[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / firechan / girltalk / htg / kemono / newbrit / radcorp / strek ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 0078e8c0ff8dcf0⋯.gif (842.83 KB, 312x176, 39:22, 1421850199460742233.gif)

 No.63590

fuck

why is antropology so sjw pc cucked?

 No.63591

When did this board become /pol/2.0?


 No.63593

>>63591

When it grew even a little bit


 No.63595

>>63590

>Anthropology

>Cucked

Only if your professors are a shit. Anthro directly challenges most of the bullshit they spew over in Sociology as well as the bullshit trying to infect archaeology. Anthro with an archeology or philosophy minor is based as fuck and guarantees unemployment.


 No.63596

>science disagreeing with me must mean they are (((cucked)))


 No.63597

>>63595

fuck off liar


 No.63599

File: 86daa76c01b2711⋯.jpg (17.34 KB, 236x335, 236:335, e7510ee4a95c05961c0c596a7f….jpg)

>>63597

>He never took an Anthropology class at a conservative school

>He never watched feminists lose their shit over the professor telling them sexual dimorphism exists and leads to cultural conclusions


 No.63600

>>63595

biology and evolutionary psychology challenges sociology, not antropology

>>63596

it is not science- it is not objective


 No.63602

>>63600

Anthropology

>the study of human societies and cultures and their development.

the study of human biological and physiological characteristics and their evolution.

noun: physical anthropology; plural noun: physical anthropologies


 No.63604

>>63602

evolutionary psychology and sociobiology write on culture too

>>63599

>knowledge about existence of sexual dimorphism in humans is controversial in the usa

literally WTF


 No.63605

>>63604

It is now


 No.63606

>>63605

burgers are nonscientific

in the past it was religiosity now it is cultural marxism

suprisingly scientists when they become successful go to the usa to work there


 No.63608

Evolution is a myth.

There is no such thing as monkeys turning to people, it's completely imaginary and macro-evolution never happens.

http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html

Creation has actual scientific evidence, not just baseless speculations or wild assertions that Darwinists constantly make.

Daily reminder to report & ignore atheist shitposters that hate actual science.

Evolution is a religion/pseudo-science.


 No.63609

File: fc94e44cde0146b⋯.pdf (3.27 MB, Unbekannter Autor - Franci….pdf)

>>63608

Sorry anon, but it's proven and in line with theism. Pdf related.


 No.63612

>>63609

>proven

PFFFHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Holy shit I hope you're not serious.


 No.63613

>>63609

Show the evidence then.


 No.63615

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>63613

They've got no evidence.

They always shout "evolution is fact" but never actually back up their arguments.

Meanwhile here are some links to scientific articles and sources that say evolution is false:

http://www.creation.com/

http://www.icr.org/

https://www.trueorigin.org/

https://www.answersingenesis.org/

http://www.creationwiki.org/Main_Page

http://www.evidentcreation.com/TRM-Logerr.html

http://www.davelivingston.com/tableofcontents.htm

http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology.htm

http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html

Dr. Jonathan Sarfati is a biochemist, chess master (can play multiple opponents blind folded) and a Christian who believes in creation.

The fact is there is data. We interpret those data depending on our priori assumptions and beliefs. Evolutionists filter the data through their worldview. They start with the answer (a false premise) and then force evidence to fit the answer.

Scientists who actually follow where the evidence leads without any bias, cannot reconcile the data with their belief in Darwinian evolution, so they become creationists (often getting fired or silenced from their job because Darwinism is a crazy atheist cult).

Evolution is bullshit. DNA, genetics, the fossil record and geological formations point towards Biblical creation and not evolution.

>>63609

Sorry buddy, but we were created. Your hatred towards God won't change reality.


 No.63616

>>63615

HERE'S THE STATE OF EVOLUTION TODAY: "Evolutionary theory itself is already in a state of flux… all the central assumptions of the Modern Synthesis (often also called Neo-Darwinism) have been disproven" - Professor Denis Noble, Evolutionist, Physiologist and Biologist, May 2013

1. Abiogenesis. They have given up on it and now say it's not part of evolution theory.

2. They are now admitting that they have no explanation for diversity. So now it's not evolution either.

3. They have given up on the fossil record since it looks like creation. So now they say they don't need the fossils.

4. Gould and associates say there is no gradualism (no transitionals). Stasis is the underlying factor in the fossils so it's not evolution either.

5. Random mutations and natural selection produce nothing so that's out too and they are rejecting it as evolution.

6. All they have left is the common ancestor monkey. The inability for "kinds" to interbreed destroys that one so it's not long for this world. 7. PE is now a failure so it's out as evolution as well.

8. The “tree of life” has also been rejected.

Evolution is a fairy tale.

Atheists have a wild imagination. You need a lot of faith to believe your grandpa was a shit-flinging monkey that crawled out of a slimepit.


 No.63617

>>63606

This is bullshit and you know it. Pragmatism has been the dominant philosophy of American academia for the better part of two centuries.


 No.63618

>>63608

Evolution is perfectly in line with theism.

You can even believe in both- Intelligent design through an evolutionary lense.


 No.63621

>>63618

Theism in general? Sure.

Biblical Christianity? No. Incompatible. You'd have to twist and mutilate the scriptures to make it fit.


 No.63730

>>63617

i was saying about burgers not burgers-academics

a lot of burgers do not believe in evolution, believe in ghosts, ufo etc


 No.63735

>>63621

The bible was written by men and inspired by god. Just like everything else, man is imperfect. We look to the bible for morals and life lessons, not for a history lesson. If you followed the bible word-for-word you'd already have failed.


 No.63738

>>63735

So you're calling God a liar, gotcha.


 No.64183

>>63735

*and inspired by psychosis

ftfy


 No.64197

File: f5c33b448247dfe⋯.jpg (30.21 KB, 300x300, 1:1, GodLovesUs_5-300x300.jpg)

>>64183

>Implying drugs aren't god's way of telling men to be happy

>Implying god didn't give us beer so that we might celebrate in his glory

ftfy


 No.64274

File: 353b5300f033ae4⋯.jpg (46.49 KB, 850x400, 17:8, quote-two-great-european-n….jpg)


 No.64275

File: dec770189d540a1⋯.png (113.51 KB, 533x541, 533:541, 1422833828759.png)

>ITT: We pray for anons soul

>>63590

>fuck

>why is antropology so sjw pc cucked?

And this is the OP of the quality-thread that was ruined by a raid from /christian/.


 No.64500

>>64197

mod why did you delete my response to this post?


 No.64507

>>64500

Porchmonkey has an active script on the site that deletes mega links and other URLs (if you included a URL).


 No.64585

>>64507

i did not i think




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / firechan / girltalk / htg / kemono / newbrit / radcorp / strek ]