/qresearch/ -Q Research

International Q Research Threads

>>18046055 ——–——– Australia #27

>>18070678 ——–——– Canada #39

>>16694358 ——–——– France #7

>>17595232 ——–——– Germany #104

>>18052454 ——–——– Japan #10

>>16694250 ——–——– Nederland #10

>>17784579 ——–——– QAJF #1

>>17352350 ——–——– Scotland #8

>>17705335 ——–——– South Africa #10

>>18158921 ——–——– UK #50

>>17631245 ——–——– Vatican #6

GLOBALS

Anons: bunker = https://endchan.org/qrbunker; ban lifts >>18147768

Posting guidelines: no naked adults near kids; report violent threats

PROTO Pass information Nov 2022: >>18142037, No p*rn videos >>18147527

Bakers: how to bake/e-bake >>17322493, >>17485628, >>17322317

formatting Q posts: >>17835052, Baker's Lite JS: >>17241444, baking range: @75 up to 751 >>18147761

Offering breads to other bakers >>18061508, >>18067193 ; No RRN in notes >>17980519

Pls notable planefag & boatfag reports >>18179893

Plz use CURRENT dough when baking >>18223281

NOTABLES ARE NOT ENDORSEMENTS

#22419 >>18293724

>>18293665, >>18293667, >>18293807 German Citizen Nadine Rebel confronts BioNTech: Why is Cov-19 vaccination in the 2019 Annual Report?

>>18293694 Scott Adams: How The "Unvaccinated" Got It Right

>>18293747 Spaceforce News on Balloon shoot-down - fell into 47 feet of water

>>18293757, >>18293778, >>18294150, >>18294160 Second 7.8M earthquake has just been recorded in Turkey at a depth of 10km

>>18293807 Moar on Nadine Rebel (BioNTech related)

>>18293835, >>18293973, >>18294063, >>18294189 Another Turkish Earthquake recorded @ 5.8M at a depth of 12.3 km

>>18293870, >>18293896, >>18293910, >>18293937, >>18293953, >>18293971, >>18293999, >>18294082 Buffalo, NY Magnitude 4.2 Quake

>>18293882, >>18293897, >>18293927, >>18293974 @SpaceX double booster landings is incredible

>>18293967, >>18293968, >>18294016, >>18294026, >>18294242 Turkish Earthquake devastation

>>18293979 Germany met with ‘silence’ over tanks for Ukraine – politician

>>18293990 Survey: 6% of large Swiss companies that left Russia plan to return w/in 3 years

>>18294000 Production of facemasks that keep out CV (vid)

>>18294014, >>18294021 The pivotal Maidan sniper killings and the 2014 Kiev coup - why is research being censored in the West?

>>18294030 Syrian PM's family members among dead in quake

>>18294043 Feb. 3: Russian shelling kills US medical volunteer in Ukraine

>>18294237 Microplastics found in human veins. Researchers discovered 15 particles of the contaminants per gram of vein tissue in the first study of its kind

>>18294287, >>18294388 Meanwhile in Germany: CHILLING scenes from Berlin as what can only be described as army marches in the streets.

>>18294320 Government Reports & Pfizer Documents prove COVID Vaccination is causing Depopulation & we now have evidence it was the plan all along

>>18294365, >>18294366 BREAKING: Massive smoke spotted amid large industrial fire at a factory in Chicago Heights, Illinois

>>8294404 #22419

#22418 >>18292857

>>18292878 Live ground footage from Turkey

>>18292877, >>18292886 Trump Truth decode

>>18292920 Jill Biden presented the Song of the Year award at the Grammy's

>>18292941, >>18293139, >>18293141 Very useful link: Earthquake fault lines

>>18293028 Emergency Alert System activated for areas in and around East Palestine, Ohio following imminent explosion threat

>>18293049, >>18293087, >>18293578 Does Gates or Fauci indirectly hold the Coofid patent?

>>18293059, >>18293063, >>18293066 Dasting Britney Spears TikTok

>>18293052 The Story of Adam and Eve

>>18293097, >>18293099, >>18293104 Turkey EQ ground footage

>>18293134 Been watching quakes since before Q, anon never seen nothing like this

>>18293155 Planefag reports

>>18293171 EQ predicted 2 days ago

>>18293189 The last time such an earthquake occurred in the same region was in 1513

>>18293197 Neighborhood in Harem, Syria destroyed by earthquake

>>18293297, >>18293312 EPIC has partnered with Stripe Climate, a company dedicated to removing CO₂ from the atmosphere

>>18293307 NSA Courting THOUSANDS Of Fired Woke Big Tech Workers For Intelligence Activities

>>18293321, >>18293327, >>18293346, >>18293422, >>18293428 Mysterious matching frequencies (Schumann)

>>18293305, >>18293363, >>18293364, >>18293386, >>18293389, >>18293396 Notes on the Ukraine, SES, EU, Pennsylvania [Keystone] similarities in symbolism

>>18293388 DDG 115 Arrives in Japan, Q115 -> JAPAN. MILITARY.

>>18293423 6-story building in Urfa, Turkey falls over due to the 7.8 earthquake

>>18293542 01st Airborne, XVIII Airborne, FORSCOM STRONGER TOGETHER

>>18293555 Imran Khan will be arrested if fresh protests are launched: Pak interior minister Rana Sanaullah

>>18293623 @realDonaldTrump RE: The 60 Minutes “hit job”

>>18293634 #22418

#22417 >>18292082

>>18292260 Turkey EQ livestream

>>18292351 Turkey EQ live text updates

>>18292114, >>18292150, >>18292164, >>18292192, >>18292155, >>18292205, >>18292336 Turkey EQ hotspots

>>18292231 Schumann correlating EQ activity

>>18292124, >>18292132, >>18292175, >>18292207, >>18292774 Turkey EQ preceded by strong magnetic pull and release

>>18292136 @DonaldJTrumpJr: Trump would have been impeached a third time if foreign spycraft was parked over the U.S. for 4 days

>>18292117, >>18292156, >>18292170, >>18292312, >>18292427, >>18292435 Raven Aerostar digs

>>18292135 ICYMI: Hunter Biden audio recording confesses partnership with 'China Spychief'

>>18292157 Keep in mind, the contracts Pfizer had with other countries was so predatory…

>>18292173, >>18292190, >>18292178, >>18292188, >>18292200, >>18292214, >>18292220, >>18292229, >>18292337 Silk road

>>18292213 There's an approx. magnitude-yield relationship established for nuclear test & magnitude of seismic events

>>18292255 Koch wants to buy a new GOP President- just like in 2016 and 2020

>>18292288, >>18292297 Heliplots are registering a strong quake all over the world as expected

>>18292331 Del Bigtree Asks Why the CDC is So Unwilling to Track Severe Adverse Events in V-Safe

>>18292314, >>18292327 Dr. Andrew Huff on the Connection Between Hunter Biden & Biolabs in Ukraine with InQtel as CIA

>>18292319, >>18292326, >>18292339 DJT Mark Pomerantz Truths

>>18292335, >>18292338, >>18292455 Huge fire raging in the city of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey following the 7.8 MAG earthquake overnight

>>18292354 Fake Meat Fail: Sales Collapse At Beyond Meat, Impossible Foods As 20% Of Staff Laid Off

>>18292357, >>18292371, >>18292383 Black Sunday, April Fools connections

>>18292396 No fly zone, all the way up. IN/OH State line, just South of Portland, IN. Rock quarry.

