This is like somebody just learned how to play chess.
Yes the object of the game is to capture the King. BUT
Determining what goes first totally ignores the other side.
Playing like this is an amateur's game.
Chess is about forward projection not about pre - planned attack strategy.
I am totally surprised that this analogy is being used by the 'trickle out' camp in the White House. The 'all at one time' camp had it right. One captures the King ALL AT ONE TIME
the moves to get there write their own path depending on the opposition and the intellectual level of the players.
Q and whatever game theory moron is directing this TOTALLY IGNORE the other side. They totally ignore counter moves, counter move potential, counter plans and most importantly CONSEQUENCES!
That always results in a loss no matter how cocky and confident the amateur might be.
The other side reading this analogy by Q is LAUGHING ITS ASS OFF!!!!!!!