[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ara / caco / ck / hikki / kemono / nofap / o / vg ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): b602c4387387306⋯.jpg (50.33 KB, 800x533, 800:533, High Speed HDMI Cable.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.980435>>980445 >>980483 >>980909 >>981119 >>988157 >>990401 >>991072 >>996457 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

>HDMI cables with ethernet

WHAT

THE

FUCK

As a former VGA man now, is this safe?

 No.980440>>980441

I dont know about ethernet but i connected my laptop to the tv with an hdmi cable...


 No.980441>>990401

>>980440

I know, that's the point. But these cables have ethernet built in. Why?


 No.980443>>980446 >>980452 >>980482

Physical connections are not the same as logical connections you fucking retard.

Video can be carried over HDMI, but also ethernet and USB-C. Likewise, ethernet can be carried over HDMI and USB-C.

Fun fact, VGA uses a D-sub connector so technically data can be carried over VGA such as RS-232.


 No.980445

>>980435 (OP)

>is this safe?

What does common sense tell is?


 No.980446>>980448 >>980450 >>983982

>>980443

I kkknow that nigger but why the FUCK does a HDMI cable need ethernet?

Smells like botnet to me


 No.980448>>980452 >>980912

>>980446

Its a standardized connector that is cheap and in mass production

Why use HDMI connectors instead of actual ethernet jacks? Maybe because you like the physical connection better, or maybe its simply because HDMI carries data better with less packet loss as a side effect of its original design as a means of carrying HD video content.


 No.980450>>980452 >>980469

File (hide): a76809465a9d0d4⋯.jpeg (7.61 KB, 225x150, 3:2, images (10).jpeg) (h) (u)

>>980446

Its a cable


 No.980452>>980453

>>980450

>>980443

>>980448

You guys are idiots, the HDMI display standard includes basic input and networking.

https://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_1_4/hec.aspx


 No.980453>>980465 >>980501

>>980452

>You guys are idiots, the HDMI display standard includes basic input and networking.

Thanks for repeating what we have all been fucking saying?


 No.980457

I don't use HDMI in my computer because the standard has DRM built into it.

But adding in ethernet to the cable makes sense for all those smart televisions that are streaming video or for when televisions are used as displays in large open areas.


 No.980465>>980479 >>980816

File (hide): b1798b7f2c8e83c⋯.jpg (51.45 KB, 400x273, 400:273, hec_after_400.jpg) (h) (u)

>>980453

No, You're talking about pushing 802.11 through a physical HDMI port, which of course is possible as it's just wires.

But the HDMI standard itself has networking, video and input all working at the same time through one cable.


 No.980469

>>980450

Yeah, and the receivers all mux the network data...


 No.980477

Just wait until you learn about power over Ethernet. Your mind will be blown all over again. Fucking Nikola Tesla himself couldn't even imagine this shit if he were alive in current year.


 No.980479

File (hide): 8e95c28337342cf⋯.png (67.05 KB, 400x273, 400:273, fixed.png) (h) (u)


 No.980482

>>980443

>Retarded

>Ignorance

<Same thing

Its appropriate that you have that on your hard drive


 No.980483>>980486

>>980435 (OP)

Does this mean my ps4 has been sending all the microphone data and shit back to hq even though ive never plugged in the ethernet cord?


 No.980486

>>980483

If your TV is plugged in to ethernet or wireless and your PS4 is plugged in via HDMI... Maybe!


 No.980487

>connecting your TV to the internet

>buying a smart TV

>buying a TV

>paying for television

>paying for jewish media at all


 No.980491

File (hide): 64456ae5dcd7d44⋯.png (72.62 KB, 750x400, 15:8, hdbasetoverip-feat1.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4e97e424002a105⋯.png (130.5 KB, 760x529, 760:529, Consumer.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 5f764ec5d6ac7c6⋯.mp4 (9.87 MB, 640x360, 16:9, videoplayback.mp4) (h) (u) [play once] [loop]


 No.980493>>980499 >>980881

>cables do cable things

>wtf! botnet!