>>18292456, >>18292632 Planefag reports

>>18292460 Pfizer has been found guilty of violating three sections of the British Pharmaceuticals Code of Practice

>>18292497 A 7.8 magnitude quake knocked down multiple buildings in southeast Turkey and Syria early Monday

>>18292577 World-wide DEFCON level at ~2 (Fast Pace or Red Alert)

>>18292634, >>18292643, >>18292653, >>18292718, >>18292782 Footage emerging after M7.8 earthquake in central Turkey

>>18292621 California Covid19 "state of emergency" to end 2/28/23

>>18292667, >>18292696 EQs in Syria also

>>18292719 Pfizer sponsored Satanism you'd expect from the Grammies

>>18292729 Japan sounds out BOJ deputy Amamiya for central bank governor-ZIRP and selling USTs (to prop Yen) to continue unabated

>>18292743, >>18292732 Ohio Nat Guard activated due to imminent explosion from train derailment on Fri night

>>18292810 Italy issues alert for possible tsunami waves following Turkey earthquake

>>18292845 #22417

Previously Collected

>>18290492 #22414, >>18291277 #22415, >>18292064 #22416

>>18288188 #22411, >>18288933 #22412, >>18289717 #22413

>>18285980 #22408, >>18286737 #22409, >>18287518 #22410

>>18283626 #22405, >>18284442 #22406, >>18285205 #22407

TripCode feed: https://8kun.top/qresearch/tripcode.xml

Aggregators: https://qnotables.com | https://anontimes.com | https://qresear.ch | https://qproofs.com

>>18154557 Q Research Notables #16: Loud and Clear

>>18294437 lb

It's that the Turkish government requested the country of Turkey to be called from now on, basically its a renaming.

>>18294436

yes

after she was arrested on 9/11

>>18294431

There's something happenin' here. What it is ain't exactly clear.

https://tora3.com/share/08ddf4b9d21a_beebb7f8bc7a31ccc6cc5e18eb5dfb8541d4ee44_ad024bc098c14360

>>18294469

ded within a week

>>18294457

No one countered with a hanging effigy of Mohammed/Mohammad?

Or shouts of praise Jesus?

Anons were lead to believe the elections were safe. White hats, patriots winning. Obvious fraud election occurs and Q disappears. Was Q taken out? Is Q just a group of knowledgeable political enthusiasts who had no response after election loss? Is Q a Trump team member used to prop the orange man? Is Q a military intelligence team that has not been corrupted ( the only one )? Is Q inter dimensional time traveler? Was it all 2 kids in a basement playing D & D? It doesn’t take away from the work done and truth exposed by anons but what’s the consensus on disappearance of Q?

NOVEMBER 13, 2017 AM UPDATED 5 YEARS AGO

Timeline: World's 14 deadliest earthquakes of last decade

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-quake-global-idUSKBN1DD257

>>18294491

What is Aleppo?

>>18294481

ChatGPT: It's on muh interwebs, so….

>>18294478

That bread was CHOCK FULL of shills. Felt like bots that got triggered and ran a script to fill up the bread. What are they hiding?

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna26809309

Scholar claims to find medieval Jewish capital

An archaeologist says he has found the lost capital of the Khazars, a powerful nation that adopted Judaism more than 1,000 years ago, only to disappear leaving little trace of its culture.

A Russian archaeologist says he has found the lost capital of the Khazars, a powerful nation that adopted Judaism as its official religion more than 1,000 years ago, only to disappear leaving little trace of its culture.

Dmitry Vasilyev, a professor at Astrakhan State University, said his nine-year excavation near the Caspian Sea has finally unearthed the foundations of a triangular fortress of flamed brick, along with modest yurt-shaped dwellings, and he believes these are part of what was once Itil, the Khazar capital.

By law Khazars could use flamed bricks only in the capital, Vasilyev said. The general location of the city on the Silk Road was confirmed in medieval chronicles by Arab, Jewish and European authors.

"The discovery of the capital of Eastern Europe's first feudal state is of great significance," he told The Associated Press. "We should view it as part of Russian history."

Kevin Brook, the American author of "The Jews of Khazaria," e-mailed Wednesday that he has followed the Itil dig over the years, and even though it has yielded no Jewish artifacts, "Now I'm as confident as the archaeological team is that they've truly found the long-lost city."

Ruling nomadic tribe

The Khazars were a Turkic tribe that roamed the steppes from Northern China to the Black Sea. Between the 7th and 10th centuries they conquered huge swaths of what is now southern Russia and Ukraine, the Caucasus Mountains and Central Asia as far as the Aral Sea.

Itil, about 800 miles south of Moscow, had a population of up to 60,000 and occupied 0.8 square miles of marshy plains southwest of the Russian Caspian Sea port of Astrakhan, Vasilyev said.

It lay at a major junction of the Silk Road, the trade route between Europe and China, which "helped Khazars amass giant profits," he said.

The Khazar empire was once a regional superpower, and Vasilyev said his team has found "luxurious collections" of well-preserved ceramics that help identify cultural ties of the Khazar state with Europe, the Byzantine Empire and even Northern Africa. They also found armor, wooden kitchenware, glass lamps and cups, jewelry and vessels for transporting precious balms dating back to the eighth and ninth centuries, he said.

>>18294512

>Scholar claims to find medieval Jewish capital

'We know almost nothing'

But a scholar in Israel, while calling the excavations interesting, said the challenge was to find Khazar inscriptions.

"If they found a few buildings, or remains of buildings, that's interesting but does not make a big difference," said Dr. Simon Kraiz, an expert on Eastern European Jewry at Haifa University. "If they found Khazar writings, that would be very important."

Vasilyev says no Jewish artifacts have been found at the site, and in general, most of what is known about the Khazars comes from chroniclers from other, sometimes competing cultures and empires.

"We know a lot about them, and yet we know almost nothing: Jews wrote about them, and so did Russians, Georgians, and Armenians, to name a few," said Kraiz. "But from the Khazars themselves we have nearly nothing."

