>>53673
>You project one
Not really, you act like a genuine leftist
>what's to keep them from creating said government?
Loss of business. You don't just come and claim you're government - you have to make people believe in your legitimacy.
>You're the only one that mentioned economics, i don't know what you're talking about
Fucking retarded.
>So i'm now centrist?
You're a fuck who tries hard to not show any serious position, only whine and shitpost.
>What's to keep them from doing that or setting another organization that would do that or something similar in case it benefits them?
Because the same thing applies to that organization.
>why would they play fair?
To not lose.
>can't you see how corps kill any opportunity for small businesses and self employment?
They don't. It's government regulation and grants that do that.
>You do if you have the power to do so
You don't get such power as a corporation., you stupid fuck.
>how's a small business with a better product going to compete with the megacorp with billions on the bank
By having a better product. That obliviousness shouldn't even be possible.
>hiring a hitman would be way cheaper than investing in your own R&D
Prove it. Even with current worthless police hiring a hitman to remove any of the appearing competitors would be the more unsustainable the shittier your product is.
>at the end of the day the corp only cares about its profits, nothing else
Which is why we see so many NPOs, corps supporting free software and giving brouzouf to charities, as well as being more effective at that than government with stolen shit.
>competition is about yielding the greatest profits
Go back to gender studies class, you stupid leftist. I won't bother explaining such basic economics.
>seems like common sense to me
<They don't go in hand but sometimes they do which means they always do
>So you're agreeing with me that that logic makes no real sense?
Obvious shitposting. Your posts have no logic. You didn't even make such statement for me to "agree" with.
>you're basically agreeing with me
Keep strawmanning, it will surely work one day.
>a counter argument against your projections and misunderstandings of me
<I won't do anything but make broad claims and shitposting so anything you say about me is misinterpreted
>Just a good old anarchist for the most part, and definitely not leftist
Old anarchists are almost exclusively leftists and you're using their claims. Who are you if not one of them? Describe how your speshul anarchism is not leftist or BTFO.
>so at that point it makes no real difference for the average person
>at that point it makes no real difference for the average person
At that point they stop being corporations. But keep trying to equivocate these two.
>Punished? by who? the brain dead normies?
By organizations whose work is to protect property rights of people.
>think you're putting too much faith in the average guy to know and care
You're putting too much care in the average guy to live and prosper.
>they have the power and influence, they'd control everything
But they haven't yet. Wow, looks like they cannot.
>your delusions require corps that play completely fair
Strawman. For shit to work it requires for corps to not be able to become a government, as it's the only thing that can make their unfair games sustainable. Otherwise, even with governments of today, absolute majority of corporations do not participate in lobbyism, bribes and other attempts to use governmental force to its advantage.
>are not after their own interests
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages." Adam Smith. Not that difficult to understand now, is it?
>public that's an expert on everything
Not really. Just the part of the public that does. If you want to burn your dollars, literally, nothing is stopping your from doing it, yet most people don't, because they aren't completely irrational. It also helps to incentivize making rational choices by allowing irrational ones to fail.
>deeply cares about the ethics of the organizations he trades with
Not really, only if the organization's actions directly present a malicious threat. You wouldn't go to a store whose owner would try to rob you, would you? Especially if you're paying brouzouf specifically to prevent such actions, it'd be even more clear they it's a bad decision to do so, as you get the opposite results.
>I don't offer a solution because i don't have one
So you're basically a blackpillfag. Well, your job is failed, as your attempts are secured only by your ignorance.