/tech/ in a nutshell


 No.980499

>>980493

>technology emits any kind of RF frequencies and/or connects to any router

>wtf botnet!

Al technology is botnet fam


 No.980500>>980503

Delete your thread


 No.980501>>980578

>>980453

Like, fucking, seriously? Ugh? Shelly is SUCH a bitch.


 No.980503

>>980500

((( )))


 No.980519>>980525 >>980527

have I made a huge mistake?

I bought a monitor yesterday, Benq GW2280 and it had two choices - DVI or HDMI. I chose HDMI.

Is 1080p DVI different than 1080p HDMI?


 No.980525>>980531

>>980519

They are identical. HDMI is compatible with DVI to the point were adapters are simple cables without any electronics.


 No.980527>>980531

>>980519

They send the exact same signal, DVI lacks the DRM though.


 No.980531


 No.980578

>>980501

>Shelly is SUCH a bitch

This to be honest.


 No.980705>>980809 >>983992

Is there a way to strip that functionality from the cable, the same way you can keep devices from turning each other on/off by running one side through an adapter that drops that signal?


 No.980767

WARNING: Amazon Cloud™ Has detected you are attempting to send copyrighted content over HDMI™.


 No.980771>>980789 >>980909

>HDMI has a vulnerability which allows malicious codes to view plaintext screendata and send portions of it remotely without the user ever knowing.

>Using similar microcode vulnerabilities as Spectre/Meltdown, this new vulnerability allows attackers to intercept the HDMI data from the motherboard and graphics card and view the output data with no warning to the user.

>However, VGA And DVI seem to be unaffected by this vulnerability which has targeted HDMI exclusively. It is highly suspected that this vulnerability is only able to intercept HDMI signals and is prevented from being able to access other video outputs.


 No.980789

>>980771

Sauce?


 No.980809>>983992

>>980705

HDMI<>VGA adaptor connected to a VGA<>HDMI adaptor


 No.980813

BOTNET


 No.980816

>>980465

> using TV/monitor as a router

ebin

Also having a "home theater system", fuck that. I just want a computer that doesn't suck.


 No.980824>>980833

>Cable that uploads screen data to the jewnet

Gosh, I wonder what 2019 will bring...


 No.980829

VGA - image

HDMI - image+audio

HEC - image+ether+audio

might as well just upgrade to a fucking nvme or a new sata port next time.


 No.980833

>>980824

forced implant for the goyim livestock


 No.980881

>>980493

Lolcity


 No.980909>>980914 >>980917 >>984015

>>980435 (OP)

>a cable that can transmit data can also transmit data!!!!1111!one!!!

Panic (((merchant))).

Aside from that nugget of stupidity, HDMI Ethernet Channel (HEC) is a completely separate cable from a standard HDMI.

You haven't been botnetted unless you bought the wrong cable like a retard, a cable which has a different name and thus wouldn't stand out to you.

Added to that, you'd need the functionality to spy built into every fucking television, game console since the 360/PS3, DVD/BluRay player etc. I doubt in all the years since HDMI was invented and those devices torn down, no one managed to find the code that transmits data throught the HDMI cable.

Then again, most of the anons here hit the bunker instead of taking 10 seconds to search the topic for answers. Maybe you all deserve the botnet.

>>980771

>making things up

Faggot.

DVI and HDMI are the same signal, so you're clearly making up shit for fun. Copy pasting your sentences yields a fucking AOL exploit from a decade ago.

Also, what the fucking is plaintext screendata? A HDMI cable only transmits the image; it doesn't render the text so unless every HDMI cable has a built in text interpreter, this is bullshit.

Or does it make a giant fucking ASCII art of the gay midget porn you watch?

Craft your bait better.


 No.980912

>>980448

>or maybe its simply because HDMI carries data better with less packet loss as a side effect of its original design as a means of carrying HD video content.