'Russia is a successor'

The Khazars' ruling dynasty and nobility converted to Judaism sometime in the 8th or 9th centuries. Vasilyev said the limited number of Jewish religious artifacts such as mezuzas and Stars of David found at other Khazar sites prove that ordinary Khazars preferred traditional beliefs such as shamanism, or newly introduced religions including Islam.

Yevgeny Satanovsky, director of the Middle Eastern Institute in Moscow, said he believes the Khazar elite chose Judaism out of political expediency — to remain independent of neighboring Muslim and Christian states. "They embraced Judaism because they wanted to remain neutral, like Switzerland these days," he said.

In particular, he said, the Khazars opposed the Arab advance into the Caucasus Mountains and were instrumental in containing a Muslim push toward eastern Europe. He compared their role in eastern Europe to that of the French knights who defeated Arab forces at the Battle of Tours in France in 732.

The Khazars succeeded in holding off the Arabs, but a young, expanding Russian state vanquished the Khazar empire in the late 10th century. Medieval Russian epic poems mention Russian warriors fighting the "Jewish Giant."

"In many ways, Russia is a successor of the Khazar state," Vasilyev said.

Traces of conquest

He said his dig revealed traces of a large fire that was probably caused by the Russian conquest. He said Itil was rebuilt following the fall of the Khazar empire, when ethnic Khazars were slowly assimilated by Turkic-speaking tribes, Tatars and Mongols, who inhabited the city until it was flooded by the rising Caspian Sea around the 14th century.

The study of the Khazar empire was discouraged in the Soviet Union. The dictator Josef Stalin, in particular, detested the idea that a Jewish empire had come before Russia's own. He ordered references to Khazar history removed from textbooks because they "disproved his theory of Russian statehood," Satanovsky said.

Only now are Russian scholars free to explore Khazar culture. The Itil excavations have been sponsored by the Russian-Jewish Congress, a nonprofit organization that supports cultural projects in Russia.

"Khazar studies are just beginning," Satanovsky said.

Fires and Quakes Oh My! Manic Monday!

>>18294517

“One of the most contentious features of United States arbitral law is the doctrine that permits vacatur of an arbitral award based on a "manifest disregard of the law" by the arbitrators”

“most commentators concede that arbitral awards may be reviewed where the decision would violate national or international public policy, which could encompass situations where an arbitrator’s decision not to apply "mandatory rules" of national law is considered to violate a public policy of the enforcing state.”

“the privacy of the arbitral process and the absence of full scrutiny of arbitrators’ substantive decisions may incentivize some international arbitrators to depart from legal decisional norms”

“the incorporation of international arbitration in the parties’ contract may be more meaningful than their choice of governing law.”

“At its most basic, governing law can offer predictability of result, or at least a meaningful and experience rich body of law and precedent to guide the substantive result.”

“Perhaps the very lack of judicial review of arbitrators’ substantive decision-making has contributed to a lacuna in this area; we have developed clear and nearly universally accepted standards to address various procedural issues in arbitration, but leave the scope and nature of legal decision making distinctly to the individual arbitrator.

“Nearly all arbitral institutions, as well as the UNCITRAL Model Law and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, provide that arbitrators "shall" or "will" apply the law or rules of law designated by the parties in their agreement.”

“The ICC Rules similarly envision the application of the law chosen by the parties, stating that the "parties shall be free to agree upon the rules of law to be applied by the arbitral tribunal to the merits"”

“While it is not clear that these directives go so far as to preclude reference to principles falling outside of national law, there is no reason that they should be considered any less indicative of party intent than, for example, the "clear and unmistakable evidence" to allow arbitrators to decide their own jurisdiction that is commonly found by U.S. courts when parties refer their dispute to arbitral rules containing provisions regarding competence-competence.”

“the prevailing view is that arbitrators should not resort to lex mercatoria where not expressly authorized to do so by the parties in their contract.”

“Modern arbitral procedure tends to focus on facts and procedure over the application of legal standards; counsel and arbitrators share responsibility for this trend.”

“There are myriad ways in which these issues can be addressed, all of which first and foremost rely on attention, rigor, and care from arbitrators and counsel alike. A few specific proposals for ways in which legal decision-making might be elevated and prioritized include:

Reference to burdens/standard of proof and evidentiary standards in order to place emphasis on those facts relevant to the legal dispute at hand.

Consideration of early dismissal of claims without legal merit.

Constitution of a tribunal familiar with the law and/or reliance on legal experts, where necessary.”

“Increased attention to the governing law chosen by the parties, including by insisting that a party’s claims and defenses be framed within the applicable legal construct and by providing clear and consistent reasoning as to when and how transnational principles will be applied, are small steps that could go a long way in re-elevating the role of "law" in arbitral decision-making.”

Again - I HIGHLY RECOMMEND anyone who want to try to understand the process of challenging the Pfizer contracts to read this article !!! It’s A MUST!

Finally, if you’re interested, I’ve written a lot about the contracts multiple posts in the past, which you can find here, on Substack.

Sending love and healing to everyone who got injured by the jabs.

Ehden Biber

2 of 2

Sunday Talks, Cohn and Brennan Talk Gleefully About the Return of the Service Driven Economy Under Biden, Happy with No Wage Growth

February 5, 2023 | Sundance |

This is one of those interviews whereyou don’t have to take my word for what is being said, Gary Cohn and Margaret Brennan are gleeful about the January jobs reportand the overall return of the U.S. economy to a service driven system with low wages.

Seriously, this is them celebrating out loud.

In order to calm the Wall Street apoplexy about his election victory, President Trump selected Gary Cohn to be an economic advisor early in the administration. However, it was also no surprise that President Trump did not follow Cohn’s advice, and quickly dispatched him after Cohn protested. In this interview the worldview of Cohn is typically globalist, multinational and Wall St centric.

Talking about the January jobs report, Cohn literally gets everything wrong from the position of Main Street USA. Cohn also celebrates what he calls the “renormalization of the new economy.” Continuing with his thought process Cohn states, “A lot of the jobs that we saw were jobs in the service industry, the service, the industries coming back very strong because we’re starting to see the economy go back to what we historically think of the economy,” he said. This is exactly how Wall Street, and the multinationals look at the U.S. economy.

The next part that both Cohn and Margaret Brennan celebrate is even more sunlight. “The interesting thing about last month’s unemployment numbers is we brought people back to work, but we did not have to entice them with pay,” Cohn stated. “So, the monthly, the month over month number in wage gains was 30 basis points. The prior month was 40 basis points. So, we’re seeing we’re getting people back into the labor force for a lower wage than we were prior to this,” he said. With higher prices (inflation) crushing the middle-class and service workers, the multinationals Cohn represents are celebrating that they don’t have to pay workers higher wages WATCH:

https://youtu.be/08n5JxZAD1w

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/02/05/sunday-talks-cohn-and-brennan-talk-gleefully-about-the-return-of-the-service-driven-economy-under-biden-happy-with-no-wage-growth/

The movie has picked up in 2023.

