No.87783
U.N. PROPOSES INITIATIVE TO BAN LOLI, SHOTA, AND UNDERAGE ‘DRAWINGS AND CARTOONS’
https://archive.fo/j98mi
“Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as ‘any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes’. The qualification ‘by whatever means’ reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline. It includes, inter alia: visual material such as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments.1
"The Committee urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse material in any form. The Committee notes that such material is increasingly circulating online, and strongly recommends States parties to ensure that relevant provisions of their Criminal Codes cover all forms of material, including when the acts listed in article 3.1(c) are committed online and including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.
It gets worse.
>“As a minimum, States parties must establish criminal jurisdiction over all offences mentioned in article 3, para. 1, as explained under the section on Prohibition, when they are committed in their territory, including on board of a ship or aircraft registered in their countries, regardless of the location of said ship or aircraft. This allows the State to investigate and prosecute all these offences regardless whether the alleged perpetrator or the victim is a national of that State. If necessary, the State can issue an international warrant for the arrest of the alleged perpetrator. The Committee urges States parties to adopt legislation to comply with this obligation if this is not already the case."
Holy fucking shit, imagine getting slapped with an international warrant because you dared to take your 'Shota Boimanko Bonanza 3: The Adventures of 仲田志位' volumes with you. The Lolicaust is upon us.
Full draft of the proposal - anonfile.com/kef2l3udbd/INT_CRC_INF_8870_E_docx
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87784
If the UN does it I think the US will follow, lol.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87785
Meanwhile real children in skimpy clothing and degenerate behavior are celebrated in primetime TV.
Meanwhile mudslimes and other rapefugees in the west get a slap in the wrist for child trafficking and raping actual children.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87786
>>87785
Oh, it's much worse than that
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87787
and it will happen because no one wants to be known for defending it
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87788
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87789
EVERYBODY COMPILE ALL THE ARCHIVES AND ARTICLE SCREENSHOTS IN REGARDS TO THE U.N. CONTAINING PEDOPHILE WORKERS, CP RINGS AND CHILD TRAFFICKERS IN THEIR ORGANIZATION!
SHARE ALL THE INFO TO OTHERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH LARGE AUDIENCES LIKE RAGING GOLDEN EAGLE AND APPABEND!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87793
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87796
With where lolis/lolicon material stand now in Japan, it is inevitable that sooner or later it will be looked upon and punished the same everywhere as actual child porn.
Nobody said anything when anime removed it after all, and nobody will stand up for anything else.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87811
>>87783
And in case they don't succeed to push this, they will fucking put chemicals in the water that turn the fricking loli's gay.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87813
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87814
>>>/animu/87796
> and nobody will stand up for anything else.
blackpillniggers get out
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87815
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87825
>>87815
This, especially first image. It makes me think that we are witnessing an intentional alcohol-prohibition equivalent with the intent to (((monopolize child pornography))).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87829
If they take my lolis, I will take their lives.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87833
UN's bullshit won't work on you if you're not a member state.
If this retardation leads to Japan leaving UN (along with other nations in the future), I have no problems with it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87843
>>87837
Damn. Just get the Northgooks to nuke the whole damn country then.
Being atomized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being ruled over by frenzied feminazis.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87845
>>87829
Yeah, sure, you'll just keep your mouth shut like always.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87846
>>87783
what are the chances of this succeeding?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87848
>>87845
That's the joke.
Thankfully, this is only a proposal and someone with enough common sense might make the statement that banning lolis is essentially stifling and censoring of art.
Which is ironically what Hitler did, so maybe that comparison will rustle them enough to drop the idea.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87850
>The Committee recommends that States parties provide fast and effective procedures for blocking and removal of prejudicial or harmful material involving children, in order to avoid that such material continues to be accessed and shared. Such procedures should be established in collaboration with law enforcement, reporting hotlines, as well as the private sector, in particular Internet Service Providers and social networks.
>Similarly, States parties should, through increased cooperation, remove obstacles to effective investigations of and prosecutions for the sale of children, child sexual exploitation and sexual abuse both online and offline by facilitating access by the competent law enforcement and judicial authorities to evidence of crimes committed across borders, including witness testimony and electronic information stored by Internet Service Providers and online platforms. The private sector should collaborate and comply with the law enforcement measures taken in that respect.
Well alright then, that is a fucking terrifying thought
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87852
The only way to fight this is to advocate for the legalization of actual child pornography, thus ripping off the leg that they are currently standing on. Without that, they will try this shit again, and again, and again, until they eventually win. One would have to convince others that there is no actual link between child pornograhy and child rape, a fact that is easily substantiated by all the children who upload pornographic videos and images of themselves of their own free will. One would also have to manage to convince others that the legal definition of "consent" to sexual activity is not at all in-line with the logical concept of consent.
It's never going to happen. People don't have the stones to fight against centuries of propaganda. I know this because I don't have the stones to fight against centuries of propaganda, at least, not on my own, and I expect nothing from others that I do not expect of myself.
Fuck you all. I hate you. You're part of the problem and can't even realize it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87854
>>87852
>legal definition of "consent" to sexual activity is not at all in-line with the logical concept of consent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87858
>mfw LolisRDead was right
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87859
>>87854
Here's the breakdown:
Logical consent: I said "yes". You said "yes". Consent is established.
Legal consent: I said "yes". You said "yes". Either your "yes" or my "yes" is legally invalid because either you or I is/am not considered worthy of making your/my own decisions, or you/I were intoxicated, or you/I were manipulated, therefore consent has not been established.
The same shit, the same way of thinking that allows a drunk girl who fucks a drunk dude at a party to claim rape is the way of thinking that enables the laws that have established the precedent that has led directly to the point we are at currently. And you let it happen, because you were afraid.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87861
>>87857
>We have literally no reason not to surrender now. We should have fucking listened.
Fuck you. Don't use my words for your cowardly blackpill. I said that I have no hope. That doesn't mean I believe people shouldn't fight, it means I lament the fact that I am not more brave. I want others to be better than me, not to roll over and accept their fate.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87863
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87864
>>87859
Drunk girls claiming rape for drunk sex is not liable and only passes because of corruption.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87866
>>87864
>corruption
Corruption like a study getting federally censured, barred from academic discussion, for no reason other than disagreeing with the current propaganda? That kind of corruption?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87867
>>87859
>>87864
stems from the fact that it's easier to coerce drunk people and children into doing something they didn't 100% want to do in the first place. also tacitly implies that all women are drunk and children.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87870
I'm indifferent to lolis, but honestly, this only sounds like they want control over who gets to create lolishit and its methods of distribution. Because let's be honest, just because something is illegal doesn't mean it will become non-existent, it simply means you have to go through hoops to get it in an underground industry, and the UN kikes want to be a part of it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87872
>>87870
> just because something is illegal doesn't mean it will become non-existent, it simply means you have to go through hoops to get it in an underground industry
You really think actual child porn is like that?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87874
>>87872
No I was thinking more along the lines of drugs. Lolishit is dissimilar to child porn in the fact that there are no children involved, anyway.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87875
>>87793
>>87833
These. Mangaka have also gone heavily against censorship for decades, Go Nagai being a prime example and succeeding in spite of angry parents and the government. Him, Rumiko (who's one of the richest people in Japan), and even hentai artists have the voice to go against them when needed.
>>87796
Correction: 3D lolis/lolicon. The 2D industry is still thriving over there in spite of bumps in the road a few years back. See my above post, too.
>>87837
I've seen some of this shit in mainstream news, but part of me still wonders how much of it is exaggerated and how much is really real.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87876
>>87874
> Lolishit is dissimilar to child porn in the fact that there are no children involved, anyway.
Yet it is demonized as the same thing, and they are basically trying to make it the same thing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87877
>>87875
> The 2D industry is still thriving over there in spite of bumps in the road a few years back
That's why lolicon content disappeared from anime industry already?
Sure, outright 18+ material is safe for now, but you can't say that it's not being affected at all.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87880
>>87876
Well that'd be an entirely different can of worms. I can't speak for myself about lolis and its ostensible connection with pedophilia since I'm more of a kemono and ara fag, but I certainly am disgusted by 3D furries/MILFshit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87882
>>87880
The point here is not how many lolicons are into 3D (I'd say the minority, but still a good amount), but how the entire point of making lolicon illegal is likening it to 3D, so it will sooner or later be treated the exact same.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87884
>>87877
Well, we don't know what's going to happen. There's always going to be underground shit, but there are other things affecting the industry's outcome besides laws- saturated markets, horrible animation, changing tastes, and the list goes on.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87887
>>87877
I suspect the olympics
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87888
>>87887
People keep bringing that up as if that was somehow the reason, the Olympics might affect their 18+ industry, but it certainly is not the reason why lolis can't show a single pantyshot in their shows nowadays.
If it was due to the olympics, then 15-16 year old characters wouldn't be able to show that either, but they can go full borderline hentai in anime…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87890
Someone tattoo the Miller Test onto these fucker's eyelids.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87891
>>87887
>>87888
This is true, but I suspect that if it does affect anything, it'd be Tokyo spending too much and further drowning themselves into the debt made by their own Abenomics.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87892
>>87891
Sounds about right, but it's related to said problem.
>even more reliant on their western saviours
>even more sumimasen about values that clash western standards
>banning lolicon material as child porn to get some bonus points in the eyes of western power
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87893
>>87890
>the Miller Test
>the precedent that established that it's okay to disregard the First Amendment if you jump through enough hoops
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87895
>>87888
Japan probably defines loli by body type not age, especially given the body types of mid late high school girls in anime. The thing is that this shit seems to be only affecting anime not manga/ mobile games/light and visual novels. Seeing how normalfags and sjws don't get triggered unless shit pops up in anime like GB or SH shows that they don't read manga or light novels unless it is attached to a shounen. And the nips most likely know this due to the lack of outrage from the media, so it make since that anime would be affected by PR faggotry but know the question is will shit go back to normal after the olypmics.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87896
>>87895
>Japan probably defines loli by body type not age, especially given the body types of mid late high school girls in anime
Yeah, I know, I could have said "small girls" can't show lewd fanservice unless it's really under the radar, while bigger girls can show anything.
