/races/ - All human races

#001 The Han Chinese race is cultural, rather than genetic

Some people suspect that there are "Han genes" that make the Hans who they are.

But history suggests otherwise. The Han race has absorbed a lot of non-Hans throughout its history, it's even still happening.

#002 The Han culture is superior or even the cradle of the world civilizations

If any researcher who has no experience of fighting the Han Chinese draws the above conclusion, it only suggests they are ignorant.

The Han culture expands in its unique way and form. It expands through aggression in the Han way. Their victims or adversaries only have two choices, either defeat the Han in their own ways or fight the Han in the Han way. The latter effectively turns them into Hans.

The Han culture evolves around aggression and fight in a dishonest and dishonorable way. It becomes the core of the Han culture.

And yes, it has influenced Koreans and some South East Asians. But its influence isn't the same as "superiority or the cradle of the world civilizations". The opposite is true. It hinders the races that it influences, with the only exception, the Japanese..

(Why are the Japanese immune to the Han crime culture? Because there's a more fundamental Nipponism in Japan that makes them who they are and gives them immunity to the Han culture. Confucianism in Japan isn't the same in China.)

And why does "the cradle of the world civilizations" have to adopt (fake) democracy to show the world they are not ancient nor pure Chinese any more, but become modern?

#003 Only hate-speeches against the Han Chinese tell some truth.

If students are interested in the truth, they must be aware that most of researches into the Han people tell lies, no matter who or what institution conducts the research. The more official, the more misleading they are.

Those who tell some truth are called haters (or racists) and their speeches called hateful, sinister, vicious, rabid, or evil. Some of them were beaten, jailed or threatened with prison time.

But even they don't understand the Han race correctly or what makes them who they are. I call them honest and courageous. They realized that the official narratives or approved narratives weren't true, and they decided to find the truth to fight against lies. But even their work is at the beginning level. If anyone reads the writings by Lu Xun, Bo Yang, Ralph Townsend, they would realize none of them explained the Han race, and sometimes, they made serious mistakes.

#004 Two of the major differences between the Hans and Europeans

1

The Hans don't think truth has any value except when they lie they tell their victims their lies are truth and expect their victims are stupid enough to accept it.

They don't think the world is ruled and determined by some natural forces and truth can help them use their knowledge to live a better life. Instead, they firmly believe crimes can help them achieve it. That's why the Han wisdom is always "wisdom" centred (what to do in what situation to serve oneself, even if it doesn't work,) not the right way of life, knowledge, accuracy and success centred (try to find truth and apply knowledge to succeed.)

2

Honest and honorable Europeans would think that everyone is equally under the same type of reasoning, and they would admit they could be wrong and correct per their own reasoning, and also admit their adversaries could be right. But the Hans follow no any type of reasoning. They have opposing types of reasoning following them. Reasoning serves them and goes against their adversaries. That's why they have different reasoning for different people or different cases. Inconsistency? It never upsets them. The Han reasoning is fight-dishonestly-centred.

#005 If one thing is removed, most of the Han military "wisdom" disappears.

That one thing is deception.

Deception plays such an important role in almost all Han military "wisdom" that if their enemies don't trust them, they could hardly achieve any military success.

#006 Sun Tzu's Art of War is vastly overrated.

The Han Chinese are proud of their "superior" military "wisdom". Sun Tzu's book is evidence. It's taught everywhere in the world. And they love to tell the story that when Napoleon Bonaparte was forced into exile on the tiny island St. Helena, he read Sun Tzu's Art of War and lamented, had he read that book before he invaded Russia, he would not have met his misfortune.

The truth is had Napoleon read Sun Tsu's book and become a follower, he would never have become who he was. Napoleon is a follower of European way of thinking, and Sun Tzu's thinking is typically Han.

Napoleon once said "Peruse again and again the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, Gustavus Adolphus, Turenne, Engene, and Frederick. Model yourself upon them. This is the only means of becoming a great captain, and of acquiring the secret of the art of war." Sun Tzu's Art of War can explain none of the campaigns mentioned by Napoleon. All of those campaigns show the way Europeans think: victory, honor, and conditions of achieving them. Great generals can meet the conditions of victory and avoid meeting the conditions of failure, while forcing their adversaries to meet the opposite. At least since the Greco-Persian Wars, Europeans have reached the advanced level of conducting wars or fighting battles, while the Han remain at the beginning or intermediate level.