Jill loves the anons. Be sweet.

>>18294519

piolt otts to lose license over taht.

>>18294431

Thank you Baker

>>18294546

1 ‘Immunising that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea.’

The complainant alleged that by recommending vaccinating healthy British children under the age of 11 against Covid-19, the Pfizer CEO was making a claim for the clinical efficacy and safety of Pfizer’s product and its risk/benefit balance, even though the vaccine had not yet been included in the emergency use temporary approval for use in children this young in the UK.

2 ‘Covid in schools was thriving’. ‘This was disturbing significantly the educational system and there were kids that would have severe symptoms.’

The complainant stated that severe Covid-19 was rare amongst children and school age in the UK and while the virus did circulate in schools, schools had typically reflected community transmission throughout the pandemic. Neither had Covid-19 itself had a significant impact on disturbing children’s education in the UK. The ‘disturbance’ to the UK educational system had resulted from political decisions made by governments, not the virus. Indeed, the complainant knew that the UK had the second highest rates of school closures in Europe, except for Italy – a result of political decisions.

The complainant stated that there was simply no evidence that healthy school children in the UK were at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they were was disgracefully misleading.

3 ‘So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favour of doing it.’

The complainant alleged that this was probably the most egregiously false and misleading of the Pfizer’s CEO’s statements. It completely neglected to consider that there were potential risks to healthy children associated with administration of the Covid-19 vaccine. The complainant referred to a number of documents including a Pfizer leaflet listing side-effects; Latest government advice regarding myocarditis to healthcare workers detailing rates of myocarditis in hospitalised children; and Latest adverse events reported for Pfizer.

The complainant stated that the conclusion of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation earlier in 2021 when asked to give an opinion on this very subject in relation to the older cohort of children between 12 and 15 hardly seemed to be consistent with the opinion of Pfizer’s CEO that there was ‘no doubt’ or that ‘the benefits completely were in favour’. The complainant alleged that the failure to promote the rational use of the medicine, the misleading presentation of the risk/benefit profile and the use of exaggerated, all-embracing claims (‘no doubt’ and ‘completely in favour’) was in breach of the Code.

p2

>>18294548

The complainant stated whether Pfizer, or indeed the BBC, liked it or not, opinion about the benefits and risks of vaccinating healthy children against an infection which posed little risk to them, and the ethical considerations of exposing healthy children to the risks of vaccination (no matter how rare those effects might be) in order to protect adults or vulnerable members of society, was not settled. For a pharmaceutical company to be behaving on a public platform as if it was, was wrong. The complainant alleged that the material was in breach of the Code in that ‘emerging clinical and scientific opinions which had not been resolved in favour of one generally accepted viewpoint must be referred to in a balanced manner’.

The complainant understood that Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine fell within the clause of the Code relating to temporary authorisation for sale or supply without a marketing authorisation. The complainant stated such was the poor quality of this activity and the materials which were the subject of this complaint in terms of their lack of compliance with the Code that the complainant found it difficult to believe that Pfizer had undergone the required prior scrutiny and approval by the MHRA on behalf of the ministers as set out in Clause 11.3 of the Code.

The complainant alleged a breach of the Code as no information, whatsoever, was provided about reporting of side-effects, or indeed the side-effects themselves.

The complainant had no way of knowing whether the interview was or was not solicited by Pfizer. Similarly, the complainant had no way of knowing whether Pfizer’s CEO was formulating his answers based on briefing notes prepared by the Pfizer communications department or, indeed, whether the journalist prepared his written article with the aid of written briefing notes or press releases provided by Pfizer. This information would no doubt inform and guide judgements about this case.

In summary, the complainant alleged that the article, and associated video constituted promotion by Pfizer of its unlicensed medicine which fell within the scope of the Code. The complainant further alleged that Pfizer had failed to maintain high standards and brought discredit upon the industry. Furthermore, bearing in mind that Pfizer was found guilty of illegitimately promoting its Covid-19 vaccine using the internet less than six months ago, a breach of undertaking was alleged.

The detailed response from Pfizer is given below.

p3

>>18294549

PANEL RULING

The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that it had been approached by the BBC for an interview with its CEO which was held on 22 November 2021. The news article and associated video interview, referred to by the complainant, were produced and published by the BBC on 2 December 2021. The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that the 45-minute interview was intended to cover news topics identified by the BBC about Pfizer’s commitment to the global Covid-19 vaccine rollout and ongoing innovation to fight the pandemic.

The Panel noted that complaints about third party articles in the press etc were judged upon the acceptability of the information provided to that third party by the pharmaceutical company, such as any press release, unedited interview etc rather than the final published article. The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that it had no editorial control or right to review the excerpts of the interview chosen by the BBC for inclusion in their news articles and no Pfizer press briefing was issued to the BBC in association with the interview. The Panel also noted Pfizer’s submission that it had not been able to obtain a full transcript of the interview from the BBC as the BBC’s own policies did not allow this; it had, however, obtained some limited expanded excerpts from the interview. The Panel noted that it was obliged to make its rulings based on what Pfizer’s CEO had actually stated rather than the edited published article and video. The Panel noted, therefore, that in relation to the quotations cited by the complainant, these could only be considered within the context of the overall interview based on the limited BBC transcript provided by Pfizer as part of its response.

The Panel did not have the full unedited transcript of the interview or the video. Whilst the complainant referred to the published video, it appeared that the substantive allegations related to the published article.

The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that prior to the interview, Pfizer UK had briefed the CEO who was based in the USA about the interview, the regulatory status of Covid-19 vaccines in the UK and the requirements of the ABPI Code.

p4

>>18294431

TYB

>>18294550

The Panel noted the comments that had been included in the article which were attributable to Pfizer’s CEO within the context of the limited interview excerpt provided by Pfizer particularly ‘Immunising that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea’ and ‘So, there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’ and considered that the strong unqualified nature of the comments were such that they promoted Covid-19 vaccines including the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

The Panel noted, that at the time the CEO’s comments were made, and subsequently published, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine did not have a temporary supply authorisation, it was the subject of a conditional marketing authorisation. In the Panel’s view, the medicine therefore had not been promoted prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation and no breach of the Code was ruled.