Wrong

You can have 100m UTP cables without worrying about any major loss, any HDMI beyond 3 meters is going to need a signal regenerator.


 No.980914>>980917 >>994526

>>980909

Thanks for being a bastion in the sea of /pol/ stupidity


 No.980917>>980962


 No.980931

>smugly unchecks Play DRM-controlled content


 No.980962

>>980917

> t-they don't cower in bewilderment and fear over a basic piece of technology and resort to panic and FUD

<m-must be cuckchan!!

Fuck a landmine, nigger.


 No.981119>>984010

File (hide): 129c9c594a8b08b⋯.jpg (43.92 KB, 512x442, 256:221, me_n_ma_boy.jpg) (h) (u)

>>980435 (OP)

This is slanderous. Don't ever talk to me or my son ever again.


 No.983982

>>980446

It doesn't. You can carry anything through any cable as long as it's electrically compatible.

Also, HDMI has lots of pins available to use and its quality is high because it needs to be able to carry tons of data over distance of an entire room, sometimes more.


 No.983984

Why HDMI to begin with?

Just use DVI or Display Port.

If you're not a TV fag, you normally don't have low quality loudspeakers in your monitor.


 No.983992

>>980705

like what >>980809 said but use DVI.


 No.984001>>984011 >>987734

Is Display Port any good, or is it fucked too for some reason? I always used VGA but I like the idea of combining video and audio into one cable and using shitty built-in speakers on a monitor to save space. It would make moving easier.


 No.984010

>>981119

>Don't ever talk to me or my female connector's son again!


 No.984011>>991074

>>984001

>shitty built-in speakers on a monitor

Not a good Idea. It's simply a shitty idea as a whole, solely propagated by the TV industry.

>VGA

Analog can give you stupid artifacts and color inaccuracy.

Depending on your pixel count and framerate use DVI or Display Port.


 No.984015

File (hide): f3e939fc0ba56a7⋯.png (176.13 KB, 500x700, 5:7, OReilly4chanbotnet.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 34c3c4af71067a8⋯.png (120.11 KB, 500x700, 5:7, allisbotnet_orlycover.png) (h) (u)

>>980909

>You haven't been botnetted unless you bought the wrong cable like a retard

>haven't been botnetted unless

lel

It's easy to tell the difference between >>>/g/ and >>>/tech/

Images related.


 No.987734>>993099

>>984001

DisplayPort is even more fucked because it's advertised as an open VESA standard but then HDMI patent parasites started extorting royalties out of it for having something vaguely similar to their DRM

The last good connector standard was DVI.


 No.987873>>991074

The good thing about VGA is there's lots of cheap monitors on places like craigslist. Even better, most of them are 4:3 ratio. After being stuck with two laptops with widescreen shit (16:10 and 16:9), I'm looking forward to get a real monitor again.


 No.988150

OP probably doesn't even know that audio can be transmitted through the power lines in his mom's house.


 No.988157>>988165

>>980435 (OP)

the physical connections can do whatever they want, i recall a game company using hdmi for adapting multiple types of game controllers because it has a bunch of pins & it's a standard


 No.988165>>988168

>>988157

Well there are limitations based on the length and composition of the wires, and the connectors themselves. Try shoving more than 2W through a microUSB "power cable" and see what happens. Also here's a fun video with melting wires:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=n70N_sBYepQ


 No.988168

>>988165

I mean 2A, which would be 10W @5V.


 No.990401

>>980441

It's so the two devices can communicate. If you tell a movie to pause through the TV remote it came send it to the HDMI source.

>>980435 (OP)

Yes it's safe. It's also not very fast but it's good enough.


