/hypno/ - Hypnochan

No, I'm not deleting threads of hypnotists who've made some sissy files but don't mainly cater to them, or links to those big mega folders and volafile rooms. I can't and don't want to police what you guys share on RetroShare either. This is more about dealing with cancer than banning stuff I personally don't like.

https://youtu.be/WyF8RHM1OCg

THE ABSOLUTE MAD MAN DID IT

I think we'll see a decrease in the number of posts per day, but I am positive that /hypno/ will be a better board.

>>61250 Are we allowed to make requests for "cancerous content" on general file request threads?

Also, this is the place where people come for stuff on hypnosis, so if one genre is outright excluded, not by the quality of the post or thread, but simply because it is part of "feminization", what does that say about this board? Not good things, by most standards.

My suggestion is that instead of all these threads cluttering up the site, we have one thread for each subfetish where people can request files.

I understand your concern (if there is "cancer, low-quality posts, and newfaggotry" then that's a problem), but you're going to kill your board this way.

>>61261

>we have one thread for each subfetish where people can request files

They tried that. Sissyfags nuked the board.

Also

>redditspacing

>>61261

>My suggestion is that instead of all these threads cluttering up the site, we have one thread for each subfetish where people can request files.

The cyclical general was a trial run for that idea, and guess what? The entire thread had around two file requests, the rest was people bitching. Their most common complaint was that they didn't want to share a thread with other hypnotists, the second most common being that any sort of general or containment thread for their fetishes was oppression nevermind that other fetishfags already do this on their own and get along fine. It's not going to work.

>Also, this is the place where people come for stuff on hypnosis, so if one genre is outright excluded, not by the quality of the post or thread, but simply because it is part of "feminization", what does that say about this board? Not good things, by most standards.

Don't play stupid: this isn't an arbitrary exclusion.

>>61250

so can you let us link to another board to divert the sissyfags there?

>>61265

could you answer my first question though?

>Don't play stupid: this isn't an arbitrary exclusion.

You seem bold enough to say that all feminization threads are cancerous. Well, if that's the case, then a filter on "cancerous content" would vet out all femthreads. Otherwise, you've unfairly thown the baby out with the bathwater.

On another note, feminization is a huge marketplace in the hypnotism community. If you aspire to remove such a huge part of the community, change your board name to reflect your selectivity.

The only reason /larp/ hasn't far surpassed you is because /hypno/ is easier to type.

>>61268

larp, not larp.

>>61268

i'd say it's primarily an awareness issue, which is why the mod wordfiltered it :: he knows this board is dead now

>>61271

It's been filtered ever since you trannies spammed the board to death with it.

>>61272

a bit ineffective when you can just add a space

>>61267

>so can you let us link to another board to divert the sissyfags there?

likera.com?

>>61267

>>>/sissy/ or some transgender board. Maybe >>>/bimbo/ for bimbofication stuff too but I dunno if they'll take kindly to it.

>>61268

>could you answer my first question though?

Still thinking about it.

>Well, if that's the case, then a filter on "cancerous content" would vet out all femthreads

Not all female-oriented files are feminization so much of their stuff wouldn't be affected, and frankly, we don't have many women here to begin with. If the board improves in the future I'd like to give them more leeway.

>On another note, feminization is a huge marketplace in the hypnotism community. If you aspire to remove such a huge part of the community, change your board name to reflect your selectivity.

Microtransaction-riddled phone games make shittons of money and yet /v/ doesn't embrace them. Should /v/ - Video Games change its name?

>>61277

>Microtransaction-riddled phone games make shittons of money and yet /v/ doesn't embrace them. Should /v/ - Video Games change its name?

I'm sure they would embrace well-made mobile games, like The Battle Cats, Girls Frontline, Minecraft PE, etc. They don't have a hard rule against any genre, no matter the cancer. You do.

There's also the question of where you draw the line. There's files like "LRFemaleOrgasm" and "Curse Milky" which, while they mention femininity integrating with you slightly, they might not qualify as feminization to others. What about submission/humiliation files that draw analogies to things like concubines or housewives? is that feminization? feminization literally just means "gaining aspects typically found in the female sex" which is so fucking broad.

Also, virtually all tists have some (or many) feminization files. Basically, feminization is no different from any other erotic hypno - yet another way to stimulate dopamine producing.

Seems like a weird distinction.

What was so cancerous about Ke1 threads for example?

Threads about $4mu3l were much worse even though she has plenty of non-feminization stuff unlike Ke1.

Why not just ban her and (((B4mb1))) stuff?

>>61280

/monster/'s ban on furry content, monster boys, and futa is likely a better comparison.

>>61281

>Basically, feminization is no different from any other erotic hypno - yet another way to stimulate dopamine producing.

Even if you were correct and feminization were only yet another way of getting dopamine, like >>61280

you'd still be missing the point: this is more about posters than files and there's some grey areas I don't care about much.

>>61282

>SB

>plenty of non-feminization stuff

People still believe that?

To me the obnoxious fucks throwing "faggots" over the pettiest shit are much worst than a few sissy threads…

But in the end I don't really care, just doubting it will improve the overall quality by much

And, at the same time, 5amba 4lex (and IV) is not banned, yet more, than a half of her files are sissification related (check the screen shot) :D

WolfGirl is about creating a fem tulpa. Ban it!

>>61283

>>plenty of non-feminization stuff

>People still believe that?

2 wipe clean files?

>>61283

>People still believe that?

For every Ke1 file without any feminization you can come up with, I could give you 5 non-feminiazion B4nd13r files.

>>61285

The MLP thread is about becoming (female) ponies.

Ban that too (but unironically)

>>61283

>/monster/'s ban on furry content, monster boys, and futa is likely a better comparison.

The subtext of /monster/ is literally "monstergirls". It is a thread about monster girls, of which futa and monster boys(male) and furry are seperate from. /furry/ is an available name! But you're taking the /hypno/ name and excluding things that are VERY obviously hypnosis. You can't make an apt comparison, because you are wrong.

>>61288

>trusting SB's descriptions

Thanks for the kek.

You have a point about the pony thread, even if the post quality is somehow higher than most feminization threads. I'll think about it, might direct them to >>>/pone/.

>>61289

There are a bunch of people who think /monster/'s definition of monster girls is too narrow for not including xenos or monstrous girls without human faces and a couple faggots who think girls should include futa. Since you're still missing the point and probably don't know about Polt, here's a more spoonfeedy comparison: 4chan's historic furry ban. Do you think the moderators had an irrational hatred of fuzzy animal people?

>>61291

>and a couple faggots who think girls should include futa

There's a grey area there (if it has a vagina and tits, is it not a girl?) but that's irrelevant, since nobody with functioning neurons can say that feminization "hypnosis" does not qualify as -wait for it- hypnosis.

>Polt

What the frick did you just say. eSports came up on google search.

>Do you think the moderators had an irrational hatred of fuzzy animal people?

Yes. the only reason 4chan ever gives for banning furries is " it's part of 4chan culture". nobody ever mentions instances where furries are toxic, so I would assume 4chan is the one to blame here.

>>61295

yeah, so i'm not immersed in the chan culture, big deal. Am i wrong though, are furries this malignant tumor that ruin boards the way you do? I'm pretty sure you modded fem stuff out on the reason of "i don't like it". Which isn't ever a good thing to do, especially when this the place they would belong on this site. Is it hypno? yes. Is it illegal? No. Then wouldn't it belong on /hypno/? I haven't seen a good reason why not.

So, incontinence and impotence files are allowed, but feminization ones are not? Do I smell a logic here?

>>61297

There's other fetishes I don't like and I'm not banning them. So why feminization? I'll be blunt: a lot of people think the community surrounding it are the cancer that ruined /hypno/, a gateway for newfags, and a protective bubble that keeps them from getting gud. I and the previous BO wanted to see if that's actually true. What would a hypnosis board look like without feminizationfags? We won't know until someone tests it.

>are furries this malignant tumor that ruin boards the way you do?

We'll see if the feminizationfag ban is cancer or chemo soon enough. Spam attacks will only prove the chemo came too late.

>>61305

Yes: the people who want limp penises and shit themselves are better behaved than feminizationfags.

>>61306

What even qualifies as cancer? What behaviour are they doing that is so horrendous? Do you just not want your board to be organised by artist? I don't really see this bad behaviour, but if you defined it better, then maybe people could actually give suggestions on how to go about this. Until then, you're just a haterfag, wasting a namespace to enact his sad fantasies.

tl;dr give a demonstration.

this is retarded, it was huge part of hypno and appealed to many, also had some of greast series with real hypno and not just erotic audio shlock and had some of the most active threads too

and you erased just like that and now we need a separate sissy_hypno board?

If you like order you can go to https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Hypnosis-and-Hypno-fetish

If you like anarchy you can go to https://8ch.net/larp/catalog.html

The second link should be:

https://8ch.net/larp/catalog.html

Unless the board owner set another obfuscation. It's / l a r p /

BO, WTF? You ban sissy and you ban the board the sissies created for themselves? And who's cancer to this board?

>>61318

>And who's cancer to this board?