In relation to the alleged breach of undertaking, the Panel noted that the current case (Case AUTH/3591/12/21) concerned excerpts from an interview with Pfizer’s CEO which were subsequently published in an article by the BBC and referred to Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine which had a conditional marketing authorisation at the time. In the Panel’s view, the current case, Case AUTH/3591/12/21, was sufficiently different to the previous cases which involved promotion prior to the grant of the market authorisation as a result of individual employee’s personal use of social media which did not follow company policy such that there had been no breach of the undertakings given in Cases AUTH/3422/11/20, AUTH/3437/12/20 and AUTH/3438/12/20 as alleged. The Panel therefore ruled no breach of the Code.

In relation to the quotation ‘Immunising that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea’ the Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that at the time the article at issue, including excerpts from the Pfizer CEO’s interview, was published, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine was approved for use in individuals 12 years and older; no Covid-19 vaccines were approved by the MHRA for use in children under the age of 12 years.

p5

>>18294552

Whilst the Panel noted that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine was not licensed for use in under 12 year olds at the time the CEO’s comments were made, and subsequently published within the BBC article, it did have a conditional marketing authorisation for use in those aged 12 and over. The Panel did not consider, therefore, that the clause which required that a medicine must not be promoted prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation which permits its sale or supply was relevant and no breach of the Code was ruled in relation to the quotation in question.

The Panel noted, however, that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was not approved by the MHRA for use in children aged 5 to 11 years until 22 December 2021. At the time the CEO’s comments were made and subsequently published within the BBC article, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was not approved for use in children aged 5-11 years. In the Panel’s view, the statements attributable to the Pfizer CEO promoted the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in this age group and a breach of the Code was ruled. This ruling was appealed by Pfizer.

The Panel noted that with regard to the quotations ‘Covid in schools was thriving’ and ‘This was disturbing significantly the educational system and there were kids which would have severe symptoms’, Pfizer provided a BBC transcript of this part of the interview. The quotations in question were slightly different in the transcript: ‘I think that Covid in schools was thriving’ and ‘I believe that this is disturbing, significantly the educational system’. They appeared as part of a response to a question about whether immunising 5 to 11 year olds was likely to happen in the UK and Europe. The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that the evidence showed rising levels of Covid-19 infection seen in UK school age children in autumn 2021 potentially representing a pool of infection and risk of transmission to peers, staff and families. An opinion piece published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) December 2021 highlighted the key issues. Further, in the UK, the pandemic had resulted in two significant periods of school closures causing notable disturbance to the education system. The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that numerous reports documented the detrimental impact of the disruption on children’s wellbeing and learning. This included The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (OFQUAL) review published in July 2021, which stated that the nature of learning loss varied depending on the phase of education. Primary leaders were most likely to report significant learning loss, with the youngest pupils apparently most negatively affected by the pandemic. The Panel further noted Pfizer’s submission that whilst data concerning long Covid-19 were limited in young children, there was documented evidence of the occurrence of long Covid-19 in children aged 11 to 17 years; the BMJ reported that one in seven children in the UK might still have symptoms 15 weeks after infection. The Panel did not consider that the complainant had established that the cited quotations were misleading or incapable of substantiation on the basis that there was no evidence that healthy school children in the UK were at risk from the SARS COV-2 virus as alleged. Based on the very narrow allegation, no breaches of the Code were ruled.

p6

>>18294553

With regard to the allegations about the statement ‘So, there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely are in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’ the Panel noted that a transcript of this part of the interview was provided to Pfizer by the BBC. The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that it showed that its CEO was asked a specific question about vaccinating 5 to 11-year-old children against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The interviewer asked ‘In October the FDA, the American regulator approved your vaccine for 5-to 11-year-olds after successful trials. Do you think immunising that age group is likely to happen in the UK and Europe? And if so, why is it a good idea?’. The CEO responded ‘I think it will happen. I don't want to speak about specific candidates I don't want to speak about for the health authorities or the regulatory authorities of UK. It’s up to them to approve it and use it or not. I believe it's a very good idea. I think that COVID in schools is thriving. I believe that this is disturbing, significantly, the educational system. I think is becoming the pool of infection for the adults. It is becoming a pool of infection for a pool of where the virus keeps replicating and that creates variants. At the end of the day, although the symptoms are not very severe, there is the long COVID. That is very worrisome. And there are kids that will have severe symptoms. So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favour of doing it’.

The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that the CEO made it clear that the decision on whether to authorize the vaccines in the 5 to 11 year age group was the responsibility of the MHRA and he was not speaking on its behalf. He also explained that he was answering the question in the context of Covid-19 vaccination in general rather than specifically the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Pfizer’s CEO then went onto express his opinion that the wider benefits of vaccinating the 5 to 11 year age group were in favour of vaccination. The Panel noted from the transcript that there was a clear inference that a risk/benefit analysis would be undertaken by the regulator. On balance, however, the Panel considered that the subsequent strong opinion statements, including ‘So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’ and ‘I believe it’s a very good idea’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that there was no need to be concerned about potential side-effects which was not so. The Panel considered that this implication was incapable of substantiation and through phrases such as ‘no doubt’ and ‘completely in favour’, Pfizer’s CEO did not encourage the rational use of a medicine. Breaches of the Code were ruled. These rulings were appealed by Pfizer.

The Panel noted that at the time the CEO’s comments were made and subsequently published within the BBC article, there appeared to be differing opinion on the benefit of vaccinating children under 12. Whilst the Panel noted the CEO’s statement that he/she ‘did not want to speak for the health authorities or the regulatory authorities of UK, it was up to them to approve it and use it or not’, the Panel considered that the CEO’s opinion statements, including ‘So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favour of doing it’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that the benefits outweighed the risks when the regulatory authorities had not yet made any conclusions in relation to the vaccination of 5 to 11 year olds; the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine was not licensed in the UK in that age group when the article at issue was published and the Panel therefore ruled breaches of the Code. These rulings were appealed by Pfizer.

p7

>>18294554

The Panel noted that, at the relevant time, the Pfizer/BioTech vaccine had a conditional marketing authorisation. The clause of the Code which applied to medicines with a temporary supply authorisation, was therefore not applicable and no breach was ruled.

The Panel did not consider that the complainant had established that the interview with the CEO, excerpts of which were subsequently included in the BBC article, was a campaign approved by health ministers and thereby required a reference to reporting of side-effects. No breach of the Code was ruled.

The Panel did not consider that the complainant had established that the interview in question was intended for patients taking the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine and therefore the requirements of the Code which related to material related to a medicine intended for patients taking that medicine were not relevant. No breach of the Code was ruled.

The Panel noted its comments and ruling above and considered that Pfizer had failed to maintain high standards and a breach of the Code was ruled. This ruling was appealed by Pfizer.