Sun Tzu is a Han, and the way of his thinking is typically Han. The Hans have no idea what honor is, what freedom is. They have no values that are worth them sacrificing their lives for. They are opportunistic. If they can win, then they are aggressive. If they are losing, then they become submissive. And they don't understand battle field kinetics much. Readers can see the ghost of yin-and-yang thinking in Art of War. It's totally different from the European way of thinking.

The history of the Hans is mostly a history of military failures. That's the level of "superiority" of their military "wisdom".

#007 The superiority of the Han culture or wisdom is caused by Confucian psychosis.

Confucianism puts everyone in a who-can-prey-and-who-has-to-be-preyed-on order. To convince people to accept that order, Confucians invent bullshit theories to "prove" their order is right.

By Confucianism, older people can prey on younger people. To convince younger people to accept it, they call older people superior to younger people, morally better than younger people, and worth more than younger people.

It's why the Han always want to tell the world they are superior (to say they can prey on the rest of the world per Confucianism), while they call their own people pigs, dogs (so that they could prey on their own too) and they have no problems with it.

Bizarre?

Yes, bizarre. Often the most bizarre things in China are caused by Confucianism.

#008 Two definitions of the Han Chinese

1

By language, ancestor, custom, tradition, etc.

By this definition, it's easy to determine if someone is a Han. But it's not accurate.

2

By distinct Han character or characteristics

This is accurate. No matter what languages they speak, whoever their ancestors are, if they show distinct Han character or characteristics, they are Hans. But what is Han character or characteristics?

Some characteristics are shared by other races, like aggressiveness, cruelty, bullying, cowardice, slavery, dishonesty, corruption, etc.

But to the best of my knowledge there are at least 6 characteristics unique to the Han race. They are

1. preying on their own people, hostile to their own;

2. showing no empathy;

3. they don't appreciate when someone helps them, but hate, blame and attack, and they don't stand their ground when attacked and bullied and they can be defeated, but yield and please attackers;

4. morals, peace, justice, wisdom, all serve criminals against victims but they try to convince victims to think it's right to do so by reasoning;

5. they think wisdom is more important than truth, and they are proud of their lies, fallacies, deceptions, and they advance in that direction;

6. they follow no principles, values, reasoning, laws, rules, honor no agreements (unless in their favor), but have all of them following them. If they do something, nobody can call them wrong, but if someone does the same, they call it wrong and attack. They have no problems with it.

It's possible the Han race has more unique characteristics, and together with the above mentioned characteristics and their origin, all of them can be used to determine if someone is a Han accurately.

#009 Students can't trust dictionaries.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/confucianism

>Confucianism

>a religion based on the ideas of the Chinese philosopher Confucius

(If you call a bullshit artist a philosopher!)

>Examples from literature

>Buddhism and Confucianism were sneered at because of their foreign origin.

The dictionary uses a lie as an example. They were sneered at NOT because of their foreign origin but because they are bullshit. What if those isms tell truth and can really help people?

#010 Real Confucianism

Did Karl Marx tell communists to murder millions? I haven't found evidence. But in many cases, communists are mass murderers. It's a fact, and Marx needs to explain it.

Communism in reality is quite different from communism in books.

Did Confucius tell his followers to be cruel? No, he taught "humanity". But why are Confucians so cruel, aggressive, dishonest, selfish and psychotic?

Confucianism in reality is quite different from Confucianism in books.

Real Confucianism is a member of leftism family. It's pro despotism and anti democracy, pro hierarchy and anti equality, pro slavery and and anti freedom, pro food chain and anti natural relations, pro cruelty and anti compassion, pro terrorism and anti mercifulness, pro oppression and anti justice, pro bullies and anti victims, pro parasites and anti those who contribute. All is done in the name of humanity.

#011 Confucianism is all crimes and lies

Confucians teach children humanity, love, help. But they are very cruel to those they teach.

Why?

