wrist and punish anyone who ratted them out.
f3dd70 No.16133948
>>16133940
I've seen some of this shit in mainstream news, but part of me still wonders how much of it is exaggerated and how much is really real.
0b8ed2 No.16133984
>>16133972
>Then it's not a self contained medium.
Sure then. VN is simply a descriptor that you can attach to a product's storytelling. Hence you can have a game being a VN too. Since something can have more than one descriptor describing its individual attributes.
fea0dd No.16133995
>>16132958
Disney probably wants to sell official disney porn
e86efe No.16133999
>>16132942
Does anyone have the study itself, not just the article talking about the study?
>>16133014
If lolicon isn't pedophilia then shotacon isn't homophilia.
0172da No.16134023
>>16133999
>If lolicon isn't pedophilia
Not raping real girls doesn't mean you stop liking girls
>then shotacon isn't homophilia.
Liking boys is liking boys, just accept it
0b8ed2 No.16134036
>>16134020
That's a problem with you disingenuously labeling something then. Not a problem with the label, VN, itself. Bad argument. It's the difference between a game feturing fmv and a game being a fmv game. VNs can be games simply because the descriptors, VN and game, cover difference aspects. I have no idea why people are unable to accept the fact that products can have different labels depending on the viewpoint that you view them on.
000000 No.16134045
> The qualification ‘by whatever means’ reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline.
> written materials in print or online;
It can be construed to include mentions in text, too. Like mentions of things related to pizza and certain islands.
e86efe No.16134046
>>16134023
So you say lolicon is pedophilia? Or at least the subsection of it that focuses on littler girls and not just early teens looking anime girls? There used to be a time where you'd get banned around here for even implying the possibility.
>>16134027
IP hop*
>>16133266
My fucking god, Rustle draws the best damned floors.
91fb9e No.16134098
>>16134045
How long until Nabokov's Lolita gets banned?
Which is a shit book full of lies, by the way. She isn't a loli and not even called Lolita. Fucking Russians.
7fa98a No.16134128
>>16133011
>>16133031
>>16133036
>>16133039
>>16133057
>>16133068
>>16133073
>>16133096
Just look at this scum "screaming" ME ME LOOK AT ME I LIKE COCKS IN MY ASS LOOCK IM A DEGENERATE LOOK AT ME PLESE.
All fagots needs to be gassed.
e86efe No.16134132
>>16133324
>perfectly normal adult man
>reading lolicon
Wew.
>>16133461
>Kamidori Alchemy Meister
>A VN
>Not an SRPG with VN elements
I guess Cowadoody is a JRPG because it uses RPG elements in some ways just like JRPGs do.
>>16133933
>VN is a definition that only covers how the story is conveyed and not the entire product/program.
Wait, so you're telling me the JRPGs with anime cutscenes are actually animes with JRPG elements?
>>16133393
>Because surely everyone in the UN knows exactly what classifies as a loli in the first place and won't go banning anime high school girls
They specify underage. Any anime girl that could possibly be visibly construed as 17 or younger and even shows a flash of nipple is up for banning. Not that the UN can actually enforce this shit.
>>16133425
>>16133427
I can't remember if it passed and was reverted, or if it was being heavily considered but ever got anywhere. Either way, I don't think it's in effect there now.
>>16133421
Zogkikes.
0b8ed2 No.16134134
>>16134098
Shouldn't you be angry at the Japs then? It was them that took the name and applied it to prebubescent girls, not the Russians.
91fb9e No.16134151
>>16134134
I'm not angry about that, I just hate Russians in general.
e86efe No.16134164
>>16133533
>In regards to loli hentai, the First Amendment allows it so long as it, by our legal definition of the word, isn't "obscene".
>These two are to stop degenerates from being obscene In Public
>Believe it or not, we still live in a society alongside little kids
Anon, those don't say anything about whether the work is in public view or available to children or not. Obscenity laws are bullshit. There are obscenity laws on the books right now that forbid the interstate trafficking of regular pornography, making all internet porn illegal. These laws are of course unenforced in 99.9% of cases. The obscenity laws against loli, though unconstitutional, are only enforced when lolicon material is in the possession of actual pedophiles being convicted for real CP in order to give them harsher sentences. And you bet your ass their lolicon was not in public view or accessible to children. The cases where a non-pedos were charged for loli are military courts, because they weren't supposed to have porn on them in the first place, and one case of a guy's wife pushing for legal action against her husband.
e86efe No.16134206
>>16133922
That last image could really use some archives for both the tweet and articles.
>>16134098
>and not even called Lolita
This is like complaining that a movie doesn't have it's title read aloud at some point during the script.
>She isn't a loli
But how "not loli" is she? I see japs use of the term in hentai generally covers body types that are proportionally similar to anything vaguely 7 to 14.
65fefc No.16134323
892b47 No.16134334
>>16134098
Her name was Dolores Haze, she was nicknamed Lolita by the main character. The most famous line is "Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins." He says lolita all the time. Have you even read the book?
0b8ed2 No.16134343
>>16134075
Fair enough. I understand your point of view, but we just have different standards on how to apply definitions.
91fb9e No.16134367
>>16134334
But it's not her name, the MC makes it up.
354dc5 No.16134369
>>16134323
>Unbumplocked
And the reason it was bumplocked in the first place was?
>>16134343
Apparently there's (((somebody))) who cannot be as civil about this issue as you are.
2afb1d No.16134370
>UN
>attempting to remain relevant
Nobody wants you, and in fact, your very foundation was a farce.
91fb9e No.16134371
2afb1d No.16134374
You'd think they'd have an idea about two dimensional works. The projection is off the charts anyway, for how much outright pederasty they have been involved in.
d672df No.16134381
It also bans shotas too so no more /ss/ for you fags who think you're safe
91fb9e No.16134383
>>16134334
>>16134367
I think we have this misunderstanding because my choice of words was shitty.
She's called Lolita, but it's not her actual given name, which is what I wanted to say. I should have thought about that before phrasing it like that.
a8b0d4 No.16134386
>>16134369
>/v/ - United Nations Resolutions
0b8ed2 No.16134394
>>16134369
No the other anon was arguing reasonably too. We both understood the elements of a VN, but for me that was enough to call it a VN whether or not there was also gameplay. For him however if also contained gameplay, then those elements were VN elements within the game instead of being a stand-alone VN. He reserved the term VN for pure stories only. Like I said, we just had different standards on how to apply the definition.
2afb1d No.16134398
>>16134128
I'm mostly with you on this, but sideways. Dumpers are a malignancy.
354dc5 No.16134399
>>16134386
It was deemed worthy of unbumplock now, so somebody must've fucked up doing it in the first place.
