/liberty/ -Empirical Evidence for The Labor Theory of Value

Name
Email
Subject	REC STOP
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive	Archive [500 char limit]
* = required field	[▶Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag	open flag menu
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf Max filesize is16 MB. Max image dimensions are15000 x15000. You may upload5 per post.

File: d585e9407208a28⋯.png (50.01 KB,1200x1200,1:1,1200px-Hammer_and_sickle_r….png)

Empirical Evidence for The Labor Theory of Value Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 16:13:39 No.100905

Thoughts?

____________________________

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 18:10:15 No.100908

File: 162a7306603f29a⋯.jpg (29.62 KB,300x300,1:1,boxfan.jpg)

You're playing both sides to see which one gives more interesting responses, aren't you?

https://8ch.net/leftypol/res/2857570.html

You should know that half of this board is already /leftypol/ shitposters anyways.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 18:58:50 No.100910

File: 1f62a8b25d1126d⋯.png (8.13 KB,605x340,121:68,bankingTheoryOfValue.png)

I followed the same method he did only with the financial industry. Is this empirical evidence for The Insurance Theory of Value?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 19:07:49 No.100911

>>100910

explain your theory

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 20:35:30 No.100914

File: d856a816f014107⋯.png (8.19 KB,605x340,121:68,GEORGISMINTHEHOUSE.png)

>>100910

You can actually do this with a lot of stuff in that excel sheet.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 21:30:03 No.100917

>>100911

>theory

HAHAHAHAHA, LOOK AT THE ANCAPICUCK TRYING TO COPE WITH SCIENTIFIC SOCIALIST EMPIRICISM DISPROVING HIS OUTDATED THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 22:18:12 No.100920

>>100905

>Empirical Evidence

Sorry, not even going to bother watching, because the only empirical evidence I need is seeing everything that socialists, communists, and miscellaneous leftists touch turn to shit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 23:21:17 No.100924

>>100911

Oh, so NOW you care about theory.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/06/19 (Sat) 23:23:01 No.100925

>>100920

You know what, go ahead and watch it, the "empirical evidence" is bad enough, and the other talking points are so fucking tired that it's worth the watch.

ALSO, it's Cockshott. AGAIN. How many threads do we have to have on that guy? It feels like we refute a paper of his once a week.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/07/19 (Sun) 07:32:49 No.100929

>>100905

Please don't tell me this is the same fucking paper I had to skim two years ago. As >>100925 said, we refute this giganigger every other week.

If it's based on the paper, then I am pretty sure he got his results by making some pretty bad assumptions. He acknowledged that none of his data accurately correlated with labor time, but as one probably tended to be higher and one probably tended to be lower, he assumed that the average of these two would correlate perfectly. That's not just a very big assumption, it's also begging the question.

One thing I always notice is that no one is capable of so much as summarizing Cockshotts methods. It's like you're happy to have him on your side, but you don't actually read and understand him. Can't even blame you that much, as he's nearly unreadable.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 04/07/19 (Sun) 16:36:07 No.100936

>>94468 was our previous Cockshott thread, FWIW.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.