Because Confucianism is all about crimes. Evidence? The core of Confucianism, li, tells everything. To teach someone Confucian li, is like to find the next prey, the next victim to turn them into an ideal victim and prey on them. Who is an ideal victim? A victim that predators don't even have to attack, but do what predators want them to do to serve predators and think it's moral, good, right. It's exactly what Confucian criminals teach and want.

But why is it called humanity, love, help?

It's a distinct Han characteristic.

They don't reason based on facts and follow their own reasoning, but do the opposite. Their reasoning follows them to lie about and excuse what they want or do and fool their victims.

012 It's a mistake to compare Confucianism to Christianity

Ralph Townsend made a major mistake in his book Ways That Are Dark. The descriptions of the Han Chinese are remarkably accurate. But it's a mistake to call Confucianism a cure. The truth is it's a major cause of Han characteristics.

A tiny part of Confucianism sounds like Christian teaching. Some people are fooled by the similarity and mistakenly think the two are similar, while they are almost the opposite of each other. Confucianism is all about slavery, or predation or food chain in the name of humanity.

#013 Nanjing massacre, rape of Nanjing

Battle of Nanjing vs Battle of Vienna

Despite there was tension among the various commanders and their armies, the Christian allied themselves, came to rescue the city, and the allies won the battle and saved the city.

Where were the Han allies, the allies of the people allegedly from the same amniotic sac?

How many Han rushed to rescue Nanjing from various part of China?

0?

Zero?

Not a single one?

And you know why they were defeated, raped, massacred, and why their dearest brothers sisters were only screaming "rape, massacre", while doing nothing more.

Next time, they should try marching to the city about to be massacred and raped, instead of doing nothing more than screaming around, and see if rape and massacre would still happen.

Battle of Nanjing vs Battle of Constantinople

Constantine XI Palaiologos was in the city when the battle was fought. Some said the emperor had never been found after the battle, while others said he was found dead and beheaded. Either, no evidence showed he escaped alive.

Did Chiang Kai-Shek fought to the last minute? Was his body found among dead soldiers?

He wasn't even in the city of Nanjing during the battle. He escaped and left soldiers defending his capital city.

The commander of the Chinese army didn't see the fall of the city either. He fled before it. He left the residents and soldiers to being raped and massacred

Sino-Japanese war vs Winter war

Finland, a tiny country was ready to fight to the last man to stop a huge invading army and held for months.

China, a huge country, where nobody was ready to fight to death for their own country, but ready to fight against each other. How could the Han race of superior culture not be raped?

#014 The evolution of the Han race and their characteristics

Hanism (hypothetical): What caused Taoism? I suppose before Taoism the Han had been preying on their own people (leading to infighting, hostility, no common interests, no values holding them together, following no common reasoning, dishonesty, bullying among themselves which lead to Taoism.)

Taoism ( Lao Tzu c. 500 BCE) : It describes Han characteristics caused by hostility, bullying and later deception among themselves. I believe Taoism is sort of (bullshit) philosophy largely inspired by Han characteristics. Its ideas didn't inspire the Han to have their notorious characteristics. Early Taoism describes the effect of Hanism, and accepts it as something "natural". It also talks about how to win fights caused by Hanism and how to fight. Later Taoism teaches some stratagems: how to successfully hurt someone. It's mostly about aggression, bullying, dishonesty, deception, dirty tricks, weaponize everything.

But Taoism before Confucianism had given everyone the same/equal opportunity to apply its ideas.

Not any more after Confucianism became a state ideology. There have been no equal opportunities in any aspect of the Han lives since that. Everyone is put in a food chain, who can prey, who can be preyed on.

Confucianism (Emperor Wu of Han made it a state ideology between 141 and 87 BC): Confucianism is all about crimes in the name of humanity. Confucians commit crimes, accept crimes and become the same evil criminals by Confucian li.

Han Buddhism (starting to influence the Han during the Jin dynasty 266-420 AD) : Han Buddhists are the most godless scum in the world. They turned Buddhism into a death cult. They invented size of mind to redefine good and evil to bully victims and encourage aggression in the name of peace or wisdom.