 No.990506>>990510 >>990695 >>991074 >>996458

File (hide): 659bebba3f7fd9e⋯.png (282.51 KB, 558x496, 9:8, 1029.png) (h) (u)

>Willingly using inferior VGA or DVI

Fucking hipster dinosaurs

Stay on the dirt where you belong


 No.990510>>990695 >>991074

>>990506

VGA gets me 1024x768 or even 1280x1024, and that's really all I could ever need. Anyway I always hated widescreens, ever since the industry started forcing them down everyone's throat.


 No.990695>>990779

>>990506

>using FCC part 15 compliant 'screen transmitting' HDMI cable 1984 edition

>literally anyone with brain can make a diy hamradio-tier device to stream your display and audio from miles away

>probably 10 people are remote surfing your monitor right now top kek!

>probably lives in The 14 Eyes and doesn't even know what the hell's going on

Fucking hipster. I bet you're using a 16:9 or 21:9 monitor with the secret mind control patent which makes you addicted to games whenever that certain "color signal trigger's" received by the monitor the same way Braun tube televisions made baby boomers fuck like rabbits. Enjoy your demise and your botnet literal goyim NPC. >>>/v/ >>>/g/

>>990510

look for 1600x1200 , 2048x1536 , or a 2560x2048.

most widescreens are trash and have terrible viewing angles top-down so manufacturers decided to only extend left-right till the end times and get away with making low height cheap shiny lcd sheets with slow as fuck response time and cheap PWM flickering backlight controller.


 No.990779>>990843

>>990695

>Using a video cable with adamant quality loss and color inaccuracy

>Legitimately thinks HDMI transmits image to any network from just any monitor or television just because it's HDMI and not the fact that the monitor/television has to be directly connected to the internet

>vomiting all these /pol/ buzzwords you just learned a day ago without even being aware of their origins as if it were an actual argument

Flay yourself you piece of genetic reject.


 No.990781

DisplayPort MASTER RACE


 No.990788

DVI is quite alright tbhfam.


 No.990843>>990953 >>994529

>>990779

>being a triggered npc

>npc_angry_face

That's misleading and inane anon. I remember the NSA leaks which confirms what that anon said about display signals leaking out if the cable isn't noise-suppressed. Sadly most cables these days do not have that dangling 'magnet' thing to suppress outgoing-incoming signal-noise and it is illegal for manufacturers to sell them due to the revised FCC standard.

>/pol/ buzzword

NPC isn't of pol but you are obviously an NPC.


 No.990849

File (hide): a5780217c9e9e88⋯.png (177 KB, 413x312, 413:312, 011114_1441_HowtheNSAMo2.png) (h) (u)

They could even do it without these implants by tuning to the right frequency and removing background noise. Notice how that cable doesn't have the 'magnet'?


 No.990852

>a wire standard is able to take on multiple tasks

>caring about this because "muh botnet internet connection REEEEEE"

>when wireless has already done so much worse


 No.990953

>>990843

>NSA leaks which confirms what that anon said about display signals leaking out if the cable isn't noise-suppressed

Noise is purely trash signal. They have way better methods than analyzing fucking powerlines for them. Post source or fuck off.

Also, there ARE HDMI cables with noise suppressors, not to mention standalone noise suppression clamps available for HDMI cables, you inept retard.

>NPC isn't of pol

Originally fromcuckchan but it's been cultivated into what it is the most on /pol/. Stop misusing it, dumbass.

>pol

A dumbass and a newfag to boot. The only NPC here is you for being a luditte instead of researching workarounds for problems.


 No.990973>>991072

It's not ethernet per se, but there are data lines in hdmi cables. It's how things like CEC capable TV remotes work, so you can, for example, use your TV's remote to control Kodi running on a raspberry pi. It could possibly be used for nefarious purposes, but only insofar as sniffing the data going between your TV and whatever connected device - not even video or audio data, but the raw 0s and 1s that your TV's remote sends to the TV and then on to the pi (sticking with the example above).

Unless one or more of the connected devices is backdoored, in which case anything is possible. But that goes for literally everything.