The faggots who were so angry about having to stay in a general for a couple days as a test that they selfishly spammed everyone else's threads off the board with ads for their new board, then didn't understand why it got wordfiltered.

>>61319

>with ads for their new board,

Isn't that what you wanted? Let them go to their own place? But this place needs to be advertised, otherwise they will keep returning.

In other words, your actions are contradicting and counterintuitive.

>>61321

>spammed the board so every thread gets wiped

>WE JUST ADVERTISIN

>WE DINDU NUFFIN

>>61319

>they selfishly spammed everyone else's threads off the board

As far as I understand, it was "he" not "they", and the annoying captcha should have solved that.

>>61317

>Unless the board owner set another obfuscation. It's / l a r p /

>Post last edited at 06/20/19 (Thu) 01:39:28

The BO is obviously trying to keep the sissies here :D

OK, then the only option "allowed" by BO is Like Ra's site. Ask there what the other board name is.

>>61323

>>61325

One spammer wiped the board but he wasn't the only /larp/ spammer, just the biggest one. A captcha wouldn't stop the original spam method either, which was usually autists going into random threads and posting LARP LARP LARP over and over in a single post. This began the day their board went up and only stopped after the spam attack, when I finally had enough of their shit and wordfiltered them.

Again, I'm not against sending feminizationfags elsewhere: I've actually encouraged it earlier in this thread. You know what I am against? Catering to spammers.

rules

>Threads must be related to hypnosis or mind control in some way

>Unless its feminization hypnosis, which is somehow unfitting here, cause a few dudes spammed the board and the BO is a blind ape pretending be a benevolent prick

welp, boys, it's time for the a n a r c h y b o a r d.

I'm not waiting for you to ban the thing I like next. Don't tread on me.

>>61250

You redirected all the sissy stuff to /sissy/ (they might not be very accepting hosts, but ok) and you redirected the bimbo stuff to /bimbo/ (possibly better, but still not great). My biggest problem is the people who want to discuss feminization files that don't fit into the above 2 groups. Where does the niche stuff go? Previously, it would go here, but a ban on all feminization stuff means people like me have nowhere to go. Any advice?

>>61333

You still haven't said what the "sissies" did that warrants calling them "the source of cancer, low-quality posts, and newfaggery".

Even if a few spammed the board after being constrained (rather unfairly, given the amount of content is in that genre), said actions do not in any way warrant the absolute censorship you have done with this once great board.

>>61250

> I've banned feminization and subfetishes like sissification, bimbofication, and transgender stuff.

THANK YOU!

>>61268

You don't understand - the sissyfags aren't being banned for being sissies. They're banned for spamming the board to hell.

>>61285

There's a pretty big difference between establishing a companion - that is feminine but technically sexless - and telling the listener to grow a pussy.

>>61288

It's pretty well established that $B's "non-feminization" files ultimately lead to the feminization files if used as directed. That entire deceptive clusterfuck deserves banning for that reason as I mentioned in >>58785 in the previous meta thread.

>>61290

> You have a point about the pony thread, even if the post quality is somehow higher than most feminization threads.

I offer that the higher-than-average post quality is an indication that it's not actually a sissy thread. Bronies are ... something else.

I argue that MLP should be allowed, especially for historical interest - which seems to be what that thread has become - because it wasn't MPLfags who torched the board. If I understand correctly, sissy content isn't banned because it's sissy content - it's banned because the sissies torched the board. Sissyfags torched the board. MLPfags have not torched the board, therefore there's no reason to ban MLP.

>>61322 (checked)

It's a little more outrageous than that. Wiping the board had the effect of pushing every thread into the archive - with the spam included, now beyond the reach of the mod's "delete" button because the threads are archived. The sissies destroyed every thread on the board just to graffiti the archive. If that's not narcissistic entitlement, I'm not sure what is. And if that kind of narcissistic entitlement isn't cancer worthy of chemo-banning, I'm not sure what is.

>>61327

> You know what I am against? Catering to spammers.

Good. Don't surrender to net.terrorism.

>>61331

Don't let the door whack your ass on the way out. Or do - it's your ass after all.

Project "Wolfgirl" will remain on /hypno/ for as long as it is welcome here.

>>61337

What part of the sissies rioted and torched the board after being ordered into the same type of containment that all other groups had voluntarily adopted without being asked do you not understand?

61340>>

>What part of the sissies rioted and torched the board after being ordered into the same type of containment that all other groups had voluntarily adopted without being asked do you not understand?

Easy question, easy answer. I don't understand the part where "sissies" became synonymous with "the people torching the board". Why are you lumping in the entirety of what is by far the biggest and most broad topic on this with a small group of people?

And also, It is perfectly fine with everyone if those people want to >voluntarily adopt something without being asked

why should they be involuntarily forced into someone else choices?

But we can all agree that torching the board was a terrible, dastardly thing to do. Nobody challenges that. Advertising and vandalism have a distinct line between the two. But it's the sissies being hurt here, not the spammers.

>>61343

not to mention this terrible thing happened 2 months ago, after which nothing bad happened. Not exactly a prime example of a cancerous community.

I don't really get the problem here, the sissies have their anarchy board now, where they can riun their life in there safe space, why not just migrate there?

What a fucking joke. You know where to go. Let's make larp board a thing.

>>61267

Yeah it's not like BO makes a safespace out of /hypno/ also *their

Containment thread would have worked if the BO wasn't a faggot about it, when you implement a controversial measure the last thing you want to do is piss the negatively affected side more off. So BO with his levelheadedness decided to give it a retarded title with a cancerous image.

Now he bans the sissies and obviously he doesn't link them the alternative hypnoboard, because he is a very rational human being.

>>61354

Nah the content of sissy hypno is way to diverse to keep it to one thread. Also it would get way too much traffic.

>>61250

quick someone posted a megadump in the Cock Cage Encouragement thread, there is also a bimbo file in there. I would suggest purging the whole thread.

pls no faggotry on my hypno board, thx

people posting sissy requests in 3ll3chemy thread. pls keep this place safe and clean from the dangerous ppl oh gods

>>61340

On the one hand, i doubt sissies care what board they're on. As long as they get their daily dose of cock in their ass

On the other hand, we can't just ban an entire group of people based off of a few toxic spammers that happened to be one of them.

If the spammers happened to be furries, would you just ban all anthropomorphic files?

>>61365

> just ban all anthropomorphic files

Yes, please! I do not like them!

>>61367

good idea. I personally want all diaper and wetting files banned please

>>61368

Can't agree more! Add the impotence files to the list, please! They are not healthy!

>>61372

…and anything that's too vanilla. They can go elsewhere for that sissy stuff.

>>61374

In the past few weeks there was literally only a single new post in the meta thread complaining about sissy stuff. Other than that things appeared to have normalized and the meta thread wasn't piling up with other issues. Instead everyone was minding their own threads, like it should be on a board covering a broad range of kinks.

So you being you appear to think sissies are the only problem left (because of that one fucker who persistently needs to remind everyone of his hatred towards such an "unmanly" kink) and initiate another large change just to get the complaints rolling again.

Do you really believe that you are backed by the majority of the current posters or even just the leftover core audience that used to frequent this board years ago?

Wouldn't there have been more people advocating for change if people interested in this board had any more significant problem with it?

>>61327

that's understandable, but wouldn't it still benefit you to just have in the rules sticky "if you want X Y OR Z, FUCK OF TO >>>/larp/"?

maybe this board won't die and those of us like my who likes all kinds of hypno will have TWO hypno boards to post on, which is profit

>>61374

Again, why not just ban SB and (((B4mb1))) stuff only if they are the problem?

There's plenty of feminization heavy hypno threads that never really had the problems these threads have.

Also, I find your behaviour pretty weird. You don't want to ban autistic arguments and idpol sperging because "it's part of chan culture". But at the same time you hate it so much that you're willing to nuke the threads completely because of it.

>>61384

>/hypno/ was never good and mods = fags.

yeah, at least the sissies want to look a little feminine before the shovw a cock up their ass.

>>61374

>when the first BO stopped giving a shit

THIS is the actual problem!

>>61385

>Again, why not just ban SB and (((B4mb1))) stuff only if they are the problem?

I'd rather delete "wrong posts" or ban individuals, not the subjects.

>>61382

>just cave in already or your board will die

You honestly think I'm going to unblock the board that couldn't even cough up an apology for all the threads their shitters spammed and knocked off the board? All we got was screeching about the wordfilter after they wiped the board.

Besides, I've already linked alternatives in the announcement bar. There's another 8chan board I may link up there and in the rules if they behave themselves and don't spam like retards.

>>61384

>ignoring the success of 4um's furry ban and /monster/

topkek

>>61385

>idpol

>>>/trannypol/

>>61387

It's too late for the first BO's OG approach to moderation. It worked when the board was mostly gamergate refugees, but now the board is too full of shitters from web searches and reddit. People like you and most of the other complainers in here.

>>61389

>You honestly think I'm going to unblock the board that couldn't even cough up an apology for all the threads their shitters spammed and knocked off the board?

Why should we apologize for things we didn't do?

