>>357803
>you can't tell a business who they can or can't bake a cake for
That's correct.
You CAN force a business to SELL a cake to everyone. But you CANNOT force a baker to create a specific cake, because baking (really it's more about decorating) is an artistic act. It is speech in and of itself.
You also can't force an architect to design a specific building for a specific group. For example, you can't force a jewish architect to design meeting hall for a neo-nazi group. And I'm sure you would support that.
>god dammit if you don't demand a business allow me to fellate nazis, I'll sue/impeach!
Your attempt at the logical fallacy: "argument by ridicule" is cute. But actually, the exact same logic applies here as I explained above.
If you operate a service, be it a telephone service, or a bakery, or a food delivery service, or twitter - you must treat everyone equally. You are not allowed to discriminate based on the identity of the customer.
A baker DOES have to sell cupcakes to gay people. A telephone company DOES have to give a telephone to the KKK. And yes, twitter should be forced to give an account to everyone who wants one.
There is no contradiction in the right-wing view.
