>>183259
> but the price it had on the future of some former colonies was not worth the price.
You can only make niggers so smart. South Korea was destroyed in the Korean war yet way more advanced than anything African who were ahead of Korea (thanks to colonialism…) in the early 1900's.
> colonizing nations bailed whenever either they decided it wasn’t worth the effort or the natives won their independence back through a war
This was engineered by USA post WW 2. This would lead western Europe to become more dependent upon the larger USA, rather than sustaining their own economies through colonialism (which is why France and UK were so powerful through 1700's, 1800's and early 1900's). Effectively putting an end to European hegemony.
> instead of outright genociding them
Western nations with a powerful navy just wanted to exploit them for resources, which worked successfully. If you kill all of them you don't have your slave labor for very long anymore.
> importing niggers into Europe
This was a post WW 2 thing, and again something USA heavily pushed for. The push for multiculturalism came out of USA since they know that it inevitably would weaken their nations relative to USA.
> Now, the niggers have gotten out of control and the country is rapidly deteriorating.
Because the niggers aren't being put in their place. It's also difficult to do this since the moment you will do this not only will western nations in EU cry about human rights, you will have the USA planning a 'democracy revolution' in your country.
> pissed off american
The doom of multiculturalism was mostly an USA idea. Country got in a position so strong after WW II they could take over half of Europe directly and most of the European colonies. Instead of doing that they decided to use their economical influence to just mix everything together in the entire world for God knows why. The only places left that aren't some kind of advanced race mix experiment are former soviet union countries.