>>1084634 (OP)
>he does this with 4-D arrays as well and I find myself shuddering in awe and fear that I'll be tasked with maintaining his rube goldberg monstrosities if he ever quits
>he is irreplaceable
Smarter than you, wagecuck.
>>1084641
I don't understand it.
>you should be writing a language where it's a flat array to begin with
A C-array is flat.
>and just does the calculation for you.
Yeah, he could have made functions for interacting with the array but that comes with a performance penalty.