/liberty/ - Liberty

>>93620

>The "white race" is a spook in the finest sense of the term

We need an alternative to the Alt Right that discusses stupid laws that punish intelligent honest high integrity white families through dirty political and economic incentives. Conservatism is bringing back the values that made our forefathers stronger.

The only time that Hollywood Nazis ever got a good look was in the Man in High Castle, where John Smith is a model patriotic conservative who fought tooth and nail for his country. Even as the spooky nazi under the new order, he goes out of his way to support his family and the highest ideals of his changed country. The only true constant is how his decisions affect his family

What is the Ethnostate?

Ethno- White American. The majority who own all the property worth having, jobs worth doing, and overwhelmingly represented in the electoral collage.

State. The law. The government. The Judges, prosecutors, and appointees that serve at the pleasure of the executive. Who has the greatest influence on the law? Landed white people of wealth.

Now, currently, the conservatives who represent the ethnostate are in a power crisis. This gives those willing to do what is needed to be done to preserve the ethnostate, out of pure partisanism alone, leverage to adapt the economic system to reward political alliances. This will force money and power back to white people and the based minorities we actually like as neighbors.

This is where the State and the Constitution comes in. Democrats are doing our job for us by turning casual liberals into White nationalists. Democrats are radicalizing the Senate and the highest officers of the court against them on a racial divide. Democrats are obsessed on anti-white minorities because they protect the corruption of the deep state from accountability. Democrat minorities protect the system for rich people. These New breed of right wing Judges and lawyers aren't going to be concerned about constitutional purism anymore so long as they can reinterpret it to protects WHITE Families who give their office legitimacy. THEIR Family. Anti-white liberals have made it personal, and they will do everything in their power to harm laws that produce the anti-white machine.

OP makes a good point. There is capital to create a constitutional level change of laws that will make it very difficult for Jews, liberals, or otherwise to maintain their nepotistic corruption. Regardless of the most autistic Ethnostate setups, the rules and the incentives that need to change are going to be the same. Otherwise, if you can hide your corruption behind an ethnostate of butthurt white socialists rallying on a petty piece of legislation, of the ethnostate, you're just going to repeat California and Sweden.

Our people on the top do not live in a vacuum. They're going to either set sail on the winds of change or be destroyed.

>>12436534

[in response to stonetoss complaint about not enough regulation]

>The concept that nationalists have to throw away white privilege, power, and money for worthless obsessives is absurd. The crazy right dude gets banned in public meat spaces for shitposting IRL. The only difference is he's laughed out of the room instead of arrested.

>In Public building, you have the right to free speech and get banned for bad behavior. Jim Acosta is suing to create Occupy Press Corps because CNN can't maintain viewership under a semi-private arrangement. Private spaces can boot without cause. You have the right to speak so long as you're paying the bills, which naturally puts most free speech on a rightward leaning path. The right has an interest in freedom to prevent it becoming an insufferable echo chamber where the left demand an echo chamber. The left uses (((other people's expenses))) to speak, which is why leftist media thrives in a regulated public spaces. Onerous regulations for net neutrality puts censorship in the palms of the state, therefore puts (((free speech))) to the highest bidder of white shoe law firms and a commission of unelected lawyers.

>Why not hand (((free speech))) over to the ADL? Why would you want to turn /pol/ into racist CNN?

Thusly censored. Disregard the Alt Right. They are false opposition promoted by the power structure.

>>93767

Got banned for discussing internet speech regulatory question why Joos spammers should be allowed to harrass and threaten people on a private platform. Questioning how to respect private property rights to shut off spam while securing free speech on an information monopoly service that alters opinion of the state. Private censorship and propaganda pressed usually towards liberal democrats, superfluous idpol, pro-regulation to favor megacorporations, and the promotion of the democratic party.

So for questioning the great "just give the internet to the governemnt dumb goy", I got banned on the land of muh freeazepeech. Sad and gay.