>>16134394
>he
That was me, I was banned for "derailing" a at the time bumplocked thread
2afb1d No.16134403
>>16134369
Because the faggot never actually reads through a thread and gets triggered like a tumblrette. Are you new to this charade?
b0b98b No.16134408
>>16134363
>you can't like multiple things at the same time
354dc5 No.16134410
>>16134403
>Are you new to this charade?
It's a new thing that the thread wasn't just nuked entirely and Mark posting "whoops my lard fingers accidentally pressed the wrong button as I shipost from my phone" in another thread to save face, as if that were possible.
2afb1d No.16134412
End of story: The UN is a den of actual human trafficking and every blue helmet hides a goon walnut.
91fb9e No.16134416
>>16134363
Personally I've always liked statues more than paintings
e86efe No.16134421
>>16134383
>She's called Lolita, but it's not her actual given name
Wow, this is even worse than complaining that a movie doesn't have it's title in the script. I can't think of a proper analogy for how retarded this is.
bd4132 No.16134422
>>16134363
Too bad the west hasn't had good art in decades if not longer.
1b2592 No.16134426
>>16134132
>Not that the UN can actually enforce this shit.
How many people that look at or draw loli/shota would they even need to arrest in order to fully enforce this?
deba22 No.16134434
>>16134426
I wanna jam my carrot in Reisen's mouth.
238721 No.16134438
>>16134386
>businesses (steam) that want to censor/ban games with lolis?
>discuss
>governments now wanting to criminalize games with lolis?
>anchored
c0b591 No.16134440
>>16133922
>"Goyim we must ban all of these drawings because it hurts children, only WE the lawmakers are allowed to hurt them"
At last I truly see. Thank you UN
f3cb11 No.16134450
798034 No.16134451
>>16133226
No one gives a fuck about your shitty quarrels jappo.
>>16132987
Actually it's quite a bit more complex than that. A lot of this feminist shit is not something culturally ingrained, and by your logic, we ought to have been overrun by the Moors.
>>16133029
Japan were dirt-farmers too until the West civilized them.
God dammit, I like anime and manga and otaku culture, but Japan would've been fucking nothing without the West, you fucking weeaboo faggots. We civilized them. /pol/ish imperialism to fags who never study anything other than whatever board they use (e.g. /a/nons don't know shit about the Byzantine Empire) was a mistake.
a4b398 No.16134457
Fun fact: The UN has no mechanism in place to actually enforce crap like this, it's up to the individual member states to agree to it, and then enforce it.
Much like the so called Paris treaty on climate change, it's little more than a gentlemen's agreement that has no force behind it.
798034 No.16134462
>>16134363
I agree with this post because nu/pol/ack weeaboo are the fucking worst. I miss when wapanese would shit on Korea and China while glorifying Japan without liking Japan because "muh Axis"/a love of the West.
c7821e No.16134468
lel the negholes on /a/ ban whoever talks about this.
0b8ed2 No.16134470
>>16134363
Those images would be banned too if they had their way.
798034 No.16134471
>>16134468
Really? Pics or don't real.
2c784a No.16134472
>>16134468
There's a thread on /animu/
f48b29 No.16134480
>>16134468
Probably because you came over like a huge crossie and posted /v/ memes, just like last time
Away with you dear GG-chan.
238721 No.16134488
>>16134467
What is Canada doing? I don't get it
c7821e No.16134492
>>16134462
>muh Axis
Damn straight they love the Axis. It was an international alliance between latino, germanic and japanese cultures: the best of all worlds.
And what have you got? Kike controlled anglos who backstabbed Europe who was defending itself from Communism, who is now responsible for its own ethnic replacement.
35dea4 No.16134501
>>16134488
A lot of provinces are having trouble getting drinkable water iirc. Wells drying up, pollution and what not.
deba22 No.16134503
>>16134450
Just a matter of having good taste.
>>16134468
/a/ mods really don't want political threads, though last I saw it was mentioned in the news thread.
c7821e No.16134506
>>16134480
>MUH GAMERGATE
/a/ is half pozzed mods, half cowardly weebs. I might be a weeb myself, but not the kind who buries his head to pretend Japan is still invulnerable to socjus.
159175 No.16134507
9c4a20 No.16134510
>>16132859
They crossed the line this time
798034 No.16134511
>>16134492
You newfags need understand how politics work.
9b0ba6 No.16134522
>>16134468
They're run by a tranny. Why else do you think they ban politics and SJW's subversion related to anime?
c7821e No.16134524
>>16134503
>/a/ mods really don't want political threads
Banning lolis is a direct attack on anime and mango: it's more than political, this is survival.
deba22 No.16134528
>>16134524
Indeed, they should be more lax on that rule when it comes to a direct threat.
c7821e No.16134531
>>16134472
>>16134507
>Then go to >>>/animu/
Yes, an alternative would be good since this is about to blow up.
a2db7a No.16134534
>>16134507
>>16134515
This. Forget about /a/ and go to /animu/ instead to discuss this.
2c784a No.16134537
>>16134528
They always prefer to stick their heads in the sand, unfortunately.
4e1d5c No.16134577
>>16132898
I'm thinking gook anon called it when he was talking about elites and pedos being the ones to pass these bills because it's easier to arrest and distracts from actual pedophiles
0bf6a8 No.16134595
>>16134468
They are talking about it in their news thread you colossal faggot.
b3a50d No.16134614
File: 023bfa989bf801b⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.42 MB, 1920x1920, 1:1, b4cdbe52805857063989e1a3c0….jpg)
Long live lolis!
>>16134470
Funny you'd say that, my mum used to have a kikebook account and when she posted some nude paintings, they got deleted for being "pornographic."
So in a way, they're getting there.
b2a7a4 No.16134629
>unlocked instead of deleted
but of course!
b458ff No.16134631
>>16133676
Not an argument.
668ebf No.16134635
>3 lines will soon be illegal
f3cb11 No.16134642
>>16134635
HE'S GOT 3 LINES, GET THAT DEGENERATE
38b07a No.16134654
>>16133133
>get job
>free bdsm services
wtf I love china now!
f48b29 No.16134656
>>16134595
>Anons go to the news thread to talk about it now that you noted that
>They get banned
>Even more FUD about /a/ gets spread
a2db7a No.16134668
>>16134656
/animu/ is a much better board anyways. They scanlate Number Girl, World of Moral Reversal and have other projects. Plus, /animu/ are better OC makers.
c48b62 No.16134669
>>16134659
CENSOR THAT, YOU MADMAN
b2a7a4 No.16134678
>>16134668
your waifu is shit
2c784a No.16134684
>>16134668
I like their Friday Night anime Jazz radio.
0b8ed2 No.16134691
>>16134684
Peak comfiness.
b2a7a4 No.16134696
>>16134681
Gee, I dunno, maybe because the BO is a fucking jew?
deba22 No.16134701
>>16134635
I'm gonna miss that leafless tree.
