/liberty/ - Liberty

ironic considering the reddit spacing in OP's post

You ever consider posting something worthwhile to combat that or do you just plan to whine like a bitch?

>>82168

>>>/soyboys/

you will occasionally get decent responses here but you have to really work at it. there's a heavy layer of shitposting that has crusted over this board.

>>82172

This. A brilliant observation. 🔬

>>82168

We are not worthy, Grace us with your tepid smugness, unattached internet intellectual. We shall devour this bait bestowed upon our lowly existence and shower your "prove me wrong" assertion with pointless examples.

>>82189

really sad, I expected better

>>82168

>t. boomer

>>82241

>t. millenial

>complains about board quality

<brainlets

<lollll 56% mutt read economics

<there are no facts (or shit i agree with personally)

<DUDE REDDIT

>reddit spacing

Can't even be bait it's so bad. Redditors/normalfags pretending to be "kool channers" is unforgivable. I want to wring your fucking neck.

>>82168

I'm posting here sometimes because /leftypol/ and /leftpol/ piss me off. At least due to the slow speed of this board, there is less shitposting and spam.

Every political board is an echochamber. Is there any board on 8chan that is not? Even if you were to open a strictly neutral board with a strictly neutral moderation, one ideology would eventually become the dominant one.

>>82189

This, lazy bait thread aside. Most threads are basically the equivalent of /v/'s template threads, which aren't exactly supporting of deep discussions of issues.

>>82252

You're not welcome here, fuck off.

>>82254

I'm not welcome at the free marketplace of ideas? I never insult anybody.

>>82255

>free marketplace of ideas

First of all, nothing is free, if you want to be welcomed then you have to bring something of value, no one is going to accept you just because you exist, second, in this "marketplace" of ideas you never buy anything others sell and constantly push your own shit nobody else wants.

You're not welcome here. You're a fucking nuisance.

>>82257

wow rude

>>82252

A good board, that is, one without moderation, could have newfags always coming, in which case no ideology would become dominant.

>>82257

>you never buy anything others sell

To be fair, the libertarians on this board usually do a very shitty job of selling their ideas. They just take for granted that its obvious their theories are correct and invest zero effort in defending them. Even when a debate happens it's usually full of strawmen by people who haven't even read the ideas they're criticizing.

Now, I won't accuse /liberty/ of being any worse in this regard than most online communities, but come on, in the past if you had visited leftypol or leftpol there was usually 1 or 2 posters who would invest time in debating someone in good faith.

tl;dr - this board isn't your hugbox, faggot. go jump out of a helicopter.

>>82262

unfortunately most people don't like seeing opinions they disagree with. its why hugboxes and echochambers are so prevalent. no one has to put up with hotpockets, but they do, since they don't care people are being censored as long as they disagree with them.

>expecting /liberty/ not to be brainlets

lmaoing at you lol

>>82247

Came here to say that. I doubt it's bait tho, even normalfags don't expect libertarians/ancaps to not be retarded.

>>82268

more like brain-elites

>>82168

>without political diversity this board is pointless

Well then bust out the fucking champagne there buckaroo, 'cause this board has nothing but political diversity. In just about any thread, half the posts are guaranteed to be from left-wing statists, instead of being from people who genuinely value liberty. Is that enough diversity for you?

>>83102

BO never responds, well not unless you post nude pic now. Poor guy must have gone nofap all of a sudden. Some people just don't know how to keep things in moderation.

>>82168

The entire board is communist shitposting, are you fucking kidding me?

>>83148

>moral

>be legalized

You do not know much about acnap, do you?

>>83148

They are moral, but there's no one who should decide if they are legal.

>>83148

>all he knows about Rothbard is intentionally out of context cringe memes from leftypol

You're too smart for us.

Rothbard was in favor of caretaking rights being up for sale. Ownership of human beings under any form is a strict no.

>>83148

To be fair, he ALSO posited the right to run away. Meanwhile, the FBI-informant grade left literally goes around tearing down all the last several hundred years' work of the left in children's liberation.

Besides, what if the child consents, though?

>>83158

custodial ownership != ownership of a child

>>82257

Its free as in freedom not free as in beer