But the olympics is definitely not the reason, ever since anime got media's attention, lolicon content is being removed from it more and more, while not many staff members are willing to get associated with lolicon content either, cause now they would be sticking out of the usual like a sore thumb.
I don't see a way for this to turn back to normal at the very least, even if anything else will be unaffected.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87912
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87913
>>87890
But the Miller Test is shit and shouldn't be applied to piece of art
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87914
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87916
>>87890
The Miller Test is actually unconstitutional.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87946
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87949
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87973
Have there been any other sites talking about this?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87975
>>87946
that's it, now you're gonna get it, bucko!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87977
>>87785
>Meanwhile real children in skimpy clothing and degenerate behavior are celebrated in primetime TV.
The fuck kind of TV are you watching?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87978
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87982
>>87977
Desmond is amazing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87983
>>87981
From Wikipedia:
<The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California.[2] It has three parts:
<Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
<Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[3] specifically defined by applicable state law,
<Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[4]
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87984
>>87983
So, basically it's completely arbitrary?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87986
>>87984
Absolutely.
>I'll know it when I see it!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87989
They can't keep their shit opinions to themselves.
If you dare disagree your country will be sanctioned and/or bombed.
I swear the (((West))) is being handled by a bunch of psychopathic children.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87991
>>87848
>Which is ironically what Hitler did
That was degenerate primitive jew shit with totally fucked up scary proportions which was shown in public places as art.
I can't remember censorship beyond that. I will also note that it wasn't really censored. It was shown to the public in educational exhibits as the degenerate art (modern art) it is. Censorship would be to prevent the public from viewing it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_art
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.87996
Lolis don't even real though.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88013
>>87946
>dildo raping machine
Is that a machine that uses dildos to rape or a machine that rapes dildos?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88014
>>87982
Oh, that dreck. I must be watching different channels. Whenever someone yammers about scantily clad 3D children on TV I'm thinking of /hebe/ tier shit and I'm pretty sure the news would blow up at flesh and blood little girls in panties.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88019
Reminder to treat people with contempt if they use the FBI OPEN UP XD meme. They'll get nervous and sweaty when a little anime girl dates to exist in a series and will bitch about pedophilia, yet will justify niggers and sandniggers grooming and raping girls in their communities.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88033
>>87875
>Mangaka have also gone heavily against censorship for decades,[…] even hentai artists have the voice to go against them when needed.
how do they do that?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88037
>>87875
>first pic
anyone got a link of the full video?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88039
>>88019
>FBI OPEN UP XD meme
I was warning you fuckers about this months ago because I never once saw it used on an actual loli. I saw the busty, blonde, high school girl in this picture being referred to as a loli and immediately saw the FBI meme for what it was: a blatant attempt to normalize the idea that beautiful woman of any age = child porn. Know what I was told in response? That I was overreacting and couldn't take a joke. Only when it's being shoved in your face do you people see the writing on the wall.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88042
>>88039
Normalfaggots in the US always refer to liking anyone below the age of 18 as pedophilia. Even though our fucking country has multiple states where the AOC is fucking 16. Honestly these mentally retarded cretins and their proto puritan brand of feminism pisses me off. They only shit on the reproductive rights of white males and Japanese males, but the moment they see some low class shitskin do it they turn a blind eye and go on with their business. If you point out the hypocrisy you're a weeaboo nazi zealot pedophile who deserves to be jailed in hell or some gay shit like that.
What makes matters worse though is that nearly 40% of all normalfaggots in the US lose their virginities by the age of 14. So these faggots are some of the biggest hypocrites you can find out there.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88044
>>88042
In my sperg rant I forgot to mention, that pedophilia doesn't even mean you're attracted to someone who doesn't have the magical number of 18 to their age. It means, to be attracted to women who have not gone through puberty.
I'm sure this board is not full of floor licking retards, so I don't even know why I bothered typing this out. But since I did already I'll post it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88046
>>88033
As I said before, Go Nagai's infamy (at least to the PTA) reached new heights. Similar situations have happened to certain PC and video games in the United States when their senate had hearings over "Mortal Kombat" and the pretty harmless "Night Trap", which led to the creation of the ESRB). Basically, institutions were overreacting, and we saw the "Streisand effect" in full force: Japanese PTA was unsuccessful, and Nagai did gain a lot of popularity from that whole procedure. From today's perspective, all of that appears laughable.
Another example is that many female mangaka supported Kumiko Yamada's response, in which you can see their names towards the bottom of the page: http://archive.is/oPjmv
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88094
>>87870
All anime girls are (((lolis))) in their eyes. Have you not heard of Jason Schreier?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88096
>>88087
Fuck off with your blackpill faggot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88115
>>88044
This. Most lolicons are not even pedos, they are hebefags because the loli is visibly shown going through puberty. If you wanna see true pedo stuff then look at toddlercons.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88123
>>88115
>tfw it only took one artist to make me like toddlercon
Though only him, and he sometimes uses lolis. But damn if those lewd mouth close-ups aren't hot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88127
>>88123
Who is this artist that you speak of anon?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88151
Whats the chances of this shit succeeding? Normalfags all over the internet are going "who cares it's loli" and supporting the UN. Any attempts made to explain that not only loli/shota will be affected is meant with them calling me a pedo among other shit.
>>87870
What people over the internet don't it isn't just "lolishit" it's "underage" mind you that normalfags already have trouble defining what is or isn't loli.
The thing is that the fags in the UN aren't apart of the community so how they define underage is vastly different to how we do. The end goal is the same as the last time they went after japan for sexualizing women in anime 2 years ago, except this time they are using an easier attack vector.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88155
>>88151
The UN has no power over the laws of any country, with the exception of Eurocucks caring about them. I understand shit like loli can add up, but so far no one's reported on this besides OAG. Also, they don't have much to do with Japan's existing laws anyway.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88159
>>88094
>NTR+
>+
What fresh hell is this?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88165
>>88159
A buff dude cucking the fat dude that's cucking the real couple of the girl?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88168
>>88159
Can't be any worse than NTR^2
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88169
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88171
>>88169
GET IT RIGHT, SHITLORD. IT'S:
LGBTPQ2SWTFBBQAYYLMAOQWERTYNTREX+alpha & Knuckles, Featuring Dante From The Devil May Cry™, and introducing AKB0048
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88172
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88176
>>88172
Every time I see a new one, I add it in. That's how it got so long. Now that's going in. Thanks for you contribution.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88209
>>88094
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
thanks for reminding me of this piece of shit cancer from the early gamer gate days.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88210
>>88209
Why do jews and western soycucks always push women with masculine jawlines as pretty? Why do they hate women with feminine round or roundish faces?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88212
>>88210
No idea, but thanks to that kike's comments we've been ending up with these abominations and many similar like them. Look at the fucking Dragon Age poster, just look at that tranny's fucking Jaw!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88213
>>88210
>first pic
What is this feeling? that obviously is an unreal beautified picture yet i feel drawn to woman depicted there.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88214
>>88213
It's called neoteny, you're attracted to her very apparent youth, plus the photoshoop makes it hard to see any wrinkles she might or might not have. It's a very easily double edged sword, if you're unlucky you end up looking like an ugly toddler like in gif related. I find neoteny when looking for an irl 3dpd woman should be handled in controlled doses, like in this Saori Hara and Momiji comparison picture. She's youthful but still has signs of maturity that way if your child is not born beautiful he/she at least isn't born like a deformed toddler for the rest of their lives.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88215
>>88210
People would call the first image pedophilic because she looks like a little girl. You wouldn't believe how many people I saw call men pedos just for going out with cutsey East Asian girls even though they're adults.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88216
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88217
>>87991
You're looking at it wrong. If loli is seen as cp, which it isn't, then people will support its banning. If loli is seen as art, which it is, then banning it is something Hitler did, and Hitler was bad so we shouldn't do things he did.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88220
>>88215
To be fair, Asian people are in general much more neotenous, and neoteny is what you could call "babyfication" of certain sexual features as well as other features. Additionally feminine features are not reviled even in some of the worst shitholes in Asia. Hell Korea which was ruled by, literal satanic Jew Worshipping feminists of the Megalian cult, still values femininity and has thousands of women shave off their jaws due to being too masculine for the Asian ideal of beauty.
Yeah most of those SK popstars are literally a product of plastic surgery.
It's gotten so bad South Korean beauty pageant contestants are unironically suffering from an Arr Rook Same syndrome.
http://archive.is/5ysu6
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88221
>>88216
>comments shown on that video
I guess I'm a pedo for liking young looking women, rip me.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88226
For those of you who want to do something about this
www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/DraftGuidelinesOPs.aspx
>All comments:
>Should be in one concise and focused document indicating precisely the paragraphs to which comments are being made and must not exceed 5 pages
>Should be submitted electronically in WORD format to the following email address: crc@ohchr.org;
>Comments must be submitted by 31 March 2019. No submissions received after this deadline will be considered or posted on the webpage.
Gather any and all info you can suggesting that there is no link between child abuse and cartoon depictions of minors. If anyone can find Danmark's study, that would be great. You could also site the drastically lower rate of child sexual abuse in Japan vs America. Tell them that one's tastes in fictional content does not represent their real life impulses. Tell them that similar bans on this kind of content has resulted in content that isn't even loli getting banned (See Steam, Reddit, disagreement etc) Tell them fucking something and call it Operation Locked and Loli'd or some stupid shit, I don't know. But everyone should be sending their emails even if they don't believe the U.N. will go through with this. They've been trying to do this at least since 2015 and they won't fucking stop until enough people tell them to. Apathy is death, anons.