The Panel noted its comments and rulings above, including that the statements made by the Pfizer CEO did not encourage the rational use of the medicine, and considered that the briefing document by Pfizer UK did not sufficiently brief the CEO on how to address questions on children aged 5 to 11, despite this being described as a hot topic; the briefing was limited to stating that there were no current plans to authorise the vaccine for ages 5 to 11 and that Pfizer would submit data on the 5 to 11 population to the UK regulator in the coming weeks. [See post Panel consideration note]. Further, whilst the briefing instructed the CEO not to promote nor state messages which could appear to encourage individuals to specifically ask their doctors for a prescription based on the information provided, it provided key messages, contradictory to this instruction such as ‘I encourage anyone who is on the fence about receiving a vaccine to think again and to look at the science’ and ‘This is a decision that will not only affect your life but those you spend the most time with including your family and loved ones’. The Panel noted its comments and rulings above and considered that Pfizer had brought discredit upon, and reduced confidence in, the industry in this regard and a breach of Clause 2 was ruled. This ruling was appealed by Pfizer.

[Post Panel consideration note: Following notification of the Panel’s rulings, Pfizer pointed out that the briefing stated ‘No current plans to authorize the vaccine for ages 5-11 but this is hot topic behind closed doors within Government (not publicly in media)’].

p8

>>18294556

Pfizer considered the briefing document to be confidential and initially did not want it to be shared with the complainant. The briefing document was not provided to the complainant when notified of the outcome of the Panel’s consideration of the case as it was not considered relevant to enable him/her to decide whether or not to appeal the Panel’s rulings of no breach of the Code. Upon Pfizer’s appeal the issue of confidentiality of the enclosure which Pfizer re-submitted as part of its appeal was reviewed. A redacted version of the briefing document was settled by the Director as set out in Paragraph 7.5 of the PMCPA Constitution and Procedure. The terms of its disclosure to the complainant, however, could not be settled with the parties. The complainant declined to receive the redacted Enclosure based on the terms of confidentiality and was originally sent Pfizer’s appeal papers without it. The Chair of the Appeal Board was asked to decide how to proceed and decided that relevant sections, quoted directly from the Enclosure, were to be included in one document titled ‘Relevant extracts from Enclosure 22, a briefing document from Pfizer for an interview with the BBC on November 22, 2021.’ and that this was shared with the complainant, Pfizer and the Appeal Board.

The appeal from Pfizer and the complainant’s detailed comments upon it are given below.

APPEAL BOARD RULING

The Appeal Board noted Pfizer’s submission that the 45-minute interview was intended to cover news topics identified by the BBC about Pfizer’s commitment to the global Covid-19 vaccine rollout and ongoing innovation to fight the pandemic. Pfizer’s objective for the interview was to reiterate its continued commitment to delivering equitable access to its COVID-19 vaccine across low- and middle-income countries which was a topic of particular media interest at the time. Pfizer submitted that it had reasonably considered that the topic of childhood vaccination would not be a specific focus of the interview. At the appeal Pfizer stated that its CEO who was based in the USA had been given the briefing document and verbally briefed by an experienced media relations team and senior staff. Pfizer UK had briefed the CEO about the regulatory status of Covid-19 vaccines in the UK and the requirements of the ABPI Code. In response to a question at the appeal, Pfizer acknowledged that perhaps additional wording could have been added to the briefing to help the CEO navigate the more complicated areas.

The Appeal Board noted Pfizer’s submission that it had no editorial control or right to review the excerpts of the interview chosen by the BBC for inclusion in its news articles and no press briefing was issued to the BBC in association with the interview. The Appeal Board also noted Pfizer’s submission that it had not been able to obtain a full transcript of the interview from the BBC as the BBC’s own policies did not allow this; it had, however, obtained some limited expanded excerpts. Pfizer stated at the appeal that whilst the topic of vaccination in children appeared to be a focus in the online article, it formed only a small part of the complete 45 minute interview. The Appeal Board agreed with the Panel that it was obliged to make its rulings based on what Pfizer’s CEO had actually stated rather than the edited published article and video. The Appeal Board noted that whilst it did not have the full unedited transcript of the interview, it had before it two questions and answers in relation to vaccination in children. One was not included within the online article and was not the subject of the complaint. The other was:

BBC medical editor: ‘In October the FDA, the American regulator approved your vaccine for 5 to 11-year-olds after successful trials. Do you think immunising that age group is likely to happen in the UK and Europe? And if so, why is it a good idea?

p9

>>18294558

Pfizer CEO: ‘I think it will happen. I don't want to speak about specific candidates I don't want to speak [about] for the health authorities or the regulatory authorities of UK. It's up to them to approve it and use it or not. I believe it's a very good idea. I think that COVID in schools is thriving. I believe that this is disturbing, significantly, the educational system. I think is becoming the pool of infection for the adults. It is becoming a pool of infection for a pool of where the virus keeps replicating and that creates variants. At the end of the day, although the symptoms are not very severe, there is the long COVID. That is very worrisome. And there are kids that will have severe symptoms. So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely [completely] are in favour of doing it.’

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was not approved by the MHRA for use in children aged 5 to 11 years until 22 December 2021, after this interview.

The Appeal Board noted Pfizer’s submission that its CEO was asked a specific question about vaccinating 5 to 11-year-old children against SARS-CoV-2 infection. At the appeal Pfizer submitted that it was not unreasonable to talk about the principles of vaccination in this age group in general and that at the time, there were two other vaccine candidates being investigated in children under 12.

The Appeal Board considered the comments by Pfizer’s CEO particularly ‘Immunising that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea’ and ‘So, there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely [completely], are in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’. The Appeal Board determined that the strong unqualified nature of the comments were such that they promoted the use of Covid-19 vaccines in the 5-11 age group in general, but in the context of the whole answer the Appeal Board considered that those comments did not promote the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine in isolation.

The relevant clause which stated that the promotion of a medicine must be in accordance with the terms of its marketing authorisation and must not be inconsistent with the particulars listed in its summary of product characteristics (SPC) had not been raised in relation to the allegation that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had been promoted for use in 5 to 11 year olds for which it was not approved at the time of the interview and so the Panel had considered the matter under the clause relating to maintaining high standards. The Appeal Board, noting its comments above, did not consider that Pfizer’s CEO had specifically promoted Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine for use in the 5-11 age group and no breach of the Code was ruled in this regard. The appeal on this point was successful.

p10

>>18294559

The Appeal Board noted Pfizer’s submission that its CEO made it clear that the decision on whether to authorize the vaccines in the 5 to 11 year group was the responsibility of the MHRA and that he was not speaking on its behalf. He also explained that he was answering the question in the context of Covid-19 vaccination in general rather than specifically in relation to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Pfizer’s CEO then went on to express his opinion that the wider benefits of vaccinating the 5 to 11 year age group were in favour of vaccination.