4faad0 No.16134703
Here's a handy guide to help you differentiate between illegal content and state approved legal content.
d1c8d9 No.16134711
>>16132894
the hypocrisy is the worst part of this world.
deba22 No.16134712
>>16134707
>Posted it again
>ID hopped
1a9946 No.16134715
>>16134707
You are advocating for policing people on basis of mere fantasies alone. How the fuck is that different from a thought crime?
b2a7a4 No.16134721
>>16134712
Woah there anon! Don't you know this is supposed to be a free speech platform?
b3a50d No.16134722
>>16134681
>Mark and his fuckboys are doing something right for once
Nice.
You're a faggot.
Now get the fuck out.
f7a663 No.16134724
>>16132859
For a while I thought the next frontier of human debate would be about the morality or implied morality of actions done in the virtual world (because we're on the verge of creating something matrix like) but no, we have to discuss about the "rights" of fictional characters when it's well known that a lot of high ranking politicians and celebrities are part of pedo rings and child trafficking.
354dc5 No.16134726
>>>/v/16134720
>cuckime
Suddenly everything makes sense.
91fb9e No.16134730
>>16134720
>cuckime
Just using that goon slang should be grounds for a permaban
1a9946 No.16134732
>>16134720
>cuckime
Your retarded fucking meme is not going to fly here you stupid nigger. Get out of here you dirty normalfaggot.
f3cb11 No.16134733
>>16134718
really hot, gonna fap to this right now
99a0db No.16134745
>>16134724
You don't understand, anon. Saving actual children could make some rich or important people look bad. We clearly cannot take that risk. We must save the fictional children instead. Then we can pat ourselves on the back.
35dea4 No.16134746
>>16134707
>I understand many of you are not predators but there is just no way to tell you apart from people who will act on a child.
Easy to tell the difference, divide it between actual CP and victimless drawings.
35dea4 No.16134752
>>16134749
I like to call it "loli-confidence"
fbcfb0 No.16134756
So why is fucking children illegal again? no, really why does the law prohibit it? in shitholes they fuck kids and the jews in hollywood get to fuck kids so why cant the common man blow his load in some cunny?
b2a7a4 No.16134759
>like furfags they cant resist spamming their shit
>they get offended by people calling them out
>they demand acceptance for their shit fetish
Everytime.
35dea4 No.16134760
>>16134754
Do you have studies that prove that consuming lolicon content increases the chance of acting upon children? I don't even like loli shit your arguments just retarded moral panic.
>hence segregation. I dont want you to ruin your life or the life of someone else.
<I don't want to ruin your life
<just out you as an outcast and remove you from mixing with the rest of society in a normal manner.
1a9946 No.16134771
>>16134754
>Liking violent video game is indicative of actual violence. You might be in denail about your violent behaviour but the fact you play violent video games indicates you have violent tendencies. I don't hate people like you, I just feel its important that we ensure you arent tempted by real violence, hence segregation. I dont want you to ruin your life or the life of someone else.
Same shit, different coat of paint.
b0b98b No.16134773
>>16134627
>I understand many of you are not predators but there is just no way to tell you apart from people who will act on a child
Oh I don't fucking know, maybe you can tell by how they get involved with pedo rings, purchase child porn off the internet, or solicit sexual images from minors? A child predator is someone who is actively looking to engage in sexual contact with a minor. Implying someone is doing that because they like a sub-genre of Japanese art is fucking absurd, man. Your idea would treat everyone as predators regardless of their intentions. I like loli because it's cute and I also enjoy the general aesthetics of anime and manga. That's it. That's all there is to it. I enjoy cute shit and think it's relaxing and wholesome. I'm not about to go out and invite a little girl into my fucking Pre-Schooler Strangler Rape Van because of my enjoyment of loli in much the same manner that I'm not going to shoot up Time Square because I like to massacre cops in GTAIV.
People can have an enjoyment of a certain art or medium that is completely detached from their real life impulses and behavior.
f7a663 No.16134774
>>16134745
And what makes them think banning loli will magically make it disappear? Actually now that I'm saying this, it makes me think this push to make loli illegal is a smoke screen to divert the attention from real CP distribution and child trafficking, i.e organize a massive witch hunt and go after lolicons, make the media put it front and center and pretend real CP and child trafficking ain't an issue. I need to put on my tinfoil hat.
1a9946 No.16134778
>>16134759
You fucking niggers, this isn't an issue of porn, this is a purely free speech fucking issue. How many times do you need to be told that?
b2a7a4 No.16134779
>>16134768
>anon want to take part in jewish and shitskin culture
b2a7a4 No.16134782
>>16134778
you wouldnt give half a shit if it wasnt loli, dont kid yourself
99a0db No.16134791
>>16134756
>So why is fucking children illegal again?
Feminism, mostly. But because it's no longer economically viable for a man to take care of a family like they used to. A single blue collar worker can no longer provide for a family.
f3cb11 No.16134793
>>16134739
>senna
why did you have to remind me?
e86efe No.16134794
>>16134724
>For a while I thought the next frontier of human debate would be about the morality or implied morality of actions done in the virtual world
It is. Lolicon porn games are moral. End of debate.
1a9946 No.16134801
>>16134786
You're the one conflating the two you stupid nigger. Conflating loli with child porn is the equivalent of conflating violent video games/violent movies with snuff movies.
b2a7a4 No.16134802
>>16134781
>slow heavy mental
Is that a thing?
4faad0 No.16134804
>>16134759
>Posting vidya characters relevant to the topic at hand isn't video games and is spam
>Implying I give a shit whether you accept anything and don't just want your retarded ass off the board
1a9946 No.16134807
>>16134782
Nigger, I am wholeheartely against any kind of fucking censorship and want the idea to die.
2a5fa6 No.16134808
Wait, didn't this thread have the anchor of quality earlier? Well, good that it's gone, censorship is a real issue facing a free society.
b3a50d No.16134813
>>16134779
Men have been marrying young girls since forever.
This "pedo" nonsense is just a passing fad of this era.
35dea4 No.16134821
>>16134805
>It doesnt increase the likelihood youll act on a child
Good, end of discussion. There's no reason to do anything since the end goal, children not being violated, is status quo. And again, I don't like loli, your arguments just bullshit and full of false propostions.
2ae277 No.16134822
>>16134816
How does that work? Kids look and act retarded.
deba22 No.16134825
>>16134805
>It doesnt increase the likelihood youll act on a child
>The attraction is what im afraid of.
>What happens when cartoons just dont do it anymore and you look outside and see a child in a diaper?
If it doesn't increase the likelihood of acting on real kids, then that scenario won't occur. Are you even aware of what you just posted?
4faad0 No.16134826
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16134786
>murderers dont seek out video games
1a9946 No.16134835
>>16134816
Exploitative movies prove you wrong. The entire horror genre proves you wrong. People are attracted to violence for the sake of violence and yet function normaly. We've been over this so many fucking times, stop spewing your retarded fucking drivel.