You should all download the draft of the proposal so you can reference exact sections in it.
anonfile.com/kef2l3udbd/INT_CRC_INF_8870_E_docx
The part about cartoons is on page 14, section 56. There are more sections talking about it though, as well as a section proposing international jurisdiction so you can get prosecuted for this shit by a country that you're not even a national of.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88231
>>88221
I've seen guys get called pedos for liking images of women because the women in those images looked very feminine while hugging a teddy bear. Femininity is being equated to pedos these days.
It's okay for women to be girly and like plushies.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88235
>>88220
>>88214
Could it be argued that us westerners are becoming so pussywhipped by kikes and women that we're starting to prefer more masculine women? Hell this may have started taking into effect since the mid 2000s. I remember back when the thirsty beta males that watched g4 idolized morgan manjawebb so much she even got a playboy mag shoot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88236
>>88235
Someone post the picture of that actress in a bikini on a boat with massive shoulders and no tits.
>>88231
I might not be a pussy slayer, but at least people don't despise femininity where I live.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88237
>>88236
there's alot of ugly jewllywood whores who are not feminine at all, you don't even have to be specific because they're easy to find.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88243
>>88236
>>88237
Pretty sure he meant this one specifically but yea it's not hard to find an example.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88245
>>88235
I've liked masculine women since I was old enough to appreciate them. Tomboys, female athletes, those legitimate nerd girls with no chest and moderate autism. It's more the personality I look for though, rather than a mannish appearance. I still like a pretty face.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88248
>>88245
>masculine
Having a tough personality doesn't mean the girl is masculine. A cousin of mine acts pretty mannish, but if you push her buttons hard enough she blushes or fidgets really hard over the stupidest girly shit. For example I once criticized how her eye lashes weren't properly curled one day while we were at a party and so one of them looked like she put one of those faked ones on. She turned beet red and almost cried until I hugged her and kissed her on the forehead.
Another time I touched her fat handles for like 2 hours straight and she started punching me over it while getting a bit teary eyed.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88255
>>88206
Not if Japan's otaku have plenty to say about it. Have you seen how they react with manga endings and idols having secret relationships? Don't be pessimistic just yet. The more we gather info, the stronger we can push back. And I don't know why you think 99% of the Internet is "against us" when there's a lot more than you think. This happened 3 years back and it's likely that the UN will get pushback considering their own crimes. They fail every time.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88256
>>88255
The issue here is not about Japan stopping the production of loli stuff or materials that depict teenagers. The problem is that the UN passing this law into effect will effectively kill the fansubbing scene in European countries by criminalizing this fictional content. So even if Japan refuses to partake into this mental retardation and utter faggotry it still means the rest of us will suffer and will have to struggle to learn Jap even harder. Granted I live in the US, but I'm not delusional enough not to take into consideration what a bunch of virtue signaling faggots people are in my side of the pond either.
Think about it, if this goes through our only hope for the fan subbing scene would be huehues or Slav countries who wipe their asses with UN/EU laws.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88257
>>88248
>She turned beet red and almost cried until I hugged her and kissed her on the forehead
Bullshit. The kind of creatures you spoke of doesn't exist in base reality.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88261
>>88257
I'd be fucking her and proposing to marraige if she weren't underaged in the state we live in tbh. The best I can do is protect her smile as best I can,and cuddle with her while playing party games like fusion frenzy, I love pissing her off. It's cute and dick arousing.
Sage due to not personal blog
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88294
>>88243
There is no way that thing is female. The bone structure is all wrong.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88298
>>88294
Hollywood is full of fugly whores, makes me wonder how low Harvey Weinstein's standards were to molest some of these things…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88300
>>88294
>Hollywood promotes actresses that look like underage boys
wow how strange can't imagine who would be attracted to that
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88312
>>88298
>>88300
You don't understand. Women have wider hips than shoulders. That thing has wider shoulders than hips like men. In fact it has no hips what so ever. It has to be a tranny.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88314
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88322
>>87787
The fucking japanese government told them no, why can't you just quote them and have immunity via appeal to authority?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88339
>>88312
Tbh it varies a lot. Even very curvy hour glass or pear shaped figures of 3dpd their hips are usually about the same width as their shoulders it's usually just their smaller waists give off that impression.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88342
>>88256
Yeah, I figured it wouldn’t be a Japan-only problem. My bad.
>>87787
Well, there are tons of protests going on in Germany right now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88344
>>88300
If you're implying that she looks like a little girl, then not, fuck off.
Also if you think little girls look like underage boys, you can also fuck off.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88345
>>>/v/16140720
>>>/v/16140722
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88452
>>88206
>Exactly why it's useless to fight back. Literally 99% of the internet is going against us and there is nothing we can do to push back.
You can literally send them a thorough reply as to why they should fuck off, and you have until March 31st to do it. Read >>88226 and >>88345
I've already sent them mine. Do your part and stop blackpilling everyone.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88475
>>88255
>Not if Japan's otaku have plenty to say about it.
They literally don't and won't be able to say anything about it.
OHCHR is only accepting responses to their draft in their official languages. Japanese is not among those languages
Sitting around and waiting for Japan to save the day is not an option here. Form your own response and email it to them.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88481
>>88226
>>88475
>in WORD format
So they want you to attach a Microsoft Word document?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88482
>>88481
Sounds like it. No longer than 5 pages.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88484
>>88475
>Form your own response and email it to them.
I really want to, but I can't articulate my point well enough and I think all I could send is a paragraph about how this is not a children's' rights issue because no real children are involved.
Someone please give me some pointers.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88485
>>88484
Just write it plainly if you're hopeless with formal writing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88486
>>88475
I didn’t say that specifically for that form, I meant that for the people pushing against loli in basic social media.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88487
>>88484
I'm not good at this sort of thing either.
This shit is way out of my league but here's what I have so far
My points so far are: 1) Fiction is an idealized fantasy that has no consequence (We, as adults, are aware that fictional acts are heavily exaggerated/idealized. Actions in fiction mostly do not have exact realistic consequences that can occur in the real world, for it is part of the creator's artistic freedom. Though it can make actions and events look more pleasing or unattractive, adults will not act upon or recreate these actions/events because we know well enough that actions can lead to consequence, as well as not producing the same pleasing result that occurred in the fictional world.)
2) Negligence of Real Life children being abused (Making this law will only make law maker's waste time having to go through this violation which isn't harmful in the first place. If such meager is being dealt with seriously, why aren't the law enforcers and the UN investigating the corrupt entertainment industry that exploits real children? [Desmond and toddler beauty pageants being an example, maybe briefly mention Hollywood], there was plea from the public for the law enforcers to investigate but there are still no conclusions or any swift action.)
I don't know if this is alright. I'm not good at citing shit especially the first point because its mostly out of my life experiences. I haven't written any essays since high school. is Purdue Owl legit? How do I cite for things like this?
This whole law is fucking terrible along with other horrifying shit happening in everywhere for the last decade. I just want to fap to my loli/shota, keep my anime intact, and stay away from every 3DPD out there as much as I can; what the fuck do normalfags want from us, fucking leave us alone jesus christ.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88492
If the resolution passes, at least the market will be shaken. Anime has been stagnating for long, there hasn't been any significant revolution ever since imageboards became a thing.
Granted, censorship is not the right tool for change but a period of prohibitionism is sure to stir things up.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88493
>>88484
I'll post my response. It's long, so I'll have to break it up.
This response will focus mainly on Page 14, §61 of the aforementioned draft of guidelines. This response seeks to challenge the validity, ethics, and efficacy of the definitions laid out in §61 of the guideline draft, particularly, its inclusion of fictitious, cartoon depictions of minors.
The section in question:
"Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as “any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes”. The qualification “by whatever means” reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline. It includes, inter alia: visual material such as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments."
Drawings, cartoons, animated movies, toys, and sculptures should not be included in this definition of child pornography, nor should it be regulated as such, and I shall lay out why.
Firstly, there is no known link between drawings of fictitious children and the sexual abuse of actual children. In 2012, the former Justice Minister of Denmark, Lars Barfod, ordered a study to be conducted in order to find a link between drawn depictions of minors and sexual abuse of children. The study was conducted by the Sexologist Klinik which is a part of one of Denmark’s largest hospitals, Rigshospitalet. This study was conducted after the Socialdemokraterne (opposition party) proposed banning drawings and animations of children being sexually abused. The original document is in Danish, but here are some translated sections of their findings.
1. It is clear from the opinion that there are no scientific studies to illustrate whether the possession of fictitious child pornography, which is not realistic depictions, is similar or approximate in the same way as Photographs, etc., may lead individuals to commit sexual assault on children.
2. The opinion also states that research into the link between the use of pornographic images of real children and sexual abuse of children has only been taken up in recent years. Studies so far seem to show that there is a high-risk group for whom the use of pornography-like images of real children can be a contributory cause of sexual abuse of a child, but the use of pornographic images of real children without a This high-risk group does not in itself appear to lead to sexual abuse of children.
3. The Penal Council then points out that there are no studies showing or resorting to the fact that the possession of fictitious child pornography, which does not have the same resemblance to photographic representations of real children, is a contributory factor in the misuse of children Sexually.
4. Against this background, it is difficult for the Council to justify an extension of the prohibition already in force on the distribution and possession of certain forms of fictitious child pornography to include animated children's pornographic graphy, which does not have the Similar to photographic representations of real-life children.
5. Thus, the prohibition of Disclosure and, subsequently, possession of child pornography has been consistently designed to protect children against sexual assault of one kind or another, whereas the purpose has not been, for example, To protect a common moral perception in society, after which it may be considered in itself to be offensive in more explicit form to fantaage about committing sexual assaults against children.