The ones that spammed the board aren't sorry. The ones that didn't spam the board and were nice people didn't do anything wrong.

The most we can do is disavow the spammers, which is something i'm sure everyone can do or has already done. But blaming a genre for an attack is like blaming brown skinned people for 9/11: stupid and unproductive.

>>61389

Why do you keep dodging my question?

>>61395

You do realise your wordfilter doesn't prevent spammed adverts, right? If la-rp was willing (which it's not, we believe we can surpass you perfectly civilly now that you have alienated your base), it could still spam adverts like, for instance

Try the larp board! google search "larp" for more info!

I would guess the reason they aren't doing that is because they are good people. But even if they weren't, I don't get why you are alienating an important part of the base because some of them did something bad (assuming they weren't being framed, everyone's anonymous here) when innocent people like me and others are getting hit in the collateral.

>>61395

Some other anon here

So basically one or two guys spammed the board and now you are banning an entire subgenre because of it… nice job man, some real quality moderation there.

If it really was some coordinated attack, some sissy conspiracy, giving us some evidence would be great.

I thought the sissy stuff was cancer, but this is space aids.

Time to make a board for mlp-hypno or incontinence and aloha snackbar under their name? What else can we get banned?

What the fuck man….

>>61399

>So basically one or two guys spammed the board and now you are banning an entire subgenre because of it… nice job man, some real quality moderation there.

Nope, read the thread.

… teenagers …

>>61400

why is cocksucking, cumeating, chastity and other faggotry not also banned?

>>61402

Yes. ABDL, impotence and tulpas too.

What's left? :D

>>61250

Thank you, BO. You are a gentleman and a scholar.

The whiny, entitled comments in this thread are the perfect example of why the board is better off without sissy content.

>>61350

>I don't really get the problem here, the sissies have their homoy board now, where they can riun their life in there safe space, why not just migrate there?

Co-signed.

board owner is a self-serving moron. There was no discontent recently. Everything was fine. Now: suddenly banning an entire arbitrary subgenre because of a few alleged bad apples (not convinced there weren't just as many on both sides). Whatever past drama was overblown trivial shit and the constant unnecessary framing of it as a sissy vs anti-sissy race war just stirred everything up when all that was needed was actual moderation.

>>61402

Anon, you don't get it. BO isn't gay. He likes being told to smoke cock instead of cigarettes by WOMEN. It's self-improvement and not gay at all.

Sissies just make normal guys like him look bad. Nobody will think he's a passive sexual failure once they're gone from this cum-eating and healthy living board. Did you know that sperm is a superfood? BO can tell you all about it.

>>61283

>People still believe that?

You sound pretty familiar with SB files. Did things get weird for a while there?

>>61423

Nah, the deceptive nature of SB's shit has been common knowledge for a long time now. The Mindwriters wiki even has a big-ass article about it.

>>61424

I just checked the mindwriters wiki, and their article on SB is literally a copypasta of the same posts that one autist spams on here.

I still believe that said autist is SB himself shilling by means of

>oy vey, these files are pretty hardcore and deceptive

since that's what many people seem to want.

>>61425

For the record, I am the supposed "shill" who wrote the majority of those posts. I also wrote posts describing file contents about Mr Daniels, Candice, StudioJ, and tons of other hypnotists. Are you going to accuse me of shilling for them too, or only when it suits your argument?

For the record, not that you care in your prejudiced determination that "anyone who posts stuff I don't like must be in a conspiracy", I have no personal or financial ties with SB or anyone else that has any benefit from hypno file sales as far as I know. And furthermore, I have routinely stated that SB files are less likely to cause actual changes than other files. My cautionary statements were always about the fact that SB tried to hide it in files that supposedly were legit and also hid other harsh "training steps" in files that were supposedly tame.

I'm actually glad that SB has been banned surprisingly. I don't agree with 'how' the ban has gone down or the collateral damage. But I also think it is a good thing that now the only ones who could possibly get affected by those files are people who were already wanting to be fucked up sex dolls and not random joe shmoe wanting just a normal hypno experience.

>>61428

Addendum:

Furthermore, you call me an autist and make statements that I spam.

I deny the first statement and question what behavior you think I exemplify that necessitates that first tag. As for the spammer claims… I have never once gone into a random thread and said "Hey go check out blah blah instead." Nor have I done anything remotely similar to that. The only time I ever wrote a post about SB is in response to someone else posting about it, and even then it was to tell people not to check out said hypnotist.

That is not spam and that is not shilling. Nor am I an "autist" for having a belief that SB is a nasty hypnotist with bad habits in their files. The fact that you persist in labeling me as all of these things only shows that someone around here truly has a mental block but you should check your mirror out.

>>61429

>>61428

SB's content sounds like shit from an audio perspective, for the most part. That being said, everytime it got brought up in any context whatsoever, you'd pop up like a fucking gopher, going

>hurr hope you goys don't get into this SB stuff, it's seriously hardcore and he's clearly an advanced hypnotist with a super knowledge of psychology and blah blah blah

If you're not him then you might as well be for the amount you concern shill for him.

Lastly,

Nor am I an "autist"

Doubt.

>>61428

>For the record

>Are you going to accuse me

>For the record

>prejudiced determination

>I have no personal or financial ties

>And furthermore

>My cautionary statements

>>61429

>Addendum:

>Furthermore

>I deny

>As for the spammer claims

It's been a rough day in court for this lad.

lmfao why even come to this board without those threads? GG/(((B4mb1)))/MSJ/Ke1 made up like 60% of posts here. I guess this board really needed to be cleaned so that all the shitty hypnodommes with garbage mics can findom you instead. If you look at the remaining threads it's still shit like lactation and nipple sensitivity, premature ejaculation, that stuff is step away from feminization and sissy stuff if not already there.

FWIW, it looks like https://fapchan.org/hypno is running again, and could really use somebody actually posting something. Maybe the banned traffic could move there.

(Hope that's ok to say, I'm not advocating lifting the ban here)

>>61453

>https://fapchan.org/hypno

It was always up, but also always dead. 47 hypnotists are in the ban list. Useless.

>>61397

hell even actually click through to the larp board and you'll find a redirection thread

same with >>>/larp/

well this board is going to properly die now, pretty happy about it

male lactation, furry transformation, premature ejaculation, nipple play, erectile dysfunction, chastity, cum eating instructions and more weird shit are all permitted here then? but gay stuff isn't?

guess we're off to >>>/larp/ then

OP ate too much kosher food and the kishka got to his brain

>>61474

>not eating so much pork the jew repellent leaks from your skin and they flee to Israel

>>61422

> BO isn't gay. He likes being told to smoke cock

Did you overdose on bimbo files again just to make that post?

>>61428

> I also wrote posts describing file contents about Mr Daniels, Candice, StudioJ, and tons of other hypnotists.

Any possibility of reposts in a bad 'tist Hall of Shame thread? The only one of those I've seen was $B.

BO, would $B be permitted to be discussed in that context?

>>61465

> … weird shit are all permitted here then? but gay stuff isn't?

If I understand correctly, actual gay stuff is allowed. Only feminization is banned.

>>61467

I've also read the larp-1 meta thread and a few others. Their efforts to make war on us are comical. Uploading RAR archives with the larp-1 board name as the password - as if that won't be an easy automated piracy hit. Checking uploaded archives to see if a particular known password decodes them is trivial to automate.

They fundamentally don't understand the concept of negative value - which is good, because they'll attract the cancer away from us, while this board is an obvious stem for larp-1's name that the better posters will find on their own. We'll have fewer posts, but much higher quality - until the next "topic of cancer" arrives to bring a new wave of reddit to our nice little garden.

They think that they could claim and use /larp/ and it couldn't be wordfiltered. Idiots. "hypnosis" -> "hypno" - and everyone here will still understand.

They really seem to think that all they have to do is tell people that they exist and everyone will flock to them. How did they get so delusional?

And I'll apologize in advance for the grave-dancing, but I had too many lulz to not share this.

To the tune of the chorus from "One Night in Bangkok"

THE SISSY FAGGOTS GOT THE FLAMIN' BUTTHOLES!

THEY'RE ASS-BLASTED 'CAUSE THEY GOT B&!

That crazy preacher gave a long-ass sermon.

He brings us teh lulz even though he's nuts.

I can see the butthurt all the way from here.

< vid related - it's the crazy preacher's infamous "flaming butthole" sermon

>>61475

mmmm … bacon

As the kids say these days, This ain't it chief

>>61477 (self reply)

> they could claim and use /larp/

And it's already been wordfiltered, nice. I need to start checking the filter list before suggesting wordfilters…

< polite sage for self-reply

>>61481

If it were an actual alternative instead of one they claimed as a glorified redirect because some faggot said I couldn't filter it, it wouldn't be filtered. For comparison, all /erotichypnosis/ has is a single rules thread and it already looks more promising than /larp/. I'm considering linking them instead to see how they fare.

>>61487

please let go of this petty personal war and let people easily find what they want

>>61487

holy shit! did you actually grow back some of your brain overnight? almost impressed but im sure youll manage to disappoint on implementing that suggestion and we will be back on square 0.