0b8ed2 No.16134837
>>16134825
Look at his entire post history. He's derailing intentionally and everyone is biting the bait.
Those posts are copy and pasted too. Look at previous loli threads and you'll see the same posts, same words, same writing style.
b2a7a4 No.16134843
>>16134804
>just because its characters in vidya totally mean im actually talking about vidya and not just using it as an excuse to post my fetish
>"i dont give a shit if im an annoying faggot"
>>16134813
>Men have been marrying young girls since forever.
Yes, shitskin. In Europe young girl got married to YOUNG men and they wouldnt be below fertility age. The exception to this would be royals and the degenerate elite.
You want to engage in shitskin culture.
>>16134807
Yes, and I completely believe you.
e86efe No.16134847
PROTIP
If lolicon actually does attract real pedophiles it is a force for good. It follows the same rules as all other porn in that it decreases one's tendency of engaging in sex acts of any kind. Thus, not only should it not be banned, trying to identify and mark all lolicons as potential predators would be a massive waste of resources and time. They are statistically less likely to sexually harm a child than even the basic population and those resources would be better spent catching actual criminals.
deba22 No.16134848
>>16134837
That's true. The bait is too good.
2c784a No.16134849
>>16134837
I just report him.
1a9946 No.16134852
>>16134843
>Yes, and I completely believe you
I don't believe that you're anything more than a retarded faggot either.
d1c8d9 No.16134854
>>16134781
the problem with your thinking is who gets to decide what is considered loli? For instance, remember when Jason Schreier was trying to say the Sorceress in Dragon's Crown was a "lolicon fantasy"? And he's considered one of gamings top journalists.
5110d5 No.16134855
Good! We must issue a government mandated ID for everyone that connects to the internet. If there's a violation the person must be banned permanently from ever going online.
0b8ed2 No.16134856
>>16134843
You're full of shit faggot. Plenty of anons are livid over DOA too. Look at e1b1c5's posts. That's how you craft bait. Practice some fucking more.
b0b98b No.16134857
>>16134816
>The focus of loli is kids. The focus of games is many things. Loli is about relations with kids or just general jack off content revolving around kids.
Really. Not the cuteness? Not how the aesthetic of anime can be used to make almost anything more visually appealing? Not the art style or the absurd, fantasy aspect of an average loli doujin. Just the fact that the character is depicted as a child. Fucking moron.
What do you make of people who like Shinobu, then? You don't seem to account for the fact that people find things that are unattainable/fantastical to be attractive, hence why roleplaying is such a popular fetish. Hence why girls will dress up as anything between a school girl and a nurse for foreplay. None of it is real and that is the appeal of it.
fc559a No.16134865
>>16134756
The main reason it's illegal, is because it's the most powerful blackmail tool in the (((elite))) upper circles. And that's also why being a literal kiddie fucker is pretty much one of the basic requirements to get in, and they often have initiation ceremonies that involve fucking kids.
It's the main reason I think pedophilia will never be normalized, while even bestiality and necrophilia might be, eventually. Not because the NPC* sheep would never accept it as many believe - I'm sure they would accept it, and faster than you think, if pushed by the (((media))) - they don't have souls, and don't have an inner monologue, they just do what they're instructed to.
The kike elites would never want to lose the most powerful blackmail weapon at their disposal. If blackpill fags are right and the social and political climate keeps turning in their direction, I suppose they could eventually switch from pedophilia to stuff such as accusations of racism, homophobia and misoginy as blackmail tools of absolute social destruction, though.
* I know npc is considered a 4cum meme but I do like it and in many cases such as this one, I think it's more fitting than anything else.
b2a7a4 No.16134868
>>16134852
at least im not a faggot that actively shits up the board with their faggot fetish
>>16134856
>if he doesnt agree with me its bait
sure smells of 4um in here
1a9946 No.16134869
>>16134847
>When he can't answer he just goes on to spew his retarded drivel.
Gas the scholmo.
1a9946 No.16134871
>>16134868
> im not a faggot that actively shits up the board with their faggot fetish
Yes, and I completely believe you.
2ae277 No.16134874
I was born just in time to watch 2d loli become illegal whilst actual pedophilia is normalized.
e86efe No.16134875
>>16134869
Did you even read what the fuck I posted? I agree with you and not the IP hopping retard you illiterate niggerfaggot.
4faad0 No.16134876
>>16134843
>Liking girls is a fetish
What a faggot you are. Get off this board.
f5c08b No.16134878
>>16134828
Even if fucking children was 100% entirely legal in every city, state, county, country, and continent, you still would not see it as a common sexual choice because nearly everyone with a functioning brain understands that children are not capable of reasonable consent, and everyone with a functioning conscience knows that taking advantage of children is sick.
This has nothing to do with sexual attraction to childlike aspects, or children themselves. Your fear is about people without functioning brains or morals acting on degenerative desires and you're contorting that to fit the narrative that people who like loli/shota by default have nonfunctioning brains and morals. It's just factually not the case, the two are not directly linked. Drop it and stop being retarded.
b2a7a4 No.16134880
>>16134865
Yeah, that exactly why its already being pushed.
>>16134871
You are not being clever. Just more of a faggot.
0b8ed2 No.16134883
>>16134868
>wawawaa stop posting what i dont like
You're pathetic faggot.
>>16134869
Did you reply to thw wrong post?
1a9946 No.16134885
>>16134883
Yeah sorry, I misread the ID.
b2a7a4 No.16134888
>>16134876
Where did I say girls in general you stupid faggot? Nice strawman.
>>16134883
>wawawaa stop insulting what i like
Right back at you, you pathetic faggot.
1a9946 No.16134892
>>16134880
>You are not being clever. Just more of a faggot.
Said the pot to the kettle.
0b8ed2 No.16134904
>>16134888
>WAWAWA
I get it. You don't like loli. You don't need to act like a newfag and freak out about it everytime though. This anger is unhealthy for you anon.
4faad0 No.16134905
>>16134888
>I post pictures of females
>Calls it a fetish
>THAT'S NO T WHAT I MEANT! STRAWMAN!
You've already proven yourself illiterate and unable to formulate coherent thought. Get off the board.
dfdd3c No.16134913
>>16134828
>Regardless of how you try and spin it the fact remains. You own a gun. Even if you say you'll never commit a mass shooting, you could. That is my whole point.
That's what you sound like.
b2a7a4 No.16134917
>>16134904
>>16134905
>resorts to playing retarded
Merely pretending I see.
ae28f6 No.16134921
>>16134901
Anon, regardless of how you try and separate the two you just cant. Whether cartoon or real, its a fetish around Violence, whether its looks, attitude or what have you.
Having that violent attraction doesnt make you dangerous but it shows you could be. Do you not understand? violent videogames shouldn't be banned, im not saying that. Im saying the people who consume it need to be watched. Its not your fault you like violence but its the responsibility of healthy rational people to ensure you never find yourself in a position where you COULD act on your fetish.