6. In the view of the Penal Council, it would also be very far-reaching to carry out a criminalisation solely in order to protect such morals in society, and criminalisation on this basis is not known in practice in recent times in Danish law.
7. The Penal Council has not found grounds to engage in reflection on issues other than the latter example, photographs of children. Thus, the Penal Council has not found any grounds for considering the neo-criminalisation of the propagation or possession of non-photographic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88494
>>88493
–material which shows an interest in sexual relations with children. With regard to animated child pornography, see the Considerations in Section 5.2 above
In much the same way that there has been no proven link between violent video games or movies enticing people to engage in acts of real violence, there is no proven link between artistic works of fictional children enticing anyone to sexually abuse an actual child. §61 is a massive overreach that relies heavily on unproven assumptions that share a premise with other assumptions that have already been debunked. The assumption being that one’s taste in art or entertainment is a direct reflection of their real life tendencies, behaviors, and impulses. We wouldn’t assume that someone who enjoys viewing art depicting the torture of Saint Barbara is a woman-hater. We wouldn’t assume that someone who enjoys watching war movies wants to join the military. We should not assume that people who enjoy art or entertainment featuring sexualized, but fictitious children, will ever actually assault a child. Again, one’s choice in entertainment does not reflect their impulses.
By far, the most popular creator of sexual content involving fictitious children is Japan. The genres of loli and shota, for instance, involve little boys and girls engaging in sexual, sometimes sexually abusive activities. Not every work under these genres are sexual, as some can just be innocent stories about the child character’s daily life. These are some of the most popular genres of art and entertainment in Japan, and yet, Japan’s sees a lower volume of child sexual abuse cases than most other countries where such content isn’t nearly as popular or is even outright illegal. In 2016, Japan saw 1,622 cases of child sexual abuse, as reported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. In the United Kingdom in the same year, England saw a startling rise in sexual abuse cases involving children. Over 2,800 children were identified as needing protection against sexual abuse. In 2016 alone, in England alone, there were 10,581 cases of sexual assault on children younger than 13, as reported by the NSPCC. Mind you, fictitious drawings of children, such as loli and shota, are illegal in the United Kingdom. This only serves to highlight the clear disconnect between one’s consumption of content such as loli and shota, and their actual tendencies to abuse a child. It speaks volumes that a country where this kind of content originated and is currently popular has ten times less the amount of child sexual abuse cases as a country where it is illegal and frowned upon.
There have been several online platforms that have attempted to carry out what is being proposed with this draft, and it has never worked out well. Steam, an online platform that sells video games, has taken down the works of developers whose games don’t even depict children. Reddit has banned users for posting pictures of anime characters that are not even children. This brings us to our next problem; It is extremely difficult to properly categorize drawn, fictitious child pornography.
For instance, a popular character archetype in the loli/shota genres is a vampire that is a child in physical form, but it really thousands of years old. What is law enforcement supposed to do in such a situation? Do they punish people anyway because the character seems to depict a child, despite the character not being a child? How does law enforcement prove the age of a fictional, non-existent character? What happens if a character who is physically an adult, or even elderly, is actually underage in the story from which they originate? Do we punish people then, because the character is underage despite looking like an adult? Again, how do we prove the age of the character?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88495
>>88494
This is a problem law enforcement is bound to run into, and the “I know it when I see it” attitude does not apply here, because a character’s looks often does not betray their actual age. The attempts of Steam, Reddit, and similar platforms to try and make these distinctions have been failures that resulted in innocent people being punished and works that do not even fall under the loli/shota genres to be scrubbed from the platforms. Attempts to criminalize the fictitious always results in steep overreach that hurts far more than it helps. Unlike actual photographs of real children, drawings can visually depict one thing, but be defined as something completely different by the creator, and it is perfectly valid to do so because it is an artistic creation. The criminalization of this content will also severely hurt Japan’s anime, manga, and video game industries, as many of the characters featured in these works are underaged.
In closing, I will say this. There is no question that media featuring real children being sexually abused is a crime with a clear, tangible victim. The child suffered at the hands of an abuser. But this cannot be said of drawn, fictitious children, like the ones seen in loli/shota. There is no victim, no child harmed anywhere on earth, if someone draws an anime girl and states she is underage. As we saw with Japan’s volume of sexual abuse cases versus that of the United Kingdom, we can’t even make the assumption that there is a connection between the consumption of loli/shota content and the sexual abuse of real children. §61 encompasses and assumes far too much with no reason, logic, or data to back it up. It assumes that even fictional content is representative of one’s impulses when that simply is not the case. §61’s inclusion of fictional content will only do harm to those who do not deserve it, criminalize content with absolutely no link to the crime insinuated, and open up a can of legal worms. Law enforcement cannot prove the age of a fictional character, nor can they dispute the age if the creator says that a physically young-looking girl is actually hundreds of years old. Drawings should not be treated as if they are human victims of a crime, with human rights.
Drawings, cartoons, animated movies, sculptures, and other artistic works featuring completely fictitious children should not ever be criminalized, nor shout they be included in §61’s definition of child pornography.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88497
>>88226
>Apathy is death, anons.
Boku wa mo shindeiru.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88501
>>88487
Purdue Owl is legit and citings are usually in MLA format. If you still need some help with citing, use easybib.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88536
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88541
>>88536
Needs a bigger nose.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88546
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88589
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88592
>>88536
Saudi Arabia is fine though.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88593
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88594
>>88592
Is this some ebic trole?
Why do you think so?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88595
>>88593
Not really, no.
Loveless relationships are wrong in itself, but having a child as wife is no worse than having a hag.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88596
>>88595
There's plenty of other reasons.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88597
>>88493
Could you please post a link to that danish study?
I can't seem to find it.
And that statistic of sexual abuse of children in England vs. Japan, please.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88599
>>88596
Well yeah, but the one related to the topic on hand is not one of them.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88604
>>88597
>Could you please post a link to that danish study?
>>>/v/16145563
Subject. Request for an opinion on fictitious adult pornography
>>The Ministry of Justice has in letter of 23. June 2010 to the Sexological clinic and the Visitation and treatment network, requested an opinion to be given on the possession, etc. of fictitious children's Porn, which are not realistic models, which are produced in the same way or at the same time as photographs, etc., may lead persons to conduct sexual assaults on children.
>>In answering the above, the bodies consulted have contacted Col leagues and experts abroad. A comprehensive literature search has also been carried out. In addition, several employees from the Sexological clinic and the Visitation and treatment network have been from 1.0 to 4. September 2010 participated in Congress under the auspices of the Iatso (International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders). The title of the Congress, held in Oslo, was: "New Perspectives in Sex offender treatment: Restorative justice, legal questions and humanistic traditions as challenges to therapy ". Relevant Research presented at this Congress is referred to in this answer.
>>We have found that, to the best of our knowledge, there are no scientific studies related to the question asked and that, therefore, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the use of fictitious images of sexual abuse on children , ' child pornography ' alone can lead people to conduct sexual assaults on children. The scope will be subject to future studies, with a study of the consumption/misuse of (non-fictional) image and film material of sexual assaults on children at the above-mentioned Congress. An area of increasing interest in scientific research.
>>In the following, a few of the most recent studies in this field will be summarised as follows:
>>Kingston et al (2008) investigated persons convicted of sex crime where there had been real physical sexual contact between the infringer and victim (hands-on) place and found that the consumption of images of sexual assaults on children for this group was a Relevant risk factor, as the sex offenders who had used the illegal pomographic material were more likely to fall back to the crime of equality than those who did not.
>>Seto and Eke (2005), on the basis of a study of 201 abusers of images of sexual assaults on children, stated that the likelihood that abusers of images of sexual assault on children later on would be in the hands-on assault is unknown. In their study, they find that people with previous convictions had a significantly greater probability of reusing and breaking the law. Abusers of images of sexual assaults on children who had committed sexual assault before the moment of the present judgment were the individuals most likely to be in breach of the law-either generally or sexually.
>>Endrbutt et al (2009) has attempted, in a Swiss study, to assess whether consumers of images of sexual assaults on children on the internet pose a greater risk of having a hands-on assault on children. It was about 231 men convicted of possession of illegal images of sexual assaults on children. The study showed that 11 (5%) Of men had a previous conviction for sexual and/or violent assault, 2 (1%) Had a conviction for hands-on sexual assault involving sexual abuse of child, 8 (3%) Had a conviction for a sexual assault in which there had been no physical sexual contact between the infringer and the victim (HANDS-O.FJ), and one had a conviction for a non-sexually violent attack. Evaluation of the relapse for the group showed that 7 (3%) Of the relapsed with a violent and/or sexual violence, 9 (4%) Relapsed with a hands-off and 2 (1%) With a hands-on sexual assault.
>>Endrbutt et al concluded on the basis of this material that the consumption of images of sexual assault on children alone was not a risk factor for the use of a hands-on sexual assault-at least not for those individuals who were never previously convicted of hands-on Sexual assault. The majority of the investigated did not have any previous convictions for hands-on infringer or assault. The researchers estimate that the prognosis for not to Bega hands-on sexual violations and assaults as well as relapse into child pornography for this group was good. At the Oslo Congress, Endrbutt presented an AL follow-up to the above study. It re-examined the group of 231 men convicted of possession of images of sexual assaults on children, and found that after six years no one had been convicted of hands-on assault. The majority of these had no criminal history either sexually or in any way.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88605
>>88597
>>88604
>>>/v/16145565
>>The empirical literature in the field of non-fictitious images of sexual abuse in children has not presented unambiguous evidence that the consumption of this material can lead to significant risk of engaging in hands-on sexual assault. Some studies (e.g. Endrbutt 2009, Benz 2010) make the assumption that abusers of images of sexual assault on children constitute a special group. They state that although some of these are also hands-on assaults, the majority probably does not. As stated in several studies, there may be a real risk that former hands-on convicted offenders will again be able to re-use non-fictional images of sexual assaults on children. The consumption or abuse of images of sexual assault on children alone does not seem to be a prelate to hands-on sexual assault on children.