>>61492

Never was against linking to other boards, fag, I've already linked some so they're visible above every thread but the usual suspects are still pissed because they aren't /larp/.

>>61494

The boards you linked aren't centered around hypnosis. That's the problem. I don't care if you link the board that shall not be named, but the linked boards are in no way a sufficient alternative to this board with freedom of content choice.

And no one wants to split their attention for a single thing to multiple boards. So no matter what, it's either going to be a new board, no board, or this one if it's ever going to drop its content restrictions. I expect this board will have to break down a little more before an alternative can take over, but I'm willing to wait for that to happen.

>>61494

>ban hypnosis content

>link faggots to non hypnosis boards

good job brainlet

>>61477

>mmmm … bacon

Mmm, memes that died with the Budweiser frogs.

I bet you still think about George Bush.

What I don't understand is why BO doesn't set up the circle-jerky forum with registration, postcounts, and names that he and his middle-aged buddies so clearly crave. That would be the perfect walled garden. You would have all the in-jokes you want, and you'd get to haze the new user every month. You could meet up for hypnosis themed barbecues in southern Illinois.

>>61523

To answer my own question:

You don't do that, BO, because nobody knows you, likes you, or cares about your tastes.

You have no userbase except one you co-opt and socially engineer until it matches the contents of your hypno folder, the content of which gravitates towards the year 2009, like other things I could mention - your income, perhaps.

I'm indifferent to this whole fiasco, because I think it will handle itself, with the inevitable life-cycle of all planned economies run for the benefit of faceless desk jockeys. It's nonetheless a pleasure to hold a mirror up to that face of yours.

>>61523

>You could meet up for hypnosis themed barbecues in southern Illinois.

That sounds fucking awesome.

>>61531

You don't get to bring brownies.

>>61487

What makes it even funnier is that larp-3 appears to have initially been created as a spam board.

archive.today/1daoq

> Good Vibes Hypnosis

> Hypnosis Training and Services

Really? A quick search and … archive.today/3iupO

Looks like that guy used Pajeet's Curry Parlor's SEO Services. It seems that board either never had any posts or the posts weren't restored after the big hack.

>>61490

> petty personal war

It ain't just the BO anymore. Are you really so stupid as to think that nuking the board makes people who didn't care before like you?

I didn't really care about the sissies - until a sissy spammer nuked the board in response to testing a new rule. Now I agree 100% with banning them and even argued for the ban.

>>61492

Well, let's see some activity on >>>/erotichypnosis/ then.

>>61504

> The boards you linked aren't centered around hypnosis.

They are centered around feminization and transformations - >>>/tf/ even explicitly allows hypnosis in their rules.

> the linked boards are in no way a sufficient alternative to this board with freedom of content choice.

Oh, so now it's about freedom?

> And no one wants to split their attention for a single thing to multiple boards.

But it's not a single thing - at least, not to non-sissies. And since when has anyone on the Internet not been able to juggle multiple sites? hownew.ru/?

> So no matter what, it's either going to be a new board, no board, or this one if it's ever going to drop its content restrictions.

The content restrictions are the consequence of a long history of bad behavior by connoisseurs of the banned content.

>>61518

>>61527

Get some popcorn and enjoy nuclearbutthurt.mp4.webm. Now playing on an imageboard near you.

>>61523

> memes that died with the Budweiser frogs

The Budweiser frogs are dead? Last I heard, the lizards tried to assassinate them, but the ferret they hired to do the hit fucked up and the frogs were still croaking. bud … weis … er

< Anon uses Facts. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

> That would be the perfect walled garden. You would have all the in-jokes you want

You - hownew.ru/?

>>61526

> You don't do that, BO, because nobody knows you, likes you, or cares about your tastes.

Argument by social proof, also known as the bandwagon fallacy, also characteristic of women trying to argue on feelz instead of reality. I must ask how long you've been listening to bimbofication files or are you just Swedish?

> You have no userbase except one you co-opt and socially engineer until it matches the contents of your hypno folder

Have you considered that other anons might - just might - happen to share the BO's tastes? Enough anons to have a lively board?

> the content of which gravitates towards the year 2009

And of course IT'S THE CURRENT YEAR comes out. As if that actually means anything.

< Anon uses Identify Fallacies. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

>>61536

> You don't get to bring brownies.

< The Board Owner has joined the meme party.

>>61537

>Are you really so stupid as to think that nuking the board makes people who didn't care before like you?

Lol this mans tryna blame a 2-month-old anonymous cyber attack on somebody he disagrees with.

>>61542

I didn't say any of that. It's entirely possible (unprovable, but possible) that the attack was committed by a sissy or sissies. Maybe it was the gayest sissy that ever gayly sissied. But you can not reasonably blame one person, who you've never met, and with no identification, for an attack by people who may not even be on the boards (this one or the narch-E board).

With the transgender suicide rate as high as it is, the attacker might even be dead by now.

If you and the BO stopped treating connoisseurs of feminization hypnosis as this weird hivemind, maybe you could have killed the cancer a bit sooner.

>>61358

> Lol this mans tryna blame a 2-month-old anonymous cyber attack on somebody he disagrees with.

Let's try some facts about the spam raid and sissy ban.

[1] This board was raided with spam promoting another board, which I now refer to as larp-1 in accordance with the BO's strenuous efforts to wordfilter the spam.

[2] The larp-1 board was founded specifically as a place where connoisseurs of the now-banned content could get their fix.

[2a] This even went so far as the original title for the larp-1 board, which left no doubt as to its true purpose by prefixing "sissy" to the board's name. While the title was changed before any archives were made, archive.today/iHijz has posts 25 and 26 where the title change was requested.

[2b] This was done during the containment thread test before banning the sissies was even being seriously considered.

[3] The BO's long delay in actually banning the sissies after the spam raid can be explained as recovery from PTSD from watching the board get torched out from under him while he was a mere vol acting on the previous BO's instructions and could do nothing to stop the spam.

Facts [1] and [2] are particularly damning - someone wanted to promote a sissy board by systematically torching this board and pushing all threads into the archive, presumably thinking that new threads would be made on the larp-1 board. The BO handled the incident well, and new threads were made on this board.

At last check, the larp-1 board barely has two pages of threads, while this board has recovered to eight pages. This board is expected to continue to recover, with only a handful of threads remaining gone - the banned topics.

< Anon uses Facts. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

>>61554

> With the transgender suicide rate as high as it is, the attacker might even be dead by now.

That's possible. That kind of frighteningly high suicide rate is another reason to ban such content - do we really want to push any of our visitors down a path to suicide?

>>61487

Clarification request originally asked in >>61477

Is discussion of $B in the context of an Unethical Hypnotist Hall of Shame thread permitted?

Let's break this down

>>61570

1. Incontrovertible fact. The ads are still in the archive.

2. It's an annarchy board, so I believe it was originally for everything. Probably to "build /hypno/ to it's former glory". But I shall take you at your word, and we'll say it had "sissy" somewhere in the titles.

2b. Yes, we get it. Anon spammed the board promoting a board that was built exclusively to not have the changes implemented at the time. Do we know how many? Or where they organised this attack, if it was a plurality?

3. How the fuck can you possibly assume this?

Literally no evidence, aside from "hurr he took a while therefore PTSD" I'm open to evidence to support your explanation, but until then I'll just come up with my own explanation.

Explanation: The BO waited for the spammers to leave, and for things to cool down, so as not to provoke a second torching.

[EXPLANATION END]

But again, none of this points to the idea that the people vouching for the return of feminization content are in anyway linked to the spammers, outside of the board they resided in. Stop blaming the people you disagree with for an attack we really didn't cause, because we didn't. We wouldn't ask 8chan to throttle you if one of your more cancerous users torched the anarky board.

It's like you think all people who want to ask for some weird files are secretly conspiring to end your board. This isn't the case, as the spammers haven't torched the board. The spammers are long gone, and the only thing you have lost is people, who are now condemned to echo chambers to get their fix of whatever they want.

You've given larp exactly what it needed. People. I don't like sissy stuff ( Let me be a girl or a boy, don't try to hold me in some gender-limbo) but now I do business exclusively in board-which-totally-can't-be-named, because I think it's going places. The ban here turned up it's growth rate to 11.

Tl:dr, we can assume the character of the spammers, but we cannot assume the character of the person who disagrees with us. Stop trying to do the latter.

so is (((B4mb1))) stuff completely banned then?

>>61570

> The BO's long delay in actually banning the sissies after the spam raid can be explained as recovery from PTSD from watching the board get torched out from under him while he was a mere vol acting on the previous BO's instructions and could do nothing to stop the spam.

As >>61575 said, it was to let things cool down: I was still only a vol at the time and couldn't protect the catalog from a similar spam attack. Even after receiving ownership and setting up some proper anti-spam measures, I figured rebuilding the catalog was more important in the short term, and for a while I leaned against banning feminizationfags.

>Is discussion of $B in the context of an Unethical Hypnotist Hall of Shame thread permitted?

Yeah, sure.

>>61575

>wasting real money on a VPN to white knight a hypnosis board

Is this the new 10 bucks?