Bodajingshen (bullshitting to bully): It's the direction of the Han evolution. It's the opposite of honesty, knowledge, truth, accuracy, natural relationship, fairness, justice, and national interests. It's totally different from the direction in which Europe evolved.

Han Communism: It's a worse version of Confucianism, less freedom, more total control, including mind control, opinion control to enslave and rob the people and force victims to appreciate rulers' crimes and bless robbers. But it only has an minor impact on Han characteristics.

#015 The incurable Han Chinese

What makes them incurable?

Becoming who they are is the way of their life. If they correct themselves, they don't know how they could survive. And the fear is often powerful enough to prevent them from correcting themselves and drive them to be proud of who they are. But with their Han characteristics,, despite all of their crimes and failures, they know how to survive, in the dark ways.

#016 How dishonest are the Han Chinese?

A lot of people know it's common for the Han to lie, cheat, manipulate impressions and opinions, and deceive. But they often do something worse.

When the Han practice their "national pride" called bodajingshen reasoning, they often employ opposing-reasoning or changing-reasoning by

* switching what the matter is, what it is about, (What you say is about something, I say it's about something else to fight what you say.)

* switching what is right and wrong, (It's right to do something if I do it, but it's evil to do the same thing if you do it. Changing premises.)

* changing hierarchy of importance (Peace or justice, which one is more important than the other? It's about who fights whom. If you fight me, then no matter what your reason is, peace is the most important. If I fight you, then my reason is the most important. If you resist, defend, then I'll attack you more.)

* reasoning against reasoning. (Whatever your reason or reasoning is, I can call it wrong or use what you say to attack you back. Whatever my reason or reasoning is, it could never be wrong, and you must accept it, or I'll do something worse because you call it wrong, unless you stop calling it wrong.)

It's what the Han say or do when the level of their dishonesty reaches bodajingshen (bullshitting to bully.) Nobody should expect them to admit they are wrong just by reasoning with them.

Crime experts often suggest that people should not reason with criminals, instead, they should fight criminals.

#017 Confucian multi-level marketing

Multi-level marketing style businesses started to exist in the 1920s in California. But in China, about two thousand years earlier, Confucians had started their own multi-level marketing.

Confucianism is all about chain of predation, who can prey on whom. After accepting crimes and serving their Confucian criminals, victims earn a license to find their own victims to prey on, and it's not evil because they have served their own predators. It's Confucianism, and it's multi-level marketing.

Nobody wonders why it's so hard to promote freedom, equality, democracy, fairness and justice in China, but it's so easy for multi-level marketing style businesses to thrive there? Because it has been there for two thousand years!

#018 Evidence why Confucianism causes Han characteristics

While Confucianism isn't the only ism that causes Han Chinese characteristics, it contributes the most.

Evidence:

When the Han are cruel to someone, they often look down on their victims, trash their victims, no matter how much their victims can achieve, and no matter how little they themselves could achieve, no matter how nice their victims are, no matter how evil they themselves are. Facts don't matter. How they could belittle their victims matters.

It's caused by Confucianism. It's so common in China that if someone doesn't do something like that, they would be considered eccentric.

#019 Confucian reasoning process is typically reverse.

Confucians never reason like trying to find truth first (inductive reasoning), followed by deductive reasoning, if they fail in reality, they try to examine the process of their reasoning, until they trace back to the origin, the facts their reasoning is based on and start their reasoning process again until they could fix problems..

The process of their reasoning is the opposite. They first decide who can commit crimes against whom, then criminals must be important, good and right (so they deserve to attack), victims must be worthless, evil and wrong (so they deserve to be victims), then they try to invent reasoning to make crimes sound "true and fair by reasoning".

It's why Confucian reasoning is always so bizarre.

So is Han Buddhist reasoning.

There isn't a tiny bit of truth in their reasoning, because truth isn't what they want. What they want is to serve criminals and sound "true and fair by reasoning". If their victims are stupid enough they may not be able to defend themselves, which is what Confucians and Han Buddhists count on.