>>As it is, research in this field has only taken place in recent years. Further and more extensive studies will be carried out for prevention purposes. Studies so far seem to show that there is a high-risk group for whom the misuse of non-fictitious images of sexual abuse in children can contribute to abuse. The referenced studies seem to question the misuse of child pornography imagery alone can lead to sexual assault.
>>Documentation to "possession, etc. of fictitious child pornography, which are not realistic, which are produced in the same way or in the same way as photographs, etc. may lead persons to conduct sexual assaults on children "Do not appear to be available at the moment.
>>Sincerely,
>>Jorgen Bech-Jessen, clinical psychologist, external lecturer
>>Thorkil Sørensen, professor, Dr. Med.
>>Ellids Kristensen, senior physician, clinical lecturer, visitation and treatment network Coordinator
>>>/v/16145584
>TL:DR, they can't find anything that links loli images to actual pedophilia, but they say more study could be necessary to better understand what's going on.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88606
>>88597
>And that statistic of sexual abuse of children in England vs. Japan, please.
Forgot about that. Sorry.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88608
>>88217
>loli is seen as
Loli doesn't exist. It refers to little girls in drawings which is fully legal in my country. Churches have little naked angels too.
Manga style isn't modern art either.
>Hitler was bad
>sauce: my ass
>we shouldn't do things he did
We should all strive to be like Hitler.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88610
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88611
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88612
>>88606
Can't find a link to that statistic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88621
>>87784
I love little girls.
>>87783
Old image but relevant.
>>87788
>implying
They definitely do have some power, they just don't do anything useful with it, because corruption.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88623
>>87786
Hot.
>>87789
This but do you have to act like a faggot nu/pol/tard about it? Less caps and redtext. /animu/ is a slow board so there's no need to try to gain attention, and you should use images instead if you want to do that on the faster boards.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88624
>>88606
Of course the jappos don't realize that it's mostly foreigners doing it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88625
>>88610
Fuck this shit, fuck all shit, it's not even the UN that will kill lolis, Japan is already doing it.
I wonder when will loli hentai be banned, at most a few years, and we'll get at most ugly underground works, while risking to get jailed too.
Lolis in anime are dead, but not because of a "lolicaust", but because globalization is unstoppable, and somehow the Evil of Humanity are people who love the youthful.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88629
>>87783
If we're going up against them, then we'd better off playing with their own kind of tricks. And so, i think that we shoul-
>and including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.
Wow that's an easy loophole. There's also research in where
>>88605
>>88604
That pretty much says that the link between pedophilia and loli images is inconclusive. Shit this is like when the EU (as useless as they are) funded a research that piracy doesn't harm sales of vidya games, and in some cases actually helped it. Of course, that doesn't mean that there are people who are against it, i mean people will definitely get creeped out by this for sure so there in lies the core problem. How do we discuss this matter with them, in a way that could be understood by both sides lest the other side would just start throwing insults.
I don't even like lewd lolis, they're for qt only.
>>88621
I think the new version is better that the old one
>>88625
Fuck off niggerpill, noone wants to hear you ramblings.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88632
>>88629
>Fuck off niggerpill
Hey, how about you fuck off?
I'm not that blackpill shilling fag, but as far as lolis are concerned, you can't even argue that they are dead in anime.
Loli fanservice, or high budget loli series are literally a thing from the past.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88633
>>88625
>lolicaust
I found this: http://www.lolicaust.com/
Looks pretty lolcowish :^)
>>88629
What's the new one?
Also,
>muh blackpill
>waah no bad thoughts! only good thoughts!
Fuck off underagfaggot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88634
>>88541
>>88546
>>88589
Not all of the UN are Jewish you know.
>>88536
Did you make this?
I bet none of you fagetz are actually considering why the UN might be doing this, from a purely political perspective, and I bet that because no one does anymore. I've seen others say anons have gotten stupider, whether because they never think or because everyone is new, and I have to agree. Everything is black and white, all reasons are mutually exclusive, even when they're not, because what is nuance.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88637
>>88634
They do it exactly because of why anime does it.
Getting rid of lolis makes them look better.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88652
>>88634
>why the UN might be doing this
1) they need to look like they are doing something (busybody explanation)
2) japan is an easy target (populace respects authority, 1st world country)
3) lolifags are weird and easy to demonize (who could say no to protecting children)
4) to preserve lolis/cp as an exotic temptation only to be enjoyed by (((the initiated)))
5) they tried it before and were refused, making them upset having their pride bruised.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88656
>>88652
>why the UN might be doing this
They impose their religion unto others.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88666
>>88634
>why they might be doing this
Because they are a bunch of jews and good goys.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88756
You guys might find this useful, if you want to compare the amount of child sexual abuse in Japan to England or Sweden or whatever.
United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (UN-CTS). "Total sexual offences against children at the national level, number of police-recorded offences". United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/CTS12_Sexual_violence.xls
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88770
>>88652
You're probably overthinking this. Most people here are too young to remember all the conservative, anti-gay preachers in the mid and late 90s. These guys would give sermons about how evil gays were and how all gays were going to hell only to end up getting caught having gay sex. This is basically the same thing the UN is doing. The UN is bending over backwards to pretend they want to protect children while their officials go to third world shitholes and start child sex rings in countries that don't have the means to protect their kids.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88785
Funnily enough, this happened today.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88787
>>88632
>as far as lolis are concerned, you can't even argue that they are dead in anime.
Are you for fucking real, it's not dead when lolis continue to be depicted in anime you dolt. What changes is the fact that people likes lolis in a non-sexual way, as in being cute and all that sugary shit. If you want lolis to be portrayed sexily, then you will get weird looks from most people. You want to change that? Either try to persuade them or just enjoy it in secret.
NOW, the fucking UN wants to ban the second option. Though i really don't think anything serious would come out from this, seeing as the UN is as limp-dicked as it gets. Still, do not ever underestimate the enemy.
>Loli fanservice, or high budget loli series are literally a thing from the past.
Same with any niche shit really, i mean ffs animated hentai these days has almost powerpoint-slideshow tier animation. I mean come on, this shit is designed for a specific audience to begin with, of course it's not expected to break bank. Unless you are rich, and you are probably notToo bad furries would spend more on furfag pron than actual animation lol.
>>88633
>What's the new one?
Edits some of the text to be more descriptive except for the last panel, alas i don't have any strong reason to post it for you.
>implying being negative is all there is to life
I bet you're an edgy fag during high school too anon. Wallow in deep shited fears all you want, but i just want to be given a chance to be something more in this degenerate world.
If all else fails, i could just go out in a bang.
So if you want to kill yourself, kill yourself in the most amazing way possible Probably won't happen since most suicidal losers are way too apathetic lmao
>>88785
The protests are still going on? I thought that they died during after January passed through.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88789
>>88787
>I thought that they died during after January passed through
The media is covering it up. Its going stronger than ever, and is now in Geneva Switzerland, trying to get the UN to do something about the police violence in France.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88801
>>88787
>Are you for fucking real, it's not dead when lolis continue to be depicted in anime you dolt. What changes is the fact that people likes lolis in a non-sexual way, as in being cute and all that sugary shit. If you want lolis to be portrayed sexily, then you will get weird looks from most people. You want to change that? Either try to persuade them or just enjoy it in secret.
How about you fuck off, moralfag?
Lolis used to have dedicated high profile shows, drawn nicely and attractively, while now they only get cheap crap, drawn over simplified, and get the fanservice fucking butchered even if the source is lolicon.
That is what changed, that is how lolis are dead in anime. Now they are just "dawww look at this cute pet/daughter/son" tier for normalfags to enjoy, in cheap looking shit shows.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88811
>>88801
Fanservice in general has taken a huge hit in recent years. After the age of the ecchi battle harem things took a nose dive regardless of body type. It is true loli was hit the hardest though.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88812
>>88243
>shoulders
————————————
>hips
—————
That's a tranny for sure. There's no way that thing could give birth.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88815
>>88811
While it stands true to this season (it still has some big breasted "super hot" girl lewd, mind you), and last season also only had a few lewd ones, for example Summer had quite the borderline hentai tier ecchi, that doesn't lose to any older lewd shows.
We even got super sexualized shota main lead show.
Lolis on the other hand? Dry fields everywhere for years, aside from at most some worthless token legal loli getting (in comparison) mild service in a borderline ecchi series.
Lolis are in a pretty different situation than anything else.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88816
>>88815
It's been true for years. Most so called ecchi anime nowadays don't even show nipples on the disk releases.I wasn't disagreeing with you on the loli situation though, loli is even more nonexistent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88817
>>88816
I give you that, nipple situation is horrible.
But we at least still get scantily-clad-butts-in-our-face/detailed pantyshots, and subtle cameltoes (not on the level as Strike Witches had, though).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.88961
>>88811
>>88816
The amount and quality of fanservice (with nipples) depends on the show, but I’ve noticed that neither has really fared well these days despite having lots in the past few years. I think it’s more of the season and over saturation of isekai than anything else.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89028
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89029
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89030
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89082
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89087
>>89082
I'm like 99 percent sure that guy was attracted to her grandmother.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89107
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89132
Ban the (((West))) from existence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89151
>>89132
Even is Games Workshop is pozzed and retarded that would mean no more WH40k.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89202
>>89107
Matsuki Miyu died for our sins
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89207
>>88801
>>88811
Nips seem to think it is due to the Olympics coming soon, so animation studios are self censoring themselves. We wont know until after July 2020, keep an eye out for light novels and manga with fanservice and lolis especially those that come out post olympics since anime is mostly an adaptational media. If the Olympics is truly to blame then shit wont go back to normal until mid-late 2021.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89208
>>89107
>first they came for the lolis
>then they came for the shotas
>finally, they took away everything except BLACKED.COM
>>89030
>charity
Every single time, and it's always a fucking scam of some kind.