 No.991072>>1004578

>>980435 (OP)

HDMI is fucking bloat for ipodniggers

>>990973

CEC is bloat too, DDC, EDID, and DisplayID

fun fact, some CRTs had their EDID overwritten because they're shitty bloated implementation made it so the computer could write to it over the VGA cable


 No.991074>>1004578

>>984011

LCDs have shitty crystalline looking shit deposited all over screen and you can't see shit. It's literally 10x worse than the noise of a VGA cable. Looking at a plain white screen on any CRT with VGA looks crystal clear compared to any LCD with digital connectors. Not to mention LCDs are unable to display motion content.

>>987873

5:4. 4:3 is rare for LCDs. 5:4 is more square though

>>990506

Name one reason why DVI is inferior to whatever you think is better than it, you can't.

>>990510

I can get 2560x1536@79Hz over VGA or 1024x768@151Hz and that's just using the manufacturer recommended settings.


 No.993099

>>987734

It's MPEG LA that's doing the extortion


 No.994526

>>980914

>everything I don't like is /pol/

kys already


 No.994529>>1004578

>>990843

>I remember the NSA leaks which confirms what that anon said about display signals leaking out if the cable isn't noise-suppressed.

It's much easier to do for analog signals like VGA than digital ones. In fact, you could build yourself a black-and-white VGA radio emission capture widget for less than $200 in parts if you know what you're doing. The hardest part is synchronising with the signal pixel clock, since that isn't feasible to capture. You need to reconstruct it from the signal itself.


 No.996457

>>980435 (OP)

>Coaxial cables with 802.1

omg we are doomed


 No.996458

>>990506

>He doesn't know that DVI is digital.

Disgusting.


 No.996773>>1004578

Is there a way to disable DRM / Ethernet capability in HDMI?

Yes:

1. break off Pin 14 and Pin 19 from the connector.

2. use DVI-D or DisplayPort instead (passive cable adapters are available)


 No.1004578

>>991074

There's flat panels that can be pretty shitty with HDMI cables. Most I'd seen doesn't even reproduce pitchblack and see lots of static noise. It's probably picking up too much interference from the neighboring computers.

The noise could be fixed by using wires with actual zinc ferrite (the big bulge) and sometimes they jew it and just put a chunk of plastic.

I noticed as my VGA cable degraded the color reproduction started to fade until it the entire signal left is just magenta so i had to replace the wire and this time I got a real zinc ferrite and it's 10x better. No more fonts shadowing or white bar ghosting

>>991072

Reminded me that I need to rewrite the corrupted EDID of a fully working laptop display. Nouveau detected the corruption and fell back to 1024x720 but I'm not sure where to even start with writing edid to a LVDS monitor.

>CRTs had their EDID overwritten

Makes sense why some CRTs are almost impossible to remove black bars

>>996773

This.

>>994529

It's can be easily explained as opening up an ASCII art on a notepad with zero line breaks so you just tune it with wordwrap until you see the actual image. That's really possible to do but you can easily shield your entire wires so it doesn't leak out image signals and even test it with a ___ meter. I wouldn't trust most modern displays as I don't trust modern processors. Old displays that were made before the age of surveillance are the only way to go when you're handling sensitive information. Most of displays are likely eveb rigged to transmit display data zero-effort not to mention that zombie wake backdoor they put on laptops that can turn on webcams and snoop on you (that is if you forgot to disconnect from the net). At one point this happened to my laptop and good thing I tilted my screen hinge upwards before I went to sleep. Fucking creepy. The webcam indicator was turned on it means something is accessing it (thank god they fucking used led for activity).


 No.1004615

HDMI was a mistake, it shouldn't have been introduced in the first place. DisplayPort should have been the one and only DVI successor. Now you can easily end up with say a graphics card which has HDMI but no DP and a monitor which has DP but no HDMI, and you have to use shitty converters (or cables which have integrated converters and different plugs on each end).




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
82 replies | 9 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ara / caco / ck / hikki / kemono / nofap / o / vg ][ watchlist ]