020 Morals don't have to be the enemies of advancement of knowledge.

Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg speech is well known. It reminds people of the fact that a government may not always serve the people despite a lot of rulers claim to do so. A less well known fact is that morals don't always serve those who are expected to follow them either. Morals may be designed to serve criminals, but victims are expected to follow morals. If it's the case, morals often become the enemies of truth and the advancement of knowledge because it's easier to attack victims with morals when victims are stupid.

Question:

Then is it possible to have morals serving those who are expected to follow the morals without hindering the advancement of knowledge?

I believe it's possible as long as we only try to find morals made by nature to serve those who are expected to follow the morals. The advancement of knowledge would only keep us away from false or criminal-serving morals.

Why do Confucians hate everything new or different from their narratives? Why do Han Buddhists hate truth, fairness or justice? Why do they have moral values against truth or knowledge or anything that would lead to finding truth or the advancement of knowledge? Who and what their morals serve answers all of the questions.

>>20

#021 Why are the Han Chinese so "superior"?

The Han Chinese don't start to tell the world they are superior (to the rest of the world) only after developed countries gave them the opportunity to exploit their stupid decision, which let China join WTO. They have been saying that possibly in thousands of years, even when they were licking invaders' boots!

It's bizarre.

But why?

The only reason is it's because they want to commit crimes.

Then why when they want to commit crimes they have to tell their victims they are superior?

Confucian reasoning. According to Confucianism, the superior can attack the inferior, the better can attack the less, and those who want to attack, have to tell their victims they are soupier to them, better and worth more than them.

And when they hear you say you are better than them, either true or false, they feel like you are going to attack them, and they hate it. They are Confucian psychos.

But when they try to "beat" you, they don't always try to become better than you, but more likely tell you their culture is older than yours, their civilization is older than yours, they started something earlier than you did. Again, it's bizarre. And again, it's Confucianism. When criminals try to make their crimes excusable by reasoning, their reasoning will sound bizarre to any normal people.

>>29

#022 The truth of five major isms in the Han world

Hanism (hypothetical, still not very clear): A social state in which peace is impossible among people, hostility forever, caused by bullying, preying on anyone, and weaponizing everything.

Taoism: How to fight. Since peace impossible, hostility forever, it's impossible to stop aggression, impossible for truth or justice to make peace, then how to fight.

Confucianism: How to commit crimes by li and morals. Li is multi level marketing crimes, which tells you to let someone commit crimes against you and wait your turn to commit your own crimes against your own victims. A attacks B, B doesn't resist, but let attack, then waits their turn to attack C, their own victim. It gives the false impression that it's "fair" because before B commits their own crimes against C, they let A attack them. Only if someone refuses to attack anyone and refuses to let anyone attack them, they can clearly see the truth that it's not fair, but spreading crimes. But Confucians are unable to see the truth due to their psychological state caused by Confucianism.

Han Buddhism: Believe that victims are evil, bullies are not evil, then how to fight victims, how to stop victims from defending, resisting, or demanding truth and justice by using size of mind to shame or wisdom to fool victims.

Han communism: How to prey on victims by claiming serving them, besides, all of the earlier isms.

>>41

#023 There isn't much difference between the Han Chinese living in China and the free world. All of them are influenced by Hanism, Taoism, Confucianism and Han Buddhism. There are only some minor differences caused by Han communism, which isn't communism at all. An anti-communism Han could still be a typical Han if they don't reject other four major isms outright.

#024 Why is it hard for democracy to function in the countries dominated by the Han Chinese?

Hanism and Confucianism are to blame. Han communism is also to blame in China.

#025 Mianzi isn't something like honor.

What the Han Chinese call mianzi is often called face-saving in English. When one tries to grasp the meaning of mianzi, they may feel mianzi sounds like honor. But it isn't.

Mianzi is impression manipulation caused by a culture of hostility and bullying, and intended to look like a bully, not someone that could be bullied. It isn't what honor means.

Why couldn't a race of mianzi fight to death for their mianzi when invaded? Why couldn't a race of mianzi stand their ground for mianzi, but lick invaders' boots and still want mianzi?

Bizarre?