The hypocrisy is amazing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89209
>>89207
Were there ever any trend involving loli sexualization that went upwards after a downfall?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89218
Sent my e-mail to the UN today.
It's honestly pretty shit and won't change a damn thing, but at least I can claim to have done something.
Feels pretty good.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89221
>>89218
hope you used the argument that most of the mangaka that make loli doujins are female and making loli illegal is directly hurting real women rather than autistically screeching that you can't fap to 3dpd roasties anymore after experiencing the loli enlightenment
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89225
>>89221
>tfw you can't even remember when was the last time you fapped to 3D women
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89228
>>89225
>tfw you can't even remember when was the last time you fapped to an adult 3D women
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89243
>>89228
>tfw you no longer fap to 3D or even 2D anymore
>just to floor tiles, contemplating dog knees, Ohio, or backpack cucking.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89244
>>89225
>>89228
>>89243
>fapping
>being unable to cum by sheer willpower alone
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89254
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89257
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89261
>>89257
>tfw you can only fap to 1D.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89267
>>89207
For now, that's only happened with the recent Senran Kagura anime and franchise. They said nothing about anime, manga, light novels, or even video games (which is the only real victim of censorship with Sony). Furthermore, SK only mentioned that they wouldn't do "pointless fanservice"; fanservice that has a reason will remain unaffected. Unless something happens, the only period that IS going to be affected will be part of 2020.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89314
>>89209
Might be worthwhile to check the last time the olympics came to japan 1998?,I remember some anons saying the nips were on edge last time it happened.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89409
>>89314
FYI, owning child porn never became legal again after the olympics were over (yes, it WAS legal before) just like lolicon will be brought back into anything that has the media's and masses' attention.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89410
>>89261
go home RMS, you're drunk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89428
>>89410
>current year
>not having superior taste in lewd novel
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89431
>>89409
I could have sworn Japan only criminalized owning CP several years back. Of course making or distributing it was illegal years prior.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89447
>>89431
That accounts for 3D CP.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89449
People here loved the holocaust and they will love the lolicaust. The same people who hate jews hate weebs too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89454
>>87784
>If the UN does it I think the US will follow
The US has agreed and signed a bunch of "hate speech" mandates put out by the UN while simultaneously going "But not really, fuck you, we protect the 1st." The US funds them. They aren't so easy to push around. Anything the UN does or says in these kinds of cases is essentially a suggestion to its member nations that the UN has no power to enforce.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89464
>>89447
3DPD CP is the only kind of CP. Loli isn't illegal and isn't CP.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89465
>>88608
>Loli doesn't exist. It refers to little girls in drawings
Only in the "western anime community". In Japan, loli is just another word for little girl and lolicon another word for pedophile, spefically one interested in girls.
>>87833
>UN's bullshit won't work on you if you're not a member state.
It probably won't work even if you are one.
>>87875
>Mangaka have also gone heavily against censorship for decades
Don't they only do that when it's sudden new regulations? Sure, it'll stop the UN from outright banning lolicon, but haven't the genital censorship requirements for h-manga and doujinshi been slowly getting stricter over the years? I'm seeing more and more mosaics, full white outs, zebra dicks, and pussy prisons in the average hentai I find.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89466
>>89449
Looks like weebs need to unite with greatest allies.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89467
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89469
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89471
>>87852
>The only way to fight this is to advocate for the legalization of actual child pornography
No. Not only is it not the only way to fight this, trying to do so would actively sabotage the cause of trying to fight this.
>>88248
>Having a masculine personality doesn't mean the girl is masculine.
>>88151
>Whats the chances of this shit succeeding?
>>89467
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89475
>>89465
>In Japan, loli is just another word for little girl and lolicon another word for pedophile
So what wapanese?
>>89469
This
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89476
>>89475
>So what wapanese?
Basically, except the nips took the term loli from the Russian book Lolita. Technically the term's origins aren't Japanese, but the way weebs use "loli" is the Japanese use of the term altered to only mean 2D, without any direct connection to its origin.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89478
>>87912
Loli trees. Anyone have the original loli tree?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89480
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89481
>>88042
>Even though our fucking country has multiple states where the AOC is fucking 16
Roughly a third of them. And roughly a third 17. I think slightly over 2/3 of states are 16/17 AoC.
>>88115
>This. Most lolicons are not even pedos, they are hebefags because the loli is visibly shown going through puberty.
This is true,
>If you wanna see true pedo stuff then look at toddlercons.
But this is unnecessary. Loli generally covers girls anime 7-looking to 14-looking at the oldest. While pubescent looking lolis are the most common, true flats with rectangle bodies in the lower age range aren't too hard to find either. It frustrastes me looking for the latter and not the former, and toddlercon kills my mood.
>>89480
>Image editing on a phone
This is even worse than phoneposting.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89484
>>89465
To answer your third reply, yeah, it probably has to do with the Olympics as well.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89485
>>88123
What artist?
>>88255
>Have you seen how they react with manga endings and idols having secret relationships?
Isn't that really old shit by now? Is that fire in them even there anymore?
>>88629
>Shit this is like when the EU (as useless as they are) funded a research that piracy doesn't harm sales of vidya games
They funded research on piracy of all entertainment with the intention of proving once and for all piracy's negative effect. The research found that piracy boosted sales of all entertainment with the exception of harming sales for brand new blockbuster movies. The EU suppressed the study when it didn't get the result they wanted, but some retard who happened to have access to it cited the one negative finding about blockbuster movies in a paper they were writing against piracy. Someone asked for the source of the citation and after much bullshit by the EU, got the study to go public via a freedom of information request.
>>89484
I thought censorship of genitals had been slowly but steadily increasing since long before Japan was chosen for the 2020 Olympics. At least since that one time a publisher got raided and all their h-manga pulled from stores for having censorship too light and not bribing the right people to get away with it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89488
anti-loli people always have access and knowledge of how to get to real CP.
It's almost as if they have some nasty ass skeletons in their closet…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89490
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89491
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89492
>>88634
>I bet none of you fagetz are actually considering why the UN might be doing this
You haven't been reading the thread then.
>>89243
>tfw you can't remember the last time you fapped
>>89428
This would ban that too. If any character was under 18. And if the UN had any way to actually enforce this.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89503
>>89464
Loli is illegal in horrible backward Islamic regimes like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the British Commonwealth countries, but they also banned criticism of Islam and jokes.
It's also Banned in Worst Korea due to the country effectively becoming a Feminist Caliphate.
>>89478
Here is a completely innocent picture of a loli tree.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89506
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89509
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89520
>>89476
>but the way weebs use "loli"
Oh yeah, the ironic "lolicons" use it that way.
Actual lolicons don't give a shit about the distinction, even if they're only into 2D, but they still prefer lolis to hags in any dimension.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89527
>>89520
>Oh yeah, the ironic "lolicons" use it that way.
No, the ironic lolicons are the entry tier weebs that call 3DPD loli and watch shit like webm related. Most actual western "lolicons" want to distance themselves from 3D as much as possible, which is why the term has come to be seen by many in the west as 2D only.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89544
>>89520
>Actual lolicons don't give a shit about the distinction
This is a lefty shilling for censorship by blurring the line between 2D loli and pedophilia.
Of course the difference is known in Japan, how gullible are you guys?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89545
>>89544
Japs know there is difference between 2D and 3D, but lolicon is still a term that includes both to them. Hell, some hentai I've read have even been about guys who say they're "2D lolicons only, not 3D lolicons" until a horny loli falls into their lap. The guy you're replying to is a faggot though that either doesn't know, or is lying, about what he's talking about.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89546
>>89544
>>89545
I get the feeling he's LRD.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89547
So apparently this OPSC(Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography) already passed in 2002 what the hell is going on now https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx. Given how Optional is in the title, how the UN doesn't have any power I am assuming that this is nothing to worry about?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89549
>>89547
An update to it that includes loli/shota?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89551
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89552
>>89471
>trying to do so would actively sabotage the cause of trying to fight this
If you don't, they're just going to pull this again in two years, or five, or ten, with the exact same justification, until they win. These people never stop.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89553
>>89552
Something something eternal vigilance.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89554
>>89553
Something something frog in pot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89555
>>89545
>is still a term
Notice how the shill is doing semantics. No one here was arguing about the definition of loli: the UN ban is about manga content, yet he's trying to conflate it with pedophilia by pretending it's about a wider definition of loli.
Fuck off /leftypol/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89557
>>89555
>No one here was arguing about the definition of loli
>>88608
>>89465
>>89475
>>89476
Follow the chain of posts retard. It's merely tangential to the topic, but it's not wrong. I personally like that lolicon only refers to 2D to westerners and hope a similar trend in language picks up in Japan, as I'm sure they probably have other words for pedophile that existed long before Lolita was published.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89558
>>89557
>as I'm sure they probably have other words for pedophile that existed long before Lolita was published
Yeah. "Normal".
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89559
>>89558
>Fuck prebuscent kids is normal
No. One could make the argument that if you go far back enough, hebe shit was once normal, but never prebuscence. Sure, there were arranged marriages of prebuscent girls, but normal folk didn't actually fuck them until prime child bearing age.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89561
>>89559
It's naive to believe that. Especially considering the preponderance of video evidence showing such relations carried out lovingly and without trauma. But then, you wouldn't know about that evidence, would you? Nor would most normalfags. You wouldn't want to go to jail for watching a video, would you?