>But again, none of this points to the idea that the people vouching for the return of feminization content are in anyway linked to the spammers, outside of the board they resided in.

>It's like you think all people who want to ask for some weird files are secretly conspiring to end your board.

From what I've heard in vola rooms, /larp/ is either run by or closely associated with a couple namefags from a vola circlejerk. If the spam was planned by a group, it probably originated from there, and even if it didn't their meta thread was very pleased with it. We're only getting /larp/fags disavowing it now that they want off the wordfilter.

There probably isn't a secret conspiracy to end /hypno/ becase they don't need one: /larp/ers openly want /hypno/ to die if they can't have their way. Feminizationfags in general have always had this "we are the board/larp/ fetish and the rest of you wouldn't have anything without us" attitude, kind of like typical reddit crossposters, and this is really just more of the same except now they're crammed into an echo chamber with themselves and their white knights.

>This isn't the case, as the spammers haven't torched the board. The spammers are long gone

We didn't have any anti-spam measures back then, not even captchas. Spamming /hypno/ now would take far more time and effort to create a fraction of the damage.

>>61583

>accuse people of being redditfags

>moderate worse than a redditfag

Cool, enjoy watching your board die!

>>61575

> we'll say it had "sissy" somewhere in the titles.

I provided an archive link showing the request to change the title in their meta thread. That is strong, if circumstantial, evidence.

> Literally no evidence, aside from "hurr he took a while therefore PTSD"

I don't need evidence to justify going easy on our new BO under the circumstances. The possibility is enough, since the sissies were trying to claim that the BO was somehow responsible for the spam raid.

> none of this points to the idea that the people vouching for the return of feminization content are in anyway linked to the spammers, outside of the board they resided in. Stop blaming the people you disagree with for an attack we really didn't cause, because we didn't.

We can certainly say that larp-1 didn't disavow the spam at the time that it happened - far from it. The OP of their file request thread literally began with "To celebrate the death of /hypno/ and the birth of larp-1-sissy-spam-o-rama" - and it was posted a few hours after the spam raids.

archive.today/NMdnQ - snapshot of board index from "then"

archive.today/td2iA - it's still there "now" - and no one complained about it

> The spammers are long gone

Effective anti-spam measures, far beyond the ability of a bunch of bimbos to circumvent, are now in place. Before the attack, /hypno/ was a totally open board. I'm surprised we didn't have more Pajeet-tier spambots, really.

> The ban here turned up it's growth rate to 11.

Two pages there. Eight pages here. I think the rest of us are glad to see the sissies go. If you fags succeed in drawing the piracy to larp-1, we'll be left with general discussions here, which I see as an improvement.

And in a point-and-laugh moment, larp-1 doesn't even have a rules sticky. I guess that was too "archic" for them.

>>61583

> I was still only a vol at the time and couldn't protect the catalog from a similar spam attack. Even after receiving ownership and setting up some proper anti-spam measures, I figured rebuilding the catalog was more important in the short term

To be fair, I first mentioned it after you had been promoted to BO and had implemented anti-spam measures, in >>58837 replying to a sissy redditposter that attacked me for showing restraint instead of loudly and repeatedly demanding immediate bans on sissy crap.

> for a while I leaned against banning feminizationfags

I must ask what was the last straw that brought down the sissy ban, then? What changed your mind?

> Is this the new 10 bucks?

Are VPNs that cheap? I think it might be more than 10 bucks...

> /larp/ is either run by or closely associated with a couple namefags from a vola circlejerk. If the spam was planned by a group, it probably originated from there, and even if it didn't their meta thread was very pleased with it. We're only getting /larp/fags disavowing it now that they want off the wordfilter.

Interesting. Egofaggotry would also explain the bizarre insistence on larp-1 specifically, instead of simply taking the topic to other boards that orient towards feminization and accept hypnosis. Really, the namefags want to be King of the Shitheap and the whole sissy topic is merely an excuse to attack this board because they couldn't get control of this board.

> There probably isn't a secret conspiracy to end /hypno/ becase they don't need one: /larp/ers openly want /hypno/ to die if they can't have their way.

So, there's a conspiracy against this board - and they're such arrogant fools that they openly conspire in public for all the world to see?

LULZ!

I guess the IQ-reducing bimbo files really do work after all...

> are the board/larp/ fetish

A request - please change the wordfilters to produce "larp-1"/"larp-2"/"larp-3" to make it easier for knowledgeable anons to determine what was meant when the wordfilters misfire - as I'm fairly sure "hypnosis"/"larp-3" did on your post.

> now they're crammed into an echo chamber with themselves and their white knights

Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish.

>>61591

> Cool, enjoy watching your board die!

Mmmm, the arrogance of fools... but who are the fools here?

not very happy about the changes. you said it's not about banning stuff you don't personally like but i am not convinced

I generally don't even listen to sissy files unless they have something else going for them. But stop splitting up communities that are already incredibly niche. Threads last for about half a year or longer on this board. No single genre is going to prevent you from discussing the things you want.

please correct me if i'm wrong

this thread has more activity than the rest of this board, or hypno(a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems)

why don't you just link that board directly BO? you shouldn't be afraid of a split if you believe there is actually a group of users who would prefer a sissyshit-free board

>>61594

FYI i'm the one who made that thread

i didn't spam the board but i honestly don't care about it either

i just want a place which is uncensored

that's why we're all on 8chan in the first place

>>61594

>Two pages there. Eight pages here.

That board has effectively only been alive since the new ban took effect. If you read their posts you can see they talk about coming back to this board.

Right now they have similar levels of activity. Old threads are not activity. You're even including some spam threads in your assertion of "12 pages". The assertion is like China's GDP. Fake news.

Given how long this board has been around compared to that one, I would wager this one will die. But we will see. In the mean time I'm not posting on either board, there's other options than 8chan.

>>61606

>>61607

>>61611

I'm not normally one to bitch about redditspacing, but Jesus Christ…

>>61625

Interesting… between >>61594 and your post, every single post is either definitely reddit spaced or too short to reliably detect reddit spacing. They're also all in favor of sissy content and/or predicting the death of this board - and all of the IDs are either unique itt or appear on two posts in that group and nowhere earlier.

This sounds more and more like egofaggots being salty because their efforts to take over this board have failed.

I'm going to have to start researching stylometry, aren't I? Those posts "feel like" an IP-hopper or two.

>>61632

Or, and try to stay with me here, fans of feminization hypnosis files stopped by here to talk about and find new files. As they stop by they see the ban, and are bummed out because this was a pretty good place to find stuff they liked.

Honestly, I don't get hypnosis fetish shit that ISN'T feminization. I mean, besides that kind of fantasy fulfillment, what's the point? If I wanted an audio file of someone "hypnotically" sucking my dick I'd just watch a porno…

>>61632

Hey fag, I don't know if you realize this, but your post is also Reddit spaced.

>>61263

Unfortunately this. Whether or not there are reasonable people that enjoy that type of content aside, as a group they've caused more harm than good.

I mostly agree with this, but I don't agree with including bimbofication into it. 99% of the problem with the bimbo hypnosis is that (((B4mb1))) garbage. Just ban that and let the rest of the bimbo hypnosis stay.

>my degeneracy is better than yours

truly epic indeed

>>61265

>the cyclical general

you mean the one that had an OP post that insulted the users it was for? it's no wonder the tranny spammed the board into oblivion

is larp gone?

>>61250

>>61607

here here

>>61696

no, the real board is still up and running, if that's what you mean

just takes a tiny bit of digging since (((BO))) is afraid of losing users

>>61706

He's talking about a glitch that made its front page 404.

this is pretty sad

taking the biggest hypno related board and banning several popular genres, and then not letting viewers of that content easily find the new place, how can you even justify that?

what harm does letting others easily find the content you don't like cause?

if you wanted a board without sissy shit you should have made a board called /maschypno/ or some shit

>>61711

You could try reading the thread, you know.

>>61712

i read them, the "reason" you gave for filtering the other board is a joke.

whatever you've obviously got yourself caught up in some of your own problems, i doubt you care about this board or another person leaving.

also bit of a joke to call this /hypno/ when you ban the most popular hypnosis media

>>61713

>spamming all existing threads off the catalog is a joke

>I should ignore how /larp/ apologists only began disavowing it recently to get their board unfiltered

It's the same shit every time. You come in here, demand sympathy for a group that showed none to others, others who disliked them but showed some restraint and mercy at first, then you talk about how important your subfetish is and, if you continue following the stereotype, you'll probably insist hypnofag communities can't surV1v3 without it. Then to top it all off, you act as though there's only one alternative and whine that I don't pander to it specifically.

Nothing I do or say except unbanning feminizationfaggotry or unfiltering /larp/ will satisfy you. And soon another person with no post history outside deleted feminization threads will pop in and repeat the exact same talking points. There's little reason for this thread to exist anymore.

>inb4 enjoy your dead board

>>61714

>There's little reason for this thread to exist anymore.