1a9946 No.16134926
>>16134901
Do you have no fucking understanding what a nightmarish Orwellian hellhole one would create by making the government police people based on your fetishes and hobbies? Are you out of your fucking mind? Read a bit about the USSR for fuck's sake, see what people will do with that kind of power and what it leads to. Fuck, play a cyberpunk game, watch a cyberpunk movie, read a cyberpunk book, read 1984 for fuck's sake, actually read any kind of sci-fi work. Even shitty sci-fi writers know why this isn't a good idea.
0b8ed2 No.16134928
>>16134913
>trigger discipline
It pisses me off every time.
2ae277 No.16134929
>>16134926
Oy it's better to be a shitty sci-fi writer than someone who doesn't write at all.
1a9946 No.16134936
>>16134929
Hey I'm not saying that sci-fi writers are bad, what I'm saying is that even the shittiest of sci-fi writers understand that.
f345f0 No.16134937
soon we will need to go on tor to look at anime lolis
2c784a No.16134940
>He's IP hopping to evade bans
0b8ed2 No.16134948
>>16134917
You're pathetic anon. Every single thread you show up and repeat the same shit. It's sad. You really don't belong here.
99a0db No.16134949
>>16134901
As other anons have pointed out, you're a fucking retard if you think people should be policed for potential crimes, when they haven't broken any laws. It's a dystopian nightmare of a thought.
dfdd3c No.16134952
>>16134922
This is about preventing the UN from exerting control over other countries political sovereignty and trampling all over freedom of speech NOT about arguing whether loli is pedo or not. It's a derail whether you mean it to be or not.
2c784a No.16134955
Japan is the land of 2D loli, yet it's safer for children to walk the streets alone at night there than in any Western country where loli is illegal during the day. Denmark's researchers already discovered that there is no correlation with 2D to 3DPedos.
4faad0 No.16134961
>>16134917
You have no right to to call anyone a retard, retard.
>>16134922
Loli isn't pedophilia, fantasy isn't reality. So long as you cannot understand something a child can then your opinion holds no value.
>>16134935
>>16134939
You're an even bigger idiot than the other guy, assuming you're not the same person. Thought crime is some of the most jewish bullshit ever conceived and you lot should be put down for ever suggesting it.
ae28f6 No.16134962
>>16134935
>I see what you are trying to do but it just doesnt hold up under scrutiny.
If you have a counter-argument, make it. Don't just respond with "Nuh-uh you're wrong". If you want want to keep on with this "I just want to have a conversation" act you need to actual come up with counterarguments instead of just spamming the same thing over and over.
1a9946 No.16134963
>>16134939
Let me explain what's the problem with your post in this one simple diagram.
99a0db No.16134966
>>16134956
It's pretty much impossible to become "someone with a known sexual attraction to kids" unless you commit some kind of crime. And I don't mind if those people are put on lists or whatever. Just leave law abiding citizens alone.
b2a7a4 No.16134970
>>16134948
Every single thread you are in its the same shit. You always act like furfags and then call other some ad hominem over them calling out your faggotry.
2c784a No.16134976
>>16134956
You're assuming that people that find animated giant eyed noseless midgets with inhuman squeaky voices would go after real kids.
b0b98b No.16134982
>>16134972
And yet, despite the puritan drives to erase it here, the U.S. sees more children sexually abused every year than Japan ever does.
dfdd3c No.16134984
>>16134935
> I feel people who own guns should be on a watch list of some kind and have an indicator on their ID card. Not a badge, the ID, kept in a wallet. Police should be allowed to ask to see your ID when you visit beaches, parks, public restrooms, theater, etc. If you are found to be in a prohibited place as a person who owns a firearm or a PAF for short, you will be subject to fine or even arrest. Its just not okay for people who like guns to walk around freely in society.
4faad0 No.16134991
>>16134966
His retarded ass would have looking at drawings online count the same as molesting a kid. Hell I bet these dumbasses would take it a step further and include watching anime in general to warrant your name on a list because it may or may not have lolis and they may or may not be sexualized. The jews always word laws to be vague and apply to as broad a spectrum as possible so more folk can be incriminated and sent to their private jails to make them money. This nightmare world is well within the realm of possibility, we have people in this thread seriously advocating for it.
99a0db No.16134992
>>16134977
You're the one who needs to be segregated from the mainstream population, with ideas like that.
0b8ed2 No.16134999
>>16134970
>them
Stop pretending to be retarded now. It's you. You're the one butthurt over loli that you keep spamming this "ur just like fuRfaGs" line over and over. You keep using "faggot fetish", you keep using "lolishittery".
I think you should kill yourself to be honest with you in my honest opnion.
99a0db No.16135003
>>16134998
>faggot had to change ips again
This should clue you into something.
deba22 No.16135009
>>16134999
>Flat in the BD
Now that's an improvement
2c784a No.16135013
>>16135003
He really doesn't belong here.
4faad0 No.16135015
>>16134977
See? What did I tell you. I guarantee these guys are jew hires pushing to normalize false morality and reactionary tendencies so as many innocents can be put through the system so the jews can siphon some money from the top each step of the way.
You've been found out. You're done.
99a0db No.16135016
>>16135010
It means you're a commie piece of shit.
1a9946 No.16135023
>>16134983
Nigger it's simple, to even allow for a creation of such list you need to police the citizens enough so that you will know about their daily lives and interests. With this kind of knowlede and information you have all the tools you need for control of the populace, and if a human has the possibility to fuck you over, you should assume that he will always, with no doubt fuck you over. We are all horrible shitstains and should always expect the worst out of each other. Implementation of your idea is connected to having to police other areas of human life, giving more knowledge to the government and allowing the government to act on this knowledge. If you think that this power won't be abused by the people in power you are a retarded fucking nigger.
ae28f6 No.16135031
>>16134998
His point is pretty obvious. Scrubbing out loli has no effect on people performing sexual acts on children. Therefore loli does not cause people who consume it to be of any harm to children. I also notice you still won't post any counterargument to any post calling you out on your logic being identical to the logic of banning violent videogames. If you can't actualy defend your arguments, you're wrong. Pretty simple stuff
23a96d No.16135032
e6af12 No.16135034
>>16134977
if the age of consent was 13 or none, whites would have never had the problem of underpopulation in the first place. but nah, lets wait until the female is borderline sterile to start thinking it might be okay for her to fuck.
dfdd3c No.16135035
>>16135010
>>16135022
>>16135004
>>16134998
Don't reply to this guy. Just report and filter.
0b2c4c No.16135043
Wouldnt Ashcroft v FSC kinda make this pointless
1b2592 No.16135045
>>16135037
>If you buy loli
>buy
4faad0 No.16135046
>>16135037
Why don't you acknowledge my posts calling you out, shill-kun?
ae28f6 No.16135047
>>16135037
> If you buy loli
Nobody buys loli retard.