Fear is how they rule you. Fear is how they get you to avoid questioning the steps they took to put in place the same social mores that led to this situation. And they will never stop, because they know you will not fight.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89563
>>89561
Go promote kiddie fiddling somewhere else niggerfaggot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89565
>>89563
No. You are the problem, you and your cowardice, whether you want to admit it or not. These people have power because people like you gave it to them, willingly.
https://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1042321-0
https://falkvinge.net/2012/05/23/cynicism-redefined-why-the-copyright-lobby-loves-child-porn/
http://www.mhamic.org/rind/
The biggest engine in the world is useless without fuel, and you are the fuel.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89566
>>89565
Most of these "lolicons" have a life goal of settling down with a hot, mature woman, etc, and "liking lolis, too" is just a side hobby for them, not their preference.
They are also the ones that call lolis that are younger than borderline/Illya-tier pubescent ones "toddlers".
So the average person. Of course associating loli even remotely with the 3D counterpart will disgust and revolt them more than anything.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89576
>>89558
>>89561
>called out of using semantics to derail the thread
>switches to normalization of pedophilia
Ban the lefty shill, he will keep moving the goalposts and pilpul until discussion is impossible.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89578
>>89576
>lefty
>shill
>pilpul
Please FUCK OFF with those phrases only you're familiar with, we literally don't care about anything like that.
Fuck, ban this retard already.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89585
>>89578
>phrases only you're familiar with
>we literally don't care about anything like that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89588
>>89576
>called out of using semantics to derail the thread
You're mistaking me for someone else, retard.
>lefty
And that's just fucking offensive.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89589
>>89559
>hebe shit was once normal
>was
Just because burgers went full retard in the last century doesn't mean everyone else should too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89590
>>89428
What is this from?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89594
>>89589
>Just because burgers went full retard in the last century
http://chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/case-studies/230
Started long before burgers, and long before last century. Where we are at now is the result of hundreds of years of baby steps. Baby steps taken via the same tactics that they are still using today, and NOBODY is willing to call them out on it. Why would you, after all? You aren't a dirty, stinking, fat virgin pedophile, right?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89596
>>89578
>he doesn't know
Thank you for outing yourself as the lefty shill you are. Mind telling us how you got there - another lefty board, reddit, disagreement?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89597
>>89585
We = everyone who isn't a retarded shithole crossboarder.
So fuck off.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89598
>>89596
You keep repeating the same buzzwords, like a broken record.
Fuck off with, die along all the "lefty", the "non lefty" and other fucking crossboarder retards.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89599
>>89594
I've only ever seen LARPagans defending pedophilia with the ancient society angle. But antiquity being pedo is a mistification in american education: the West was based off the stoic roman values, which mixed well with Christianity; the Greeks' pederasty was alien and blamed as part of their decadence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89600
>>89597
>>89598
You got outed, idiot. It's too late.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89601
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89602
>>89599
>LARPagans
Oh, you're from /pol/. That explains everything. You probably think you're "woke", too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89603
>>89602
He's that insane fucking retard who keeps spouting pol buzzwords as if anyone cared about his retarded politics bullshit.
Don't give him more (you).
He literally shits out some phrase from his board, and then agrees with himself and acts as if he accomplished something, while he doesn't realize that he sticks out on a board about anime related discussions like a sore thumb, because he still can't think in other terms than his politic bullshit.
And he's so boring, I can't even laugh at him anymore.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89606
>>89603
He's got a point being in this thread, since this issue IS a very political issue. His problem is that he either hasn't broken his conditioning or, worse yet, traded the conditioning he recieved in childhood for the way /pol/ conditions people. The latter is worse because it's much harder to break conditioning when somebody does it to himself. Perhaps he'll eventually start doing his own research, questioning everything, not just lapping up infographics and propaganda like the leftists to whom he arrogantly considers himself superior, but I don't have faith. I don't have faith in much, anymore. The information's all there, but it doesn't make any difference if nobody reads it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89610
>>89578
>being literally pic related
"Laughing Out Loud", as the kids say.
>b-b-but what is pilpul then?
tl;dr reinterpreting reality to fit the fantasy world inside your head/to fit your agenda
example: Yahveh told us that me must sacrifice 54 circumcised babies of Judah! What do we do, chief rabbi?!
Well,
<mp4 cue
he never said that they have to be OUR babies, didn't he? We'll steal 54 goyim infants from the surrounding villages, and then we will circumcise them, and thus, they will be under our covenant, they will be of Judah!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89621
>>89506
>Liquid gets killed
>Campbell calls out to Snake
I mean, I probably shouldn't be complaining that that particular part doesn't make sense, yet here we are.
Great .mp4 either way.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89633
>>89549
>Article 2 (c) Child pornography means any representation, by whatever means, of a child engaged in real or simulated
>Article 3(c) Producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling or possessing for the above purposes child pornography as defined in article 2.
It seems like that was always there
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89634
>>89633
So it's a huge nothing. But at least "it started a discussion". :^)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89637
>>89590
[spoiler]A lesbian elf and a cursed princess by Araoshi Yuu[spoiler]
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89638
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89641
>>89637
Nooo! my spoiler has been spoiled!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89645
>>89610
I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with that kind of reasoning, and I don't wanna become familiar with either, but yeah I get what you mean.
But you are wrong.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89646
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89649
>>89645
>But you are wrong.
No he is right
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89652
Of course the brain damaged anon is also a samefagging retard.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89655
>>89652
>Of course the brain damaged anon is also a samefagging retard.
per-thread ids would be nice
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89663
Twitter banned loli, nips are leaving for Pawoo. http://archive.is/WneF5
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89665
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89667
>>89663
Twitter always banned loli.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89669
>>89503
None of those places are Japan. Japan only made possession of real CP illegal in 2014.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89672
>>89667
Not outright, no.
Just some "problematic" artists got deleted, but now it's full on attack against anything lolicon.
Don't worry, everything will follow suit sooner or later. People must show how "WOKEN" they are, and stand up against such satanic act as loving 2D children's illustrations.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89673
>>89667
Found the original.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89675
>>89645
>Makes sense
>but you are wrong because I just got BTFO
Thanks for the pilpul.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89677
>>89667
but leaves the actual pedos sharing actual cp alone
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89678
>>89677
If they're doing that on twitter you can report them to the police.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89716
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89725
I see poltard is here again.
I hope he sucked many leftyshill dick today, like he always does before projecting it onto others. ;)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89732
>>89672
What "attack" is there, aside from the change in policy? I've read through the Japanese and English policies and there hasn't been anything about an update.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89735
>>89655
Or the BO could do his job and ban the ebin teen spammer.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89776
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89812
>>89547
That measure never specifically defined illustrations or sculptures or any depiction that didn't actually involve a child. This measure specifically includes fictional media in which no actual child is depicted or harmed.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89819
>>89675
This board is off the radar of SRS or /leftypol/. What you have is probably spilling from /a/, possibly one of their tranny mods and his fuckboy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89833
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89862
>>89819
Don't really care who it is, I'm just merely simply having a giggle baiting hotheads here, m16.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89865
>>89833
He says we eat ganmodoki (literal sounds like fake goose) because that's what we want to eat, not because we want to eat goose meat. He's likening lolis with "fake goose". Figure out the rest yourself.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89898
>>87837
nice. now those gooks wont be playing my vidya
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89904
>>89812
It still separated real and "simulated", regardless nips still ignored it for 12 years with real CP >>89669 and theres a Japanese politician that basically said that they don't have to follow whatever the initiative the UN shits out.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89936
>>89904
The 'simulated' part is referring to sexual activities, not simulated content as in drawings, sculptures etc. That means pictures in which the child is pretending or acting out a sexual activity, but not actually doing it. Both implied and real sexual activities are what's being prohibited there
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89948
You guys should take care that what happened on /v/ won't bring here a stream of normalfags.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89950
>>89948
/a/'s rulefaggotry is more normalfag speed. Loli threads are probably the only thing normalfags wouldn't like about it, but everything else is spot on.
>no banter
>no shitposting
>no /v/
>no /pol/
etc etc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.89954
>>89950
Normalfags can't into proper grammar or keeping 2d and 3d separate. They would get banned pretty fast.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90136
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90290
>>90136
Archive doesn't work for Lewdgamer.
>>89954
This. One slip of slang and they're gone.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90291
>>89950
/a/ is full of circlejerking autists convinced they're the last bastion of old 4/a/ tradition when in reality they're a cargo cult. pretty far from normalfags, in any event
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90316
>>90290
Wayback Machine is being an ass about archiveing it too, so I just took a full page screen capture.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90406
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90415
Apparently, the Creeper act was shut down and never made it to Senate. This organization is raising funds to study the effect of the use of child sex dolls on actual pedophiles.
https://prostasia.org/donations/research-fund/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90418
>>90406
While the UN is powerless to doing anything as >>90136 says. If the UN listens and changes their definition of CP (which they will not). Then it gives one less arguing point for the sjws/normalfags
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90422
>>90291
The circlejerk on /a/ is curated in a way its users remain isolated and ineffective against SJWs. It is pretty much a subreddit, with taboo topics and acceptance of the status quo.