Because, unlike honor, (mianzi sounds like honor but isn't honor,) mianzi is what criminals, bullies want when they commit crimes, to make themselves look like right, good. Even when they are attacked, what they want is not just "I can't be bullied without consequences", but still they want to say "I can bully." People who want honor don't want that. Honor could be used to defend oneself, but mianzi isn't used to defend, it can only be used to commit crimes, do something wrong, attack, bully. That's why when they are attacked, their desire to survive becomes their prominent concern, and concern over mianzi disappears, in order to survive, they could do anything, lick invaders' boots, let invaders take anything, let invaders rape their women, no problems with it. Their mianzi concern disappears. Mianzi isn't honor, only looks like it. Mianzi concern is the result of the culture of hostility, malicious intention, taking every opportunity to attack, and following Confucian li of "who can bully". Yes, Confucianism is a major contributor to mianzi concern.

People don't feel honored if they bully a member of their own society. Instead, it's dishonorable. Honor could help one defend oneself. You'd rather die for honor than live in dishonour. But nobody dies for mianzi no matter how much they are concerned about mianzi. Honor is totally different from mianzi.

#026 The "hard working" Han Chinese

Almost everything the Han say is a lie, and almost every impression is false. When the Han say they are hard working people, it's a lie. When people in the rest of the world think the Han are hard working people, their impression fools them.

The Han people aren't hard working all the time. Sometimes, for example, during "the great leap", the Han were only hard pretending. They pretended to work hard while weren't doing much actually and it resulted in low productivity and shortage. (One of the reasons for the great famine.)

It's never that all of them were hard working. Confucianism rewards lazy or less capable people in the name of humanity, love, help, and heart-warmness. It encourages people to become lazy by forcing the industrious to support them.

But why sometimes do some of them look hard working?

There are several reasons some of the Han look "hard working" and there are more facts to check.

1

For survival, for food.

When the Han have nobody to prey on, they have to work hard to survive.

2

Not all of them are hard working, that's why some of them have to work hard to support those who don't work hard or don't work at all. Hosts have to work hard to support parasites. It's how a Confucian family "functions". And those who work hard have the dream one day they don't have to work any more but can have hard working slaves to support them. Don't mistake slavery for hard working.

3

Under social pressure, they have to work hard to earn something to get married, or earn a desirable social status or identity.

4

In the Confucian world, their culture of "who can bully or enslave" is always at the centre of everyone's life. Some of them would work hard only to have an opportunity to bully someone and enjoy. It's called "work hard to become a Confucian criminal". (A Confucian criminal can attack their victims and it's moral.) A Confucian's greatest ambition is to become a Confucian criminal of higher level. They are psychos.

5

A lot of "hard working" Han aren't actually hard working but committing crimes hard. Instead of providing markets quality products, they work hard only to produce something worth less that could help them achieve what they want: unfair exchange to hurt their customs to make more profit. And it motivates them to "work" really hard.

6

Their response to someone who work hard could be very different.

Those who don't work hard would openly or secretly hate those who work hard because it makes them look bad, but sometimes, they would praise those who work hard so that they could have a share.

Bosses would call hard working employees lazy, because it gives them an excuse to pay less. And they can always make a hard working employee look lazy. You work 18 hours a day? Tell you to work more. You can't? You are lazy! You will get paid less!

7

In most part of the history of the Han, their government officials and employees are infamous for their laziness and ineffectiveness, not hard working. Bizarre? If the Han are hard working people, how could they have lazy people governing them?

8

There are a lot of Han who don't want to work at all, only want to play cards or gamble day and night. Those who call the Han hard working people must take a look at them as well.

#027 Leader crime

Everyone wants to be a leader in China because once they can tell someone they are leaders, they can commit crimes against those they "lead" or they don't even "lead", and their victims can't defend, or even resist. If their victims resist, they would be called "not obeying leaders" or "not obeying administration" or "not showing respect to leaders", and they can be punished. They are forced to let leaders attack them.

It's caused by Hanism and Confucianism.

#028 Globalists underestimate the danger of Confucian li and the psychosis it causes.

Confucian li is who can be cruel to whom, who has to suffer and serve and please those who are cruel to them. It drives everyone to become a Confucian criminal, It's sort of psychosis.

When the Han want to rise, it's not the rise of a country of a nation or a race, but the rise of Confucian li criminals: they could climb higher up in a Confucian crime chain.