I've said before that your meta threads are garbage, yet here we are cause you refuse to listen. The only cancer that ever manifested on this board are your shitty meta threads, which btw caused this entire circus with the gender dysphoria fags.

On the other hand it's retarded that there are 2 hypno boards now, if the other one went full sissy then at least I wouldn't have to go and check it. So now we have 2 absolute morons as BOs. Classic.

>>61713

Were you here when the spammers torched the board?

>>61714

> others who disliked them but showed some restraint and mercy at first

I was like that. Then the transfaggots torched the board. Now I fully support banning them.

> Nothing I do or say except unbanning feminizationfaggotry or unfiltering /larp/ will satisfy you.

Even that won't satisfy them - their real goal is almost certainly a coup. Egofaggotry - not even once.

> There's little reason for this thread to exist anymore.

I respectfully disagree - we get lulz from the sissies itt and this is probably functioning as a form of containment - if this thread weren't here, they'd be spam-whining in other threads. With this thread stickied, they'll all come in here to whine, rather than shit up whatever thread happens to be at the top of the board.

>>61724

> The only cancer that ever manifested on this board are your shitty meta threads, which btw caused this entire circus with the gender dysphoria fags.

hownew.ru/?

Did you even pay attention to the original containment test, which was done at the direction of the previous BO? Do you have any idea what was actually happening on this board that led to that test? Do you have any idea what the results were?

> if the other one went full sissy then at least I wouldn't have to go and check it

It won't because it's a coup attempt.

The more the transfags complain here, the more I think the BO is actually right that larp-1 is the work of some vola egofaggots.

>>61730

>I was like that. Then the transfaggots torched the board. Now I fully support banning them.

Only after the BO started discriminating against them. They didn't make the first move. It's amazing how all of you choose to ignore that fact.

>>61730

I don't understand. Sticky drama bait. And when the bait is discussed u automatically win the discussion. Who wouldn't like those odds. You win alright but not because of some "morally" self-established highground. I tell you why u win the discussion. Power over the board.

If anything guys here that are lucky. BO could have been Christian evangelist. Could have turned the board into a place of healing/discussion or consensual meditated guidance or just post links to churches. Then a lot more would have been on the losing side. Erotic hypno are the new furbies or brony…whatever the bo says.

Progression would have had the had the same time stamps. Same dealings. Lets contain all erotic hypnosis in 1 thread un-announced while bo is also afk. ( good plan ). Triggering a negative response by those, whose wishes not supported. What a bunch of dicks right? Don't they know hypnosis is for the devil. Pretending to be butthurt just because they had a place for over a year and now without a headsup are "contained".

And then just stop moderating for weeks.

And then say yeah. The guys failed. They had their chance nothing changed. Hell not even our un-announced direct attack on their character worked.

Like I said before. I understand bo position. Let's say a abdl sub genre group came here. And every 4:1 topics was selfy of guy in diapers defecating and ever day it had less to do with hypno and more about diapers. And the guy had to administrate it. Wouldn't be my hobby.

At the same time the overall fakeness of the discussion is cringe worthy. I feel offended to be part of this puppet play to orchestrate a high ground to say. Jep we are good guys. Even though its political/personal preference by those in charge of the board.

I mean come on during the containment time. No containment topic was made or enforced after initial set back. After 2 months a sissy told his fantasy looking for hypno to accommodate being more feminine. A breach of said containment ruling ( like 20 others at the time ). Was it moderated? No.

So it went on as usual. Discussion about difference between fantasy and reality. Some guy pointed out research on how the fantasy is hurting the LGBT community. I read it. It wasn't anything special just a summup of isolated cases to proof a vague point ( no statistical backing as it its political of course ).

Someone marked it though as rule breaking and got called out for it by bo. Then banhammer for that subgenre.

And now that the agenda is achieved. It's also moderated.

That's my only problem with this dialogue. There was no moderation or containment prior to ban. Just one half assed attempt.

>>61732

> Only after the BO started discriminating against them.

Being expected to behave in an orderly manner like everyone else is unfair discrimination now? Being expected to cooperate with the only way a general board can work is unfair? REALLY?

Behold, everyone, the narcissistic entitlement of the sissy transfags.

>>61738

> who will keep posting here though?

Oh I don't know - maybe everyone who doesn't want retarded bimbosissy transfags shitting up their threads?

>>61739

I have to ask which spam board that was - is there a larp-4 now or was it the expected larp-1 spam?

I've been keeping an eye on larp-1 and holy cow are they newfags - proper cross-board links are incredibly rare and their index actually has a link to a post on the same board as the full URL as of this writing - archive.today/n0RD6 and search for 303.html#303 to find it.

>>61754

> Erotic hypno are the new furbies

> furbies

Wow, I think I still have one of those in a closet around here somewhere…

> Lets contain all erotic hypnosis in 1 thread un-announced while bo is also afk.

> all erotic hypnosis

Are you aware that there is such a thing as erotic hypnosis that isn't feminization?

> without a headsup are "contained"

No warning at all, you say? WTF do you think the Madotsuki sticky was? Or maybe you only know "barf girl" instead of her name?

> There was no moderation or containment prior to ban. Just one half assed attempt.

What?

A containment thread was made announcing the then-temporary rule change and the other threads locked. The sissy transfags responded by torching the board.

All they had to do was wait two weeks and see what the results of the containment test would be. They couldn't wait two weeks and instead torched the board with spam.

We're now fairly sure that the people behind larp-1 were behind or connected to the spam and saw the containment test as an opportunity for a coup. So we have a chance at a win-win scenario - this board gets rid of some cancer and larp-1 gets to have their little sissy circlejerk - or are the sissies going to other feminization-oriented boards and skipping out on larp-1?

Butthurt much, vola egofaggots?

>>61759

I see, other than the BO who is traumatized by unintentionally having set off a spam wave he didn't have ways to deal with there's still only that one faggot scared of being exposed to supposedly gay stuff.

Is sissy stuff a personal threat to you, darling?

>>61771

> I see, other than the BO who is traumatized by unintentionally having set off a spam wave he didn't have ways to deal with there's still only that one faggot scared of being exposed to supposedly gay stuff.

Wrong. The general redditfaggotry that the sissies brought into the board irritated numerous anons. I didn't make the Madotsuki thread, in case you've used too many bimbo files to figure that out on your own.

And there you go again, erasing our gayfags and lesbianfags by pretending that there is only "straight" and "sissy" because it's convenient for your argument. When are you going to accept that your favorite files are a niche within a niche? When are you going to accept that sissies are massively outnumbered by actual gays and lesbians who in turn are massively outnumbered by heterosexuals - as it must be for the species to continue to exist?

Oh, right, pretending that everyone is secretly into your fetish is part of your delusional behavior pattern. Do you understand that demanding we embrace your fetish irritates us? How would you like it if you were told that you can't be a sissy anymore and your only choices are to be a bulging straight musclejock or a bulging gay musclejock? That's about what the rest of us think when you bimbosissy idiots try to force your retarded fetish on us.

< Anon uses Iron Bar of Reality. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

> Is sissy stuff a personal threat to you, darling?

Wrong again. I even helped shoot down the suicide subliminal troll in the (((B4mb1))) Sleep threads. But there must be consequences for torching the board and banning the sissies seems reasonable in these circumstances.

I opposed banning the sissies at first and wanted the containment thread to work. Sissies make great lulz and the convenience of having such prolific lulz sources right here is easily understated. My view changed after the board was torched with sissy spam. You sissies whine about being banned after destroying everyone else's discussions just to graffiti the archive. That is not acceptable behavior.

< Anon uses Straight Talk. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

And when are you going to admit to yourself that you'll never really pass?

>>61797

>10 year old chan speak

>autistic semi rp insults

>oblivious to how cringey they are

boomer and/or major autismo

Is this you BO or just another autist?

>>61797

>you'll never really pass

It's a shame normal fags here still don't seem to get erotic feminization. I don't intend to ever pass. I listen to that stuff for recreational purposes. I'm interested in the implied power shift. For me it's just another kind of femdom that happens to incorporate traditional gender roles to reinforce the power dynamic.

In my opinion it wouldn't even work properly if gender roles didn't exist. It's a play on the conservative world view and the peak of role reversal.

The stupidity aspect that you like to cite is specific to bimbofication and not strictly bound to feminization, though it complements it nicely in many cases.

>>61799

Another autist. He's pretty easy to recognize.

>>61806

>Getting hung up on which words are used instead of addressing the criticism.

Now I get the great discussion culture you are referring to all the time.

>>61813

IDs show someone samefagging from the same device within a limited time frame.

They are absolutely worthless beyond that.

Even if you are someone different, why would you rather criticize someone's choice of words than the argument they form?

Isn't dismissing the opinions of others just the easy way out and a telltale sign of ignorance towards the bigger picture?

>>61818

>cancer

Which one do you mean? I was engaging in a discussion about erotic feminization. Where did I dismiss anything?

This is the most popular thread now. Mission accomplished.

>>61816

>IDs show someone samefagging

Please, how naive do you have to be to actually believe that. Vast majority of the time it's someone pretending they don't know that the IDs expose them and of course best used while false-flagging.

