[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / abdl / animus / ara / film / furry / loomis / r / x ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Voice recorder Show voice recorder

(the Stop button will be clickable 5 seconds after you press Record)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Welcome Page | Index | Archive | Poal Sub | Q Posts | Notables | Q Proofs
Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS/ /TheStorm/ /GreatAwakening/ | Politics News & Debate: /pnd/ | BO's Discord: The Den of Absolute Retards

File: 45c68e578ecc296⋯.jpg (55.89 KB, 701x452, 701:452, sundar_pichai.JPG)

512a96  No.14102179

An analysis of recent admissions made by Google employees in their official capacities by a search engine optimization (SEO) expert proves that Google CEO Sundar Pichai lied to Congress in 2018 when he testified under oath that it is not possible for Google employees to manipulate their search results. This analysis is backed up by properly cited sources including blog posts written by Google employees in their official capacities, comments they made publicly, and Pichai's testimony itself.

The facts exposed in this analysis lead to one conclusion. That Google has a mechanism in place for suppressing specific sites for specific searches. It involves adding domain names to lists of sites categorized a certain way and then adding search terms to second list. When someone searches for one of the search terms then Google automatically ranks sites on the first list significantly lower.

Google admitted doing this to sites with exploitative removal practices recently and stated in that admission that they had already been doing it to porn sites for some time. Their methods involve soliciting complaints from people claiming to have been victimized, having employees review the complaints, and if the complaints are substantiated they add the name of the complainant to a list of "known victims." When a person is a "known victim" and someone searches for their name then sites on the exploitative practices list rank lower.

This mechanism in which Google employees manually categorize websites and add names to a suppression list is the same type of mechanism needed to suppress conservative sites from appearing in search results for politicians. The only difference is that in such cases the category would be populated with a different type of site (ex: right wing media) and the "known" list would be something like "known Republicans." Then when someone searches for a known Republican like Donald Trump, conservative news sites would be suppressed automatically.

Read the damning analysis at https://googleemployees.com/sundar-pichai/

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b0b567  No.14122350

FastJack hidden 16 hours /qresearch/ Bumplocked thread #14102179

This tread has been deemed irrelevant by the BO

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / abdl / animus / ara / film / furry / loomis / r / x ]