>Police already can ask for your id any time they want to in the US
No they can't retard.
I continue to notice you still won't post any counterargument to any post calling you out on your logic being identical to the logic of banning violent videogames. If you can't actually defend your arguments, you're wrong. Pretty simple stuff
b2a7a4 No.16135048
>>16134999
My point is that you have a shit fetish that you should stop waving proudly like the faggot you are. I compare you to furfags because that exactly how you act(actually you are worse because furfags no longer get defensive about it and actually use designated shitposting threads), just replace lolishit with furshit and its almost a perfect parallel. The only reason you arent actually exiled is because vols are on your side. If a furfag started posting exactly like you he would be relegated to the shadow realm instantly. You are on the same level of faggotry as them, you are too ignorant of the fact because you've had your shit fetish sheltered. You are in the same basket as furfags, horsefuckers, trapfags and fagfags.
You should kill yourself over being so defensive over what you stroke your peepee to.
23a96d No.16135050
>>16135044
The fuck is there to refute? You're a retarded goon who thinks he can wipe away ideas.
f5c08b No.16135052
>>16135037
And what if you were subjected to the same treatment? You think you'd accept it if it was something you enjoyed harmlessly? Would you accept the social stigmas of being associated with criminals in spite of never having done anything wrong?
No, you wouldn't, and don't try to pretend like you would. Fuck off.
dfdd3c No.16135056
>>16135043
Yes. At most in the US any new law would be able to do is clarify the grey area concerning 3DCG loli.
0b2c4c No.16135066
>>16135056
I dont even like loli but fuck those who police drawings of fake shit
dfdd3c No.16135067
>>16135046
DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THE DERAILER
ae28f6 No.16135069
>>16135058
And neither of them causes any harm to anyone. As there is no harm caused to anyone setting up an Orwellian nightmare to police would be fucking retarded.
1a9946 No.16135070
>>16135058
I called you out on that you dirty little kike, exploitation and horror movies prove you wrong. People like violence for the sake of violence, and there is nothing wrong with that. Unless you think people should be segregated on the base of watching slasher movies.
e6af12 No.16135073
>>16135060
if you were a pedophile you should look for some tight cunny you faggot kike, or just go to your neighboors barmitzvah party, they have lolis to fuck there.
2c784a No.16135078
>>16135067
>>16135073
Lolis are cuter when they have no noses, to be honest.
99a0db No.16135081
>>16135037
>Police already can ask for your id any time they want to in the US. Its illegal to not have an ID on you.
It is not only perfectly legal to not carry an ID, it is also legal to refuse to show your ID to police. Your true colors are really showing now, commie police cuck. Your ideas are not acceptable.
0b8ed2 No.16135083
>>16135048
>wall of text to prove youre not butthurt
Where did I imply any of that anon? I never said loli was normal or should be celebrated. It's an imageboard, no shit people are going to post things you don't like. The greater freedom of expression in these sites is exactly for that purpose.
Why are you so mad over what I stroke my peepee to? This obsession from you is unhealthy.
1a9946 No.16135085
>>16135037
Are you for real? Not only would that be a slippery slope for worse actions to come like jailing those people, would put a stigma on the marked people and keep them from job, but would also be completely fucking ineffective as people could just pirate loli.
e6af12 No.16135087
>>16135076
>banning loli is too far
>but creating a police state with a legitimized 2nd class citizen status for people who like things you dont like is not
kys
2c784a No.16135090
He keeps IP hopping to virtue signal hard. I wonder if he's an actual pedophile that feels guilty for something and decidea to take it out on 2D lolicons to feel better about himself?
1a9946 No.16135091
>>16135084
That's not a fucking contr-argument you retarded fucking kike. Do you think that people who watch exploitation and horror movies should be segregated from other people as well? After all they enjoy violence for the sake of violence, so by your logic they would have violent tendencies.
dfdd3c No.16135092
>>16135076
>I just think its important that once someone is identified as a PAC (person attracted to kids) they should be watched and kept from being in a position where they could act on a child in real life.
And that totally won't be abused by authorities because people in power are totally good people who would never abuse their positions to go on a private crusade.
t. retarded bootlicker
b2a7a4 No.16135093
>>16135083
>why are you mad about me being a faggot
GEEE
fc559a No.16135095
>>16135085
This. Additionally, most child molesters are not pedophiles (meaning, they don't consume loli or child porn).
ae28f6 No.16135096
>>16135084
That is in no way a valid counter-argument to either post
2c784a No.16135105
>>16135098
And you are being banned for a reason. Just accept your ban and leave.
23a96d No.16135106
>>16135094
Who the fuck said they wanted to fuck children you subhuman
1a9946 No.16135107
>>16135098
Why do you even post here if you don't even answer half of the arguments thrown at you, you stupid nigger?
e6af12 No.16135108
>>16135098
>admitted ban evasion
>>16135094
employeers could look this up and not hire you based on something you have no control over. that sounds like second class citizenship.
>>16135083
>if you reply i win the argument :^)
the reason people are replying is because you're being a fucking retard
dfdd3c No.16135114
>>16135098
You're not going to win. I'm reporting you whenever you pop up again and if you run the thread out we'll just make a new one because this is important.
c09a30 No.16135116
I dont know about any of you but I want to fuck a kid
e6af12 No.16135117
>>16135109
>well my argument is perfect so i win again, ha ha
you could go around the world in 80 days with all that hot air carrying your balloon
0b8ed2 No.16135121
>>16135093
Again why are you so mad? Why do you keep spamming the same posts. This is fucking sad. I'm going to stop replying to you, I enabling your unhealthy obsession.
ae28f6 No.16135124
>>16135109
And I hope you realize wanting to set up a system to violate the rights of people who you have admitted several times in this thread are not of an increased threat to children is not being kind to anyone.
e6af12 No.16135128
File: 3b9a87fb1afcc3e⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 682.8 KB, 917x934, 917:934, 3b9a87fb1afcc3ef3104c50006….png)
>>16135116
but do you want to fuck a squid?
23a96d No.16135129
1a9946 No.16135132
>>16135109
>>16135121
>Announcing the fact that you are leaving.
Both of you. You're literally trying to show that you are in the right by announcing your leave to make yourself seem smarter than you are, so that it seems that you're the one who's reasonable and walking away from the discussion. If you were really reasonable you would just leave the discussion without the need of announcing it. You're stroking your own fucking ego.
dfdd3c No.16135133
>>16135128
I desperately want to fuck an inkling..
0b8ed2 No.16135142
>>16135109
You ignored all half the arguments thrown at you. You lost.
>>16135108
Read his posts.
2c784a No.16135144
>>16135133
Their squishy boneless bodies.
f5c08b No.16135145
>>16135060
Bullshit you would, the main reason pedos don't seek help already is because of the social stigma against them and the concern of being arrested on suspicion of committing crimes even if they never have.