>>61822

Hardly surprising with the faggotry shown by Anons and OP.

>>61250

why is it that also non-sissy threads are being nuked?

>>61825

this is a christian meditation board

if you have a problem just leave

amen

>>61825

They're probably duplicates or spam.

>>61799 (a new id…)

< A wild Bimbo appears! Since you obviously haven't gotten the reference yet.

You must be one of those people who calls disagreeing "cringe" because all of your beliefs are The One True Right And Only Way. I've had to deal with people like you irl. It's fun to make you bozos cringe over and over and over. Trollololololololol.

And you're criticizing me for talking like the oldfag I admit that I am? Really? Wow… it really has been 10 years…

hownew.ru/?

< Anon uses Explain the Obvious. Bimbo is confused. Bimbo has always been confused.

>>61803

> I don't intend to ever pass. I listen to that stuff for recreational purposes.

That's how I suggest distinguishing people like you from transfag cancer.

Unfortunately, we can't target the chemo precisely enough right now and your fetish is collateral damage. Sorry.

>>61809

> He's pretty easy to recognize.

Thanks. I've been trying to keep a consistent face here.

I'm not the only torfag, but I'm probably most of the torposting on this board right now.

>>61816

> IDs show someone samefagging from the same device within a limited time frame.

Not quite - IDs are by IP address as seen by the server. Multiple devices behind the same NAT or VPN will have the same ID, as do all torfags. IP-hopping shills will have many IDs. This is well known.

The limited time frame is the few weeks or so before the server rotates the IP hashing salt. This was added after the Sunshine scandal - IDs had been hashes of IP address and thread before then.

>>61842

>NAT

My comment about different devices was aimed at smartphones posting over mobile networks or public WiFi. There isn't even a need for a VPN to easily switch IPs.

Furthermore unless you are using a commercial server to access the internet your IP is going to change in 24 hour intervals in most cases. I haven't had a single ISP that didn't rotate the IP at least in that time frame to protect its users' privacy. When the server changes the hashing is not important in that regard. That's also why banning IPs for any longer than a day is usually ineffective at best.

>>61759

That's exactly what I mean with no heads up. A throw up girl post got stickied for 2 months. And then on a random day the flawless plan got introduced. Accepted and executed with the support level being by bo: Good plan, go ahead man I'm AWOL. It backfired and without support it left a nasty after taste.

The second warning was of similar calibre. The "containment" had failed and the decease was growing. Maybe there is no other chance, but to ban it all toghether. Oh woo us. Nothing changed despite our immense effort of doing nothing as well. Here comes the ban.

If 0 is no moderation or any attempt to improve board. And 10 is intensive moderation. Then where does the stickying 2 dead topics for weeks on end fit on that scale and does it suffice as a good heads up?

Like I said the narrative is so self positive its insulting to read. People are claiming the fetish is collaterable damage for the drama it brought with it. It physically pains me to read that smut.

While the drama had no policing or moderation and if anything was encouraged on those type of topics. Even with the bo/admins partaking in spam or making fun off the reports if bait or spam arrived. The spam at the time did break the board rules. ( but then again those rules are now summarised as tldr by the admin himself to point out the level of interest in basic board moderation. )

On the other hand banning of the targetted fetish is in fact moderated right now. Which is in clear contrast to any attempt for coexistence done in the past. It shows signs of an agenda if anything.

So again I get the reasoning I don't get the self proclaimed "there was no other way" "they brought it on themselves" "I'm sorry but your collateral damage" kind of narrative. I mean if I purposely misquote people with "I'm just a stupid bimbo", as a poor way to win a conversation. Post political articles of why feminization is bad. And actively help bait. And nag about reports of said bait.

Then I cant at the same time claim to be a "good guy" that has the board and all its members in best interest.

Especially if I make it clear several times that I rather see the board dead than catering to what makes up most of the online hypno stores.

And that's the narrative you are trying to pull here.

>>61827

No: they were two topics about 7h3 |-|yp|\|0 M1$tr€$5 first one had been here for months, then suddenly deleted, so I created a new one, and the same fate occurred.

>>61856

Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than whine into the void?

>>61856

Why are you fags still so upset about Madotsuki? Nobody else gave a shit.

>And then on a random day the flawless plan got introduced. Accepted and executed with the support level being by bo: Good plan, go ahead man I'm AWOL

The cyclical feminization general was announced by the previous BO two months beforehand (see >>55231 and >>55300 ) and accompanied with a call for vols. Upon my acceptance (it took a while, the guy's dealing with some IRL stuff), I was basically told to clean up duplicates and rule-breaking posts, and around a month later to test the cyclical general for two weeks. As everyone knows, this was cut short.

Could I have made a new sticky announcing the general a day or so beforehand? Maybe. Would it have stopped the spammer or kept the cyclical general on topic? Probably not.

>While the drama had no policing or moderation and if anything was encouraged on those type of topics. Even with the bo/admins partaking in spam or making fun off the reports if bait or spam arrived. The spam at the time did break the board rules.

You guys probably didn't realize this because IDs weren't enabled at the time, but most of the "trolls" (aside from one-off baitposts or negative posts by an anon who popped in briefly and fucked off) you argued with in sissy and feminization threads were actually just other feminizationfags who began sperging at each other. Cleaning up the mess would have meant deleting posts from or banning a good chunk of those threads' regular posters, and past a certain point you really need to question whether these posters are worth keeping around.

The most commonly proposed solution by people from these threads was to ban anything that wasn't rigidly on-topic or critical of the thread's files/hypnotists/fetish, all of which is very common on imageboards and only becomes an issue when there's intentional derailment or very thin-skinned people taking issue with it. In the latter case, I'm not giving up everyone else's freedoms to pacify shitters that really shouldn't be on an imageboard in the first place.

>Especially if I make it clear several times that I rather see the board dead than catering to what makes up most of the online hypno stores.

No, I said I'd rather have a better board take /hypno/'s place than let it continue stagnating. /larp/ definitely wasn't that board and all its proponents really did was confirm the board was better off without them.

And you know what? The ban has been worth it. We're gaining anons again you can't blame the meta thread, it's slowed down a lot despite or maybe even thanks to the ban, enough that we're almost back to the usual unique poster counts without all the drama and baggage feminizatizationfags carry around. Feminizationfaggotry is not getting unbanned and /larp/ is not getting its wordfilter removed.

>>61859

Yep, looks like they were duplicates. There's a thread for her at >>58758

>>61827

No: they were two topics about 7h3 |-|yp|\|0 M1$tr€$5 first one had been here for months, then suddenly deleted, so I created a new one, and the same fate occurred.

God bless! I thought someone decided to "protect" them. Thank you for the heads up: I couldn't find that topic.

>>61864

would you like to tell us what the OP image was?

do you believe the general/containment was earnest given the OP image?

>>61526

>co-opt and socially engineer

exactly. BO is a control freak who can't stand that when people are left to their own devices a majority of the content discussed and shared is STUFF HE DOESN'T LIKE.

I saw this coming over a year ago when the big vola rooms were a thing. Certain people had to socially engineer them as well to conform to their taste and agenda. Wound up ruining what started out as good fun then too. And so it goes here.

Censorship always sucks and censors are always the same. New board it is.

>>61853

> smartphones posting over mobile networks or public WiFi.

That's a reason phoneposting is frowned upon.

> your IP is going to change in 24 hour intervals in most cases

Not in my part of the world it doesn't - mine only changes when the link resets and I've had friends with IP addresses that were tied to the MAC address of either the router or modem itself.

> protect its users' privacy

Yeah, they don't care about that here. Why do you think I'm a torfag?

>>61856

> throw up girl

Her name is Madotsuki.

> People are claiming the fetish is collaterable damage for the drama it brought with it.

Calling torching the board "drama" is a bit of an understatement.

> It physically pains me to read that smut.

So the truth hurts, then?

> Even with the bo/admins partaking in spam

Are you accusing our BO of spamming the board?

> making fun off the reports if bait or spam arrived.

That's called pointing and laughing. It's a good response to /sp/am. And some of the reports have also been insane.

> "there was no other way"

"I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

> "they brought it on themselves"

"One bad apple spoils the bunch."

> "I'm sorry but your collateral damage"

"We had to burn the village to save it."

> rather see the board dead than catering to what makes up most of the online hypno stores

Ah yes, the "/hypno/ is dying" and "the board will die without the drama queens" narrative.

I've been collecting data. Preliminary results are that you're wrong.

>>61864

> We're gaining anons again

I've been collecting data but it's probably too soon to be more than cautiously optimistic.

Excluding meta threads and counting only posts after this thread was posted announcing the ban, /hypno/ has more posts than the entire history of larp-1. If we apply the same filters to larp-1 and compare "apples to apples" we find that this board has almost three times as many posts as larp-1.

This board also has about 10x as many meta posts as larp-1, suggesting lively discussion about both the actual topic and the board itself.

If a board is dying here, it's the larp-1 sissy-spam-o-rama board.

> Feminizationfaggotry is not getting unbanned and /larp/ is not getting its wordfilter removed.

Thank you.

>>61869

> do you believe the general/containment was earnest given the OP image?