That they're being told this is the way of oldfags and true otakus, is irrelevant. Communists too are told they're being starved for a bright future.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90435
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90438
>>90422
I've seen a lot of bad threads on /a/ recently and they seem to be more lax about misspellings. If anything I think people like you are making /animu/ the cargo cult, thinking it to be some sort of rebel faction when its not.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90439
>>90438
I guess it's alright to head back to /a/ then.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90470
>>90415
>actual pedophiles
This meaning "persons sexually attracted exclusively to prepubescent children", or "persons convicted of a sex crime with a person under the age of 25?"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90472
>>90470
It's ambiguous for now, but I assume it means both.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90640
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90642
>>90640
Well, for the second-to-last point, it was only with the Senran Kagura series so far (and even then, they used “pointless fanservice” as a reason). I can imagine more caution being taken in the near future, but nothing’s really been said for Japanese creators aside from those working with Soyny.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90646
>bad things in fiction are allowed as long as they are portrayed in negative light
what about Superman flying? That's potrayed in a positive light. We should ban Superman comics and movies because some sped will try to fly off a building and die.
>says loli should be banned
>proceeds to have a picture of a man's ass on profile pic
of fucking course
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90649
>>90646
>you can "manipulate" people into fucking children through fiction
The leftard's mind.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90654
>>90649
The patrician approach is manipulating people into fucking children through comedy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90660
>>90646
Violent video games cause School shootings.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90667
>>90646
A small amount of any population is going to be insane and that's what the "rarely" refers to. They're going to do shitty things regardless of whether or not someone draws them out. It SHOULDN'T happen, but it does, and it will, and it always will just as it always had. Pedos will continue being sick fucks regardless of whether or not someone draws a petite animu girl in a bikini for some humans to enjoy. Also, Monika did nothing wrong.:^)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90670
>>90646
Well, I guess there should have no issue whatsoever with showing Quzilax manga to anyone and everyone, according to this logic. No, in fact, it clearly should be a moral imperative.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90675
>>90649
it's the same people who try to use pozzed fairy tales, movies, education, advertisements, etc. to change people's minds
perhaps their beliefs and values come from fiction, so they think everyone else does too
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90682
>>90646
By this logic, Punisher should be banned as well.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90689
>>90649
>>you can "manipulate" people into fucking children through fiction
>The leftard's mind.
But that's exactly how they pushed consensus on degeneracy. Owning all media and bombarding NPCs with programming.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90692
>>90689
>exactly
not really, imo
There has surely been more degeneracy on media, and less of a pushback, but I'm not so sure it translates into the general public being more degenerate. If anything, it made normal people speak out less about stupid shit. But I would guess the general population is being just as degenerate as it has been for the past centuries or so (people were freaky back then too), but the few extreme cases are speaking out more often and more openly, with the help of the media.
I'm not defending them, though. Just gonna throw out that there are silent allies among normalfags who don't speak out because they are afraid of repercussions.
Recently in my country some progressive show filled with your run of the mill leftist celebrities was talking about exposing children to highly sexualized displays of "art" (nude body painted actors performing dances and interacting with the children allowing them to touch the actors and such) the braindead celebrities were literally praising it because "there is nothing wrong with our bodies and children need to know it is ok to explore it too" as if anyone needed some sort of guide on exploring their own body, or even the opposite gender's, there is nothing wrong with having an awkward first interaction, there never was.
The show had a kind of "open talk" format, with said celebrities and host discussing it among themselves in front of a live audience. They usually talk to some audience members in this kind of show, and as usual they eventually opened the mic for them to speak up.
Literally every member of teh audience who took the mic reprehended them. After I think 3 people they stopped talking to the audience. People simply spoke common sense like "children don't need to see this kind of things, neither they should be touching these exposed actors, this isn't good for them, it looks like something a pedophile would do to get kids to touch them". Those celebrities simply stood there with their yellow smiles, they couldn't confront normal people in teh open like that, it was obvious they were vastly outnumbered.
Mind you, the audience was supposedly comprised of what you would call normalfags and NPCs, but even they were not so far into the cool aid to take shit like that.
There's more people who are into the "live and let live" motto but that would rather not have shit forced into their houses, than we think.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90704
>>90692
>The show had a kind of "open talk" format, with said celebrities and host discussing it among themselves in front of a live audience. They usually talk to some audience members in this kind of show, and as usual they eventually opened the mic for them to speak up.
>Literally every member of teh audience who took the mic reprehended them. After I think 3 people they stopped talking to the audience. People simply spoke common sense like "children don't need to see this kind of things, neither they should be touching these exposed actors, this isn't good for them, it looks like something a pedophile would do to get kids to touch them".
This as fuck. People need to realize that since the (((French Revolution))) the aristocracy has been almost entirely replaced by a circus of dancing monkeys and glorified prostitutes, what we call "celebrities", controlled by blackmailing and drugs, acting as mouthpieces of the kikes for passing down their orders to the hapless enslaved goyim.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90727
>>90692
>Mind you, the audience was supposedly comprised of what you would call normalfags and NPCs
People like you, you mean?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90735
>>90689
is it the leftard who manipulates others through fiction or is it the leftard who is manipulated through fiction? there's a theory we're all in search of the best story, and the government who has the best story for us to participate in is the one we vote for
>>90675
>their beliefs and values come from fiction, so they think everyone else does too
>>90692
>silent majority
the majority illusion is worth knowing
>>90704
< “Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison.”
< C.S. Lewis, Present Concerns
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.90749
if they lolicaust we holocaust
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.91465
https://archive.fo/pNfdW
Japan is now striking back.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.91466
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.91479
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.93255
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94780
>>93255
March 31st is the deadline to submit arguments/complaints to the UN. They'll "review" them and then decide later whether or not it should pass.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94797
>>94780
Spoiler: They give no fucks and pass it anyway just like what europe did with article 13 even after millions protested against it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94815
>>90646
>murder is bad
That depends on the situation.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94819
>>90646
>vampire queen
>queen
>they/them
It's almost like this person is a retard who's has no idea what they're talking about and just looking for attention and progressive points.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94820
>>94815
Murder by definition cannot be anything than bad.
By using the word "murder" instead of "killing", you create an assumption that a moral justification for taking someone's life simply does not exist you edgy retard.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94897
>>94820
The two terms are commonly conflated and accepted as such.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94900
>>94897
That isn't true at all. What country do you live in?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.94923
>>94900
People always use both to refer to the act of killing or death. I understand the difference but other people do not therefore I accounted for their point of view on what their vocabulary is. The artist is a faggot so that context is also important.
>murdered by a bear
>killed by cancer
>serial killer
>muerte, mord, brudermord, moartea, mort
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.95383
>>90646
>very first panel places lolicon under the same umbrella as actual exploitation of children, an obvious attempt at conflation
Don't even need to read the rest to know it's gonna be disingenuous schlock.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.95594
>>89488
This tends to be a pattern.
>anti-gun politicians with ties to either the defense industry or the weapons black market
>free speech/anti-defamation groups supporting censure
>charity organizers swindling funds from shell organizations for personal use
>union leaders forcing workers to do their jobs in dangerous conditions or under unfair rules/contract
>persons in the financial sector embezzling exorbitant amounts of client-owned funds and committing mass fraud
>"green energy" leaders whose companies rampantly pollute and lobby aggressively for mineral rights while spending millions on carbon credits
It's almost like the kinds of people who aggressively and consistently ladder-climb positions of social/political power are the kinds of people who shouldn't be trusted with said power.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.100502
Does anybody have the pdf files translated in https://archive.fo/8o7vG#selection-189.1-189.24 ?
Mixtape.moe died, so the links lead to 404 now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.103832
I'm sorry, I didn't even realize this thread was still alive. Let me update everyone who doesn't already know.
https://archive.fo/pu3y7
>The Committee on the Rights of the Child appreciates the nearly 300 comments received to its draft Guidelines on the implementation of the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
>The Committee received comments from 17 States parties, and 14 comments from organizations and civil society associations, including one submitted by a group of adolescents. These submissions are published individually below.
>Among the submissions received from individuals, more than 200 concerned specifically paragraphs 61-63 of the draft Guidelines, with many of them referring also to paragraph 64. Other paragraphs that received numerous comments were paragraphs 43, 65-66, 68 (partially) and 77. More than 50 submissions contained the exact same text and were treated as one single contribution. Contributors identified themselves as professors, researchers, artists, citizens and survivors of sexual abuse.
The sections refer to the parts that included drawings and computer images in the definition of child pornography, as well as a few other sections.
>All submissions will be taken into account by the Committee when deciding on the contents of the final version of the Guidelines.
Japan, JSCC, Teenagers Group Against the Prohibition of Comics Animation and Games, and Center for Japanese Language and Culture were four groups that sent in comments rebuking the protocol's inclusion of art not depicting a real child as child pornography. Japan highlighted the absurdity of extending human rights to artwork and how it's nigh unenforceable. The other interest groups pointed out that the protocol would end up criminalizing a ton of celebrated Japanese novels, anime, and manga. Of course, there were also tons of individual submissions as well.
TL;DR is loli is safe for now. Japan and a surprisingly large force of weebs managed to get OHCHR to reconsider how they'll define and enforce their protocol as it pertains to the definition of child porn.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.103876
>>103832
There is still hope left for man. Thank you, anon.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.103957
>>103832
>mfw those fucking Japs actually pulled it off
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.104184
>shamelessly stolen from /b2/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.104212
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.104217
been watching personality type vids, and this >>104184 is starting to resemble a certain personality type
- enfp, the advocate (Ne>Fi>Te>Si/Ni>Fe>Ti>Se)
pretty funny the trickster/blindspot is Ti (introverted thinking)
there's a guy who posits the theory each type has virtues and vices, and enfp's is charity vs depravity
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.104244
>>104212
Is it safe to say the USA knows how big of an industry animu is?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.104273
>>104244
US Gov't is restricted by 1st amendment: they can't restrict speech, only protect it
>>104217
there should be a word for "accusing others of exactly what you're doing to take attention off from yourself" - projecting is overused and doesn't really imply the second half of the statement, and hypocrisy doesn't quite do it either. it's a really common phenomenon, like the creepy male feminists trope or the closeted gay publicly homophobic preacher etc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