0b8ed2 No.16135160
>>16135130
It was already a pasta though. It's been thrown around in previous threads. Nothing new.
a2f4ac No.16135168
>>16132953
>>We have at least partialy, our own language
Technically it would be our own dialect you doofus.
b2a7a4 No.16135176
>>16135121
So you can't refute the fact that you are an annoying cock-gobbling lolishitter worse than furfags? Because you seem awfully adverse to me calling you out and have moved on to calling me mad?
0b8ed2 No.16135183
>>16135132
Read his posts and my posts. We're not having a discussion or argument. We're throwing shit at each other. There's no winning or looking smarter with the conversation we had. I'm calling out his spam. He makes the same posts similar to the master baiter that you keep replying to. This entire thread is biting the bait hard so fuck you I'm going to join in and laugh at the autist that's butthurt over loli.
dfdd3c No.16135186
Hey Mark pin the next thread so that faggots can't shitpost to the bump limit.
For everyone else:
DON'T REPLY THE THE DERALING FAGGOTS
When you realize that you are talking to him just report and filter.
1a9946 No.16135198
>>16135168
Give it enough time.
f3cb11 No.16135199
>>16135188
this thread was all around great and I really enjoyed it, mr hitler
b2a7a4 No.16135219
>>16135183
see >>16134868
Just because you don't have a response or think are too smug to give one doesnt mean you are right. With each thread you faggots continue look more and more like retards that cant handle getting called out. Sad, really.
dfdd3c No.16135222
Hey Pewter I don't often say this but you are doing an excellent job.
52dfd0 No.16135224
I fucking HOPE it passes just to see the fucking butthurt
0b8ed2 No.16135227
>>16135186
If only people could learn restraint. The salt from the autists butthurt over loli is delicious at the very least.
b2a7a4 No.16135231
>>16135227
>he keeps trying to hide his asshurt
Keep going. You are very convincing.
b0b98b No.16135234
Why didn't you protect their smiles?
f3cb11 No.16135248
>>16135234
wow thats awesome
0b8ed2 No.16135250
>>16135234
Biting the bait was more important.
60564e No.16135263
>>16135234
Me on the left.
f3cb11 No.16135277
>>16135263
then you'll have to excuse me buuuut…….. I want to rape you until you're raped :-D
dfdd3c No.16135305
>>16135234
Imagine a world without little girls. We cannot let such an evil happen.
b0b98b No.16135312
>>16135305
And if there's no little girls, there's no aras either
b85a5e No.16135324
>>16135305
why can't you faggot's save screenshots in PNG?
There's an entire thread about image formats on /tech/: >>>/tech/1027999
0b8ed2 No.16135327
The end of loli and arafags. The dark ages of traps and bara. Never let this nightmare become a reality.
0b8ed2 No.16135333
60564e No.16135338
>>16135312
No expired hags would be a good thing though
dfdd3c No.16135345
>>16135324
>why can't you faggot's save screenshots in PNG?
I've had that pic for a long time and even then I got it second hand. At least it's not as bad as people who save pixelart as JPG.
0b8ed2 No.16135346
>>16135338
I believe in variety. The dainty loli, the flustered tomboy, the comforting cake. The world should know the pleasures of all types.
e86efe No.16135366
>>16134976
>with inhuman squeaky voices
So Japs are no longer honorary Aryans?
3479de No.16135374
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16134802
Black Sabbath was considered heavy metal, so yes.
I also thought heavy metal was the loud, fast music, but that's a sub-genre apparently.
This could possibly fall under slow heavy metal, but I wonder if there's a more specific term.
bd4132 No.16135375
>>16135366
That's just the women… and yes that is half the reason I don't watch JAV. The other half is the censorship.
60564e No.16135391
>>16135346
Variety is great as long as a few things remain constant. The girl must be a virgin. The girl must be faithful. The girl must not be too old relative to their species. Deviance from these traits is evidence of worst girl and leads toward acceptance of 3DPD.
b2a7a4 No.16135393
>>16135374
I dont think that could be called metal at all. I mean it sound like the same instruments. I'm not gonna pretend I have any understanding of music but what I imagined is the heavy riffs(?) just done way slower but still as deep sounding.
0b8ed2 No.16135407
>>16135391
I agree, but I still find cakes to be far far removed from their 3DPD counterparts.
e86efe No.16135410
>>16135078
>Lolis are cuter when they have no noses, to be honest.
e86efe No.16135419
>>16135234
Because most of them are idolsluts.
dfdd3c No.16135437
>>16135419
> idolsluts
Take that back!
>>16135410
This reminds me of some artist.
e86efe No.16135450
>>16135437
Mostly it's pic 2.
b0b98b No.16135461
>>16135393
Sabbath? As in, early Sabbath? That's metal. Metal as a genre can be traced back to the late 60's (maybe mid if you're really stretching it, but that's more psychedelic rock territory). It developed further in the 70's with bands like, well, Sabbath, for one. Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and tons of other smaller bands like BANG!, Atomic Rooster, Pentagram, Tear Gas, Saint Vitus, Toad etc. A distinction is usually made between that kind of music and bands that represent metal as we know it, like Metallica or Megadeath. Songs that came out in the late 60's and before the late 70's are usually labeled 'proto-metal' because they were metal before metal really existed or was fleshed out completely. Helter Skelter by the Beatles, for instance, is a proto-metal song. All of these bands were primarily rock bands, but they did produce songs that had the core aspects of what would later be known as metal. So yes, Sabbath, even early sabbath, is metal. They're just not your Slipknot or your Diamond Head.
Have an example of proto-metal from 1971
f3cb11 No.16135474
>>16135461
this shit is good
0fbda4 No.16135584
>>16135437
Imagine those were all shota
000000 No.16135902
>>16132859
They ban. We disobey. Lolis are eternally ok.
01df9b No.16135945
why don't we just ban real porn first?
jews can't answer this question
5806fd No.16135959
>>16135945
Because that would upset too many people it's about the slow creep into slavery.
1fffa4 No.16136584
Next thing they will want is your guns, don't let them.
7d366f No.16136637
>>16134451
The West civilized nothing. If it was just down to Western influence and nothing else, then every place visited by the West would be civilized.
7d366f No.16136648
>>16134098
Loli is short for lolita.
054e30 No.16136732
>>16132859
FUCK THE UN
SAUDI ARABIA AS HEAD OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
SEX TRAFFICKING OF UNDERAGE GIRLS VIA UN FORCES OUT OF UKRAINE AND THE YUGOSLAV WARS
CHILD SEX ABUSE OF REFUGEES BY UN PEACEKEEPERS THROUGHOUT AFRICA
the UN are kikes, hypocrites who say one thing and do another, its an auction house of democracy where moral supremacy is sold to the highest bidder
it needs to be destroyed
3f804d No.16136777
Everything I love is being taken from me.