It was posted with the "## Board Volunteer" capcode. The OP image is irrelevant.

>>61875

> This thread has little reason to exist besides salt farming. I'll probably unsticky it soon and let it float around the catalog with everything else.

I disagree - having this at the top of the catalog gives the sissies an obvious place to complain and instant reassurance to any anons "checking back in" after being away for a while. I expect that, without this sticky, the sissies would whine in random threads.

>>61887

/larp/ has only existed a short while, naturally there's some inertia with people still visiting this board by default, the 'rate of growth of users' is what's important

i'm happy for both boards to exist personally, its not too hard to check both and i don't mind having a place to look where there won't be 100 cock themed threads. also if theres competition between the boards make it "let us see who can share more files", that's good for everyone

>>61898

> there's some inertia with people still visiting this board by default, the 'rate of growth of users' is what's important

I've got the post headers including machine-readable timestamps in a database. Any ideas how to estimate rate of userbase growth from that?

I can't directly count users - larp-1 doesn't have IDs at all and IDs aren't really 1-to-1 with users anyway. The database currently has one distinct user name on /hypno/ - "Anonymous" - and nine distinct names on larp-1, but with 361 of 374 collected posts also from "Anonymous" - wow that guy posts a lot!

I jest, I jest. At least namefaggotry didn't instantly overrun larp-1 - perhaps turning "Force Anon" off on this board wouldn't cause problems after all - but that doesn't help us estimate userbase size for either board. The site's statistics aren't much better than counting IDs - the "user" counts on the front page are actually counts of distinct /24 IP groups IIRC. Those aren't much better than the in-thread IDs on this board for estimating user count.

For comparison, counting only posts made after the spam raid, I currently have 2494 posts from this board.

> i'm happy for both boards to exist personally, its not too hard to check both

Agreed.

> i don't mind having a place to look where there won't be 100 cock themed threads.

Even you see the reason that some anons hated the sissies early on. I was very late on the "ban the sissies" bandwagon, not joining until after the board was torched.

Imagine an Anon standing amidst burning cinders as the ashes of the still-burning board settle into his hair. Imagine the look of pure rage on his non-face as he realizes that this is the work of the very people he had been defending. Being that Anon was what changed my mind on the issue - and I'm normally a free speech absolutist!

But then torching the board doesn't exactly promote free speech, now does it?

> also if theres competition between the boards make it "let us see who can share more files", that's good for everyone

Even better - if the retard horde turns out to be more sissy-oriented, maybe we can actually get OC production going on this board. Imagine… actual new content, by and for anons, instead of pirating the thousandth "gimmee, gimmee, gimmee" file from some hypnowhale.

>>61917

>I can't directly count users

>the "user" counts on the front page are actually counts of distinct /24 IP groups IIRC

It's still useful for gauging a board's active posters, especially if you pay attention to it over a long period of time.

Hiding posts was fine. BO seems motivated by bigotry moreso than "wahhh look at the spammers". On a side note watching the drama around the hypnosissypurge was a fun time. And the guy who writes long reply post essays really needs a better creative outlet than the holy trannie crusade. There could have been less threads but a general didn't match the amount of content that was out there, and the obvious troll posts left up for so much time doesn't speak well of BO intentions.

>>61977

glad you admit it, I'm sure you'll wear it like a badge of honor

also

>being such a total fuckup that you need to edit nearly every single post you make

>>61970

> the guy who writes long reply post essays

Writing these is fun for me. I know I'm weird - you don't have to tell me that.

> really needs a better creative outlet than the holy trannie crusade

I have several, but thank you for your concern. I didn't originally want the transfags banned, but I must admit that the butthurt whining of the transfags provides at least some meager lulz.

>>61973

> >claim board

I watched the whole mess unfold and I can tell you that you're wrong at your very first line unless you're complaining about the previous BO. This board was not claimed. The old BO logged in just often enough to prevent the board from going up for claim.

Our new BO started out as a lowly vol implementing the sissy containment policy test. The transfags torched the board in response and our new BO went to /sudo/ with a screencap of an email the old BO sent saying that he no longer had time to manage the board and that he planned to hand the board over to his new vol. Amazingly, the 8chan admin actually took action and transferred the board to that vol, who is now the BO.

The rest of your post is out of order no matter how I try to slice it, so I'll just say the whole thing reeks of pilpul and is not worth a response.

>>61982

> cry about the BO editing like five or six of his own posts

To be fair, editing our posts isn't something the normal users can do here.

>>61997

I don't get what your 2 cents are.

The new bo just got power from 8chan and took the board into a new direction is your defence against the other guy saying the bo hijacked the board? "I can tell you that you're wrong at your very first line".. unless your right? Are u actually agreeing with this guy?

And that was your opening to just retell the history of the board again with the "containment" and "board torch" one liners. Oh boy it's not like "the containment" was nothing more than a untactful sticky with a fugly picture. Or the "board torch" wasn't inevitabele localised backlash of containment antics. And those sorry losers that stuck around for 1,5 year got butthurt after their haven became hostile. There is no pleasing those guys. After everything we did for them.

At this point I am leaning towards the whole nazi/jew narrative. Think about it. Group gets blamed for all problems on board. Get contained into concentration ..my apologies… containment sticky. And then wiped out :D.

But u know what the real narrative is? There was a conflict of interest. There. See not that hard. Try saying it with me. There was a disagreement between the moderator and certain group of people.

>>62047

The fact that sissies spammed all of the threads off of the catalogue is proof that them being sent to internet auschwitz was morally justified.

>>62047

> The new bo just got power from 8chan and took the board into a new direction

No, he didn't. Our current BO - who presumably is the person >>61973 is complaining about because he didn't mention a handoff in his story - did not take the board in a new direction. The previous BO set the containment policy and left a new vol that had a month or so on the job to put it into practice. The board had previously been peaceful and no one expected the sissies to torch the board to earn their ban in response to a two week test of a containment policy.

Our current BO was given control of the board after the board was torched. A "baptism of fire" if you will.

> At this point I am leaning towards the whole nazi/jew narrative.

Whatever happened to leaving /pol/ in /pol/? Oh, and since your post is the first mention of "nazi" itt, by the corollaries to Godwin's Law you lose the argument. And the other sissyposters were calling our new BO Jewish for banning the sissies. I believe that /pol/ would ask who is Jewing who here?

> Group gets blamed for all problems on board. Get contained into concentration ..my apologies… containment sticky. And then wiped out :D.

Tell you what, I'll accept your analogy as valid if you can produce a single verifiable case of Jews rioting and burning down a Nazi concentration camp. The Warsaw ghetto uprising doesn't count - the Nazis set that fire when they got tired of taking casualties while trying to round up the Jews. The Reichstag fire doesn't count either - the Nazis blamed that one on a Communist and may or may not have actually done it themselves. No Jews were involved, unless you want to repeat the anti-Semitic canard that Jews and Communists are one and the same - which even the Nazis did not claim.

When did Jews burn down a concentration camp where they had been interned?

And you are completely ignoring the possibility that the group blamed for the problems might actually be guilty as charged - I can't say that was the case, but I can't definitively say that it wasn't either. One bad apple spoils the bunch.

Thank the gods, now I can finally listen to any file here without worrying about getting turned into a dick sucking faggot addicted to BBC

Could you also ban all the furfags? This animal fucking shit is disgusting.

>>62109

> now I can finally listen to any file here without worrying about getting turned into a dick sucking faggot addicted to BBC

The gayfags didn't torch the board so you just might still find that. Actual gayfaggotry isn't banned - they've behaved themselves, unlike the sissy transfags.

>>62117

> Could you also ban all the furfags? This animal fucking shit is disgusting.

Why? The furfags are staying in their thread without needing to be asked. We aren't even at the "impose containment" stage because they contain themselves, just as every other faction except the sissy transfags has always done.

The sissy transfags were banned for their behavior rather than their content. I suspect that these ongoing "please ban X because I don't like it" requests are an effort to kill this board by inciting moderator overreaction. Twisting the sissy ban into a content ban and then broadening the bounds of the banned content inch by inch is an obvious way to kill this board, which I suspect the vola egofaggots are trying to do. You may be innocent, but you should know that you are acting exactly like a shill would be expected to act.

About the 1337speak, please use this instead to make things readable

https://github.com/codebox/homoglyph/blob/master/raw_data/chars.txt

>>62171

> please use this instead

No, the Unicode homoglyph tables are well-known and standardized - it's only a matter of time before indexes start canonicalizing Unicode homoglyphs. 13375p34|< can be harder to read, but is completely non-standard - it can't be automatically resolved because the same symbols appear in unrelated contexts.

Tqbh the only thing I actually care about is: how does the sissy shit ban affects 女体化 which is in all instances but one exception purely temporary and doesn't intend to turn you into a cocksucker? (it's mostly getting railed by futa or tentacles)

Also greentexting the rules is fucking moronic.

found the old thread, check out that mod trolling

https://8ch.net/hypno/res/52429

>>62435

have to add .html at the end

>>65114

that post is from months ago when we had a different BO

everything is different now