#029 Confucianism and Han Buddhism don't fight criminals but serve criminals.

It becomes the foundation for their moral values.

It's quite strange. If you don't try to hurt anyone, but try to be nice to people, at the same time, you fight crimes, it makes you an evil person. Confucians and Han Buddhists hate you!

But Confucians and Han Buddhists don't call predators or criminals evil by Confucian li or their own fear. They have every reason to defend predators or criminals, unless they can bully predators or criminals, then they have the opposite morals ready!

It's amazing.

#030 The Han Chinese are trained to be cowards by their government and the way of their life throughout their history.

Thousands of years ago, a Han Chinese dynasty started lianzuo, which means if someone commits a crime, their family members, relatives, or even neighbours will all be thrown into jail, no matter how innocent they are. It looks like an effective measure. Everyone has to think twice if they want to commit a crime. But the problem is their government officials or employees aren't saints. What if the authorities commit crimes and bully the people with lianzuo? It effectively turns their people into cowards: surrendering to crimes in fear. And the Han people are supposed to be criminals, not victims encouraged to stand up to criminals.

When Confucianism started to rule China, it also effectively turned every Confucian into a coward (at the same time, a very aggressive cruel bully, predator and criminal.)

Multi level marketing crimes are all what Confucianism is about. Confucianism ins't driven by national security, but humanity, or more exactly, slavery in the name of humanity, help and love. Slavery is cruel. What all Confucian criminals do is to enslave their victims and enjoy. What all their victims do is to be forced to serve their criminals, and dream one day they become Confucian criminals like the criminals they serve now.

When their country is invaded, neither Confucian criminals nor their victims have any reason to fight to death for their country or their own freedom, but both have all the reasons to save their lives no matter how much their country loses. Confucian criminals have no reasons to fight to death. They are already enjoying. As long as they can keep their slaves, they can enjoy, no matter how much their country loses. Confucian victims have no reasons to fight to death. All sufferings they have to endure now will be paid off when it's their turn to become Confucian criminals and can enslave their own Confucian victims to enjoy. If they die now, they lose everything. If Confucian criminals and Confucian victims surrender to invaders, it doesn't hurt them as much as losing the chance to be Confucian criminals and enjoy their own crimes.

Confucianism turns everyone into an aggressive and cruel criminal and a coward before invaders.

#031 The Han Chinese are far worse than ordinary criminals.

Ordinary criminals, if insane, don't realize they would be punished, if sane, know they would be punished for their crimes and they would try to conceal their crimes.

But when the Han Chinese commit crimes, in most of cases, they have morals ready to defend their crimes, and attack their victims. They even look like morally better than their victims.

How could they do that?

The trick is opposing morals, or values, or reasoning.

It's not wrong for them to commit crimes by morals (but it's certainly wrong for you to do the same, again by morals.)

It's not wrong for them to defend their crimes by morals ( but it's certainly wrong for you to do the same again by morals.)

If you don't accept their opposing premises, it's evidence that you are evil. Now they attack you, tell you to be morally educated.

If you accept their opposing premises, then you should let them commit crimes. But you can't do the same. You can't even stop them from committing crimes, can't punish them. You have to let them.

But the Han criminals won't always be "successful". They could succeed only when their victims are inexperienced, or still trust them. If their victims are experienced, or don't trust them, like ordinary bullies, or foreign adversaries, they will fail.

>>27

#032 Confucianism and Christianity are totally different.

Confucianism: commit crimes in the name of humanity.

Christianity: love to show humanity.

Each is the opposite of the other.

#033 Confucianism is the world most successful cult, a crime scheme in the name of humanity. Through multi level marketing crimes, it turns everyone into a criminal who doesn't realize they are committing crimes when they are.

Not even communism is as evil as Confucianism.

Invaders have revealed the truth, they are criminals.

#034 Why is it so hard to convert the Han Chinese?

Because they don't try to find truth and follow truth but always try to find excuses or invent fallacies to commit crimes. They want something to bully someone's reasoning, not truth against something false.

You try to convert them?

They only take advantage of it, or learn how to weaponize it to commit crimes.