I don't know what to do, but every ounce of my soul is telling me I have to do something. Everything I've helped with here feels like I've missed a moving target though.
c2ce1b No.16136781
>>16134999
Wow, I have to download that bd
342795 No.16136839
>>16132951
Their Venn diagrams do cross over quite a bit though.
3f804d No.16136860
Realistically, how long do we have until this is in effect?
342795 No.16136895
>>16136860
>in effect
Implying it'll have any effect
69413c No.16136923
>>16134374
My guess is that they're trying to cut down the competition that's eating into their child porn/prostitution ring profits.
0876f1 No.16136997
>>16136584
But they've already been after your guns and successfully taken them away in places. Hell, even if it is legal in your area the police/government will still ignore that and violate your rights while getting away with it.
For example, look at the Daniel Shaver shooting. Daniel was in an open carry state, yet somebody saw him with a gun which wasn't even a real gun and called the police, which they sent a swat team to kill him dead. Your rights are being slowly striped away, and they're almost gone.
7d1015 No.16139641
>>16132859
Granted all pornography is depraved and disgusting, but this is just another ploy to pretend that the UN and all the highest echelons of government aren't full of satanic paedophiles, while also distracting from the diverse group of middle eastern refugees raping small children in the streets of Europe while the police watch
5806fd No.16139719
>>16139641
You are more true than you know. The guy leading the council that tried this last time is now in jail for raping children.
f3edba No.16140756
f3edba No.16140757
>>16140745
In the end, it seems they reach their conclusion based off of reasoning without any actual "study" done on the subject.
15bc94 No.16143224
>>16139641
>Granted all pornography is depraved and disgusting
go back to your forest shed varg
775deb No.16143272
>>16136997
The chart is out of date. Texas passed an open carry law recently.
180341 No.16145610
>>>/v/16145563
Subject. Request for an opinion on fictitious adult pornography
>>The Ministry of Justice has in letter of 23. June 2010 to the Sexological clinic and the Visitation and treatment network, requested an opinion to be given on the possession, etc. of fictitious children's Porn, which are not realistic models, which are produced in the same way or at the same time as photographs, etc., may lead persons to conduct sexual assaults on children.
>>In answering the above, the bodies consulted have contacted Col leagues and experts abroad. A comprehensive literature search has also been carried out. In addition, several employees from the Sexological clinic and the Visitation and treatment network have been from 1.0 to 4. September 2010 participated in Congress under the auspices of the Iatso (International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders). The title of the Congress, held in Oslo, was: "New Perspectives in Sex offender treatment: Restorative justice, legal questions and humanistic traditions as challenges to therapy ". Relevant Research presented at this Congress is referred to in this answer.
>>We have found that, to the best of our knowledge, there are no scientific studies related to the question asked and that, therefore, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the use of fictitious images of sexual abuse on children , ' child pornography ' alone can lead people to conduct sexual assaults on children. The scope will be subject to future studies, with a study of the consumption/misuse of (non-fictional) image and film material of sexual assaults on children at the above-mentioned Congress. An area of increasing interest in scientific research.
>>In the following, a few of the most recent studies in this field will be summarised as follows:
>>Kingston et al (2008) investigated persons convicted of sex crime where there had been real physical sexual contact between the infringer and victim (hands-on) place and found that the consumption of images of sexual assaults on children for this group was a Relevant risk factor, as the sex offenders who had used the illegal pomographic material were more likely to fall back to the crime of equality than those who did not.
>>Seto and Eke (2005), on the basis of a study of 201 abusers of images of sexual assaults on children, stated that the likelihood that abusers of images of sexual assault on children later on would be in the hands-on assault is unknown. In their study, they find that people with previous convictions had a significantly greater probability of reusing and breaking the law. Abusers of images of sexual assaults on children who had committed sexual assault before the moment of the present judgment were the individuals most likely to be in breach of the law-either generally or sexually.
>>Endrbutt et al (2009) has attempted, in a Swiss study, to assess whether consumers of images of sexual assaults on children on the internet pose a greater risk of having a hands-on assault on children. It was about 231 men convicted of possession of illegal images of sexual assaults on children. The study showed that 11 (5%) Of men had a previous conviction for sexual and/or violent assault, 2 (1%) Had a conviction for hands-on sexual assault involving sexual abuse of child, 8 (3%) Had a conviction for a sexual assault in which there had been no physical sexual contact between the infringer and the victim (HANDS-O.FJ), and one had a conviction for a non-sexually violent attack. Evaluation of the relapse for the group showed that 7 (3%) Of the relapsed with a violent and/or sexual violence, 9 (4%) Relapsed with a hands-off and 2 (1%) With a hands-on sexual assault.
>>Endrbutt et al concluded on the basis of this material that the consumption of images of sexual assault on children alone was not a risk factor for the use of a hands-on sexual assault-at least not for those individuals who were never previously convicted of hands-on Sexual assault. The majority of the investigated did not have any previous convictions for hands-on infringer or assault. The researchers estimate that the prognosis for not to Bega hands-on sexual violations and assaults as well as relapse into child pornography for this group was good. At the Oslo Congress, Endrbutt presented an AL follow-up to the above study. It re-examined the group of 231 men convicted of possession of images of sexual assaults on children, and found that after six years no one had been convicted of hands-on assault. The majority of these had no criminal history either sexually or in any way.
180341 No.16145612
>>16145610
>>>/v/16145565
>>The empirical literature in the field of non-fictitious images of sexual abuse in children has not presented unambiguous evidence that the consumption of this material can lead to significant risk of engaging in hands-on sexual assault. Some studies (e.g. Endrbutt 2009, Benz 2010) make the assumption that abusers of images of sexual assault on children constitute a special group. They state that although some of these are also hands-on assaults, the majority probably does not. As stated in several studies, there may be a real risk that former hands-on convicted offenders will again be able to re-use non-fictional images of sexual assaults on children. The consumption or abuse of images of sexual assault on children alone does not seem to be a prelate to hands-on sexual assault on children.
>>As it is, research in this field has only taken place in recent years. Further and more extensive studies will be carried out for prevention purposes. Studies so far seem to show that there is a high-risk group for whom the misuse of non-fictitious images of sexual abuse in children can contribute to abuse. The referenced studies seem to question the misuse of child pornography imagery alone can lead to sexual assault.
>>Documentation to "possession, etc. of fictitious child pornography, which are not realistic, which are produced in the same way or in the same way as photographs, etc. may lead persons to conduct sexual assaults on children "Do not appear to be available at the moment.
>>Sincerely,
>>Jorgen Bech-Jessen, clinical psychologist, external lecturer
>>Thorkil Sørensen, professor, Dr. Med.
>>Ellids Kristensen, senior physician, clinical lecturer, visitation and treatment network Coordinator