In the Appeal Board’s view the alleged clauses of the Code would apply if classes of medicines were referred to and not only a specific medicine.

The Appeal Board considered that the subsequent strong opinion statements, including ‘So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely [completely] were in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’ and ‘I believe it’s a very good idea’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that there was no need to be concerned about potential side-effects of vaccination in healthy children aged 5-11 which was not so. The Appeal Board considered that this implication was misleading and incapable of substantiation. The Appeal Board therefore upheld the Panel’s rulings of breaches of the Code. The appeal on this point was unsuccessful.

The Appeal Board, however, did not consider the claim failed to ‘encourage the rational use’ of a particular medicine and it therefore ruled no breach of the Code. The appeal on this point was successful.

Whilst the Appeal Board noted the CEO’s statement that he/she ‘did not want to speak for the health authorities or the regulatory authorities of UK, it was up to them to approve it and use it or not’, the Appeal Board considered that the CEO’s opinion statements, including ‘So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favour of doing it’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that the benefits outweighed the risks when the UK regulatory authorities had not yet made any conclusions in relation to the vaccination of 5 to 11 year olds; no Covid-19 vaccine was licensed in the UK in that age group when the article at issue was published and the Appeal Board therefore upheld the Panel’s rulings of breaches of the Code. The appeal on this point was unsuccessful.

The Appeal Board noting the unique circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic and its comments above including that Pfizer UK had briefed the CEO about the regulatory status of Covid-19 vaccines in the UK and the requirements of the ABPI Code, considered that in the particular circumstances of this case its concerns were covered by its rulings above, and further rulings of breaches of the Code in relation to high standards and Clause 2 were not warranted. The Appeal Board ruled no breach including of Clause 2. The appeal on these points was successful.

11 of 11

>>18294547

found and fixed

tyvm

>>18294519

>>18294519

most excellent

>>18294568

McCullough became a controversial figure in the medical field amid the global pandemic, which prompted medical associations and legacy media to discredit his promotion of hydroxychloroquine and other early treatments.

In December 2021, the cardiologist appeared on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast where he made a number of claims about information surrounding treatments for the coronavirus, including questioning the efficacy and safety of the vaccines and how the pandemic started.

“When I graduated from medical school, I took the Hippocratic Oath, which said that, above all, I would do no harm to any patient, and I would do everything in my power to help each and every patient,” McCullough said. “I’ve done that throughout the pandemic — not only with my personal patients — but through my public statements in my work as a public figure to help as many people in the world as possible, helping them avoid hospitalization and death with COVID-19 illness and helping them avoid injury, disability and death with COVID-19 vaccination.”

“I think this is a very important stance — I wouldn’t do anything any differently,” he said. “Whether there was a lawsuit or no lawsuit — this is very important. The question on the table is, ‘Why can’t all doctors in America in the world say that?’”

2 of 2

>>18294542

>Turkey Earthquake Videos ripped from Twitter

>>18294565

>>18294542

>>18294565

no tremors

just buildings falling

not weird at all

>>18294492

That is not Jill Biden…

>>18294510

there are two subjects anons are not supposed to talk about.

anon made two comments only in the last bread about the state of the things especially when it comes to men and boys, the lgbtq+ is directed at boys due to a number of reasons, it is not just pedo shit, it is weakening society, splitting families and democide.

Same fucking thing, unless it is highlighted (maybe not right now as there is too much going on) it will not be addressed and the same shit will remain.

if you good enough to do the job great but proportional representation and diversity has been the ruin of all countries used by the w.e.f and its planners and schemers to gain power,

they are easily replaceable thus moar useful idiots are employed into highpowered postions.

They are also easily manipulated and frightened into following orders.

>>18294542

remember 911 bitches

>>18294587

We are in a babylon system right now. This all boils down to spiritual corruption. But thats why WE are here. The great awakening. We will return to righteousness

3.8 magnitude earthquake strikes Buffalo area, New York

https://twitter.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1622579967967076352

Thank you all Bakers

Good morning Anons

Colombian military spotted a balloon in country’s airspace

𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠

How The "Unvaccinated" Got It Right

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/how-unvaccinated-got-it-right

ZeroHedge

>>18294578

appreciate this for double check

got em all

o7

These people are sick, demented degenerates…

NEW - Sam Smith dresses as the devil in Satanic performance of "Unholy" during The Grammys.

"Sponsored by Pfizer" on CBS.

https://www.disclose.tv/id/1622442407613661184/

@disclosetv

𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠

>>18294599

Chinese diplomat Zhang Meifang says “perhaps China was simply giving the US a balloon. Much like one would give a child to make them feel better!”

>>18294592

sea ports similar quakes in the past all man-made not climate change

>>18294568

notable

BREAKING: FTX is sending letters to politicians who received donations from FTX to return the money they received.

There was not a list of the politicians they gave money to, and the amounts.

Until now.

See it here:

https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/senate_ftx

>>18294621

diverse = die verse

>>18294605

Who the fuck is Sam Smith?

And why does anyone care?

Looks like a pudgy fucking nerd dressing up in costume with his other nerd buddies to LARP some gay award show.

>>18294623

I think it should be das verse if I have my German gender rules down correctly.

>>18294605

The Grammy’s are sponsored by Pfizer.

Essentially China runs America. The balloon proved the final pieces.

*Own and control President.

*Own and control Military Generals and other assets within the defense system

*Own land within the country

*Open ports with access to country at anytime

*Secret" Chinese Police Stations scattered throughout the country.

The FDA "doesn't know" how much we depend on China for medicine

https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/how-much-does-u-s-rely-china-for-drugs-fda-simply-doesn-t-know

Not only does China supply a tremendous amount of our consumer and commercial goods, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, and vital raw materials, but it also controls a huge share of the world's shipping fleet and commercial ship building capabilities. China owns roughly $1.08 trillion worth of U.S. debt.

Now why would China need to fly a balloon over the country when they have this much control on US already?

3:59

The Obama administration overthrew Ukraine's elected government in 2014.

John McCain rallied protestors, and Victoria Nuland was caught on tape planning Ukraine's new government.

What role did this have on the current NATO proxy war in Ukraine?

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1622309104067964928

@KanekoaTheGreat

>>18294562

I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound

Everybody look what's going down

>https://tora3.com/share/08ddf4b9d21a_beebb7f8bc7a31ccc6cc5e18eb5dfb8541d4ee44_ad024bc098c14360

>>18294609

Don’t worry Turkey, Ukraine will keep on receiving billions in aid from countries all around the world to help rebuild. You just sit tight and await your turn

Dear Lord,

We are sorry for destroying your creation.

We know not what we do.

I alone accept full responsibility.

We would rather see a cell tower in place of a lone tree providing food and shelter to the little ones.

I pray you allow me to sit by Your side and provide me comfort.

>>18294570

God bless Dr. McCullough, he was the second highly credentialed medical doctor that came out denouncing doctors not treating their patients, but just letting them die at home, without any medical advice. And he exposed the vaccine early for having bad side effects.

I hope all doctors that broke their oath to do no harm,are punished by the law or their conscience for the rest of their lives!

The agencies and superiors that made the doctors do this, need to have Nuremberg trials and public executions!

>>18294631

EVERYTHING on the fucking brain fry box is sponsored by Pfizer!

DERP!!

@200

#22420 >>18294431

>>18294469 Japanese Professor Sues the Government for Hiding Inconvenient Truths About the Jab

>>18294474 Aussie: Dramatic near 2x higher deaths in area of Australia has new variant?

>>18294491, >>18294495, >>18294506, >>18294542, >>18294565, >>18294609, >>18294647 1,000+ killed, infrastructure and historic sites damaged: What is known about horrific quakes in Türkiye and Syria

>>18294493, >>18294605, >>18294628, >>18294614, >>18294622 Hollywood’s demonic praise of Satan brought to you by Pfizer

>>18294502, >>18294505 Who is Dr Kirsty Ainslie/ Ecohealth DEFUSE proposal

>>18294511 Evidence Suggests BioNTech and Pfizer Falsified Key Data

>>18294517, >>18294518 PFIZER AND THE ROYAL THAI FAMILY

>>18294520 Sunday Talks, Cohn and Brennan Talk Gleefully About the Return of the Service Driven Economy Under Biden, Happy with No Wage Growth

>>18294521, >>18294626 Western media quickly scrambling to scrub the internet of the evidence of Nazis in Ukraine…

>>18294537, >>18294546, >>18294548, >>18294549, >>18294550, >>18294552, >>18294553, >>18294554, >>18294558, >>18294549, >>18294578 Pfizer has been found guilty of violating three sections of the British Pharmaceuticals Code of Practice/2021 complaint filed

>>18294568, >>18294570 Dr. Peter McCullough Unbowed After Winning Legal Case

>>18294581, >>18294588, >>18294593 DNC Approves Obama, Clyburn Plan for South Carolina to Lead 2024 Democrat Presidential Primary

>>18294583, >>18294466, >>18294538 Jan 2022 Morgan Li Expands Production Capabilities with New Facility/Chicago fire

>>18294615 FTX Wants Politicians to Return Sam Bankman-Fried Donations. It’s a Long List./anyone got the list???

lemme know

>>18294627

I knew this, but did they have the ability to divert hurricanes back then? If so why aren’t they using it on every hurricane?

₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø***ULTRA2QQQ🐴

“When the Trump administration banned TikTok from U.S. markets in 2020—a ban which a federal judge blocked and then the Biden administration reversed—the executive order included another Chinese social media app, WeChat. While not as psychologically menacing as the TikTok app with its invasive ByteDance algorithms, WeChat may pose an even greater danger from the angle that alarmed government officials from the very start, as an app that gives the Chinese government direct access to user data in the US.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/arthurherman/2023/02/03/wechat-chinas-other-trojan-horse/?sh=7d935c823d84

Forbes

I am a 78 point magnitude earthquake. I’m sure some of you are too. 78!

>>18294515

I'd be watching other news like what's happening in our .gov as they never let a crisis go to waste.

>>18294615

Link to the list of FTx

https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/senate_ftx

@intheMatrixxx

Brave Canadian truckers are at it again. This time featuring the vaccine injured.

@intheMatrixxx

Brave Canadian truckers are at it again. This time featuring the vaccine injured.

Injuries from the COVID-19 Vaccine Are Now Being Publicly Displayed in Canada Using Trucks Driving Down the Street - Join the Campaign!

Since the launch of the COVID-19 vaccine in Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) reported that 52,203 adverse events had been documented in its system. The Liberal government led by Justin Trudeau paid up almost $2.8 million in compensation for…

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/injuries-covid-19-vaccine-now-publicly-displayed-canada-using-trucks-driving-street-join-campaign/

@mgshowchannel

The Gateway Pundit

PN>>18294615 FTX Wants Politicians to Return Sam Bankman-Fried Donations. It’s a Long List./anyone got the list???

Link to list

https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/senate_ftx

What kind of organization is allowed to "take over" ones stereo, like Sirius XM or regular radio?

Asking for a friend.

Alice

Billion dollar babies

>>18294533

kys

>>18294677

Training grounds

Disney = TRASH

>>18294562

>>18294642

So, the story as told by Stephen Stills in several interviews goes like this:

There was a popular bar at the foot of Laurel Canyon that was going out of business (which is weird since if they're popular why are they closing??? but I digress…).

So, on the last night the whole 20-something world showed up and it got so crowded everyone was congregated outside blocking the main road up into the canyon.

So, the cops came and said GTFO and the kids said FO pigs.

Well, as was popular at the time, the cops then started billy clubbing all of them.

Stephen and a buddy were fashionably late heading down there out of the canyon to attend and saw all the action taking place.

Stephen then told the buddy to turn around (the road was blocked to traffic anyway) and head back home because he's got this song in his head that must be written lest he lose it.

And the rest is history.

>>18294663

>>18294663

52544c is a pelican who chased me from Cali to Alabama

>>18294674

bless you

noted

>>18294495

Kekkity, you got a great memory. Wasn't that the pot smoking libertarian in 2020

SpyGate Down 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇧🇷

Let this sink in.

Illegals from squalid third world countries are fleeing NYC because of its filth, drugs, and crime.

Well done Demoncrats.

https://nypost.com/2023/02/05/migrants-abandon-nyc-for-canada-with-taxpayer-funded-bus-tickets/

@SpyGateDown

New York Post

comp'd ghey larp loaf

>>18294701

>>18294698

how do anons cope with the fact that the vast majority of normies dont want trump to run for president again, and what is the plan to get them to come around in time for 2024?

ps if you call me a “shill” or fail in any way to answer the question at hand, you will be forfeiting the debate, and signaling to the board that you simply have no answers at all.

SpyGate Down 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇧🇷

The McStain-Lady G-Nuland coup

https://t.me/electionwizard/5850

Telegram

COL. (RET.) RICHARD BLACK: In 2014, Obama, through the CIA, helped topple a democratically elected government in Ukraine. The US then handpicked replacement officials. Those officials persecuted Russian-speaking people in Ukraine.

>>18294705

anon's don't give a rat's ass

>>18294685

911 Commission Report.

Unedited.

Several Million Copies.

Hard Paper Copies.

Exist.